Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/16/2018 Item 2, Seaborne Goodwin, Heather From:Cohen, Rachel Sent:Thursday, July 12, 2018 4:09 PM To:Advisory Bodies; CityClerk Subject:FW: 790 Foothill Blvd project Attachments:790 Foothill Blvd.docx Please forward the letter attached to the ARC regarding Item # 2. Thank you, Rachel Cohen Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E rcohen@slocity.org T 805.781.7574 slocity.org From: Marianne Seaborne < Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 4:00 PM To: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org> Subject: Fwd: 790 Foothill Blvd project Dear Ms. Cohen, My letter listing concerns about the 790 Foothill blvd project seems to have gone missing. Would you/your staff please repost it in time for the July 16 meeting on this subject? Thank you, Marianne Seaborne ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Marianne Seaborne < Date: Wed, May 16, 2018 at 4:09 PM Subject: 790 Foothill Blvd project To: rcohen@slocity.org Dear Ms. Cohen, Please find attached a letter to you addressing my concerns about this project. I look forward to the May 23 meeting at 6 pm at City Hall when this project will be further discussed. Sincerely, Marianne Seaborne 1 680 Rancho Dr, SLO 2 May 15, 2018 Dear Ms. Rachel Cohen, SLO City Planner: I am writing you today as a concerned neighbor, homeowner and recently, landlord in the neighborhood north of Foothill. I am shocked that another high-rise is being considered in our neighborhood, even before we can learn the full safety, traffic and health impact of the still uninhabited 22 Chorro student housing project across the street. I am not in favor of the proposed development at 790 Foothill for the following reasons: Parking/additional cars in the neighborhood: I don’t believe there’s room for additional cars in our neighborhood. As a landlord, I know that students are encouraged to and will ride (buses or bicycles) to campus, but I also know they come to our town with their cars. These are parked on the streets. We’ve provided our student tenants with a 2-car garage, a 2-car driveway and 2 parking passes for the street, and all spaces are used. I agree with all those who have already spoken up about the parking issues that are likely to follow. People probably won’t be waiting for those mechanica l lifts. Safety concerns: I am perplexed and dismayed that the city is considering such a population increase (mostly students) to an area that is close to one of the most dangerous intersections in our city. The intersections of Chorro, Broad and Foothill Blvd. are already very difficult to navigate. Who will benefit here? Do we really need more luxury student housing in this family neighborhood? It seems that type of housing should be built on campus. From what I've learned, the type of housing we reall y need in our beautiful city is housing for our workforce and housing that is affordable for low income families. This developer added low income units to this project for one reason only and that is the loophole that buys you additional height (43 feet versus the allowed 35 feet). I am also wondering how these families will enjoy living with students who can afford $1300 a bed in a dorm -type atmosphere? I think not. Our scenic mountain views are being obliterated. Please drive west on Foothill Blvd. and notice how the mountain views to your left are gone, blocked by the building at 22 Chorro. Now imagine driving in the same direction (toward Patricia drive) and NOT seeing our beautiful Bishop Peak. We don't want the high rises and traffic that are infamous in Los Angeles and Orange counties. Many of us live here as permanent residents to escape that. Planning: I spent the day in Santa Barbara last weekend and noticed the beauty of balance and proportion in this city. Buildings are approximately the same height, and seem to "fit" together. On Foothill Blvd., it seems odd that we are now planning 4-story buildings next to one story homes and businesses. Is that town planning or "town cramming"? Thank you for considering the views (pun intended) of a local. I hope to hear more at the next meeting on May 23rd at 6 pm. Specifically, that the scale, proportion and massing of this project has been considerably downsized. Marianne Seaborne 680 Rancho drive, SLO 805-816-0484