Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-28-2019 Item 11, McLean JAN 2 8 2019 From: cc me lean < Sent: Monday, January 28, 2019 2:24 PM To: Advisory Bodies Subject: TREE COMMITTEE RE: ITEM # 10, 152 or 148 BROAD ST. REDWOOD REMOVAL PLEASE FORWARD TO TREE COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND POST WITH AGENDA CORRESPONDENCE. THANK YOU. DEAR TREE COMMITTEE, PLEASE DENY THE REMOVAL OF THE BEAUTIFUL, HEALTHY, PROMINENT REDWOOD TREE (s) ON THE PROPERTY WHOSE ADDRESS IS EITHER 148 OR 152 BROAD ST. I THINK THE TREE(s) DESERVE TO BE SAVED. TO BE FAIR, NEIGHBORS NEED TO BE GIVEN PROPER NOTIFICATION AND A CITY SIGN IS PLACED IN A VISIBLE LOCATION WITH CLEAR INDICATION OF THE NUMBER OF TREES AND WHICH EXACT TREE(s) THE OWNER WANTS REMOVED. THE TREE NEXT TO THE HOUSE MAY BE ONE OR THREE TREES: IT WOULD BE TRESPASSING FOR A NEIGHBOR TO GO ONTO THE PROPERTY TO DISCERN EXACTLY WHAT THE OWNER IS REFERRING TO. THERE IS NO NUMBER INDICATED, MERELY "REDWOOD." THE CITY SIGN CANNOT BE SEEN DUE TO A TRAILER PARKED IN FRONT, AT THE CURB, AND VEHICLES BLOCKING THE LINE OF SIGHT FROM THE STREET. I SAW IT ON FRIDAY AFTERNOON JUST BY CHANCE WHEN THERE WAS A CAR MOVING FROM ONE OF THE 2 SPOTS IN FRONT OF THE HOUSE. IT ALSO SEEMS LIKE THE ADDRESS IS INCORRECT ON THE SIGN. THIS SHOULD BE CRYSTAL CLEAR, NOT CONFUSING. PLEASE DENY THE REMOVAL OF THE TREE(s). ONLY YOU CAN PROTECT SUCH A WONDERFUL NATURAL ASSET TO OUR ALLEGED "TREE CITY", A VALUABLE CARBON SEQUESTRATION FRIEND, AND A HABITAT FOR MANY BIRDS. THANK YOU. SINCERELY, CHERYL MCLEAN ANHOLM