HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 3 - ARCH-0263-2019 (3761 Orcutt)ARCH-0263-2019 (3761 Orcutt)
Page 1
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT
FROM: Shawna Scott, Senior Planner BY: Walter Oetzell, Assistant Planner
PROJECT ADDRESS: 3761 Orcutt Rd FILE NUMBER: ARCH-0263-2019
APPLICANT: Ambient Communities, represented by RRM Design Group
For more information contact Walter Oetzell, Assistant Planner: 781-7593 (woetzell@slocity.org)
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & SETTING
Ambient Communities proposes to construct
17 new two-story multi-unit residential buildings
(eight duplex, nine triplex) acommodating 43
condominium dwelling units, on the “Jones
Ranch” property (Tract 3066).
General Location: The subject property is
comprised of Lots 14-20 of Vesting Tentative
Tract Map #3066,1 11.6 acres located about
325 feet west of Orcutt Road, about 1,000 feet
south of Johnson Avenue.
Present Use: Vacant
Zoning: Medium-Density Residential (R-2),
Conservation\Open Space (C/OS), and Specific
Plan (SP) Overlay Zones
General Plan: Medium Density Residential; Open Space
Specific Plan: Orcutt Area Specific Plan
Surrounding Uses:
▪ East: Low-Density Residential
▪ West: Vacant (Future: Medium-High Density Residential; Pratt Ranch Development)
▪ North: Vacant (Future: Medium-Density Residential; South Morros Development)
▪ South: Vacant (Future: Low- and Medium Density Residential; Righetti Ranch and Imel
Ranch Developments)
1 Vesting Tentative Tract Map 3006 approved May 19, 2019 by City Co uncil Resolution No. 10620 (Attachment 3)
Meeting Date: September 16, 2019
Figure 1: Subject Property
Item # 3
Packet Page 108
ARCH-0263-2019 (3761 Orcutt)
Page 2
2.0 PROPOSED DESIGN
Architecture: Craftsman style theme
Design Details: Each building is generally rectangular in form, two stories in height, with broad
gently-sloping gable roofs (see Figure 2) and a conventional pattern of rectangular windows. Entry
is taken from accessways branching off of Tiburon Road (south of the project) and Sponza Drive
(north), into garages at the ground floor at the rear of each building (see Figure 3). Building entries
are oriented facing opposite of the garage accessways, fronting on walking paths meandering
across the front of each building group (see Illustrative Site Plan, Sheet 2 of Project Plans,
Attachment 1).
Materials and Colors: Smooth stucco and Hardie Board siding in varying orientation are used as
the primary surface material, accented with white wood trim. Asphalt shingle, charcoal in color, is
the primary roofing material, with corrugated metal accenting the lower-level roof elements (e.g.
entry and porch covers). Colors and materials are more completely described and depicted on
pages 7 and 10 of Project Plans (Attachment 1).
3.0 FOCUS OF REVIEW
The project is comprised of condominium
dwellings in buildings set within surrounding
common area, and the site layout and
improvements have been largely established
through Public Improvement Plans for the
Vesting Tentative Map for Tract 3066.
Condition #89 of Tract Map approval (see
Resolution No. 10620, Attachment 3) provides
that the Commission will review the building and
landscape improvements. These are compared to
the City’s Community Design Guidelines, and to
guidelines provided in the Orcutt Area Specific
Plan. Consistency with the most relevant guidelines is summarized in the tables below.
Figure 2: Front Elevation views (triplex, left; duplex, right)
Figure 3: Rear Elevation (triplex)
Item # 3
Packet Page 109
ARCH-0263-2019 (3761 Orcutt)
Page 3
4.0 PROJECT STATISTICS
Site Details Allowed/
Required
Proposed Consistency
Creek Setback 20 ft. 20 ft 20-foot setback established in Tract 3006
Density (Density Units) 66 43 5.58 net acres R-2 area. Per Orcutt Area
Specific Plan (OASP) Policy 3.1b, dwellings
with two or more bedrooms account for
1.0 density unit.
Height 35 ft 27 ft
31 ft
Duplex
Triplex
Lot Coverage 50% 48% max
Public Art
In-Lieu Contribution (Zoning §17.70.140)
Setbacks 0 0 ft. and
3-5 ft.
Zero feet along small extent (at commercial
space); Narrowest setback is three feet at
the building sides and front; at least 50 ft.
at rear
Parking and Loading Commission should consider provision of
required motorcycle and bicycle spaces
Vehicles 112 112 77 spaces provided in unit garages
35 spaces provided in surface parking lot
Motorcycles 6 0 1 space per 20 vehicle spaces
Bicycle (Short-Term) 6 0 5% of required auto spaces
Environmental Status The project is consistent with the Orcutt Area Specific Plan Final
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and the Supplemental Initial Study
and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) adopted for Vesting
Tentative Tract Map #3063.
5.0 COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES
Guidelines for residential development, including Multi-Family and Clustered Housing Design
are provided in Chapter 5 of the City’s Community Design Guidelines.
Guideline Note
§5.2(F) Exterior Finish Materials
Visual interest, consistent
elevations
Stucco and Hardie Board used to provide visual interest and texture; all
elevations treated consistently
Windows (privacy) Buildings separated by at least 10 feet
Item # 3
Packet Page 110
ARCH-0263-2019 (3761 Orcutt)
Page 4
Garages Garages equipped with roll-up doors; landscape area provided between
driveways; design of doors coordinated with building architecture
§5.4(A) Site Planning
Orientation for privacy Private upper-floor deck areas offset from neighboring decks;
Structures separated by at least 10 feet
Cluster multi-family units Each structure has two or three units
Setback Consistent setback pattern
Entrances
Units and activity areas connected by pedestrian walkways; Units have
individual entrances from pedestrian walkway, with “front yard” space
differentiated by a porch
§5.4(B) Parking and Driveways
Garages Garages provided for each unit, from “woonerf” access
Entry Drive; Internal street Access ways have colored, textured paving treatment; landscape
planting areas provided between driveways and between structures
Bicycle parking Commission should consider appropriate convenient location for
required short-term bicycle parking
§5.4(C) Architecture
Articulation Wall and roof articulation, balconies, and porches included
Scale Large single structures avoided; dwellings provided in groupings if
appropriately-scaled Individual structures
Balconies, porches, patios;
unit access
Balcony decks, porches (including individual covered porches), and
patios are used to break up wall masses, add human scale; porches
used to highlight unit entrances
6.0 ORCUTT AREA SPECIFIC PLAN GUIDELINES
Guidelines in the Orcutt Area Specific Plan focus attention on the special features desired in the
implementation of the Plan, but seek to avoid replication of the City’s Community Design
Guidelines.
Guideline Note
§ 1: Site Planning
DS-2 Entries Residences front a pedestrian walkway
DS-3 Fencing Limited amount of solid wood privacy fencing around individual patios
Item # 3
Packet Page 111
ARCH-0263-2019 (3761 Orcutt)
Page 5
§ 2: Lot Site Design, Building Configuration
DG 1.6 Alleys Alleys are encouraged for alternative parking solutions; most buildings
face creek or park features
DG 2.1 Driveways Shared driveways are used
DG 2.2 Garages Short driveways (<18’) provided, accessing garages at rear of buildings
§3 Building Design
DG 3.1 Design Themes Craftsman style used as general residential theme
DG 3.2 Landscape Consistent landscape character across site
DG 3.3: Driveway Materials Alternative paving materials used
DG 3.4 Porches Residences have covered porches
DG 3.7 Façade Elements Design breaks structure into distinct elements
DG 3.9 Surface Materials Hardie Board and smooth stucco used to provide material variation
DG 3.10 Roofing Materials Composition shingle used exclusively throughout project
DG 3.11 Color Palettes Two different color schemes employed for each building type; color
varied in each individual building, corresponding to material changes
7.0 ACTION ALTERNATIVES
7.1 Continue the project with direction to the applicant and staff on pertinent issues
7.2 Recommend that the Planning Commission deny the project based on findings of
inconsistency with the City’s Community Design Guidelines or Orcutt Area Specific
Plan Design Guidelines
8.0 ATTACHMENTS
1 Project Plans (Site Plan, Floor Plan, Elevation Drawings)
2 Project Description (excerpt from Council Agenda Report)
3 Resolution No. 10620, approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map 3066
Available at hearing: Materials and Colors board
Item # 3
Packet Page 112
TITLE PAGETRACT 3066 AT ORCUTT ROAD, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIAARCHITECTURAL REVIEWJONES PARCEL R-2 PRODUCT1#0428-01-RS1606/21/191/8” = 1’-0” (24X36 SHEET)048 161/16” = 1’-0” (12X18 SHEET)PARKING CALCULATIONS - R-2 DEVLOPMENT AREA:R-2 PARKING REQUIRED:2 PER 2-BEDROOM UNIT (9 UNITS) = 18 SPACES 2.5 PER 3-BEDROOM UNIT (34 UNITS) = 85 SPACESGUEST 1 PER 5 UNITS (43 UNITS) = 9 SPACESTOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 112 SPACESTOTAL H.C. PARKING REQUIRED: 5 SPACESR-2 PARKING PROVIDED:1 SPACE GARAGE PER 2-BEDROOM UNIT = 9 SPACES2 SPACE GARAGE PER 3-BEDROOM UNIT = 68 SPACESSURFACE PARKING = 35 SPACES*TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED = 112 SPACESA PORTION OF THE ORCUTT SPECIFIC PLAN AREAJONES RANCHSHEET INDEXVICINITY MAPCONTACT INFORMATIONDEVELOPER & PROPERTY OWNERAMBIENT COMMUNITIES641 HIGUERA STREET, SUITE 235SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401(805) 602-0009ARCHITECTRRM DESIGN GROUP3765 S. HIGUERA STREET, SUITE 102SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401(805) 543-1794 VOICE 543-4609 FAXLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTRRM DESIGN GROUP3765 S. HIGUERA STREET, SUITE 102SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401(805) 543-1794 VOICE 543-4609 FAXPROJECT INFORMATIONAPN: 076-481-011ZONE: R-1GROSS SITE AREA: 11.63 ACRESTOTAL LOT COVERAGE: 46,097 SFOCCUPANCY: R-2 (TRIPLEX)R-3 (DUPLEX)OASP GROSS DENSITY: 4.81 DU/ACREOASP EST. UNITS: 54-56 UNITSOASP R-1 DEVELOPMENT AREA: 2.84 ACRESOASP R-1 EST. UNITS: 10-11 UNITSOASP R-2 DEVELOPMENT AREA: 4.75 ACRESOASP R-2 EST. UNITS: 44-45 UNITSFIRE SPRINKLER DUPLEX: NFPA 13D TRIPLEX: NFPA 13RAFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENT MET THROUGH LAND DONATION PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AS PART OF PRATT VTM.PROJECT DESCRIPTIONARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF 43 DWELLINGS WITHIN (17) NEW BUIDLINGS; (8) DUPLEXES AND (9) TRIPLEXES ON LOTS 14, 15 16, 17, 18, 19, & 20 OF TRACT 3066 - PHASE 2 DESIGNATED FOR RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIIUMS ON FINAL MAP RECORDED DEC. 27, 2918.1 TITLE PAGE2 ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN3 SITE PLAN4 TRIPLEX GROUND FLOOR PLAN5 TRIPLEX SECOND FLOOR PLAN6 TRIPLEX ELEVATIONS7 TRIPLEX COLOR AND MATERIALS8 DUPLEX FLOOR PLAN9 DUPLEX ELEVATIONS10 DUPLEX FRONT ELEVATIONSPROPOSED R-2 / R-3 DEVELOPMENT AREA:PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 43 CONDOMINIUM UNITSDUPLEX (R-3) OCCUPANCY 8 BUILDINGS - 16 UNITSTRIPLEX (R-2) OCCUPANCY 9 BUILDINGS - 27 UNITS PROPOSED BLDG. COMPOSITION:DUPLEX: (2) 3-BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH UNITS, 1,550-1,750 SF, 2-CAR GARAGETRIPLEX: (1) 2-BEDROOM CARRIAGE UNIT, 2 BATH, 1200 SF, 1-CAR GARAGE(2) 3-BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH UNITS, 1,600-1,700 SF, 2-CAR GARAGE TOTAL: (9) 2-BEDROOM UNITS (34) 3-BEDROOM UNITSADAPTABLE/ACCESSIBLE UNITS: ALL GROUND FLOOR ADAPTABLE/5 ADA UNITSDUPLEX FRONT ELEVATIONCOLORS AND MATERIALS - SCHEME CTRIPLEX FRONT ELEVATIONCOLORS AND MATERIALS - SCHEME APREVIOUS APPROVALSFINAL MAP TRACT 3066 PHASE 2 RECORDED DEC.27, 2018. (ATTACHED FOR REFERENCE)TRACT 3066 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS APPROVED AUG. 24, 2017 & APPROVED AS AMENDED MAR. 29, 2019. (COVER SHEET ATTACHED FOR REFERENCE)TRACT 3066 ON-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS APPROVED SEPT. 7, 2017 & APPROVED AS AMENDED MAR. 29, 2019. (COVER SHEET ATTACHED FOR REFERENCE)RIGHETTI TRACT 3066 (JONES) LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLANS APPROVED JAN. 29, 2018. (COVER SHEET ATTACHED FOR REFERENCE)*(3 SPACES UTILIZED WITHIN ADJACENT MIXED-USE PROJECT PARKING LOT)ATTACHMENT 1Item # 3Packet Page 113
ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN1:30(24X36 SHEET)01530 601:60(12X18 SHEET)2#0428-01-RS1606/21/19JONES PARCELT-1 T-2 T-3T-4D-1D-2D-3D-4D-5D-6D-7D-8T-5NOT A PART OF THIS PROJECT/REVIEWNOT A PART OF THIS PROJECT/REVIEWT-6T-7T-8T-9LAYOUT PER TRACT 3066 ON-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS APPROVED AS AMMENDED MAY 29, 2018. LANDSCAPE PER TRACT 3066 LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLANS, APPROVED JAN. 29, 2018ATTACHMENT 1Item # 3Packet Page 114
JONES PARCEL R-2 PRODUCT3#0428-01-RS1606/21/191” = 30” (24X36 SHEET)01530 601” = 60’ (12X18 SHEET)APPROVED SITE PLAN20’ CREEK SETBACKTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANK36.77’11.86’34.76’27.36’16.37’10.07’20.91’25.55’25.16’25.92’18.4’NOT A PART OF THIS PROJECT REVIEW20’ CREEK SETBACK20’ CREEK SETBACK20’ CREEK SETBACKTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANKLAYOUT PER TRACT 3066 ON-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS APPROVED AS AMMENDED MAY 29, 2018. LANDSCAPE PER TRACT 3066 LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLANS, APPROVED JAN. 29, 2018ATTACHMENT 1Item # 3Packet Page 115
1/4” = 1’-0” (24X36 SHEET)024 81/8” = 1’-0” (12X18 SHEET)TRIPLEX GROUND FLOOR PLAN8355':':
81,7$81,7$&$5*$5$*(81,7%&$5*$5$*(81,7&&$5*$5$*((175<81,7$/,9,1*',1,1*.,7&+(1$'$37$%/(32:'(5$'$37$%/(32:'(5',1,1*.,7&+(1/,9,1*3$175<&/&/(175<81,7%(175<81,7&36)3$7,26)3$7,2
5(48,5('23(163$&( 5(48,5('23(163$&( &/),5(5,6(55220),5('(3$570(17&211(&72581,7$5($6&RPPHQWV $UHD81,7$ 6)81,7$*$5$*( 6)81,7% 6)81,7%*$5$*( 6)81,7& 6)JONES PARCEL R-2 PRODUCT4#0428-01-RS1606/21/19TRIPLEX GROUND FLOORATTACHMENT 1Item # 3Packet Page 116
TRIPLEX SECOND FLOOR PLAN1/4” = 1’-0” (24X36 SHEET)024 81/8” = 1’-0” (12X18 SHEET)81,7$5($6&RPPHQWV $UHD81,7$ 6)81,7$*$5$*( 6)81,7% 6)81,7%*$5$*( 6)81,7& 6)83:':':'':5
3//,9,1*%('.,7&+(10%('%$7+0&/0%$7+%('%$7+%('0%$7+0%('%('%$7+%('0%('0%$7+0&//$81'5<0&//$81'5<',1,1*+$//&/&/+$//+$//&/&/&/&/81,7%81,7&81,7$6)'(&.6)'(&.6)'(&.6)'(&.
5(48,5('23(163$&( 5(48,5('23(163$&( 5(48,5('23(163$&( 5(48,5('23(163$&( JONES PARCEL R-2 PRODUCT5#0428-01-RS1606/21/19TRIPLEX SECOND FLOORATTACHMENT 1Item # 3Packet Page 117
TRIPLEX ELEVATIONSJONES PARCEL R-2 PRODUCT6#0428-01-RS1606/21/191/8” = 1’-0” (24X36 SHEET)048 161/16” = 1’-0” (12X18 SHEET)TRIPLEX SIDE ENTRANCE ELEVATIONTRIPLEX SIDE YARD ELEVATIONTRIPLEX REAR ELEVATION+31’-0”+31’-0”TRIPLEX FRONT ELEVATIONSHOWN IN COLOR SCHEME ASCALE 1/4” =1’-0”+31’-0”ATTACHMENT 1Item # 3Packet Page 118
TRIPLEX COLOR AND MATERIALSJONES PARCEL R-2 PRODUCT7#0428-01-RS1606/21/191/8” = 1’-0” (24X36 SHEET)048 161/16” = 1’-0” (12X18 SHEET)TRIPLEX FRONT ELEVATIONCOLORS AND MATERIALS - SCHEME ATRIPLEX FRONT ELEVATIONCOLORS AND MATERIALS - SCHEME B+31’-0”+31’-0”CEMENT PLASTER STUCCOGRAY MATTERSSW 7066TRIM COLORCOTTON WHITESW 7104TYPICAL COLORS, MATERIALS, AND SPECS FOR ALL COLOR SCHEMESBLACK WINDOW FRAMECORONADO TUMBLED LEDGESTONENOTTINGHAMACCENT SIDING HARDIE BOARDFLOWER POTSW 6334ACCENT SIDING HARDIE BOARDFADED FLAXFLOWERSW 9146PRIMARY SIDINGHARDIE BOARDNUANCESW 7049HARDIE BOARD SIDINGNUANCESW 7049PRIMARY SIDINGHARDIE BOARDUSEFUL GRAYSW 7050ASPHALT SHINGLESGAF TIMBERLINECHARCOALACCENT CORRUGATED METAL ROOFING: GALVANIZED CHARCOALEXTERIOR GOOSENECK LIGHT FIXTUREATTACHMENT 1Item # 3Packet Page 119
DUPLEX FLOOR PLAN1/4” = 1’-0” (24X36 SHEET)024 81/8” = 1’-0” (12X18 SHEET)583835':':
.,7&+(1',1,1*/,9,1*/,9,1*',1,1*.,7&+(1$'$37$%/(32:'(5$'$37$%/(32:'(581,7$&$5*$5$*(81,7%&$5*$5$*(&/&/3(175<81,7$(175<81,7%81,7$ 81,7%6)3$7,26)3$7,2 5(48,5('23(163$&( 5(48,5('23(163$&(
383':'1':/
%('%('%$7+/$81'5<0%$7+0%('0&/0%('%('0%$7+0&//$81'5<%$7+%('+$//&/&/)2<(5+$//&/7&/7//:&
'(&.81,7$ 81,7%81,7$5($6&RPPHQWV $UHD81,7$ 6)81,7$*$5$*( 6)81,7% 6)81,7%*$5$*( 6)JONES PARCEL R-2 PRODUCT8#0428-01-RS1606/21/19DUPLEX GROUND FLOORDUPLEX SECOND FLOORATTACHMENT 1Item # 3Packet Page 120
DUPLEX ELEVATIONSDUPLEX FRONT ELEVATIONSHOWN IN COLOR SCHEME CSCALE 1/4” =1’-0”JONES PARCEL R-2 PRODUCT9#0428-01-RS1606/21/191/8” = 1’-0” (24X36 SHEET)048 161/16” = 1’-0” (12X18 SHEET)DUPLEX SIDE ENTRANCE ELEVATIONDUPLEX SIDE YARD ELEVATIONDUPLEX REAR ELEVATION+27’-0”+27’-0”+27’-0”ATTACHMENT 1Item # 3Packet Page 121
DUPLEX FRONT ELEVATIONSJONES PARCEL R-2 PRODUCT10#0428-01-RS1606/21/191/8” = 1’-0” (24X36 SHEET)048 161/16” = 1’-0” (12X18 SHEET)DUPLEX FRONT ELEVATIONCOLORS AND MATERIALS - SCHEME DCEMENT PLASTER STUCCONUANCESW 7049CEMENT PLASTER STUCCODRIFT OF MISTSW 9166TRIM COLORCOTTON WHITESW 7104TYPICAL COLORS, MATERIALS, AND SPECS FOR ALL COLOR SCHEMESBLACK WINDOW FRAMECORONADO TUMBLED LEDGESTONENOTTINGHAMDUPLEX FRONT ELEVATIONCOLORS AND MATERIALS - SCHEME CACCENT SIDINGHARDIE BOARD YELLOW BIRDSW 9022ACCCENT SIDING HARDIE BOARDJADE DRAGONSW 9129PRIMARY SIDINGHARDIE BOARD THEY CALL IT MELLOWSW 6179PRIMARY SIDINGHARDIE BOARDBONSAI TINTSW 6436+27’-0”ASPHALT SHINGLESGAF TIMBERLINECHARCOALACCENT CORRUGATED METAL ROOFING: GALVANIZED CHARCOALEXTERIOR GOOSENECK LIGHT FIXTUREATTACHMENT 1Item # 3Packet Page 122
ATTACHMENT 1Item # 3Packet Page 123
ATTACHMENT 1Item # 3Packet Page 124
ATTACHMENT 1Item # 3Packet Page 125
ATTACHMENT 1Item # 3Packet Page 126
ATTACHMENT 1Item # 3Packet Page 127
ATTACHMENT 1Item # 3Packet Page 128
ATTACHMENT 1Item # 3Packet Page 129
ATTACHMENT 1Item # 3Packet Page 130
Project Description and Statements
Jones Parcel
DEDICATION"
ASREQUIRED
NEIGHBORHOODPARK v-ETU-.-
MIHGATIQN
AREA4.2.4
uoaiiE
Orcutt Area Specific Plan
I. Project Description
Ambient Communities is requesting the review and approval of a Vesting Tentative Tract Map for the development of
the "Jones Ranch" property within the Orcutt Area Specific Plan (OASP). The property and specific plan area were
recently annexed into the City of San Luis Obispo.1 The OASP was approved on March 2, 2010.2 These actions
allocated an estimated 56 residential homes on the Jones Ranch property (10 - 11 R-1 units and 44 -45 R-2 units)3 ,
although this estimate does not include the mixed use residential units allocated to the property.
The Jones Ranch property is 11.56 acres of gently sloping land bisected by Barrandca Creek. The proposed plan is
to build nine (9) market rate single-family detached homes (Jones Family has 2 existing residences, lots 1 and 2, and
will build two more, lots 3 and 4 to be retained as homestead lots) on the R-1 zoned portion of the property.
In the R-2 zoned area of the property, which will include the "R-1 Island" presently shown on OASP maps (as R1)
that is a part of a zone change requested in the Righetti Ranch General Plan Amendment/SpecificPlan amendment
application, Jones Ranch proposes 43 medium density residences in an attached home configuration. Jones Ranch
will provide its required inclusionary housing units, and is proposing to provide an additional nine inclusionary units to
meet the requirement of the Righetti Ranch property
1 Orcutt Area annexed November 16,2011
2 Resolution No.10154 (2010 Series)
3 See Table A-2 of the Orcutt Area Specific Plan
Attachment 2
PH2-100
Item # 3
Packet Page 131
see section VI below) to fulfill a shared arrangement for affordable units with Righetti Ranch. In all, the Jones Ranch
project proposes 13 R-1 lots, 9 to be for sale market rate homes and 4 homestead lots, 43 attached homes in the R-
2 area, and 9 mixed use apartments/condominiumson top of approximately 15,000 square feet of commercial
space. This amounts to 65 total units, 61 total for sale units of which there are 44 market rate units and 17 affordable
units. The Jones Ranch property will be constructed in a single phase with phase 1 of the Righetti Ranch project
where utilities, accessand necessary infrastructure will be coordinated with the Righetti Ranch as if the
developments are a single project. Righetti Ranch and Jones Ranch will share the same CC&R's and master HOA.
The HOA will maintain the project stormwater features and common space among other things as detailed in the
CC&R's.
Jones Ranch as designed has four separate land use designations. There are 2.96 acres zoned R-1, 3.66 acres
zoned R-2 and 1.33 acres zoned CCMU (community commercial mixed use). There are 2.03 acres zoned
conservation open space. the R-1 area will have a density of 4.4 units per acre which is well within the limits for R-1.
The R-2 area density is calculated as 11.7 units per acre where 12 units per acre is the maximum.4
The Jones Ranch property main natural feature is Barrandca Creek which traverses the property and has a fork on
the north side creating two creek areas that run across the property and merge into one creek.These areas are
maintained as open space and are protected and valued property features. Appropriate creek setbacks and open
space treatment is provided in the site design.5
The R-1 portion of the property is uniquely designed in a courtyard arrangement of two groupings of single family
homes. One grouping is a cluster of 5 homes around a shared access courtyard and the other a cluster of 4 homes
around a shared access courtyard. Each cluster will be accessed from "B" Street. This design differentiation
provides a different and unique product that is an efficient use of the limited R-1 space and is encouraged by the
OASP.6
Attached housing product like duplexes and triplexes are highly encouraged in the R-2 zone by the OASP.7 The
Jones Ranch project will make extensive use of this design in the R-2 zoned portion of the property and make
efficient use of limited space. The project as proposed will provide 43 attached units in a mix of eight (8) duplex and
nine (9) triplex buildings. The duplex buildings will provide two three-bedroom units, each two stories. The triplex
buildings will provide two three-bedroom units, each two stories, with the additional two bedroom unit designed as a
single level second floor unit above the garages.
Each two-bedroom unit has an associated one car garage and each three-bedroom unit has an associated two car
garage. The Garages will provide a combined 74 parking spaces. Additionally there are 38 additional surface
parking spaces proposed in the R-2 area. The mixed use area will add 58
4 City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations 17.16.010(2)(a)and Table 3.1
5 See OASP Figure 2.1 and policy 2.2.1 and policy 2.2.2 and program 2.2.2C et al
6 See OASP Goal 3.1a and policy 3.2.5 et al.
7 OASP Policy 3.2.9
Attachment 2
PH2-101
Item # 3
Packet Page 132
parking spaces including 4 disabled access spaces. The mixed use area incorporates a mixed use parking reduction
of 25%.8
Each unit of the attached product will have 250 square feet of private open space as required by the City's
subdivision standards. Additionally, the R-2 zone will provide a central common open space area as well as a
pocket park area which will provide well over 6,450 square feet of common area open space or a minimum of 150
square feet of common open space per unit.9
The last portion of the Jones Ranch property is the approximately 1.3 acre strip of land zoned Community
Commercial Mixed Use. Jones Ranch is proposing to add approximately 15,000 square feet of commercial space to
provide a mix of retail, personal service and office space uses.10 The commercial center provides a plaza area along
A street and at the intersection of A and B Streets and will provide affordable residential above the ground floor
commercial space.11
Jones Ranch will create a community that successfully accomplishes the goals and objectives of the OASP. It will
provide a new communitythat brings needed housing to the City while creating a community that is diverse and
balanced with the natural setting. The natural beauty will be maintained and protected alongside the new home
sites. Jones Ranch will provide a "balanced mix of housing types including single-family and multi-family" and
inclusionary housing12.
The community will feature walking trails and bicycle paths, a variety of park-like space and open space for the
enjoyment of its residents. The community protects and emphasizes creeks and riparian areas, wetlands and
sensitive environmental features. By focusing the design on balancing and meeting all of the goals and objectives of
the OASP, the Jones Ranch project will provide a livable, walkable, desirable community with a unique sense of
place for all to enjoy13.
II. Statement of Existing and Proposed Land Use
The Jones property is a mix of residential zoning, mixed use zoning and open space established by the approval of
the OASP and annexation of the property into the City of San Luis Obispo. The zoning currently established
includes the open space zone covering riparian areas including creek setbacks, R-1 low density zoning on the
eastern half of the property, R-2 medium density zoning on the central portion of the property and mixed
use/community commercial zoning on the western eighth of the property.
The proposed Ambient Communities Vesting Tentative Tract Map for Jones Ranch will maintain largely the same
zoning as indicated in the OASP with one small modification. There is an area on the northeast
8 City of San Luis Obispo Zoning regulations 17.16.060(C)
9 City of San Luis Obispo Subdivision Regulations 16.17.030(B)
10 OASP section 3.2.2
11 OASP Policy 3.2.16a,b and c
12 See Orcutt Area Specific Plan Section 1.6,page 1-5
13 See OASP Section 1.6
Attachment 2
PH2-102
Item # 3
Packet Page 133
portion of the Jones Ranch property within the fork of the creek that is zoned R-1 in the OASP. This 14,800 square
foot area situated between the open space creek areas presents significant constraints that make R-1 development
there a challenge. Therefore it is proposed in a previous (Righetti Ranch) application that this R-1 "island" be
rezoned to R-2 which is a more suitable zone that will lessen the development impacts and create better land use
compatibility with the neighboring Taylor property to the north. This map proposal assumes that zone change for
design purposes.
III. Statement of Proposed Landscape Improvements
The project is designed to meet the intent of the Orcutt Area Specific Plan and City of San Luis Obispo standards.
The project includes ample open space and a public trail system. The project contains a range of housing and
commercial opportunities, along with a central common open space. The character of the project is intended to
mimic the natural ranch and adjacent creek setting, utilize native and drought -tolerant vegetation, and reduce
impacts to the surrounding environment where possible.
RESIDENTIAL & COMMERICAL AREAS
A schematic Planting Plan has been developed to demonstrate a recommended landscape palette and design
intent, but is not intended to be an inclusive plant list. Landscaping will primarily consist of drought -tolerant trees
and shrubs, with riparian species used along the existing creek corridor and within bio-infiltration areas. Turf will be
only used in the common open space area for recreational purposes. The design principles for the Jones Property
landscaping includes the following:
Shrubs
Planting will be located with low groundcover and shrubs in the foreground and layered with higher plants
behind. Blank walls will utilize taller vegetation to soften expanses, and low planting will be placed along
entries, walkways and driveways. Shrubs will be located to maintain views out of windows.
Sun and shade preferences will be considered for planting under trees and along building foundations.
Plants will be placed based on their ultimate width at maturity, and shrubs planted under tree canopies will not
grow more that 0.75% of the canopy height.
Bio-infiltration areas are proposed between the commercial buildings and parking lot. These areas will treat
storm water, and shrubs will consist of riparian species that can tolerate periodic flows and standing water.
Shrub areas adjacent to riparian corridors will transition into each other, and not have abrupt edges
designating the zones.
Attachment 2
PH2-103
Item # 3
Packet Page 134
Trees
Trees with low root damage potential will be used when planted within 5' of hardscape elements.
Trees will be placed so that canopies do not extend into buildings or other trees to alleviate the need for
future pruning.
Trees should be utilized to provide shading of buildings and parking areas whenever feasible.
Bio-infiltration areas are proposed between the commercial buildings and parking lot. These areas will treat
storm water, and trees will consist of riparian species that can tolerate periodic flows and standing water.
OPEN SPACE & TRAILS
A centrally located common open space is proposed within the project, and it is approximately 0.25 acres in size.
The open space will include pedestrian trails and individual picnic areas. Lighting will be limited to primary
pedestrian walkways and parking areas as needed for security. Please see Righetti Ranch "Trails and Public
Access" sheet L-4.
Pedestrian Paths: Pedestrian pathways will be provided, and they will be 5 feet wide and will likely be
constructed of decomposed granite or concrete. Gazebos with benches will be provided along the path
system in strategic locations to provide viewing of open space areas.
Bicycle Paths: 8-foot bike path with 2-foot shoulders along creek will provide a bicycle staging area and
provide connectivity to other bike paths and streetsand the community park.
Individual Picnic Areas: Two picnic areas will be provided within the central common open space and they
will include accessible paving, picnic table, and trash and recycling receptacles.
IV.Exceptions from Design Standards
The presence of Barrandca Creek and the fork of the creek and the associated creek setbacks and open space
requirements create difficulty in the design and configuration of lots and the subdivision of the land. The creek
meanders and the setbacks are therefore highly irregular and meandering. This presents many challenges and
limitations for lot design and site planning. This is a primary design constraint that requires a variety of exceptions
and adjustment requests.
A. BUILDING HEIGHT 25 FEET IN R-1 ZONE:
Building heights in the R-1 zone on the Jones Ranch tract map will exceed 25 feet from existing grade. City
ordinance requires height to be measured from the "existing topography" of the site14. The City
14 City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Ordinance Section 17.16.040
Attachment 2
PH2-104
Item # 3
Packet Page 135
Zoning Ordinance defines "existing topography" to be "the topography resulting from grading activity legally
permitted in conjunction with subdivision improvements..." which is design grade in a subdivision15.
Additionally, the code allows discretion to the director to allow a house in the R-1 zone to exceed the 25-foot building
height limit16. The building heights in the R-1 will exceed 25 feet so this application will request an adjustment for
Houses in the R-1 zone that exceed the 25-feet height limit. The structures will be less than 30 feet in height.
B. LOT COVERAGE:
R-1 zoned lots have a maximum 40% lot coverage17. R-2 zoned lots are allowed 50% lot coverage18. This
application is requesting an adjustment to allow R-2 (development standards) for R-1 lots of 5,000 s.f. or less.
i. Lot Size (Area):
There are 4 R-1 lots being retained by the Jones family as homestead lots. The OASP table 3.1 limits R-1 lots to a
maximum of 15,000 square feet. The four Jones homestead lots will exceed the maximum OASP lot size and remain
more consistent with lots that predate the OASP.
C. STREET SECTION:
One of the ways we are able to respond to the new requirements for storm water and low impact development is to
reduce impervious surfaces. Travel lanes for local streets (Sponza Drive) have been reduced to 10' width, the
minimum needed for fire access. Parking provided meets the minimum requirements only. Sidewalks have been
eliminated wherever possible along private streets, while still providing access. Bulb outs are provided to reduce
impervious surface of streets and provide stormwater treatment. All of these changes are encouraged by OASP
Policy 5.6.[7]In addition, the Water Quality Control Board Post-Construction Requirements notes, "construct streets,
sidewalks, or parking lot aisles to the minimum widths necessary, provided that public safety or mobility are not
compromised."
B" Street Section:
Figure 5.1, Program 5.2.3.a, and Figure 5.7 -The OASP provides conflicting information regarding the B Street
section from the neighborhood park to Orcutt Road. The text calls for separated sidewalk and
15 City of san Luis Obispo Zoning Ordinance Section 17.100(E)Definitions -"Existing Topography"
16 City of San Luis Obispo Zoning Ordinance Section 17.24.020(C)
17 OASP Table 3.1:residential Development Standards
18 Ibid
171 Please seeOASPPolicy 5.6 onpage5-16which encourages varied street widths forincreased density anddesign flexibility
Attachment 2
PH2-105
Item # 3
Packet Page 136
street parking adding up to a 68' right-of-way section, while the maps and current City zoning GIS indicates a
narrowing of the right-of-way beyond the neighborhood park to a width of 44'. The project proposes a 48' section
between the Neighborhood Park and Orcutt Road which does not include parking, but does include bike lanes and
attached sidewalks.
D. SETBACKS:
Lot 7 in the R-1 courtyard residences is up against the creek setback. In order to accommodate the lot and the
setback, the rear yard of lot 7 is reduced to 14 feet at the closest point to the creek setback. Therefore an exception
for rear yard setback of less than 20 feet is requested. See attached lot 7 exception exhibit.
The "island" area between the fork in Barrandca Creek is constrained by the two creek areas and associated 20 feet
setbacks. This creates physical constraints not typically experienced with other lots of the same zone, topography or
size. While we are able to fit the buildings, a very short bend in the driveway access on lot 28 and lot 23 encroaches
into the 20 foot creek setback. No part of the structure encroaches, only a small portion of the driveway. Therefore it
is requested that an exception be granted to allow an approximate four (4) feet encroachment into the creek setback
for the very short portion of the driveway to properly access the residence (see Lot 23 and Lot 28 exhibit included).
The OASP attempts to accommodate the challenges the creeks can present in constraining development, for
example, by allowing R-1 lots to be enlarged where creeks are present19 and also allowing measures such as zero
lot lines20 and duplexes to help in more confined spaces and for more compact development. While not specific, the
intent of these policies is for the OASP to acknowledge some of the physical constraints and provide some flexibility
to work around them. We request some flexibility for this conflict.
Side yard setbacks for the two duplex units on lot 23 are reduced from 5 feet to 3 - 4 feet for each unit (see Lot 23
and Lot 28 exhibit included). This is needed due to the site constraints of the creek fork and required creek setbacks
which confine the space. Additionally the OASP does encourage zero lot lines and duplex units21 which should allow
for side yard setback reduction.
E.Homestead Existing Conditions and Open Space
The Lot 1 homestead includes and existing home within ten (10) feet of the creek setback and several miscellaneous
structures within the creek setback and CDFW jurisdiction. These structures predate the approval of the OASP. It is
requested that the existing conditions present on Lot 1 remain as "grandfathered" uses. An easement or other
mechanism can be executed in order to restrict any future improvements within open space or other restricted areas
noted in the OASP.
19 OASP 3.2.5 "where creeks or other natural features constrain lot configurations there may be some larger R -1 lots"
20 OASP 3.2.8
21 OASP Policy 3.2.8 and Policy 3.2.9
Attachment 2
PH2-106
Item # 3
Packet Page 137
F. DRIVEWAY LENGTH
Due to the constraints of the creek, and limited R-1 space, we have used a courtyard style of lot layout for the R-1
residences. This design is an efficient use of space and is encouraged by the OASP22. However it does restrict
driveway length as the driveway is shared by all 4 or 5 homes in the cluster. Therefore the lengths of the individual
driveways are shortened. We request that an exception be granted to accommodate this design and the shortened,
varying lengths of the driveways in the R-1 lots listed in table 4.1.
TABLE 4.1 LOT EXCEPTIONS
Lot Height Lot Coverage Lot Size Exception Setback Exception Driveway
Number Exception
Requeste
d
Exception
Requested
Length
Exception
Lot 1 30 Feet No Yes over 15K sf
allowed by OASP
Section 3.2.5
Yes existing structures
Within the creek setback
No
Lot 2 30 Feet No Yes over 15K sf
OASP 3.2.5)
No
Lot 3 30 Feet No Yes over 15K sf
OASP 3.2.5)
No
Lot 4 30 Feet No Yes over 15K sf
OASP 3.2.5)
No
Lot 5 30 Feet No No Yes
Lot 6 30 Feet No No Yes
Lot 7 30 Feet Yes: Only R1
Less than
5,000sf
No Rear Yard Exception to
14 feet (from 20)
Yes
Lot 8 30 Feet No No Yes
Lot 9 30 Feet No No Yes
Lot 10 30 feet No No Yes
Lot 11 30 feet No No Yes
Lot 12 30 Feet No No Yes
Lot 13 30 Feet No No Yes
Lot 23 No No No
Driveway encroaches
into creek setback.
Building Side Yard
Setback Encroachment
No
Lot 28 No No No Driveway encroaches
into creek setback
No
22 See OASP DG 2.2 on page 4-2
Attachment 2
PH2-107
Item # 3
Packet Page 138
V .Low Impact Development
As a residential tentative subdivision map with five (5) or more units, the project is classified as a Tier 3 Low Impact
Development project. This requires at least two (2) LID measures that retain or reduce runoff. The following LID
measures will be implemented:
Bio-filtration systems (bio-retention with underdrains due to underlying impervious rock)
Down-spout disconnect
Storm water ponds (stormwater directed to off-site vegetated regional detention pond)
VI.Inclusionary Housing
The Jones Ranch vesting tentative tract map proposes 61 for sale units plus two existing homestead units and two
future homestead units the Jones family reserved for its use and enjoyment. Of those 61 units, 9 are low income
affordable units provided to complete the Righetti affordable requirement as positioned according to the
implementation of policy 3.3.3 which allows the cooperation of properties to share the affordable housing
responsibility. The 9 low income units will be located in the mixed use area above the commercial use on the
property. The Jones parcel affordable responsibility is 8 units, 5 moderate and 3 low income units, which is 15% of
53 units. The Jones Ranch project will provide 44 market rate units, not 53. We have added the 9 affordable units
from Righetti Ranch to the 44, making it 53, to properly account for the sharing of affordable responsibility between
Righetti Ranch and Jones Ranch. For the Jones calculation, we count the 9 units from Righetti as market rate units
for calculation purposes on Jones, though those units are sold at affordable rates in Jones Ranch. This will bring the
total affordable housing unit sales by Jones Ranch to 17 (9 from Righetti and 8 from Jones). Righetti Ranch is selling
32 of its 41 affordable units, the remaining 9 being added to the Jones Ranch project. The 8 units Jones Ranch is
responsible to provide as affordable will be located in the R-2 units as two bedroom homes there. The affordable
units will be built alongside market rate three bedroom units. The construction and treatment of the affordable units
will be the same as the market rate units in the R-2 attached housing product.
VII .Architecture Review
City subdivision regulations indicate that a Vesting Tentative Tract Map within a specific plan is exempt from the
requirement for architecture review23. The intention of this application is to comply with the OASP design guidelines.
However at the direction of the City Community Development Department, Ambient Communities is including a
Minor Architecture Review Application with the vesting tentative map application and is thus in process.
23 Subdivision Regulations Section 16.12.020(B)(1); Page 32 of City of SLO Subdivision Regulations
Attachment 2
PH2-108
Item # 3
Packet Page 139
VIII. Consistent with Current Zoning
This request for a Vesting Tentative Tract Map is in general conformance with the existing zoning of the OASP
remains with the proposed map application. There is no zone change request with this application (although there is
with the Righetti Ranch application which will affect the R-1 "island" on the Jones parcel). This request is consistent
with current and expected zoning of R-1, R-2 and Community Commercial Mixed Use.
IX. Status of Approvals from other Agencies
Applications to the Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of Fish and Wildlife have been submitted.
We can provide those at your request if needed prior to the CEQA review process.
Attachment 2
PH2-109
Item # 3
Packet Page 140
RESOLUTION NO. 10620 (2015 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. 3066 CREATING 33 LOTS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3765
ORCUTT ROAD
TR/ER SBDV- 0067 -2014; TRACT #3066 JONES)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a
public hearing on March 25 and April 8th, 2015 in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm
Street, San Luis Obispo, California, for the purpose of considering SBDV- 0067 -2014, a vesting
tentative tract map subdividing an approximately 11.56 -acre site into 33 lots; and recommended
the City Council approve the Vesting Tentative Tract Map; and
WHEREAS, the April 8, 2015 Planning Commission hearing was for the purpose of
formulating and forwarding recommendations to the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
regarding the project; and
WHEREAS, notices of said public hearing were made at the time and in the manner
required by law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the initial study of
environmental impact as prepared by staff; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony
of the applicant, interested parties, and the evaluation and recommendations by staff, presented at
said hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. CEQA Findings, Mitigation_ Measures and Mitigation Monitoring
Program. Based upon all the evidence, the City Council makes the following CEQA findings
in support of the Vesting Tentative Map SBDV- 0067 -2014 (Tract No. 3066):
The proposed project is consistent with the requirements of the Orcutt Area Specific
Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) certified and adopted by the City Council
on March 2, 2010, and this approval incorporates those FEIR mitigation measures as
applicable to VTM #3066, as detailed herein.
2. A supplemental initial study has been prepared for VTM #3066 addressing potential
environmental impacts which were not identified or detailed in the FEIR for the Orcutt
Area Specific Plan (OASP). The Community Development Director has recommended
that the results of that additional analysis be incorporated into a Mitigated Negative
Declaration (MND) of environmental impacts, and recommends adoption of additional
mitigation measures to those imposed by the FEIR, all of which are incorporated below.
R 10620
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 141
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 2
3. All potentially significant effects were analyzed adequately in the referenced FEIR and
IS- MND, and reduced to a level of insignificance, provided the following mitigation
measures are incorporated into the development project and the mitigation monitoring
program:
AIR QUALITY MITIGATION
Operational Phase Mitigation
AQ -1(a) Energy Efficiency. The building energy efficiency rating shall be 10% above what is
required by Title 24 requirements for all buildings within the Specific Plan Area. The
following energy- conserving techniques shall be incorporated unless the applicant
demonstrates their infeasibility to the satisfaction of City Planning and Building
Department staff. increase walls and attic insulation beyond Title 24 requirements;
orient buildings to maximize natural heating and cooling; plant shade trees along
southern exposures of buildings to reduce summer cooling needs; use roof material
with a solar reflectance value meeting the Environmental Protection
Agency /Department of Energy Star rating; build in energy efficient appliances; use
low energy street lighting and traffic signals; use energy efficient interior lighting; use
solar water heaters; use double -paned windows; solar panel plumbing; grey water
recycling; tank -less water heaters; dedicated hot water line loops.
AQ -1(b) Transit. Bus turnouts and shelter improvements with direct pedestrian access shall be
installed at all bus stops.
AQ -1(c) Shade Trees. All parking lots shall include shade trees within the parking area. There
shall be at least one shade tree for every six vehicle parking spaces.
AQ -1(d) Telecommuting. All new homes within the Specific Plan area shall be constructed
with internal wiring /cabling that allows telecommuting, teleconferencing, and tele-
learning to occur simultaneously in at least three locations in each home.
AQ -1(e) Pathways. Where feasible, all cul -de -sacs and dead -end streets shall be links by
pathways to encourage pedestrian and bicycle travel.
AQ -1 Monitoring Program:
Compliance with operational phase mitigation measures will be reviewed with the subdivision
plans and accompanying architectural review plans and ultimately shown on improvement plans
and construction drawings.
ConstructionPhaseMiti agtion
AQ -3(a) Application of CBACT (Best Available Control Technology for construction
related equipment). The following measures shall be implemented to reduce
combustion emissions from construction equipment where a project will have an area
of disturbance greater than 1 acre.
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 142
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 3
Specific Plan applicants shall submit for review by the Community Development
Department and Air Pollution Control District (APCD) staff a grading plan
showing the area to be disturbed and a description of construction equipment that
will be used and pollution reduction measures that will be implemented. Upon
confirmation by the Community Development Department and APCD, appropriate
CBACT features shall be applied. The application of these features shall occur
prior to Specific Plan construction.
Specific Plan applicants shall be required to ensure that all construction
equipment and portable engines are properly maintained and tuned according to
manufacturer's specifications.
Specific Plan applicants shall be required to ensure that off -road and portable
diesel powered equipment, including but not limited to bulldozers, graders,
cranes, loaders, scrapers, backhoes, generator sets, compressors, auxiliary power
units, shall be fueled exclusively with CARB motor vehicle diesel fuel (non -taxed
off -road diesel is acceptable).
Specific Plan applicants shall be required to install a diesel oxidation catalyst on
each of the two pieces of equipment projected to generate the greatest emissions.
Installations must be prepared according to manufacturer's specifications.
AQ -3(b) Dust Control. The following measures shall be implemented to reduce PM10
emissions during all Specific Plan construction:
Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible.
Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne
dust from leaving the site. Water shall be applied as soon as possible whenever
wind speeds exceed 15 miles per hour. Reclaimed (nonpotable) water should be
used whenever possible.
All dirt- stock -pile areas shall be sprayed daily as needed.
Permanent dust control measures shall be identified in the approved Specific Plan
revegetation and landscape plans and implemented as soon as possible following
completion of any soil disturbing activities.
Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one
month after initial grading shall be sown with a fast - germinating native grass seed
and watered until vegetation is established.
All disturbed soil areas not subject to revegetation shall be stabilized using
approved chemical soil binders, jute netting, or other methods approved in
advance by the APCD.
All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc., to be paved shall be completed as soon
as possible. In addition, building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after
grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.
Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any
unpaved surface at the construction site.
All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil or other loose materials shall be covered or shall
maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of
load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114.
Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or
wash off trucks and equipment leaving the site.
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 143
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 4
Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent
paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water shall be used where feasible.
AQ -3(c) Cover Stockpiled Soils. If importation, exportation, or stockpiling of fill material is
involved, soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or
treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. Trucks transporting material shall
be tarped from the point of origin.
AQ -3(d) Dust Control Monitor. On all projects with an area of disturbance greater than 1
acre, the contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the dust
control program and to order increased watering as necessary to prevent transport of
dust off -site. Their duties shall include holiday and weekend periods when work may
not be in progress.
AQ -3 Monitoring Program:
These conditions shall be noted on all project grading and building plans. The applicant will also
be required to secure necessary permits from the Air Pollution Control Board (APCD) before the
onset of grading or demolition activities including, but not limited to additional dust control
measures, evaluation for Naturally Occurring Asbestos. The applicant shall present evidence of a
plan for complying with these requirements prior to issuance of a grading or building permit
from the City. The applicant shall provide the City with the name and telephone number of the
person responsible for ensuring compliance with these requirements. The Building Inspector and
Public Works Inspectors shall conduct field monitoring.
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION
B -3(a) Construction Requirements. Development under the Specific Plan shall abide by
the requirements of the City Arborist for construction. Requirements shall include but
not be limited to: the protection of trees with construction setbacks from trees;
construction fencing around trees; grading limits around the base of trees as required;
and a replacement plan for trees removed including replacement at a minimum 1:1
ratio.
B -4(c) Riparian/Wetland Mitigation. If riparian and /or wetland habitat are proposed for
removal pursuant to development under the Specific Plan, such development shall
apply for all applicable permits and submit a Mitigation Plan for areas of disturbance
to wetlands and /or riparian habitat. The plan shall be prepared by a biologist familiar
with restoration and mitigation techniques. Compensatory mitigation shall occur on-
site using regionally collected native plant material at a minimum ratio of 2:1 (habitat
created to habitat impacted) in areas shown on figure 4.4 -2 as directed by a biologist.
The resource agencies may require a higher mitigation ratio. If the Orcutt Regional
Basin is necessary as a mitigation site for waters of the U.S. and State it shall be
designed as directed by a biologist taking into consideration hydrology, soils, and
erosion control and using the final mitigation guidelines and monitoring requirements
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2004). As noted above, the trail shall be setback out
of the buffer area for riparian and wetland habitat.
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 144
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 5
B -5( a) Bird Pre - Construction Survey. To avoid impacts to nesting special- status bird
species and raptors including the ground- nesting burrowing owl, all initial ground -
disturbing activities and tree removal shall be limited to the time period between
September 15 and February 1. If initial site disturbance, grading, and tree removal
cannot be conducted during this time period, a pre- construction survey for active nests
within the limits of grading shall be conducted by a qualified biologist at the site two
weeks prior to any construction activities (for ground- nesting burrowing owl survey
see below). If active nests are located, all construction work must be conducted
outside a buffer zone of 200 feet to 500 feet from the nests as determined in
consultation with the CDFG. No direct disturbance to nests shall occur until the
adults and young are no longer reliant on the nest site. A qualified biologist shall
confirm that breeding /nesting is completed and young have fledged the nest prior to
the start of construction.
B -5(b) Burrowing Owl Survey. When an applicant requests entitlements from the City
under the Specific Plan a qualified biologist shall conduct surveys for burrowing owls
during both the wintering and nesting seasons (unless the species is detected on the
first survey) in potentially suitable habitats prior to construction in accordance with
the guidelines described in the CDFG Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation
1995). Winter surveys shall be conducted on the entire project site between
December 1 and February 1, and the nesting season survey shall be conducted
between April 15 and July 15. If burrowing owls are detected within the proposed
disturbance area, CDFG shall be contacted immediately to develop and implement a
mitigation plan to protect owls and their nest sites.
B -5(c) Monarch Pre - Construction Survey. If initial ground- breaking is to occur between
the months of October and March a pre- construction survey for active monarch roost
sites within the limits of grading shall be conducted by a qualified biologist at the site
two weeks prior to any construction activities. If active roost sites are located no
ground- disturbing activities shall occur within 50 feet of the perimeter of the habitat.
Construction shall not resume within the setback until a qualified biologist has
determined that the monarch butterfly has vacated the site.
B -5(d) VPFS Sampling Surveys. Prior to development in areas shown as potential VPFS
habitat on Figure 4.4 -2, current USFWS protocol level sampling surveys shall be
conducted in all such areas. A report consistent with current Federal, State, and local
reporting guidelines shall be prepared to document the methods and results of surveys.
If VPFS are found, the report shall include a map that identifies the VPFS locations.
Should the presence of additional special- status wildlife species be determined
including California linderiella, a map identifying locations in which these species
were found shall be prepared and included in the report.
B -5(e) FESA Consultation and Mitigation Regarding VPFS. If any VPFS individuals are
located onsite pursuant to Mitigation Measure B -5(d), substantial setbacks from their
identified habitat shall be implemented to avoid take of a Federally listed species. If
complete avoidance is not economically or technically feasible, then Section 10 of the
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 145
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 6
Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) shall be used to authorize incidental take
when no other Federal agency such as the Corps is involved. This process includes
development of a Habitat Conservation Plan for protecting and enhancing the
Federally listed species at a specific location in perpetuity. Species take can also be
authorized under Section 7 of the FESA if a Federal agency is involved in the project
e.g., Corps Section 404 permitting for impacts to waters of the U.S. and/or Federal
funding) and agrees to be the lead agency requesting Section 7 consultation. This
consultation process takes at a minimum 135 days from the official request by the
Federal lead agency.
The compensatory mitigation ratio shall be determined by the appropriate resource
agencies. Suitable replacement habitat shall be constructed either within the site
boundaries or offsite. [OASP FEIR] Figure 4.4 -2 identifies areas that could be
appropriate for onsite VPFS mitigation. Figure 4.4 -2 is not intended to preclude
development but shall be used as a starting point for incorporating VPFS mitigation
sites into the development plan. While the Orcutt Regional Basin included in the
potential VPFS mitigation sites may need regular maintenance and may be seasonally
flooded, depressions could be created on the upper edges of the terrace in such a
manner that they are protected from flooding. VPFS mitigation areas shall be
approved by a biologist familiar with VPFS habitat "creation" techniques.
Enhancement of the onsite seasonal freshwater wetland habitat that is undisturbed by
project activities may also be a part of the mitigation program. Alternatively, fairy
shrimp cysts could be collected during the dry season from the existing habitat and
placed into storage. Topsoil could also be removed and stored in conditions suitable
to retain cysts. Wetland habitat could be enhanced /created in the areas shown on
Figure 4.4 -2 by grading depressions in the landscape and "top dressing" the
depressions with the preserved topsoil. Preserved cysts would be added to the
recreated wetlands in December or January, after sufficient ponding has occurred.
It is important to note that VPFS habitat mitigation is still considered experimental.
VPFS habitat mitigation is ambitious as it is costly, labor intensive, and difficult to
ensure success. Habitat may be "created" only in an existing vernal pool landscape
that provides suitable soils and a number of other specific ecological factors (USFWS,
2004).
An alternative to onsite mitigation is the purchase of mitigation bank credits. Credits
can be purchase by the acre as suitable mitigation for VPFS. There is currently no
known mitigation bank with VPFS habitat occurring within San Luis Obispo County,
however, mitigation banks may be available in the future.
0 B -3a, B -4c, B -5 Monitoring Program:
Monitoring will include Natural Resources Department staff consultation and implementation at
time of review and prior to approval of grading plan(s) and during tract construction (B -3a, B -4c,
B -5).
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 146
Resolution No. 10620 ( 2015 Series)
Page 7
B -6(c) Educational Pet Brochure. Any development pursuant to the Specific Plan shall
prepare a brochure that informs prospective homebuyers and Home Owners
Association (HOA) members about the impacts associated with non- native animals,
especially cats and dogs, to the project site; similarly, the brochure must inform
potential homebuyers and all HOA members of the potential for coyotes to prey on
domestic animals.
B -6(c) Landscaping Plan Review. To ensure that project landscaping does not introduce
invasive non - native plant and tree species to the region of the site, the final
landscaping plan shall be reviewed and approved by a qualified biologist. The
California Invasive Plant Council (Cal -IPC) maintains several lists of the most
important invasive plants to avoid. The lists shall be used when creating a plant
palette for landscaping to ensure that plants on the lists are not used. The following
plants shall not be allowed as part of potential landscaping plans pursuant to
development under the Specific Plan:
African sumac (Rhus lancea)
Australian saltbush (Atriplex semibaccata)
Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia)
California pepper (Schinus molle) and Brazilian pepper (S. terebinthifolius)
Cape weed (Arctotheca calendula)
Cotoneaster (Cotoneaster pannosus), (C. lacteus)
Edible fig (Ficus carica)
Fountain grass (Pennisetum setaceum)
French broom (Genista monspessulana)
Ice plant, sea fig (Carpobrotus edulis)
Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula)
Myoporum (Myoporum spp.)
Olive (Olea europaea)
Pampas grass (Cortaderia selloana), and Andean pampas grass (C. jubata)
Russian olive (Elaeagnus angusticifolia)
Scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius) and striated broom (C. striatus)
Spanish broom (Spartium junceum)
Tamarix, salt cedar (Tamarix chinensis), (T. gallica), (T. parviflora), (T.
ramosissima)
Blue gum (Eucalyptus globulus)
Athel tamarisk (Tamarix aphylla)
B -6c Monitoring Program:
Compliance with mitigation measures will be reviewed with landscaping plans as part of the
architectural review submittal and ultimately shown on improvement plans and construction
drawings.
CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION
CR -1(d) Archaeological Resource Construction Monitoring. At the commencement of
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 147
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 8
project construction, an orientation meeting shall be conducted by an archaeologist
for construction workers associated with earth disturbing procedures. The orientation
meeting shall describe the possibility of exposing unexpected archaeological resources
and directions as to what steps are to be taken if such a find is encountered.
An archaeologist shall monitor construction grading within 50 meters (164 feet) of
the two isolated finds. In the event that prehistoric or historic archaeological
resources are exposed during project construction, all earth disturbing work within 50
meters (164 feet) of the find must be temporarily suspended or redirected until an
archaeologist has evaluated the nature and significance of the find. After the find has
been appropriately mitigated (e.g., curation, preservation in place, etc.), work in the
area may resume. The City should consider retaining a Chumash representative to
monitor any field work associated with Native American cultural material.
If human remains are exposed, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires
that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the
necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code
Section 5097.98.
CR -Id Monitoring Program:
Requirements for cultural resource mitigation shall be clearly noted on all plans for project
grading and construction.
DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY MITIGATION
D -2(a) Vegetative and Biotechnical Approaches to Bank Stabilization. Vegetative or
biotechnical (also referred to as soil bioengineering) approaches to bank stabilization
are preferred over structural approaches. Bank stabilization design must be consistent
with the SLO Creek Stream Management and Maintenance Program Section 6.
Streambank stabilization usually involves one or a combination of the following
activities:
Regrading and revegetating the streambanks to eliminate overhanging banks and
create a more stable slope;
Deflecting erosional water flow away from vulnerable sites;
Reducing the steepness of the channel bed through installation of grade
stabilization structures;
Altering the geometry of the channel to influence flow velocities and sediment
deposition;
Diverting a portion of the higher flow into a secondary or by -pass channel;
Armoring or protecting the bank to control erosion, particularly at the toe of
slopes.
The bank stabilization design will:
Be stable over the long term;
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 148
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 9
Be the least environmentally damaging and the "softest" approach possible;
Not create upstream or downstream flooding or induce other local stream
instabilities;
Minimize impacts to aquatic and riparian habitat.
D -2( c) Riparian Zone Planting. The OASP proposes riparian enhancement of creek
corridors. Section 11 guidelines of the SLO Creek Drainage Design Manual shall be
followed for riparian areas that are modified, created and /or managed for flood
damage reduction, stream enhancement, and bank repair. Linear park terrace
vegetation, streambank repair and channel maintenance projects may require stream
channel modifications that include shaping, widening, deepening, straightening, and
armoring. Many channel management projects also require building access roads for
maintenance vehicles and other equipment. These construction activities can cause a
variety of impacts to existing sensitive riparian and aquatic habitat that, depending on
the selected design alternative, range from slight disturbances to complete removal of
desirable woody vegetation and faunal communities. In urban areas within the SLO
creek watershed, riparian vegetation often provides the only remaining natural habitat
available for wildlife populations.
D -5(a) Biofilters. The applicant shall submit to the Director of Community Development
for review and approval a plan that incorporates grassed swales (biofilters) into the
project drainage system where feasible for runoff conveyance and filtering of
pollutants.
D -5(c) Pervious Paving Material. Consistent with Land Use Element Policy 6.4.7, the
applicant shall be encouraged to use pervious paving material to facilitate rainwater
percolation. Parking lots and paved outdoor storage areas shall, where feasible, use
pervious paving to reduce surface water runoff and aid in groundwater recharge.
D -2a, D -2c, D -5a, D -5c Monitoring Program:
Monitoring will include Natural Resources Department staff consultation and implementation at
time of landscaping construction plan review and Engineering - Public Works staff at the time of
tract construction.
NOISE MITIGATION
N -1(a) Compliance with City Noise Ordinance. Construction hours and noise levels shall
be compliant with the City Noise Ordinance [Municipal Code Chapter 9.12, Section
9.12.050(6)]. Methods to reduce construction noise can include, but are not limited to,
the following:
Equipment Shielding. Stationary construction equipment that generates noise can
be shielded with a barrier.
Diesel Equipment. All diesel equipment can be operated with closed engine doors
and equipped with factory- recommended mufflers.
Electrical Power. Whenever feasible, electrical power can be used to run air
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 149
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 10
compressors and similar power tools.
Sound Blankets. The use of sound blankets on noise generating equipment.
N -1 a Monitoring Program:
Requirements for construction noise mitigation shall be clearly noted on all plans for project
grading and construction.
PUBLIC SERVICES MITIGATION
PS -4 Wastewater Main System Extensions. Prior to recordation of a final map for Jones
Ranch (TR 3066), the improvement plans for the tract shall include connections to
future improvements planned by Tract 3063 (Righetti Ranch) to convey sanitary
sewer service to the existing connection points on Tank Farm Road. Prior to
recordation of Tract 3066, (a) the needed improvements through Tract 3063 shall be
completed and available to tie -in Tract 3066, or (b) Tract 3066 shall provide
easements and financial guarantees that guarantee Tract 3066 can proceed with
construction of Tract 3063 improvements to serve the Jones Ranch.
PS -4 Monitoring Program:
Compliance will be reviewed and implemented by the City Engineer's office with the
subdivision plans and accompanying final map prior to recordation of the final map.
PUBLIC SAFETY MITIGATION
S -2(b) Disclosure. Prior to recordation of final map, the applicant shall develop Covenants,
Codes, and Restrictions (CC &R's) that disclose to potential buyers or leasers that aircraft
over - flights occur, and that such flights may result in safety hazard impacts should an
aircraft accident occur. In addition, prior to recordation of final map, avigation easements
shall be recorded over the entire project site for the benefit of the SLO County Regional
Airport.
S -2b Monitoring Program:
Monitoring will include Community Development, City Attorney and Engineering staff
approvals of the Disclosure(s) prior to recordation of a final tract map.
S -4(d) 55- Gallon Drums. Prior to development on the property where 55- Gallon drums
were identified on FEIR Figure 4.9 -1, soils samples shall be taken in the vicinity of
the drums and analyzed for total extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (TEPH) by EPA
method 8015, heavy metals by CCR Title 22 metals, and solvents by EPA method
8260B. If levels of contaminants are found to exist in concentrations that exceed
regulatory thresholds, further sampling may be needed to determine the extent of
contamination. If contamination is delineated, an appropriate remediation method
shall be implemented according to the size of the area contaminated and the
contaminant involved.
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 150
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 11
S -4d Monitoring Program:
Monitoring will include Engineering staff review of soils sampling and implementation of
appropriate remediation measures, if required, prior to tract construction in the vicinity of any
such positive sample(s).
TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION
T -4 Street B & Tiburon Way Alignment. Applicant shall align Street B with the
existing alignment of Tiburon Way and design the roadway curvature to maintain
appropriate residential speeds.
T -4 Monitoring Program:
Compliance and implementation shall be reviewed by the City Engineer's office with the
subdivision plans and shall be completed prior to issuance of any building permits for Phase 1.
T -6 Traffic Calming & Safety. Intersection of Streets A & B shall be controlled by a
single lane urban compact intersection. Eliminate Mid -block crosswalk on Street A.
Align curb, gutter, and sidewalk with Sponza Drive of the Taylor Wingate Project.
T -6 Monitoring Program:
Compliance and implementation shall be reviewed by the City Engineer's office with the
subdivision plans and accompanying final map prior to recordation of the final map.
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS MITIGATION
USS -1 Off -site Water Main Line Extensions to the OASP To Meet Fire Flow and
Storage Standards. Concurrent with applications for Final Map(s), the applicant
shall submit a water supply plan to meet adequate fire flow standards for all lots
within each Final Map. Implementation of such a water line extension plan shall be
included as a part of public improvement plans for the subdivision, and approved by
Utilities, Public Works and the City Engineer. This implementation plan may include
a financing plan, including reimbursement provisions, approved by the City Council
at the time of considering any Final Map. Required water main line extension(s) to
the subdivision shall be completed and operational to the satisfaction of the Utilities
Director, prior to construction of any of the residential and /or commercial uses.
USS -1 Monitoring Program
Compliance will be reviewed and implemented by the City Engineer's office with the subdivision
plans and shall be completed prior to issuance of any occupancy permits for Tract
3066.
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 151
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 12
SECTION 2. Vesting Tract Map Approval with Findings & Conditions. The City
Council does hereby approve application SBDV- 0067 -2014 TR/ER (VTM #3066, "Jones
Ranch "), a tentative tract map to create up to 33 residential, commercial and open space lots,
based on the following findings, and subject to the following conditions being incorporated into
the project:
Findingsl
As conditioned, the design of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General
Plan because the proposed subdivision respects existing site constraints, will incrementally
add to the City's residential housing inventory, results in parcels that meet minimum density
standards, and will be consistent with the density, lot sizes and project amenities established
by the Orcutt Area Specific Plan (OASP).
2. The site is physically suited for the type and density of development allowed in the C /OS -SP,
P -F -SP, R -1 -SP, R -2 -SP, R -3 -SP, R -4 -SP, and CC -MU zoning districts.
The design of the vesting tentative tract map and the proposed improvements are not likely to
cause serious health problems, substantial environmental damage or substantially and
unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, since further development or
redevelopment of the proposed parcels will occur consistent with VTM 3066 and the required
architectural review process, which will allow for detailed review of development plans to
assure compliance with City plans, policies, and standards.
4. As conditioned, the design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements for access
through (or use of property within) the proposed subdivision, and the project is consistent
with the pattern of development prescribed in the Orcutt Area Specific Plan.
5. The proposed project will provide affordable housing consistent with the intent of California
Government Code §65915, and in compliance with City policies and the Housing Element.
6. The tentative map, as conditioned, will comply with all environmental mitigation measures
prescribed herein, and therefore is consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act,
the OASP Final EIR, and the Initial Study- Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS -MND).
7. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural
heating or cooling opportunities.
Conditions:
Dedications and Easements
1. Any easements including but not limited to provisions for all public and private utilities,
access, grading, drainage, slope banks, construction, public and private streets, pedestrian
and bicycle facilities, common driveways, and maintenance of the same shall be shown on
the final map and /or shall be recorded separately prior to or concurrent with the
recordation of the map, unless a deferral is requested by the subdvider and granted by the
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 152
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 13
City. Said easements may be provided for in part or in total as blanket easements
2. The final map and improvement plans shall show the extent of all on -site and off -site
offers of dedication. Subdivision improvement plans and or preliminary designs may be
required for any deferred improvements so that dedication limits can be established. These
improvements may include but are not limited to road construction and widening, grading
and drainage improvements, utility easements, bridges, bike bridges, transit stops,
bikeways, pedestrian paths, and intersection improvements.
3. The map and improvement plans shall provide for all minimum street improvements and
utility placements within the improved or partially improved streets adjoining the
subdivision as needed for orderly development to the satisfaction of the City. In some
cases, "dry" pipes may be required to be constructed under improved street sections for
the benefit of others.
4. Access rights shall be dedicated to the City along Orcutt Road except at approved
driveway locations and intersections as shown on the tentative map or as otherwise
approved by the city.
5. The subdivider shall dedicate a 10' wide street tree easement and 6' public utility
easement (P.U.E.) across the frontage of each lot. Said easements shall be adjacent to and
contiguous with all public right -of -way lines bordering each lot. A 10' wide street tree
easement and 6' P.U.E. shall be provided along the frontage for all private streets. A 10'
street tree easement and 15' P.U.E. shall be provided along the frontages of the Mixed Use
Commercial Lots 24 — 26. The easements may be removed or reduced under the footprint
of proposed buildings.
6. The subdivider shall dedicate all public Open Space in fee to the City, consistent with the
OASP, in conjunction with or prior to the Phase 1 map recordation unless otherwise
deferred or a reimbursement agreement is processed. Deferral shall be approved by the
City and may require that all appropriate OASP fees are paid as a condition of
development. The land shall be granted free and clear of all encumbrances to the
satisfaction of the City.
7. All private improvements shall be owned and maintained by the individual property
owners or the Homeowner's Association (HOA) as applicable. Private improvements
include but are not limited to streets, sidewalks, private pedestrian/bike paths, sewer
mains, drainage systems, detention basin(s), street lighting, landscape, landscape
irrigation, common areas, pocket parks, and linear park improvements.
8. The private open space C /OS Lots 31 and 32 along with the proposed improvements,
including but not limited to trails, bikeways, and landscaping shall be owned and
maintained by the HOA. Open Space and bikeway easements along with any public
utility easements shall be offered to the City and shown and noted on the final map. An
easement agreement may be required for specific open space areas, creek corridors,
bikeways, and utility corridors in a format approved by the City.
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 153
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 14
9. A wildland fuel management /reduction zone along with any required easements and /or
zone limits shall be provided for Lots 31 and 32 to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief. If
required, the limits shall be shown and noted on the final map and improvement plans for
reference. The limits of the zone shall be in accordance with the adopted Fire Code and
approved to the satisfaction of the City Fire Chief and City Natural Resources Manager.
The HOA shall be responsible for wildland fuel management, weed abatement, and creek
maintenance within the established fuel reduction zone and private open space areas.
10. A notice of requirements or other agreement acceptable to the City of San Luis Obispo
may need to be recorded in conjunction with the Final Map to clarify development
restrictions, conditions of development, and references to any pertinent conditions related
to the OASP and City codes and ordinances.
11. Off -site easements and /or dedications may be required to facilitate secondary points of
access, through street access, and public water and sewer main extensions beyond the tract
boundary and in accordance with the GASP. Looped water mains may be required in
accordance with the tentative map, development phasing, and the City water model to
provide adequate service and compliance with adopted codes and standards.
12. Off -site dedication/acquisition of property for this public right -of -way purpose is
necessary to facilitate orderly development and the anticipated OASP improvements.
The subdivider shall work with the City and the land owner(s) to acquire the necessary
rights -of -way. In the event the subdivider is unable to acquire said rights -of -way, the City
Council may consider lending the subdivider its powers of condemnation to acquire the
off -site right -of -way dedication, including any necessary slope and drainage easements.
If condemnation is required, the subdivider shall agree to pay all costs associated with the
off -site right -of -way acquisition (including attorney fees and court costs).
13. With respect to all off -site improvements, prior to filing of the Final Map, the subdivider
shall either:
a. Clearly demonstrate their right to construct the improvements by showing title or
interest in the property in a form acceptable to the City Engineer; or,
b. Demonstrate, in writing, that the subdivider has exhausted all reasonable efforts to
acquire interest to the subject property and request that the City assist in acquiring
the property required for the construction of such improvements and exercise its
power of eminent domain in accordance with Government Code Section 66462 .5
to do so, if necessary. subdivider shall also enter into an agreement with the City
to pay all costs of such acquisition including, but not limited to, all costs
associated with condemnation. Said agreement shall be in a form acceptable to the
City Engineer and the City Attorney. If condemnation proceedings are required,
the subdivider shall submit, in a form acceptable to the City Engineer, the
following documents regarding the property to be acquired:
i. Property legal description and sketch stamped and signed by a
Licensed Land Surveyor or Civil Engineer authorized to practice land
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 154
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 15
surveying in the State of California;
ii. Preliminary title report including chain of title and litigation guarantee;
iii. Appraisal of the property by a City approved appraiser. In the
course of obtaining such appraisal, the property owner(s) must be
given an opportunity to accompany the appraiser during any
inspection of the property or acknowledge in writing that they
knowingly waived the right to do so;
iv. Copies of all written correspondence with off -site property owners
including purchase summary of formal offers and counter offers to
purchase at the appraised price.
V, Prior to submittal of the aforementioned documents for City Engineer
approval, the Subdivider shall deposit with the City all or a portion of
the anticipated costs, as determined by the City Attorney, of the
condemnation proceedings. The City does not and cannot guarantee
that the necessary property rights can be acquired or will, in fact, be
acquired. All necessary procedures of law would apply and would have
to be followed.
Transportation
14. Secondary access is required from all portions and /or phases of the subdivision where
more than 30 dwelling units are proposed. The location and development of the proposed
secondary access shall be presented to the City for review and approval prior to the
preparation of the related improvement plans.
15. Unless an alternate access and egress plan is approved to the satisfaction of the Public
Works Director and the Fire Chief, the westerly Phase 1 of Jones Ranch shall be provided
with a secondary access to Orcutt Road in conjunction with an access to Tank Farm Road.
The completion of development may need to be deferred to Phase 2 or the B Street bridge
would need to be construction in conjunction with Phase 1. Regardless of access, the
required water supply to this phase may require a looped water main with indications that
the B Street bridge may need to be constructed in support of the required water main
extension prior to commencing with combustible construction.
16. Fire Department access shall be provided for each construction phase to the satisfaction of
the Fire Chief. Phased street construction shall consider and provide suitable Fire
Department hydrant access, circulation routes, passing lanes, and turn- around areas in
accordance with current codes and standards.
17. All public streets shall conform to City Engineering Standards and OASP including curb,
gutter, and sidewalk, driveway approaches, and curb ramps as approved by the City
Engineer. Where conflicts occur between the City Engineering Standards and concepts
identified in the GASP, final determination of shall design shall be provided by the City
Engineer. Traffic calming improvements may be required at select locations within in
the subdivision. Improvements may include bulb -outs, elevated sidewalks /speed tables,
or alternate paving materials to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department and Fire
Department.
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 155
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 16
18. The developer shall record a Notice of Requirements with each map phase regarding the
designed and installed traffic calming devices and that the subdivisions are not eligible for
future Residential Parking District or Neighborhood Traffic Management program
processing.
19. The improvement plans shall include all final line -of -sight analysis at certain intersections
to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. Fence heights and plantings in the
areas of control shall be reviewed in conjunction with the analysis. A separate recorded
agreement or Notice of Requirements for private property owner or HOA maintenance of
sight lines may be required.
20. The final map and improvement plans shall include the required right -of -way, transit stop
easements, and all details of the required bus turnouts to accommodate all proposed and
future bus stops per City Engineering Standards, the OASP and current Short Range
Transit plan. The final location of all North -South and East -West route stops shall be
approved to the satisfaction of the City Transit Manager and Public Works Director.
21. The public improvement plans may need to include full frontage improvements on Orcutt
Road from north of B Street to Tank Farm Road, including the Imel and Garay properties.
The northerly transition may require improvements across the Fiala frontage. The plans
shall show all improvements including concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk per City
Engineering Standards on the west side of Orcutt; 6' bike lanes, 12' travel lanes, and a
12' two -way left turn lane in accordance with the tentative map, OASP, City Engineering
Standards, and the Cal Trans Highway Design Manual; undergrounding of the overhead
utilities on the west side; and complete details for the Orcutt Road points of access.
22. The east side of Orcutt Road where widening is proposed or required may terminate in an
AC berm to match the existing adjoining road sections per City Engineering Standards or
the appropriate County rural road standards where approved by the City Engineer. The
Orcutt Road plans shall include all phases of construction including road widening,
stormdrain improvements, culvert extensions, grading /walls, and any water quality
BMP's. Some off -site dedication of property for public right -of -way purposes may be
required to facilitate the Orcutt Road improvements and transitions between the OASP full
build -out road section and adjoining road segments beyond the tract boundaries.
23. The Orcutt Road improvements shall be constructed as a condition of the map, unless a
deferral is requested by the subdvider and granted by the City. Prior to approval of any
deferrals, the subdivider shall demonstrate that the construction of the required
improvements is not feasible.
24. Prior to occupancy of Phase 1 the Tank Farm / Orcutt intersection shall be modified to
provide a southbound right -turn lane on Orcutt Road and to eliminate the skew, as
required in the GASP. All overhead utilities conflicting with this improvement shall be
undergrounded.
25. The applicant shall conduct neighborhood speed surveys one year after occupancy of
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 156
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 17
each phase at locations approved by the Director of Public Works. If 85th percentile
speeds exceed current City NTM thresholds additional traffic calming measures shall be
installed. The applicant shall bond for these potential additional traffic calming measures.
26. All mitigation measures (MM) specific to Transporation requirements shall be provided
as detailed under CEQA section 1, above, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
27. The subdivider may present financing and reimbursement programs for transportation
improvements to be considered with approval and recordation of the initial final map for
VTM #3066. Any such program(s) will be subject to approval by the City Council.
28. The subdivider shall be responsible for securing the off -site right -of -way needs for
VTM #3066, and dedicating that right -of -way to the city as a condition of final map
approval.
On and Off -Site Improvements
29. Improvement plans for the entire subdivision, including any off -site improvements shall
be approved to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department, Utilities Department,
and Fire Department prior to map recordation.
30. Off -site improvements may include but are not limited to roadways, sewer mains, water
mains, stormdrain improvements, off -site access roadways, the water main extensions
provided by MM USS -1, and the "B" Street to Tiburon Way alignment improvements.
31. A separate demolition permit will be required from the Building Division for the removal
of any existing structures and related infrastructure. Building removals are subject to the
Building Demolition Regulations including the additional notification and timing
requirements for any structure over 50 -years old.
32. The improvement plans shall clearly show all existing structures, site improvements,
utilities, water wells, septic tanks, leach fields, gas and wire services, etc. The plan shall
include any pertinent off -site water well and private waste disposal systems that are
located within regulated distances to the proposed drainage and utility improvements. The
plan shall include the proposed disposition of the improvements and any proposed phasing
of the removal and demolition. All structures and utilities affected by the proposed lot
lines shall be removed and receive final inspection approvals prior to map recordation.
33. The subdivider shall provide additional documentation on the easement agreement related
to the existing well and appurtenances located on the Jones parcel and serving the Fiala
property. Some existing non - conformance was generally recognized per Appendix
Section A -2 of the OASP. Additional detail and clarifications may be required on the
final map and improvement plans to acknowledge any legal non - conforming utility
installations between the parcels /lots in question.
34. If construction phasing of the new street pavement is proposed, the phasing shall provide
for the ultimate structural street section and pavement life (per the City's Pavement
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 157
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 18
Management Plan) prior to acceptance by the City. The engineer of record shall detail this
requirement in the public improvement plans, to the satisfaction of the Public Works.
35. The improvement plan submittal shall include a complete construction phasing plan in
accordance with the conditions of approval and map phasing. A truck circulation plan and
construction management and staging plan shall be included with the improvement plan
submittal. General truck routes shall be submitted for review and acceptance by the City.
The engineer of record shall provide a summary of the extent of cut and fill with estimates
on the yards of import and export material. The summary shall include rough grading,
utility trench construction, road construction, AC paving, concrete delivery, and vertical
construction loading estimates on the existing public roadways. The developer shall
either; 1) complete roadway deflection testing before and after construction to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and shall complete repairs to the pre- construction
condition, or 2) shall pay a roadway maintenance fee in accordance with City Engineering
Standards and guidelines, or 3) shall propose a pavement repair /replacement program to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements.
36. Retaining wall and /or retaining wall /fence combinations along property lines shall be
approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Division and shall conform with the zoning
regulations for allowed combined heights or shall be approved through the ARC or
separate Fence Height exception process.
37. The ARC plans and public improvement plans shall show the location of the proposed
mail receptacles or mail box units (MBU's) to the satisfaction of the Post Master and the
City Engineer. Provide a mailbox unit or multiple units to serve all dwelling units and
lease spaces within this development as required by the Post Master. MBU's shall not be
located within the public right -of -way or public sidewalk area unless specifically approved
by the City Engineer. Contact the Post Master at 543 -2605 to establish any
recommendations regarding the number, size, location, and placement for any MBU's.
38. Street trees are required as a condition of development. Tree species and planting
requirements shall be in accordance with City Engineering Standards. Street trees shall
generally be planted at the rate of one 15- gallon street tree for each 35 lineal feet of
property frontage. Street trees shall be planted along private streets as required for public
streets. The subdivision improvement plans /landscape plans shall include street tree
plantings along the Orcutt Road frontage.
Utilities
39. Specialized street pavement in the area of public water and /or sewer mains may create
maintenance /replacement concerns and additional costs. The final pavement sections
shall be reviewed and approved in conjunction with ARC approvals and public
improvement plan review. A separate agreement and /or CC &R provision shall be
required to clarify that the Jones Ranch Homeowners Association will have final street
maintenance responsibility in areas of specialized pavement where said pavement is
damaged or removed in conjunction with public improvements or maintenance of said
public water and /or sewer mains.
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 158
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 19
40. The City will not be responsible for replacement of any specialty street pavement within
private streets. City trench repairs within private streets will be backfilled and finished
per City Engineering Standards.
41. Separate utilities, including water, sewer, gas, electricity, telephone, and cable TV shall
be served to each lot to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department and serving
utility companies. All public and private sewer mains shall be shown on the public
improvement plans and shall be constructed per City Engineering Standards unless a
waiver or alternate standard is otherwise approved by the City. The plans shall clearly
delineate and distinguish the difference between public and private improvements.
42. Recycled water mains shall be extended along A Street, B Street, and /or Sponza to serve
the landscape irrigation of the project's R2 lots and commercial lots. Applicant shall work
with the Water Division of the City's Utilities Department to determine the appropriate
size of all proposed recycled water mains.
43. City recycled water or another non - potable water source, shall be used for construction
water (dust control, soil compaction, etc.). An annual Construction Water Permit is
available from the City's Utilities Department. Recycled water is readily available near
the intersection of Tank Farm Road and Orcutt Road.
44. Final grades and alignments of all public and /or private water, sewer and storm drains
shall be approved to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director and Utilities
Department. The final location, configuration, and sizing of service laterals and meters
shall be approved in conjunction with the review of the building plans, fire sprinkler plans,
and /or public improvement plans.
45. The improvement plans shall show the location of all domestic and landscape water
meters. The plan shall include service lateral sizes and meter sizes. Sizing calculations
may be required to justify service and meter sizing. Water impact fees related to the
irrigation water meter(s) shall be paid prior to approval of the subdivision improvement
plans for each pertinent map and /or construction phase.
46. Off -site utility improvements shall include the water main upgrade /replacement and
extension from the High Pressure /Bishop pressure zone at the intersection of
Tanglewood /Johnson Avenue to serve the subdivision. Pipe sizing is contingent upon the
modeling for the proposed development phases and looping of the main. Improvement
plans may be required to clarify the design for main extensions outside the Phase 1
improvements. Pressure regulating valves, control valves, or other appurtenances may be
required by the Utilities Department as a part of the required water system improvements
to be certain that the new area interacts properly with the existing water system.
47. A reimbursement request, if proposed for the off -site water main upgrade, shall include
all pertinent details and analysis in accordance with City and State codes and ordinances
and shall be presented separately to the City Council.
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 159
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 20
48. The subdivider shall provide a plan for meeting off -site wastewater main line extensions
as needed (pursuant to MM PS -4) through adjoining VTM43063. Said plan shall be
approved by the Utilities Director before approval and recordation of any final map.
49. A final sewer report and supporting documentation for the OASP public sewer main
design shall be approved by the Utilities Department prior to approval of the public
improvement plans.
50. The final sewer report shall discuss and present additional information and assumptions
on the system elevations and grades that will allow other OASP parcels to utilize the
proposed public sewer main in accordance with the OASP Wastewater Plan. The
applicant shall submit an analysis of a backbone system that shows the elevations and
grades that serve the adjacent parcels described in the study. The City will have the final
discretion on the extent and limits of the study if additional properties could reasonably
benefit from the proposed alignment.
51. The depth of the off -site and on -site sewer mains shall be approved to the satisfaction of
the Utilities Director. The depth analysis shall consider the balance between the possible
extent of the gravity sewer basin needed to serve the other OASP properties and the long-
term public maintenance requirements related to sewer depth. The analysis of sewer
depth shall be considered at the intersection of Street A and Street B, at Street A and
Sponza in Tract 3044, and at Street A and the northerly limits of Tract 3044.
52. Omitted ....covered by COA #68 Righetti
53. The public improvement plan submittal shall show all existing and proposed overhead
wire utilities. Any existing overhead wiring within the tract boundary and adjoining
Orcutt Road shall be undergrounded in conjunction with the subdivision improvements.
Areas of road widening along Bullock Lane, if required for a secondary access, shall
include undergrounding where applicable unless otherwise deferred or waived by the
Public Works and Community Development Directors. Unless otherwise specifically
approved, pole relocation in lieu of undergrounding is not supported.
54. Terminal end utility poles shall be located off -site unless otherwise approved by the City.
55. Preliminary undergrounding plans for the entire subdivision shall be processed through
PGE and any respective wire utility companies in conjunction with the map recordation.
56. The subdivider shall install public street lighting and all associated facilities including but
not limited to conduits, sidewalk vaults, fusing, wiring, and lumenaires along all adjoining
public streets as applicable per City Engineering Standards.
57. Private street lighting shall be provided along the private streets per OASP lighting
requirements, City Engineering Standard and /or as approved in conjunction with the final
ARC approvals.
58. Lighting fixtures, including public streetlights shall not exceed 16' in height in accordance
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 160
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 21
with the OASP unless otherwise required for traffic safety. The developer shall submit a
streetlight proposal for approval by the City Engineer for any public streetlights. Street
lights associated with the Orcutt Road and Tank Farm Road improvements, signalized
intersections, or round -a -bouts shall comply with the Highway Design Manual and City
Engineering Standards.
Grading, Drainage and Stormwater
59. Any permit approvals required from the Army Corp of Engineers, California Fish and
Wildlife, or the Regional Water Control Board shall be secured and presented to the City
prior to the approval of any subdivision grading and /or improvements related to the
proposed phase of construction. The engineer of record shall review the permit approvals
and any specific permit conditions for compliance with the plans, subdivision
improvement designs, drainage system design/report, and soils report. The engineer of
record shall forward the permits to the City with a notation that the permits have been
reviewed and are in general conformance with the design of the improvements.
60. The public improvement plans submittal shall clarify how the several wetlands, creek
corridors, and riparian habitat areas will be preserved to the satisfaction of the Natural
Resources Manager. Include any specific details for the proposed creek crossings in
accordance with any preservation strategies, mitigation measures, and higher
governmental authority agency permits. Sensitive areas shall be staked, fenced, or
otherwise delineated and protected prior to commencing with construction, grading, or
grubbing.
61. Expansion index testing or other soils analysis may be required on a lot -by -lot basis for all
graded pads and for in -situ soils on natural lots in accordance with the current Building
Codes or where deemed necessary by the City Engineer or Building Official.
62. Final pad certifications shall include the certification of pad construction and elevations.
The soils engineer shall certify all grading prior to acceptance of the public improvements
and /or prior to building permit issuance. The certification shall indicate that the graded
pads are suitable for their intended use.
63. The subdivision improvement plans shall include a complete grading plan to show site
accessibility in accordance with State and Federal regulations for all public and /or private
roads, transit stops, trails, paths, walks, bikeways, parks, and bridges where applicable.
The submittal shall provide additional analysis if site accessibility will not be provided
and for any feature or element where accessibility is purportedly not required. The
accessibility regulations or guidelines in effect at the time of subdivision improvement
construction will be applied.
64. The subdivision improvement plans, grading plans, drainage plans, and drainage reports
shall show and note compliance with City Codes, Standards and Ordinances, Floodplain
Management Regulations, OASP stormwater provisions, Waterways Management Plan
Drainage Design Manual, and the Post Construction Stormwater Regulations as
promulgated by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, whichever pertinent sections
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 161
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 22
are more restrictive.
65. The improvement plan submittal shall include a complete grading, drainage, and erosion
control plan. The proposed grading shall consider the proposed construction phasing.
Historic off -site and upslope watersheds tributary to the area of phased construction shall
be considered. Run -on from adjoining developed or undeveloped parcels shall be
considered.
66. The calculated 100 -year flood limits shall be shown and noted on the improvement plans
and an additional final map sheet for reference. The drainage report and final plans shall
clarify the 100 -year flood elevations, clearances, and freeboard at all new vehicle bridge,
pedestrian bridge, and pipe bridge crossings of the creek corridors.
67. The engineer of record shall provide a digital copy of the final HEC -RAS modeling to the
City in accordance with Section 4.0 of the Waterways Management Plan Drainage Design
Manual.
68. The developer shall prepare an Operations and Maintenance Manual for review and
approval by the City in conjunction with the development of any stormwater BMP's that
will be maintained by the HOA or by the respective private property owner. A Private
Stormwater Conveyance Agreement shall be recorded in a format provided by the City
prior to final inspection approvals and acceptance of subdivision improvements.
69. The subdivider /developer shall provide notification to private property owners regarding
any individual maintenance responsibility of backyard stormwater BMP's in accordance
with Section E.2 of the RQWCB Resolution R3- 2013 -0032. The notification may be by
Notice of Requirements or other method acceptable to the City.
70. The stormwater improvements other than City Standard public stormdrain infrastructure
shall be maintained by the HOA. A separate encroachment /hold harmless agreement may
be required in conjunction with certain improvements proposed for location within the
public rights -of -way.
71. The final details for the proposed bioretention facilities located within the public right -of-
way shall be approved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The project soils engineer
shall review and provide recommendations on the proposed site constructed and /or
proprietary retention systems. Analysis of impacts to the public improvements, protection
of utilities, and methods to minimize piping and protection of private properties shall be
addressed in the final analysis.
72. The developer shall show legal entitlement to access or annex into the regional detention
basin or shall provide an alternate drainage solution and strategy to the satisfaction of the
City.
73. The proposed detention basin and any pre -basin shall be designed in accordance with the
OASP requirements and the Waterways Management Plan Drainage Design Manual. The
proposed surface runoff and drainage from the detention basin(s) shall include a non-
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 162
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 23
erosive outlet to an approved point of disposal. The outlet(s) design and location should
replicate the historic drainage where feasible. Any off -site detention basin, temporary
basin, or other drainage improvements shall be approved by the City. Any required or
proposed off -site grading or drainage improvements shall be completed within recorded
easements or under an appropriate license or other private agreement.
74. The naming of the local creeks and drainages shall comply with the appropriate and
pertinent creek naming standards and justifications. The inclusion of the naming on the
final map and /or improvement plans shall be approved by the City prior to map and /or
plan approval as applicable.
75. All bridging, culverting and modifications to the existing creek channels along with any
necessary clearing of existing creek and drainage channels, including tree pruning or
removals, and any necessary erosion repairs shall be in compliance with the OASP, city
standards and policies, the Waterways Management Plan and shall be approved by the
Natural Resources Manager, Public Works Department, Army Corp of Engineers, the
Regional Water Quality Control Board, and California Fish & Wildlife.
76. Any existing areas of swale, creek and /or channel erosion shall be stabilized to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer, Natural Resources Manager, and other permitting
agencies.
77. The project soils engineer shall review the final grading and drainage plans and Low
Impact Development (LID) improvements. The soils report shall include specific
recommendations related to public improvements, site development, utility, and building
pad /foundation construction related to the proposed LID improvements. The project soils
engineering report shall be referenced on the final map in accordance with the Subdivision
Regulations and City Engineering Standards.
78. The final plans and drainage report shall show and note compliance with City Engineering
Standard 1010.13 for spring or perched groundwater management and for water quality
treatment of run -off from impervious streets, drive aisles, parking areas, and trash
enclosures.
79. A SWPPP is required in accordance with State and local regulations. A hard copy of the
SWPPP shall be provided to the City in conjunction with the Public Improvement Plan
submittal and subsequent building plan submittals. The WDID number shall be included
by reference on all construction plans sets. An erosion control plan shall be included with
the improvement plans and all building plan submittals for demolitions, grading, and new
construction.
80. The project development and grading shall comply with all air quality standards and
mitigation measures. The developer shall provide written notification from the County
Air Pollution Control District (APCD) regarding compliance with all local, state, and
federal regulations including but not limited to the National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations related to Naturally Occuring Asbestos
NOA).
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 163
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 24
Fire
81. The project shall provide a minimum of two points of access to the subdivision from an
existing public way wherever there are 30 or more housing units. Emergency Vehicle
Access points will NOT be accepted in lieu of full access.
82. All streets that are less than 28 feet in width shall be posted "No Parking — Fire Lane" on
both sides. Streets less than 36 feet in width shall be posted on one side only.
83. The project shall provide water mains and city - standard fire hydrants to provide a
minimum needed fire flow of 1500 GPM for 2 hours to within 300 feet of the exterior
walls of all proposed structures. Fire hydrant spacing shall not exceed 500 feet.
Homeowners' Association
84. Subdivider shall prepare conditions, covenants, and restrictions (CC &R's) to be approved
by the City Attorney and Community Development Director prior to final map approval.
VTM #3066 shall have the option of establishing their own HOA, or be incorporated into
the "Master Homeowner's Association" (Master HOA) established under VTM #3063
Righetti Ranch). To the extent desired by the subdivider, individual phases of the
project may include sub - associations (such as for the affordable housing and /or townhome
products) as described in the applicant's "Master Declaration of CC &R's for Righetti
Ranch ", dated 6/ 6/14. CC &R's shall minimally contain the following provisions that
pertain to all lots:
a. The initial set of CC &R's provided for the VTM #3066 final map shall define
either an independent HOA for Jones Ranch, or will be automatically incorporated
into the Righetti Ranch Master HOA through annexation provisions of the Master
HOA. A graphic or other exhibit describing all properties to be annexed to the
Righetti Ranch Master HOA shall be included with any CC &R's for VTM #3066.
b. All private improvements shall be owned and maintained by the individual
property owners, sub - associations or the Master HOA as applicable. Private
improvements include but are not limited to streets, sidewalks, pedestrian and bike
paths, sewer mains, drainage systems, detention basin(s), street lighting, landscape,
landscape irrigation, and common area improvements.
c. Grant to the city the right to maintain common areas if the HOA fails to perform,
and to assess the HOA for expenses incurred, and the right of the city to inspect
the site at mutually agreed times to assure conditions of CC &R's and final map are
being met.
d. No parking except in approved, designated spaces.
e. No outdoor storage of boats, campers, motorhomes, or trailers nor long -term
storage of inoperable vehicles.
f. No outdoor storage by individual units except in designated storage areas.
g. The responsibility for the placement of the trash and recycling containers at the
street on collection days will be the responsibility of the property owner's
association. The property owner's association shall coordinate with San Luis
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 164
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 25
Garbage Company regarding the collection time and preferred location for the
placement of trash and recycling containers to minimize the obstruction of project
streets.
h. No changes in city- required provisions of the CC &R's will be considered valid and
in effect without prior City Council approval.
i. Provision for all of the maintenance responsibilities outlined in various conditions.
Planning Requirements
85. At the time of submittal of a request for a final map, the subdivider shall provide a
written report detailing the methods and techniques employed for complying with all
required environmental mitigation measures as adopted herein.
86. In order to be consistent with the requirements of the Orcutt Area Specific Plan and
County Airport Land Use Plan, the property owner shall grant an avigation easement for
the benefit and protection of the City of San Luis Obispo, the County of San Luis Obispo
and the San Luis Obispo County Airport via an avigation easement document prior to the
recordation of the final map.
87. All owners, potential purchasers, occupants (whether as owners or renters), and potential
occupants (whether as owners or renters) shall receive full and accurate disclosure
concerning the noise, safety, or overflight impacts associated with airport operations prior
to entering any contractual obligation to purchase, lease, rent, or otherwise occupy any
property or properties within the airport area.
88. Provisions for trash, recycle, and green waste containment, screening, and collection shall be
approved to the satisfaction of the City and San Luis Obispo Garbage Company. Proposed
refuse storage area(s) and on -site conveyance shall consider convenience, aesthetics, safety,
and functionality. Ownership boundaries and/or easements shall be considered in the final
design. Any common storage areas shall be maintained by the HOA and shall be included
in the OCR's or other property maintenance agreement accordingly. The solid waste
solutions shall be shown and noted on the submittal(s) for Architectural Review
Commission (ARC) approvals.
89. Prior to the issuance of building permits for residential units, the Architectural Review
Commission shall review the residential building program, including building and landscape
improvements, and provide comments and recommendations to the Community
development Director. Final architectural design approval authority shall be vested in the
Community Development Director. Director decisions may be appealed pursuant to
standard city policies.
90. Prior to the recording of any phase of the final map, the applicant shall enter into an
Affordable Housing Agreement with the City Council that details the timing of construction
of affordable units on -site, proposed " transfers" of affordable units to another site, , and
contains guarantees for failure to complete any or all of the affordable housing units (such
as collecting affordable housing in -lieu fees, cash guarantees for the completion of the
affordable units, providing a letter of credit, bond or other financial guarantee to assure
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 165
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 26
compliance).
91. The tentative tract map as presented includes an option to create a fifth (51') homestead
parcel for Jones Ranch in the event that the `B" Street to (existing) Tiburon Way "preferred
road alignment" is completed. This alignment (off -site through the Imel property), is
described in Exhibit A which identifies how the 5t" parcel would be described and
accessed with utilities and vehicles.
92. A construction phasing plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Director
prior to the issuance of the first building permit.
93. The subdivider shall develop a Construction Management Plan for review and approval by
the Public Works and Community Development Directors. The plan shall be submitted
prior to the issuance of a building permit for proposed project buildings and/or a phase of
buildings. In addition, the contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to
monitor the Construction Management Plan components and provide their contact names
and phone numbers. The Construction Management Plan shall include at least the following
items and requirements:
a. A set of comprehensive traffic control measures, including scheduling of major truck
trips and deliveries to avoid peak traffic and pedestrian hours, detour signs if
required, directional signs for construction vehicles, and designated construction
access routes.
b. Notification procedures for adjacent property owners and public safety personnel
regarding when major deliveries and more intensive site work may be occurring,
c. Location of construction staging areas which shall be located on the project site, for
materials, equipment, and vehicles.
d. Identification of haul routes for movement of construction vehicles that would
minimize impacts on vehicular and pedestrian traffic, circulation and safety, and
noise impacts to surrounding neighbors.
e. The applicant shall ensure that the construction contractor employs the following
noise reducing measures:
i. Standard construction activities shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and
7:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday.
ii. All equipment shall have sound- control devices no less effective than those
provided by the manufacturer. No equipment shall have un- muffled exhaust
pipes; and
iii. Stationary noise sources shall be located as far from sensitive receptors as
possible, and they shall be muffled and enclosed within temporary sheds, or
insulation barriers or other measures shall be incorporated to the extent
possible.
f. Temporary construction fences to contain debris and material and to secure the site.
g. Provisions for removal of trash generated by project construction activity.
h. A process for responding to, and tracking, complaints pertaining to construction
activity.
i. Provisions for monitoring surface streets used for truck routes so that any damage
and debris attributable to the trucks can be identified and corrected.
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 166
Resolution No. 10620 ( 2015 Series)
Page 27
j. Designated location(s) for construction worker parking.
94. Pursuant to Government Code §66474.9(b), the subdivider shall defend, indemnify and
hold harmless the City and /or its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or
proceeding against the City and /or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside,
void or annul, the approval by the City of this subdivision, and all actions relating thereto,
including but not limited to environmental review.
95. Conditions relating to phasing and timing of infrastructure are approved as contained
herein, or as approved by the Community Development and Public Works Directors
during review of public improvement plans and final maps.
96. Financing and "fair share" contribution plans may be submitted for City Council review
with any final map application. The City Council will have sole discretion as to any
reimbursement and /or fee credit programs implemented with said final maps.
Upon motion of Vice Mayor Ashbaugh, seconded by Council Member Christianson, and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Carpenter, Christianson and Rivoire,
Vice Mayor Ashbaugh and Mayor Marx
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 19th day of May 2015.
an Marx
ATTEST:
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 167
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 28
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City
of San Luis Obispo, California, this ti r} t° , day of _ T" ," , 20 r
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 168
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 29 Exhibit A
LAIN OF FIALA I o
IN PART) Y .
11 } RI 47
ice-- _
10,415 SQFT !I r ~ _.,s • . [; ..•'
rr., i x
y
OPEN SPACE / PROPOSIM OM
SPACE fuh39"Off
II ,.
3r SOFT, i
10,161 SA3'"F NET Oi £1,IENT
k 1
x
1 `• 44' y
Y..,6 2 SOFT ; I 14 fl Ij q
SOFT wT 5B
7,694 SQFT
jiij
I
I n.+8s SQF • '
I
K
rl![, v[n AAITO L7F
1°luury MAY ` q a osc a
ja
L I 170 p a
E RIE PFWAiC h Ci4, ® x
AM l
II
Il i,I11Y FASFNO i 1 ,4.00 SQFT
14.2&0 54FT SEN
SPACE £FS+t1Gf% 1
r t
s LANDS Or JMEL -- -_
y EAST HALF LOT 127`
73 DEEDS 173) N
TM%
I, 4
4 90 1091
1 INCH = 50 FEET
SHEET SIZE; 11" x 17"
Jones Homestead Lots I
Graphic JONES RANCH — TRACT 3066
Cannon JONES HOMESTEAD
Revision to VTTM 3066 ,..,.:,. c r tYOUT
SAN LUI$ i19 {SpCy, CA
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 169
Resolution No. 10620 (2015 Series)
Page 30 Exhibit A
Jones Homestead Lots Narrative Revision to
VTTM 3066: APN 004 - 705 -008
The Jones family is requesting to have five (5) homestead lots remain on their property as opposed to
the four lots originally submitted. Therefore Ambient Communities is requesting that the Vesting Tract
Map be updated to include the additional lot for a total of 66 lots. This request is enhanced by the
proposed solution for the option "A" road alignment for "B" Street and Tiburon which will best align
Tiburon as the preferred option.
Additionally the Jones family is requesting that, as the original owner, they retain ownership in fee of the
entire property. The Jones family will grant an open space easement to the City of San Luis Obispo for
the required open space areas on lot 1 and lot 3 of the proposed vesting tentative tract map. The Jones
family will continue to maintain the property. If desired, the Jones family will create a Common
Maintenance Agreement for the homestead lots to ensure the properties are properly maintained in
perpetuity.
ATTACHMENT 3Item # 3
Packet Page 170