Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/16/2019 Item 1, Ellison Wilbanks, Megan From:Scott, Shawna Sent:Friday, September 13, 2019 3:04 PM To:CityClerk Cc:Cohen, Rachel Subject:FW: Architectural Review Commission 9/16/19 Attachments:ARC Ltr 09132019.pdf Please post attached correspondence for the 9/16/19 ARC meeting. From: Rick Ellison < Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 3:02 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Architectural Review Commission 9/16/19 Dear Shawna Scott, Please find correspondence regarding the September 16 ARC Agenda items. Thank you for your review and consideration. Rick Ellison -- Rick Ellison | Executive Director rick@bikeslocounty.org O: 805.547.2055 | Cell: 805.748.2733 bikeslocounty.org 1 860 Pacific St, Suite 105 | San Luis Obispo, CA | 93401 September 13, 2019 San Luis Obispo Architectural Review Commission Dear Committee Members, Thank you for your time and public service. Bike SLO County would like to point out a few items with regards to bicycle facilities on a couple of the projects on the September 16 agenda in hopes that your committee add these recommendations to the Planning Commission for consideration. We feel these recommendations will be better suited for bike riders, help encourage better transportation choices, and meets the Community Design Guide intent. Item #1 - 1911 Johnson Ave We recommend changing the style of bike rack proposed on Detail 16 Sheet L102 to Peak Rack style bike racks. The proposed bike rack style tends to be not well suited for parking bikes. Bikes are not well supported and tend to fall o ver in this style of bike rack. The Peak Rack is made locally and is well liked in the bike community. It is not clear from the plans how much bike parking is currently available, but it seems that this calculation should be included and new bike parking should accommodate the appropriate number of spaces per city standards. Item #2 – 609 Palm St Detail R10 on sheet L2.1 in the plans indicate an inverted "U" bike rack is proposed. Though this meets the City Standards, the standard and Community Design Guide also specifically call out Peak Racks. The Peak Rack standard 2-bike Peak rack, or two 2-bike Peak racks back to back to fit 4 bikes is much more accommodating of bikes in the same space, a variety of bike styles, and helps prevent the bikes from falling over. Ideally we would like to see the City adopt this as their standard for future projects. With regards to the enclosed bike parking area, it would be recommended that some of this bike parking not be enclosed by a fence/gate. Opening a gate and rolling a bike into the area is cumbersome so it would be beneficial to have covered space available outside of a gate. It is not clear, but maybe the gated area is intended for long term bike storage, but we would recommend increasing clear space in front of the rack to help maneuver bikes in and out of this area. Additionally, e-bikes and cargo bikes are becoming more and more popular. Though this may be beyond the ARC's purview, we think that it would be beneficial to have power outlets nearby to allow charging of e-bikes, as well as additional standard single level Peak Racks in this area to accommodate larger cargo bikes. Thank you for your consideration. Rick Ellison, Executive Director BIKE SLO COU N T Y bikeslocounty.org