HomeMy WebLinkAbout8592-8597f I
RESOLUTION NO. 8597(1996 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCQ. OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO OPPOSING PROPOSITION 218
WHEREAS, Proposition 218, the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act," is an initiative measure
which will appear on the November 5, 1996 General Election ballot; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 218 would require voter approval of all local taxes, and
fundamentally change existing laws related to the use of special assessments and the imposition
of other property-based fees and charges; and
WHEREAS, such changes would dramatically reduce the flexibility of local governments
to raise revenue necessary to provide, operate, and maintain adequate public facilities and
services; and
WHEREAS, the State Director of Finance has estimated that the fiscal impact to local
governments may exceed a loss of 5100 million annually if Proposition 218 passes; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 218 authorizes the use of the initiative process to repeal or
reduce local taxes, assessments, fees and charges which could have far reaching negative impacts
on local government's ability to plan budgets or pledge revenues to the repayment of bonds, and
may adversely affect the overall credit rating and financial viability of local governments; and
WHEREAS, the many unanswered questions raised about the effect of Proposition 218
would undoubtedly generate significant litigation in the future, and
WHEREAS, Proposition 218 would grant disproportionate voting power to corporations,
large landowners, and out -of -state interests, and deny renters the right to vote under the weighed
voting system for assessments; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 218 would result in a tax increase to local governments since it
would require public agencies (such as schools) to pay assessments; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 218 would impose on local governments significantly increased
costs to hold elections, calculate fees and assessments (often on a block -by -block or parcel -by-
parcel basis), mail notices and ballots, and defend any fees and assessments in court; and
WHEREAS, the constraints imposed by Proposition 218 will substantially impair local
government's ability to provide important new infrastructure necessary to meet the needs of the
public, to promote economic development, and to compete in a competitive marketplace.
R -8597
Resolution No. 8597 (1996 Series)
Page Two
NOW, TEEREEFORE, BE rr RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo hereby opposes Proposition 218 on the November 5, 1996, General election ballot.
Upon motion of Council Member Smith, seconded by Council Member Romero, and
on the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Members Smith, Romero, Roalman, Williams and Mayor Settle
Noes: None
Absent: None
The foregoing Resolution was adopted this 22nd
ATTEST:
ity Clerk Bo ie L Gawf
APPROVED:
day of October
�� '- ' ze�_
Mayor Allen K. Settle
CTROP218.CAR
1996.
All
RESOLUTION NO. 8596 (1996 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FINDING
THAT A 1646 SQ. FT. PORTION OF THE AMTRAK PARKING LOT IS SURPLUS LAND
AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF THE
PARCEL TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER AT 1020 RAILROAD AVENUE.
WHEREAS, the owners of the property at 1020 Railroad Avenue (Saro and Marco Rizzo)
have requested the purchase of a 1646 sq. ft. strip of City-owned property adjacent to the parking
lot serving the Amtrak Station and surrounding area, as shown on the attached "Exhibit A ", to
accommodate the remodel and expansion of a restaurant, and
WHEREAS, said property is not needed for the current or future use of the said parking
lot, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that disposal of the subject parcel
is consistent with the City's General Plan and exempt from the California Environmental Quality
Act, pursuant to its Resolution No. 5189 -96 adopted on August 14, 1996.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
hereby determines that the subject 1646 sq. ft parcel is surplus land and authorizes the City
Administrative Officer to execute an agreement to sell said parcel to the adjacent property owner
at fair market value, to the satisfaction of the City Administrative Officer, City Attorney and
Director of Public Works.
R -8596
C �J
Resolution No. 8596 (1996 Series)
Page Two
On motion of Council Member Romero , and seconded by Council Member Smith , and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Smith, Romero, Roalman, Williams and Mayor Settle
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted on this 22nd day of October 1996.
MAYOR Allen K. Settle
ATTEST:
rICLERK A I��i_14A
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ey G. Jorgensen
G: \... \caferoma.rep
rv'd
C ob�p
DATE: November 27, 1996
TO: Bonnie Gawf, City Clerk
FROM: Jerry Kenny, Supervising Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Sales agreement with Rizzo's (proposed C e Roma - 1020 Railroad Ave.)
The attached original sales agreement is transmitted for your records. Although it was
envisioned that this agreement would be recorded in the County Recorder's office, it was not
notarized by the Rizzo's and, therefore, would need to be resigned, etc. However, Jeff
Jorgensen said it does not need to be recorded.
The agreement should probably be attached to the relevant City Council resolution, approved
at the October 22, 1996 Council meeting.
Attachment: original agreement
ul: /,I:
G:\ ... \stre ets\ri zzo ag r. C C
A /�
cL 2 199.,1
- . Ga-y CLE=RK
SAN LUIS OC:S�Q CA
I . p.6
13.73' 0,
NJ6�5J'00 . w 5.0
04
8.86'
7p
LO-f
S36'53'0
0 °E
32.03'
0
PURCHASE
AREA (1646 SO. FT)
G'19'14-E
S36'53 00 "E 5.46'
. V
S36753'00 -ev
71.67'
At
I BT
I
T 2
i c)
ENGINEERING I PURCHASE AREA FROM
AM DEVELOPMENT CITY OF SAN LUIS OBSIPO
CAO REPORT TRANoMITTAL
This form should be completed in legible handwriting.
PURPOSE (Check one —see reverse side for required documentation) I 11 in Use — Admin Use Only —
Authorize Invitation for Bids (IFB) or Request for Proposals (RFP)
Re«=mcndra vendor
Award Contract
r-
Arc there any special award circumstances? Yes 71 NO
Ifyes, a CAO Report describing them should be attached
Other Action Requiring CAO Approval
See reverse side for description
REQUEST SUMMARY
Report Title
1 14
Specification No.'
Department of:
Ci Att e
I Y
Iattiat De ar ment I
I De artme I
d=l
ITransmit l Da ?e
Personnel
inistra ive Offccr
I Date'
Financial Plan Reference
[Budget
i I Bid Estimate
I Bid Amount I
S
IS
IS
All formal IFB or RFPpackages must be assigned specircation number by Finance before submitting t.,is form.
APPROVALS (Check appropriate box if review is required —see reverse side for guidance)
Department of: lFinamcc
Department of:
Ci Att e
I Y
Cit�Ea inccr
IAssist t OWO
Personnel
inistra ive Offccr
I Date'
Routing till occur is the or der listed unless otherwise noted by the initialing deftft rtment�
REVIEWER COMMENTS
Attach additional
DISTRIBUTION AFTER CAO APPROVAL
In the case ofauthorization to invite bids (request proposals) or to award a contract, Administration will return the original package to
Me initiating department and send -cop), of the report to Finance (ard to Public Forks if it is a constructio :, related project) after CAA
approval. For all other CAO Rcport-i the itilriating department should indicate below the appropriate distribution after CAO approval:
CAO REPORT
DATE: November 20, 1996
FROM: Mike McCluskey, Director of Public Workswyy r -
Prepared By: Jerry Kenny, Supervising Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of property sale agreement with Rizzo's (1020 Railroad Avenue)
DISCUSSION:
The Council authorized staff to pursue an agreement with the Rizzo's at the 10 -22 -96 meeting
to sell surplus land at 1020 Railroad Avenue. The resolution provides for you to approve
such agreement, subject to receiving fair market value for the 1646 sq. ft to be sold.
Staff received a copy of a letter to Saro Rizzo from John C. Hough (Broker /owner of "The
Real Estate Group "), dated July 29, 1996 (attached), which estimated the value of the subject
land at $ 10.00 per sq. ft. That would have equaled $ 12,100, based on dimensions of 11 ft.
by 110 ft., or 12,100 sq. ft. However, the actual dimensions are 13 ft by 131 +/- ft., or, more
exactly 1,646 sq. ft., per Rizzo's engineer (EDA). Staff agrees with the latter.
Staff solicited a "value statement" from Hal Dill, a commercial property broker, whose
expertise has been solicited by the City for other minor property value quotations, rather than
soliciting a more "formal" appraisal. Mr. Dill estimated a value at $ 19,500, which equates to
$ 11.85 per sq. ft. In a discussion with him, he indicated a compromise value would be
$ 11.00 per sq. ft., or $ 18,106.00. Staff rounded the figure to $ 18,000. Due to the small
size, shape and location of the strip, its value would probably be substantially lower, in staffs
opinion, so this is considered to be a fair price.
The attached agreement has been approved by Jeff Jorgensen and has been signed by the
Rizzo's. If you concur, please sign and return it to me for completion via, an escrow.
FISCAL IMPACT:
City's General Fund will receive $ 18,000 as a result of the sale.
Attachments:
1) J Hough letter (7- 29 -96)
2) Dill letter (9 -5 -96)
3) Sale agreement (executed by Rizzo's)
4) Council Report ( 10- 22 -96)
c: MB/HB /file
G: \...\Rail road \Agrememo. dun
C
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
Saro Rizzo
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:.
City Clerk
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
THIS PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT constitutes an agreement by which the
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, a chartered municipal corporation of the State of California
( "SELLER" and/or "CITY ") agrees to sell, and SARO RIZZO and MARCO RIZZO
( "BUYERS "), agree to purchase that certain real property ( "property") legally described and
shown on the attached "Exhibit A" and "Exhibit B" which are incorporated herein by
reference.
The terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT are as follows:
Purchase and Sale. Seller agrees to sell to Buyers, and Buyers agree to
purchase from Seller, the real property described in the above- referenced "Exhibit A" for the
price of eighteen thousand dollars ($18,000.00).
2. Payment of Purchase Price. Buyers shall pay the purchase price in full upon
transfer of the property as specified in this Agreement.
3. Lot Line Adjustment. The Buyers shall provide the necessary legal
descriptions and shall process and finalize a Lot Line Adjustment with the City's Community
Development Department, including associated fees (including Recording fees) to merge the
subject parcel and Buyers' contiguous parcels of record into one parcel.
Sale and Purchase Agreement (Rizzo)
Page Two
4. Conditions of Title: Fee simple title to the subject property shall be conveyed
to Buyers by grant deed, to be fully executed and acknowledged by Seller, subject to the
following conditions of title:
A. Matters affecting the conditions of title created by or with the consent
of Buyers.
B. Prior to transfer of the property, a preliminary title report showing the
willingness of a title insurer to provide a policy of title insurance in the
amount of the purchase price and showing title to the property vested in
the name of the Buyers.
5. Costs and Expenses. The cost and expense of the title report and insurance
policy to be issued in favor of the Buyers, as noted in paragraph 4.B, above, shall be paid by
Buyers. The cost of drafting documents necessary to accomplish this transaction shall
be borne by Buyers. Recording fees shall be borne by the Buyers.
6. Default. Seller agrees that if this sale is not completed due to the fault of Seller,
Buyers may, at their option, terminate this Agreement without any liability. Buyers shall not
be entitled to recover any of its out. of pocket expenses.
7.Notices. All notices or other communication required or permitted shall
be in writing, and will be personally delivered or sent by registered mail, return receipt
requested, at the following addresses:
Buyers: Saro G. and Marco Rizzo
Post Office Box 2178
Avila Beach, CA 93424
Seller: City of San Luis Obispo
Attention: Michael D. McCluskey
955 Morro St.
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Purchase and Sale Agreement (Rizzo)
Page Three
Notice shall be deemed given as of the time of personal delivery or forty-eight (48) hours
following deposit in the United States Mail. Notice of change of address shall be given by
written notice.
8. Seller's Representations and Warranties. In addition to any express agree-
ments of Seller contained herein, the following constitute representations and warranties of
Seller which shall be true and correct as of the transfer of title, the truth and accuracy of
which will constitute a condition to the Buyers accepting the transfer of title:
(1) There are no actions, suits, claims, legal proceedings or any
other proceedings affecting the Property or any portion thereof at
law or in equity before any Court or governmental agency,
domestic or foreign.
(2) Seller has not received any notices from governmental authorities
pertaining to violations of law or governmental regulations with
respect to the Property.
(3) Seller has no knowledge of any pending or threatened
proceeding in eminent domain or otherwise by any public entity
which would affect the Property, or any portion thereof, nor does
Seller know the existence of any facts which might give rise to
such action or proceedings.
(4) There are no liens or encumbrances on or claims to, or
covenants, conditions and restrictions, easements, rights of way,
rights of first refusal, options to purchase, or other matters
affecting the Property except those previously disclosed and any
rights conferred to Buyer by this Agreement.
(5) There is no material adverse fact or condition relating to the
Property, or any portion thereof ( including the existence of any
underground tanks or hazardous material) of which the Seller is
aware. The Buyer agrees to accept the Property in its existing
condition, without warranty whatsoever.
Purchase and Sale Agreement (Rizzo)
Page Four
(6) Seller has the legal power, right and authority to enter into this
agreement, and to consummate the transaction contemplated
hereby.
(7) There are no fixtures on the property in which anyone other than
Seller has any claim, rights, or security or other interest.
(8) There are no service or maintenance contracts, management
agreements or any other agreements which will affect Buyer or
the property subsequent to the transfer of title.
(9) In the event that, during the period between the execution of this
Agreement, and the transfer of title, Seller has actual knowledge
of, learns of, or has a reason to believe that any of the above
representations or warranties may cease to be true, Seller hereby
covenants to immediately give notice to Buyer of the change in
circumstances. Upon Seller notifying Buyer of the change in
circumstances Buyer may terminate this agreement, and all funds
delivered to Seller in connection herewith shall be immediately
returned.
(10) Use of Property - Indemnification. Upon transfer of the
Property, Buyer hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and
hold the City and its agents, officers, and employees harmless
from and against any claims asserted or liability established for
damages or injuries to any person or property occurring on the
Property which arise from or are connected with or are caused or
claimed to be caused by the acts or omissions of the City with
respect to operation of an intermodal facility (parking lot and
related matters) on adjacent property and all expenses of
investigation and defending against same; prcvided, however,
that Buyer's duty to indemnify and hold harmless shall not
include any claims or liability arising from the established sole
active negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its agents,
officers, or employees.
(11) Survival of Conditions. The covenants, agreements,
representations and warranties made in this Agreement shall
survive the recordation and delivery of the Grant Deed
conveying the Property. to Buyer.
G G
Purchase and Sale Agreement (Rizzo)
Page Five
(12) Successors and Assigns. The Agreement shall be binding upon,
and shall inure to the benefit of, the successors, heirs, and
assigns of the parties hereto.
(13) Required Action of Buyer and Seller. Buyer and Seller agree to
execute all such instruments and documents and to take all
actions pursuant to the provisions hereof in order to consummate
the purchase and sale herein contemplated and shall use their
best efforts to accomplish the timely Transfer of Title in
accordance with the provisions hereof THIS AGREEMENT IS
VALID FOR A PERIOD OF SIX- (6) MONTHS FROM THE
DATE OF THIS AGREEMENT, UNLESS AN EXTENSION IS
GRANTED BY SELLER, AT ITS DISCRETION.
(14) Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire
agreement between the parties hereto relating to the Property,
and may not be modified except by an instrument in writing
signed by the parties hereto.
(15) 'Approvals. Whenever an approval is required under this
Agreement, such approval shall be construed as "reasonable
approval."
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties her!tp have executed the Agreement in
duplicate originals on this iC,(p day of ,nY�— , 1996.
SELLER:
CITY OF SAN UIS OBISPO
John Dunn "
City Administrative Officer
ATTEST`. ,
n,
e
n;
F
1. 11 VdQ
g:\ ... Vai I road \ri zzo . ag r
FA
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A. portion of lots 3, 4 and 5 of Block 182 of the Ingleside Homestead Tract in the City of
San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California as shown on map filed
in Book A of Maps at Page 132 granted from A. T. Mason to Southern Pacific Railroad
Company in deed recorded November 21, 1990 in Book 11 of Deeds at Page 1 in the
recorder's office of said county described as follows:
Beginning at the most westerly corner of Lot 3 of said block 182, said point also being
on the southeasterly right -of -way line of Church Street (being 60 feet wide); thence South
36° 53' East 54.00 feet to the northwesterly line of said Southern Pacific Railroad right -of-
way line being parallel and 150 feet from the centerline of the Southern Pacific right -of -way
and the northwesterly line of depot grounds as described in deed to Southern Pacific
Railroad Company recorded November 21, 1990 in Book 11 of Deeds at. Page 1, said
point being the true point of beginning: thence
1) North 28° 49' 57" East along said railroad right -of -way line a distance of 131.32
feet more or less to intersect the southeasterly right -of -way line of Church Street,
said point being distant thereon North 53* 07' 00" East 21.00 feet from the
southwesterly corner of Lot 5; thence at right angles
2) South 36* 53' 00" East 13.73 feet; thence
3) South 28 ° 46' 37" West 125.40 feet; thence
4) South 50 ° 19' 14" West 5.46 feet to the southwesterly line of said lot 3; thence
5) North 35 o 53' West along the southwesterly line of said Lot 3 a distance of 11.67
feet to the northwesterly line of depot grounds as described in said deed to
Southern Pacific Railroad Company and the true point of beginning.
The above described parcel contains 1646 square feet.
The above described parcel is graphically shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made
a part hereof by reference.
i.
N
qz)
EXHIBIT B
c
O- 4
0
32.03'
A)
ko
O UN
615j,00T
54.00'
PURCHASE
AIR454' (1646 SO. FT)
Nq
.LOT 2
A
N\
ENGINEERING PURCHASE. AREA FROM
DEVELOPMENT C17-Y OF SAN LUIS 08SIP0
ASSOCIATES SCALE 10-20'
ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
V"
5.46,
iZIA
Nq
.LOT 2
A
N\
ENGINEERING PURCHASE. AREA FROM
DEVELOPMENT C17-Y OF SAN LUIS 08SIP0
ASSOCIATES SCALE 10-20'
ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
C�
RESOLUTION NO. 8595 (1996 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF APPLICATIONS WITH THE FEDERAL TRANSIT
ADMINISTRATION, AN OPERATING ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FOR FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION
ASSISTANCE AUTHORIZED BY 49 U.S.C. CHAPTER 53, TITLE 23 UNITED STATES
CODE, AND OTHER FEDERAL STATUTES ADMINISTERED BY THE FED_ ERAL
TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION
WHEREAS, the Federal Transportation Administrator has been delegated authority to
award Federal financial assistance for a transportation project;
WHEREAS, the grant for Federal financial assistance will impose certain obligations
upon the City of San Luis Obispo, and may require the City of San Luis Obispo to provide
the local share of the project cost,
WHEREAS; the City of San Luis Obispo has or will provide all annual certifications
and assurances to the Federal Transit Administration required for the project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
The City of San Luis Obispo is the Designated Recipient as defined by 49 U.S.C.
5307(a)(2) and that the Public Works Director is authorized to execute and file an
application for Federal assistance on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo with the
Federal Transit Administration for Federal assistance authorized by 49 U.S.C. chapter
53, Title 23, United States Code, or other Federal statutes authorizing a project
administered by the Federal Transit Administration.
2. The Public Works Director is authorized to execute and file with its applications the
annual certifications and assurances and other documents the Federal Transportation
Administration requires before awarding a Federal assistance grant.
3. The Public Works Director is authorized to execute grant agreements with the Federal
Transit Administration on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo.
Upon motion of -vice Mayor Williams ,seconded by Council Member Romero
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Williams, Romero, Smith, Roalman and Mayor Settle''
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
R -8595
i
Resolution No. 8595 (1996 Series)
Filing of Applications with the Federal Transit Administration
Page 2
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 22nd . day of October 1996.
ATTESTED:
' Clerk
Bonn'
APPROVED:
i ttom
%^ r
i
FTA PROGRAM OF PROJECTS
PROJECT BUDGET-FY-97
APPROVAL DATE: 1996 Apportionment: $
Previous Years Surplus: $600,000
GRANTEE: City of San Luis Obispo - SLO Transit
PROJECT NO: BUDGET NO:
FEDERAL AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT
SCOPE
113 -01 Bus - Stations /Stops/Terminals
ACTIVITY
11.33.10 Construct Passenger Amenities
TOTAL CAPITAL
SCOPE
300 -90 Operating Assistance
ACTIVITY
30.90.00 Operating Assistance
for the period July 1, 1996 thru
June 30, 1997
TOTAL
ESTIMATED NET PROJECT COST
FEDERAL SHARE
LOCAL SHARE
20,000 25,000
20;000 25,000
455,000 1,301,000
475,000 1,3269000
$1,326,000
$475,000
$851,000
� o a
� ��
� G,
�� U , ��.
w
J�jf}��l
RESOLUTION NO. 8594 (1996 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING THE 1996 -97 ANNUAL CLAIM FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS
AND STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS TOTALING $929,940
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments ( "SLOCOG ") has
apportioned $929,940 of Transportation Development Act subventions ($872,310 from the
Local Transportation Fund and $57,630 from the State Transit Assistance Fund) to the City of
San Luis Obispo for approved transportation programs and projects; and
WHEREAS, to receive this money the City of San Luis Obispo must file a claim with
SLOCOG;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT .RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
to approve the 1996 -97 Annual Claim for Local Transportation Funds and State
Transit Assistance Funds;
2. to authorize the Public Works Director to execute the claim documents;
3. to direct the City Clerk to forward the annual claim plus one certified copy of this
resolution to:
San Luis Obispo Council of Governments
1150 Osos Street, Suite 202
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Upon motion of Vice Mayor Williams seconded by Council.Member Romero
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Williams, Romero, Smith ;. :.Roalman -7 and Mayor Settle
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
R -8594
Resolution No. 8594 (1996 Series)
1996 -97 Annual Claim for Local Transportation Funds and State Transit Assistance Funds
Page 2
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 22nd day of October 1996.
ATTESTED:
ty o
ITEM 1 . ANNUAL CLAIM
FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS AND
STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS
CLAIM #SLO -967- I
FISCAL YEAR 1996197
TO: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
1 1 50 OSOS STREET, SUITE 202
SAN Luis OBISPO, CA 93401
FROM: CLAIMANT: CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ADDRESS: 955 MORRO STREET
CITY: SAN LUIS OBISPO ZIP CODE: 93401
CONTACT: HARRY WATSON, TRANSIT MGR PHONE: 78 1 -71 21
THIS CLAIMANT, QUALIFIED PURSUANT TO SECTION 99203 OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES CODE, HEREBY
REQUESTS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 1400, STATUTES OF 197 1, AS AMENDED AND
APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS, THAT AN ALLOCATION BE MADE FOR THE PURPOSES AND IN THE
RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED PROJECT AND FINANCIAL PLAN CLAIM FORM.
A) ANNUAL (LTF) APPORTIONMENT $ 872,310
B) ANNUAL (STA) FUNDS $ 57,630
1) OPERATOR REVENUES $ 7,461
2) APPORTIONMENT $ 50,169
TOTAL FUNDS BEING CLAIMED ARE: $ 929,940
cst
CLAIMANT SIGNATURr- -'-�� %� L�
TITLE: Public Works Director
DATE: 0,4
THIS CLAIM WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROVED BY THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS AT
A MEETING ON JUNE 5, 1996, BY RESOLUTION NO. 96- 10.
RONALD L. DE CARLI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
C:4wLwHtywamrow\TDA2e7\ct KSLO.0e7
DATE
ITEM 2. CERTIFICATIONS
' CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIM
FY 1996/97
BY SIGNING BELOW, THE AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL CERTIFIES COMPLIANCE WITH ALL OF THE REQUIRED
TDA CERTIFICATIONS (THOSE MARKED BY AN X).
x I . VERIFICATION THE PROPOSED EXPENDITURES ARE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION PLAN (CCR § 665 1).
X 2. FULL USE IS BEING MADE OF FEDERAL FUNDS AVAILABLE UNDER THE URBAN MASS
TRANSPORTATION ACT AND INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT
FOR TRANSPORTATION PURPOSES (CCR § 6754).
X 3. COMPLIANCE WILL BE MAINTAINED WITH THE ADOPTED BUS TRANSFER PASS POLICY.
(PUC § 99282).
X 4. COMPLIANCE WILL BE. .MAINTAINED WITH THE LAW THAT REQUIRES EQUIVELANT
REDUCED TRANSIT FARES AND IDENTIFICATION CARDS FOR SENIOR CITIZENS AND
DISABLED PERSONS.
X 5. THE TRANSIT SYSTEM OPERATOR DOES NOT ROUTINELY STAFF A TRANSIT VEHICLE
DESIGNED TO BE OPERATED BY ONE PERSON WITH TWO OR MORE PERSONS (PUC §
99264); OR IS NOT PRECLUDED BY CONTRACT FROM EMPLOYING PART TIME DRIVERS
OR FROM CONTRACTING WITH COMMON CARRIERS OF PERSONS OPERATING UNDER A
FRANCHISE OR LICENSE (CCR § 6754).
6. EXISTING AND PROJECTED FAREBOX RATIOS ARE AS LISTED BELOW, AND MEET THE
MINIMUM FARE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS FOR BOTH LTF AND STA MONIES (20%
APPLIES TO SLO TRANSIT).
A. FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 FAREBOX RATIO 26 /o
O
B. PROJECTED FISCAL YEAR 1996/97 FAREBOX RATIO
X- 7. THE TRANSIT SYSTEM WILL NOT RECEIVE TDA FUNDS IN EXCESS OF OPERATING COSTS
ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING ELIGIBILITY FUND TEST (CCR § 6634, 6754).
ESTIMATED 1996/97 OPERATING COSTS
!LESS DEPRECIATION, AMORTIZATION,
VEHICLE LEASE COSTS, AND THE COSTS OF
PROVIDING SERVICES PURUANT TO THE ADA
NET OPERATING COSTS
LESS AMOUNT OF FARE REVENUES REQUIRED
TO MEET YOUR MINIMUM FAREBOX REVENUE
MAXIMUM AMOUNT RECEIVABLE
FOR TRANSIT SYSTEM
1:301.000
1-9,6,600
1,.904,40x:.
220,900
883,580•
- J
NIA '8. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL PURPOSE PARATRANSIT VEHICLES (GPPV) INSPECTION
AND DRIVER CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS PER CCR § 1 201 THROUGH 1 208.
x 9. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS PLACED UPON THE CLAIM BY ACTION OF THE SAN LUIS
OBISPO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS WILL BE MET IN A TIMELY FASHION, INCLUDING
THE FOLLOWING: !.
,1
A. PRIOR TO DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS, QUARTERLY TRANSIT OPERATING
DATA WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS.
B. IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED IN THE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS BUS
STOP POLICY WILL BE PROGRAMMED OR IMPLEMENTED /F APPLICABLE.
C. PROGRAM OR IMPLEMENT SERVICES TO MEET ALL UNMET TRANSIT
NEEDS PER THE ADOPTED 1996 SLOCOG RESOLUTION IF
APPLICABLE.
10. PRIOR TO DISBURSEMENT OF ANY TDA FUNDS, THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS WILL BE
SUBMITTED:
A. THIS CLAIM FOR FUNDS WILL BE SUBMITTED TO SLOCOG; AND.
B. A STATE CONTROLLERS REPORT OF' FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS (LGFA)
WILL BE .SUBMITTED TO THE STATE" CONTROLLERS OFFICE AND TO
SLOCOG (BY SEPTEMBER 30); AND
C. THREE COPIES OF A CERTIFIED FISCAL AUDIT OF ALL TDA FUNDS
RECEIVED THE PRIOR FISCAL YEAR WILL BE SUBMITTED TO SLOCOG
(BY DECEMBER 3 1 FOR 2ND QUARTER PAYMENT). THE FISCAL AUDIT
WILL INCLUDE A DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY OF FUNDS PER PUC
§ 993 14.6 AND CCR § 6634.
C D�ZS�
SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL DATE
CERTIFYING COMPLIANCE
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ITEM 3. ANNUAL PROJECT AND FINANCIAL PLAN - 1996/97
PROPOSED USE AUTHORITY
SLORTA SYSTEM - JURISDICTIONAL LTF ART. 4
SHARE OF REGIONAL TRANSIT SEC. 99260
UNDER AUTHORITY OF JPA
TOTAL TRANSIT JPA
2% BIKE/PEDESTRIAN WAYS PROJECTS
LTF ART.8
AND BICYCLE SAFETY EDUCATION
SEC. 99234
SLID TRANSIT - A. LOCAL FIXED
LTF ART. 4
ROUTE SYSTEM
SEC. 99260
Transportation Assistant;
LTF ART. 8 (a)
Position, for Pedestrian
SEC. 99400
&._Bikeway. Projects,
..
I
TDA AUDIT COST
LTF ART. 3
REIMBURSEMENT
SEC. 99245
TOTAL LTF RECEIVE
SLO TRANSIT - A LOCAL FIXED
ROUTE SYSTEM
SLO TRANSIT - A LOCAL FIXED
.ROUTE SYSTEM
.Y
STA ART. 5.5
SEC. 99314
STA ART. 6.5
SEC. 99313
TOTAL STA RECEIVED DIRECTLY
TOTAL LTF FUNDS
TOTAL STA FUNDS
TOTAL TDA FUNDS
*AMOUNTS TO BE DETERMINED BY CLAIMANT. SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL BASED ON AUDIT FINDING.
AMOUNT
281.161
281,161
1 7, 446
•550, 503
• 21.,950
1,250
591, 149
7,461
50,169
57,630
872,310
57.630
929,940
O.K.
rI'EM 5
M
1996 -97 Transportation Budget
for Programs and Projects Using TDA Apportionments
Revenues:
Federal Transit Administration Grants $475,000
TDA/LTF Allocation for Transit 608,100
TDA /STAF Allocation for Transit 57,600
TDA/LTF Allocation for Pedestrian/Bikeway Program Administration 22,000
TDA/LTF Allocation for Pedestrian/Bikeway Promotion and Education 17,400
Cash Fares and Pass Sales 96,800
Cal Poly In -lieu Fare Contribution 125,000
Other Revenue 2.600
$1,404,500
Expenditures:
SLO Transit Direct Administration
96,400
SLO Transit Indirect Administration
188,600
SLO Transit Contract Operations
1,015;800
SLO Transit Capital
25,000
SLO Transit Capital Reserve
39,300
Pedestrian/Bikeway Program Administration
22,000
Pedestrian/Bikeway Promotion and Education
-17,400
$1,404,500
Note: The City has applied for $475,000 in federal grants, with only a slim chance of
receiving that full amount. The actual amount will more likely be about $200,000. In
that case, there will be no need for the transit capital reserve of $39,300.
I
rITM 6
1995 -96 Estimated Transportation Revenues and Expenditures
for Programs and Projects Using TDA Apportionments
Revenues:
Federal Transit Administration Grants $462,300
TDA/LTF Allocation for Transit 476,400
TDAISTAF Allocation for Transit 55,800
TDA/LTF Allocation for PedestrianBikeway Promotion and Education 16,500
Cash Fares and Pass Sales 102,100
Cal Poly In -lieu Fare Contribution 229,400
Other Revenue 8.200
$1,350,700
Expenditures:
SLO Transit Direct Administration
99,100
SLO Transit Indirect Administration
183,100
SLO Transit Contract Operations
978,700
SLO Transit Capital
45,500
Pedestrian/Bikeway Program Administration
22,000
Pedestrian/Bikeway Promotion and Education
16,500
$1,344,900
ITEM 7
Actions to Comply with 1994 -95 Fiscal Audit Recommendations
The fiscal audit for 1994 -95 noted that when SLO Transit began receiving federal operating
assistance in 1993 -94 and 1994 -95, this additional revenue created an unanticipated excess of
revenue over expense. Because of this excess, SLO Transit was not eligible to receive a
portion of its TDA allocation, and the ineligible portion was classified as deferred revenue.
The audit recommended "that the City more closely monitor the mix of funding requested and
its eligibility for TDA funds . . . ."
In response to this recommendation, the City prepared a spreadsheet which closely matches
revenue received to specific programs and projects. This spreadsheet is periodically reviewed
and updated to reflect chan ging revenue projections and estimated program and project costs.
Significant reductions expected in federal operating assistance starting in 1996 -97 should
prevent this situation from recurring and should also immediately exhaust any remaining
deferred revenue.
ftEM S
Actions to Comply with 1991 -92 to 1994 -95 Performance Audit Recommendations
Because the performance audit was not completed until September 1996, the City has not had
time to respond to the audit recommendations.
ITEM 9
Identification of Substantial Changes to Programs and Projects.
The 1996 -97 transit operating budget is 3 percent higher than actual transit operating cost in
1995 -96..
Because of potential significant reductions in federal operating assistance starting in 1996 -97,
there may be corresponding decreases in the scope of operations and deferrals of previously
budgeted capital projects. The extent of these decreases and deferrals will not be known until
disposition of the City's pending application for federal transit assistance.
SEP -04 -96 WED 04:30 PM MCS SLO U832 18055442916
DEPAHTYENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PAMM �'
TRANSIT OPERATOR COMPLIA...oE CERTIFICATE .�
CAP'339 (tav 7.90 )QPI o62
, TAAN R OPEMTOA NA616 -
l� l i
a/.f � -
P.01
I
1 •�
i oC
i CITY ZIP Ooce OOUNTY
-SAN •�r iS �Qi�i�v
'?3 410
This isto certitythat the above named transit operatotwas ins on this date and found to be in compliance with California Vehicta Cod,
1809:1, regarding participation in the Department of Motor Vehicles Pull Notice Program, and with Section 12804.6, regarding transrk bus
certificates.
MED AY
LM NULtaEA DATE
Destroy previous aditions,
e
n
f
V
•I
SEP -04 -96 WED 04:31 PM MCS SLO 8632 16055442916 P.02
tLg4 *MEMr OP CALIFORNIA HIOHWAY PATROL INSPECTION LOCATION (NUMBER, STREET, CnY OR 00UNTV) TrLSPNONE Ml1MHER AR "
SAFETY COMPLIANCE REPORTS
MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY OPERATIONS CAR ER TYPE I 000E CAR IERREPRE NTATIVEaNAMEANDTITLE .4
CHP 343 (Rev 2-91) OP1062 /S.i�dC� ,nj U.iw /✓% I ��
FLEET AND EMERGENCY RESOURCE INFORMATION
HM Tic. No. HWH Rea. No. IMS Lio. No. PUC NUIAEFEA
Exo. date Exp, date Ex p. date
TRUCKS AND TYPES TRAILERS AND TYPES BUSES BY TYPE REO: C.T. HW. VER HW CONT. DRIVERS
SHOP FUEL SU&AREA CRP 346 , RRSTIUSP. a CHP Iwo
,/ GAS ,� DIESEL LPG NUMBER ISSUED THIS YEAR COLUMN WO. `
Yes ❑ No ❑ Yea U No ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ IJ Yas ❑ No ❑ Yes Eh w
INSPECTION RATINGS: S 6 Satisfactory U = Unsatlateclory C -2 Condittonal UR o Unrated
MAINTENANCE PROGRAM DRIVER_ RECORDS REGULATED EOUIPUFNT HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TERMINAL ` .
I'S S 3 S 4 'S t .S 2 S 3 4 'S 1 S 2 3 4 S 1 2 4 7 -S 2 s 3 'S 4 S
TIME TIMEN TIMEOUT S'
No. rune jo.. No. 16 Time 1,5-
. No. rune 1/1
U � 7!%t�
CONTAINERS/TANKS VAPOR RECOVERY SYS. MIBTER CATEGORY y/ % ❑Carder
Time Tested��CerL ❑Terminal ❑ Both JFDAT9CFELA3T,
62 i
REQM*TS. VIOL. REMARKS
MAIN-
TENANCE P€�• rp.t 42
PROGRAM
DRIVER `
RECORDS
DRIVER
HOURS
J
BRAKES
m
J ;c
SIGNALS
CONNECTING
DEVICES
STEERWG b r /�41, O /
SUSPENSION
TIRES 6 ,N
WHEELS
EOUIPMENT 2 T/ Oa I.
REOMTS. �J
CONTAINERS/ ,
TANKS
HAZARDOUS WsPCCTEO By -- LD. NUMBEa SUSPENSti DATE A
�y AUTO tN
MATERIALS �J /.LJ ZZ :
MOTOR CARRIER CERTIF1CAT10N .
1 hereby ce* that all violations described hereon and recorded on attached vehfote'inspectlon reports (pages T through ), will
be oortecfed in accordance w17h /icable provisions of the Callfomla Vehicle Code and the CaliforWa Code of R ulatmns.
An unsatisfactory rated caRiBr who believes the rating is not justified, may, w)thin five calendar days of the rating, oontactthe Motor Carrier
Safer UnR Supervisor at — obtain areviewoltheratin andano rttrni tores dtoth`re fit
CU ENT TERMINAL RATING TU AND T TLE
J 7 !
I Jr
ermsRa
I�
i
SEP -04 -96 WED 04:32 PM MCS SLO U932
i
I
18055442916 P.03
DEPARTMENTOF CALIFORNIA NAiNWAYPATROL
VEMCLFJEQUIPMT INSPECTION REPORT
MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY OPERATIONS
CHP 343A (Rev 441 OPI 062
CARRIER TNAMEORTENUMLFLECONTAOtAQAf alR J
--- -- _U - _
PARE - OF
INSPECTION ADDRESS - --
T
CRY OR COUNTY
DA
CIRCLE T lOr TraUer
TNOk- , sI, Dopy
MAKE
EQUIPMENTNAWR
T io/
LLIICENSENUMBER
7 3
YW
/c CS 05 dTl6�
000METS
TYKP4
VAO E,
Tracoor Trailer
Trqck .. _ _Bua Dolly>
MAKE
EOUIPMENTNUMBER.
LICENSE NUMBER
YIN
ODOMETER
�68p
TYPER�
tl�
TANWCMAWERMAKE
SPECJTYPE
SERIAL NUMBERNNIT.NUMBER
CTNUMBER
VRB
D Cordfiea_ D
eit •;
"
CERTIFICATE TYPE
CERTIFICATE NUMBER
22-9 cl 7S 7
DATE ISSUED
REWSPECTION DATE
ODOMETER
•'K'
skenoN
13 c CAL
2E 119 — D
•�
(�
I
I
'
I
CIRCLEONE- TraHer
Truck eu Co
'-
I_ifj
EOUIPMENTNUMBER
LICE NUMBER - -
%
VIN - -
GC q SFi l
ODOMETER
I b
TYPEFUQ
CIRCLE ONE
Traotor Tracer
T Bus do ,
MAKE
EQUIPMENT NUMBER
LICENSE NUMBER
VIN
ODOMETER
TYPE PiI;
TAW.GONTAWERMAKE "- - - - _
r
- --
SPECATYPE
SERIAL NUMSEWUNITNUMBER
CT NUMBER -
VR-s
❑ Certlfled � �eb�t
�
CERTIFICATETYPE - _ " -�
-
CERTIFICATE NUMBER
DATE ISSUED
RE WSPECTION DATE - - -
OODUMA
I
SECTION _
e
i
6
SEO -04 -96 WE'D 04:32 PM MCS SLO $832 18055442916
cErARrnEisTOFCR�iuworiwAV .PAViSX .... __
VMCLEJEQU"ENT INSPECTION REP&T
MOTOR CARRIERR fAFETY OPERATIONS
CHP 343A ROV 4 -91) OP1062
CARRIER p"kE DA TEAMAM FLE CONTROL p&WkiY
1
eLSaEOTwNADDaese -
Cm OR COUNTY
_
OAT
'
Goc�cOryE MAIM EWIPM NTNUMBER NSE.NUMBER VIN .- ODOMETER
for 92b(r ' j 7, s%� 2 9 67
Trurlt Do 1 IJ y
MAKE EOUIPMENT NUMBER LICENSE NUMBER VIN 0�7
CIRCLE ONE Tractor Tmaer
Tnxk 1 -bus DO
TANKrCONTAINERMAKE - PE SERIALNUMBEAKNIrNUMBER CTNUMBEA — YRS —
O Certdied ❑
� TYPE ' 71 REIN9PECTION DATE . - ..__.__- - ODOMETER
� gTF��'U�MB(E� - )-
SECTION 4 S -
I
r
Pat
Fitt
:r¢
,{
(1.
.vh
I
_
h
_
I
i
I
I
ONE T CDOt Trager
Truck M �
MAKE
EQUIPMENT NUMBER
1131
I WCENSE NUMBER
799,156
VW
�i . �S?
OOOMETE
oa �[z9l
TYPfi
lWKFUR
*' Tractor Tra17er
Truck _.i _Bus_ Dogy
MAKE
_
EOUIPYENTNUMBEA
UCENSENUNBER
V
COOMETEH
TANWOONGYIERMAKE "- -
I -r
429SA APE ;�, --
SERIAL NUWBERNNITNUMBER
CTNUMBER -
AS
❑ C6111
� •
Shed �:
CERTF LATE TYPE
CERTIFICATE NUMBER
DATE ISSUED
REINSPECTION DATE•
OOOMBTfA -
''
SECTION
-- I
I
i
I
NSPECTEO lay
J __J�VJll�N
LO. NUMBER I
- /_Sl3
Use preNOus edldons until depleted. _ us
ITEM I I. TRANSIT OPERATING DATA
TRANSIT SYSTEM NAME
SAN LUIS OBISPO TRANSIT
F/1(: 1995/96
(FROM 7/1/95 - 6/30/96)
FARE REVENUE
OPERATING COSTS
$ Abrtiw,
$ CONTRA=
134,270
959.910
TOTAL PASSENGERS
# LIFT DEPLOTE6:
# Now Um.
6,672
1,016,513
VEHICLE SERVICE
HOURS
29.405
VEHICLE SERVICE
MILES
320,629
EMPLOYEE PAY
HOURS
NUMBER OF TRIPS
#ToTAL TRIPS: ,
# ON- 11METRIPS:
30,156
30,089
NUMBER OF FORMAL
# COMPUMENTS: 23
# COMPLAINTS: 21
COMMENTS
NUMBER OF
ACCIDENTS
7
NUMBER OF
MECHANICAL
FAILURES
56 .
MAINTENANCE COSTS
: VEr+ICLE:
CTMER:.
1.311,988
N/A
CAPITAL COSTS
20,000
ITEM 12
Requirement to Establish a Capital Reserve Account
Because of expected significant reductions in federal operating assistance, the City will
probably be eligible to use almost all of its 1996 -97 TDA allocation plus any deferred TDA
revenue for operations. Consequently, there should be no need to establish a capital reserve
account.
�v�
'L"" r
� �,
1
,�G
�'�I' � :; l U � -�'"'�
,� __
�. r �,
P�� � E,�-
��� i
�. �,
RESOLUTION NO. 8593 (1996 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ACCEPTING A NEGOTIATED EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE AND
ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AND THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FOR THE EL CAPITAN ANNEXATION
AT 850 EL CAPPTAN (SLO COUNTY ANNEXATION #45)
(CITY FILE # ANNEX 46-96)
VVIIEREAS, in the case of a jurisdictional change which will alter the service area
or responsibility of a local agency, Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99(b) requires that the
amount of property tax revenue to be exchanged, if any, and the amount of annual tax increment to
be exchanged among the affected local agencies shall be determined by negotiation; and
WHEREAS, when a city is involved, the negotiations are conducted between the
City Council and the Board of Supervisors of the County; and
WHEREAS, Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99(b) requires that each local
agency, upon completion of negotiations, adopt resolutions whereby said local agencies agree to
accept the negotiated exchange of property tax revenues, if any, and annual tax increment and
requires that each local agency transmit a copy of each such resolution to the Executive Officer of
the Local Agency Formation Commission; and
WHEREAS, no later than the date on which the certificate of completion of the
jurisdictional change is recorded with the County Recorder, the Executive Officer shall notify the
County Auditor of the exchange of property tax revenues by transmitting a copy of said resolution
to him and the County Auditor shall therefore make the appropriate adjustments as required by
law; and
WHEREAS, the negotiations have taken place concerning the transfer of property
tax revenues and annual tax increment between the County of San Luis Obispo and the City of San
R -8593
K
8593
Resolution No. (1996 Series)
Page 2
San Luis Obispo pursuant to Section 99(b) for the jurisdictional change designated as Annexation
No. 45 to the City of San Luis Obispo (El Capitan Annexation); and
WHEREAS, the negotiating parties, to wit: Paul Hood, Principal Administrative
Analyst; County of San Luis Obispo, and Ken Hampian, Assistant City Administrative Officer,
have negotiated the exchange of property tax revenue and annual tax increment between such
entities as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest that such negotiated' exchange of property
tax revenues and annual tax increment be consummated.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San
Luis Obispo, as follows:
1. That the recitals set forth above are true, correct, and valid.
2. That the City of San Luis Obispo agrees to accept the following negotiated
exchange of property tax revenues and annual tax increment:
(a) No base property tax revenue shall be transferred from the County
of San Luis Obispo to the City of San Luis Obispo.
(b) Annual tax increment in an amount to be determined by the County
Auditor, based upon the following percentage agreed to by the negotiating parties, 9.96809
percent, shall be transferred from the County of San Luis Obispo to the City of San Luis Obispo
in the fiscal year 1997 -98 and each fiscal year thereafter.
3. Upon receipt of a certified copy of this resolution and a copy of the
recorded certificate of completion, the County Auditor shall make the appropriate adjustments to
property tax revenues and annual tax increments as set forth above.
t
8593
Resolution No. (1996 Series)
Page 3
4. That the City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy
of the resolution to the Executive Officer of the San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation
Commission, who shall then distribute copies in the manner prescribed by law.
On motion of Council Member Romero Seconded by Vice Mayor Williams
_, and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Romero; Williams, Roalman, Smith and Mayor Settle
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was ,
g g , passed and adopted this nn., y of. October 1996.
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Mayor Allen K. Settle
n
RESOLUTION NO. 8592(1996 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO DECLARING A BUILDING AS SURPLUS PROPERTY
WHEREAS, the City has acquired the property at 860 Pacific Street for expansion of
downtown parking, and;
WHEREAS, the Cultural Heritage Committee has considered the merits of the building
and found the house does not meet the criteria for historically significant buildings, and;
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has reviewed the proposed
removal of the building and has determined there would be no significant environmental impact.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo hereby declares:
SECTION 1. The building at 860 Pacific Street as shown in Exhibit A is surplus
property.
SECTION 2. That the removal of the building at 860 Pacific Street .is categorically
exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 15301),
because removal of the building will not pose a risk to the public, surrounding property, or to
natural resources, and the City's Cultural Heritage Committee has determined that the building
is not culturally, historically, or architecturally significant:
J
SECTION 3. Disposal of the building shall be made by sale at public auction or by
another method of disposal in accordance with the City's surplus property policy as determined
by the Director of Finance to be in the best interest of the City.
Upon motion ofCouncil Member Romerogeconded by vice Mayor Williams
and
on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Romero, Williams and Mayor Settle
NOES: Council Member Roalman
ABSENT: Council Member Smith (not participating)
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 22nd day of October
1996.
Attachment B
D_0 G09
i
8592
Resolution (1996 Series)
Page 2
ATTEST:
tty Clerk Bprrfe • GawfZ
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
n
Gio 50 0 155 70 5
0
I N
q m a OW
'$ I'. I o 0
0! JS?IS
W I 40
G 84.03 N I QDI V m a Y
W °m
O ¢.m
-4 7825_
M 90 57.5
L
0
I
0
• N ro
r
o
GARDEN,,,,, IN ST.o
Q s+ y
m
~
,Je} •w
697 41.71,
ne°
42.5
ve •m,
57.9 `YS
OV
o NIPOMO
ST.o
D
A
Z
P
s
u
nw
_
30
166
7.3
77,
60
-
30 -
40
70
n
N
ro
GMy9 5
D
I'
O
D
�
'
S!S °JO'. E•S�] ° °5'E
B7
)
m W
.s0
G
I
N
m � lu a
30120 130
n � -•N
0
0 '98 roa 57
r o
_
—•
62.8
e'j:eef Solo
°
�42,5
50 23
50
/1°.
- - --
n`'�.
— 150
y
a u
N O
y +
u u:
a
Ugy
FIN
�
_
O
O
60
60
u
0
�+•.v
•
?
W •
O
o' m — 0
60
{Y
50
ro — O
?
o'
(p N W
R
_ •. ,�,.
150
O
n
A 115.4.
O
O
• � O
e,
®
30
N
5.0
O
to
IS
m
�1 m Z
o-
yyo°
a. I
I
u
ro
°
o
zoy
a
I
30
.1
20' JO
SO
30
23 I 65.0 V
I
u
W
N BROAD
ST."
60
Gio 50 0 155 70 5
0
I N
q m a OW
'$ I'. I o 0
0! JS?IS
W I 40
G 84.03 N I QDI V m a Y
W °m
O ¢.m
-4 7825_
M 90 57.5
L
0
I
0
• N ro
r
o
GARDEN,,,,, IN ST.o
Q s+ y
EXHIBIT A
m
~
,Je} •w
697 41.71,
ne°
42.5
ve •m,
57.9 `YS
uo4 13"
23 50
v ;
D
A
Z
m
s
u
nw
1
nos
.•
4
m
m
ys
-
N
45
W
W
m r
�
x5
o.
-- r
Q
m W
.s0
ro
I O
50
_
m � lu a
30120 130
n � -•N
�.
r o
_
62.8
e'j:eef Solo
°
�42,5
50 23
50
EXHIBIT A
o GHORRO ,
„s,..
m
°= ST..o
v�
'
v ;
m
45 13
• . r a
nw
me
nos
.•
4
m
m
ys
-
EXHIBIT A
o GHORRO ,
„s,..
m
°= ST..o
v�
'
v ;
m
45 13
• . r a
nw
me
nos
_no
50 20 30 a
05 so 1 63 4
-
W
W
o.
-- r
a so
m W
.s0
ro
I O
50
m � lu a
30120 130
n � -•N
�.
y +
a
Ugy
FIN
_
O
60
60
oN rp�v
IJm
V-N
�
N
D y
R
_ •. ,�,.
150
'' o
150
A 115.4.
3.
e,
®
30
N
5.0
O
500
�1 m Z
o-
yyo°
a. I
I
u
ro
. I A iW
zoy
I
125
I
u
W
SO
60
50
25
60
30
50 T' S0 ...65.4
70
I
Z (
oM0RRO
45
ST. o
cc
-
S76°53'E
Ox
A ro
N
EXHIBIT A
0