Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-17-2019 Item 09 - Appropriate Zone 9 Funding for mid-Higuera bypass project final design Department Name: Public Works Cost Center: 5009 For Agenda of: September 17, 2019 Placement: Consent Estimated Time: N/A FROM: Daryl Grigsby, Public Works Director Prepared By: Brian Nelson, Supervising Civil Engineer SUBJECT: MID-HIGUERA BYPASS PROJECT, SPECIFICATION NUMBER 90649 – FINAL DESIGN FUNDING RECOMMENDATION Receive $90,000 from the County of San Luis Obispo, and as recommended by the Flood Control and Water Conservation District Zone 9 County Advisory Committee, appropriate it to fund the final design services for Mid-Higuera Bypass Project. DISCUSSION Background San Luis Obispo has experienced catastrophic flooding due to the nature of its watershed. Most recently, in 1995, flooding caused damage throughout the San Luis Obispo watershed, with creeks breaching their banks and creek bank failures. In response to the damage, and to protect residents, businesses, and infrastructure, the City requested permits from regulatory agencies to repair the damage to public facilities. The Army Corps of Engineers and other regulators requested the City prepare a comprehensive Waterway Management Plan (WMP) that could be used as the basis for future project planning, decision making, and permitting. The Waterway Management Plan (WMP) preparation was approved by Council in the fall of 1999. In January 2002, the WMP was presented to Council and direction was received for various aspects of the program which included flood protection levels, major capital projects, and design policies. On October 21, 2003 Council adopted the WMP, a three-volume document which includes components for stream management and maintenance, a drainage design, and a flood management plan identifying potential flood management projects. Mid Higuera Bypass Project Of the projects identified by the WMP, the Mid-Higuera Bypass project presented a favorable cost benefit ratio with a strong likelihood of completion due to construction predominantly on City-owned facilities. The work associated with this project decreases the existing flooding potential through this area of San Luis Obispo creek. As a result, the Flood Control and Water Conservation District Zone 9 County Advisory Committee (Zone 9) recommended proceeding forward and allocating Zone 9 Funding to support the project development. Packet Pg. 81 Item 9 The Mid Higuera Bypass Project will increase flood protection by removing sediment from the creek, creation of pathways for flood waters in the roadway to return to the creek, removal of barriers within the creek channel, creation of flood bypass channels and graded benches for increased creek capacity, and replacement of the Bianchi Lane Bridge. Mid Higuera Location Current Progress Since the Zone 9 Advisory Committee approved the Mid-Higuera Bypass project, a feasibility study and a Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (Final SEIR) have been completed, including preliminary design work that was completed in conjunction with development of the project SEIR Document. Final design of the project is currently underway and includes detailed design work including Plans, Specifications and Construction Estimates for public bidding. Packet Pg. 82 Item 9 The project’s anticipated timeframe is as follows: Task Anticipated Completion Date Final Bid Documents June 2020 Final Regulatory Permits October 2020 Ready for Construction June 2021 Construction funding has not yet been identified for this project. City staff have identified a potential Proposition 1 Coastal Watershed Flood Reduction Risk grant funding opportunity available to support the project and will work with Zone 9 on additional funding recommendations for FY2020 as necessary. The estimated cost of construction at the preliminary design stage was $5.5 Million. Refined estimates are expected to be delivered by the City’s consultant in Fall 2019 when 90% design work is completed and a comprehensive cost estimate can be prepared. Policy Context Per the October 2018 Financial Management Manual Exhibit 201-A the Council must approve the additional allocation of funding outside the original budget. This requested budget appropriation will provide funding to complete final design of the project. Public Engagement Zone 9 committee members and community members were presented with the proposed funding at the October 2018 meeting and approved of the recommendation. CONCURRENCE The Flood Control and Water Conservation District Zone 9 concurs with this recommendation and has made this funding available to support this project in the current budget. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A Final SEIR was prepared by County staff for the project focusing on the following mitigations: biological resources, cultural resources, air quality, visual resources, hazardous materials, drainage/erosion and sedimentation, and noise. On August 21, 20188/21/18, San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors certified the SEIR. SEIR State Clearinghouse Number is SCH2016021077. In accordance with recommendations of the SEIR, County Staff will be applying for permits with the Water Resources Control Board, California Fish and Wildlife, and Army Corp of Engineers. Packet Pg. 83 Item 9 FISCAL IMPACT Budgeted: Yes Budget Year: 2019-20 Funding Identified: Yes Fiscal Analysis: This is an existing project, Specification No. 90649. Funding Sources Current FY Cost Annualized On-going Cost Total Project Cost General Fund $0 $0 $0 State $0 $0 $0 Federal $0 $0 $0 Fees $0 $0 $0 Other: Zone 9 $90,000 $0 $406,400 Total $90,000 $0 $406,400 The above chart refers to the design phase only. The cost summary of this project is as follows: • Total design cost of $406,400 is funded by $316,400 in prior Zone 9 allocations reimbursed quarterly by the County, and the $90,000 in this request. Budget funding supports project design, permitting, grant review and application, and design contingency. • Construction estimates of $5.5M may be funded by future grant opportunities such as Proposition 1 Coastal Flood Reduction Risk Program and future Zone 9 budget increases. ALTERNATIVES Deny appropriation of Zone 9 funding. This alternative is not recommended because additional funds are necessary to complete the project design and environmental permitting, and this project will increase the flood control capacity of San Luis Obispo Creek within the downtown area. Attachments: a - Zone 9 Budget Request Memo Packet Pg. 84 Item 9 City of San Luis Obispo, Public Works, 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93401-3218, 805.781.7200, slocity.org Date: October 9, 2017 To: Demond Mayfield, Engineer II – County of San Luis Obispo From: Matt Horn, City Engineer - City of San Luis Obispo Subject: 2018-19 Zone 9 Budget Request Based on the current status and future needs to continue making progress on several projects, the City is requesting the following funding from Zone 9 for the 2018-19 Fiscal Year. Project Name Requested FY 2018/19 General Creek Maintenance $113,000 Silt Removal $100,000 Mid Higuera Bypass $150,000 Total $363,000 General Creek Maintenance $113,000 to fund ongoing general creek maintenance which includes channel clearing, including removal of trees, vegetation, and arundo from creeks. Funding is planned to be used as follows: 1. CCC Contract - Channel Clearing: $40,000 2. Channel Tree Removals: $40,000 3. Vegetation Disposal: $ 5,000 4. Arundo Removal: $28,000 Silt Removal $100,000 to add to the available funding of $211,000 to support creek silt removal work. Based on field observations the following locations are the highest needs for silt removal work and are currently being designed with an anticipated construction in 2018. 1. Prefumo Creek arm – Between LOVR and Laguna Lake: $190,000 2. Tank Farm Road 250 ft West of Orcutt: $ 30,000 3. Sacramento 500 ft North of Via Esteban: $ 30,000 4. Prefumo Creek - Downstream of South Madonna: $ 61,000 Mid Higuera Bypass $150,000 to fund ongoing work on the Mid Higuera Bypass project. Funding is planned to be used to assist with the completion of the project design, contract documents and construction grant investigation and application. Packet Pg. 85 Item 9 Page intentionally left blank. Packet Pg. 86 Item 9