Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/16/2018 Item 4, Lopes Purrington, Teresa From:James Lopes <jameslopes@charter.net> Sent:Thursday, July Cc:Advisory Bodies Subject:Fwd: 1135 Santa Rosa Street Architectural Review Commission City of San Luis Obispo RE: 1135 Santa Rosa Street Dear Chairperson Root and Commissioners: On Monday, the Architectural Review Commission will be considering what to do about the difficult, obstinate proposals of Stalwork, the applicant, and whatever was the City Council's odd direction to perhaps allow the renegade dark gray color. As Allan Cooper states in his letter, this dark color is NOT anywhere to be found in substantial scale within the vicinity. The absence of any similar nearby colors is patently why the project is not consistent with the Community Design Guidelines. The dark gray is in violation of the underlined guideline quoted below, because it is not a compatible color with anything in the area. For some strange reason, these guidelines are completely ignored by staff in the review, recommendation and findings for approval. Yet, this finding is the one which resonates with the entire proposal - architecture and color. It should be the key to making findings for denial of the modification. Dark gray and black on buildings are usually reserved for European, stylish elegance on fancy shops or restaurants. It is not considered a suitable color on larger buildings. In general, this may be because black is considered the universal color of sorrow, of shame and of degradation. It is used as a malevolent, intimidating color in the military, the arts and theater, and in industrial uses. Although Stalwork utilizes black and dark gray at its Parker Street building, that semi- industrial location is away from pedestrian traffic and residential areas. The existing color at 1135 Santa Rosa has turned blotchy and is bleeding; it does not hold up to sun and weather well. The direction of the City Council in part and most importantly, was: "The building colors, materials or design shall be modified to achieve a visual reduction in apparent building mass and scale, specifically to break up the perception of building mass when viewed from the Marsh Street approach (at the west elevation and southwest corner of the building), subject to the final approval of the Architectural Review Commission; ..." (emphasis added) The massing of the building was somewhat attended to on the Marsh Street side by the City Council in its deliberations and direction. Yet, the side and front facades facing Santa Rosa Street are as or even more austere than the ones facing Marsh Street. It is clear that no other buildings in the entire area have any significant amounts of color similar to this one. It appears that the intent of the original approval was to break up and soften the stark wall planes of the modernist design. Those colors were the MITIGATION for this stark design. They are not just an entertainment, they are the mitigating elements that make the building architecture somewhat acceptable. Your Commission should follow the Council direction to reduce the apparent building mass and scale, particularly by requiring the approved light color scheme and denying the proposed modification. Color in the Downtown is guided by the Community Design Guidelines. The City needs to adhere to its Community Design Guidelines in responding to extreme cases such as this. The applicant's original color proposal, shown below, which the ARC originally required, and which was appealed by the applicant, should be restored as the official requirement, or the proposal should be denied and the Code Enforcement case re-opened. 1 It is beyond time for the City to apply its standards and guidelines strictly and conservatively, especially in response to such ill-conceived designs as this proposal. Thank you. James Lopes, AICP ph. 805-602-1365 from Community Design Guidelines: 3.1 – Commercial Project Design Guidelines (no. 12): 12. Colors. The exterior colors of a building are as important as the materials in determining how people think about the building and its surroundings. Colors should be compatible with the existing colors of the surrounding area but need not duplicate existing colors. a. The use of muted tones for the structure's base color is recommended. Color should not be used as an attention getting device. b. Accent colors should be used thoughtfully and complement the base color or a variation of its hue, either weaker or stronger. c. The transition between base and accent colors should relate to changes in building materials or the change of building surface planes. Colors should generally not meet or change without some physical change or definition to the surface plane. 2 3