HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-04-2019 PRC Agenda PacketCity of San Luis Obispo, Agenda, Planning Commission
Agenda
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Wednesday, September 4, 2019
5:30 p.m. REGULAR MEETING Council Chambers
990 Palm Street
CALL TO ORDER Vice Chair Rodney Thurman
ROLL CALL : Commissioners Kari Applegate, Keri Schwab, Robert Spector, Adam Stowe,
Vice Chair Rodney Thurman, and Andrew Webber, VACANT
PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, people may address the Committee about items not on the
agenda. Persons wishing to speak should come forward and state their name and address.
Comments are limited to three minutes per person. Items raised at this time are generally referred
to staff and, if action by the Committee is necessary, may be scheduled for a future meeting.
Introduction: New Parks and Recreation Director – Greg Avakian (Stanwyck – 5 minutes)
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of the Parks and Recreation Committee of August 7, 2019.
CONSENT ITEMS
BUSINESS ITEMS
2. Parks and Recreation Master Plan and General Plan Element Update (Stanwyck/Scott
– 1 hour)
Recommendation:
PACKET PAGE 1
Parks and Recreation Committee Agenda for September 4, 2019
2 | P a g e
1. Receive a presentation and public comment, and review, discuss, and confirm park and
facility improvement tiers as presented in Attachment 1 (Park-by-Park Assessment, WRT
2019).
2. Receive a presentation and public comment, and review, discuss, and provide input on
Park-by-Park Assessment project list (Attachment 1, Park-by-Park Assessment, WRT
2019) with a focus on Tier 3 Visionary Park Improvements.
3. North Broad Street Neighborhood Park (Kloepper – 30 minutes)
Recommendation:
1. Review and discuss proposed layout for North Broad Street Neighborhood Park
2. Provide direction to staff on the preferred draft layout option in order to proceed with
final layout preparation.
SUBCOMMITTEE LIAISON REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS
4. Subcommittee Liaison Reports (Chair Avakian – 15 minutes)
a. Adult and Senior Programming: Commissioner Spector
b. Active Transportation Committee: Commissioner Webber
c. City Facilities (Damon Garcia, Golf, Pool & Joint Use Facilities): Commissioner
Applegate
d. Jack House Committee: Commissioner Schwab
e. Tree Committee: Commissioner Thurman
f. Youth Sports Association: Commissioner Stowe
5. Directors’ Report (Stanwyck - 5 minutes)
6. Communication
ADJOURNMENT
To the Public Workshop of the Parks and Recreation Commi ttee as approved by the PRC to
Wednesday , October 2, 2019 , at 5:30 p.m., Ludwick Community Center, 864 Santa Rosa
Street, San Luis Obispo, California.
PACKET PAGE 2
Parks and Recreation Committee Agenda for September 4, 2019
3 | P a g e
The City of San Luis Obispo wishes to make all of its public meetings accessible to the public. Upon request,
this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with disabilities. Any person with a
disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request
to the Parks and Recreation Department at (805) 781-7300 at least 48 hours before the meeting, if possible.
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (805) 781-7107.
Meeting audio recordings can be found at the following web address:
http://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/1/fol/61014/Row1.aspx
PACKET PAGE 3
August 28, 2019
Parks and Recreation Commission
City of San Luis Obispo
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, Ca 93401
ATT: Shelly Stanwyck, Assistant City Manager
Dear Commissioners and Shelly:
Please accept this letter of resignation for my position as Chair – Parks and Recreation Commission for
the City of San Luis Obispo. I have truly enjoyed the relationships and the impacts that we, as the
commission, have been able to provide the community of San Luis Obispo over the past three years. I
have full confidence that the current commissioners will continue to be committed and take pride in
being the voice of our wonderful community as they provide advocacy for recreational programs,
services, and facility decisions.
I am excited to announce that I will be the new Director of Parks and Recreation for the City of San Luis
Obispo beginning at the end of September. I have valued the input and style that you all have
contributed to each meeting, workshop, and especially for your liaison groups over the years. I am
looking forward to reestablishing my relationship in a new way and continuing the proactive and open
communication between the City staff and Commissioners as we move forward into the future of parks
and recreation for the community of San Luis Obispo.
Sincerely,
Greg Avakian
PACKET PAGE 4
City of San Luis Obispo, Agenda, Planning Commission
Minutes
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Wednesday, August 7, 2019
5:30 p.m. REGULAR MEETING Parks and Recreation
Conference Room
1341 Nipomo Street
San Luis Obispo, CA
CALL TO ORDER Vice Chair Rodney Thurman
ROLL CALL : Commissioners Kari Applegate, Adam Stowe, Andrew Webber
ABSENT: Chair Greg Avakian, Commissioners Keri Schwab and Robert Spector
PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, people may address the Committee about items not on the
agenda. Persons wishing to speak should come forward and state their name and address.
Comments are limited to three minutes per person. Items raised at this time are generally referred
to staff and, if action by the Committee is necessary, may be scheduled for a future meeting.
Public Comment:
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of the Parks and Recreation Committee of May 1, 2019.
ACTION: APPROVAL OF THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND
RECREATION COMMISSION FOR MAY 1, 2019.
CARRIED 4:0:0:3 to approve the corrected minutes of the Parks and Recreation Advisory
Body for the regular meeting of 05/01/19 as motioned by Stowe and second by Webber.
PACKET PAGE 5
Parks and Recreation Committee Minutes DRAFT for August 7, 2019
2 | P a g e
AYES: APPLEGATE, STOWE, THURMAN AND WEBBER
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: AVAKIAN, SCHWAB AND SPECTOR
CONSENT ITEMS
2. Prop 68 Grant Opportunities
Recommendation: Receive a report on the Proposition 68 grant application and proposed
Emerson Park site improvements.
Commissioners Comment: All support the application and look forward to the grant award
decision in December.
Public Comment
NONE
BUSINESS ITEMS
3. Mission Plaza Restroom Project (Burde 30 minutes)
Recommendation: Receive presentation on the Mission Plaza Restroom Replacement.
Provide review/comment on the Mission Plaza Restroom Replacement concept plan and
recommend City Council acceptance of the plan.
The Parks and Recreation Commission is asked to provide feedback on the activation and use
of Mission Plaza, a City Park with focus on the design features and amenities of the Mission
Plaza Restroom, Café, and Murray Adobe Improvements – Preliminary Site Plan:
1) Does the PRC favor the Murray Adobe Improvements of a Café option or flexible space
for “Food Trucks” or similar uses option presented in the Preliminary Plan?
2) Does the PRC have any significant concerns regarding the general site layout, plaza design,
proposed recreational facilities or uses?
3) What other types of active or passive recreation would the PRC like to see incorporated
on-site?
PACKET PAGE 6
Parks and Recreation Committee Minutes DRAFT for August 7, 2019
3 | P a g e
Commissioner Comment
Commissioner Applegate: Who will manage the food trucks onsite and the scheduling. Is the
food truck area in the middle of adobe and the restroom. How is the adobe currently used.
Commissioner Stowe: What is the maximum size of an event that would require additional
porta stalls. I like the concept of the Café; but I do not that is a more permanent decision and
the food trucks will offer more flexibility. And will there be utilities and power for the
trucks. The sculpture garden did not show a grass area. For the active and passive recreation,
I would recommend art shows, smaller musical shows, children’s workshops, and public
readings.
Director Stanwyck indicated that the sculpture garden is not part of this concept plan. This
project is the adobe wall, restroom and gazebo area. The Mission Plan overall Master Plan
will incorporate ADA improvements to the entire plaza, this would be the first step to
accomplish the ADA accessibility. The adobe is too fragile for use, and is currently used for
storage supplies for Downtown SLO and City of SLO Facilities. It is considered culturally
sensitive and will require significant historical analysis and rehabilitation.
Commissioner Thurman: It seems like by moving the building back to decrease hiding
spaces is not as important as increasing the size by one-third for higher capacity with extra
stalls. Will we have another chance for review and comment. Turnover for the cafes might
be problematic and food trucks can be more exciting. In the areas where trees will need to be
removed and replanted, I recommend the use of a structural soil for the brick areas to allow
root space.
Staff Horn responded this is the meeting for comments, but we will come back after it goes to
the other Advisory Body meetings. This meeting would be the time to give the overall
comments on the layout, concept and size.
Commissioner Webber: The 165 sq.ft. size of the proposed café is not feasible for onsite
facilities very limited in services; the food truck option offers more options. Is the closing of
Monterey and Broad streets part of this project.
Staff Horn indicated that the dogleg of Broad Street is not part of this project.
Commissioners all agreed and recommend on the concept of the restroom plan and the
flexibility of the food truck option, and the activation of recreation including smaller art and
musical shows, workshops for children and public readings. Please include bike racks in the
plan.
Public Comment
NONE
ACTION: APPROVAL OF THE RESTROOM PLAN AND THE FLEXIBLE SPACE FOR
FOOD TRUCK AND RECREATION USES OF SMALLER ART AND MUSIC SHOWS
AND CHILDREN EVENTS ON SITE.
PACKET PAGE 7
Parks and Recreation Committee Minutes DRAFT for August 7, 2019
4 | P a g e
CARRIED 4:0:0:3 to approve restroom plan and flexible space for food trucks and smaller
recreation uses onsite as motioned by Stowe and second by Webber.
AYES: APPLEGATE, STOWE, THURMAN AND WEBBER
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: AVAKIAN, SCHWAB AND SPECTOR
4. Update on Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan Project (Stanwyck/Scott –
30 minutes)
Recommendation: Review, discuss, and provide feedback on public input received in
association with the June 2019 Community Needs Assessment Workshop and next steps.
Staff presented the findings on public input received from the June 5, 2019 Community
Needs Assessment Workshop and the multiple sources that will be used to inform the Master
Plan and General Element Update. The September 2019 meeting will be focused on a park
by park list of amenities and improvements it will not be a prioritized list more of a list of
projects from the community engagement of the past year. We will ask for the PRC to
provide input and take in the public comment from the list provided on the Agenda. The
Agenda will also include a first look at the first draft of the Master Plan Vision and Goals and
Policies, and we will have some written text for you to review. This will be a more high-
level review but indicating did we miss a policy, or should we remove a policy. This will
come back to you in a more comprehensive formal review at the end of the year.
Commissioner Comment
Commissioner Applegate: At the September meeting, you will want feedback on the draft
policies and list of projects.
Commissioner Stowe: Clarification on the review of the list of projects at the parks. If we go
park by park, I will need to recuse myself during that portion of review.
Public Comment
Jeff Whitener: I am still a little skeptical of the numbers and the representation in the survey.
I do appreciate the focus on safe access to the parks and the safe connectivity needed to all
parks.
SUBCOMMITTEE LIAISON REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS
5. Subcommittee Liaison Reports (Vice Chair Thurman – 15 minutes)
a. Adult and Senior Programming: Commissioner Spector: ABSENT
PACKET PAGE 8
Parks and Recreation Committee Minutes DRAFT for August 7, 2019
5 | P a g e
b. Active Transportation Committee: Commissioner Webber: No report. Meeting
next week with Adam Fukushima to determine meeting schedule.
c. City Facilities (Damon Garcia, Golf, Pool & Joint Use Facilities): Commissioner
Applegate: Aquatics Last day of summer is Sunday, August 10.SLO Swim Center will be
closed for maintenance from August 12 thru August 25 reopening on August 26 . The
Therapy pool will be under construction for re-plastering through October 7. 40th
Anniversary of the SLO Swim Center will take place this Friday August 9 from 5:30-8:30.
The Birthday Splash is a free rec swim featuring a giant floating obstacle course ,
cannonball contest and games. Hot Dogs and fruit will be provided. Facilities: Damon-
Garcia is now open. Fall is the busy season for Damon with AYSO leagues, annual rugby
tournament, and many other uses. French Park Improvement project is currently u nder
construction. Once completed in September, French Park will offer three dedicated
pickleball courts and a basketball area replacing the unused volleyball court. Golf Course
The 2018-19 fiscal year (July through June) saw almost 25,000 rounds of golf played.
Biggest uses were Seniors (3400 rounds), Twilight (3-5pm) use (2800) and Super Twilight
(last hour) (3200). Due to some damage at to the greens at hole #7, the hole will be closed
for August while the green is repaired to a playable condition. Summer FootGolf has been
seeing steady play of 10 to 15 participants every other Wednesday. August will be the last
month for FootGolf with NightGolf beginning in September. Youth and Adult Sports,
Community Events: Adult Softball Summer League is winding down with all divisions
either finishing or entering into playoffs. 64 teams total (4 all-women’s teams). Fall
registration opened up this week. Fall season will begin last week of August. Junior Giants
T-ball and Minors division completely full at 75 kids per division – waitlists were created,
and teams filled. Total of 192 registrations. New drop-in league – Basketball every Friday
from 6-9 PM in the Ludwick Community Center. Annual SLO Triathlon was held the last
weekend in July. Over 800 registrants and around 600 finishers. Annual Family campout
will take place August 10.
d. Jack House Committee: Commissioner Schwab: ABSENT
e. Tree Committee: Commissioner Thurman: Update to the Tree Ordinance and
Regulations for Tree Removals. The SLO Tree Friends group is not active anymore;
ECOSLO has been approached to take on the grant and complete the planting of
120 trees by the end of year to fulfill the grant.
f. Youth Sports Association: Commissioner Stowe: No Report.
6. Directors’ Report (Stanwyck - 5 minutes)
A few highlights, as mentioned earlier a very successful 40th SLO Triathlon. The golf course
has had two medical events at the course, and most recently the Rec Coordinator Ava Morales-
Davis performed CPR on a golf customer at the course and was transported to the hospital.
Very thankful to the bi-annual CPR trainings by Shawn Tucker, and the AED’s added to the
facilities and school sites in addition to the Ranger trucks. As part of continued work on the
Department Strategic Plan, this summer staff has been rewarded when noticed with exemplary
service with a reusable utensil set or Yeti coffee mug to encourage the Healthy and Smart
sustainability throughout the City. Lindsey has been working on a new public art idea in the
parking garages – more to come. Youth Services is hiring for the school year and we would
appreciate passing the word that we are in need of part time teachers and aides in the school
sites. First phase has been completed for recruitment of the Parks and Recreation Director;
PACKET PAGE 9
Parks and Recreation Committee Minutes DRAFT for August 7, 2019
6 | P a g e
with interview panels next week August 15-17. We hope to make an appointment by early
September. In addition, the Public Works Director has announced his retirement effective
October 1, 2019.
7. Communication
ADJOURNMENT at 7:01 pm
To the Public Workshop of the Parks and Recreation Committee as approved by the PRC to
Wednesday, September 4, 2019 , at 5:30 p.m., Council Chambers, 990 Palm Street, San Luis
Obispo, California.
The City of San Luis Obispo wishes to make all of its public meetings accessible to the public. Upon request,
this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to pe rsons with disabilities. Any person with a
disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request
to the Parks and Recreation Department at (805) 781-7300 at least 48 hours before the meeting, if possible.
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (805) 781-7107.
Meeting audio recordings can be found at the following web address:
http://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/1/fol/61014/Row1.aspx
PACKET PAGE 10
Parks and Recreation Commission
Agenda Report Meeting Date: 09/04/2019
Item Number:
DATE: September 4, 2019
FROM: Shelly Stanwyck, Assistant City Manager Community Services
Prepared By: Shawna Scott, Senior Planner, Community Development
SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Master Plan and General Plan Element Update
RECOMMENDATION
1. Receive a presentation and public comment, and review, discuss, and confirm park and facility
improvement tiers as presented in Attachment 1 (Park-by-Park Assessment, WRT 2019).
2. Receive a presentation and public comment, and review, discuss, and provide input on Park-by-
Park Assessment project list (Attachment 1, Park-by-Park Assessment, WRT 2019) with a
focus on Tier 3 Visionary Park Improvements.
DISCUSSION
Background
In 2017, the City Parks and Recreation and Community Development Departments initiated the update
to the City’s Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan and the Master Plan (the “Update”). The
Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) reviewed and provided feedback on the Project Plan for the
Master Plan and Element on September 6th and October 4th of 2017 and recommended the City Council
approve the Project Plan. On November 7, 2017, the City Council approved the Project Plan, and a
consultant team led by WRT was selected in February 2018 to support the Master Plan and Element
Staff team.
Since that time, the team has implemented the foundational stages of the Project Plan by conducting
extensive initial community outreach pursuant to the approved Community Engagement Plan1 and as
summarized in the Community Needs Assessment Engagement Memorandum2 approved by the PRC in
December 2018. In addition, the results from the statistical survey conducted by ETC Institute are
available for review in the Needs Assessment Survey Findings Report3. A PRC Workshop Series was
held in January, February, and March of 2019, which consisted of focused discussions and public input
related to the community’s values and priorities, unmet needs, and hopes and dreams. Following the
1 Approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission in April 2018, available here.
2 Approved by the Parks and Recreation Commiss ion in December 2018, available here.
3 Approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission in December 2018, available here.
PACKET PAGE 11
City of San Luis Obispo, Title, Subtitle
Parks and Recreation Master Plan and General Plan Element Update
Page 2
Workshop Series, a Draft Community Needs Assessment Report4 prepared by WRT was presented at
the May 2019 PRC meeting and feedback from the Commission was provided regarding 1) the Draft
Report and 2) the topics and format of the June 2019 Community Needs Assessment Workshop. A
summary of the June 2019 Workshop and feedback received was provided in the August 2019 PRC
report.5
Actions completed and ongoing include:
Date Action
October 2017 PRC approves Update Project Plan
November 2017 Council approves Update Project Plan
April 2018 PRC approves Community Engagement Plan
Spring/Summer 2018 Staff hosts pop-ups promoting September Workshop
September 13, 2018 Bright Ideas Public Workshop
August-October 2018 ETC – Needs Assessment Survey
December 2018 Community Needs Assessment, Engagement
Memorandum and Needs Assessment Survey
Findings Report approved by the PRC
January 2019 PRC Workshop on SLO Swim Center and Events
February 2019 PRC Workshop on Parks
March 2019 PRC Workshop on Community Centers, Youth
Services and Programs, and Fields and Facilities
May 2019 Draft Community Needs Assessment; WRT & PROS
June 5, 2019 Community Needs Assessment Public Workshop
September 4, 2019 PRC review of Draft Park-by-Park Assessment
Ongoing Comment cards and email interested list gathering
Ongoing E-Newsletter/Email blasts
Ongoing Social media: education, meeting announcements
Ongoing Neighborhood meetings (staff available for)
Ongoing Public input and communications to staff
Ongoing Open City Hall
DRAFT PARK-BY-PARK ASSESSMENT
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update will include site-specific recommendations for the
system’s existing and planned parks and facilities. This PRC meeting is the first opportunity for public
consideration of preliminary recommendations; therefore, the Park-by-Park Assessment (Attachment 1)
prepared by WRT identifies the types of projects to be considered within each identified park and facility
and does not include specific site planning or conceptual designs. The focus of this September 2019
meeting is to review and receive a presentation on the Assessment (Attachment 1) by WRT, receive
public comment, ask questions of staff and WRT, and discuss and provide input to staff and WRT
4 Reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission in May 2019, available here.
5 Parks and Recreation Commission Agenda Report, August 2019, available here.
PACKET PAGE 12
City of San Luis Obispo, Title, Subtitle
Parks and Recreation Master Plan and General Plan Element Update
Page 3
regarding proposed tiers and projects for each identified park and fa cility, with a focus on Tier 3
(Visionary Park Improvements). Additional summarized information regarding proposed tiers is
provided below, and proposed park-by-park projects are presented in Attachment 1 (Park-by-Park
Assessment).
Recommended Tier Designations for Parks and Facilities
As shown in Attachment 1 (Park-by-Park Assessment, WRT 2019) and summarized in Table 1 Proposed
Park and Facility Tiers, on the following page, each park and facility has been designated a “Tier”, as
described below.
Tier 1: Critical Park Improvements – Maintenance. Tier 1 includes park improvements critical to keep
the park system functioning. This includes routine maintenance, repairs, repainting, replanting, lifecycle
replacement, and replacement of inaccessible amenities with accessible amenities to remove barriers to
access for people with disabilities. The intention of this category is to make the most of existing resources
with the primary goal being for the City to maintain services. WRT recommends that the actions
associated with this category are expected to be funded through tax dollars. Lifecycle replacement is
considered an annual value to be included in the City’s budget. Total replacement value is amortized
over the life of the facility.
Tier 2: Strategic Park Improvements – Improvement of Existing Parks/Facilities. These improvements
are characterized as being strategic to make measured park enhancements to the existing system.
Strategic improvements and redesign may include site, amenity, and facility upgrades. This includes
strategically enhancing existing parks with new features and program amenities that change the
experience or making other strategic changes that would require additional operational or capital
funding. WRT recommends that the City evaluate and analyze potential sources of additional revenue
for these improvements, including but not limited to capital bond funding, partnerships, program income,
grants, and existing or new taxes.
Tier 3: “Visionary” Park Improvements – New Opportunities. Visionary park improvements include
comprehensive park renovations, acquisitions, and the creation of new parks. This category represents
the complete set of services and facilities desired by the community. It is fiscally unconstrained but can
help provide policy guidance by illustrating the ultimate goals of the community, and by providing a
long-range look to address future needs and deficiencies. WRT recommends that funding for visionary
projects would be derived from partnerships, grants, private investments and new tax dollars. As noted
in Attachment 1, WRT notes that typically Tier 3 improvements start with a park- or facility-specific
master plan; however, this may not be appropriate for all Tier 3 parks based on the level of community
outreach conducted to date, and this topic warrants further discussion with the PRC and the public.
PACKET PAGE 13
City of San Luis Obispo, Title, Subtitle
Parks and Recreation Master Plan and General Plan Element Update
Page 4
Table 1. Recommended Park and Facility Improvement Tiers
Improvement Tier (1-3) Park / Facility
Community Parks
Tier 1 Exposition Park
Jack House Gardens
Tier 2 Meadow Park
Santa Rosa Park
Tier 3 Laguna Lake Park
Mission Plaza
Sinsheimer Park
Neighborhood Parks
Tier 1 Anholm Park
De Vaul Park
French Park
Laguna Hills Park
Throop Park
Vista Lago Park
Tier 2 Islay Hill Park
Johnson Park
Tier 3 Emerson Park
Mitchell Park
Mini Parks
Tier 1 Buena Vista Park
Eto Park
Poinsetta Creek Walk and Park
Priolo-Martin Park
Triangle Park
Tier 2 Ellsford Park
PACKET PAGE 14
City of San Luis Obispo, Title, Subtitle
Parks and Recreation Master Plan and General Plan Element Update
Page 5
Improvement Tier (1-3) Park / Facility
Las Praderas Park
Rodriguez Adobe Park
Stoneridge Park
Tier 3 Cheng Park
Recreation Centers and Special Features
Tier 1 SLO Skate Park
Tier 2 Damon-Garcia Sports Complex
Tier 3 Broad Street Community Gardens
Laguna Lake Golf Course
Ludwick Community Center
Meadow Park Center
Railroad Bike Path
Sinsheimer Stadium
SLO Senior Citizen Center
SLO Swim Center
Planned Parks (Approved Specific Plans)
Tier 3 Avila Ranch Specific Plan Parks
Righetti Development Parks (Orcutt Area
Specific Plan)
San Luis Ranch Specific Plan Parks
West Creek Park (Orcutt Area Specific
Plan)
Recommended PRC Input and Action
The PRC and the public will receive a presentation by WRT on their park-by-park tier and project
recommendations identified in the Park-by-Park Assessment (Attachment 1), and WRT and staff will be
available to address questions from the PRC and the public. WRT will present the recommended tier and
improvement recommendations (projects) identified for each park for review and discussion, and will
provide a summary of how community and PRC input informed their recommendations. While PRC and
public input is welcomed for all parks and facilities, staff recommends the PRC focus their direction on
Tier 3 parks and facilities, as there is greater opportunity for aspirational improvements within these
identified parks and facilities. Input from the PRC and the public will be used to further refine the list as
PACKET PAGE 15
City of San Luis Obispo, Title, Subtitle
Parks and Recreation Master Plan and General Plan Element Update
Page 6
we move forward towards identifying priorities with the PRC and the public. Staff encourages the PRC
to be creative and aspirational when considering and providing direction to staff and the WRT
consultants on the preliminary recommendations.
Recommended PRC Action includes:
1. Receive a presentation and public comment, and review, discuss, and confirm park and facility
improvement tiers.
2. Receive a presentation and public comment, and review, discuss, and provide creative and
aspirational input on the Park-by-Park Assessment project list. PRC input should include
direction to staff and WRT on identified projects/improvements within each park and facility and
on priorities for both parks and facilities. The PRC should identify if specific projects should be
removed, added, or amended. Staff recommends that the PRC focus on Tier 3 Visionary Park
Improvements.
NEXT STEPS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR FURTHER PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
As described in the Community Engagement Plan for this Project, there will continue to be many more
opportunities for public input. As outlined below, all documents will be provided to the PRC and
additional advisory bodies and the City Council, as applicable. Staff encourages the public to review
these documents, as well, and provide comments throughout the Master Plan and Element update
process. Highlights of past, current, and next steps include the following:
Date Action Details
May 1, 2019 Draft Community Needs
Assessment
1. PRC review of Draft Community Needs
Assessment report by WRT
2. Public review and input
June 5, 2019 Community Needs
Assessment Public
Workshop
1. Discussion of Community Needs Assessment
2. WRT present
3. Engagement and discussion of themes and trends
May/June/July 2019 Community Needs
Assessment provided to
Advisory Bodies and
Council
1. Advisory bodies receive Community Needs
Assessment and update from staff
2. Council receives Community Needs Assessment
and update from staff
3. Public meetings and engagement for ALL
August 2019 June Workshop results
presented to PRC
1. PRC review of June Workshop results and next
steps in the Update process
2. Receive public comment and feedback
September 2019 Park by Park discussion 1. Review park by park tier recommendations and
list of amenities and improvements (not
prioritized at this stage)
PACKET PAGE 16
City of San Luis Obispo, Title, Subtitle
Parks and Recreation Master Plan and General Plan Element Update
Page 7
Date Action Details
2. Receive public comment and feedback
3. Provide direction to staff regarding proposed
amenities and improvements
October 2019 Review Draft Master Plan
components and conduct
Prioritization Exercise
1. Review, discuss, and provide feedback on
received information, based on staff presentation,
review of materials, and public comment
November 2019 Review Draft Capital
Improvement Plan with
Cost Estimates
1. Review, discuss, and provide feedback on
received information, based on staff presentation,
review of materials, and public comment
December 2019 Review Draft Operational
Cost Estimates for Future
Improvements
1. Review, discuss, and provide feedback on
received information, based on staff presentation,
review of materials, and public comment
January - March 2020 Public Review Draft Parks
Master Plan
1. WRT and consultant team to work with staff and
PRC on Public Review Draft Parks Master Plan
components, with complete document release to
the public March 2020
2. Advisory bodies receive Public Review Draft
Parks Master Plan and update from staff
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1: PRC Consideration of Park-by-Park Assessment (WRT, August 2019)
PACKET PAGE 17
MEMORANDUM
WRT, LLC | 478 Tehama Street, Suite 2B | San Francisco, CA 94103 James Stickley CA LA-4251
wrtdesign.com | 415.575.4722 John Gibbs CA LA-4417
N:\8000\8143 SLO Parks & Rec MP and GP Element Update\4-Documents\3. Master Plan Development\Park-by-Park Analysis\Park-by-Park Recommendations Memo_2019-08-28v2.docx
To: Shawna Scott
Senior Planner
City of San Luis Obispo
Date: August 28, 2019
From: Peter Winch, Project Manager
John Gibbs, Principal
Ref. No.: 08143.01
Project: San Luis Obispo Parks &
Recreation Master Plan Update
Pages: 8
Re: PRC Consideration of Park-by-Park
Assessment
CC:
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update will include site-specific recommendations
for the system’s existing and planned facilities. This PRC meeting is the first opportunity for
public consideration of preliminary recommendations. City Staff and members of the
Consultant Team will summarize our analysis of existing parks and present preliminary
recommendations.
Park Improvements: Three-Tiers
For this Master Plan Update, we propose that park and facility improvements be
understood in three “tiers”. The first tier is focused on maintenance, the second on
strategic enhancements, and the third on new or wholly transformed parks, as described
below.
TIER 1: CRITICAL PARK IMPROVEMENTS - MAINTAINING WHAT WE HAVE
Tier 1 includes park improvements critical to keep the park system functioning. They
include routine maintenance, repairs, repainting, replanting, lifecycle replacement, and
replacement of inaccessible amenities with accessible amenities to remove barriers to
access for people with disabilities. The intention of this category is to make the most of
existing resources with the primary goal being for the department to maintain services.
The actions associated with this category are expected to be funded through tax dollars.
Lifecycle replacement is considered an annual value to be included in San Luis Obispo’s
budget. Total replacement value is amortized over the life of the facility.
TIER 2: STRATEGIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS - IMPROVING WHAT WE HAVE
These park improvements are characterized as being strategic to make measured park
enhancements to the existing system. Strategic improvements and redesign may include
ATTACHMENT 1
PACKET PAGE 18
MEMORANDUM
August 28, 2019
Page | 2
site, amenity, and facility upgrades. This includes strategically enhancing existing parks
with new features and program amenities that change the experience or making other
strategic changes that would require additional operational or capital funding.
The City would evaluate and analyze potential sources of additional revenue for these
improvements, including but not limited to capital bond funding, partnerships, program
income, grants, and existing or new taxes.
TIER 3: “VISIONARY” PARK IMPROVEMENTS - DEVELOPING NEW OPPORTUNITIES
Visionary park improvements include comprehensive park renovations, acquisitions, and
the creation of new parks. This category represents the complete set of services and
facilities desired by the community. It is fiscally unconstrained but can help provide policy
guidance by illustrating the ultimate goals of the community, and by providing a long-
range look to address future needs and deficiencies. Typically, Tier 3 improvements start
with a park- or facility-specific master plan to analyze conditions, explore the needs of the
community, and design a new park. Funding for visionary projects would be derived from
partnerships, grants, private investments and new tax dollars.
Park-by-Park Assessment
San Luis Obispo Staff and WRT conducted a park-by-park assessment in August 2019. The
assessment team went through the full list of City park and recreation facilities and
identified the general physical condition of each site; any relevant issues pertaining to site
access and use; and park-specific recommendations communicated by members of the
public and the Parks and Recreation Commission during the Plan Update process. Based
on these factors, the group made preliminary park improvement recommendations and
classified each park according to what type of improvements are needed.
Recommendations describe the general type of program change or improvement
opportunity.
The analysis found that 15 of San Luis Obispo’s existing parks need Tier 3 improvements.
Nine of the system’s parks are identified for Tier 2 improvements, and 14 sites are
identified as Tier 1. Community gardens are expected to continue operation and are not
evaluated here.
The following table provides a detailed matrix of parks, general condition assessment,
improvement needs, and improvement tier. It is important to remember that San Luis
Obispo’s park system must also continue to grow, adding new facilities to better serve a
growing community. Future parks are, by definition, Tier 3 improvements. Parks that are
currently planned are included in the table, with anticipated amenities identified.
ATTACHMENT 1
PACKET PAGE 19
Page | 3
August 28th, 2019Community Parks
Park Type Area
(acres)Condition1 Improvement Recommendations Improvement
Tier (1-3)2
Exposition
Park Community 7.2 Fair Pathway Replacement, Fitness Equipment
planned pedestrian bridge replacement 1
Jack House
Gardens Community 0.8 Good Replace arbor 1
Laguna Lake
Park Community 40 Fair
Complete a comprehensive master plan. Plan
will identify enhancements to natural aquatic
and upland functions; add sports fields and
other active uses; add amenities including
fencing, shade, and ground treatment to the
off-leash dog area; and include facilities to
allow the park to better accommodate events.
Master plan and park development will be
supported by dedicated funding available
through development agreements.
Community members have shown support for
a transition to more active uses, with strongest
support for a bike pump track, adventure
playground/obstacle course, exercise walking
path, and unlighted multi-use sports fields. A
botanical garden was also well-supported as a
passive use.
3
Meadow Park Community 16 Good
Expand field use by installing synthetic turf
(softball and soccer); expand the playground
footprint and add an enclosed tot lot;
reprogram and rebuild areas around the
Meadow Park Center as part of that facility
improvement planning such as outdoor shade
structures for picnic rental, platforms for
classes, parking lot redesign to create shared
space/mini plazas for special events.
2
Mission Plaza Community 3 Implement Mission Plaza Concept Plan.3
Santa Rosa
Park Community 11 Good
Restore horseshoe pit, incorporate street
crossing enhancements into the City’s
Circulation Element and Active Transportation
Plan, improve basketball court functions,
enhance lawn areas to enable flexible
recreational use by regrading and adding
fencing along street.
2
Sinsheimer
Park Community 21.7 Good
Complete a comprehensive master plan to
identify new and expanded park programs.
Park should include lighted tennis courts;
remodeled restrooms, and new pathways.
The plan should address parking, accessibility,
and improvements that enable efficient and
effective long-term operations.
3
1 Qualitative summary of overall park condition, based on San Luis Obispo Parks Inventory and Assessment (2018).
2 Tier 1=Critical: Maintaining what we have; Tier 2=Strategic: improvements/enhancements; Tier 3=Visionary: complete site revision needed.
ATTACHMENT 1
PACKET PAGE 20
Page | 4
August 28th, 2019Neighborhood Parks
Park Type Area
(acres)Condition1 Improvement Recommendations Improvement
Tier (1-3)2
Anholm Park Neighborhood 0.1 Good
Despite being less than half an acre in size, the
previous parks master plan designated Anholm
park as a neighborhood park. Re-designate
this park as a mini park based on its size,
amenities, and use by the neighborhood.
1
De Vaul Park Neighborhood 0.9 Good No recommendations beyond maintenance of
existing amenities.1
Emerson Park Neighborhood 3.3 Fair
Staff has applied for a Proposition 68 grant
to revitalize this park. Implement the concept
plan, which includes restroom facilities, a shade
structure, educational and Zen gardens, fitness
equipment, tot bike pump track, re-paving the
existing blacktop for a free play area, creation
of a multi-functional plaza for neighborhood
events, and ADA upgrades.
3
French Park Neighborhood 10 Good Repave parking lot; improve path connectivity
to Islay Hill Park 1
Islay Hill Park Neighborhood 6 Good
Reconfigure ball field diamonds for specific
age sports, and implement the planned
playground renovation with added shade. Park
may include dog park or dog area if warranted
(to be further evaluated.)
2
Johnson Park Neighborhood 5 Fair
Renovate restroom, regrade lawn area and
reprogram based on further evaluation.
Replace natural turf with synthetic turf to
extend daily and seasonal use.
2
Laguna Hills
Park Neighborhood 3.2 Good Park may include dog park or dog area if
warranted (to be further evaluated.)1
Mitchell Park Neighborhood 3 Fair
Complete a comprehensive park master
plan to identify new and expanded park
amenities and programming that supports
multi-generational activation. The plan should
define physical improvements that encourage
appropriate daily park use by seniors,
neighbors and downtown residents.
Convene a small-scale neighborhood
discussion to explore concerns about security
and how park programs might create a safer
park for everyone.
Launch a branded event series that features
pop up programming to encourage neighbors
and local residents to enjoy the park. (Music,
beer gardens, coffees, night lighting, art
shows, yoga, hula hoop contests, movies in the
park,. etc.)
3
Throop Park Neighborhood 3 Good
Baseball field enhancements including
pedestrian bridge replacement; hydration
stations
1
Vista Lago
Park Neighborhood 0.2 Fair No recommendations beyond maintenance of
existing amenities.1
1 Qualitative summary of overall park condition, based on San Luis Obispo Parks Inventory and Assessment (2018).
2 Tier 1=Critical: Maintaining what we have; Tier 2=Strategic: improvements/enhancements; Tier 3=Visionary: complete site revision needed.
ATTACHMENT 1
PACKET PAGE 21
Page | 5
August 28th, 2019Mini Parks
Park Type Area
(acres)Condition1 Improvement Recommendations Improvement
Tier (1-3)2
Buena Vista
Park Mini 0.5 Fair Replace concrete and bench 1
Cheng Park Mini 0.3 Poor
Complete a mini-master plan to strategically
enhance safety, visibility, and activation. Plan
will identify spatial redesign and amenities to
replace.
3
Ellsford Park Mini 1 Fair
Explore design and features appropriate
for a small pocket park adjacent to a creek.
Considerations include native demonstration
pollinator garden, public art, climbing
structure, tot lot, dog waste stations,
interpretive signage, and seating.
2
Eto Park Mini 0.20 Fair Replace plant materials.1
Las Praderas
Park Mini 0.4 Fair
Beautification and possible Zen garden,
amenities to encourage passive uses (i.e. soft
surface trail, seating, additional neighborhood
planting, native demonstration pollinator
garden, and maintenance of associated
irrigation system. Add connection to Bob
Jones Trail.
2
Mission Plaza
Extension Mini 0.43 See Mission Plaza.
Poinsettia
Creek Walk
and Park
Mini 2 Fair Enhance connectivity to French Park.1
Priolo-Martin
Park Mini 0.5 Good Maintain existing amenities.1
Rodriguez
Adobe Park Mini 1.4 Fair
Renovate lawn, enhance walking loop by
adding exercise equipment. Potential reuse of
Adobe for classes, gallery space, or other uses,
pending cultural sensitivity evaluation.
2
Stoneridge
Park Mini 1 Fair
Enhance turf, add dog park or area, provide
neighborhood park amenities such as parkour
equipment, nature-themed adventure play for
young children.
2
Triangle Park Mini 0.2 Good Maintain existing amenities.1
1 Qualitative summary of overall park condition, based on San Luis Obispo Parks Inventory and Assessment (2018).
2 Tier 1=Critical: Maintaining what we have; Tier 2=Strategic: improvements/enhancements; Tier 3=Visionary: complete site revision needed.
ATTACHMENT 1
PACKET PAGE 22
Page | 6
August 28th, 2019Recreation Centers & Special Features
Park Type Area
(acres)Condition1 Improvement Recommendations Improvement
Tier (1-3)2
Broad Street
Community
Gardens
Recreation Centers
& Special Features 0.91 Site will transition to become the North Broad
Street Neighborhood Park (planned 2020)3
Damon-
Garcia Sports
Complex
Recreation Centers
& Special Features 22 Good
Potential for artificial turf in upper field;
reconfigure lighting to expand usability of
lower field, consider future land acquisition for
facility expansion
2
Emerson Park
Community
Gardens
Recreation Centers
& Special Features NA Not evaluated.
Jack House Recreation Centers
& Special Features 0.1 Good Enhance programming, make ADA upgrades.
Designate non-
profit operator,
remove from
City facility list
Kiwanis
Centennial
Garden
Recreation Centers
& Special Features NA Not evaluated.
Laguna Lake
Golf Course
Recreation Centers
& Special Features 27 Fair
Enhance community events and uses of
the property in support of ongoing course
operation.
Create a master plan with facility condition
assessment and implementation guidance on
the rehab of irrigation, utilities, grounds, and
clubhouse.
Conduct golf operations study to analyze
finance and ongoing operations of the course
as a City resource. Consider alternate uses for
the property with value and cost documented.
Alternate programming could include nature
park with restored creek, trails and nature
play; natural park with disc golf, play, and other
active uses.
3
Laurel Lane
Community
Gardens
Recreation Centers
& Special Features 0.26 Not evaluated.
Ludwick
Community
Center
Recreation Centers
& Special Features 1 Poor Complete replacement of the building to
create multi-generational community center.3
Meadow Park
Center
Recreation Centers
& Special Features 0.1 Poor
Complete a full master plan to reimagine
the building for new uses, improved safety
and security, overall functionality, ease of
maintenance, and activation. The restroom and
snack bar should be specifically addressed.
The master plan should reprogram and rebuild
areas around the Meadow Park Center as
part of that facility improvement planning
such as outdoor shade structures for picnic
rental, platforms for classes (i.e. Zumba, yoga),
parking lot redesign to create shared space/
mini plazas for special events, stormwater
education.
3
1 Qualitative summary of overall park condition, based on San Luis Obispo Parks Inventory and Assessment (2018).
2 Tier 1=Critical: Maintaining what we have; Tier 2=Strategic: improvements/enhancements; Tier 3=Visionary: complete site revision needed.
ATTACHMENT 1
PACKET PAGE 23
Page | 7
August 28th, 2019Recreation Centers & Special Features
Park Type Area
(acres)Condition1 Improvement Recommendations Improvement
Tier (1-3)2
Railroad Bike
Path
Recreation Centers
& Special Features 10 Fair
Complete a park master plan to identify
improvements including addition of a bike
pump track, park connections, railroad
overcrossing bridge, railroad fencing.
3
Rotary
Community
Garden at
Meadow Park
Recreation Centers
& Special Features NA Not evaluated.
Sinsheimer
Stadium
Recreation Centers
& Special Features 1.8 Poor
Complete renovation of facility to support
multi-use sports and community events, as
community members have shown strong
support for. Improvements could include
replacing and upgrading current lighting
conditions and updating the play surface to
artificial turf (Phase 1); replacing the current
structure (Phase 2); improving and expanding
seating (Phase 3); and creating an auxiliary
space (Phase 4). Potential for private funding.
3
SLO Senior
Citizen
Center
Recreation Centers
& Special Features 0.1 Fair
Renovate or replace to achieve multi-
generational use of facility and accommodate
diverse programming.
Facility improvements should address multi-
functionality, ease of maintenance, security,
storage, food handling, ADA, outdoor spaces.
With facility expansion, child and youth
activities should be considered to augment
senior activities, with emphasis on similar and
compatible activities such as tutoring, music,
crafts, and reading.
Rentability should be considered as a way to
augment operating budget.
3
SLO Skate
Park
Recreation Centers
& Special Features NA Good 1
SLO Swim
Center
Recreation Centers
& Special Features NA Good
Expand therapy pool, replace deck, make
ADA upgrades, add new multi-purpose
spaces, add shade, lockers, bleachers; expand
programming. See Building Assessment Plan
for preliminary concepts.
3
1 Qualitative summary of overall park condition, based on San Luis Obispo Parks Inventory and Assessment (2018).
2 Tier 1=Critical: Maintaining what we have; Tier 2=Strategic: improvements/enhancements; Tier 3=Visionary: complete site revision needed.
ATTACHMENT 1
PACKET PAGE 24
Page | 8
August 28th, 2019Planned Parks
Park Type Area
(acres)Condition1 Improvement Recommendations Improvement
Tier (1-3)2
Avila Ranch
Specific Plan
Parks
Planned Parks 18.25 NA
Neighborhood Park, Pocket and Mini Parks: A
9.5- acre neighborhood park and 9 one-half to
2.5 acre mini-parks and pocket parks will serve
the Avila Ranch development. The parks are
planned to include group BBQs, turf fields, a
nature path, basketball courts, boulders for
informal play, tot lots, baseball fields, soccer
fields, pickleball courts, tennis courts, bocce
ball courts, a dog park, a skate park, ping
pong tables, place for catering trucks, shade
structures, picnic tables, bicycle infrastructure,
community garden, exercise stations, and a
community plaza/farmer’s market.
3
Righetti
Development
Parks (Orcutt
Area Specific
Plan)
Planned Parks 14.9 NA
Neighborhood Park, Pocket Park and Linear
Park : The Orcutt Area Specific Plan features
a neighborhood park, several pocket parks, a
linear park and bicycle/ pedestrian paths. The
neighborhood park will serve as a community
gathering place for casual recreation and
sports events. The linear park will double
as a passive recreation/viewing area and
stormwater management area. The pocket
parks provide access points to the railroad bike
path and passive recreation facilities
such as seating for wildlife viewing. Other
amenities include: play areas, exercise station,
a climbing wall, a community garden, a dog
park, a soccer field, turf fields, pickleball courts,
tennis courts, a full basketball court, bicycle
infrastructure, viewing deck/telescope, gazebo
pavilion, and BBQ’s
3
San Luis
Ranch
Specific Plan
Parks
Planned Parks 3.9 NA
Central Neighborhood Park, Fitness Loop
and Parkway, Pocket Parks and Preserve and
Trailhead San Luis Ranch will include a central
neighborhood park, pocket parks, an active
linear park. These parks will include play areas,
an exercise station, a ping pong table, turf
fields, half court basketball, a bocce ball court,
shade structures, bicycle infrastructure, and
BBQ’s
3
WestCreek
Park (Orcutt
Area Specific
Plan)
Planned Parks 0.54 NA
Linear park and Creek Trail: The Orcutt Area
Specific Plan features a linear park and creek
trail will double as a passive recreation/viewing
area and stormwater
management area and will include a play area,
boulders for informal play, a ping pong table, a
turf field, and benches.
3
1 Qualitative summary of overall park condition, based on San Luis Obispo Parks Inventory and Assessment (2018).
2 Tier 1=Critical: Maintaining what we have; Tier 2=Strategic: improvements/enhancements; Tier 3=Visionary: complete site revision needed.
ATTACHMENT 1
PACKET PAGE 25
City of San Luis Obispo, Council Agenda Report, Meeting Date, Item Number
Parks and Recreation Commission
AGENDA REPORT
SUBJECT: NORTH BROAD STREET NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
Prepared by: Shelsie Kloepper, Engineer III
RECOMMENDATION
1. Review and discuss proposed layouts for North Broad Street Neighborhood Park
2. Provide direction to Staff on the preferred draft layout option in order to proceed with final
layout preparation.
DISCUSSION
Background
Through the 2017-19 Financial Plan Supplement 2018-19 Adopted Budget, funding was provided
for the creation of a new park in the Broad Street area north of Highway 101. Staff was directed
by Council to pursue the creation of a park at 533 Broad St, an existing City community garden
(Broad Street Community Garden). Given the history of the first City owned community garden,
garden plots will be incorporated into the elements of the park design. The project scope is to
provide a neighborhood park with some play features and gathering spaces. The new park will
require access improvements for pedestrians and bicycles such as curb ramp(s) at the Lincoln and
Broad intersection.
The City hired Cannon to design this neighborhood park. Cannon has created two layout options
based on community feedback that need to be reviewed and discussed.
Public Outreach
The public’s input about its parks and park amenities is a critical foundational step that facilitated
by staff for all projects in parks. City staff has conducted three community events to receive input
on the project components for the design. All three meetings were noticed by fliers, email list, and
social media posts.
1. Neighborhood Outreach at Lincoln Deli. On May 8, 2019, Public Works and Parks and
Recreation staff presented four concept boards to the public from the corner of the Lincoln
Deli frontage. Over eight hundred (800) notices were mailed to residents surrounding the
proposed park location. The four concept boards each focused on a different theme that
could be used at the new park. Themes included community, wellness, play, and grow.
Over seventy-five (75) community members of all ages provided, through sticker
placement, their favorite potential park elements. Staff also invited new ideas and provided
comments cards for public input.
Meeting Date: September 4, 2019
Item Number:__#2
PACKET PAGE 26
(Title of Report) Page 2
2. Parks and Recreation Master Plan Workshop. The next outreach event was coupled
with the Parks and Recreation Master Plan Public Workshops held at the Ludwick Center
on June 5, 2019. The same four element boards were presented and voted on by the
community. The event attracted over 125 community members.
3. Community Workshop Meeting. The third workshop meeting was held at the Ludwick
Center on August 28, 2019. At this meeting the community reviewed and commented on
the two layouts that will be discussed at the Parks and Recreation Meeting.
Proposed Park Layouts
The most popular elements from outreach events one (1) and two (2) were used to create two park
layouts that were presented at outreach event three (3). These layouts incorporated as many
features as possible within the limits of the space. The layouts focused on the most versatile
features for all park users. The new park layout will also include frontage improvements and safety
features such as a barrier fence between the road and the front of the park.
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISION CONSIDERATION / NEXT STEPS
The Parks and Recreation Commission purview is to review and make recommendations for
changes which could have an impact on the City’s parks and park facilities. Staff will review all
feedback from the Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting. This feedback will be used for staff
to revise the layouts to meet the desires of the community. The final design layout will be returned
to the Parks and Recreation Commission for consideration and approval.
ATTACHMENTS
A. North Broad Street Neighborhood Park Layouts
PACKET PAGE 27
PACKET PAGE 28
PACKET PAGE 29
PACKET PAGE 30