Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 07 - Islay Hill Park Playground Renovation ProjectDepartment Name: Public Works Cost Center: For Agenda of: Placement: Estimated Time: 5002 November 12, 2019 Consent N/A FROM: Shelly Stanwyck, Assistant City Manager Community Services Prepared By: Shelsie Kloepper, Engineer III SUBJECT: ISLAY HILL PARK PLAYGROUND RENOVATION, SPECIFICATION NO. 91654 RECOMMENDATION 1.As recommended by the Parks and Recreation Commission, approve the Project Plans (Attachment A) and Special Provisions (Attachment B) for the Islay Hill Park Playground Renovation Project, Specification Number 91654; and 2.Authorize staff to advertise for bids and authorize the City Manager to award the construction contract if the lowest responsible bid is within the publicly disclosed Funding Amount of $300,000; and 3.Approve a City Sole Source purchase from GameTime Equipment in an amount not to exceed $150,000 for purchase of playground equipment and authorize Finance Director to execute Purchase Order upon receipt of final quote. DISCUSSION Background Replacing playground equipment in the City’s parks limits the City’s liability exposure and keeps the City in compliance with State regulations. In 1999, staff developed a plan to identify replacement of the City’s park playground equipment, which anticipates the useful life of the equipment to be 15 years. Islay Hill Park Playground was built in 1997 and is the next playground scheduled to be replaced. In 2008, the State passed AB 1144 which mandates that all play equipment constructed between 1994 and 1999 must be replaced or upgraded within 15 years of installation. The scope of the Islay Hill Park Playground Renovation is to replace the existing playground equipment and provide a new playground layout within the existing playground footprint. The project also includes Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) path of travel upgrades from the parking lot to the playground. Staff contracted with Wallace Group to propose new playground layout alternatives, engage in public outreach and discussion of improvement options, and design the playground renovation as well as the associated civil engineering and site improvements. During the preliminary design phase, Wallace Group worked with several playground equipment vendors and presented options from three different vendors to the Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC). The PRC approved Packet Page 83 Item 7 Figure 1: Five to twelve-year-old interconnective climbing course a final playground layout with equipment manufactured by GameTime. The final GameTime layout incorporates shade features for all ages and focuses on a unique interconnective climbing course for the five to twelve-year-old play area. The layout also included many of the most voted on elements from the public outreach events for the two to five-year-old play area including mini-monkey bars, musical components, a teeter-totter, and a spinner. In order for the contractor to be able to construct the playground as approved by PRC, the contractor must use GameTime play equipment. GameTime equipment provides a discount to government organizations when purchased directly. Staff recommends purchasing the play equipment directly from GameTime Equipment (Attachment C) which will reduce construction cost by approximately $20,000. Previous Council or Advisory Body Action This project was identified in the 2017-19 Financial Plan that was approved by Council. The PRC approved the proposed project layout with GameTime equipment at the April 3, 2019, meeting. Policy Context Per the October 2018 Purchasing Policy Update to the July 2015 Financial Management Manual, Council approval is required for Public Projects that cost over $175,000. The PRC is an advisory body that reviews projects and provides recommendations to Council. Through the review and approval of the Islay Hill Park Playground layout the PRC recommends approval of the project to Council. Public Engagement Public engagement was done throughout the design of this project. Several public outreach events were conducted at the park and the park design was discussed at the February 6, 2019 (Attachment D), and April 3, 2019 (Attachment E), PRC Meetings. During the February 6th meeting the PRC reviewed layouts from three playground vendors and provided feedback to create the final layout. During the April 3rd meeting the PRC approved the final layout with GameTime equipment. Packet Page 84 Item 7 CONCURRENCE There is concurrence from Parks and Recreation, Public Works, and Community Development Departments. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This project is exempt from environmental review under Section 15301 Class 1 (existing facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines because the project proposes to replace the existing playground with similar equipment. The project is consistent with the applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable City Regulations. FISCAL IMPACT Budgeted: Yes Budget Year: 2020 Funding Identified: Yes Fiscal Analysis: Funding Sources Current FY Cost Annualized On-going Cost Total Project Cost General Fund: Local Revenue Measure Fund $500,000 $500,000 State Federal Fees Other: Total $500,000 N/A $500,000 Project Cost Estimate City Playground Equipment Purchase $150,000 Construction Estimate $270,000 Contingency (28% of Construction Estimate) $75,000 Materials Testing $5,000 Total for Project $500,000 Packet Page 85 Item 7 While the construction estimate is $270,000, staff is requesting authorization to award a contract up to the Publicly Disclosed Funding amount of $300,000 in compliance Public Contract Code Section 20103.8C. If the full $300,000 have to be allocated, the construction contingency will be lowered accordingly. This project is funded by the Local Revenue Measure. ALTERNATIVES The Council could choose to deny authorization to advertise. This is not recommended because the playground equipment is deteriorating, and the playground will need to be closed if not replaced soon. Attachments: a - COUNCIL READING FILE - Project Plans b - COUNCIL READING FILE - Project Special Provisions c - Sole Source Justification for GameTime d - COUNCIL READING FILE - February 6, 2019 PRC Meeting Minutes e - COUNCIL READING FILE - April 3, 2019 PRC Meeting Minutes Packet Page 86 Item 7 City of San Luis Obispo  Sole Source Justification Form GameTime c/o Great Western  It is the policy of the City of San Luis Obispo to solicit quotations or bids for purchases of commodities or  services for specified dollar amounts and to select vendors on a competitive basis (See City of San Luis  Obispo Financial Management Manual, Section 201, Exhibit 201‐B).  Pursuant to San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Chapter 3.24.060, certain acquisitions in which the products  or services may only be obtained from a single source may be purchased without engaging in bidding  procedures.  Such Sole Source acquisitions must be justified in sufficient detail to explain the basis for  suspending the usual competitive procurement process and approved by the approving authority before  such a purchase is made.  1. What product or service is being requested?  Why is it necessary?  The purchase of park playground equipment. The playground equipment is required for the Islay Hill  Park Playground Renovation project.     2. Is this “brand” of product or services offered the only one that meets the City’s requirements? If  yes, what is unique about the product/services?  This vendor produces equipment that will completely match the layouts that were reviewed and  approved by the Parks and Recreation commission.  There are other  playground  equipment  manufacturers, but GameTime’s equipment was specifically chosen by the Parks and Recreation  Commission.   3. Is the product or service proprietary or is it available from various dealers? Have you verified this?  Playground equipment is available from various dealers, but this specific layout can only be created  from GameTime. This was verified during the design stage.  4.  Have  other  products/vendors  been  considered?  If  yes,  which  products/vendors  have  been  considered and how did they fail to meet the City’s requirements?  Yes two other playground equipment manufacturers were considered and reviewed. The Parks and  Recreation  Commission  and  the  public  reviewed  layouts  from  other  manufacturers.  The  other  vendors’ products and layout designs were ultimately not selected as the best fit for this park  renovation.   5. Is the purchase an upgrade or addition to an existing system or brand of products adopted citywide?   If so, will purchase of this product avoid other costs as opposed to purchasing another product or  service (e.g., additional training required; data conversion; implementation of a new system; etc.)?  This purchase will be an upgrade to the existing system in order to meet current ADA and State  Requirements. The purchase of this equipment directly from the manufacturer will result in a $20,000  discount for the City.  Purchase of this equipment is specific to the Islay Park Renovation Project,  future park renovations may utilize another equipment manufacturer.  Packet Page 87 Item 7 City of San Luis Obispo  Sole Source Justification Form 6. Is this a request for services by a contractor with necessary, unique and critical knowledge of  established City systems or programs?  If so, will using the contractor’s services avoid other costs  (e.g.: significant staff time in compiling information, data transfers, etc.)?  This request does not eliminate the need for a competitive bidd ing process for the construction of the  project. The Contractor will be required to meet the appropriate licensing requirements to install the  purchased equipment.   7. What is the quoted price for the product or services and is it reasonable (based on other products  or services in the same field or based on historical pricing for the City for similar products or  services)?  The estimated price for the playground equipment is $144,502.26. This is a reasonable fee for the  equipment provided.    Approved:  ______________________________________       _____________________  Name:        Date  Title:  Packet Page 88 Item 7