HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-07-2019 Item 06 - Contract award for Anholm Neighborhood Greenway Phase 1A - Foothill Crossing
Department Name: Public Works
Cost Center: 5010
For Agenda of: May 7, 2019
Placement: Consent
Estimated Time: N/A
FROM: Daryl R. Grigsby, Director of Public Works
Prepared By: Luke Schwartz, Interim Transportation Manager
SUBJECT: CONTRACT AWARD FOR ANHOLM NEIGHBORHOOD GREENWAY
PHASE 1A—FOOTHILL CROSSING
RECOMMENDATION
1. Award a contract to Lee Wilson Electric Company, Inc. in the amount of $296,549.75 for the
Anholm Neighborhood Greenway Phase 1A—Foothill Crossing Project, Specification No.
91619; and
2. Approve the following budget transfers:
a. $1,063.17 from the Bicycle Transportation Plan Implementation account (Spec. No.
91373) to the project account (Spec. No. 91619); and
b. $37,891.91 from the Concrete Streets & Accessibility Improvements 2016 account (Spec.
No. 91455) to the project account (Spec. No. 91619); and
c. $28,802.16 from the Traffic Safety and Operations accounts (Spec. No. 90558, 91295) to
the project account (Spec. No. 91619).
DISCUSSION
Background
On February 5, 2019, the City Council approved Plans and Specifications and authorized inviting
bids for the Anholm Neighborhood Greenway Phase 1A—Foothill Crossing Project,
Specification Number 91619. The Council action on February 5th also authorized the City
Manager to award the construction contract if the lowest responsible bid was within the Publicly
Disclosed Funding amount of $257,000, representing the Engineer’s Estimate of $233,000 plus
10 percent contingency. A copy of the staff report authorizing advertisement for the Anholm
Neighborhood Greenway Phase 1A—Foothill Crossing Project is provided for reference.
(Attachment A)
Bids were opened April 4, 2019 and Lee Wilson Electric Company, Inc. was the lowest
responsible bidder with a proposal of $296,549.75 for the total project. This bid was higher than
the Engineer’s Estimate of $233,000 by $63,549.75 and exceeded the total approved budget for
award of the construction contract. Staff has observed continuing increases in construction costs
with a relatively strong economy and active construction market within the region. This is
particularly evident with higher observed construction costs for recent traffic signal projects —a
trend that will be reflected more conservatively in future cost estimates for City traffic signal
projects, including Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon installations.
Packet Pg. 21
Item 6
The Contractor’s references, license and registration with the Department of Industrial Relations
have been verified (See attached Bid Summary, Attachment B). Because lowest responsible bid
exceeds the Engineer’s Estimate and amount previously authorized by Council, staff is returning
to Council to request approval of the recommended budget transfers to fund the project, and
award of the construction contract to Lee Wilson Electric Company, Inc. Because the Anholm
Neighborhood Greenway Phase 1A—Foothill Crossing project strongly supports the City’s
Major City Goal for Sustainable Transportation, has been identified as a high-priority
bicycle/pedestrian safety project per the City’s Vision Zero/Traffic Safety Program, adopted Safe
Routes to School Plans, and per the City’s Active Transportation Committee, Staff is
recommending the proposed budget transfers in order to fully fund the project and proceed with
construction.
Previous Council Action
On February 5th, 2019, the City Council approved plans and specifications for the Anholm
Neighborhood Greenway Phase 1A – Foothill Crossing project. As part of this action, Council
also authorized staff to formally advertise for bids, authorized the City Manager to award the
construction contract if the lowest bid was within the approved funding amount.
Policy Context
In addition to supporting the 2019-21 adopted Major City, the project is identified as the highest-
priority improvement in the Safe Routes to School Plan for Bishop’s Peak and Pacheco
Elementary Schools, the Anholm Neighborhood Greenway Plan, and is identified in the City’s
2013 Bicycle Transportation Plan as a “First Priority” project.
Public Engagement
Prior to adoption of both the Anholm Neighborhood Greenway Plan and Safe Routes to School
Plan, numerous public outreach opportunities were organized to invite community input,
including neighborhood outreach meetings, design charrettes, project websites and online
discussion forums, and presentations to the City Council and Active Transportation Committee.
These outreach activities included targeted noticing to residents and businesses located within
proximity of the proposed projects, as well as citywide notifications via email, newspaper ads
and social media posts.
Prior to taking the Anholm Neighborhood Greenway Phase 1A plans for approval, targeted
notices were sent to Ferrini Road residents, as well as Pacheco Elementary representatives, to
provide an update on the status of the project the design decision to install traffic calming
elements (speed humps) along Ferrini in lieu of parking removal for a dedicated cycle track. As
part of this noticing, residents were encouraged to contact Transportation Staff or provide
comment to the Council for this agenda item if they wish to share any further questions or
comments regarding this project.
Packet Pg. 22
Item 6
CONCURRENCE
The Active Transportation Committee (ATC) and Fire Department previously reviewed the
project construction plans and provided concurrence prior to advertising for construction.
Recommended budget transfers have been approved by the Public Works Director and City
Engineer.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
See February 5, 2019, staff report (Attachment A) for environmental review discussion. No
additional environmental review is required in conjunction with this request.
FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: Yes Budget Year: 2017-18
Funding Identified: Yes
Fiscal Analysis:
The project had an original budget of $198,000 which was augmented by a $100,000 grant from
SLOCOG. To date, funding has been expended for an easement purchase and the procurement of
signal equipment, leaving approximately $258,000 allocated to the project. After receipt of
construction bids, the total project construction costs are summarized as follows:
Construction Cost (Lowest Responsible Bid): $296,549.75
Contingency (10%) $29,654.98
Total $326,204.73
The shortfall to move forward with construction is proposed to be funded as summarized below
in Table 1.
Table 1: Recommended Budget Transfers
Project Account Available
Budget
Proposed
Transfer
Remaining
Balance
BTP Implementation
(Spec. #91373) $1,063.17 ($1,063.17) $0
Concrete Streets & Accessibility
Improvements 2016 (Spec. #91455) $37,891.91 ($37,891.91) $0
Traffic Safety Report 2015-17
Implementation (Spec. #90558) $2,703.00 ($2,703.00) $0
Transportation Safety & Operations
2017-19 (Spec. #91295) $53,874.40 ($26,099.16) $27,774.84
Total $67,757.25
Packet Pg. 23
Item 6
Staff is recommending that $67,757.25 be transferred to the project account from the Bicycle
Transportation Plan (BTP) Implementation, Traffic Safety and Transportation Operations, and
Concrete Streets & Accessibility Improvements accounts to provide funding needed to proceed
with construction. The recommendation to proceed with the budget transfers is based on staff’s
assessment and determination that reallocating funds will not impede the ability to proceed with
implementation of the City’s ongoing commitments under the BTP, concrete street and
accessibility improvements, or traffic safety and operations programs. The following summary
provides an update on the status of current project commitments under these programs and how
the proposed budget reallocations will affect these projects:
1. Concrete Streets & Accessibility Improvements 2016
a. Project improvements under this program have been completed and remaining funds are
not currently allocated to other project commitments. The Foothill Crossing Project
includes concrete work to improve existing stormwater drainage, and to bring existing
pedestrian facilities at the Foothill/Ferrini intersection to compliance per current ADA
requirements; thus, Staff considers this to be an appropriate use of these carryover funds.
2. Transportation Safety and Operations 2017-19
a. Current project commitments under the Traffic Safety and Operations Program require
approximately $285,000 to complete. This includes all financially-constrained projects
identified in the Staff Reports presented to Council for the three most recently published
Annual Traffic Safety and Operations Reports. The current funding balance allocated to
these improvements after accounting for the requested budget transfer is approximately
$294,000, which is expected to sufficiently fund implementation of remaining projects.
Implementation of the Anholm Neighborhood Greenway Project was recommended as a
high-priority project in the 2017 Traffic Safety Report to address high collision rates
along Foothill Boulevard; thus, Staff considers this to be an appropriate use of Traffic
Safety and Operations program funds.
b. It should be noted that the total estimate of $285,000 for Traffic Safety & Operations
project costs cited above reflects an adjustment to the estimated costs for the planned
installation of Speed Feedback Signs at the California/Monterey intersection—a project
recommended in the 2015 Traffic Safety Report. The original cost estimate of $60,000
has been revised to $30,000 to reflect a refined design approach to the improvements at
this intersection, which is now proposed to include illuminated “Yield to Bike” warning
signs in lieu of Speed Feedback Signs.
Packet Pg. 24
Item 6
Table 2 below provides an overall summary of Project funding.
Table 2: Project Funding Summary
Funding Sources
Current FY
Cost
Annualized
On-going Cost
Total Project
Cost
General Fund $67,757.25 $3,000 $67,757.25
State
Federal
Fees
Other:
SB 1 Road Repair Fund $158,447.48 $158,447.48
SLOCOG Grant $100,000 $100,000
Total $326,204.73 $326,204.73
ALTERNATIVES
Deny or Defer Award. The Council could choose to deny or defer the approval to award this
project. Staff does not recommend this option, as this is a high-priority project for the ATC and
will provide significant benefits in supporting the City’s safe routes to school and mode share
goals. Additionally, construction material and labor costs may continue to rise, and additional
funds may be required if the project is delayed further.
Attachments:
a - 91619 Council Authorization to Advertise
b - 91619 Bid Summary
c - 91619 Contract
Packet Pg. 25
Item 6
Department Name: Public Works
Cost Center: 5010
For Agenda of: February 5, 2019
Placement: Consent Item
Estimated Time: 0 Minutes
FROM: Daryl Grigsby, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Luke Schwartz, Transportation Planner-Engineer
SUBJECT: ANHOLM BIKEWAY PHASE 1A – FOOTHILL CROSSING
RECOMMENDATION
1.Approve plans and specifications for the Anholm Bikeway Phase 1 A – Foothill Crossing
project, Specification No. 91619; and
2.Authorize staff to formally advertise for bids; and
3.Authorize the City Manager to award the construction contract if the lowest responsible bid
is within the Publicly Disclosed Funding Amount of $257,000.
4.Adopt a resolution renaming the “Anholm Bikeway Plan” to the “Anholm Neighborhood
Greenway Plan” (Attachment E).
DISCUSSION
Background
In August 2017, the City Council adopted a Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Plan for Bishop’s
Peak and Pacheco Elementary Schools. The SRTS Plan provides a blueprint to guide
transportation infrastructure investments, traffic enforcement strategies, educat ion and outreach
programs to make active transportation modes—walking and bicycling—more viable options for
students and families traveling to school. Based on community input, the highest -priority
improvement project recommended in the SRTS Plan was the installation of an enhanced bicycle
and pedestrian crossing at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Ferrini Road.
Building off the recommendations of the SRTS Plan, the City Council adopted the Anholm
Bikeway Plan (previously “Broad Street Bicycle B oulevard”) in April 2018, with additional plan
amendments approved in September 2018. The Anholm Bikeway Plan defines a series of
physical improvements to develop a low-stress route for bicyclists and pedestrians of all ages and
ability levels connecting t he downtown with Foothill Boulevard and the neighborhoods to the
north.
Packet Pg. 26
Item 6
The Anholm Bikeway Plan recommends construction of improvements in three phases, with the
elements that support SRTS connections near Foothill Boulevard at the north end of the corridor
prioritized in Phase 1, including:
•Signalized pedestrian/bicycle crossing at Foothill & Ferrini
•Class I Bike/Pedestrian Path through the LDS Church Property (Foothill to Ramona)
•Ramona Drive Protected Bike Lanes (from Class I Path to Broad Street)
It should be noted that the Class I Path proposed through the LDS Church property was also
identified in the SRTS Plan as the 2nd highest priority improvement project .
Supporting Multimodal Transportation as a Major City Goal, the City’s 2017 -19 Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP) allocated funding for design and construction of the SRTS
Foothill/Ferrini Crossing project and Phase 1 of the Anholm Bikeway .
The final SRTS Plan and Anholm Bikeway Plan are provided for reference as Attachment A and
B, respectfully.
Project Scope of Work
The bid package discussed in this staff report includes plans and specifications for construction
of the bicycle/pedestrian crossing at the Foothill/Ferrini intersection only—referred to herein as
“Anholm Bikeway Phase 1A.” The remaining Anholm Bikeway “Phase 1B” improvements,
which include the Class I Path and Ramona Protected Bike Lanes, are currently under design
with plans to return to Council a request to advertise for construction during the 2nd quarter of
2019. The Anholm Bikeway Phase 1 project components have been separated into a Phase 1A
and Phase 1B because the designs for the Foothill/Ferrini crossing are complete now and the
safety benefits of this crossing can be realized by the community more urgently by advancing
this component of the project to construction first.
The Foothill/Ferrini crossing improvements will include installation of a Pedestrian Hybrid
Beacon (PHB), often referred to as a “HAWK Signal.” PHBs are often used to improve non-
motorized crossings of ma jor streets in locations where conditions do not warrant installation of
a conventional traffic signal. Per the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), on average,
PHBs reduce overall collision rates by 29%, with a reduction to pedestrian collision rates of
69%. This device provides the user experience and comfort of a traditional signalized crossing
for pedestrians and bicyclists crossing from the side street (Ferrini), with less disruption to
vehicle traffic flows on the major street (Foothill). Pedestria ns and bicyclists will have dedicated
signal heads to control crossing phases, while vehicle traffic on the major street is controlled via
flashing beacons mounted over the roadway on conventional traffic signal poles. From the motor
vehicle driver’s persp ective, PHB operations are somewhat different from the operations of
standard traffic signals and this will be the first installation in San Luis Obispo. For this reason,
staff will conduct a public information campaign prior to installation of the PHB sys tem to
educate community members on how to use this device. With several other PHB installations
planned throughout the city in the coming years, this campaign will help reduce the learning
curve for users.
Packet Pg. 27
Item 6
The construction plans include the following elements in addition to the PHB system installation:
•High-visibility pedestrian crosswalk and dedicated bicycle crossing markings
•ADA curb ramp and path-of-travel upgrades
•New overhead street lighting to improve night time visibility at crossing
•Curb-separated bike lane at the Ferrini intersection approach to provide additional protection
for cyclists at the crossing
•Bicycle left -turn box to facilitate the left -turn from westbound Foothill to the future Class I
Path using PHB crossing signal
•Speed humps, shared lane markings (sharrows), and route signage along Ferrini between
Foothill and Pacheco Elementary to calm traffic and convey a priority bicycle route.
Attachment C includes a project fact sheet with a simplified summary of the project design
element s and an overview of how a PHB system operates. Construction plans and specifications
are provided as Attachment D.
Feasibility of Protected Bike Lanes on Ferrini Road
In conjunction with approval of the SRTS Plan in 2017, the Council asked staff to stud y the
feasibility of incorporating protected bike lanes along Ferrini Road to complete a low-stress
bicycle connection between the new crossing, Pacheco Elementary and the future bicycle
boulevard along Cerro Romauldo. Staff has conducted a detailed review of existing physical
constraints, traffic and parking conditions, and best practices for bicycle facility planning. Based
on the findings of this analysis, staff is not recommending the installation of protected bike lanes
on Ferrini at this time for the following reasons:
•Ferrini Road does not have sufficient width to provide dedicated bike lanes without removal
of on-street parking on both sides of the street (approximately 30-50 spaces would be
eliminated).
•Per parking occupancy surveys conducted for the Anholm Bikeway Plan in 2017, peak street
parking utilization currently exceeds 90% along Ferrini Road and along nearby side streets.
Removal of parking would create a deficit that could not be easily absorbed along other
streets and driveways within reasonable walking distance.
•Current bicycle facility planning best practices, such as guidance published by the National
Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) and the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), suggests that the traffic volumes alo ng Ferrini Road (<1,000
veh/day) are within the acceptable thresholds for a low -stress shared street where cyclists and
drivers share travel lanes. However, additional traffic calming would be required to bring
traffic speeds into the ideal range recommended for a low-stress shared street; thus, speed
humps and shared lane markings are proposed along Ferrini in lieu of dedicated bike lanes.
Staff proposes to formally designate Ferrini Road as a Class III Bike Route as part of the
upcoming Active Transport ation Plan development to link the Anholm Bikeway with the future
Cerro Romauldo Bicycle Boulevard, Pacheco Elementary and Cal Poly to the north.
Packet Pg. 28
Item 6
Anholm Bikeway Plan Renaming
Initially improvements envisioned for the Anholm Neighborhood under the City’s Bicycle
Transportation Plan were bicycling focused. However, the scope of the plan ultimately adopted
was substantially broadened to include pedestrian, landscaping, and aesthetic improvements. The
current title as a Bikeway Plan is not reflective of the scope and scale of improvements adopted
under that plan. Therefore, staff is recommending that the Anholm Bikeway Plan be renamed.
Consistent with the City Climate Action Plan, development of a sustainable project branding
program is currently underway which would apply to sustainable infrastructure and include
project naming conventions, icons, & logos. Consistent with the effort , its recommended that the
new name for the Anholm Bikeway Plan be the “Anholm Neighborhood Greenway”. Although
the Foothill Crossing plans do not include physical branding at this time, once physical branding
conventions and graphics are adopted those can easily be retrofitted to the equipment being
constructed as part of this project. The proposed change only affects the name of the plan, all
other elements remain as previously adopted.
Public Engagement
Prior to adoption of both the Anholm Bikeway Plan and SRTS Plan, numerous public outreach
opportunities were organized to invite community input, including neighborhood outreach
meetings, design charrettes, project websites and online discussion forums, and presentations to
the City Council and Active Transportation Committee. These outreach activities included
targeted noticing to residents and businesses located within proximit y of the proposed projects,
as well as citywide notifications via email, newspaper ads and social media posts.
Prior to taking the Anholm Bikeway Phase 1A plans for approval, targeted notices were sent to
Ferrini Road residents, as well as Pacheco Elementary representatives, to provide an update on
the status of the project the design decision to install traffic calming elements (speed humps)
along Ferrini in lieu of parking removal for a dedicated cycle track. As part of this noticing,
residents were encouraged to contact Transportation Staff or provide comment to the Council for
this agenda item if they wish to share any further questions or comments regarding this project.
CONCURRENCE
Draft construction plans were presented to the City’s Active Transp ortation Committee (ATC)
for review in November 2018. The ATC members commented on design of the bicycle crossing
markings, turn restrictions for motor vehicles on Ferrini during the PHB crossing sequence, and
design of the southern curb ramp to allow convenient ingress/egress for bikes. All of these
comments have been addressed in the final designs.
Project plans were also reviewed by City Fire Department staff to assess potential concerns to
emergency response providers related to the PHB system and/or proposed traffic calming devices
along Ferrini. The Fire Department did not have any concerns associated with these plans, as
long as any new speed humps are constructed per City Engineering Standards.
Packet Pg. 29
Item 6
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
With approval of the SRTS Plan on August 15, 2017 (Resolution No. 10828 2017 Series), the City
Council approved amendments to the City’s 2013 Bicycle Transportation Plan (BTP) to include the
transportation improvement projects recommended in the SRTS Plan, including the Foothill/Ferrini
Crossing and Multiuse Path through the LDS Church property. As part of that action, the Council
adopted an Addendum to the 2013 BTP Initial Study/Negative Declaration (ER 71-13), finding that
the amendments to the 2013 BTP did not result in any new impacts not previously disclosed in the
adopted Negative Declaration, or increase the severity of any impact identified in the adopted
Negative Declaration. The design of proposed project is consistent with the design and analysis in
the BTP and therefore, no additional CEQA analysis is required for this project at this time.
FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: Yes Budget Year: 2017-18
Funding Identified: Yes
Fiscal Analysis:
The total construction cost for the Anholm Bikeway Phase 1A—Foothill Crossing project is
estimated at $257,000, including $24,200 in contingencies.
A total of $633,000 from SB1 and Measure G funding was allocated for this project in the 2017-
19 Financial Plan under two CIP project descriptions: SRTS Implementation-Foothill Crossing
(Spec. #91376), and Broad Street Bike Boulevard (now “Anholm Bikeway”) (Spec. #91619).
Since adoption of the FY2017-19 Financial Plan, the City was also awarded a $100,000 SRTS
grant from SLOCOG for construction of the Foothill Crossing and Anholm Bikeway Phase 1
improvements, bringing the project funding total to $733,000. To date, $474,363 has been used
or encumbered from these project accounts for property acquisition, project design, and advance
order of traffic signal equipment that requires a lengthy lead time for procurement—leaving a
balance of $258,637 available for construction.
Remaining project funding sources include the SB 1 Road Repair Fund and SLOCOG Safe
Routes to School grant.
Funding Sources
Total Budget
Available
Current Funding
Request
Remaining
Balance
Annual
Ongoing Cost
General Fund $3,000
State
Federal
Fees
Other:
SB 1 Road Repair Fund $158,637 $157,000 $1,637
SLOCOG Grant $100,000 $100,000
Total $258,637 $257,000 $1,637 $3,000
Packet Pg. 30
Item 6
ALTERNATIVES
The Council may choose not to authorize advertising for construction at this time. However, this
is not recommended because there is adequate funding for the project, the improvements will
provide a much-desired safe route to school crossing for bicyclists and pedestrians traveling to
the nearby elementary schools, and this project will set up a critical first link for the Anholm
Bikeway to connect Foothill Boulevard with Downtown San Luis Obispo.
Attachments:
a - Council Reading File - Safe Routes to School Plan for Bishop's Peak and Pacheco
Elementary
b - Council Reading File - Anholm Bikeway Plan
c - Foothill/Ferrini Crossing Project Fact Sheet
d - Council Reading File - Plans and Specifications
e - Resolution
Packet Pg. 31
Item 6
Anholm Bikeway Phase 1A - Foothill Crossing, Specification No. 91619Bid Opening: 4/4/19Unit PriceItem TotalUnit PriceItem TotalUnit PriceItem TotalUnit PriceItem Total1 12 Traffic ControlLS 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $21,500.00 $21,500.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $37,850.00 $37,850.002 5 Construction Survey & Benchmark ResetLS1$1,500.00 $1,500.00 $4,700.00 $4,700.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $1,310.00 $1,310.003 15, 86 Install Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Signal SystemLS1$85,000.00 $85,000.00 $151,960.00 $151,960.00 $225,000.00 $225,000.00 $146,985.00 $146,985.004 15, 73 Curb Ramp Improvements at Foothill and Ferrini (Northwest and Northeast Corners)LS1$65,000.00 $65,000.00 $49,424.00 $49,424.00 $56,486.00 $56,486.00 $15,217.00 $15,217.005 15, 73 Curb Ramp Improvements at Foothill and Ferrini (Southwest Corner)LS1$15,000.00 $15,000.00 $21,855.00 $21,855.00 $24,980.00 $24,980.00 $15,217.00 $15,217.006, 56, 73, Median & Planter Box InstallationLS1$5,000.00 $5,000.00 $10,027.00 $10,027.00 $11,320.00 $11,320.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.007 15 Remove and Seal (E) Traffic StripeLS1$500.00 $500.00 $400.00 $400.00 $360.00 $360.00 $327.00 $327.008 15 Remove and Seal (E) Pavement MarkingLS1$500.00 $500.00 $200.00 $200.00 $300.00 $300.00$4.38$4.389 84 Traffic Stripe - Detail 22LF 40$2.00$80.00$4.00 $160.00$4.80 $192.00$21.83 $873.2010 84 Traffic Stripe - 24" WhiteLF 120$3.50 $420.00$13.00 $1,560.00$24.00 $2,880.00$10.91 $1,309.2011 84 Traffic Stripe - 12" WhiteLF 195$3.00 $585.00$8.00 $1,560.00$12.00 $2,340.00$6.53 $1,273.3512 84 Traffic Stripe - 8" WhiteLF 15$2.00$30.00$3.00$45.00$7.20 $108.00$3.28$49.2013 84 Traffic Stripe - 4" WhiteLF 29$1.50$43.50$2.00$58.00$3.60 $104.40$12.23 $354.6714 84 Green Paint Bike Lane CoatingSF 1345$8.00 $10,760.00$8.35 $11,230.75$14.40 $19,368.00$10.94 $14,714.3015 84 Bike Lane BufferLF 32$4.00 $128.00$9.00 $288.00$12.00 $384.00$10.94 $350.0816 84White Thermoplastic Pavement Markings(Arrows, Bike Lane Symbol, Sharrow Symbol, etc.)SQFT 612$10.00 $6,120.00$10.00 $6,120.00$14.40 $8,812.80$13.09 $8,011.0817 84 Road Bump Per City Eng. Std. 7320 (Type 1)EA3$5,000.00 $15,000.00 $2,104.00 $6,312.00 $2,405.00 $7,215.00 $1,636.00 $4,908.0018 56 Remove and Reinstall Existing Sign and PostEA2$300.00 $600.00 $250.00 $500.00 $480.00 $960.00 $275.00 $550.0019 56 R10-23 Sign on Signal Mast ArmEA2$300.00 $600.00 $350.00 $700.00 $128.00 $256.00 $275.00 $550.0020 56 W11-15 Sign on Signal Mast ArmEA2$300.00 $600.00 $350.00 $700.00 $193.00 $386.00 $275.00 $550.0021 56 R10-10b Sign on Signal PoleEA2$300.00 $600.00 $350.00 $700.00 $180.00 $360.00 $275.00 $550.0022 56 R10-23 Sign on Signal PoleEA1$300.00 $300.00 $350.00 $350.00 $128.00 $128.00 $272.00 $272.0023 56 R10-11 Sign on Signal PoleEA1$300.00 $300.00 $350.00 $350.00 $175.00 $175.00 $2,483.00 $2,483.0024 56 R7-9 Sign w/ PostEA1$600.00 $600.00 $250.00 $250.00 $600.00 $600.00 $550.00 $550.0025 56 R4-11 Sign w/ PostEA2$600.00 $1,200.00 $275.00 $550.00 $600.00 $1,200.00 $550.00 $1,100.0026 56 R10-6 Sign w/ PostEA2$600.00 $1,200.00 $275.00 $550.00 $600.00 $1,200.00 $550.00 $1,100.0027 56 D11-20L SignEA1$300.00 $300.00 $100.00 $100.00 $120.00 $120.00 $110.00 $110.0028 56 Type 2 Object Marker (OM2-1H)EA2$300.00 $600.00 $125.00 $250.00 $120.00 $240.00 $109.00 $218.0029 56 W11-15 Sign w/ PostEA2$600.00 $1,200.00 $250.00 $500.00 $600.00 $1,200.00 $550.00 $1,100.0030 56 W16-9P SignEA2$300.00 $600.00$75.00 $150.00 $120.00 $240.00 $109.00 $218.0031 56 Relocate W4-2L SignEA1$150.00 $150.00 $225.00 $225.00 $480.00 $480.00 $436.00 $436.0032 56 W84 (CA) SignEA2$300.00 $600.00 $100.00 $200.00 $120.00 $240.00 $109.00 $218.0033 56 W84 (CA) Sign w/ PostEA1$600.00 $600.00 $300.00 $300.00 $600.00 $600.00 $545.00 $545.0034 56 Reinstall (E) R1-1 Sign w/ (N) PostEA1$600.00 $600.00 $150.00 $150.00 $480.00 $480.00 $436.00 $436.0035 73, 77 Regrade Back of Sidewalk, Landscape Protection and RestorationLS1$1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,625.00 $2,625.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $2,536.00 $2,536.00Total Bid$232,816.50$296,549.75$402,715.20$312,275.46Unit ofMeasureItem DescriptionSSItem #Sturgeon Electric California, LLCEngineer's EstimateLee Wilson Electric Company, Inc.California Professional Engineering, Inc.QuantityPacket Pg. 32Item 6
Packet Pg. 33Item 6
Packet Pg. 34Item 6
Packet Pg. 35Item 6
Packet Pg. 36Item 6