Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Final IS-MND Appendix
Appendix A Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Calculations 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Mobile Home Park 35.00 Dwelling Unit 4.41 42,000.00 100 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 4 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)3.2 44 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company 2020Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 641.35 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Tank Farm Project (Existing) San Luis Obispo County, Summer CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 1 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer Project Characteristics - Land Use - Default Vehicle Trips - Traffic Study removed the existing trips from Proposed Construction Phase - no Construction Off-road Equipment - No Construction Off-road Equipment - No Construction Off-road Equipment - No Construction Grading - No Construction Demolition - No Construction Trips and VMT - No Construction On-road Fugitive Dust - No Construction Architectural Coating - No Construction Area Coating - Revised as it is existing Energy Use - Existing Uses predate T-24 requirements Water And Wastewater - Solid Waste - Woodstoves - 5 existing trailers have chimneies Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Residential_Exterior 17,820.00 0.00 tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Residential_Interior 53,460.00 0.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Parking 150.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 2 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 0.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 0.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 0.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 0.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 3.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 3.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 3.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Demolition tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Grading tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Site Preparation tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 6.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 7.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 6.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 6.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 7.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 3 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 2.0 Emissions Summary tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 2.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 18.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 16.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 20.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 3.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 5.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.36 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 4.99 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 4 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2018 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4999 0.0000 0.0000 1.4099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2019 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.8483 0.0000 0.0000 0.7925 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4999 0.0000 0.0000 1.4099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2018 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4999 0.0000 0.0000 1.4099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2019 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.8483 0.0000 0.0000 0.7925 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4999 0.0000 0.0000 1.4099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 5 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 1.2133 0.0335 2.8971 1.5000e- 004 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 5.1993 5.1993 5.0700e- 003 0.0000 5.3261 Energy 0.0185 0.1582 0.0673 1.0100e- 003 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 201.8986 201.8986 3.8700e- 003 3.7000e- 003 203.0984 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2318 0.1917 2.9644 1.1600e- 003 0.0000 0.0287 0.0287 0.0000 0.0287 0.0287 0.0000 207.0979 207.0979 8.9400e- 003 3.7000e- 003 208.4245 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 1.2133 0.0335 2.8971 1.5000e- 004 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 5.1993 5.1993 5.0700e- 003 0.0000 5.3261 Energy 0.0185 0.1582 0.0673 1.0100e- 003 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 201.8986 201.8986 3.8700e- 003 3.7000e- 003 203.0984 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2318 0.1917 2.9644 1.1600e- 003 0.0000 0.0287 0.0287 0.0000 0.0287 0.0287 0.0000 207.0979 207.0979 8.9400e- 003 3.7000e- 003 208.4245 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 6 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 2/16/2018 2/15/2018 5 0 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 3/16/2018 3/15/2018 5 0 3 Grading Grading 3/23/2018 3/22/2018 5 0 4 Building Construction Building Construction 4/4/2018 4/3/2018 5 0 5 Paving Paving 2/20/2019 2/19/2019 5 0 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/16/2019 3/15/2019 5 0 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 7 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 0 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 0 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Graders 0 8.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 6.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 6.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 8 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 9 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 10 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 11 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 12 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 13 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 14 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 15 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 16 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 17 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 18 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 19 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 20 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 21 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Mobile Home Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Mobile Home Park 13.00 5.00 5.00 35.80 21.00 43.20 86 11 3 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Mobile Home Park 0.559162 0.032279 0.198583 0.128083 0.030808 0.007362 0.013004 0.019140 0.002385 0.001267 0.005421 0.000811 0.001695 Historical Energy Use: Y CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 22 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0185 0.1582 0.0673 1.0100e- 003 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 201.8986 201.8986 3.8700e- 003 3.7000e- 003 203.0984 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0185 0.1582 0.0673 1.0100e- 003 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 201.8986 201.8986 3.8700e- 003 3.7000e- 003 203.0984 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Mobile Home Park 1716.14 0.0185 0.1582 0.0673 1.0100e- 003 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 201.8986 201.8986 3.8700e- 003 3.7000e- 003 203.0984 Total 0.0185 0.1582 0.0673 1.0100e- 003 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 201.8986 201.8986 3.8700e- 003 3.7000e- 003 203.0984 Unmitigated 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 23 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 1.2133 0.0335 2.8971 1.5000e- 004 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 5.1993 5.1993 5.0700e- 003 0.0000 5.3261 Unmitigated 1.2133 0.0335 2.8971 1.5000e- 004 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 5.1993 5.1993 5.0700e- 003 0.0000 5.3261 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Mobile Home Park 1.71614 0.0185 0.1582 0.0673 1.0100e- 003 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 201.8986 201.8986 3.8700e- 003 3.7000e- 003 203.0984 Total 0.0185 0.1582 0.0673 1.0100e- 003 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 201.8986 201.8986 3.8700e- 003 3.7000e- 003 203.0984 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 24 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.2263 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.8988 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0882 0.0335 2.8971 1.5000e- 004 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 5.1993 5.1993 5.0700e- 003 5.3261 Total 1.2133 0.0335 2.8971 1.5000e- 004 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 5.1993 5.1993 5.0700e- 003 0.0000 5.3261 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 25 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.2263 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.8988 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0882 0.0335 2.8971 1.5000e- 004 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 5.1993 5.1993 5.0700e- 003 5.3261 Total 1.2133 0.0335 2.8971 1.5000e- 004 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 5.1993 5.1993 5.0700e- 003 0.0000 5.3261 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 26 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 11.0 Vegetation Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:30 AMPage 27 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Summer 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Mobile Home Park 35.00 Dwelling Unit 4.41 42,000.00 100 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 4 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)3.2 44 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company 2020Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 641.35 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Tank Farm Project (Existing) San Luis Obispo County, Winter CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 1 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter Project Characteristics - Land Use - Default Vehicle Trips - Traffic Study removed the existing trips from Proposed Construction Phase - no Construction Off-road Equipment - No Construction Off-road Equipment - No Construction Off-road Equipment - No Construction Grading - No Construction Demolition - No Construction Trips and VMT - No Construction On-road Fugitive Dust - No Construction Architectural Coating - No Construction Area Coating - Revised as it is existing Energy Use - Existing Uses predate T-24 requirements Water And Wastewater - Solid Waste - Woodstoves - 5 existing trailers have chimneies Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Residential_Exterior 17,820.00 0.00 tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Residential_Interior 53,460.00 0.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Parking 150.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 2 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 0.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 0.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 0.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 0.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 3.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 3.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 3.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Demolition tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Grading tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Site Preparation tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 6.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 7.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 6.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 6.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 7.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 3 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 2.0 Emissions Summary tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 2.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 18.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 16.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 20.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 3.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 5.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.36 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 4.99 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 4 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2018 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4999 0.0000 0.0000 1.4099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2019 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.8483 0.0000 0.0000 0.7925 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4999 0.0000 0.0000 1.4099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2018 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4999 0.0000 0.0000 1.4099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2019 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.8483 0.0000 0.0000 0.7925 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4999 0.0000 0.0000 1.4099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 5 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 1.2133 0.0335 2.8971 1.5000e- 004 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 5.1993 5.1993 5.0700e- 003 0.0000 5.3261 Energy 0.0185 0.1582 0.0673 1.0100e- 003 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 201.8986 201.8986 3.8700e- 003 3.7000e- 003 203.0984 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2318 0.1917 2.9644 1.1600e- 003 0.0000 0.0287 0.0287 0.0000 0.0287 0.0287 0.0000 207.0979 207.0979 8.9400e- 003 3.7000e- 003 208.4245 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 1.2133 0.0335 2.8971 1.5000e- 004 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 5.1993 5.1993 5.0700e- 003 0.0000 5.3261 Energy 0.0185 0.1582 0.0673 1.0100e- 003 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 201.8986 201.8986 3.8700e- 003 3.7000e- 003 203.0984 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2318 0.1917 2.9644 1.1600e- 003 0.0000 0.0287 0.0287 0.0000 0.0287 0.0287 0.0000 207.0979 207.0979 8.9400e- 003 3.7000e- 003 208.4245 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 6 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 2/16/2018 2/15/2018 5 0 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 3/16/2018 3/15/2018 5 0 3 Grading Grading 3/23/2018 3/22/2018 5 0 4 Building Construction Building Construction 4/4/2018 4/3/2018 5 0 5 Paving Paving 2/20/2019 2/19/2019 5 0 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/16/2019 3/15/2019 5 0 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 7 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 0 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 0 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Graders 0 8.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 6.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 6.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 8 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 9 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 10 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 11 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 12 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 13 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 14 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 15 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 16 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 17 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 18 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 19 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 20 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 21 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Mobile Home Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Mobile Home Park 13.00 5.00 5.00 35.80 21.00 43.20 86 11 3 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Mobile Home Park 0.559162 0.032279 0.198583 0.128083 0.030808 0.007362 0.013004 0.019140 0.002385 0.001267 0.005421 0.000811 0.001695 Historical Energy Use: Y CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 22 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0185 0.1582 0.0673 1.0100e- 003 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 201.8986 201.8986 3.8700e- 003 3.7000e- 003 203.0984 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0185 0.1582 0.0673 1.0100e- 003 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 201.8986 201.8986 3.8700e- 003 3.7000e- 003 203.0984 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Mobile Home Park 1716.14 0.0185 0.1582 0.0673 1.0100e- 003 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 201.8986 201.8986 3.8700e- 003 3.7000e- 003 203.0984 Total 0.0185 0.1582 0.0673 1.0100e- 003 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 201.8986 201.8986 3.8700e- 003 3.7000e- 003 203.0984 Unmitigated 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 23 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 1.2133 0.0335 2.8971 1.5000e- 004 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 5.1993 5.1993 5.0700e- 003 0.0000 5.3261 Unmitigated 1.2133 0.0335 2.8971 1.5000e- 004 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 5.1993 5.1993 5.0700e- 003 0.0000 5.3261 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Mobile Home Park 1.71614 0.0185 0.1582 0.0673 1.0100e- 003 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 201.8986 201.8986 3.8700e- 003 3.7000e- 003 203.0984 Total 0.0185 0.1582 0.0673 1.0100e- 003 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 0.0128 201.8986 201.8986 3.8700e- 003 3.7000e- 003 203.0984 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 24 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.2263 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.8988 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0882 0.0335 2.8971 1.5000e- 004 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 5.1993 5.1993 5.0700e- 003 5.3261 Total 1.2133 0.0335 2.8971 1.5000e- 004 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 5.1993 5.1993 5.0700e- 003 0.0000 5.3261 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 25 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.2263 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.8988 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0882 0.0335 2.8971 1.5000e- 004 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 5.1993 5.1993 5.0700e- 003 5.3261 Total 1.2133 0.0335 2.8971 1.5000e- 004 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 5.1993 5.1993 5.0700e- 003 0.0000 5.3261 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 26 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 11.0 Vegetation Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:28 AMPage 27 of 27 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Winter 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Mobile Home Park 35.00 Dwelling Unit 4.41 42,000.00 100 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 4 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)3.2 44 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company 2020Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 641.35 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Tank Farm Project (Existing) San Luis Obispo County, Annual CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 1 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual Project Characteristics - Land Use - Default Vehicle Trips - Traffic Study removed the existing trips from Proposed Construction Phase - no Construction Off-road Equipment - No Construction Off-road Equipment - No Construction Off-road Equipment - No Construction Grading - No Construction Demolition - No Construction Trips and VMT - No Construction On-road Fugitive Dust - No Construction Architectural Coating - No Construction Area Coating - Revised as it is existing Energy Use - Existing Uses predate T-24 requirements Water And Wastewater - Solid Waste - Woodstoves - 5 existing trailers have chimneies Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Residential_Exterior 17,820.00 0.00 tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Residential_Interior 53,460.00 0.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Parking 150.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 2 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 0.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 0.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 0.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 0.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 3.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 3.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 3.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Demolition tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Grading tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Site Preparation tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 6.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 7.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 6.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 6.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 7.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 3 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 2.0 Emissions Summary tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 2.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 18.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 16.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 20.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 3.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 5.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.36 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 4.99 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 4 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2018 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2019 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2018 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2019 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 5 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.2199 5.5300e- 003 0.4780 3.0000e- 005 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 0.0000 0.7783 0.7783 7.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.7972 Energy 3.3800e- 003 0.0289 0.0123 1.8000e- 004 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 0.0000 84.6537 84.6537 2.9600e- 003 1.0900e- 003 85.0530 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0543 0.0000 2.0543 0.1214 0.0000 5.0894 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4548 3.1764 3.6312 0.0469 1.1300e- 003 5.1399 Total 0.2233 0.0344 0.4903 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 4.9600e- 003 4.9600e- 003 0.0000 4.9600e- 003 4.9600e- 003 2.5090 88.6083 91.1174 0.1720 2.2200e- 003 96.0796 Unmitigated Operational Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Highest CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 6 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.2199 5.5300e- 003 0.4780 3.0000e- 005 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 0.0000 0.7783 0.7783 7.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.7972 Energy 3.3800e- 003 0.0289 0.0123 1.8000e- 004 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 0.0000 84.6537 84.6537 2.9600e- 003 1.0900e- 003 85.0530 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0543 0.0000 2.0543 0.1214 0.0000 5.0894 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4548 3.1764 3.6312 0.0469 1.1300e- 003 5.1399 Total 0.2233 0.0344 0.4903 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 4.9600e- 003 4.9600e- 003 0.0000 4.9600e- 003 4.9600e- 003 2.5090 88.6083 91.1174 0.1720 2.2200e- 003 96.0796 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 7 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 2/16/2018 2/15/2018 5 0 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 3/16/2018 3/15/2018 5 0 3 Grading Grading 3/23/2018 3/22/2018 5 0 4 Building Construction Building Construction 4/4/2018 4/3/2018 5 0 5 Paving Paving 2/20/2019 2/19/2019 5 0 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/16/2019 3/15/2019 5 0 OffRoad Equipment Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 8 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 0 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 0 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Graders 0 8.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 6.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 6.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 9 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 10 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 11 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 12 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 13 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 14 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 15 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 16 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 17 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 18 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 19 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 20 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 21 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 22 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Mobile Home Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Mobile Home Park 13.00 5.00 5.00 35.80 21.00 43.20 86 11 3 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Mobile Home Park 0.559162 0.032279 0.198583 0.128083 0.030808 0.007362 0.013004 0.019140 0.002385 0.001267 0.005421 0.000811 0.001695 Historical Energy Use: Y CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 23 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 51.2271 51.2271 2.3200e- 003 4.8000e- 004 51.4278 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 51.2271 51.2271 2.3200e- 003 4.8000e- 004 51.4278 NaturalGas Mitigated 3.3800e- 003 0.0289 0.0123 1.8000e- 004 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 0.0000 33.4266 33.4266 6.4000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 33.6252 NaturalGas Unmitigated 3.3800e- 003 0.0289 0.0123 1.8000e- 004 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 0.0000 33.4266 33.4266 6.4000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 33.6252 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Mobile Home Park 626390 3.3800e- 003 0.0289 0.0123 1.8000e- 004 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 0.0000 33.4266 33.4266 6.4000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 33.6252 Total 3.3800e- 003 0.0289 0.0123 1.8000e- 004 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 0.0000 33.4266 33.4266 6.4000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 33.6252 Unmitigated 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 24 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Mobile Home Park 626390 3.3800e- 003 0.0289 0.0123 1.8000e- 004 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 0.0000 33.4266 33.4266 6.4000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 33.6252 Total 3.3800e- 003 0.0289 0.0123 1.8000e- 004 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 2.3300e- 003 0.0000 33.4266 33.4266 6.4000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 33.6252 Mitigated 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Mobile Home Park 176092 51.2271 2.3200e- 003 4.8000e- 004 51.4278 Total 51.2271 2.3200e- 003 4.8000e- 004 51.4278 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 25 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.2199 5.5300e- 003 0.4780 3.0000e- 005 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 0.0000 0.7783 0.7783 7.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.7972 Unmitigated 0.2199 5.5300e- 003 0.4780 3.0000e- 005 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 0.0000 0.7783 0.7783 7.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.7972 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Mobile Home Park 176092 51.2271 2.3200e- 003 4.8000e- 004 51.4278 Total 51.2271 2.3200e- 003 4.8000e- 004 51.4278 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 26 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0413 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.1640 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0146 5.5300e- 003 0.4780 3.0000e- 005 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 0.0000 0.7783 0.7783 7.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.7972 Total 0.2199 5.5300e- 003 0.4780 3.0000e- 005 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 0.0000 0.7783 0.7783 7.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.7972 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 27 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0413 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.1640 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0146 5.5300e- 003 0.4780 3.0000e- 005 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 0.0000 0.7783 0.7783 7.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.7972 Total 0.2199 5.5300e- 003 0.4780 3.0000e- 005 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 2.6300e- 003 0.0000 0.7783 0.7783 7.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.7972 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 28 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 3.6312 0.0469 1.1300e- 003 5.1399 Unmitigated 3.6312 0.0469 1.1300e- 003 5.1399 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Mobile Home Park 1.43339 / 0.903658 3.6312 0.0469 1.1300e- 003 5.1399 Total 3.6312 0.0469 1.1300e- 003 5.1399 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 29 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Mobile Home Park 1.43339 / 0.903658 3.6312 0.0469 1.1300e- 003 5.1399 Total 3.6312 0.0469 1.1300e- 003 5.1399 Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 2.0543 0.1214 0.0000 5.0894 Unmitigated 2.0543 0.1214 0.0000 5.0894 Category/Year CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 30 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Mobile Home Park 10.12 2.0543 0.1214 0.0000 5.0894 Total 2.0543 0.1214 0.0000 5.0894 Unmitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Mobile Home Park 10.12 2.0543 0.1214 0.0000 5.0894 Total 2.0543 0.1214 0.0000 5.0894 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 31 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 11.0 Vegetation 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 8:31 AMPage 32 of 32 Tank Farm Project (Existing) - San Luis Obispo County, Annual 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 356.00 Space 3.20 142,400.00 0 Apartments Low Rise 249.00 Dwelling Unit 6.90 249,000.00 712 Regional Shopping Center 17.50 1000sqft 0.00 17,500.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 4 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)3.2 44 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company 2021Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 641.35 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Tank Farm Project (Proposed) San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 1 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer Project Characteristics - Land Use - Mixed Use - No Lot acreage for retail - all contained in residential Construction Phase - no demolition of coaches, extended arch coating (refer to IS-MND discussion) Trips and VMT - Grading - 25,000 cubic yards of fill, 10.1 acre development Architectural Coating - 2016 CalGreen Building Code - 50 g/l Vehicle Trips - vehicle trips from Traffic Study (includes reductions) Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors - Woodstoves - no woodstove Area Coating - 2016 CalGreen Building Code - 50 g/l Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Area Mitigation - Energy Mitigation - Water Mitigation - Waste Mitigation - Fleet Mix - Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Parking 150.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250 50 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250 50 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 2 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 2.0 Emissions Summary tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Parking 150 50 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Exterior 250 50 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Interior 250 50 tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintParkingCheck False True tblEnergyUse LightingElect 0.35 0.88 tblEnergyUse LightingElect 5.25 5.38 tblEnergyUse NT24E 3,172.76 3,418.36 tblEnergyUse T24E 365.68 431.22 tblEnergyUse T24E 2.76 2.89 tblEnergyUse T24NG 7,043.85 10,164.29 tblEnergyUse T24NG 2.37 2.38 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 75.00 10.10 tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 25,000.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 15.56 6.90 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.40 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.21 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 39.86 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 4.46 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 28.59 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.58 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 35.79 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 60.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 2,016.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 3 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 6.5413 90.4611 52.0441 0.1472 21.6881 2.5997 23.1695 9.9779 2.3997 12.1781 0.0000 15,293.97 78 15,293.97 78 2.4481 0.0000 15,355.17 99 2020 83.6098 38.2178 47.6410 0.1272 21.6882 1.2526 22.9408 5.4985 1.1784 6.6769 0.0000 12,758.98 09 12,758.98 09 1.0406 0.0000 12,784.99 58 Maximum 83.6098 90.4611 52.0441 0.1472 21.6882 2.5997 23.1695 9.9779 2.3997 12.1781 0.0000 15,293.97 78 15,293.97 78 2.4481 0.0000 15,355.17 99 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 6.5413 90.4611 52.0441 0.1472 21.6881 2.5997 23.1695 9.9779 2.3997 12.1781 0.0000 15,293.97 78 15,293.97 78 2.4481 0.0000 15,355.17 99 2020 83.6098 38.2178 47.6410 0.1272 21.6882 1.2526 22.9408 5.4985 1.1784 6.6769 0.0000 12,758.98 09 12,758.98 09 1.0406 0.0000 12,784.99 58 Maximum 83.6098 90.4611 52.0441 0.1472 21.6882 2.5997 23.1695 9.9779 2.3997 12.1781 0.0000 15,293.97 78 15,293.97 78 2.4481 0.0000 15,355.17 99 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 4 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 6.8354 0.2380 20.6257 1.0900e- 003 0.1136 0.1136 0.1136 0.1136 0.0000 37.0713 37.0713 0.0361 0.0000 37.9728 Energy 0.0992 0.8486 0.3657 5.4100e- 003 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 1,082.402 3 1,082.402 3 0.0208 0.0198 1,088.834 5 Mobile 4.1026 15.5425 42.6931 0.1194 10.4619 0.1233 10.5853 2.7955 0.1158 2.9113 12,035.12 71 12,035.12 71 0.4894 12,047.36 17 Total 11.0372 16.6291 63.6846 0.1259 10.4619 0.3055 10.7674 2.7955 0.2980 3.0935 0.0000 13,154.60 07 13,154.60 07 0.5462 0.0198 13,174.16 90 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 6.1134 0.1880 15.6628 7.1000e- 004 0.0845 0.0845 0.0845 0.0845 0.0000 25.9276 25.9276 0.0188 0.0000 26.3977 Energy 0.0992 0.8486 0.3657 5.4100e- 003 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 1,082.402 3 1,082.402 3 0.0208 0.0198 1,088.834 5 Mobile 3.9642 14.4843 39.2517 0.1072 9.3216 0.1116 9.4332 2.4908 0.1048 2.5956 10,808.27 61 10,808.27 61 0.4492 10,819.50 63 Total 10.1768 15.5208 55.2802 0.1133 9.3216 0.2646 9.5862 2.4908 0.2578 2.7486 0.0000 11,916.60 60 11,916.60 60 0.4888 0.0198 11,934.73 85 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 5 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/25/2019 2/21/2019 5 20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 2/22/2019 3/7/2019 5 10 3 Grading Grading 3/8/2019 4/18/2019 5 30 4 Building Construction Building Construction 4/19/2019 6/11/2020 5 300 5 Paving Paving 6/12/2020 7/9/2020 5 20 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 7/10/2020 8/6/2020 5 20 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 7.80 6.66 13.20 9.97 10.90 13.37 10.97 10.90 13.48 11.15 0.00 9.41 9.41 10.51 0.00 9.41 Residential Indoor: 504,225; Residential Outdoor: 168,075; Non-Residential Indoor: 26,250; Non-Residential Outdoor: 8,750; Striped Parking Area: 8,544 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 10.1 Acres of Paving: 3.2 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 6 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 7 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.5134 35.7830 22.0600 0.0388 1.7949 1.7949 1.6697 1.6697 3,816.899 4 3,816.899 4 1.0618 3,843.445 1 Total 3.5134 35.7830 22.0600 0.0388 1.7949 1.7949 1.6697 1.6697 3,816.899 4 3,816.899 4 1.0618 3,843.445 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 3,125.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 245.00 53.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 245.00 53.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 245.00 53.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 49.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 49.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 8 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0705 0.0608 0.6028 1.4400e- 003 0.1483 9.8000e- 004 0.1493 0.0393 9.1000e- 004 0.0402 143.0023 143.0023 5.2500e- 003 143.1336 Total 0.0705 0.0608 0.6028 1.4400e- 003 0.1483 9.8000e- 004 0.1493 0.0393 9.1000e- 004 0.0402 143.0023 143.0023 5.2500e- 003 143.1336 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.5134 35.7830 22.0600 0.0388 1.7949 1.7949 1.6697 1.6697 0.0000 3,816.899 4 3,816.899 4 1.0618 3,843.445 1 Total 3.5134 35.7830 22.0600 0.0388 1.7949 1.7949 1.6697 1.6697 0.0000 3,816.899 4 3,816.899 4 1.0618 3,843.445 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 9 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0705 0.0608 0.6028 1.4400e- 003 0.1483 9.8000e- 004 0.1493 0.0393 9.1000e- 004 0.0402 143.0023 143.0023 5.2500e- 003 143.1336 Total 0.0705 0.0608 0.6028 1.4400e- 003 0.1483 9.8000e- 004 0.1493 0.0393 9.1000e- 004 0.0402 143.0023 143.0023 5.2500e- 003 143.1336 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.3350 45.5727 22.0630 0.0380 2.3904 2.3904 2.1991 2.1991 3,766.452 9 3,766.452 9 1.1917 3,796.244 5 Total 4.3350 45.5727 22.0630 0.0380 18.0663 2.3904 20.4566 9.9307 2.1991 12.1298 3,766.452 9 3,766.452 9 1.1917 3,796.244 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 10 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0846 0.0729 0.7233 1.7200e- 003 0.1780 1.1800e- 003 0.1791 0.0472 1.0900e- 003 0.0483 171.6027 171.6027 6.3000e- 003 171.7603 Total 0.0846 0.0729 0.7233 1.7200e- 003 0.1780 1.1800e- 003 0.1791 0.0472 1.0900e- 003 0.0483 171.6027 171.6027 6.3000e- 003 171.7603 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.3350 45.5727 22.0630 0.0380 2.3904 2.3904 2.1991 2.1991 0.0000 3,766.452 9 3,766.452 9 1.1917 3,796.244 5 Total 4.3350 45.5727 22.0630 0.0380 18.0663 2.3904 20.4566 9.9307 2.1991 12.1298 0.0000 3,766.452 9 3,766.452 9 1.1917 3,796.244 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 11 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0846 0.0729 0.7233 1.7200e- 003 0.1780 1.1800e- 003 0.1791 0.0472 1.0900e- 003 0.0483 171.6027 171.6027 6.3000e- 003 171.7603 Total 0.0846 0.0729 0.7233 1.7200e- 003 0.1780 1.1800e- 003 0.1791 0.0472 1.0900e- 003 0.0483 171.6027 171.6027 6.3000e- 003 171.7603 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.5325 0.0000 6.5325 3.3720 0.0000 3.3720 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.7389 54.5202 33.3768 0.0620 2.3827 2.3827 2.1920 2.1920 6,140.019 5 6,140.019 5 1.9426 6,188.585 4 Total 4.7389 54.5202 33.3768 0.0620 6.5325 2.3827 8.9152 3.3720 2.1920 5.5641 6,140.019 5 6,140.019 5 1.9426 6,188.585 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 12 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 1.0599 35.8599 7.7086 0.0833 1.8169 0.2158 2.0327 0.4977 0.2064 0.7041 8,963.288 7 8,963.288 7 0.4984 8,975.749 7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0940 0.0810 0.8037 1.9200e- 003 0.1977 1.3100e- 003 0.1990 0.0524 1.2100e- 003 0.0537 190.6697 190.6697 7.0000e- 003 190.8448 Total 1.1538 35.9409 8.5123 0.0852 2.0146 0.2171 2.2317 0.5501 0.2077 0.7578 9,153.958 4 9,153.958 4 0.5054 9,166.594 5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.5325 0.0000 6.5325 3.3720 0.0000 3.3720 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.7389 54.5202 33.3768 0.0620 2.3827 2.3827 2.1920 2.1920 0.0000 6,140.019 5 6,140.019 5 1.9426 6,188.585 4 Total 4.7389 54.5202 33.3768 0.0620 6.5325 2.3827 8.9152 3.3720 2.1920 5.5641 0.0000 6,140.019 5 6,140.019 5 1.9426 6,188.585 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 13 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 1.0599 35.8599 7.7086 0.0833 1.8169 0.2158 2.0327 0.4977 0.2064 0.7041 8,963.288 7 8,963.288 7 0.4984 8,975.749 7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0940 0.0810 0.8037 1.9200e- 003 0.1977 1.3100e- 003 0.1990 0.0524 1.2100e- 003 0.0537 190.6697 190.6697 7.0000e- 003 190.8448 Total 1.1538 35.9409 8.5123 0.0852 2.0146 0.2171 2.2317 0.5501 0.2077 0.7578 9,153.958 4 9,153.958 4 0.5054 9,166.594 5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.3612 21.0788 17.1638 0.0269 1.2899 1.2899 1.2127 1.2127 2,591.580 2 2,591.580 2 0.6313 2,607.363 5 Total 2.3612 21.0788 17.1638 0.0269 1.2899 1.2899 1.2127 1.2127 2,591.580 2 2,591.580 2 0.6313 2,607.363 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 14 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.7276 17.9543 5.3437 0.0322 1.7890 0.1435 1.9325 0.4705 0.1372 0.6077 3,418.590 3 3,418.590 3 0.2100 3,423.839 7 Worker 3.4525 2.9773 29.5366 0.0704 19.8991 0.0480 19.9471 5.0279 0.0444 5.0723 7,007.1101 7,007.1101 0.2574 7,013.545 4 Total 4.1802 20.9316 34.8803 0.1026 21.6881 0.1915 21.8796 5.4985 0.1816 5.6800 10,425.70 04 10,425.70 04 0.4674 10,437.38 50 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.3612 21.0788 17.1638 0.0269 1.2899 1.2899 1.2127 1.2127 0.0000 2,591.580 2 2,591.580 2 0.6313 2,607.363 5 Total 2.3612 21.0788 17.1638 0.0269 1.2899 1.2899 1.2127 1.2127 0.0000 2,591.580 2 2,591.580 2 0.6313 2,607.363 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 15 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.7276 17.9543 5.3437 0.0322 1.7890 0.1435 1.9325 0.4705 0.1372 0.6077 3,418.590 3 3,418.590 3 0.2100 3,423.839 7 Worker 3.4525 2.9773 29.5366 0.0704 19.8991 0.0480 19.9471 5.0279 0.0444 5.0723 7,007.1101 7,007.1101 0.2574 7,013.545 4 Total 4.1802 20.9316 34.8803 0.1026 21.6881 0.1915 21.8796 5.4985 0.1816 5.6800 10,425.70 04 10,425.70 04 0.4674 10,437.38 50 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 2,553.063 1 2,553.063 1 0.6229 2,568.634 5 Total 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 2,553.063 1 2,553.063 1 0.6229 2,568.634 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 16 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.5766 16.4093 4.7024 0.0321 1.7891 0.0891 1.8782 0.4706 0.0852 0.5558 3,415.346 4 3,415.346 4 0.1964 3,420.256 1 Worker 3.1437 2.6224 26.0901 0.0682 19.8991 0.0465 19.9456 5.0279 0.0429 5.0708 6,790.571 5 6,790.571 5 0.2214 6,796.105 3 Total 3.7203 19.0317 30.7925 0.1003 21.6882 0.1356 21.8238 5.4985 0.1281 5.6266 10,205.91 79 10,205.91 79 0.4177 10,216.36 13 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 0.0000 2,553.063 1 2,553.063 1 0.6229 2,568.634 5 Total 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 0.0000 2,553.063 1 2,553.063 1 0.6229 2,568.634 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 17 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.5766 16.4093 4.7024 0.0321 1.7891 0.0891 1.8782 0.4706 0.0852 0.5558 3,415.346 4 3,415.346 4 0.1964 3,420.256 1 Worker 3.1437 2.6224 26.0901 0.0682 19.8991 0.0465 19.9456 5.0279 0.0429 5.0708 6,790.571 5 6,790.571 5 0.2214 6,796.105 3 Total 3.7203 19.0317 30.7925 0.1003 21.6882 0.1356 21.8238 5.4985 0.1281 5.6266 10,205.91 79 10,205.91 79 0.4177 10,216.36 13 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.3566 14.0656 14.6521 0.0228 0.7528 0.7528 0.6926 0.6926 2,207.733 4 2,207.733 4 0.7140 2,225.584 1 Paving 0.4192 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.7758 14.0656 14.6521 0.0228 0.7528 0.7528 0.6926 0.6926 2,207.733 4 2,207.733 4 0.7140 2,225.584 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 18 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0642 0.0535 0.5325 1.3900e- 003 0.1483 9.5000e- 004 0.1492 0.0393 8.8000e- 004 0.0402 138.5831 138.5831 4.5200e- 003 138.6960 Total 0.0642 0.0535 0.5325 1.3900e- 003 0.1483 9.5000e- 004 0.1492 0.0393 8.8000e- 004 0.0402 138.5831 138.5831 4.5200e- 003 138.6960 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.3566 14.0656 14.6521 0.0228 0.7528 0.7528 0.6926 0.6926 0.0000 2,207.733 4 2,207.733 4 0.7140 2,225.584 1 Paving 0.4192 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.7758 14.0656 14.6521 0.0228 0.7528 0.7528 0.6926 0.6926 0.0000 2,207.733 4 2,207.733 4 0.7140 2,225.584 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 19 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0642 0.0535 0.5325 1.3900e- 003 0.1483 9.5000e- 004 0.1492 0.0393 8.8000e- 004 0.0402 138.5831 138.5831 4.5200e- 003 138.6960 Total 0.0642 0.0535 0.5325 1.3900e- 003 0.1483 9.5000e- 004 0.1492 0.0393 8.8000e- 004 0.0402 138.5831 138.5831 4.5200e- 003 138.6960 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 82.9484 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2422 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 Total 83.1906 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 20 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.4192 0.3497 3.4787 9.0900e- 003 1.8110 6.2000e- 003 1.8172 0.4637 5.7200e- 003 0.4694 905.4095 905.4095 0.0295 906.1474 Total 0.4192 0.3497 3.4787 9.0900e- 003 1.8110 6.2000e- 003 1.8172 0.4637 5.7200e- 003 0.4694 905.4095 905.4095 0.0295 906.1474 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 82.9484 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2422 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 Total 83.1906 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 21 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Increase Density Increase Diversity Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Pedestrian Network 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.4192 0.3497 3.4787 9.0900e- 003 1.8110 6.2000e- 003 1.8172 0.4637 5.7200e- 003 0.4694 905.4095 905.4095 0.0295 906.1474 Total 0.4192 0.3497 3.4787 9.0900e- 003 1.8110 6.2000e- 003 1.8172 0.4637 5.7200e- 003 0.4694 905.4095 905.4095 0.0295 906.1474 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 22 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 3.9642 14.4843 39.2517 0.1072 9.3216 0.1116 9.4332 2.4908 0.1048 2.5956 10,808.27 61 10,808.27 61 0.4492 10,819.50 63 Unmitigated 4.1026 15.5425 42.6931 0.1194 10.4619 0.1233 10.5853 2.7955 0.1158 2.9113 12,035.12 71 12,035.12 71 0.4894 12,047.36 17 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Low Rise 1,389.42 1,546.29 1110.54 3,486,991 3,106,909 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Regional Shopping Center 626.33 697.55 500.33 893,053 795,710 Total 2,015.75 2,243.84 1,610.87 4,380,044 3,902,619 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 13.00 5.00 5.00 35.80 21.00 43.20 86 11 3 Parking Lot 13.00 5.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Regional Shopping Center 13.00 5.00 5.00 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 23 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0992 0.8486 0.3657 5.4100e- 003 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 1,082.402 3 1,082.402 3 0.0208 0.0198 1,088.834 5 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0992 0.8486 0.3657 5.4100e- 003 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 1,082.402 3 1,082.402 3 0.0208 0.0198 1,088.834 5 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.567875 0.030811 0.198391 0.124124 0.028385 0.006896 0.012949 0.019383 0.002368 0.001236 0.005232 0.000797 0.001552 Parking Lot 0.567875 0.030811 0.198391 0.124124 0.028385 0.006896 0.012949 0.019383 0.002368 0.001236 0.005232 0.000797 0.001552 Regional Shopping Center 0.567875 0.030811 0.198391 0.124124 0.028385 0.006896 0.012949 0.019383 0.002368 0.001236 0.005232 0.000797 0.001552 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 24 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low Rise 9086.31 0.0980 0.8374 0.3563 5.3400e- 003 0.0677 0.0677 0.0677 0.0677 1,068.977 7 1,068.977 7 0.0205 0.0196 1,075.330 1 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 114.11 1.2300e- 003 0.0112 9.4000e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.5000e- 004 8.5000e- 004 8.5000e- 004 8.5000e- 004 13.4247 13.4247 2.6000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 13.5044 Total 0.0992 0.8486 0.3657 5.4100e- 003 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 1,082.402 3 1,082.402 3 0.0208 0.0199 1,088.834 5 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low Rise 9.08631 0.0980 0.8374 0.3563 5.3400e- 003 0.0677 0.0677 0.0677 0.0677 1,068.977 7 1,068.977 7 0.0205 0.0196 1,075.330 1 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 0.11411 1.2300e- 003 0.0112 9.4000e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.5000e- 004 8.5000e- 004 8.5000e- 004 8.5000e- 004 13.4247 13.4247 2.6000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 13.5044 Total 0.0992 0.8486 0.3657 5.4100e- 003 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 1,082.402 3 1,082.402 3 0.0208 0.0199 1,088.834 5 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 25 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer Use Electric Lawnmower Use Electric Leafblower Use Electric Chainsaw Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Exterior Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Interior Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior No Hearths Installed Use Low VOC Cleaning Supplies 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 6.1134 0.1880 15.6628 7.1000e- 004 0.0845 0.0845 0.0845 0.0845 0.0000 25.9276 25.9276 0.0188 0.0000 26.3977 Unmitigated 6.8354 0.2380 20.6257 1.0900e- 003 0.1136 0.1136 0.1136 0.1136 0.0000 37.0713 37.0713 0.0361 0.0000 37.9728 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 26 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.4545 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 5.7535 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.6274 0.2380 20.6257 1.0900e- 003 0.1136 0.1136 0.1136 0.1136 37.0713 37.0713 0.0361 37.9728 Total 6.8354 0.2380 20.6257 1.0900e- 003 0.1136 0.1136 0.1136 0.1136 0.0000 37.0713 37.0713 0.0361 0.0000 37.9728 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 27 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.4545 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 5.3271 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.3317 0.1880 15.6628 7.1000e- 004 0.0845 0.0845 0.0845 0.0845 25.9276 25.9276 0.0188 26.3977 Total 6.1134 0.1880 15.6628 7.1000e- 004 0.0845 0.0845 0.0845 0.0845 0.0000 25.9276 25.9276 0.0188 0.0000 26.3977 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 28 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 11.0 Vegetation Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:52 AMPage 29 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Summer 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 356.00 Space 3.20 142,400.00 0 Apartments Low Rise 249.00 Dwelling Unit 6.90 249,000.00 712 Regional Shopping Center 17.50 1000sqft 0.00 17,500.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 4 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)3.2 44 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company 2021Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 641.35 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Tank Farm Project (Proposed) San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 1 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter Project Characteristics - Land Use - Mixed Use - No Lot acreage for retail - all contained in residential Construction Phase - no demolition of coaches, extended arch coating (refer to IS-MND discussion) Trips and VMT - Grading - 25,000 cubic yards of fill, 10.1 acre development Architectural Coating - 2016 CalGreen Building Code - 50 g/l Vehicle Trips - vehicle trips from Traffic Study (includes reductions) Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors - Woodstoves - no woodstove Area Coating - 2016 CalGreen Building Code - 50 g/l Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Area Mitigation - Energy Mitigation - Water Mitigation - Waste Mitigation - Fleet Mix - Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Parking 150.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250 50 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250 50 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 2 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 2.0 Emissions Summary tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Parking 150 50 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Exterior 250 50 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Interior 250 50 tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintParkingCheck False True tblEnergyUse LightingElect 0.35 0.88 tblEnergyUse LightingElect 5.25 5.38 tblEnergyUse NT24E 3,172.76 3,418.36 tblEnergyUse T24E 365.68 431.22 tblEnergyUse T24E 2.76 2.89 tblEnergyUse T24NG 7,043.85 10,164.29 tblEnergyUse T24NG 2.37 2.38 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 75.00 10.10 tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 25,000.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 15.56 6.90 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.40 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.21 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 39.86 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 4.46 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 28.59 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.58 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 35.79 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 60.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 2,016.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 3 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 7.0546 90.7515 52.0602 0.1460 21.6881 2.6044 23.1735 9.9779 2.4041 12.1781 0.0000 15,158.83 10 15,158.83 10 2.4647 0.0000 15,220.44 93 2020 83.6684 38.4904 47.5263 0.1231 21.6882 1.2554 22.9436 5.4985 1.1811 6.6796 0.0000 12,337.811 9 12,337.811 9 1.0469 0.0000 12,363.98 38 Maximum 83.6684 90.7515 52.0602 0.1460 21.6882 2.6044 23.1735 9.9779 2.4041 12.1781 0.0000 15,158.83 10 15,158.83 10 2.4647 0.0000 15,220.44 93 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 7.0546 90.7515 52.0602 0.1460 21.6881 2.6044 23.1735 9.9779 2.4041 12.1781 0.0000 15,158.83 10 15,158.83 10 2.4647 0.0000 15,220.44 92 2020 83.6684 38.4904 47.5263 0.1231 21.6882 1.2554 22.9436 5.4985 1.1811 6.6796 0.0000 12,337.811 9 12,337.811 9 1.0469 0.0000 12,363.98 38 Maximum 83.6684 90.7515 52.0602 0.1460 21.6882 2.6044 23.1735 9.9779 2.4041 12.1781 0.0000 15,158.83 10 15,158.83 10 2.4647 0.0000 15,220.44 92 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 4 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 6.8354 0.2380 20.6257 1.0900e- 003 0.1136 0.1136 0.1136 0.1136 0.0000 37.0713 37.0713 0.0361 0.0000 37.9728 Energy 0.0992 0.8486 0.3657 5.4100e- 003 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 1,082.402 3 1,082.402 3 0.0208 0.0198 1,088.834 5 Mobile 3.9789 16.1075 44.0047 0.1147 10.4619 0.1247 10.5866 2.7955 0.1171 2.9126 11,559.435 3 11,559.435 3 0.4975 11,571.872 4 Total 10.9135 17.1940 64.9961 0.1212 10.4619 0.3069 10.7688 2.7955 0.2993 3.0948 0.0000 12,678.90 89 12,678.90 89 0.5543 0.0198 12,698.67 98 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 6.1134 0.1880 15.6628 7.1000e- 004 0.0845 0.0845 0.0845 0.0845 0.0000 25.9276 25.9276 0.0188 0.0000 26.3977 Energy 0.0992 0.8486 0.3657 5.4100e- 003 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 1,082.402 3 1,082.402 3 0.0208 0.0198 1,088.834 5 Mobile 3.8415 14.9878 40.7608 0.1030 9.3216 0.1129 9.4345 2.4908 0.1061 2.5969 10,378.21 81 10,378.21 81 0.4586 10,389.68 36 Total 10.0541 16.0243 56.7892 0.1091 9.3216 0.2660 9.5876 2.4908 0.2591 2.7499 0.0000 11,486.54 80 11,486.54 80 0.4982 0.0198 11,504.91 58 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 5 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/25/2019 2/21/2019 5 20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 2/22/2019 3/7/2019 5 10 3 Grading Grading 3/8/2019 4/18/2019 5 30 4 Building Construction Building Construction 4/19/2019 6/11/2020 5 300 5 Paving Paving 6/12/2020 7/9/2020 5 20 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 7/10/2020 8/6/2020 5 20 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 7.87 6.80 12.63 9.98 10.90 13.32 10.97 10.90 13.42 11.14 0.00 9.40 9.40 10.12 0.00 9.40 Residential Indoor: 504,225; Residential Outdoor: 168,075; Non-Residential Indoor: 26,250; Non-Residential Outdoor: 8,750; Striped Parking Area: 8,544 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 10.1 Acres of Paving: 3.2 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 6 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 7 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.5134 35.7830 22.0600 0.0388 1.7949 1.7949 1.6697 1.6697 3,816.899 4 3,816.899 4 1.0618 3,843.445 1 Total 3.5134 35.7830 22.0600 0.0388 1.7949 1.7949 1.6697 1.6697 3,816.899 4 3,816.899 4 1.0618 3,843.445 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 3,125.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 245.00 53.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 245.00 53.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 245.00 53.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 49.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 49.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 8 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0802 0.0690 0.5896 1.3700e- 003 0.1483 9.8000e- 004 0.1493 0.0393 9.1000e- 004 0.0402 136.3132 136.3132 5.1200e- 003 136.4411 Total 0.0802 0.0690 0.5896 1.3700e- 003 0.1483 9.8000e- 004 0.1493 0.0393 9.1000e- 004 0.0402 136.3132 136.3132 5.1200e- 003 136.4411 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.5134 35.7830 22.0600 0.0388 1.7949 1.7949 1.6697 1.6697 0.0000 3,816.899 4 3,816.899 4 1.0618 3,843.445 1 Total 3.5134 35.7830 22.0600 0.0388 1.7949 1.7949 1.6697 1.6697 0.0000 3,816.899 4 3,816.899 4 1.0618 3,843.445 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 9 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0802 0.0690 0.5896 1.3700e- 003 0.1483 9.8000e- 004 0.1493 0.0393 9.1000e- 004 0.0402 136.3132 136.3132 5.1200e- 003 136.4411 Total 0.0802 0.0690 0.5896 1.3700e- 003 0.1483 9.8000e- 004 0.1493 0.0393 9.1000e- 004 0.0402 136.3132 136.3132 5.1200e- 003 136.4411 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.3350 45.5727 22.0630 0.0380 2.3904 2.3904 2.1991 2.1991 3,766.452 9 3,766.452 9 1.1917 3,796.244 5 Total 4.3350 45.5727 22.0630 0.0380 18.0663 2.3904 20.4566 9.9307 2.1991 12.1298 3,766.452 9 3,766.452 9 1.1917 3,796.244 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 10 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0962 0.0828 0.7075 1.6400e- 003 0.1780 1.1800e- 003 0.1791 0.0472 1.0900e- 003 0.0483 163.5759 163.5759 6.1400e- 003 163.7294 Total 0.0962 0.0828 0.7075 1.6400e- 003 0.1780 1.1800e- 003 0.1791 0.0472 1.0900e- 003 0.0483 163.5759 163.5759 6.1400e- 003 163.7294 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.3350 45.5727 22.0630 0.0380 2.3904 2.3904 2.1991 2.1991 0.0000 3,766.452 9 3,766.452 9 1.1917 3,796.244 5 Total 4.3350 45.5727 22.0630 0.0380 18.0663 2.3904 20.4566 9.9307 2.1991 12.1298 0.0000 3,766.452 9 3,766.452 9 1.1917 3,796.244 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 11 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0962 0.0828 0.7075 1.6400e- 003 0.1780 1.1800e- 003 0.1791 0.0472 1.0900e- 003 0.0483 163.5759 163.5759 6.1400e- 003 163.7294 Total 0.0962 0.0828 0.7075 1.6400e- 003 0.1780 1.1800e- 003 0.1791 0.0472 1.0900e- 003 0.0483 163.5759 163.5759 6.1400e- 003 163.7294 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.5325 0.0000 6.5325 3.3720 0.0000 3.3720 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.7389 54.5202 33.3768 0.0620 2.3827 2.3827 2.1920 2.1920 6,140.019 5 6,140.019 5 1.9426 6,188.585 4 Total 4.7389 54.5202 33.3768 0.0620 6.5325 2.3827 8.9152 3.3720 2.1920 5.5641 6,140.019 5 6,140.019 5 1.9426 6,188.585 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 12 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 1.0881 36.1393 8.2084 0.0821 1.8169 0.2204 2.0373 0.4977 0.2109 0.7085 8,837.060 6 8,837.060 6 0.5153 8,849.942 3 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1069 0.0920 0.7861 1.8300e- 003 0.1977 1.3100e- 003 0.1990 0.0524 1.2100e- 003 0.0537 181.7510 181.7510 6.8200e- 003 181.9215 Total 1.1950 36.2313 8.9945 0.0840 2.0146 0.2217 2.2363 0.5501 0.2121 0.7622 9,018.811 5 9,018.811 5 0.5221 9,031.863 8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.5325 0.0000 6.5325 3.3720 0.0000 3.3720 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.7389 54.5202 33.3768 0.0620 2.3827 2.3827 2.1920 2.1920 0.0000 6,140.019 5 6,140.019 5 1.9426 6,188.585 4 Total 4.7389 54.5202 33.3768 0.0620 6.5325 2.3827 8.9152 3.3720 2.1920 5.5641 0.0000 6,140.019 5 6,140.019 5 1.9426 6,188.585 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 13 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 1.0881 36.1393 8.2084 0.0821 1.8169 0.2204 2.0373 0.4977 0.2109 0.7085 8,837.060 6 8,837.060 6 0.5153 8,849.942 3 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1069 0.0920 0.7861 1.8300e- 003 0.1977 1.3100e- 003 0.1990 0.0524 1.2100e- 003 0.0537 181.7510 181.7510 6.8200e- 003 181.9215 Total 1.1950 36.2313 8.9945 0.0840 2.0146 0.2217 2.2363 0.5501 0.2121 0.7622 9,018.811 5 9,018.811 5 0.5221 9,031.863 8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.3612 21.0788 17.1638 0.0269 1.2899 1.2899 1.2127 1.2127 2,591.580 2 2,591.580 2 0.6313 2,607.363 5 Total 2.3612 21.0788 17.1638 0.0269 1.2899 1.2899 1.2127 1.2127 2,591.580 2 2,591.580 2 0.6313 2,607.363 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 14 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.7653 17.8918 6.0059 0.0312 1.7890 0.1475 1.9365 0.4705 0.1411 0.6116 3,318.671 4 3,318.671 4 0.2245 3,324.283 8 Worker 3.9281 3.3803 28.8906 0.0671 19.8991 0.0480 19.9471 5.0279 0.0444 5.0723 6,679.347 9 6,679.347 9 0.2507 6,685.615 9 Total 4.6934 21.2721 34.8964 0.0984 21.6881 0.1955 21.8836 5.4985 0.1854 5.6839 9,998.019 2 9,998.019 2 0.4752 10,009.89 97 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.3612 21.0788 17.1638 0.0269 1.2899 1.2899 1.2127 1.2127 0.0000 2,591.580 2 2,591.580 2 0.6313 2,607.363 5 Total 2.3612 21.0788 17.1638 0.0269 1.2899 1.2899 1.2127 1.2127 0.0000 2,591.580 2 2,591.580 2 0.6313 2,607.363 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 15 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.7653 17.8918 6.0059 0.0312 1.7890 0.1475 1.9365 0.4705 0.1411 0.6116 3,318.671 4 3,318.671 4 0.2245 3,324.283 8 Worker 3.9281 3.3803 28.8906 0.0671 19.8991 0.0480 19.9471 5.0279 0.0444 5.0723 6,679.347 9 6,679.347 9 0.2507 6,685.615 9 Total 4.6934 21.2721 34.8964 0.0984 21.6881 0.1955 21.8836 5.4985 0.1854 5.6839 9,998.019 2 9,998.019 2 0.4752 10,009.89 97 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 2,553.063 1 2,553.063 1 0.6229 2,568.634 5 Total 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 2,553.063 1 2,553.063 1 0.6229 2,568.634 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 16 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.6098 16.3278 5.2950 0.0311 1.7891 0.0919 1.8810 0.4706 0.0879 0.5585 3,312.139 1 3,312.139 1 0.2100 3,317.388 9 Worker 3.5835 2.9765 25.3828 0.0650 19.8991 0.0465 19.9456 5.0279 0.0429 5.0708 6,472.609 7 6,472.609 7 0.2140 6,477.960 4 Total 4.1933 19.3043 30.6778 0.0962 21.6882 0.1384 21.8266 5.4985 0.1308 5.6293 9,784.748 8 9,784.748 8 0.4240 9,795.349 3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 0.0000 2,553.063 1 2,553.063 1 0.6229 2,568.634 5 Total 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 0.0000 2,553.063 1 2,553.063 1 0.6229 2,568.634 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 17 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.6098 16.3278 5.2950 0.0311 1.7891 0.0919 1.8810 0.4706 0.0879 0.5585 3,312.139 1 3,312.139 1 0.2100 3,317.388 9 Worker 3.5835 2.9765 25.3828 0.0650 19.8991 0.0465 19.9456 5.0279 0.0429 5.0708 6,472.609 7 6,472.609 7 0.2140 6,477.960 4 Total 4.1933 19.3043 30.6778 0.0962 21.6882 0.1384 21.8266 5.4985 0.1308 5.6293 9,784.748 8 9,784.748 8 0.4240 9,795.349 3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.3566 14.0656 14.6521 0.0228 0.7528 0.7528 0.6926 0.6926 2,207.733 4 2,207.733 4 0.7140 2,225.584 1 Paving 0.4192 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.7758 14.0656 14.6521 0.0228 0.7528 0.7528 0.6926 0.6926 2,207.733 4 2,207.733 4 0.7140 2,225.584 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 18 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0731 0.0607 0.5180 1.3300e- 003 0.1483 9.5000e- 004 0.1492 0.0393 8.8000e- 004 0.0402 132.0941 132.0941 4.3700e- 003 132.2033 Total 0.0731 0.0607 0.5180 1.3300e- 003 0.1483 9.5000e- 004 0.1492 0.0393 8.8000e- 004 0.0402 132.0941 132.0941 4.3700e- 003 132.2033 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.3566 14.0656 14.6521 0.0228 0.7528 0.7528 0.6926 0.6926 0.0000 2,207.733 4 2,207.733 4 0.7140 2,225.584 1 Paving 0.4192 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.7758 14.0656 14.6521 0.0228 0.7528 0.7528 0.6926 0.6926 0.0000 2,207.733 4 2,207.733 4 0.7140 2,225.584 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 19 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0731 0.0607 0.5180 1.3300e- 003 0.1483 9.5000e- 004 0.1492 0.0393 8.8000e- 004 0.0402 132.0941 132.0941 4.3700e- 003 132.2033 Total 0.0731 0.0607 0.5180 1.3300e- 003 0.1483 9.5000e- 004 0.1492 0.0393 8.8000e- 004 0.0402 132.0941 132.0941 4.3700e- 003 132.2033 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 82.9484 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2422 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 Total 83.1906 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 20 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.4778 0.3969 3.3844 8.6700e- 003 1.8110 6.2000e- 003 1.8172 0.4637 5.7200e- 003 0.4694 863.0146 863.0146 0.0285 863.7281 Total 0.4778 0.3969 3.3844 8.6700e- 003 1.8110 6.2000e- 003 1.8172 0.4637 5.7200e- 003 0.4694 863.0146 863.0146 0.0285 863.7281 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 82.9484 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2422 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 Total 83.1906 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 21 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Increase Density Increase Diversity Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Pedestrian Network 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.4778 0.3969 3.3844 8.6700e- 003 1.8110 6.2000e- 003 1.8172 0.4637 5.7200e- 003 0.4694 863.0146 863.0146 0.0285 863.7281 Total 0.4778 0.3969 3.3844 8.6700e- 003 1.8110 6.2000e- 003 1.8172 0.4637 5.7200e- 003 0.4694 863.0146 863.0146 0.0285 863.7281 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 22 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 3.8415 14.9878 40.7608 0.1030 9.3216 0.1129 9.4345 2.4908 0.1061 2.5969 10,378.21 81 10,378.21 81 0.4586 10,389.68 36 Unmitigated 3.9789 16.1075 44.0047 0.1147 10.4619 0.1247 10.5866 2.7955 0.1171 2.9126 11,559.435 3 11,559.435 3 0.4975 11,571.872 4 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Low Rise 1,389.42 1,546.29 1110.54 3,486,991 3,106,909 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Regional Shopping Center 626.33 697.55 500.33 893,053 795,710 Total 2,015.75 2,243.84 1,610.87 4,380,044 3,902,619 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 13.00 5.00 5.00 35.80 21.00 43.20 86 11 3 Parking Lot 13.00 5.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Regional Shopping Center 13.00 5.00 5.00 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 23 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0992 0.8486 0.3657 5.4100e- 003 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 1,082.402 3 1,082.402 3 0.0208 0.0198 1,088.834 5 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0992 0.8486 0.3657 5.4100e- 003 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 1,082.402 3 1,082.402 3 0.0208 0.0198 1,088.834 5 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.567875 0.030811 0.198391 0.124124 0.028385 0.006896 0.012949 0.019383 0.002368 0.001236 0.005232 0.000797 0.001552 Parking Lot 0.567875 0.030811 0.198391 0.124124 0.028385 0.006896 0.012949 0.019383 0.002368 0.001236 0.005232 0.000797 0.001552 Regional Shopping Center 0.567875 0.030811 0.198391 0.124124 0.028385 0.006896 0.012949 0.019383 0.002368 0.001236 0.005232 0.000797 0.001552 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 24 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low Rise 9086.31 0.0980 0.8374 0.3563 5.3400e- 003 0.0677 0.0677 0.0677 0.0677 1,068.977 7 1,068.977 7 0.0205 0.0196 1,075.330 1 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 114.11 1.2300e- 003 0.0112 9.4000e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.5000e- 004 8.5000e- 004 8.5000e- 004 8.5000e- 004 13.4247 13.4247 2.6000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 13.5044 Total 0.0992 0.8486 0.3657 5.4100e- 003 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 1,082.402 3 1,082.402 3 0.0208 0.0199 1,088.834 5 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low Rise 9.08631 0.0980 0.8374 0.3563 5.3400e- 003 0.0677 0.0677 0.0677 0.0677 1,068.977 7 1,068.977 7 0.0205 0.0196 1,075.330 1 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 0.11411 1.2300e- 003 0.0112 9.4000e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.5000e- 004 8.5000e- 004 8.5000e- 004 8.5000e- 004 13.4247 13.4247 2.6000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 13.5044 Total 0.0992 0.8486 0.3657 5.4100e- 003 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 0.0686 1,082.402 3 1,082.402 3 0.0208 0.0199 1,088.834 5 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 25 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter Use Electric Lawnmower Use Electric Leafblower Use Electric Chainsaw Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Exterior Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Interior Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior No Hearths Installed Use Low VOC Cleaning Supplies 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 6.1134 0.1880 15.6628 7.1000e- 004 0.0845 0.0845 0.0845 0.0845 0.0000 25.9276 25.9276 0.0188 0.0000 26.3977 Unmitigated 6.8354 0.2380 20.6257 1.0900e- 003 0.1136 0.1136 0.1136 0.1136 0.0000 37.0713 37.0713 0.0361 0.0000 37.9728 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 26 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.4545 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 5.7535 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.6274 0.2380 20.6257 1.0900e- 003 0.1136 0.1136 0.1136 0.1136 37.0713 37.0713 0.0361 37.9728 Total 6.8354 0.2380 20.6257 1.0900e- 003 0.1136 0.1136 0.1136 0.1136 0.0000 37.0713 37.0713 0.0361 0.0000 37.9728 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 27 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.4545 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 5.3271 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.3317 0.1880 15.6628 7.1000e- 004 0.0845 0.0845 0.0845 0.0845 25.9276 25.9276 0.0188 26.3977 Total 6.1134 0.1880 15.6628 7.1000e- 004 0.0845 0.0845 0.0845 0.0845 0.0000 25.9276 25.9276 0.0188 0.0000 26.3977 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 28 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 11.0 Vegetation Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:53 AMPage 29 of 29 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Winter 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 356.00 Space 3.20 142,400.00 0 Apartments Low Rise 249.00 Dwelling Unit 6.90 249,000.00 712 Regional Shopping Center 17.50 1000sqft 0.00 17,500.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 4 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)3.2 44 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company 2021Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 641.35 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Tank Farm Project (Proposed) San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 1 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual Project Characteristics - Land Use - Mixed Use - No Lot acreage for retail - all contained in residential Construction Phase - no demolition of coaches, extended arch coating (refer to IS-MND discussion) Trips and VMT - Grading - 25,000 cubic yards of fill, 10.1 acre development Architectural Coating - 2016 CalGreen Building Code - 50 g/l Vehicle Trips - vehicle trips from Traffic Study (includes reductions) Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors - Woodstoves - no woodstove Area Coating - 2016 CalGreen Building Code - 50 g/l Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Area Mitigation - Energy Mitigation - Water Mitigation - Waste Mitigation - Fleet Mix - Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Parking 150.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250 50 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250 50 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 2 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 2.0 Emissions Summary tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Parking 150 50 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Exterior 250 50 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Interior 250 50 tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintParkingCheck False True tblEnergyUse LightingElect 0.35 0.88 tblEnergyUse LightingElect 5.25 5.38 tblEnergyUse NT24E 3,172.76 3,418.36 tblEnergyUse T24E 365.68 431.22 tblEnergyUse T24E 2.76 2.89 tblEnergyUse T24NG 7,043.85 10,164.29 tblEnergyUse T24NG 2.37 2.38 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 75.00 10.10 tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 25,000.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 15.56 6.90 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.40 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.21 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 39.86 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 4.46 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 28.59 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.58 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 35.79 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 60.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 2,016.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 3 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2019 0.7537 5.8463 5.6913 0.0144 2.1480 0.2046 2.3527 0.5981 0.1915 0.7896 0.0000 1,315.353 2 1,315.353 2 0.1398 0.0000 1,318.847 4 2020 1.2012 2.4234 2.9616 7.6200e- 003 1.2516 0.0821 1.3337 0.3177 0.0771 0.3948 0.0000 692.4299 692.4299 0.0622 0.0000 693.9847 Maximum 1.2012 5.8463 5.6913 0.0144 2.1480 0.2046 2.3527 0.5981 0.1915 0.7896 0.0000 1,315.353 2 1,315.353 2 0.1398 0.0000 1,318.847 4 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2019 0.7537 5.8463 5.6913 0.0144 2.1480 0.2046 2.3527 0.5981 0.1915 0.7896 0.0000 1,315.352 8 1,315.352 8 0.1398 0.0000 1,318.847 0 2020 1.2012 2.4234 2.9616 7.6200e- 003 1.2516 0.0821 1.3337 0.3177 0.0771 0.3948 0.0000 692.4297 692.4297 0.0622 0.0000 693.9846 Maximum 1.2012 5.8463 5.6913 0.0144 2.1480 0.2046 2.3527 0.5981 0.1915 0.7896 0.0000 1,315.352 8 1,315.352 8 0.1398 0.0000 1,318.847 0 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 4 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 1.2365 0.0393 3.4033 1.8000e- 004 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 5.5490 5.5490 5.4000e- 003 0.0000 5.6840 Energy 0.0181 0.1549 0.0667 9.9000e- 004 0.0125 0.0125 0.0125 0.0125 0.0000 608.9563 608.9563 0.0229 7.3100e- 003 611.7051 Mobile 0.6281 2.6050 6.9530 0.0187 1.6456 0.0200 1.6656 0.4407 0.0188 0.4594 0.0000 1,706.166 3 1,706.166 3 0.0719 0.0000 1,707.963 8 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 26.9816 0.0000 26.9816 1.5946 0.0000 66.8457 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.5582 38.8008 44.3589 0.5726 0.0138 62.7998 Total 1.8827 2.7991 10.4230 0.0198 1.6456 0.0512 1.6968 0.4407 0.0500 0.4907 32.5397 2,359.472 4 2,392.012 1 2.2674 0.0212 2,454.998 4 Unmitigated Operational Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-25-2019 4-24-2019 2.1971 2.1971 2 4-25-2019 7-24-2019 1.5779 1.5779 3 7-25-2019 10-24-2019 1.6026 1.6026 4 10-25-2019 1-24-2020 1.5839 1.5839 5 1-25-2020 4-24-2020 1.4497 1.4497 6 4-25-2020 7-24-2020 1.3737 1.3737 7 7-25-2020 9-30-2020 0.3976 0.3976 Highest 2.1971 2.1971 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 5 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 1.1099 0.0310 2.5844 1.2000e- 004 0.0139 0.0139 0.0139 0.0139 0.0000 3.8810 3.8810 2.8200e- 003 0.0000 3.9514 Energy 0.0181 0.1549 0.0667 9.9000e- 004 0.0125 0.0125 0.0125 0.0125 0.0000 608.9563 608.9563 0.0229 7.3100e- 003 611.7051 Mobile 0.6060 2.4243 6.4270 0.0168 1.4662 0.0181 1.4843 0.3926 0.0170 0.4096 0.0000 1,532.243 4 1,532.243 4 0.0662 0.0000 1,533.898 0 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 26.9816 0.0000 26.9816 1.5946 0.0000 66.8457 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.5582 38.8008 44.3589 0.5726 0.0138 62.7998 Total 1.7340 2.6101 9.0781 0.0179 1.4662 0.0445 1.5108 0.3926 0.0434 0.4361 32.5397 2,183.881 4 2,216.421 2 2.2591 0.0212 2,279.199 9 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 7.90 6.75 12.90 9.89 10.90 13.08 10.97 10.90 13.19 11.13 0.00 7.44 7.34 0.37 0.00 7.16 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 6 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/25/2019 2/21/2019 5 20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 2/22/2019 3/7/2019 5 10 3 Grading Grading 3/8/2019 4/18/2019 5 30 4 Building Construction Building Construction 4/19/2019 6/11/2020 5 300 5 Paving Paving 6/12/2020 7/9/2020 5 20 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 7/10/2020 8/6/2020 5 20 OffRoad Equipment Residential Indoor: 504,225; Residential Outdoor: 168,075; Non-Residential Indoor: 26,250; Non-Residential Outdoor: 8,750; Striped Parking Area: 8,544 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 10.1 Acres of Paving: 3.2 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 7 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 8 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0351 0.3578 0.2206 3.9000e- 004 0.0180 0.0180 0.0167 0.0167 0.0000 34.6263 34.6263 9.6300e- 003 0.0000 34.8672 Total 0.0351 0.3578 0.2206 3.9000e- 004 0.0180 0.0180 0.0167 0.0167 0.0000 34.6263 34.6263 9.6300e- 003 0.0000 34.8672 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 3,125.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 245.00 53.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 245.00 53.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 245.00 53.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 49.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 49.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 9 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.2000e- 004 6.8000e- 004 5.8600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.2467 1.2467 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2479 Total 7.2000e- 004 6.8000e- 004 5.8600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.2467 1.2467 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2479 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0351 0.3578 0.2206 3.9000e- 004 0.0180 0.0180 0.0167 0.0167 0.0000 34.6263 34.6263 9.6300e- 003 0.0000 34.8671 Total 0.0351 0.3578 0.2206 3.9000e- 004 0.0180 0.0180 0.0167 0.0167 0.0000 34.6263 34.6263 9.6300e- 003 0.0000 34.8671 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 10 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.2000e- 004 6.8000e- 004 5.8600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.2467 1.2467 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2479 Total 7.2000e- 004 6.8000e- 004 5.8600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.2467 1.2467 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2479 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0903 0.0000 0.0903 0.0497 0.0000 0.0497 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0217 0.2279 0.1103 1.9000e- 004 0.0120 0.0120 0.0110 0.0110 0.0000 17.0843 17.0843 5.4100e- 003 0.0000 17.2195 Total 0.0217 0.2279 0.1103 1.9000e- 004 0.0903 0.0120 0.1023 0.0497 0.0110 0.0607 0.0000 17.0843 17.0843 5.4100e- 003 0.0000 17.2195 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 11 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.3000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 3.5200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.7480 0.7480 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.7487 Total 4.3000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 3.5200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.7480 0.7480 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.7487 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0903 0.0000 0.0903 0.0497 0.0000 0.0497 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0217 0.2279 0.1103 1.9000e- 004 0.0120 0.0120 0.0110 0.0110 0.0000 17.0843 17.0843 5.4100e- 003 0.0000 17.2195 Total 0.0217 0.2279 0.1103 1.9000e- 004 0.0903 0.0120 0.1023 0.0497 0.0110 0.0607 0.0000 17.0843 17.0843 5.4100e- 003 0.0000 17.2195 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 12 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.3000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 3.5200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.7480 0.7480 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.7487 Total 4.3000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 3.5200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.7480 0.7480 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.7487 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0980 0.0000 0.0980 0.0506 0.0000 0.0506 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0711 0.8178 0.5007 9.3000e- 004 0.0357 0.0357 0.0329 0.0329 0.0000 83.5520 83.5520 0.0264 0.0000 84.2129 Total 0.0711 0.8178 0.5007 9.3000e- 004 0.0980 0.0357 0.1337 0.0506 0.0329 0.0835 0.0000 83.5520 83.5520 0.0264 0.0000 84.2129 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 13 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0161 0.5488 0.1190 1.2400e- 003 0.0266 3.2700e- 003 0.0299 7.3100e- 003 3.1200e- 003 0.0104 0.0000 121.2490 121.2490 6.8900e- 003 0.0000 121.4211 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.4400e- 003 1.3500e- 003 0.0117 3.0000e- 005 2.8900e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.9100e- 003 7.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 7.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.4934 2.4934 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.4957 Total 0.0175 0.5501 0.1307 1.2700e- 003 0.0295 3.2900e- 003 0.0328 8.0800e- 003 3.1400e- 003 0.0112 0.0000 123.7423 123.7423 6.9800e- 003 0.0000 123.9168 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0980 0.0000 0.0980 0.0506 0.0000 0.0506 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0711 0.8178 0.5007 9.3000e- 004 0.0357 0.0357 0.0329 0.0329 0.0000 83.5519 83.5519 0.0264 0.0000 84.2128 Total 0.0711 0.8178 0.5007 9.3000e- 004 0.0980 0.0357 0.1337 0.0506 0.0329 0.0835 0.0000 83.5519 83.5519 0.0264 0.0000 84.2128 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 14 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0161 0.5488 0.1190 1.2400e- 003 0.0266 3.2700e- 003 0.0299 7.3100e- 003 3.1200e- 003 0.0104 0.0000 121.2490 121.2490 6.8900e- 003 0.0000 121.4211 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.4400e- 003 1.3500e- 003 0.0117 3.0000e- 005 2.8900e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.9100e- 003 7.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 7.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.4934 2.4934 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.4957 Total 0.0175 0.5501 0.1307 1.2700e- 003 0.0295 3.2900e- 003 0.0328 8.0800e- 003 3.1400e- 003 0.0112 0.0000 123.7423 123.7423 6.9800e- 003 0.0000 123.9168 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.2161 1.9287 1.5705 2.4600e- 003 0.1180 0.1180 0.1110 0.1110 0.0000 215.1203 215.1203 0.0524 0.0000 216.4305 Total 0.2161 1.9287 1.5705 2.4600e- 003 0.1180 0.1180 0.1110 0.1110 0.0000 215.1203 215.1203 0.0524 0.0000 216.4305 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 15 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0681 1.6594 0.5206 2.9100e- 003 0.1594 0.0133 0.1726 0.0420 0.0127 0.0547 0.0000 280.2802 280.2802 0.0180 0.0000 280.7302 Worker 0.3230 0.3034 2.6285 6.1900e- 003 1.7685 4.4000e- 003 1.7729 0.4472 4.0600e- 003 0.4513 0.0000 558.9530 558.9530 0.0208 0.0000 559.4739 Total 0.3911 1.9629 3.1491 9.1000e- 003 1.9279 0.0177 1.9455 0.4892 0.0168 0.5060 0.0000 839.2331 839.2331 0.0388 0.0000 840.2041 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.2161 1.9287 1.5705 2.4600e- 003 0.1180 0.1180 0.1110 0.1110 0.0000 215.1201 215.1201 0.0524 0.0000 216.4302 Total 0.2161 1.9287 1.5705 2.4600e- 003 0.1180 0.1180 0.1110 0.1110 0.0000 215.1201 215.1201 0.0524 0.0000 216.4302 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 16 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0681 1.6594 0.5206 2.9100e- 003 0.1594 0.0133 0.1726 0.0420 0.0127 0.0547 0.0000 280.2802 280.2802 0.0180 0.0000 280.7302 Worker 0.3230 0.3034 2.6285 6.1900e- 003 1.7685 4.4000e- 003 1.7729 0.4472 4.0600e- 003 0.4513 0.0000 558.9530 558.9530 0.0208 0.0000 559.4739 Total 0.3911 1.9629 3.1491 9.1000e- 003 1.9279 0.0177 1.9455 0.4892 0.0168 0.5060 0.0000 839.2331 839.2331 0.0388 0.0000 840.2041 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.1240 1.1224 0.9856 1.5700e- 003 0.0654 0.0654 0.0614 0.0614 0.0000 135.4918 135.4918 0.0331 0.0000 136.3182 Total 0.1240 1.1224 0.9856 1.5700e- 003 0.0654 0.0654 0.0614 0.0614 0.0000 135.4918 135.4918 0.0331 0.0000 136.3182 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 17 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0346 0.9682 0.2933 1.8500e- 003 0.1019 5.2800e- 003 0.1072 0.0269 5.0500e- 003 0.0319 0.0000 178.9501 178.9501 0.0108 0.0000 179.2192 Worker 0.1880 0.1708 1.4790 3.8300e- 003 1.1307 2.7200e- 003 1.1334 0.2859 2.5100e- 003 0.2884 0.0000 346.3054 346.3054 0.0114 0.0000 346.5904 Total 0.2226 1.1391 1.7723 5.6800e- 003 1.2326 8.0000e- 003 1.2406 0.3128 7.5600e- 003 0.3203 0.0000 525.2555 525.2555 0.0222 0.0000 525.8096 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.1240 1.1224 0.9856 1.5700e- 003 0.0654 0.0654 0.0614 0.0614 0.0000 135.4917 135.4917 0.0331 0.0000 136.3181 Total 0.1240 1.1224 0.9856 1.5700e- 003 0.0654 0.0654 0.0614 0.0614 0.0000 135.4917 135.4917 0.0331 0.0000 136.3181 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 18 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0346 0.9682 0.2933 1.8500e- 003 0.1019 5.2800e- 003 0.1072 0.0269 5.0500e- 003 0.0319 0.0000 178.9501 178.9501 0.0108 0.0000 179.2192 Worker 0.1880 0.1708 1.4790 3.8300e- 003 1.1307 2.7200e- 003 1.1334 0.2859 2.5100e- 003 0.2884 0.0000 346.3054 346.3054 0.0114 0.0000 346.5904 Total 0.2226 1.1391 1.7723 5.6800e- 003 1.2326 8.0000e- 003 1.2406 0.3128 7.5600e- 003 0.3203 0.0000 525.2555 525.2555 0.0222 0.0000 525.8096 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0136 0.1407 0.1465 2.3000e- 004 7.5300e- 003 7.5300e- 003 6.9300e- 003 6.9300e- 003 0.0000 20.0282 20.0282 6.4800e- 003 0.0000 20.1902 Paving 4.1900e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0178 0.1407 0.1465 2.3000e- 004 7.5300e- 003 7.5300e- 003 6.9300e- 003 6.9300e- 003 0.0000 20.0282 20.0282 6.4800e- 003 0.0000 20.1902 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 19 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.6000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 5.1600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.2081 1.2081 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2091 Total 6.6000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 5.1600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.2081 1.2081 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2091 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0136 0.1407 0.1465 2.3000e- 004 7.5300e- 003 7.5300e- 003 6.9300e- 003 6.9300e- 003 0.0000 20.0282 20.0282 6.4800e- 003 0.0000 20.1901 Paving 4.1900e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0178 0.1407 0.1465 2.3000e- 004 7.5300e- 003 7.5300e- 003 6.9300e- 003 6.9300e- 003 0.0000 20.0282 20.0282 6.4800e- 003 0.0000 20.1901 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 20 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.6000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 5.1600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.2081 1.2081 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2091 Total 6.6000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 5.1600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.2081 1.2081 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2091 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.8295 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.4200e- 003 0.0168 0.0183 3.0000e- 005 1.1100e- 003 1.1100e- 003 1.1100e- 003 1.1100e- 003 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.5582 Total 0.8319 0.0168 0.0183 3.0000e- 005 1.1100e- 003 1.1100e- 003 1.1100e- 003 1.1100e- 003 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.5582 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 21 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.2900e- 003 3.8900e- 003 0.0337 9.0000e- 005 0.0176 6.0000e- 005 0.0177 4.5100e- 003 6.0000e- 005 4.5700e- 003 0.0000 7.8930 7.8930 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 7.8995 Total 4.2900e- 003 3.8900e- 003 0.0337 9.0000e- 005 0.0176 6.0000e- 005 0.0177 4.5100e- 003 6.0000e- 005 4.5700e- 003 0.0000 7.8930 7.8930 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 7.8995 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.8295 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.4200e- 003 0.0168 0.0183 3.0000e- 005 1.1100e- 003 1.1100e- 003 1.1100e- 003 1.1100e- 003 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.5582 Total 0.8319 0.0168 0.0183 3.0000e- 005 1.1100e- 003 1.1100e- 003 1.1100e- 003 1.1100e- 003 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.5582 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 22 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Increase Density Increase Diversity Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Pedestrian Network 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.2900e- 003 3.8900e- 003 0.0337 9.0000e- 005 0.0176 6.0000e- 005 0.0177 4.5100e- 003 6.0000e- 005 4.5700e- 003 0.0000 7.8930 7.8930 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 7.8995 Total 4.2900e- 003 3.8900e- 003 0.0337 9.0000e- 005 0.0176 6.0000e- 005 0.0177 4.5100e- 003 6.0000e- 005 4.5700e- 003 0.0000 7.8930 7.8930 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 7.8995 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 23 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.6060 2.4243 6.4270 0.0168 1.4662 0.0181 1.4843 0.3926 0.0170 0.4096 0.0000 1,532.243 4 1,532.243 4 0.0662 0.0000 1,533.898 0 Unmitigated 0.6281 2.6050 6.9530 0.0187 1.6456 0.0200 1.6656 0.4407 0.0188 0.4594 0.0000 1,706.166 3 1,706.166 3 0.0719 0.0000 1,707.963 8 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Low Rise 1,389.42 1,546.29 1110.54 3,486,991 3,106,909 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Regional Shopping Center 626.33 697.55 500.33 893,053 795,710 Total 2,015.75 2,243.84 1,610.87 4,380,044 3,902,619 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 13.00 5.00 5.00 35.80 21.00 43.20 86 11 3 Parking Lot 13.00 5.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Regional Shopping Center 13.00 5.00 5.00 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 24 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 429.7525 429.7525 0.0194 4.0200e- 003 431.4364 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 429.7525 429.7525 0.0194 4.0200e- 003 431.4364 NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0181 0.1549 0.0667 9.9000e- 004 0.0125 0.0125 0.0125 0.0125 0.0000 179.2038 179.2038 3.4300e- 003 3.2900e- 003 180.2688 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0181 0.1549 0.0667 9.9000e- 004 0.0125 0.0125 0.0125 0.0125 0.0000 179.2038 179.2038 3.4300e- 003 3.2900e- 003 180.2688 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.567875 0.030811 0.198391 0.124124 0.028385 0.006896 0.012949 0.019383 0.002368 0.001236 0.005232 0.000797 0.001552 Parking Lot 0.567875 0.030811 0.198391 0.124124 0.028385 0.006896 0.012949 0.019383 0.002368 0.001236 0.005232 0.000797 0.001552 Regional Shopping Center 0.567875 0.030811 0.198391 0.124124 0.028385 0.006896 0.012949 0.019383 0.002368 0.001236 0.005232 0.000797 0.001552 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 25 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Apartments Low Rise 3.3165e +006 0.0179 0.1528 0.0650 9.8000e- 004 0.0124 0.0124 0.0124 0.0124 0.0000 176.9812 176.9812 3.3900e- 003 3.2400e- 003 178.0330 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 41650 2.2000e- 004 2.0400e- 003 1.7200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.2226 2.2226 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 2.2358 Total 0.0181 0.1549 0.0668 9.9000e- 004 0.0125 0.0125 0.0125 0.0125 0.0000 179.2038 179.2038 3.4300e- 003 3.2800e- 003 180.2688 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Apartments Low Rise 3.3165e +006 0.0179 0.1528 0.0650 9.8000e- 004 0.0124 0.0124 0.0124 0.0124 0.0000 176.9812 176.9812 3.3900e- 003 3.2400e- 003 178.0330 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 41650 2.2000e- 004 2.0400e- 003 1.7200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.2226 2.2226 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 2.2358 Total 0.0181 0.1549 0.0668 9.9000e- 004 0.0125 0.0125 0.0125 0.0125 0.0000 179.2038 179.2038 3.4300e- 003 3.2800e- 003 180.2688 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 26 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 6.0 Area Detail 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Apartments Low Rise 1.16033e +006 337.5519 0.0153 3.1600e- 003 338.8745 Parking Lot 125312 36.4547 1.6500e- 003 3.4000e- 004 36.5975 Regional Shopping Center 191625 55.7459 2.5200e- 003 5.2000e- 004 55.9643 Total 429.7525 0.0194 4.0200e- 003 431.4364 Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Apartments Low Rise 1.16033e +006 337.5519 0.0153 3.1600e- 003 338.8745 Parking Lot 125312 36.4547 1.6500e- 003 3.4000e- 004 36.5975 Regional Shopping Center 191625 55.7459 2.5200e- 003 5.2000e- 004 55.9643 Total 429.7525 0.0194 4.0200e- 003 431.4364 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 27 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual Use Electric Lawnmower Use Electric Leafblower Use Electric Chainsaw Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Exterior Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Interior Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior No Hearths Installed Use Low VOC Cleaning Supplies 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 1.1099 0.0310 2.5844 1.2000e- 004 0.0139 0.0139 0.0139 0.0139 0.0000 3.8810 3.8810 2.8200e- 003 0.0000 3.9514 Unmitigated 1.2365 0.0393 3.4033 1.8000e- 004 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 5.5490 5.5490 5.4000e- 003 0.0000 5.6840 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 28 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0830 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.0500 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.1035 0.0393 3.4033 1.8000e- 004 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 5.5490 5.5490 5.4000e- 003 0.0000 5.6840 Total 1.2365 0.0393 3.4033 1.8000e- 004 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 5.5490 5.5490 5.4000e- 003 0.0000 5.6840 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 29 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0830 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.9722 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0547 0.0310 2.5844 1.2000e- 004 0.0139 0.0139 0.0139 0.0139 0.0000 3.8810 3.8810 2.8200e- 003 0.0000 3.9514 Total 1.1099 0.0310 2.5844 1.2000e- 004 0.0139 0.0139 0.0139 0.0139 0.0000 3.8810 3.8810 2.8200e- 003 0.0000 3.9514 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 30 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 44.3589 0.5726 0.0138 62.7998 Unmitigated 44.3589 0.5726 0.0138 62.7998 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Apartments Low Rise 16.2234 / 10.2278 41.0983 0.5303 0.0128 58.1748 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 1.29627 / 0.794488 3.2607 0.0424 1.0200e- 003 4.6250 Total 44.3589 0.5726 0.0138 62.7998 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 31 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Apartments Low Rise 16.2234 / 10.2278 41.0983 0.5303 0.0128 58.1748 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 1.29627 / 0.794488 3.2607 0.0424 1.0200e- 003 4.6250 Total 44.3589 0.5726 0.0138 62.7998 Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 32 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 26.9816 1.5946 0.0000 66.8457 Unmitigated 26.9816 1.5946 0.0000 66.8457 Category/Year 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Apartments Low Rise 114.54 23.2506 1.3741 0.0000 57.6023 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 18.38 3.7310 0.2205 0.0000 9.2433 Total 26.9816 1.5946 0.0000 66.8457 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 33 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Apartments Low Rise 114.54 23.2506 1.3741 0.0000 57.6023 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 18.38 3.7310 0.2205 0.0000 9.2433 Total 26.9816 1.5946 0.0000 66.8457 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 34 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/28/2019 7:51 AMPage 35 of 35 Tank Farm Project (Proposed) - San Luis Obispo County APCD Air District, Annual Greenhouse Gas Emission Worksheet N 2 O Mobile Emissions Tank Farm Project - Proposed Project From CalEEMod: Annual VMT:4,380,044 Vehicle Type Percent Type CH4 Emission Factor (g/mile)* CH4 Emission (g/mile)** N2O Emission Factor (g/mile)* N2O Emission (g/mile)** Light Auto 56.8%0.04 0.022716 0.04 0.022716 Light Truck < 3750 lbs 3.1%0.05 0.00154 0.06 0.001848 Light Truck 3751-5750 lbs 19.8%0.05 0.00992 0.06 0.011904 Med Truck 5751-8500 lbs 12.4%0.12 0.014892 0.2 0.02482 Lite-Heavy Truck 8501-10,000 lbs 2.8%0.12 0.003408 0.2 0.00568 Lite-Heavy Truck 10,001-14,000 lbs 0.7%0.09 0.000621 0.125 0.0008625 Med-Heavy Truck 14,001-33,000 lbs 1.3%0.06 0.000774 0.05 0.000645 Heavy-Heavy Truck 33,001-60,000 lbs 1.9%0.06 0.001164 0.05 0.00097 Other Bus 0.2%0.06 0.000144 0.05 0.00012 Urban Bus 0.1%0.06 0.000072 0.05 0.00006 Motorcycle 0.5%0.09 0.000468 0.01 0.000052 School Bus 0.1%0.06 0.000048 0.05 0.00004 Motor Home 0.2%0.09 0.000144 0.125 0.0002 Total 100.0%0.055911 0.0699175 Total Emissions (metric tons) = Emission Factor by Vehicle Mix (g/mi) x Annual VMT(mi) x 0.000001 metric tons/g Conversion to Carbon Dioxide Equivalency (CO2e) Units based on Global Warming Potential (GWP) CH4 21 GWP N2O 310 GWP 1 ton (short, US) =0.90718474 metric ton Annual Mobile Emissions: Total Emissions Total CO2e units N20 Emissions:0.3062 metric tons N2O 94.93 metric tons CO2e Project Total:94.93 metric tons CO2e References * from Table C.4: Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emission Factors for Mobile Sources by Vehicle and Fuel Type (g/mile). in California Climate Action Registry General Reporting Protocol, Reporting Entity-Wide Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Version 3.1, January 2009. Assume Model year 2000-present, gasoline fueled. ** Source: California Climate Action Registry General Reporting Protocol, Reporting Entity-Wide Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Version 3.1, January 2009. Appendix B Biological Resource Assessment (BRA) & Jurisdictional Delineation (JD) 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use Biological Resources Assessment prepared for City of San Luis Obispo 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Contact: Rachel Cohen, City Planner prepared by Rincon Consultants, Inc. 1530 Monterey Street, Suite D San Luis Obispo, California 93401 August 2018 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use Biological Resources Assessment prepared for City of San Luis Obispo 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Contact: Rachel Cohen, City Planner prepared by Rincon Consultants, Inc. 1530 Monterey Street, Suite D San Luis Obispo, California 93401 August 2018 Table of Contents Biological Resources Assessment i Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Project Location .................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Project Description .............................................................................................................. 3 2 Methodology.................................................................................................................................. 7 2.1 Regulatory Overview ........................................................................................................... 7 2.1.1 Environmental Statutes ......................................................................................... 7 2.1.2 Guidelines for Determining CEQA Significance ...................................................... 7 2.2 Literature Review ................................................................................................................ 8 2.3 Field Reconnaissance Surveys ............................................................................................. 9 2.4 Jurisdictional Delineation .................................................................................................... 9 3 Existing Conditions ....................................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Physical Characteristics ..................................................................................................... 11 3.1.1 Watershed and Drainages .................................................................................... 11 3.1.2 Soils ...................................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Vegetation/Land Cover Types ........................................................................................... 14 3.3 General Wildlife ................................................................................................................ 18 4 Sensitive Biological Resources ..................................................................................................... 19 4.1 Special Status Species ....................................................................................................... 19 4.1.1 Special Status Plant Species ................................................................................. 19 4.1.2 Special Status Wildlife Species ............................................................................. 20 4.2 Sensitive Plant Communities and Critical Habitats ........................................................... 23 4.3 Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands ................................................................................. 24 4.4 Wildlife Movement ........................................................................................................... 27 4.5 Resources Protected By Local Policies and Ordinances .................................................... 27 5 Impact Analysis and Mitigation Measures ................................................................................... 30 5.1 Special-Status Species ....................................................................................................... 30 5.2 Sensitive Plant Communities ............................................................................................ 37 5.3 Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands ................................................................................. 37 5.4 Wildlife Movement ........................................................................................................... 39 5.5 Local Policies and Ordinances ........................................................................................... 39 5.6 Adopted or Approved Plans .............................................................................................. 40 6 Limitations, Assumptions, and Use Reliance ............................................................................... 41 7 References ................................................................................................................................... 42 8 List of Preparers ........................................................................................................................... 44 City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use ii Tables Table 1 Summary of Vegetation/Land Cover Types within the Study Area .................................. 14 Table 2 Summary of Jurisdictional Areas within the Study Area ................................................... 25 Figures Figure 1 Regional Location Map ....................................................................................................... 4 Figure 2 Study Area ........................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 3 Top of Bank/Edge of Riparian Dripline and 35 Foot Setback ............................................ 13 Figure 4 Vegetation Communities/Land Cover Types within the Study Area ................................ 16 Figure 5 Jurisdictional Waters ......................................................................................................... 26 Appendices Appendix A Regulatory Setting Appendix B Site Photographs Appendix C Floral and Faunal Compendium Appendix D Special Status Species Evaluation Tables Executive Summary Biological Resources Assessment 1 Executive Summary Rincon Consultants, Inc. has prepared this biological resources assessment to document existing conditions, summarize a previous biological resource report and study, and provide a basis for evaluation of potential impacts to special status and sensitive biological resources during development of a mixed use project located at 650 Tank Farm Road in the City of San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California. The 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed-Use Project (project) is generally located in the southern portion of the City of San Luis Obispo, north of the intersection of Tank Farm Road and Santa Fe Road. The project site is designated Assessor’s Parcel Number 053-421-005. The project is a proposed mixed use development that would include 17,500 square feet of commercial space and 249 residential units. The project includes the development of 15 three-story residential buildings comprised of studios, one and two bedroom apartments, and four three-story mixed-use buildings containing 17,500 square feet of commercial use, and 13,530 square feet of residential use. The mixed-use buildings would be located on the southern portion of the site, along Tank Farm Road, with the residential buildings situated to the north, further from Tank Farm Road. The project includes an indoor/outdoor clubhouse near the center of the site. A pool and an outdoor recreational space would be located adjacent to the clubhouse. The conceptual site plan for the project includes potential access to the project site through the Digital West property to the west and through the Nick Tompkins property to the east. Access to the project site through the Digital West property to the west may involve modifications, including widening, to the existing crossing over Acacia Creek along the western portion of the project site. Access to the project site through the Nick Tompkins property to the east would involve construction of a new creek crossing over Orcutt Creek along the southeastern portion of the project site. The potential Orcutt Creek crossing would provide a connection to northern side of the existing signalized intersection at the Tank Farm Road/MindBody intersection. The project would also widen Tank Farm Road to accommodate circulation and traffic turning into and out of the project site. In addition, future development of the project site under the proposed rezone may include a pedestrian/bicycle access path from the northern site boundary to the existing pedestrian/bicycle paths at the Damon Garcia-Sports Fields. Seven vegetation communities / habitat types were observed within the Study Area during the biological field survey: riparian woodland, eucalyptus grove, Bermuda grass lawn, fennel patches, non-native annual grassland, herbaceous wetland, and developed/landscaped/disturbed areas. Orcutt Creek crosses the northeastern and southeastern boundaries of the Study Area. Acacia Creek runs along the western boundary of the Study Area and crosses the Study Area at the Digital West crossing. Orcutt Creek and Acacia Creek contain approximately 1.74 acres of lake and streambed (below top of bank) and associated riparian habitat, subject to the jurisdiction of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Approximately 0.14 acre of wetlands and 0.05 acre (1484 linear feet) of other waters potentially under the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Regional Water Quality Control Board jurisdictions (Clean Water Act Sections 404 and 401, respectively) are present in the Study Area. This project is anticipated to require a Nationwide Permit from the United States Army Corps of Engineers pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and a Water Quality Certification from City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 2 the Regional Water Quality Control Board pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. Likewise, the proposed project is expected to require a Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Widening of the existing crossing over Acacia Creek, the development of a new crossing over Orcutt Creek, and the addition of a pedestrian/bicycle access path from the northern site boundary to the existing pedestrian/bicycle paths at the Damon Garcia-Sports Fields may result in direct and indirect impacts to potentially jurisdictional areas. The project is expected to adhere to Section 17.16.025 of the City Zoning Regulations, which requires a structure setback of 35 feet from the top of bank or edge of riparian drip line, whichever is farther from the creeks. Direct and indirect impacts to potentially jurisdictional areas would be minimized through proposed avoidance and minimization measures incorporated into the project, and permanent impacts to jurisdictional areas would be offset through mitigation. The project site contains suitable habitat for six special status plant species: San Luis Obispo sedge (Carex obispoensis), Hoover’s button-celery (Eryngium aristulatum var. hooveri), black-flowered figwort (Scrophularia atrata), Cambria morning-glory (Calystegia subacaulis ssp. episcopalis), San Luis Obispo owl’s-clover (Castilleja densiflora ssp. obispoensis), and Adobe sanicle (Sanicula maritima). Specifically, suitable habitat occurs within the margins adjacent to Orcutt Creek, Acacia Creek, and the wetland and grassland on the northern portion of the site. Direct impacts to these plant species would be minimized and/or avoided with implementation of conservation measures described in Section 5 of this document. These measures include clearance surveys prior to disturbance in suitable habitat and implementation of avoidance buffers if special status plant species are found. Eleven special status wildlife species have potential to be impacted by project related activities. These include pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus), loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus), purple martin (Progne subis), golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), white-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus), American bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), western pond turtle (Actinemys (=Emys) marmorata), coast range newt (Taricha torosa torosa), two-striped garter snake (Thamnophis hammondii), South-central California Coast distinct population segment steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus), and California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii). In addition, vegetation with and adjacent to the project site offers potential nesting habitat for bird species that are protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code. Direct and indirect impacts to these species are not expected with proposed avoidance and minimization measures incorporated into the project. Introduction Biological Resources Assessment 3 1 Introduction Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Rincon) prepared this Biological Resources Assessment (BRA) to document the existing conditions within the project site, evaluate the potential for project-related impacts to biological resources, and recommend measures to avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts to such resources prior to, during, and following implementation of the 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use Project (Project) located in the City of San Luis Obispo (City), San Luis Obispo County, California. The purpose of this document is to confirm the accuracy of an applicant-provided study, provide additional technical information and impact analysis, and to review the project in sufficient detail to determine to what extent the project may impact special status species and sensitive natural communities. Specifically, this document has been prepared to meet the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental review process for biological resources. 1.1 Project Location The project site is located at 650 Tank Farm Road, north of the intersection of Tank Farm Road and Santa Fe Road in the southern portion of the City of San Luis Obispo (Figure 1). The project site is designated Assessor’s Parcel Number 053-421-005. The approximate center of the project site occurs at latitude 35°14’54.56”N and longitude 120°38’49.37”W (WGS-84 datum). The project site is within both the San Luis Obispo and Pismo Beach, California United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangles. The Public Land Survey System depicts the project site within the Mt. Diablo Meridian, Township 31S, Range 12E, Section 12. The BRA study area, hereinafter referred to as the “Study Area”, was defined for the Project that is extensive enough to include all project components, including access points, laydown yards, potential off-site access improvements, and areas of permanent and temporary disturbance. The Study Area analyzed in this report encompasses roughly 14.12 acres (Figure 2). 1.2 Project Description The project would include a rezone of the Business Park portion of the site (3.25 acres), and the Medium-Density Residential portion of the site (6.85 acres). The rezoning would result in a net site area of 10.1 acres designated Service Commercial with the Specific Plan overlay (C-S-SP). The 2.65- acre remainder of the 12.75-acre site is zoned Conservation Open Space (C/OS-SP) and includes the site’s two creek corridors. The project would include an amendment to the Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP) to delete the existing Medium Density Residential designation discussion related to the mobile home park and density. The project would develop the site with a mixed-use project that would include 17,500 square feet of commercial space and 249 residential units. The project includes the development of 15 three- story residential buildings comprised of studios, one and two bedroom apartments, and four three- story mixed-use buildings containing 17,500 square feet of commercial use, and 13,530 square feet of residential use. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 4 Figure 1 Regional Location Map Introduction Biological Resources Assessment 5 Figure 2 Study Area City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 6 The mixed-use buildings would be located on the southern portion of the site, along Tank Farm Road, with the residential buildings situated to the north, further from Tank Farm Road. Other Project Components The project includes an indoor/outdoor clubhouse near the center of the site. A pool and an outdoor recreational space would be located adjacent to the clubhouse. A landscape buffer zone/stormwater collection basin would be located between the four mixed-use buildings and the 15 residential buildings. In addition to development, the project would require periodic vegetation management around the perimeter of the development (e.g., pruning trees). Potential Off-Site Access Improvements The conceptual site plan for the project includes potential access to the project site through the Digital West property to the west and through the Nick Tompkins property to the east. Access to the project site through the Digital West property to the west may involve modifications, including widening, to the existing crossing over Acacia Creek along the western portion of the project site. Access to the project site through the Nick Tompkins property to the east would involve construction of a new creek crossing over Orcutt Creek along the southeastern portion of the project site. The potential Orcutt Creek crossing would provide a connection to northern side of the existing signalized intersection at the Tank Farm Road/MindBody intersection. The project would also widen Tank Farm Road to accommodate circulation and traffic turning into and out of the project site. In addition, future development of the project site under the proposed rezone may include a pedestrian/bicycle access path from the northern site boundary to the existing pedestrian/bicycle paths at the Damon Garcia-Sports Fields. Methodology Biological Resources Assessment 7 2 Methodology 2.1 Regulatory Overview Regulated or sensitive resources studied and analyzed herein include special status plant and animal species, nesting birds and raptors, sensitive plant communities, jurisdictional waters, wildlife movement, and locally protected resources, such as protected trees. Regulatory authority over biological resources is shared by Federal, State, and local authorities. Primary authority for regulation of general biological resources lies within the land use control and planning authority of local jurisdictions (in this instance, the City of San Luis Obispo). 2.1.1 Environmental Statutes For the purpose of this report, potential impacts to biological resources were analyzed based on the following statutes: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) California Fish and Game Code (CFGC) Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act City Tree Protection Policies City Zoning Regulations A discussion of resources regulated within this framework is provided in Section 5. Final quantification of impacts and mitigation measures will depend on final project design. 2.1.2 Guidelines for Determining CEQA Significance The following threshold criteria, as defined by the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G Initial Study Checklist, were used to evaluate potential environmental effects. Based on these criteria, the project would have a significant effect on biological resources if it would: a) Have substantial adverse effects, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 8 c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan. 2.2 Literature Review Queries of the USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation System (IPaC; 2017b), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB; 2017), and the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Online Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (2017) were conducted to obtain comprehensive information regarding State and Federally listed species, as well as other special status species, considered to have potential to occur within the San Luis Obispo and Pismo Beach, California USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangles and the surrounding eight quadrangles (Arroyo Grande NE, Atascadero, Lopez Mtn., Morro Bay North, Morro Bay South, Oceano, Port San Luis, and Santa Margarita).The results of these scientific database queries were compiled into a table that is presented as Appendix D. In addition, the following resources were reviewed for information about the Study Area: Aerial photographs of the Study Area and vicinity; San Luis Obispo and Pismo Beach, California USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangles; United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey (2017); USFWS IpaC list of Federally listed species with potential to occur within the Study Area and vicinity (2017b); USFWS Critical Habitat Portal (2017ª); NMFS Critical Habitat (2017); CDFW CNDDB list of species status species documented within the San Luis Obispo and Pismo Beach, California USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangles and surrounding eight quadrangles (2017b); CDFW CNDDB map of State and Federally listed species that have been previously documented within a 5-mile (8-kilometer) radius of the Study Area (2017b); CNPS California Rare Plant Rank (CRPR) list of sensitive plant species reported to occur within the San Luis Obispo and Pismo Beach, California USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangles and/or surrounding 8 quadrangles (2017); and Terra Verde Environmental Consulting, LLC 2016 report, 650 Tank Farm Waters and Wetland Assessment, San Luis Obispo, California. Methodology Biological Resources Assessment 9 2.3 Field Reconnaissance Surveys Rincon Associate Biologist Jamie Deutsch conducted field reconnaissance surveys on October 24 and December 19, 2017. Mr. Deutsch surveyed the entire Study Area on foot and recorded all biological resources encountered on site. Additional vegetation mapping was conducted on August 8, 2018, to include information about off-site improvement areas not previously studied, particularly in the vicinity of the potential pedestrian path connection. Surveys were conducted to document the existing site conditions and to evaluate the potential for presence of sensitive biological resources, including sensitive plant and animal species, sensitive plant communities and habitat for nesting birds protected by Federal and State laws. The surveys were also conducted to confirm the accuracy of the 650 Tank Farm Waters and Wetlands Assessment prepared by Terra Verde Environmental Consulting, LLC. (Terra Verde, 2017). During the October 24 survey, an inventory of all plant and animal species observed was compiled (Appendix C) and an evaluation and confirmation of previously mapped potentially jurisdictional aquatic features was conducted. During the December 19 survey, the top of bank and edge of riparian dripline along Acacia Creek and Orcutt Creek was recorded with the use of a Global Positioning System (GPS) unit to confirm that the extent of these resources has been accurately displayed on project figures. Plant species nomenclature and taxonomy followed The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition (Baldwin et al., 2012). All plant species encountered were noted and identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level. The vegetation classification system used for this analysis is based on A Manual of California Vegetation, Second Edition (Sawyer et al., 2009) and Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Communities of California (Holland, 1986), but has been modified as needed to accurately describe the existing habitats observed on site. These vegetation communities were mapped onto aerial imagery depicting the Study Area and then later digitized using ArcGIS® (ESRI, 2017). Wildlife identification and nomenclature followed standard reference texts, including Sibley Birds West: Field Guide to Birds of Western North America (Sibley, 2016), Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians (Stebbins, 2003), and Mammals of North America (Bowers et al., 2004). The habitat requirements for each regionally occurring special status species were assessed and compared to the type and quality of the habitats observed within the Study Area during the field survey. Several sensitive species were eliminated from consideration as having potential to occur on site due to lack of suitable habitat, lack of suitable soils/substrate, and/or knowledge of regional distribution. The relative density of fossorial mammal burrows and soil characteristics throughout the site were also noted. 2.4 Jurisdictional Delineation In addition to the field reconnaissance surveys, Mr. Deutsch conducted a formal jurisdictional delineation of the Study Area on August 8, 2018. Current federal and state methods and guidelines were used to identify and delineate potentially jurisdictional aquatic resources such as streams and wetlands. Potential wetland features were evaluated for presence of wetland indicators, specifically including predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology, according to routine delineation procedure (USACE 1987; 2008a). Two sets of paired sample points were investigated. In addition, the Study Area was surveyed for any streams or other drainages that might City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 10 exhibit an ordinary high water mark (OHWM) and which might constitute waters of the U.S. (Lichvar et al. 2008), as well as having a defined channel, bed and banks and any adjacent riparian habitat that could be subject to CDFW jurisdiction under the CFGC. The entire Study Area was surveyed on foot for potential wetland and non-wetland jurisdictional areas, streambeds, and riparian resources. General site characteristics were noted and vegetation was documented. Extents of potential jurisdictional features and sample points were mapped using a Trimble Geo 7X Global Positioning System (GPS) with sub-meter accuracy, and were also plotted on aerial photographs. Data was recorded on Arid West Wetland Determination forms. For a complete description of the Jurisdictional Delineation methods and results, please refer to the Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands Delineation Report for the project (Rincon Consultants, Inc. 2018). Final jurisdictional determinations of the boundaries of waters and riparian habitats are made by each agency, typically at the time that authorizations to impact such features are requested. Existing Conditions Biological Resources Assessment 11 3 Existing Conditions This section summarizes the results of the reconnaissance-level field survey and literature review. Discussions regarding the general environmental setting, vegetation communities present, plants and animals observed, potential special status species issues, and other possible constraints regarding the biological resources on site are presented below. A complete list of all plant and animal species observed on site during the field survey is presented as Appendix C and representative photographs of the Study Area are provided in Appendix B. 3.1 Physical Characteristics The Study Area is located on the coastal side of the Coast Range in San Luis Obispo County, where the moderate climate typifies a Mediterranean climate throughout the year. The majority of rainfall occurs during the winter months. The Study Area is primarily developed. The majority of the project site is highly disturbed and developed due to the existing mobile home park and recreation vehicle (RV) parking lot. Natural vegetation within the Study Area is primarily associated with the drainages and riparian areas along Orcutt and Acacia Creeks. The Study Area is bordered by Tank Farm Road to the south, Orcutt Creek to the east, Acacia Creek to the west, and the Damon Garcia sports fields to the north. The topography of the Study Area is generally flat with gentle sloping towards Tank Farm Road. Onsite elevations range from approximately 147 to 176 feet (ft) above mean sea level. The Study Area is within the South Coast Ranges (ScoR) geographic subregion of California. The ScoR subregion is a component of the larger Central Western California Region, which occurs within the even larger California Floristic Province (Baldwin et al., 2012). 3.1.1 Watershed and Drainages Hydrology of the Study Area and vicinity was evaluated through review of topographic maps, aerial photos, and the National Hydrography Dataset (USGS, 2017). The Study Area is within the Lower San Luis Obispo Creek watershed (Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC)-12 180600060702; USGS, 2017). Acacia Creek runs along the western side of the Study Area and crosses the Study Area at the existing Digital West Crossing. Acacia Creek is an intermittent to ephemeral stream that flows in a southerly direction and serves as a tributary to the east fork of San Luis Obispo Creek. The eastern side of the Study Area is bordered by Orcutt Creek, which is an ephemeral creek that flows in a southwesterly direction before its confluence with Acacia Creek, south of the Study Area. Orcutt Creek crosses the northeastern and southeastern boundaries of the Study Area respectively, before it enters a culvert and flows beneath tank Farm Road. These creeks are visible on aerial photography and the centerline, tops of bank and associated riparian vegetation are presented in Figure 3 (clipped to edge of the Study Area due to access limitations offsite). Surface waters are discussed in more detail in Section 4.3 and displayed in more detail on Figure 5. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 12 3.1.2 Soils The NRCS Web Soil Survey delineates one soil map unit within the Study Area: Cropley clay, 0 to2 percent slopes (USDA-NRCS, 2017a). Site-specific soil observations are consistent with those mapped by the NRCS Web Soil Survey. The description of the soil map unit is presented below. Cropley clay, 0 to 2 percent slopes: Cropley clay soils are moderately well drained, clay soils originating from alluvium derived from sedimentary rock. This soil map unit occurs on gentle topography, typically with 0 to 2 percent slopes. Vegetation in uncultivated or undeveloped areas is annual grasses and forbs with some scattered live oak. A typical soil profile of Cropley clay contains several layers of clay textures, in colors ranging from very dark gray (moist) to brown. A typical profile is at least 66 inches deep. This soil map unit is not included on the National Hydric Soils List (United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2017b). Existing Conditions Biological Resources Assessment 13 Figure 3 Top of Bank/Edge of Riparian Dripline and 35 Foot Setback City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 14 3.2 Vegetation/Land Cover Types Seven terrestrial vegetation community or land cover types occur within the Study Area: developed/landscaped/disturbed areas, eucalyptus grove, fennel patches, Bermuda grass lawn, non-native annual grassland and riparian woodland. Vegetation was classified and mapped during surveys conducted on October 24, 2017 and August 8, 2018 to characterize the project site and is discussed in more detail below. A summary of vegetation/land cover types identified in the Study Area is presented in Table 1, and Figure 4 provides a map of these features. Habitat characterizations were based on the classification systems presented in A Manual of California Vegetation, Second Edition (MCV2; Sawyer et al., 2009) and Preliminary Description of Terrestrial Natural Communities of California (Holland, 1986); but have been modified slightly to most accurately reflect the existing site conditions. California Vegetation (Holland and Keil, 1995) and California Wildlife Habitat Relationships (CWHR) were also referenced for describing the habitat types within the Study Area. Plant species nomenclature and taxonomy used for the Study Area follow treatments within Baldwin et al. (2012). Table 1 Summary of Vegetation/Land Cover Types within the Study Area Habitat Type Approximate Acreage Approximate Percent of Total Area Developed/landscaped/Disturbed 9.15 65 Eucalyptus grove 0.89 6 Fennel patches 0.15 1 Herbaceous wetland 0.08 1 Bermuda grass lawn 3.31 23 Non-native annual grassland 0.16 1 Riparian woodland 0.38 3 Total 14.12 100.00 Developed/Landscaped/Disturbed Areas This land cover type occurs in areas that are regularly disturbed by human activities and consists of the existing mobile home park, recreation vehicle parking lot, and Nick Tompkins property to the east. This land cover type occupies approximately 9.15 acres of the Study Area and vegetation can vary depending upon the degree of disturbance or development. The developed areas are largely devoid of vegetation. In less developed areas such as the southeastern corner of the Study Area, ruderal species dominate, including non-native herbaceous species such as mustards and curly dock (Rumex crispus). Non-native grasses such as ripgut brome (Bromus diandrus), soft chess (Bromus hordeaceus). Cover by plant species is generally low due to disturbance, and there is a high percentage of bare soil. Landscaped areas includes a mix of trees native in the vicinity of the Study Area, such as Southern California black walnut (Juglans californica) and bay laurel (Umbellularia californica), as well as other species native to California but not known to occur naturally in the vicinity of the Study Area, such Existing Conditions Biological Resources Assessment 15 as California juniper (Juniperus californica), incense cedar (Calocedrus decurrens), and Monterey cypress (Hesperocyparis macrocarpa). Other species observed include scattered individuals of Mexican fan palm (Washingtonia robusta), Canary Island palm (Phoenix canariensis), Peruvian pepper tree (Schinus molle), blue-gum eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) and iceplant (Carpobrotus edulis). Developed/landscaped/disturbed areas are not classified in the MCV2 classification system (Sawyer et al., 2009) or the Holland classification system (Holland, 1986); however, developed areas are included in the CDFW CWHR as Urban (Mayer and Laudenslayer, 1988). Eucalyptus Grove Blue gum eucalyptus grove covers approximately 0.89 acre of the Study Area. The trees range in size from saplings to mature trees 80 to 100 feet tall. Scattered native trees occur within gaps within this community and include intermittent arroyo willow (Salix lasiolepis), Southern California black walnut, and Peruvian pepper. There is little understory in the majority of this community due to the build-up of fallen eucalyptus leaves and woody debris. Where present, the understory beneath the grove consists of non-native ruderal forbs such as bull mallow (Malva nicaeensis) and early-colonizing native annual herbs including rough cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium). Other species in the understory include cactus (Cylindropuntia sp.) and iceplant. The eucalyptus grove provides nesting habitat for raptors and a variety of songbirds, and roosting habitat for owls and turkey vultures. It also provides foraging habitat for birds and small mammals. The overall health of the eucalyptus trees onsite is degraded, likely due to several years of drought conditions and overall age of the stand. The eucalyptus grove habitat type within the project site is not described by Holland (1986) but most closely corresponds with the Eucalyptus groves Semi-Natural Woodland Stands (Eucalyptus [globulus, camaldulensis] Semi-Natural Stands) described in MCV2 (Sawyer et al., 2009). Fennel Patches Fennel patches occupy approximately 0.15 acre of the Study Area. The patches are dominated by sweet fennel (Foeniculum vulgare). Castor bean (Ricinus communis), mustards (Brassica nigra; Hirschfeldia incana), curly dock (Rumex crispus) and coyote brush (Baccharis pilularis) are also present. Intermittent trees consisting of coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia), California juniper, incense cedar, and Monterey cypress are also present. Within the Study Area, this vegetation community runs parallel and adjacent to the eastern bank of Orcutt Creek. This vegetation type within the project area most closely corresponds to non-native grassland described by Holland (1986) and with Conium maculatum – Foeniculum vulgare Herbaceous Semi- Natural Alliance described in the MCV2 (Sawyer et al. 2009). City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 16 Figure 4 Vegetation Communities/Land Cover Types within the Study Area Existing Conditions Biological Resources Assessment 17 Herbaceous Wetlands Herbaceous wetlands occupy approximately 0.08 acre of the Study Area and are confined to the bed of Orcutt Creek along the southeastern side of the Study Area. Vegetation within these in-stream wetlands consists of hydrophytic vegetation dominated by common spikerush (Eleocharis macrostachya), rabbitsfoot grass (Polypogon monspeliensis), brown headed rush (Juncus phaeocephalus), and rough cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium). This vegetation type within the project area most closely corresponds to freshwater seep described by Holland (1986) and with Eleocharis macrostachya Herbaceous Alliance described in the MCV2 (Sawyer et al. 2009). Bermuda Grass Lawn Bermuda grass lawn was mapped in a routinely mowed area where Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) predominates, and occupies approximately 3.31 acres of the Study Area. Intermittent mustards and hayfield tarweed (Hemizonia congesta) are also present. This vegetation community had very few native plants and evidence of routine mowing is present and visible on aerial photos and confirmed through direct site observation. This area provides habitat for a variety of small mammals, including pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae) and California ground squirrel (Otospermophilus beecheyi) and therefore could be suitable foraging habitat for raptors. Bermuda grass lawn is not classified in the MCV2 classification system (Sawyer et al., 2009) or the Holland classification system (Holland, 1986), but is included in the CDFW CWHR as Urban (Mayer and Laudenslayer, 1988). Non-native Annual Grassland A small patch of non-native annual grassland occurs in the northern portion of the Study Area and occupies approximately 0.16 acre of the Study Area. The grassland does not show signs of routine mowing and is relatively undisturbed. The grassland is dominated by ripgut brome, soft chess, and Bermuda grass. Interspersed recruiting individuals of California sagebrush (Artemisia californica) are also found throughout this habitat type and saplings of California sycamore (Platanus racemosa) were found in and around the western border. Riparian Woodland Within the Study Area, riparian woodland is present in and around the northwestern portion of Acacia Creek as well as the westernmost extent of Orcutt Creek and occupies approximately 0.38 acre. Riparian vegetation in this habitat type consists of mature arroyo willow with intermittent California sycamore, box elder (Acer negundo) and Northern California black walnut (Juglans hindsii) in the overstory. In the understory, California blackberry (Rubus ursinus), poison hemlock (Conium maculatum), fennel (Foeniculum vulgare), poison oak (Toxicodendron diversilobum), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) and coyote brush are present. There is an in-stream wetland present at the westernmost extent of Orcutt Creek within this vegetation type, where overstory riparian trees occur at a lesser degree and cattail (Typha domingensis) and saltmarsh bulrush (Bolboschoenus maritimus ssp. paludosus) are dominant. Within the southeastern portion of the Study Area, in-channel wetlands are located within the bank of Orcutt Creek. Within the northern portion of the Study Area, a potential jurisdictional wetland extends See section 4.3 and figure 5 respectively for a detailed description and map of the extents of the wetland. This habitat provides City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 18 excellent nesting and foraging habitat for nesting birds and a variety of common and special status species. Willow riparian vegetation is consistent with Arroyo Willow Thickets Alliance in A Manual of California Vegetation, Second Edition (Sawyer et al., 2009) and Central Coast arroyo willow riparian forest in the Holland classification (Holland, 1986). 3.3 General Wildlife Wildlife activity was moderate during the field reconnaissance survey. Vegetation onsite likely supports a suite of avian, mammalian, and reptilian wildlife. Several avian species were observed during the reconnaissance level survey and included western bluebird (Sialia mexicana), western scrub jay (Aphelocoma californica), turkey vulture (Cathartes aura), and northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos). Other species observed within the project site during survey for this report included cottontail (Sylvilagus audubonii), and California ground squirrel (Otospermophilus beecheyi). The value of the developed/landscaped/disturbed areas and Bermuda grass lawn as habitat for wildlife is limited, as the majority of the Study Area is extremely disturbed and/or developed. Nevertheless, the Study Area is situated adjacent to two drainage features, Acacia Creek and Orcutt Creek. The riparian corridors associated with these two creeks function as important wildlife corridors within the region. Eucalyptus groves can also provide important roost and nesting habitat for a variety of birds. A complete list of species observed can be found in Appendix C. Special status species with potential to occur are discussed below in Section 4. Sensitive Biological Resources Biological Resources Assessment 19 4 Sensitive Biological Resources Local, State, and Federal agencies regulate special status species and other sensitive biological resources and require an assessment of their presence or potential presence to be conducted on- site prior to the approval of any proposed development on a property. This section discusses sensitive biological resources observed on the project site, and evaluates the potential for the project site to support other sensitive biological resources. Assessments for the potential occurrence of special status species are based upon known ranges, habitat preferences for the species, species occurrence records from the CNDDB, species occurrence records from other sites in the vicinity of the survey area, and previous reports for the project site. The potential for each special status species to occur in the survey area was evaluated according to the following criteria: Not Expected. Habitat on and adjacent to the site is clearly unsuitable for the species requirements (foraging, breeding, cover, substrate, elevation, hydrology, plant community, site history, disturbance regime). Low Potential. Few of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present, and/or the majority of habitat on and adjacent to the site is unsuitable or of very poor quality. The species is not likely to be found on the site. Moderate Potential. Some of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present, and/or only some of the habitat on or adjacent to the site is unsuitable. The species has a moderate probability of being found on the site. High Potential. All of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present and/or most of the habitat on or adjacent to the site is highly suitable. The species has a high probability of being found on the site. Present. Species is observed on the site or has been recorded (e.g., CNDDB, other reports) on the site recently (within the last 5 years). The evaluation of potential to occur for each species identified in the records search is presented in Appendix D. 4.1 Special Status Species Rincon staff determined that the Study Area contains suitable habitat for twelve special status animal species and six special status plant species. The majority of the suitable habitat is within the riparian areas, eucalyptus groves, wetland and annual grassland areas, primarily adjacent to but outside the project footprint, but also associated with potential offsite improvements. 4.1.1 Special Status Plant Species Based on the database and literature review of records from the San Luis Obispo and Pismo Beach, California USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangles and surrounding eight quadrangles as well as the USFWS IpaC list of federally listed species, numerous special status plant species are known to or have the potential to occur within the vicinity of the Study Area (Appendix D). Of these, six special City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 20 status plant species may occur within the Study Area based on the presence of suitable habitat and include: Cambria morning-glory (Calystegia subacaulis ssp. episcopalis) – CRPR 4.2 San Luis Obispo sedge (Carex obispoensis) – CRPR 1B.2 San Luis Obispo owl’s-clover (Castilleja densiflora ssp. obispoensis) – CRPR 1B.2 Hoover’s button-celery (Eryngium aristulatum var. hooveri) – CRPR 1B.1 Adobe sanicle (Sanicula maritima) – California Rare (CR) CRPR 1B.1 Black-flowered figwort (Scrophularia atrata) – CRPR 1B.2 None of the special status plant species listed above were detected during the reconnaissance level survey; however, the survey was not conducted within the bloom periods for these species and as such, their potential to occur within the Study Area is based solely on the presence of potentially suitable habitat and the proximity of the Study Area to CNDDB documented occurrences. The onsite development footprint does not contain suitable habitat for these species; however, these species have potential to occur within the riparian corridor and stream setbacks and some of the offsite improvement areas within the Study Area. CRPR 1B and 2 plant species are typically regarded as rare, threatened, or endangered under the CEQA by lead CEQA agencies and were considered as such in this document. Although not expected to occur, CRPR 3 and 4 plant species are typically not considered for analysis under CEQA except where they are designated as rare or otherwise protected by local governments. 4.1.2 Special Status Wildlife Species Forty-three (43) special status animal species were identified in the region by using the San Luis Obispo and Pismo Beach, California USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangles and the surrounding eight quadrangles, as well as the USFWS IpaC list of federally listed species. Of the 43 species, twelve (12) special status animal species may occur onsite based on the presence of suitable habitat: Pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus), California Species of Special Concern (SSC) Loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus), SSC Purple Martin (Progne subis), SSC Western pond turtle (Actinemys (=Emys) marmorata), SSC Golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), California Fully Protected (FP) White-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus), FP American bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), State Endangered (SE), FP Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus), California Special Animal (SA); locally important Coast Range newt (Taricha torosa torosa), SSC California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii), Federally Threatened (FT), SSC Two-striped garter snake (Thamnophis hammondii), SSC South-central California Coast distinct population segment steelhead (steelhead; Oncorhyncus mykiss irideus), FT and SSC Sensitive Biological Resources Biological Resources Assessment 21 No special status animal species were detected during the reconnaissance-level survey. Even though definitive surveys for special status animal species were not conducted, no individuals or sign indicating the presence of these species were detected. As such, the following analysis of potential for occurrence is based on habitat suitability and CNDDB occurrences of these species in the vicinity. Western Pond Turtle This species is an aquatic turtle that occurs in ponds, marshes, rivers, streams and irrigation ditches that typically support aquatic vegetation. It requires downed logs, rocks, mats of vegetation, or exposed banks for basking. Western pond turtle lay their eggs in nests that are dug along the banks of streams or other uplands in sandy, friable soils. Western pond turtles, especially those that reside in creeks, are also known to overwinter in upland habitats. Upland movements can be quite extensive, and individuals have been recorded nesting or overwintering hundreds of feet from aquatic habitats. The typical nesting season is usually from April through August; however, variation exists depending upon geographic location. No western pond turtles were observed during the site survey. However, the CNDDB documents an occurrence (Occurrence #1019) within Acacia Creek immediately north of the Study Area. The riparian habitat surrounding Acacia Creek and Orcutt creek in the northern portion of the Study Area may provide suitable nesting habitat for western pond turtle. Therefore, this species may occur onsite. Pallid Bat The CDDDB records pallid bat in the San Luis Obispo area, the nearest of which was 2.2 miles northwest of the Study Area (Occurrence #77). No pallid bats were detected and no evidence of bats (e.g., guano) were observed within the Study Area during the field surveys. However, pallid bats may forage in the Study Area, and could roost in tree hollows, or crevices, with the highest potential occurring within the eucalyptus grove. Therefore, this species may occur onsite. Monarch Butterfly Monarch butterfly overwintering sites have been documented by the CNDDB within five miles of the Study Area. Monarch butterflies occur widely in coastal California, but have specific roost requirements for overwintering sites, in wind-protected tree groves such as eucalyptus, Monterey pine, and cypress groves, with nectar and water sources nearby. Eucalyptus trees in the Study Area do not form a suitable grove with appropriate microhabitat for roosting monarch butterfly. The eucalyptus stand within the project site is too thin and small to provide enough shelter to support suitable winter roosting habitat. In addition, the October 24 survey was conducted between the months of October 1 and March 31 when overwintering occurs. No aggregation was documented during the survey. Although individual monarchs may occur, they are not expected to overwinter onsite. Two-striped Garter Snake Two-striped garter snake occurs along the coast from the vicinity of Salinas to northwest Baja California. This species is highly aquatic, and found in or near permanent fresh water. It is often along streams with rocky beds and riparian growth. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 22 No two-striped garter snakes were observed during the field survey and this species has not been previously documented within the San Luis Obispo area in the CNDDB; however, suitable riparian habitat exists in the northern portion of the Study Area around Acacia Creek and Orcutt Creek. Therefore, this species may occur onsite. Coast Range Newt The Coast Range newt occurs along the coast and within the Coast Range Mountains from Mendocino County south to San Diego County. A disjunct population occurs in the southern Sierra Nevada. Coast Range newt utilizes wet forests, oak woodlands, chaparral, and rolling grassland communities, but requires permanent or seasonal aquatic habitats such as ponds, reservoirs, and sluggish pools in streams for breeding. The Coast Range newt breeding season typically occurs during late December through February. Suitable habitat exists within the Acacia Creek and Orcutt Creek riparian corridor. No Coast Range newts were observed during the field survey and the closest documented occurrence (Occurrence #61) in the CNDDB is 3.6 miles northeast of the Study Area. Nevertheless, the willow riparian habitat associated with Acacia Creek and Orcutt Creek in the northern portion of the Study Area is considered suitable upland habitat for foraging and aestivation. Therefore, this species may occur onsite. California Red-legged Frog The California red-legged frog (CRLF) inhabits quiet pools of streams, marshes, and ponds. All life history stages are most likely to be encountered in and around breeding sites, which include coastal lagoons, marshes, springs, permanent and semi-permanent natural ponds, and ponded and backwater portions of streams, as well as artificial impoundments such as stock ponds, irrigation ponds, and siltation ponds. Eggs are typically deposited in permanent pools, attached to emergent vegetation. The Study Area is located within the known range of CRLF in San Luis Obispo County based upon the current range depicted in the USFWS Recovery Plan for the California Red-legged Frog (USFWS, 2002). The Study Area does not occur within federally designated Critical Habitat for the CRLF. No CRLF were observed onsite during the field survey. The closest CRLF occurrence (Occurrence #895) was recorded by the CNDDB approximately 1.85 miles west of the Study Area in San Luis Obispo Creek. There are no records of CRLF occurring in Orcutt Creek or Acacia Creek and no potential breeding habitat for CLRF was documented onsite during the survey. In addition, no CRLF were documented during the focused protocol level CRLF surveys conducted by Padre in 2008 on the adjacent Tank Farm Site (Padre, 2008). However, Acacia Creek and Orcutt Creek have potential to serve as dispersal and foraging corridors for CRLF as they move through the region. Therefore, this species may occur onsite. Upland habitat quality within the majority of the Study Area is poor due to the lack of suitable habitat, existing development, and constant vegetation maintenance activities such as mowing. The upland and dispersal habitat within the riparian corridor in the northern portion of the project site contains the highest quality habitat. However, south and downstream of the project site in both Acacia and Orcutt Creeks, the habitat quality decreases dramatically. This species may be present within both Acacia and Orcutt Creeks, particularly in the northern portion of the Study Area where water and suitable cover are present. However, this species would only be expected to occur in disturbance areas incidentally, if at all, during periods of overland movement occurring during or Sensitive Biological Resources Biological Resources Assessment 23 immediately after rainstorms, due to the disturbed nature and limited vegetative cover in the project footprint. Bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) has been reported from Acacia Creek downstream of the Study Area, and this non-native predatory frog is known to both prey upon and outcompete CRLF (Padre 2008). Steelhead The South-central California Coast DPS of steelhead (steelhead) requires shaded pools within cool low-flow streams and warm water habitats below some dams or pipeline outfalls where summer releases provide high flows and fast-waters. This species requires gravel substrates with sufficient flow velocities to clean and oxygenate the substrates for spawning. Juveniles typically frequent streams that provide cover from overhanging banks within willow and/or cottonwood riparian forests, woodlands, and scrubs. Steelhead tend to spawn when winter rains have been substantial enough to raise stream flows and breach any sandbars that formed in the dry season. Migration and spawning occur during the months of December through May. No water was observed in Acacia Creek where the crossing widening is proposed during any of the field surveys. Acacia Creek within the Study Area contains suitable habitat for steelhead; however, suitable spawning areas are not present due to the absence of suitable substrate and water. The existing crossing is likely a barrier to fish passage due to its small capacity, and the formation of a scour pool below the outfall of the elevated culvert suspended five feet from the bed on the south side of the crossing. It is unknown whether or not suitable pools or perennial waters exist upstream of the Study Area for steelhead to exist. The City reported that two steelhead were captured in Acacia Creek immediately downstream from the Study Area where the Tank Farm Road bridge crosses Acacia Creek (Deutsch, pers. comm. 2018). Special Status Birds The Study Area contains a eucalyptus grove and willow riparian habitat that provides suitable habitat for five special status birds, of which golden eagle and white-tailed kite are fully protected; loggerhead shrike and purple martin are State Species of Special Concern, and American bald eagle is State Endangered and fully protected. These species have potential to nest and/or forage in or near the Study Area. No nests of special status birds were documented during the survey but such nests could occur in the future. Other Nesting Birds Trees and shrubs present in and surrounding the Study Area provide suitable habitat for other bird species to nest. Several species of birds common to the area that typically nest in the habitats found within the Study Area, such as western scrub jay, were detected during the reconnaissance survey. Although no raptor nests were detected during the field survey, any of the larger trees within and adjacent to the Study Area could be utilized by raptors for nesting. 4.2 Sensitive Plant Communities and Critical Habitats The CNDDB lists eight sensitive natural communities in the ten quadrangles including and surrounding the Study Area (Appendix D). None of the communities listed in Appendix D occur within the Study Area. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 24 The Sensitive Natural Communities List in the CNDDB is not currently maintained and no new information has been added in recent years. Therefore, vegetation types on site were also compared with the List of Vegetation Alliances and Associations (California Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2010). According to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Vegetation Program, Alliances with State ranks of S1-S3 are considered to be imperiled, and thus, potentially of special concern. No vegetation types with rank S1-S3 or otherwise designated as high priority or potentially rare in the hierarchical list are present in the project area. Willow riparian vegetation is discussed in Section 4.3. The CNDDB lists critical habitat for California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii) and South/Central California Coast Distinct Population Segment Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus) within five miles of the Study Area; however, there is no critical habitat present for either species within the Study Area. 4.3 Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands Development of offsite improvements have potential to result in direct impacts to jurisdictional areas, including other waters, wetlands, and riparian habitats. A full jurisdictional delineation was completed for the Study Area (Rincon Consultants, Inc., 2018). Results of the jurisdictional delineation are also summarized here. Table 2, below, summarizes the total acreage of jurisdictional waters, wetlands, streambeds, lakes, and riparian areas onsite by agency and regulation. Figure 5 depicts the location and extent of USACE, RWQCB, and CDFW jurisdictions within the Study Area. Acacia Creek enters the Study Area west of the Damon-Garcia Sports Field and travels in a southerly direction, passing through a two-foot corrugated pipe culvert set in a concrete one-lane crossing structure before continuing southward to a divided box culvert under Tank Farm Road. Within the Study Area, Acacia Creek has a well-defined bed and bank and is surrounded by a riparian corridor for approximately 600 feet. The vegetation then transitions to a canopy dominated by blue-gum eucalyptus for approximately 900 feet until the creek exits the Study Area and flows beneath Tank Farm Road. This stream meets the USACE jurisdictional standards due to the presence of an OHWM, and may also be regulated by the RWQCB under the Porter-Cologne Act. In addition, this stream meets the definition of a CDFW-jurisdictional streambed. Orcutt Creek is an ephemeral stream which enters the northern portion of the Study Area before it runs in an easterly and then south easterly direction along the eastern side of the Study Area. Orcutt Creek enters the Study Area again in the southeastern corner of the site and exits the Study Area through a culvert and flows beneath Tank Farm Road. The creek contains in-channel emergent wetlands in some areas. This segment of the channel shows evidence of previous human alteration, including past placement of rock along the banks in some areas, as well as a constructed berm along the banks. During the survey, water was observed in the northern portion of the creek for approximately 100 feet near the Damon-Garcia Sports Complex before the stream turns in an easterly direction and out of the Study Area. No water was observed in the creek where it reenters the Study Area in the southeastern corner of the site. Within the southeastern portion of the Study Area, in-channel wetlands are located within the bank of Orcutt Creek. Within the northern portion of the Study Area, a potential jurisdictional wetland extends from the channel of Orcutt Creek to the west for approximately 90 linear feet. Due to the presence of an OHWM, as well as segments with wetland characteristics, Orcutt Creek and the associated wetlands meet the definition of a USACE jurisdictional feature and may also be regulated by the RWQCB under both the Clean Water Act and Sensitive Biological Resources Biological Resources Assessment 25 the Porter-Cologne Act. In addition, this stream, including associated riparian vegetation, where present meets the definition of a CDFW-jurisdictional streambed. Table 2 Summary of Jurisdictional Areas within the Study Area Feature Waters of the U.S.1 Waters of the State1 (acres/linear feet) CDFW Jurisdictional Streambed2 (acres/linear feet) Non-wetland Waters of the U.S. (acres/linear feet) Wetland Waters of the U.S. (acres/linear feet) Acacia Creek 0.02 acre/ 1402 feet --/ -- 0.02 acre/ 1402 feet 1.65 acres/ 1623 feet Orcutt Creek 0.03 acre/ 82 feet 0.14 acre/ 635 feet 0.17 acre/ 717 feet 0.09 acre/ 617 feet Totals 0.05 acre/ 1484 feet 0.14 acre/ 635 feet 0.19 acre/ 2119 feet 1.74 acres/ 2240 feet 1Calculated to OHWM or edge of wetland 2Calculated to top of bank or edge of riparian, whichever is greater *The acreages for the in-stream wetlands are included within the Orcutt Creek row of this table. Note the final jurisdictional determinations of the boundaries of wetlands, waters, and riparian habitat are made by each agency, typically at the time that authorizations to impact such features are requested. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 26 Figure 5 Jurisdictional Waters Sensitive Biological Resources Biological Resources Assessment 27 4.4 Wildlife Movement Wildlife movement corridors, or habitat linkages, are generally defined as connections between habitat patches that allow for physical and genetic exchange between otherwise isolated animal populations. Such linkages may serve a local purpose, such as providing a linkage between foraging and denning areas, or they may be regional in nature. Some habitat linkages may serve as migration corridors, wherein animals periodically move away from an area and then subsequently return. Others may be important as dispersal corridors for young animals. A group of habitat linkages in an area can form a wildlife corridor network. The habitats within the link do not necessarily need to be the same as the habitats that are being linked. Rather, the link merely needs to contain sufficient cover and forage to allow temporary inhabitation by ground-dwelling species. Typically habitat linkages are contiguous strips of natural areas, though dense plantings of landscape vegetation can be used by certain disturbance-tolerant species. Depending upon the species using a corridor, specific physical resources (such as rock outcroppings, vernal pools, or oak trees) may need to be located within the habitat link at certain intervals to allow slower-moving species to traverse the link. For highly mobile or aerial species, habitat linkages may be discontinuous patches of suitable resources spaced sufficiently close together to permit travel along a route in a short period of time. Wildlife movement corridors can be both large and small scale. Regionally, the Study Area is not located within an Essential Connectivity Area (ECA) as mapped in the report California Essential Habitat Connectivity Project: A Strategy for Conserving a Connected California (2010). ECAs represent principle connections between Natural Landscape Blocks. ECAs are regions in which land conservation and management actions should be prioritized to maintain and enhance ecological connectivity. ECAs are mapped based on coarse ecological condition indicators, rather than the needs of particular species and thus serve the majority of species in each region. Within the Study Area, Acacia Creek and Orcutt Creek provide suitable small scale corridors for wildlife to travel locally. The existing crossing over Acacia Creek is likely a barrier to fish passage due to its small capacity, and the formation of a scour pool below the outfall of the elevated culvert suspended five feet from the bed on the south side of the crossing. The majority of the Study Area is not conducive to frequent use as a movement corridor due to existing development and hardscapes. 4.5 Resources Protected By Local Policies and Ordinances The project would be required to comply with Section 17.16.025 of the City Zoning Regulations, Creek Setbacks, which establishes setback distances for different classes of creeks. For creeks in areas annexed after 1996, including Orcutt Creek and Acacia Creek, the required setback is 35 feet. Zoning Regulations setbacks are defined in terms of the distances from the top of bank or edge of riparian drip line, whichever is farther from the creek, that development is permitted to occur. The City Zoning Regulations prohibits the following activities from occurring within a set-back area: paving, parking lots, and, in nonresidential zones, areas used for storing or working on vehicles, equipment, or materials. The City regulates tree removal within its jurisdiction (Tree Ordinance No. 1544 2010 Series). Implementation of the proposed project may require removal of trees onsite. If tree removal is City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 28 required, a tree removal permit must be obtained from the City prior to the onset of these activities. Once the project plans have been finalized, the exact number, type, and locations of trees within the project site to be removed can be determined and the associated tree removal permit may be obtained, if needed. The City’s Conservation and Open Space Element (COSE) includes goals that address biological resources, including Goal 7.2 Sustainable Natural Populations which includes Policy 7.3.3 and Goal 7.7 Program which includes policies 7.7.8 and 7.7.9. The following COSE policies define the local regulatory setting for biological resources in Study Area. Policy 7.3.3. Wildlife Habitat and Corridors. Continuous wildlife habitat, including corridors free of human disruption, shall be preserved and where necessary, created by interconnecting open spaces, wildlife habitat and corridors. To accomplish this, the City will: Require public and private developments, including public works projects, to evaluate animal species and their movements within and through development sites and create habitats and corridors appropriate for wildlife. Plan for connectivity of open spaces and wildlife habitat and corridors using specific area plans, neighborhood plans, subdivision maps or other applicable planning processes, consistent with Open Space Guidelines. Coordinate with San Luis Obispo County and adjoining jurisdictions, federal and state agencies such as Caltrans to assure regional connectivity of open space and wildlife corridors. Preserve and expand links between open spaces and creek corridors. Policy 7.7.8. Protect Wildlife Corridors. Condition development permits in accordance with applicable mitigation measures to ensure that important corridors for wildlife movement and dispersal are protected. Features of particular importance to wildlife include riparian corridors, wetlands, lake shorelines, and protected natural areas with cover and water. Linkages and corridors shall be provided to maintain connections between habitat areas. Policy 7.7.9. Creek Setbacks. As further described in the zoning regulations (Section 17.16.025), the City will maintain creek setbacks to include: an appropriate separation from the physical top of bank, the appropriate floodway as identified in the Flood Management Policy, native riparian plants or wildlife habitat and space for paths called for by any city-adopted plan. In addition, creek setbacks should be consistent with the following: The following items should be no closer to the wetland or creek than the setback line: buildings, streets, driveways, parking lots, aboveground utilities, and outdoor commercial storage or work areas. Development approvals should respect the separation from creek banks and protection of floodways and natural features identified in Part A above, whether or not the setback line has been established. Features which normally would be outside the creek setback may be permitted to encroach where there is no practical alternative, to allow reasonable development of a parcel, consistent with the Conservation and Open Space Element. Existing bridges may be replaced or widened, consistent with policies in this Element. Removal of any existing bridge or restoration of a channel to more natural conditions will provide for wildlife corridors, traffic circulation, access, utilities and reasonable use of adjacent properties. Sensitive Biological Resources Biological Resources Assessment 29 The City’s Standard Specifications and Engineering Standards includes standard specifications for creek crossings. The project would be required to comply with these specifications. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 30 5 Impact Analysis and Mitigation Measures This section discusses the possible adverse impacts to biological resources that may occur from implementation of the project and suggests appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures that would reduce those impacts to less than significant levels. The criteria used to evaluate potential project-related impacts/effects to biological resources were presented in Section 2.1.2. 5.1 Special-Status Species The project would have a significant effect on biological resources if it would: a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Impact # 1 Special Status Plant Species Six special status plant species were determined to have potential to occur within the Study Area considering the presence of suitable habitat. The species determined to have potential to occur would be limited to the creek margins and setbacks around Orcutt Creek and Acacia Creek as well as the grassland and wetland in the northern portion of the Study Area. If there is ground disturbance in these areas, such as in association with vegetation management activities or ground disturbance associated with the pedestrian/bicycle access path, direct impacts to special status plant species may occur. Additionally, indirect impacts could occur due to the spread of invasive, non-native species from construction equipment or imported fill materials. Invasive, non-native plant species can out-compete native species and/or alter habitat towards a state that is unsuitable for special status species. For example, the spread of certain weed species can reduce the biodiversity of native habitats through displacement of vital pollinators, potentially eliminating special status plant species, or through competition with native plants for water and light. Special Status Plant Recommended Mitigation Measures If ground disturbance is anticipated in the margins or setbacks of Orcutt Creek and/or Acacia Creek, then BIO-1(a-c) would be required to reduce impacts to special status plant species to a less than significant level. BIO-1(a) Special Status Plant Species Surveys. Prior to the start of vegetation management activities on the project site, or prior to the start of any construction activity within potential off-site improvement areas, the developer shall ensure an approved biologist conducts surveys for special status plant species throughout suitable habitat. Surveys shall be conducted when plants with potential to occur are in a phenological stage conducive to positive identification (i.e., usually during the Impact Analysis and Mitigation Measures Biological Resources Assessment 31 blooming period for the species. Reference sites must be visited prior to botanical surveys to confirm target species are detectable. Valid botanical surveys will be considered current for up to five years; if construction has not commenced within five years of the most recent survey, botanical surveys must be repeated. BIO-1(b) Special Status Plant Species Avoidance. If special status plant species are discovered within the Study Area, the applicant shall ensure an approved biologist will flag and fence these locations before construction activities start to avoid impacts. During vegetation management activities, any special status plants identified during the survey must be flagged for avoidance. BIO-1(c) Restoration Plan. If avoidance is not feasible; the applicant shall ensure all impacts be mitigated at a minimum ratio of 2:1 (number of acres or individuals restored to number of acres or individuals impacted) for each species as a component of habitat restoration. The applicant shall prepare and submit a restoration plan to the City for approval. The restoration plan shall include, at a minimum, the following components: Description of the project/impact site (i.e., location, responsible parties, areas to be impacted by habitat type); Goal(s) of the compensatory mitigation project [type(s) and area(s) of habitat to be established, restored, enhanced, and/or preserved; specific functions and values of habitat type(s) to be established, restored, enhanced, and/or preserved]; Description of the proposed compensatory mitigation site (location and size, ownership status, existing functions and values); Implementation plan for the compensatory mitigation site (rationale for expecting implementation success, responsible parties, schedule, site preparation, planting plan [including species to be used, container sizes, seeding rates, etc.]); Maintenance activities during the monitoring period, including weed removal and irrigation as appropriate (activities, responsible parties, schedule); Monitoring plan for the compensatory mitigation site, including no less than quarterly monitoring for the first year, along with performance standards, target functions and values, target acreages to be established, restored, enhanced, and/or preserved, and annual monitoring reports to be submitted to the City for a minimum of five years at which time the applicant shall demonstrate that performance standards/success criteria have been met; Success criteria based on the goals and measurable objectives; said criteria to be, at a minimum, at least 80% survival of container plants and 70% absolute cover by vegetation type. Absolute cover will be determined in comparison to a reference plot for native species. An adaptive management program and remedial measures to address any shortcomings in meeting success criteria; Notification of completion of compensatory mitigation and agency confirmation; and City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 32 Contingency measures (initiating procedures, alternative locations for contingency compensatory mitigation, funding mechanism). Impact # 2 Special Status Animal Species As discussed in Section 4.1.2, twelve special status animal species have potential to occur in the Study Area based upon known ranges, habitat preferences for the species, and species occurrence records from other sites in the vicinity of the survey area from the CNDDB. Of the twelve species, eleven species have potential to be impacted by project related activities. Within the Study Area, the highest quality habitat for special status animal species occurs within Orcutt Creek, Acacia Creek, and the riparian corridors surrounding these creeks. Potential offsite improvements include widening of an existing crossing over Acacia Creek, development of a new creek crossing over Orcutt Creek, and the development of a pedestrian/bicycle access path through the riparian corridor on the northern boundary of the site. Therefore, the potential for direct impacts as a result of these offsite improvements is much higher than that of construction buildout of the onsite project. Impacts as well as recommended avoidance and minimization efforts for special status animals are discussed below. Western pond turtle No pond turtles were detected during the field survey. Orcutt Creek and Acacia Creek provide suitable aquatic habitat, and creek margins are suitable for basking. The riparian corridor in the northern portion of the Study Area is suitable for nesting. Therefore, this species’ potential to occur onsite, with the highest probability occurring within the riparian corridor. Potential direct impacts to western pond turtle include destruction of nests and harassment or injury of active as well as overwintering individuals if they are present within the Study Area during implementation. Coast Range newt No evidence of Coast Range newt was found on site. The riparian corridor surrounding Acacia Creek and Orcutt Creek in the northern portion of the Study Area provides suitable foraging habitat for this species. As such, implementation of potential offsite improvements may result in loss or fragmentation of Coast Range newt habitat. Direct impacts to this species may occur if it is foraging or aestivating onsite during construction activities. Two-striped garter snake No two-striped garter snakes were observed onsite during the field survey. The riparian corridor around Acacia Creek and Orcutt Creek in the northern portion of the Study Area provides suitable habitat for this species. Direct impacts to this species may occur during the construction of potential offsite improvements, with the highest probability occurring on the northern side of the Study Area where the potential bicycle/pedestrian path is proposed. California Red-legged Frog As previously mentioned in Section 4, CRLF may be present within both Acacia and Orcutt Creeks, particularly in the northern portion of the Study Area where water and suitable cover are present. Implementation of potential offsite improvements would occur in suitable foraging and dispersal habitat for this species. The majority of the upland habitat within the project site isn’t suitable for CRLF and this species would only be expected to occur in disturbance areas incidentally, if at all, Impact Analysis and Mitigation Measures Biological Resources Assessment 33 during periods of overland movement occurring during or immediately after rainstorms, due to the disturbed nature and limited vegetative cover in the project footprint. Construction of the offsite improvements are expected to result in impacts to potential dispersal and foraging habitat, and therefore potential direct effects to CRLF and its habitat may occur. Indirect impacts to CRLF could result from general project-related disturbance and noise if individuals are dispersing or aestivating within the Study Area. Indirect impacts to water and habitat quality could occur during construction associated with the widening of an existing crossing over Acacia Creek and the development of a new creek crossing over Orcutt Creek. Potential direct and indirect impacts to this species resulting from implementation of the project would be minimized with avoidance and minimization measures incorporated. Steelhead No water was documented within Acacia Creek during the field surveys where project related disturbance is proposed and no steelhead individuals were observed onsite during the field surveys. Potential direct impacts to steelhead in Acacia Creek include harassment or injury during widening of the existing crossing should they be present within the work area. Widening of the existing crossing also has potential to result in indirect impacts to water and habitat quality. However, depending on final design of the crossing improvement over Acacia Creek, the project could result in net improvements to flow and passage potential at this location by alleviating the choke point currently caused by the existing undersized structure. Construction could result in impacts to habitat and individuals during implementation, but this potential would be minimized with implementation of the avoidance and minimization measures described below. Nesting Birds The project has potential to result in direct impacts to nesting birds, including special status birds, if they are nesting within the project site and/or immediate vicinity during construction activities. As mentioned in Section 4.1.2, two State Fully Protected bird species (golden eagle and white-tailed kite), two State Species of Special Concern bird species (loggerhead shrike and purple martin), and one State Endangered and Fully Protected species (American bald eagle) have potential to occur or are known to occur in the vicinity of the Study Area. The project is not anticipated to result in removal of substantial foraging habitat for raptors due to the existing development and disturbed condition of the project site. Fully Protected birds must be fully avoided; impacts cannot be authorized. Nesting birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code. Additional avoidance measures for special status bird nests such as American bald eagle nests are often required. Mitigation measures are recommended to avoid impacts to special status birds and other nesting birds. Pallid Bat The project site contains suitable foraging habitat for pallid bat and this species could roost in trees and/or crevices within the site. Potential direct impacts to pallid bats within the Study Area include removal of roosting habitat and harassment or injury if they are foraging within the project area during project implementation. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 34 Special Status Animal Recommended Mitigation Measures The following measures would reduce impacts to special status animal species to a less than significant level. BIO-2(a) Best Management Practices. The applicant shall ensure the following Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be required for project construction activities within the work area. No pets or firearms shall be allowed at the project site during construction activities. All trash that may attract predators must be properly contained and removed from the work site. All such debris and waste shall be picked up daily and properly disposed of at an appropriate site. All refueling, maintenance, and staging of equipment and vehicles shall occur at least 50 feet from Acacia Creek and Orcutt Creek and in a location where a spill would not drain toward aquatic habitat. A plan must be in place for prompt and effective response to any accidental spills prior to the onset of work activities. All workers shall be informed of the appropriate measures to take should an accidental spill occur. Pallets or secondary containment areas for chemicals, drums, or bagged materials shall be provided. Should material spills occur, materials and/or contaminants shall be cleaned from the project site and recycled or disposed of to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Prior to construction activities in areas within 30 feet of potentially jurisdictional features, including Acacia Creek and Orcutt Creek, the features shall be fenced with orange construction fencing and signed to prohibit entry of construction equipment and personnel unless authorized by the City. Fencing should be located a minimum of 30 feet from the edge of the riparian canopy or top of bank and shall be maintained throughout the construction period for each phase of development. Once all phases of construction in this area are complete, the fencing may be removed. Erosion control and landscaping specifications allow only natural-fiber, biodegradable meshes and coir rolls, to prevent impacts to the environment and to fish and terrestrial wildlife. All vehicles and equipment shall be in good working condition and free of leaks. Construction work shall be restricted to daylight hours (7:00 AM to 7:00 PM) to avoid impacts to nocturnal and crepuscular (dawn and dusk activity period) species. Concrete truck and tool washout shall be limited to locations designated by a qualified biologist or a Qualified Storm-water Practitioner such that no runoff will reach Acacia Creek or Orcutt Creek. All open trenches shall be constructed with appropriate exit ramps to allow species that accidentally fall into a trench to escape. Trenches will remain open for the shortest period necessary to complete required work. No water will be impounded in a manner to attract sensitive species. Impact Analysis and Mitigation Measures Biological Resources Assessment 35 BIO-2(b) Worker Environmental Awareness Program. Prior to the initiation of construction activities (including staging and mobilization), the applicant shall ensure all personnel associated with project construction attend a Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) training. The training shall be conducted by a qualified biologist, to aid workers in recognizing special status resources that may occur in the project area. The specifics of this program shall include identification of the sensitive species and habitats, a description of the regulatory status and general ecological characteristics of sensitive resources, and review of the limits of construction and avoidance measures required to reduce impacts to biological resources within the work area. A fact sheet conveying this information shall also be prepared for distribution to all contractors, their employers, and other personnel involved with construction of the project. All employees shall sign a form provided by the trainer documenting they have attended the training. BIO-2(c) California Red-legged Frog Impact Avoidance and Minimization. The applicant shall implement the following to avoid and minimize potential impacts to CRLF. A pre-construction survey of the proposed disturbance footprint (within the project site or potential off-site improvement areas) for California red-legged frog shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within 48 hours prior to the start of project construction to confirm this species is not present in the work area. In the event the pre-construction survey identifies the presence of individuals of CRLF, or if individuals of these species are encountered during construction, then the applicant shall stop work and comply with all relevant requirements of the Federal Endangered Species Act prior to resuming project activities. Only City- and USFWS-approved biologists shall participate in activities associated with the capture, handling, and monitoring of CRLF. If activities occur between November 1 and April 30, the qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-activity clearance sweep prior to start of project activities on the morning following any rain events of 0.1 inch or greater. BIO-2(d) Coast Range Newt, Two-striped Garter Snake, and Western Pond Turtle Impact Avoidance and Minimization. A qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey within 48 hours of initial ground disturbing activities associated with the offsite improvements. The survey area should include any proposed disturbance area(s) and all proposed ingress/egress routes. If any of these species are found and the individuals are likely to be injured or killed by work activities, the biologist shall be allowed sufficient time to move them from the project site before work activities begin. The biologist(s) shall relocate any coast range newts, two-striped garter snakes, and/or western pond turtles the shortest distance possible to a location that contains suitable habitat that is not likely to be affected by activities associated with the project. BIO-2(e) Steelhead – South-central California Coast DPS Impact Avoidance and Minimization. The applicant shall implement the following to avoid and minimize potential impacts to steelhead. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 36 Construction associated with the widening of the existing crossing over Acacia Creek shall be restricted to periods of dry weather from April 16 through October 31, and shall not be conducted within 48 hours after a rain event of 0.25 inch or greater, or until an approved biologist confirms there is no longer a chance for flowing water to enter the work area. Widening of the existing crossing shall follow the design standards developed by the City of San Luis Obispo and shall be developed in a manner that does not impede wildlife movement. BIO-2(f) Nesting Birds Impact Avoidance and Minimization. The applicant shall ensure the following actions are undertaken to avoid and minimize potential impacts to nesting birds: For construction activities occurring during the nesting season (generally February 1 to September 15), surveys for nesting birds covered by the California Fish and Game Code and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act shall be conducted by a qualified biologist no more than 14 days prior to vegetation removal. The surveys shall include the disturbance area plus a 500-foot buffer around the site. If active nests are located, all construction work shall be conducted outside a buffer zone from the nest to be determined by the qualified biologist. The buffer shall be a minimum of 50 feet for non-raptor bird species and at least 300 feet for raptor species. Larger buffers may be required depending upon the status of the nest and the construction activities occurring in the vicinity of the nest. The buffer area(s) shall be closed to all construction personnel and equipment until the adults and young are no longer reliant on the nest site. A qualified biologist shall confirm that breeding/nesting is completed and young have fledged the nest prior to removal of the buffer. If feasible, removal of vegetation within suitable nesting bird habitats will be scheduled to occur in the fall and winter (between September 1 and February 14), after fledging and before the initiation of the nesting season. If a suspected American bald eagle nest is discovered during the pre- construction survey, then the applicant shall consult with the City, USFWS, and CDFW regarding appropriate nest buffers and nest monitoring. If a nest is discovered with construction underway, a no-activity buffer a minimum of 660 feet from the nest must be implemented, or as otherwise directed by CDFW and USFWS, until appropriate authorizations are obtained. Any subsequent buffer adjustments shall be made in consultation with the City, CDFW and USFWS and shall rely on monitoring observations and activity at the site. BIO-2(g) Roosting Bat Impact Avoidance and Minimization. The applicant shall ensure the following actions are undertaken to avoid and minimize potential impacts to roosting bats: Prior to issuance of grading permits, a qualified biologist shall conduct a survey of existing structures within the project site to determine if roosting bats are present. The survey shall be conducted during the non-breeding season (November through March). The biologist shall have access to all interior attics, as needed. If a colony of bats is found roosting in any structure, further surveys Impact Analysis and Mitigation Measures Biological Resources Assessment 37 shall be conducted sufficient to determine the species present and the type of roost (day, night, maternity, etc.) If the bats are not part of an active maternity colony, passive exclusion measures may be implemented, in close coordination with CDFW. These exclusion measures must include one-way valves that allow bats to exit the structure but are designed so that the bats may not re-enter the structure. If a bat colony is excluded from the project site, appropriate alternate bat habitat as determined by a qualified biologist shall be installed on the project site or at an approved location offsite. Prior to removal of any trees, a survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to determine if any of the trees proposed for removal or trimming harbor sensitive bat species or maternal bat colonies. If a non-maternal roost is found, the qualified biologist, in close coordination with CDFW shall install one-way valves or other appropriate passive relocation method. For each occupied roost removed, one bat box or alternate roost structure shall be installed in similar habitat and should have similar cavity or crevices properties to those which are removed, including access, ventilation, dimensions, height above ground, and thermal conditions. Maternal bat colonies may not be disturbed. 5.2 Sensitive Plant Communities The project would have a significant effect on biological resources if it would: b) Would the project have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service. The proposed project is not anticipated to result in direct impacts to sensitive plant communities identified by the CNDDB as well as communities identified as sensitive in the current List of Vegetation Alliances and Associations (CDFW, 2018). Potential project-related impacts to streambed/riparian habitat potentially subject to regulation by CDFW under Section 1600 et seq. of the CFGC are addressed under Section 5.3 below. 5.3 Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands The project would have a significant effect on biological resources if it would: c) Would the project adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. The study area contains riparian habitat, which may be under CDFW jurisdiction pursuant to Section 1600 et seq. of the California Fish and Game Code. Future development on the project site facilitated by the proposed rezone would not result in direct disturbances to Acacia Creek, Orcutt Creek, or associated jurisdictional areas. However, widening Tank Farm Road along the project site frontage and the implementation of potential off-site improvements have the potential to result in temporary and permanent impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources, including wetlands, other City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 38 waters, and riparian habitats. Approximately 0.14 acre of wetlands and 0.05 acre of other waters potentially under USACE and RWQCB jurisdictions (Clean Water Act Sections 404 and 401, respectively) are present in the study area. In addition, 1.74 acres of streambed/riparian habitat potentially subject to regulation by CDFW under Section 1600 et seq. of the CFGC, and RWQCB under Porter-Cologne are also present. The exact location and area of potential impacts that would result from implementation of potential off-site improvements are not yet known. However, off-site improvements would impact these jurisdictional features within the potential off-site improvement areas. Impacts to jurisdictional areas resulting from implementation of potential off-site improvements are potentially significant. The City has established a zoning regulation that requires a 35-foot setback for development off both Acacia Creek and Orcutt Creek. The setback distance is defined in terms of the distance from the top of bank or edge of riparian drip line, whichever is farther from the creek. Mitigation Measure BIO-2(a) requires implementation of construction BMPs that would avoid indirect impacts to the riparian habitat and stream during construction activities. Modification to the existing crossing over Acacia Creek or the development of a new crossing over Orcutt Creek would be required to comply with the City’s Standard Specifications and Engineering Standards for creek crossings. Nevertheless, potential impacts to jurisdictional features and associated riparian habitat would result. Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands Recommended Mitigation Measures The project proponent will acquire all applicable regulatory permits for jurisdictional areas that cannot be fully avoided. There will be no work within jurisdictional areas until all necessary regulatory permits have been acquired. Additionally, the following measures would reduce impacts to jurisdictional waters and wetlands to a less than significant level. BIO-3(a) Wetland, Stream, and Riparian Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring. Temporary impact areas shall be restored at a one to one (1:1) ratio (one acre of restoration for each acre of impact) to offset temporary losses in wetland, stream, or riparian function. Permanent impacts on jurisdictional areas shall be offset through creation, restoration, and/or enhancement of in-kind habitats at a minimum ratio of 2:1. Permitting agencies (CDFW, USACE, RWQCB) may require a higher mitigation ratio associated with applicable permits. A Mitigation and Monitoring Plan is required to outline the approach that will be taken for restoration and habitat creation or enhancement. The plan shall be prepared by a qualified restoration ecologist. The plan shall include, but not be limited to the following components: Description of the project/impact site, Goal(s) of the compensatory mitigation project, Description of the proposed compensatory mitigation-site, Implementation plan for the compensatory mitigation-site, Maintenance activities during the monitoring period, Monitoring plan for the compensatory mitigation-site, Success criteria and performance standards, Reporting requirements, and Impact Analysis and Mitigation Measures Biological Resources Assessment 39 Contingency measures and funding mechanisms. Mitigation Measure BIO-2(a) requires implementation of construction BMPs that would reduce indirect impacts to potentially jurisdictional habitat during construction activities. No further measures are recommended. 5.4 Wildlife Movement The project would have a significant effect on biological resources if it would: d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites. Future development facilitated by the proposed rezone would result in increased residential development in proximity to riparian areas along Acacia Creek and Orcutt Creek, and the wildlife corridors associated with these features. However, future development would be designed consistent with the City’s required 35-foot creek setback from Orcutt Creek and Acacia Creek, which would ensure that development would not result in long-term adverse effects to wildlife utilization and movement along these riparian areas and associated wildlife corridors. Construction of potential off-site improvements would potentially result in temporary short-term impacts to wildlife movement due to equipment access and staging in and around the riparian corridor. Modification to the existing crossing over Acacia Creek or the development of a new crossing over Orcutt Creek would be required to comply with the City’s Standard Specifications and Engineering Standards for creek crossings. Depending on final design of a modified crossing over Acacia Creek, the project could result in net improvements to flow and passage potential at this location by alleviating the choke point currently caused by the existing undersized structure and replacing older asphalt and concrete rubble with materials that facilitate passage. Because the project site and immediate vicinity are already developed and disturbed, the increase in lighting, noise, and human activity onsite due to the project would not result in a substantial change or long term impact to wildlife movement through the region. Therefore, no measures are recommended. 5.5 Local Policies and Ordinances The project would have a significant effect on biological resources if it would: e) Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance The City has established a zoning regulation that requires a 35-foot setback off both Acacia Creek and Orcutt Creek. The setback distance is defined in terms of the distance from the top of bank or edge of riparian drip line, whichever is farther from the creek. Planted and naturally-occurring trees are present in the project site. The project may require removal of naturally-occurring native trees. The City regulates tree removal within its jurisdiction. Once the project plans have been finalized, the exact number, type, and locations of trees within the project site to be removed, if any, shall be determined. If trees will be removed, the project applicant would be required to obtain tree removal permit from the City, and to develop and implement a tree protection and replacement plan to ensure the project is consistent with local tree City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 40 removal regulations. As the project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances, this impact would be less than significant. Therefore, no further measures are recommended. 5.6 Adopted or Approved Plans The project would have a significant effect on biological resources if it would: f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. The project site is not located in any adopted Habitat Conservation Plans or Natural Community Conservation Plans or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Therefore, there would be no impact. Limitations, Assumptions, and Use Reliance Biological Resources Assessment 41 6 Limitations, Assumptions, and Use Reliance This Biological Resources Assessment has been performed in accordance with professionally accepted biological investigation practices conducted at this time and in this geographic area. The biological investigation is limited by the scope of work performed. The reconnaissance biological survey for certain taxa may have been conducted as part of this assessment but was not performed during a particular blooming period, nesting period, or particular portion of the season when positive identification would be expected if present, and therefore, cannot be considered definitive. The biological survey is limited also by the environmental conditions present at the time of the surveys. In addition, a general biological survey does not guarantee that the organisms are not present and will not be discovered in the future within the site. In particular, mobile wildlife species could occupy the site on a transient basis, or re-establish populations in the future. Our field study was based on current industry practices, which change over time and may not be applicable in the future. No other guarantees or warranties, expressed or implied, are provided. The findings and opinions conveyed in this report are based on findings derived from site reconnaissance, jurisdictional areas, review of CNDDB RareFind5, and specified historical and literature sources. Standard data sources relied upon during the completion of this report, such as the CNDDB, may vary with regard to accuracy and completeness. In particular, the CNDDB is compiled from research and observations reported to CDFW that may or may not have been the result of comprehensive or site-specific field surveys. Although Rincon believes the data sources are reasonably reliable, Rincon cannot and does not guarantee the authenticity or reliability of the data sources it has used. Additionally, pursuant to our contract, the data sources reviewed included only those that are practically reviewable without the need for extraordinary research and analysis. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 42 7 References Baldwin, B.G., D.H. Goldman, D.J. Keil, R. Patterson, T.J. Rosatti, and D.H. Wilken, editors. 2012. The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, second edition. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. Bowers, N., R. Bowers, & K. Kaufman. 2004. Mammals of North America. Calflora. 2009. Information on wild California plants for conservation, education, and appreciation. Berkeley, California. Updated online and accessed at: http://www.calflora.org/. California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2010. List of Vegetation Alliances and Associations. Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program, Sacramento, CA. November 2017. California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2017a. Special Animals List. Biogeographic Data Branch, California Natural Diversity Database. November 2017. California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2017b. California Natural Diversity Database, Rarefind V (online). Accessed November 2017. California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2017c. Biogeographic Information and Observation System (BIOS). Retrieved November 21, 2017 from www.wildlife.ca.gov/data/BIOS. California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2017d. Special Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Lichens List. Biogeographic Data Branch, California Natural Diversity Database. November 2017. California Native Plant Society. 2017. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants. V.7-08c-Interim 8- 22-02. Updated online and accessed via: www.rareplants.cnps.org. City of San Luis Obispo. 2018. Standard Specifications and Engineering Standards. Available at http://www.slocity.org/home/showdocument?id=19925 ESRI. 2017. ArcGIS Desktop version 10.5.x.2017. Google Earth. 2017. Available at: http://earth.google.com/. Hickman, J.C. (Ed.). 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. University of California Press. Berkeley, California. Holland, Robert F. 1986. Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Nongame Heritage Program. 156 pgs. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2017. Endangered Species Critical Habitat. Accessed online via http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/maps_data/endangered_species_act_critical_hab itat.html. Padre. 2008. Protocol-level California Red-legged Frog Survey Report for the Former San Luis Obispo Tank Farm Site (Tank Farm) San Luis Obispo County, California. http://www.slocity.org/Home/ShowDocument?id=6147. RRM Design Group. 2016. 650 Tank Farm Waters and Wetland Assessment, San Luis Obispo, California. References Biological Resources Assessment 43 Sawyer, J. O., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J.M. Evens. 2009. A Manual of California Vegetation, Second Edition. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, California. Stebbins, R. C. 2003. A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians. 2nd ed. Houghton-Mifflin Company. Boston, Massachusetts. United States Department of Agricultural, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2017a. Web Soil Survey. Accessed November 21, 2017. Soil Survey Area: San Luis Obispo County, California. Soil Survey Data Available at: https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2017b. Lists of Hydric Soils. National Cooperative Soil Survey, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Accessed via: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/soils/use/hydric/. United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 1973. The Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C 1531 et seq.). United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2000. Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Botanical Inventories for Federally Listed, Proposed, and Candidate Plants. January 2000. United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2017a. Critical Habitat Portal. Available at: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/report/table/critical-habitat.html. United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2017b. Information, Planning, and Conservation System. Available at: http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/. Western Regional Climate Center. 2017. Climate of California. Available at: www.wrcc.dri.edu/Climate/narrative_ca.php. Zeiner, D., W.F. Laudenslayer, Jr., and K.E. Mayer (May 1988). California’s Wildlife. California Statewide Wildlife Habitat Relationship System, Volumes I, II, & III. California Department of Fish and Wildlife. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use 44 8 List of Preparers Rincon Consultants, Inc. Primary Author Jamie Deutsch, Associate Biologist Technical Review Meg Perry, Program Ma–ager - Senior Biologist/Botanist Colby J. Boggs, M.S., Principal/Senior Ecologist Graphics Craig Huff, Program Manager - Information Technology and Graphics Services Field Reconnaissance Surveys Jamie Deutsch, Associate Biologist Appendix A Regulatory Guidance Regulatory Setting Biological Resources Assessment A-1 Regulatory Setting Special-status habitats are vegetation types, associations, or sub-associations that support concentrations of special-status plant or animal species, are of relatively limited distribution, or are of particular value to wildlife. Listed species are those taxa that are formally listed as endangered or threatened by the Federal government (e.g. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS]), pursuant to the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) or as endangered, threatened, or rare (for plants only) by the State of California (i.e. California Fish and Game Commission), pursuant to the California Endangered Species Act or the California Native Plant Protection Act. Some species are considered rare (but not formally listed) by resource agencies, organizations with biological interests/expertise (e.g. Audubon Society, CNPS, The Wildlife Society), and the scientific community. The following is a brief summary of the regulatory context under which biological resources are managed at the Federal, State, and local levels. A number of Federal and state statutes provide a regulatory structure that guides the protection of biological resources. Agencies with the responsibility for protection of biological resources within the project site include: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (wetlands and other waters of the United States); Regional Water Quality Control Board (waters of the State); U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (federally listed species and migratory birds); California Department Fish and Wildlife (riparian areas and other waters of the State, state- listed species, Species of Special Concern); City of San Luis Obispo U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has authority to regulate activities that could discharge fill of material or otherwise adversely modify wetlands or other “waters of the United States.” Perennial and intermittent creeks are considered waters of the United States if they are hydrologically connected to other jurisdictional waters. The USACE also implements the Federal policy embodied in Executive Order 11990, which is intended to result in no net loss of wetland value or acres. In achieving the goals of the Clean Water Act, the USACE seeks to avoid adverse impacts and offset unavoidable adverse impacts on existing aquatic resources. Any fill or adverse modification of wetlands that are hydrologically connected to jurisdictional waters would require a permit from the USACE prior to the start of work. Typically, when a project involves impacts to waters of the United States, the goal of no net loss of wetland acres or values is met through compensatory mitigation involving creation or enhancement of similar habitats. Regional Water Quality Control Board The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and the local Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) have jurisdiction over “waters of the State,” pursuant to the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, which are defined as any surface water or groundwater, including saline waters, within the boundaries of the State. The SWRCB has issued general Waste Discharge Requirements City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use A-2 (WDRs) regarding discharges to “isolated” waters of the State (Water Quality Order No. 2004-0004- DWQ, Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements for Dredged or Fill Discharges to Waters Deemed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to be Outside of Federal Jurisdiction). The Central Coast RWQCB enforces actions under this general order for isolated waters not subject to Federal jurisdiction, and is also responsible for the issuance of water quality certifications pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act for waters subject to Federal jurisdiction. United States Fish and Wildlife Service The USFWS implements the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 United States Code [USC] Section 703- 711) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 USC Section 668). The USFWS and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) share responsibility for implementing the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) (16 USC § 153 et seq.). Generally, the USFWS implements the FESA for terrestrial and freshwater species, while the NMFS implements the FESA for marine and anadramous species. Projects that would result in “take” of any federally threatened or endangered species are required to obtain permits from the USFWS or NMFS through either Section 7 (interagency consultation with a Federal nexus) or Section 10 (Habitat Conservation Plan) of FESA, depending on the involvement by the Federal government in permitting and/or funding of the project. The permitting process is used to determine if a project would jeopardize the continued existence of a listed species and what measures would be required to avoid jeopardizing the species. “Take” under Federal definition means to harass, harm (which includes habitat modification), pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct. Proposed or candidate species do not have the full protection of FESA; however, the USFWS and NMFS advise project applicants that they could be elevated to listed status at any time. California Department of Fish and Wildlife The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) derives its authority from the Fish and Game Code of California. The California Endangered Species Act (CESA) (Fish and Game Code Section 2050 et. seq.) prohibits take of state listed threatened, endangered or fully protected species. Take under CESA is restricted to direct mortality of a listed species and does not prohibit indirect harm by way of habitat modification. The CDFW also prohibits take for species designated as Fully Protected under the Code. California Fish and Game Code sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3511 describe unlawful take, possession, or destruction of native birds, nests, and eggs. Fully protected birds (Section 3511) may not be taken or possessed except under specific permit. Section 3503.5 of the Code protects all birds-of-prey and their eggs and nests against take, possession, or destruction of nests or eggs. Species of Special Concern (SSC) is a category used by the CDFW for those species which are considered to be indicators of regional habitat changes or are considered to be potential future protected species. Species of Special Concern do not have any special legal status except that which may be afforded by the Fish and Game Code as noted above. The SSC category is intended by the CDFW for use as a management tool to include these species in special consideration when decisions are made concerning the development of natural lands. The CDFW also has authority to administer the Native Plant Protection Act (NPPA) (Fish and Game Code Section 1900 et seq.). The NPPA requires the CDFW to establish criteria for determining if a species, subspecies, or variety of native plant is endangered or rare. Under Sectio©913(c) of the NPPA, the owner of land where a rare or endangered native plant is growing is required to notify the department at least 10 days in advance of changing the land use to allow for salvage of plant. Regulatory Setting Biological Resources Assessment A-3 Perennial and intermittent streams and associated riparian vegetation, when present, also fall under the jurisdiction of the CDFW. Section 1600 et seq. of the Fish and Game Code (Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreements) gives the CDFW regulatory authority over work within the stream zone (which could extend to the 100-year flood plain) consisting of, but not limited to, the diversion or obstruction of the natural flow or changes in the channel, bed, or bank of any river, stream or lake. Local Jurisdiction The project is located within the City of San Luis Obispo and is subject to the Policies set forth in the City of San Luis Obispo’s General Plan as well as the City’s zoning regulations. The project is also required to comply with the City’s Standard Specifications and Engineering Standards for creek crossings. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use A-4 This page intentionally left blank. Appendix B Site Photographs Site Photographs Biological Resources Assessment B-1 Photograph 1. Bermuda grass lawn within Study Area (October 24, 2017). Photograph 2. The entrance to the Study Area with Bermuda grass lawn bordering both sides of the developed entrance road (October 24, 2017). City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use B-2 Photograph 3. Orcutt Creek in southeastern corner of Study Area, upstream of the culverts beneath Tank Farm Road (October 24, 2017). Photograph 4. Developed road through Study Area surrounded by landscape vegetation (October 24, 2017). Site Photographs Biological Resources Assessment B-3 Photograph 5. Existing RV parking lot on north side of Study Area (October 24, 2017). Photograph 6. Acacia Creek channel within the western side of the Study Area City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use B-4 Photograph 7. Landscape vegetation within the Study Area (October 24, 2017). Photograph 8. Bermuda grass lawn and landscape vegetation between the existing mobile home development and Acacia Creek (October 24, 2017). Site Photographs Biological Resources Assessment B-5 Photograph 9. The upper bank of Acacia Creek with cactus and iceplant near the entrance to the Study Area (October 24, 2017). Photograph 10. The downstream (southern) end of the existing crossing over Acacia Creek (August 8, 2018). City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use B-6 Photograph 11. The upstream (northern) end of the existing crossing over Acacia Creek (August 8, 2018). Photograph 12. The eastern end of the wetland feature that enters the the northern end of the Study Area from the east (August 8, 2018). Appendix C Floral and Faunal Compendium Floral and Faunal Compendium Biological Resources Assessment C-1 Plant and Animal Species Observed Within the Study Area on [October 24, 2017 and August 8, 2018] Scientific Name Common Name Status Native or Introduced Plants Trees Acer negundo Box elder None Native Calocedrus decurrens Incense cedar None Native (Planted) Eucalyptus globulus blue-gum eucalyptus None Introduced; Cal-IPC Moderate Hesperocyparis macrocarpa Monterey cypress None Native (Planted) Phoenix canariensis Canary Island palm None Introduced; Cal-IPC Limited Juglans hindsii Northern California black walnut None Native Juniperus californica California juniper None Native (Planted) Ligustrum japonicum Japanese privet None Introduced Platanus racemosa Western sycamore None Native Quercus agrifolia Coast live oak None Native Salix laevigata Red willow None Native Salix lasiolepis arroyo willow None Native Schinus molle Peruvian pepper tree None Introduced Umbellularia californica Bay laurel None Native Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm None Introduced; Cal-IPC Moderate Shrubs Baccharis pilularis coyote brush None Native Cylindropuntia sp. cactus None Introduced Nerium oleander oleander None Introduced Ricinus communis Castor bean None Introduced; Cal-IPC Limited Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry None Introduced; Cal-IPC High Rubus ursinus California blackberry None Native Sambucus nigra elderberry None Native Herbs Bolboschoenus maritimus Saltmarsh bulrush None Native Brassica nigra black mustard None Introduced; Cal-IPC Moderate Carex praegracilis field sedge None Native Carpobrotus chilensis sea fig None Introduced; Cal-IPC Moderate Carpobrotus edulis iceplant None Introduced; Cal-IPC High Centaurea solstitialis yellow star thistle None Introduced; Cal-IPC High Conium maculatum poison hemlock None Introduced; Cal-IPC Moderate Cyperus eragrostis tall flatsedge None Native Datura wrightii Jimsonweed None Native Dipsacus sativus Fuller’s teasel None Introduced; Cal-IPC Moderate Eleocharis macrostachya common spikerush None Native Erodium cicutarium red stemmed filaree None Introduced; Cal-IPC Limited City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use C-2 Scientific Name Common Name Status Native or Introduced Foeniculum vulgare sweet fennel None Introduced; Cal-IPC High Helminthotheca echioides bristly ox-tongue None Introduced; Cal-IPC Limited Hemizonia congesta Hayfield tarweed None Native Hirschfeldia incana perennial mustard None Introduced; Cal-IPC Moderate Juncus phaeocephalus brown headed rush None Native Lotus corniculatus bird’s foot trefoil None Introduced Malva nicaeensis bull mallow None Introduced Plantago coronopus Buckhorn plantain None Introduced Plantago major Common plantain None Introduced Rumex crispus Curly dock None Introduced; Cal-IPC Limited Typha domingensis cattail None Native Xanthium strumarium rough cocklebur None Native Grasses Brachypodium distachyon False brome None Introduced; Cal-IPC Moderate Cynodon dactylon Bermuda grass None Introduced; Cal-IPC Moderate Hordeum marinum Seaside barley None Introduced Paspalum dilatatum Dallisgrass None Introduced Phalaris aquatica Harding grass None Introduced; Cal-IPC Moderate Polypogon interruptus beardgrass None Introduced Polypogon monspeliensis Rabbitsfoot grass None Introduced; Cal-IPC Limited Wildlife Aphelocoma californica Western scrub jay None Native Cathartes aura Turkey vulture None Native Corvus brachyrhynchos American crow None Native Mimus polyglottos Northern mockingbird None Native Otospermophilus beecheyi California ground squirrel None Native Sceloporus occidentalis Western fence lizard None Native Sialia Mexicana Western bluebird None Native Sylvilagus audubonii Cottontail None Native Thomomys sp. Gopher (sign) None Native Zenaida macroura Mourning dove None Native CRPR – California Rare Plant Rank, defined in California Native Plant Society Online Inventory and CDFW California Natural Diversity Database. Ranks are also fully listed and defined in Appendix D. Cal-IPC – California Invasive Plant Council Appendix D Special Status Species Evaluation Tables Special Status Species Evaluation Tables Biological Resources Assessment D-1 Special Status Natural Communities in the Regional Vicinity of the Project Site Plant Community G-Rank / S-Rank Potential for Impact Rationale Central Foredunes G1 / S1.2 None No central foredune habitat present within the Study Area. Central Maritime Chaparral G2 / S2.2 None No chaparral vegetation communities present within the Study Area. Coastal and Valley Freshwater Marsh G3 / S2.1 None No Coastal and valley freshwater marsh habitat present within the Study Area. Coastal Brackish Marsh G2 / S2.1 None No coastal brackish marsh habitat present within the Study Area Northern Coastal Salt Marsh G3 / S3.2 None No Northern coastal salt marsh habitat present within the Study Area Northern Interior Cypress Forest G2 / S2.2 None No Northern interior cypress forest present within the Study Area Serpentine Bunchgrass G2 / S2.2 None No serpentine bunchgrass present within Study Area. Valley Needlegrass Grassland G3 / S3.1 None No valley needlegrass grassland present within the Study Area. G-Rank/S-Rank = Global Rank and State Rank as per NatureServe and CDFW’s CNDDB RareFind3. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use D-2 Special Status Plant Species in the Regional Vicinity of the Project Site Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CRPR Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Rationale Abronia maritima Red sand-verbena --/-- G4/S3S4 4.2 Coastal dunes. Dune plant. 0- 100 m. None The appropriate coastal dune habitat is no present onsite; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Agrostis hooveri Hoover's bent grass --/-- G2 / S2 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, closed-cone coniferous forest, valley and foothill grassland. Sandy sites. 60-765 m. None Suitable habitat within the Study Area lacks sandy soils required by the species. The nearest CNDDB occurrence of the species has been documented on Irish Knob approximately 3 miles south of project site. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Amsinckia douglasiana Douglas' fiddleneck --/-- G3 / S3 4.2 Valley and foothill grassland, oak woodland. Monterey shale; dry habitats. 0-1950 m. None No Monterey shale required by the species is present onsite. Additionally, no CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Arctostaphylos cruzensis Arroyo de la Cruz manzanita --/-- G1G2 / S1S2 1B.2 Broad-leafed upland forest, coastal bluff scrub, closed- cone coniferous forest, chaparral, coastal scrub, & valley and foothill grassland. On sandy soils in several different habitat types from chaparral to coastal scrub to woodland. 5-150 m. None No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles. Additionally, no manzanita species were observed within the project site. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Arctostaphylos luciana Santa Lucia manzanita --/-- G3 / S3 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland. On shale (one site says serpentine) outcrops, on slopes, in chaparral. 105-795 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite. and project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Arctostaphylos morroensis Morro manzanita Threatened/-- G1 / S1 1B.1 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal dunes, coastal scrub. On Baywood sands, usually with chaparral associates. 30-125 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and no CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles. Additionally, no manzanita species were observed within the project site. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Special Status Species Evaluation Tables Biological Resources Assessment D-3 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CRPR Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Rationale Arctostaphylos obispoensis Bishop manzanita --/-- G4 / S4 4.3 Closed-cone coniferous forest, cismontane woodland, chaparral Rocky, serpentine sites. 150-1005 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Arctostaphylos osoensis Oso manzanita --/-- G1 / S1 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland. Usually occurs in openings within oak woodland on dacite porphyry buttes. 180-275 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Arctostaphylos pechoensis Pecho manzanita --/-- G2 / S2 1B.2 Closed-cone coniferous forest, chaparral, coastal scrub. Grows on siliceous shale with other chaparral associates. 60- 855 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and no manzanita species were observed within the project site. Therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Arctostaphylos pilosula Santa Margarita manzanita --/-- G2? / S2? 1B.2 Closed-cone coniferous forest, chaparral, broad-leafed upland forest, cismontane woodland. Shale outcrops & slopes; reported growing on decomposed granite or sandstone. 60-1220 m. None Although the species has been documented within the Los Padres National Forest, northeast of the project site, the site lacks shale outcrops and slopes and associated habitats for the species. During surveys no manzanita species were observed within the project site. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Arctostaphylos rudis Sand mesa manzanita --/-- G2 / S2 1B.2 Chaparral, coastal scrub. On sandy soils in Lompoc/Nipomo area. 20-335 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located outside the Lompoc/Nipomo area. Additionally, no manzanita species were observed within the project site. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Arctostaphylos tomentosa ssp. daciticola Dacite manzanita --/-- G4T1 / S1 1B.1 Chaparral, cismontane woodland. Only known from one site in SLO County on dacite porphyry buttes. About 120m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impacts to the species are anticipated. Arenaria paludicola Marsh sandwort Endangered/En dangered G1 / S1 1B.1 Marshes and swamps. Growing up through dense mats of Typha, Juncus, Scirpus, etc. in freshwater marsh. Sandy soil. 3-170 m. None The appropriate marsh and swamp habitat required by the species are not present onsite. Additionally, no CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use D-4 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CRPR Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Rationale Aspidotis carlotta- halliae Carlotta Hall's lace fern --/-- G3 / S3 4.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland. Generally serpentine slopes, crevices, or outcrops. 100-1400 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impacts to the species are anticipated. Astragalus didymocarpus var. milesianus Miles' milk-vetch --/-- G5T2 / S2 1B.2 Coastal scrub. Clay soils. 50- 385 m. None Although clay soils required by the species are present onsite, the appropriate species habitat is not present onsite. CNDDB occurrences have been documented within 5 miles of the project site. With a lack of habitat and soils combinations the project is not anticipated to impact the species. Astragalus nuttallii var. nuttallii Ocean bluff milk-vetch --/-- G4T4 / S4 4.2 Coastal bluff scrub, coastal dunes. 3-120 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite. Additionally, no CNDDB occurrences have been documented within 5 miles of the project site. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Atriplex coulteri Coulter's saltbush --/-- G3 / S1S2 1B.2 Coastal bluff scrub, coastal dunes, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland. Ocean bluffs, ridgetops, as well as alkaline low places. Alkaline or clay soils. 2-460 m. None The appropriate alkaline and clay soils required by the species are not present onsite. No CNDDB occurrences have been documented within 5 miles of the project site. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Bryoria pseudocapillaris False gray horsehair lichen --/-- G3 / S2 3.2 Coastal dunes, North Coast coniferous forest (immediate coast). Usually on conifers. 0- 90 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite. Additionally, no CNDDB occurrences have been documented within 5 miles of the project site. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Bryoria spiralifera Twisted horsehair lichen --/-- G3 / S1S2 1B.1 North coast coniferous forest. Usually on conifers. 0-30 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite. Additionally, no CNDDB occurrences have been documented within 5 miles of the project site. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Special Status Species Evaluation Tables Biological Resources Assessment D-5 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CRPR Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Rationale Calandrinia breweri Brewer's calandrinia --/-- G4 / S4 4.2 Chaparral, coastal scrub. Sandy or loamy soils. Disturbed sites, burns. 10- 1200 m. None The appropriate species habitats and sandy or loamy soils required by the species are not present onsite. Additionally, no CNDDB occurrences have been documented within 5 miles of the project site. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Calochortus clavatus var. clavatus Club-haired mariposa- lily --/-- G4T3 / S3 4.3 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grassland, coastal scrub. Generally on serpentine clay, rocky soils. 75-1300 m. None Serpentine soils required by the species are not present onsite. Additionally, no CNDDB occurrences have been documented within 5 miles of the project site. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Calochortus obispoensis San Luis mariposa-lily --/-- G2 / S2 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland. Often in serpentine grassland. 15-550 m. None Suitable serpentine soils are not present onsite; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Calochortus simulans La Panza mariposa-lily --/-- G2 / S2 1B.3 Valley and foothill grassland, cismontane woodland, chaparral, lower montane coniferous forest. Decomposed granite. 50-1160 m. None Suitable habitat is not present and the project site lacks decomposed granite substrate required by the species. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Calycadenia villosa Dwarf calycadenia --/-- G3 / S3 1B.1 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grassland, meadows and seeps. Open, dry meadows, hillsides, gravelly outwashes. 240-1350 m. None The project site is located well below the elevation range of the species and no CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Calystegia subacaulis ssp. episcopalis Cambria morning-glory --/-- G3T2 / S2 4.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal prairie, valley and foothill grassland. 5-475 m. Low Potentially suitable habitat for this species is limited to the grassland on the northern portion of the Study Area. Implementation of the pedestrian/bicycle access path from the northern site boundary to the existing pedestrian/bicycle paths at the Damon Garcia-Sports Fields may result in impacts to this species. Camissoniopsis hardhamiae Hardham's evening- primrose --/-- G2 / S2 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland. Sandy, decomposed carbonate. 140- 945 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impacts to the species are anticipated. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use D-6 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CRPR Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Rationale Carex obispoensis San Luis Obispo sedge --/-- G3? / S3? 1B.2 Closed-cone coniferous forest, chaparral, coastal prairie, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland. Usually in transition zone on sand, clay, serpentine, or gabbro. In seeps. 5-845 m. Low The portion of Orcutt Creek and its setback within the project site may contain suitable habitat for this species. Construction of a new crossing over Orcutt Creek vegetation management activities have a low potential to impact this species Castilleja densiflora var. obispoensis San Luis Obispo owl's- clover --/-- G5T2 / S2 1B.2 Valley and foothill grassland, meadows and seeps. Sometimes on serpentine. 10- 485 m. Low Potentially suitable habitat for this species is limited to the grassland and wetland on the northern portion of the Study Area. Implementation of the pedestrian/bicycle access path from the northern site boundary to the existing pedestrian/bicycle paths at the Damon Garcia-Sports Fields may result in impacts to this species. Caulanthus californicus California jewelflower Endangered/En dangered G1 / S1 1B.1 Annual herb. Blooms Feb- May. Chenopod scrub, valley and foothill grassland, pinyon- juniper woodland. Historical from various valley habitats in both the Central Valley and Carrizo Plain. 65-900m. None No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site and the project site is located outside the known range of the species; therefore, the project is not anticipated to impact the species. Ceanothus cuneatus var. fascicularis Lompoc ceanothus --/-- G5T4 / S4 4.2 Chaparral. Sandy soils. 5-400 m. None The appropriate habitat and soils required by the species are not present onsite. No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site. The project is not anticipated to have impacts on the species. Ceanothus gloriosus var. gloriosus Point Reyes ceanothus --/-- G4T4 / S4 4.3 Closed-cone coniferous forest, coastal dunes, coastal scrub, coastal bluff scrub. Usually on bluffs along the coast in sandy soils, but also known from more inland sites. 5-520 m. None The appropriate habitat and soils required by the species are not present onsite. No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site. The project is not anticipated to have impacts on the species. Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii Congdon's tarplant --/-- G3T2 / S2 1B.1 Valley and foothill grassland. Alkaline soils, sometimes described as heavy white clay. 0-230 m. None The project site lacks alkaline soils required by the species. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Special Status Species Evaluation Tables Biological Resources Assessment D-7 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CRPR Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Rationale Cercocarpus betuloides var. blancheae Island mountain- mahogany --/-- G5T4 / S4 4.3 Chaparral, closed-cone coniferous forest. 30-600 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite. No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site. The project is not anticipated to have impacts on the species. Chenopodium littoreum Coastal goosefoot --/-- G2 / S2 1B.2 Coastal dunes. 10-30 m. None The appropriate coastal dune habitat is not present onsite and no CNDDB occurrences have been documented within 5 miles of the project site. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Chlorogalum pomeridianum var. minus Dwarf soaproot --/-- G5T2T3 / S2S3 1B.2 Chaparral. Serpentine. 305- 1000 m. None The appropriate chaparral habitat with serpentine soils required by the species is not present onsite and the project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Chloropyron maritimum ssp. maritimum Salt marsh bird's-beak Endangered/En dangered G4?T1 / S1 1B.2 Marshes and swamps, coastal dunes. Limited to the higher zones of salt marsh habitat. 0- 10 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite including salt marsh habitat. No CNDDB occurrences have been documented within 5 miles of the project site. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Chorizanthe breweri Brewer's spineflower --/-- G3 / S3 1B.3 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub, closed-cone coniferous forest. Rocky or gravelly serpentine sites; usually in barren areas. 45-765 m. None The appropriate species habitat and rocky soils required by the species are not present onsite. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Chorizanthe douglasii Douglas' spineflower --/-- G4 / S4 4.3 Cismontane woodland, lower montane coniferous forest, chaparral, coastal scrub. 55- 1600 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and no CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Chorizanthe leptotheca Peninsular spineflower --/-- G3 / S3 4.2 Chaparral, coastal scrub, lower montane coniferous forest. On granitic soils, in alluvial fans. 300-1900 m. None The appropriate species habitat and required granitic soils are not present and the project site is not located on an alluvial fan. No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site. No impacts to the species are anticipated. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use D-8 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CRPR Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Rationale Chorizanthe palmeri Palmer's spineflower --/-- G4? / S4 4.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grassland. Dry, rocky places and hillsides; sometimes on serpentine. 60-945 m. None The project site lacks rocky places and serpentine soils. No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Chorizanthe rectispina Straight-awned spineflower --/-- G2 / S2 1B.3 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub. Often on granite in chaparral. 45-1040 m. None The appropriate species habitat and granite substrates required by the species are not present onsite. No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Chorizanthe ventricosa Potbellied spineflower --/-- G4 / S4 4.3 Valley and foothill grassland, cismontane woodland. Serpentine. 65-1235 m. None The site lacks serpentine soils required by the species. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Cirsium fontinale var. obispoense San Luis Obispo fountain thistle Endangered/En dangered G2T2 / S2 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland. Serpentine seeps. 5-385 m. None The site lacks serpentine seeps required by the species. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Cirsium occidentale var. lucianum Cuesta Ridge thistle --/-- G3G4T2 / S2 1B.2 Chaparral. Openings; on serpentinite. Often on steep rocky slopes and along disturbed roadsides. 485-765 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impacts to the species are anticipated. Cirsium rhothophilum Surf thistle --/Threatened G1 / S1 1B.2 Coastal dunes, coastal bluff scrub. Open areas in central dune scrub; usually in coastal dunes. 3-60 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and no CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Cirsium scariosum var. loncholepis La Graciosa thistle Endangered/Th reatened G5T1 / S1 1B.1 Coastal dunes, coastal scrub, brackish marshes, valley and foothill grassland, cismontane woodland. Lake edges, riverbanks, other wetlands; often in dune areas. Mesic, sandy sites. 4-220 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and no CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Cladium californicum California saw-grass --/-- G4 / S2 2B.2 Meadows and seeps, marshes and swamps (alkaline or freshwater). Freshwater or alkaline moist habitats. -20- 2135 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and no CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Special Status Species Evaluation Tables Biological Resources Assessment D-9 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CRPR Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Rationale Cladonia firma Popcorn lichen --/-- G4 / S1 2B.1 Coastal dunes, coastal scrub. On soil and detritus on stabilized sand dunes, in pure stands or intermixed with other lichens and mosses forming biotic soil crusts, covering areas up to several meters. 30-80 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and no CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Clarkia exilis Slender clarkia --/-- G4 / S4 4.3 Cismontane woodland. 120- 1000 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impacts to the species are anticipated. Clarkia speciosa ssp. immaculata Pismo clarkia Endangered/Ra re G4T1 / S1 1B.1 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grassland. On ancient sand dunes not far from the coast. Sandy soils; openings. 30-185 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite; therefore; no impacts to the species are anticipated. Clinopodium mimuloides Monkey-flower savory --/-- G3 / S3 4.2 North coast coniferous forest, chaparral Streambanks, mesic sites. 305-1800 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impacts to the species are anticipated. Cordylanthus maritimus ssp. maritimus Salt marsh bird's-beak Endangered/En dangered G4?T1 / S1 1B.2 Blooms May-Jun. Native to the Southwestern United States and northern Baja California. Grows in areas of high salt concentrations, coastal salt marshes, dunes and wetlands or the inland salt flats of the Great Basin. 0- 30m. None The appropriate species habitat is with high salt concentrations required by the species is not present onsite. No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Corethrogyne leucophylla Branching beach aster --/-- G3Q / S3 3.2 Closed-cone coniferous forest, coastal dunes. 3-60 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and no CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Deinandra paniculata Paniculate tarplant --/-- G4 / S4 4.2 Coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools. Usually in vernally mesic sites. Sometimes in vernal pools or on mima mounds near them. 25-940 m. None Although grassland habitats are present within the project site, the site lacks vernally mesic sites commonly associated with the species. No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use D-10 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CRPR Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Rationale Delphinium parryi ssp. blochmaniae Dune larkspur --/-- G4T2 / S2 1B.2 Chaparral, coastal dunes (maritime). On rocky areas and dunes. 18-305 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Delphinium parryi ssp. eastwoodiae Eastwood's larkspur --/-- G4T2 / S2 1B.2 Chaparral, valley and foothill grassland. Serpentine. Openings. 60-640 m. None Non-native grassland habitat is present within the project site; however, the site lacks serpentine soils required by the species. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Delphinium umbraculorum Umbrella larkspur --/-- G3 / S3 1B.3 Cismontane woodland, chaparral. Mesic sites. 215- 2075 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impacts to the species are anticipated. Dithyrea maritima Beach spectaclepod --/Threatened G1 / S1 1B.1 Coastal dunes, coastal scrub. Sea shores, on sand dunes, and sandy places near the shore. 3-65 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located greater than 7 miles from the ocean; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Dudleya abramsii ssp. bettinae Betty's dudleya --/-- G4T2 / S2 1B.2 Coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland, chaparral. On rocky, barren exposures of serpentine within scrub vegetation. 20-250 m. None The nearest CNDDB occurrence of the species is less than one mile northwest of the site; however, the site lacks rocky serpentine soils required by the species. Therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Dudleya abramsii ssp. murina Mouse-gray dudleya --/-- G4T2 / S2 1B.3 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grassland. Serpentine outcrops. 25-535 m. None The site lacks serpentine soils required by the species and the nearest CNDDB occurrence is located approximately 5 miles east of the site within the foothills of the Santa Lucia Range. Therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Dudleya blochmaniae ssp. blochmaniae Blochman's dudleya --/-- G3T2 / S2 1B.1 Coastal scrub, coastal bluff scrub, chaparral, valley and foothill grassland. Open, rocky slopes; often in shallow clays over serpentine or in rocky areas with little soil. 5-450 m. None The site lacks rocky slopes with little soil required by the species; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Eleocharis parvula Small spikerush --/-- G5 / S4 4.3 Marshes and swamps. In coastal salt marshes. 1-3020 m. None Species has not been documented by the CNDDB within 5- miles of the Study Area. The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Special Status Species Evaluation Tables Biological Resources Assessment D-11 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CRPR Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Rationale Eriastrum luteum Yellow-flowered eriastrum --/-- G2 / S2 1B.2 Broad-leafed upland forest, cismontane woodland, chaparral. On bare sandy decomposed granite slopes. 240-580 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impacts to the species are anticipated. Erigeron blochmaniae Blochman's leafy daisy --/-- G2 / S2 1B.2 Coastal dunes, coastal scrub. Sand dunes and hills. 0-185 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Eriodictyon altissimum Indian Knob mountainbalm Endangered/En dangered G1 / S1 1B.1 Chaparral (maritime), cismontane woodland, coastal scrub. Ridges in open, disturbed areas within chaparral on Pismo sandstone. 90-270 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impacts to the species are anticipated. Eryngium aristulatum var. hooveri Hoover's button-celery --/-- G5T1 / S1 1B.1 Vernal pools. Alkaline depressions, vernal pools, roadside ditches and other wet places near the coast. 1- 50 m. Low The portion of Orcutt Creek and its setback within the project site may contain suitable habitat for this species. Construction of a new crossing over Orcutt Creek and vegetation management activities have a low potential to impact this species Erysimum suffrutescens Suffrutescent wallflower --/-- G3 / S3 4.2 Coastal dunes, coastal scrub, coastal bluff scrub, chaparral. Coastal dunes and bluffs. 0- 150 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Extriplex joaquinana San Joaquin spearscale --/-- G2 / S2 1B.2 Chenopod scrub, alkali meadow, playas, valley and foothill grassland. In seasonal alkali wetlands or alkali sink scrub with Distichlis spicata, Frankenia, etc. 0-840 m. None The site lacks alkali wetlands and associated wetland plants. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Fritillaria agrestis Stinkbells --/-- G3 / S3 4.2 Cismontane woodland, chaparral, valley and foothill grassland. Sometimes on serpentine; mostly found in nonnative grassland or in grassy openings in clay soil. 10-1555 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and no CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Fritillaria ojaiensis Ojai fritillary --/-- G2? / S2? 1B.2 Broad-leafed upland forest (mesic), chaparral, lower montane coniferous forest, cismontane woodland. Usually loamy soil. Sometimes on serpentine; sometimes along roadsides. 225-1000 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impact to the species is anticipated. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use D-12 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CRPR Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Rationale Fritillaria viridea San Benito fritillary --/-- G2 / S2 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland. Serpentine slopes. Sometimes on rocky streambanks. 365-1360 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite for the species and the project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impact to the species is anticipated. Grindelia hirsutula var. maritima San Francisco gumplant --/-- G5T1Q / S1 3.2 Coastal scrub, coastal bluff scrub, valley and foothill grassland. Sandy or serpentine slopes, sea bluffs. 15-305 m. None The site lacks serpentine slopes and sandy soils required by the species; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Horkelia cuneata var. puberula Mesa horkelia --/-- G4T1 / S1 1B.1 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub. Sandy or gravelly sites. 15- 1645 m. None The project site lacks suitable habitat for the species; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Horkelia cuneata var. sericea Kellogg's horkelia --/-- G4T1? / S1? 1B.1 Closed-cone coniferous forest, coastal scrub, coastal dunes, chaparral. Old dunes, coastal sandhills; openings. Sandy or gravelly soils. 5-430 m. None Sandy soils are present within the project site; however, suitable habitat is not present onsite and no CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site. Therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Lasthenia californica ssp. macrantha Perennial goldfields --/-- G3T2 / S2 1B.2 Coastal bluff scrub, coastal dunes, coastal scrub. 5-185 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and no CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri Coulter's goldfields --/-- G4T2 / S2 1B.1 Coastal salt marshes, playas, vernal pools. Usually found on alkaline soils in playas, sinks, and grasslands. 1-1375 m. None The appropriate vernal pools and alkaline soils required by the species are not present onsite. No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Layia jonesii Jones' layia --/-- G2 / S2 1B.2 Chaparral, valley and foothill grassland. Clay soils and serpentine outcrops. 5-245 m. None Appropriate serpentine outcrops are not present onsite. Therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Lomatium parvifolium Small-leaved lomatium --/-- G4 / S4 4.2 Closed-cone coniferous forest, chaparral, coastal scrub, riparian woodland. On serpentine. 20-700 m. None The appropriate species habitat and serpentine soils required by the species are not present onsite. No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Special Status Species Evaluation Tables Biological Resources Assessment D-13 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CRPR Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Rationale Lupinus ludovicianus San Luis Obispo County lupine --/-- G1 / S1 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland. Open areas in sandy soil, Santa Margarita formation. 85-525 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impact to the species is anticipated. Lupinus nipomensis Nipomo Mesa lupine Endangered/En dangered G1 / S1 1B.1 Coastal dunes. Dry sandy flats, restricted to back dunes, associated with central dune scrub habitat - a rare community type. 10-50 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Malacothamnus gracilis Slender bush-mallow --/-- G1Q / S1 1B.1 Chaparral. Dry, rocky slopes. 150-335 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impact to the species is anticipated. Malacothamnus jonesii Jones' bush-mallow --/-- G4 / S4 4.3 Chaparral, cismontane woodland. 160-825 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impacts to the species are anticipated. Malacothamnus palmeri var. involucratus Carmel Valley bush- mallow --/-- G3T2Q / S2 1B.2 Cismontane woodland, chaparral, coastal scrub. Talus hilltops and slopes, sometimes on serpentine. Fire dependent. 5-520 m. None The appropriate species habitat and serpentine soils required by the species are not present onsite. Additionally, the project site lacks frequent fire burns. No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Malacothamnus palmeri var. palmeri Santa Lucia bush- mallow --/-- G3T2Q / S2 1B.2 Chaparral. Dry rocky slopes, mostly near summits, but occasionally extending down canyons to the sea. 60-360 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is not located near summits; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Malacothrix incana Dunedelion --/-- G4 / S4 4.3 Coastal dunes, coastal scrub. On flats and slopes, as well as unstabilized dunes near the ocean. 2-35 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located approximately 7 miles from the ocean. No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use D-14 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CRPR Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Rationale Monardella palmeri Palmer's monardella --/-- G2 / S2 1B.2 Cismontane woodland, chaparral. On serpentine, often found associated with Sargent cypress forests. 90- 945 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impact to the species is anticipated. Monardella sinuata ssp. sinuata Southern curly-leaved monardella --/-- G3T2 / S2 1B.2 Coastal dunes, coastal scrub, chaparral, cismontane woodland. Sandy soils. 20-305 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite along with sandy soils required by the species; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Monardella undulata ssp. crispa Crisp monardella --/-- G3T2 / S2 1B.2 Coastal dunes, coastal scrub. Often on the borders of open, sand areas, usually adjacent to typical backdune scrub vegetation. 5-125 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Monardella undulata ssp. undulata San Luis Obispo monardella --/-- G2 / S2 1B.2 Coastal dunes, coastal scrub. Stabilized sand of the immediate coast. 5-200 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located approximately 7 miles from the ocean; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Monolopia gracilens Woodland woollythreads --/-- G3 / S3 1B.2 Chaparral, valley and foothill grassland, cismontane woodland, broad-leafed upland forest, North Coast coniferous forest. Grassy sites, in openings; sandy to rocky soils. Often seen on serpentine after burns, but may have only weak affinity to serpentine. 120-975 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore, no impact to the species is anticipated. Mucronea californica California spineflower --/-- G3 / S3 4.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal dunes, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland. Sandy soil. 0-1400 m. None The site lacks sandy soils required by the species. No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Nasturtium gambelii Gambel's water cress Endangered/Th reatened G1 / S1 1B.1 Marshes and swamps. Freshwater and brackish marshes at the margins of lakes and along streams, in or just above the water level. 5- 330 m. None The appropriate marsh and swamp habitat is not present onsite; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Navarretia fossalis Spreading navarretia Threatened/-- G1 / S1 1B.1 Annual herb. Blooms Apr-Jun. Vernal pools, chenopod scrub, marshes and swamps, playas. San Diego hardpan and San Diego claypan vernal pools; in swales and V.P's, often surrounded by other habitat types. 30-665m. None The appropriate vernal pool habitat required by the species is not present onsite. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Special Status Species Evaluation Tables Biological Resources Assessment D-15 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CRPR Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Rationale Navarretia nigelliformis ssp. radians Shining navarretia --/-- G4T2 / S2 1B.2 Cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools. Apparently in grassland, and not necessarily in vernal pools. 60-975 m. None No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site and site is below the elevation range for this species. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Nemacaulis denudata var. denudata Coast woolly-heads --/-- G3G4T2 / S2 1B.2 Coastal dunes. 0-100 m. None The appropriate coastal dune habitat is not present onsite; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Nemacladus secundiflorus var. secundiflorus Large-flowered nemacladus --/-- G3T3? / S3? 4.3 Chaparral, valley and foothill grassland. Dry, sandy to gravelly flats and slopes. 200- 2000 m. None The project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Orobanche parishii ssp. brachyloba Short-lobed broomrape --/-- G4?T4 / S3 4.2 Coastal bluff scrub, coastal dunes, coastal scrub. Sandy soil near beaches; reported to grow on Isocoma menziesii and other shrubs. 3-305 m. None The appropriate coastal habitat and beach sand with Isocoma menziesii are not present onsite. No impacts to the species are anticipated. Perideridia pringlei Adobe yampah --/-- G4 / S4 4.3 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, pinyon and juniper woodland, coastal scrub. Serpentine, clay soils. Grassland hillsides; seasonally wet sites. 300-1800 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impacts to the species are anticipated. Phacelia ramosissima var. austrolitoralis South coast branching phacelia --/-- G5?T3 / S3 3.2 Chaparral, coastal scrub, coastal dunes, coastal salt marsh. Sandy, sometimes rocky sites. 5-300 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite along with rocky or sandy soils required by the species. No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Piperia michaelii Michael's rein orchid --/-- G3 / S3 4.2 Coastal bluff scrub, coastal scrub, cismontane woodland, chaparral, closed-cone coniferous forest, lower montane coniferous forest. Mudstone and humus, generally dry sites. 3-915 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite. No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Plagiobothrys torreyi var. perplexans Chaparral popcornflower --/-- G4T3? / S3? 4.3 Chaparral, meadows and seeps, lower montane coniferous forest, upper montane coniferous forest. Burned areas. On igneous soils. 1070-2745 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use D-16 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CRPR Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Rationale Plagiobothrys uncinatus Hooked popcornflower --/-- G2 / S2 1B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grassland. Sandstone outcrops and canyon sides; often in burned or disturbed areas. 210-855 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impacts to the species are anticipated. Poa diaboli Diablo Canyon blue grass --/-- G2 / S2 1B.2 Chaparral (mesic sites), cismontane woodland, coastal scrub, closed-cone coniferous forest. Shale, sometimes burned areas. 115-400 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impacts to the species are anticipated. Prunus fasciculata var. punctata Sand almond --/-- G5T4 / S4 4.3 Chaparral, coastal scrub, cismontane woodland, coastal dunes. Sandy flats. 15-200 m. None The appropriate species habitat and sandy flats are not present; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Sanicula hoffmannii Hoffmann's sanicle --/-- G3 / S3 4.3 Broad-leafed upland forest, coastal scrub, coastal bluff scrub, chaparral, cismontane woodland, lower montane coniferous forest. Cool slopes in deep soil, often in moist shaded serpentine soils, or in clay soils. 30-300 m. None Clay soils are present onsite; however, the appropriate species habitat and moist soils are not present. No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Sanicula maritima Adobe sanicle --/Rare G2 / S2 1B.1 Meadows and seeps, valley and foothill grassland, chaparral, coastal prairie. Moist clay or ultramafic soils. 15-215 m. Low Potentially suitable habitat and clay soils for this species are limited to the grassland and wetland on the northern portion of the Study Area. Implementation of the pedestrian/bicycle access path from the northern site boundary to the existing pedestrian/bicycle paths at the Damon Garcia-Sports Fields may result in impacts to this species. Scrophularia atrata Black-flowered figwort --/-- G2? / S2? 1B.2 Closed-cone coniferous forest, chaparral, coastal dunes, coastal scrub, riparian scrub. Sand, diatomaceous shales, and soils derived from other parent material; around swales and in sand dunes. 10- 445 m. Low The willow riparian habitat along Acacia Creek, Orcutt Creek, and setback areas within the project site may contain suitable habitat for this species. Construction of a pedestrian trail, construction of a new crossing over Orcutt Creek, and vegetation management activities in setback areas have a low potential to impact this species Special Status Species Evaluation Tables Biological Resources Assessment D-17 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CRPR Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Rationale Senecio aphanactis Chaparral ragwort --/-- G3 / S2 2B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub. Drying alkaline flats. 20-855 m. None The appropriate species habitat and alkaline soils required by the species are not present; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Senecio blochmaniae Blochman's ragwort --/-- G3 / S3 4.2 Coastal dunes. 0-100 m. None The appropriate coastal dune habitat is not present onsite; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Sidalcea hickmanii ssp. anomala Cuesta Pass checkerbloom --/Rare G3T1 / S1 1B.2 Closed-cone coniferous forest, chaparral Rocky serpentine soil; associated with Sargent cypress forest. 600-800 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impacts to the species are anticipated. Solidago guiradonis Guirado's goldenrod --/-- G3G4 / S3S4 4.3 Cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grassland. Near streams or seeps in asbestos- laden soils; serpentine. 600- 1370 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impacts to the species are anticipated. Streptanthus albidus ssp. peramoenus Most beautiful jewelflower --/-- G2T2 / S2 1B.2 Chaparral, valley and foothill grassland, cismontane woodland. Serpentine outcrops, on ridges and slopes. 90-1040 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite and the project site is located well below the elevation range of the species; therefore no impacts to the species are anticipated. Suaeda californica California seablite Endangered/-- G1 / S1 1B.1 Marshes and swamps. Margins of coastal salt marshes. 0-5 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite; therefore, no impact to the species is anticipated. Sulcaria isidiifera Splitting yarn lichen --/-- G1 / S1 1B.1 Coastal scrub. On branches of oaks and shrubs in old growth coastal scrub. 20-55 m. None The appropriate species habitat is not present onsite; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Symphyotrichum defoliatum San Bernardino aster --/-- G2 / S2 1B.2 Meadows and seeps, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub, lower montane coniferous forest, marshes and swamps, valley and foothill grassland. Vernally mesic grassland or near ditches, streams and springs; disturbed areas. 2-2040 m. None No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site and species was not documented during appropriately timed survey; therefore no impacts to the species are anticipated. Trifolium hydrophilum Saline clover --/-- G2 / S2 1B.2 Marshes and swamps, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools. Mesic, alkaline sites. 1- 335 m. None The site lacks vernal pools and alkaline sites required by the species; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use D-18 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CRPR Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Rationale Tropidocarpum capparideum Caper-fruited tropidocarpum --/-- G1 / S1 1B.1 Valley and foothill grassland. Alkaline clay. 0-360 m. None The site lacks alkaline clay soils required by the species. No CNDDB occurrences of the species have been documented within 5 miles of the project site; therefore, no impacts to the species are anticipated. Regional Vicinity refers to within a [5] mile radius of site. FE = Federally Endangered FT = Federally Threatened SE = State Endangered ST = State Threatened SR = State Rare G-Rank/S-Rank = Global Rank and State Rank as per NatureServe and CDFW’s CNDDB RareFind3. CRPR (CNPS California Rare Plant Rank): 1A=Presumed Extinct in California 1B=Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California and elsewhere 2A=Plants presumed extirpated in California, but more common elsewhere 2B=Plants Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California, but more common elsewhere 3=Need more information (a Review List) 4=Plants of Limited Distribution (a Watch List) CRPR Threat Code Extension: .1=Seriously endangered in California (over 80% of occurrences threatened / high degree and immediacy of threat) .2=Fairly endangered in California (20-80% occurrences threatened) .3=Not very endangered in California (<20% of occurrences threatened) Special Status Species Evaluation Tables Biological Resources Assessment D-19 Special Status Animal Species in the Regional Vicinity of the Project Site Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CDFW Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Potential for Occurrence Invertebrates Branchinecta lynchi Vernal pool fairy shrimp FT/-- G3 / S3 Endemic to the grasslands of the Central Valley, Central Coast mountains, and South Coast mountains, in astatic rain-filled pools. Inhabit small, clear-water sandstone-depression pools and grassed swale, earth slump, or basalt-flow depression pools. None Species has been documented by CNDDB within a mile of the Study Area within seasonal wetlands and ponds at the former tank farm site. Saturated conditions were observed in Orcutt Creek during the survey conducted by Terra Verde on May 31, 2016; however, they creek was dry during the survey conducted by Rincon on October 24, 2017. Species is not typically found in ephemeral drainages and no impacts to Orcutt Creek are expected. Danaus plexippus* Monarch butterfly --/-- SSA (overwintering) Winter roost sites extend along the coast from northern Mendocino to Baja California, Mexico. Roosts located in wind-protected tree groves (eucalyptus, Monterey pine, cypress), with nectar and water sources nearby. None (roosts) Eucalyptus grove onsite is too thin to provide enough shelter to support suitable winter roosting habitat. Not expected to overwinter onsite. Helminthoglypta walkeriana Morro shoulderband (=banded dune) snail FE/-- G1 / S1S2 Restricted to the coastal strand in the immediate vicinity of Morro Bay. Inhabits the duff beneath Ericameria [=Haplopappus], Salvia, Dudleya, and Mesembryanthemum. None The Study Area is outside the range of this species. Euprserpinus euterpe Kern primrose sphinx moth FT/ -- G1 / S1 Found in the Walker basin, Kern county, and several other scattered locations (Carrizo Plain, Pinnacles NM). Host plant is Camissonia contorta epilobiodes (evening primrose). None The Study Area is outside the range of this species. Fish Eucyclogobius newberryi Tidewater goby FE/-- G3 / S3 SSC Brackish water habitats along the California coast from Agua Hedionda Lagoon, San Diego County to the mouth of the Smith River. Found in shallow lagoons and lower stream reaches, they need fairly still but not stagnant water and high oxygen levels. None The site is too far inland for this species. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use D-20 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CDFW Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Potential for Occurrence Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus Steelhead – South/Central California Coast DPS FT/-- G5T2Q/S2 All naturally spawned populations that occur in coastal streams from the Pajaro River south to, but excluding the Santa Maria River. The major watersheds include the Pajaro, Salinas, and Carmel, as well as the smaller rivers along the Big Sur Coast and south. Low Species has potential to occur in Acacia Creek. If water is present in Acacia Creek during construction activities related to widening of the existing crossing, this species may be encountered and impacted. Reptiles Anniella pulchra pulchra Silvery legless lizard --/-- G3 / S3 SSC Sandy or loose loamy soils under sparse vegetation. Soil moisture is essential. They prefer soils with a high moisture content. None No suitable habitat (i.e., loose sandy soils). Actinemys (=Emys) marmorata Western pond turtle --/-- G3G4 / S3 SSC A thoroughly aquatic turtle of ponds, marshes, rivers, streams and irrigation ditches, usually with aquatic vegetation, below 6000 ft elevation. Needs basking sites and suitable (sandy banks or grassy open fields) upland habitat up to 0.5 km from water for egg-laying. Moderate Species has been documented by CNDDB in Acacia Creek just upstream from the Study Area. Suitable basking and nesting sites occur within the riparian habitat within the Study Area. This species has a moderate potential to be encountered during the construction of offsite improvements in suitable habitat. The remainder of the Study Area is unsuitable for this species due to lack of sandy banks and landscaping. Gambelia silus Blunt nosed leopard lizard FE/SE G1 / S1 FP Resident of sparsely vegetated alkali and desert scrub habitats, in areas of low topographic relief. Seeks cover in mammal burrows, under shrubs or structures such as fence posts; they do not excavate their own burrows. None The site is outside the range for this species. Phrynosoma blainvillii Blainsville horned lizard --/-- G3G4 / S3S4 SSC Frequents a wide variety of habitats, most common in lowlands along sandy washes with scattered low bushes. Open areas for sunning, bushes for cover, patches of loose soil for burial, and abundant supply of ants and other insects. None The site does not contain suitable habitat for this species. Amphibians Ambystoma californiense California tiger salamander FT/ST G2G3 / S2S3 SSC Central Valley DPS federally listed as threatened. Santa Barbara and Sonoma counties DPS federally listed as endangered. Need underground refuges, especially ground squirrel burrows, and vernal pools or other seasonal water sources for breeding. None Study Area is outside the range for this species. Not expected to occur. Special Status Species Evaluation Tables Biological Resources Assessment D-21 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CDFW Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Potential for Occurrence Batrachoseps minor Lesser slender salamander --/-- G1 / S1 SSC South Santa Lucia Mountains in tanbark oak, coast live oak, blue oak, sycamore & laurel. Shaded slopes with abundant leaf litter. None There are no documented occurrences by CNDDB within 5 miles and there is no suitable habitat within the Study Area Rana boylii Foothill yellow- legged frog --/SCT G3 / S3 SSC Partly-shaded, shallow streams and riffles with a rocky substrate in a variety of habitats. Needs at least some cobble-sized substrate for egg- laying. Needs at least 15 weeks to attain metamorphosis. None No suitable rocky substrate for this species within the Study Area. Additionally, no impacts to Acacia Creek or Orcutt Creek are expected. Rana draytonii California red- legged frog FT/-- G2G3 / S2S3 SSC Lowlands and foothills in or near permanent sources of deep water with dense, shrubby or emergent riparian vegetation. Requires 11-20 weeks of permanent water for larval development. Must have access to estivation habitat. Low The closest documented occurrence by CNDDB is approximately 1.85 miles west of the Study Area within the Waste Water Treatment facility property. There are no documented occurrences of CRLF within Acacia Creek or Orcutt Creek; however, these drainage features contain suitable aquatic and foraging habitat for this species. There is no breeding habitat within or adjacent to the Study Area. Due to the proximity of suitable habitat, this species has a low potential to disperse into the work area during construction. Spea hammondii Western spadefoot --/-- G3 / S3 SSC Occurs primarily in grassland habitats, but can be found in valley- foothill hardwood woodlands. Vernal pools are essential for breeding and egg-laying. None Species has not been documented within five miles of the Study Area. No vernal pools or ponding was observed during the survey Taricha torosa Coast Range newt --/-- G4 / S4 SSC Coastal drainages from Mendocino County to San Diego County. Lives in terrestrial habitats & will migrate over 1 km to breed in ponds, reservoirs & slow moving streams. Low No pools suitable for breeding were observed in the Study Area. Acacia Creek and Orcutt Creek provide suitable habitat for this species. This species has a low potentially to be encountered during the construction of offsite improvements in suitable habitat. Thamnophis hammondii Two-striped garter snake --/-- G4/S3S4 SSC Occurs near pools, creeks, cattle tanks, and other water sources, often in rocky areas, within oak woodland, chaparral, scrub communities, and coniferous forest. Low Suitable riparian habitat is present within Acacia Creek riparian corridor. However, no work is expected within this habitat type. Therefore, no impacts are expected. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use D-22 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CDFW Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Potential for Occurrence Birds Agelaius tricolor Tricolored blackbird --/SCE G2G3 / S1S2 SSC Highly colonial species, most numerous in Central Valley & vicinity. Largely endemic to California. Requires open water, protected nesting substrate, and foraging area with insect prey within a few km of the colony. None There are no documented occurrences by CNDDB within 5 miles and there is no suitable marsh habitat within the Study Area. Ammodramus savannarum Grasshopper sparrow --/-- G5 / S3 SSC Dense grasslands on rolling hills, lowland plains, in valleys and on hillsides on lower mountain slopes. Favors native grasslands with a mix of grasses, forbs and scattered shrubs. Loosely colonial when nesting. None There are no documented occurrences by CNDDB within 5 miles of the Study Area and the site does not have suitable grasslands for the species. Aquila chrysaetos Golden eagle --/-- G5 / S3 FP Rolling foothills, mountain areas, sage-juniper flats, and desert. Cliff- walled canyons provide nesting habitat in most parts of range; also, large trees in open areas. Low Golden eagles are known to forage in the vicinity. Potentially suitable nest habitat is present in mature eucalyptus trees. Removal or trimming of eucalyptus trees has a low potential to impact this species. Athene cunicularia Burrowing owl --/-- G4 / S3 SSC Open, dry annual or perennial grasslands, deserts, and scrublands characterized by low-growing vegetation. Subterranean nester, dependent upon burrowing mammals, most notably, the California ground squirrel. None The Study Area does not contain suitable habitat for this species. Not expected to occur. Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled murrelet FT/SE G3G4 / S1 Feeds near-shore; nests inland along coast from Eureka to Oregon border and from Half Moon Bay to Santa Cruz. Nests in old-growth redwood- dominated forests, up to six miles inland, often in Douglas-fir. None Species is not known to occur in this region and it has not been documented by CNDDB within 5 miles of the Study Area. Not expected to occur. Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus Western snowy plover FT/-- G3T3 / S2S3 SSC Sandy beaches, salt pond levees & shores of large alkali lakes. Needs sandy, gravelly or friable soils for nesting. None In San Luis Obispo County, snowy plovers nest at the coast. Coccyzus americanus occidentalis Western yellow- billed cuckoo FT/SE G5T2T3 / S1 Riparian forest nester, along the broad, lower flood-bottoms of larger river systems. Nests in riparian jungles of willow, often mixed with cottonwoods, with lower story of blackberry, nettles, or wild grape. None No suitable habitat on site. Riparian vegetation around Acacia Creek lacks the structural diversity and contiguous habitat required for this species. In addition, no impacts to this vegetation type are expected. Elanus leucurus White-tailed kite --/-- G5 / S3S4 FP Rolling foothills and valley margins with scattered oaks & river bottomlands or marshes next to deciduous woodland. Open grasslands, meadows, or marshes for foraging close to isolated, dense- topped trees for nesting and perching. Low Suitable habitat onsite for foraging and nesting. White tailed kites could nest in eucalyptus trees. Removal or trimming of eucalyptus trees has a low potential to impact this species. Special Status Species Evaluation Tables Biological Resources Assessment D-23 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CDFW Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Potential for Occurrence Empidonax traillii extimus Southwestern willow flycatcher FE/SE G5T1T2 / S1 Riparian woodlands in Southern California. None There are no documented occurrences by CNDDB within 5 miles of the Study Area. No impacts are expected to willows adjacent to Acacia Creek. Gymnogyps californianus California condor FE/SE G1 / S1 FP Require vast expanses of open savannah, grasslands, and foothill chaparral in mountain ranges of moderate altitude. Deep canyons containing clefts in the rocky walls provide nesting sites. forages up to 100 miles from roost/nest. None Extremely unlikely to occur. Marginal foraging habitat. Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald eagle --/SE G5 / S2 FP Ocean shore, lake margins, and rivers for both nesting and wintering. Most nests within 1 mi of water. Nests in large, old-growth, or dominant live tree with open branches, especially ponderosa pine. Roosts communally in winter. Low Bald eagles are known to forage and have made nest attempts in the vicinity. Potentially suitable nest habitat is present in mature eucalyptus trees. Removal or trimming of eucalyptus trees has a low potential to impact this species. Lanius ludovicianus Loggerhead shrike --/-- G4 / S4 SSC Broken woodlands, savannah, pinyon-juniper, Joshua tree, and riparian woodlands, desert oases, scrub & washes. Prefers open country for hunting, with perches for scanning, and fairly dense shrubs and brush for nesting. Low Marginally suitable nesting and foraging habitat exists within the Study Area. Species has been documented by CNDDB within 5 miles of the site. Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus California black rail --/ST G3G4T1 / S1 FP Inhabits freshwater marshes, wet meadows and shallow margins of saltwater marshes bordering larger bays. Needs water depths of about 1 inch that do not fluctuate during the year and dense vegetation for nesting habitat. None Species is not known to occur in this area and there are no documented occurrences by CNDDB within 5 miles of the site. No nesting habitat present within the Study Area. No impacts are expected to willows in the wetland and holding ponds. Progne subis Purple martin (nesting) --/-- G5 / S3 SSC Inhabits woodlands, low elevation coniferous forest of Douglas-fir, ponderosa pine, and Monterey pine. Nests in old woodpecker cavities mostly; also in human-made structures. Nest often located in tall, isolated tree/snag. Low Suitable trees with appropriate nest cavities occur within the Study Area. Rallus longirostris obsoletus California clapper rail FE/SE G5T1 / S1 FP Salt-water and brackish marshes traversed by tidal sloughs in the vicinity of San Francisco Bay. Associated with abundant growths of pickleweed, but feeds away from cover on invertebrates from mud- bottomed sloughs. None Salt marsh and brackish marsh habitats are not present. Not expected to occur. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed Use D-24 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CDFW Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Potential for Occurrence Rallus obsoletus obsoletus California Ridgway's rail FE/SE G5T1 / S1 FP Salt water and brackish marshes traversed by tidal sloughs in the vicinity of San Francisco Bay. Associated with abundant growths of pickleweed, but feeds away from cover on invertebrates from mud- bottomed sloughs. None No suitable habitat occurs within the Study Area for this species. Not expected to occur. Sternula antillarum browni California least tern FE/SE G4T2T3Q / S2 FP Nests along the coast from San Francisco Bay south to northern Baja California. Colonial breeder on bare or sparsely vegetated, flat substrates: sand beaches, alkali flats, landfills, or paved areas. None No suitable habitat occurs within the Study Area for this species. Not expected to occur. Vireo bellii pusillus Least Bell's vireo FE/SE G5T2 / S2 Summer resident of Southern California in low riparian in vicinity of water or in dry river bottoms; below 2000 ft. Nests placed along margins of bushes or on twigs projecting into pathways, usually willow, Baccharis, mesquite. None Species is not known to occur in this area and there are no documented occurrences by CNDDB within 5 miles of the Study Area. No suitable nesting habitat present within the Study area. Additionally, no impacts to willow riparian area are expected. Mammals Antrozous pallidus Pallid bat --/-- G5 / S3 SSC Deserts, grasslands, shrublands, woodlands and forests. Most common in open, dry habitats with rocky areas for roosting. Roosts must protect bats from high temperatures. Very sensitive to disturbance of roosting sites. Low May forage onsite; however, suitable roosts for pallid bat are limited in the Study Area. Tree hollows or crevices within the Study Area may be suitable for roosting. Corynorhinus townsendii Townsend's big- eared bat --/-- G3G4 / S2 SSC Throughout California in a wide variety of habitats. Most common in mesic sites. Roosts in the open, hanging from walls and ceilings. Roosting sites limiting. Extremely sensitive to human disturbance. None (Roosts) May forage onsite; however, suitable roosts for Townsend’s bat are not present in the Study Area. Dipodomys heermanni morroensis Morro Bay kangaroo rat FE/SE G3G4TH / SH FP Coastal sage scrub on the south side of Morro Bay. Needs sandy soil, but not active dunes, prefers early seral stages. None The Study Area is outside the range of this species. Not expected to occur. Dipodomys ingens Giant kangaroo rat FE/SE G1G2 / G2S2 Annual grasslands on the western side of the San Joaquin Valley, marginal habitat in alkali scrub. Need level terrain and sandy loam soils for burrowing. None The Study Area is outside the range of this species. Not expected to occur. Enhydra lutris nereis Southern sea otter FT/-- G4T2 / S2 FP Nearshore marine environments from about Ano Nuevo, San Mateo co. to Point Sal, Santa Barbara Co. Needs canopies of giant kelp and bull kelp for rafting and feeding. Prefers rocky substrates with abundant invertebrates. None No nearshore marine environments onsite. Not expected to occur. Special Status Species Evaluation Tables Biological Resources Assessment D-25 Scientific Name Common Name Status Fed/State ESA G-Rank/S-Rank CDFW Habitat Requirements Potential for Impact Potential for Occurrence Eumops perotis californicus Western mastiff bat --/-- G5T4 / S3S4 SSC Many open, semi-arid to arid habitats, including conifer & deciduous woodlands, coastal scrub, grasslands, chaparral, etc. Roosts in crevices in cliff faces, high buildings, trees and tunnels. None (Roosts) May forage onsite; however, suitable roosts for Western mastiff bats are not present in the Study Area Neotoma lepida intermedia San Diego desert woodrat --/-- G5T3T4 / S3S4 SSC Coastal scrub of Southern California from San Diego County to San Luis Obispo County. Moderate to dense canopies preferred. They are particularly abundant in rock outcrops, rocky cliffs, and slopes. None Suitable habitats are not present in the study area for desert wood rat. Nyctinomops macrotis Big free-tailed bat --/-- G5 / S3 SSC Low-lying arid areas in Southern California. Need high cliffs or rocky outcrops for roosting sites. Feeds principally on large moths. None May forage in the Study Area. However, suitable roosts for big free-tailed bats are not present in the Study Area Taxidea taxus American badger --/-- G5 / S3 SSC Most abundant in drier open stages of most shrub, forest, and herbaceous habitats, with friable soils. Needs sufficient food, friable soils and open, uncultivated ground. Preys on burrowing rodents. Digs burrows. None No burrows or individuals were observed during the field survey. Grassland is frequently mowed and not suitable for burrowing. Species is not expected to occur. FT = Federally Threatened SE = State Endangered FC = Federal Candidate Species ST = State Threatened FE = Federally Endangered SR = State Rare FS=Federally Sensitive SS=State Sensitive SCT=State Candidate Threatened SCE=State Candidate Endangered G-Rank/S-Rank = Global Rank and State Rank as per NatureServe and CDFW’s CNDDB RareFind3 SC = CDFW Species of Special Concern FP = Fully Protected Appendix C Cultural Resources Technical Report and Paleontological Resources Survey 650 Tank Farm Road Project Cultural Resources Technical Report prepared for City of San Luis Obispo – Community Development Contact: Rachel Cohen, Associate Planner 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, California 93401 via email: rcohen@slocity.org prepared by Rincon Consultants, Inc. 180 North Ashwood Avenue Ventura, California 93001 September 2018 Please cite this report as follows: Szromba, Meagan and Christopher Duran 2018 Cultural Resources Technical Report for the 650 Tank Farm Road Project, San Luis Obispo County, California. Rincon Consultants Project No. 17-04701. Report on file, Central Coast Information Center, University of California, Santa Barbara. Table of Contents Cultural Resources Technical Report i Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 1 Extended Phase I ............................................................................................................................ 1 Unanticipated Discovery of Cultural Resources ............................................................................. 2 Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains ................................................................................. 2 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Location and Description ........................................................................................ 3 1.1 Personnel ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 2 Regulatory Setting .......................................................................................................................... 6 California Environmental Quality Act.................................................................................. 6 2.1 Assembly Bill 52 ..................................................................................................... 6 2.1.1 City of San Luis Obispo ........................................................................................................ 7 2.2 3 Background ..................................................................................................................................10 Prehistoric Overview .........................................................................................................10 3.1 Paleo-Indian Period (10,000 – 6000 B.C.) ............................................................ 10 3.1.1 Milling Stone Horizon (6000 – 3000 B.C.) ............................................................ 11 3.1.2 Early Period and Early-Middle Transition Period (3000 – 600 B.C.) .................... 12 3.1.3 Middle Period (600 B.C. – A.D. 1000) .................................................................. 12 3.1.4 Middle-Late Transition Period (A.D. 1000 – 1250) .............................................. 13 3.1.5 Late Period (A.D. 1250 – Historic Contact) .......................................................... 13 3.1.6 Ethnographic Overview .....................................................................................................14 3.2 Historic Overview ..............................................................................................................15 3.3 Spanish Period (1769 – 1822) .............................................................................. 15 3.3.1 Mexican Period (1822 – 1848) ............................................................................. 15 3.3.2 American Period (1848 – Present) ....................................................................... 15 3.3.3 San Luis Obispo .................................................................................................... 16 3.3.4 4 Records Search and Outreach ......................................................................................................17 Cultural Resources Records Search ...................................................................................17 4.1 Native American Outreach ................................................................................................21 4.2 5 Field Survey ..................................................................................................................................22 Methods ............................................................................................................................22 5.1 Results ...............................................................................................................................22 5.2 6 Findings and Recommendations ..................................................................................................30 Extended Phase I ..........................................................................................................................30 Unanticipated Discovery of Cultural Resources ...........................................................................30 650 Tank Farm Road Project ii Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains ...............................................................................31 7 References....................................................................................................................................32 Tables Table 1 Previously Recorded Cultural Resources .......................................................................... 17 Table 2 Previously Conducted Cultural Resources Studies ........................................................... 18 Figures Figure 1 Project Location Map ......................................................................................................... 4 Figure 2 Project Site Map ................................................................................................................. 5 Figure 4 Hidden Hills Mobilodge, Facing Northeast ....................................................................... 23 Figure 5 Community Lawn Area, Facing Northwest ....................................................................... 24 Figure 6 Lazy Acres RV Storage Lot, Facing Northeast ................................................................... 25 Figure 7 Western Creek Corridor, Facing North ............................................................................. 26 Figure 8 Eastern Creek Corridor, Facing South ............................................................................... 27 Figure 9 Eastern Creek Corridor, Facing South ............................................................................... 28 Figure 10 660 Tank Farm Road ......................................................................................................... 29 Appendices Appendix A Records Search Results Appendix B Native American Outreach Executive Summary Cultural Resources Technical Report 1 Executive Summary Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Rincon) was retained by the City of San Luis Obispo to conduct a cultural resources study for the proposed 650 Tank Farm Road Project (project) in the City of San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California. The project includes a rezone of the project site to allow for mixed commercial and residential uses. Specifically, the rezone would be from 3.25 acres of Business Park (BP) land and 6.85 acres of Medium-Density (R-2) Residential land into 10.1 acres of Service Commercial land with a Specific Plan Overlay. In addition, the project proposes potential off- site access improvements including additional access points to the east and west, as well as a pedestrian path to the north. As the project includes a rezone with potential future development pending final development designs, this cultural resources study analyzes possible impacts to cultural resources at a programmatic level. Future developments may require additional analysis depending on final design and construction footprints. This cultural resources study included a cultural resources records search, Native American outreach, pedestrian field survey of the project site, and preparation of this technical report. This project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on the results of the records search, Native American outreach, and field survey, no cultural resources were identified within the study area. The project area contains one permanent structure; a single-family residence, constructed more than 50 years ago. The residence is not designated for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources or as a City of San Luis Obispo historic resource and is not located within an existing or potential historic district. The remaining built environment resources within the project area include the Hidden Hills Mobilodge, which includes non-permanent structures; therefore was not evaluated as part of this study. The record search did identify prehistoric archaeological sites within a 0.5‐mile radius of the northern portion of the project site; therefore, the area is deemed as potentially sensitive for cultural resources due to the known resources and the project site’s proximity to water sources, and poor visibility (>5%). Based on to the presence of cultural resources in the area surrounding the project site, general sensitivity, and poor surface visibility during the pedestrian survey, it is recommended that an Extended Phase I (XPI) testing program take place to explore the potential for buried cultural deposits if there are any earth disturbing activities proposed along the northern portion of the project site within an approximately 100-foot (30-meter) radius of the drainage, or in the northern potential off-site access improvement area. The current zone change will not result in a significant impact to historical resources. However, future development activities may result in a significant impact. Therefore, we recommend the following measures for future development of the project site facilitated by the proposed rezone. Adherence to the following measures may reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. Extended Phase I If ground disturbance will occur along the northern portion of the project site within an approximately 100-foot (30-meter) radius of the drainage, or in the northern potential off-site access improvement area, Rincon recommends an extended phase I (XPI) study. The XPI program 650 Tank Farm Road Project 2 may include limited testing with shovel test pits (STPs) within areas reasonably suspected to have a subsurface archaeological deposit. All archaeological excavation should be observed by a local Native American monitor. An XPI program is not intended to evaluate the significance of a resource. Should a subsurface deposit be found during an XPI program and cannot be avoided by project design, a Phase II evaluation program may be needed to determine if the current project would pose a significant impact to any such resource(s) If any resource(s) is identified as significant as part of the Phase II investigation, a Phase III data recovery program may be required if the resource(s) cannot be avoided. Unanticipated Discovery of Cultural Resources If cultural resources are encountered during ground-disturbing activities, work in the immediate area must halt and an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for archaeology (NPS 1983) should be contacted immediately to evaluate the find. If the discovery proves to be significant under CEQA, additional work such as data recovery excavation and Native American consultation may be warranted to mitigate any significant impacts. Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains The discovery of human remains is always a possibility during ground disturbing activities. If human remains are found, the State of California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the county coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. In the event of an unanticipated discovery of human remains, the county coroner must be notified immediately. If the human remains are determined to be prehistoric, the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a most likely descendant (MLD). The MLD shall complete the inspection of the site within 48 hours of notification and may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. Introduction Cultural Resources Technical Report 3 1 Introduction Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Rincon) was retained by the City of San Luis Obispo to conduct a cultural resources study for the 650 Tank Farm Road Project (project) in the City of San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California. This cultural resources study included a cultural resources records search, Native American outreach, pedestrian field survey, and preparation of this technical report. This study has been prepared in conformance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Project Location and Description 1.1 The project is located within Township 31 south, Range 12 east, and Sections 1 and 12 of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) San Luis Obispo & Pismo Beach, CA 7.5-minute quadrangles (Figure 1) on the north side of Tank Farm Road, west of Broad Street, and south of the Damon-Garcia Sports Complex (Figure 2). The project site is 12.75 acres currently in use as the Hidden Hills Mobilodge, a mobile home park, and the Lazy Acres RV Storage lot. The project applicant proposes to rezone the land into a mixed-use project site. Specifically, the rezone would be from 3.25 acres of Business Park (BP) land and 6.85 acres of Medium-Density (R-2) Residential land into 10.1 acres of Service Commercial land with a Specific Plan Overlay. The additional 2.65 acres of land within the project site that includes two creek corridors will remained zoned as Conservation Open Space. Future development on the project site could potentially include 17,500 square feet of commercial space and 249 residential units. In addition, the project proposes potential off-site access improvements including additional access points to the east and west, as well as a pedestrian path to the north. Personnel 1.2 Rincon Archaeologist Meagan Szromba, M.A., Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) conducted the cultural resources records search, Native American outreach, pedestrian field survey, and is the primary author of this report. Rincon Archaeological Resources Program Manager and Principal Investigator Chris Duran, M.A., RPA managed this cultural resources study. Mr. Duran meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for prehistoric and historic archaeology (NPS 1983). Rincon Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Analysts Julia Wiswell and Allysen Valencia prepared the figures found in this report. Rincon Sr. Principal Duane Vander Pluym, D.Env., reviewed this report for quality control. 650 Tank Farm Road Project 4 Figure 1 Project Location Map Introduction Cultural Resources Technical Report 5 Figure 2 Project Site Map 650 Tank Farm Road Project 6 2 Regulatory Setting California Environmental Quality Act 2.1 The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, in this case the City of San Luis Obispo, to determine whether a project may have a significant effect on historical resources (Public Resources Code [PRC], Section 21084.1). A historical resource is a resource listed in, or determined to be eligible for listing, in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), a resource included in a local register of historical resources or any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript that a lead agency determines to be historically significant (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5[a][1-3]). A resource shall be considered historically significant if it meets any of the following criteria: 1) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage; 2) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; 3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or 4) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. In addition, if it can be demonstrated that a project will cause damage to a unique archaeological resource, the lead agency may require reasonable efforts be made to permit any or all of these resources to be preserved in place or left in an undisturbed state. To the extent that resources cannot be left undisturbed, mitigation measures are required. PRC, Section 21083.2[a], [b], and PRC, Section 21083.2(g) defines a unique archaeological resource as an archaeological artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, the probability is high that it meets any of the following criteria: 1) Contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions and that there is a demonstrable public interest in that information; 2) Has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type; or 3) Is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person. Assembly Bill 52 2.1.1 As of July 1, 2015, California Assembly Bill (AB) 52 of 2014 (AB 52) was enacted and expands CEQA by defining a new resource category, “tribal cultural resources.” AB 52 establishes that “A project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment” (PRC Section 21084.2). It further states that the lead agency shall establish measures to avoid impacts that would alter the significant characteristics of a tribal cultural resource, when feasible (PRC Section 21084.3). PRC Section 21074 (a)(1)(A) and (B) defines tribal cultural resources as “sites, features, places, cultural Regulatory Setting Cultural Resources Technical Report 7 landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe” and meets either of the following criteria: Listed or eligible for listing in the CRHR, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. AB 52 also establishes a formal consultation process for California tribes regarding those resources. The consultation process must be completed before a CEQA document can be certified. AB 52 requires that lead agencies “begin consultation with a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project.” Native American tribes to be included in the process are those that have requested notice of projects proposed within the jurisdiction of the lead agency. City of San Luis Obispo 2.2 In 2010, the City of San Luis Obispo passed a Historic Preservation Ordinance to identify and protect important historic resources within the city (City of San Luis Obispo 2010). When determining if a property should be designated as a listed Historic or Cultural Resource, the Cultural Heritage Commission (CHC) and City Council are to consider this ordinance as well as the State Historic Preservation Officer’s standards. To be eligible for designation, the resource shall exhibit a high level of historic integrity, be at least fifty (50) years old (less than 50 if it can be demonstrated that enough time has passed to understand its historical importance), and satisfy at least one of the following criteria: A. Architectural Criteria: Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values. 1. Style: Describes the form of a building, such as size, structural shape and details within that form (e.g. arrangement of windows and doors, ornamentation, etc.). Building style will be evaluated as a measure of: a. The relative purity of a traditional style. b. Rarity of existence at any time in the locale; and/or current rarity although the structure reflects a once popular style. c. Traditional, vernacular and/or eclectic influences that represent a particular social milieu and period of the community; and/or the uniqueness of hybrid styles and how these styles are put together. 2. Design: Describes the architectural concept of a structure and the quality of artistic merit and craftsmanship of the individual parts. Reflects how well a particular style or combination of styles are expressed through compatibility and detailing of elements. Also, suggests degree to which the designer (e.g., carpenter-builder) accurately interpreted and conveyed the style(s). Building design will be evaluated as a measure of: 650 Tank Farm Road Project 8 a. Notable attractiveness with aesthetic appeal because of its artistic merit, details and craftsmanship (even if not necessarily unique). b. An expression of interesting details and eclecticism among carpenter-builders, although the craftsmanship and artistic quality may not be superior. 3. Architect: Describes the professional (an individual or firm) directly responsible for the building design and plans of the structure. The architect will be evaluated as a reference to: a. A notable architect (e.g., Wright, Morgan), including architects who made significant contributions to the state or region, or an architect whose work influenced development of the city, state or nation. b. An architect who, in terms of craftsmanship, made significant contributions to San Luis Obispo (e.g., Abrahams who, according to local sources, designed the house at 810 Osos - Frank Avila’s father’s home - built between 1927 – 30). B. Historic Criteria 1. History – Person: Associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history. Historic persons will be evaluated as a measure of the degree to which a person or group was: a. Significant to the community as a public leader (e.g., mayor, congress member, etc.) or for his or her fame and outstanding recognition - locally, regionally, or nationally. b. Significant to the community as a public servant or person who made early, unique, or outstanding contributions to the community, important local affairs or institutions (e.g., council members, educators, medical professionals, clergymen, railroad officials). 2. History – Event: Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States. Historic event will be evaluated as a measure of: a. A landmark, famous, or first-of-its-kind event for the city - regardless of whether the impact of the event spread beyond the city. b. A relatively unique, important or interesting contribution to the city (e.g., the Ah Louis Store as the center for Chinese-American cultural activities in early San Luis Obispo history). 3. History-Context: Associated with and also a prime illustration of predominant patterns of political, social, economic, cultural, medical, educational, governmental, military, industrial, or religious history. Historic context will be evaluated as a measure of the degree to which it reflects: a. Early, first, or major patterns of local history, regardless of whether the historic effects go beyond the city level, that are intimately connected with the building (e.g., County Museum). b. Secondary patterns of local history, but closely associated with the building (e.g., Park Hotel). C. Integrity: Authenticity of a historical resource’s physical identify evidenced by the survival of characteristics that existed during the resource’s period of significance. Integrity will be evaluated by a measure of: Regulatory Setting Cultural Resources Technical Report 9 1. Whether or not a structure occupies its original site and/or whether or not the original foundation has been changed, if known. 2. The degree to which the structure has maintained enough of its historic character or appearance to be recognizable as an historic resource and to convey the reason(s) for its significance. 3. The degree to which the resource has retained its design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. 650 Tank Farm Road Project 10 3 Background Prehistoric Overview 3.1 The project site lies in what is generally described as the Central Coast archaeological region, one of eight organizational divisions of the state (Jones and Klar 2007, Moratto 1984: Fig. 1). The Central Coast archaeological region extends from Monterey Bay to Morro Bay, and includes the County of San Luis Obispo. Following Jones and Klar (2007:137), the prehistoric cultural chronology for the Central Coast can be generally divided into six periods: Paleo-Indian (ca. 10,000–6,000 B.C.), Milling Stone (6,000-3,000 B.C.), Early and Early-Middle Transition (3,000-600 B.C.), Middle (600 B.C.- A.D. 1000), Middle-Late Transition (A.D. 1000-A.D. 1250), and Late (A.D. 1250-historic contact [ca. A.D. 1769]). Several chronological sequences have been devised to understand cultural changes along the Central Coast from the Millingstone Period to contact. Jones (1993) and Jones and Waugh (1995) presented a Central Coast sequence that integrated data from archaeological studies conducted since the 1980s. Three periods, including the Early, Middle, and Late periods, are presented in their prehistoric sequence subsequent to the Millingstone Period. More recently, Jones and Ferneau (2002:213) updated the sequence following the Millingstone Period as follows: Early, Early-Middle Transition, Middle, Middle-Late Transition, and Late periods. The archaeology of the Central Coast subsequent to the Millingstone Period is distinct from that of the Bay Area and Central Valley. The region has more in common with the Santa Barbara Channel area during the Middle and Middle- Late Transition periods, but few similarities during the Late period (Jones & Ferneau 2002:213). Paleo-Indian Period (10,000 – 6000 B.C.) 3.1.1 When Wallace (1955, 1978) developed the Early Man horizon in the 1950s (referred to herein as the Paleo-Indian Period), little evidence of human presence was known for the southern California coast prior to 6000 B.C. Archaeological work in the intervening years has identified a number of older sites, including coastal and Channel Islands sites (e.g., Erlandson 1991; Johnson et al. 2002; Moratto 1984). The earliest accepted dates for human occupation along the Central Coast were recovered from archaeological sites on two of the Northern Channel Islands, located off the southern coast of Santa Barbara County. On San Miguel Island, archaeological evidence from the Daisy Cave site establishes the presence of people in this area approximately 10,000 years ago (Erlandson 1991:105). On Santa Rosa Island, human remains have been dated from the Arlington Springs site to approximately 13,000 years ago (Johnson et al. 2002). In San Luis Obispo County, archaeological sites CA-SLO-1764 (Lebow et al. 2001), Cross Creek (CA-SLO-1797; Fitzgerald 2000), and CA-SLO-832 (Jones et al. 2001) yielded radiocarbon dates from approximately 9,000 years ago (Jones and Ferneau 2002). Recent data from Paleo-Indian sites in southern California indicate that the economy was a diverse mixture of hunting and gathering, with a major emphasis on aquatic resources in many coastal areas (e.g., Jones and Ferneau 2002). Although few Clovis-like or Folsom-like fluted projectile points have been found in southern California (e.g., Erlandson et al. 1987), the emphasis on hunting may have been greater during the Paleo-Indian period than during later periods. A fluted projectile point Background Cultural Resources Technical Report 11 fragment was recovered from site CA-SBA-1951 on the Santa Barbara Channel coastal plain (Erlandson 1994:44; Erlandson et al. 1987). Another fluted projectile point was reportedly found on the surface in Nipomo, San Luis Obispo County (Mills et al. 2005; Jones and Klar 2007). Large side-notched projectile points of the Central Coast Stemmed series in this area date to as early as 8,000 years ago (Justice 2002). Points of this type have been recovered along the Central Coast from sites such as Diablo Canyon (CA-SLO-2; Greenwood 1972), Cross Creek (CA-SLO-1797; Fitzgerald 2000), Little Pico Creek (CA-SLO-175; Jones and Waugh 1995), and the Honda Beach site (CA-SBA-530; Glassow 1997), among others. The Metcalf site (CA-SCL-178; Hildebrandt 1983), in southern Santa Clara Valley, yielded two large side-notched projectile points associated with charcoal dates ranging from 9,960 – 8,500 years ago. Milling Stone Horizon (6000 – 3000 B.C.) 3.1.2 The Milling Stone Horizon, as described by Wallace (1955, 1978), is characterized by an ecological adaptation to collecting plant resources, such as seeds and nuts, suggested by the appearance and abundance of well-made milling (ground stone) implements. The dominance of milling implements is generally associated with the horizontal motion of grinding small seeds and nuts and lends to the name Milling Stone Horizon. Rogers (1929) originally identified the Milling Stone Horizon along the Santa Barbara Channel in 1929. Excavations at the Tank Site (CA-LAN-1) in Topanga Canyon from 1947 to 1948 (Treganza and Bierman 1958) confirmed the presence of a significant number of milling implements that correspond with the Milling Stone Horizon identified by Rogers in 1929. Wallace (1955, 1978) further defined the Horizon, which was recognized on the Central Coast by Greenwood (1972). The Cross-Creek site (CA-SLO-1797) is a Milling Stone occupation site in San Luis Obispo County that returned radiocarbon dates ranging between 9,500 – 4,700 years ago. This site represents one of the oldest expressions of the pattern (Jones et al. 2007; Fitzgerald 2000:58). Wallace (1955, 1978) and Warren (1968) identify ground stone implements including milling stones (e.g., metates, milling slabs, or mortars) and hand stones (e.g., manos, mullers, or pestles). Milling stones occur in high frequencies for the first time in the archaeological record of the Central Coast region and become even more prevalent near the end of the Milling Stone Horizon. Flaked stone assemblages, which include crude core and cobble-core tools, flake tools, large side-notched projectile points, and pitted stones (Jones et al. 2007), and shell middens in coastal sites suggest that people during this period practiced a mixed food procurement strategy. Faunal remains identified at Milling Stone sites point to broad-spectrum hunting and gathering of shellfish, fish, birds, and mammals, though large faunal assemblages are uncommon. This mixed food procurement strategy demonstrates adaptation to regional and local environments. Along the Central Coast, Milling Stone Horizon sites are most common on terraces and knolls, typically set back from the current coastline (Erlandson 1994:46). However, 42 sites have been identified in various settings such as rocky coasts, estuaries, and nearshore interior valleys (Jones and Klar 2007). The larger sites usually contain extensive midden deposits, possible subterranean house pits, and cemeteries. Most of these sites probably reflect intermittent use over many years of local cultural habitation and resource exploitation. 650 Tank Farm Road Project 12 Early Period and Early-Middle Transition Period (3000 – 600 3.1.3 B.C.) Although Jones and Ferneau (2002:213) have distinguished an Early-Middle Transition period, it is not well defined and is difficult to observe in the archaeological record. Thus, the transition phase is included in the following discussion of the sites and characteristics recognized for the Early Period in the Central Coast region. A high frequency of shoreline midden deposits has been identified in the Central Coast region dating to the Early Period. This suggests that population numbers increased from the Milling Stone Horizon to the Early Period along the Central Coast (Jones 1995; Jones and Waugh 1995, 1997). Archaeological sites dating to the Early Period include CA-SLO-165 in Estero Bay, and CA-MNT-73, CA-MNT-108, and CA-MNT-1228 in Monterey Bay. The material culture recovered from Early Period sites within the Central Coast region provides evidence for continued exploitation of inland plant and coastal marine resources. Artifacts include milling slabs and handstones, as well as mortars and pestles, which were used for processing a variety of plant resources. Bipointed bone gorge hooks were used for fishing. Assemblages also include a suite of Olivella beads, bone tools, and pendants made from talc schist. Square abalone shell (Haliotis spp.) beads have been found in Monterey Bay (Jones and Waugh 1997:122). Shell beads and obsidian are hallmarks of the trade and exchange networks of the central and southern California coasts. The archaeological record indicates that there was a substantial increase in the abundance of obsidian at Early Period sites in the Monterey Bay and San Luis Obispo areas (Jones and Waugh 1997:124–126). Obsidian trade continued to increase during the following Middle period. Flaked stone artifact assemblages from Early Period sites include Central Coast Stemmed Series and side-notched projectile points. Square-stemmed and side-notched points were recovered from deposits at Willow Creek (CA-MNT-282) in Big Sur and Little Pico II (CA-SLO-175) on the San Luis Obispo coast (Jones and Ferneau 2002). This projectile point style trend, first identified by David Banks Rogers in 1929, was confirmed by Greenwood (1972) at Diablo Canyon. The projectile point trend has become apparent at numerous sites throughout the Central Coast. In many cases, manifestations of this trend are associated with the establishment of new settlements (Jones et al. 2007). Middle Period (600 B.C. – A.D. 1000) 3.1.4 The Middle Period describes a pronounced trend toward greater adaptation to regional or local resources as well as the development of socioeconomic and political complexity in prehistoric populations (Glassow et al. 2007). The remains of fish, land mammals, and sea mammals are increasingly abundant and diverse in archaeological deposits along the coast. Coastal populations developed shell fishhooks, and projectile points changed from side-notched dart points to contracting stem styles. Flaked stone tools used for hunting and processing—such as large side-notched, stemmed, lanceolate or leaf-shaped projectile points, large knives, edge modified flakes, and drill-like implements—occurred in archaeological deposits in higher frequencies and are more morphologically diversified during the Middle Period. Bone tools, including awls, are more numerous than in the preceding period, and the use of asphaltum adhesive became common. Circular fish hooks that date from between 1000 and 500 B.C., compound bone fish hooks that date between A.D. 300 and 900, notched stone sinkers, and the tule reed or balsa raft, indicative of Background Cultural Resources Technical Report 13 complex maritime technology, became part of the toolkit during this period (Arnold 1995; Glassow et al. 2007; Jones and Klar 2005:466; Kennett 1998:357; King 1990:87–88). Populations continued to follow a seasonal settlement pattern until the end of the Middle Period; large, permanently occupied settlements with formal architecture, particularly in coastal areas, appear to have been the norm by the end of the Middle Period (Glassow et al. 2007; Kennett 1998). Prehistoric populations began to bury the deceased in formal cemeteries with artifacts that may represent changes in ideology and the development of ritual practices (Glassow et al. 2007). Middle-Late Transition Period (A.D. 1000 – 1250) 3.1.5 The Middle-Late Transition period is marked by major changes in settlement patterns, diet, and interregional exchange. Prehistoric populations continued to occupy more permanent settlements, with the continued use of formal cemeteries and the burial of goods with the deceased. The manufacture of the plank canoe, or tomol, allowed coastal prehistoric populations to catch larger fish that occupied deeper sea waters (Glassow et al. 2007). Following the introduction of the plank canoe, populations began to use harpoons. The plank canoe appears to have influenced “commerce between the mainland coast and the Channel Islands,” and fish remains indicate “a noticeable increase in the acquisition of large deep-sea fish such as tuna and swordfish” (Glassow et al. 2007:204). Projectile points diagnostic of both the Middle and Late periods are found in Northern Bight archaeological sites (Glassow et al. 2007:204). These projectile points include large, contracting-stemmed types typical of the Middle Period, as well as small, leaf-shaped Late Period projectile points, which likely reflect the introduction of the bow and arrow. Middle-Late Transition Period sites indicate that populations replaced atlatl (dart) technologies with the bow and arrow, which required smaller projectile points. Late Period (A.D. 1250 – Historic Contact) 3.1.6 Late Period archaeological sites indicate sociopolitical and economic complexity among populations in the Northern Bight. Glassow et al. (2007: 205) explain that “sometime between cal A.D. 1200 and 1300 a ranked society emerged.” Climatic change may have stimulated the development of specialized crafts, regional trade, and changes in food procurement. Late Period sites are distinguished by small, finely-worked projectile points and temporally diagnostic shell beads. These shell beads were used as monetary currency to trade with inland populations. Trade brought many maritime goods, such as fish, shellfish, and steatite bowls to inland locations, such as CA-SBA-3404, CA-SBA-485, and CA-SBA-2358, particularly during the latter part of the Late Period. Small, finely-worked projectile points are typically associated with bow and arrow technology, which is believed to have been introduced to the area by the Takic migration from the deserts into southern California. Unlike the large Middle period shell middens, Late Period sites are more frequently single- component deposits. There are also more inland sites, with fewer and less visible sites along the Pacific shore during the Late Period. The settlement pattern and dietary reconstructions indicate a lesser reliance on marine resources than observed for the Middle and Middle-Late Transition periods, as well as an increased preference for deer and rabbit (Jones 1995). An increase in the number of sites with bedrock mortar features that date to the Late Period suggests that nuts and seeds began to take on a more significant dietary role in Late Period populations. 650 Tank Farm Road Project 14 Ethnographic Overview 3.2 The project site lies within Chumash ethnographic territory, which extends from the current City of Malibu, north beyond San Luis Obispo, and inland as far as 68 km (42 miles) and includes the northern Channel Islands (Glassow 1996:13). Chumash is the term used for the family of closely related Chumashan languages spoken by the populations in this region. These languages have been divided into two broad groups—Northern Chumash (consisting only of Obispeño) and Southern Chumash (Purisimeño, Ineseño, Barbareño, Ventureño, and Island Chumash) (Mithun 1999:389). Groups neighboring the Chumash included the Salinan to the north, the Southern Valley Yokuts and Tataviam to the east, and the Gabrielino (Tongva) to the south. Chumash place names in the project vicinity include Pismu (Pismo Beach), Tematatimi (along Los Berros Creek), and Tilhini (near San Luis Obispo) (Greenwood 1978:520). Based on the little ethnographic information available, only a general outline of the lifeways of the Obispeño Chumash, so called after their historic period association with Mission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa (Gibson 1983; Kroeber 1976), is known (Greenwood 1978). Although their language was closer to Southern Chumash groups, the material culture and lifeways of the Northern Chumash appear to have been more similar to their northern neighbors, the Salinan. Accordingly, their populations in this area are thought to have been substantially smaller than in the Santa Barbara Channel area, their villages smaller, and their livelihood less based on intensive use of marine fisheries (Glassow et al. 1988; Greenwood 1978). Chumash villages generally ranged between 30 and 200 people, with the largest settlements numbering anywhere from 500 to 800 people (Glassow 1996:14). Permanent Chumash villages included hemispherical dwellings arranged in close groups, with the chief having the largest for social obligations (Brown 2001). Each Chumash village had a formal cemetery marked by tall painted poles and often with a defined entrance area (Gamble et al. 2001:191). Archaeological studies have identified separate sections for elite and commoner families within the cemetery grounds (King 1969). The Chumash also lived in temporary special-purpose camps throughout the year to acquire seasonal resources (Glassow 1996:14). The acorn was a dietary staple for the mainland Chumash, though its dominance varied by coastal or inland location. Chumash diet also included cattail roots, fruits and pads from cactus, and bulbs and tubers of plants such as amole (soap plant) (Miller 1988:89). On the coast, populations used tomols to procure marine mammals and fish. The tomol not only facilitated marine resource procurement but also facilitated an active trade network maintained by frequent crossings between the mainland and the Channel Islands. Spanish explorers first arrived in the Santa Barbara Channel region in 1542, moving north into the San Luis Obispo region by 1769. Spanish contact led to drastic population decline and culture loss. Though the Chumash languages are no longer commonly spoken (Timbrook 1990), many descendants of the Chumash still live in the region and a cultural revitalization has been ongoing since the twentieth century (Glassow et al. 2007:191). Chumash populations were decimated by the effects of European colonization and missionization (Johnson 1987). Traditional lifeways largely gave way to laborer jobs on ranches and farms in the Mexican and early American periods. Today, the Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians is the only federally recognized Chumash tribe, though many people of Chumash descent continue to live throughout their traditional territory. Background Cultural Resources Technical Report 15 Historic Overview 3.3 Post-European contact history for California is generally divided into three periods: the Spanish Period (1769–1822), the Mexican Period (1822–1848), and the American Period (1848–present). The Spanish Period brought the establishment of the California mission system, while the Mexican Period is largely known for the division of the land of California into private land holdings. Following the Mexican-American war, the United States purchased California from Mexico; population of the state subsequently increased, particularly during the Gold Rush. Spanish Period (1769 – 1822) 3.3.1 Europeans first visited the Santa Barbara Channel region with the Cabrillo Expedition in October of 1542 (Chesnut 1993). In 1587, Pedro de Unamuno landed in an area that is most likely Morro Bay, but suffered casualties during an attack by Native Americans and left (Bean 1968). Sebastian Rodriguez Cermeño entered the San Luis Obispo region in 1595 as part of his exploration of the Alta California coast (Jones et al. 1994). Another Spanish expedition, consisting of two ships under the command of Sebastian Vizcaino, arrived in the Santa Barbara area in 1602. In the 1760s, the Spanish government established a presidio and mission in Santa Barbara (Weber 1982, 1992). The earliest detailed descriptions of the area come from members of Gaspar de Portolá’s land expedition, which passed through the region in 1769 (Squibb 1984). Gaspar de Portolá and Franciscan Father Junípero Serra established the first Spanish settlement in Alta California at Mission San Diego de Alcalá in 1769. Portolá continued north, passing through the project vicinity and reaching San Francisco Bay in 1769. Mission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa was founded in 1772, the fifth of 21 missions established by the Spanish in Alta California (Rolle 2003). Early travelers in the Central Coast region reported seeing no large Native American villages like those noted in the Santa Barbara Channel area. Mexican Period (1822 – 1848) 3.3.2 Mexico’s revolution against Spain achieved success in 1821. News of the victory reached California in 1822, marking the beginning of the Mexican period. The hallmarks of the Mexican period are the secularization of the missions, completely accomplished by 1836, and a greater distribution of private land grants to prominent citizens, including retired military personnel. The Secularization Act of 1833 enabled Mexican governors in California to distribute former mission lands to individuals in the form of land grants. The land around Laguna Lake in San Luis Obispo was originally part of a rancho associated with the Mission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa. In 1844 Governor Manuel Micheltorena granted the Church one square league or approximately 4,157 acres of land in the place called Laguna (Engelhardt 1915). In 1845 Governor Pio Pico sold the remaining mission lands and buildings to Captain John Wilson and his partners Scott and McKinley $500 (Angel 1883). The distribution of lands following secularization of the missions resulted in the granting of 40 ranchos in what is today San Luis Obispo County (San Luis Obispo County Genealogical Society 2015). The Mexican ranchos were primarily utilized to raise cattle herds and for farming (HRG 2013). American Period (1848 – Present) 3.3.3 The American Period began with the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848, which marked the end of the United States’ war with Mexico. The United States agreed to pay Mexico $15 million for the conquered territory, including California, Nevada, Utah, and parts of Colorado, 650 Tank Farm Road Project 16 Arizona, New Mexico, and Wyoming. The existing Mexican land grants were expected to be recognized, but over time, as settlement increased throughout the state, disputes arose between rancheros and settlers. Rancho owners expended money and effort attempting to defend their land holdings. The California territory officially became a state in 1850 and the County of San Luis Obispo was established as one of the state’s original 27 counties. San Luis Obispo 3.3.4 In 1850, William Hutton was authorized to survey and lay out the town of San Luis Obispo. The community’s economy was based primarily on agricultural development, with a strong focus on cattle ranching and dairy operations (Angel 1883). The region suffered a severe drought between the years of 1862 and 1864 which decimated the cattle herds (HRG 2013). Rancheros struggled with this loss of income, debt, and costs incurred from legally defending their land under the new American law. As a result, many of the rancho lands were sold or lost, but most were subdivided into agricultural parcels or towns. By April 1887, an estimated 3,000 to 4,000 people inhabited the region, and land prices increased dramatically. In 1894, the Southern Pacific Railroad completed a line from San Jose to San Luis Obispo encouraging trade and further settlement of the region. By the late 1800s, the City of San Luis Obispo had grown into a bustling community and served as a center of trade for central California, as it was surrounded by the agricultural and dairy industries of the region and by Union Oil of California’s oil fields (City of San Luis Obispo 2013). As the population increased in the town, Laguna Lake became a popular area for duck hunting and black bass were stocked in the lake. By 1896 farmers around the lake, growing mostly barley at that time, posted “No Hunting Allowed” signs throughout the area, as the popularity of the lake became troublesome to the surrounding landowners (Tognazzini 1996). California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly) was established in 1901 leading to further development focused around the campus and drastically influencing the development of greater San Luis Obispo throughout the 20th century. Additionally, in the early twentieth century, Port Harford was renamed Port San Luis, and oil from the Santa Maria and Taft-Coalinga fields was shipped beginning in 1907 and 1913, respectively. With the advent of the automobile, tourism became an important player in the regional economy. Landmarks such as Mission San Luis Obispo and the nearby Hearst Castle added to the tourism industry, and the first motel in the country, the Milestone Mo-tel, was built in 1924. In the 1930s, the economic effects of the Great Depression were slowed with the county’s agriculture and ranching production, as well as the construction and establishment of Camp San Luis Obispo, a military training camp. The establishment of the camp led to increased population as more soldiers and their families moved to the area, particularly at the start of World War II, when the U.S. War Department transferred nearly 100,000 military personnel to bases at Morro Bay, Cambria, Camp Roberts, and Camp San Luis Obispo. Post-World War II saw an increased demand for single-family housing, leading to various expansions of the city’s boundaries and the construction of large residential subdivisions throughout the 1950s and 1960s (HRG 2013). San Luis Obispo today continues to maintain its agricultural roots while providing a small-town community feel to its residents. Records Search and Outreach Cultural Resources Technical Report 17 4 Records Search and Outreach Cultural Resources Records Search 4.1 On October 24, 2017, Rincon performed a search of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) from the Central Coast Information Center (CCIC) located at the University of California, Santa Barbara. The search was conducted to identify previously recorded cultural resources (prehistoric or historic), as well as previously conducted cultural resources studies within the project site and 0.5-mile radius of surrounding it. The CHRIS search included a review of the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register of Historical Resources. The records search also included a review of available historic maps and aerial photographs (Appendix A). The CCIC records search identified 8 previously recorded cultural resources within the records search area (Table 1). None of these resources are located within the current project site. Table 1 Previously Recorded Cultural Resources Primary Number Trinomial Resource Type Description Recorder(s) and Year(s) NRHP/CRHR Status Relationship to Project Site P-40- 000785 CA-SLO- 785 Prehistoric site Shell scatter Charles E. Dills 1984 Not evaluated Outside P-40- 001427 CA-SLO- 1427 Prehistoric site Bedrock mortars, stone tools and debitage Charles E. Dills 1990; Mary Maki 2000; Clay A. Singer 2000 Not evaluated Outside P-40- 002002 CA-SLO- 2002 Prehistoric and site Bone, shell, lithics, fire- affected rock, glass and ceramic sherds Larry Carbone 1999 Not evaluated Outside P-40- 002044 CA-SLO- 2044 Prehistoric site Shell scatter L. Leach-Palm, D. Miller, P. Woltz, C. Lowgren 1999 Not evaluated Outside P-40- 002103 CA-SLO- 2103H Historic site Trash scatter L. Leach-Palm and S. Mikesell 1999 Not evaluated Outside P-40- 041008 N/A Historic building Log Cabin BBRC 2000 Nominated Outside P-40- 041026 N/A Historic property House and water tower L. Leach-Palm, S. Mikesell 1999 Not evaluated Outside P-40- 041031 N/A Historic property House L. Leach-Palm and S. Mikesell 1999 Not evaluated Outside Source: Central Coast Information Center 2017 650 Tank Farm Road Project 18 The CCIC records search additionally identified 44 previously conducted cultural resources studies within the records search area (Table 2). Of these, two studies included a portion of the project site. Neither of these studies identified any cultural resources within the current project site. Table 2 Previously Conducted Cultural Resources Studies Report Number Author(s) Year Title Relationship to Project Site SL-00006 Hoover, R. 1978 Addendum to Airport Report Outside SL-00007 Hoover, R. 1977 Airport Extension Letter Report Outside SL-00098 Dills, C. 1977 Islay Hill to Broad Street and Industrial Way, Archaeological Potential of Proposed Development Area Outside SL-00138 Dills, C. 1975 Information to aid in Interpretive Planning Map for San Luis Obispo (city) and Environs Outside SL-00140 Hoover, R. 1979 Archaeological Reconnaissance, Cheapskate Hill Subdivision, City of SLO Outside SL-00151 Breece, W. 1979 Archaeological Test Program at CA-SLO-785 Outside SL-00326 Haversat, T. and G. Breschini 1981 Preliminary Archaeological Reconnaissance of Nine Proposed Early Warning Siren Locations in SLO County, CA and Preliminary Archaeological Reconnaissance of Several Additional Early Warning Outside SL-01306 Singer, C. and J. Atwood 1988 Cultural Resources Survey and Impact Assessment for the Proposed SLO Creek Project near the City of San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California Outside SL-01307 Dills, C. 1989 Letter Report: Archaeological Potential of Volny Property on Highway 227, San Luis Obispo Outside SL-01308 Dills, C. 1989 Letter Report: Archaeological Potential of Ross Property on Highway 227, San Luis Obispo Outside SL-01577 Dills, C. 1990 Archaeological Potential of Highway Frontage for Rossetti Property Outside SL-01643 Engineering- Science, Inc. 1988 Draft Hazardous Waste Management Plan, Environmental Impact Report Within SL-02363 Gibson, Robert O. 1993 Inventory of Cultural Resources for the Water Reclamation Project, City of San Luis Obispo, CA Outside SL-02506 Parker, J. 1993 Cultural Resource Investigation of the Proposed State Farm Service Center San Luis Obispo Outside SL-02705 Dills, C. 1994 Archaeological Potential of Marigold Project on Broad Street at Tank Farm Outside SL-02714 Bertrando, E. 1994 Historical Survey and Significance Determination for Structures Impacted by the Marigold Project Outside Records Search and Outreach Cultural Resources Technical Report 19 Report Number Author(s) Year Title Relationship to Project Site SL-02729 Parker, J. 1993 Cultural Resource Investigation of the Proposed State Farm Service Center San Luis Obispo Outside SL-03366 Conway, Thor 1997 Phase I Archaeological Survey of 3450 Broad Street, San Luis Obispo Outside SL-03556 Singer, Clay 1998 Cultural Resources Survey and Impact Assessment for Six Parcels along El Capitan Way in San Luis Obispo County, California Outside SL-03745 Singer, Clay 1999 Cultural Resources Survey and Impact Assessment for 11 Acres on Santa Fe Road [Parcel Map Coal-87- 311] in San Luis Obispo County, California Outside SL-03774 Conway, Thor 1999 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Muscarella Property, Fuller Road, San Luis Obispo, California Outside SL-03780 Conway, Thor 1999 Phase I Archaeological Survey of Annexation #56, Aerovista Place and Airport Way, San Luis Obispo, California Outside SL-03919 Shepard, Richard 2000 Archaeological Test Report for the Level 3 Communications 3R D-Node Property, City of San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo, California Outside SL-03932 Conway, Thor 1999 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Lathrop Property, Broad St., San Luis Obispo Co., CA Outside SL-03938 Conway, Thor 1999 Phase I Archaeological Survey of Gateway Center, Tank Farm Road and Broad Street, San Luis Obispo, California Outside SL-03939 Conway, Thor 1999 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Sacramento Commercial Project, Sacramento Commercial Project, Sacramento Drive, San Luis Obispo, CA Outside SL-04035 Bertrando, Ethan and Betsy Bertrando 2000 Cultural Resource Inventory of the Log Cabin Parcel, P#40-041008, Southeast Corner of El Capitan Way and Broad Street, San Luis Obispo, CA Outside SL-04065 Conway, Thor 2000 Phase I Archaeological Survey of Tract 2372, Fuller Road Area, San Luis Obispo, CA Outside SL-04073 Maki, Mary K. 2000 Phase I Archaeological Survey and Impact Assessment of 23.5+ Acres with an Extended Phase I Subsurface Testing Program at CA-SLO-1427 for the Damon Garcia Sports Complex Project, SLO Outside SL-04302 Mason, Roger D., Bruce E. Lander and Richard S. Shepard 1999 Cultural Resources Survey Report and Paleontological Resources Literature Review Report for Level 3 Long Haul Fiber Optic Project: San Luis Obispo 3R D-Node, in the City of San Luis Obispo Outside 650 Tank Farm Road Project 20 Report Number Author(s) Year Title Relationship to Project Site SL-04303 Shepard, Richard S. and Roger D. Mason 1999 Cultural Resources Survey Report for the Level 3 Fiber Optic Project: WS06 Connection to San Luis Obispo 3R Facility and Los Osos Loop Connection Corridor, San Luis Obispo County, CA Outside SL-04446 Conway, Thor 2001 Extended Archaeological Surface Survey at Highway 227 and Fuller Road (Post Mile 9.2-9.35), San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California Outside SL-04852 Gibson, R. 2001 Results of Archival Records Search and Phase One Archaeological Surface Survey for the Water Refuse Project, City of San Luis Obispo, CA Outside SL-05130 Conway, Thor 2004 An Archaeological Survey for the Ricardo Court Project, San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California Outside SL-05298 Singer, Clay 2000 Archaeological Investigations at CA-SLO-1427: An Evaluation of Cultural Resources at the Proposed Damon Garcia Sports Complex in the City of San Luis Obispo Outside SL-05328 Conway, Thor 2005 Phase II Archaeological Testing at the Cinderella Carpet One Project, 3510 Broad Street, San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California Outside SL-05397 Conway, Thor 2004 An Archaeological Survey for 3510 Broad Street, San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California Outside SL-05418 Maki, Mary K. 2004 Historic Properties Survey Report for the Tank Farm Road Safety and Operational Improvements Project in San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California Within SL-05418A Maki, Mary K. 2004 Archaeological Survey Report for the Tank Farm Road Safety and Operational Improvements Project in San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California Outside SL-05418B Maki, Mary K. 2004 Appendix A: Central Coast Information Center Record Search, Appendix B: Native American Consultation Outside SL-05502 Singer, Clay A. 2005 Cultural Resources Survey and Impact Assessment for 6.2 Acre Property at 4450 Broad Street in the City of San Luis Obispo, California (APN 053-412- 004) Outside SL-05601 McLean, Roderic N. 2005 Cultural Resources Inventory, Relocation of 13 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Emergency Sirens, San Luis Obispo County, California Outside Records Search and Outreach Cultural Resources Technical Report 21 Report Number Author(s) Year Title Relationship to Project Site SL-05923 Gibson, Robert O. 1999 Results of Phase One Archaeological Surface Survey and Record Review for the Gateway Business Park Project Along Highway 227, San Luis Obispo County, CA Outside SL-06154 Conway, Thor 2008 An Archaeological Surface Survey at the Unocal San Luis Obispo Tank Farm, San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo, California Outside Source: Central Coast Information Center 2017 Native American Outreach 4.2 Rincon contacted the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) on October 20, 2017 to request a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search of the project site and a contact list of Native Americans culturally affiliated with the project site that may have knowledge of cultural resources within the area. The NAHC responded on October 31, 2017 stating that the results of the SLF search was positive and provided the telephone number of the Salinan Tribe of Monterey and San Luis Obispo Counties, whom they recommended be contacted for more information. The NAHC additionally provided a list of 10 groups and/or individuals who may have cultural resources concerns for the project. Rincon sent letters to these 10 contacts and left a voice message for the Salinan Tribe of Monterey and San Luis Obispo Counties on October 31, 2017. On November 11, 2017, Fred Collins of the Northern Chumash Tribal Council contacted Rincon requesting a copy of the report prepared for the project and stated he would review and make comments on the document. Rincon responded on the same day stating that the report was not yet complete but would coordinate gaining permission from the City of San Luis Obispo to send him a final copy of the report. On November 11, 2017, Patti Dunton of the of the Salinan Tribe of Monterey and San Luis Obispo Counties contacted Rincon regarding a recorded Sacred Site to the northeast of the project site at the Damon-Garcia Sports Complex, but stated that she was unaware of any cultural resources within the project site. Ms. Dunton requested Native American monitoring for the project given the proximity of the Sacred Site to the project location and asked for a copy of the report. Freddie Romero of the Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians contacted Rincon on November 14, 2017 to verify if local Tribes had been notified of the project, and deferred comments to these local groups. As of November 27, 2017, Rincon has not received any responses from Native American contacts regarding Sacred Lands or cultural resources within the project area. Rincon assisted the City of San Luis Obispo with AB 52 consultation by providing instructions, legislation information, draft letters, a project location map, and a correspondence tracking sheet to be used during consultation. Letters were sent to each of the groups listed on the NAHC’s Tribal Consultation list on November 15, 2017. The City has not received any requests for consultation from any of these groups regarding the proposed project. 650 Tank Farm Road Project 22 5 Field Survey Methods 5.1 Rincon conducted a pedestrian field survey of the 12.75-acre project site on October 30, 2017, and on August 18, 2018 for the potential off-site access improvements. The survey was performed using transect intervals spaced no greater than 15 meters apart moving from south to north, west to east, throughout the project site. All exposed ground surfaces were examined for artifacts (e.g., flaked stone tools, tool-making debris, stone milling tools, ceramics, fire-affected rock), ecofacts (marine shell and bone), soil discoloration that might indicate the presence of a cultural midden, soil depressions and features indicative of the former presence of structures or buildings (e.g., standing exterior walls, postholes, foundations) or historic debris (e.g., metal, glass, ceramics). Ground disturbances such as burrows and drainages were also visually inspected. In addition to the pedestrian survey, Rincon also consulted historic aerials (NETR 2017; UCSB 2018) to identify any structures that have been in place for at least 50 years within the project site or as part of off-site access improvements. Results 5.2 The project site is developed to the south with the Hidden Hills Mobilodge, to the north by the Lazy Acres RV Storage lot, and to the west and the east by seasonal creek corridors. The Mobilodge is mostly paved with concrete apart from community lawn areas and the yards of personal residences (Figures 3 and 4). Visibility of native ground surfaces throughout the mobile home park was poor, ranging from zero to 30 percent, due to prior development on the property. Areas associated with potential off-site access improvements were largely covered by vegetation. Overall visibility was poor (less than 5%) throughout. During the survey a prefabricated pipe installed to serve as a makeshift culvert was noted, but it was determined to not warrant evaluation as it is a prefabricated apparatus and not a built environment resource (Figure 3). The northern edge of the project site was near Acacia Creek and surrounding area was completely covered up to 7 feet by vegetation. On the proposed eastern off-site access improvement, APN 053-421-004 contained a single-family residence that was constructed ca. 1940s, according to historic aerial imagery (NETR 2017; UCSB 2018). Field Survey Cultural Resources Technical Report 23 Figure 4 Hidden Hills Mobilodge, Facing Northeast 650 Tank Farm Road Project 24 Figure 5 Community Lawn Area, Facing Northwest The Lazy Acres RV Storage lot is additionally paved with concrete and gravel throughout its entirety and contains several RVs and other vehicles staged throughout the area (Figure 5). No native ground surfaces could be identified. Field Survey Cultural Resources Technical Report 25 Figure 6 Lazy Acres RV Storage Lot, Facing Northeast The western creek corridor was overgrown with trees and brush and contained dead vegetation covering the ground surface, reducing visibility to approximately 50 percent (Figure 6). The western creek did not contain any stagnant or flowing water within it. 650 Tank Farm Road Project 26 Figure 7 Western Creek Corridor, Facing North The eastern creek corridor was also overgrown with brush, and visibility was approximately 50 percent (Figure 7). A small pool of stagnant water was present in this creek. Field Survey Cultural Resources Technical Report 27 Figure 8 Eastern Creek Corridor, Facing South 650 Tank Farm Road Project 28 Figure 9 Eastern Creek Corridor, Facing South Field Survey Cultural Resources Technical Report 29 Figure 10 660 Tank Farm Road The pedestrian field survey did not identify any cultural resources within the project site. 650 Tank Farm Road Project 30 6 Findings and Recommendations The results of the cultural resources records search, Native American outreach, and pedestrian field survey conducted by Rincon did not identify any prehistoric cultural resources within the project site or within any part of the off-site access improvements. The record search did identify prehistoric archaeological sites within a 0.5‐mile radius of the northern portion of the project site; therefore, the area is deemed as potentially sensitive for cultural resources due to its proximity to water sources, and poor visibility (>5%). Based on the presence of cultural resources in the area surrounding the project site, general sensitivity, and poor surface visibility during the pedestrian survey, it is recommended that an Extended Phase I (XPI) testing program take place to explore the potential for buried cultural deposits if there are any earth disturbing activities along the northern portion of the project site within an approximately 100-foot (30-meter) radius of the drainage, or the northern potential off-site access improvement area. The project area contains one permanent structure; a single-family residence, constructed more than 50 years ago. The residence is not designated for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources or as a City of San Luis Obispo historic resource and is not located within an existing or potential historic district. The remaining built environment resources within the project area include the Hidden Hills Mobilodge, which includes temporary structures. Therefore, there are no historical resources present within the project area. The current zone change will not result in a significant impact to historical resources. Future development activities may result in a significant impact; therefore, we recommend the following measures for any future development. Adherence to the following measures may reduce impacts to less than Signiant levels. Extended Phase I If ground disturbance will occur along the northern portion of the project site within a 100-foot (30- meter) radius of the drainage, or in the northern potential off-site access improvement area, Rincon recommends an extended phase I (XPI) study. The XPI program may include limited testing with shovel test pits (STPs) within areas reasonably suspected to have a subsurface archaeological deposit. All archaeological excavation should be observed by a Native American monitor. An XPI program is not intended to evaluate significance of a resource. Should a subsurface deposit be found during an XPI program and cannot be avoided by project design, a Phase II evaluation program may be needed to determine if the current project would pose a significant impact to any such resource(s) If any resource(s) is identified as significant as part of the Phase II investigation, a Phase III data recovery program may be required if the resource(s) cannot be avoided. Unanticipated Discovery of Cultural Resources If cultural resources are encountered during ground-disturbing activities, work in the immediate area must halt and an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for archaeology (NPS 1983) should be contacted immediately to evaluate Findings and Recommendations Cultural Resources Technical Report 31 the find. If the discovery proves to be significant under CEQA, additional work such as data recovery excavation and Native American consultation may be warranted to mitigate any significant impacts. Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains The discovery of human remains is always a possibility during ground disturbing activities. If human remains are found, the State of California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the county coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. In the event of an unanticipated discovery of human remains, the county coroner must be notified immediately. If the human remains are determined to be prehistoric, the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a most likely descendant (MLD). The MLD shall complete the inspection of the site within 48 hours of notification and may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. 650 Tank Farm Road Project 32 7 References Angel, Myron 1883 History of San Luis Obispo County, California. Oakland, California: Thompson & West. Arnold, Jeanne E. 1995 Transportation Innovation and Social Complexity among Maritime Hunter-Gatherer Societies. American Anthropologist 97(4):733-747. Bean, Walton 1968 California: An Interpretive History. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. Brown, Alan K., ed. 2001 A Description of Distant Roads: Original Journals of the First Expedition into California, 1769- 1770, by Juan Crespi. San Diego, California: San Diego State University Press. California Office of Surveyor-General 1886 1886 February 25, Corrected Report of Spanish and Mexican 1886 Grants in CA (Completed to 2- 25-1886), Supplement to 1883-84 Official Report (1), Surveyor General’s Report to Governor of California. Surveyor General Reports, Book 31. Chesnut, Merlyn 1993 The Gaviota Land: A Glimpse Into California History from a bend on El Camino Real. Santa Barbara, California: Fithian Press. City of San Luis Obispo 2010 Historic Preservation Ordinance. Electronic document, online at http://www.slocity.org/home/showdocument?id=4142, accessed November 2, 2015. Engelhardt, Zephyrin 1915 The Missions and Missionaries of California: Vol. IV. Upper California, Part III. General History. San Francisco, California: The James H. Barry Company. Erlandson, Jon M. 1991 Early Maritime Adaptations on the Northern Channel Islands in Hunter-Gatherers of Early Holocene Coastal California. Volume 1: Perspectives in California Archaeology. Jon M. Erlandson and R. Colten, eds. Pp. 101-111. Los Angeles, California: Costen Institute of Archaeology Press. 1994 Early Hunter-Gatherers of the California Coast. New York, New York: Plenum Press. Erlandson, Jon M., Theodore Cooley, and Richard Carrico 1987 A Fluted Projectile Point Fragment from the Southern California Coast: Chronology and Context at CA-SBA-1951. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 9(1):120–128. References Cultural Resources Technical Report 33 Fitzgerald, Richard T. 2000 Cross Creek: An Early Holocene/Millingstone Site. Issue 12: California State Water Project, Coastal Branch Series. San Luis Obispo, California: San Luis Obispo County Archaeological Society. Gamble, Lynn. H., Philip. L. Walker, and Glenn S. Russell 2001 Integrative Approach to Mortuary Analysis: Social and Symbolic Dimensions of Chumash Burial Practices. American Antiquity 66(2):185–212. Gibson, R.O. 1983 Ethnography of the Salinan People: A Systems Approach. Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, Geography and Environmental Studies, California State University, East Bay. Glassow, Michael A. 1996 Purisimeño Chumash Prehistory: Maritime Adaptations along the Southern California Coast. Fort Worth, Texas: Harcourt Brace College Publishers. 1997 Middle Holocene Cultural Development in the Central Santa Barbara Channel Region in Archaeology of the California Coast during the Middle Holocene. Volume 4: Perspectives in California Archaeology. Jon M. Erlandson and Michael A. Glassow, eds. Pp. 73–90. Los Angeles, California: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press. Glassow, Michael A., Larry R. Wilcoxen, and Jon M. Erlandson 1988 Cultural and Environmental Change during the Early Period of Santa Barbara Channel Prehistory in The Archaeology of Prehistoric Coastlines. G. Bailey and J. Parkington, eds. Pp. 64–77. New York, New York: Cambridge University Press. Glassow, Michael A., Lynn H. Gamble, Jennifer E. Perry, and Glenn S. Russell 2007 Prehistory of the Northern California Bight and the Adjacent Transverse Ranges in California Prehistory: Colonization, Culture, and Complexity. Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar, eds. Pp. 191-213. Lanham, Maryland: AltaMira Press. Greenwood, Roberta S. 1972 9000 Years of Prehistory at Diablo Canyon, San Luis Obispo County, California. San Luis Obispo County Archaeological Society Occasional Paper No 7. San Luis Obispo, California: San Luis Obispo Historical Society. 1978 Obispeño and Purisimeño Chumash in Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8: California. Robert F. Heizer, ed. and William C. Sturtevant, general ed. Pp. 520-523. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press. Hildebrandt, William 1983 Archaeological Research of the Southern Santa Clara Valley Project. Report on file, California Department of Transportation, San Francisco, California. Historic Resources Group (HRG) 2013 City of San Luis Obispo Citywide Historic Context Statement. Prepared for the City of San Luis Obispo. Electronic document, online at http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/pages/1054/files/slo%20final%20historic%20context%20statement_1.2 1.2014.pdf, accessed October 5, 2017. 650 Tank Farm Road Project 34 Johnson, John R. 1987 Chumash Social Organization: An Ethnohistoric Perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara. Johnson, John R., Thomas W. Stafford, Jr., Henry O. Ajie, and Don P. Morris 2002 Arlington Springs Revisited in Proceedings of the Fifth California Islands Symposium. D. Browne, K. Mitchell and H. Chaney, eds. Pp. 541–545. Santa Barbara, California: USDI Minerals Management Service and the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History. Jones, D.A., C. Young and W.R. Hildebrandt 2001 Phase II Archaeological Test Excavation at CA-SLO-832 and CA-SLO-1420, for the James Way/Price Street Road Improvement Project, San Luis Obispo County, California. Far Western Anthropological Research Group. Report on file, California Department of Transportation, San Luis Obispo, California. Jones, Terry L. 1993 Big Sur: A Keystone in Central California Cultural History. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 29(1):1–78. 1995 Transitions in Prehistoric Diet, Mobility, Exchange, and Social Organization along California’s Big Sur Coast. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis. Jones, Terry L., and Jennifer A. Ferneau 2002 Deintensification along the Central California Coast in Catalysts to Complexity, Late Holocene Societies of the California Coast. Volume 6: Perspectives in California Archaeology. Jon M. Erlandson and Terry L. Jones, eds. Pp. 205-232. Los Angeles, California: Costen Institute of Archaeology Press. Jones, Terry L. and Kathryn A. Klar 2005 Diffusionism Reconsidered: Linguistic and Archaeological Evidence for Prehistoric Polynesian Contact with Southern California. American Antiquity 70(3):457-484. 2007 California Prehistory: Colonization, Culture, and Complexity. Lanham, Maryland: AltaMira Press. Jones, Terry L. and Georgie Waugh 1995 Central California Prehistory: A View from Little Pico Creek. Volume 3: Perspectives in California Archaeology. Los Angeles, California: Costen Institute of Archaeology Press. 1997 Climatic Consequences of Population Pragmatism? A Middle Holocene Prehistory of the Central Coast in Archaeology of the California Coast During the Middle Holocene. Volume 4: Perspectives in California Archaeology. Jon M. Erlandson and Michael A. Glassow, eds. Pp. 111– 128. Los Angeles, California: Costen Institute of Archaeology Press. Jones, Terry L., K. Davis, G. Farris, S.D. Grantham, T.W. Fung, and B. Rivers 1994 Toward a Prehistory of Morro Bay: Phase II Archaeological Investigations for the Highway 41 Widening Project, San Luis Obispo County, California. Report on file, California Department of Transportation, San Luis Obispo, California. Jones, Terry L., Nathan E. Stevens, Deborah A. Jones, Richard T. Fitzgerald, and Mark G. Hylkema 2007 The Central Coast: A Midlatitude Milieu in California Prehistory: Colonization, Culture, and Complexity. Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar, eds. Pp. 125–146. Lanham, Maryland: AltaMira Press. References Cultural Resources Technical Report 35 Justice, Noel D. 2002 Stone Age Spear and Arrow Points of California and the Great Basin. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press. Kennett, Douglas J. 1998 Behavioral Ecology and the Evolution of Hunter-Gatherer Societies on the Northern Channel Islands, California. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara. King, Chester D. 1969 Approximate 1769 Chumash Village Locations and Populations. Archaeological Survey Annual Report 11(3). University of California, Los Angeles. 1990 Evolution of Chumash Society: A Comparative Study of Artifacts Used in Social System Maintenance in the Santa Barbara Channel Region Before A.D. 1804 in The Evolution of North American Indians. David Hurst Thomas, ed. New York, New York: Garland Publishing. Kroeber, Alfred L. 1976 Handbook of the Indians of California. New York, New York: Dover Publications, Inc. Lebow, C., M.C. Baloian, D.R. Harro, R.L. Mckim, C. Denardo, J. Onken, E. Romanski, and B.A. Price 2001 Final Report of Archaeological Investigations for Reaches 5B and 6 Coastal Branch Aqueduct, Phase II. Applied EarthWorks, Inc. Report on file, Central Coast Water Authority, Buellton, California. Miller, Bruce W. 1988 Chumash: A Picture of Their World. Los Osos, California: Sand River Press. Milliken, Randall and John R. Johnson 2005 An Ethnography of Salinan and Northern Chumash Communities- 1769 to 1810. Far Western Anthropological Research Group. Report on file, California Department of Transportation, San Luis Obispo, California. Mills, Wayne, Michael F. Rondeau, and Terry L. Jones 2005 A Fluted Point from Nipomo, San Luis Obispo County, California. Journal of California and Great Basin Archaeology 25(2):214-220. Mithun, Marianne 1999 The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press. Moratto, Michael J. 1984 California Archaeology. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press, Inc National Park Service (NPS) 1983 Archaeology and Historic Preservation: Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines. Electronic document, online at http://www.nps.gov/history/local-law/Arch_Standards.htm, accessed May 19, 2017. 650 Tank Farm Road Project 36 NETRonline 2017 Historic Aerials: 650 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo. Electronic document, online at https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer, accessed October 31, 2017. Rogers, D.B. 1929 Prehistoric Man of the Santa Barbara Coast. Santa Barbara, California: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History. Rolle, Andrew 2003 California: A History. Wheeling, Illinois: Harlan Davidson, Inc. San Luis Obispo County Genealogical Society 2015 Land Grants, Patents and Ranchos. Electronic document, online at http://www.slocgs.org/carpenter/LandGrants.html, accessed October 5, 2017. Squibb, Paul 1984 Captain Portola in San Luis Obispo County in 1769. Morro Bay, California: Tabula Rasa Press. Timbrook, Jan 1990 Ethnobotany of Chumash Indians, California, Based on Collections by John P. Harrington. Economic Botany 44(2):236-253. Tognazzini, W.N. 1996 100 Years Ago, 1896: Excerpts from the San Luis Obispo Morning Tribune and Breeze. San Luis Obispo, California. Treganza, Adan E. and Agnes Bierman 1958 The Topanga Culture: Final Report on Excavations, 1948. University of California Anthropological Records 20(2):45–86. University of California, Santa Barbara Library Frame Finder 2018 Historic Aerials: 650 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo. Electronic document, online at http://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder/, accessed August 21, 2018. Wallace, William 1955 Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11(3):214–230. 1978 Post-Pleistocene Archaeology, 9000 to 2000 B.C. in Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8: California. Robert F. Heizer, ed. and William C. Sturtevant, general ed. Pp. 505-508. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press. Warren, Claude N. 1968 Cultural Tradition and Ecological Adaptation on the Southern California Coast in Archaic Prehistory in the Western United States. C. Irwin-Williams, ed. Eastern New Mexico University Contributions in Anthropology 1(3):1–14. Weber, David J. 1982 The Mexican Frontier 1821-1846. Albuquerque, New Mexico: University of New Mexico Press. 1992 The Spanish Frontier in North America. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. Appendix A Records Search Results Appendix B Native American Outreach Rincon Consultants, Inc. 250 East 1st Street, Suite 301 Los Angeles, California 90012 213 788 4842 FAX 908 2200 info@rinconconsultants.com www.rinconconsultants.com Environmental Scientists Planners Engineers November 30, 2017 Rincon Project No: 17‐04701 Rachel Cohen Associate Planner City of San Luis Obispo – Community Development 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Via Email: rcohen@slocity.org Subject: Paleontological Resources Assessment for the 650 Tank Farm Road Project, San Luis Obispo County, California Dear Ms. Cohen: Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Rincon) was retained by the City of San Luis Obispo to conduct a paleontological resource assessment for the 650 Tank Farm Road Project (project) in the City of San Luis Obispo. The goal of the assessment is to identify the geologic units that may be impacted by development from the proposed project, determine the paleontological sensitivity of geologic units within the proposed project area, assess potential for impacts to paleontological resources from development of the proposed project, and recommend mitigation measures to avoid or mitigate impacts to scientifically significant paleontological resources, as necessary. This paleontological resource assessment consisted of a fossil locality record search at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (LACM) and review of existing geologic maps and primary literature regarding fossiliferous geologic units within the proposed project vicinity and region. Following the literature review and records search, this report assessed the paleontological sensitivity of the geologic units at the project site, determined the potential for impacts to significant paleontological resources, and proposed mitigation measures to reduce impacts to less than significant. Figures are included in Attachment A. This paleontological resource assessment has been prepared to support environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Project Description The project is located within Township 31 South, Range 12 East, Sections 1 and 12 of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) San Luis Obispo and Pismo Beach, CA 7.5‐minute quadrangles (Figure 1) on the north side of Tank Farm Road, west of Broad Street, and south of the Damon‐Garcia Sports Complex (Figure 2). The project site is 12.75 acres currently in use as the Hidden Hills Mobilodge, a mobile home park, and the Lazy Acres RV Storage lot. The project applicant proposes to rezone the land into a mixed‐ use project site. Specifically, the rezone would be from 3.25 acres of Business Park land and 6.85 acres of Medium‐Density Residential land into 10.1 acres of Service Commercial land with a Specific Plan City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Project Page 2 Overlay. The additional 2.65 acres of land within the project site that includes two creek corridors will remained zoned as Conservation Open Space. Future development on the project site could potentially include 17,500 square feet of commercial space and 249 residential units. The full extent of ground disturbance has not been fully defined and is unknown until project design is finalized. Regulatory Setting State Laws and Regulations The following are California state regulations with respect to paleontological resources. California Environmental Quality Act CEQA requires that public agencies and private interests identify the potential environmental consequences of their proposed projects on any object or site considered to be a historical resource of California (California Public Resources Code [PRC], section 21084.1, California Code of Regulations Title 14, section 15064.5). Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3) provides an Environmental Checklist of questions including a single question related to paleontological resources (Section V.c) as follows: “Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site…?” CEQA does not define “a unique paleontological resource or site.” However, the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP) has defined a “significant paleontological resource” in the context of environmental review. The SVP defines a Significant Paleontological Resources as: …fossils and fossiliferous deposits, here defined as consisting of identifiable vertebrate fossils, large or small, uncommon invertebrate, plant, and trace fossils, and other data that provide taphonomic, taxonomic, phylogenetic, paleoecologic, stratigraphic, and/or biochronologic information. Paleontological resources are considered to be older than recorded human history and/or older than middle Holocene (i.e., older than about 5,000 radiocarbon years). The loss of paleontological resources that meet the criteria outlined above (i.e. considered a significant paleontological resource) would be considered a significant impact under CEQA, and the CEQA lead agency is responsible for ensuring that paleontological resources are protected in compliance with CEQA and other applicable statutes. Public Resources Code Section 5097.5 Section 5097.5 of the PRC states: No person shall knowingly and willfully excavate upon, or remove, destroy, injure or deface any historic or prehistoric ruins, burial grounds, archaeological or vertebrate paleontological site, including fossilized footprints, inscriptions made by human agency, or any other archaeological, paleontological or historical feature, situated on public lands, except with the express permission of the public agency having jurisdiction over such lands. Violation of this section is a misdemeanor. As used in this PRC section, “public lands” means lands owned by, or under the jurisdiction of, the state or any city, county, district, authority, or public corporation, or any agency thereof. Consequently, local agencies are required to comply with PRC 5097.5 for their own activities, including construction and maintenance, as well as for permit actions (e.g., encroachment permits) undertaken by others. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Project Page 3 The City of San Luis Obispo General Plan does not set forth policies that specifically address paleontological resources. Methods Rincon evaluated the paleontological sensitivity of the geologic units that underlie the project site using the results of the paleontological locality search and review of existing information in the primary literature concerning known fossils within those geologic units. Rincon submitted a request to the LACM for a list of known fossil localities from the project site and immediate vicinity (i.e., localities recorded on the USGS San Luis Obispo and Pismo Beach , 7.5‐minute topographic quadrangle), and reviewed geologic maps and primary literature including: Agenbroad 2003; Barboza et al. 2017; Barron 1989; Bartow and Nilsen 1990; Bell et al. 2004; Boessenecker 2013; Dibblee and Minch 2006; Graymer et al. 1996; Groves 1991; Jefferson 1989, 1991a, 1991b; Jefferson at al. 1992; Lettis and Hall 1994; Lettis et al. 1994; Maguire and Holroyd 2016; Norris and Webb 1990; Savage et al. 1954; Surdham and Stanley 1984; Springer et al. 2009; Tomiya et al. 2011; Wilkerson et al. 2011. Rincon assigned a paleontological sensitivity to the geologic unit within the project site. The potential for impacts to significant paleontological resources is based on the potential for ground disturbance to directly impact paleontologically sensitive geologic units. The SVP (2010) has defined paleontological sensitivity and developed a system for assessing paleontological sensitivity, as discussed below Paleontological Sensitivity The SVP broadly defines significant paleontological resources as follows (SVP 2010:11): Fossils and fossiliferous deposits consisting of identifiable vertebrate fossils, large or small, uncommon invertebrate, plant, and trace fossils, and other data that provide taphonomic, taxonomic, phylogenetic, paleoecologic, stratigraphic, and/or biochronologic information. Paleontological resources are considered to be older than recorded human history and/or older than middle Holocene (i.e., older than about 5,000 radiocarbon years). Significant paleontological resources are determined to be fossils or assemblages of fossils that are unique, unusual, rare, diagnostically important, or are common but have the potential to provide valuable scientific information for evaluating evolutionary patterns and processes, or which could improve our understanding of paleochronology, paleoecology, paleophylogeography, or depositional histories. New or unique specimens can provide new insights into evolutionary history; however, additional specimens of even well represented lineages can be equally important for studying evolutionary pattern and process, evolutionary rates, and paleophylogeography. Even unidentifiable material can provide useful data for dating geologic units if radiocarbon dating is possible. As such, common fossils (especially vertebrates) may be scientifically important, and therefore considered highly significant. The SVP (2010) describes sedimentary rock units as having high, low, undetermined, or no potential for containing significant nonrenewable paleontological resources. This criterion is based on rock units within which vertebrate or significant invertebrate fossils have been determined by previous studies to be present or likely to be present. While these standards were specifically written to protect vertebrate paleontological resources, all fields of paleontology have adopted these guidelines: I. High Potential (sensitivity). Rock units from which significant vertebrate or significant invertebrate fossils or significant suites of plant fossils have been recovered are considered to have a high potential for containing significant non‐renewable fossiliferous resources. These City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Project Page 4 units include but are not limited to, sedimentary formations and some volcanic formations which contain significant nonrenewable paleontological resources anywhere within their geographical extent, and sedimentary rock units temporally or lithologically suitable for the preservation of fossils. Sensitivity comprises both (a) the potential for yielding abundant or significant vertebrate fossils or for yielding a few significant fossils, large or small, vertebrate, invertebrate, or botanical and (b) the importance of recovered evidence for new and significant taxonomic, phylogenetic, ecologic, or stratigraphic data. Areas which contain potentially datable organic remains older than Recent, including deposits associated with nests or middens, and areas which may contain new vertebrate deposits, traces, or trackways are also classified as significant. II. Low Potential (sensitivity). Sedimentary rock units that are potentially fossiliferous, but have not yielded fossils in the past or contain common and/or widespread invertebrate fossils of well documented and understood taphonomic, phylogenetic species and habitat ecology. Reports in the paleontological literature or field surveys by a qualified vertebrate paleontologist may allow determination that some areas or units have low potentials for yielding significant fossils prior to the start of construction. Generally, these units will be poorly represented by specimens in institutional collections and will not require protection or salvage operations. However, as excavation for construction gets underway it is possible that significant and unanticipated paleontological resources might be encountered and require a change of classification from Low to High Potential and, thus, require monitoring and mitigation if the resources are found to be significant. III. Undetermined Potential (sensitivity). Specific areas underlain by sedimentary rock units for which little information is available are considered to have undetermined fossiliferous potentials. Field surveys by a qualified vertebrate paleontologist to specifically determine the potentials of the rock units are required before programs of impact mitigation for such areas may be developed. IV. No Potential. Rock units of metamorphic or igneous origin are commonly classified as having no potential for containing significant paleontological resources. Results Locality Search A search of the paleontological locality records at the LACM resulted in no previously recorded fossil localities within the project boundaries. However, McLeod (2017) reports that at least two vertebrate localities have been recorded nearby from within older Quaternary alluvium, which has a similar lithology to the Pleistocene sedimentary deposits that likely underlie the project area at depth. Locality LACM 5903, recorded approximately 10 miles northwest of the project area near Los Osos, yielded a fossil specimen of mastodon (Mammutidae) in stream gravels at a depth of only six feet below the surface. Approximately 10 miles southeast of the project, the locality LACM 5790 yielded a fossil specimen of mammoth (Mammuthus) at unspecified, but shallow depth. In addition to the museum locality records, the paleontological literature for Pleistocene geologic units in coastal California contains an abundant and diverse fossil record (Agenbroad 2003; Axelrod 1983; Barboza et al. 2017; Bell et al. 2004; Boessenecker 2013; Jefferson 1989, 1991a, 1991b; Jefferson at al. 1992; Maguire and Holroyd 2016; Savage et al. 1954; Springer et al. 2009; Tomiya et al. 2011; Wilkerson et al. 2011). The various collections of Pleistocene‐aged fossils represent diverse assemblages of City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Project Page 5 vertebrate taxa including amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. Important invertebrate and plant fossils have also been recovered from Pleistocene alluvial units, providing important information on the environmental setting of the Pleistocene. Regional Geologic Setting The project area is situated within the Coast Ranges, one of eleven major geomorphic provinces in California (California Geological Survey [CGS] 2002). A geomorphic province is a region of unique topography and geology that is readily distinguished from other regions based on its landforms and diastrophic history. The Coast Ranges extend about 600 miles from the Oregon border south to the Santa Ynez River in Santa Barbara County and are characterized by numerous north‐south–trending peaks and valleys that range in elevation from approximately 500 feet above mean sea level (amsl) to 7,581 feet amsl at the highest summit. The basement rocks of the Coast Ranges include the Jurassic to Cretaceous rocks of the Franciscan Assemblage, which consist of over 55,000 feet of greywacke, greenstone, bluestone, metasedimentary rocks, and ophiolite sequences. During the Mesozoic and into the Cenozoic, the area of the present‐day Coast Ranges was covered by marine waters, resulting in the thick accumulation of marine and nonmarine shale, sandstone, and conglomerate on the Franciscan basement rock (Bartow and Nilsen 1990). Later, these deposits were unconformably overlain by Paleocene to Pliocene marine continental shelf sedimentary rocks (Barron 1989; Graymer et al. 1996). During the Late Miocene to the Late Pliocene, a mountain‐building episode occurred in the vicinity of the present‐day Coast Ranges, resulting in their uplift above sea level. Subsequently, from the Late Pliocene to Pleistocene, extensive deposits of terrestrial material, including alluvial fans and fluvial sediments, were deposited in the southern Coast Ranges (Norris and Webb 1990). Tectonic activity, faulting, and eustatic (global) events related to Pleistocene climate change continued to occur during the Quaternary Period, resulting in further uplift, deformation, and sea level fluctuations along the Coast Ranges (Jefferson et al. 1992). Dominant geologic features of the Coast Ranges within the vicinity of the project area include the San Luis Range and the Irish Hills; the north‐west trending Los Osos Fault Zone; and Morro Rock and the Nine Sisters Miocene volcanic peaks (Lettis and Hall 1994; Lettis et al. 1994; Surdham and Stanley 1984). The project area includes one (1) geologic unit mapped at the surface (Figure 2): Quaternary (Holocene) alluvium (Qa) (Dibblee and Minch 2006). The Quaternary alluvial deposits are composed of unconsolidated terrestrial sediment consisting of clay, silt, coarse‐grained sand, pebbles and cobbles derived from drainage of the neighboring highlands. Paleontological Sensitivity Quaternary (Holocene) alluvial deposits, particularly those younger than 5,000 years old, are generally too young to contain fossilized material, and are assigned a low paleontological sensitivity. However, these Holocene sediments may grade into older buried Pleistocene alluvium in which scientifically significant fossils could occur. Alluvial sediments of Pleistocene age have a well‐documented record of abundant and diverse vertebrate fauna throughout sedimentary basins in California (Agenbroad 2003; Axelrod 1983; Barboza et al. 2017; Bell et al. 2004; Boessenecker 2013; CGS 2002; Jefferson 1989, 1991a, 1991b; Jefferson at al. 1992; Maguire and Holroyd 2016; Savage et al. 1954; Springer et al. 2009; Tomiya et al. 2011; Wilkerson et al. 2011). Data on the specific depth at which the Holocene unit mapped at the surface of the project transitions into older Pleistocene deposits that have the potential for fossilized material is not available, but they may overlie sensitive older deposits at an unknown, but relatively shallow depth (SVP, 2010). City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Project Page 6 Impacts Analysis Quaternary alluvial sediments mapped at ground surface in the project area are Holocene in age, and as such have low paleontological sensitivity. Shallow ground disturbance in these areas would not impact scientifically significant paleontological resources; however, based on regional geologic mapping and previously identified fossil localities, these Holocene sediments may grade into older Pleistocene aged sediments that have high paleontological sensitivity at as few as six feet below ground surface. The maximum depth of proposed project ground disturbance is unknown until project design is finalized. Therefore, any excavations in the project area that disturb the buried highly sensitive Pleistocene alluvium could result in significant impacts to paleontological resources. The following recommended mitigation would address the potentially significant impacts relating to the possible discovery of intact paleontological resources during project implementation. These measures would apply to all phases of project construction and would ensure that any unanticipated fossils present on‐site are preserved. Implementation of the recommended mitigation would reduce potential project impacts to paleontological resources to a less than significant level. Recommended Mitigation Retain a Qualified Paleontologist. Prior to initial ground disturbance, the applicant shall retain a project paleontologist, defined as a paleontologist who meets the SVP standards for Qualified Professional Paleontologist, to direct all mitigation measures related to paleontological resources. A qualified paleontologist (Principal Paleontologist) is defined by the SVP standards as an individual preferably with an M.S. or Ph.D. in paleontology or geology who is experienced with paleontological procedures and techniques, who is knowledgeable in the geology of California, and who has worked as a paleontological mitigation project supervisor for a least one year (SVP 2010). Paleontological Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP). Prior to the start of construction, the Principal Paleontologist or his or her designee shall conduct training for construction personnel regarding the appearance of fossils and the procedures for notifying paleontological staff should fossils be discovered by construction staff. The WEAP shall be fulfilled at the time of a preconstruction meeting at which a qualified paleontologist shall attend. Paleontological Monitoring. Ground disturbing construction activities (including grading, trenching, foundation work, and other excavations) in previously undisturbed sediments at depths greater than six feet should be monitored on a full‐time basis during initial ground disturbance. Monitoring should be conducted by a qualified paleontological monitor, who is defined as an individual who has experience with collection and salvage of paleontological resources and meets the minimum standards of the SVP (2010) for a paleontological resources monitor. The duration and timing of the monitoring will be determined by the Principal Paleontologist and the location and extent of proposed ground disturbance. If the Principal Paleontologist determines that full‐time monitoring is no longer warranted, based on the specific geologic conditions at the surface or at depth, the Principal Paleontologist may recommend that monitoring be reduced to periodic spot‐checking or cease entirely. Ground disturbing activity that does not exceed six feet in depth within Quaternary alluvium would not require paleontological monitoring. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Project Page 7 Fossil Discoveries In the event of a fossil discovery by the paleontological monitor or construction personnel, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find shall cease. The Principal Paleontologist shall evaluate the find before restarting construction activity in the area. If it is determined that the fossil(s) is (are) scientifically significant, the Principal Paleontologist shall complete the following conditions to mitigate impacts to significant fossil resources: 1) Salvage of Fossils. If fossils are discovered, all work in the immediate vicinity should be halted to allow the paleontological monitor, and/or Principal Paleontologist to evaluate the discovery and determine if the fossil may be considered significant. If the fossils are determined to be potentially significant, the Principal Paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) should recover them following standard field procedures for collecting paleontological resources. Typically, fossils can be safely salvaged quickly by a single paleontologist and not disrupt construction activity. In some cases larger fossils (such as complete skeletons or large mammal fossils) require more extensive excavation and longer salvage periods. In this case the paleontologist should have the authority to temporarily direct, divert or halt construction activity to ensure that the fossil(s) can be removed in a safe and timely manner. 2) Preparation and Curation of Recovered Fossils. Once salvaged, significant fossils should be identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level, prepared to a curation‐ready condition, and curated in a scientific institution with a permanent paleontological collection (such as the LACM), along with all pertinent field notes, photos, data, and maps. Fossils of undetermined significance at the time of collection may also warrant curation at the discretion of the Principal Paleontologist. Final Paleontological Mitigation Report. Upon completion of ground disturbing activity (and curation of fossils if necessary) the Principal Paleontologist should prepare a final mitigation and monitoring report outlining the results of the mitigation and monitoring program. The report should include discussion of the location, duration and methods of the monitoring, stratigraphic sections, any recovered fossils, and the scientific significance of those fossils, and where fossils were curated. If you have any questions regarding this Paleontological Resources Assessment, please contact us. Sincerely, Rincon Consultants, Inc. Heather Clifford, M.S. Jessica DeBusk Associate Paleontologist Principal Investigator/Program Manager Duane Vander Pluym, D.Env. Sr. Principal Attachments Attachment A: Figures City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Project Page 8 References Agenbroad, L.D. 2003. New localities, chronology, and comparisons for the pygmy mammoth (Mammuthus exilis). In J. Reumer (ed.): Advances in Mammoth Research, Proceedings of the 2nd International Mammoth Conference, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. DEINSEA 9:1‐16. Axelrod, D. I. 1983. New Pleistocene Conifer records, coastal California. Geological Sciences No. 127. Barboza, M. M., J. F. Parham, G.‐P. Santos, B. N. Kussman, and J. Velez‐Juarbe. 2017. The age of the Oso Member, Capistrano Formation, and a review of fossil crocodylians from California. PaleoBios 34: 1–16. Barron, J.A. 1989. Diatom stratigraphy of the Monterey Formation and related rocks, San Jose 30 x 60‐ minute quadrangle, California: Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey Open‐File Report 89 565. Bartow, J. A., and Nilsen, T. H. 1990. Review of the Great Valley Sequence, Eastern Diablo Range and Northern San Joaquin Valley, Central California: U.S. Geological Survey Open‐File Report 90 226, Menlo Park, California. Bell, C.J., E.L. Lundelius, Jr., A.D. Barnosky, R.W. Graham, E.H. Lindsay, D.R. Ruez, Jr., H.A. Semken, Jr., S.D. Webb, and R.J. Zakrzewski. 2004. The Blancan, Irvingtonian, and Rancholabrean Mammal Ages. In Woodburne, M.O. (ed.) Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic Mammals of North America: Biostratigraphy and Geochronology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 232‐314. Boessenecker, R. W. 2013. A new marine vertebrate assemblage from the Late Neogene Purisima Formation in Central California, part II: Pinnipeds and Cetaceans. Geodiversitas 35: 815‐940. California Geological Survey (CGS). 2002. California Geomorphic Provinces, Note 36. Dibblee, T.W., and Minch, J.A. 2006. Geologic map of the Pismo Beach quadrangle, San Luis Obispo County, California: Dibblee Geological Foundation, Dibblee Foundation Map DF‐212, scale, 1:24,000. Graymer, R. W., Jones, D.L., and Brabb, E.E. 1996. Preliminary geologic map emphasizing bedrock formations in Alameda County, California – Digital Database. U.S. Geological Survey Open‐File Report 96‐252, scale 1:75,000, http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1996/of96‐252/. Jefferson, G.T. 1989. Late Cenozoic tapirs (Mammalia: Perissodactyla) of western North America. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Contributions in Science, 406:1‐22. ______. 1991a. A Catalogue of Late Quaternary Vertebrates from California: Part One, Nonmarine lower vertebrate and avian taxa. Technical Report No 5. Los Angeles: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. ______. 1991b. A Catalogue of Late Quaternary Vertebrates from California: Part Two, Mammals. Technical Report No 7. Los Angeles: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. Jefferson, G. T., Fierstine, H. L., Wesling, J. R., and Ku, T. L. 1992. Pleistocene Terrestrial Vertebrates from near Point San Luis, and Other Localities in San Luis Obispo County, California: Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences, v. 91, no. 1, p. 26‐38. Lettis, W.R., and Hall, N.T. 1994. Los Osos Fault Zone, San Luis Obispo County, California in Alterman, I.B., McMullen, R.B., Cluff, L.S., and Slemmons, D.B., eds., Seismotectonics of the Central California Coast Ranges: Geological Society of America Special Papers, v. 292, p. 73‐102. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Project Page 9 Lettis, W. R., Kelson, K. I., Wesling, J. R., Angell, M., Hanson, K. L., and Hall, N. T. 1994. Quaternary deformation of the San Luis Range, San Luis Obispo County, California in Alterman, I.B., McMullen, R.B., Cluff, L.S., and Slemmons, D.B., eds., Seismotectonics of the Central California Coast Ranges: Geological Society of America Special Papers, v. 292, p. 111‐132. Maguire, K.C. and P.A. Holroyd. 2016. Pleistocene vertebrates of Silicon Valley (Santa Clara County, California). PaleoBios 33(1):1‐14. McLeod, S. 2017. Collections search of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County for the 650 Tank Farm Project, City of San Luis Obispo, CA. Received on November 8, 2017. Norris, R. M. and Webb, R. W. 1990. Geology of California. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York. Savage, D.R. 1951. Late Cenozoic vertebrates of the San Francisco Bay region. University of California Publications, Bulletin of the Department of Geological Sciences, 28:215‐314. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2010. Standard Procedures for the Assessment and Mitigation of Adverse Impacts to Paleontological Resources. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Impact Mitigation Guidelines Revision Committee. Springer, K., E. Scott, J.C. Sagebiel, and L.K. Murray. 2009. The Diamond Valley Lake local fauna: Late Pleistocene vertebrates from inland southern California. In Albright, L.B. III (ed.), Papers on Geology, Vertebrate Paleontology, and Biostratigraphy in Honor of Michael O. Woodburne. Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin, 65:217‐36. Surdam, R. C., and Stanley, K. O. 1984. Stratigraphic and Sedimentologic Framework of the Monterey Formation, Pismo Syncline, California in Surdham, R.C., ed., Stratigraphic, Tectonic, Thermal and Diagenetic Histories of the Monterey Formation, Pismo and Huasna: Society for Sedimentary Geology (SEPM). Tomiya, S., J.L. McGuire, R.W. Dedon, S.D. Lerner, R. Setsuda, A.N. Lipps, J.F. Bailey, K.R. Hale, A.B. Shabel, and A.D. Barnosky. 2011. A report on late Quaternary vertebrate fossil assemblages from the eastern San Francisco Bay region, California. PaleoBios 30(2):50‐71. Wilkerson, G., T. Elam, and R. Turner. 2011. Lake Thompson Pleistocene mammalian fossil assemblage, Rosamond. In Reynolds, R.E. (ed.) The Incredible Shrinking Pliocene: The 2011 Desert Symposium Field Guide and Proceedings. California State University Desert Studies Consortium, Pp. 88‐90. Attachment A Figures Figure 1 Project Location Map Figure 2 Geologic Map Appendix D Sound Level Assessment and Construction Noise Estimates 45dB Acoustics P.O. Box 1406 San Luis Obispo California 93406 tel. 805.704.8046 www.45dB.com email: dl@45dB.com March 3, 2017 Project 1705 RE: Sound Level Assessment 650 Tank Farm Project San Luis Obispo, CA Requested by: Agera Grove Investments, LLC 4927 Calloway Drive Bakersfield, CA 93312 1 Introduction The subject of this assessment is the proposed 650 Tank Farm Road Project, with regard to the potential impact of surrounding noise levels from all sources. Noise sources examined in this study are vehicular traffic on major and minor roads, as well as flight and ground operations at the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport. In addition, there are potential existing or future stationary noise sources from neighboring commercial activities along the west boundary of the site. The south side of the site is bordered by Tank Farm Road, a significant transportation noise source with an average daily motor vehicle volume of 21,000. The southwest corner of the site is closest to the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport, a separate potential source of on-site noise. The general layout and configuration of the site, along with sound level measurement locations are shown on the next page. Existing sound levels were measured continuously and synchronously on the proposed site and at other key locations at 10-second intervals over a 24-hour period on Thursday and Friday, January 26 - 27, 2017. An acoustic software modeling tool was used to generate sound level contours based on topography, noise sources and measured sound level values. 2 Location The project is located in the City of San Luis Obispo, north of Tank Farm Road and west of Broad Street. Primary noise sources potentially impacting the site are ground transportation from Tank Farm Road and the San Luis Obispo County Airport operations to the southwest, shown below. The separate relationship of the two major noise sources, the airport and the roadway, allows the simultaneous measurement of each source as a separate contribution to the overall noise level on site. 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 2 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 Figure 1 Map Showing Relationship of the site to major noise sources, airport runway and Tank Farm Road 3 Executive Summary This Sound Level Assessment is divided into the following main sections: 1. Applicable City Sound Level Standards, including a description of the relevant criteria from the Noise Element of the City’s General Plan that is used to evaluate noise impacts. 2. Airport Sound Level Standards from the San Luis Obispo Airport Land Use Plan as well as industry measurement standards for evaluating noise impacts of aircraft operations. 3. Sound Level Measurements & Results. This includes the locations and data collected in field measurements. 4. Other Factors Influencing Noise Levels – This includes discussions about variability in airport operations, future adjacent uses, and helicopter flights. 5. Impacts to a schematic site development plan, which demonstrates how noise levels are moderated and changed by development on the site. 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 3 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 6. Mitigation Strategies, including strategies and techniques that can lower noise levels at outdoor activity areas and habitable spaces on the site. The major conclusions of this Sound Level Assessment are: 1. Automobile traffic noise is of greater significance than air traffic in terms of existing and projected future noise levels at the site. 2. The placement of buildings with less sensitive uses that parallel the Tank Farm Road corridor in addition to constructed built forms and land forms on the west side of the site can help to attenuate sound levels toward the interior of the site in order to improve compliance with standards for outdoor uses, less than CNEL = 60 dBA. 3. Through construction techniques with ordinary materials, buildings can properly attenuate noise to compliance level, yielding interior noise levels that are in accord with the City’s General Plan and the Airport Land Use Plan. 4 City Sound Level Standards The Noise Element of the General Plan for the City of San Luis Obispo is one of the guiding standards for determining the feasibility of residential or mixed use development on the site. The Noise Element stipulates the acceptability of noise-sensitive uses exposed to transportation noise sources. The relevant part of Figure 1 of the Noise Element is shown below. Figure 2. Noise Sensitive Uses and Transportation Noise. From City of San Luis Obispo Noise Element of the General Plan. As shown in the figure above, the acceptable limit below which residential development may be permitted without specific noise studies or mitigation is considered to be Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) = 60 dBA and below. The Noise Element further defines the maximum noise exposure for noise sensitive uses due to transportation noise sources, introducing the standards for noise exposure of outdoor activity areas and indoor spaces. This standard is illustrated by Table 1 in the Noise Element, with an extract shown below. As shown in the table, the maximum noise exposure limit for outdoor activity areas is also CNEL = 60 dBA. Meanwhile, indoor habitable spaces must not exceed CNEL = 45 dBA. The indoor standard is also congruent with the State Building Code. 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 4 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 Figure 3. Maximum Noise Exposure (from City of San Luis Obispo Noise Element of the General Plan). The City has published computer-generated noise contours alongside major traffic routes. The relevant noise contour map from 1990 is shown below: Figure 4. 1990 Noise Contour Map with site overlaid. (City of San Luis Obispo Noise Element of the General Plan). The future buildout noise contour map is shown below. It can be seen that projected noise levels at buildout are 70 dBA at the southern end of the site, and the 60 dBA noise contour passes through the southern 1/4 of the site. In other words, the southern quarter of the site would be in the zone above which residential development is not recommended without mitigation. 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 5 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 Figure 5. Buildout Noise Contour Map with site overlaid. (City of San Luis Obispo Noise Element of the General Plan). The proposed development site is within the City’s Airport Area Specific Plan, which is outlined in blue in the graphic exhibit below. On this map, the site lies outside the 60 dBA sound level contour: Figure 6. Airport Noise Contours with site overlaid. (from San Luis Obispo General Plan Noise Element, figure 6, page 4-19. May 7, 1996) 5 ALUP Sound Level Standards The Airport Land Use Plan classifies all residential uses as “Extremely Noise Sensitive Land Uses.” This definition and description of residential land uses is also followed by a provision for 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 6 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 “other succeeding noise contour projections as may be accepted and deemed valid by the ALUC and adopted by amendment of this ALUP.” The standard established by the ALUP is 55 dB CNEL as the maximum acceptable average noise level for new residential land uses. The Airport Land Use Commission currently defines the 55 dBA CNEL maximum level as a sound level contour determined by a Brown Buntin study in 2001. Brown Buntin developed the published sound level contours using the Integrated Noise Model (INM) and the Emissions and Dispersion Modeling System (EDMS), developed by the Federal Aviation Administration beginning in 1969, and since discredited. In the last 10 years, published reviews attempting to validate INM, have revealed that lateral sound dispersion in airport noise modeling worldwide has been at variance with measured values as much as 7 dBA (see Reference 5). This brings into question the accuracy of the 2005 ALUP sound level contours. The FAA has announced that the use of INM has been superseded by the Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT) as of May 2015. The current Airport Land Use Plan was adopted in December 1973, with the most current amended version dated May, 2005. A proposed amendment to the Airport Land Use Plan is under review, with the most recent updated draft dated September 2014. 5.1 Airport Sound Level The California Airport Noise Regulations define airport noise compatibility as follows: “The level of noise acceptable to a reasonable person residing in the vicinity of an airport is established as a community noise equivalent level (CNEL) value of 65 dB for purposes of these regulations. This criterion level has been chosen for reasonable persons residing in urban residential areas where houses are of typical California construction and may have windows partially open. It has been selected with reference to speech, sleep and community reaction.” It is important to understand, however, that the compatibility criterion (i.e., 65 dB CNEL) identified in the Airport Noise regulations is only mandated for a few airports (less than a dozen) that have been formally declared to have a “noise problem”, the regulations do not establish a mandatory criterion for evaluating the compatibility of proposed land use development around other airports. The Equivalent Sound Level, abbreviated Leq, is a measure of the exposure resulting from the accumulation of sound levels over a particular period of interest; e.g., an hour, an eight-hour school day, nighttime, or a full 24-hour day. The applicable period should always be identified or clearly understood when discussing the metric. The Equivalent Sound Level may be thought of as a constant sound level over the period of interest that contains as much sound energy as the actual varying level. It is a way of assigning a single number to a time-varying sound level. 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 7 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 The Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) is the Leq of the A-weighted noise level over a 24-hour period with a 5 dB penalty applied to noise levels between 7 p.m. and 10 p.m. and a 10 dB penalty applied to noise levels between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. Sound levels resulting from aircraft operations at San Luis Obispo County Airport have been measured for this report as Leq sound equivalent level. The SEL or Sound Exposure Level, explained below is derived from Leq sound level data. Sound Exposure Level: Used to describe and measure aircraft flyover, the Sound Exposure Level, or SEL is a summation of the A-weighted sound energy over the entire duration of a noise event. SEL expresses the accumulated energy in terms of the one-second-long steady-state sound level that would contain the same amount of energy as the actual time-varying level. In simple terms, SEL “compresses” the energy into a single second. The figure below depicts this compression: Figure 7. Graphical depiction of a Sound Exposure Level (after Harris Miller Miller Hansen, 2011) Single Event Noise Exposure Level, or SENEL: Caltrans Division of Aeronautics noise standards regulations require use of a measure called the Single Event Noise Exposure Level, or SENEL, to describe the cumulative noise exposure for an individual noise event, such as an aircraft flyover. SENEL is a very slight variation on SEL. Just like SEL, it is the one-second- long steady-state level that contains the same amount of energy as the actual time-varying level. However, unlike SEL, it is calculated only over the period when the level exceeds a selected threshold. Figure 8. Description of Single Event Noise Exposure Level (after Harris Miller Miller Hansen, 2011) 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 8 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 Because of the normalization procedure, for most aircraft overflights, the SENEL is on the order of 7 to 12 dBA higher than the Lmax. SENEL measurements generally correlate well with the degree of annoyance generated by a noise event. The SENEL is also the mandated measure of noise for a single aircraft fly-over in California. Single Event Noise contours for San Luis Obispo County Airport from the Airport Land Use Plan are shown below: Figure 9. Single Event Noise Contours, Airport Land Use Plan In the next section we describe the measurement of existing Airport SENEL at the site boundary. 5.2 Measured Airport SENEL Measured Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) for the loudest departing flight during the 24-hour measurement period was calculated, based on the distance from the end-of-runway Station LT1. The departing jet aircraft at 8:20 AM on January 27, 2017 was not a scheduled airline but probably a corporate jet. Sound level during departure was measured at 89 dB Lmax at the end of the runway; the SENEL is calculated to be 103 dBA. The nearest boundary of the 650 Tank Farm Road site is 568 meters away. Sound level attenuates over that distance from the end of the runway and the resulting measured SENEL of 60 dBA occurs at the site boundary. The measured value on January 27, 2017 is five decibels below the ALUP sound level contour map prediction. 5.3 Airport CNEL Along with single event metric, SENEL, which occurs over a one-minute period, the 24-hour metric CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) is also used to describe noise around airports. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency identified CNEL as the most appropriate measure of evaluating airport noise based on the following considerations: 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 9 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 1. CNEL is applicable to the evaluation of pervasive long-term noise in various defined areas and under various conditions over long periods of time. 2. CNEL correlates well with known effects of noise on individuals and the public. 3. CNEL is simple, practical, and accurate. In principal, it is useful for planning as well as for enforcement or monitoring purposes. 4. The required measurement equipment to determine CNEL, with standard characteristics, is commercially available. 5. CNEL is closely related to existing methods currently in use. Day-Night Level (Ldn) is also used and yields similar results to CNEL. In general, representative values of CNEL/Ldn in an urban environment range from a low of 40 to 45 dB in extremely quiet, isolated locations, to highs of 80 or 85 decibels immediately adjacent to a busy transportation route. CNEL/Ldn is typically in the range of 50 to 55 dB in a quiet suburban residential community and 60 to 65 decibels in an urban residential neighborhood. The San Luis Obispo ALUP (2005) has a noise contour map that shows CNEL contours in relation to the proposed site. The published ALUP contour map, based on computer modeling, shows the site extending between the 55 dBA and 60 dBA CNEL contours. Comparing the ALUP sound level contour with measured values reveals a 10 dB difference. The measured value is shown super-imposed on the map. If the proposed updated Airport Land Use Plan is adopted, the contours will be adusted downward by approximately 5 dB. Figure 10 Airport Land Use Plan, published CNEL contours in relation to 650 Tank Farm Road Site. The 50 dBA measured airport sound level contour is overlaid. (From the Airport Land Use Plan, page 14-A, April 2001) 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 10 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 5.4 Helicopter Flight Training In general, helicopter operations at airports are a minor issue in terms of overall noise exposure, although they generate a more specific type of noise complaint due to the nature of helicopter flight paths at relatively low altitudes. An international helicopter flight training school operates from San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport. In the year 2016, 22 pilots earned certification, which requires 70 to 200 hours of flight training for each pilot. During each year there are about 3,000 hours of helicopter operations in and around the airport. At an average 30 minutes per flight, this would potentially be 20 departures per day during 300 days of operation. Flight patterns during and after departure might mean that student training flights occasionally overfly the 760 Tank Farm Road site. The observed, estimated altitude of the overflights is about 500 to 1,000 feet above ground level. The primary training aircraft is the Robinson model R22 helicopter, which is powered by a Lycoming O-320-A2B or a Lycoming O-320-B2C reciprocating engine. According to the type- certificate for this aircraft, a level overflight at an altitude of 492 ± 30 feet (150 ± 9 meters) creates a ground-level noise impact of 81 dB EPNL during the overflight. The duration of an overflight is typically 10 to 20 seconds, and may occur as many as ten times per day and only during daytime hours. EPNL (effective perceived noise level) is a measurement value which recognizes the psychological annoyance of single event aircraft noise, taking into account duration of the overflight and predominant tonal components of the noise. The EPNL, specified in units of EPNdB, is a single number measure calculated from objective acoustic measurements in accordance with the procedures defined by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). EPNL is calculated from a time sequence of tone-adjusted perceived noise levels which are calculated from one-third octave band noise spectra. The tone adjustments are determined from one-third octave band spectra, by a procedure which estimates the extent of discrete frequency (tone) components from irregularities in the shape of the one-third octave band noise spectra. Periodic helicopter overflights are judged to have a less-than-significant impact on the site when duration and frequency are considered against the total background daytime wall of noise from Tank Farm Road traffic. 6 Variability in Airport Operations The two days of the week chosen for this analysis, Thursday and Friday, January 26 and 27, 2017, were characterized by clear weather conditions and low wind speeds. Therefore, these two days may fairly represent optimum conditions for flight activities during a winter month. However, there may be variability in airport operations through the week and through the year. There may be more daily departures during spring, summer and fall seasons. There may be a greater number of departures on a weekend day than during a week day. Therefore, sound level would increase proportionally by as much as three dB in the unlikely case of a doubling of airport operations, or decrease by as much as three dB with halving of airport operations. 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 11 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 7 Sound Level Measurements Six sound level measurement sites are shown below. The wide distribution of measurement locations allows us to calibrate the sound modeling of the site and to attribute sound levels to different and distinct sources of sound. Figure 11. Location of Sound Level Measurements for this Sound Level Assessment. Location of the selected sound level measurement stations is shown above. There are two stations at which sound levels were measured continuously for 24 hours. There are four stations at which short-term spot check sound levels were measured. By maintaining a separation between measurement stations, the effects of simultaneous and separate road noise and airport noise sources on the site has been measured and visualized through computer modeling and simulation. 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 12 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 7.1 Sound Level Results Figure 12. Measured sound levels near end of runway, at point “LT1” Figure 13. Measured sound levels near 650 Tank Farm Road, at point “LT2” 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 13 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 Figure 14. Measured sound levels at all stations (Synchronous Plot) By plotting synchronous sound level data all together on one chart, simultaneous separate noise events can be compared and correlated. Thus the measured airport noise and the measured road traffic noise can be separately and properly attributed to each source. 8 Site Sound Level Contours A Sound Level Contour is a line on a map that represents equal levels of noise exposure. SoundPlan is an acoustics modeling software program used to calculate noise contours, based on topographic relationships of noise sources and noise receivers. Measured sound level values are used to calibrate and to validate the SoundPlan generated contours. The measured sound levels used to calibrate the model include all aircraft. Nothing has been removed/excluded from the measured data set. The following sound level contours depict sound level on the site under two major conditions. 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 14 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 Figure 15 Sound Level Contours at 650 Tank Farm Road Resulting from Airport Operations Alone, no road contribution The measured CNEL values which are modeled above are about ten decibels below the ALUP predicted values. The southwest corner of the 650 Tank Farm Road site is at 50 dBA CNEL, compared to the 60 dBA CNEL shown on the ALUP contour map. The values shown above can only be revealed by subtracting sound level data for road traffic noise, achieved through computer modeling. 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 15 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 Figure 16. Sound Level at 650 Tank Farm Resulting from all sources: Traffic Noise plus Airport Operations Combined The figure above is the result of all 24-hour measured noise sources combined; the southern side of the site is above 70 dBA CNEL, due to the dominance of road traffic. Traffic noise dominates the site and airport noise is a minor factor in the overall noise portrait of the site. 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 16 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 8.1 Future Noise Level The calculated future Ldn/CNEL (year 2037) at the south boundary will be about 72 dBA, based on the existing measured sound level of Ldn/CNEL = 70 dBA and anticipated future traffic growth of approximately two percent per year. Future development along the west boundary may result in additional noise from that direction. If stationary noise from generators or mechanical equipment comes from the possible future Digital West development, the boundary line noise limit is likely to remain similar to the current San Luis Obispo City Noise Ordinance: Figure 17. Maximum Noise Levels (from City of San Luis Obispo Municipal Ordinance 9.12.050) Maximum noise levels for long-term operation of stationary equipment Single-Family Residential Multi-family Residential Mixed Residential /Commercial Daily, except Sundays and legal holidays 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA Daily, 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 am. and all day Sunday and legal holidays 50 dBA 55 dBA 60 dBA 8.2 Schematic Site Development A trial design and layout of buildings on the site was analyzed for the distribution of sound, affected by the presence of buildings on the site. The conceptual layout is shown below. Figure 18. Schematic Site Development 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 17 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 Using the previous conceptual layout and the sound levels measured from all sources, the distribution of sound across the site will appear in general as shown in the exhibit shown below. Addition of site hardscape, patio walls, fin walls or parking structure on the west side of the site, or re-orientation of housing along the west side, will be effective in reducing sound levels within the site. Figure 19. Initial Sound Level Contour Map for Schematic Design. Figure 20. Predicted spot sound levels at specific locations across the site. The description for each spot is shown in the following order: daytime 7am to 7pm evening 7 – 10pm night 10 pm to 7am CNEL = 24 hr. average 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 18 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 9 Conclusion The measured and predicted sound levels impacting the proposed 650 Tank Farm Road project are primarily a result of transportation noise along Tank Farm Road. Airport noise levels at the site are considerably lower than road traffic noise levels and are mostly inaudible at the southern boundary of the site. Future noise level from transportation sources at buildout is predicted to result in an increase in sound level of less than three decibels. When commercial mixed use or other building types are placed along Tank Farm Road, an effective sound barrier is created. This results in sound levels in the potential outdoor activity areas across the site which are generally below CNEL = 60 dBA. Potential residential building elevations facing the noise source are mostly below CNEL = 60 dBA. Therefore, ordinary building construction assemblies with a Sound Transmission Class (STC) of 20 or greater will ensure that interior sound levels in habitable spaces are below CNEL = 45 dBA. Future sound level growth may be less than perceptible. Perceived sound level studies reveal the subjective interpretation of sound differences. Less-than-three dBA increase in sound level is barely noticeable to most subjects. Sound level must increase by five dBA before most listeners report a noticeable or significant change in sound level. 45dB Acoustics, LLC David Lord 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 19 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 10 Glossary of Acoustical Terms A-Weighted Sound Level (dBA) The sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using the internationally standardized A-weighting filter or as computed from sound spectral data to which A-weighting adjustments have been made. A-weighting de-emphasizes the low and very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the response of the average human ear. A- weighted sound levels correlate well with subjective reactions of people to noise and are universally used for community noise evaluations. Air-borne Sound Sound that travels through the air, differentiated from structure-borne sound. Ambient Sound Level The prevailing general sound level existing at a location or in a space, which usually consists of a composite of sounds from many sources near and far. The ambient level is typically defined by the Leq level. Background Sound Level The underlying, ever-present lower level noise that remains in the absence of intrusive or intermittent sounds. Distant sources, such as Traffic, typically make up the background. The background level is generally defined by the L90 percentile noise level. Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) The Leq of the A-weighted noise level over a 24-hour period with a 5 dB penalty applied to noise levels between 7 p.m. and 10 p.m. and a 10 dB penalty applied to noise levels between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. CNEL is similar to Ldn. Day-Night Sound Level (Ldn) The Leq of the A-weighted noise level over a 24-hour period with a 10 dB penalty applied to noise levels between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. Ldn is similar to CNEL. Decibel (dB) The decibel is a measure on a logarithmic scale of the magnitude of a particular quantity (such as sound pressure, sound power, sound intensity) with respect to a reference quantity. DBA or dB(A) A-weighted sound level. The ear does not respond equally to all frequencies, but is less sensitive at low and high frequencies than it is at medium or speech range frequencies. Thus, to obtain a single number representing the sound level of a noise containing a wide range of frequencies in a manner representative of the ear’s response, it is necessary to reduce the effects of the low and high frequencies with respect to the medium frequencies. The resultant sound level is said to be A-weighted, and the units are dBA. The A-weighted sound level is also called the noise level. 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 20 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 Energy Equivalent Level (Leq) Because sound levels can vary markedly in intensity over a short period of time, some method for describing either the average character of the sound or the statistical behavior of the variations must be utilized. Most commonly, one describes ambient sounds in terms of an average level that has the same acoustical energy as the summation of all the time-varying events. This energy-equivalent sound/noise descriptor is called Leq. In this report, an hourly period is used. Field Sound Transmission Class (FSTC) A single number rating similar to STC, except that the transmission loss values used to derive the FSTC are measured in the field. All sound transmitted from the source room to the receiving room is assumed to be through the separating wall or floor-ceiling assembly. Outdoor-Indoor Transmission Class (OITC) A single number classification, specified by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM E 1332 issued 1994), that establishes the A-weighted sound level reduction provided by building facade components (walls, doors, windows, and combinations thereof), based upon a reference sound spectra that is an average of typical air, road, and rail transportation sources. The OITC is the preferred rating when exterior façade components are exposed to a noise environment dominated by transportation sources. Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) The time-integrated A-weighted sound pressure level of a single aircraft flyover (which exceeds a threshold noise level) which is expressed by the level of an equivalent one-second duration reference signal. Sound Transmission Class (STC) STC is a single number rating, specified by the American Society for Testing and Materials, which can be used to measure the sound insulation properties for comparing the sound transmission capability, in decibels, of interior building partitions for noise sources such as speech, radio, and television. It is used extensively for rating sound insulation characteristics of building materials and products. Structure-Borne Sound Sound propagating through building structure. Rapidly fluctuating elastic waves in gypsum board, joists, studs, etc. Subjective Loudness Level In addition to precision measurement of sound level changes, there is a subjective characteristic which describes how most people respond to sound: A change in sound level of 3 dBA is barely perceptible by most listeners. A change in level of 6 dBA is clearly perceptible. A change of 10 dBA is perceived as being twice (or half) as loud. 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 21 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 11 Appendix 11.1 Sound level modeling Sound level contours compared to the measured sound level values were generated for assessment using SoundPlan noise simulation software. The software calculates sound attenuation of environmental noise around buildings. For this project, the land between the sources (road and airport operations) and receiver project boundary, is generally flat and partially paved. The modeling software calculates the sound field in accordance with ISO 9613-2 “Acoustics - Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors, Part 2: General Method of Calculation.” This standard states that “this part of ISO 9613 specifies an engineering method for calculating the attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors in order to predict the levels of environmental noise at a distance from a variety of sources. The method predicts the equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure level under meteorological conditions favorable to propagation from sources of known sound emissions.” 11.2 Sound Level Measurement The protocol used for the sound level measurements is prescribed in detail by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) in their E 1014 publication. The procedures and standards in that document were met or exceeded for sound level measurements shown in this report. The standards of ASTM E 1014 are exceeded by using Type 1 (Class 1) sound level meters for all measurements in this report instead of less accurate Type 2 meters. Therefore, the precision of the measurements in this report is likely to be better than +/- 1 dB. The sound level meters used for measurements shown in this report are Norsonic Nor140 Sound Analyzers, with synchronized time settings. These sound level meters meet all requirements of ANSI s1.4, IEC 651 for Class 1 accuracy. The sound level meters were calibrated before and after each sound level measurement. The measurement results from all sound level meters running simultaneously were compared and found to be in close agreement. 11.3 Wind Speed Wind speed and direction data was taken from San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport weather station. January 26, 2017 Wind Speed and Direction 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 22 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 January 27, 2017 Wind Speed and Direction Wind speed above 12 mph has an increasing adverse effect on the accuracy of sound level measurements (reference: Federal Highway Administration, Noise Measurement ). On two occasions in the afternoon of January 26, wind speed at the airport exceeded 12 mph. Wind speed on January 27 was measured below 8 mph throughout the day. 12 References 1. Airport Land Use Commission of San Luis Obispo County. 2005. Airport Land Use Plan for the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport. 2. American National Standards Institute, Inc. 2004. ANSI 1994 American National Standard Acoustical Terminology. ANSI S.1.-1994, (R2004), New York, NY. 3. American Society for Testing and Materials. 2004. ASTM E 1014 - 84 (Reapproved 2000) Standard Guide for Measurement of Outdoor A-Weighted Sound Levels. 4. Bolt, Beranek and Newman. 1973. Fundamentals and Abatement of Highway Traffic Noise, Report No. PB-222-703. Prepared for Federal Highway Administration. 5. Cooper, Steven, 2006. Problems with INM: Part 1 – Lateral Attenuation. Proceedings of Acoustics 2006. 6. State of California Department of Transportation. 2011. California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook. 7. California Airport Noise Regulations – Section 5000 et seq. of the California Code of Regulations (Title 21, Division 2.5, Chapter 6) 8. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 1982. Caltrans Transportation Laboratory Manual. 9. ______. 1998. Caltrans Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol for New Highway Construction and Highway Reconstruction Projects 10. California Resources Agency. 2007. Title 14. California Code of Regulations Chapter 3: Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act Article 5. Preliminary Review of Projects and Conduct of Initial Study Sections, 15060 to 15065. 11. City of San Luis Obispo, California. 1996. General Plan Chapter 4 Noise. 12. City of San Luis Obispo, California, Public Works, Traffic Data. https://goo.gl/aRJIRq 45dB Acoustics, LLC 650 Tank Farm Road Project page 23 of 23 noise management : room acoustics : environmental impact tel: 805.704.8046 13. Federal Highway Administration. 2006. FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide Final Report. FHWA-HEP-05-054 DOT-VNTSC-FHWA-05-01 14. Federal Highway Administration. 2011. Measurement of Highway-Related Noise. https://goo.gl/dKlwZk 15. Harris, Cyril M., editor. 1979 Handbook of Noise Control. 16. Interactive Sound Level Calculator, MAS Environmental https://goo.gl/23zTnQ Appendix E Multimodal Draft Transportation Impact Study (TIS) 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Multimodal Transportation Impact Study Central Coast Transportation Consulting 895 Napa Avenue, Suite A-6 Morro Bay, CA 93442 (805) 316-0101 May 2018 Prepared For: City of San Luis Obispo Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 1 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Executive Summary This study evaluates the potential transportation impacts of the mixed-use project located at 650 Tank Farm Road in the City of San Luis Obispo. The project consists of 249 apartment dwelling units and 17,500 square feet of retail. Nine intersections were evaluated during the weekday morning (7-9 AM) and weekday evening (4-6 PM) time periods under Existing and Cumulative conditions with and without the project. The project is expected to generate 1,835 daily trips, 129 AM peak hour trips, and 164 PM peak hour trips. Impacts and mitigation measures are summarized below. Existing Plus Project # Location Mode Impact Mitigation Measure 1 Broad / Tank Farm Auto Addition of project traffic extends EBL turning queue by one to two vehicles Either provide a vehicular connection to the adjacent site to the east (allowing project traffic to use Industrial Way to turn north onto Broad Street) or add a second SBL lane at the intersection 2 Project driveway Auto Two full-access driveways on an arterial roadway are inconsistent with the City’s Access Management policies. Provide a single right-in/right-out driveway with right turn pocket along Tank Farm Road. Provide access to SESLOC or provide acceptable traffic control at the Digital West driveway on Tank Farm Road. In addition to the Existing Plus Project impacts and mitigation, the following impacts are noted for Cumulative Plus Project. Cumulative Plus Project # Location Mode Impact Mitigation Measure 3 Tank Farm / South Higuera Auto Intersection operates unacceptably, and addition of project traffic increases V/C by 0.01 Install a second SBL turn lane. 4 Tank Farm / Santa Fe Auto Northbound approach operates at LOS F with and without the project.Install a multi-lane roundabout. 5 Broad / Industrial Auto Operates at LOS F during the PM peak hour with and without the project due to long pedestrian crossing times and split phasing. Convert east and west approaches from split phasing to permissive phasing and restripe both approaches to provide dedicated left turn lanes and shared through/right turn lanes. 6 Broad / Tank Farm Auto Operates at LOS F for both peak hours with and without the project. Project traffic increases V/C by 0.01 during the AM peak hour and by 0.09 during the PM peak hour. Add a second southbound left turn lane, add a dedicated northbound right turn lane, and convert the westbound right turn lane to a shared through/right lane. Establish time-of- day timing plans as recommended in the City’s Circulation Element EIR. Further details are provided in the body of this report. Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 2 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Contents ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Analysis Methods.................................................................................................................................................. 6 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................................................. 8 Existing Plus Project Conditions .....................................................................................................................18 Cumulative Conditions ......................................................................................................................................30 References ............................................................................................................................................................45 Figure 1: Project and Study Locations .............................................................................................................. 4 Figure 2: Project Site Plan ................................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 3: Existing Peak Hour Volumes and Lane Configurations .............................................................17 Figure 4: Project Trip Distribution and Existing Project Volumes............................................................20 Figure 6: Cumulative and Cumulative Project Volumes ..............................................................................31 Figure 7: Cumulative Plus Project Volumes ..................................................................................................32 Appendix A: Traffic Counts Appendix B: Intersection LOS Calculation Sheets Appendix C: Segment LOS Calculation Sheets Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 3 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Introduction This study evaluates the potential transportation impacts of the mixed-use project located at 650 Tank Farm in the City of San Luis Obispo. The project consists of 249 apartment dwelling units and 17,500 square feet of retail space. The project’s location and study intersections are shown on Figure 1, while Figure 2 shows the project site plan. Study intersections were identified in consultation with City staff. The following intersections were analyzed during the weekday morning (7-9 AM) and evening (4-6 PM) time periods: 1. Tank Farm Road/South Higuera Street 2. Tank Farm Road/Long Street 3. Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road 4. Tank Farm Road/Mindbody Traffic Signal 5. Broad Street/Capitolio Way 6. Broad Street/Industrial Way 7. Broad Street/Tank Farm Road 8. Broad Street/Aero Vista Lane 9. Broad Street/Aero Drive Vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle levels of service are reported for each study intersection consistent with the City’s Multimodal Transportation Impact Guidelines. The study segments were identified in consultation with City staff consistent with City policies. Four roadway segments were analyzed for bicycle, pedestrian, transit, and auto level of service during the AM and PM peak hours: 1. Tank Farm Road (Broad Street to Higuera Street) 2. Tank Farm Road (Broad Street to Orcutt Road) 3. Broad Street (Orcutt Road to Tank Farm Road) 4. Broad Street (Tank Farm Road to South City Limits) The study locations were evaluated under these scenarios: 1. Existing Conditions reflects 2016 traffic counts and the existing transportation network. 2. Existing Plus Project adds Project-generated traffic to Existing Conditions volumes. 3. Cumulative Conditions represents future traffic conditions reflective of the buildout of land uses in the area, not including the proposed Project. 4. Cumulative Plus Project represents future traffic conditions reflective of the buildout of land uses in the area, including the proposed Project. Each scenario is described in more detail in the appropriate chapter. 650 Tank Farm TIS Figure 1: Project and Study Locations Legend: x - Study Intersection- Project Site 2 7 3 5 41 8 9 6 A20439- 01-RS15 DATE:12/22/16650 TANK FARM • CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN66666666666666666666666666666666666666666666655555555555555555555555555555555555550000000000000000000000000000 TANK FARMM • COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEPTUAL SITE PLAN 040404040400444044404040404040404000404040000000004400000343434343443434344434443433343433434344333333444333444349- 99999999999999999999999 01-0000000111010100110101000000000 RS15 DATE:12/22/16 A2222222222222222222222222222222222222222220100200 SCALE: 1”=100’ 50 CREEK SETBACK CREEK SETBAC K CREEK SETBA C KLANDSCAPE BUFFER/ WATER COLLECTION BAS INMAX R IGH T OF WAY CREEK S E T B A C K SESLOC MINDBODY TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK OUTDOOR REC. SPACE 2MIXED USE MIXED USE MIXED USE MIXED USE 2 2 2 2 211 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SESLOC P R O P E RT YPOOLCLUB-HOUSEEXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL DIGITAL WEST CONNECTIONAttachment 6Figure 2: Project Site Plan 650 Tank Farm TIS Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 6 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Analysis Methods The analysis approach was developed based on the City of San Luis Obispo’s standards and policies. Facilities operated by the City of San Luis Obispo were evaluated using thresholds identified in the 2014 Circulation Element. Table 2 of the Circulation Element specifies that level of service (LOS) D or better operations shall be maintained for bicycle, transit, and vehicle modes in the study area. The minimum LOS standard for pedestrians is LOS C. The Circulation Element establishes priorities of each mode as presented in Table 1. Project impacts are considered significant if the project degrades a higher priority mode. Intersection Analysis The level of service thresholds for intersections and the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes based on the 6th Edition Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) are presented in Table 2. The study intersections were analyzed with the Synchro 10 software package applying the HCM 6th Edition methods. Segment Analysis The study roadway segments were evaluated for auto, transit, pedestrians, and bicycles using the LOS+ software, which applies the HCM 2010 methods. The LOS score thresholds are shown in Table 3. Priority Residential Corridors & Neighborhoods Commercial Corridors & Areas Regional Arterial and Highway Corridors 1 Pedestrians Vehicles Vehicles 2 Bicycles Bicycles Transit 3 Vehicle Transit Bicycles 4 Transit Pedestrians Pedestrians Table 1: Modal Priorities for Level of Service1 1. Source: Table 3 City of San Luis Obispo TIS Guidelines Control Delay (sec/vehicle) Level of Service Control Delay (seconds/vehicle) Level of Service LOS Score Level of Service Control Delay (sec/ped) Level of Service ≤ 10 A ≤ 10 A ≤ 1.5 A ≤ 5A > 10 - 20 B > 10 - 15 B >1.5 - 2.5 B >5 - 10 B > 20 - 35 C > 15 - 25 C >2.5 - 3.5 C >10 - 20 C > 35 - 55 D > 25 - 35 D >3.5 - 4.5 D >20 - 30 D > 55 - 80 E > 35 - 50 E > 4.5 - 5.5 E >30 - 45 E > 80 F > 50 or v/c > 1 F > 5.5 F >45 F Table 2: Intersection Level of Service Thresholds 1. Source: Exhibit 19-8 of the 6th Edition Highway Capacity Manual. 2. Source: Exhibit 20-2 of the 6th Edition Highway Capacity Manual. 4. Source: Exhibit 20-3 of the 6th Edition Highway Capacity Manual. Signalized Intersections1 Two-Way Stop Sign Controlled2 Pedestrian and Bicycle Modes, TWSC4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Modes, Signal Control3 3. Source: Exhibit 19-9 of the 6th Edition Highway Capacity Manual Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 7 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Thresholds of Significance Significant impacts to transportation facilities are identified under the following circumstances: Unsignalized intersections: Project traffic causes an intersection operating at LOS A, B, C, or D to degrade to unacceptable traffic conditions of LOS E or F; and the volume-demand-to-capacity ratio (V/C), which compares roadway demand (vehicle volumes) with roadway supply (roadway capacity), is increased by 0.01 or more and signal warrants are met; or the project buildout causes or exacerbates 95th percentile turning movement queues exceeding available turn pocket capacity. Signalized Intersections Project traffic causes an intersection operating at an acceptable LOS D or better to degrade to unacceptable traffic conditions, and the V/C ratio is increased by 0.01 or more; or the project buildout causes or exacerbates 95th percentile turning movement queues exceeding available turn pocket capacity. Segments: Project traffic causes segment operation level of service degradation as follows: For bicycles, a segment operating at LOS A, B, C, or D to degrade to LOS E or F. For pedestrians, a segment operating at LOS A, B, or C to degrade to LOS D, E, or F. For vehicles, segments operating at LOS A, B, C, or D to degrade to LOS E or F and an increase of the V/C ratio by .01 or more. For transit service, a segment operating at LOS A, B, C, or D to degrade to LOS E or F; or a segment with a baseline LOS E or F to degrade in a contextually significant way. The City’s Multimodal Transportation Impact Study Guidelines allow discretion when identifying impacts to non-auto modes based on whether the impacts are contextually significant. LOS Score Level of Service ≤ 2.00 A > 2.00-2.75 B > 2.75-3.50 C > 3.50-4.25 D > 4.25-5.00 E > 5.00 F Table 3: Roadway Segment Level of Service Thresholds 1. Source: Exhibits 16-5 and 16-6 of the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, assuming 60 ft2/p for pedestrian mode. Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Modes, Segments4 Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 8 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Existing Conditions This section describes the existing transportation system and current operating conditions in the study area. EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK Broad Street is a north-south, two-way road. North of its intersection with South Street and Santa Barbara Avenue, it is a 2-lane residential arterial street with a speed limit of 35 mph. This section of road functions as a main connection between residential areas and the downtown core. South of the Broad/South/Santa Barbara intersection, Broad Street is a 4-lane highway/regional route with a speed limit ranging from 40 mph at the north end of the segment to 45 mph at the southern end. This segment serves as a main route to and from the southern industrial and commercial centers to the downtown core and other regions. Tank Farm Road is an east-west, 2- lane arterial road with a speed limit of 45 mph in the study area. Tank Farm Road serves a major connection from South Higuera Street to Broad Street, connecting residential with commercial and industrial areas. Santa Fe Road is a two-lane, two-way commercial collector. Santa Fe Road connects Buckley Road and Hoover Ave to Tank Farm Road. Industrial Way is a two-lane commercial collector with a speed limit of 40 mph. Industrial Way connects the commercial properties of Broad Street to the rest of the region via Broad Street. West of Broad Street Industrial Way serves Damon Garcia Park and a commercial development. Aero Vista Lane is a two-lane, two-way highway/regional route with a speed limit of 25 mph. Aero Vista Lane links commercial properties to Broad street, which provides access to the airport region. Aero Drive is a two-lane, two-way local road with a speed limit of 25 mph. Aero Drive serves as the primary access point for the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport. Capitolio Way is a two-lane, two-way commercial collector with a speed limit of 35 mph. It links commercial properties to Sacramento Drive and Broad Street. Long Street is a two-lane, two-way local road. Long street connects Hind Lane to Tank Farm Road. South Higuera Street is a north-south, 4-lane arterial with a speed limit of 45 mph in the study area. South Higuera Street serves as the primary north-south route on the east side of US 101 serving local traffic. Mindbody Driveway is the main entrance serving the main campus of Mindbody, Inc., along with other businesses in the same business park. EXISTING PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES Pedestrian facilities include sidewalks, crosswalks, and pedestrian signals at signalized intersections. South of Rockview Place, Broad Street has a paved sidewalk only on the east side of the street. Broad Street between Tank Farm Road and Aero Vista Lane has a discontinuous sidewalk on the east side of the street. East of the Union Pacific Railroad overhead crossing, Tank Farm Road has a discontinuous sidewalk on its north side. West of Broad Street, Tank Farm Road has no sidewalks on the north side of the road, and between Santa Fe Road and Old Windmill Lane has no sidewalks on either side. All other study segments have paved sidewalks on both sides of the street. The intersection of Tank Farm Road and Long Street, with stop control only on Long Street, does not have striped crosswalks for any pedestrian movements. The intersection of Tank Farm Road and Santa Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 9 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Fe Road, with stop control only on Santa Fe Road, does not have striped crosswalks for any pedestrian movements. The signalized intersection of Tank Farm Road and the Mindbody driveway has no pedestrian phases or striped crosswalks. The intersection of Broad Street and Capitolio Way, with stop control only on Capitolio Way, does not have any striped crosswalks. The intersection of Broad Street and Aero Vista Lane, with stop control only on Aero Vista Lane, does not have any striped crosswalks. The signalized intersection of Broad Street and Aero Drive only has pedestrian phases for the north, east, and west legs. All other intersections have crosswalks on all legs. Bicycle facilities in the study area consist of Class II bike lanes. A Class II bike lane provides a striped lane for one-way bicycle travel on the side of a street. Broad Street and Tank Farm Road both have Class II bike lanes on both sides of the road throughout the study segments. EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICE The San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority (RTA) and the City of San Luis Obispo Transit Division (SLO Transit) provide transit service to the study area. SLO Transit Routes 1 and 3 provide fixed-route service to the study area. RTA offers Dial-A-Ride curb to curb services within the city limits. An acceptable transit LOS is primarily predicated on the presence of shelters and benches at bus stops, as well as the frequency and on-time performance of each route. If there are no bus stops on a segment, transit LOS is marked as N/A. SLO Transit Route 1A passes through the vicinity of the project as it travels north and southbound along Broad Street. Route 1A services the Downtown Transit Center, the Orcutt Road/Johnson Avenue area and the San Luis Obispo County Regional Airport. It enters the vicinity of the project traveling westbound on Tank Farm Road, before turning south to serve the airport and going north on Broad Street to serve the Downtown Transit Center. It has stops at the airport near Aero Drive, Aero Vista Lane, Broad and Tank Farm (Marigold Center), Broad and Industrial, and stops to the north and south of Capitolio Way. It is important to note that the stops along Broad Street north of Tank Farm Road are located on the east side of Broad Street. Route 1A runs daily with hourly headways. Buses typically run from 6:15 AM to 10:00 PM on weekdays and from 8:15 AM to 8:00 PM on weekends. SLO Transit implemented their latest Short-Range Transit Plan (SRTP) in mid-2017, so long-term boarding data is not available. Before implementation of the SRTP, Route 3 served stops around the Marigold shopping center, which is located on the northeast corner of the Tank Farm Road and Broad Street intersection. The SRTP notes that the stop at the Marigold center served 37 boardings and 10 alightings per day. The stop nearer to Capitolio Way was served 24 boardings and alightings per day. Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 10 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study EXISTING TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS This section is divided into the following subsections: 1) intersection operations, 2) segment operations. 1. Intersection Operations Traffic counts were collected in 2016 by the City of San Luis Obispo as a part of their biannual traffic count data collection program, with the exceptions of Tank Farm Road/Long Street, Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road, Tank Farm Road/Mindbody Traffic Signal, and Broad Street/ Aero Vista Lane, which were collected independently in 2016 and 2017. Traffic count sheets are provided in Appendix A. Figure 3 shows the Existing peak hour traffic volumes. Table 4 shows the LOS for the study intersections and Table 5 summarizes the vehicular queuing, with detailed calculation sheets included in Appendix B. The following intersection operates below the LOS D threshold for vehicles: Tank Farm Road/Long Street (#2): The southbound approach operates at LOS E during the PM peak hour due to long delays experienced by left-turning traffic. Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road (#3): The northbound approach operates at LOS E during the PM peak hour due to long delays experienced by left-turning traffic and high volumes on Tank Farm Road. Intersection Peak Hour V/C 1 Delay2 (sec/veh) LOS AM 0.87 26.7 C PM 0.93 32.7 C AM 0.19 1.9 (23.4) - (C) PM 0.40 3.8 (41.7) - (E) AM 0.15 1.3 (20.5) - (C) PM 0.57 3.7 (39.6) - (E) AM 0.77 7.4 A PM 0.91 14.7 B AM 0.20 1.0 (14.7) - (B) PM 0.38 1.7 (23.5) - (C) AM 0.79 13.5 B PM 0.97 26.9 C AM 0.87 38.2 D PM 0.88 43.8 D AM 0.14 0.8 (19.9) - (C) PM 0.47 2.1 (28.0) - (D) AM 0.66 7.6 A PM 1.07 32.9 C 1. Volume to capacit y ratio reported for worst movement. Note: Unacceptable operations shown in bold text. 2. HCM 6th average control delay in seconds per vehicle. For side-street-sto p controlled intersections the worst Table 4: Existing Intersection Auto Levels of Service 6. Broad Street/Industrial Way 7. Broad Street/Tank Farm Road 8. Broad Street/Aero Vista Lane 1. Tank Farm Road/South Higuera Street 2. Tank Farm Road/Long Street 3. Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road 4. Tank Farm Road/MindBody Traffic Signal 5. Broad Street/Capitolio Way 9. Broad Street/Aero Drive Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 11 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Tables 5 presents a summary of the existing queues for the study intersections. Existing queue calculations can be found in Appendix B. Existing 95th Percentile Queues (ft)1 AM 125 PM #311 AM 63 PM 93 AM 30 PM 61 AM #324 PM #471 AM 11 PM 73 AM 36 PM 20 AM 21 PM #183 AM 3 PM 16 AM 18 PM 67 AM 63 PM #96 AM 79 PM #274 AM 145 PM #277 AM 89 PM 58 AM #265 PM #273 AM 120 PM #210 AM 95 PM #244 AM 83 PM 167 AM 11 PM 51 AM 32 PM 83 Bold indicates queue length longer than storage length. SBL 250 SBR 300 3. Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road NBR 25 4. Tank Farm Road/MindBody Traffic Signal WBL 210 NBL 330 5. Broad Street/Capitolio Way WBL - Table 5: Existing Queue Summary Intersection Movement Storage Length (ft)Peak Hour 1. Tank Farm Road/South Higuera Street WBL 670 WBR 250 NBR 140 SBL 165 8. Broad Street/Aero Vista Lane EBL 75 9. Broad Street / Aero Drive EBT/L 310 1. Queue length that would not be exceeded 95 percent of the time. # indicates that 95th percentile volume exceeds capacit y, queue may be longer. Detailed queues provided in Appendix B. 6. Broad Street/Industrial Way EBT/L 350 NBL 150 SBL 150 7. Broad Street/Tank Farm Road EBL 300 EBR 90 WBL 150 NBL 290 Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 12 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study The following instances of queue spillback or overcapacity movements are noted: Tank Farm Road/South Higuera Street (#1): The westbound left turning movement is over capacity and occasionally does not clear in a single cycle during the PM peak hour. The southbound left turning movement queues sometimes require more than one cycle to clear. The reported queues are longer than field-observed conditions due to the high vehicular volumes and the minimum green times required to serve pedestrians. There are relatively few pedestrian calls, so the intersection operates with shorter queues than shown in Table 5. However, some of the observed queues still exceeded the turn pocket lengths and did not clear within a cycle. Additionally, vehicles making a southbound left turning movement can utilize the two-way left turn lane to effectively extend the turn pocket without blocking through movements. Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road (#3): The northbound right queue exceeds the turn pocket during the PM peak hour. The northbound approach is flared, without a marked turn pocket, so a pocket length of 25 feet was assumed for this analysis. However, the wide flare at this intersection prevents the right-turning queue from blocking left-turning traffic, even if queues exceed 25 feet. Broad Street/Industrial Way (#6): In the PM peak hour, the southbound left turning movement is over capacity and the queue length exceeds the turn pocket length. At this location, the pedestrian walk and flashing don’t walk times and split phasing dictate long cycle lengths on the east and westbound approaches, resulting in green times longer than are needed to serve the vehicular volumes. Traffic counts and field observations indicate that there are relatively few pedestrian crossings and the reported overcapacity queue operates acceptably in the field. Broad Street/Tank Farm Road (#7): In the PM peak hour, the eastbound left movement is over capacity. The westbound left movement is over capacity and exceeds the turn pocket length for both peak hours. The northbound and southbound left movements are over capacity during the PM peak hour. This intersection experiences high turning volumes, which results in queues for many turning movements. Tables 6 and 7 show the existing pedestrian and bicycle LOS for the study intersections. Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 13 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Pedestrian service levels exceed the acceptable levels at intersections 2, 3, 5, and 8 due to the presence of side-street stop controlled intersections. There are signalized intersections providing pedestrian signals near all of these locations. No other pedestrian deficiencies are reported. Intersection Direction LOS Score 2 LOS1 LOS Score4 LOS1 NB 2.83 C 3.05 C SB 2.69 C 3.02 C EB 1.98 B 2.00 B WB 2.68 C 2.85 C EB >200 F >200 F WB >200 F >200 F EB 18.70 C 30.60 E WB >200 F >200 F NB 1.98 B 2.03 B EB 2.56 C 2.79 C WB 2.58 C 2.74 C NB >200 F >200 F SB >200 F >200 F NB 2.87 C 2.92 C SB 2.84 C 2.91 C EB 2.00 B 2.03 B WB 2.09 B 2.16 B NB 2.86 C 2.88 C SB 2.87 C 2.92 C EB 2.74 C 2.83 C WB 2.51 C 2.59 C NB >200 F >200 F SB >200 F >200 F NB 2.70 C 2.68 C SB 2.71 C 2.70 C EB 1.98 B 2.01 B WB 1.97 B 1.97 B 1. HCM 6th pedestrian score and LOS. 2. HCM 6th reports pedestrian LOS at two-way stop controlled intersections in delay (seconds). Table 6: Existing Intersection Pedestrian Levels of Service AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 1. Tank Farm Road/South Higuera Street 2. Tank Farm Road/Long Street 5. Broad Street/Capitolio Way 6. Broad Street/Industrial Way 7. Broad Street/Tank Farm Road 4. Tank Farm Road/MindBody Traffic Signal 8. Broad Street/Aero Vista Lane 9. Broad Street/Aero Drive 3. Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 14 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study No bicycle intersection LOS deficiencies are reported. Intersection Direction LOS Score 2 LOS1 LOS Score4 LOS1 NB 3.41 C 3.60 D SB 3.04 C 3.47 C EB 3.12 C 3.10 C WB 3.55 D 4.44 D EB WB EB WB NB 2.51 C 2.87 C SB ---- EB 2.89 C 3.10 C WB 4.13 D 4.50 D NB SB NB 3.12 C 3.28 C SB 3.14 C 3.21 C EB 2.71 C 2.86 C WB 2.89 C 3.25 C NB 3.58 D 3.73 D SB 3.69 D 3.80 D EB 3.27 C 3.57 D WB 3.89 D 3.85 D NB SB NB 3.43 C 2.89 C SB 2.85 C 3.28 C EB 2.70 C 2.90 C WB 2.71 C 2.76 C 1. HCM 6th bicycle score and LOS. 2. The HCM 6th does not establish LOS standards for bicycles at stop-controlled intersections. 9. Broad Street/Aero Drive 1. Tank Farm Road/South Higuera Street 2. Tank Farm Road/Long Street 3. Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road 5. Broad Street/Capitolio Way 6. Broad Street/Industrial Way 7. Broad Street/Tank Farm Road 8. Broad Street/Aero Vista Lane Table 7: Existing Intersection Bicycle Levels of Service AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4. Tank Farm Road/MindBody Traffic Signal Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 15 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study 2. Segment Operations Tables 8 and 9 show the existing segment operations during the AM and PM peak hours. The following deficiencies are reported: Auto: Multiple segments of Broad Street operate deficiently because their volume to capacity ratios are greater than one, which results in an automatic LOS F. The segment of westbound Tank Farm from Old Windmill Lane to Santa Fe Road (#1a) also operates unacceptably at LOS F during the PM peak hour due to a volume to capacity ratio greater than one. The remaining segments operate acceptably. Pedestrian: Multiple segments do not have a pedestrian LOS reported due to the absence of pedestrian facilities, or discontinuous pedestrian facilities. The segment of northbound Broad Street from Orcutt Road to Industrial Way (#3a) operates unacceptably at LOS D during the PM peak hour. This segment has a relatively wide sidewalk (over eight feet in most places) with narrower sections separated from the travel lanes by a landscaped buffer. This buffer was not included in the MMLOS analysis because it is discontinuous; however, coding even a one foot buffer improves this segment to LOS C. The remaining segments operate acceptably. The remaining segments with pedestrian facilities operate accpetably. Bicycle: All bicycle segments operate acceptably at LOS D or better. Transit: Multiple study segments operate below the desired transit service level due to relatively infrequent service or the lack of bus stops on a specific segment. Segment Direction Score LOS 1 Score LOS Score LOS Score LOS EB 2.34 B N/A N/A 2.78 C N/A N/A WB 2.34 B N/A N/A 2.69 B N/A N/A EB 2.75 B 2.79 C2.05BN/AN/A WB 2.75 B N/A N/A 2.44 B N/A N/A EB 2.47 B 2.84 C2.18BN/AN/A WB 2.47 B 3.14 C2.38B3.33C EB 3.13 C 1.12 A0.30AN/AN/A WB 3.13 C N/A N/A 0.47 A 4.17 D NB 2.14 B 3.14 C2.21B4.65 E SB 2.14 B N/A N/A 2.09 B N/A N/A NB 2.14 B 2.83 C2.09B5.55 F SB 2.14 F N/A N/A 2.06 B N/A N/A NB 2.52 F N/A N/A 2.08 B N/A N/A SB 2.52 B 3.22 C0.98A4.69 E NB 2.14 B 2.89 C1.24AN/AN/A SB 2.14 B 2.18 B0.92AN/AN/A NB 2.93 F N/A N/A 2.10 B N/A N/A SB 2.93 C N/A N/A 1.22 A 5.70 F Transit3 2b. Tank Farm Road - UPRR to Orcutt Road 2. LOS is not established for segments without a sidewalk. Auto Pedestrian 2 Bicycle 1. HCM 2010 LOS score and LOS. 3. LOS is not established for segments without a directional transit route. 2a. Tank Farm Road - Broad Street to UPRR 1a. Tank Farm Road - Old Windmill Lane to Santa Fe Road 1b. Tank Farm Road - Santa Fe Road to Broad Street 3b. Broad Street - Industrial Way to Tank Farm Road 4b. Broad Street - Aero Vista Lane to Aero Drive 4c. Broad Street - Aero Drive to South City Limits 4a. Broad Street - Tank Farm Road to Aero Vista Lane 3a. Broad Street - Orcutt Road to Industrial Way Table 8: Existing AM Segment MMLOS1 Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 16 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Segment Direction Score LOS1 Score LOS Score LOS Score LOS EB 2.34 B N/A N/A 2.80 C N/A N/A WB 2.34 B N/A N/A 2.92 C N/A N/A EB 2.75 B 3.11 C 2.20 B N/A N/A WB 2.75 B N/A N/A 2.57 B N/A N/A EB 2.47 B 3.30 C 2.59 B N/A N/A WB 2.47 B 3.13 C 2.37 B 3.32 C EB 3.13 C 1.72 A 0.66 A N/A N/A WB 3.13 C N/A N/A 0.33 A 4.14 D NB 2.14 F 3.64 D 2.39 B 4.71 E SB 2.14 B N/A N/A 2.11 B N/A N/A NB 2.14 B 2.80 C 2.11 B 5.53 F SB 2.14 F N/A N/A 2.08 B N/A N/A NB 2.52 F N/A N/A 2.06 B N/A N/A SB 2.52 B 3.38 C 1.05 A 4.72 E NB 2.14 B 2.32 B 0.83 A N/A N/A SB 2.14 F 2.68 B 1.18 A N/A N/A NB 2.93 C N/A N/A 1.77 A N/A N/A SB 2.93 C N/A N/A 1.53 A 5.71 F Table 9: Existing PM Segment MMLOS1 2. LOS is not established for segments without a sidewalk. 3a. Broad Street - Orcutt Road to Industrial Way Auto Pedestrian 2 Bicycle Transit 3 1. HCM 2010 LOS score and LOS. 4a. Broad Street - Tank Farm Road to Aero Vista Lane 4b. Broad Street - Aero Vista Lane to Aero Drive 3. LOS is not established for segments without a directional transit route. 4c. Broad Street - Aero Drive to South City Limits 1b. Tank Farm Road - Santa Fe Road to Broad Street 2a. Tank Farm Road - Broad Street to UPRR 2b. Tank Farm Road - UPRR to Orcutt Road 3b. Broad Street - Industrial Way to Tank Farm Road 1a. Tank Farm Road - Old Windmill Lane to Santa Fe Road Figure 3: Existing Peak Hour Volumes and Lane Configurations 650 Tank Farm TIS Figure 1: Project and Study Locations Legend: x - Study Intersection - Project Sites Legend: - Study Intersection - Project Site- AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes x - Stop Sign - Traffic Signal 1.2.3. 4.5.6. 7.8.9. 2 3 5 41 8 9 6 7 Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 18 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Existing Plus Project Conditions This section evaluates the impacts of the proposed project on the surrounding transportation network. PROJECT TRAFFIC ESTIMATES The amount of project traffic affecting the study locations is estimated in three steps: trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment. Trip generation refers to the total number of trips generated by the site. Trip distribution identifies the general origins and destination of these trips, and trip assignment specifies the routes taken to reach these origins and destinations. Trip Generation The project’s trip generation estimate was developed using weekday daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour data provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. Table 10 shows the estimated trip generation from the proposed project. The project is expected to generate a total of 1,835 new daily trips, 129 new AM peak hour trips, and 164 new PM peak hour trips. Net new trips were found by subtracting internal capture trips, pass-by trips, and existing mobile home park trips from the gross trip generation. Trips from the mobile home park currently at the site were counted and credited to the project. Trip Distribution and Assignment Trip distribution and assignment for the project trips were estimated using a select zone procedure in the City’s Travel Demand Model, refined based on the site plan and local knowledge. Figure 4 shows the trip distribution percentages and existing conditions project traffic assignment. Figure 5 shows the Existing Plus Project volumes. Planned Improvements The current site plan does not show detailed dimensions of all frontage improvements. Consistent with the Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP), two through lanes, a bike lane, a 5-foot landscaped buffer, and a 6-foot sidewalk were assumed on Tank Farm Road along the project frontage. Simultaneously, Tank Land Use Size Unit 1 Daily In Out Total In Out Total Apartment (220)2 249 DU 1,656 25 102 127 100 54 154 Shopping Center (820)3 17.5 KSF 747 11 6 17 31 34 65 2,403 36 108 144 131 88 219 328 0 0 0 13 13 26 90 0 0 0 9 9 18 150 6 9 15 5 6 11 1,835 30 99 129 104 60 164 Table 10: Weekday Vehicle Trip Generation AM PM Gross Trips: Internal Trips Pass-By Trips4 Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual , 9th Edition, 2012; CCTC, 2017. Existing Mobile Home Park5 Net New Trips 1) DU = dwelling unit, KSF = thousand square feet 2) ITE Land Use Code #220, Apartment. Fitted curve equations used. 3) ITE Land Use Code #820, Shopping Center. Average rates used. 4) PM Peak Hour rate multiplied by a factor of 5 to determine daily trips. 5) AM Peak Hour rate multiplied by a factor of 10 to determine daily trips. Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 19 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Farm Road was assumed to be consistently widened to two through lanes per direction east of Santa Fe Road. However, sidewalks were not assumed to be provided on Tank Farm Road between Broad Street and the project site under the Existing Plus Project scenario. Site access is proposed via two side-street stop controlled intersections on Tank Farm Road near Santa Fe Road and via a connection to the Digital West property to the west. These improvements and recommended access changes are discussed in detail in the Site Access and Circulation section of this report. 650 Tank Farm TIS Figure 4: Project Trip Distribution and Existing Project Volumes Figure 1: Project and Study Locations Legend: x - Study Intersection - Project Sites Legend: - Study Intersection - Project Site - AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes x - Existing% (Cumulative %) Project Trip Distribution 1.2.3. 4.5.6. 7.8.9. 2 3 5 41 8 9 6 7 Figure 5: Existing Plus Project Volumes 650 Tank Farm TIS Figure 1: Project and Study Locations Legend: x - Study Intersection - Project Sites Legend: - Study Intersection - Project Site - AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes x 1.2.3. 4.5.6. 7.8.9. 2 3 5 41 8 9 6 7 Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 22 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study EXISTING PLUS PROJECT IMPACT ANALYSIS 1. Intersection Operations Figure 5 shows the Existing Plus Project peak hour traffic volumes. Table 11 shows the LOS for the study intersections and Table 12 summarizes the vehicular queuing under Existing Plus Project conditions, with detailed calculation sheets included in Appendix B. The following intersection operates below the LOS D threshold for vehicles: Tank Farm Road/Long Street (#2): the side street approaches to this intersection operate unacceptably both with and without the project during the PM peak hour. A traffic signal is in final design for this location and is required as a condition of approval for a nearby project. Installation of a traffic signal would result in acceptable operations. The remaining intersections operate at an acceptable service level. Table 12 presents the key queues for the study intersections. Detailed queue and LOS results are provided in Appendix B. Intersection Peak Hour V/C 1 Delay2 (sec/veh) LOS V/C 1 V/C Delta Delay2 (sec/veh) LOS AM 0.87 26.7 C 0.87 0.00 27.0 C PM 0.93 32.7 C 0.94 0.01 33.3 C AM 0.19 1.9 (23.4) - (C) 0.19 0.00 1.9 (24.1) - (C) PM 0.40 3.8 (41.7) - (E)0.42 0.02 4.0 (50.0) - (F) AM 0.15 1.3 (20.5) - (C) 0.15 0.00 1.1 (14.9) - (B) PM 0.57 3.7 (39.6) - (E)0.48 -0.09 2.0 (20.0) - (C) AM 0.77 7.4 A 0.78 0.01 6.3 A PM 0.91 14.7 B 0.95 0.04 9.3 A AM 0.20 1.0 (14.7) - (B) 0.21 0.01 1.1 (15.4) - (C) PM 0.38 1.7 (23.5) - (C) 0.39 0.01 1.8 (24.8) - (C) AM 0.79 13.5 B 0.79 0.00 13.6 B PM 0.97 26.9 C 0.98 0.01 28.2 C AM 0.87 38.2 D 0.87 0.00 39.2 D PM 0.88 43.8 D 0.89 0.01 46.1 D AM 0.14 0.8 (19.9) - (C) 0.15 0.01 0.8 (20.1) - (C) PM 0.47 2.1 (28.0) - (D) 0.48 0.01 2.1 (28.6) - (D) AM 0.66 7.6 A 0.66 0.00 7.7 A PM 1.07 32.9 C 1.11 0.04 33.8 C 5. Broad Street/Capitolio Way 6. Broad Street/Industrial Way 8. Broad Street/Aero Vista Lane 4. Tank Farm Road/MindBody Traffic Signal 1. Volume to capacity ratio reported for worst movement. Existing Table 11: Existing and Existing Plus Project Intersection Auto Levels of Service Existing + Project 7. Broad Street/Tank Farm Road 9. Broad Street/Aero Drive 1. Tank Farm Road/South Higuera Street 2. Tank Farm Road/Long Street 3. Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road Note: Unacceptable operations shown in bold text. 2. HCM 6th average control delay in seconds per vehicle. For side-street-stop controlled intersections the worst approach's delay is reported in parentheses next to the overall intersection delay. Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 23 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Existing Existing + Project AM 125 47 PM #311 #316 AM 63 63 PM 93 94 AM 30 30 PM 61 63 AM #324 #324 PM #471 #477 AM 11 7 PM 73 31 AM 36 36 PM 20 19 AM 21 23 PM #183 #159 AM 3 9 PM 16 18 AM 18 18 PM 67 67 AM 63 63 PM #96 #96 AM 79 79 PM #274 #274 AM 145 173 PM #277 #313 AM 89 101 PM 58 59 AM #265 #266 PM #273 #276 AM 120 122 PM #210 #223 AM 95 95 PM #244 #246 AM 83 98 PM 167 230 AM 11 11 PM 51 53 AM 32 32 PM 83 84 SBL 165 Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queues (ft)1 1. Tank Farm Road/South Higuera Street WBL 670 WBR 250 NBR 140 Detailed queues provided in Appendix B. 6. Broad Street/Industrial Way EBT/L 350 NBL 150 SBL 150 7. Broad Street/Tank Farm Road EBL 300 EBR 90 WBL 150 NBL 290 SBL 250 SBR 300 8. Broad Street/Aero Vista Lane EBL 75 9. Broad Street / Aero Drive EBT/L 310 1. Queue length that would not be exceeded 95 percent of the time. # indicates that 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. 3. Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road NBR 25 4. Tank Farm Road/MindBody Traffic Signal WBL 210 NBL 330 5. Broad Street/Capitolio Way WBL - Table 12: Summary Existing and Existing Plus Project Queues Intersection Movement Storage Length (ft) Bold indicates queue length longer than storage length. Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 24 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study The addition of project traffic increases critical queues by at least one vehicle length at the following intersection: Broad Street/Tank Farm Road (#7): The eastbound left queue length is increased by one to two vehicles with the addition of project traffic., due to project traffic turning north onto Broad Street. The queues for Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road (#3) and Tank Farm Road/MindBody Traffic Signal (#4) decrease with the addition of the project due to the widening of Tank Farm Road to a four lane cross-section along the project frontage. Intersection Mitigations Tank Farm Road/Long Street (#2): Installation of a traffic signal would result in acceptable operations. Broad Street/Tank Farm Road (#7): A vehicular connection from the 650 Tank Farm parcel to the adjacent site to the east, once developed, would allow use of the traffic signal at Industrial Way, thereby avoiding the impacted intersection, reducing the eastbound left turn queue, and improving site circulation. Alternatively, the eastbound left turn queue at Broad Street/Tank Farm Road could be reduced to acceptable levels by providing a second southbound left turn lane. This may require a slight widening of the southbound approach of Broad Street. Tables 13 and 14 show the Existing and Existing Plus Project pedestrian and bicycle levels of service at the study intersections. The intersection of Tank Farm Road and Santa Fe Road (#3) changes from LOS C to LOS E with the addition of the project. This is due to the widening of Tank Farm Road at the project frontage. Crosswalks are available at the intersection of Tank Farm Road and Broad Street and there are currently very few pedestrians crossing Tank Farm Road at Santa Fe Road, so this change is not anticipated to impact pedestrians. No other new deficiencies are reported from Existing to Existing Plus Project conditions. Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 25 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Intersection Direction LOS Score 1,2 LOS1 LOS Score1 LOS1 NB 2.83 C 2.83 C SB 2.69 C 2.69 C EB 1.98 B 1.98 B WB2.68C2.68 C NB 3.05 C 3.05 C SB 3.02 C 3.02 C EB 2.00 B 2.00 B WB 2.85 C 2.86 C EB >200 F >200 F WB >200 F >200 F EB >200 F >200 F WB >200 F >200 F EB 18.70 C 39.1 E WB >200 F >200 F EB 30.60 E 85.6 F WB >200 F >200 F NB 1.98 B 1.98 B EB 2.56 C 2.62 C WB 2.58 C 2.68 C NB 2.03 B 2.04 B EB 2.79 C 2.81 C WB 2.74 C 2.82 C NB >200 F >200 F SB >200 F >200 F NB >200 F >200 F SB >200 F >200 F NB 2.87 C 2.88 C SB 2.84 C 2.85 C EB 2.00 B 2.00 B WB 2.09 B 2.09 B NB 2.92 C 2.94 C SB 2.91 C 2.92 C EB 2.03 B 2.03 B WB 2.16 B 2.17 B NB 2.86 C 2.86 C SB 2.87 C 2.88 C EB 2.74 C 2.75 C WB 2.51 C 2.51 C NB 2.88 C 2.88 C SB 2.92 C 2.93 C EB 2.83 C 2.85 C WB 2.59 C 2.59 C NB >200 F >200 F SB >200 F >200 F NB >200 F >200 F SB >200 F >200 F NB 2.70 C 2.70 C SB 2.71 C 2.71 C EB 1.98 B 1.98 B WB 1.97 B 1.97 B NB 2.68 C 2.68 C SB 2.70 C 2.71 C EB 2.01 B 2.01 B WB 1.97 B 1.97 B 1. HCM 2010 pedestrian score and LOS. 2. HCM 2010 reports pedestrian LOS at two-way stop controlled intersections in delay (seconds). Table 13: Existing and Existing Plus Project Intersection Pedestrian Levels of Service Existing Existing + Project 9. Broad Street/Aero Drive AM PM AM 6. Broad Street/Industrial Way 2. Tank Farm Road/Long Street AM PM PM 1. Tank Farm Road/South Higuera Street 3. Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road PM 5. Broad Street/Capitolio Way 7. Broad Street/Tank Farm Road 8. Broad Street/Aero Vista Lane AM PM AM PM AM PM AM 4. Tank Farm Road/MindBody Traffic Signal PM AM PM AM Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 26 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Intersection Direction LOS Score 1 LOS1 LOS Score1 LOS1 NB 3.41 C 3.41 C SB 3.04 C 3.04 C EB 3.12 C 3.12 C WB 3.55 D 3.58 D NB 3.60 D 3.60 D SB 3.47 C 3.47 C EB 3.10 C 3.10 C WB 4.44 D 4.46 D AM - PM - AM - PM - NB 2.51 C 2.70 C EB 2.89 C 2.97 C WB 4.13 D 3.49 C NB 2.87 C 3.06 C EB 3.10 C 3.15 C WB 4.50 D 3.73 D AM - PM - NB 3.12 C 3.17 C SB 3.14 C 3.15 C EB 2.71 C 2.71 C WB 2.89 C 2.90 C NB 3.28 C 3.31 C SB 3.21 C 3.26 C EB 2.86 C 2.86 C WB 3.25 C 3.25 C NB 3.58 D 3.58 D SB 3.69 D 3.70 D EB 3.27 C 3.33 C WB 3.89 D 3.90 D NB 3.73 D 3.74 D SB 3.80 D 3.85 D EB 3.57 D 3.61 D WB 3.85 D 3.86 D AM - PM - NB 3.43 C 3.43 C SB 2.85 C 2.86 C EB 2.70 C 2.70 C WB 2.71 C 2.71 C NB 2.89 C 2.89 C SB 3.28 C 3.29 C EB 2.90 C 2.90 C WB 2.76 C 2.76 C 1. HCM 2010 bicycle score and LOS. 2. The 2010 HCM does not establish LOS standards for bicycles at stop-controlled intersections. PM 2. Tank Farm Road/Long Street 1. Tank Farm Road/South Higuera Street AM PM 7. Broad Street/Tank Farm Road 5. Broad Street/Capitolio Way AM Table 14: Existing and Existing Plus Project Intersection Bicycle Levels of Service 8. Broad Street/Aero Vista Lane N/A AM PM 9. Broad Street/Aero Drive AM PM 4. Tank Farm Road/MindBody Traffic Signal 6. Broad Street/Industrial Way AM PM Existing Existing + Project N/A N/A 3. Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road N/A Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 27 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study 2. Segment Operations Tables 15 and 16 show the Existing Plus Project segment operations during the AM and PM peak hours. The following deficiencies are reported: Auto: The westbound segment of Tank Farm Road from Santa Fe Road to Broad Street (#1b) operates at LOS F during the PM peak hour because its volume to capacity ratio is greater than one, resulting in an automatic LOS F. The addition of project traffic does not change the auto LOS score. Vehicular capacity on this segment is constrained by the intersections of Tank Farm Road at S Higuera Street and Broad Street, which would meter flow well before the segment capacity caused congestion. This is an insignificant impact. No other new deficiencies were noted with the addition of project traffic. Pedestrian: The northbound segment of Broad Street from Orcutt Road to Industrial Way operates at LOS D during the PM peak hour both with and without the project due to the high vehicular volumes and percentage of vehicles turning at the downstream intersection. The addition of project traffic increases the LOS score by less than one percent and increases vehicular volumes by less than three percent. This is an insignificant change that would not substantively worsen pedestrian conditions. Bicycle: No bicycle deficiencies are reported. Transit: Multiple study segments operate below the desired transit service level due to relatively infrequent service or the lack of bus stops on a specific segment. The addition of project traffic would not overburden or otherwise impact the transit network. Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 28 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Segment Direction Score LOS1 Score LOS Score LOS Score LOS EB 2.34 B N/A N/A 2.79 C N/A N/A WB 2.34 B N/A N/A 2.71 B N/A N/A EB 2.75 B 2.84 C 2.07 B N/A N/A WB 2.75 B N/A N/A 2.10 B N/A N/A EB 2.47 B 2.85 C 2.19 B N/A N/A WB 2.47 B 3.14 C 2.38 B 3.33 C EB 3.13 C 1.14 A 0.32 A N/A N/A WB 3.13 C N/A N/A 0.47 A 4.17 D NB 2.14 B 3.20 C 2.24 B 4.66 E SB 2.14 B N/A N/A 2.10 B N/A N/A NB 2.14 B 2.88 C 2.12 B 5.55 F SB 2.14 F N/A N/A 2.06 B N/A N/A NB 2.52 F N/A N/A 2.08 B N/A N/A SB 2.52 B 3.23 C 0.98 A 4.70 E NB 2.14 B 2.89 C 1.25 A N/A N/A SB 2.14 B 2.19 B 0.93 A N/A N/A NB 2.93 F N/A N/A 2.10 B N/A N/A SB 2.93 C N/A N/A 1.22 A 5.71 F 2a. Tank Farm Road - Broad Street to UPRR 2b. Tank Farm Road - UPRR to Orcutt Road 3a. Broad Street - Orcutt Road to Industrial Way 2. LOS is not established for segments without a sidewalk. Auto 3b. Broad Street - Industrial Way to Tank Farm Road 4b. Broad Street - Aero Vista Lane to Aero Drive 4c. Broad Street - Aero Drive to South City Limits 1. HCM 2010 LOS score and LOS. 3. LOS is not established for segments without a directional transit route. Pedestrian2 Bicycle Transit 3 1a. Tank Farm Road - Old Windmill Lane to Santa Fe Road 1b. Tank Farm Road - Santa Fe Road to Broad Street 4a. Broad Street - Tank Farm Road to Aero Vista Lane Table 15: Existing Plus Project AM Segment MMLOS1 Segment Direction Score LOS1 Score LOS Score LOS Score LOS EB 2.34 B N/A N/A 2.81 C N/A N/A WB 2.34 B N/A N/A 2.92 C N/A N/A EB 2.75 B 3.14 C 2.22 B N/A N/A WB 2.75 B N/A N/A 2.24 B N/A N/A EB 2.47 B 3.30 C 2.59 B N/A N/A WB 2.47 B 3.14 C 2.38 B 3.33 C EB 3.13 C 1.73 A 0.66 A N/A N/A WB 3.13 C N/A N/A 0.35 A 4.14 D NB 2.14 F 3.67 D 2.40 B 4.72 E SB 2.14 B N/A N/A 2.13 B N/A N/A NB 2.14 B 2.82 C 2.13 B 5.54 F SB 2.14 F N/A N/A 2.10 B N/A N/A NB 2.52 F N/A N/A 2.07 B N/A N/A SB 2.52 B 3.39 C 1.05 A 4.72 E NB 2.14 B 2.33 B 0.83 A N/A N/A SB 2.14 F 2.68 B 1.18 A N/A N/A NB 2.93 C N/A N/A 1.77 A N/A N/A SB 2.93 C N/A N/A 1.53 A 5.71 F Transit Table 16: Existing Plus Project PM Segment MMLOS1 Auto 3. LOS is not established for segments without a directional transit route. 1a. Tank Farm Road - Old Windmill Lane to Santa Fe Road Pedestrian 2. LOS is not established for segments without a sidewalk. 3b. Broad Street - Industrial Way to Tank Farm Road 4c. Broad Street - Aero Drive to South City Limits 1. HCM 2010 LOS score and LOS. 3a. Broad Street - Orcutt Road to Industrial Way 4a. Broad Street - Tank Farm Road to Aero Vista Lane 4b. Broad Street - Aero Vista Lane to Aero Drive 1b. Tank Farm Road - Santa Fe Road to Broad Street 2a. Tank Farm Road - Broad Street to UPRR 2b. Tank Farm Road - UPRR to Orcutt Road Bicycle Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 29 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study SITE ACCESS AND ON-SITE CIRCULATION This section discusses issues related to site access and on-site circulation. On-site circulation deficiencies would occur if project designs fail to meet appropriate standards, fail to provide adequate truck access, or would result in hazardous conditions. The site plan is shown on Figure 2. The project proposes access from two driveways on Tank Farm Road and a connection to the future Digital West project. Intersection control was not specified. Two full access driveways on an arterial roadway are inconsistent with the City’s Access Management policies. Recommendations Provide a single right-in/right-out driveway on Tank Farm Road with a right turn pocket on Tank Farm Road. Provide a vehicular connection to the SESLOC parking lot when the adjacent lot is developed, or provide acceptable traffic control at the Digital West Driveway on Tank Farm Road. Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 30 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Cumulative Conditions Cumulative Conditions represent build-out of the land uses in the region. CUMULATIVE VOLUME FORECASTS Cumulative, Cumulative Project, and Cumulative Plus Project traffic volume forecasts, shown on Figures 6 and 7, were developed using the City’s Travel Demand Model, which includes planned network and land use changes expected upon buildout of the City’s General Plan. The following key network changes will shift travel patterns in the study area: Prado Road would extend as a four-lane regional route arterial from S Higuera Street to Broad Street with a new intersection between Capitolio Way and Industrial Way. A full interchange would be constructed at Prado Road and US 101. Victoria Avenue would be extended from Woodbridge Street to High Street. Orcutt Road would be widened as a four-lane arterial from the railroad tracks to Johnson Avenue. Tank Farm Road would be widened to four lanes west of 250 Tank Farm Road and east of Santa Fe Road. The intersection of Tank Farm Road/Long Street would be signalized. Transit conditions were assumed to remain the same as those in Existing conditions. Figures 6 and 7 show the Cumulative, Cumulative Project, and Cumulative Plus Project traffic volumes. Figure 6: Cumulative Volumes and Cumulative Project Volumes Cumulative VolumesCumulative ProjectVolumes650 Tank Farm TIS Legend: - Study Intersection - Project Site - AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes x 1.2.3. 4.5.6.7. 8.9.1. 2.3.4.5. 6.7.8.9. Figure 7: Cumulative Plus Project Volumes 650 Tank Farm TIS Figure 1: Project and Study Locations Legend: x - Study Intersection - Project Sites Legend: - Study Intersection - Project Site - AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes x 1.2.3. 4.5.6. 7.8.9. 2 3 5 41 8 9 6 7 Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 33 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study CUMULATIVE TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS This section describes 1) intersection operations and 2) segment operations under Cumulative and Cumulative Plus Project conditions. 1. Intersection Operations Figures 6 and 7 show the Cumulative, Cumulative Project, and Cumulative Plus Project peak hour traffic volumes. Table 17 shows the LOS for the study intersections and Table 18 summarizes the vehicular queuing under Cumulative and Cumulative Plus Project conditions, with detailed calculation sheets included in Appendix B. The following intersections operate below the LOS D threshold for vehicles: Tank Farm Road/South Higuera Street (#1) operates at LOS F during the AM peak hour and at LOS E during the PM peak hour both with and without the project. The addition of project traffic increases the worst movement V/C by 0.01 during the PM peak hour. Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road (#3) operates at LOS F on the northbound approach both with and without the project. Broad Street/Capitolio Way (#5) operates at LOS F during the PM peak hour both with and without the project. The westbound approach has a large delay due to the side street stop controlled intersection and the high volume of traffic along Broad Street. The addition of project traffic increases the worst movement V/C by 0.12. Broad Street/Industrial Way (#6) operates at LOS F during the PM peak hour both with and without the project due to the presence of long pedestrian crossing times across the north and Intersection Peak Hour V/C 1 Delay2 (sec/veh) LOS V/C 1 V/C Delta Delay2 (sec/veh) LOS AM 1.35 94.9 F 1.35 0.00 94.9 F PM 1.70 78.9 E 1.71 0.01 79.2 E AM 0.83 16.9 B 0.83 0.00 17.0 B PM 0.75 12.0 B 0.76 0.01 12.1 B AM >1.00 - (>200) - (F) >1.00 -- (>200) - (F) PM >1.00 - (>200) - (F)>1.00 -- (>200) - (F) AM 0.76 17.4 B 0.85 0.09 18.7 B PM 0.96 38.0 D 0.99 0.03 42.5 D AM 0.24 1.3 (25.2) - (D) 0.26 0.02 1.3 (26.6) - (D) PM 1.58 13.2 (191.2) - (F) 1.70 0.12 14.6 (>200) - (F) AM 1.05 35.1 D 1.06 0.01 36.8 D PM 1.35 106.1 F 1.38 0.03 113.9 F AM 1.36 103.2 F 1.37 0.01 105.2 F PM 1.82 134.9 F 1.91 0.09 142.6 F AM 0.29 1.2 (26.7) - (D) 0.31 0.02 1.2 (27.8) - (D) PM 1.09 7.8 (132.3) - (F) 1.13 0.04 8.4 (142.6) - (F) AM 0.95 31.7 C 0.95 0.00 32.2 C PM 0.91 37.1 D 0.94 0.03 38.4 D Table 17: Cumulative and Cumulative Plus Project Intersection Auto Levels of Service Note: Unacceptable operations shown in bold text. 4. Tank Farm Road/MindBody Traffic Signal 5. Broad Street/Capitolio Way 6. Broad Street/Industrial Way 8. Broad Street/Aero Vista Lane 7. Broad Street/Tank Farm Road 9. Broad Street/Aero Drive 2. HCM 6th average control delay in seconds per vehicle. For side-street-stop controlled intersections the worst approach's delay is reported in parentheses next to the overall intersection delay. 1. Volume to capacity ratio reported for worst movement. Cumulative Cumulative + Project 1. Tank Farm Road/South Higuera Street 2. Tank Farm Road/Long Street 3. Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 34 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study south approaches. Without pedestrian actuation, the intersection operates acceptably at LOS D. The addition of project traffic increases the worst movement V/C by 0.03. Broad Street/Tank Farm Road (#7) operates at LOS F during the AM and PM peak hours both with and without the project due to high volumes from all approaches of the intersection. The addition of project traffic increases the worst movement V/C by 0.01 during the AM peak hour and by 0.09 during the PM peak hour. Broad Street/Aero Vista Lane (#8) operates at LOS F during the PM peak hour both with and without the project. The eastbound approach has high delays due to the side street stop control, and the high volumes and speeds along Broad Street. The addition of project traffic increases the worst movement V/C by 0.04. Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 35 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Cumulative Cumulative + Project AM 151 153 PM #434 #440 AM 71 71 PM #340 #342 AM #297 #298 PM 63 63 AM #681 #681 PM #704 #706 AM 48 48 PM 167 174 AM #176 #176 PM #199 #196 AM 73 75 PM 292 #303 AM 20 22 PM 191 202 AM 41 41 PM 111 111 AM #67 #67 PM #98 #98 AM #115 #115 PM #311 #311 AM #197 #245 PM #523 #553 AM 308 #347 PM 56 57 AM #554 #554 PM #405 #409 AM #251 #256 PM #319 #346 AM #237 #237 PM #523 #529 AM #796 #824 PM 346 #450 AM 24 26 PM 169 176 AM 73 73 PM #360 #361 300 EBR 90 WBL 150 NBL 290 SBL 250 WBL - EBT/L 350 NBL 1. Queue length that would not be exceeded 95 percent of the time. # indicates that 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Detailed queues provided in Appendix B. 1. Tank Farm Road/South Higuera Street 3. Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road 4. Tank Farm Road/MindBody Traffic Signal 5. Broad Street/Capitolio Way 6. Broad Street/Industrial Way 7. Broad Street/Tank Farm Road 8. Broad Street/Aero Vista Lane 9. Broad Street / Aero Drive EBT/L 310 SBR 300 EBL 75 EBL 150 SBL 150 NBR 25 WBL 210 NBL 330 WBL 670 WBR 250 NBR 140 SBL 165 Table 18: Summary Cumulative and Cumulative Plus Project Queues 95th Percentile Queues (ft)1 Intersection Movement Storage Length (ft) Peak Hour Bold indicates queue length longer than storage length. Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 36 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study The following queue deficiencies are noted: Tank Farm Road/S Higuera Street (#1): Queues exceed storage length during at least one peak hour on the westbound right, northbound right, and southbound left turning movements. The addition of project traffic increases these queues by less than one vehicle length. Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road (#3): The northbound right turn queue length exceeds storage length during the AM and PM peak hours both with and without the project. The addition of project traffic increases the queue by less than one vehicle length. Broad Street/Industrial Way (#6): The southbound left turn queue exceeds storage length during the PM peak hour. The addition of project traffic does not change this queue length. Broad Street/Tank Farm Road (#7): During at least one peak hour, the addition of project traffic to queues that exceed storage results in an increase of more than one vehicle length on the eastbound left, eastbound right, northbound left, and southbound right movements. Broad Street/Aero Vista Lane (#8): The eastbound left movement exceeds storage during the PM peak hour both with and without the project. The addition of project traffic increases this queue by less than one vehicle length. Recommendations The recommendations below would address Cumulative LOS and queueing deficiencies. Tank Farm Road/S Higuera Street (#1): The intersection operates unacceptably and the project increases V/C by 0.01. Installing a second southbound left turn lane would improve operations and address this impact. Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road (#3) operates at LOS F on the northbound approach both with and without the project. Installing a multi-lane roundabout would provide acceptable operations. Broad Street/Capitolio Way (#5) operates at LOS F during the PM peak hour both with and without the project. The planned future intersection of Prado Road/Broad Street would be signalized, making signalization of the nearby Broad Street/Capitolio Way intersection undesirable. Capitolio Way is connected to both Orcutt Road and Industrial Way by Sacramento Drive, thereby providing an alternative access point for drivers seeking signalized access to Broad Street. No changes are recommended. Broad Street/Industrial Way (#6) operates at LOS F during the PM peak hour both with and without the project due to the presence of long pedestrian crossing times across the north and south approaches and the split phasing. Converting the east and west approaches from split phasing to permissive phasing and restriping both approaches to provide dedicated left turn lanes and shared through/right turn lanes would result in LOS C operations. Broad Street/Tank Farm Road (#7) operates at LOS F during the AM and PM peak hours both with and without the project due to high volumes from all approaches of the intersection. The addition of project traffic increases the worst movement V/C by 0.01 during the AM peak hour and by 0.09 during the PM peak hour. Adding a second southbound left turn lane, adding a dedicated northbound right turn lane, and converting the westbound right turn lane to a shared through/right lane would result in delay and V/C better than Cumulative Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 37 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study conditions without the project. However, while some queue lengths would be decreased, others would be increased. The City’s Circulation Element EIR recommends establishing time-of-day timing plans at this intersection. Broad Street/Aero Vista Lane (#8) operates at LOS F during the PM peak hour both with and without the project. The eastbound approach has high delays due to the side street stop control and the high volumes and speeds along Broad Street. The signalized intersection of Broad Street/Aero Drive provides a viable alternative route for drivers in this area. No improvements are recommended. Tables 19 and 20 show the bicycle and pedestrian levels of service at the study intersections. Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 38 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Intersection Direction LOS Score 1 LOS1 LOS Score1 LOS1 NB 3.03 C 3.03 C SB 2.88 C 2.88 C EB 1.99 B 1.99 B WB2.89 C 2.89 C NB 3.24 C 3.24 C SB 3.28 C 3.29 C EB 2.00 B 2.00 B WB2.99 C 3.00 C NB 2.06 B 2.06 B SB 2.02 B 2.02 B EB 2.74 C 2.74 C WB 2.77 C 2.77 C NB 2.06 B 2.07 B SB 2.03 B 2.03 B EB 2.74 C 2.74 C WB 2.78 C 2.78 C EB 115.40 F 118.40 F WB >200 F >200 F EB 119.10 F 121.30 F WB >200 F >200 F NB 2.16 B 2.17 B SB 1.97 B 1.97 B EB 2.93 C 2.95 C WB 2.93 C 2.95 C NB 2.20 B 2.21 B SB 1.98 B 1.98 B EB 2.98 C 3.01 C WB 2.99 C 3.02 C NB >200 F >200 F SB >200 F >200 F NB >200 F >200 F SB >200 F >200 F NB 3.00 C 3.01 C SB 2.98 C 2.99 C EB 2.01 B 2.01 B WB 2.10 B 2.10 B NB 3.07 C 3.08 C SB 3.07 C 3.08 C EB 2.05 B 2.05 B WB 2.19 B 2.19 B NB 2.99 C 3.00 C SB 3.04 C 3.05 C EB 2.98 C 2.99 C WB 2.61 C 2.61 C NB 3.01 C 3.02 C SB 3.08 C 3.09 C EB 3.02 C 3.04 C WB 2.70 C 2.71 C NB >200 F >200 F SB >200 F >200 F NB >200 F >200 F SB >200 F >200 F NB 2.82 C 2.82 C SB 2.96 C 2.97 C EB 2.03 B 2.03 B WB 2.18 B 2.18 B NB 2.84 C 2.85 C SB 3.02 C 3.03 C EB 2.10 B 2.10 B WB 2.21 B 2.21 B 2. Tank Farm Road/Long Street AM PM AM 4. Tank Farm Road/MindBody Traffic Signal AM PM 5. Broad Street/Capitolio Way AM 8. Broad Street/Aero Vista Lane 9. Broad Street/Aero Drive PM PM AM PM AM 6. Broad Street/Industrial Way AM PM 7. Broad Street/Tank Farm Road Table 19: Cumulative and Cumulative Plus Project Intersection Pedestrian Levels of Service Cumulative Cumulative + Project 1. Tank Farm Road/South Higuera Street AM PM 3. Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road AM PM PM 1. HCM 2010 pedestrian score and LOS. 2. HCM 2010 reports pedestrian LOS at two-way stop controlled intersections in delay (seconds). Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 39 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study The following intersections operate below the LOS C threshold for pedestrians: Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road (#3) operates at LOS F during the AM and PM peak hours both with and without the project due to the presence of side street stop controlled intersections and high volumes and speeds along Tank Farm Road. Installation of the recommended roundabout at this intersection would provide acceptable pedestrian operations. Broad Street/Capitolio Way (#5) operates at LOS F during the AM and PM peak hours both with and without the project due to the presence of side street stop controlled intersections and high volumes and speeds along Broad Street. Pedestrians seeking to cross Broad Street would use one of the nearby signalized intersections with dedicated pedestrian phases. Broad Street/Aero Vista Lane (#8) operates at LOS F during the AM and PM peak hours both with and without the project due to the presence of side street stop controlled intersections and high volumes and speeds along Broad Street. Pedestrians seeking to cross Broad Street would use one of the nearby signalized intersections with dedicated pedestrian phases. Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 40 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Intersection Direction LOS Score 1 LOS1 LOS Score1 LOS1 NB 3.89 D 3.89 D SB 3.40 C 3.4 C EB 3.15 C 3.15 C WB 3.58 D 3.59 D NB 3.85 D 3.85 D SB 3.84 D 3.84 D EB 3.12 C 3.12 C WB 4.89 E 4.90 E NB 2.72 C 2.72 C SB 2.61 C 2.61 C EB 3.35 C 3.35 C WB 2.83 C 2.83 C NB 2.85 C 2.85 C SB 2.62 C 2.62 C EB 2.90 C 2.90 C WB 3.29 C 3.29 C AM - PM - NB 2.83 C 2.83 C SB 2.50 C 2.50 C EB 3.34 C 3.42 C WB 3.54 D 3.56 D NB 3.46 C 3.47 C SB 2.54 C 2.54 C EB 3.49 C 3.54 D WB 3.38 C 3.46 C AM - PM - NB 3.31 C 3.35 C SB 3.66 D 3.68 D EB 2.75 C 2.75 C WB 2.94 C 2.94 C NB 3.75 D 3.77 D SB 3.50 C 3.54 D EB 2.95 C 2.95 C WB 3.34 C 3.34 C NB 3.92 D 3.93 D SB 4.41 D 4.42 D EB 3.46 C 3.53 D WB 4.45 D 4.46 D NB 4.29 D 4.31 D SB 4.34 D 4.38 D EB 3.90 D 3.94 D WB 3.96 D 3.98 D AM - PM - NB 3.49 C 3.5 D SB 3.69 D 3.71 D EB 2.76 C 2.76 C WB 2.94 C 2.94 C NB 3.34 C 3.36 C SB 3.72 D 3.74 D EB 3.18 C 3.18 C WB 3.37 C 3.38 C 2. Tank Farm Road/Long Street AM PM Cumulative + Project AM 5. Broad Street/Capitolio Way N/A 4. Tank Farm Road/MindBody Traffic Signal AM PM 3. Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road N/A PM AM Table 20: Cumulative and Cumulative Plus Project Intersection Bicycle Levels of Service 9. Broad Street/Aero Drive AM PM 1. HCM 2010 bicycle score and LOS. 2. The 2010 HCM does not establish LOS standards for bicycles at stop-controlled intersections. 8. Broad Street/Aero Vista Lane N/A PM 7. Broad Street/Tank Farm Road AM Cumulative 6. Broad Street/Industrial Way PM 1. Tank Farm Road/South Higuera Street Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 41 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study The following intersection operates below the LOS D threshold for bicycles: Tank Farm Road/South Higuera Street (#1) operates at LOS E in the westbound direction during the PM peak hour both with and without the project. The addition of project traffic to this intersection would not noticeably change bicycle comfort, so this is an insignificant impact. 2. Segment Operations Tables 21, 22, 23, and 24 show the segment operations during the AM and PM peak hours under Cumulative and Cumulative Plus Project conditions. The following deficiencies are reported: Auto: The following segments have a V/C ratio that is greater than one, resulting in an automatic LOS F, even thought the LOS scores are acceptable. The addition of project traffic does not change the auto LOS, and the nearby intersections would constrain flow before the segments did, so the project would have an insignificant effect on these segments. #3a: Southbound Broad Street from Orcutt Road to Industrial Way – AM and PM #3a: Northbound Broad Street from Orcutt Road to Industrial Way – PM #3b: Southbound Broad Street from Industrial Way to Tank Farm Road – AM and PM #3b: Northbound Broad Street from Industrial Way to Tank Farm Road – PM #4a: Northbound Broad Street from Aero Vista Lane to Tank Farm Road – AM and PM #4b: Southbound Broad Street from Aero Vista Lane to Aero Drive – AM and PM #4c: Northbound Broad Street from South City Limits to Aero Drive – AM and PM Pedestrian: Multiple segments do not have a pedestrian LOS reported due to the absence of pedestrian facilities, or the presence of discontinuous pedestrian facilities. The eastbound segment of Tank Farm Road from Santa Fe Road to Broad Street (#1b) operates unacceptably at LOS D during the PM peak hour due to high vehicular volumes and speeds. The segment of Tank Farm Road from UPRR to Orcutt Road (#2a) operates unacceptably at LOS D westbound during the AM peak hour and eastbound during the PM peak hour due to high vehicular volumes and speeds. The addition of project traffic does not change the pedestrian score at this location. The segment of northbound Broad Street from Orcutt Road to Industrial Way (#3a) operates unacceptably at LOS E with the project during the PM peak hour due to the high vehicular volumes and speeds. The segment of southbound Broad Street from Industrial Way to Tank Farm Road (#3b) operates unacceptably at LOS D during the PM peak hour due to the high vehicular volumes and speeds along Broad Street. Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 42 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study The segment of southbound Broad Street from Tank Farm Road to Aero Vista Lane (#4a) operates unacceptably at LOS D during both peak hours with and without the project due to high vehicular volumes and speeds. Bicycle: No bicycle deficiencies are reported. Transit: Several segments operate below the transit LOS threshold due to infrequent service to the study segments. Given the relatively low boardings on stops in the area, the addition of project traffic would not overburden or otherwise impact the transit network. Recommendations No mitigations are recommended for the segments with deficient pedestrian LOS scores. On each of these segments, the addition of project traffic increases the pedestrian LOS score by less than two percent and increases vehicular volumes by less than three percent. These are insignificant changes that would not substantively worsen pedestrian conditions. Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 43 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Segment Direction Score LOS1 Score LOS Score LOS Score LOS EB 2.34 B N/A N/A 2.98 C N/A N/A WB 2.34 B N/A N/A 2.88 C N/A N/A EB 2.75 B 3.17 C2.23BN/AN/A WB 2.75 B 3.11 C2.38BN/AN/A EB 2.47 B 2.98 C2.34BN/AN/A WB 2.47 B 3.51 D 2.60 B 3.38 C EB 3.13 C 0.94 A0.12AN/AN/A WB 3.13 C N/A N/A 0.34 A 4.14 D NB 2.14 B 3.31 C2.28B4.68 E SB 2.14 F N/A N/A 2.29 B N/A N/A NB 2.14 B 3.04 C2.20B5.58 F SB 2.14 F 3.55 D 2.27 B N/A N/A NB 2.52 F N/A N/A 2.23 B N/A N/A SB 2.52 B 3.63 D 1.14 A 4.76 E NB 2.14 B 3.22 C1.35AN/AN/A SB 2.14 F 2.91 C1.26AN/AN/A NB 2.93 F N/A N/A 2.13 B N/A N/A SB 2.93 C N/A N/A 1.48 A 5.84 F 4a. Broad Street - Tank Farm Road to Aero Vista Lane Table 21: Cumulative AM Segment MMLOS1 Auto Pedestrian 2 Bicycle Transit 3 1a. Tank Farm Road - Old Windmill Lane to Santa Fe Road 4b. Broad Street - Aero Vista Lane to Aero Drive 1b. Tank Farm Road - Santa Fe Road to Broad Street 2a. Tank Farm Road - Broad Street to UPRR 2b. Tank Farm Road - UPRR to Orcutt Road 3b. Broad Street - Industrial Way to Tank Farm Road 4c. Broad Street - Aero Drive to South City Limits 3a. Broad Street - Orcutt Road to Industrial Way 2. LOS is not established for segments without a sidewalk. 1. HCM 2010 LOS score and LOS. 3. LOS is not established for segments without a directional transit route. Segment Direction Score LOS1 Score LOS Score LOS Score LOS EB 2.34 B N/A N/A 2.89 C N/A N/A WB 2.34 B N/A N/A 3.00 C N/A N/A EB 2.75 B 3.55 D 2.36 B N/A N/A WB 2.75 B 3.03 C2.35BN/AN/A EB 2.47 B 3.88 D 2.86 C N/A N/A WB 2.47 B 3.21 C 2.43 B 3.34 C EB 3.13 C 1.55 A0.58AN/AN/A WB 3.13 C N/A N/A 0.05 A 4.10 D NB 2.14 F 4.23 D 2.55 B 4.80 E SB 2.14 F N/A N/A 2.23 B N/A N/A NB 2.14 F 3.21 C2.29B5.60 F SB 2.14 F 3.30 C2.20BN/AN/A NB 2.52 F N/A N/A 2.30 B N/A N/A SB 2.52 B 3.62 D 1.13 A 4.76 E NB 2.14 B 3.25 C1.19AN/AN/A SB 2.14 F 3.11 C1.33AN/AN/A NB 2.93 F N/A N/A 2.06 B N/A N/A SB 2.93 C N/A N/A 1.61 A 5.77 F Table 22: Cumulative PM Segment MMLOS1 Auto 3. LOS is not established for segments without a directional transit route. 1b. Tank Farm Road - Santa Fe Road to Broad Street 2a. Tank Farm Road - Broad Street to UPRR 4a. Broad Street - Tank Farm Road to Aero Vista Lane 3a. Broad Street - Orcutt Road to Industrial Way 2. LOS is not established for segments without a sidewalk. 4b. Broad Street - Aero Vista Lane to Aero Drive 4c. Broad Street - Aero Drive to South City Limits 1. HCM 2010 LOS score and LOS. 2b. Tank Farm Road - UPRR to Orcutt Road 3b. Broad Street - Industrial Way to Tank Farm Road Pedestrian2 Bicycle 1a. Tank Farm Road - Old Windmill Lane to Santa Fe Road Transit3 Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 44 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study Segment Direction Score LOS1 Score LOS Score LOS Score LOS EB 2.34 B N/A N/A 2.98 C N/A N/A WB 2.34 B N/A N/A 2.88 C N/A N/A EB 2.75 B 3.22 C2.25BN/AN/A WB 2.75 B 3.13 C2.38BN/AN/A EB 2.47 B 2.99 C2.35BN/AN/A WB 2.47 B 3.51 D 2.60 B 3.38 C EB 3.13 C 0.95 A0.13AN/AN/A WB 3.13 C N/A N/A 0.34 A 4.14 D NB 2.14 B 3.36 C2.30B4.69 E SB 2.14 F N/A N/A 2.29 B N/A N/A NB 2.14 B 3.08 C2.22B5.58 F SB 2.14 F 3.57 D 2.28 B N/A N/A NB 2.52 F N/A N/A 2.23 B N/A N/A SB 2.52 B 3.66 D 1.15 A 4.76 E NB 2.14 B 3.23 C1.35AN/AN/A SB 2.14 F 2.94 C1.27AN/AN/A NB 2.93 F N/A N/A 2.13 B N/A N/A SB 2.93 C N/A N/A 1.49 A 5.85 F 4a. Broad Street - Tank Farm Road to Aero Vista Lane Table 23: Cumulative Plus Project AM Segment MMLOS1 Auto Pedestrian 2 Bicycle Transit 3 1a. Tank Farm Road - Old Windmill Lane to Santa Fe Road 1b. Tank Farm Road - Santa Fe Road to Broad Street 2a. Tank Farm Road - Broad Street to UPRR 4b. Broad Street - Aero Vista Lane to Aero Drive 3a. Broad Street - Orcutt Road to Industrial Way 2. LOS is not established for segments without a sidewalk. 2b. Tank Farm Road - UPRR to Orcutt Road 3b. Broad Street - Industrial Way to Tank Farm Road 4c. Broad Street - Aero Drive to South City Limits 1. HCM 2010 LOS score and LOS. 3. LOS is not established for segments without a directional transit route. Segment Direction Score LOS1 Score LOS Score LOS Score LOS EB 2.34 B N/A N/A 2.89 C N/A N/A WB 2.34 B N/A N/A 3.00 C N/A N/A EB 2.75 B 3.59 D 2.37 B N/A N/A WB 2.75 B 3.08 C2.37BN/AN/A EB 2.47 B 3.88 D 2.86 C N/A N/A WB 2.47 B 3.23 C 2.44 B 3.34 C EB 3.13 C 1.55 A0.58AN/AN/A WB 3.13 C N/A N/A 0.06 A 4.10 D NB 2.14 F 4.26 E 2.56 B 4.81 E SB 2.14 F N/A N/A 2.24 B N/A N/A NB 2.14 F 3.23 C2.30B5.60 F SB 2.14 F 3.36 C2.22BN/AN/A NB 2.52 F N/A N/A 2.31 B N/A N/A SB 2.52 B 3.64 D 1.14 A 4.76 E NB 2.14 B 3.27 C1.19AN/AN/A SB 2.14 F 3.13 C1.34AN/AN/A NB 2.93 F N/A N/A 2.07 B N/A N/A SB 2.93 C N/A N/A 1.62 A 5.78 F Table 24: Cumulative Plus Project PM Segment MMLOS1 Auto Pedestrian 2 3a. Broad Street - Orcutt Road to Industrial Way 2. LOS is not established for segments without a sidewalk. 2b. Tank Farm Road - UPRR to Orcutt Road 3b. Broad Street - Industrial Way to Tank Farm Road 3. LOS is not established for segments without a directional transit route. Bicycle Transit 3 1a. Tank Farm Road - Old Windmill Lane to Santa Fe Road 1b. Tank Farm Road - Santa Fe Road to Broad Street 2a. Tank Farm Road - Broad Street to UPRR 4a. Broad Street - Tank Farm Road to Aero Vista Lane 4b. Broad Street - Aero Vista Lane to Aero Drive 4c. Broad Street - Aero Drive to South City Limits 1. HCM 2010 LOS score and LOS. Central Coast Transportation Consulting May 2018 45 650 Tank Farm Road Draft Transportation Impact Study References City of San Luis Obispo. 2010. Orcutt Area Specific Plan. ______. 2014. Circulation Element of the General Plan. ______. 2014. Airport Area Specific Plan. ______. 2014. Bicycle Transportation Plan. ______. 2014. South Broad Street Area Plan. ______. 2015. Multimodal Transportation Impact Guidelines. ______. 2016. SLO Transit Short Range Transit Plan. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). 2012. Trip Generation, 9th Edition. ______. 2014. Trip Generation Handbook. San Luis Obispo Council of Governments. 2014. Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. Transportation Research Board. 2017. Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition. Appendix A: Traffic Counts 4,156 96 (0) 2,273 1,787 TOTAL 4,682 1,767 63 (0) 1,060 644 PM 2,060 1,438 21 (0) 764 653 MD 1,499 N 951 12 (0) 449 490 AM 1,123 926 1,404 1,817 4,147 252 137 77 38 482 (299687 (413908 (4972077 (128 14 24 46 TOTALPMMDAM436 703 885 2,024 119 33 33 53 AMMDPMTOTAL55 14 17 24 98 (0)31 (0)30 (0)37 (0)1,461 1,444 1,383 4,288 272 78 80 114 922 AM 18 588 947 (351)1,553 1,497 MD 42 779 774 (336)1,595 1,976 PM 50 1,119 725 (282)1,894 4,395 TOTAL 110 2,486 2446 (969)5,042 2,314 60 (0) 1,256 998 TOTAL 2,603 988 38 (0) 594 356 PM 1,146 758 14 (0) 398 346 MD 833 N 568 8 (0) 264 296 AM 624 544 752 991 2,287 148 70 47 31 284 (172399 (218503 (2631186 (657 11 12 30 TOTALPMMDAMAM 8:00 AM #REF!253 342 476 1,071 48 13 16 19 MIDDAY 12:00 PM #REF!AMMDPMTOTAL32 10 9 13 PM 4:30 PM #REF!60 (0)17 (0)18 (0)25 (0)823 745 716 2,284 140 40 43 57 542 AM 16 321 514 (180)851 758 MD 22 418 390 (183)830 1,087 PM 20 630 350 (114)1,000 2,387 Total 58 1,369 1254 (477)2,681 AimTD LLC TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Tank FarmTank FarmSC0843 ALL HOURS Higuera San Luis Obispo Higuera Higuera Higuera Tank FarmTank FarmPEAK HOUR DATE:LOCATION:PROJECT #:SC0843 Wed, Feb 3, 16 NORTH & SOUTH:LOCATION #:54 EAST & WEST:CONTROL:SIGNAL NOTES:AM ▲ PM N MD ◄ W E ► OTHER S OTHER ▼ NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:1 2 1 1 2 0 0.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 5 7:15 AM 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 7:30 AM 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 7:45 AM 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 5 8:00 AM 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 8:30 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 8:45 AM 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 6 VOLUMES 0 6 1 5 11 0 2 2 2 5 0 0 34 APPROACH %0%86%14%31%69%0%33%33%33%100%0%0% APP/DEPART 7 /8 16 /18 6 /8 5 /0 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 0 3 1 3 6 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 19 APPROACH %0%75%25%33%67%0%50%25%25%100%0%0% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.500 0.750 1.000 0.500 0.950 APP/DEPART 4 /5 9 /9 4 /5 2 /0 0 11:00 AM 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 11:15 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 5 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 11:45 AM 0 4 2 1 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 13 12:00 PM 0 4 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 11 12:15 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12:30 PM 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 12:45 PM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 VOLUMES 0 13 4 2 15 1 0 1 0 8 0 1 45 APPROACH %0%76%24%11%83%6%0%100%0%89%0%11% APP/DEPART 17 /14 18 /23 1 /7 9 /1 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 0 9 3 1 10 0 0 1 0 7 0 1 32 APPROACH %0%75%25%9%91%0%0%100%0%88%0%13% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.500 0.458 0.250 0.667 0.615 APP/DEPART 12 /10 11 /17 1 /5 8 /0 0 04:00 PM 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4:15 PM 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 4:30 PM 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4:45 PM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 5:15 PM 0 1 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 8 5:30 PM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 7 5:45 PM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 VOLUMES 0 17 0 1 10 0 1 1 0 5 1 3 39 APPROACH %0%100%0%9%91%0%50%50%0%56%11%33% APP/DEPART 17 /21 11 /15 2 /2 9 /1 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 0 7 0 1 3 0 1 1 0 4 1 3 21 APPROACH %0%100%0%25%75%0%50%50%0%50%13%38% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.583 0.250 0.500 0.667 0.656 APP/DEPART 7 /11 4 /7 2 /2 8 /1 0 Higuera NORTH SIDE Tank Farm WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Tank Farm SOUTH SIDE HigueraAM7:00 AM MD11:15 AM PM5:00 PM INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 pacific@aimtd.com San Luis Obispo Higuera Tank Farm Higuera Tank Farm Tank FarmHiguera 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL7:00 AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 7:15 AM0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 7:30 AM0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 1 6 7:45 AM0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 4 8:00 AM0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 6 8:15 AM0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8:30 AM0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 8:45 AM0 0 1 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 6 TOTAL 0 1 1 1 11 8 0 7 1 3 1 2 36 11:00 AM0 0 0 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 7 11:15 AM0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 11:30 AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 11:45 AM0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12:00 PM0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 12:15 PM0 0 1 1 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 12:30 PM0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 1 0 1 3 10 12:45 PM0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 TOTAL 0 1 2 2 12 9 0 3 1 1 4 5 40 4:00 PM0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 5 0 10 4:15 PM0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 4:30 PM0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 1 1 9 4:45 PM0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 5:00 PM0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 5:15 PM0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 5:30 PM0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 4 5:45 PM0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 5 TOTAL 0 0 2 0 7 6 0 3 12 0 8 4 42 12 3412 5N11 610 9 8 7MDPMPEDESTRIAN CROSSINGSAM Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Central Coast Transportation Consulting 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 895 Napa Avenue, Suite A-6 www.metrotrafficdata.com Morro Bay, CA 93442 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 00600040511396125541 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 105110104141371485212 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 301311051316841316108114 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 101130130822415929188714 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 1 0 22 4 0 0 10 0 10 218 11 10 25 160 4 13 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 011202010121991093911769 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 10152103011211131124148115 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 2023020207202111025123311 TOTAL 9 1 107 11 7 1 29 1 60 1476 76 75 184 984 28 89 Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 4 0 39 1 3 0 11 1 15 176 9 4 31 221 3 2 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 213312030131841051925363 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 2 0 51 1 2 0 15 0 14 164 5 5 28 280 4 1 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 4 2 36 0 2 2 10 0 15 165 7 4 20 261 7 4 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 124510090102061162527903 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 4 0 40 0 2 0 11 0 16 182 5 3 33 251 4 3 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 2 0 46 1 1 1 10 0 13 143 5 5 15 227 2 2 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 2 0 24 0 3 2 17 0 8 116 0 0 22 185 1 1 TOTAL 21 5 314 5 15 5 86 1 104 1336 52 32 193 1957 27 19 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:45 AM - 8:45 AM 3 1 60 9 3 1 17 0 41 852 49 39 117 613 18 51 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 11 4 172 2 6 2 45 0 55 717 28 18 106 1071 15 11 PHF Trucks PHF AM 0.911 5.6% PM 45 2 6 0.779 PM 0.949 1.4% AM 17 1 3 0.525 PHF 0.881 0.953 AM PM 55 41 18 15 717 852 613 1071 28 49 117 106 PM AM PHF 0.835 0.955 PHF 0.696 3 1 60 AM 0.882 11 4 172 PM Southbound Southbound Eastbound Northbound Westbound Eastbound WestboundNorthbound Page 1 of 3Long St Long St Tank Farm RdTank Farm Rd Northbound Westbound Turning Movement Report Southbound Tank Farm Rd @ Long St San Luis Obispo Thursday, October 5, 2017 Clear Eastbound 35.246802° -120.671143° Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Central Coast Transportation Consulting 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 895 Napa Avenue, Suite A-6 www.metrotrafficdata.com Morro Bay, CA 93442 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0010000100001000 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0010000001000000 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000000002000100 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000001400000 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000101000000 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000100100000 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0010004100100100 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0010000001000100 TOTAL 0040004406601300 Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 1000011100100010 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0112000000000000 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0000000000000001 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0000000100000110 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0010000000000200 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0000010100020000 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0010020000000000 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0000000000020400 TOTAL 1132041300140721 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:45 AM - 8:45 AM 0010004302600100 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0010010200020311 Bikes Peds Peds <> AM Peak Total 14 3 PM0100 PM Peak Total 6 5 AM 4000 Peds <>10 AM PM 00 01 02 13 06 00 PM AM Peds <>02 Peds <>3001AM 2001PM Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Long St Tank Farm Rd Tank Farm Rd Long St Page 2 of 3 Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Turning Movement Report Tank Farm Rd @ Long St 35.246802° San Luis Obispo -120.671143° Thursday, October 5, 2017 Clear Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Central Coast Transportation Consulting 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 895 Napa Avenue, Suite A-6 www.metrotrafficdata.com Morro Bay, CA 93442 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 001100000091143127702 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 109200000127212310403 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 10190000001688141812106 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 40152000001821083123907 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 2080101002299132916916 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 009200000197763217308 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 5014200000200107816406 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 3017300000207671814715 TOTAL 16010211101001401 66 59 171 1194 2 43 Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 15032300000207681123001 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 903720000020587524502 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 160282000002111051426801 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 4030100100191541924805 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 10048100000256732329204 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 9042300000223842327301 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 12034100000187311220011 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 802201010015331918101 TOTAL 83027313102001633 50 33 116 1937 1 16 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:45 AM - 8:45 AM 110466101008083634100745127 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 3901487001008813016791081 0 11 PHF Trucks PHF AM 0.909 3.8% PM 1 0 0 0.25 PM 0.888 1.5% AM 1010.25 PHF 0.866 0.887 AM PM 00 10 881 808 745 1081 30 36 100 79 PM AM PHF 0.783 0.921 PHF 0.75 11 0 46 AM 0.806 39 0 148 PM Southbound Southbound Eastbound Northbound Westbound Eastbound WestboundNorthbound Page 1 of 3Santa Fe Rd Mobile Home Park Tank Farm RdTank Farm Rd Northbound Westbound Turning Movement Report Southbound Tank Farm Rd @ Santa Fe Rd San Luis Obispo Thursday, October 5, 2017 Clear Eastbound 35.246811° -120.647384° Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Central Coast Transportation Consulting 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 895 Napa Avenue, Suite A-6 www.metrotrafficdata.com Morro Bay, CA 93442 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0010000001000100 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000000002000200 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000000001000200 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000000001000000 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000002001000 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000000000 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000000100100200 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0010000001000100 TOTAL 0020000108101800 Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0010000000000000 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0000000002000100 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0000000001000100 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0000000000000000 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0000000001001200 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0020000001000000 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0020000001000000 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 1010000000000400 TOTAL 1060000006001800 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:45 AM - 8:45 AM 0000000103101200 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0020000003001300 Bikes Peds Peds <> AM Peak Total 71 PM0000 PM Peak Total 9 0 AM 0000 Peds <>00 AM PM 00 00 33 23 01 11 PM AM Peds <>00 Peds <>1000AM 0002PM Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Mobile Home Park Tank Farm Rd Tank Farm Rd Santa Fe Rd Page 2 of 3 Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Turning Movement Report Tank Farm Rd @ Santa Fe Rd 35.246811° San Luis Obispo -120.647384° Thursday, October 5, 2017 Clear Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Central Coast Transportation Consulting 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 895 Napa Avenue, Suite A-6 www.metrotrafficdata.com Morro Bay, CA 93442 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 300000000997428302 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 500000000122124413504 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 1010000001631812712904 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 50100000018220121327109 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 2000000002191313320306 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 502000000175175720908 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 4001000001871751317006 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 503000000200179816605 TOTAL 30071000001347 121 64 57 1366 0 44 Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 2101400000024109121903 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 190800000023536024303 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 2901000000023247225704 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 3301100000022732123805 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 5001500000030081428703 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 3901600000026814128300 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 2501700000021131220001 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 220400000017521116001 TOTAL 2380950000001889 24 31 12 1887 0 20 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:45 AM - 8:45 AM 1603100000763673536853029 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 1510520000001027 16 14 8 1065 0 12 PHF Trucks PHF AM 0.883 3.7% PM 0 0 0 ##### PM 0.873 1.1% AM 0 0 0 ##### PHF 0.847 0.894 AM PM 00 00 1027 763 853 1065 16 67 36 8 PM AM PHF 0.783 0.922 PHF 0.679 16 0 3 AM 0.781 151 0 52 PM Southbound Southbound Eastbound Northbound Westbound Eastbound WestboundNorthbound Page 1 of 3MindBody Tank Farm RdTank Farm Rd Northbound Westbound Turning Movement Report Southbound Tank Farm Rd @ MindBody Entrance/Signal San Luis Obispo Thursday, October 5, 2017 Clear Eastbound 35.247295° -120.645686° Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Central Coast Transportation Consulting 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 895 Napa Avenue, Suite A-6 www.metrotrafficdata.com Morro Bay, CA 93442 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0001000000200200 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000000002000200 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000000000000200 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0001000001000200 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0001000001000200 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000000000 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000000001001200 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0001000001000100 TOTAL 00040000062011300 Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0000000001000000 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0000000002000100 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0000000001000100 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0001000001000000 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0010000001000200 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0000000002000100 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0000000002000000 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 1000000001000100 TOTAL 10110000011000600 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:45 AM - 8:45 AM 0002000003001600 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0011000005000400 Bikes Peds Peds <> AM Peak Total 10 2 PM0001 PM Peak Total 10 1 AM 0002 Peds <>00 AM PM 00 00 53 64 00 10 PM AM Peds <>00 Peds <>0000AM 0001PM Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds 0 Tank Farm Rd Tank Farm Rd MindBody Page 2 of 3 Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Turning Movement Report Tank Farm Rd @ MindBody Entrance/Signal 35.247295° San Luis Obispo -120.645686° Thursday, October 5, 2017 Clear 6,839 0 (0) 6,341 498 TOTAL 6,631 2,425 0 (0) 2,287 138 PM 2,601 2,212 0 (0) 2,066 146 MD 2,243 N 2,202 0 (0) 1,988 214 AM 1,787 115 219 251 585 0 0 0 0 96 (0)180 (0)211 (0)487 (0)0 0 0 0 TOTALPMMDAM19 39 40 98 0 0 0 0 AMMDPMTOTAL0 0 0 0 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)284 187 181 652 0 0 0 0 2,007 AM 0 1,686 75 (0)1,761 2,105 MD 0 2,060 44 (0)2,104 2,327 PM 0 2,389 44 (0)2,433 6,439 TOTAL 0 6,135 163 (0) 6,298 3,713 0 (0) 3,445 268 TOTAL 3,686 1,265 0 (0) 1,195 70 PM 1,428 1,166 0 (0) 1,093 73 MD 1,289 N 1,282 0 (0) 1,157 125 AM 969 61 122 155 338 0 0 0 0 54 (0)103 (0)130 (0)287 (0)0 0 0 0 TOTALPMMDAMAM 7:45 AM #REF!7 19 25 51 0 0 0 0 MIDDAY 11:45 AM #REF!AMMDPMTOTAL0 0 0 0 PM 4:30 PM #REF!0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)162 94 87 343 0 0 0 0 1,164 AM 0 912 40 (0)952 1,112 MD 0 1,183 24 (0)1,207 1,220 PM 0 1,297 18 (0)1,315 3,496 Total 0 3,392 82 (0) 3,474 AimTD LLC TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS CapitolioCapitolioSC0843 ALL HOURS Broad San Luis Obispo Broad Broad Broad CapitolioCapitolioPEAK HOUR DATE:LOCATION:PROJECT #:SC0843 Wed, Mar 16, 16 NORTH & SOUTH:LOCATION #:12 EAST & WEST:CONTROL:STOP W NOTES:AM ▲ PM N MD ◄ W E ► OTHER S OTHER ▼ NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:X 2 0 1 2 X X X X 1 X 1 7:15 AM 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7:30 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7:45 AM 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8:00 AM 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8:30 AM 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8:45 AM 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 9:00 AM 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 VOLUMES 0 6 0 4 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 APPROACH %0%100%0%13%87%0%0%0%0%0%0%0% APP/DEPART 6 /6 30 /26 0 /4 0 /0 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 0 3 0 3 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 APPROACH %0%100%0%17%83%0%0%0%0%0%0%0% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.375 0.643 0.000 0.000 0.656 APP/DEPART 3 /3 18 /15 0 /3 0 /0 0 11:30 AM 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 11:45 AM 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 12:00 PM 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 12:15 PM 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 12:45 PM 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1:00 PM 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1:15 PM 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 VOLUMES 0 15 1 1 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 42 APPROACH %0%94%6%4%96%0%0%0%0%0%0%100% APP/DEPART 16 /16 25 /24 0 /2 1 /0 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 0 8 0 1 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 APPROACH %0%100%0%7%93%0%0%0%0%0%0%0% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.500 0.938 0.000 0.000 0.719 APP/DEPART 8 /8 15 /14 0 /1 0 /0 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 3 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4:45 PM 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5:00 PM 0 7 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 5:15 PM 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 5:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5:45 PM 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6:00 PM 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 VOLUMES 0 20 0 1 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 APPROACH %0%100%0%7%93%0%0%0%0%0%0%0% APP/DEPART 20 /20 15 /14 0 /1 0 /0 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 0 14 0 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 APPROACH %0%100%0%8%92%0%0%0%0%0%0%0% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.500 0.600 0.000 0.000 0.722 APP/DEPART 14 /14 12 /11 0 /1 0 /0 0 Broad NORTH SIDE Capitolio WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Capitolio SOUTH SIDE BroadAM8:15 AM MD11:30 AM PM4:30 PM INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 pacific@aimtd.com San Luis Obispo Broad Capitolio Broad Capitolio CapitolioBroad 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL7:15 AM0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 7:30 AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 7:45 AM0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 8:00 AM0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 8:15 AM0 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 10 8:30 AM0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8:45 AM0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 9:00 AM0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 6 12 0 0 0 0 0 8 26 11:30 AM0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11:45 AM0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12:00 PM0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12:15 PM0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 12:30 PM0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 12:45 PM0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1:00 PM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:15 PM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4:15 PM0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4:30 PM0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 4:45 PM0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5:00 PM0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 5:15 PM0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5:30 PM0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 5:45 PM0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 6:00 PM0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 TOTAL 0 0 0 1 14 6 0 0 0 0 2 2 25 12 3412 5N11 610 9 8 7MDPMPEDESTRIAN CROSSINGSAM 6,428 271 (3) 5,578 579 TOTAL 6,302 2,261 86 (1) 1,966 209 PM 2,351 2,195 138 (1) 1,802 255 MD 2,198 N 1,972 47 (1) 1,810 115 AM 1,753 253 662 594 1,509 583 178 264 141 83 (18)288 (24)241 (24)612 (66)13 31 15 59 TOTALPMMDAM157 343 338 838 210 85 111 14 AMMDPMTOTAL73 24 39 10 221 (48)96 (23)114 (20)11 (5)409 559 457 1,425 504 205 264 35 1,980 AM 83 1,655 285 (1)2,023 2,263 MD 99 1,797 267 (6)2,163 2,401 PM 78 2,024 225 (9)2,327 6,644 TOTAL 260 5,476 777 (16) 6,513 3,518 138 (3) 3,063 317 TOTAL 3,336 1,234 41 (1) 1,071 122 PM 1,314 1,141 68 (1) 941 132 MD 1,062 N 1,143 29 (1) 1,051 63 AM 960 117 387 320 824 310 85 143 82 38 (9)155 (9)127 (12)320 (30)7 21 5 33 TOTALPMMDAMAM 7:45 AM #REF!72 211 188 471 106 40 61 5 MIDDAY 12:30 PM #REF!AMMDPMTOTAL35 15 17 3 PM 4:30 PM #REF!115 (20)49 (9)57 (6)9 (5)230 288 269 787 256 104 135 17 1,132 AM 46 917 164 (1)1,127 1,211 MD 56 844 141 (5)1,041 1,308 PM 39 1,147 132 (7)1,318 3,651 Total 141 2,908 437 (13) 3,486 Broad Broad Broad IndustrialIndustrialPEAK HOUR AimTD LLC TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS IndustrialIndustrialSC0843 ALL HOURS Broad San Luis Obispo DATE:LOCATION:PROJECT #:SC0843 Tue, Mar 15, 16 NORTH & SOUTH:LOCATION #:13 EAST & WEST:CONTROL:SIGNAL NOTES:AM ▲ PM N MD ◄ W E ► OTHER S OTHER ▼ NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:1 2 1 1 2 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 7:30 AM 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 7 8:00 AM 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 8:30 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 8:45 AM 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 VOLUMES 0 5 0 1 22 1 0 1 0 5 0 2 37 APPROACH %0%100%0%4%92%4%0%100%0%71%0%29% APP/DEPART 5 /7 24 /27 1 /2 7 /1 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 0 4 0 0 12 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 21 APPROACH %0%100%0%0%92%8%0%100%0%67%0%33% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.333 0.542 0.250 0.750 0.750 APP/DEPART 4 /5 13 /14 1 /1 3 /1 0 11:30 AM 0 2 0 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 8 11:45 AM 1 5 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 12:00 PM 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 11 12:15 PM 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 10 12:30 PM 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 12:45 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 1:00 PM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 1:15 PM 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 VOLUMES 2 16 1 4 20 1 0 2 5 2 4 0 57 APPROACH %11%84%5%16%80%4%0%29%71%33%67%0% APP/DEPART 19 /16 25 /27 7 /7 6 /7 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 2 12 0 1 12 1 0 1 5 2 3 0 39 APPROACH %14%86%0%7%86%7%0%17%83%40%60%0% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.583 0.875 0.500 0.417 0.886 APP/DEPART 14 /12 14 /19 6 /2 5 /6 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 4:30 PM 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 2 10 4:45 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 5:00 PM 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 8 5:15 PM 0 3 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 7 5:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 5:45 PM 0 3 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 6:00 PM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 4 VOLUMES 0 19 4 1 12 0 0 5 2 3 0 4 50 APPROACH %0%83%17%8%92%0%0%71%29%43%0%57% APP/DEPART 23 /23 13 /17 7 /10 7 /0 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 0 13 1 0 6 0 0 4 1 2 0 3 30 APPROACH %0%93%7%0%100%0%0%80%20%40%0%60% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.700 0.750 0.313 0.625 0.750 APP/DEPART 14 /16 6 /9 5 /5 5 /0 0 Broad NORTH SIDE Industrial WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Industrial SOUTH SIDE Broad INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 pacific@aimtd.com San Luis Obispo Broad Industrial Broad Industrial IndustrialBroad AM7:15 AM MD11:30 AM PM4:30 PM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL7:15 AM0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7:30 AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 8:00 AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 8:15 AM0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 8:30 AM0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 8:45 AM0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9:00 AM0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 TOTAL 1 1 2 3 4 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 16 11:30 AM0 0 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 11:45 AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 12:00 PM0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12:15 PM0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 2 0 0 6 12:30 PM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:45 PM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1:00 PM1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 1:15 PM1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 TOTAL 2 1 1 2 4 5 0 5 5 2 0 0 27 4:15 PM0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 4:30 PM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5:30 PM0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5:45 PM0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 6:00 PM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 0 0 1 2 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 2 11 12 3412 5N11 610 9 8 7MDPMPEDESTRIAN CROSSINGSAM 6,528 2365 (697)3,572 591 TOTAL 6,584 2,340 764 (320) 1,302 274 PM 2,285 2,267 926 (169) 1,143 198 MD 2,197 N 1,921 675 (208) 1,127 119 AM 2,102 995 679 1,024 2,698 4,943 1,809 1,686 1,448 222 (75)167 (84)226 (89)615 (248397 264 449 1,110 TOTALPMMDAM376 248 349 973 2,372 881 934 557 AMMDPMTOTAL1,334 669 371 294 1133 (30327 (124392 (47)414 (131599 716 1,282 2,597 4,839 1,877 1,697 1,265 1,917 AM 376 1,323 186 (14)1,885 1,783 MD 496 1,095 148 (9)1,739 1,978 PM 595 1,179 339 (27)2,113 5,678 TOTAL 1,467 3,597 673 (50) 5,737 3,519 1246 (368)1,946 327 TOTAL 3,642 1,296 411 (171) 736 149 PM 1,311 1,099 449 (84) 538 112 MD 1,181 N 1,124 386 (113) 672 66 AM 1,150 588 343 580 1,511 2,690 1,016 848 826 139 (45)73 (46)115 (46)327 (137222 136 255 613 TOTALPMMDAMAM 7:45 AM #REF!227 134 210 571 1,254 483 488 283 MIDDAY 11:00 AM #REF!AMMDPMTOTAL721 378 189 154 PM 4:30 PM #REF!630 (156195 (66)195 (22)240 (68)320 380 718 1,418 2,605 1,056 872 677 1,139 AM 218 728 100 (7)1,046 867 MD 263 619 80 (3)962 1,141 PM 349 714 191 (19)1,254 3,147 Total 830 2,061 371 (29) 3,262 Broad Broad Broad Tank FarmTank FarmPEAK HOUR AimTD LLC TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Tank FarmTank FarmSC0843 ALL HOURS Broad San Luis Obispo DATE:LOCATION:PROJECT #:SC0843 Tue, Mar 15, 16 NORTH & SOUTH:LOCATION #:14 EAST & WEST:CONTROL:SIGNAL NOTES:AM ▲ PM N MD ◄ W E ► OTHER S OTHER ▼ NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:2 1.5 0.5 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 7:30 AM 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 10 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 8 8:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 8:30 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 4 8:45 AM 1 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 8 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 9:15 AM 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 VOLUMES 1 5 0 1 18 1 1 1 0 8 8 1 45 APPROACH %17%83%0%5%90%5%50%50%0%47%47%6% APP/DEPART 6 /7 20 /26 2 /2 17 /10 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 0 3 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 3 7 1 24 APPROACH %0%100%0%0%100%0%100%0%0%27%64%9% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.375 0.450 0.250 0.550 0.600 APP/DEPART 3 /5 9 /12 1 /0 11 /7 0 11:00 AM 0 1 0 4 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 10 11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 2 1 10 11:30 AM 3 2 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 12 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 6 12:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 12:30 PM 0 5 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 10 12:45 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 6 2 0 0 11 VOLUMES 4 9 1 4 14 0 4 12 7 5 5 1 66 APPROACH %29%64%7%22%78%0%17%52%30%45%45%9% APP/DEPART 14 /14 18 /26 23 /17 11 /9 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 3 3 1 4 9 0 3 9 0 2 3 1 38 APPROACH %43%43%14%31%69%0%25%75%0%33%50%17% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.292 0.542 0.750 0.500 0.792 APP/DEPART 7 /7 13 /11 12 /14 6 /6 0 04:15 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 4 4:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 4 1 0 0 0 9 4:45 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 5:00 PM 0 1 2 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 9 5:15 PM 0 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 9 5:30 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 5:45 PM 0 7 0 0 3 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 15 6:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 VOLUMES 1 15 3 1 8 2 11 11 1 1 2 0 56 APPROACH %5%79%16%9%73%18%48%48%4%33%67%0% APP/DEPART 19 /26 11 /10 23 /15 3 /5 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 0 11 3 1 5 1 8 4 0 0 2 0 35 APPROACH %0%79%21%14%71%14%67%33%0%0%100%0% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.500 0.438 0.500 0.500 0.583 APP/DEPART 14 /19 7 /5 12 /8 2 /3 0 Broad NORTH SIDE Tank Farm WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Tank Farm SOUTH SIDE Broad INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 pacific@aimtd.com San Luis Obispo Broad Tank Farm Broad Tank Farm Tank FarmBroad AM7:30 AM MD11:00 AM PM5:00 PM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL7:30 AM0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 7:45 AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 8:00 AM0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 2 0 9 8:15 AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 8:30 AM0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 6 8:45 AM0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 9 9:00 AM0 3 1 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 1 3 14 9:15 AM0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 4 TOTAL 0 5 6 0 4 1 0 6 17 0 6 4 49 11:00 AM0 5 2 0 0 2 0 12 3 2 2 3 31 11:15 AM0 10 3 0 4 1 0 3 10 0 2 9 42 11:30 AM0 1 9 0 2 9 0 10 6 0 12 1 50 11:45 AM0 1 5 0 0 2 1 7 7 0 4 0 27 12:00 PM0 2 5 0 2 0 0 2 7 0 4 2 24 12:15 PM0 0 2 0 4 3 0 5 6 0 4 0 24 12:30 PM0 0 4 0 1 1 0 5 1 0 4 0 16 12:45 PM0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 7 TOTAL 0 19 32 0 13 20 1 44 41 2 34 15 221 4:15 PM0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 1 7 4:30 PM0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 6 4:45 PM0 0 0 0 2 3 0 2 3 0 0 0 10 5:00 PM0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 4 5:15 PM0 0 0 0 1 4 0 5 0 0 0 1 11 5:30 PM0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 3 0 0 0 9 5:45 PM0 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 6 6:00 PM1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 TOTAL 1 1 0 0 4 15 3 22 8 0 0 4 58 12 3412 5N11 610 9 8 7MDPMPEDESTRIAN CROSSINGSAM Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Central Coast Transportation Consulting 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 895 Napa Avenue, Suite A-6 www.metrotrafficdata.com Morro Bay, CA 93442 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 5130020121208280400000 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 720107010413460100000 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 825406013420770000000 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 532007015638970100000 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 2327007020830870000000 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 243010801814010110400000 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 26266011013441280400000 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 1419107015542670500000 TOTAL 112 1933 0 55 0 1193 244 54 81 0 19 00000 Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 31800302584051601100000 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 21890302402412901300000 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 51710302662311340700000 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 41730402421352201400000 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 52340402651022401500000 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 2210010269313230700000 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 2190040226145190900000 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 11230001861601301000000 TOTAL 24 1470 0 22 0 1952 171 32 180 0 86 00000 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:45 AM - 8:45 AM 78 1157 0 33 0 679 149 29 33 0900000 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 16 788 0 12 0 1042 77 21 103 0 43 00000 PHF Trucks PHF AM 0.938 2.9% PM 77 1042 0 0.933 PM 0.935 1.6% AM 149 679 0 0.87 PHF 0.89 0.7 AM PM 103 33 0 0 00 00 43 9 0 0 PM AM PHF ##### ##### PHF 0.95 78 1157 0 AM 0.841 16 788 0 PM Southbound Southbound Eastbound Northbound Westbound Eastbound WestboundNorthbound Page 1 of 3Broad Street Broad Street Aerovista Lane Northbound Westbound Turning Movement Report Southbound Broad St @ Aerovista Ln San Luis Obispo Thursday, October 5, 2017 Clear Eastbound 35.243115° -120.639959° Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Central Coast Transportation Consulting 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 895 Napa Avenue, Suite A-6 www.metrotrafficdata.com Morro Bay, CA 93442 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000000000000000 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000011000000000 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0100000000010000 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000011000000000 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0100001000000000 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000011000030000 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000040000000000 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0000021000000000 TOTAL 0200095000040000 Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0000000000000000 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0000000000000000 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0100000000000000 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0200000000000000 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0000001000000000 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0300010000000000 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0100000000020000 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0200000000000000 TOTAL 0900011000020000 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:45 AM - 8:45 AM 0100063000030000 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0600011000000000 Bikes Peds Peds <> AM Peak Total 10 3 PM1100 PM Peak Total 8 0 AM 3600 Peds <>00 AM PM 00 00 00 00 00 00 PM AM Peds <>30 Peds <>0010AM 0060PM Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Broad Street Aerovista Lane 0 Broad Street Page 2 of 3 Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Turning Movement Report Broad St @ Aerovista Ln 35.243115° San Luis Obispo -120.639959° Thursday, October 5, 2017 Clear 3,066 148 (0) 2,856 62 TOTAL 3,590 1,906 83 (0) 1,806 17 PM 1,440 0 0 (0) 0 0 MD 0 N 1,160 65 (0) 1,050 45 AM 2,150 59 0 65 124 216 107 0 109 39 (12)0 (0)47 (29)86 (41)0 0 0 0 TOTALPMMDAM20 0 18 38 221 171 0 50 AMMDPMTOTAL4 2 0 2 61 (30)48 (21)0 (0)13 (9)75 0 25 100 286 221 0 65 1,083 AM 44 2,061 28 (0)2,133 0 MD 000 (0)0 1,872 PM 23 1,223 6 (0)1,252 2,955 TOTAL 67 3,284 34 (0) 3,385 1,705 61 (0) 1,613 31 TOTAL 2,016 1,090 37 (0) 1,039 14 PM 773 0 0 (0) 0 0 MD 0 N 615 24 (0) 574 17 AM 1,243 19 0 46 65 92 49 0 43 11 (6)0 (0)33 (21)44 (27)0 0 0 0 TOTALPMMDAMAM 7:30 AM #REF!8 0 13 21 128 105 0 23 MIDDAY 11:00 AM #REF!AMMDPMTOTAL3 1 0 2 PM 4:30 PM #REF!36 (18)31 (13)0 (0)5 (5)36 0 19 55 167 137 0 30 587 AM 19 1,209 17 (0)1,245 0 MD 000 (0)0 1,083 PM 11 636 4 (0)651 1,670 Total 30 1,845 21 (0) 1,896 AimTD LLC TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS AeroAeroSC0843 ALL HOURS Broad San Luis Obispo Broad Broad Broad AeroAeroPEAK HOUR DATE:LOCATION:PROJECT #:SC0843 Tue, Mar 15, 16 NORTH & SOUTH:LOCATION #:15 EAST & WEST:CONTROL:SIGNAL NOTES:AM ▲ PM N MD ◄ W E ► OTHER S OTHER ▼ NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:1 2 0 1 2 0 0.5 0.5 1 0 1 0 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 8:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 0 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 9:00 AM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 VOLUMES 0 5 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 APPROACH %0%100%0%0%100%0%0%0%0%0%0%0% APP/DEPART 5 /5 12 /12 0 /0 0 /0 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 APPROACH %0%100%0%0%100%0%0%0%0%0%0%0% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.500 0.300 0.000 0.000 0.357 APP/DEPART 4 /4 6 /6 0 /0 0 /0 0 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VOLUMES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH %0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0% APP/DEPART 0 /0 0 /0 0 /0 0 /0 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH %0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 APP/DEPART 0 /0 0 /0 0 /0 0 /0 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5:00 PM 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5:15 PM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5:30 PM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5:45 PM 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6:00 PM 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 VOLUMES 0 13 0 0 11 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 26 APPROACH %0%100%0%0%92%8%0%0%100%0%0%0% APP/DEPART 13 /13 12 /12 1 /0 0 /1 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 0 8 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 APPROACH %0%100%0%0%80%20%0%0%0%0%0%0% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.500 0.417 0.000 0.000 0.650 APP/DEPART 8 /8 5 /4 0 /0 0 /1 0 Broad NORTH SIDE Aero WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Aero SOUTH SIDE BroadAM8:00 AM MD11:00 AM PM4:15 PM INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 pacific@aimtd.com San Luis Obispo Broad Aero Broad Aero AeroBroad 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL7:15 AM0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7:30 AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8:30 AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:00 AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 11:00 AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 PM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 PM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 PM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 PM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4:30 PM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 5:45 PM0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 6:00 PM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 12 3412 5N11 610 9 8 7MDPMPEDESTRIAN CROSSINGSAM Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Central Coast Transportation Consulting 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 895 Napa Avenue, Suite A-6 www.metrotrafficdata.com Morro Bay, CA 93442 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000200001040209202 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 00001000013503013403 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 000010000183012013705 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 000010101202012026809 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 000030301237013020306 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 00001000019907021119 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 00000000021606016436 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 00000000122507017214 TOTAL 0000904031501 0 62 0 1381 5 44 Time Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 000000101240010023702 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 00000000124107026523 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 00001000123609027612 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 00003000022403027316 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 00000000130201031623 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 00001000027004028301 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 00000010021603021902 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 00000000017201018901 TOTAL 0000502041901 0 38 0 2058 6 20 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks Left Thru Right Trucks 7:45 AM - 8:45 AM 0000504028540380846430 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0000500021032 0 17 0 1148 4 12 PHF Trucks PHF AM 0.906 4.0% PM 0 0 5 0.417 PM 0.882 1.3% AM 4050.375 PHF 0.853 0.899 AM PM 22 44 1032 854 846 1148 00 00 PM AM PHF 0.793 0.906 PHF ##### 0 0 0 AM ##### 0 0 0 PM Southbound Southbound Eastbound Northbound Westbound Eastbound WestboundNorthbound Page 1 of 3 Mobile Home Park Tank Farm RdTank Farm Rd Northbound Westbound Turning Movement Report Southbound Tank Farm Rd @ Mobile Home Park Driveway San Luis Obispo Thursday, October 5, 2017 Clear Eastbound 35.246968° -120.646609° Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Central Coast Transportation Consulting 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 895 Napa Avenue, Suite A-6 www.metrotrafficdata.com Morro Bay, CA 93442 LOCATION LATITUDE COUNTY LONGITUDE COLLECTION DATE WEATHER Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0000000002000100 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0000000002000200 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0000000002000200 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0000001001010200 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0000000002000200 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0000000000000000 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0000000001000200 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0000000101000101 TOTAL 000000110110101201 Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0000000001000000 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0000000002000100 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0000000001000100 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0000000000000000 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0000000001000300 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0000000003000100 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0000000003000100 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0000000001000300 TOTAL 000000000120001000 PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:45 AM - 8:45 AM 0000001004010600 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0000000005000500 Bikes Peds Peds <> AM Peak Total 11 1 PM0000 PM Peak Total 10 0 AM 1000 Peds <>00 AM PM 00 00 54 65 00 00 PM AM Peds <>10 Peds <>0000AM 0000PM Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Mobile Home Park Tank Farm Rd Tank Farm Rd 0 Page 2 of 3 Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Westbound Bikes W.Leg Peds Northbound Bikes N.Leg Peds Southbound Bikes S.Leg Peds Eastbound Bikes E.Leg Peds Turning Movement Report Tank Farm Rd @ Mobile Home Park Driveway 35.246968° San Luis Obispo -120.646609° Thursday, October 5, 2017 Clear Appendix B: Intersection LOS Calculation Sheets Existing 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 1Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 34 26 136 137 299 17 338 541 312 286v/c Ratio 0.20 0.08 0.41 0.40 0.53 0.15 0.56 0.58 0.68 0.18Control Delay 38.6 0.5 31.3 30.8 7.5 42.2 33.3 3.5 37.6 15.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 38.6 0.5 31.3 30.8 7.5 42.2 33.3 3.5 37.6 15.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 16 0 61 62 0 8 81 0 141 39Queue Length 95th (ft) 47 0 125 125 63 31 135 30 #324 91Internal Link Dist (ft) 109 1057 1054 1668Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 140 100 165Base Capacity (vph) 647 685 490 510 693 117 1166 1043 461 1839Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.05 0.04 0.28 0.27 0.43 0.15 0.29 0.52 0.68 0.16Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 19 13 25 253 7 284 16 321 514 296 264 8Future Volume (veh/h) 19 13 25 253 7 284 16 321 514 296 264 8Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 20 14 26 271 0 0 17 338 541 312 278 8Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 62 43 87 434 0 28 1123 681 359 1768 51Arrive On Green 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.32 0.32 0.20 0.50 0.50Sat Flow, veh/h 1069 748 1512 3563 0 1585 1781 3554 1545 1781 3524 101Grp Volume(v), veh/h 34 0 26 271 0 0 17 338 541 312 140 146Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1817 0 1512 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1545 1781 1777 1848Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 0.0 1.3 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.7 5.5 23.0 12.9 3.2 3.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 0.0 1.3 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.7 5.5 23.0 12.9 3.2 3.3Prop In Lane 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 105 0 87 434 0 28 1123 681 359 891 927V/C Ratio(X) 0.32 0.00 0.30 0.62 0.00 0.60 0.30 0.79 0.87 0.16 0.16Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 646 0 537 1032 0 117 1123 681 446 891 927HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 34.4 0.0 34.3 31.7 0.0 0.0 37.1 19.6 18.5 29.3 10.2 10.2Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.8 0.0 1.9 1.5 0.0 0.0 18.8 0.1 6.4 14.2 0.1 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 0.0 0.5 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.4 2.1 10.3 6.4 1.1 1.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 36.1 0.0 36.2 33.2 0.0 0.0 55.9 19.8 24.9 43.5 10.3 10.3LnGrp LOS D A D C A E B C D B BApproach Vol, veh/h 60 271 A 896 598Approach Delay, s/veh 36.2 33.2 23.6 27.6Approach LOS DCCCTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.3 30.0 10.4 6.2 44.1 15.3Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 24.0 27.0 5.0 38.0 22.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.9 25.0 3.4 2.7 5.3 7.5Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.6 0.9Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.7HCM 6th LOS CNotesUser approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 3Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 50.7 58.5 67.8 54.5Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3465Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 25 45 45 45Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 57.5 57.5 57.5 57.5Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 1.98 2.68 2.83 2.69Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B C C C7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 4Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 60 572 896 598Effct. Green for Bike (s) 7.3 15.4 13.1 34.8Cross Street Width (ft) 67.8 54.5 58.5 50.7Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 10.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 127 268 228 605Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 50.4 43.1 45.1 28.0Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor FairBicycle LOS Score 3.12 3.55 3.41 3.04Bicycle LOS CDCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 5IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.9Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 41 852 49 117 613 18 3 1 60 3 1 17Future Vol, veh/h 41 852 49 117 613 18 3 1 60 3 1 17Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000000000Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length 225 - - 160----25--25Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91Heavy Vehicles, % 222222222222Mvmt Flow 45 936 54 129 674 20 3 1 66 3 1 19Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 694 0 0 990 0 0 1649 2005 495 1501 2022 347 Stage 1 ------1053 1053 - 942 942 - Stage 2 ------596952-5591080 -Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------6.545.54-6.545.54-Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------6.545.54-6.545.54-Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 897 - - 694 - - 65 59 520 84 57 649 Stage 1 ------242301-283340- Stage 2 ------457336-481293-Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 897 - - 694 - - 51 46 520 59 44 649Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------5146-5944- Stage 1 ------230286-269277- Stage 2 ------360274-397278-Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 0.4 1.8 17.3 23.4HCM LOS C CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1SBLn2Capacity (veh/h) 50 520 897 - - 694 - - 54 649HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.088 0.127 0.05 - - 0.185 - - 0.081 0.029HCM Control Delay (s) 83.8 12.9 9.2 - - 11.4 - - 77.5 10.7HCM Lane LOS F B A - - B - - F BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.4 0.2 - - 0.7 - - 0.3 0.17DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 6ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 17896.6Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 66Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1465Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 21.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.89Delay for adq Gap 17899.01Avg Ped Delay (s) 17896.56ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 25375.5Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 69Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1465Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.71Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.90Delay for adq Gap 25377.95Avg Ped Delay (s) 25375.49 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 7IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.3Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 808 36 100 745 11 46Future Vol, veh/h 808 36 100 745 11 46Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - 110 - 0 25Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 898 40 111 828 12 51Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 938 0 1968 918 Stage 1 - - - - 918 - Stage 2 - - - - 1050 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 730 - 69 329 Stage 1 - - - - 389 - Stage 2 - - - - 337 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 730 - 59 329Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 148 - Stage 1 - - - - 330 - Stage 2 - - - - 337 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Control Delay, s 0 1.3 20.5HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 148 329 - - 730 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.083 0.155 - - 0.152 -HCM Control Delay (s) 31.5 17.9 - - 10.8 -HCM Lane LOS D C - - B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.5 - - 0.5 -7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 8ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? YesApproach Delay(s) 18.7Level of Service CCrosswalkLength (ft) 12 16Lanes Crossed 1 1Veh Vol Crossed 808 745Ped Vol Crossed 0 0Yield Rate(%) 0 0Ped Platooning No NoCritical Headway (s) 6.43 7.57Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.76 0.79Prob of Blocked Lane 0.76 0.79Delay for adq Gap 10.44 13.59Avg Ped Delay (s) 7.97 10.75ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 8388.3Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 56Lanes Crossed 2Veh Vol Crossed 1553Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 19.00Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.98Delay for adq Gap 8390.64Avg Ped Delay (s) 8388.33 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 9Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBRLane Group Flow (vph) 943 41 969 18 3v/c Ratio 0.33 0.19 0.55 0.11 0.02Control Delay 4.1 22.6 3.3 22.9 17.0Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 4.1 22.6 3.3 22.9 17.0Queue Length 50th (ft)09040Queue Length 95th (ft) 134 36 245 21 6Internal Link Dist (ft) 357 533 330Turn Bay Length (ft) 210 120Base Capacity (vph) 2782 214 1739 171 156Starvation Cap Reductn00000Spillback Cap Reductn00000Storage Cap Reductn00000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.19 0.56 0.11 0.02Intersection Summary7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 10Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 763 67 36 853 16 3Future Volume (veh/h) 763 67 36 853 16 3Initial Q (Qb), veh000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 867 76 41 969 18 3Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222Cap, veh/h 1525 134 66 1232 37 33Arrive On Green 0.46 0.46 0.04 0.66 0.02 0.02Sat Flow, veh/h 3399 290 1781 1870 1781 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 466 477 41 969 18 3Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1818 1781 1870 1781 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 7.2 7.2 0.8 13.7 0.4 0.1Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.2 7.2 0.8 13.7 0.4 0.1Prop In Lane 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 820 839 66 1232 37 33V/C Ratio(X) 0.57 0.57 0.62 0.79 0.48 0.09Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1328 1359 238 1947 190 169HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.4 7.4 17.8 4.5 18.1 18.0Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.6 9.1 1.1 9.3 1.2Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.9 1.9 0.5 1.7 0.2 0.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 8.0 8.0 26.9 5.7 27.5 19.1LnGrp LOS A A C A C BApproach Vol, veh/h 943 1010 21Approach Delay, s/veh 8.0 6.5 26.3Approach LOS A A CTimer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.8 7.4 23.3 30.7Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 5.0 28.0 39.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 2.8 9.2 15.7Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 6.3 8.9Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.4HCM 6th LOS A 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 11Approach EB WB NBCrosswalk Length (ft) 59.2 60.1 36.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed 3 4 3Number of Right-Turn Islands 0 0 0Type of Control None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase 8 2 4Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service - - -Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code - - -Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 27.5 27.5 27.5Pedestrian Compliance Code Fair Fair FairPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.56 2.58 1.98Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS C C B7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 12Approach EB WB NBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0 0 0Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 943 1010 21Effct. Green for Bike (s) 35.1 39.9 4.1Cross Street Width (ft) 36.2 59.2 60.1Through Lanes Number 2 1 1Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No NoOn Street Parking? No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 1276 1451 149Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 3.6 2.1 23.6Bicycle Compliance Good Good FairBicycle LOS Score 2.89 4.13 2.51Bicycle LOS C D C 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 13IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 7 54 912 40 125 1157Future Vol, veh/h 7 54 912 40 125 1157Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 12 12 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 100 - - 200 -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 7 57 960 42 132 1218Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1866 513 0 0 1014 0 Stage 1 993----- Stage 2 873-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 64 506 - - 680 - Stage 1 319----- Stage 2 369-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 51 500 - - 672 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 171----- Stage 1 254----- Stage 2 369-----Approach WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 14.7 0 1.1HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h) - - 171 500 672 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.043 0.114 0.196 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 27 13.1 11.7 -HCM Lane LOS - - D B B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0.4 0.7 -7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 14ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 689713.8Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2069Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.96Delay for adq Gap 689715.56Avg Ped Delay (s) 689713.81ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 689713.8Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2069Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.96Delay for adq Gap 689715.56Avg Ped Delay (s) 689713.81 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 15Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 8 10 84 40 49 976 174 67 1118 31v/c Ratio 0.05 0.04 0.37 0.14 0.33 0.46 0.18 0.38 0.52 0.03Control Delay 37.5 0.3 37.5 1.0 42.6 13.6 6.4 42.3 13.8 0.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 37.5 0.3 37.5 1.0 42.6 13.6 6.4 42.3 13.8 0.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 0 32 0 19 129 14 26 151 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 18 0 88 0 63 267 60 79 312 0Internal Link Dist (ft) 288 473 1028 1931Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 180 150 170 150 430Base Capacity (vph) 907 835 817 784 152 2267 1014 177 2305 1036Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.05 0.32 0.43 0.17 0.38 0.49 0.03Intersection Summary7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 16Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 5 3 9 72 7 38 46 917 164 63 1051 29Future Volume (veh/h) 5 3 9 72 7 38 46 917 164 63 1051 29Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 5 3 10 77 7 40 49 976 174 67 1118 31Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 20 12 27 130 12 126 69 1618 700 85 1649 717Arrive On Green 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.04 0.46 0.46 0.05 0.46 0.46Sat Flow, veh/h 1134 680 1547 1639 149 1585 1781 3554 1537 1781 3554 1546Grp Volume(v), veh/h 8 0 10 84 0 40 49 976 174 67 1118 31Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1814 0 1547 1788 0 1585 1781 1777 1537 1781 1777 1546Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 0.0 0.3 2.4 0.0 1.3 1.5 11.1 3.7 2.0 13.2 0.6Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.2 0.0 0.3 2.4 0.0 1.3 1.5 11.1 3.7 2.0 13.2 0.6Prop In Lane 0.62 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 32 0 27 142 0 126 69 1618 700 85 1649 717V/C Ratio(X) 0.25 0.00 0.37 0.59 0.00 0.32 0.71 0.60 0.25 0.79 0.68 0.04Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1182 0 1008 1066 0 944 199 2746 1187 232 2812 1223HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.0 0.0 26.1 23.9 0.0 23.3 25.5 11.0 9.0 25.3 11.2 7.9Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.1 0.0 8.1 3.9 0.0 1.4 12.7 0.4 0.2 15.1 0.5 0.0Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.1 0.0 0.5 0.8 3.6 1.1 1.1 4.3 0.2Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.1 0.0 34.2 27.8 0.0 24.8 38.3 11.4 9.2 40.4 11.7 7.9LnGrp LOS C A C C A C D B A D B AApproach Vol, veh/h 18 124 1199 1216Approach Delay, s/veh 32.4 26.8 12.1 13.2Approach LOS C C B BTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.6 30.9 5.9 7.1 31.4 9.3Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.0 41.5 35.0 6.0 42.5 32.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.0 13.1 2.3 3.5 15.2 4.4Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 7.2 0.0 0.0 9.7 0.6Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.5HCM 6th LOS B 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 17Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 36.0 36.1 61.3 62.1Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3366Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 68.5 68.5 68.5 68.5Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.00 2.09 2.87 2.84Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 18Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 18 124 1199 1216Effct. Green for Bike (s) 6.1 9.2 43.0 43.8Cross Street Width (ft) 73.1 73.9 37.5 37.7Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 89 134 628 639Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 62.5 59.6 32.2 31.7Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 2.71 2.89 3.12 3.14Bicycle LOS CCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 19Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 304 166 258 244 239 149 234 891 71 723 415v/c Ratio 0.61 0.32 0.61 0.72 0.67 0.35 0.57 0.71 0.47 0.69 0.56Control Delay 44.0 37.7 14.1 50.1 45.0 8.2 46.2 30.7 54.7 33.8 6.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 44.0 37.7 14.1 50.1 45.0 8.2 46.2 30.7 54.7 33.8 6.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 90 48 15 138 137 0 69 240 42 195 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 145 81 89 #265 223 50 120 369 95 305 75Internal Link Dist (ft) 533 770 1992 1028Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 300 150 125 250 250 300Base Capacity (vph) 652 1385 739 405 801 757 479 1323 168 1190 792Starvation Cap Reductn00000000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.47 0.12 0.35 0.60 0.30 0.20 0.49 0.67 0.42 0.61 0.52Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 20Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 283 154 240 227 222 139 218 728 100 66 672 386Future Volume (veh/h) 283 154 240 227 222 139 218 728 100 66 672 386Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 304 166 258 244 239 149 234 783 108 71 723 415Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 387 896 385 279 556 456 306 1021 141 92 1029 438Arrive On Green 0.11 0.25 0.25 0.16 0.30 0.30 0.09 0.33 0.33 0.05 0.29 0.29Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1527 1781 1870 1535 3456 3124 431 1781 3554 1514Grp Volume(v), veh/h 304 166 258 244 239 149 234 445 446 71 723 415Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1527 1781 1870 1535 1728 1777 1778 1781 1777 1514Q Serve(g_s), s 8.9 3.8 15.7 13.8 10.6 7.8 6.8 23.3 23.3 4.1 18.8 27.7Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.9 3.8 15.7 13.8 10.6 7.8 6.8 23.3 23.3 4.1 18.8 27.7Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.24 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 387 896 385 279 556 456 306 581 581 92 1029 438V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.19 0.67 0.87 0.43 0.33 0.76 0.77 0.77 0.78 0.70 0.95Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 568 1203 517 353 696 572 418 584 585 146 1031 439HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.7 30.3 34.8 42.6 29.3 28.3 46.1 31.3 31.3 48.5 32.7 35.9Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.4 0.1 2.0 17.5 0.5 0.4 5.6 6.0 6.0 13.0 2.2 29.7Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.0 1.6 6.0 7.4 4.8 2.9 3.2 10.7 10.8 2.1 8.3 13.6Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 49.1 30.4 36.8 60.1 29.8 28.7 51.6 37.3 37.3 61.5 34.9 65.6LnGrp LOS DCDECCDDDECEApproach Vol, veh/h 728 632 1125 1209Approach Delay, s/veh 40.5 41.3 40.3 47.0Approach LOS DDDDTimer - Assigned Phs12345678Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.8 39.3 21.7 31.6 14.7 35.4 17.1 36.2Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.5 34.0 20.5 35.0 12.5 30.0 17.0 38.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.1 25.3 15.8 17.7 8.8 29.7 10.9 12.6Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.8 0.4 2.1 0.3 0.2 0.7 2.2Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 42.7HCM 6th LOS D 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 21Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 73.8 71.3 72.3 84.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed6566Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.74 2.51 2.86 2.87Pedestrian Crosswalk LOSCCCC7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 22Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 728 632 1125 1209Effct. Green for Bike (s) 13.6 17.7 33.2 27.0Cross Street Width (ft) 72.3 84.2 71.3 73.8Through Lanes Number2122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 227 295 553 450Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 47.2 43.6 31.4 36.0Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.27 3.89 3.58 3.69Bicycle LOS CDDD 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 23IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.8Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 33 9 78 1157 679 149Future Vol, veh/h 33 9 78 1157 679 149Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 75 200 - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 35 10 83 1231 722 159Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1584 441 881 0 - 0 Stage 1 802----- Stage 2 782-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 99 564 763 - - - Stage 1 402----- Stage 2 411-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 88 564 763 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 244----- Stage 1 358----- Stage 2 411-----Approach EB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 19.9 0.7 0HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 763 - 244 564 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.109 - 0.144 0.017 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 10.3 - 22.2 11.5 - -HCM Lane LOS B - C B - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 0.5 0.1 - -7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 24ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 157321.6Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 67Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1836Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.14Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.94Delay for adq Gap 157323.58Avg Ped Delay (s) 157321.63ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 1045976.3Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 80Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1836Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 25.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.96Delay for adq Gap 1045978.25Avg Ped Delay (s) 1045976.31 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 25Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 27 5 9 12 21 1348 19 657v/c Ratio 0.11 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.12 0.46 0.14 0.23Control Delay 26.2 0.2 25.9 0.3 29.4 4.7 30.9 3.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 26.2 0.2 25.9 0.3 29.4 4.7 30.9 3.4Queue Length 50th (ft)60205050Queue Length 95th (ft) 32 0 16 0 29 254 28 101Internal Link Dist (ft) 310 100 537 936Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 75 200 200Base Capacity (vph) 1073 954 1073 954 175 2847 140 2794Starvation Cap Reductn00000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.47 0.14 0.24Intersection Summary7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 26Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 23258011191209171757424Future Volume (veh/h) 23258011191209171757424Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 25259012211329191963126Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 156 0 69 162 0 69 37 2028 29 34 1959 81Arrive On Green 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.57 0.57 0.02 0.56 0.56Sat Flow, veh/h 0 0 1585 0 0 1585 1781 3585 51 1781 3475 143Grp Volume(v), veh/h 270590122165869019322335Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 0 1585 0 0 1585 1781 1777 1860 1781 1777 1841Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.5 11.3 11.4 0.5 4.3 4.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 0.0 0.1 1.9 0.0 0.3 0.5 11.3 11.4 0.5 4.3 4.3Prop In Lane 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.08Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 156 0 69 162 0 69 37 1005 1052 34 1002 1038V/C Ratio(X) 0.17 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.00 0.17 0.57 0.66 0.66 0.57 0.32 0.32Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1028 0 1036 1022 0 1036 201 1622 1698 161 1582 1639HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.2 0.0 20.4 22.2 0.0 20.4 21.5 6.6 6.7 21.6 5.2 5.2Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 1.2 13.3 0.7 0.7 14.1 0.2 0.2Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 2.8 2.9 0.3 1.0 1.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.7 0.0 20.8 22.3 0.0 21.6 34.9 7.4 7.4 35.7 5.3 5.3LnGrp LOS C A C C A C C A A D A AApproach Vol, veh/h 32 21 1369 676Approach Delay, s/veh 22.4 21.9 7.8 6.2Approach LOS C C A ATimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.8 31.6 6.9 5.9 31.5 6.9Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 40.5 29.0 5.0 39.5 29.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.5 13.4 3.9 2.5 6.3 3.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 11.7 0.1 0.0 4.7 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.6HCM 6th LOS A 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 27Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 34.0 34.2 57.2 59.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3355Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 1.98 1.97 2.70 2.71Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 28Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 32 21 1369 676Effct. Green for Bike (s) 6.9 6.7 44.5 44.3Cross Street Width (ft) 57.2 59.2 34.2 34.0Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 153 149 989 984Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 38.4 38.5 11.5 11.6Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Fair FairBicycle LOS Score 2.70 2.71 3.43 2.85Bicycle LOS CCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 1Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 26 19 273 275 565 22 708 393 400 710v/c Ratio 0.21 0.07 0.75 0.73 0.71 0.22 0.79 0.44 1.01 0.41Control Delay 47.4 0.5 50.3 48.1 8.7 50.4 41.1 4.7 85.7 17.5Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 47.4 0.5 50.3 48.1 8.7 50.4 41.1 4.7 85.7 17.5Queue Length 50th (ft) 16 0 173 173 0 14 225 28 ~282 133Queue Length 95th (ft) 43 0 #311 #305 93 40 #317 61 #471 231Internal Link Dist (ft) 109 1057 1054 1668Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 140 100 165Base Capacity (vph) 483 564 365 380 796 105 905 903 398 1735Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.05 0.03 0.75 0.72 0.71 0.21 0.78 0.44 1.01 0.41Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 13 10 17 476 12 503 20 630 350 356 594 38Future Volume (veh/h) 13 10 17 476 12 503 20 630 350 356 594 38Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 15 11 19 544 0 0 22 708 393 400 667 43Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 52 38 75 673 0 34 895 687 432 1607 104Arrive On Green 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.48 0.48Sat Flow, veh/h 1049 769 1503 3563 0 1585 1781 3554 1540 1781 3382 218Grp Volume(v), veh/h 26 0 19 544 0 0 22 708 393 400 350 360Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1818 0 1503 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1540 1781 1777 1823Q Serve(g_s), s 1.2 0.0 1.1 13.1 0.0 0.0 1.1 16.7 17.2 19.7 11.6 11.6Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.2 0.0 1.1 13.1 0.0 0.0 1.1 16.7 17.2 19.7 11.6 11.6Prop In Lane 0.58 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.12Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 91 0 75 673 0 34 895 687 432 844 866V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.00 0.25 0.81 0.00 0.66 0.79 0.57 0.93 0.41 0.42Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 546 0 452 872 0 119 989 728 436 844 866HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.1 0.0 41.1 34.9 0.0 0.0 43.8 31.4 18.9 33.3 15.4 15.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.7 0.0 1.7 4.4 0.0 0.0 19.7 4.1 1.0 25.8 0.3 0.3Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 0.0 0.4 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.6 7.2 8.2 11.0 4.2 4.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.9 0.0 42.8 39.3 0.0 0.0 63.5 35.5 19.8 59.1 15.7 15.7LnGrp LOS DADDA EDBEBBApproach Vol, veh/h 45 544 A 1123 1110Approach Delay, s/veh 42.8 39.3 30.6 31.4Approach LOS DDCCTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 27.8 28.6 10.5 7.7 48.7 23.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 25.0 27.0 6.0 41.0 22.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 21.7 19.2 3.2 3.1 13.6 15.1Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 3.0 0.2 0.0 4.3 1.4Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.7HCM 6th LOS CNotesUser approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 3Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 50.7 58.5 67.8 54.5Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3465Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 25 45 45 45Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.00 2.85 3.05 3.02Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B C C C7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 4Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 45 1113 1123 1110Effct. Green for Bike (s) 7.0 21.9 25.0 48.6Cross Street Width (ft) 67.8 54.5 58.5 50.7Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 10.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 117 365 417 810Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 53.2 40.1 37.6 21.2Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor FairBicycle LOS Score 3.10 4.44 3.60 3.47Bicycle LOS CDDC 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 5IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 3.8Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 55 717 28 106 1071 15 11 4 172 6 2 45Future Vol, veh/h 55 717 28 106 1071 15 11 4 172 6 2 45Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000000000Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length 225 - - 160----25--25Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95Heavy Vehicles, % 222222222222Mvmt Flow 58 755 29 112 1127 16 12 4 181 6 2 47Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 1143 0 0 784 0 0 1675 2253 392 1855 2259 572 Stage 1 ------886886-1359 1359 - Stage 2 ------7891367 - 496 900 -Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------6.545.54-6.545.54-Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------6.545.54-6.545.54-Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 607 - - 830 - - 62 41 607 46 41 463 Stage 1 ------306361-157215- Stage 2 ------350213-524355-Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 607 - - 830 - - 44 32 607 24 32 463Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------4432-2432- Stage 1 ------277326-142186- Stage 2 ------269184-328321-Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 0.8 0.9 23.9 41.7HCM LOS C EMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1SBLn2Capacity (veh/h) 40 607 607 - - 830 - - 26 463HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.395 0.298 0.095 - - 0.134 - - 0.324 0.102HCM Control Delay (s) 144.6 13.4 11.6 - - 10 - - 199.5 13.7HCM Lane LOS F B B - - B - - F BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4 1.2 0.3 - - 0.5 - - 1 0.37DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 6ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 104330.8Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 66Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1788Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 21.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.93Delay for adq Gap 104332.84Avg Ped Delay (s) 104330.83ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 29076.2Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 57Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1788Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 19.29Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.91Delay for adq Gap 29078.24Avg Ped Delay (s) 29076.23 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 7IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 3.7Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 881 30 79 1081 39 148Future Vol, veh/h 881 30 79 1081 39 148Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - 110 - 0 25Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 990 34 89 1215 44 166Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1024 0 2400 1007 Stage 1 - - - - 1007 - Stage 2 - - - - 1393 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 678 - ~ 37 292 Stage 1 - - - - 353 - Stage 2 - - - - 230 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 678 - ~ 32 292Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 100 - Stage 1 - - - - 307 - Stage 2 - - - - 230 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Control Delay, s 0 0.8 39.6HCM LOS EMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 100 292 - - 678 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.438 0.569 - - 0.131 -HCM Control Delay (s) 66.5 32.5 - - 11.1 -HCM Lane LOS F D - - B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.9 3.3 - - 0.4 -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 8ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? YesApproach Delay(s) 30.6Level of Service ECrosswalkLength (ft) 12 16Lanes Crossed 1 1Veh Vol Crossed 881 1081Ped Vol Crossed 0 0Yield Rate(%) 0 0Ped Platooning No NoCritical Headway (s) 6.43 7.57Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.79 0.90Prob of Blocked Lane 0.79 0.90Delay for adq Gap 11.59 23.91Avg Ped Delay (s) 9.19 21.45ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 57619.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 56Lanes Crossed 2Veh Vol Crossed 1962Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 19.00Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.99Delay for adq Gap 57620.88Avg Ped Delay (s) 57619.04 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 9Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBRLane Group Flow (vph) 1198 9 1224 174 60v/c Ratio 0.48 0.11 0.91 0.74 0.23Control Delay 7.0 44.2 21.1 57.2 12.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0Total Delay 7.0 44.2 24.7 57.2 12.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 118 5 447 97 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 224 20 #701 #183 33Internal Link Dist (ft) 357 533 330Turn Bay Length (ft) 210 120Base Capacity (vph) 2521 83 1454 251 276Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 153 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn00000Storage Cap Reductn00000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.48 0.11 0.94 0.69 0.22Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 10Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 1027 16 8 1065 151 52Future Volume (veh/h) 1027 16 8 1065 151 52Initial Q (Qb), veh000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1180 18 9 1224 174 60Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222Cap, veh/h 2278 35 16 1351 219 195Arrive On Green 0.64 0.64 0.01 0.72 0.12 0.12Sat Flow, veh/h 3676 55 1781 1870 1781 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 585 613 9 1224 174 60Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1861 1781 1870 1781 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 13.9 13.9 0.4 40.8 7.4 2.7Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.9 13.9 0.4 40.8 7.4 2.7Prop In Lane 0.03 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1130 1183 16 1351 219 195V/C Ratio(X) 0.52 0.52 0.56 0.91 0.79 0.31Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1283 1343 92 1592 276 245HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.7 7.7 38.3 8.6 33.1 31.0Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.4 26.5 7.0 11.9 0.9Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.4 4.6 0.3 13.6 3.8 1.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 8.0 8.0 64.8 15.7 45.0 31.9LnGrp LOS AAEBDCApproach Vol, veh/h 1198 1233 234Approach Delay, s/veh 8.0 16.0 41.6Approach LOS A B DTimer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.5 6.7 55.3 62.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.0 4.0 56.0 66.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.4 2.4 15.9 42.8Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.0 11.2 13.3Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.7HCM 6th LOS B 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 11Approach EB WB NBCrosswalk Length (ft) 59.2 60.1 36.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed 3 4 3Number of Right-Turn Islands 0 0 0Type of Control None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase 8 5 4Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service - - -Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code - - -Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 45.0 45.0 45.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.79 2.74 2.03Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS C C B7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 12Approach EB WB NBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0 0 0Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1198 1233 234Effct. Green for Bike (s) 59.9 61.8 11.3Cross Street Width (ft) 36.2 59.2 60.1Through Lanes Number 2 1 1Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No NoOn Street Parking? No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 1331 1373 251Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 5.0 4.4 34.4Bicycle Compliance Good Good PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.10 4.50 2.87Bicycle LOS C D C 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 13IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.7Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 25 130 1297 18 70 1195Future Vol, veh/h 25 130 1297 18 70 1195Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 12 12 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 100 - - 200 -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 27 140 1395 19 75 1285Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 2210 719 0 0 1426 0 Stage 1 1417----- Stage 2 793-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 37 371 - - 473 - Stage 1 190----- Stage 2 406-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 31 367 - - 468 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 136----- Stage 1 158----- Stage 2 406-----Approach WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 23.5 0 0.8HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h) - - 136 367 468 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.198 0.381 0.161 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 37.9 20.7 14.2 -HCM Lane LOS - - E C B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.7 1.7 0.6 -7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 14ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 7987607.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2492Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.98Delay for adq Gap 7987608.50Avg Ped Delay (s) 7987607.00ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 7987607.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2492Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.98Delay for adq Gap 7987608.50Avg Ped Delay (s) 7987607.00 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 15Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 58 52 203 134 41 1207 139 128 1127 43v/c Ratio 0.23 0.16 0.59 0.32 0.44 0.97 0.23 1.09 0.80 0.06Control Delay 33.6 1.0 38.4 8.1 59.1 49.2 10.4 153.6 32.0 0.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 33.6 1.0 38.4 8.1 59.1 49.2 10.4 153.6 32.0 0.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 25 0 87 0 19 281 9 ~67 248 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 67 0 204 48 #96 #828 74 #274 #746 0Internal Link Dist (ft) 288 473 1028 1931Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 180 150 170 150 430Base Capacity (vph) 833 789 752 748 93 1242 603 117 1401 674Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.07 0.27 0.18 0.44 0.97 0.23 1.09 0.80 0.06Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 16Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 40 15 49 188 5 127 39 1147 132 122 1071 41Future Volume (veh/h) 40 15 49 188 5 127 39 1147 132 122 1071 41Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 42 16 52 198 5 134 41 1207 139 128 1127 43Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 80 31 95 285 7 260 57 1352 583 132 1503 654Arrive On Green 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.03 0.38 0.38 0.07 0.42 0.42Sat Flow, veh/h 1307 498 1543 1739 44 1585 1781 3554 1533 1781 3554 1545Grp Volume(v), veh/h 58 0 52 203 0 134 41 1207 139 128 1127 43Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1805 0 1543 1783 0 1585 1781 1777 1533 1781 1777 1545Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 0.0 2.2 7.2 0.0 5.2 1.5 21.4 4.2 4.8 18.0 1.1Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.1 0.0 2.2 7.2 0.0 5.2 1.5 21.4 4.2 4.8 18.0 1.1Prop In Lane 0.72 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 111 0 95 293 0 260 57 1352 583 132 1503 654V/C Ratio(X) 0.52 0.00 0.55 0.69 0.00 0.52 0.72 0.89 0.24 0.97 0.75 0.07Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 939 0 803 849 0 754 106 1400 604 132 1503 654HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.6 0.0 30.7 26.5 0.0 25.7 32.3 19.5 14.2 31.0 16.4 11.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.8 0.0 4.9 2.9 0.0 1.6 15.9 7.5 0.2 67.7 2.1 0.0Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 0.0 0.9 3.2 0.0 2.0 0.9 9.3 1.4 4.5 7.0 0.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.4 0.0 35.5 29.5 0.0 27.2 48.2 27.0 14.4 98.7 18.5 11.6LnGrp LOS C A D C A C D C B F B BApproach Vol, veh/h 110 337 1387 1298Approach Delay, s/veh 34.9 28.6 26.4 26.2Approach LOS CCCCTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 32.1 9.1 7.1 34.9 16.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 26.5 35.0 4.0 27.5 32.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.8 23.4 4.2 3.5 20.0 9.2Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.2 0.5 0.0 4.5 1.8Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.9HCM 6th LOS C 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 17Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 36.0 36.1 61.3 62.1Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3366Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.03 2.16 2.92 2.91Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 18Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 110 337 1387 1298Effct. Green for Bike (s) 11.4 15.5 28.1 31.7Cross Street Width (ft) 73.1 73.9 37.5 37.7Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 190 258 468 528Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 49.1 45.5 35.2 32.5Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 2.86 3.25 3.28 3.21Bicycle LOS CCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 19Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 503 394 203 219 266 120 364 943 155 767 428v/c Ratio 0.79 0.51 0.41 0.77 0.73 0.31 0.76 0.85 0.78 0.74 0.49Control Delay 53.2 40.1 7.6 62.8 53.7 11.0 57.1 42.7 75.8 40.8 9.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 53.2 40.1 7.6 62.8 53.7 11.0 57.1 42.7 75.8 40.8 9.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 177 133 0 149 181 7 129 313 110 257 68Queue Length 95th (ft) #277 183 58 #273 271 55 #210 #471 #244 365 167Internal Link Dist (ft) 533 770 1992 1028Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 300 150 125 250 250 300Base Capacity (vph) 674 1192 650 331 610 584 514 1195 198 1093 885Starvation Cap Reductn00000000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.75 0.33 0.31 0.66 0.44 0.21 0.71 0.79 0.78 0.70 0.48Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 20Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 483 378 195 210 255 115 349 714 191 149 736 411Future Volume (veh/h) 483 378 195 210 255 115 349 714 191 149 736 411Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 503 394 203 219 266 120 364 744 199 155 767 428Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 583 923 397 253 436 356 436 850 227 184 1017 701Arrive On Green 0.17 0.26 0.26 0.14 0.23 0.23 0.13 0.31 0.31 0.10 0.29 0.29Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1528 1781 1870 1527 3456 2752 736 1781 3554 1513Grp Volume(v), veh/h 503 394 203 219 266 120 364 480 463 155 767 428Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1528 1781 1870 1527 1728 1777 1711 1781 1777 1513Q Serve(g_s), s 15.2 9.9 12.2 12.9 13.7 7.0 11.1 27.5 27.5 9.2 21.1 23.1Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.2 9.9 12.2 12.9 13.7 7.0 11.1 27.5 27.5 9.2 21.1 23.1Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.43 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 583 923 397 253 436 356 436 549 528 184 1017 701V/C Ratio(X) 0.86 0.43 0.51 0.87 0.61 0.34 0.84 0.88 0.88 0.84 0.75 0.61Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 675 1190 512 331 609 497 514 612 589 199 1091 732HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.5 33.1 34.0 45.1 36.9 34.3 45.9 35.2 35.2 47.3 34.9 22.3Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.0 0.3 1.0 16.8 1.4 0.6 10.0 12.5 12.9 25.1 2.8 1.4Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 7.3 4.3 4.6 6.9 6.4 2.7 5.3 13.6 13.1 5.3 9.4 8.3Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 53.5 33.4 35.0 61.9 38.3 34.9 55.9 47.7 48.1 72.4 37.7 23.7LnGrp LOS D C C E D C E D D E D CApproach Vol, veh/h 1100 605 1307 1350Approach Delay, s/veh 42.9 46.2 50.1 37.3Approach LOS DDDDTimer - Assigned Phs12345678Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.1 38.2 20.3 32.9 18.6 35.8 23.1 30.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.0 37.0 20.0 36.0 16.0 33.0 21.0 35.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.2 29.5 14.9 14.2 13.1 25.1 17.2 15.7Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.7 0.4 3.7 0.5 4.5 0.9 2.1Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 43.8HCM 6th LOS D 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 21Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 73.8 71.3 72.3 84.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed6566Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.83 2.59 2.88 2.92Pedestrian Crosswalk LOSCCCC7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 22Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1100 605 1307 1350Effct. Green for Bike (s) 23.7 21.1 34.6 31.6Cross Street Width (ft) 72.3 84.2 71.3 73.8Through Lanes Number2122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 379 338 554 506Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 41.0 43.2 32.7 34.9Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.57 3.85 3.73 3.80Bicycle LOS DDDD 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 23IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 2.1Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 103 43 16 788 1042 77Future Vol, veh/h 103 43 16 788 1042 77Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 75 200 - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 110 46 17 838 1109 82Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1603 596 1191 0 - 0 Stage 1 1150----- Stage 2 453-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 96 447 582 - - - Stage 1 264----- Stage 2 607-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 93 447 582 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 231----- Stage 1 256----- Stage 2 607-----Approach EB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 28 0.2 0HCM LOS DMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 582 - 231 447 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.029 - 0.474 0.102 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 11.4 - 33.9 14 - -HCM Lane LOS B - D B - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 2.3 0.3 - -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 24ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 152117.9Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 67Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1830Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.14Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.94Delay for adq Gap 152119.89Avg Ped Delay (s) 152117.92ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 1005140.6Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 80Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1830Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 25.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.96Delay for adq Gap 1005142.56Avg Ped Delay (s) 1005140.56 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 25Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 116 34 14 36 12 703 15 1183v/c Ratio 0.46 0.09 0.06 0.09 0.09 0.32 0.11 0.54Control Delay 26.4 0.4 19.1 0.5 27.9 7.6 28.3 9.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 26.4 0.4 19.1 0.5 27.9 7.6 28.3 9.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 300303494101Queue Length 95th (ft) 83 0 17 0 20 138 23 273Internal Link Dist (ft) 310 100 537 936Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 75 200 200Base Capacity (vph) 746 932 708 932 136 2126 136 2118Starvation Cap Reductn00000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.09 0.33 0.11 0.56Intersection Summary7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 26Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 105 1 31 13 0 33 11 636 4 14 1039 37Future Volume (veh/h) 105 1 31 13 0 33 11 636 4 14 1039 37Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 115 1 34 14 0 36 12 699 4 15 1142 41Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 108 1 614 108 0 614 21 1358 8 25 1320 47Arrive On Green 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.39 0.01 0.38 0.38 0.01 0.38 0.38Sat Flow, veh/h 27 1 1585 27 0 1585 1781 3622 21 1781 3496 125Grp Volume(v), veh/h 116 0 34 14 0 36 12 343 360 15 580 603Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 29 0 1585 27 0 1585 1781 1777 1866 1781 1777 1844Q Serve(g_s), s 0.6 0.0 1.0 0.6 0.0 1.1 0.5 11.0 11.0 0.6 22.3 22.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 28.6 0.0 1.0 28.6 0.0 1.1 0.5 11.0 11.0 0.6 22.3 22.3Prop In Lane 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.07Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 108 0 614 108 0 614 21 666 700 25 671 696V/C Ratio(X) 1.07 0.00 0.06 0.13 0.00 0.06 0.58 0.51 0.51 0.60 0.87 0.87Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 115 0 622 115 0 622 96 734 770 96 734 761HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.8 0.0 14.2 36.7 0.0 14.2 36.3 17.9 17.9 36.2 21.3 21.3Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 107.3 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 23.2 0.6 0.6 20.7 9.9 9.7Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.1 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.3 4.3 4.5 0.4 10.4 10.7Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 144.1 0.0 14.2 37.3 0.0 14.2 59.5 18.5 18.5 56.9 31.2 30.9LnGrp LOS FABDABEBBECCApproach Vol, veh/h 150 50 715 1198Approach Delay, s/veh 114.6 20.7 19.2 31.4Approach LOS F C B CTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.1 34.3 33.8 5.9 34.5 33.8Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 30.5 29.0 4.0 30.5 29.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 13.0 30.6 2.5 24.3 30.6Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.9HCM 6th LOS C 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 27Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 34.0 34.2 57.2 59.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3355Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.01 1.97 2.68 2.70Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 28Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 150 50 715 1198Effct. Green for Bike (s) 10.3 10.0 33.8 33.8Cross Street Width (ft) 57.2 59.2 34.2 34.0Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 258 250 845 845Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 30.4 30.6 13.3 13.3Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Fair FairBicycle LOS Score 2.90 2.76 2.89 3.28Bicycle LOS CCCC Existing Plus Project 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 1Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 34 26 141 143 303 17 338 544 313 286v/c Ratio 0.20 0.08 0.43 0.41 0.53 0.15 0.56 0.58 0.68 0.18Control Delay 38.7 0.5 31.5 31.0 7.4 42.2 33.4 3.5 37.9 15.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 38.7 0.5 31.5 31.0 7.4 42.2 33.4 3.5 37.9 15.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 16 0 64 64 0 8 81 0 142 40Queue Length 95th (ft) 47 0 129 129 63 31 135 30 #324 91Internal Link Dist (ft) 109 1057 1054 1668Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 140 100 165Base Capacity (vph) 645 684 488 509 694 117 1163 1044 460 1834Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.05 0.04 0.29 0.28 0.44 0.15 0.29 0.52 0.68 0.16Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 19 13 25 263 7 288 16 321 517 297 264 8Future Volume (veh/h) 19 13 25 263 7 288 16 321 517 297 264 8Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 20 14 26 282 0 0 17 338 544 313 278 8Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 62 43 87 445 0 28 1117 684 360 1763 51Arrive On Green 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.31 0.31 0.20 0.50 0.50Sat Flow, veh/h 1069 748 1512 3563 0 1585 1781 3554 1545 1781 3524 101Grp Volume(v), veh/h 34 0 26 282 0 0 17 338 544 313 140 146Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1817 0 1512 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1545 1781 1777 1848Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 0.0 1.3 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 5.5 23.3 13.0 3.3 3.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 0.0 1.3 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 5.5 23.3 13.0 3.3 3.3Prop In Lane 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 105 0 87 445 0 28 1117 684 360 889 925V/C Ratio(X) 0.33 0.00 0.30 0.63 0.00 0.60 0.30 0.80 0.87 0.16 0.16Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 642 0 535 1026 0 117 1117 684 443 889 925HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 34.6 0.0 34.5 31.7 0.0 0.0 37.3 19.8 18.5 29.5 10.3 10.3Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.8 0.0 1.9 1.5 0.0 0.0 18.8 0.2 6.5 14.5 0.1 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.7 0.0 0.5 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 2.1 10.5 6.5 1.1 1.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 36.3 0.0 36.4 33.2 0.0 0.0 56.2 20.0 25.0 44.0 10.4 10.4LnGrp LOS D A D C A E B C D B BApproach Vol, veh/h 60 282 A 899 599Approach Delay, s/veh 36.4 33.2 23.7 28.0Approach LOS DCCCTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.4 30.0 10.4 6.2 44.2 15.5Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 24.0 27.0 5.0 38.0 22.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 15.0 25.3 3.4 2.7 5.3 7.7Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.6 1.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 27.0HCM 6th LOS CNotesUser approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 3Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 50.7 58.5 67.8 54.5Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3465Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 25 45 45 45Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 57.5 57.5 57.5 57.5Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 1.98 2.68 2.83 2.69Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B C C C7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 4Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 60 587 899 599Effct. Green for Bike (s) 7.3 15.6 13.1 34.8Cross Street Width (ft) 67.8 54.5 58.5 50.7Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 10.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 127 271 228 605Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 50.4 43.0 45.1 28.0Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor FairBicycle LOS Score 3.12 3.58 3.41 3.04Bicycle LOS CDCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 5IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.9Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 41 856 49 118 627 19 3 1 60 3 1 17Future Vol, veh/h 41 856 49 118 627 19 3 1 60 3 1 17Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000000000Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length 225 - - 160----25--25Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91Heavy Vehicles, % 222222222222Mvmt Flow 45 941 54 130 689 21 3 1 66 3 1 19Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 710 0 0 995 0 0 1663 2028 498 1521 2045 355 Stage 1 ------1058 1058 - 960 960 - Stage 2 ------605970-5611085 -Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------6.545.54-6.545.54-Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------6.545.54-6.545.54-Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 885 - - 691 - - 64 57 518 81 55 641 Stage 1 ------240300-276333- Stage 2 ------451330-480291-Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 885 - - 691 - - 50 44 518 57 42 641Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------5044-5742- Stage 1 ------228285-262270- Stage 2 ------354268-396276-Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 0.4 1.8 17.7 24.1HCM LOS C CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1SBLn2Capacity (veh/h) 48 518 885 - - 691 - - 52 641HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.092 0.127 0.051 - - 0.188 - - 0.085 0.029HCM Control Delay (s) 87.4 13 9.3 - - 11.4 - - 80.5 10.8HCM Lane LOS F B A - - B - - F BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.4 0.2 - - 0.7 - - 0.3 0.17DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 6ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 19723.5Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 66Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1483Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 21.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.89Delay for adq Gap 19725.91Avg Ped Delay (s) 19723.49ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 24964.2Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1483Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.90Delay for adq Gap 24966.60Avg Ped Delay (s) 24964.18 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 7IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.1Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 813 36 100 762 11 46Future Vol, veh/h 813 36 100 762 11 46Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - 110 - 0 25Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 903 40 111 847 12 51Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 943 0 1569 472 Stage 1 - - - - 923 - Stage 2 - - - - 646 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 723 - 101 538 Stage 1 - - - - 347 - Stage 2 - - - - 484 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 723 - 85 538Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 188 - Stage 1 - - - - 294 - Stage 2 - - - - 484 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Control Delay, s 0 1.3 14.9HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 188 538 - - 723 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.065 0.095 - - 0.154 -HCM Control Delay (s) 25.5 12.4 - - 10.9 -HCM Lane LOS D B - - B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.3 - - 0.5 -7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 8ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? YesApproach Delay(s) 39.1Level of Service ECrosswalkLength (ft) 10 28Lanes Crossed 2 1Veh Vol Crossed 813 762Ped Vol Crossed 0 0Yield Rate(%) 0 0Ped Platooning No NoCritical Headway (s) 5.86 11.00Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.73 0.90Prob of Blocked Lane 0.48 0.90Delay for adq Gap 8.64 36.29Avg Ped Delay (s) 6.34 32.75ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 41713.8Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1575Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.91Delay for adq Gap 41716.04Avg Ped Delay (s) 41713.76 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 9Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBRLane Group Flow (vph) 1037 41 995 20 3v/c Ratio 0.36 0.19 0.32 0.10 0.02Control Delay 5.3 24.1 2.0 24.0 17.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 5.3 24.1 2.0 24.0 17.7Queue Length 50th (ft)07040Queue Length 95th (ft) 153 36 70 23 6Internal Link Dist (ft) 100 503 330Turn Bay Length (ft) 210 120Base Capacity (vph) 2661 221 3143 199 181Starvation Cap Reductn00000Spillback Cap Reductn00000Storage Cap Reductn00000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.19 0.32 0.10 0.02Intersection Summary7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 10Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 840 72 36 876 18 3Future Volume (veh/h) 840 72 36 876 18 3Initial Q (Qb), veh000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 955 82 41 995 20 3Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222Cap, veh/h 1530 131 66 2357 41 36Arrive On Green 0.46 0.46 0.04 0.66 0.02 0.02Sat Flow, veh/h 3405 284 1781 3647 1781 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 512 525 41 995 20 3Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1819 1781 1777 1781 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 8.0 8.0 0.8 4.8 0.4 0.1Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.0 8.0 0.8 4.8 0.4 0.1Prop In Lane 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 821 841 66 2357 41 36V/C Ratio(X) 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.42 0.49 0.08Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1358 1391 243 3784 219 195HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.4 7.4 17.4 2.9 17.7 17.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.8 9.0 0.1 9.0 1.0Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.0 2.1 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 8.2 8.2 26.4 3.0 26.6 18.5LnGrp LOS A A C A C BApproach Vol, veh/h 1037 1036 23Approach Delay, s/veh 8.2 3.9 25.6Approach LOS A A CTimer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.3 7.4 22.9 30.3Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.5 5.0 28.0 39.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 2.8 10.0 6.8Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 6.9 9.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.3HCM 6th LOS A 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 11Approach EB WB NBCrosswalk Length (ft) 59.2 60.1 36.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 5 3Number of Right-Turn Islands 0 0 0Type of Control None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase 8 5 4Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service - - -Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code - - -Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 27.5 27.5 27.5Pedestrian Compliance Code Fair Fair FairPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.62 2.68 1.98Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS C C B7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 12Approach EB WB NBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0 0 0Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1037 1036 23Effct. Green for Bike (s) 34.8 38.1 4.8Cross Street Width (ft) 36.2 70.4 72.0Through Lanes Number 2 2 1Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No NoOn Street Parking? No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 1265 1385 175Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 3.7 2.6 22.9Bicycle Compliance Good Good FairBicycle LOS Score 2.97 3.49 2.70Bicycle LOS C C C 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 13IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.1Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 8 54 959 43 125 1171Future Vol, veh/h 8 54 959 43 125 1171Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 12 12 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 100 - - 200 -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 8 57 1009 45 132 1233Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1925 539 0 0 1066 0 Stage 1 1044----- Stage 2 881-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 59 487 - - 649 - Stage 1 300----- Stage 2 365-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 46 481 - - 642 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 163----- Stage 1 236----- Stage 2 365-----Approach WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 15.4 0 1.2HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h) - - 163 481 642 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.052 0.118 0.205 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 28.3 13.5 12 -HCM Lane LOS - - D B B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.2 0.4 0.8 -7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 14ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 979723.1Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2130Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.96Delay for adq Gap 979724.75Avg Ped Delay (s) 979723.06ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 979723.1Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2130Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.96Delay for adq Gap 979724.75Avg Ped Delay (s) 979723.06 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 15Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 8 10 86 40 49 1031 180 67 1135 31v/c Ratio 0.05 0.04 0.39 0.14 0.34 0.49 0.19 0.39 0.53 0.03Control Delay 37.8 0.3 38.1 1.0 43.3 13.8 6.7 43.1 13.9 0.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 37.8 0.3 38.1 1.0 43.3 13.8 6.7 43.1 13.9 0.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 0 34 0 20 140 16 27 155 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 18 0 89 0 63 288 63 79 322 0Internal Link Dist (ft) 288 473 1028 1931Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 180 150 170 150 430Base Capacity (vph) 881 814 793 765 147 2244 1004 172 2281 1027Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.05 0.33 0.46 0.18 0.39 0.50 0.03Intersection Summary7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 16Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 5 3 9 74 7 38 46 969 169 63 1067 29Future Volume (veh/h) 5 3 9 74 7 38 46 969 169 63 1067 29Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 5 3 10 79 7 40 49 1031 180 67 1135 31Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 20 12 27 133 12 128 69 1630 705 85 1663 723Arrive On Green 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.04 0.46 0.46 0.05 0.47 0.47Sat Flow, veh/h 1134 680 1547 1643 146 1585 1781 3554 1537 1781 3554 1546Grp Volume(v), veh/h 8 0 10 86 0 40 49 1031 180 67 1135 31Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1814 0 1547 1788 0 1585 1781 1777 1537 1781 1777 1546Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 0.0 0.3 2.5 0.0 1.3 1.5 12.0 3.9 2.0 13.6 0.6Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.2 0.0 0.3 2.5 0.0 1.3 1.5 12.0 3.9 2.0 13.6 0.6Prop In Lane 0.62 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 32 0 27 144 0 128 69 1630 705 85 1663 723V/C Ratio(X) 0.25 0.00 0.37 0.60 0.00 0.31 0.72 0.63 0.26 0.79 0.68 0.04Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1168 0 996 1052 0 933 197 2712 1173 229 2778 1208HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.4 0.0 26.4 24.1 0.0 23.6 25.8 11.2 9.0 25.6 11.3 7.9Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.1 0.0 8.2 3.9 0.0 1.4 12.9 0.4 0.2 15.0 0.5 0.0Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.1 0.0 0.5 0.8 3.9 1.1 1.2 4.4 0.2Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.4 0.0 34.6 28.0 0.0 24.9 38.8 11.6 9.2 40.6 11.8 7.9LnGrp LOS C A C C A C D B A D B AApproach Vol, veh/h 18 126 1260 1233Approach Delay, s/veh 32.7 27.0 12.3 13.3Approach LOS C C B BTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.6 31.4 6.0 7.1 31.9 9.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.0 41.5 35.0 6.0 42.5 32.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.0 14.0 2.3 3.5 15.6 4.5Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.0 9.9 0.6Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.6HCM 6th LOS B 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 17Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 36.0 36.1 61.3 62.1Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3366Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 68.5 68.5 68.5 68.5Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.00 2.09 2.88 2.85Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 18Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 18 126 1260 1233Effct. Green for Bike (s) 6.1 9.2 44.3 45.0Cross Street Width (ft) 73.1 73.9 37.5 37.7Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 89 134 647 657Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 62.5 59.6 31.4 30.9Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 2.71 2.90 3.17 3.15Bicycle LOS CCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 19Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 366 173 271 244 241 149 239 891 71 723 433v/c Ratio 0.66 0.30 0.61 0.73 0.68 0.35 0.58 0.72 0.48 0.72 0.49Control Delay 44.8 37.0 14.6 51.7 46.2 8.3 47.5 32.1 56.1 35.5 5.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 44.8 37.0 14.6 51.7 46.2 8.3 47.5 32.1 56.1 35.5 5.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 111 51 23 145 144 0 74 254 43 207 27Queue Length 95th (ft) 173 83 101 #266 226 50 122 370 95 306 98Internal Link Dist (ft) 503 770 1992 1028Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 300 150 125 250 250 300Base Capacity (vph) 640 1359 729 398 787 745 470 1299 164 1168 915Starvation Cap Reductn00000000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.57 0.13 0.37 0.61 0.31 0.20 0.51 0.69 0.43 0.62 0.47Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 20Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 340 161 252 227 224 139 222 728 100 66 672 403Future Volume (veh/h) 340 161 252 227 224 139 222 728 100 66 672 403Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 366 173 271 244 241 149 239 783 108 71 723 433Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 447 917 394 280 534 438 312 997 138 92 996 637Arrive On Green 0.13 0.26 0.26 0.16 0.29 0.29 0.09 0.32 0.32 0.05 0.28 0.28Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1528 1781 1870 1534 3456 3123 431 1781 3554 1542Grp Volume(v), veh/h 366 173 271 244 241 149 239 445 446 71 723 433Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1528 1781 1870 1534 1728 1777 1777 1781 1777 1542Q Serve(g_s), s 10.6 3.9 16.4 13.7 10.8 7.9 6.9 23.4 23.4 4.0 18.9 23.7Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.6 3.9 16.4 13.7 10.8 7.9 6.9 23.4 23.4 4.0 18.9 23.7Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.24 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 447 917 394 280 534 438 312 567 567 92 996 637V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.19 0.69 0.87 0.45 0.34 0.77 0.79 0.79 0.78 0.73 0.68Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 572 1211 521 356 701 575 421 588 589 147 1038 656HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.5 29.7 34.3 42.3 30.1 29.0 45.6 31.7 31.7 48.1 33.4 24.9Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.2 0.1 2.4 17.2 0.6 0.5 5.8 6.7 6.7 13.0 2.5 2.7Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.9 1.7 6.3 7.3 4.9 2.9 3.2 10.9 10.9 2.1 8.3 8.9Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 50.8 29.8 36.8 59.5 30.7 29.5 51.4 38.5 38.5 61.1 35.8 27.6LnGrp LOS DCDECCDDDEDCApproach Vol, veh/h 810 634 1130 1227Approach Delay, s/veh 41.6 41.5 41.2 34.4Approach LOS DDDCTimer - Assigned Phs12345678Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.8 38.3 21.6 32.0 14.8 34.3 18.8 34.8Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.5 34.0 20.5 35.0 12.5 30.0 17.0 38.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.0 25.4 15.7 18.4 8.9 25.7 12.6 12.8Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.8 0.4 2.2 0.3 2.7 0.7 2.2Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 39.1HCM 6th LOS D 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 21Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 73.8 71.3 72.3 84.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed7566Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.86 2.51 2.86 2.88Pedestrian Crosswalk LOSCCCC7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 22Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 810 634 1130 1227Effct. Green for Bike (s) 15.5 18.0 33.1 26.7Cross Street Width (ft) 72.3 83.5 71.3 85.5Through Lanes Number2122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 258 300 552 445Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 45.5 43.3 31.5 36.3Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.33 3.88 3.58 3.88Bicycle LOS CDDD 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 23IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.8Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 33 9 78 1160 688 150Future Vol, veh/h 33 9 78 1160 688 150Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 75 200 - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 35 10 83 1234 732 160Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1595 446 892 0 - 0 Stage 1 812----- Stage 2 783-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 98 560 756 - - - Stage 1 397----- Stage 2 411-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 87 560 756 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 242----- Stage 1 353----- Stage 2 411-----Approach EB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 20.1 0.7 0HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 756 - 242 560 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.11 - 0.145 0.017 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 10.3 - 22.4 11.5 - -HCM Lane LOS B - C B - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 0.5 0.1 - -7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 24ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 168274.6Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 67Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1848Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.14Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.94Delay for adq Gap 168276.58Avg Ped Delay (s) 168274.63ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 1132727.4Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 80Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1848Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 25.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.96Delay for adq Gap 1132729.38Avg Ped Delay (s) 1132727.38 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 25Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 27 5 9 12 21 1350 20 665v/c Ratio 0.11 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.12 0.46 0.14 0.23Control Delay 26.2 0.2 25.9 0.3 29.4 4.7 31.1 3.5Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 26.2 0.2 25.9 0.3 29.4 4.7 31.1 3.5Queue Length 50th (ft)60205050Queue Length 95th (ft) 32 0 16 0 29 255 28 102Internal Link Dist (ft) 310 100 537 936Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 75 200 200Base Capacity (vph) 1072 953 1072 953 175 2847 140 2793Starvation Cap Reductn00000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.47 0.14 0.24Intersection Summary7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 26Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 23258011191211171858125Future Volume (veh/h) 23258011191211171858125Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 25259012211331192063827Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 156 0 69 162 0 69 37 2028 29 35 1960 83Arrive On Green 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.57 0.57 0.02 0.56 0.56Sat Flow, veh/h 0 0 1585 0 0 1585 1781 3585 51 1781 3470 147Grp Volume(v), veh/h 270590122165969120326339Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 0 1585 0 0 1585 1781 1777 1860 1781 1777 1840Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.5 11.4 11.4 0.5 4.4 4.4Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 0.0 0.1 1.9 0.0 0.3 0.5 11.4 11.4 0.5 4.4 4.4Prop In Lane 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.08Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 156 0 69 162 0 69 37 1005 1052 35 1004 1039V/C Ratio(X) 0.17 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.00 0.17 0.57 0.66 0.66 0.57 0.33 0.33Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1025 0 1034 1019 0 1034 200 1618 1693 160 1578 1634HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.2 0.0 20.4 22.2 0.0 20.5 21.6 6.7 6.7 21.6 5.2 5.2Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 1.2 13.4 0.7 0.7 13.7 0.2 0.2Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 2.8 2.9 0.3 1.0 1.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.8 0.0 20.8 22.4 0.0 21.7 34.9 7.4 7.4 35.3 5.3 5.3LnGrp LOS C A C C A C C A A D A AApproach Vol, veh/h 32 21 1371 685Approach Delay, s/veh 22.5 22.0 7.8 6.2Approach LOS C C A ATimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.9 31.7 6.9 5.9 31.6 6.9Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 40.5 29.0 5.0 39.5 29.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.5 13.4 3.9 2.5 6.4 3.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 11.7 0.1 0.0 4.8 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.7HCM 6th LOS A 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 27Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 34.0 34.2 57.2 59.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3355Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 1.98 1.97 2.70 2.71Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 28Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 32 21 1371 685Effct. Green for Bike (s) 6.9 6.7 44.5 44.3Cross Street Width (ft) 57.2 59.2 34.2 34.0Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 153 149 989 984Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 38.4 38.5 11.5 11.6Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Fair FairBicycle LOS Score 2.70 2.71 3.43 2.86Bicycle LOS CCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 1Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 26 19 276 279 567 22 708 404 404 710v/c Ratio 0.21 0.07 0.76 0.74 0.71 0.22 0.79 0.45 1.02 0.41Control Delay 47.4 0.5 50.5 48.5 8.7 50.4 41.3 4.8 88.6 17.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 47.4 0.5 50.5 48.5 8.7 50.4 41.3 4.8 88.6 17.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 16 0 175 176 0 14 225 29 ~287 133Queue Length 95th (ft) 43 0 #316 #311 94 40 #317 63 #477 231Internal Link Dist (ft) 109 1057 1054 1668Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 140 100 165Base Capacity (vph) 481 564 364 379 797 104 903 905 397 1730Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.05 0.03 0.76 0.74 0.71 0.21 0.78 0.45 1.02 0.41Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 13 10 17 482 12 505 20 630 360 360 594 38Future Volume (veh/h) 13 10 17 482 12 505 20 630 360 360 594 38Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 15 11 19 551 0 0 22 708 404 404 667 43Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 52 38 75 677 0 33 900 691 432 1613 104Arrive On Green 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.48 0.48Sat Flow, veh/h 1049 769 1503 3563 0 1585 1781 3554 1540 1781 3382 218Grp Volume(v), veh/h 26 0 19 551 0 0 22 708 404 404 350 360Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1818 0 1503 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1540 1781 1777 1823Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 0.0 1.1 13.4 0.0 0.0 1.1 16.9 18.0 20.2 11.7 11.7Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.3 0.0 1.1 13.4 0.0 0.0 1.1 16.9 18.0 20.2 11.7 11.7Prop In Lane 0.58 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.12Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 90 0 75 677 0 33 900 691 432 847 869V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.00 0.25 0.81 0.00 0.66 0.79 0.58 0.94 0.41 0.41Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 541 0 447 864 0 118 979 726 432 847 869HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.6 0.0 41.5 35.2 0.0 0.0 44.2 31.6 19.1 33.7 15.5 15.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.7 0.0 1.8 4.7 0.0 0.0 19.9 4.0 1.1 27.8 0.3 0.3Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 0.0 0.4 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.7 7.2 8.6 11.4 4.3 4.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.3 0.0 43.3 40.0 0.0 0.0 64.1 35.6 20.2 61.5 15.8 15.8LnGrp LOS D A D D A E D C E B BApproach Vol, veh/h 45 551 A 1134 1114Approach Delay, s/veh 43.3 40.0 30.7 32.4Approach LOS DDCCTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 28.0 29.0 10.5 7.7 49.3 23.3Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 25.0 27.0 6.0 41.0 22.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 22.2 20.0 3.3 3.1 13.7 15.4Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.8 0.2 0.0 4.3 1.4Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.3HCM 6th LOS CNotesUser approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 3Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 50.7 58.5 67.8 54.5Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3465Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 25 45 45 45Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.00 2.86 3.05 3.02Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B C C C7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 4Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 45 1122 1134 1114Effct. Green for Bike (s) 7.0 22.1 24.9 48.6Cross Street Width (ft) 67.8 54.5 58.5 50.7Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 10.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 117 368 415 810Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 53.2 39.9 37.7 21.2Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor FairBicycle LOS Score 3.10 4.46 3.60 3.47Bicycle LOS CDDC 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 5IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 4Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 55 732 28 107 1079 16 11 4 173 7 2 45Future Vol, veh/h 55 732 28 107 1079 16 11 4 173 7 2 45Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000000000Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length 225 - - 160----25--25Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95Heavy Vehicles, % 222222222222Mvmt Flow 58 771 29 113 1136 17 12 4 182 7 2 47Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 1153 0 0 800 0 0 1697 2281 400 1875 2287 577 Stage 1 ------902902-1371 1371 - Stage 2 ------7951379 - 504 916 -Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------6.545.54-6.545.54-Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------6.545.54-6.545.54-Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 602 - - 819 - - 60 39 600 44 39 460 Stage 1 ------299355-154212- Stage 2 ------347210-518349-Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 602 - - 819 - - 42 30 600 23 30 460Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------4230-2330- Stage 1 ------270321-139183- Stage 2 ------265181-322315-Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 0.8 0.9 24.9 50HCM LOS C FMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1SBLn2Capacity (veh/h) 38 600 602 - - 819 - - 24 460HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.416 0.304 0.096 - - 0.138 - - 0.395 0.103HCM Control Delay (s) 155.3 13.6 11.6 - - 10.1 - - 231.4 13.7HCM Lane LOS F B B - - B - - F BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4 1.3 0.3 - - 0.5 - - 1.2 0.37DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 6ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 118445.8Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 66Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1811Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 21.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.94Delay for adq Gap 118447.80Avg Ped Delay (s) 118445.81ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 157900.1Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1811Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.94Delay for adq Gap 157902.09Avg Ped Delay (s) 157900.11 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 7IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 2Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 899 30 79 1091 39 148Future Vol, veh/h 899 30 79 1091 39 148Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - 110 - 0 25Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 1010 34 89 1226 44 166Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1044 0 1818 522 Stage 1 - - - - 1027 - Stage 2 - - - - 791 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 662 - 69 499 Stage 1 - - - - 306 - Stage 2 - - - - 407 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 662 - 60 499Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 159 - Stage 1 - - - - 265 - Stage 2 - - - - 407 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Control Delay, s 0 0.8 20HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 159 499 - - 662 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.276 0.333 - - 0.134 -HCM Control Delay (s) 36 15.8 - - 11.3 -HCM Lane LOS E C - - B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1 1.4 - - 0.5 -7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 8ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? YesApproach Delay(s) 85.6Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 10 28Lanes Crossed 2 1Veh Vol Crossed 899 1091Ped Vol Crossed 0 0Yield Rate(%) 0 0Ped Platooning No NoCritical Headway (s) 5.86 11.00Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.77 0.96Prob of Blocked Lane 0.52 0.96Delay for adq Gap 9.67 81.12Avg Ped Delay (s) 7.43 78.22ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 438344.3Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1990Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.95Delay for adq Gap 438346.09Avg Ped Delay (s) 438344.28 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 9Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBRLane Group Flow (vph) 1256 9 1317 179 60v/c Ratio 0.60 0.07 0.60 0.55 0.18Control Delay 9.6 32.9 8.2 31.8 9.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 9.6 32.9 8.2 31.8 9.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 119 3 129 49 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 245 19 169 #159 30Internal Link Dist (ft) 88 620 330Turn Bay Length (ft) 210 120Base Capacity (vph) 3276 121 3403 380 387Starvation Cap Reductn00000Spillback Cap Reductn00000Storage Cap Reductn00000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.07 0.39 0.47 0.16Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 10Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 1074 19 8 1146 156 52Future Volume (veh/h) 1074 19 8 1146 156 52Initial Q (Qb), veh000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1234 22 9 1317 179 60Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222Cap, veh/h 1860 33 17 2288 246 219Arrive On Green 0.52 0.52 0.01 0.64 0.14 0.14Sat Flow, veh/h 3666 64 1781 3647 1781 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 614 642 9 1317 179 60Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1859 1781 1777 1781 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 13.3 13.3 0.3 11.1 5.1 1.8Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.3 13.3 0.3 11.1 5.1 1.8Prop In Lane 0.03 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 925 968 17 2288 246 219V/C Ratio(X) 0.66 0.66 0.54 0.58 0.73 0.27Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1887 1974 135 4448 422 376HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.3 9.3 26.0 5.3 21.8 20.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.8 24.4 0.2 4.1 0.7Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.1 4.3 0.2 2.5 2.2 0.6Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 10.1 10.0 50.4 5.5 25.9 21.0LnGrp LOS B B D A C CApproach Vol, veh/h 1256 1326 239Approach Delay, s/veh 10.1 5.8 24.7Approach LOS B A CTimer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.8 6.5 33.5 40.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.5 4.0 56.0 66.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.1 2.3 15.3 13.1Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.0 12.1 15.4Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.3HCM 6th LOS A 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 11Approach EB WB NBCrosswalk Length (ft) 59.2 60.1 36.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 5 3Number of Right-Turn Islands 0 0 0Type of Control None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase 8 5 4Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service - - -Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code - - -Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 45.0 45.0 45.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.81 2.82 2.04Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS C C B7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 12Approach EB WB NBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0 0 0Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1256 1326 239Effct. Green for Bike (s) 35.5 37.0 11.0Cross Street Width (ft) 36.2 70.3 72.0Through Lanes Number 2 2 1Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No NoOn Street Parking? No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 789 822 244Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 16.5 15.6 34.7Bicycle Compliance Fair Fair PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.15 3.73 3.06Bicycle LOS C D C 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 13IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.8Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 28 130 1325 20 70 1244Future Vol, veh/h 28 130 1325 20 70 1244Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 12 12 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 100 - - 200 -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 30 140 1425 22 75 1338Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 2267 736 0 0 1459 0 Stage 1 1448----- Stage 2 819-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 34 361 - - 459 - Stage 1 183----- Stage 2 394-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 28 357 - - 454 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 130----- Stage 1 151----- Stage 2 394-----Approach WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 24.8 0 0.8HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h) - - 130 357 454 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.232 0.392 0.166 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 40.8 21.4 14.5 -HCM Lane LOS - - E C B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.8 1.8 0.6 -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 14ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 12518184.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2569Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.98Delay for adq Gap 12518185.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 12518184.00ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 12518184.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2569Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.98Delay for adq Gap 12518185.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 12518184.00 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 15Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 58 52 208 134 41 1241 142 128 1185 43v/c Ratio 0.23 0.16 0.60 0.32 0.44 1.00 0.24 1.09 0.85 0.06Control Delay 33.7 1.0 38.6 8.1 59.3 55.9 10.7 153.7 34.2 0.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 33.7 1.0 38.6 8.1 59.3 55.9 10.7 153.7 34.2 0.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 25 0 90 0 19 295 10 ~68 268 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 67 0 209 48 #96 #857 77 #274 #797 0Internal Link Dist (ft) 288 473 1028 1931Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 180 150 170 150 430Base Capacity (vph) 831 787 750 746 93 1238 601 117 1398 672Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.07 0.28 0.18 0.44 1.00 0.24 1.09 0.85 0.06Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 16Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 40 15 49 193 5 127 39 1179 135 122 1126 41Future Volume (veh/h) 40 15 49 193 5 127 39 1179 135 122 1126 41Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 42 16 52 203 5 134 41 1241 142 128 1185 43Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 80 30 94 290 7 264 56 1359 586 131 1507 655Arrive On Green 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.03 0.38 0.38 0.07 0.42 0.42Sat Flow, veh/h 1307 498 1543 1740 43 1585 1781 3554 1533 1781 3554 1545Grp Volume(v), veh/h 58 0 52 208 0 134 41 1241 142 128 1185 43Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1805 0 1543 1783 0 1585 1781 1777 1533 1781 1777 1545Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 0.0 2.2 7.5 0.0 5.2 1.6 22.5 4.3 4.9 19.6 1.1Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.1 0.0 2.2 7.5 0.0 5.2 1.6 22.5 4.3 4.9 19.6 1.1Prop In Lane 0.72 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 111 0 94 297 0 264 56 1359 586 131 1507 655V/C Ratio(X) 0.52 0.00 0.55 0.70 0.00 0.51 0.73 0.91 0.24 0.98 0.79 0.07Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 929 0 794 839 0 746 105 1385 598 131 1507 655HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.9 0.0 31.0 26.7 0.0 25.8 32.6 19.9 14.3 31.4 16.9 11.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.8 0.0 4.9 3.0 0.0 1.5 16.1 9.4 0.2 71.3 2.8 0.0Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 0.0 0.9 3.3 0.0 2.0 0.9 10.1 1.4 4.6 7.7 0.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.8 0.0 35.9 29.7 0.0 27.3 48.7 29.3 14.5 102.7 19.7 11.6LnGrp LOS C A D C A C D C B F B BApproach Vol, veh/h 110 342 1424 1356Approach Delay, s/veh 35.3 28.8 28.4 27.3Approach LOS DCCCTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 32.5 9.2 7.2 35.3 16.3Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 26.5 35.0 4.0 27.5 32.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.9 24.5 4.2 3.6 21.6 9.5Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.5 0.0 3.8 1.9Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 28.2HCM 6th LOS C 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 17Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 36.0 36.1 61.3 62.1Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3366Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.03 2.17 2.94 2.92Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 18Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 110 342 1424 1356Effct. Green for Bike (s) 11.4 15.7 28.1 31.7Cross Street Width (ft) 73.1 73.9 37.5 37.7Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 190 262 468 528Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 49.1 45.3 35.2 32.5Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 2.86 3.25 3.31 3.26Bicycle LOS CCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 19Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 540 398 210 219 273 120 376 943 155 767 491v/c Ratio 0.83 0.50 0.41 0.77 0.74 0.31 0.78 0.86 0.79 0.75 0.56Control Delay 55.9 39.7 7.4 63.8 54.4 11.5 58.6 43.7 77.8 41.8 12.0Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 55.9 39.7 7.4 63.8 54.4 11.5 58.6 43.7 77.8 41.8 12.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 193 135 0 149 187 9 135 315 110 258 106Queue Length 95th (ft) #313 184 59 #276 278 56 #223 #475 #246 367 230Internal Link Dist (ft) 620 770 1992 1028Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 300 150 125 250 250 300Base Capacity (vph) 665 1176 648 327 602 576 507 1180 195 1078 876Starvation Cap Reductn00000000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.81 0.34 0.32 0.67 0.45 0.21 0.74 0.80 0.79 0.71 0.56Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 20Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 518 382 202 210 262 115 361 714 191 149 736 471Future Volume (veh/h) 518 382 202 210 262 115 361 714 191 149 736 471Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 540 398 210 219 273 120 376 744 199 155 767 491Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 607 943 406 251 432 353 442 858 230 183 1019 721Arrive On Green 0.18 0.27 0.27 0.14 0.23 0.23 0.13 0.31 0.31 0.10 0.29 0.29Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1529 1781 1870 1527 3456 2752 736 1781 3554 1542Grp Volume(v), veh/h 540 398 210 219 273 120 376 480 463 155 767 491Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1529 1781 1870 1527 1728 1777 1711 1781 1777 1542Q Serve(g_s), s 17.1 10.4 13.1 13.5 14.7 7.3 11.9 28.5 28.5 9.6 22.0 28.1Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.1 10.4 13.1 13.5 14.7 7.3 11.9 28.5 28.5 9.6 22.0 28.1Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.43 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 607 943 406 251 432 353 442 554 534 183 1019 721V/C Ratio(X) 0.89 0.42 0.52 0.87 0.63 0.34 0.85 0.87 0.87 0.85 0.75 0.68Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 649 1144 492 319 585 478 494 588 566 191 1048 733HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.1 34.0 35.0 47.0 38.7 35.9 47.7 36.3 36.3 49.3 36.3 23.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 13.8 0.3 1.0 18.7 1.5 0.6 12.3 12.5 12.9 27.4 3.0 2.5Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 8.4 4.5 5.0 7.3 6.9 2.8 5.9 14.1 13.6 5.6 9.9 10.5Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 58.9 34.3 36.0 65.8 40.3 36.5 60.0 48.8 49.2 76.7 39.3 26.2LnGrp LOS E C D E D D E D D E D CApproach Vol, veh/h 1148 612 1319 1413Approach Delay, s/veh 46.2 48.6 52.1 38.9Approach LOS DDDDTimer - Assigned Phs12345678Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.5 39.9 20.8 34.7 19.3 37.1 24.6 30.8Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.0 37.0 20.0 36.0 16.0 33.0 21.0 35.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.6 30.5 15.5 15.1 13.9 30.1 19.1 16.7Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.3 0.3 3.7 0.4 2.0 0.6 2.1Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 46.0HCM 6th LOS D 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 21Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 73.8 71.3 72.3 84.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed7566Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.94 2.59 2.88 2.93Pedestrian Crosswalk LOSCCCC7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 22Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1148 612 1319 1413Effct. Green for Bike (s) 24.8 21.6 34.7 31.4Cross Street Width (ft) 72.3 83.5 71.3 85.2Through Lanes Number2122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 397 346 555 502Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 40.2 42.8 32.6 35.0Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.61 3.85 3.74 4.03Bicycle LOS DDDD 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 23IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 2.1Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 104 43 16 797 1047 78Future Vol, veh/h 104 43 16 797 1047 78Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 75 200 - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 111 46 17 848 1114 83Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1614 599 1197 0 - 0 Stage 1 1156----- Stage 2 458-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 95 445 579 - - - Stage 1 262----- Stage 2 604-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 92 445 579 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 229----- Stage 1 254----- Stage 2 604-----Approach EB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 28.6 0.2 0HCM LOS DMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 579 - 229 445 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.029 - 0.483 0.103 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 11.4 - 34.6 14 - -HCM Lane LOS B - D B - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 2.4 0.3 - -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 24ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 164540.7Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 67Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1844Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.14Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.94Delay for adq Gap 164542.66Avg Ped Delay (s) 164540.70ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 1103034.5Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 80Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1844Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 25.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.96Delay for adq Gap 1103036.50Avg Ped Delay (s) 1103034.50 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 25Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 117 34 14 37 12 711 16 1188v/c Ratio 0.46 0.09 0.06 0.10 0.09 0.32 0.12 0.54Control Delay 26.5 0.4 19.1 0.5 27.9 7.6 28.5 9.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 26.5 0.4 19.1 0.5 27.9 7.6 28.5 9.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 300303505102Queue Length 95th (ft) 84 0 17 0 20 140 24 275Internal Link Dist (ft) 310 100 537 936Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 75 200 200Base Capacity (vph) 744 931 707 931 135 2119 135 2111Starvation Cap Reductn00000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.09 0.34 0.12 0.56Intersection Summary7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 26Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 106 1 31 13 0 34 11 643 4 15 1043 38Future Volume (veh/h) 106 1 31 13 0 34 11 643 4 15 1043 38Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 116 1 34 14 0 37 12 707 4 16 1146 42Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 105 1 614 105 0 614 21 1358 8 27 1321 48Arrive On Green 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.39 0.01 0.38 0.38 0.01 0.38 0.38Sat Flow, veh/h 22 1 1585 22 0 1585 1781 3622 20 1781 3493 128Grp Volume(v), veh/h 117 0 34 14 0 37 12 347 364 16 583 605Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 24 0 1585 22 0 1585 1781 1777 1866 1781 1777 1844Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 1.1 0.5 11.2 11.2 0.7 22.5 22.5Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 28.7 0.0 1.0 28.7 0.0 1.1 0.5 11.2 11.2 0.7 22.5 22.5Prop In Lane 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.07Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 106 0 614 105 0 614 21 666 700 27 672 697V/C Ratio(X) 1.11 0.00 0.06 0.13 0.00 0.06 0.58 0.52 0.52 0.60 0.87 0.87Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 111 0 620 110 0 620 96 731 768 96 731 758HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.9 0.0 14.2 36.9 0.0 14.2 36.5 18.0 18.0 36.3 21.3 21.3Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 118.7 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 23.0 0.6 0.6 19.9 10.2 9.9Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.4 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.3 4.4 4.6 0.4 10.5 10.8Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 155.6 0.0 14.2 37.5 0.0 14.3 59.5 18.6 18.6 56.2 31.5 31.2LnGrp LOS FABDABEBBECCApproach Vol, veh/h 151 51 723 1204Approach Delay, s/veh 123.8 20.7 19.3 31.7Approach LOS F C B CTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.1 34.4 33.9 5.9 34.7 33.9Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 30.5 29.0 4.0 30.5 29.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 13.2 30.7 2.5 24.5 30.7Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.8HCM 6th LOS C 7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 27Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 34.0 34.2 57.2 59.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3355Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.01 1.97 2.68 2.71Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C7DQN)DUP5RDG ([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 28Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 151 51 723 1204Effct. Green for Bike (s) 10.3 10.0 33.8 33.8Cross Street Width (ft) 57.2 59.2 34.2 34.0Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 258 250 845 845Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 30.4 30.6 13.3 13.3Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Fair FairBicycle LOS Score 2.90 2.76 2.89 3.29Bicycle LOS CCCC Cumulative 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 1Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 42 32 143 143 305 21 568 886 526 506v/c Ratio 0.29 0.11 0.40 0.39 0.52 0.20 0.75 0.88 1.26 0.31Control Delay 47.9 0.8 37.0 36.4 7.6 49.9 40.9 16.4 168.3 17.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 47.9 0.8 37.0 36.4 7.6 49.9 40.9 16.4 168.3 17.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 25 0 78 78 0 13 171 84 ~428 90Queue Length 95th (ft) 61 0 151 150 71 39 238 #297 #681 163Internal Link Dist (ft) 109 1057 1054 1668Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 140 100 165Base Capacity (vph) 509 570 383 399 612 110 988 1028 418 1666Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.06 0.37 0.36 0.50 0.19 0.57 0.86 1.26 0.30Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 20 20 30 261 10 290 20 540 842 500 470 10Future Volume (veh/h) 20 20 30 261 10 290 20 540 842 500 470 10Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 21 21 32 283 0 0 21 568 886 526 495 11Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 55 55 90 428 0 33 1067 654 453 1904 42Arrive On Green 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.30 0.30 0.25 0.54 0.54Sat Flow, veh/h 912 912 1514 3563 0 1585 1781 3554 1544 1781 3551 79Grp Volume(v), veh/h 42 0 32 283 0 0 21 568 886 526 247 259Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1825 0 1514 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1544 1781 1777 1853Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 0.0 1.8 6.6 0.0 0.0 1.0 11.5 26.0 22.0 6.5 6.5Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 0.0 1.8 6.6 0.0 0.0 1.0 11.5 26.0 22.0 6.5 6.5Prop In Lane 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 109 0 90 428 0 33 1067 654 453 952 993V/C Ratio(X) 0.39 0.00 0.35 0.66 0.00 0.64 0.53 1.35 1.16 0.26 0.26Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 569 0 472 905 0 123 1067 654 453 952 993HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.2 0.0 39.1 36.4 0.0 0.0 42.2 25.2 22.1 32.3 10.8 10.8Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 0.0 2.3 1.7 0.0 0.0 19.2 0.5 169.4 94.9 0.1 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.0 0.7 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.6 4.6 44.2 20.7 2.2 2.3Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 41.4 0.0 41.4 38.1 0.0 0.0 61.4 25.7 191.4 127.2 11.0 11.0LnGrp LOS D A D D A E C F F B BApproach Vol, veh/h 74 283 A 1475 1032Approach Delay, s/veh 41.4 38.1 125.8 70.2Approach LOS D D F ETimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 27.0 32.0 11.2 6.6 52.4 16.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 26.0 27.0 6.0 42.0 22.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 24.0 28.0 3.9 3.0 8.5 8.6Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 3.0 1.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 94.9HCM 6th LOS FNotesUser approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 3Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 50.7 58.5 67.8 54.5Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3465Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 25 45 45 45Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 1.99 2.89 3.03 2.88Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B C C C7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 4Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 74 591 1475 1032Effct. Green for Bike (s) 7.9 20.8 20.5 44.1Cross Street Width (ft) 67.8 54.5 58.5 50.7Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 10.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 132 347 342 735Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 52.4 41.0 41.3 24.0Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor FairBicycle LOS Score 3.15 3.58 3.89 3.40Bicycle LOS CDDC 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 5Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 55 1442 132 726 44 99 55 44v/c Ratio 0.10 0.62 0.41 0.29 0.21 0.33 0.30 0.16Control Delay 3.1 10.0 8.1 5.2 27.4 9.8 29.4 5.5Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 3.1 10.0 8.1 5.2 27.4 9.8 29.4 5.5Queue Length 50th (ft) 4 175 10 57 15 0 20 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 273 38 95 42 36 50 16Internal Link Dist (ft) 1057 1748 155 449Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 160 25 25Base Capacity (vph) 561 2414 329 2526 655 741 596 724Starvation Cap Reductn00000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.60 0.40 0.29 0.07 0.13 0.09 0.06Intersection Summary7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 6Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 50 1262 50 120 621 40 20 20 90 40 10 40Future Volume (veh/h) 50 1262 50 120 621 40 20 20 90 40 10 40Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 55 1387 55 132 682 44 22 22 99 44 11 44Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 450 1681 67 269 1709 110 91 67 444 121 20 444Arrive On Green 0.04 0.48 0.48 0.06 0.50 0.50 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3484 138 1781 3389 219 40 238 1585 88 72 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 55 706 736 132 357 369 44 0 99 55 0 44Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1846 1781 1777 1831 277 0 1585 160 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 1.0 23.0 23.1 2.5 8.4 8.4 0.5 0.0 3.2 1.5 0.0 1.4Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 23.0 23.1 2.5 8.4 8.4 18.4 0.0 3.2 18.9 0.0 1.4Prop In Lane 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.12 0.50 1.00 0.80 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 450 857 891 269 896 923 158 0 444 141 0 444V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.82 0.83 0.49 0.40 0.40 0.28 0.00 0.22 0.39 0.00 0.10Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 490 1003 1042 323 1056 1088 278 0 565 245 0 565HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 8.4 15.0 15.0 13.2 10.3 10.4 19.8 0.0 18.6 28.5 0.0 17.9Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 4.9 4.9 1.4 0.3 0.3 0.9 0.0 0.3 1.8 0.0 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 9.1 9.5 0.9 2.9 3.0 0.5 0.0 1.1 0.9 0.0 0.5Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 8.5 19.9 19.9 14.6 10.6 10.6 20.7 0.0 18.8 30.3 0.0 18.0LnGrp LOS ABBBBBCABCABApproach Vol, veh/h 1497 858 143 99Approach Delay, s/veh 19.5 11.2 19.4 24.8Approach LOS B B B CTimer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.8 8.1 36.9 23.8 6.5 38.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 24.0 6.0 38.0 24.0 4.0 40.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 20.4 4.5 25.1 20.9 3.0 10.4Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.1 8.1 0.1 0.0 5.3Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.9HCM 6th LOS B 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 7Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 57.8 60.4 36.1 36.7Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed5533Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.74 2.77 2.06 2.02Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS C C B B7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 8Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1497 858 143 99Effct. Green for Bike (s) 38.2 41.3 7.8 7.8Cross Street Width (ft) 36.1 36.7 60.4 57.8Through Lanes Number2211Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 955 1032 195 195Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 10.9 9.4 32.6 32.6Bicycle Compliance Fair Good Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.35 2.83 2.72 2.61Bicycle LOS CCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 9ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 176386.5Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 66Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1883Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 21.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.94Delay for adq Gap 176388.38Avg Ped Delay (s) 176386.47ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 237840.2Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1883Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.95Delay for adq Gap 237842.11Avg Ped Delay (s) 237840.207DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 10IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.5Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 1144 40 231 1203 20 161Future Vol, veh/h 1144 40 231 1203 20 161Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - 110 - 0 25Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 1271 44 257 1337 22 179Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1315 0 2476 658 Stage 1 - - - - 1293 - Stage 2 - - - - 1183 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 522 - 25 407 Stage 1 - - - - 221 - Stage 2 - - - - 253 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 522 - ~ 13 407Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - ~ -7 - Stage 1 - - - - 112 - Stage 2 - - - - 253 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Control Delay, s 0 3HCM LOS -Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) + 407 - - 522 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.44 - - 0.492 -HCM Control Delay (s) - 20.6 - - 18.4 -HCM Lane LOS - C - - C -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 2.2 - - 2.7 -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 11ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? YesApproach Delay(s) 115.4Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 10 28Lanes Crossed 2 1Veh Vol Crossed 1144 1203Ped Vol Crossed 0 0Yield Rate(%) 0 0Ped Platooning No NoCritical Headway (s) 5.86 11.00Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.84 0.97Prob of Blocked Lane 0.61 0.97Delay for adq Gap 13.30 106.86Avg Ped Delay (s) 11.24 104.16ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 3436526.5Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2347Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.97Delay for adq Gap 3436528.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 3436526.507DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 12Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 5 1478 136 1569 3 57 25 9 4v/c Ratio 0.06 0.72 0.67 0.57 0.00 0.37 0.15 0.11 0.04Control Delay 45.2 16.3 57.0 8.0 0.0 46.6 19.0 46.6 35.0Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 45.2 16.3 57.0 8.2 0.0 46.6 19.0 46.6 35.0Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 275 73 145 0 30 1 5 1Queue Length 95th (ft) 15 475 #176 448 0 73 26 22 12Internal Link Dist (ft) 149 109 330 342Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 210 50Base Capacity (vph) 81 2052 202 2750 1259 182 594 81 524Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 44900000Spillback Cap Reductn000000000Storage Cap Reductn000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.72 0.67 0.68 0.00 0.31 0.04 0.11 0.01Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 13Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 5 950 350 120 1381 3 50 2 20 8 2 2Future Volume (veh/h) 5 950 350 120 1381 3 50 2 20 8 2 2Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 5 1080 398 136 1569 3 57 2 23 9 2 2Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.92 0.88 0.92 0.88 0.92 0.92 0.92Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 9 1346 488 171 2217 989 88 10 111 16 24 24Arrive On Green 0.01 0.53 0.53 0.10 0.62 0.62 0.05 0.08 0.08 0.01 0.03 0.03Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 2555 926 1781 3554 1585 1781 128 1476 1781 858 858Grp Volume(v), veh/h 5 746 732 136 1569 3 57 0 25 9 0 4Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1704 1781 1777 1585 1781 0 1605 1781 0 1716Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 27.4 28.6 6.0 23.8 0.1 2.5 0.0 1.2 0.4 0.0 0.2Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.2 27.4 28.6 6.0 23.8 0.1 2.5 0.0 1.2 0.4 0.0 0.2Prop In Lane 1.00 0.54 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.50Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 9 936 898 171 2217 989 88 0 120 16 0 49V/C Ratio(X) 0.53 0.80 0.82 0.80 0.71 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.21 0.56 0.00 0.08Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 89 1130 1084 222 2549 1137 200 0 630 89 0 567HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.8 15.5 15.7 35.5 10.2 5.7 37.4 0.0 34.8 39.6 0.0 37.9Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 40.0 3.4 4.2 14.1 0.8 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.8 26.8 0.0 0.7Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 10.7 10.9 3.2 8.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 79.7 18.8 19.9 49.5 10.9 5.7 45.2 0.0 35.7 66.3 0.0 38.6LnGrp LOS E B B D B A D A D E A DApproach Vol, veh/h 1483 1708 82 13Approach Delay, s/veh 19.6 14.0 42.3 57.8Approach LOS B B D ETimer - Assigned Phs12345678Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.2 12.0 13.7 48.3 10.0 8.3 5.9 56.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 * 6 5.5 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 31.5 10.0 51.0 9.0 * 27 4.0 57.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 3.2 8.0 30.6 4.5 2.2 2.2 25.8Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.1 0.1 11.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.4HCM 6th LOS BNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 14Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 59.2 60.1 36.2 24.1Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed5633Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.93 2.93 2.16 1.97Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS C C B B 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 15Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1483 1708 82 13Effct. Green for Bike (s) 52.5 68.3 8.1 5.8Cross Street Width (ft) 36.3 37.4 74.2 60.2Through Lanes Number2211Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 875 1138 135 97Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 19.0 11.1 52.2 54.3Bicycle Compliance Fair Fair Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.34 3.54 2.83 2.50Bicycle LOS CDCC7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 16IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.3Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 21 60 981 81 140 1696Future Vol, veh/h 21 60 981 81 140 1696Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 12 12 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 100 - - 200 -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 22 63 1033 85 147 1785Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 2275 571 0 0 1130 0 Stage 1 1088----- Stage 2 1187-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 34 464 - - 614 - Stage 1 284----- Stage 2 252-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 26 459 - - 607 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 91----- Stage 1 213----- Stage 2 252-----Approach WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 25.2 0 1HCM LOS DMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h) - - 91 459 607 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.243 0.138 0.243 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 56.8 14.1 12.8 -HCM Lane LOS - - F B B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.9 0.5 0.9 - 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 17ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 23543750.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2677Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.98Delay for adq Gap 23543752.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 23543750.00ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 23543750.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2677Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.98Delay for adq Gap 23543752.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 23543750.007DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 18Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 35 11 108 43 53 1191 181 85 1716 47v/c Ratio 0.19 0.04 0.42 0.13 0.43 0.72 0.24 0.70 0.93 0.05Control Delay 31.6 0.3 32.4 0.8 44.5 21.2 7.8 64.7 34.2 0.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 31.6 0.3 32.4 0.8 44.5 21.2 7.8 64.7 34.2 0.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 14 0 43 0 22 238 19 36 ~490 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 41 0 89 0 #67 #404 64 #115 #684 1Internal Link Dist (ft) 288 473 497 1931Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 180 150 170 150 430Base Capacity (vph) 972 898 879 843 122 1655 768 122 1851 855Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.01 0.12 0.05 0.43 0.72 0.24 0.70 0.93 0.05Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 19Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 22 11 10 90 11 40 50 1120 170 80 1613 44Future Volume (veh/h) 22 11 10 90 11 40 50 1120 170 80 1613 44Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 23 12 11 96 12 43 53 1191 181 85 1716 47Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 43 22 56 154 19 153 70 1562 675 108 1638 713Arrive On Green 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.04 0.44 0.44 0.06 0.46 0.46Sat Flow, veh/h 1190 621 1545 1592 199 1585 1781 3554 1536 1781 3554 1546Grp Volume(v), veh/h 35 0 11 108 0 43 53 1191 181 85 1716 47Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1811 0 1545 1791 0 1585 1781 1777 1536 1781 1777 1546Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 0.0 0.4 3.4 0.0 1.5 1.7 16.5 4.4 2.8 27.0 1.0Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 0.0 0.4 3.4 0.0 1.5 1.7 16.5 4.4 2.8 27.0 1.0Prop In Lane 0.66 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 65 0 56 173 0 153 70 1562 675 108 1638 713V/C Ratio(X) 0.54 0.00 0.20 0.63 0.00 0.28 0.75 0.76 0.27 0.78 1.05 0.07Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1082 0 923 978 0 866 137 1638 708 137 1638 713HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.8 0.0 27.4 25.4 0.0 24.6 27.8 13.8 10.4 27.1 15.8 8.8Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.7 0.0 1.7 3.7 0.0 1.0 14.9 2.1 0.2 20.3 35.8 0.0Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 0.0 0.2 1.5 0.0 0.6 1.0 6.0 1.3 1.7 17.1 0.3Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.5 0.0 29.1 29.1 0.0 25.6 42.8 15.9 10.6 47.4 51.6 8.8LnGrp LOS C A C C A C D B B D F AApproach Vol, veh/h 46 151 1425 1848Approach Delay, s/veh 33.2 28.1 16.2 50.3Approach LOS C C B DTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.6 32.2 7.1 7.3 33.5 10.7Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.5 27.0 35.0 4.5 27.0 32.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.8 18.5 3.1 3.7 29.0 5.4Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.9 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.8Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 35.1HCM 6th LOS D7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 20Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 36.0 36.1 61.3 62.1Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3366Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.01 2.10 3.00 2.98Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 21Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 46 151 1425 1848Effct. Green for Bike (s) 6.9 9.4 30.8 34.4Cross Street Width (ft) 72.9 73.9 37.5 37.9Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 115 157 513 573Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 53.3 51.0 33.2 30.5Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 2.75 2.94 3.31 3.66Bicycle LOS CCCD7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 22Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 344 217 403 355 424 204 342 1195 119 894 860v/c Ratio 0.74 0.24 0.82 1.31 0.85 0.40 1.04 1.00 1.18 0.83 1.11Control Delay 58.4 34.1 39.1 199.9 55.5 15.5 111.0 63.5 193.5 45.5 90.9Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 58.4 34.1 39.1 199.9 55.5 15.5 111.0 63.5 193.5 45.5 90.9Queue Length 50th (ft) 128 66 183 ~343 294 45 ~143 ~477 ~107 327 ~504Queue Length 95th (ft) #197 100 308 #554 416 110 #251 #667 #237 #455 #796Internal Link Dist (ft) 344 770 1992 451Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 300 150 125 250 250 300Base Capacity (vph) 468 1091 572 272 607 593 329 1197 101 1078 776Starvation Cap Reductn00000000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.74 0.20 0.70 1.31 0.70 0.34 1.04 1.00 1.18 0.83 1.11Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 23Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 320 202 375 330 394 190 318 981 130 111 831 800Future Volume (veh/h) 320 202 375 330 394 190 318 981 130 111 831 800Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 344 217 403 355 424 204 342 1055 140 119 894 860Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 404 1017 438 262 591 486 316 1029 136 97 1033 634Arrive On Green 0.12 0.29 0.29 0.15 0.32 0.32 0.09 0.33 0.33 0.05 0.29 0.29Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1532 1781 1870 1537 3456 3141 416 1781 3554 1542Grp Volume(v), veh/h 344 217 403 355 424 204 342 596 599 119 894 860Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1532 1781 1870 1537 1728 1777 1781 1781 1777 1542Q Serve(g_s), s 11.6 5.5 30.3 17.5 23.9 12.5 10.9 39.0 39.0 6.5 28.4 34.6Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.6 5.5 30.3 17.5 23.9 12.5 10.9 39.0 39.0 6.5 28.4 34.6Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 404 1017 438 262 591 486 316 582 583 97 1033 634V/C Ratio(X) 0.85 0.21 0.92 1.36 0.72 0.42 1.08 1.02 1.03 1.22 0.87 1.36Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 450 1045 450 262 591 486 316 582 583 97 1033 634HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 51.5 32.3 41.2 50.8 36.0 32.1 54.1 40.0 40.0 56.3 40.0 35.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 13.3 0.1 23.7 183.1 4.2 0.6 73.9 43.6 44.3 163.2 7.9 170.8Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.8 2.4 14.2 21.1 11.5 4.7 8.0 23.8 24.0 7.3 13.4 48.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 64.9 32.4 64.9 233.9 40.2 32.7 128.0 83.6 84.3 219.4 47.9 206.2LnGrp LOS ECEFDCFFFFDFApproach Vol, veh/h 964 983 1537 1873Approach Delay, s/veh 57.6 108.6 93.8 131.5Approach LOS E F F FTimer - Assigned Phs12345678Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.0 44.5 23.0 39.6 16.4 40.1 19.4 43.1Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.5 39.0 17.5 35.0 10.9 34.6 15.5 37.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.5 41.0 19.5 32.3 12.9 36.6 13.6 25.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.3 2.9Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 103.2HCM 6th LOS F7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 24Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 73.8 71.3 72.3 84.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed7566Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.98 2.61 2.99 3.04Pedestrian Crosswalk LOSCCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 25Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 964 983 1537 1873Effct. Green for Bike (s) 28.6 30.6 39.1 34.7Cross Street Width (ft) 72.3 83.0 71.5 85.4Through Lanes Number2122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 477 510 652 578Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 34.8 33.3 27.3 30.3Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Fair PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.46 4.45 3.92 4.41Bicycle LOS CDDD7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 26IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.2Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 41 40 90 1529 1006 151Future Vol, veh/h 41 40 90 1529 1006 151Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 75 200 - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 44 43 96 1627 1070 161Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 2157 616 1231 0 - 0 Stage 1 1151----- Stage 2 1006-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 41 433 562 - - - Stage 1 263----- Stage 2 314-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 34 433 562 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 149----- Stage 1 218----- Stage 2 314-----Approach EB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 26.7 0.7 0HCM LOS DMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 562 - 149 433 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.17 - 0.293 0.098 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 12.7 - 38.9 14.2 - -HCM Lane LOS B - E B - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 - 1.1 0.3 - -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 27ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 8393756.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 67Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2535Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.14Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.98Delay for adq Gap 8393758.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 8393756.00ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 114774376.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 80Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2535Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 25.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.99Delay for adq Gap 114774376.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 114774376.007DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 28Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 55 11 11 144 22 1425 485 1203v/c Ratio 0.44 0.04 0.09 0.53 0.26 0.92 0.98 0.47Control Delay 54.0 0.3 42.7 14.9 54.6 37.0 72.9 6.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0Total Delay 54.0 0.3 42.7 14.9 54.6 37.6 72.9 6.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 34 0 7 0 14 434 307 98Queue Length 95th (ft) 73 0 24 56 40 #633 #540 241Internal Link Dist (ft) 310 100 537 936Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 75 200 200Base Capacity (vph) 397 530 375 545 85 1551 495 2539Starvation Cap Reductn000002200Spillback Cap Reductn00000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.02 0.03 0.26 0.26 0.93 0.98 0.47Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 29Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 40 10 10 10 0 131 20 1277 20 441 975 120Future Volume (veh/h) 40 10 10 10 0 131 20 1277 20 441 975 120Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 44 11 11 11 0 144 22 1403 22 485 1071 132Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 195 42 181 244 0 181 33 1554 24 512 2233 275Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.11 0.02 0.43 0.43 0.29 0.70 0.70Sat Flow, veh/h 1141 367 1585 1511 0 1585 1781 3579 56 1781 3176 391Grp Volume(v), veh/h 55 0 11 11 0 144 22 696 729 485 599 604Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1508 0 1585 1511 0 1585 1781 1777 1858 1781 1777 1790Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 8.9 1.2 36.5 36.6 26.7 15.1 15.2Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.3 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.0 8.9 1.2 36.5 36.6 26.7 15.1 15.2Prop In Lane 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.22Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 236 0 181 244 0 181 33 771 807 512 1249 1258V/C Ratio(X) 0.23 0.00 0.06 0.05 0.00 0.80 0.68 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.48 0.48Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 498 0 459 490 0 459 89 807 844 515 1249 1258HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.7 0.0 39.6 39.6 0.0 43.3 48.9 26.4 26.4 35.0 6.7 6.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 7.8 21.7 13.1 12.7 26.9 0.3 0.3Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.3 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 3.8 0.7 17.5 18.3 15.1 5.0 5.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 41.2 0.0 39.8 39.7 0.0 51.1 70.6 39.4 39.1 61.9 6.9 7.0LnGrp LOS D A D D A D E D D E A AApproach Vol, veh/h 66 155 1447 1688Approach Delay, s/veh 41.0 50.3 39.8 22.7Approach LOS DDDCTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 33.8 50.0 16.4 6.8 77.0 16.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.0 45.5 29.0 5.0 69.5 29.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 28.7 38.6 5.3 3.2 17.2 10.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 4.9 0.3 0.0 12.0 0.6Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 31.7HCM 6th LOS C7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 30Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 34.0 34.2 57.2 59.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3355Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.03 2.18 2.82 2.96Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 31Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 66 155 1447 1688Effct. Green for Bike (s) 9.2 9.2 45.5 75.6Cross Street Width (ft) 57.2 59.2 34.2 34.0Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 153 153 758 1260Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 51.2 51.2 23.1 8.2Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Fair GoodBicycle LOS Score 2.76 2.94 3.49 3.69Bicycle LOS CCCD 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 1Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 33 22 346 342 698 22 1011 396 507 1056v/c Ratio 0.25 0.08 0.96 0.91 0.90 0.32 0.91 0.42 1.77 0.60Control Delay 48.2 0.5 76.6 66.5 24.8 59.8 45.1 4.8 386.2 20.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 48.2 0.5 76.6 66.5 24.8 59.8 45.1 4.8 386.2 20.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 20 0 ~236 228 99 14 332 34 ~497 231Queue Length 95th (ft) 50 0 #434 #418 #340 41 #476 63 #704 373Internal Link Dist (ft) 109 1057 1054 1668Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 140 100 165Base Capacity (vph) 477 561 362 377 779 69 1114 954 287 1760Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.04 0.96 0.91 0.90 0.32 0.91 0.42 1.77 0.60Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 20 10 20 593 20 621 20 900 352 451 900 40Future Volume (veh/h) 20 10 20 593 20 621 20 900 352 451 900 40Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 11 22 682 0 0 22 1011 396 507 1011 45Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 62 31 78 769 0 33 1119 829 298 1604 71Arrive On Green 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.31 0.31 0.17 0.46 0.46Sat Flow, veh/h 1207 603 1505 3563 0 1585 1781 3554 1545 1781 3460 154Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 0 22 682 0 0 22 1011 396 507 519 537Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 0 1505 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1545 1781 1777 1837Q Serve(g_s), s 1.7 0.0 1.3 17.8 0.0 0.0 1.2 26.1 15.5 16.0 21.2 21.2Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 0.0 1.3 17.8 0.0 0.0 1.2 26.1 15.5 16.0 21.2 21.2Prop In Lane 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.08Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 93 0 78 769 0 33 1119 829 298 824 851V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.00 0.28 0.89 0.00 0.67 0.90 0.48 1.70 0.63 0.63Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 510 0 424 818 0 74 1150 842 298 824 851HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.9 0.0 43.7 36.4 0.0 0.0 46.7 31.4 14.2 39.9 19.5 19.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.3 0.0 2.0 11.1 0.0 0.0 20.8 9.9 0.4 330.8 1.6 1.5Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.5 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.7 11.9 7.9 34.0 8.2 8.5Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.1 0.0 45.7 47.6 0.0 0.0 67.5 41.3 14.6 370.7 21.0 21.0LnGrp LOS D A D D A E D B F C CApproach Vol, veh/h 55 682 A 1429 1563Approach Delay, s/veh 45.9 47.6 34.3 134.4Approach LOS D D C FTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.0 36.2 10.9 7.8 50.4 26.7Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 31.0 27.0 4.0 43.0 22.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 18.0 28.1 3.7 3.2 23.2 19.8Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.1 0.2 0.0 6.5 0.8Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 78.9HCM 6th LOS ENotesUser approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 3Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 50.7 58.5 67.8 54.5Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3465Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 25 45 45 45Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.00 2.99 3.24 3.28Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B C C C7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 4Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 55 1386 1429 1563Effct. Green for Bike (s) 7.4 22.1 31.2 49.5Cross Street Width (ft) 67.8 54.5 58.5 50.7Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 10.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 123 368 520 825Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 52.8 39.9 32.9 20.7Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor FairBicycle LOS Score 3.12 4.89 3.85 3.84Bicycle LOS C E D D 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 5Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 95 856 117 1299 32 191 53 53v/c Ratio 0.33 0.44 0.24 0.64 0.15 0.49 0.26 0.18Control Delay 6.7 8.8 4.1 9.9 21.5 8.8 23.7 5.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 6.7 8.8 4.1 9.9 21.5 8.8 23.7 5.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 78 8 128 9 0 15 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 20 132 23 215 28 44 41 16Internal Link Dist (ft) 1057 1798 155 449Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 160 25 25Base Capacity (vph) 286 1991 483 2092 702 847 658 787Starvation Cap Reductn00000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.43 0.24 0.62 0.05 0.23 0.08 0.07Intersection Summary7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 6Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 90 783 30 111 1164 70 20 10 181 40 10 50Future Volume (veh/h) 90 783 30 111 1164 70 20 10 181 40 10 50Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 95 824 32 117 1225 74 21 11 191 42 11 53Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 330 1646 64 460 1627 98 153 56 353 175 31 353Arrive On Green 0.06 0.47 0.47 0.06 0.48 0.48 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3487 135 1781 3405 205 147 254 1585 201 141 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 95 420 436 117 639 660 32 0 191 53 0 53Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1846 1781 1777 1833 400 0 1585 342 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 8.1 8.1 1.6 14.6 14.6 0.2 0.0 5.3 1.3 0.0 1.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.3 8.1 8.1 1.6 14.6 14.6 9.6 0.0 5.3 10.1 0.0 1.3Prop In Lane 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.11 0.66 1.00 0.79 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 330 839 871 460 849 876 209 0 353 206 0 353V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.75 0.75 0.15 0.00 0.54 0.26 0.00 0.15Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 370 1001 1040 561 1073 1107 595 0 766 539 0 766HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 8.3 9.1 9.1 6.5 10.6 10.6 16.0 0.0 17.1 19.9 0.0 15.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 2.3 2.3 0.3 0.0 1.3 0.7 0.0 0.2Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 2.5 2.6 0.5 4.9 5.0 0.3 0.0 1.8 0.6 0.0 0.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 8.8 9.5 9.5 6.8 12.9 12.9 16.3 0.0 18.4 20.5 0.0 15.7LnGrp LOS AAAABBBABCABApproach Vol, veh/h 951 1416 223 106Approach Delay, s/veh 9.4 12.4 18.1 18.1Approach LOS ABBBTimer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.7 7.2 27.6 15.7 6.9 27.9Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 24.0 6.0 28.0 24.0 4.0 30.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.6 3.6 10.1 12.1 3.3 16.6Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 0.1 5.5 0.3 0.0 7.5Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.0HCM 6th LOS B 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 7Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 57.8 60.4 36.1 36.7Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed5533Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.74 2.78 2.06 2.03Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS C C B B7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 8Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 951 1416 223 106Effct. Green for Bike (s) 28.0 29.5 7.4 7.4Cross Street Width (ft) 36.1 36.7 60.4 57.8Through Lanes Number2211Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 800 843 211 211Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 12.6 11.7 28.0 28.0Bicycle Compliance Fair Fair Fair FairBicycle LOS Score 2.90 3.29 2.85 2.62Bicycle LOS CCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 9ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 251606.7Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 66Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1947Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 21.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.95Delay for adq Gap 251608.55Avg Ped Delay (s) 251606.70ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 342728.1Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1947Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.95Delay for adq Gap 342729.91Avg Ped Delay (s) 342728.067DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 10IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.6Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 1127 30 251 1218 40 301Future Vol, veh/h 1127 30 251 1218 40 301Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - 110 - 0 25Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 1266 34 282 1369 45 338Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1300 0 2532 650 Stage 1 - - - - 1283 - Stage 2 - - - - 1249 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 529 - ~ 23 412 Stage 1 - - - - 224 - Stage 2 - - - - 234 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 529 - ~ 11 412Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - ~ -135 - Stage 1 - - - - 105 - Stage 2 - - - - 234 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Control Delay, s 0 3.3HCM LOS -Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) + 412 - - 529 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.821 - - 0.533 -HCM Control Delay (s) - 43.1 - - 19.3 -HCM Lane LOS - E - - C -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 7.6 - - 3.1 -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 11ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? YesApproach Delay(s) 119.1Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 10 28Lanes Crossed 2 1Veh Vol Crossed 1127 1218Ped Vol Crossed 0 0Yield Rate(%) 0 0Ped Platooning No NoCritical Headway (s) 5.86 11.00Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.84 0.98Prob of Blocked Lane 0.60 0.98Delay for adq Gap 13.01 110.89Avg Ped Delay (s) 10.93 108.21ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 3396865.3Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2345Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.97Delay for adq Gap 3396866.75Avg Ped Delay (s) 3396865.257DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 12Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 12 1652 115 1393 8 287 176 24 13v/c Ratio 0.18 0.93 0.85 0.65 0.01 0.81 0.42 0.35 0.12Control Delay 60.2 36.5 96.7 18.5 0.0 58.7 17.6 67.5 35.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 60.2 36.5 96.7 19.3 0.0 58.7 17.6 67.5 35.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 470 74 230 0 174 35 15 2Queue Length 95th (ft) 30 #822 #199 532 0 292 102 #48 24Internal Link Dist (ft) 160 81 330 315Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 210 50Base Capacity (vph) 67 1775 135 2157 1036 457 554 69 144Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 42500000Spillback Cap Reductn000000000Storage Cap Reductn000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 0.93 0.85 0.80 0.01 0.63 0.32 0.35 0.09Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 13Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 11 1297 140 100 1212 7 250 4 150 22 4 8Future Volume (veh/h) 11 1297 140 100 1212 7 250 4 150 22 4 8Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 1491 161 115 1393 8 287 4 172 24 4 9Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.92 0.87 0.92 0.87 0.92 0.92 0.92Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 20 1573 168 132 1965 876 324 7 318 34 19 42Arrive On Green 0.01 0.49 0.49 0.07 0.55 0.55 0.18 0.20 0.20 0.02 0.04 0.04Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3238 347 1781 3554 1585 1781 36 1554 1781 512 1151Grp Volume(v), veh/h 12 812 840 115 1393 8 287 0 176 24 0 13Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1808 1781 1777 1585 1781 0 1591 1781 0 1663Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 46.9 48.3 6.9 31.2 0.2 17.0 0.0 10.7 1.5 0.0 0.8Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 46.9 48.3 6.9 31.2 0.2 17.0 0.0 10.7 1.5 0.0 0.8Prop In Lane 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.69Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 20 863 878 132 1965 876 324 0 325 34 0 61V/C Ratio(X) 0.60 0.94 0.96 0.87 0.71 0.01 0.88 0.00 0.54 0.71 0.00 0.21Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 66 869 885 132 1965 876 444 0 461 67 0 130HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 53.3 26.4 26.8 49.7 17.8 10.9 43.2 0.0 38.5 52.8 0.0 50.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 25.8 17.9 20.4 43.3 1.2 0.0 14.8 0.0 1.4 23.8 0.0 1.7Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 23.1 24.7 4.7 12.4 0.1 8.8 0.0 4.3 0.9 0.0 0.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 79.1 44.2 47.1 92.9 19.0 10.9 58.0 0.0 39.9 76.6 0.0 52.3LnGrp LOS EDDFBBEADEADApproach Vol, veh/h 1664 1516 463 37Approach Delay, s/veh 46.0 24.6 51.1 68.1Approach LOS D C D ETimer - Assigned Phs12345678Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.6 28.2 14.0 58.6 25.7 10.0 6.7 65.9Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 * 6 5.5 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.1 31.4 8.0 53.0 27.0 * 8.5 4.0 57.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 12.7 8.9 50.3 19.0 2.8 2.7 33.2Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 12.5Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 38.0HCM 6th LOS DNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 14Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 59.2 60.1 36.2 24.0Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed5633Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.98 2.99 2.20 1.98Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS C C B B 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 15Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1664 1516 463 37Effct. Green for Bike (s) 53.6 64.3 22.2 6.1Cross Street Width (ft) 36.3 37.5 74.4 60.1Through Lanes Number2211Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 893 1072 370 102Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 18.4 12.9 39.9 54.1Bicycle Compliance Fair Fair Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.49 3.38 3.46 2.54Bicycle LOS CCCC7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 16IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 13.2Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 91 150 1698 101 90 1524Future Vol, veh/h 91 150 1698 101 90 1524Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 12 12 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 100 - - 200 -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 98 161 1826 109 97 1639Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 2907 980 0 0 1947 0 Stage 1 1893----- Stage 2 1014-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 12 249 - - 297 - Stage 1 104----- Stage 2 311-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 8 246 - - 294 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 62----- Stage 1 ~ 69----- Stage 2 311-----Approach WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 191.2 0 1.3HCM LOS FMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h) - - 62 246 294 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 1.578 0.656 0.329 -HCM Control Delay (s) - -$ 434.3 43.7 23.1 -HCM Lane LOS - - F E C -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 8.7 4.1 1.4 -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 17ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 583470080.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 3222Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.99Delay for adq Gap 583470080.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 583470080.00ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 583470080.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 3222Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.99Delay for adq Gap 583470080.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 583470080.007DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 18Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 108 56 213 179 42 1769 147 147 1439 62v/c Ratio 0.39 0.16 0.62 0.40 0.49 1.54 0.26 1.36 1.12 0.10Control Delay 36.3 1.0 40.0 7.8 64.3 273.5 11.3 247.8 94.9 1.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 36.3 1.0 40.0 7.8 64.3 273.5 11.3 247.8 94.9 1.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 49 0 96 0 20 ~628 12 ~92 ~437 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 111 0 214 55 #98 #1308 81 #311 #1015 7Internal Link Dist (ft) 288 473 404 1931Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 180 150 170 150 430Base Capacity (vph) 767 738 696 728 86 1147 565 108 1282 626Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.08 0.31 0.25 0.49 1.54 0.26 1.36 1.12 0.10Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 19Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 81 22 53 190 12 170 40 1681 140 140 1367 59Future Volume (veh/h) 81 22 53 190 12 170 40 1681 140 140 1367 59Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 85 23 56 200 13 179 42 1769 147 147 1439 62Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 133 36 146 284 18 269 56 1309 564 124 1443 627Arrive On Green 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.03 0.37 0.37 0.07 0.41 0.41Sat Flow, veh/h 1416 383 1551 1677 109 1585 1781 3554 1533 1781 3554 1545Grp Volume(v), veh/h 108 0 56 213 0 179 42 1769 147 147 1439 62Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1800 0 1551 1786 0 1585 1781 1777 1533 1781 1777 1545Q Serve(g_s), s 4.2 0.0 2.4 8.1 0.0 7.6 1.7 26.5 4.8 5.0 29.1 1.8Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.2 0.0 2.4 8.1 0.0 7.6 1.7 26.5 4.8 5.0 29.1 1.8Prop In Lane 0.79 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 169 0 146 303 0 269 56 1309 564 124 1443 627V/C Ratio(X) 0.64 0.00 0.38 0.70 0.00 0.67 0.75 1.35 0.26 1.19 1.00 0.10Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 875 0 754 794 0 705 99 1309 564 124 1443 627HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.4 0.0 30.6 28.2 0.0 28.0 34.6 22.7 15.9 33.5 21.3 13.2Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.0 0.0 1.7 3.0 0.0 2.8 17.6 163.5 0.2 140.0 22.9 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.9 0.0 1.0 3.6 0.0 3.0 1.0 39.8 1.6 6.9 15.5 0.6Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.4 0.0 32.3 31.2 0.0 30.8 52.2 186.2 16.1 173.5 44.3 13.3LnGrp LOS D A C C A C D F B F D BApproach Vol, veh/h 164 392 1958 1648Approach Delay, s/veh 34.3 31.0 170.5 54.6Approach LOS C C F DTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 33.0 11.8 7.3 35.7 17.2Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 26.5 35.0 4.0 27.5 32.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.0 28.5 6.2 3.7 31.1 10.1Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 2.1Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 106.1HCM 6th LOS F7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 20Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 36.0 36.1 61.3 62.1Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3366Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.05 2.19 3.07 3.07Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 21Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 164 392 1958 1648Effct. Green for Bike (s) 13.3 16.5 27.5 30.7Cross Street Width (ft) 72.9 73.9 37.4 37.7Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 222 275 458 512Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 47.4 44.6 35.7 33.2Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 2.95 3.34 3.75 3.50Bicycle LOS CCDC7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 22Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 678 599 222 219 286 178 524 1460 304 900 573v/c Ratio 1.77 0.70 0.41 1.66 0.74 0.40 0.91 1.08 1.68 0.78 0.71Control Delay 384.6 41.3 6.5 361.3 52.2 10.1 65.8 81.5 358.6 39.1 18.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 384.6 41.3 6.5 361.3 52.2 10.1 65.8 81.5 358.6 39.1 18.6Queue Length 50th (ft) ~359 197 0 ~220 185 11 184 ~585 ~306 292 172Queue Length 95th (ft) #523 256 56 #405 276 66 #319 #824 #523 417 346Internal Link Dist (ft) 372 770 1992 544Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 300 150 125 250 250 300Base Capacity (vph) 384 1289 698 132 608 616 577 1350 181 1156 812Starvation Cap Reductn00000000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 1.77 0.46 0.32 1.66 0.47 0.29 0.91 1.08 1.68 0.78 0.71Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 23Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 651 575 213 210 275 171 503 1042 360 292 864 550Future Volume (veh/h) 651 575 213 210 275 171 503 1042 360 292 864 550Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 678 599 222 219 286 178 524 1085 375 304 900 573Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 372 969 417 128 443 362 558 974 331 176 1117 656Arrive On Green 0.11 0.27 0.27 0.07 0.24 0.24 0.16 0.38 0.38 0.10 0.31 0.31Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1530 1781 1870 1528 3456 2583 877 1781 3554 1544Grp Volume(v), veh/h 678 599 222 219 286 178 524 740 720 304 900 573Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1530 1781 1870 1528 1728 1777 1684 1781 1777 1544Q Serve(g_s), s 12.0 16.4 13.7 8.0 15.3 11.2 16.7 42.0 42.0 11.0 25.9 35.0Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.0 16.4 13.7 8.0 15.3 11.2 16.7 42.0 42.0 11.0 25.9 35.0Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.52 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 372 969 417 128 443 362 558 670 635 176 1117 656V/C Ratio(X) 1.82 0.62 0.53 1.71 0.65 0.49 0.94 1.11 1.13 1.73 0.81 0.87Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 372 1244 536 128 588 480 558 670 635 176 1117 656HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 49.7 35.4 34.5 51.7 38.3 36.7 46.1 34.7 34.7 50.2 35.1 29.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 379.9 0.6 1.1 351.1 1.6 1.0 23.8 67.2 78.4 350.3 4.4 12.5Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 24.8 7.2 5.2 16.0 7.2 4.3 9.0 30.1 30.5 22.0 11.7 15.9Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 429.6 36.1 35.5 402.8 39.9 37.7 70.0 101.8 113.1 400.5 39.5 42.0LnGrp LOS F D D F D D E F F F D DApproach Vol, veh/h 1499 683 1984 1777Approach Delay, s/veh 214.0 155.7 97.5 102.1Approach LOS FFFFTimer - Assigned Phs12345678Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.0 47.0 13.0 35.4 23.0 40.0 17.0 31.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 42.0 8.0 39.0 18.0 35.0 12.0 35.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.0 44.0 10.0 18.4 18.7 37.0 14.0 17.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 134.9HCM 6th LOS F7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 24Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 73.8 71.3 72.3 84.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed7566Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 3.02 2.70 3.01 3.08Pedestrian Crosswalk LOSCCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 25Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1499 683 1984 1777Effct. Green for Bike (s) 26.1 22.1 42.1 35.1Cross Street Width (ft) 72.3 83.1 71.4 85.7Through Lanes Number2122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 435 368 702 585Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 36.7 39.9 25.3 30.0Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Fair PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.90 3.96 4.29 4.34Bicycle LOS DDDD7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 26IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 7.8Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 121 50 90 1413 1315 81Future Vol, veh/h 121 50 90 1413 1315 81Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 75 200 - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 129 53 96 1503 1399 86Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 2386 743 1485 0 - 0 Stage 1 1442----- Stage 2 944-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 28 358 449 - - - Stage 1 184----- Stage 2 339-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 22 358 449 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 118----- Stage 1 145----- Stage 2 339-----Approach EB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 132.3 0.9 0HCM LOS FMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 449 - 118 358 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.213 - 1.091 0.149 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 15.2 - 180 16.8 - -HCM Lane LOS C - F C - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - 7.7 0.5 - -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 27ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 25564822.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 67Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2728Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.14Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.98Delay for adq Gap 25564824.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 25564822.00ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 426589408.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 80Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2728Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 25.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.99Delay for adq Gap 426589408.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 426589408.007DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 28Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 276 44 33 387 22 1243 321 1411v/c Ratio 0.90 0.10 0.22 0.62 0.29 0.90 0.90 0.68Control Delay 74.1 0.4 40.1 12.0 65.9 42.5 74.2 18.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 74.1 0.4 40.1 12.0 65.9 43.5 74.2 18.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 205 0 20 34 17 467 244 400Queue Length 95th (ft) #360 0 51 134 46 #606 #412 486Internal Link Dist (ft) 310 100 537 936Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 75 200 200Base Capacity (vph) 339 497 169 650 75 1464 378 2116Starvation Cap Reductn000007100Spillback Cap Reductn00000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.81 0.09 0.20 0.60 0.29 0.89 0.85 0.67Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 29Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 241 10 40 30 0 352 20 1111 20 292 1213 71Future Volume (veh/h) 241 10 40 30 0 352 20 1111 20 292 1213 71Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 265 11 44 33 0 387 22 1221 22 321 1333 78Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 426 15 412 495 0 412 32 1401 25 353 1952 114Arrive On Green 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.02 0.39 0.39 0.20 0.57 0.57Sat Flow, veh/h 1392 58 1585 1654 0 1585 1781 3569 64 1781 3407 199Grp Volume(v), veh/h 276 0 44 33 0 387 22 608 635 321 694 717Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1450 0 1585 1654 0 1585 1781 1777 1857 1781 1777 1829Q Serve(g_s), s 17.5 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 26.5 1.4 35.0 35.0 19.5 30.3 30.5Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 19.1 0.0 2.3 1.5 0.0 26.5 1.4 35.0 35.0 19.5 30.3 30.5Prop In Lane 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.11Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 441 0 412 495 0 412 32 697 729 353 1018 1048V/C Ratio(X) 0.63 0.00 0.11 0.07 0.00 0.94 0.70 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.68 0.68Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 457 0 430 511 0 430 80 778 813 402 1099 1132HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.2 0.0 31.2 30.9 0.0 40.1 54.1 31.0 31.1 43.4 16.6 16.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 28.0 23.9 9.8 9.5 22.4 1.6 1.6Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 7.1 0.0 0.9 0.7 0.0 13.4 0.8 16.5 17.2 10.7 12.1 12.6Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 39.8 0.0 31.3 30.9 0.0 68.1 78.0 40.9 40.5 65.8 18.1 18.2LnGrp LOS DACCAEEDDEBBApproach Vol, veh/h 320 420 1265 1732Approach Delay, s/veh 38.6 65.1 41.3 27.0Approach LOS D E D CTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 27.0 49.9 33.8 7.0 69.9 33.8Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.0 48.5 30.0 5.0 68.5 30.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 21.5 37.0 21.1 3.4 32.5 28.5Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 6.5 1.2 0.0 14.2 0.3Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 37.1HCM 6th LOS D7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 30Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 34.0 34.2 57.2 59.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3355Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.10 2.21 2.84 3.02Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 31Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 320 420 1265 1732Effct. Green for Bike (s) 27.5 27.5 46.2 69.3Cross Street Width (ft) 57.2 59.2 34.2 34.0Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 458 458 770 1155Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 35.7 35.7 22.7 10.7Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Fair FairBicycle LOS Score 3.18 3.37 3.34 3.72Bicycle LOS CCCD Cumulative Plus Project 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 1Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 42 32 145 145 306 21 568 887 526 506v/c Ratio 0.29 0.11 0.41 0.39 0.52 0.20 0.75 0.88 1.26 0.31Control Delay 48.0 0.8 37.1 36.5 7.6 49.9 40.8 16.4 168.5 17.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 48.0 0.8 37.1 36.5 7.6 49.9 40.8 16.4 168.5 17.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 25 0 80 80 0 13 171 85 ~428 90Queue Length 95th (ft) 61 0 153 152 71 39 238 #298 #681 163Internal Link Dist (ft) 109 1057 1054 1668Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 140 100 165Base Capacity (vph) 508 570 383 399 612 110 987 1028 417 1665Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.06 0.38 0.36 0.50 0.19 0.58 0.86 1.26 0.30Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 20 20 30 265 10 291 20 540 843 500 470 10Future Volume (veh/h) 20 20 30 265 10 291 20 540 843 500 470 10Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 21 21 32 287 0 0 21 568 887 526 495 11Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 55 55 90 432 0 33 1066 655 452 1901 42Arrive On Green 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.30 0.30 0.25 0.54 0.54Sat Flow, veh/h 912 912 1514 3563 0 1585 1781 3554 1544 1781 3551 79Grp Volume(v), veh/h 42 0 32 287 0 0 21 568 887 526 247 259Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1825 0 1514 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1544 1781 1777 1853Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 0.0 1.8 6.7 0.0 0.0 1.0 11.5 26.0 22.0 6.5 6.5Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 0.0 1.8 6.7 0.0 0.0 1.0 11.5 26.0 22.0 6.5 6.5Prop In Lane 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 109 0 90 432 0 33 1066 655 452 951 992V/C Ratio(X) 0.39 0.00 0.35 0.66 0.00 0.64 0.53 1.35 1.16 0.26 0.26Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 568 0 471 904 0 123 1066 655 452 951 992HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.2 0.0 39.2 36.4 0.0 0.0 42.3 25.3 22.0 32.4 10.9 10.9Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 0.0 2.3 1.8 0.0 0.0 19.2 0.5 169.0 95.5 0.1 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.0 0.7 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.6 4.6 44.2 20.7 2.2 2.3Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 41.4 0.0 41.5 38.2 0.0 0.0 61.5 25.8 191.1 127.9 11.0 11.0LnGrp LOS D A D D A E C F F B BApproach Vol, veh/h 74 287 A 1476 1032Approach Delay, s/veh 41.5 38.2 125.6 70.6Approach LOS D D F ETimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 27.0 32.0 11.2 6.6 52.4 16.5Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 26.0 27.0 6.0 42.0 22.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 24.0 28.0 3.9 3.0 8.5 8.7Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 3.0 1.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 94.9HCM 6th LOS FNotesUser approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 3Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 50.7 58.5 67.8 54.5Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3465Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 25 45 45 45Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 1.99 2.89 3.03 2.88Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B C C C7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 4Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 74 596 1476 1032Effct. Green for Bike (s) 7.9 20.8 20.5 44.2Cross Street Width (ft) 67.8 54.5 58.5 50.7Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 10.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 132 347 342 737Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 52.4 41.0 41.3 23.9Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor FairBicycle LOS Score 3.15 3.59 3.89 3.40Bicycle LOS CDDC 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 5Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 55 1444 133 732 44 99 55 44v/c Ratio 0.10 0.62 0.41 0.29 0.21 0.33 0.30 0.16Control Delay 3.1 10.0 8.2 5.2 27.4 9.8 29.4 5.5Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 3.1 10.0 8.2 5.2 27.4 9.8 29.4 5.5Queue Length 50th (ft) 4 175 10 58 15 0 20 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 274 39 96 42 36 50 16Internal Link Dist (ft) 1057 1748 155 449Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 160 25 25Base Capacity (vph) 559 2413 329 2526 655 741 595 723Starvation Cap Reductn00000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.60 0.40 0.29 0.07 0.13 0.09 0.06Intersection Summary7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 6Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 50 1264 50 121 626 40 20 20 90 40 10 40Future Volume (veh/h) 50 1264 50 121 626 40 20 20 90 40 10 40Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 55 1389 55 133 688 44 22 22 99 44 11 44Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 448 1682 66 269 1712 109 91 66 444 121 20 444Arrive On Green 0.04 0.48 0.48 0.06 0.50 0.50 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3485 138 1781 3391 217 40 237 1585 88 71 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 55 707 737 133 360 372 44 0 99 55 0 44Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1846 1781 1777 1831 277 0 1585 159 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 1.0 23.1 23.2 2.5 8.5 8.5 0.5 0.0 3.2 1.5 0.0 1.4Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 23.1 23.2 2.5 8.5 8.5 18.4 0.0 3.2 18.9 0.0 1.4Prop In Lane 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.12 0.50 1.00 0.80 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 448 857 891 269 897 924 158 0 444 141 0 444V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.82 0.83 0.49 0.40 0.40 0.28 0.00 0.22 0.39 0.00 0.10Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 487 1001 1040 322 1054 1086 276 0 564 244 0 564HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 8.4 15.0 15.0 13.3 10.4 10.4 19.8 0.0 18.6 28.6 0.0 18.0Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 5.0 4.9 1.4 0.3 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.3 1.8 0.0 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 9.2 9.6 0.9 3.0 3.0 0.5 0.0 1.1 0.9 0.0 0.5Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 8.5 20.0 20.0 14.7 10.7 10.7 20.8 0.0 18.9 30.3 0.0 18.1LnGrp LOS ACBBBBCABCABApproach Vol, veh/h 1499 865 143 99Approach Delay, s/veh 19.6 11.3 19.5 24.9Approach LOS B B B CTimer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.8 8.1 36.9 23.8 6.5 38.5Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 24.0 6.0 38.0 24.0 4.0 40.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 20.4 4.5 25.2 20.9 3.0 10.5Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.1 8.1 0.1 0.0 5.3Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.0HCM 6th LOS B 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 7Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 57.8 60.4 36.1 36.7Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed5533Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.74 2.77 2.06 2.02Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS C C B B7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 8Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1499 865 143 99Effct. Green for Bike (s) 38.2 41.3 7.8 7.8Cross Street Width (ft) 36.1 36.7 60.4 57.8Through Lanes Number2211Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 955 1032 195 195Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 10.9 9.4 32.6 32.6Bicycle Compliance Fair Good Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.35 2.83 2.72 2.61Bicycle LOS CCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 9ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 183363.7Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 66Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1890Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 21.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.94Delay for adq Gap 183365.61Avg Ped Delay (s) 183363.70ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 247522.9Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1890Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.95Delay for adq Gap 247524.81Avg Ped Delay (s) 247522.917DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 10IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.5Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 1147 40 233 1214 20 162Future Vol, veh/h 1147 40 233 1214 20 162Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - 110 - 0 25Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 1274 44 259 1349 22 180Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1318 0 2489 659 Stage 1 - - - - 1296 - Stage 2 - - - - 1193 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 520 - 24 406 Stage 1 - - - - 220 - Stage 2 - - - - 250 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 520 - ~ 12 406Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - ~ -13 - Stage 1 - - - - 110 - Stage 2 - - - - 250 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Control Delay, s 0 3HCM LOS -Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) + 406 - - 520 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.443 - - 0.498 -HCM Control Delay (s) - 20.7 - - 18.6 -HCM Lane LOS - C - - C -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 2.2 - - 2.7 -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 11ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? YesApproach Delay(s) 118.4Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 10 28Lanes Crossed 2 1Veh Vol Crossed 1147 1214Ped Vol Crossed 0 0Yield Rate(%) 0 0Ped Platooning No NoCritical Headway (s) 5.86 11.00Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.85 0.98Prob of Blocked Lane 0.61 0.98Delay for adq Gap 13.36 109.80Avg Ped Delay (s) 11.29 107.12ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 3727492.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2361Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.97Delay for adq Gap 3727493.50Avg Ped Delay (s) 3727492.007DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 12Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 5 1575 136 1597 3 59 25 9 4v/c Ratio 0.06 0.76 0.69 0.58 0.00 0.39 0.15 0.11 0.04Control Delay 45.2 17.7 58.8 8.1 0.0 47.2 19.0 46.8 35.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 45.2 17.7 58.8 8.4 0.0 47.2 19.0 46.8 35.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 312 73 151 0 31 1 5 1Queue Length 95th (ft) 15 534 #176 463 0 75 26 22 12Internal Link Dist (ft) 149 109 330 342Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 210 50Base Capacity (vph) 79 2072 197 2748 1258 177 579 79 511Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 44100000Spillback Cap Reductn000000000Storage Cap Reductn000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.76 0.69 0.69 0.00 0.33 0.04 0.11 0.01Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 13Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 5 1030 356 120 1405 3 52 2 20 8 2 2Future Volume (veh/h) 5 1030 356 120 1405 3 52 2 20 8 2 2Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 5 1170 405 136 1597 3 59 2 23 9 2 2Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.92 0.88 0.92 0.88 0.92 0.92 0.92Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 9 1410 477 170 2263 1009 90 10 111 16 24 24Arrive On Green 0.01 0.54 0.54 0.10 0.64 0.64 0.05 0.08 0.08 0.01 0.03 0.03Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 2606 882 1781 3554 1585 1781 128 1476 1781 858 858Grp Volume(v), veh/h 5 789 786 136 1597 3 59 0 25 9 0 4Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1712 1781 1777 1585 1781 0 1605 1781 0 1716Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 30.8 32.8 6.3 24.9 0.1 2.7 0.0 1.2 0.4 0.0 0.2Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.2 30.8 32.8 6.3 24.9 0.1 2.7 0.0 1.2 0.4 0.0 0.2Prop In Lane 1.00 0.52 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.50Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 9 961 926 170 2263 1009 90 0 121 16 0 48V/C Ratio(X) 0.54 0.82 0.85 0.80 0.71 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.21 0.56 0.00 0.08Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 85 1078 1039 212 2431 1084 191 0 601 85 0 541HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.7 15.9 16.4 37.2 10.1 5.6 39.2 0.0 36.5 41.5 0.0 39.8Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 40.2 4.7 6.2 15.9 0.9 0.0 7.9 0.0 0.8 27.1 0.0 0.7Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 12.4 13.0 3.4 8.4 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 81.9 20.7 22.6 53.2 10.9 5.6 47.1 0.0 37.3 68.6 0.0 40.5LnGrp LOS F C C D B A D A D E A DApproach Vol, veh/h 1580 1736 84 13Approach Delay, s/veh 21.8 14.2 44.2 60.0Approach LOS C B D ETimer - Assigned Phs12345678Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.3 12.3 14.0 51.5 10.2 8.4 5.9 59.5Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 * 6 5.5 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 31.5 10.0 51.0 9.0 * 27 4.0 57.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 3.2 8.3 34.8 4.7 2.2 2.2 26.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.1 0.1 10.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.8Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.7HCM 6th LOS BNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 14Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 59.2 60.1 36.2 24.1Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed5633Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.95 2.95 2.17 1.97Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS C C B B 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 15Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1580 1736 84 13Effct. Green for Bike (s) 54.3 69.8 8.2 5.7Cross Street Width (ft) 36.3 37.4 74.2 60.2Through Lanes Number2211Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 905 1163 137 95Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 18.0 10.5 52.1 54.4Bicycle Compliance Fair Fair Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.42 3.56 2.83 2.50Bicycle LOS CDCC7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 16IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.3Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 22 60 1021 83 140 1708Future Vol, veh/h 22 60 1021 83 140 1708Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 12 12 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 100 - - 200 -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 23 63 1075 87 147 1798Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 2324 593 0 0 1174 0 Stage 1 1131----- Stage 2 1193-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 31 449 - - 591 - Stage 1 270----- Stage 2 250-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 23 444 - - 584 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 88----- Stage 1 200----- Stage 2 250-----Approach WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 26.6 0 1HCM LOS DMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h) - - 88 444 584 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.263 0.142 0.252 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 59.9 14.4 13.2 -HCM Lane LOS - - F B B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1 0.5 1 -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 17ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 31931440.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2729Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.99Delay for adq Gap 31931442.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 31931440.00ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 31931440.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2729Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.99Delay for adq Gap 31931442.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 31931440.007DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 18Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 35 11 109 43 53 1238 184 85 1730 47v/c Ratio 0.19 0.04 0.43 0.13 0.43 0.75 0.24 0.70 0.93 0.05Control Delay 31.6 0.3 32.4 0.8 44.5 22.2 8.0 64.7 35.1 0.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 31.6 0.3 32.4 0.8 44.5 22.2 8.0 64.7 35.1 0.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 14 0 43 0 22 252 20 36 ~496 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 41 0 90 0 #67 #430 65 #115 #691 1Internal Link Dist (ft) 288 473 497 1931Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 180 150 170 150 430Base Capacity (vph) 972 898 879 843 122 1655 768 122 1851 855Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.01 0.12 0.05 0.43 0.75 0.24 0.70 0.93 0.05Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 19Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 22 11 10 91 11 40 50 1164 173 80 1626 44Future Volume (veh/h) 22 11 10 91 11 40 50 1164 173 80 1626 44Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 23 12 11 97 12 43 53 1238 184 85 1730 47Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 43 22 56 155 19 154 70 1561 675 108 1637 712Arrive On Green 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.04 0.44 0.44 0.06 0.46 0.46Sat Flow, veh/h 1190 621 1545 1594 197 1585 1781 3554 1536 1781 3554 1546Grp Volume(v), veh/h 35 0 11 109 0 43 53 1238 184 85 1730 47Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1811 0 1545 1791 0 1585 1781 1777 1536 1781 1777 1546Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 0.0 0.4 3.4 0.0 1.5 1.7 17.6 4.5 2.8 27.0 1.0Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 0.0 0.4 3.4 0.0 1.5 1.7 17.6 4.5 2.8 27.0 1.0Prop In Lane 0.66 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 65 0 56 174 0 154 70 1561 675 108 1637 712V/C Ratio(X) 0.54 0.00 0.20 0.63 0.00 0.28 0.75 0.79 0.27 0.78 1.06 0.07Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1081 0 923 978 0 865 137 1637 707 137 1637 712HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.8 0.0 27.4 25.4 0.0 24.6 27.9 14.1 10.5 27.1 15.8 8.8Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.7 0.0 1.7 3.7 0.0 1.0 15.0 2.7 0.2 20.3 39.0 0.0Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 0.0 0.2 1.5 0.0 0.6 1.0 6.5 1.3 1.7 17.8 0.3Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.5 0.0 29.2 29.1 0.0 25.5 42.8 16.8 10.7 47.5 54.8 8.8LnGrp LOS C A C C A C D B B D F AApproach Vol, veh/h 46 152 1475 1862Approach Delay, s/veh 33.2 28.1 17.0 53.3Approach LOS C C B DTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.6 32.2 7.1 7.3 33.5 10.7Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.5 27.0 35.0 4.5 27.0 32.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.8 19.6 3.1 3.7 29.0 5.4Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.8Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 36.8HCM 6th LOS D7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 20Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 36.0 36.1 61.3 62.1Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3366Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.01 2.10 3.01 2.99Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 21Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 46 152 1475 1862Effct. Green for Bike (s) 6.9 9.4 30.8 34.4Cross Street Width (ft) 72.9 73.9 37.5 37.9Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 115 157 513 573Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 53.3 51.0 33.2 30.5Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 2.75 2.94 3.35 3.68Bicycle LOS CCCD7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 22Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 395 228 429 355 427 204 349 1195 119 894 875v/c Ratio 0.84 0.26 0.87 1.31 0.85 0.40 1.06 1.00 1.18 0.83 1.13Control Delay 66.1 34.3 44.9 200.3 55.9 15.6 117.0 63.9 194.4 45.6 99.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 66.1 34.3 44.9 200.3 55.9 15.6 117.0 63.9 194.4 45.6 99.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 151 70 207 ~344 296 45 ~150 ~494 ~108 329 ~532Queue Length 95th (ft) #245 104 #347 #554 420 110 #256 #667 #237 #455 #824Internal Link Dist (ft) 344 770 1992 451Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 300 150 125 250 250 300Base Capacity (vph) 468 1089 572 272 606 592 328 1196 101 1077 773Starvation Cap Reductn00000000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.84 0.21 0.75 1.31 0.70 0.34 1.06 1.00 1.18 0.83 1.13Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 23Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 367 212 399 330 397 190 325 981 130 111 831 814Future Volume (veh/h) 367 212 399 330 397 190 325 981 130 111 831 814Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 395 228 429 355 427 204 349 1055 140 119 894 875Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 446 1036 447 260 577 474 314 1021 135 96 1025 649Arrive On Green 0.13 0.29 0.29 0.15 0.31 0.31 0.09 0.32 0.32 0.05 0.29 0.29Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1533 1781 1870 1537 3456 3141 416 1781 3554 1542Grp Volume(v), veh/h 395 228 429 355 427 204 349 596 599 119 894 875Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1533 1781 1870 1537 1728 1777 1781 1781 1777 1542Q Serve(g_s), s 13.5 5.8 33.0 17.5 24.6 12.7 10.9 39.0 39.0 6.5 28.7 34.6Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.5 5.8 33.0 17.5 24.6 12.7 10.9 39.0 39.0 6.5 28.7 34.6Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 446 1036 447 260 577 474 314 577 579 96 1025 649V/C Ratio(X) 0.89 0.22 0.96 1.37 0.74 0.43 1.11 1.03 1.03 1.23 0.87 1.35Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 446 1036 447 260 577 474 314 577 579 96 1025 649HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 51.4 32.2 41.8 51.3 37.2 33.1 54.5 40.5 40.5 56.7 40.6 35.1Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 18.8 0.1 32.3 187.7 5.1 0.6 84.3 46.0 46.7 167.0 8.4 166.5Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 7.0 2.5 16.3 21.3 12.0 4.8 8.4 24.1 24.3 7.4 13.6 48.5Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 70.1 32.3 74.1 238.9 42.2 33.7 138.9 86.5 87.2 223.7 49.0 201.6LnGrp LOS ECEFDCFFFFDFApproach Vol, veh/h 1052 986 1544 1888Approach Delay, s/veh 63.6 111.3 98.6 130.7Approach LOS E F F FTimer - Assigned Phs12345678Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.0 44.5 23.0 40.5 16.4 40.1 21.0 42.5Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.5 39.0 17.5 35.0 10.9 34.6 15.5 37.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.5 41.0 19.5 35.0 12.9 36.6 15.5 26.6Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 105.2HCM 6th LOS F7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 24Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 73.8 71.3 72.3 84.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed7566Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.99 2.61 3.00 3.05Pedestrian Crosswalk LOSCCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 25Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1052 986 1544 1888Effct. Green for Bike (s) 28.8 30.8 39.1 34.7Cross Street Width (ft) 72.3 83.0 71.5 85.4Through Lanes Number2122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 480 513 652 578Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 34.7 33.2 27.3 30.3Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Fair PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.53 4.46 3.93 4.42Bicycle LOS DDDD7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 26IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.2Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 42 40 90 1536 1028 153Future Vol, veh/h 42 40 90 1536 1028 153Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 75 200 - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 45 43 96 1634 1094 163Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 2185 629 1257 0 - 0 Stage 1 1176----- Stage 2 1009-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 39 425 549 - - - Stage 1 255----- Stage 2 313-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 32 425 549 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 145----- Stage 1 210----- Stage 2 313-----Approach EB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 27.8 0.7 0HCM LOS DMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 549 - 145 425 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.174 - 0.308 0.1 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 12.9 - 40.5 14.4 - -HCM Lane LOS B - E B - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 - 1.2 0.3 - -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 27ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 9919347.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 67Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2564Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.14Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.98Delay for adq Gap 9919348.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 9919347.00ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 139754512.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 80Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2564Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 25.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.99Delay for adq Gap 139754512.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 139754512.007DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 28Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 55 11 11 145 22 1431 488 1224v/c Ratio 0.44 0.04 0.09 0.54 0.26 0.92 0.99 0.48Control Delay 54.0 0.3 42.7 14.9 54.6 37.4 74.4 6.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0Total Delay 54.0 0.3 42.7 14.9 54.6 38.1 74.4 6.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 34 0 7 0 14 438 309 101Queue Length 95th (ft) 73 0 24 57 40 #636 #546 247Internal Link Dist (ft) 310 100 537 936Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 75 200 200Base Capacity (vph) 397 530 375 546 85 1551 495 2539Starvation Cap Reductn000002200Spillback Cap Reductn00000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.02 0.03 0.27 0.26 0.94 0.99 0.48Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 29Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 40 10 10 10 0 132 20 1282 20 444 993 121Future Volume (veh/h) 40 10 10 10 0 132 20 1282 20 444 993 121Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 44 11 11 11 0 145 22 1409 22 488 1091 133Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 195 42 181 244 0 181 33 1553 24 513 2237 272Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.11 0.02 0.43 0.43 0.29 0.70 0.70Sat Flow, veh/h 1141 366 1585 1511 0 1585 1781 3579 56 1781 3180 387Grp Volume(v), veh/h 55 0 11 11 0 145 22 699 732 488 609 615Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1508 0 1585 1511 0 1585 1781 1777 1858 1781 1777 1790Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 9.0 1.2 37.0 37.1 27.1 15.6 15.6Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.3 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.0 9.0 1.2 37.0 37.1 27.1 15.6 15.6Prop In Lane 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.22Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 237 0 181 244 0 181 33 771 806 513 1250 1259V/C Ratio(X) 0.23 0.00 0.06 0.05 0.00 0.80 0.68 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.49 0.49Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 495 0 456 488 0 456 88 803 839 513 1250 1259HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.9 0.0 39.8 39.7 0.0 43.5 49.2 26.6 26.6 35.2 6.7 6.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 7.8 21.8 13.7 13.3 27.9 0.3 0.3Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.3 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 3.9 0.7 17.9 18.6 15.4 5.1 5.2Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 41.4 0.0 39.9 39.8 0.0 51.3 70.9 40.3 40.0 63.1 7.0 7.0LnGrp LOS D A D D A D E D D E A AApproach Vol, veh/h 66 156 1453 1712Approach Delay, s/veh 41.1 50.5 40.6 23.0Approach LOS DDDCTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 34.0 50.2 16.5 6.8 77.4 16.5Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.0 45.5 29.0 5.0 69.5 29.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 29.1 39.1 5.3 3.2 17.6 11.0Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.6 0.3 0.0 12.4 0.6Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.2HCM 6th LOS C7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 30Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 34.0 34.2 57.2 59.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3355Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.03 2.18 2.82 2.97Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 31Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 66 156 1453 1712Effct. Green for Bike (s) 9.2 9.2 45.5 75.6Cross Street Width (ft) 57.2 59.2 34.2 34.0Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 153 153 758 1260Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 51.2 51.2 23.1 8.2Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Fair GoodBicycle LOS Score 2.76 2.94 3.50 3.71Bicycle LOS CCCD 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 1Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 33 22 348 343 699 22 1011 400 508 1056v/c Ratio 0.25 0.08 0.96 0.91 0.90 0.32 0.91 0.42 1.77 0.60Control Delay 48.2 0.5 77.8 66.9 25.0 59.8 45.1 4.9 387.7 20.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 48.2 0.5 77.8 66.9 25.0 59.8 45.1 4.9 387.7 20.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 20 0 ~241 229 100 14 332 35 ~498 231Queue Length 95th (ft) 50 0 #440 #418 #342 41 #476 63 #706 373Internal Link Dist (ft) 109 1057 1054 1668Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 140 100 165Base Capacity (vph) 477 561 362 377 779 69 1114 955 287 1760Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.04 0.96 0.91 0.90 0.32 0.91 0.42 1.77 0.60Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 20 10 20 595 20 622 20 900 356 452 900 40Future Volume (veh/h) 20 10 20 595 20 622 20 900 356 452 900 40Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 11 22 685 0 0 22 1011 400 508 1011 45Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 62 31 78 771 0 33 1119 829 297 1603 71Arrive On Green 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.31 0.31 0.17 0.46 0.46Sat Flow, veh/h 1207 603 1505 3563 0 1585 1781 3554 1545 1781 3460 154Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 0 22 685 0 0 22 1011 400 508 519 537Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 0 1505 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1545 1781 1777 1837Q Serve(g_s), s 1.7 0.0 1.3 17.9 0.0 0.0 1.2 26.1 15.7 16.0 21.2 21.2Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 0.0 1.3 17.9 0.0 0.0 1.2 26.1 15.7 16.0 21.2 21.2Prop In Lane 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.08Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 93 0 78 771 0 33 1119 829 297 823 851V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.00 0.28 0.89 0.00 0.67 0.90 0.48 1.71 0.63 0.63Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 510 0 424 818 0 74 1149 842 297 823 851HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.9 0.0 43.8 36.4 0.0 0.0 46.8 31.5 14.2 39.9 19.5 19.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.3 0.0 2.0 11.4 0.0 0.0 20.8 10.0 0.4 332.9 1.6 1.5Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.5 8.6 0.0 0.0 0.7 11.9 8.0 34.1 8.2 8.5Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.2 0.0 45.7 47.8 0.0 0.0 67.6 41.4 14.7 372.9 21.1 21.0LnGrp LOS D A D D A E D B F C CApproach Vol, veh/h 55 685 A 1433 1564Approach Delay, s/veh 46.0 47.8 34.3 135.3Approach LOS D D C FTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.0 36.2 10.9 7.8 50.4 26.7Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 31.0 27.0 4.0 43.0 22.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 18.0 28.1 3.7 3.2 23.2 19.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.1 0.2 0.0 6.5 0.7Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 79.2HCM 6th LOS ENotesUser approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 3Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 50.7 58.5 67.8 54.5Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3465Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 25 45 45 45Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.00 3.00 3.24 3.29Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B C C C7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 4Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 55 1390 1433 1564Effct. Green for Bike (s) 7.4 22.1 31.2 49.5Cross Street Width (ft) 67.8 54.5 58.5 50.7Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 10.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 123 368 520 825Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 52.8 39.9 32.9 20.7Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor FairBicycle LOS Score 3.12 4.90 3.85 3.84Bicycle LOS C E D D 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 5Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 95 861 118 1302 32 192 53 53v/c Ratio 0.33 0.45 0.25 0.64 0.15 0.49 0.26 0.18Control Delay 6.7 8.8 4.1 9.9 21.5 8.8 23.7 5.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 6.7 8.8 4.1 9.9 21.5 8.8 23.7 5.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 78 8 128 9 0 15 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 20 133 23 216 28 44 41 16Internal Link Dist (ft) 1057 1798 155 449Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 160 25 25Base Capacity (vph) 286 1990 480 2092 701 847 657 787Starvation Cap Reductn00000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.43 0.25 0.62 0.05 0.23 0.08 0.07Intersection Summary7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 6Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 90 788 30 112 1167 70 20 10 182 40 10 50Future Volume (veh/h) 90 788 30 112 1167 70 20 10 182 40 10 50Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 95 829 32 118 1228 74 21 11 192 42 11 53Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 329 1647 64 458 1628 98 152 56 353 174 31 353Arrive On Green 0.06 0.47 0.47 0.06 0.48 0.48 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3488 135 1781 3405 205 147 253 1585 201 141 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 95 422 439 118 640 662 32 0 192 53 0 53Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1846 1781 1777 1833 400 0 1585 341 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 8.2 8.2 1.6 14.6 14.7 0.2 0.0 5.3 1.3 0.0 1.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.3 8.2 8.2 1.6 14.6 14.7 9.6 0.0 5.3 10.2 0.0 1.3Prop In Lane 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.11 0.66 1.00 0.79 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 329 839 872 458 850 877 209 0 353 206 0 353V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.50 0.50 0.26 0.75 0.76 0.15 0.00 0.54 0.26 0.00 0.15Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 369 1000 1038 559 1071 1105 593 0 764 537 0 764HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 8.3 9.1 9.1 6.5 10.6 10.6 16.0 0.0 17.1 19.9 0.0 15.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.3 2.3 2.3 0.3 0.0 1.3 0.7 0.0 0.2Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 2.5 2.6 0.5 4.9 5.0 0.3 0.0 1.8 0.6 0.0 0.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 8.8 9.6 9.5 6.8 12.9 12.9 16.3 0.0 18.4 20.6 0.0 15.7LnGrp LOS AAAABBBABCABApproach Vol, veh/h 956 1420 224 106Approach Delay, s/veh 9.5 12.4 18.1 18.1Approach LOS ABBBTimer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.7 7.2 27.7 15.7 6.9 28.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 24.0 6.0 28.0 24.0 4.0 30.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.6 3.6 10.2 12.2 3.3 16.7Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 0.1 5.5 0.3 0.0 7.5Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.1HCM 6th LOS B 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 7Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 57.8 60.4 36.1 36.7Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed5533Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.74 2.78 2.07 2.03Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS C C B B7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 8Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 956 1420 224 106Effct. Green for Bike (s) 28.0 29.6 7.4 7.4Cross Street Width (ft) 36.1 36.7 60.4 57.8Through Lanes Number2211Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 800 846 211 211Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 12.6 11.7 28.0 28.0Bicycle Compliance Fair Fair Fair FairBicycle LOS Score 2.90 3.29 2.85 2.62Bicycle LOS CCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 9ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 263049.1Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 66Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1955Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 21.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.95Delay for adq Gap 263050.91Avg Ped Delay (s) 263049.06ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 358769.8Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1955Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.95Delay for adq Gap 358771.69Avg Ped Delay (s) 358769.847DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 10IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.7Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 1138 30 252 1225 40 303Future Vol, veh/h 1138 30 252 1225 40 303Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - 110 - 0 25Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 1279 34 283 1376 45 340Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1313 0 2550 657 Stage 1 - - - - 1296 - Stage 2 - - - - 1254 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 523 - ~ 22 407 Stage 1 - - - - 220 - Stage 2 - - - - 232 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 523 - ~ 10 407Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - ~ -160 - Stage 1 - - - - 101 - Stage 2 - - - - 232 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Control Delay, s 0 3.4HCM LOS -Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) + 407 - - 523 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.836 - - 0.541 -HCM Control Delay (s) - 45.5 - - 19.7 -HCM Lane LOS - E - - C -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 7.9 - - 3.2 -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 11ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? YesApproach Delay(s) 121.3Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 10 28Lanes Crossed 2 1Veh Vol Crossed 1138 1225Ped Vol Crossed 0 0Yield Rate(%) 0 0Ped Platooning No NoCritical Headway (s) 5.86 11.00Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.84 0.98Prob of Blocked Lane 0.60 0.98Delay for adq Gap 13.20 112.83Avg Ped Delay (s) 11.13 110.16ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 3771035.5Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2363Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.97Delay for adq Gap 3771037.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 3771035.507DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 12Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 12 1713 115 1490 8 294 176 24 13v/c Ratio 0.18 0.97 0.85 0.69 0.01 0.81 0.42 0.35 0.12Control Delay 60.3 42.3 97.6 19.8 0.0 59.2 17.8 67.8 34.8Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 60.3 42.3 97.6 21.0 0.0 59.2 17.8 67.8 34.8Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 512 74 262 0 179 36 15 3Queue Length 95th (ft) 30 #872 #199 592 0 300 103 #48 24Internal Link Dist (ft) 160 81 330 315Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 210 50Base Capacity (vph) 67 1769 135 2149 1032 456 551 69 143Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 40300000Spillback Cap Reductn000000000Storage Cap Reductn000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 0.97 0.85 0.85 0.01 0.64 0.32 0.35 0.09Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 13Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 11 1346 144 100 1296 7 256 4 150 22 4 8Future Volume (veh/h) 11 1346 144 100 1296 7 256 4 150 22 4 8Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 1547 166 115 1490 8 294 4 172 24 4 9Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.92 0.87 0.92 0.87 0.92 0.92 0.92Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 20 1572 167 130 1960 874 331 8 323 34 19 42Arrive On Green 0.01 0.48 0.48 0.07 0.55 0.55 0.19 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.04 0.04Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3241 344 1781 3554 1585 1781 36 1554 1781 512 1151Grp Volume(v), veh/h 12 841 872 115 1490 8 294 0 176 24 0 13Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1808 1781 1777 1585 1781 0 1591 1781 0 1663Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 50.5 52.5 7.0 35.4 0.2 17.6 0.0 10.8 1.5 0.0 0.8Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 50.5 52.5 7.0 35.4 0.2 17.6 0.0 10.8 1.5 0.0 0.8Prop In Lane 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.69Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 20 862 877 130 1960 874 331 0 331 34 0 61V/C Ratio(X) 0.60 0.98 0.99 0.88 0.76 0.01 0.89 0.00 0.53 0.71 0.00 0.21Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 65 862 877 130 1960 874 440 0 457 67 0 129HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 53.8 27.5 28.0 50.2 18.9 11.0 43.4 0.0 38.6 53.3 0.0 51.1Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 25.9 24.7 29.0 45.3 1.8 0.0 15.9 0.0 1.3 24.0 0.0 1.7Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 26.3 28.5 4.7 14.3 0.1 9.1 0.0 4.3 0.9 0.0 0.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 79.7 52.2 57.0 95.5 20.7 11.0 59.3 0.0 39.9 77.3 0.0 52.9LnGrp LOS E D E F C B E A D E A DApproach Vol, veh/h 1725 1613 470 37Approach Delay, s/veh 54.8 26.0 52.0 68.7Approach LOS D C D ETimer - Assigned Phs12345678Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.6 28.7 14.0 59.0 26.3 10.0 6.7 66.3Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 * 6 5.5 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.1 31.4 8.0 53.0 27.0 * 8.5 4.0 57.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 12.8 9.0 54.5 19.6 2.8 2.7 37.4Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 12.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 42.5HCM 6th LOS DNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 14Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 59.2 60.1 36.2 24.0Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed5633Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 3.01 3.02 2.21 1.98Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS C C B B 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 15Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1725 1613 470 37Effct. Green for Bike (s) 53.5 64.3 22.6 6.1Cross Street Width (ft) 36.3 37.5 74.4 60.1Through Lanes Number2211Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 892 1072 377 102Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 18.4 12.9 39.5 54.1Bicycle Compliance Fair Fair Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.54 3.46 3.47 2.54Bicycle LOS DCCC7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 16IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 14.6Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 93 150 1722 102 90 1566Future Vol, veh/h 93 150 1722 102 90 1566Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 12 12 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 100 - - 200 -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 100 161 1852 110 97 1684Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 2955 993 0 0 1974 0 Stage 1 1919----- Stage 2 1036-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 11 244 - - 290 - Stage 1 101----- Stage 2 303-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 7 241 - - 287 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 59----- Stage 1 ~ 66----- Stage 2 303-----Approach WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 215.3 0 1.3HCM LOS FMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h) - - 59 241 287 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 1.695 0.669 0.337 -HCM Control Delay (s) - -$ 488.8 45.7 23.8 -HCM Lane LOS - - F E C -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 9.2 4.3 1.4 -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 17ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 862561088.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 3288Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.99Delay for adq Gap 862561088.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 862561088.00ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 862561088.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 3288Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.99Delay for adq Gap 862561088.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 862561088.007DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 18Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 108 56 216 179 42 1797 149 147 1487 62v/c Ratio 0.39 0.16 0.62 0.39 0.49 1.57 0.26 1.36 1.16 0.10Control Delay 36.3 1.0 40.2 7.7 64.5 285.2 11.5 247.9 110.3 1.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 36.3 1.0 40.2 7.7 64.5 285.2 11.5 247.9 110.3 1.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 49 0 98 0 20 ~645 13 ~93 ~466 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 111 0 216 55 #98 #1332 84 #311 #1056 7Internal Link Dist (ft) 288 473 404 1931Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 180 150 170 150 430Base Capacity (vph) 766 737 695 727 86 1145 564 108 1280 625Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.08 0.31 0.25 0.49 1.57 0.26 1.36 1.16 0.10Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 19Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 81 22 53 193 12 170 40 1707 142 140 1413 59Future Volume (veh/h) 81 22 53 193 12 170 40 1707 142 140 1413 59Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 85 23 56 203 13 179 42 1797 149 147 1487 62Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 133 36 146 287 18 271 56 1306 563 123 1440 626Arrive On Green 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.03 0.37 0.37 0.07 0.41 0.41Sat Flow, veh/h 1416 383 1551 1679 108 1585 1781 3554 1533 1781 3554 1545Grp Volume(v), veh/h 108 0 56 216 0 179 42 1797 149 147 1487 62Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1800 0 1551 1786 0 1585 1781 1777 1533 1781 1777 1545Q Serve(g_s), s 4.2 0.0 2.4 8.2 0.0 7.6 1.7 26.5 4.9 5.0 29.2 1.8Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.2 0.0 2.4 8.2 0.0 7.6 1.7 26.5 4.9 5.0 29.2 1.8Prop In Lane 0.79 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 169 0 146 306 0 271 56 1306 563 123 1440 626V/C Ratio(X) 0.64 0.00 0.38 0.71 0.00 0.66 0.75 1.38 0.26 1.19 1.03 0.10Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 873 0 753 793 0 703 99 1306 563 123 1440 626HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.5 0.0 30.7 28.2 0.0 27.9 34.6 22.8 16.0 33.6 21.5 13.3Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.0 0.0 1.7 3.0 0.0 2.7 17.7 174.2 0.2 141.1 32.6 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.9 0.0 1.0 3.6 0.0 3.0 1.0 41.7 1.7 6.9 17.5 0.6Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.5 0.0 32.4 31.2 0.0 30.7 52.3 197.1 16.2 174.6 54.0 13.4LnGrp LOS D A C C A C D F B F F BApproach Vol, veh/h 164 395 1988 1696Approach Delay, s/veh 34.4 30.9 180.4 63.0Approach LOS C C F ETimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 33.0 11.8 7.3 35.7 17.3Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 26.5 35.0 4.0 27.5 32.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.0 28.5 6.2 3.7 31.2 10.2Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 2.1Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 113.9HCM 6th LOS F7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 20Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 36.0 36.1 61.3 62.1Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3366Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.05 2.19 3.08 3.08Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 21Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 164 395 1988 1696Effct. Green for Bike (s) 13.3 16.6 27.5 30.7Cross Street Width (ft) 72.9 73.9 37.4 37.7Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 222 277 458 512Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 47.4 44.5 35.7 33.2Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 2.95 3.34 3.77 3.54Bicycle LOS CCDD7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 22Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 707 605 236 219 297 178 550 1460 304 900 624v/c Ratio 1.85 0.69 0.42 1.67 0.76 0.39 0.96 1.09 1.69 0.78 0.78Control Delay 422.5 40.9 6.4 365.8 52.4 10.4 74.8 84.5 363.5 39.8 23.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 422.5 40.9 6.4 365.8 52.4 10.4 74.8 84.5 363.5 39.8 23.3Queue Length 50th (ft) ~384 200 0 ~222 194 13 196 ~592 ~309 295 221Queue Length 95th (ft) #553 258 57 #409 288 68 #346 #834 #529 #425 #450Internal Link Dist (ft) 372 770 1992 544Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 300 150 125 250 250 300Base Capacity (vph) 382 1280 704 131 604 611 573 1340 180 1149 802Starvation Cap Reductn00000000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 1.85 0.47 0.34 1.67 0.49 0.29 0.96 1.09 1.69 0.78 0.78Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 23Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 679 581 227 210 285 171 528 1042 360 292 864 599Future Volume (veh/h) 679 581 227 210 285 171 528 1042 360 292 864 599Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 707 605 236 219 297 178 550 1085 375 304 900 624Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 371 979 422 127 449 366 556 970 330 175 1112 653Arrive On Green 0.11 0.28 0.28 0.07 0.24 0.24 0.16 0.38 0.38 0.10 0.31 0.31Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1531 1781 1870 1528 3456 2583 877 1781 3554 1544Grp Volume(v), veh/h 707 605 236 219 297 178 550 740 720 304 900 624Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1531 1781 1870 1528 1728 1777 1684 1781 1777 1544Q Serve(g_s), s 12.0 16.6 14.8 8.0 16.0 11.2 17.8 42.0 42.0 11.0 26.1 35.0Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.0 16.6 14.8 8.0 16.0 11.2 17.8 42.0 42.0 11.0 26.1 35.0Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.52 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 371 979 422 127 449 366 556 667 632 175 1112 653V/C Ratio(X) 1.91 0.62 0.56 1.72 0.66 0.49 0.99 1.11 1.14 1.73 0.81 0.95Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 371 1239 534 127 585 478 556 667 632 175 1112 653HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 49.9 35.4 34.7 51.9 38.4 36.6 46.8 34.9 34.9 50.4 35.3 31.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 417.8 0.6 1.2 354.1 1.8 1.0 35.1 68.8 80.2 353.3 4.6 24.5Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 26.7 7.2 5.6 16.1 7.5 4.3 10.3 30.4 30.8 22.1 11.8 20.3Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 467.7 36.0 35.9 406.0 40.2 37.6 81.9 103.7 115.1 403.8 39.9 56.0LnGrp LOS FDDFDDFFFFDEApproach Vol, veh/h 1548 694 2010 1828Approach Delay, s/veh 233.2 155.0 101.8 105.9Approach LOS FFFFTimer - Assigned Phs12345678Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.0 47.0 13.0 35.8 23.0 40.0 17.0 31.8Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 42.0 8.0 39.0 18.0 35.0 12.0 35.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.0 44.0 10.0 18.6 19.8 37.0 14.0 18.0Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 142.6HCM 6th LOS F7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 24Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 73.8 71.3 72.3 84.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed7566Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 3.04 2.71 3.02 3.09Pedestrian Crosswalk LOSCCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 25Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1548 694 2010 1828Effct. Green for Bike (s) 26.9 22.8 42.1 35.1Cross Street Width (ft) 72.3 83.1 71.4 85.7Through Lanes Number2122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 448 380 702 585Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 36.1 39.4 25.3 30.0Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Fair PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.94 3.98 4.31 4.38Bicycle LOS DDDD7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 26IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 8.4Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 123 50 90 1436 1328 82Future Vol, veh/h 123 50 90 1436 1328 82Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 75 200 - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 131 53 96 1528 1413 87Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 2413 750 1500 0 - 0 Stage 1 1457----- Stage 2 956-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 27 354 443 - - - Stage 1 181----- Stage 2 334-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 21 354 443 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 116----- Stage 1 142----- Stage 2 334-----Approach EB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 142.6 0.9 0HCM LOS FMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 443 - 116 354 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.216 - 1.128 0.15 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 15.4 - 193.6 17 - -HCM Lane LOS C - F C - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - 8 0.5 - -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 27ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 31485814.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 67Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2764Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.14Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.99Delay for adq Gap 31485816.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 31485814.00ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 545272320.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 80Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2764Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 25.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.99Delay for adq Gap 545272320.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 545272320.007DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 28Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 277 44 33 390 22 1264 323 1424v/c Ratio 0.90 0.10 0.22 0.63 0.29 0.91 0.91 0.69Control Delay 74.6 0.4 40.2 12.4 66.0 43.9 75.2 18.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0Total Delay 74.6 0.4 40.2 12.4 66.0 45.3 75.2 18.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 207 0 20 36 17 480 246 405Queue Length 95th (ft) #361 0 51 138 46 #624 #417 494Internal Link Dist (ft) 310 100 537 936Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 75 200 200Base Capacity (vph) 336 494 166 646 75 1454 376 2101Starvation Cap Reductn000007000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.82 0.09 0.20 0.60 0.29 0.91 0.86 0.68Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 29Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 242 10 40 30 0 355 20 1130 20 294 1224 72Future Volume (veh/h) 242 10 40 30 0 355 20 1130 20 294 1224 72Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 266 11 44 33 0 390 22 1242 22 323 1345 79Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 426 15 413 495 0 413 31 1407 25 354 1959 115Arrive On Green 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.02 0.39 0.39 0.20 0.58 0.58Sat Flow, veh/h 1393 58 1585 1654 0 1585 1781 3570 63 1781 3406 200Grp Volume(v), veh/h 277 0 44 33 0 390 22 618 646 323 700 724Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1450 0 1585 1654 0 1585 1781 1777 1857 1781 1777 1829Q Serve(g_s), s 17.9 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 27.2 1.4 36.4 36.4 20.0 31.1 31.4Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 19.5 0.0 2.4 1.6 0.0 27.2 1.4 36.4 36.4 20.0 31.1 31.4Prop In Lane 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.11Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 441 0 413 495 0 413 31 700 732 354 1022 1052V/C Ratio(X) 0.63 0.00 0.11 0.07 0.00 0.94 0.70 0.88 0.88 0.91 0.68 0.69Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 449 0 422 503 0 422 79 765 799 395 1080 1112HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.8 0.0 31.7 31.4 0.0 40.8 55.0 31.7 31.7 44.2 16.8 16.8Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.7 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 29.6 24.3 11.1 10.8 23.6 1.7 1.7Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 7.3 0.0 0.9 0.7 0.0 13.9 0.8 17.4 18.1 11.1 12.5 13.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 40.6 0.0 31.8 31.4 0.0 70.5 79.4 42.8 42.5 67.8 18.5 18.5LnGrp LOS DACCAEEDDEBBApproach Vol, veh/h 321 423 1286 1747Approach Delay, s/veh 39.4 67.4 43.3 27.6Approach LOS D E D CTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 27.4 50.9 34.4 7.0 71.3 34.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.0 48.5 30.0 5.0 68.5 30.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 22.0 38.4 21.5 3.4 33.4 29.2Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 6.0 1.2 0.0 14.3 0.2Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 38.4HCM 6th LOS D7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 30Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 34.0 34.2 57.2 59.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3355Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.10 2.21 2.85 3.03Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C 7DQN)DUP5RDG &XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 31Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 321 423 1286 1747Effct. Green for Bike (s) 27.7 27.7 46.5 69.7Cross Street Width (ft) 57.2 59.2 34.2 34.0Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 462 462 775 1162Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 35.5 35.5 22.5 10.5Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Fair FairBicycle LOS Score 3.18 3.38 3.36 3.74Bicycle LOS CCCD Mitigated 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 1Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 34 26 141 143 303 17 338 544 313 286v/c Ratio 0.20 0.08 0.43 0.41 0.53 0.15 0.56 0.58 0.68 0.18Control Delay 38.7 0.5 31.5 31.0 7.4 42.2 33.4 3.5 37.9 15.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 38.7 0.5 31.5 31.0 7.4 42.2 33.4 3.5 37.9 15.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 16 0 64 64 0 8 81 0 142 40Queue Length 95th (ft) 47 0 129 129 63 31 135 30 #324 91Internal Link Dist (ft) 109 1057 1054 1668Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 140 100 165Base Capacity (vph) 645 684 488 509 694 117 1163 1044 460 1834Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.05 0.04 0.29 0.28 0.44 0.15 0.29 0.52 0.68 0.16Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 19 13 25 263 7 288 16 321 517 297 264 8Future Volume (veh/h) 19 13 25 263 7 288 16 321 517 297 264 8Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 20 14 26 282 0 0 17 338 544 313 278 8Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 62 43 87 445 0 28 1117 684 360 1763 51Arrive On Green 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.31 0.31 0.20 0.50 0.50Sat Flow, veh/h 1069 748 1512 3563 0 1585 1781 3554 1545 1781 3524 101Grp Volume(v), veh/h 34 0 26 282 0 0 17 338 544 313 140 146Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1817 0 1512 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1545 1781 1777 1848Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 0.0 1.3 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 5.5 23.3 13.0 3.3 3.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 0.0 1.3 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 5.5 23.3 13.0 3.3 3.3Prop In Lane 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 105 0 87 445 0 28 1117 684 360 889 925V/C Ratio(X) 0.33 0.00 0.30 0.63 0.00 0.60 0.30 0.80 0.87 0.16 0.16Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 642 0 535 1026 0 117 1117 684 443 889 925HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 34.6 0.0 34.5 31.7 0.0 0.0 37.3 19.8 18.5 29.5 10.3 10.3Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.8 0.0 1.9 1.5 0.0 0.0 18.8 0.2 6.5 14.5 0.1 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.7 0.0 0.5 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 2.1 10.5 6.5 1.1 1.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 36.3 0.0 36.4 33.2 0.0 0.0 56.2 20.0 25.0 44.0 10.4 10.4LnGrp LOS D A D C A E B C D B BApproach Vol, veh/h 60 282 A 899 599Approach Delay, s/veh 36.4 33.2 23.7 28.0Approach LOS DCCCTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.4 30.0 10.4 6.2 44.2 15.5Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 24.0 27.0 5.0 38.0 22.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 15.0 25.3 3.4 2.7 5.3 7.7Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.6 1.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 27.0HCM 6th LOS CNotesUser approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 3Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 50.7 58.5 67.8 54.5Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3465Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 25 45 45 45Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 57.5 57.5 57.5 57.5Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 1.98 2.68 2.83 2.69Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B C C C7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 4Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 60 587 899 599Effct. Green for Bike (s) 7.3 15.6 13.1 34.8Cross Street Width (ft) 67.8 54.5 58.5 50.7Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 10.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 127 271 228 605Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 50.4 43.0 45.1 28.0Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor FairBicycle LOS Score 3.12 3.58 3.41 3.04Bicycle LOS CDCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 5Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 45 995 130 710 4 66 4 19v/c Ratio 0.08 0.46 0.29 0.28 0.01 0.20 0.01 0.06Control Delay 2.9 7.2 4.3 4.9 16.0 5.2 16.0 0.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 2.9 7.2 4.3 4.9 16.0 5.2 16.0 0.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 77 7 241010Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 130 20 85 7 17 7 0Internal Link Dist (ft) 1057 626 155 449Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 160 25 25Base Capacity (vph) 591 2187 450 2572 1159 1018 1159 1018Starvation Cap Reductn00000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.45 0.29 0.28 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.02Intersection Summary7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 6Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 41 856 49 118 627 19 3 1 60 3 1 17Future Volume (veh/h) 41 856 49 118 627 19 3 1 60 3 1 17Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 45 941 54 130 689 21 3 1 66 3 1 19Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 585 1539 88 527 1748 53 280 29 113 278 28 113Arrive On Green 0.04 0.45 0.45 0.09 0.50 0.50 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3416 196 1781 3521 107 1057 400 1585 1021 388 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 45 489 506 130 348 362 4 0 66 4 0 19Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1835 1781 1777 1851 1456 0 1585 1409 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 6.4 6.4 1.1 3.8 3.8 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 6.4 6.4 1.1 3.8 3.8 0.1 0.0 1.2 0.1 0.0 0.3Prop In Lane 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.06 0.75 1.00 0.75 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 585 801 827 527 882 919 309 0 113 306 0 113V/C Ratio(X) 0.08 0.61 0.61 0.25 0.39 0.39 0.01 0.00 0.58 0.01 0.00 0.17Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 743 1215 1255 603 1215 1266 1317 0 1187 1279 0 1187HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 4.2 6.4 6.4 4.4 4.8 4.8 13.3 0.0 13.8 13.3 0.0 13.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.8 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.7Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 1.4 1.4 0.2 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 4.2 7.2 7.1 4.6 5.1 5.1 13.3 0.0 18.5 13.3 0.0 14.1LnGrp LOS AAAAAABABBABApproach Vol, veh/h 1040 840 70 23Approach Delay, s/veh 7.0 5.0 18.2 14.0Approach LOS AABBTimer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.2 6.7 17.8 6.2 5.3 19.2Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.0 4.0 21.0 23.0 4.0 21.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 3.1 8.4 2.3 2.4 5.8Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.0 5.4 0.0 0.0 4.1Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.7HCM 6th LOS A 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 7Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 57.8 60.5 36.1 36.7Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed5533Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Fair Fair Fair FairPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.63 2.65 2.02 1.96Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS C C B B7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 8Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1040 840 70 23Effct. Green for Bike (s) 23.5 27.7 5.9 5.9Cross Street Width (ft) 36.1 36.7 60.5 57.8Through Lanes Number2211Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 783 923 197 197Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 11.1 8.7 24.4 24.4Bicycle Compliance Fair Good Fair FairBicycle LOS Score 2.97 2.81 2.60 2.48Bicycle LOS C C C B 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 9ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 19723.5Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 66Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1483Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 21.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.89Delay for adq Gap 19725.91Avg Ped Delay (s) 19723.49ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 24964.2Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1483Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.90Delay for adq Gap 24966.60Avg Ped Delay (s) 24964.187DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 10IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.1Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 813 36 100 762 11 46Future Vol, veh/h 813 36 100 762 11 46Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - 110 - 0 25Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 903 40 111 847 12 51Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 943 0 1569 472 Stage 1 - - - - 923 - Stage 2 - - - - 646 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 723 - 101 538 Stage 1 - - - - 347 - Stage 2 - - - - 484 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 723 - 85 538Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 188 - Stage 1 - - - - 294 - Stage 2 - - - - 484 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Control Delay, s 0 1.3 14.9HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 188 538 - - 723 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.065 0.095 - - 0.154 -HCM Control Delay (s) 25.5 12.4 - - 10.9 -HCM Lane LOS D B - - B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.3 - - 0.5 - 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 11ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? YesApproach Delay(s) 39.1Level of Service ECrosswalkLength (ft) 10 28Lanes Crossed 2 1Veh Vol Crossed 813 762Ped Vol Crossed 0 0Yield Rate(%) 0 0Ped Platooning No NoCritical Headway (s) 5.86 11.00Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.73 0.90Prob of Blocked Lane 0.48 0.90Delay for adq Gap 8.64 36.29Avg Ped Delay (s) 6.34 32.75ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 41713.8Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1575Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.91Delay for adq Gap 41716.04Avg Ped Delay (s) 41713.767DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 12Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBRLane Group Flow (vph) 1037 41 995 20 3v/c Ratio 0.36 0.19 0.32 0.10 0.02Control Delay 5.3 24.1 2.0 24.0 17.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 5.3 24.1 2.0 24.0 17.7Queue Length 50th (ft)07040Queue Length 95th (ft) 153 36 70 23 6Internal Link Dist (ft) 100 503 330Turn Bay Length (ft) 210 120Base Capacity (vph) 2661 221 3143 199 181Starvation Cap Reductn00000Spillback Cap Reductn00000Storage Cap Reductn00000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.19 0.32 0.10 0.02Intersection Summary 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 13Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 840 72 36 876 18 3Future Volume (veh/h) 840 72 36 876 18 3Initial Q (Qb), veh000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 955 82 41 995 20 3Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222Cap, veh/h 1530 131 66 2357 41 36Arrive On Green 0.46 0.46 0.04 0.66 0.02 0.02Sat Flow, veh/h 3405 284 1781 3647 1781 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 512 525 41 995 20 3Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1819 1781 1777 1781 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 8.0 8.0 0.8 4.8 0.4 0.1Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.0 8.0 0.8 4.8 0.4 0.1Prop In Lane 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 821 841 66 2357 41 36V/C Ratio(X) 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.42 0.49 0.08Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1358 1391 243 3784 219 195HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.4 7.4 17.4 2.9 17.7 17.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.8 9.0 0.1 9.0 1.0Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.0 2.1 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 8.2 8.2 26.4 3.0 26.6 18.5LnGrp LOS A A C A C BApproach Vol, veh/h 1037 1036 23Approach Delay, s/veh 8.2 3.9 25.6Approach LOS A A CTimer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.3 7.4 22.9 30.3Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.5 5.0 28.0 39.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 2.8 10.0 6.8Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 6.9 9.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.3HCM 6th LOS A7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 14Approach EB WB NBCrosswalk Length (ft) 59.2 60.1 36.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 5 3Number of Right-Turn Islands 0 0 0Type of Control None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase 8 5 4Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service - - -Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code - - -Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 27.5 27.5 27.5Pedestrian Compliance Code Fair Fair FairPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.62 2.68 1.98Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS C C B 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 15Approach EB WB NBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0 0 0Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1037 1036 23Effct. Green for Bike (s) 34.8 38.1 4.8Cross Street Width (ft) 36.2 70.4 72.0Through Lanes Number 2 2 1Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No NoOn Street Parking? No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 1265 1385 175Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 3.7 2.6 22.9Bicycle Compliance Good Good FairBicycle LOS Score 2.97 3.49 2.70Bicycle LOS C C C7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 16IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.1Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 8 54 959 43 125 1171Future Vol, veh/h 8 54 959 43 125 1171Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 12 12 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 100 - - 200 -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 8 57 1009 45 132 1233Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1925 539 0 0 1066 0 Stage 1 1044----- Stage 2 881-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 59 487 - - 649 - Stage 1 300----- Stage 2 365-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 46 481 - - 642 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 163----- Stage 1 236----- Stage 2 365-----Approach WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 15.4 0 1.2HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h) - - 163 481 642 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.052 0.118 0.205 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 28.3 13.5 12 -HCM Lane LOS - - D B B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.2 0.4 0.8 - 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 17ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 979723.1Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2130Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.96Delay for adq Gap 979724.75Avg Ped Delay (s) 979723.06ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 979723.1Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2130Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.96Delay for adq Gap 979724.75Avg Ped Delay (s) 979723.067DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 18Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 8 10 86 40 49 1031 180 67 1135 31v/c Ratio 0.05 0.04 0.39 0.14 0.34 0.49 0.19 0.39 0.53 0.03Control Delay 37.8 0.3 38.1 1.0 43.3 13.8 6.7 43.1 13.9 0.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 37.8 0.3 38.1 1.0 43.3 13.8 6.7 43.1 13.9 0.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 0 34 0 20 140 16 27 155 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 18 0 89 0 63 288 63 79 322 0Internal Link Dist (ft) 288 473 1028 1931Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 180 150 170 150 430Base Capacity (vph) 881 814 793 765 147 2244 1004 172 2281 1027Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.05 0.33 0.46 0.18 0.39 0.50 0.03Intersection Summary 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 19Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 5 3 9 74 7 38 46 969 169 63 1067 29Future Volume (veh/h) 5 3 9 74 7 38 46 969 169 63 1067 29Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 5 3 10 79 7 40 49 1031 180 67 1135 31Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 20 12 27 133 12 128 69 1630 705 85 1663 723Arrive On Green 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.04 0.46 0.46 0.05 0.47 0.47Sat Flow, veh/h 1134 680 1547 1643 146 1585 1781 3554 1537 1781 3554 1546Grp Volume(v), veh/h 8 0 10 86 0 40 49 1031 180 67 1135 31Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1814 0 1547 1788 0 1585 1781 1777 1537 1781 1777 1546Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 0.0 0.3 2.5 0.0 1.3 1.5 12.0 3.9 2.0 13.6 0.6Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.2 0.0 0.3 2.5 0.0 1.3 1.5 12.0 3.9 2.0 13.6 0.6Prop In Lane 0.62 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 32 0 27 144 0 128 69 1630 705 85 1663 723V/C Ratio(X) 0.25 0.00 0.37 0.60 0.00 0.31 0.72 0.63 0.26 0.79 0.68 0.04Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1168 0 996 1052 0 933 197 2712 1173 229 2778 1208HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.4 0.0 26.4 24.1 0.0 23.6 25.8 11.2 9.0 25.6 11.3 7.9Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.1 0.0 8.2 3.9 0.0 1.4 12.9 0.4 0.2 15.0 0.5 0.0Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.1 0.0 0.5 0.8 3.9 1.1 1.2 4.4 0.2Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.4 0.0 34.6 28.0 0.0 24.9 38.8 11.6 9.2 40.6 11.8 7.9LnGrp LOS C A C C A C D B A D B AApproach Vol, veh/h 18 126 1260 1233Approach Delay, s/veh 32.7 27.0 12.3 13.3Approach LOS C C B BTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.6 31.4 6.0 7.1 31.9 9.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.0 41.5 35.0 6.0 42.5 32.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.0 14.0 2.3 3.5 15.6 4.5Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.0 9.9 0.6Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.6HCM 6th LOS B7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 20Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 36.0 36.1 61.3 62.1Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3366Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 68.5 68.5 68.5 68.5Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.00 2.09 2.88 2.85Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 21Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 18 126 1260 1233Effct. Green for Bike (s) 6.1 9.2 44.3 45.0Cross Street Width (ft) 84.6 79.7 39.7 37.8Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 89 134 647 657Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 62.5 59.6 31.4 30.9Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 2.88 2.99 3.21 3.16Bicycle LOS CCCC7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 22Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 366 173 271 244 241 149 239 891 71 723 433v/c Ratio 0.66 0.29 0.61 0.73 0.67 0.35 0.58 0.72 0.27 0.73 0.49Control Delay 44.5 36.7 14.6 51.1 45.8 8.2 47.1 31.6 47.0 35.9 5.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 44.5 36.7 14.6 51.1 45.8 8.2 47.1 31.6 47.0 35.9 5.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 110 51 22 142 142 0 73 249 22 207 27Queue Length 95th (ft) 173 83 101 #266 226 50 122 370 46 306 98Internal Link Dist (ft) 503 770 1992 1028Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 300 150 125 250 250 300Base Capacity (vph) 644 1368 733 401 792 750 474 1311 322 1173 917Starvation Cap Reductn00000000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.57 0.13 0.37 0.61 0.30 0.20 0.50 0.68 0.22 0.62 0.47Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 23Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 340 161 252 227 224 139 222 728 100 66 672 403Future Volume (veh/h) 340 161 252 227 224 139 222 728 100 66 672 403Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 366 173 271 244 241 149 239 783 108 71 723 433Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 447 917 394 280 534 438 312 1048 145 121 996 637Arrive On Green 0.13 0.26 0.26 0.16 0.29 0.29 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.04 0.28 0.28Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1528 1781 1870 1534 3456 3124 431 3456 3554 1542Grp Volume(v), veh/h 366 173 271 244 241 149 239 445 446 71 723 433Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1528 1781 1870 1534 1728 1777 1778 1728 1777 1542Q Serve(g_s), s 10.6 3.9 16.4 13.7 10.8 7.9 6.9 22.8 22.8 2.1 18.9 23.7Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.6 3.9 16.4 13.7 10.8 7.9 6.9 22.8 22.8 2.1 18.9 23.7Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.24 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 447 917 394 280 534 438 312 596 597 121 996 637V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.19 0.69 0.87 0.45 0.34 0.77 0.75 0.75 0.59 0.73 0.68Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 572 1211 521 356 701 575 421 596 597 286 1038 656HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.5 29.7 34.3 42.3 30.1 29.0 45.6 30.2 30.2 48.8 33.4 24.9Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.2 0.1 2.4 17.2 0.6 0.5 5.8 5.1 5.1 4.4 2.5 2.7Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.9 1.7 6.3 7.3 4.9 2.9 3.2 10.4 10.4 1.0 8.3 8.9Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 50.8 29.8 36.8 59.5 30.7 29.5 51.4 35.4 35.4 53.2 35.8 27.6LnGrp LOS DCDECCDDDDDCApproach Vol, veh/h 810 634 1130 1227Approach Delay, s/veh 41.6 41.5 38.8 33.9Approach LOS DDDCTimer - Assigned Phs12345678Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.1 40.0 21.6 32.0 14.8 34.3 18.8 34.8Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.5 34.0 20.5 35.0 12.5 30.0 17.0 38.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.1 24.8 15.7 18.4 8.9 25.7 12.6 12.8Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 4.0 0.4 2.2 0.3 2.7 0.7 2.2Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 38.3HCM 6th LOS D7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 24Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 73.8 71.3 72.3 84.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed7567Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.86 2.51 2.86 2.97Pedestrian Crosswalk LOSCCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 25Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 810 634 1130 1227Effct. Green for Bike (s) 15.4 17.9 33.1 26.2Cross Street Width (ft) 72.3 83.9 71.4 85.5Through Lanes Number2122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 257 298 552 437Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 45.6 43.4 31.5 36.7Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.33 3.89 3.58 3.88Bicycle LOS CDDD7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 26IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.8Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 33 9 78 1160 688 150Future Vol, veh/h 33 9 78 1160 688 150Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 75 200 - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 35 10 83 1234 732 160Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1595 446 892 0 - 0 Stage 1 812----- Stage 2 783-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 98 560 756 - - - Stage 1 397----- Stage 2 411-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 87 560 756 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 242----- Stage 1 353----- Stage 2 411-----Approach EB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 20.1 0.7 0HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 756 - 242 560 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.11 - 0.145 0.017 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 10.3 - 22.4 11.5 - -HCM Lane LOS B - C B - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 0.5 0.1 - - 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 27ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 168274.6Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 67Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1848Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.14Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.94Delay for adq Gap 168276.58Avg Ped Delay (s) 168274.63ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 1132727.4Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 80Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1848Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 25.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.96Delay for adq Gap 1132729.38Avg Ped Delay (s) 1132727.387DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 28Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 27 5 9 12 21 1350 20 665v/c Ratio 0.11 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.12 0.46 0.14 0.23Control Delay 26.2 0.2 25.9 0.3 29.4 4.7 31.1 3.5Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 26.2 0.2 25.9 0.3 29.4 4.7 31.1 3.5Queue Length 50th (ft)60205050Queue Length 95th (ft) 32 0 16 0 29 255 28 102Internal Link Dist (ft) 310 100 537 936Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 75 200 200Base Capacity (vph) 1072 953 1072 953 175 2847 140 2793Starvation Cap Reductn00000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.47 0.14 0.24Intersection Summary 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 29Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 23258011191211 17 18 581 25Future Volume (veh/h) 23258011191211 17 18 581 25Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 25259012211331 19 20 638 27Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 156 0 69 162 0 69 37 2028 29 35 1960 83Arrive On Green 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.57 0.57 0.02 0.56 0.56Sat Flow, veh/h 0 0 1585 0 0 1585 1781 3585 51 1781 3470 147Grp Volume(v), veh/h 270590122165969120326339Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 0 1585 0 0 1585 1781 1777 1860 1781 1777 1840Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.5 11.4 11.4 0.5 4.4 4.4Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 0.0 0.1 1.9 0.0 0.3 0.5 11.4 11.4 0.5 4.4 4.4Prop In Lane 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.08Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 156 0 69 162 0 69 37 1005 1052 35 1004 1039V/C Ratio(X) 0.17 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.00 0.17 0.57 0.66 0.66 0.57 0.33 0.33Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1025 0 1034 1019 0 1034 200 1618 1693 160 1578 1634HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.2 0.0 20.4 22.2 0.0 20.5 21.6 6.7 6.7 21.6 5.2 5.2Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 1.2 13.4 0.7 0.7 13.7 0.2 0.2Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 2.8 2.9 0.3 1.0 1.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.8 0.0 20.8 22.4 0.0 21.7 34.9 7.4 7.4 35.3 5.3 5.3LnGrp LOS C A C C A C C A A D A AApproach Vol, veh/h 32 21 1371 685Approach Delay, s/veh 22.5 22.0 7.8 6.2Approach LOS C C A ATimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.9 31.7 6.9 5.9 31.6 6.9Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 40.5 29.0 5.0 39.5 29.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.5 13.4 3.9 2.5 6.4 3.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 11.7 0.1 0.0 4.8 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.7HCM 6th LOS A7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 30Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 34.0 34.2 57.2 59.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3355Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 1.98 1.97 2.70 2.71Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 31Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 32 21 1371 685Effct. Green for Bike (s) 6.9 6.7 44.5 44.3Cross Street Width (ft) 57.2 59.2 34.2 34.0Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 153 149 989 984Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 38.4 38.5 11.5 11.6Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Fair FairBicycle LOS Score 2.70 2.71 3.43 2.86Bicycle LOS CCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 1Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 26 19 276 279 567 22 708 404 404 710v/c Ratio 0.21 0.07 0.76 0.74 0.71 0.22 0.79 0.45 1.02 0.41Control Delay 47.4 0.5 50.5 48.5 8.7 50.4 41.3 4.8 88.6 17.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 47.4 0.5 50.5 48.5 8.7 50.4 41.3 4.8 88.6 17.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 16 0 175 176 0 14 225 29 ~287 133Queue Length 95th (ft) 43 0 #316 #311 94 40 #317 63 #477 231Internal Link Dist (ft) 109 1057 1054 1668Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 140 100 165Base Capacity (vph) 481 564 364 379 797 104 903 905 397 1730Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.05 0.03 0.76 0.74 0.71 0.21 0.78 0.45 1.02 0.41Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 13 10 17 482 12 505 20 630 360 360 594 38Future Volume (veh/h) 13 10 17 482 12 505 20 630 360 360 594 38Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 15 11 19 551 0 0 22 708 404 404 667 43Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 52 38 75 677 0 33 900 691 432 1613 104Arrive On Green 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.48 0.48Sat Flow, veh/h 1049 769 1503 3563 0 1585 1781 3554 1540 1781 3382 218Grp Volume(v), veh/h 26 0 19 551 0 0 22 708 404 404 350 360Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1818 0 1503 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1540 1781 1777 1823Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 0.0 1.1 13.4 0.0 0.0 1.1 16.9 18.0 20.2 11.7 11.7Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.3 0.0 1.1 13.4 0.0 0.0 1.1 16.9 18.0 20.2 11.7 11.7Prop In Lane 0.58 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.12Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 90 0 75 677 0 33 900 691 432 847 869V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.00 0.25 0.81 0.00 0.66 0.79 0.58 0.94 0.41 0.41Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 541 0 447 864 0 118 979 726 432 847 869HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.6 0.0 41.5 35.2 0.0 0.0 44.2 31.6 19.1 33.7 15.5 15.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.7 0.0 1.8 4.7 0.0 0.0 19.9 4.0 1.1 27.8 0.3 0.3Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 0.0 0.4 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.7 7.2 8.6 11.4 4.3 4.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.3 0.0 43.3 40.0 0.0 0.0 64.1 35.6 20.2 61.5 15.8 15.8LnGrp LOS D A D D A E D C E B BApproach Vol, veh/h 45 551 A 1134 1114Approach Delay, s/veh 43.3 40.0 30.7 32.4Approach LOS DDCCTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 28.0 29.0 10.5 7.7 49.3 23.3Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 25.0 27.0 6.0 41.0 22.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 22.2 20.0 3.3 3.1 13.7 15.4Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.8 0.2 0.0 4.3 1.4Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.3HCM 6th LOS CNotesUser approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 3Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 50.7 58.5 67.8 54.5Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3465Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 25 45 45 45Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.00 2.86 3.05 3.02Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B C C C7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 4Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 45 1122 1134 1114Effct. Green for Bike (s) 7.0 22.1 24.9 48.6Cross Street Width (ft) 67.8 54.5 58.5 50.7Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 10.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 117 368 415 810Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 53.2 39.9 37.7 21.2Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor FairBicycle LOS Score 3.10 4.46 3.60 3.47Bicycle LOS CDDC 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 5Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 58 800 113 1153 16 182 9 47v/c Ratio 0.15 0.43 0.22 0.50 0.07 0.44 0.04 0.14Control Delay 4.4 9.5 4.1 7.5 16.3 7.4 16.0 2.8Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 4.4 9.5 4.1 7.5 16.3 7.4 16.0 2.8Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 66 7 483020Queue Length 95th (ft) 13 123 23 182 15 39 11 9Internal Link Dist (ft) 1057 848 155 449Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 160 25 25Base Capacity (vph) 375 2048 529 2288 813 967 816 927Starvation Cap Reductn00000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.15 0.39 0.21 0.50 0.02 0.19 0.01 0.05Intersection Summary7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 6Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 55 732 28 107 1079 16 11 4 173 7 2 45Future Volume (veh/h) 55 732 28 107 1079 16 11 4 173 7 2 45Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 58 771 29 113 1136 17 12 4 182 7 2 47Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 382 1513 57 512 1645 25 335 88 267 328 73 267Arrive On Green 0.05 0.43 0.43 0.07 0.46 0.46 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3492 131 1781 3584 54 977 523 1585 920 433 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 58 392 408 113 563 590 16 0 182 9 0 47Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1847 1781 1777 1861 1500 0 1585 1353 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.6 5.9 5.9 1.2 9.3 9.3 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 5.9 5.9 1.2 9.3 9.3 0.3 0.0 4.0 0.1 0.0 0.9Prop In Lane 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.03 0.75 1.00 0.78 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 382 770 800 512 815 854 423 0 267 401 0 267V/C Ratio(X) 0.15 0.51 0.51 0.22 0.69 0.69 0.04 0.00 0.68 0.02 0.00 0.18Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 488 960 998 668 1056 1106 1043 0 942 955 0 942HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.2 7.6 7.6 5.4 7.9 7.9 12.9 0.0 14.5 12.9 0.0 13.2Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 1.3 1.3 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.3Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 1.6 1.7 0.3 2.5 2.6 0.1 0.0 1.4 0.1 0.0 0.3Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 6.4 8.2 8.1 5.6 9.2 9.2 12.9 0.0 17.5 12.9 0.0 13.5LnGrp LOS AAAAAABABBABApproach Vol, veh/h 858 1266 198 56Approach Delay, s/veh 8.0 8.9 17.1 13.4Approach LOS AABBTimer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.2 6.7 20.0 10.2 5.8 21.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 6.0 20.0 22.0 4.0 22.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.0 3.2 7.9 2.9 2.6 11.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 0.1 4.2 0.2 0.0 5.7Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.4HCM 6th LOS A 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 7Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 57.8 60.4 36.1 36.7Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed5533Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Fair Fair Fair FairPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.69 2.73 2.05 1.98Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS C C B B7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 8Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 858 1266 198 56Effct. Green for Bike (s) 21.2 26.0 6.7 6.7Cross Street Width (ft) 36.1 36.7 60.4 57.8Through Lanes Number2211Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 707 867 223 223Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 12.5 9.6 23.7 23.7Bicycle Compliance Fair Good Fair FairBicycle LOS Score 2.82 3.17 2.81 2.54Bicycle LOS CCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 9ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 118445.8Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 66Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1811Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 21.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.94Delay for adq Gap 118447.80Avg Ped Delay (s) 118445.81ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 157900.1Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1811Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.94Delay for adq Gap 157902.09Avg Ped Delay (s) 157900.117DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 10IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 2Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 899 30 79 1091 39 148Future Vol, veh/h 899 30 79 1091 39 148Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - 110 - 0 25Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 1010 34 89 1226 44 166Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1044 0 1818 522 Stage 1 - - - - 1027 - Stage 2 - - - - 791 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 662 - 69 499 Stage 1 - - - - 306 - Stage 2 - - - - 407 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 662 - 60 499Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 159 - Stage 1 - - - - 265 - Stage 2 - - - - 407 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Control Delay, s 0 0.8 20HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 159 499 - - 662 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.276 0.333 - - 0.134 -HCM Control Delay (s) 36 15.8 - - 11.3 -HCM Lane LOS E C - - B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1 1.4 - - 0.5 - 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 11ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? YesApproach Delay(s) 85.6Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 10 28Lanes Crossed 2 1Veh Vol Crossed 899 1091Ped Vol Crossed 0 0Yield Rate(%) 0 0Ped Platooning No NoCritical Headway (s) 5.86 11.00Prob of Delayed X-ing 0.77 0.96Prob of Blocked Lane 0.52 0.96Delay for adq Gap 9.67 81.12Avg Ped Delay (s) 7.43 78.22ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 438344.3Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1990Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.95Delay for adq Gap 438346.09Avg Ped Delay (s) 438344.287DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 12Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBRLane Group Flow (vph) 1256 9 1317 179 60v/c Ratio 0.60 0.07 0.60 0.55 0.18Control Delay 9.6 32.9 8.2 31.8 9.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 9.6 32.9 8.2 31.8 9.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 119 3 129 49 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 245 19 169 #159 30Internal Link Dist (ft) 88 620 330Turn Bay Length (ft) 210 120Base Capacity (vph) 3276 121 3403 380 387Starvation Cap Reductn00000Spillback Cap Reductn00000Storage Cap Reductn00000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.07 0.39 0.47 0.16Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 13Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 1074 19 8 1146 156 52Future Volume (veh/h) 1074 19 8 1146 156 52Initial Q (Qb), veh000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1234 22 9 1317 179 60Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222Cap, veh/h 1860 33 17 2288 246 219Arrive On Green 0.52 0.52 0.01 0.64 0.14 0.14Sat Flow, veh/h 3666 64 1781 3647 1781 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 614 642 9 1317 179 60Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1859 1781 1777 1781 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 13.3 13.3 0.3 11.1 5.1 1.8Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.3 13.3 0.3 11.1 5.1 1.8Prop In Lane 0.03 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 925 968 17 2288 246 219V/C Ratio(X) 0.66 0.66 0.54 0.58 0.73 0.27Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1887 1974 135 4448 422 376HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.3 9.3 26.0 5.3 21.8 20.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.8 24.4 0.2 4.1 0.7Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.1 4.3 0.2 2.5 2.2 0.6Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 10.1 10.0 50.4 5.5 25.9 21.0LnGrp LOS B B D A C CApproach Vol, veh/h 1256 1326 239Approach Delay, s/veh 10.1 5.8 24.7Approach LOS B A CTimer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.8 6.5 33.5 40.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.5 4.0 56.0 66.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.1 2.3 15.3 13.1Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.0 12.1 15.4Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.3HCM 6th LOS A7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 14Approach EB WB NBCrosswalk Length (ft) 59.2 60.1 36.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed 4 5 3Number of Right-Turn Islands 0 0 0Type of Control None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase 8 5 4Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h) 0 0 0Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 0Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 0 0 085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service - - -Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code - - -Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 45.0 45.0 45.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.81 2.82 2.04Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS C C B 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 15Approach EB WB NBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0 0 0Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1256 1326 239Effct. Green for Bike (s) 35.5 37.0 11.0Cross Street Width (ft) 36.2 70.3 72.0Through Lanes Number 2 2 1Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No NoOn Street Parking? No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 789 822 244Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 16.5 15.6 34.7Bicycle Compliance Fair Fair PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.15 3.73 3.06Bicycle LOS C D C7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 16IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.8Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 28 130 1325 20 70 1244Future Vol, veh/h 28 130 1325 20 70 1244Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 12 12 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 100 - - 200 -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 30 140 1425 22 75 1338Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 2267 736 0 0 1459 0 Stage 1 1448----- Stage 2 819-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 34 361 - - 459 - Stage 1 183----- Stage 2 394-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 28 357 - - 454 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 130----- Stage 1 151----- Stage 2 394-----Approach WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 24.8 0 0.8HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h) - - 130 357 454 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.232 0.392 0.166 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 40.8 21.4 14.5 -HCM Lane LOS - - E C B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.8 1.8 0.6 -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 17ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 12518184.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2569Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.98Delay for adq Gap 12518185.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 12518184.00ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 12518184.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2569Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.98Delay for adq Gap 12518185.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 12518184.007DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 18Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 58 52 208 134 41 1241 142 128 1185 43v/c Ratio 0.23 0.16 0.60 0.32 0.44 1.00 0.24 1.09 0.85 0.06Control Delay 33.7 1.0 38.6 8.1 59.3 55.9 10.7 153.7 34.2 0.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 33.7 1.0 38.6 8.1 59.3 55.9 10.7 153.7 34.2 0.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 25 0 90 0 19 295 10 ~68 268 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 67 0 209 48 #96 #857 77 #274 #797 0Internal Link Dist (ft) 288 473 1028 1931Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 180 150 170 150 430Base Capacity (vph) 831 787 750 746 93 1238 601 117 1398 672Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.07 0.28 0.18 0.44 1.00 0.24 1.09 0.85 0.06Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 19Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 40 15 49 193 5 127 39 1179 135 122 1126 41Future Volume (veh/h) 40 15 49 193 5 127 39 1179 135 122 1126 41Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 42 16 52 203 5 134 41 1241 142 128 1185 43Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 80 30 94 290 7 264 56 1359 586 131 1507 655Arrive On Green 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.03 0.38 0.38 0.07 0.42 0.42Sat Flow, veh/h 1307 498 1543 1740 43 1585 1781 3554 1533 1781 3554 1545Grp Volume(v), veh/h 58 0 52 208 0 134 41 1241 142 128 1185 43Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1805 0 1543 1783 0 1585 1781 1777 1533 1781 1777 1545Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 0.0 2.2 7.5 0.0 5.2 1.6 22.5 4.3 4.9 19.6 1.1Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.1 0.0 2.2 7.5 0.0 5.2 1.6 22.5 4.3 4.9 19.6 1.1Prop In Lane 0.72 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 111 0 94 297 0 264 56 1359 586 131 1507 655V/C Ratio(X) 0.52 0.00 0.55 0.70 0.00 0.51 0.73 0.91 0.24 0.98 0.79 0.07Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 929 0 794 839 0 746 105 1385 598 131 1507 655HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.9 0.0 31.0 26.7 0.0 25.8 32.6 19.9 14.3 31.4 16.9 11.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.8 0.0 4.9 3.0 0.0 1.5 16.1 9.4 0.2 71.3 2.8 0.0Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 0.0 0.9 3.3 0.0 2.0 0.9 10.1 1.4 4.6 7.7 0.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.8 0.0 35.9 29.7 0.0 27.3 48.7 29.3 14.5 102.7 19.7 11.6LnGrp LOS C A D C A C D C B F B BApproach Vol, veh/h 110 342 1424 1356Approach Delay, s/veh 35.3 28.8 28.4 27.3Approach LOS DCCCTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 32.5 9.2 7.2 35.3 16.3Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 26.5 35.0 4.0 27.5 32.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.9 24.5 4.2 3.6 21.6 9.5Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.5 0.0 3.8 1.9Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 28.2HCM 6th LOS C7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 20Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 36.0 36.1 61.3 62.1Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3366Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.03 2.17 2.94 2.92Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 21Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 110 342 1424 1356Effct. Green for Bike (s) 11.4 15.7 28.1 31.7Cross Street Width (ft) 84.6 79.7 39.7 37.8Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 190 262 468 528Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 49.1 45.3 35.2 32.5Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.04 3.34 3.34 3.26Bicycle LOS CCCC7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 22Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 540 398 210 219 273 120 376 943 155 767 491v/c Ratio 0.78 0.47 0.40 0.77 0.73 0.28 0.76 0.82 0.61 0.82 0.57Control Delay 50.6 37.0 6.8 63.9 53.1 4.8 57.0 39.3 61.5 46.2 11.9Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 50.6 37.0 6.8 63.9 53.1 4.8 57.0 39.3 61.5 46.2 11.9Queue Length 50th (ft) 188 131 0 150 187 0 135 306 56 266 103Queue Length 95th (ft) #290 177 57 #288 278 29 #223 435 #105 #380 227Internal Link Dist (ft) 620 770 1992 1028Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 300 150 125 250 250 300Base Capacity (vph) 750 1311 699 319 619 618 522 1278 260 1042 881Starvation Cap Reductn00000000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.72 0.30 0.30 0.69 0.44 0.19 0.72 0.74 0.60 0.74 0.56Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 23Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 518 382 202 210 262 115 361 714 191 149 736 471Future Volume (veh/h) 518 382 202 210 262 115 361 714 191 149 736 471Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 540 398 210 219 273 120 376 744 199 155 767 491Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 621 964 415 251 435 355 443 948 254 215 989 714Arrive On Green 0.18 0.27 0.27 0.14 0.23 0.23 0.13 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.28 0.28Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1530 1781 1870 1527 3456 2753 736 3456 3554 1541Grp Volume(v), veh/h 540 398 210 219 273 120 376 480 463 155 767 491Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1530 1781 1870 1527 1728 1777 1712 1728 1777 1541Q Serve(g_s), s 16.8 10.1 12.8 13.3 14.5 7.2 11.7 26.8 26.8 4.9 21.9 28.0Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.8 10.1 12.8 13.3 14.5 7.2 11.7 26.8 26.8 4.9 21.9 28.0Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.43 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 621 964 415 251 435 355 443 612 590 215 989 714V/C Ratio(X) 0.87 0.41 0.51 0.87 0.63 0.34 0.85 0.78 0.78 0.72 0.78 0.69Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 720 1256 541 307 593 484 501 628 605 250 998 718HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.0 33.0 34.0 46.4 38.1 35.3 47.1 32.5 32.5 50.8 36.7 23.8Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.0 0.3 1.0 20.1 1.5 0.6 11.8 6.4 6.6 8.2 3.9 2.7Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 8.0 4.4 4.8 7.3 6.8 2.7 5.8 12.4 12.0 2.3 9.9 10.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 54.0 33.3 34.9 66.5 39.6 35.9 58.8 38.9 39.1 59.0 40.5 26.5LnGrp LOS D C C E D D E D D E D CApproach Vol, veh/h 1148 612 1319 1413Approach Delay, s/veh 43.3 48.5 44.6 37.7Approach LOS DDDDTimer - Assigned Phs12345678Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.9 43.0 20.6 34.9 19.2 35.7 24.8 30.6Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.0 39.0 19.0 39.0 16.0 31.0 23.0 35.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.9 28.8 15.3 14.8 13.7 30.0 18.8 16.5Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 4.6 0.3 3.9 0.4 0.8 1.1 2.1Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 42.6HCM 6th LOS D7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 24Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 73.8 71.3 72.3 84.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed7567Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.94 2.59 2.88 3.01Pedestrian Crosswalk LOSCCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 25Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1148 612 1319 1413Effct. Green for Bike (s) 25.9 21.4 35.7 28.3Cross Street Width (ft) 72.3 83.9 71.4 85.2Through Lanes Number2122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 414 342 571 453Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 39.3 42.9 31.9 37.4Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.61 3.85 3.74 4.03Bicycle LOS DDDD7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 26IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 2.1Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 104 43 16 797 1047 78Future Vol, veh/h 104 43 16 797 1047 78Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 75 200 - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 111 46 17 848 1114 83Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1614 599 1197 0 - 0 Stage 1 1156----- Stage 2 458-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 95 445 579 - - - Stage 1 262----- Stage 2 604-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 92 445 579 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 229----- Stage 1 254----- Stage 2 604-----Approach EB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 28.6 0.2 0HCM LOS DMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 579 - 229 445 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.029 - 0.483 0.103 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 11.4 - 34.6 14 - -HCM Lane LOS B - D B - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 2.4 0.3 - -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 27ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 164540.7Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 67Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1844Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.14Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.94Delay for adq Gap 164542.66Avg Ped Delay (s) 164540.70ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 1103034.5Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 80Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1844Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 25.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.96Delay for adq Gap 1103036.50Avg Ped Delay (s) 1103034.507DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 28Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 117 34 14 37 12 711 16 1188v/c Ratio 0.46 0.09 0.06 0.10 0.09 0.32 0.12 0.54Control Delay 26.5 0.4 19.1 0.5 27.9 7.6 28.5 9.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 26.5 0.4 19.1 0.5 27.9 7.6 28.5 9.7Queue Length 50th (ft) 300303505102Queue Length 95th (ft) 84 0 17 0 20 140 24 275Internal Link Dist (ft) 310 100 537 936Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 75 200 200Base Capacity (vph) 744 931 707 931 135 2119 135 2111Starvation Cap Reductn00000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.09 0.34 0.12 0.56Intersection Summary 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 29Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 106 1 31 13 0 34 11 643 4 15 1043 38Future Volume (veh/h) 106 1 31 13 0 34 11 643 4 15 1043 38Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 116 1 34 14 0 37 12 707 4 16 1146 42Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 105 1 614 105 0 614 21 1358 8 27 1321 48Arrive On Green 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.39 0.01 0.38 0.38 0.01 0.38 0.38Sat Flow, veh/h 22 1 1585 22 0 1585 1781 3622 20 1781 3493 128Grp Volume(v), veh/h 117 0 34 14 0 37 12 347 364 16 583 605Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 24 0 1585 22 0 1585 1781 1777 1866 1781 1777 1844Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 1.1 0.5 11.2 11.2 0.7 22.5 22.5Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 28.7 0.0 1.0 28.7 0.0 1.1 0.5 11.2 11.2 0.7 22.5 22.5Prop In Lane 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.07Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 106 0 614 105 0 614 21 666 700 27 672 697V/C Ratio(X) 1.11 0.00 0.06 0.13 0.00 0.06 0.58 0.52 0.52 0.60 0.87 0.87Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 111 0 620 110 0 620 96 731 768 96 731 758HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.9 0.0 14.2 36.9 0.0 14.2 36.5 18.0 18.0 36.3 21.3 21.3Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 118.7 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 23.0 0.6 0.6 19.9 10.2 9.9Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.4 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.3 4.4 4.6 0.4 10.5 10.8Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 155.6 0.0 14.2 37.5 0.0 14.3 59.5 18.6 18.6 56.2 31.5 31.2LnGrp LOS FABDABEBBECCApproach Vol, veh/h 151 51 723 1204Approach Delay, s/veh 123.8 20.7 19.3 31.7Approach LOS F C B CTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.1 34.4 33.9 5.9 34.7 33.9Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 30.5 29.0 4.0 30.5 29.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 13.2 30.7 2.5 24.5 30.7Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.8HCM 6th LOS C7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 30Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 34.0 34.2 57.2 59.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3355Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.01 1.97 2.68 2.71Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG([LVWLQJ3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 31Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 151 51 723 1204Effct. Green for Bike (s) 10.3 10.0 33.8 33.8Cross Street Width (ft) 57.2 59.2 34.2 34.0Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 258 250 845 845Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 30.4 30.6 13.3 13.3Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Fair FairBicycle LOS Score 2.90 2.76 2.89 3.29Bicycle LOS CCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 1Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 42 32 145 145 306 21 568 887 526 506v/c Ratio 0.28 0.11 0.39 0.38 0.51 0.19 0.73 0.86 0.73 0.32Control Delay 47.3 0.8 36.4 35.9 7.4 49.3 39.2 15.2 41.1 17.9Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 47.3 0.8 36.4 35.9 7.4 49.3 39.2 15.2 41.1 17.9Queue Length 50th (ft) 25 0 80 80 0 13 170 83 154 90Queue Length 95th (ft) 61 0 153 152 71 39 238 #298 228 163Internal Link Dist (ft) 109 1057 1054 1668Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 140 100 165Base Capacity (vph) 535 591 403 420 628 115 1039 1047 853 1721Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.05 0.36 0.35 0.49 0.18 0.55 0.85 0.62 0.29Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 20 20 30 265 10 291 20 540 843 500 470 10Future Volume (veh/h) 20 20 30 265 10 291 20 540 843 500 470 10Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 21 21 32 287 0 0 21 568 887 526 495 11Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 55 55 92 446 0 33 1175 710 660 1786 40Arrive On Green 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.33 0.33 0.19 0.50 0.50Sat Flow, veh/h 912 912 1514 3563 0 1585 1781 3554 1546 3456 3551 79Grp Volume(v), veh/h 42 0 32 287 0 0 21 568 887 526 247 259Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1825 0 1514 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1546 1728 1777 1853Q Serve(g_s), s 1.7 0.0 1.6 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 10.0 26.0 11.4 6.3 6.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 0.0 1.6 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 10.0 26.0 11.4 6.3 6.3Prop In Lane 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 111 0 92 446 0 33 1175 710 660 894 932V/C Ratio(X) 0.38 0.00 0.35 0.64 0.00 0.63 0.48 1.25 0.80 0.28 0.28Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 626 0 520 997 0 136 1175 710 967 949 990HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.5 0.0 35.4 32.7 0.0 0.0 38.3 21.0 18.7 30.4 11.3 11.3Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.1 0.0 2.2 1.6 0.0 0.0 17.9 0.3 124.0 3.0 0.2 0.2Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.6 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 3.8 37.4 4.6 2.1 2.2Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 37.6 0.0 37.7 34.3 0.0 0.0 56.3 21.3 142.8 33.3 11.5 11.5LnGrp LOS D A D C A E C F C B BApproach Vol, veh/h 74 287 A 1476 1032Approach Delay, s/veh 37.7 34.3 94.8 22.6Approach LOS D C F CTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.0 32.0 10.8 6.5 45.6 15.8Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 26.0 27.0 6.0 42.0 22.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.4 28.0 3.7 2.9 8.3 8.0Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.6 0.0 0.3 0.0 3.0 1.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 61.3HCM 6th LOS ENotesUser approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 3Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 50.7 58.5 67.8 54.5Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3466Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 25 45 45 45Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 1.99 2.89 3.03 2.94Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B C C C7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 4Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 74 596 1476 1032Effct. Green for Bike (s) 8.0 21.1 20.5 41.3Cross Street Width (ft) 78.9 66.6 58.5 49.8Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 10.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 133 352 342 688Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 52.3 40.8 41.3 25.8Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor FairBicycle LOS Score 3.32 3.78 3.89 3.39Bicycle LOS CDDC 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 5Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 55 1444 133 732 44 99 55 44v/c Ratio 0.10 0.61 0.39 0.28 0.22 0.34 0.30 0.17Control Delay 3.1 10.2 6.7 4.9 31.1 10.7 33.1 7.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 3.1 10.2 6.7 4.9 31.1 10.7 33.1 7.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 4 185 10 60 16 0 20 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 296 34 96 48 40 57 20Internal Link Dist (ft) 1057 1748 155 449Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 160 25 25Base Capacity (vph) 558 2643 381 2803 626 713 569 690Starvation Cap Reductn00000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.55 0.35 0.26 0.07 0.14 0.10 0.06Intersection Summary7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 6Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 50 1264 50 121 626 40 20 20 90 40 10 40Future Volume (veh/h) 50 1264 50 121 626 40 20 20 90 40 10 40Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 55 1389 55 133 688 44 22 22 99 44 11 44Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 451 1736 69 268 1764 113 85 62 441 112 19 441Arrive On Green 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.06 0.52 0.52 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3485 138 1781 3391 217 37 222 1585 81 67 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 55 707 737 133 360 372 44 0 99 55 0 44Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1846 1781 1777 1831 260 0 1585 147 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 24.1 24.2 2.6 8.9 8.9 0.5 0.0 3.5 1.5 0.0 1.5Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 24.1 24.2 2.6 8.9 8.9 19.7 0.0 3.5 20.2 0.0 1.5Prop In Lane 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.12 0.50 1.00 0.80 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 451 885 919 268 924 953 147 0 441 130 0 441V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.80 0.80 0.50 0.39 0.39 0.30 0.00 0.22 0.42 0.00 0.10Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 485 1127 1170 361 1225 1262 229 0 524 202 0 524HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 8.5 15.2 15.2 13.6 10.5 10.5 21.4 0.0 20.1 31.2 0.0 19.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 3.2 3.2 1.4 0.3 0.3 1.1 0.0 0.3 2.2 0.0 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 9.3 9.7 1.0 3.1 3.2 0.6 0.0 1.3 1.0 0.0 0.5Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 8.6 18.4 18.4 15.0 10.7 10.7 22.6 0.0 20.4 33.4 0.0 19.5LnGrp LOS ABBBBBCACCABApproach Vol, veh/h 1499 865 143 99Approach Delay, s/veh 18.1 11.4 21.1 27.2Approach LOS B B C CTimer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.1 8.3 40.6 25.1 6.6 42.3Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 24.0 8.0 46.0 24.0 4.0 50.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 21.7 4.6 26.2 22.2 3.1 10.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.1 10.9 0.1 0.0 5.5Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.4HCM 6th LOS B 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 7Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 57.8 60.4 36.1 36.7Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed5533Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.75 2.78 2.06 2.02Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS C C B B7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 8Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1499 865 143 99Effct. Green for Bike (s) 41.3 45.4 8.2 8.2Cross Street Width (ft) 36.1 36.7 60.4 57.8Through Lanes Number2211Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 918 1009 182 182Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 13.2 11.1 37.2 37.2Bicycle Compliance Fair Fair Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.35 2.83 2.72 2.61Bicycle LOS CCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 9ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 183363.7Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 66Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1890Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 21.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.94Delay for adq Gap 183365.61Avg Ped Delay (s) 183363.70ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 247522.9Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1890Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.95Delay for adq Gap 247524.81Avg Ped Delay (s) 247522.917DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th RoundaboutCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 10IntersectionIntersection Delay, s/veh10.8Intersection LOS BApproach EB WB NBEntry Lanes 2 2 2Conflicting Circle Lanes 2 2 2Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 1318 1608 202Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 1344 1640 206Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 264 22 1299Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 1398 1483 309Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000Approach Delay, s/veh 11.6 9.8 14.1Approach LOS B A BLane Left Right Left Right Left RightDesignated Moves LT TR LT TR L TRAssumed Moves LT TR LT TR L TRRT ChannelizedLane Util 0.470 0.530 0.470 0.530 0.107 0.893Follow-Up Headway, s 2.667 2.535 2.667 2.535 2.667 2.535Critical Headway, s 4.645 4.328 4.645 4.328 4.645 4.328Entry Flow, veh/h 632 712 771 869 22 184Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1059 1135 1323 1394 409 471Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.981 0.980 0.981 1.000 0.978Flow Entry, veh/h 619 698 756 852 22 180Cap Entry, veh/h 1037 1113 1297 1367 409 460V/C Ratio 0.597 0.628 0.583 0.623 0.054 0.391Control Delay, s/veh 11.5 11.7 9.5 10.0 9.6 14.7LOS BBABAB95th %tile Queue, veh 4 5 4 5 0 2 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 11Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 5 1575 136 1597 3 59 25 9 4v/c Ratio 0.06 0.75 0.77 0.58 0.00 0.39 0.15 0.12 0.04Control Delay 45.2 16.6 68.6 8.1 0.0 47.2 19.0 46.8 35.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 45.2 16.6 68.6 8.4 0.0 47.2 19.0 46.8 35.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 301 74 151 0 31 1 5 1Queue Length 95th (ft) 15 521 #188 463 0 75 26 22 12Internal Link Dist (ft) 149 109 330 342Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 210 50Base Capacity (vph) 78 2111 177 2749 1258 177 579 78 510Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 44100000Spillback Cap Reductn000000000Storage Cap Reductn000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.75 0.77 0.69 0.00 0.33 0.04 0.12 0.01Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 12Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 5 1030 356 120 1405 3 52 2 20 8 2 2Future Volume (veh/h) 5 1030 356 120 1405 3 52 2 20 8 2 2Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 5 1170 405 136 1597 3 59 2 23 9 2 2Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.92 0.88 0.92 0.88 0.92 0.92 0.92Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 9 1416 479 169 2270 1012 90 10 111 16 24 24Arrive On Green 0.01 0.54 0.54 0.09 0.64 0.64 0.05 0.08 0.08 0.01 0.03 0.03Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 2606 882 1781 3554 1585 1781 128 1476 1781 858 858Grp Volume(v), veh/h 5 789 786 136 1597 3 59 0 25 9 0 4Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1712 1781 1777 1585 1781 0 1605 1781 0 1716Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 30.9 32.8 6.3 24.9 0.1 2.8 0.0 1.2 0.4 0.0 0.2Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.2 30.9 32.8 6.3 24.9 0.1 2.8 0.0 1.2 0.4 0.0 0.2Prop In Lane 1.00 0.52 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.50Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 9 965 930 169 2270 1012 90 0 121 16 0 48V/C Ratio(X) 0.54 0.82 0.85 0.81 0.70 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.21 0.56 0.00 0.08Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 84 1092 1052 190 2416 1078 190 0 598 84 0 538HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.0 15.9 16.3 37.5 10.0 5.5 39.5 0.0 36.7 41.7 0.0 40.1Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 40.3 4.5 5.9 20.0 0.9 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.8 27.2 0.0 0.7Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 12.4 12.9 3.6 8.4 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 82.2 20.3 22.2 57.6 10.9 5.5 47.4 0.0 37.6 68.9 0.0 40.8LnGrp LOS F C C E B A D A D E A DApproach Vol, veh/h 1580 1736 84 13Approach Delay, s/veh 21.5 14.5 44.5 60.3Approach LOS C B D ETimer - Assigned Phs12345678Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.3 12.4 14.0 52.0 10.3 8.4 5.9 60.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 * 6 5.5 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 31.5 9.0 52.0 9.0 * 27 4.0 57.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 3.2 8.3 34.8 4.8 2.2 2.2 26.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.1 0.0 11.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.8Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.7HCM 6th LOS BNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 13Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 59.2 60.1 36.2 24.1Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed5633Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.95 2.95 2.17 1.97Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS C C B B7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 14Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1580 1736 84 13Effct. Green for Bike (s) 55.3 69.8 8.2 5.7Cross Street Width (ft) 36.3 37.4 74.2 60.2Through Lanes Number2211Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 922 1163 137 95Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 17.4 10.5 52.1 54.4Bicycle Compliance Fair Fair Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.42 3.56 2.83 2.50Bicycle LOS CDCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 15IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.3Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 22 60 1021 83 140 1708Future Vol, veh/h 22 60 1021 83 140 1708Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 12 12 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 100 - - 200 -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 23 63 1075 87 147 1798Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 2324 593 0 0 1174 0 Stage 1 1131----- Stage 2 1193-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 31 449 - - 591 - Stage 1 270----- Stage 2 250-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 23 444 - - 584 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 88----- Stage 1 200----- Stage 2 250-----Approach WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 26.6 0 1HCM LOS DMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h) - - 88 444 584 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.263 0.142 0.252 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 59.9 14.4 13.2 -HCM Lane LOS - - F B B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1 0.5 1 -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 16ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 31931440.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2729Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.99Delay for adq Gap 31931442.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 31931440.00ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 31931440.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2729Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.99Delay for adq Gap 31931442.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 31931440.00 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 17Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 23 23 97 55 53 1238 184 85 1730 47v/c Ratio 0.13 0.10 0.54 0.22 0.41 0.57 0.19 0.46 0.76 0.05Control Delay 38.7 26.0 50.7 17.5 54.1 13.4 4.3 49.9 15.7 1.5Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 38.7 26.0 50.7 17.5 54.1 13.4 4.3 49.9 15.7 1.5Queue Length 50th (ft) 13 7 57 7 32 225 14 50 366 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 36 29 109 41 74 350 50 101 536 10Internal Link Dist (ft) 288 473 497 1931Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 180 150 170 150 430Base Capacity (vph) 523 674 538 666 137 2237 1016 242 2421 1077Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.03 0.18 0.08 0.39 0.55 0.18 0.35 0.71 0.04Intersection Summary7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 18Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 22 11 10 91 11 40 50 1164 173 80 1626 44Future Volume (veh/h) 22 11 10 91 11 40 50 1164 173 80 1626 44Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 23 12 11 97 12 43 53 1238 184 85 1730 47Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 207 101 92 236 41 145 67 2154 934 111 2241 976Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.04 0.61 0.61 0.06 0.63 0.63Sat Flow, veh/h 1349 889 815 1388 358 1282 1781 3554 1541 1781 3554 1548Grp Volume(v), veh/h 23 0 23 97 0 55 53 1238 184 85 1730 47Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1349 0 1704 1388 0 1640 1781 1777 1541 1781 1777 1548Q Serve(g_s), s 1.2 0.0 0.9 5.1 0.0 2.3 2.2 15.9 4.0 3.6 26.5 0.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.5 0.0 0.9 6.0 0.0 2.3 2.2 15.9 4.0 3.6 26.5 0.9Prop In Lane 1.00 0.48 1.00 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 207 0 193 236 0 186 67 2154 934 111 2241 976V/C Ratio(X) 0.11 0.00 0.12 0.41 0.00 0.30 0.79 0.57 0.20 0.77 0.77 0.05Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 678 0 789 721 0 759 165 2643 1146 290 2892 1260HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.4 0.0 30.1 32.8 0.0 30.7 36.1 9.0 6.7 34.9 10.0 5.3Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.3 1.1 0.0 0.9 18.0 0.2 0.1 10.4 1.0 0.0Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.0 0.4 1.7 0.0 0.9 1.3 5.2 1.2 1.8 8.5 0.2Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.6 0.0 30.4 34.0 0.0 31.6 54.1 9.2 6.8 45.3 11.0 5.3LnGrp LOS C A C C A C D A A D B AApproach Vol, veh/h 46 152 1475 1862Approach Delay, s/veh 31.5 33.1 10.5 12.5Approach LOS C C B BTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.7 52.3 13.6 7.9 54.2 13.6Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.3 56.2 35.0 7.0 61.5 35.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.6 17.9 5.5 4.2 28.5 8.0Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 11.2 0.2 0.0 19.2 0.7Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.8HCM 6th LOS B 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 19Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 36.0 36.1 61.3 62.1Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3366Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.01 2.10 3.01 2.99Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 20Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 46 152 1475 1862Effct. Green for Bike (s) 12.0 12.0 56.3 58.9Cross Street Width (ft) 72.6 72.1 37.7 37.5Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 200 200 938 982Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 48.6 48.6 16.9 15.6Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Fair FairBicycle LOS Score 2.75 2.91 3.35 3.67Bicycle LOS CCCD 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 21Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 395 228 429 355 631 349 1055 140 119 894 875v/c Ratio 0.60 0.25 0.88 1.11 0.71 1.21 0.92 0.24 0.83 0.90 1.08Control Delay 47.5 33.4 48.8 125.4 38.9 166.5 51.7 8.4 96.9 53.2 78.3Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 47.5 33.4 48.8 125.4 38.9 166.5 51.7 8.4 96.9 53.2 78.3Queue Length 50th (ft) 141 69 223 ~311 198 ~168 403 9 46 342 ~690Queue Length 95th (ft) 201 103 #369 #519 261 #273 #568 57 #106 #487 #737Internal Link Dist (ft) 344 770 1992 451Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 300 150 250 250 250 300Base Capacity (vph) 654 1129 572 321 1088 289 1155 582 143 1004 813Starvation Cap Reductn00000000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.60 0.20 0.75 1.11 0.58 1.21 0.91 0.24 0.83 0.89 1.08Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 22Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 367 212 399 330 397 190 325 981 130 111 831 814Future Volume (veh/h) 367 212 399 330 397 190 325 981 130 111 831 814Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 395 228 429 355 427 204 349 1055 140 119 894 875Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 472 1049 453 306 766 362 275 1097 475 136 954 630Arrive On Green 0.14 0.30 0.30 0.17 0.33 0.33 0.08 0.31 0.31 0.04 0.27 0.27Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1533 1781 2317 1094 3456 3554 1537 3456 3554 1541Grp Volume(v), veh/h 395 228 429 355 326 305 349 1055 140 119 894 875Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1533 1781 1777 1634 1728 1777 1537 1728 1777 1541Q Serve(g_s), s 13.3 5.8 32.6 20.5 17.9 18.3 9.5 34.8 8.3 4.1 29.3 32.0Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.3 5.8 32.6 20.5 17.9 18.3 9.5 34.8 8.3 4.1 29.3 32.0Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 472 1049 453 306 588 540 275 1097 475 136 954 630V/C Ratio(X) 0.84 0.22 0.95 1.16 0.56 0.56 1.27 0.96 0.29 0.87 0.94 1.39Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 623 1073 463 306 588 540 275 1097 475 136 954 630HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.2 31.6 41.1 49.3 32.7 32.8 54.8 40.5 31.3 56.9 42.6 35.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.6 0.1 28.8 101.6 1.2 1.4 145.7 18.6 0.3 42.0 16.1 184.6Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.2 2.5 15.8 17.7 7.9 7.4 9.7 17.8 3.1 2.6 14.9 50.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 57.7 31.7 69.9 150.9 33.9 34.2 200.6 59.1 31.7 98.9 58.7 220.2LnGrp LOS E C E F C C F E C F E FApproach Vol, veh/h 1052 986 1544 1888Approach Delay, s/veh 57.0 76.1 88.6 136.1Approach LOS E E F FTimer - Assigned Phs12345678Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.2 42.3 26.0 40.7 15.0 37.5 21.8 44.9Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.7 36.8 20.5 36.0 9.5 32.0 21.5 35.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.1 36.8 22.5 34.6 11.5 34.0 15.3 20.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.7Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 96.7HCM 6th LOS F 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 23Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 73.8 71.3 72.3 84.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed7577Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.99 2.61 3.06 3.11Pedestrian Crosswalk LOSCCCC7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 24Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1052 986 1544 1888Effct. Green for Bike (s) 29.2 28.2 36.6 31.8Cross Street Width (ft) 84.2 84.1 72.9 85.5Through Lanes Number2222Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 487 470 610 530Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 34.4 35.1 29.0 32.4Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Fair PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.72 3.66 3.95 4.43Bicycle LOS DDDD 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 25IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.2Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 42 40 90 1536 1028 153Future Vol, veh/h 42 40 90 1536 1028 153Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 75 200 - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 45 43 96 1634 1094 163Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 2185 629 1257 0 - 0 Stage 1 1176----- Stage 2 1009-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 39 425 549 - - - Stage 1 255----- Stage 2 313-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 32 425 549 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 145----- Stage 1 210----- Stage 2 313-----Approach EB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 27.8 0.7 0HCM LOS DMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 549 - 145 425 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.174 - 0.308 0.1 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 12.9 - 40.5 14.4 - -HCM Lane LOS B - E B - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 - 1.2 0.3 - -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 26ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 9919347.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 67Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2564Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.14Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.98Delay for adq Gap 9919348.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 9919347.00ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 139754512.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 80Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2564Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 25.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.99Delay for adq Gap 139754512.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 139754512.00 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 27Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 55 11 11 145 22 1431 488 1224v/c Ratio 0.44 0.04 0.09 0.54 0.26 0.92 0.99 0.48Control Delay 54.0 0.3 42.7 14.9 54.6 37.4 74.4 6.4Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0Total Delay 54.0 0.3 42.7 14.9 54.6 38.1 74.4 6.4Queue Length 50th (ft) 34 0 7 0 14 438 309 101Queue Length 95th (ft) 73 0 24 57 40 #636 #546 247Internal Link Dist (ft) 310 100 537 936Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 75 200 200Base Capacity (vph) 397 530 375 546 85 1551 495 2539Starvation Cap Reductn000002200Spillback Cap Reductn00000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.02 0.03 0.27 0.26 0.94 0.99 0.48Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 28Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 40 10 10 10 0 132 20 1282 20 444 993 121Future Volume (veh/h) 40 10 10 10 0 132 20 1282 20 444 993 121Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 44 11 11 11 0 145 22 1409 22 488 1091 133Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 195 42 181 244 0 181 33 1553 24 513 2237 272Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.11 0.02 0.43 0.43 0.29 0.70 0.70Sat Flow, veh/h 1141 366 1585 1511 0 1585 1781 3579 56 1781 3180 387Grp Volume(v), veh/h 55 0 11 11 0 145 22 699 732 488 609 615Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1508 0 1585 1511 0 1585 1781 1777 1858 1781 1777 1790Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 9.0 1.2 37.0 37.1 27.1 15.6 15.6Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.3 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.0 9.0 1.2 37.0 37.1 27.1 15.6 15.6Prop In Lane 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.22Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 237 0 181 244 0 181 33 771 806 513 1250 1259V/C Ratio(X) 0.23 0.00 0.06 0.05 0.00 0.80 0.68 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.49 0.49Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 495 0 456 488 0 456 88 803 839 513 1250 1259HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.9 0.0 39.8 39.7 0.0 43.5 49.2 26.6 26.6 35.2 6.7 6.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 7.8 21.8 13.7 13.3 27.9 0.3 0.3Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.3 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 3.9 0.7 17.9 18.6 15.4 5.1 5.2Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 41.4 0.0 39.9 39.8 0.0 51.3 70.9 40.3 40.0 63.1 7.0 7.0LnGrp LOS D A D D A D E D D E A AApproach Vol, veh/h 66 156 1453 1712Approach Delay, s/veh 41.1 50.5 40.6 23.0Approach LOS DDDCTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 34.0 50.2 16.5 6.8 77.4 16.5Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.0 45.5 29.0 5.0 69.5 29.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 29.1 39.1 5.3 3.2 17.6 11.0Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.6 0.3 0.0 12.4 0.6Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.2HCM 6th LOS C 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 29Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 34.0 34.2 57.2 59.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3355Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.03 2.18 2.82 2.97Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW$03HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 30Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 66 156 1453 1712Effct. Green for Bike (s) 9.2 9.2 45.5 75.6Cross Street Width (ft) 57.2 59.2 34.2 34.0Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 153 153 758 1260Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 51.2 51.2 23.1 8.2Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Fair GoodBicycle LOS Score 2.76 2.94 3.50 3.71Bicycle LOS CCCD 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 1Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 33 22 348 343 699 22 1011 400 508 1056v/c Ratio 0.25 0.08 0.92 0.87 0.89 0.32 0.91 0.41 0.97 0.61Control Delay 48.2 0.5 68.1 59.9 24.5 59.8 45.1 4.6 75.4 21.1Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 48.2 0.5 68.1 59.9 24.5 59.8 45.1 4.6 75.4 21.1Queue Length 50th (ft) 20 0 233 226 105 14 332 32 ~179 236Queue Length 95th (ft) 50 0 #428 #408 #347 41 #476 60 #286 380Internal Link Dist (ft) 109 1057 1054 1668Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 140 100 165Base Capacity (vph) 477 561 379 394 784 69 1114 971 523 1724Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.04 0.92 0.87 0.89 0.32 0.91 0.41 0.97 0.61Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 20 10 20 595 20 622 20 900 356 452 900 40Future Volume (veh/h) 20 10 20 595 20 622 20 900 356 452 900 40Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 11 22 685 0 0 22 1011 400 508 1011 45Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 63 31 78 783 0 33 1127 838 547 1580 70Arrive On Green 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.32 0.32 0.16 0.46 0.46Sat Flow, veh/h 1207 603 1506 3563 0 1585 1781 3554 1545 3456 3459 154Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 0 22 685 0 0 22 1011 400 508 519 537Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 0 1506 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1545 1728 1777 1837Q Serve(g_s), s 1.7 0.0 1.3 17.6 0.0 0.0 1.2 25.7 15.3 13.7 21.3 21.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 0.0 1.3 17.6 0.0 0.0 1.2 25.7 15.3 13.7 21.3 21.3Prop In Lane 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.08Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 94 0 78 783 0 33 1127 838 547 812 839V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.00 0.28 0.88 0.00 0.67 0.90 0.48 0.93 0.64 0.64Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 516 0 429 864 0 75 1162 854 547 812 839HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.4 0.0 43.2 35.7 0.0 0.0 46.2 30.9 13.7 39.4 19.8 19.8Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 0.0 1.9 9.3 0.0 0.0 20.6 9.3 0.4 22.5 1.7 1.6Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.5 8.2 0.0 0.0 0.7 11.6 7.9 7.2 8.3 8.5Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.6 0.0 45.2 45.1 0.0 0.0 66.8 40.2 14.1 61.8 21.5 21.4LnGrp LOS D A D D A E D B E C CApproach Vol, veh/h 55 685 A 1433 1564Approach Delay, s/veh 45.5 45.1 33.3 34.6Approach LOS DDCCTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 21.0 36.0 10.9 7.8 49.3 26.8Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.0 31.0 27.0 4.0 42.0 23.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 15.7 27.7 3.7 3.2 23.3 19.6Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.3 0.2 0.0 6.4 1.1Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 36.2HCM 6th LOS DNotesUser approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.Unsignalized Delay for [WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 3Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 50.7 58.5 67.8 54.5Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3466Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 25 45 45 45Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.00 3.00 3.24 3.28Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B C C C7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU +LJXHUD 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 4Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 55 1390 1433 1564Effct. Green for Bike (s) 7.4 23.1 31.2 48.5Cross Street Width (ft) 78.9 66.6 58.5 49.8Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 10.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 123 385 520 808Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 52.8 39.1 32.9 21.3Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Poor FairBicycle LOS Score 3.29 5.09 3.85 3.83Bicycle LOS C E D D 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 5Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBT NBR SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 95 861 118 1302 32 192 53 53v/c Ratio 0.33 0.45 0.25 0.64 0.15 0.49 0.26 0.18Control Delay 6.7 8.8 4.1 9.9 21.5 8.8 23.7 5.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 6.7 8.8 4.1 9.9 21.5 8.8 23.7 5.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 78 8 128 9 0 15 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 20 133 23 216 28 44 41 16Internal Link Dist (ft) 1057 1798 155 449Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 160 25 25Base Capacity (vph) 286 1990 480 2092 701 847 657 787Starvation Cap Reductn00000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.43 0.25 0.62 0.05 0.23 0.08 0.07Intersection Summary7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 6Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 90 788 30 112 1167 70 20 10 182 40 10 50Future Volume (veh/h) 90 788 30 112 1167 70 20 10 182 40 10 50Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 95 829 32 118 1228 74 21 11 192 42 11 53Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 329 1647 64 458 1628 98 152 56 353 174 31 353Arrive On Green 0.06 0.47 0.47 0.06 0.48 0.48 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3488 135 1781 3405 205 147 253 1585 201 141 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 95 422 439 118 640 662 32 0 192 53 0 53Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1846 1781 1777 1833 400 0 1585 341 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 8.2 8.2 1.6 14.6 14.7 0.2 0.0 5.3 1.3 0.0 1.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.3 8.2 8.2 1.6 14.6 14.7 9.6 0.0 5.3 10.2 0.0 1.3Prop In Lane 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.11 0.66 1.00 0.79 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 329 839 872 458 850 877 209 0 353 206 0 353V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.50 0.50 0.26 0.75 0.76 0.15 0.00 0.54 0.26 0.00 0.15Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 369 1000 1038 559 1071 1105 593 0 764 537 0 764HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 8.3 9.1 9.1 6.5 10.6 10.6 16.0 0.0 17.1 19.9 0.0 15.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.3 2.3 2.3 0.3 0.0 1.3 0.7 0.0 0.2Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 2.5 2.6 0.5 4.9 5.0 0.3 0.0 1.8 0.6 0.0 0.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 8.8 9.6 9.5 6.8 12.9 12.9 16.3 0.0 18.4 20.6 0.0 15.7LnGrp LOS AAAABBBABCABApproach Vol, veh/h 956 1420 224 106Approach Delay, s/veh 9.5 12.4 18.1 18.1Approach LOS ABBBTimer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.7 7.2 27.7 15.7 6.9 28.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 24.0 6.0 28.0 24.0 4.0 30.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.6 3.6 10.2 12.2 3.3 16.7Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 0.1 5.5 0.3 0.0 7.5Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.1HCM 6th LOS B 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 7Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 57.8 60.4 36.1 36.7Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed5533Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.74 2.78 2.07 2.03Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS C C B B7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 8Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 956 1420 224 106Effct. Green for Bike (s) 28.0 29.6 7.4 7.4Cross Street Width (ft) 36.1 36.7 60.4 57.8Through Lanes Number2211Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 800 846 211 211Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 12.6 11.7 28.0 28.0Bicycle Compliance Fair Fair Fair FairBicycle LOS Score 2.90 3.29 2.85 2.62Bicycle LOS CCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU /RQJ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 9ApproachApproach Direction EBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 263049.1Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 66Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1955Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 21.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.95Delay for adq Gap 263050.91Avg Ped Delay (s) 263049.06ApproachApproach Direction WBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 358769.8Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 1955Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.95Delay for adq Gap 358771.69Avg Ped Delay (s) 358769.847DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 6DQWD)H 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th RoundaboutCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 10IntersectionIntersection Delay, s/veh13.3Intersection LOS BApproach EB WB NBEntry Lanes 2 2 2Conflicting Circle Lanes 2 2 2Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 1313 1659 385Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 1340 1693 393Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 289 46 1305Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 1450 1652 324Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000Approach Delay, s/veh 12.1 10.7 28.5Approach LOS B B DLane Left Right Left Right Left RightDesignated Moves LT TR LT TR L TRAssumed Moves LT TR LT TR L TRRT ChannelizedLane Util 0.470 0.530 0.470 0.530 0.117 0.883Follow-Up Headway, s 2.667 2.535 2.667 2.535 2.667 2.535Critical Headway, s 4.645 4.328 4.645 4.328 4.645 4.328Entry Flow, veh/h 630 710 796 897 46 347Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1035 1111 1294 1366 406 468Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.981 0.978 0.980Flow Entry, veh/h 617 696 780 880 45 340Cap Entry, veh/h 1014 1089 1268 1339 398 459V/C Ratio 0.609 0.639 0.615 0.657 0.113 0.741Control Delay, s/veh 12.0 12.2 10.3 11.0 10.8 30.8LOS BBBBBD95th %tile Queue, veh 4 5 4 5 0 6 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 11Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 12 1713 115 1490 8 294 176 24 13v/c Ratio 0.18 0.97 0.85 0.69 0.01 0.82 0.42 0.35 0.12Control Delay 59.9 42.0 97.2 19.6 0.0 59.9 18.0 67.4 35.2Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 59.9 42.0 97.2 20.8 0.0 59.9 18.0 67.4 35.2Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 515 74 265 0 179 36 15 3Queue Length 95th (ft) 30 #860 #196 583 0 #303 104 #49 24Internal Link Dist (ft) 160 81 330 315Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 210 50Base Capacity (vph) 67 1770 135 2150 1033 439 552 69 159Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 40200000Spillback Cap Reductn000000000Storage Cap Reductn000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 0.97 0.85 0.85 0.01 0.67 0.32 0.35 0.08Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 12Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 11 1346 144 100 1296 7 256 4 150 22 4 8Future Volume (veh/h) 11 1346 144 100 1296 7 256 4 150 22 4 8Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 1547 166 115 1490 8 294 4 172 24 4 9Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.92 0.87 0.92 0.87 0.92 0.92 0.92Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 20 1573 167 130 1961 875 330 7 322 34 19 42Arrive On Green 0.01 0.49 0.49 0.07 0.55 0.55 0.19 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.04 0.04Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3241 344 1781 3554 1585 1781 36 1554 1781 512 1151Grp Volume(v), veh/h 12 841 872 115 1490 8 294 0 176 24 0 13Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1808 1781 1777 1585 1781 0 1591 1781 0 1663Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 50.5 52.4 7.0 35.3 0.2 17.6 0.0 10.8 1.5 0.0 0.8Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 50.5 52.4 7.0 35.3 0.2 17.6 0.0 10.8 1.5 0.0 0.8Prop In Lane 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.69Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 20 862 878 130 1961 875 330 0 330 34 0 61V/C Ratio(X) 0.60 0.97 0.99 0.88 0.76 0.01 0.89 0.00 0.53 0.71 0.00 0.21Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 65 862 878 130 1961 875 424 0 457 67 0 145HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 53.8 27.5 28.0 50.1 18.9 11.0 43.4 0.0 38.6 53.3 0.0 51.1Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 25.9 24.6 28.8 45.2 1.8 0.0 17.2 0.0 1.3 24.0 0.0 1.7Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 26.2 28.5 4.7 14.2 0.1 9.3 0.0 4.3 0.9 0.0 0.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 79.7 52.0 56.8 95.3 20.7 11.0 60.6 0.0 39.9 77.3 0.0 52.8LnGrp LOS E D E F C B E A D E A DApproach Vol, veh/h 1725 1613 470 37Approach Delay, s/veh 54.6 25.9 52.9 68.7Approach LOS D C D ETimer - Assigned Phs12345678Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.6 28.6 14.0 59.0 26.2 10.0 6.7 66.3Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 * 6 5.5 6.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.1 31.4 8.0 53.0 26.0 * 9.5 4.0 57.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 12.8 9.0 54.4 19.6 2.8 2.7 37.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 12.0Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 42.5HCM 6th LOS DNotes* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 13Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 59.2 60.1 36.2 24.0Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed5633Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 3.01 3.02 2.21 1.98Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS C C B B7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU 0LQG%RG\ 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 14Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1725 1613 470 37Effct. Green for Bike (s) 53.5 64.2 22.5 6.1Cross Street Width (ft) 36.3 37.5 74.4 60.1Through Lanes Number2211Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 892 1070 375 102Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 18.4 13.0 39.6 54.1Bicycle Compliance Fair Fair Poor PoorBicycle LOS Score 3.54 3.46 3.47 2.54Bicycle LOS DCCC 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 15IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 14.6Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 93 150 1722 102 90 1566Future Vol, veh/h 93 150 1722 102 90 1566Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 12 12 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 100 - - 200 -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 100 161 1852 110 97 1684Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 2955 993 0 0 1974 0 Stage 1 1919----- Stage 2 1036-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 11 244 - - 290 - Stage 1 101----- Stage 2 303-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 7 241 - - 287 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 59----- Stage 1 ~ 66----- Stage 2 303-----Approach WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 215.3 0 1.3HCM LOS FMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h) - - 59 241 287 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 1.695 0.669 0.337 -HCM Control Delay (s) - -$ 488.8 45.7 23.8 -HCM Lane LOS - - F E C -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 9.2 4.3 1.4 -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG &DSLWROLRHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 16ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 862561088.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 3288Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.99Delay for adq Gap 862561088.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 862561088.00ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 862561088.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 68Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 3288Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.43Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.99Delay for adq Gap 862561088.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 862561088.00 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 17Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 85 79 203 192 42 1797 149 147 1487 62v/c Ratio 0.46 0.21 0.75 0.45 0.39 0.93 0.17 0.89 0.68 0.06Control Delay 44.9 14.5 56.8 17.0 62.0 33.8 8.2 97.1 18.1 3.5Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 44.9 14.5 56.8 17.0 62.0 33.8 8.2 97.1 18.1 3.5Queue Length 50th (ft) 52 13 132 40 28 559 24 101 364 0Queue Length 95th (ft) 100 50 212 102 70 #931 70 #252 594 21Internal Link Dist (ft) 288 473 404 1931Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 180 150 170 150 430Base Capacity (vph) 292 576 429 606 115 1931 870 165 2200 984Starvation Cap Reductn0000000000Spillback Cap Reductn0000000000Storage Cap Reductn0000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.29 0.14 0.47 0.32 0.37 0.93 0.17 0.89 0.68 0.06Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 18Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 81 22 53 193 12 170 40 1707 142 140 1413 59Future Volume (veh/h) 81 22 53 193 12 170 40 1707 142 140 1413 59Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 85 23 56 203 13 179 42 1797 149 147 1487 62Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 205 106 258 308 24 332 54 1895 821 164 2116 921Arrive On Green 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.03 0.53 0.53 0.09 0.60 0.60Sat Flow, veh/h 1191 477 1162 1320 108 1493 1781 3554 1539 1781 3554 1547Grp Volume(v), veh/h 85 0 79 203 0 192 42 1797 149 147 1487 62Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1191 0 1639 1320 0 1602 1781 1777 1539 1781 1777 1547Q Serve(g_s), s 7.4 0.0 4.3 16.1 0.0 11.5 2.5 51.8 5.4 8.9 31.6 1.8Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.9 0.0 4.3 20.4 0.0 11.5 2.5 51.8 5.4 8.9 31.6 1.8Prop In Lane 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 205 0 364 308 0 356 54 1895 821 164 2116 921V/C Ratio(X) 0.41 0.00 0.22 0.66 0.00 0.54 0.78 0.95 0.18 0.89 0.70 0.07Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 325 0 529 440 0 517 115 1917 830 164 2116 921HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.6 0.0 34.5 42.8 0.0 37.3 52.2 23.9 13.1 48.7 15.3 9.2Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.3 0.0 0.3 2.4 0.0 1.3 21.3 10.7 0.1 41.5 1.1 0.0Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.2 0.0 1.7 5.4 0.0 4.6 1.5 23.2 1.9 5.8 12.2 0.6Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.9 0.0 34.8 45.2 0.0 38.5 73.6 34.6 13.2 90.2 16.3 9.3LnGrp LOS DACDADECBFBAApproach Vol, veh/h 164 395 1988 1696Approach Delay, s/veh 41.1 42.0 33.8 22.5Approach LOS DDCCTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.0 64.3 29.1 8.3 71.1 29.1Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.0 58.5 35.0 7.0 61.5 35.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.9 53.8 20.9 4.5 33.6 22.4Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.1 0.7 0.0 14.2 1.7Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.3HCM 6th LOS C 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 19Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 36.0 36.1 61.3 62.1Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3366Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.05 2.19 3.08 3.08Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG ,QGXVWULDOHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 20Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 164 395 1988 1696Effct. Green for Bike (s) 22.3 22.3 58.8 67.0Cross Street Width (ft) 72.7 72.1 37.7 37.5Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 372 372 980 1117Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 39.8 39.8 15.6 11.7Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Fair FairBicycle LOS Score 2.94 3.31 3.78 3.53Bicycle LOS CCDD 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 21Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane Group Flow (vph) 707 605 236 219 475 550 1085 375 304 900 624v/c Ratio 1.22 0.71 0.45 0.88 0.60 1.22 0.86 0.50 1.19 0.85 0.73Control Delay 154.7 42.0 9.4 80.9 32.3 160.1 41.3 7.8 159.8 45.0 18.7Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 154.7 42.0 9.4 80.9 32.3 160.1 41.3 7.8 159.8 45.0 18.7Queue Length 50th (ft) ~312 203 16 151 122 ~243 360 25 ~131 304 191Queue Length 95th (ft) #479 262 78 #324 174 #392 #545 111 #243 #462 381Internal Link Dist (ft) 372 770 1992 544Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 300 150 250 250 250 300Base Capacity (vph) 578 1258 677 248 1159 449 1291 762 256 1092 856Starvation Cap Reductn00000000000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000000Reduced v/c Ratio 1.22 0.48 0.35 0.88 0.41 1.22 0.84 0.49 1.19 0.82 0.73Intersection Summary~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 22Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 679 581 227 210 285 171 528 1042 360 292 864 599Future Volume (veh/h) 679 581 227 210 285 171 528 1042 360 292 864 599Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 707 605 236 219 297 178 550 1085 375 304 900 624Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 560 930 400 241 500 290 436 1248 541 249 1056 715Arrive On Green 0.16 0.26 0.26 0.14 0.23 0.23 0.13 0.35 0.35 0.07 0.30 0.30Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1529 1781 2133 1237 3456 3554 1541 3456 3554 1543Grp Volume(v), veh/h 707 605 236 219 246 229 550 1085 375 304 900 624Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1529 1781 1777 1593 1728 1777 1541 1728 1777 1543Q Serve(g_s), s 18.0 16.8 15.0 13.5 13.6 14.3 14.0 31.7 23.2 8.0 26.5 33.0Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.0 16.8 15.0 13.5 13.6 14.3 14.0 31.7 23.2 8.0 26.5 33.0Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 560 930 400 241 417 374 436 1248 541 249 1056 715V/C Ratio(X) 1.26 0.65 0.59 0.91 0.59 0.61 1.26 0.87 0.69 1.22 0.85 0.87Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 560 1216 523 241 560 502 436 1248 541 249 1056 715HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.5 36.5 35.8 47.4 37.8 38.0 48.5 33.6 30.9 51.5 36.7 27.2Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 131.9 0.8 1.4 34.9 1.3 1.6 135.5 6.8 3.8 130.1 6.9 11.5Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 17.9 7.3 5.7 8.3 6.1 5.7 14.2 14.6 9.1 7.9 12.3 16.7Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 178.4 37.3 37.2 82.3 39.1 39.6 184.0 40.5 34.7 181.6 43.6 38.7LnGrp LOS F D D F D D F D C F D DApproach Vol, veh/h 1548 694 2010 1828Approach Delay, s/veh 101.7 52.9 78.7 64.9Approach LOS F D E ETimer - Assigned Phs12345678Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.0 44.0 20.0 34.1 19.0 38.0 23.0 31.1Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.0 39.0 15.0 38.0 14.0 33.0 18.0 35.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.0 33.7 15.5 18.8 16.0 35.0 20.0 16.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.0 0.0 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 77.4HCM 6th LOS E 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 23Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 73.8 71.3 72.3 84.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed7577Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 3.04 2.71 3.08 3.14Pedestrian Crosswalk LOSCCCC7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG 7DQN)DUPHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 24Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 1548 694 2010 1828Effct. Green for Bike (s) 26.0 23.0 38.2 32.2Cross Street Width (ft) 84.2 84.1 73.0 85.7Through Lanes Number2222Through Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 433 383 637 537Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 36.8 39.2 27.9 32.1Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Fair PoorBicycle LOS Score 4.12 3.42 4.33 4.38Bicycle LOS DCDD 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th TWSCCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 25IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 8.4Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 123 50 90 1436 1328 82Future Vol, veh/h 123 50 90 1436 1328 82Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 75 200 - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 2 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow 131 53 96 1528 1413 87Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 2413 750 1500 0 - 0 Stage 1 1457----- Stage 2 956-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 27 354 443 - - - Stage 1 181----- Stage 2 334-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 21 354 443 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 116----- Stage 1 142----- Stage 2 334-----Approach EB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 142.6 0.9 0HCM LOS FMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 443 - 116 354 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.216 - 1.128 0.15 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 15.4 - 193.6 17 - -HCM Lane LOS C - F C - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - 8 0.5 - -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURYLVWDHCM 6th Edition TWSC-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 26ApproachApproach Direction NBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 31485814.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 67Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2764Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 22.14Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.99Delay for adq Gap 31485816.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 31485814.00ApproachApproach Direction SBMedian Present? NoApproach Delay(s) 545272320.0Level of Service FCrosswalkLength (ft) 80Lanes Crossed 4Veh Vol Crossed 2764Ped Vol Crossed 0Yield Rate(%) 0Ped Platooning NoCritical Headway (s) 25.86Prob of Delayed X-ing 1.00Prob of Blocked Lane 0.99Delay for adq Gap 545272320.00Avg Ped Delay (s) 545272320.00 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURQueuesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 27Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBTLane Group Flow (vph) 277 44 33 390 22 1264 323 1424v/c Ratio 0.90 0.10 0.22 0.63 0.29 0.91 0.91 0.69Control Delay 74.6 0.4 40.2 12.4 66.0 43.9 75.2 18.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0Total Delay 74.6 0.4 40.2 12.4 66.0 45.3 75.2 18.6Queue Length 50th (ft) 207 0 20 36 17 480 246 405Queue Length 95th (ft) #361 0 51 138 46 #624 #417 494Internal Link Dist (ft) 310 100 537 936Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 75 200 200Base Capacity (vph) 336 494 166 646 75 1454 376 2101Starvation Cap Reductn000007000Spillback Cap Reductn00000000Storage Cap Reductn00000000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.82 0.09 0.20 0.60 0.29 0.91 0.86 0.68Intersection Summary# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 28Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 242 10 40 30 0 355 20 1130 20 294 1224 72Future Volume (veh/h) 242 10 40 30 0 355 20 1130 20 294 1224 72Initial Q (Qb), veh000000000000Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 266 11 44 33 0 390 22 1242 22 323 1345 79Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222Cap, veh/h 426 15 413 495 0 413 31 1407 25 354 1959 115Arrive On Green 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.02 0.39 0.39 0.20 0.58 0.58Sat Flow, veh/h 1393 58 1585 1654 0 1585 1781 3570 63 1781 3406 200Grp Volume(v), veh/h 277 0 44 33 0 390 22 618 646 323 700 724Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1450 0 1585 1654 0 1585 1781 1777 1857 1781 1777 1829Q Serve(g_s), s 17.9 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 27.2 1.4 36.4 36.4 20.0 31.1 31.4Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 19.5 0.0 2.4 1.6 0.0 27.2 1.4 36.4 36.4 20.0 31.1 31.4Prop In Lane 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.11Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 441 0 413 495 0 413 31 700 732 354 1022 1052V/C Ratio(X) 0.63 0.00 0.11 0.07 0.00 0.94 0.70 0.88 0.88 0.91 0.68 0.69Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 449 0 422 503 0 422 79 765 799 395 1080 1112HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.8 0.0 31.7 31.4 0.0 40.8 55.0 31.7 31.7 44.2 16.8 16.8Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.7 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 29.6 24.3 11.1 10.8 23.6 1.7 1.7Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 7.3 0.0 0.9 0.7 0.0 13.9 0.8 17.4 18.1 11.1 12.5 13.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 40.6 0.0 31.8 31.4 0.0 70.5 79.4 42.8 42.5 67.8 18.5 18.5LnGrp LOS DACCAEEDDEBBApproach Vol, veh/h 321 423 1286 1747Approach Delay, s/veh 39.4 67.4 43.3 27.6Approach LOS D E D CTimer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 27.4 50.9 34.4 7.0 71.3 34.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.0 48.5 30.0 5.0 68.5 30.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 22.0 38.4 21.5 3.4 33.4 29.2Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 6.0 1.2 0.0 14.3 0.2Intersection SummaryHCM 6th Ctrl Delay 38.4HCM 6th LOS D 7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-PedestriansCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 29Approach EB WB NB SBCrosswalk Length (ft) 34.0 34.2 57.2 59.2Crosswalk Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0Total Number of Lanes Crossed3355Number of Right-Turn Islands0000Type of Control None None None NoneCorresponding Signal Phase6248Effective Walk Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Size A (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Size B (ft) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Right Corner Curb Radius (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Total Area (sq.ft) 81.00 81.00 81.00 81.00Ped. Left-Right Flow Rate (p/h)0000Ped. Right-Left Flow Rate (p/h) 0000Ped. R. Sidewalk Flow Rate (p/h)0000Veh. Perm. L. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. Perm. R. Flow in Walk (v/h) 0000Veh. RTOR Flow in Walk (v/h) 000085th percentile speed (mph) 30 30 30 30Right Corner Area per Ped (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Right Corner Quality of Service----Ped. Circulation Area (sq.ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Crosswalk Circulation Code----Pedestrian Delay (s/p) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Pedestrian Compliance Code Poor Poor Poor PoorPedestrian Crosswalk Score 2.10 2.21 2.85 3.03Pedestrian Crosswalk LOS B B C C7DQN)DUP5RDG 0LWLJDWHG&XPXODWLYH3OXV3URMHFW303HDN+RXU %URDG $HURHCM 6th Signals-BicyclesCentral Coast Transportation Consulting Synchro 10 ReportPage 30Approach EB WB NB SBBicycle Flow Rate (bike/h) 0000Total Flow Rate (veh/h) 321 423 1286 1747Effct. Green for Bike (s) 27.7 27.7 46.5 69.7Cross Street Width (ft) 57.2 59.2 34.2 34.0Through Lanes Number1122Through Lane Width (ft) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0Bicycle Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Striped Parking Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Paved Shoulder Width (ft) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Curb Is Present? No No No NoOn Street Parking? No No No NoBicycle Lane Capacity (bike/h) 462 462 775 1162Bicycle Delay (s/bike) 35.5 35.5 22.5 10.5Bicycle Compliance Poor Poor Fair FairBicycle LOS Score 3.18 3.38 3.36 3.74Bicycle LOS CCCD Appendix C: Segment LOS Calculation Sheets Existing >K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϲϵϮ͘ϭϰ ϭϲϲϯϮ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϭϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϭ ϰ͘ϲϱ ϮϬ͘ϲϮϮ͘ϭϰ ϭϭϬϴϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯ͘ϴϯ Ϯ͘Ϭϵ ϱ͘ϱϱ &ϯϭ͘ϬϲϮ͘ϱϮ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϰϰ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘Ϭϴ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϰϬ͘ϯϲϮ͘ϭϰ ϵϱϬϯ͘ϵϵ Ϯ͘ϴϵ ϭ͘Ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ Eͬϱϭ͘ϴϴϮ͘ϵϯ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘ϯϬ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϭϬ η/sͬϬ͊ Eͬ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ ĞƌŽĞƌŽ ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKƌĐƵƚƚ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů dĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐ> džŝƐƚŝŶŐDƌŽĂĚ^ƚƌĞĞƚEŽƌƚŚďŽƵŶĚ EŽƌƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ϭϮͬϭϯͬϮϬϭϳ>K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϵϬϮ͘ϭϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϰϭ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘Ϭϵ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϭ͘ϬϰϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘ϰϬ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘Ϭϲ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϮϰϮ͘ϱϮ ϲϲϵϮ͘ϯϵ ϯ͘ϮϮ Ϭ͘ϵϴ ϰ͘ϲϵ ϰϬ͘ϲϭϮ͘ϭϰ ϭϭϴϴϬ͘ϬϬ Ϯ͘ϭϴ Ϭ͘ϵϮ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϱϬ͘ϮϲϮ͘ϵϯ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϴϭ η/sͬϬ͊ ϭ͘ϮϮ ϱ͘ϳϬ &^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ ĞƌŽĞƌŽ ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKƌĐƵƚƚ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů dĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐ> džŝƐƚŝŶŐDƌŽĂĚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ^ŽƵƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ^ŽƵƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ϭϮͬϭϯͬϮϬϭϳ >K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϰϬϮ͘ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϱ͘ϰϬ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϳϴ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϬ͘ϭϴϮ͘ϳϱ ϭϱϱϮ͘Ϯϴ Ϯ͘ϳϵ Ϯ͘Ϭϱ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϭϬϮ͘ϰϳ Ϯϱϯϰ͘ϯϴ Ϯ͘ϴϰ Ϯ͘ϭϴ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϰϬ͘Ϭϯϯ͘ϭϯ ϭϵϬϬ͘ϳϳ ϭ͘ϭϮ Ϭ͘ϯϬ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϱKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů>ĂŶĞƚŽKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚ džŝƐƚŝŶŐDdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĂƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ĂƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ϭϮͬϭϯͬϮϬϭϳƌŽĂĚ hWZZ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ ƌŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳhWZZ KƌĐƵƚƚEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿ>K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϯϰϮ͘ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϱ͘Ϭϴ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϲϵ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϬ͘ϲϰϮ͘ϳϱ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϳϵ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϰϰ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϭϴϮ͘ϰϳ ϲϯϯϱ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘ϭϰ Ϯ͘ϯϴ ϯ͘ϯϯ ϰϬ͘Ϭϴϯ͘ϭϯ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϭϴ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϭ͘ϰϳ ϰ͘ϭϳ ϱKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů>ĂŶĞ> džŝƐƚŝŶŐDdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚtĞƐƚďŽƵŶĚ tĞƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ϭϮͬϭϯͬϮϬϭϳƌŽĂĚ hWZZ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ ƌŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳhWZZ KƌĐƵƚƚEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿ >K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϭ͘ϭϮϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ ϭϬϮϵϱ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘ϲϰ Ϯ͘ϯϵ ϰ͘ϳϭ ϮϬ͘ϳϳϮ͘ϭϰ ϭϭϬϴϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯ͘ϴϬ Ϯ͘ϭϭ ϱ͘ϱϯ &ϯϭ͘ϬϲϮ͘ϱϮ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϯϵ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘Ϭϲ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϰϬ͘ϮϯϮ͘ϭϰ ϵϱϬϯ͘ϵϵ Ϯ͘ϯϮ Ϭ͘ϴϯ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϱϬ͘ϵϱϮ͘ϵϯ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϵϱ η/sͬϬ͊ ϭ͘ϳϳ η/sͬϬ͊ Eͬ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ ĞƌŽĞƌŽ ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKƌĐƵƚƚ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů dĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐ> džŝƐƚŝŶŐWDƌŽĂĚ^ƚƌĞĞƚEŽƌƚŚďŽƵŶĚ EŽƌƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ϭϮͬϭϯͬϮϬϭϳ>K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϴϵϮ͘ϭϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘ϱϰ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϭϭ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϭ͘ϭϰϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘ϰϯ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘Ϭϴ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϯϮϮ͘ϱϮ ϲϲϵϮ͘ϯϵ ϯ͘ϯϴ ϭ͘Ϭϱ ϰ͘ϳϮ ϰϭ͘ϬϰϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ ϭϭϴϴϬ͘ϬϬ Ϯ͘ϲϴ ϭ͘ϭϴ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϱϬ͘ϰϴϮ͘ϵϯ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϵϬ η/sͬϬ͊ ϭ͘ϱϯ ϱ͘ϳϭ &KƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐ> džŝƐƚŝŶŐDƌŽĂĚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ^ŽƵƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ^ŽƵƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ϭϮͬϭϯͬϮϬϭϳdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKƌĐƵƚƚ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů dĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ ĞƌŽĞƌŽ ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿ >K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϰϭϮ͘ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϱ͘ϰϱ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϴϬ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϬ͘ϯϴϮ͘ϳϱ ϭϱϱϮ͘Ϯϴ ϯ͘ϭϭ Ϯ͘ϮϬ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϮϮϮ͘ϰϳ ϲϯϯϱ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘ϯϬ Ϯ͘ϱϵ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϰϬ͘ϭϯϯ͘ϭϯ ϭϵϬϬϴ͘ϬϬ ϭ͘ϳϮ Ϭ͘ϲϲ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϱKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů>ĂŶĞƚŽKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚ> džŝƐƚŝŶŐWDdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĂƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ĂƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ϭϮͬϭϯͬϮϬϭϳƌŽĂĚ hWZZ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ ƌŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳhWZZ KƌĐƵƚƚEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿ>K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϱϮϮ͘ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϲ͘ϬϬ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϵϮ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϬ͘ϮϵϮ͘ϳϱ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘ϰϬ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϱϳ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϭϴϮ͘ϰϳ ϲϯϯϱ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘ϭϯ Ϯ͘ϯϳ ϯ͘ϯϮ ϰϬ͘Ϭϳϯ͘ϭϯ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϵϵ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϭ͘ϯϯ ϰ͘ϭϰ ϱ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳhWZZ KƌĐƵƚƚEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ ƌŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞƌŽĂĚ hWZZ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů>ĂŶĞ> džŝƐƚŝŶŐWDdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚtĞƐƚďŽƵŶĚ tĞƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ϭϮͬϭϯͬϮϬϭϳ Existing Plus Project >K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϳϮϮ͘ϭϰ ϭϲϲϯϮ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϮϬ Ϯ͘Ϯϰ ϰ͘ϲϲ ϮϬ͘ϲϲϮ͘ϭϰ ϭϭϬϴϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯ͘ϴϴ Ϯ͘ϭϮ ϱ͘ϱϱ &ϯϭ͘ϬϲϮ͘ϱϮ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϰϰ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘Ϭϴ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϰϬ͘ϯϲϮ͘ϭϰ ϵϱϬϯ͘ϵϵ Ϯ͘ϴϵ ϭ͘Ϯϱ η/sͬϬ͊ Eͬϱϭ͘ϴϴϮ͘ϵϯ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘ϯϭ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϭϬ η/sͬϬ͊ Eͬ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ ĞƌŽĞƌŽ ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKƌĐƵƚƚ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů dĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐ> džŝƐƚŝŶŐWůƵƐWƌŽũĞĐƚDƌŽĂĚ^ƚƌĞĞƚEŽƌƚŚďŽƵŶĚ EŽƌƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ϰͬϭϵͬϮϬϭϴ>K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϵϭϮ͘ϭϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϰϯ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϭϬ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϭ͘ϬϲϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϯϯ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘Ϭϲ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϮϱϮ͘ϱϮ ϲϲϵϮ͘ϯϵ ϯ͘Ϯϯ Ϭ͘ϵϴ ϰ͘ϳϬ ϰϬ͘ϲϮϮ͘ϭϰ ϭϭϴϴϬ͘ϬϬ Ϯ͘ϭϵ Ϭ͘ϵϯ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϱϬ͘ϴϳϮ͘ϵϯ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϴϯ η/sͬϬ͊ ϭ͘ϮϮ ϱ͘ϳϭ &KƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐ> džŝƐƚŝŶŐWůƵƐWƌŽũĞĐƚDƌŽĂĚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ^ŽƵƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ^ŽƵƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ϰͬϭϵͬϮϬϭϴdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKƌĐƵƚƚ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů dĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ ĞƌŽĞƌŽ ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿ >K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϰϬϮ͘ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϱ͘ϰϭ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϳϵ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϬ͘ϭϳϮ͘ϳϱ ϭϱϱϮ͘Ϯϴ Ϯ͘ϴϰ Ϯ͘Ϭϳ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϭϬϮ͘ϰϳ Ϯϱϯϰ͘ϯϴ Ϯ͘ϴϱ Ϯ͘ϭϵ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϰϬ͘Ϭϯϯ͘ϭϯ ϭϵϬϬ͘ϳϳ ϭ͘ϭϰ Ϭ͘ϯϮ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϱKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů>ĂŶĞƚŽKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚ džŝƐƚŝŶŐWůƵƐWƌŽũĞĐƚDdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĂƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ĂƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ϰͬϭϵͬϮϬϭϴƌŽĂĚ hWZZ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ ƌŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳhWZZ KƌĐƵƚƚEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿ>K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϯϰϮ͘ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϱ͘ϭϮ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϳϭ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϬ͘ϯϯϮ͘ϳϱ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϵϴ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϭϬ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϭϴϮ͘ϰϳ ϲϯϯϱ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘ϭϰ Ϯ͘ϯϴ ϯ͘ϯϯ ϰϬ͘Ϭϴϯ͘ϭϯ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϭϴ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϭ͘ϰϳ ϰ͘ϭϳ ϱKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů>ĂŶĞ> džŝƐƚŝŶŐWůƵƐWƌŽũĞĐƚDdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚtĞƐƚďŽƵŶĚ tĞƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ϰͬϭϵͬϮϬϭϴƌŽĂĚ hWZZ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ ƌŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳhWZZ KƌĐƵƚƚEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿ >K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϭ͘ϭϰϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ ϭϬϮϵϱ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘ϲϳ Ϯ͘ϰϬ ϰ͘ϳϮ ϮϬ͘ϳϵϮ͘ϭϰ ϭϭϬϴϴ͘ϬϬ Ϯ͘ϴϮ Ϯ͘ϭϯ ϱ͘ϱϰ &ϯϭ͘ϬϳϮ͘ϱϮ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϰϬ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘Ϭϳ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϰϬ͘ϮϰϮ͘ϭϰ ϵϱϬϯ͘ϵϵ Ϯ͘ϯϯ Ϭ͘ϴϯ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϱϬ͘ϵϲϮ͘ϵϯ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϵϳ η/sͬϬ͊ ϭ͘ϳϳ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐ> džŝƐƚŝŶŐWůƵƐWƌŽũĞĐƚWDƌŽĂĚ^ƚƌĞĞƚEŽƌƚŚďŽƵŶĚ EŽƌƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ϰͬϭϵͬϮϬϭϴdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKƌĐƵƚƚ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů dĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ ĞƌŽĞƌŽ ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿ>K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϵϯϮ͘ϭϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘ϲϬ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϭϯ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϭ͘ϭϵϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘ϱϬ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϭϬ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϯϮϮ͘ϱϮ ϲϲϵϮ͘ϯϵ ϯ͘ϯϵ ϭ͘Ϭϱ ϰ͘ϳϮ ϰϭ͘ϬϱϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ ϭϭϴϴϬ͘ϬϬ Ϯ͘ϲϴ ϭ͘ϭϴ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϱϬ͘ϰϴϮ͘ϵϯ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϵϭ η/sͬϬ͊ ϭ͘ϱϯ ϱ͘ϳϭ &^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ ĞƌŽĞƌŽ ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKƌĐƵƚƚ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů dĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐ> džŝƐƚŝŶŐWůƵƐWƌŽũĞĐƚDƌŽĂĚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ^ŽƵƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ^ŽƵƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ϰͬϭϵͬϮϬϭϴ >K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϰϮϮ͘ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϱ͘ϱϬ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϴϭ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϬ͘ϯϵϮ͘ϳϱ ϭϱϱϮ͘Ϯϴ ϯ͘ϭϰ Ϯ͘ϮϮ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϮϮϮ͘ϰϳ ϲϯϯϱ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘ϯϬ Ϯ͘ϱϵ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϰϬ͘ϭϯϯ͘ϭϯ ϭϵϬϬϴ͘ϬϬ ϭ͘ϳϯ Ϭ͘ϲϲ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϱKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů>ĂŶĞƚŽKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚ džŝƐƚŝŶŐWůƵƐWƌŽũĞĐƚWDdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĂƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ĂƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ϰͬϭϵͬϮϬϭϴƌŽĂĚ hWZZ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ ƌŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳhWZZ KƌĐƵƚƚEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿ>K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϱϮϮ͘ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϲ͘ϬϮ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϵϮ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϬ͘ϱϬϮ͘ϳϱ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘ϯϬ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘Ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϭϴϮ͘ϰϳ ϲϯϯϱ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘ϭϰ Ϯ͘ϯϴ ϯ͘ϯϯ ϰϬ͘Ϭϳϯ͘ϭϯ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘Ϭϭ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϭ͘ϯϱ ϰ͘ϭϰ ϱKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůůƚŽKƌĐƵƚƚ> džŝƐƚŝŶŐWůƵƐWƌŽũĞĐƚWDdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚtĞƐƚďŽƵŶĚ tĞƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ϰͬϭϵͬϮϬϭϴƌŽĂĚ hWZZ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ ƌŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳhWZZ KƌĐƵƚƚEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿ Cumulative >K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϳϵϮ͘ϭϰ ϭϲϲϯϮ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϯϭ Ϯ͘Ϯϴ ϰ͘ϲϴ ϮϬ͘ϴϬϮ͘ϭϰ ϭϭϬϴϴ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘Ϭϰ Ϯ͘ϮϬ ϱ͘ϱϴ &ϯϭ͘ϰϮϮ͘ϱϮ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϴϳ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘Ϯϯ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϰϬ͘ϰϰϮ͘ϭϰ ϵϱϬϯ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘ϮϮ ϭ͘ϯϱ η/sͬϬ͊ Eͬϱϭ͘ϵϵϮ͘ϵϯ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘ϰϳ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϭϯ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞDƌŽĂĚ^ƚƌĞĞƚEŽƌƚŚďŽƵŶĚ EŽƌƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ϱͬϴͬϮϬϭϴdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKƌĐƵƚƚ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů dĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ ĞƌŽĞƌŽ ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿ>K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϭ͘ϯϯϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘Ϭϲ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘Ϯϵ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϭ͘ϲϬϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ ϵϱϬϯ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘ϱϱ Ϯ͘Ϯϳ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϯϱϮ͘ϱϮ ϲϲϵϮ͘ϯϵ ϯ͘ϲϯ ϭ͘ϭϰ ϰ͘ϳϲ ϰϭ͘ϬϳϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ ϭϭϴϴϬ͘ϬϬ Ϯ͘ϵϭ ϭ͘Ϯϲ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϱϬ͘ϰϰϮ͘ϵϯ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘ϳϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϭ͘ϰϴ ϱ͘ϴϰ &KƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞDƌŽĂĚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ^ŽƵƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ^ŽƵƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ϱͬϴͬϮϬϭϴdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKƌĐƵƚƚ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů dĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ ĞƌŽĞƌŽ ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿ >K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϱϴϮ͘ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϲ͘ϯϯ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϵϴ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϬ͘ϮϱϮ͘ϳϱ ϭϱϱϮ͘Ϯϴ ϯ͘ϭϳ Ϯ͘Ϯϯ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϭϯϮ͘ϰϳ Ϯϱϯϰ͘ϯϴ Ϯ͘ϵϴ Ϯ͘ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϰϬ͘ϬϮϯ͘ϭϯ ϭϵϬϬ͘ϳϳ Ϭ͘ϵϰ Ϭ͘ϭϮ η/sͬϬ͊ Eͬϱ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳhWZZ KƌĐƵƚƚEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ ƌŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞƌŽĂĚ hWZZ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů>ĂŶĞƚŽKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞDdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĂƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ĂƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ϱͬϴͬϮϬϭϴ>K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϰϴϮ͘ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϱ͘ϴϭ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϴϴ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϬ͘ϳϯϮ͘ϳϱ ϵϯϰϱ͘ϱϵ ϯ͘ϭϭ Ϯ͘ϯϴ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϮϴϮ͘ϰϳ ϲϯϯϱ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘ϱϭ Ϯ͘ϲϬ ϯ͘ϯϴ ϰϬ͘Ϭϲϯ͘ϭϯ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϬϬ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϭ͘ϯϰ ϰ͘ϭϰ ϱ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳhWZZ KƌĐƵƚƚEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ ƌŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞƌŽĂĚ hWZZ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů>ĂŶĞƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞDdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚtĞƐƚďŽƵŶĚ tĞƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ϱͬϴͬϮϬϭϴ >K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϭ͘ϱϰϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ ϭϬϮϵϱ͘ϵϵ ϰ͘Ϯϯ Ϯ͘ϱϱ ϰ͘ϴϬ Ϯϭ͘ϭϯϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ ϭϭϬϴϴ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘Ϯϭ Ϯ͘Ϯϵ ϱ͘ϲϬ &ϯϭ͘ϲϯϮ͘ϱϮ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘ϭϮ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϯϬ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϰϬ͘ϰϲϮ͘ϭϰ ϵϱϬϯ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͘ϭϵ η/sͬϬ͊ Eͬϱϭ͘ϲϴϮ͘ϵϯ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘Ϭϵ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘Ϭϲ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞWDƌŽĂĚ^ƚƌĞĞƚEŽƌƚŚďŽƵŶĚ EŽƌƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ϱͬϴͬϮϬϭϴdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKƌĐƵƚƚ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů dĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ ĞƌŽĞƌŽ ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿ>K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϭ͘ϭϰϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘ϵϯ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘Ϯϯ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϭ͘ϰϳϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ ϵϱϬϯ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘ϯϬ Ϯ͘ϮϬ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϯϴϮ͘ϱϮ ϲϲϵϮ͘ϯϵ ϯ͘ϲϮ ϭ͘ϭϯ ϰ͘ϳϲ ϰϭ͘ϯϬϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ ϭϭϴϴϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϭϭ ϭ͘ϯϯ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϱϬ͘ϱϲϮ͘ϵϯ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘ϯϱ η/sͬϬ͊ ϭ͘ϲϭ ϱ͘ϳϳ &^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ ĞƌŽĞƌŽ ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKƌĐƵƚƚ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů dĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞDƌŽĂĚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ^ŽƵƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ^ŽƵƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ϱͬϴͬϮϬϭϴ >K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϰϵϮ͘ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϱ͘ϴϲ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϴϵ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϬ͘ϱϴϮ͘ϳϱ ϭϱϱϮ͘Ϯϴ ϯ͘ϱϱ Ϯ͘ϯϲ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϯϳϮ͘ϰϳ ϲϯϯϱ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘ϴϴ Ϯ͘ϴϲ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϰϬ͘ϭϭϯ͘ϭϯ ϭϵϬϬϴ͘ϬϬ ϭ͘ϱϱ Ϭ͘ϱϴ η/sͬϬ͊ Eͬϱ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳhWZZ KƌĐƵƚƚEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ ƌŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞƌŽĂĚ hWZZ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů>ĂŶĞƚŽKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞWDdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĂƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ĂƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ϱͬϴͬϮϬϭϴ>K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϲϭϮ͘ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϲ͘ϰϴ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϬϬ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϬ͘ϭϵϮ͘ϳϱ ϭϴϲϵ͘Ϭϵ ϯ͘Ϭϯ Ϯ͘ϯϱ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϲϲϮ͘ϰϳ ϲϯϯϱ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘Ϯϭ Ϯ͘ϰϯ ϯ͘ϯϰ ϰϬ͘Ϭϰϯ͘ϭϯ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϳϯ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϭ͘Ϭϱ ϰ͘ϭϬ ϱKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů>ĂŶĞƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞWDdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚtĞƐƚďŽƵŶĚ tĞƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ϱͬϴͬϮϬϭϴƌŽĂĚ hWZZ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ ƌŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳhWZZ KƌĐƵƚƚEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿ Cumulative Plus Project >K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϴϮϮ͘ϭϰ ϭϲϲϯϮ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϯϲ Ϯ͘ϯϬ ϰ͘ϲϵ ϮϬ͘ϴϮϮ͘ϭϰ ϭϭϬϴϴ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘Ϭϴ Ϯ͘ϮϮ ϱ͘ϱϴ &ϯϭ͘ϰϯϮ͘ϱϮ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϴϴ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘Ϯϯ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϰϬ͘ϰϱϮ͘ϭϰ ϵϱϬϯ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘Ϯϯ ϭ͘ϯϱ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϱϮ͘ϬϬϮ͘ϵϯ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘ϰϴ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϭϯ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞWůƵƐWƌŽũĞĐƚDƌŽĂĚ^ƚƌĞĞƚEŽƌƚŚďŽƵŶĚ EŽƌƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ϱͬϴͬϮϬϭϴdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKƌĐƵƚƚ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů dĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ ĞƌŽĞƌŽ ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿ>K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϭ͘ϯϰϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘Ϭϴ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘Ϯϵ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϭ͘ϲϭϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ ϵϱϬϯ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘ϱϳ Ϯ͘Ϯϴ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϯϲϮ͘ϱϮ ϲϲϵϮ͘ϯϵ ϯ͘ϲϲ ϭ͘ϭϱ ϰ͘ϳϲ ϰϭ͘ϬϴϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ ϭϭϴϴϬ͘ϬϬ Ϯ͘ϵϰ ϭ͘Ϯϳ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϱϬ͘ϰϰϮ͘ϵϯ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘ϳϴ η/sͬϬ͊ ϭ͘ϰϵ ϱ͘ϴϱ &KƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞWůƵƐWƌŽũĞĐƚDƌŽĂĚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ^ŽƵƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ^ŽƵƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ϱͬϴͬϮϬϭϴdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKƌĐƵƚƚ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů dĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ ĞƌŽĞƌŽ ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿ >K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϱϴϮ͘ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϲ͘ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϵϴ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϬ͘ϮϲϮ͘ϳϱ ϭϱϱϮ͘Ϯϴ ϯ͘ϮϮ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϭϰϮ͘ϰϳ Ϯϱϯϰ͘ϯϴ Ϯ͘ϵϵ Ϯ͘ϯϱ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϰϬ͘ϬϮϯ͘ϭϯ ϭϵϬϬ͘ϳϳ Ϭ͘ϵϱ Ϭ͘ϭϯ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϱKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů>ĂŶĞƚŽKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞWůƵƐWƌŽũĞĐƚDdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĂƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ĂƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ϱͬϴͬϮϬϭϴƌŽĂĚ hWZZ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ ƌŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳhWZZ KƌĐƵƚƚEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿ>K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϰϴϮ͘ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϱ͘ϴϯ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϴϴ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϬ͘ϳϰϮ͘ϳϱ ϵϯϰϱ͘ϱϵ ϯ͘ϭϯ Ϯ͘ϯϴ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϮϴϮ͘ϰϳ ϲϯϯϱ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘ϱϭ Ϯ͘ϲϬ ϯ͘ϯϴ ϰϬ͘Ϭϲϯ͘ϭϯ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϬϬ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϭ͘ϯϰ ϰ͘ϭϰ ϱKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů>ĂŶĞƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞWůƵƐWƌŽũĞĐƚDdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚtĞƐƚďŽƵŶĚtĞƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ϱͬϴͬϮϬϭϴƌŽĂĚ hWZZ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ ƌŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳhWZZ KƌĐƵƚƚEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿ >K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϭ͘ϱϲϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ ϭϬϮϵϱ͘ϵϵ ϰ͘Ϯϲ Ϯ͘ϱϲ ϰ͘ϴϭ Ϯϭ͘ϭϰϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ ϭϭϬϴϴ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘Ϯϯ Ϯ͘ϯϬ ϱ͘ϲϬ &ϯϭ͘ϲϱϮ͘ϱϮ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘ϭϱ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϯϭ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϰϬ͘ϰϳϮ͘ϭϰ ϵϱϬϯ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘Ϯϳ ϭ͘ϭϵ η/sͬϬ͊ Eͬϱϭ͘ϳϭϮ͘ϵϯ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘ϭϯ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘Ϭϳ η/sͬϬ͊ Eͬ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ ĞƌŽĞƌŽ ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKƌĐƵƚƚ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů dĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞWůƵƐWƌŽũĞĐƚWDƌŽĂĚ^ƚƌĞĞƚEŽƌƚŚďŽƵŶĚ EŽƌƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ϱͬϴͬϮϬϭϴ>K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϭ͘ϭϳϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘ϵϴ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘Ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϭ͘ϱϭϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ ϵϱϬϯ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘ϯϲ Ϯ͘ϮϮ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϯϴϮ͘ϱϮ ϲϲϵϮ͘ϯϵ ϯ͘ϲϰ ϭ͘ϭϰ ϰ͘ϳϲ ϰϭ͘ϯϭϮ͘ϭϰ &;ǀͬĐхϭͿ ϭϭϴϴϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ͘ϭϯ ϭ͘ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϱϬ͘ϱϳϮ͘ϵϯ η/sͬϬ͊ ϰ͘ϯϴ η/sͬϬ͊ ϭ͘ϲϮ ϱ͘ϳϴ &^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ ĞƌŽĞƌŽ ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKƌĐƵƚƚ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů dĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĞƌŽǀŝƐƚĂ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƚŽ^ŽƵƚŚŝƚLJ>ŝŵŝƚƐƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞWůƵƐWƌŽũĞĐƚDƌŽĂĚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ^ŽƵƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ^ŽƵƚŚďŽƵŶĚ ϱͬϴͬϮϬϭϴ >K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϰϵϮ͘ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϱ͘ϴϴ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϴϵ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϬ͘ϱϳϮ͘ϳϱ ϭϱϱϮ͘Ϯϴ ϯ͘ϱϵ Ϯ͘ϯϳ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϯϳϮ͘ϰϳ ϲϯϯϱ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘ϴϴ Ϯ͘ϴϲ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϰϬ͘ϭϭϯ͘ϭϯ ϭϵϬϬϴ͘ϬϬ ϭ͘ϱϱ Ϭ͘ϱϴ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϱKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů>ĂŶĞƚŽKƌĐƵƚƚZŽĂĚƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞWůƵƐWƌŽũĞĐƚWDdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚ ĂƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ĂƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ϱͬϴͬϮϬϭϴƌŽĂĚ hWZZ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ ƌŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳhWZZ KƌĐƵƚƚEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿ>K^нDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐZĞƐƵůƚƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚƐŶĂůLJƐƚsͬZĂƚŝŽ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^WĞĚ^ƉĂĐĞϭ>K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ >K^^ĐŽƌĞ >K^ϭϬ͘ϲϭϮ͘ϯϰ η/sͬϬ͊ ϲ͘ϰϵ η/sͬϬ͊ ϯ͘ϬϬ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϮϬ͘ϲϳϮ͘ϳϱ ϭϴϲϵ͘Ϭϵ ϯ͘Ϭϴ Ϯ͘ϯϳ η/sͬϬ͊ EͬϯϬ͘ϮϬϮ͘ϰϳ ϲϯϯϱ͘ϵϵ ϯ͘Ϯϯ Ϯ͘ϰϰ ϯ͘ϯϰ ϰϬ͘Ϭϰϯ͘ϭϯ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϯ͘ϳϰ η/sͬϬ͊ Ϭ͘Ϭϲ ϰ͘ϭϬ ϱKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůůƚŽKƌĐƵƚƚƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞWůƵƐWƌŽũĞĐƚWDdĂŶŬ&ĂƌŵZŽĂĚtĞƐƚďŽƵŶĚtĞƐƚďŽƵŶĚ ϱͬϴͬϮϬϭϴƌŽĂĚ hWZZ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ dŽdƌĂŶƐŝƚDŽĚĞKůĚtŝŶĚŵŝůů ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ^ĂŶƚĂ&Ğ ƌŽĂĚƵƚŽDŽĚĞ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶDŽĚĞ ŝĐLJĐůĞDŽĚĞ^ŽƵƌĐĞ͗E,ZWWƌŽũĞĐƚϯͲϳϬDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů>ĞǀĞůŽĨ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ&ŽƌhƌďĂŶ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂƉĂĐŝƚLJDĂŶƵĂůϮϬϭϬ͕ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳhWZZ KƌĐƵƚƚEŽƚĞ͗ϭ͘WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƉĂĐĞŝƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ;ĨƚϮͬƉĞĚͿ (805) 316-0101 895 Napa Avenue Suite A-6, Morro Bay, CA 93442 MEMORANDUM Date: October 3, 2018 To: Bryan Wheeler, City of San Luis Obispo From: Joe Fernandez, CCTC Subject: 650 Tank Farm- Tank Farm Road Fair Share Calculation This memorandum summarizes the fair share calculation for the widening of Tank Farm Road to four lanes between Santa Fe Road and Old Windmill Lane. The Multimodal Transportation Impact Study (‘TIS’, CCTC, May 2018) prepared for the project evaluated segment Level of Service (LOS) using a different methodology than was used in the 2014 Circulation Element Update. This memorandum summarizes the LOS on this segment using a method consistent with the Circulation Element and calculates the project’s share of cumulative traffic. ANALYSIS The Circulation Element update applied generalized LOS thresholds obtained from the FDOT Quality/Level of Service Handbook. Table 1 summarizes the thresholds applicable to the segment of Tank Farm Road between Santa Fe Road and Old Windmill Lane. Under Cumulative conditions the PM peak hour volume along the study segment is 2,415 vehicles which corresponds to LOS E. The 650 Tank Farm project adds 18 vehicles, for a total of 2,433 vehicles under Cumulative Plus Project conditions, also LOS E. The 650 Tank Farm project’s proportional share is 0.74 percent (18/2,433=.0074). Please let me know if you have any questions. Peak Hour Volume Level of Service N/A A <1,167 B 1,167-1,775 C 1,776-2,405 D 2,406-3,224 E >3,224 F Table 1: Roadway Auto Segment Level of Service Thresholds 1. Source: Table 4 of FDOT Quality/Level of Service Handbook. 1 Chris Bersbach From:Streder, Melissa@DOT <melissa.streder@dot.ca.gov> Sent:Monday, September 18, 2017 3:11 PM To:Wheeler, Bryan Cc:Cohen, Rachel; Hudson, Jake; Boyle, Frank@DOT; Persons, Terri@DOT Subject:650 Broad Street Trip Generation Attachments:TankFarm_SanteFeToBroad.pdf; Broad_IndustrialToTankFarm.pdf; 227 count data.pdf; 227 count data.pdf Hi Bryan, Thank you for your call regarding trip generation assumptions proposed for the 650 Broad Street projects. After review of the peak hour data you provided, we stand behind our recommendation that at the very least the 8:00 am peak hour and the PM peak hour be analyzed. Perhaps the midday peak could be evaluated as well. The costs should be negligible considering that the majority of the intersection analyses work is setting up the intersection’s variables. From the attached data, it looks like for Broad between Industrial Way and Tank Farm, the AM peak appears to occur at 8:00 AM (Day 1: 298 NB and 307 SB and Day 2: 308 NB and 279 SB) and on Tank Farm between Santa Fe and Broad (Day 1: 249 EB and 212 WB and Day 2: 189 EB and 176 WB). Please let me know if this is your understanding as well. This interpretation appears to be flip flopped from your previous email discussing peak hour and I want to make sure we are understanding this right. Broad also serves as an arterial while Tank Farm functions as a collector, so we believe that it is more important to base the am peak hour time frame on Broad (8:00 AM) if it is not possible to evaluate both the 8:00 am and the 11:00 am in addition to the pm peak. Also, the traffic count data that we have at Creston Rd/227 shows that the peak hour is at 7‐9 and 2‐6 everyday day during the week (see attached). Only on weekends do the peak hours largely shift to 11‐12 and 12‐ 2. These are 24 hour counts that span two months. This information may influence your decision as well. Anyway, these are our recommendations. Please feel free to email or call if you have any additional questions. Best Regards, Melissa Streder Associate Transportation Planner California Department of Transportation (805) 549‐3800 (Mon‐Thurs) Volumes for:CITY:San Luis Obispo PROJECT: Location: Weather conditions: AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB 0:00 0 0 5 5 12:00 0 0 187 215 0:15 0 0 5 3 12:15 0 0 235 224 0:30 0 0 7 1 12:30 0 0 186 193 0:45 0 0 0 0 1 18 7 16 34 12:45 0 0 0 0 217 825 206 838 1663 1:00 0 0 3 1 13:00 0 0 201 211 1:15 0 0 5 1 13:15 0 0 220 225 1:30 0 0 5 2 13:30 0 0 184 198 1:45 0 0 0 0 1 14 1 5 19 13:45 0 0 0 0 212 817 219 853 1670 2:00 0 0 2 3 14:00 0 0 202 178 2:15 0 0 7 2 14:15 0 0 192 213 2:30 0 0 3 3 14:30 0 0 203 194 2:45 0 0 0 0 3 15 0 8 23 14:45 0 0 0 0 173 770 193 778 1548 3:00 0 0 0 6 15:00 0 0 176 191 3:15 0 0 5 3 15:15 0 0 175 184 3:30 0 0 2 3 15:30 0 0 211 252 3:45 0 0 0 0 5 12 6 18 30 15:45 0 0 0 0 212 774 214 841 1615 4:00 0 0 2 5 16:00 0 0 251 229 4:15 0 0 9 10 16:15 0 0 253 236 4:30 0 0 6 15 16:30 0 0 257 257 4:45 0 0 0 0 19 36 28 58 94 16:45 0 0 0 0 256 1017 243 965 1982 5:00 0 0 25 28 17:00 0 0 299 250 5:15 0 0 20 37 17:15 0 0 245 266 5:30 0 0 22 32 17:30 0 0 240 218 5:45 0 0 0 0 24 91 64 161 252 17:45 0 0 0 0 169 953 193 927 1880 6:00 0 0 42 33 18:00 0 0 159 146 6:15 0 0 49 54 18:15 0 0 132 121 6:30 0 0 61 63 18:30 0 0 114 103 6:45 0 0 0 0 81 233 98 248 481 18:45 0 0 0 0 109 514 127 497 1011 7:00 0 0 71 111 19:00 0 0 98 92 7:15 0 0 74 133 19:15 0 0 98 92 7:30 0 0 111 132 19:30 0 0 105 77 7:45 0 0 0 0 162 418 239 615 1033 19:45 0 0 0 0 67 368 76 337 705 8:00 0 0 182 201 20:00 0 0 102 63 8:15 0 0 151 201 20:15 0 0 66 63 8:30 0 0 182 185 20:30 0 0 49 66 8:45 0 0 0 0 178 693 171 758 1451 20:45 0 0 0 0 57 274 51 243 517 9:00 0 0 154 173 21:00 0 0 45 38 9:15 0 0 145 146 21:15 0 0 42 35 9:30 0 0 132 163 21:30 0 0 38 33 9:45 0 0 0 0 160 591 172 654 1245 21:45 0 0 0 0 38 163 34 140 303 10:00 0 0 162 165 22:00 0 0 46 18 10:15 0 0 147 168 22:15 0 0 22 22 10:30 0 0 174 145 22:30 0 0 13 25 10:45 0 0 0 0 189 672 180 658 1330 22:45 0 0 0 0 12 93 11 76 169 11:00 0 0 249 212 23:00 0 0 16 13 11:15 0 0 214 217 23:15 0 0 14 9 11:30 0 0 205 213 23:30 0 0 13 12 11:45 0 0 0 0 204 872 206 848 1720 23:45 0 0 0 0 13 56 10 44 100 Total Vol.3665 4047 7712 6624 6539 13163 NB SB EB WB Combined 10289 10586 20875 Split %47.5%52.5%36.9%50.3%49.7%63.1% Peak Hour 11:00 11:30 11:00 16:15 16:30 16:30 Volume 872 858 1720 1065 1016 2073 P.H.F.0.88 0.96 0.93 0.89 0.95 0.94 pacific@aimtd.com Tell. 714 253 7888 SC0843Tuesday, March 15, 2016 DAY 1 Daily Totals AM PM Sunny ADT192 Tank Farm between Santa Fe and Broad, Lat: 35°14'53.18"N; Long: 120°38'37.32"W Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 Volumes for:CITY:PROJECT: Location: Weather conditions: AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB 0:00 0 0 6 9 12:00 0 0 241 228 0:15 0 0 0 5 12:15 0 0 212 198 0:30 0 0 2 5 12:30 0 0 168 191 0:45 0 0 0 0 4 12 4 23 35 12:45 0 0 0 0 183 804 227 844 1648 1:00 0 0 6 5 13:00 0 0 206 191 1:15 0 0 2 3 13:15 0 0 196 207 1:30 0 0 4 3 13:30 0 0 186 202 1:45 0 0 0 0 2 14 4 15 29 13:45 0 0 0 0 177 765 212 812 1577 2:00 0 0 2 0 14:00 0 0 192 173 2:15 0 0 0 3 14:15 0 0 174 184 2:30 0 0 4 1 14:30 0 0 174 202 2:45 0 0 0 0 5 11 2 6 17 14:45 0 0 0 0 175 715 213 772 1487 3:00 0 0 3 2 15:00 0 0 165 212 3:15 0 0 4 1 15:15 0 0 192 206 3:30 0 0 5 4 15:30 0 0 113 145 3:45 0 0 0 0 1 13 5 12 25 15:45 0 0 0 0 212 682 222 785 1467 4:00 0 0 5 9 16:00 0 0 217 195 4:15 0 0 9 9 16:15 0 0 209 235 4:30 0 0 10 21 16:30 0 0 223 246 4:45 0 0 0 0 17 41 28 67 108 16:45 0 0 0 0 238 887 220 896 1783 5:00 0 0 8 18 17:00 0 0 245 251 5:15 0 0 24 29 17:15 0 0 261 223 5:30 0 0 18 19 17:30 0 0 241 246 5:45 0 0 0 0 30 80 58 124 204 17:45 0 0 0 0 185 932 197 917 1849 6:00 0 0 39 53 18:00 0 0 177 144 6:15 0 0 42 57 18:15 0 0 143 164 6:30 0 0 65 55 18:30 0 0 151 126 6:45 0 0 0 0 85 231 100 265 496 18:45 0 0 0 0 120 591 118 552 1143 7:00 0 0 78 117 19:00 0 0 101 121 7:15 0 0 104 118 19:15 0 0 88 141 7:30 0 0 123 133 19:30 0 0 83 95 7:45 0 0 0 0 140 445 198 566 1011 19:45 0 0 0 0 115 387 89 446 833 8:00 0 0 148 168 20:00 0 0 93 101 8:15 0 0 157 193 20:15 0 0 77 74 8:30 0 0 143 180 20:30 0 0 86 67 8:45 0 0 0 0 189 637 159 700 1337 20:45 0 0 0 0 72 328 68 310 638 9:00 0 0 121 186 21:00 0 0 69 60 9:15 0 0 153 171 21:15 0 0 52 51 9:30 0 0 145 167 21:30 0 0 45 33 9:45 0 0 0 0 148 567 171 695 1262 21:45 0 0 0 0 42 208 36 180 388 10:00 0 0 142 169 22:00 0 0 39 20 10:15 0 0 142 175 22:15 0 0 36 23 10:30 0 0 166 151 22:30 0 0 24 17 10:45 0 0 0 0 174 624 172 667 1291 22:45 0 0 0 0 14 113 13 73 186 11:00 0 0 189 176 23:00 0 0 18 14 11:15 0 0 159 181 23:15 0 0 10 9 11:30 0 0 190 207 23:30 0 0 12 25 11:45 0 0 0 0 215 753 216 780 1533 23:45 0 0 0 0 7 47 11 59 106 Total Vol.3428 3920 7348 6459 6646 13105 NB SB EB Side Combined 9887 10566 20453 Split %46.7%53.3%35.9%49.3%50.7%64.1% Peak Hour 11:30 11:30 11:30 16:45 16:15 16:45 Volume 858 849 1707 985 952 1925 P.H.F.0.89 0.93 0.91 0.94 0.95 0.97 Sunny SC0843San Luis ObispoWednesday, March 16, 2016 ADT192 Tank Farm between Santa Fe and Broad, Lat: 35°14'53.18"N; Long: 120°38'37.32"W Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 Daily Totals AM PM pacific@aimtd.com Tell. 714 253 7888 DAY 2 Volumes for:&CITY:San Luis Obispo PROJECT: Location: AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB 0:00 0 0 6 7 12:00 0 0 214 222 0:15 0 0 3 4 12:15 0 0 224 211 0:30 0 0 5 3 12:30 0 0 177 192 0:45 0 0 0 0 3 17 6 20 37 12:45 0 0 0 0 200 815 217 842 1657 1:00 0 0 5 3 13:00 0 0 204 201 1:15 0 0 4 2 13:15 0 0 208 216 1:30 0 0 5 3 13:30 0 0 185 200 1:45 0 0 0 0 2 16 3 11 27 13:45 0 0 0 0 195 792 216 833 1625 2:00 0 0 2 2 14:00 0 0 197 176 2:15 0 0 4 3 14:15 0 0 183 199 2:30 0 0 4 2 14:30 0 0 189 198 2:45 0 0 0 0 4 14 1 8 22 14:45 0 0 0 0 174 743 203 776 1519 3:00 0 0 2 4 15:00 0 0 171 202 3:15 0 0 5 2 15:15 0 0 184 195 3:30 0 0 4 4 15:30 0 0 162 199 3:45 0 0 0 0 3 14 6 16 30 15:45 0 0 0 0 212 729 218 814 1543 4:00 0 0 4 7 16:00 0 0 234 212 4:15 0 0 9 10 16:15 0 0 231 236 4:30 0 0 8 18 16:30 0 0 240 252 4:45 0 0 0 0 18 39 28 63 102 16:45 0 0 0 0 247 952 232 932 1884 5:00 0 0 17 23 17:00 0 0 272 251 5:15 0 0 22 33 17:15 0 0 253 245 5:30 0 0 20 26 17:30 0 0 241 232 5:45 0 0 0 0 27 86 61 143 229 17:45 0 0 0 0 177 943 195 923 1866 6:00 0 0 41 43 18:00 0 0 168 145 6:15 0 0 46 56 18:15 0 0 138 143 6:30 0 0 63 59 18:30 0 0 133 115 6:45 0 0 0 0 83 233 99 257 490 18:45 0 0 0 0 115 554 123 526 1080 7:00 0 0 75 114 19:00 0 0 100 107 7:15 0 0 89 126 19:15 0 0 93 117 7:30 0 0 117 133 19:30 0 0 94 86 7:45 0 0 0 0 151 432 219 592 1024 19:45 0 0 0 0 91 378 83 393 771 8:00 0 0 165 185 20:00 0 0 98 82 8:15 0 0 154 197 20:15 0 0 72 69 8:30 0 0 163 183 20:30 0 0 68 67 8:45 0 0 0 0 184 666 165 730 1396 20:45 0 0 0 0 65 303 60 278 581 9:00 0 0 138 180 21:00 0 0 57 49 9:15 0 0 149 159 21:15 0 0 47 43 9:30 0 0 139 165 21:30 0 0 42 33 9:45 0 0 0 0 154 580 172 676 1256 21:45 0 0 0 0 40 186 35 160 346 10:00 0 0 152 167 22:00 0 0 43 19 10:15 0 0 145 172 22:15 0 0 29 23 10:30 0 0 170 148 22:30 0 0 19 21 10:45 0 0 0 0 182 649 176 663 1312 22:45 0 0 0 0 13 104 12 75 179 11:00 0 0 219 194 23:00 0 0 17 14 11:15 0 0 187 199 23:15 0 0 12 9 11:30 0 0 198 210 23:30 0 0 13 19 11:45 0 0 0 0 210 814 211 814 1628 23:45 0 0 0 0 10 52 11 53 105 Total Vol.3560 3993 7553 6551 6605 13156 NB SB EB WB Combined 10111 10598 20709 Split %47.1%52.9%36.5%49.8%50.2%63.5% Peak Hour 11:30 11:30 11:30 16:45 16:30 16:30 Volume 846 854 1700 1013 980 1992 P.H.F.0.94 0.96 0.97 0.93 0.97 0.95 2-DAY AVERAGE Daily Totals AM PM pacific@aimtd.com Tell. 714 253 7888 SC0843Tuesday, March 15, 2016 Wednesday, March 16, 2016 ADT192 Tank Farm between Santa Fe and Broad, Lat: 35°14'53.18"N; Long: 120°38'37.32"W Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 Volumes for:CITY:San Luis Obispo PROJECT: Location: Weather conditions: AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB 0:00 6 13 0 0 12:00 313 262 0 0 0:15 6 12 0 0 12:15 273 279 0 0 0:30 7 9 0 0 12:30 248 287 0 0 0:45 2 21 8 42 0 0 0 0 63 12:45 288 1122 286 1114 0 0 0 0 2236 1:00 4 3 0 0 13:00 256 302 0 0 1:15 2 3 0 0 13:15 249 334 0 0 1:30 5 10 0 0 13:30 238 289 0 0 1:45 1 12 1 17 0 0 0 0 29 13:45 253 996 258 1183 0 0 0 0 2179 2:00 1 5 0 0 14:00 270 263 0 0 2:15 5 4 0 0 14:15 216 263 0 0 2:30 5 8 0 0 14:30 228 247 0 0 2:45 2 13 3 20 0 0 0 0 33 14:45 213 927 295 1068 0 0 0 0 1995 3:00 3 4 0 0 15:00 227 280 0 0 3:15 3 5 0 0 15:15 268 277 0 0 3:30 5 3 0 0 15:30 258 329 0 0 3:45 10 21 7 19 0 0 0 0 40 15:45 288 1041 275 1161 0 0 0 0 2202 4:00 8 8 0 0 16:00 249 321 0 0 4:15 5 14 0 0 16:15 268 330 0 0 4:30 12 16 0 0 16:30 345 351 0 0 4:45 20 45 16 54 0 0 0 0 99 16:45 319 1181 299 1301 0 0 0 0 2482 5:00 25 28 0 0 17:00 330 326 0 0 5:15 29 30 0 0 17:15 324 332 0 0 5:30 38 48 0 0 17:30 297 325 0 0 5:45 52 144 71 177 0 0 0 0 321 17:45 237 1188 232 1215 0 0 0 0 2403 6:00 63 47 0 0 18:00 207 205 0 0 6:15 83 86 0 0 18:15 177 218 0 0 6:30 122 91 0 0 18:30 194 183 0 0 6:45 159 427 121 345 0 0 0 0 772 18:45 161 739 181 787 0 0 0 0 1526 7:00 136 135 0 0 19:00 135 170 0 0 7:15 168 156 0 0 19:15 124 141 0 0 7:30 237 179 0 0 19:30 144 137 0 0 7:45 305 846 290 760 0 0 0 0 1606 19:45 92 495 142 590 0 0 0 0 1085 8:00 298 307 0 0 20:00 101 122 0 0 8:15 261 284 0 0 20:15 88 116 0 0 8:30 263 251 0 0 20:30 73 123 0 0 8:45 261 1083 266 1108 0 0 0 0 2191 20:45 68 330 96 457 0 0 0 0 787 9:00 230 245 0 0 21:00 70 94 0 0 9:15 185 191 0 0 21:15 56 76 0 0 9:30 193 218 0 0 21:30 56 70 0 0 9:45 191 799 182 836 0 0 0 0 1635 21:45 59 241 54 294 0 0 0 0 535 10:00 214 217 0 0 22:00 46 42 0 0 10:15 201 175 0 0 22:15 33 38 0 0 10:30 203 171 0 0 22:30 28 25 0 0 10:45 241 859 211 774 0 0 0 0 1633 22:45 24 131 29 134 0 0 0 0 265 11:00 234 262 0 0 23:00 22 26 0 0 11:15 228 228 0 0 23:15 22 25 0 0 11:30 293 245 0 0 23:30 10 22 0 0 11:45 243 998 264 999 0 0 0 0 1997 23:45 12 66 11 84 0 0 0 0 150 Total Vol.5268 5151 10419 8457 9388 17845 NB SB EB WB Combined 13725 14539 28264 Split %50.6%49.4%36.9%47.4%52.6%63.1% Peak Hour 7:45 7:45 7:45 16:30 16:30 16:30 Volume 1127 1132 2259 1318 1308 2626 P.H.F.0.92 0.92 0.93 0.96 0.93 0.94 pacific@aimtd.com Tell. 714 253 7888 SC0843Tuesday, March 15, 2016 DAY 1 Daily Totals AM PM Sunny ADT19 Broad betweend Industrial Way and Tank Farm, Lat: 35°15'2.59"N; Long: 120°38'39.78"W Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 Volumes for:CITY:PROJECT: Location: Weather conditions: AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB 0:00 13 15 0 0 12:00 283 283 0 0 0:15 4 13 0 0 12:15 305 257 0 0 0:30 4 10 0 0 12:30 265 263 0 0 0:45 4 25 7 45 0 0 0 0 70 12:45 235 1088 274 1077 0 0 0 0 2165 1:00 6 8 0 0 13:00 289 297 0 0 1:15 2 7 0 0 13:15 237 275 0 0 1:30 6 6 0 0 13:30 208 253 0 0 1:45 2 16 5 26 0 0 0 0 42 13:45 216 950 247 1072 0 0 0 0 2022 2:00 4 4 0 0 14:00 267 231 0 0 2:15 2 7 0 0 14:15 183 261 0 0 2:30 3 2 0 0 14:30 236 241 0 0 2:45 5 14 2 15 0 0 0 0 29 14:45 231 917 223 956 0 0 0 0 1873 3:00 3 5 0 0 15:00 233 270 0 0 3:15 3 3 0 0 15:15 228 287 0 0 3:30 6 5 0 0 15:30 264 318 0 0 3:45 5 17 4 17 0 0 0 0 34 15:45 268 993 287 1162 0 0 0 0 2155 4:00 5 7 0 0 16:00 275 274 0 0 4:15 7 11 0 0 16:15 238 252 0 0 4:30 13 19 0 0 16:30 333 320 0 0 4:45 20 45 23 60 0 0 0 0 105 16:45 312 1158 286 1132 0 0 0 0 2290 5:00 23 32 0 0 17:00 380 356 0 0 5:15 39 28 0 0 17:15 366 303 0 0 5:30 23 29 0 0 17:30 311 305 0 0 5:45 57 142 74 163 0 0 0 0 305 17:45 270 1327 259 1223 0 0 0 0 2550 6:00 66 52 0 0 18:00 247 189 0 0 6:15 96 90 0 0 18:15 205 225 0 0 6:30 121 82 0 0 18:30 174 191 0 0 6:45 150 433 134 358 0 0 0 0 791 18:45 194 820 191 796 0 0 0 0 1616 7:00 131 128 0 0 19:00 130 164 0 0 7:15 171 171 0 0 19:15 122 221 0 0 7:30 234 203 0 0 19:30 138 187 0 0 7:45 327 863 274 776 0 0 0 0 1639 19:45 116 506 150 722 0 0 0 0 1228 8:00 308 279 0 0 20:00 116 162 0 0 8:15 287 277 0 0 20:15 108 146 0 0 8:30 229 272 0 0 20:30 97 110 0 0 8:45 281 1105 257 1085 0 0 0 0 2190 20:45 75 396 134 552 0 0 0 0 948 9:00 245 227 0 0 21:00 81 109 0 0 9:15 208 206 0 0 21:15 66 93 0 0 9:30 216 215 0 0 21:30 50 77 0 0 9:45 196 865 218 866 0 0 0 0 1731 21:45 62 259 78 357 0 0 0 0 616 10:00 202 187 0 0 22:00 51 45 0 0 10:15 194 228 0 0 22:15 51 48 0 0 10:30 197 172 0 0 22:30 29 35 0 0 10:45 222 815 214 801 0 0 0 0 1616 22:45 24 155 34 162 0 0 0 0 317 11:00 209 223 0 0 23:00 28 43 0 0 11:15 237 206 0 0 23:15 20 29 0 0 11:30 246 251 0 0 23:30 28 25 0 0 11:45 261 953 267 947 0 0 0 0 1900 23:45 11 87 17 114 0 0 0 0 201 Total Vol.5293 5159 10452 8656 9325 17981 NB SB EB Side Combined 13949 14484 28433 Split %50.6%49.4%36.8%48.1%51.9%63.2% Peak Hour 7:30 7:45 7:45 16:30 16:30 16:30 Volume 1156 1102 2253 1391 1265 2656 P.H.F.0.88 0.99 0.94 0.92 0.89 0.90 Daily Totals AM PM pacific@aimtd.com Tell. 714 253 7888 DAY 2 Sunny SC0843San Luis ObispoWednesday, March 16, 2016 ADT19 Broad betweend Industrial Way and Tank Farm, Lat: 35°15'2.59"N; Long: 120°38'39.78"W Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 Volumes for:&CITY:San Luis Obispo PROJECT: Location: AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB 0:00 10 14 0 0 12:00 298 273 0 0 0:15 5 13 0 0 12:15 289 268 0 0 0:30 6 10 0 0 12:30 257 275 0 0 0:45 3 24 8 45 0 0 0 0 69 12:45 262 1106 280 1096 0 0 0 0 2202 1:00 5 6 0 0 13:00 273 300 0 0 1:15 2 5 0 0 13:15 243 305 0 0 1:30 6 8 0 0 13:30 223 271 0 0 1:45 2 15 3 22 0 0 0 0 37 13:45 235 974 253 1129 0 0 0 0 2103 2:00 3 5 0 0 14:00 269 247 0 0 2:15 4 6 0 0 14:15 200 262 0 0 2:30 4 5 0 0 14:30 232 244 0 0 2:45 4 15 3 19 0 0 0 0 34 14:45 222 923 259 1012 0 0 0 0 1935 3:00 3 5 0 0 15:00 230 275 0 0 3:15 3 4 0 0 15:15 248 282 0 0 3:30 6 4 0 0 15:30 261 324 0 0 3:45 8 20 6 19 0 0 0 0 39 15:45 278 1017 281 1162 0 0 0 0 2179 4:00 7 8 0 0 16:00 262 298 0 0 4:15 6 13 0 0 16:15 253 291 0 0 4:30 13 18 0 0 16:30 339 336 0 0 4:45 20 46 20 59 0 0 0 0 105 16:45 316 1170 293 1218 0 0 0 0 2388 5:00 24 30 0 0 17:00 355 341 0 0 5:15 34 29 0 0 17:15 345 318 0 0 5:30 31 39 0 0 17:30 304 315 0 0 5:45 55 144 73 171 0 0 0 0 315 17:45 254 1258 246 1220 0 0 0 0 2478 6:00 65 50 0 0 18:00 227 197 0 0 6:15 90 88 0 0 18:15 191 222 0 0 6:30 122 87 0 0 18:30 184 187 0 0 6:45 155 432 128 353 0 0 0 0 785 18:45 178 780 186 792 0 0 0 0 1572 7:00 134 132 0 0 19:00 133 167 0 0 7:15 170 164 0 0 19:15 123 181 0 0 7:30 236 191 0 0 19:30 141 162 0 0 7:45 316 856 282 769 0 0 0 0 1625 19:45 104 501 146 656 0 0 0 0 1157 8:00 303 293 0 0 20:00 109 142 0 0 8:15 274 281 0 0 20:15 98 131 0 0 8:30 246 262 0 0 20:30 85 117 0 0 8:45 271 1094 262 1098 0 0 0 0 2192 20:45 72 364 115 505 0 0 0 0 869 9:00 238 236 0 0 21:00 76 102 0 0 9:15 197 199 0 0 21:15 61 85 0 0 9:30 205 217 0 0 21:30 53 74 0 0 9:45 194 834 200 852 0 0 0 0 1686 21:45 61 251 66 327 0 0 0 0 578 10:00 208 202 0 0 22:00 49 44 0 0 10:15 198 202 0 0 22:15 42 43 0 0 10:30 200 172 0 0 22:30 29 30 0 0 10:45 232 838 213 789 0 0 0 0 1627 22:45 24 144 32 149 0 0 0 0 293 11:00 222 243 0 0 23:00 25 35 0 0 11:15 233 217 0 0 23:15 21 27 0 0 11:30 270 248 0 0 23:30 19 24 0 0 11:45 252 977 266 974 0 0 0 0 1951 23:45 12 77 14 100 0 0 0 0 177 Total Vol.5295 5170 10465 8565 9366 17931 NB SB EB WB Combined 13860 14536 28396 Split %50.6%49.4%36.9%47.8%52.2%63.1% Peak Hour 7:45 7:45 7:45 16:30 16:30 16:30 Volume 1139 1118 2257 1355 1288 2643 P.H.F.0.90 0.95 0.94 0.96 0.94 0.95 pacific@aimtd.com Tell. 714 253 7888 SC0843Tuesday, March 15, 2016 Wednesday, March 16, 2016 2-DAY AVERAGE Daily Totals AM PM ADT19 Broad betweend Industrial Way and Tank Farm, Lat: 35°15'2.59"N; Long: 120°38'39.78"W Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 OTM3252009/14/201704:07:59CALTRANS TRAFFIC VOLUMESDetail All Vehicle Hourly Count Report16Page#Direction of Count:0-11-22-33-44-55-66-77-88-99-1010-1112-1313-1414-1516-1717-1818-1919-2020-2121-2222-2323-2411-1215-16AM Peak HourPM Peak HourAM Peak TrafficDay TotalPM Peak TrafficAPR 01 APR 02 APR 03 APR 04 APR 05 APR 06 APR 07 APR 083187 8589 8737 8864 5366 4307 8698 8746AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACAAAAAAACAAAAAAACAAAAAAACAAAAAAACAAAAAAACAAAAAAACAAAAAAACAAAAAAACAAAAAAACAAAAAAAC16 13 26 39 63 18 1410 16 12 17 20 9 91013 91214151026 35 35 11 7 27 3092 79 70 38 30 75 74185 197 177 76 51 181 188538 571 512 131 77 532 5891065 1070 1035 224 113 1046 11081263 1205 1106 360 209 1032 1220560 592 594 402 270 847 645480 447 544 436 353 519 578466 545 576 449 404 573 563493 561 557 387 387 532 531431 504 475 473 464 343 576 431617 632 669 676 443 328 627 617550 535 505 523 364 294 542 550453 465 494 502 293 335 458 453408 436 425 455 302 293 422 408292 276 280 308 238 199 247 292186 178 218 206 168 179 150 18697 135 130 160 160 144 114 9782 127 112 110 141 99 89 8244 59 62 109 122 64 39 4427 38 23 89 89 31 28 27AAAAAAATue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue1263 1205 1106 449 404 1046 1220- 08-09 08-09 08-09 11-12 11-12 07-08 08-0914-15 14-15 14-15 14-15 13-14 12-13 14-15 14-15PAAAAAAC617 632 669 676 464 387 627 617NorthDistrictCountyLegRoutePostmile 9.367 BCRESTMONT DRIVE05SLO227Location DescriptionTraffic Station:Location Type: Profile PointLanes:Lane Code:Year2014RPrefixSfx Hg OTM3252009/14/201704:07:59CALTRANS TRAFFIC VOLUMESDetail All Vehicle Hourly Count Report17Page# 7-Day Periods7-Day Total Daily Average5330776151st2nd3rd4thNORTHDistrictCountyLegRoutePostmile 9.367 BCRESTMONT DRIVE05SLO227Location DescriptionTraffic Station:Location Type: Profile PointLanes:Lane Code:RPrefix 5-Day PeriodsNORTH5-Day TotalWeekday Average1st2nd3rd4th43634 8727Sfx Hg OTM3252009/14/201704:07:59CALTRANS TRAFFIC VOLUMESDetail All Vehicle Hourly Count Report18Page#Direction of Count:0-11-22-33-44-55-66-77-88-99-1010-1112-1313-1414-1516-1717-1818-1919-2020-2121-2222-2323-2411-1215-16AM Peak HourPM Peak HourAM Peak TrafficDay TotalPM Peak TrafficAPR 01 APR 02 APR 03 APR 04 APR 05 APR 06 APR 07 APR 086049 9082 9523 9568 5953 4574 9286 9498AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACAAAAAAACAAAAAAACAAAAAAACAAAAAAACAAAAAAACAAAAAAACAAAAAAACAAAAAAACAAAAAAACAAAAAAAC17 26 32 36 60 21 2112 42 26 68 33 14 1461525491415 98981398523 22 20 14 7 15 2073 90 59 41 23 94 105165 159 200 68 48 191 223327 324 381 140 93 340 350563 586 588 222 173 415 656383 430 381 311 245 574 494377 423 460 400 290 489 454472 525 539 478 326 513 524556 567 600 493 409 562 574530 570 585 617 514 412 548 530796 795 784 792 512 431 823 796816 873 919 1009 542 432 903 8161090 1139 1141 1115 519 390 1117 10901268 1177 1222 1072 412 377 1178 1268613 592 571 631 295 238 542 613374 393 396 374 245 214 377 374267 242 304 232 216 148 234 267143 173 220 207 179 113 176 14398 82 101 134 114 58 94 9854 64 62 66 72 31 43 54AAAAAAATue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue563 586 588 478 326 574 656- 08-09 08-09 08-09 11-12 11-12 09-10 08-0917-18 17-18 17-18 16-17 15-16 15-16 17-18 17-18PAAAAAAC1268 1177 1222 1115 542 432 1178 1268SouthDistrictCountyLegRoutePostmile 9.367 BCRESTMONT DRIVE05SLO227Location DescriptionTraffic Station:Location Type: Profile PointLanes:Lane Code:Year2014RPrefixSfx Hg OTM3252009/14/201704:07:59CALTRANS TRAFFIC VOLUMESDetail All Vehicle Hourly Count Report19Page#57484 82127-Day Periods7-Day Total Daily Average1st2nd3rd4thSOUTHDistrictCountyLegRoutePostmile 9.367 BCRESTMONT DRIVE05SLO227Location DescriptionTraffic Station:Location Type: Profile PointLanes:Lane Code:RPrefix5-Day PeriodsSOUTH5-Day TotalWeekday Average1st2nd3rd4th469579391Sfx Hg OTM3252009/14/201704:07:59CALTRANS TRAFFIC VOLUMESDetail All Vehicle Hourly Count Report20Page#Direction of Count:0-11-22-33-44-55-66-77-88-99-1010-1112-1313-1414-1516-1717-1818-1919-2020-2121-2222-2323-2411-1215-16AM Peak HourPM Peak HourAM Peak TrafficDay TotalPM Peak TrafficMAY 01 MAY 02 MAY 03 MAY 04 MAY 05 MAY 06 MAY 079367 9702 5677 4424 9086 9283 9386AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA15 15 46 53 20 12 1611 11 22 33 7 8 1512 5 9 10 14 14 1340 37 19 11 28 34 2750 53 32 27 63 56 49182 187 71 53 161 172 181491 452 117 94 484 536 4921017 942 260 129 973 1011 10011056 1220 332 208 929 1064 1055592 764 386 258 815 587 597496 546 410 380 538 559 584639 599 441 380 582 642 623599 652 404 392 677 621 619578 509 410 352 516 523 542608 680 431 368 573 644 640611 656 469 357 640 613 628572 655 361 302 597 625 633712 593 436 321 624 572 656382 347 276 213 340 355 378265 242 223 157 197 268 253164 182 154 137 132 158 159152 144 166 92 89 129 12079 121 135 64 51 44 6844 90 67 33 36 36 37AAAAAAAThu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed1056 1220 441 380 973 1064 105508-09 08-09 11-12 10-11 07-08 08-09 08-0917-18 14-15 15-16 12-13 12-13 14-15 17-18AAAAAAA712 680 469 392 677 644 656NorthDistrictCountyLegRoutePostmile 9.370ANOOF CRESTMONT DR05SLO227Location DescriptionTraffic Station:Location Type: Profile PointLanes:Lane Code:Year2014RPrefixSfx Hg OTM3252009/14/201704:07:59CALTRANS TRAFFIC VOLUMESDetail All Vehicle Hourly Count Report21Page# 7-Day Periods7-Day Total Daily Average5692581321st2nd3rd4thNORTHDistrictCountyLegRoutePostmile 9.370ANOOF CRESTMONT DR05SLO227Location DescriptionTraffic Station:Location Type: Profile PointLanes:Lane Code:RPrefix 5-Day PeriodsNORTH5-Day TotalWeekday Average1st2nd3rd4th46824 9365Sfx Hg OTM3252009/14/201704:07:59CALTRANS TRAFFIC VOLUMESDetail All Vehicle Hourly Count Report22Page#Direction of Count:0-11-22-33-44-55-66-77-88-99-1010-1112-1313-1414-1516-1717-1818-1919-2020-2121-2222-2323-2411-1215-16AM Peak HourPM Peak HourAM Peak TrafficDay TotalPM Peak TrafficMAY 01 MAY 02 MAY 03 MAY 04 MAY 05 MAY 06 MAY 078854 8657 7506 4202 8232 8108 7333AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA27 33 39 65 15 15 1815 16 73 28 15 12 10138321559710 12 18 7 9 10 1333 29 13 11 24 25 1970 69 45 35 68 75 60215 204 74 50 204 192 190407 395 120 90 406 384 407626 645 237 156 496 592 568483 450 279 226 538 499 430457 481 384 289 422 387 398479 546 412 325 499 446 406626 578 409 361 554 547 471564 647 424 368 583 550 488659 684 895 373 635 608 554761 774 968 359 725 715 660945 920 935 365 883 896 773938 828 842 314 948 912 762520 480 556 239 460 453 413346 256 230 186 312 286 257279 218 155 167 181 205 192215 200 149 84 140 161 120101 117 121 57 60 70 7665 67 96 32 50 59 41AAAAAAAThu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed626 645 412 325 538 592 56808-09 08-09 11-12 11-12 09-10 08-09 08-0916-17 16-17 15-16 14-15 17-18 17-18 16-17AAAAAAA945 920 968 373 948 912 773SouthDistrictCountyLegRoutePostmile 9.370ANOOF CRESTMONT DR05SLO227Location DescriptionTraffic Station:Location Type: Profile PointLanes:Lane Code:Year2014RPrefixSfx Hg OTM3252009/14/201704:07:59CALTRANS TRAFFIC VOLUMESDetail All Vehicle Hourly Count Report23Page#52892 75567-Day Periods7-Day Total Daily Average1st2nd3rd4thSOUTHDistrictCountyLegRoutePostmile 9.370ANOOF CRESTMONT DR05SLO227Location DescriptionTraffic Station:Location Type: Profile PointLanes:Lane Code:RPrefix5-Day PeriodsSOUTH5-Day TotalWeekday Average1st2nd3rd4th411848237Sfx Hg Appendix F Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed-Use Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Response to Comments Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program This document is the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the 650 Tank Farm Mixed‐Use Project, proposed in the City of San Luis Obispo, California. Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 requires that a Lead Agency adopt an MMRP before approving a project in order to mitigate or avoid significant impacts that have been identified in the Initial Study‐Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS‐MND). The purpose of the MMRP is to ensure that the required mitigation measures identified in the IS‐MND are implemented as part of the overall project development process. In addition to ensuring implementation of mitigation measures, the MMRP provides guidance to agency staff and decision‐makers during project implementation, and identifies the need for enforcement action before irreversible environmental damage occurs. Where an impact was identified to be less than significant in the IS‐MND, no mitigation measures were required. The 650 Tank Farm Mixed‐Use Project consists of a General Plan Amendment, a rezone of the property and a Specific Plan Amendment to the AASP, a Conditional Use Permit for a mixed‐use project within the C‐S‐SP zone, approval of a parking reduction request, and approval of a mobile home park conversation impact report for a 12.75‐acre site project site in the City of San Luis Obispo. The following table summarizes the mitigation measures for each issue area identified in the IS‐MND for the project. Specifically, the table identifies each mitigation measure; the action required for the measure to be implemented; the time at which the monitoring is to occur; the monitoring conditions; and the agency or party responsible for ensuring that the monitoring is performed. In addition, the table includes columns for compliance verification. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed-Use Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Response to Comments 2 Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Monitoring Responsible Agency or Party Compliance Verification Initial Date Comments Air Quality AQ‐1(a) SLOAPCD Operational Emissions Reduction Measures Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall define and incorporate into project design at least four of the standard emission reduction measures from the SLOAPCD CEQA Air Quality Handbook (Table 3‐5). Emission reduction measures shall include, but would not be limited to: Provide a pedestrian friendly and interconnected streetscape with good access to/from the development for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users to make alternative transportation more convenient, comfortable, and safe. Provide shade over 50% of parking spaces to reduce evaporative emissions from parked vehicles. Incorporate traffic calming modification into project roads to reduce vehicle speeds and increase pedestrian and bicycle usage and safety. Work with SLOCOG to create, improve, or expand a nearby ‘Park and Ride’ lot with car parking and bike lockers in proportion to the size of the project. Exceed Cal Green standards by 25% for providing on‐site bicycle parking: both short term racks and long term lockers, or a locked room with standard racks and access limited to bicyclists only. Provide improved public transit amenities (covered transit turnouts, direct pedestrian access, bicycle racks, covered bench, smart signage, route information displays, lighting, etc.) Provide bicycle‐share program for development. Provide dedicated parking for carpools, vanpools, and/or high‐efficiency vehicles to meet or exceed Cal Green Tier 2. The applicant shall incorporate operational emissions reduction measures into development plans and submit evidence to the Community Development Department that these provisions would reduce long‐term operational emissions have been reduced to below daily threshold levels prior to issuance of grading permits. The Community Development Department shall verify compliance prior to issuance of construction permits. The Community Development Department shall site inspect to ensure development is in accordance with approved plans prior to occupancy clearance. Community Development staff shall verify installation of operational emissions reduction measures in accordance with approved building plans. City of San Luis Obispo AQ‐1(b) Fugitive Dust Control Measures Construction projects shall implement the following dust control measures so as to reduce PM10 emissions in accordance with SLOAPCD requirements. Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible; Water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used during construction in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency shall be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non‐potable) water shall be used whenever possible; All dirt stock pile areas shall be sprayed daily as needed; Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape plans shall be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities; Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading shall be sown with a fast germinating, non‐invasive grass seed and watered until vegetation is established; All disturbed soil areas not subject to revegetation shall be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the SLOAPCD; All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used; Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site; Fugitive dust control measures and standard control measures for construction equipment shall be shown on grading and construction plans prior to issuance of permits. The Community Development Department shall verify compliance prior to issuance of grading permits. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor fugitive dust emissions as necessary during construction to minimize dust complaints, reduce visible emissions below 20 percent opacity, and to prevent transport of dust offsite. Their duties shall include holidays and weekend periods when work may not be in progress. The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the SLOAPCD Compliance Division prior to the start of any grading, earthwork or demolition. The Community Development Department shall site inspect to ensure construction activities are completed in accordance with approved plans. City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed-Use Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Response to Comments 3 Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Monitoring Responsible Agency or Party Compliance Verification Initial Date Comments All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or shall maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with California Vehicle Code Section 23114; Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or wash off trucks and equipment leaving the site; Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water shall be used where feasible; AQ‐1(c) Standard Control Measures for Construction Equipment The following standard air quality mitigation measures shall be implemented during construction activities at the project site: Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturer’s specifications; Fuel all off‐road and portable diesel powered equipment with ARB certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (non‐taxed version suitable for use off‐road); Use diesel construction equipment meeting ARB’s Tier 2 certified engines or cleaner off‐road heavy‐duty diesel engines, and comply with the State Off‐Road Regulation; Use on‐road heavy‐duty trucks that meet the ARB’s 2007 or cleaner certification standard for on‐road heavy‐duty diesel engines, and comply with the State On‐Road Regulation; Construction or trucking companies with fleets that do not have engines in their fleet that meet the engine standards identified in the above two measures (e.g. captive or NOX exempt area fleets) may be eligible by proving alternative compliance; All on and off‐road diesel equipment shall not idle for more than 5 minutes. Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas and or job sites to remind drivers and operators of the 5 minute idling limit; Diesel idling within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors is not permitted; Staging and queuing areas shall not be located within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors; Electrify equipment when feasible; Substitute gasoline‐powered in place of diesel‐powered equipment, where feasible; and Use alternatively fueled construction equipment on‐site where feasible, such as compressed natural gas, liquefied natural gas, propane or biodiesel. Fugitive dust control measures and standard control measures for construction equipment shall be shown on grading and construction plans prior to issuance of permits. The Community Development Department shall verify compliance prior to issuance of grading permits. The Community Development Department shall site inspect to ensure construction activities are completed in accordance with approved plans. Biological Resources BIO‐1(a) Special Status Plant Species Surveys Prior to the start of vegetation management activities on the project site, or prior to the start of any construction activity within potential off‐site improvement areas, the developer shall ensure an approved biologist conducts surveys for special status plant species throughout suitable habitat. Surveys shall be conducted when plants with potential to occur are in a phenological stage conducive to positive identification (i.e., usually during the blooming period for the species), a qualified biologist shall conduct surveys for special status plant species throughout suitable habitat within all potential vegetation management Special status species protection plans and surveys shall be prepared by the applicant and shall be submitted to for review and approval by the City prior to the approval of grading and construction permits. Any required permits shall be obtained from the state and federal agencies prior to issuance of grading permits The Environmental Monitor shall monitor environmental compliance of the construction activities throughout the construction period or as stipulated in the species‐ or resource‐specific mitigation measure and provide monitoring reports to the City City of San Luis Obispo City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed-Use Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Response to Comments 4 Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Monitoring Responsible Agency or Party Compliance Verification Initial Date Comments areas. Reference sites must be visited prior to botanical surveys to confirm target species are detectable. Valid botanical surveys will be considered current for up to five years; if construction has not commenced within five years of the most recent survey, botanical surveys must be repeated. BIO‐1(b) Special Status Plant Species Avoidance If special status plant species are discovered within the project site or potential off‐site improvement areas, an approved biologist shall flag and fence these locations before construction activities start to avoid impacts. During vegetation management activities, any special status plants identified during the survey must be flagged for avoidance. Special status species protection plans and surveys shall be prepared by the applicant and shall be submitted to for review and approval by the City prior to the approval of grading and construction permits. Any required permits shall be obtained from the state and federal agencies prior to issuance of grading permits The Environmental Monitor shall monitor environmental compliance of the construction activities throughout the construction period or as stipulated in the species‐ or resource‐specific mitigation measure and provide monitoring reports to the City City of San Luis Obispo BIO‐1(c) Restoration Plan If avoidance is not feasible; all impacts shall be mitigated at a minimum ratio of 2:1 (number of acres or individuals restored to number of acres or individuals impacted) for each species as a component of habitat restoration. A qualified biologist shall prepare and submit a restoration plan to the City for approval. The restoration plan shall include, at a minimum, the following components: Description of the project/impact site (i.e., location, responsible parties, areas to be impacted by habitat type); Goal(s) of the compensatory mitigation project [type(s) and area(s) of habitat to be established, restored, enhanced, and/or preserved; specific functions and values of habitat type(s) to be established, restored, enhanced, and/or preserved]; Description of the proposed compensatory mitigation site (location and size, ownership status, existing functions and values); Implementation plan for the compensatory mitigation site (rationale for expecting implementation success, responsible parties, schedule, site preparation, planting plan [including species to be used, container sizes, seeding rates, etc.]); Maintenance activities during the monitoring period, including weed removal and irrigation as appropriate (activities, responsible parties, schedule); Monitoring plan for the compensatory mitigation site, including no less than quarterly monitoring for the first year, along with performance standards, target functions and values, target acreages to be established, restored, enhanced, and/or preserved, and annual monitoring reports to be submitted to the City for a minimum of five years at which time the applicant shall demonstrate that performance standards/success criteria have been met; Success criteria based on the goals and measurable objectives; said criteria to be, at a minimum, at least 80% survival of container plants and 30% relative cover by vegetation type; An adaptive management program and remedial measures to address any shortcomings in meeting success criteria; Notification of completion of compensatory mitigation and agency confirmation; and Contingency measures (initiating procedures, alternative locations for contingency compensatory mitigation, funding mechanism). Special status species protection plans and surveys shall be prepared by the applicant and shall be submitted to for review and approval by the City prior to the approval of grading and construction permits. Any required permits shall be obtained from the state and federal agencies prior to issuance of grading permits The Environmental Monitor shall monitor environmental compliance of the construction activities throughout the construction period or as stipulated in the species‐ or resource‐specific mitigation measure and provide monitoring reports to the City City of San Luis Obispo BIO‐2(a) Best Management Practices Special status species protection plans and surveys shall be prepared by the The Environmental Monitor shall monitor environmental compliance of the City of San City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed-Use Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Response to Comments 5 Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Monitoring Responsible Agency or Party Compliance Verification Initial Date Comments The following Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be implemented for project construction activities within the work area. No pets or firearms shall be allowed at the project site during construction activities. All trash that may attract predators must be properly contained and removed from the work site. All such debris and waste shall be picked up daily and properly disposed of at an appropriate site. All refueling, maintenance, and staging of equipment and vehicles shall occur at least 50 feet from Acacia Creek and Orcutt Creek and in a location where a spill would not drain toward aquatic habitat. A plan must be in place for prompt and effective response to any accidental spills prior to the onset of work activities. All workers shall be informed of the appropriate measures to take should an accidental spill occur. Pallets or secondary containment areas for chemicals, drums, or bagged materials shall be provided. Should material spills occur, materials and/or contaminants shall be cleaned from the project site and recycled or disposed of to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Prior to construction activities within 30 feet of potentially jurisdictional features, including Acacia Creek and Orcutt Creek, the drainage features shall be fenced with orange construction fencing and signed to prohibit entry of construction equipment and personnel unless authorized by the City. Fencing should be located a minimum of 30 feet from the edge of the riparian canopy or top of bank and shall be maintained throughout the construction period for each phase of development. Once all phases of construction in this area are complete, the fencing may be removed. Erosion control and landscaping specifications allow only natural‐fiber, biodegradable meshes and coir rolls, to prevent impacts to the environment and to fish and terrestrial wildlife. All vehicles and equipment shall be in good working condition and free of leaks. Construction work shall be restricted to daylight hours (7:00 AM to 7:00 PM) to avoid impacts to nocturnal and crepuscular (dawn and dusk activity period) species. Concrete truck and tool washout shall be limited to locations designated by a qualified biologist or a Qualified Storm‐water Practitioner such that no runoff will reach Acacia Creek or Orcutt Creek. All open trenches shall be constructed with appropriate exit ramps to allow species that accidentally fall into a trench to escape. Trenches will remain open for the shortest period necessary to complete required work. No water will be impounded in a manner to attract sensitive species. applicant and shall be submitted to for review and approval by the City prior to the approval of grading and construction permits. Any required permits shall be obtained from the state and federal agencies prior to issuance of grading permits construction activities throughout the construction period or as stipulated in the species‐ or resource‐specific mitigation measure and provide monitoring reports to the City Luis Obispo BIO‐2(b) Worker Environmental Awareness Program Prior to the initiation of construction activities (including staging and mobilization), all personnel associated with project construction shall attend a Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) training. The training shall be conducted by a qualified biologist, to aid workers in recognizing special status resources that may occur in the project area. The specifics of this program shall include identification of the sensitive species and habitats, a description of the regulatory status and general ecological characteristics of sensitive resources, and review of the limits of construction and Special status species protection plans and surveys shall be prepared by the applicant and shall be submitted to for review and approval by the City prior to the approval of grading and construction permits. Any required permits shall be obtained from the state and federal agencies prior to issuance of grading permits The Environmental Monitor shall monitor environmental compliance of the construction activities throughout the construction period or as stipulated in the species‐ or resource‐specific mitigation measure and provide monitoring reports to the City City of San Luis Obispo City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed-Use Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Response to Comments 6 Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Monitoring Responsible Agency or Party Compliance Verification Initial Date Comments avoidance measures required to reduce impacts to biological resources within the work area. A fact sheet conveying this information shall also be prepared for distribution to all contractors, their employers, and other personnel involved with construction of the project. All employees shall sign a form provided by the trainer documenting they have attended the training. BIO‐2(c) California Red‐legged Frog Impact Avoidance and Minimization The following shall be implemented to avoid and minimize potential impacts to CRLF. A pre‐construction survey of the proposed disturbance footprint (within the project site or potential off‐site improvement areas) for California red‐legged frog shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within 48 hours prior to the start of project construction to confirm this species is not present in the work area. In the event the pre‐construction survey identifies the presence of individuals of CRLF, or if individuals of these species are encountered during construction, then the applicant shall stop work and comply with all relevant requirements of the Federal Endangered Species Act prior to resuming project activities. Only City‐ and USFWS‐approved biologists shall participate in activities associated with the capture, handling, and monitoring of CRLF. If activities occur between November 1 and April 30, the qualified biologist shall conduct a pre‐activity clearance sweep prior to start of project activities on the morning following any rain events of 0.1 inch or greater. Special status species protection plans and surveys shall be prepared by the applicant and shall be submitted to for review and approval by the City prior to the approval of grading and construction permits. Any required permits shall be obtained from the state and federal agencies prior to issuance of grading permits The Environmental Monitor shall monitor environmental compliance of the construction activities throughout the construction period or as stipulated in the species‐ or resource‐specific mitigation measure and provide monitoring reports to the City City of San Luis Obispo BIO‐2(d) Coast Range Newt, Two‐striped Garter Snake, and Western Pond Turtle Impact Avoidance and Minimization A qualified biologist shall conduct a pre‐construction survey within 48 hours of initial ground disturbing activities associated with any off‐site improvements, including modifications to the existing crossing over Acacia Creek or the development of a new crossing over Orcutt Creek. The survey area shall include any proposed disturbance area(s) and all proposed ingress/egress routes. If any of these species are found and individuals may be injured or killed by work activities, the biologist shall be allowed sufficient time to move them from the project site before work activities begin. The biologist(s) shall relocate any coast range newts, two‐striped garter snakes, and/or western pond turtles the shortest distance possible to a location that contains suitable habitat that is not likely to be affected by activities associated with the project. Special status species protection plans and surveys shall be prepared by the applicant and shall be submitted to for review and approval by the City prior to the approval of grading and construction permits. Any required permits shall be obtained from the state and federal agencies prior to issuance of grading permits The Environmental Monitor shall monitor environmental compliance of the construction activities throughout the construction period or as stipulated in the species‐ or resource‐specific mitigation measure and provide monitoring reports to the City City of San Luis Obispo BIO‐2(e) Steelhead – South‐central California Coast DPS Impact Avoidance and Minimization The applicant shall implement the following to avoid and minimize potential impacts to steelhead. Construction associated with the widening of the existing crossing over Acacia Creek shall be restricted to periods of dry weather from April 16 through October 31, and shall not be conducted within 48 hours after a rain event of 0.25 inch or greater, or until an approved biologist confirms there is no longer a chance for flowing water to enter the work area. Widening of the existing crossing shall follow the design standards developed by the City of San Luis Obispo and shall be developed in a manner that does Special status species protection plans and surveys shall be prepared by the applicant and shall be submitted to for review and approval by the City prior to the approval of grading and construction permits. Any required permits shall be obtained from the state and federal agencies prior to issuance of grading permits The Environmental Monitor shall monitor environmental compliance of the construction activities throughout the construction period or as stipulated in the species‐ or resource‐specific mitigation measure and provide monitoring reports to the City City of San Luis Obispo City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed-Use Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Response to Comments 7 Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Monitoring Responsible Agency or Party Compliance Verification Initial Date Comments not impede wildlife movement. BIO‐2(f) Nesting Birds Impact Avoidance and Minimization The following actions shall be undertaken to avoid and minimize potential impacts to nesting birds. For construction activities occurring during the nesting season (generally February 1 to September 15), surveys for nesting birds covered by the California Fish and Game Code and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act shall be conducted by a qualified biologist no more than 14 days prior to vegetation removal. The surveys shall include the disturbance area plus a 500‐foot buffer around the site. If active nests are located, all construction work shall be conducted outside a buffer zone from the nest to be determined by the qualified biologist. The buffer shall be a minimum of 50 feet for non‐raptor bird species and at least 300 feet for raptor species. Larger buffers may be required depending upon the status of the nest and the construction activities occurring in the vicinity of the nest. The buffer area(s) shall be closed to all construction personnel and equipment until the adults and young are no longer reliant on the nest site. A qualified biologist shall confirm that breeding/nesting is completed and young have fledged the nest prior to removal of the buffer. If feasible, removal of vegetation within suitable nesting bird habitats will be scheduled to occur in the fall and winter (between September 1 and February 14), after fledging and before the initiation of the nesting season. If a suspected American bald eagle nest is discovered during the pre‐construction survey, then the applicant shall consult with the City, USFWS, and CDFW regarding appropriate nest buffers and nest monitoring. If a nest is discovered with construction underway, a no‐activity buffer a minimum of 660 feet from the nest must be implemented, or as otherwise directed by CDFW and USFWS, until appropriate authorizations are obtained. Any subsequent buffer adjustments shall be made in consultation with the City, CDFW and USFWS and shall rely on monitoring observations and activity at the site. Additional avoidance measures for special status bird nests such as American bald eagle nests are often required, and would be developed in consultation with the City, CDFW and USFWS. Special status species protection plans and surveys shall be prepared by the applicant and shall be submitted to for review and approval by the City prior to the approval of grading and construction permits. Any required permits shall be obtained from the state and federal agencies prior to issuance of grading permits The Environmental Monitor shall monitor environmental compliance of the construction activities throughout the construction period or as stipulated in the species‐ or resource‐specific mitigation measure and provide monitoring reports to the City City of San Luis Obispo BIO‐2(g) Roosting Bat Impact Avoidance and Minimization The following actions shall be undertaken to avoid and minimize potential impacts to roosting bats: Prior to issuance of grading permits, a qualified biologist shall conduct a survey of existing structures within the project site to determine if roosting bats are present. The survey shall be conducted during the non‐breeding season (November through March). The biologist shall have access to all interior attics, as needed. If a colony of bats is found roosting in any structure, further surveys shall be conducted sufficient to determine the species present and the type of roost (day, night, maternity, etc.) If the bats are not part of an active maternity colony, passive exclusion measures may be implemented, in close coordination with CDFW. These exclusion measures must include one‐way valves that allow bats to exit the structure but are designed so that the bats may not re‐enter the structure. If a bat colony is excluded from the project site, appropriate alternate bat Special status species protection plans and surveys shall be prepared by the applicant and shall be submitted to for review and approval by the City prior to the approval of grading and construction permits. Any required permits shall be obtained from the state and federal agencies prior to issuance of grading permits The Environmental Monitor shall monitor environmental compliance of the construction activities throughout the construction period or as stipulated in the species‐ or resource‐specific mitigation measure and provide monitoring reports to the City City of San Luis Obispo City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed-Use Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Response to Comments 8 Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Monitoring Responsible Agency or Party Compliance Verification Initial Date Comments habitat as determined by a qualified biologist shall be installed on the project site or at an approved location offsite. Prior to removal of any trees, a survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to determine if any of the trees proposed for removal or trimming harbor sensitive bat species or maternal bat colonies. If a non‐maternal roost is found, the qualified biologist, in close coordination with CDFW shall install one‐way valves or other appropriate passive relocation method. For each occupied roost removed, one bat box or alternate roost structure shall be installed in similar habitat and should have similar cavity or crevices properties to those which are removed, including access, ventilation, dimensions, height above ground, and thermal conditions. Maternal bat colonies may not be disturbed. BIO‐3 Wetland, Stream, and Riparian Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Temporary impact areas shall be restored at a one to one (1:1) ratio (one acre of restoration for each acre of impact) to offset temporary losses in wetland, stream, or riparian function. Permanent impacts on jurisdictional areas shall be offset through creation, restoration, and/or enhancement of in‐kind habitats at a minimum ratio of 2:1. Permitting agencies (CDFW, USACE, RWQCB) may require a higher mitigation ratio associated with applicable permits. A Mitigation and Monitoring Plan is required to outline the approach that will be taken for restoration and habitat creation or enhancement. The plan shall be prepared by a qualified restoration ecologist. The plan shall include, but not be limited to the following components: Description of the project/impact site, Goal(s) of the compensatory mitigation, Description of the proposed compensatory mitigation‐site, Implementation plan for the compensatory mitigation‐site, Maintenance activities during the monitoring period, Monitoring plan for the compensatory mitigation‐site, Success criteria and performance standards, Reporting requirements, and Contingency measures and funding mechanisms. Crossing structure designs and the Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall be prepared by the applicant and shall be submitted to for review and approval by the City prior to the approval of grading and construction permits. Any required permits shall be obtained from the state and federal agencies prior to issuance of grading permits. The Environmental Monitor shall monitor environmental compliance of the construction activities throughout the construction period or as stipulated in the Mitigation and Monitoring Plan and provide monitoring reports to the City. City of San Luis Obispo Cultural Resources CR‐2(a) Retain a Qualified Principal Investigator In accordance with the City’s Conservation and Open Space Policies 3.5.6 and 3.5.7, a qualified principal investigator, defined as an archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for professional archaeology (hereafter qualified archaeologist), shall be retained to carry out all mitigation measures related to archaeological resources. Monitoring shall involve inspection of subsurface construction disturbance in the immediate vicinity of known sites, or at locations that may harbor buried resources that were not identified on the site surface. A Native American monitor shall also be present because the area is a culturally‐sensitive location. The monitor(s) shall be on‐site on a full‐time basis during earthmoving activities, including grading, trenching, vegetation removal, or other excavation activities. The project applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist prior to the issuance of grading permits. The City shall confirm the qualifications of and approve the applicant’s choice of a qualified archaeologist. The City shall inspect the site periodically during grading and demolition to ensure compliance with this measure. City of San Luis Obispo City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed-Use Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Response to Comments 9 Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Monitoring Responsible Agency or Party Compliance Verification Initial Date Comments CR‐2(b) Extended Phase I (XPI) Testing Program An extended phase I (XPI) testing program, utilizing standard shovel test pits and/or hand auguring at arbitrary levels, shall be conducted for development activity that would require ground disturbance within the potential off‐site improvement areas, including riparian areas associated with the Orcutt Creek and Acacia Creek corridors, and in riparian areas immediately north of the project site. If the XPI program identifies subsurface deposits that cannot be avoided by project design, a Phase II evaluation program shall be prepared to determine whether development would significantly impact identified resources. If the Phase II evaluation program identifies identified resources as significant, a Phase III data recovery program shall be prepared and implemented. The purpose of the Phase III data recovery program is to recover, analyze, interpret, report, curate, and preserve archaeological data that would otherwise be destroyed. The testing and evaluation programs shall be prepared by a qualified archaeologist prior to the issuance of grading permits, and shall be submitted for review and approval by the City prior to the approval of grading and construction permits. The qualified archaeologist shall monitor compliance with testing and evaluation program requirements during implementation of the testing and evaluation programs. The project applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist prior to the issuance of grading permits. If resources are found, the project applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist and Native American monitor prior to the issuance of grading permits. The City shall confirm the qualifications of and approve the applicant’s choice of a qualified archaeologist. The City shall inspect the site periodically during grading and demolition to ensure compliance with this measure. The City shall review construction plans and periodically inspect project construction to ensure compliance with these measures. City of San Luis Obispo CR‐2(c) Unanticipated Discovery of Cultural Resources If cultural resources are encountered during ground‐disturbing activities, work in the immediate area must halt and an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for archaeology (NPS 1983) should be contacted immediately to evaluate the find. If the discovery proves to be significant under CEQA, additional work such as data recovery excavation and Native American consultation may be warranted to mitigate any significant impacts. The requirement that construction work be stopped in the event of discovery of archaeological resources shall be included on construction plans prior to the issuance of grading permits. The City shall inspect the site periodically during grading and demolition to ensure compliance with this measure. The City shall review construction plans and periodically inspect project construction to ensure compliance with these measures. City of San Luis Obispo CR‐3(a) Paleontological Monitoring Prior to the commencement of ground disturbing activities under the project, a qualified professional paleontologist shall be retained to conduct paleontological monitoring during project ground disturbing activities. The Qualified Paleontologist (Principal Paleontologist) shall have at least a Master’s Degree or equivalent work experience in paleontology, shall have knowledge of the local paleontology, and shall be familiar with paleontological procedures and techniques. Ground disturbing construction activities (including grading, trenching, drilling with an auger greater than 3 feet in diameter, and other excavation) within previously undisturbed sediments at depths greater than six feet shall be monitored on a full‐time basis. Monitoring shall be supervised by the Qualified Paleontologist and shall be conducted by a qualified paleontological monitor, who is defined as an individual who meets the minimum qualifications per standards set forth by the SVP (2010), which includes a B.S. or B.A. degree in geology or paleontology with one year of monitoring experience and knowledge of collection and salvage of paleontological resources. The duration and timing of the monitoring shall be determined by the Qualified The project applicant shall retain the qualified paleontologist prior to the issuance of grading permits. Prior to the issuance of any construction related permits, the City shall confirm that the training of construction personnel has occurred. During initial ground disturbance, the project applicant shall ensure that the qualified paleontologist is on‐site and monitoring during these activities. Prior to initial ground disturbance, the City shall confirm the qualifications of and approve the applicant’s choice of the qualified paleontologist. The City shall inspect the site periodically during grading and demolition to ensure compliance with this measure. The City shall review construction plans and periodically inspect project construction to ensure compliance with these measures. City of San Luis Obispo City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed-Use Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Response to Comments 10 Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Monitoring Responsible Agency or Party Compliance Verification Initial Date Comments Paleontologist. If the Qualified Paleontologist determines that full‐time monitoring is no longer warranted, he or she may recommend reducing monitoring to periodic spot‐checking or cease entirely. Monitoring would be reinstated if any new ground disturbances are required and reduction or suspension would need to be reconsidered by the Qualified Paleontologist. Ground‐disturbing activity that does not exceed six feet in depth within Quaternary alluvium would not require paleontological monitoring. CR‐3(b) Fossil Discovery, Preparation, and Curation In the event that a paleontological resource is discovered, the monitor shall have the authority to temporarily divert the construction equipment around the find until it is assessed for scientific significance and collected. Once salvaged, significant fossils shall be identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level, prepared to a curation‐ready condition, and curated in a scientific institution with a permanent paleontological collection along with all pertinent field notes, photos, data, and maps. Curation fees are assessed by the repository, and are the responsibility of the project owner. During initial ground disturbance, the project applicant shall ensure that the qualified paleontologist is on‐site and monitoring during these activities. The City shall inspect the site periodically during grading and demolition to ensure compliance with this measure. The City shall review construction plans and periodically inspect project construction to ensure compliance with these measures. City of San Luis Obispo CR‐3(c) Final Paleontological Mitigation Report At the conclusion of laboratory work and museum curation, a final report shall be prepared describing the results of the paleontological mitigation monitoring efforts associated with the project. The report shall include a summary of the field and laboratory methods, an overview of the project geology and paleontology, a list of taxa recovered (if any), an analysis of fossils recovered (if any) and their scientific significance, and recommendations. The report shall be submitted to the lead agency(s) for the project. If the monitoring efforts produced fossils, then a copy of the report shall also be submitted to the designated museum repository. The Final Paleontological Monitoring Report shall be submitted to the City of San Luis Obispo once ground‐disturbing activities are finished. The City shall review and approval the Final Paleontological Monitoring Report. City of San Luis Obispo Geology and Soils GEO‐1 Site Geotechnical Study A geotechnical study shall be prepared for the project site prior to site development. This report shall include an analysis of the liquefaction potential of the underlying materials according to the most current liquefaction analysis procedures. If the site is confirmed to be in an area prone to seismically‐induced liquefaction, appropriate techniques to minimize liquefaction potential shall be prescribed and implemented. In addition to a liquefaction analysis, the Geotechnical Study shall include an evaluation of the potential for soil settlement and soil expansion beneath the project site. All on‐site structures shall comply with applicable methods of State and Local Building Codes. Future development of the site shall incorporate all applicable engineering requirements and recommendations as presented in the Geotechnical Study. Suitable measures to reduce liquefaction, settlement, and soil expansion impacts may include one or more of the following techniques, as determined by a registered geotechnical engineer: Specialized design of foundations by a structural engineer; Removal or treatment of liquefiable soils to reduce the potential for liquefaction; The Applicant shall submit a geotechnical study in accordance with this mitigation measure for approval prior to site development. Applicable engineering requirements shall be incorporated into project site plans submitted for approval before the issuance of grading and building permits. The Community Development Department shall verify compliance prior to issuance of grading permits. The Community Development Department shall site inspect to ensure development is in accordance with approved plans prior to occupancy clearance. Community Development staff shall verify installation in accordance with approved building plans. City of San Luis Obispo City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed-Use Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Response to Comments 11 Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Monitoring Responsible Agency or Party Compliance Verification Initial Date Comments In‐situ densification of soils or other alterations to the ground characteristics; or Other alterations to the ground characteristics. Excavation and re‐compaction of on‐site or imported soils; Treatment of existing soils by mixing a chemical grout into the soils prior to re‐compaction; or Foundation design that can accommodate certain amounts of differential settlement such as post tensional slab and/or ribbed foundations designed in accordance with the California Building Code. Hydrology and Water Quality HYD‐1 Conditional Letter of Map Revision/Letter of Map Revision The applicant shall prepare the CLOMR application and obtain a LOMR from FEMA. The applicant shall prepare the CLOMR application and submit it to FEMA. The City will confirm that FEMA has approved the CLOMR prior to issuance of a grading permit, and LOMR prior to issuance of a building permit. City of San Luis Obispo Noise N‐1 Interior Noise Reduction If the final project site design includes residential units facing Tank Farm Road in the structures located closest to Tank Farm Road, the project site developer shall implement the following measures, or similar combination of measures, which demonstrate that interior noise levels in residences facing Tank Farm Road would be reduced below the City’s 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard. The required interior noise reduction shall be achieved through a combination of standard interior noise reduction techniques, which may include (but are not limited to): In order for windows and doors to remain closed, mechanical ventilation such as air conditioning shall be provided for all units facing Tank Farm Road (passive ventilation may be provided, if mechanical ventilation is not necessary to achieve interior noise standards, as demonstrated by a qualified acoustical consultant). All exterior walls shall be constructed with a minimum STC rating of 50, consisting of construction of 2 inch by 4 inch wood studs with one layer of 5/8 inch Type “X” gypsum board on each side of resilient channels on 24 inch centers and 3 ½ inch fiberglass insulation. All windows and glass doors shall be rated STC 39 or higher such that the noise reduction provided will satisfy the interior noise standard of 45 dBA CNEL. An acoustical test report of all the sound‐rated windows and doors shall be provided to the City for review by a qualified acoustical consultant to ensure that the selected windows and doors in combination with wall assemblies would reduce interior noise levels sufficiently to meet the City’s interior noise standard. All vent ducts connecting interior spaces to the exterior (i.e., bathroom exhaust, etc.) shall have at least two 90 degree turns in the duct. All windows and doors facing Tank Farm Road shall be installed in an acoustically‐effective manner. Sliding window panels shall form an air‐tight seal when in the closed position and the window frames shall be caulked to the wall opening around the perimeter with a non‐hardening caulking compound to prevent sound infiltration. Exterior doors shall seal air‐tight These requirements shall be incorporated into all the building plan submittals. The Community Development Department shall verify compliance prior to approval of the building plans and shall verify installation in accordance with approved building plans. City of San Luis Obispo City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed-Use Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Response to Comments 12 Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Monitoring Responsible Agency or Party Compliance Verification Initial Date Comments around the full perimeter when in the closed position. The applicant shall submit a report to the Community Development Department by a qualified acoustical consultant certifying that the specific interior noise reduction techniques included in residential, hotel, and office components of the project would achieve interior noise levels that would not exceed 45 dBA CNEL. N‐2(a) Construction Equipment Best Management Practices For all construction activity at the project site, noise attenuation techniques shall be employed to ensure that noise levels are maintained within levels allowed by the City of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, Title 9, Chapter 9.12 (Noise Control). Such techniques shall include: Sound blankets on noise‐generating equipment. Stationary construction equipment that generates noise levels above 60 dBA at the project boundaries shall be shielded with barriers that meet a sound transmission class (a rating of how well noise barriers attenuate sound) of 25. All diesel equipment shall be operated with closed engine doors and shall be equipped with factory‐recommended mufflers. For stationary equipment, the applicant shall designate equipment areas with appropriate acoustic shielding on building and grading plans. Equipment and shielding shall be installed prior to construction and remain in the designated location throughout construction activities. Electrical power shall be used to power air compressors and similar power tools. The movement of construction‐related vehicles, with the exception of passenger vehicles, along roadways adjacent to sensitive receptors shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM, Monday through Saturday. No movement of heavy equipment shall occur on Sundays or official holidays (e.g., Thanksgiving, Labor Day). Temporary sound barriers shall be constructed between the construction site and the single‐family residence to the southeast. Construction plans shall note construction hours, truck routes, and construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) and shall be submitted to the City for approval prior to grading and building permit issuance for each project phase. BMPs shall be identified and described for submittal to the City for review and approval prior to building or grading permit issuance. BMPs shall be adhered to for the duration of the project. All construction workers shall be briefed at a pre‐construction meeting on how, why, and where BMP measures are to be implemented. City staff shall ensure compliance throughout all construction phases. Building inspectors and permit compliance staff shall periodically inspect the site for compliance with activity schedules and respond to complaints. City of San Luis Obispo N‐2(b) Neighboring Property Owner Notification and Construction Noise Complaints The contractor shall inform the property owner of the single‐family residence to the southeast of the project site of proposed construction timelines and noise complaint procedures to minimize potential annoyance related to construction noise. Proof of mailing the notice shall be provided to the Community Development Department before the City issues a zoning clearance. Signs shall be in place before beginning of and throughout grading and construction activities. Noise‐related complaints shall be directed to the City’s Community Development Department. The applicant shall provide and post signs stating these restrictions at construction site entries. Signs shall be posted prior to commencement of construction and maintained throughout construction. Schedule and neighboring property owner notification mailing list shall be submitted 10 days prior to initiation of any earth movement. The Community Development department shall confirm that construction noise reduction measures are incorporated in plans prior to approval of grading/building permit issuance. All construction workers shall be briefed at a pre‐construction meeting on construction hour limitations. A workday schedule will be adhered to for the duration of construction for all phases. City staff shall ensure compliance throughout all construction phases. Building inspectors and permit compliance staff shall periodically inspect the site for compliance with activity schedules and respond to complaints. City of San Luis Obispo Transportation/Traffic T‐1 Broad Street/Tank Farm Road Intersection Improvements The project applicant shall pay fair share costs for required intersection improvements to address the project’s identified queueing impact at the Broad The City shall calculate the fair share costs required for payment by the applicant. The applicant shall pay fair share costs upon acceptance by the City of final design plans and in accordance with the timing of improvements. A The City shall verify payment of fair share costs (or inclusion of a vehicular connection to the adjacent site to the east on project site plans) upon acceptance by the City of final design plans. City of San Luis Obispo City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed-Use Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Response to Comments 13 Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Monitoring Responsible Agency or Party Compliance Verification Initial Date Comments Street/Tank Farm Road intersection. Required intersection improvements include: Broad Street/Tank Farm Road: Re‐stripe the existing cross‐sectional width to provide a second southbound left turn lane. Alternatively, the identified queueing impact at the Broad Street/Tank Farm Road intersection would be eliminated if the applicant provides a vehicular connection to the adjacent site to the east, which would allow use of the traffic signal at Industrial Way. funding mechanism shall be established as a condition of project approval. Otherwise, the City shall verify that a vehicular connection to the adjacent site to the east, which would allow use of the traffic signal at Industrial Way, is provided on project site plans. T‐2 Fair Share Costs for Required Intersection Improvements The project applicant shall pay fair share costs for required intersection improvements to address the project’s contribution to identified cumulative intersection level of service and queueing impacts. Required intersection improvements include: Tank Farm Road/South Higuera Street: Install a second southbound left turn lane. Tank Farm Road/Santa Fe Road: Install a multi‐lane roundabout. Broad Street/Industrial Way: Convert the east and west approaches from split phasing to permissive phasing and restripe both approaches to provide dedicated left turn lanes and shared through/right turn lanes. Broad Street/Tank Farm Road: Add a second southbound left turn lane, add a dedicated northbound right turn lane, convert the westbound right turn lane to a shared through/right lane, and establish time‐of‐day timing plans. The City shall calculate the fair share costs required for payment by the applicant for development of the project site. The applicant shall pay fair share costs upon acceptance by the City of final design plans and in accordance with the timing of improvements. A funding mechanism shall be established as a condition of project approval. The City shall verify payment of fair share costs upon acceptance by the City of final design plans and in accordance with the timing of improvements. City of San Luis Obispo Utilities and Service Systems UT‐1 Wastewater Reduction Measures Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall define and incorporate into the project design an Inflow and Infiltration reduction strategy consistent with the City’s Wastewater Infrastructure Renewal Strategy. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the developer shall be required to implement, and demonstrate off‐site sewer rehabilitation that results in quantifiable inflow and infiltration reduction in the City’s wastewater collection system in sub‐basin A1, A2, A3, A4, B.2 or B.3 in an amount equal to offset the project’s wastewater flow increase. This may be satisfied by one of the following: Sufficient reductions in wastewater flow within sub‐basins A1, A2, A3, A4, B.2 or B.3, commensurate with the additional wastewater flow contributed by the project, to be achieved by the verified replacement of compromised private sewer laterals, or public sewer mains, either by the developer, or any property owner located within said basins; or Participation in a sewer lateral replacement program, or similar inflow and infiltration reduction program to be developed by City if program is in place prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy; or any other off‐site sewer rehabilitation proposed by the developer and approved by the Utilities Director, which will achieve a reduction in wastewater flow commensurate with the additional wastewater flow contributed by the project. The final selection of the inflow and infiltration reduction project will be approved by the Utilities Director. The applicant shall incorporate wastewater reduction measures into development plans and submit evidence to the Utilities Department that these provisions would result in quantifiable inflow and infiltration reduction in the City’s wastewater collection system in sub‐basin A1, A2, A3, A4, B.2 or B.3 in an amount equal to offset the project’s wastewater flow increase. The Utilities Department shall verify compliance prior to issuance of building permits. City of San Luis Obispo City of San Luis Obispo 650 Tank Farm Road Mixed-Use Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Response to Comments 14 Mitigation Measure Plan Requirements and Timing Monitoring Responsible Agency or Party Compliance Verification Initial Date Comments UT‐2 Water Reduction Measures Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall define and incorporate into the project design water reduction measures consistent with the City’s Recycled Water Master Plan. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the developer shall be required to implement, and demonstrate water offsets that result in quantifiable water demand reductions in the City’s potable water distribution system with an amount equal to offset the project’s water flow increase. This may be satisfied by one of the following: Sufficient reductions in potable water demands, commensurate with the additional water demands contributed by the project, to be achieved by verified conversions of existing irrigation system from potable water to recycled water systems located within the City’s potable water distribution system; Participation in the construction of new mains for the recycled water transmission system; or construction of any other recycled water main proposed by the developer and approved by the Utilities Director, which will achieve a reduction in potable water demands commensurate with the additional water demands contributed by the project. The applicant shall incorporate water reduction measures into development plans and submit evidence to the Utilities Department that these provisions would result in quantifiable water demand reductions in the City’s potable water distribution system with an amount equal to offset the project’s water flow increase. The Utilities Department shall verify compliance prior to issuance of building permits. City of San Luis Obispo