HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-06-2017 Item 17 2017 Parking Fund Review no Presentation17
CouncilAgenda Report
I5
Meeting Date: 6/6/2017
FROM: Daryl Grigsby, Director of Public Works
Prepared By: Scott Lee, Parking Services Manager
SUBJECT: 2017 PARKING FUND REVIEW
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Review and accept the 2017-19 Parking Fund Analysis; and
2. Conceptually approve the Parking Enterprise Fund budget for 2017-19 with final action on
June 20, 2017 with the adoption of the 2017-19 Financial Plan; and
3. Authorize the release of the Parking Structure Assessment and Maintenance Report Request
for Proposal (RFP); and
4. Introduce an ordinance approving an increase in parking rates for metered spaces effective
January 1, 2018, July 1, 2019 and again on July 1, 2020; and
5. Adopt a resolution approving modifications to parking rates in the parking structures
effective January 1, 2018 and July 1, 2020; and
6. Adopt a resolution to modify/increase the fine and forfeiture amounts for certain parking
violations identified in the resolution effective January 1, 2018.
REPORT IN BRIEF
On April 18th, 2017 the Council received a five year forecast for the Parking Fund as part of the
Strategic Budget Direction (SBD). Since that time, projections for revenues and expenses have
been refined and staff has conducted public outreach for potential changes to rates, fines and
forfeitures that are necessary to help the fund meet is financial obligations.
The SBD identified that working capital for the fund at the end of Fiscal Year 2015-16 was over
$11.9 million. The SBD did not include any proposed rate changes as part of the forecast so the
fiscal outlook for the next five years showed the working capital balance decreasing each year
with a projection of falling to less than one-third the current level in the outmost year (2021-22).
Additionally, the forecast included the funding (through partial debt financing) of the Palm
Nipomo structure in 2019-20, but even without this major project, the annual working capital
balance would continue to decrease due to expenditures exceeding annual revenue.
At SBD staff requested and council conceptually approved multi-year rate increases be adopted
as part of the adoption of the Financial Plan based on the forecasted expenditures, current level
of rates and projected revenues and working capital balances. Staff recommends that the Council
reviews and adopts the specific rates, fines and forfeitures proposed in this report. This will
reestablish the relationship between certain types of rates (permit v. hourly) and build a working
capital balance necessary for the long-term sustainability and reinvestment in capital projects of
the Parking Enterprise Fund, including but not limited to facilitating the construction of the Palm
Nipomo structure.
In addition to the Palm Nipomo Structure, the Parking Enterprise Fund expenditures include
Packet Pg 307
17
completing for the parking structure assessment program (RFP release being recommended as
part of this item), the Marsh Street Structure Maintenance and the long awaited replacement of
the Parking Access Revenue Control System (PARCS) in our structures.
DISCUSSION
This report presents the final 2017 Parking Fund Review. It highlights adjustments made to
the Parking Fund Analysis since the preparation of the 2016-17 Financial Plan Supplement, the
2016-17 Mid -Year budget and information given to Council as part of the Strategic Budget
Direction session on April 18, 2017.
Attachment A is the full fund review for the Parking Fund for FY 2016-17. As outlined in the
analysis, the Parking Services Division is able to:
1. Provide parking services and enforcement for the Downtown Area for businesses,
visitors and patrons;
2. Provide parking services and enforcement for residential permit district and other areas
seven days per week;
3. Fund the debt service for the existing parking structures as well as new long-term
financing obligations for the Palm-Nipomo parking structure;
4. Meet bond covenants and debt ratios to maintain a strong bond rating;
S. Fund reserves as set by city policy; and
6. Continue capital maintenance projects to maintain assets and provide high quality:
Major assumptions that effect the position of the fund include:
1. Revenue and expense changes resulting from lot closures in the last two years and
projected construction closure of Lot 14 in FY19-20 (location of the Palm Nipomo
structure).
2. Increased retirement costs commencing on July 1, 2018 due to change in Ca1PERS
discount rate.
3. The Palm-Nipomo Parking structure is scheduled to begin construction in FY 2019-20
and is partially debt financed at $17.6 million.
4. Proposed Rate and Fine Adjustments as shown in Exhibit B.
The Parking Fund remains in a healthy position with a continued modest year-end working
capital in preparation for commencing with the Palm Nipomo Parking Structure. The five-year
forecast indicates the fund is able to support current expenses, capital projects, and debt service
obligations while maintaining the minimum 20% reserve level in working capital in accordance
with the City Financial Management policies. However, the base five-year forecast shown as part
of the SBD assumed minimal CIP investment in our facilities. This is anticipated to change as a
result of the Structure Assessment Study. That potential investment, combined with no additional
changes in rates or fine would result in a further annual fund balance decline as expenses exceed
revenues. Reinvestment in these community assets is necessary to support the city's long-term
fiscal health and sustainability.
This report highlights significant issues that affect the Parking Fund for the FY 2017-19
Financial Plan and beyond including the four CIP projects identified below:
Packet Pg 308
17
1. The Structural Assessment Study will be undertaken in FYI 7-18 for each of the existing
parking structures and may result in the identification of additional capital projects. The
RFP release is recommended as part of this proposed Council action.
2. The Marsh Street Structure maintenance project is anticipated to begin in FY17-18 and
includes resealing decks, painting, lighting replacement and elevator upgrades to extend
the useful life of the structure.
3. The Payment Access and Revenue Control System (PARCS) replacement of existing
hardware and software operating in the three existing parking structures is allocated in
FY 18-19 but design and final costs are currently underway.
4. The Palm-Nipomo Parking Structure is moving forward with environmental review and
additional design work. It is programmed to begin construction in FY19-20 but will
continue to expend funds in FYI 7-18 for planning and design aspects.
5. Increase in operating costs, including pension changes are forecasted for the fund.
Parking Fund Revenues
Parking Fund revenues will continue to grow due to the economic recovery but will be tempered
by the recent loss of on -street meters and lot closures for the Garden Street and Chinatown
projects. Revenue projections for the five-year forecast assume an annual 1% growth in volume
due to redevelopment activity and other factors.
Historically, the Parking Enterprise Fund has assumed the need for a 10% increase in
revenues every third year (by rate, fines and forfeitures changes), that generally were from
system -wide rate increases. As explained in the SBD, prior increases were delayed or not
implemented due to the recession and other factors. The last major increase was delayed in 2008,
approved in 2011, and was not implemented until 2015.
One-time parking in -lieu fees are projected but the timing and amount is conservative because
the payment is sporadic and the annual operating conditions of the fund do not rely on these fees
for solvency.
Table 1: Parking Fund Revenue Proiections - without rate or fine chan-zes
Packet Pg 309
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
Budget
Budget
Projected
Projected
Projected
Mid Year Budget
Revenues
- ---------- - ----------
Parking Meter Collections
Lots
166,200
140,400
141,900
122,900
124,200
125,500
Streets
1,539,100
1,648,100
1,664,700
1,681,400
1,698,300
1,715,200
Parking Structure Collections
1,054,700
1,489,500
1,504,400
1,519,500
1,596,700
1,801,100
Long -Term Parking Revenues
434,900
795,000
802,900
810,900
819,100
827,300
Lease Revenues
500,500
502,900
509,800
512,300
514,800
521,800
Parking In -Lieu Fees
20,200
20,400
20,600
20,800
21,000
21,200
Other Service Charges
100
89,100
90,000
96,400
97,400
98,400
Total Service Charges
3,715,700
4,507,200
4,554,300
4,571,400
4,676,700
4,913,700
Investment & Property Revenues
48,200
48,000
52,000
53,900
24,400
22,700
Fines and Forfeitures
669,900
587,300
593,200
599,100
605,100
611,100
Other Revenues
100
100
100
100
100
Total Revenues
4,433,800
5,142,600
5,199,600
5,224,500
5,306,300
5,547,600
Packet Pg 309
17
Table 2: Parking Fund Revenue Projections - WITH proposed rate and fine changes
WITH PROPOSED RATE AND FINE
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
Contract Services
920,364
Budget
Budget
Projected
Projected
Projected
INCREASES
Mid Year Budget
241,171
249,014
256,500
264,100
272,100
Revenues
197,795
61,300
62,600
64,400
66,100
67,700
Parking Meter Collections
157,700
171,800
193,300
207,500
222,300
Lots
166,200
152,500
166,000
142,200
165,400
165,400
Streets
1,539,100
1,787,000
1,942,100
1,942,100
2,252,500
2,252,500
Parking Structure Collections
1,054,700
1,658,900
1,843,300
1,843,300
2,299,100
2,560,500
Long -Term Parking Revenues
434,900
890,800
994,500
1,085,200
1,220,600
1,292,500
Lease Revenues
500,500
500,500
504,900
504,900
504,900
509,400
Parking In -Lieu Fees
20,200
20,200
20,200
20,200
20,200
20,200
Other Service Charges
100
113,100
134,600
134,600
181,500
181,500
Total Service Charges
3,715,700
4,896,800
5,336,400
5,403,300
6,281,200
6,619,000
Investment & Property Revenues
48,200
50,000
55,000
60,300
32,500
36,900
Fines and Forfeitures
669,900
616,500
669,000
669,000
686,500
686,500
Other Revenues
100
100
100
100
100
Total Revenues
4,433,800
5,563,400
6,060,500
6,132,700
7,000,300
7,342,500
Operating Program Expenses
The Parking Fund 's operating program budget was based on the continuation of existing
service levels and staffing, but with reduced contract service expenditures forecast due to
reductions in maintenance for closures of Lots 2, 3, and 11. Expected increases in retirement
contributions, unfunded liabilities and the effects of the Ca1PERS discount rate adjustment as
well as the one-time costs related to the citywide Motion Project have been included.
2016-17 2017-18 M 2018-19 1 2019-20 V 2020-21 2021-2022
Mid Year Budget Budget Projected Projected Projected
Budget
Staffing * $
1,031,488
1,060,392
1,086,949
1,119,500
1,153,100
1,187,700
Contract Services
920,364
694,525
703,662
724,800
746,500
768,900
Other Operating Expenses
235,459
241,171
249,014
256,500
264,100
272,100
Retirement Contributions
197,795
61,300
62,600
64,400
66,100
67,700
Unfunded Liabilities
157,700
171,800
193,300
207,500
222,300
Ca1PERS discount Rate Cost
-
6,200
12,500
28,500
36,700
Palm Nipomo Expenses
-
-
-
-
46,800
192,400
Total Parking Services
2,385,106
2,215,088
2,280,225
2,371,000
2,512,600
2,747,800
General Government
684,603
622,189
622,189
648,400
649,800
651,300
Total Parking Services Operating
3,069,709
2,837,277
2,902,414
3,019,400
3,162,400
3,399,100
Capital Improvement Plan
The City's 2017-22 five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) identifies approximately $25.4
Packet Pg 310
17
million projects to be funded by the Parking Fund. Most notable will be the construction of
the Palm-Nipomo Parking Structure ($23.6M) anticipated to begin in FY 2019-20.
The Palm-Nipomo Parking Structure, when constructed, will permanently remove
approximately 77 metered parking spaces in city -owned surface parking Lot 14 and is
anticipated to create approximately 400-445 parking spaces; for a net total of 323-368
parking spaces. It is assumed that Palm Nipomo will cost $23.6 million to construct; $17.6
million from debt financing or Bond Issuance and the remaining $6 million from the Parking
Fund's working capital.
A Parking Structure Assessment will be completed in FY 2017-18 to determine the condition of
existing three parking structures and make recommendations for long term maintenance to
extend the useful life of each of the facilities. This Assessment may result in additional CEP
projects. No additional funding has been approved or requested, except as shown in Exhibit B -
Proposed Rate and Fine Adjustments.
CIP projects to be completed in the five-year plan include the Marsh Street Structure
maintenance project and the long awaited replacement of the Payment Access and Revenue
Control System (PARCS) operating in the three existing parking structures. These projects are
budgeted to occur in FYI 7-18 and FYI 8-19 respectively.
Proposed Revisions to Parking Rates and Fine Amounts
As identified in the April 18th SBD meeting, staff has conducted stakeholder outreach regarding
potential rate changes for the Parking Fund. On May 11, 2017 staff presented potential rate and
fine changes for the fund to the Downtown Association Parking and Access committee. It has
been a number of years since a system wide rate change to reflect increases in expense and
program needs. In general, the committee understood the need for rate changes and accepted that
staff would be recommending to Council to increase rates beginning in FY 2107-18.
Therefore, staff recommends that Council approve a multiple year rate and fine increases
schedule that will assist in stabilizing the Parking Enterprise Fund for the next five-year period.
A multi-year rate plan has been common practice for managing the Parking Enterprise Fund.
These increases are recommended to occur in FY17-18 and continue thru FY20-21. This is
intended to fund anticipated expenses, capital projects, and debt service obligations This is
consistent with the historical trend of rate increases on a three-year cycle and can be tempered
with economic changes in condition if necessary. The following is a description of each parking
type along with the recommended changes for Council consideration:
1. Metered Spaces
Table 3 - Metered Sbaces
Tier 1
Super Core
30 minute
2 Hour
Credit Card, Coin
Tier 2
Core
30 minute
2 Hour
Coin, Meter Keys
Tier 3
10 -Hour & Permit
5 Minute
10 Hour
Coin, Permit
Packet Pg 311
17
Table 4 - Proposed Rate Changes
Type
Current Rate
Proposed
Jan. 1, 2018
Proposed Proposed
July 1, 2019 July 1, 2020
Tier 1
$ 1.50
$ 1.75
$ 2.00
Tier 2
$ 1.25
$ 1.50
$ 1.75
Tier 3
$ 0.75
$ 1.00
$ 1.25
Tier 3 monthly/quarterly
$40/$120
$60/$180
$80/$240 $90/$270
Continued differential costs between the Tier 1 and Tier 2 meter rates and hourly
structure rates will continue to push increased usage of the parking structures and
increase turnover in the on -street meter spaces. Additionally, the rate increases help offset
the cost of providing the convenience of credit card acceptance.
2. Parking Structures - hourly & monthly
The last rate enhancement in the parking structures was approved in 2011 but the
implementation was delayed until 2015 when it was increased from $.75 to $1.00 per
hour. The "first 60 minutes free" provision of the structures is proposed as an ongoing
practice for the time period in question to allow free short duration visits to Downtown.
Proposed parking structure rate changes:
a. Increases Effective January 1, 2018:
1. Hourly rate: $1.00 per hour to $1.25 per hour
2. Daily maximum rate: $10.00 to $12.50
3. Structure validation booklets: $60 for 100 hours to $75 for 100 hours
4. Proxcards: Increase all structures from $225 per quarter to $255 per quarter
5. DROP Program (overnight): Increase from $300 per quarter to $375 per quarter
b. Increase Effective July 1, 2020:
1. Hourly rate: $1.25 per hour to $1.50 per hour
2. Daily maximum rate: $12.50 to $15.00
3. Structure validation booklets: $75 for 100 hours to $90 for 100 hours
4. Proxcards: Increase all structures from $255 per quarter to $285 per quarter
5. DROP Program (overnight): Increase from $375 per quarter to $435 per quarter
6. Establish the Palm Nipomo Structure rates as:
a. Hourly rate: $1.00 per hour
b. Daily maximum rate: $10
c. Proxcards: $225 per quarter
d. DROP program at Palm/Nipomo only: $375 per quarter
Packet Pg 312
17
3. Annual Residential Permits
Type
Current
Rate
Proposed
Jan. 1, 2018
Proposed
July 1, 2020
Residential Parking Permit
$ 10
$ 15
$ 20
DT Residential Permit
$ 10
$ 15
$ 20
4. Other:
Validation tokens and stickers are available to businesses only in blocks of 100. These
blocks have been offered at a forty percent (40%) discount off the hourly structured
parking rates. Therefore, it is being proposed that the discount be set at forty percent
(40%) and adjust automatically to the then prevailing rate in the structures.
5. Parkin, Fines:
Parking Fines are being proposed to increase for five (5) specific violations only. These
violations should be increased at the same time as they are comparable violations, and
generally occur in the same areas so this will discourage vehicles from finding a "less
expensive violation" for essentially the same infraction.
Violation
Current Fine Amount
Proposed Jan. 1, 2018
Expired Meter
$ 33
$ 40
Overtime Parking
$ 43
$ 50
Passenger Loading Zone
$ 33
$ 40
Parking Space Marking
$ 33
$ 40
No Permit (parking lot)
$ 38
$ 45
Credit Card Acceptance in Parking Structures and Meters
Beginning in late 2016, Parking Services began accepting credit cards at the 919 Palm Street
structure. Plans are underway to expand the acceptance of credit cards at all locations and
expected to be by the end of FYI 6-17.
Parking Services is looking to expand the number of credit card capable meters deployed
throughout the city. The additional capital and ongoing costs are not projected in the base
forecast operating and CIP budget. These additional costs are included in additional CIP
Projects included in Exhibit B - Proposed Parking Rate and Fine Adjustments as the revenue
from the rate adjustments would be used to fund these additional capital expenditures.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Adoption of a budget is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act.
FISCAL IMPACT
Attached to this report is a detailed analysis of the Parking Fund revenues, expenditures,
and changes in financial position. The 2017 Parking Fund Analysis includes the key
assumptions used in preparing Fund projections. With the proposed rate and fine increases, the
Packet Pg 313
17
analysis presented to Council in this report and in the Preliminary 2017-19 Financial Plan,
demonstrate sufficient funds to support operations, capital projects, and debt service needs
of the Parking Fund including the CIP projects yet to be specifically identified.
ALTERNATIVES
Council, at its discretion, can adopt all or part of the requested rate and fine increases or
proposed capital improvement projects, presented in this report.
Attachments:
a - 2017-19 Pkg Fund Analysis
b - Structure Assessment RFP
c - Ordinance - Meter Rates - 2017
d - Resolution - Parking Structure Rates - 2017
e - Resolution - Modifying Parking Citation Fines - 2017
Packet Pg 314
Parking Enterprise Fund
ATTACHMENT X
2017-19 Financial Plan
Parking Enterprise Fund
2017 Fund Analysis
May 17, 2017
Packet Pg 315
17
Attachment A
Page 2
2017 Parking Fund
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
I.
OVERVIEW........................................................................................................................... 3
11.
2017-19 FINANCIAL PLAN................................................................................................. 4
a. Summary of Operating Programs.....................................................................................
4
b. Capital Improvement Program............................................................................................ 4
c. Revenues............................................................................................................................. 5
d. Debt Service........................................................................................................................ 6
e. Revenue over/(Under) Expenses and Working Capital.........................................6
III.
ASSUMPTIONS.....................................................................................................................7
1. General Assumptions.......................................................................................................... 7
2. Parking Lots........................................................................................................................ 7
3. On -Street Metered Parking................................................................................................. 7
4. Parking Structures...............................................................................................................
7
5. Long -Term Parking.............................................................................................................
8
6. Parking Leases....................................................................................................................
8
7. Parking In-Lieu...................................................................................................................
8
8. Investment Earnings............................................................................................................
8
9. Parking Fines...................................................................................................................... 8
10. Transportation & General Government Expenses.............................................................. 8
11. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Expenses........................................................................
9
12. Debt Service........................................................................................................................ 9
EXHIBITS....................................................................................................10
IV.
EXHIBIT A: 2017-19 Changes in Financial Position............................................1
I
V.
EXHIBIT B: 2017-19 Changes in Financial Position with rate & fine increases.............12
VI.
EXHIBIT C: Proposed Parking Rate and Fine Adjustments....................................13
Packet Pg 316
17
Attachment A
Page 3
CITYOF
SHII LLLI5 OBISPO
2017 Parking Fund Report
I. OVERVIEW
This report presents the financial condition of the Parking Fund based on the preliminary
2017-19 Financial Plan. The Parking Fund remains in a healthy position with a modest year
end working capital in preparation for commencing with the Palm Nipomo Parking
Structure. A Structural Assessment Study is also being planned for FY17-18 for each of
the existing parking structures. This may result in additional capital projects being
identified. The Marsh Street structure maintenance project is anticipated to begin in FYI 7-
18 and includes resealing decks, painting, lighting replacement and elevator upgrades to
extend the useful life of the structure. The funding to replace the Payment Access and
Revenue Control System (PARCS) existing hardware and software operating in the three
existing parking structures is allocated in FYI 8-19, as it is anticipated it will take until then
for a vendor to be selected and a replacement system designed. The Palm-Nipomo Parking
Structure is moving forward with environmental review and additional design work. It is
programmed to begin construction in FYI 9-20 but will continue to expend funds in FYI 7-
18 for planning and design aspects.
The five-year forecast indicates the fund is able to support current expenses, capital
projects, and debt service obligations while maintaining the minimum 20% reserve level
in working capital in accordance with the City Financial Management policies. However,
the five-year forecast assumes minimal CIP investment in our facilities (which will likely
change as a result of the Assessment Study) and the fund balance continues to decline
annually due to expenses exceeding revenues. In FY21-22 the balance reaches a level 67%
below the FY15-16 level. This "status quo' fund scenario does not assume any parking
rate, fines and forfeiture adjustments since none were forecast in the current 2015-17
Financial Plan. Reviewing the continual annual deficiency as well as longer fund forecasts,
the adjusting of rates, fines and forfeitures should be considered to balance the fund and
provide working capital to address issues such as CIP delivery and maintaining positive
cash flow. In previous periods, Council preferred that multi-year rate modifications be
adopted by the City to show methodical and steady increases when necessary. This practice
was set aside due to the recession and it has been many years since an across the board rate
modification has occurred.
Parking Services is proposing to return to a multiple year plan for adoption of rate and fine
changes that will assist in stabilizing the Fund. These increases are recommended to occur
beginning in FY17-18 and again in FY20-21 to fund anticipated expenses, capital projects,
and debt service obligations and to maintain a healthy working capital balance. This
follows a historical pattern of rate increases every three years. Proposed Parking Rate
and Fine Adjustments (Exhibit B) includes the proposed rate and fine adjustments,
additional capital improvement projects in the projected years (based on average annual
CIP expenditures) that were not budgeted previously due to lack of sufficient working
capital. Exhibit B also demonstrates the Parking Services target goal of an average 15%
Packet Pg 317
17
Attachment A
Page 4
working capital annual increase and how the revised annual projections reach this target
level.
II. 2017-19 FINANCIAL PLAN
a. Summary of Operating Programs
Below is the summary of the preliminary 2017-19 Financial Plan operating budget
projections for the Parking Services Enterprise Fund. This includes the expected increases
in retirement contributions, unfunded liabilities and the effects of the Ca1PERS discount
rate adjustment as well as the one-time costs related to the citywide Motion Project.
Mid Year f Bu` Budget Projected Projected Projected
Budget
Staffing *
$ 1,031,488
Contract Services
920,364
Other Operating Expenses
235,459
Retirement Contributions
197,795
Unfunded Liabilities
64,400
Ca1PERS discount Rate Cost
67,700
1,060,392 1,086,899
694,525 703,662
241,171 249,064
61,300 62,600
157,700 171,800
■
6,200
1,119,500
1,153,000
1,187,700
724,800
746,500
768,900
256,500
264,200
272,100
64,400
66,100
67,700
193,300
207,500
222,300
12,500
28,500
36,700
Palm Nipomo Expenses -
- - - 46,800
192,400
Total Parking Services 2,385,106
2,215,088 2,280,225 2,371,000 2,512,600
2,747,800
General Government 684,603
622,189 622,189 648,400 649,800
651,300
Total Parking Services Operating 3,069,709
2,837,277 2,902,414 3,019,400 3,162,400
3,399,100
b. Capital Improvement Program
Below is the summary of the preliminary 2017-19 Financial Plan capital project budget
projections for the Parking Services Enterprise Fund. The Palm-Nipomo Parking Structure
is projected to begin construction in July 2019. Debt financing will be used to fund $17.6
million of the projected $23.6 million total project cost. This amount is subject to change
as we approach construction and determine the best ratio of borrowing versus capital outlay
for the project.
Packet Pg 318
17
Attachment A
Page 5
Parking Capital Program 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Budget Budget Projected Projected Projected
Mid -year Budget
Fleet Replacement: Utility Vehicle 28,500
Fleet Replacement: Pickup Trucks (2) 70,000
Fleet Replacement: Scooter 34,000
Palm Nipomo Parking Structure 250,000 23,600,000
Parking Structure Assessment 76,667
Upgrade Parking Structure Equipment 113,000 650,000
Marsh Street Structure Maintenance 575,000
Vehile License Plate Recognition 145,000
IT MS Office Replacement 5,700 4,080
IT Radio Site Upgrade & Enhancement 6,633 4,789
IT Server Oper System Software 633 633
IT UPS Battery Replacement 646 646 646
IT VM Infrastructure 3,065
IT Wireless System Citywide 2,870
IT VoIP 6,233
IT Tait Radio System 9,334
IT Firewall Replacement 4,069
Carryoverfrom Previous Years
Palm-Nipomo Land acquistion &
Environmental 211,744
Palm-Nipomo Design 1,062,699
Other Carryover projects 165,421
Total Parking Capital Program 1,813,075 831,633 668,854 23,638,069 70,633 9,749
c. Revenues
It is anticipated that Parking Fund revenues will continue to grow due to the economic
recovery but will be tempered by the loss of on -street meters. Revenue projections assume
an annual 1% growth in volume. Overall parking meter revenue from surface parking lots
decreased significantly in FY15-16 due to the lot closures, and is projected to decrease in
FYI 9-20 with the closure of lot 14 for construction of Palm Nipomo. Revenue from on -
street metered parking and structure parking is projected to increase because of these lot
closures and higher occupancy rates. Parking structure revenue will significantly increase
in FY21-22 with the opening of the Palm Nipomo structure in late FY20-21. One-time
parking in -lieu fees are projected but the timing and amount is very conservative because
the payment is sporadic and the annual operating conditions of the fund do not rely on their
income for solvency.
Packet Pg 319
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
im
Mid Year Budget
Budget
Budget
Projected
Projected
Projected
7evenuesparking
Meter Collections
Lots
166,200
140,400
141,900
122,900
124,200
125,500
Streets
1,539,100
1,648,100
1,664,700
1,681,400
1,698,300
1,715,200
Parking Structure Collections
1,054,700
1,489,500
1,504,400
1,519,500
1,596,700
1,801,100
Long -Term Parking Revenues
434,900
795,000
802,900
810,900
819,100
827,300
Lease Revenues
500,500
502,900
509,800
512,300
514,800
521,800
Parking In -Lieu Fees
20,200
20,400
20,600
20,800
21,000
21,200
Other Service Charges
100
89,100
90,000
96,400
97,400
98,400
Total Service Charges
3,715,700
4,507,200
4,554,300
4,571,400
4,676,700
4,913,700
Investment & Property Revenues
48,200
48,000
52,000
53,900
24,400
22,700
Fines and Forfeitures
669,900
587,300
593,200
599,100
605,100
611,100
Other Revenues
100
100
100
100
100
Total Revenues
4,433,800
5,142,600
5,199,600
5,224,500
5,306,300
5,547,600
Packet Pg 319
17
Attachment A
Page 6
d. Debt Service
Debt Service for the Palm Nipomo Parking Structure is scheduled to begin in FY 2019-20,
the expected timeframe when construction would begin. Annual payments for Palm
Nipomo will average $1.45 million depending upon final debt financing terms. The next
debt service to be retired is for the Marsh Street Parking Structure expansion which will
occur in August 2031.
Parking Debt Service 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Mid Year Budget Budget Projected Projected Projected
at Budget
Marsh Expansion until Aug 2031
419,741
418,885
417,997
417,002
416,026
415,096
919 Palm until Jun 2036
539,899
538,755
539,803
540,275
540,162
539,320
Palm-Nipomo until 2048
9,293,824
9,702,234
10,217,892
1,086,023
1,452,112
1,450,684
Dispatch Ctr Upgrade until Jun 2039
9,760
9,760
9,700
4,200
4,200
4,200
969,400
967,400
967,500
2,047,500
2,412,500
2,409,300
e. Revenue over Expenses and Working Capital Balance
The annual expenditures exceed revenues in the FYI 6-17 mid -year budget and in FYI 9-
20 and each projected year thereafter. These deficits erode the working capital balance to
a level 67% below the beginning balance in FY16-17. This is not sustainable, nor does
the fund achieve the target of 15% revenue over expenses as an annual increase in the
working capital that Parking Services has set as the goal.
CURRENT SCENARIO- NO INCREASES 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Mid Year Budget Budget Projected Projected Projected
Budget
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenses (2,347,911) 361,923 528,686 (5,930,469) (389,233) (320,549)
Working Capital, Beginning of Year 12,255,677 9,907,766 10,269,689 10,798,375 4,867,906 4,478,673
Working Capital, End of Year
9,907,766
10,269,689
10,798,375
4,867,906
4,478,673
4,158,124
Reserve @ 20%
613,942
567,455
580,483
603,880
632,480
679,820
Unreserved Working Capital
9,293,824
9,702,234
10,217,892
4,264,026
3,846,193
3,478,304
TAR(Er: Revenue over/(Under) Expenses:
15% annually
717,102
700,637
773,245
854,330
880,222
The table below includes the proposed multi-year parking rate and fine increases, and increased
amount anticipated to be spent on CIP projects (not yet presented or approved) with annual
amounts based on historical averages. This scenario demonstrates how the annual revenue over
expenses essentially achieves the target of 15% and improves the working capital balance, but
the balance still remains below the current level.
Packet Pg 320
17
Attachment A
Page 7
PROPOSED RATE AND FINE INCREASES 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Mid Year Budget Budget Projected Projected Projected
Budget
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenses (2,347,911) 776,067 1,370,646 (5,549,869) 867,467 924,251
Working Capital, Beginning of Year 12,255,677 9,907,766 10,683,833 12,054,479 6,504,610 7,372,077
Working Capital, End of Year
9,907,766
10,683,833
12,054,479
6,504,610
7,372,077
8,296,328
Reserve @ 20%
613,942
567,460
580,500
603,900
632,440
679,840
Unreserved Working Capital
9,293,824
10,116,373
11,473,979
5,900,710
6,739,637
7,616,488
TAROT: Revenue over/(Under) Expenses:
15% annually
718,100
703,478
852,385
919,925
962,737
Includes additional CIP projects anticipated but not yet presented or approved
Annual amount based on historical average a mount spent on C1 projects.
III. ASSUMPTIONS
The following assumptions have been programmed into the long-term forecast of the Parking
Fund. No rate or fine adjustments have been included herein, except as noted in Exhibit B.
1. General Assumptions
Minimum working capital reserve should equal at least 20% of the total Operating Program
expenditures according to the City's fiscal policy and Standard and Poor's rating criteria.
Based upon this policy, the minimum annual reserve level should be approximately
$615,000-680,000. The budgeted and projected year-end working capital balance exceeds
the minimum reserve policy levels.
2. Parking Lots
a. Assumes an annual I% growth in paid parking usage in city owned lots.
b. Parking revenues from Lot 14 will cease due to the construction of the Palm-Nipomo
parking structure in FY19-20.
3. On Street Metered Parking
a. Assumes an annual 1% growth in paid parking usage for on street meters.
4. Parking Structures
a. Assumes an annual 1% growth in paid parking usage in the parking structures.
b. It is anticipated that some of the vehicles previously parked in now closed lots will park
in garages due to the reduction of lot parking spaces. With the first hour free in the
garages and the lower hourly rate at the structures, it is anticipated that a lesser amount
of revenue will be recouped through garage parking fees than is lost thru the lot
closures.
c. A study will be conducted in FY17-18 to do a structural assessment of each of the
parking structures, determine the current condition and make recommendations for new
annual maintenance plans, projects and programs to extend the useful life of each
structure and minimize emergency repair needs. However, no funds have been
allocated or budgeted for these additional expenses except in exhibit B- Proposed
Parking Rate and Fine Adjustments.
Packet Pg 321
17
Attachment A
Page S
5. Long -Term Parking
a. Assumes an overall annual 1% growth in paid parking usage for long term options.
b. It is anticipated that more drivers will opt to purchase monthly parking passes (prox
cards) for parking in the structures.
c. The 10 -hour Residential Meter Permit sales have reached current capacity.
d. Meter bag sales, loading zone permits and residential permit sales are anticipated to
increase due to continued construction and work projects in the downtown area and
loss of available street and lot parking.
6. Parking Leases
a. Assumes a conservative 1% growth in lease revenue.
b. The Memorandum of Agreement with Garden Street SLO Partners, L.P. states that the
Parking Fund will loan the developer $500,000, and this is assumed to occur in FYI 6-
17. In the same year, the developer will begin repayment to the City Parking Fund by
paying approximately $36,000 per year for 30 years with the option of a balloon
payment buyout at the end of 10 years.
c. The same MOA states that the Developer will pay an annual rent equal to the annual
net revenue from the operation of surface parking lot 2. The fund review projects this
amount at $222,000 annually. The annual base rent shall be increased on the first day
of every third fiscal year.
7. Parking In -Lieu
a) One-time parking in -lieu fees are minimally projected at the rate of 1 space per year
because the payment and number is uncertain.
8. Investment Earnings
a. Assumes projected interest earnings of 0.5% annually.
9. Parking Fines
a. Assumes a conservative 1% growth rate annually in total parking fine revenue.
b. Transfer of parking fines to the Police Department is approximately $60,000 annually
for citations written by that department.
c. State and County surcharges of $13 per parking citation is included in the base citation
amount, then deducted from collected fine revenues and transferred to the State and
County. The projected surcharge amounts are calculated as a percentage of the overall
projected parking fines.
d. Parking fine revenue is projected to decrease in FY 17-18 due to lot closures and loss
of on -street parking stalls.
e. No projected decrease in fine revenues due to the loss of Lot 14 for the construction of
Palm-Nipomo parking structure in FYI 9-20.
10. Transportation & General Government Expenses
a. Transportation operating expenses are projected to decrease by 3% overall in FYI 7-18
from the mid -year budget due to budgetary constraints, and increase 3% in FY18-19.
Packet Pg 322
17
Attachment A
Page 9
b. The amount of retirement contributions, unfunded liabilities and Ca1PERS discount
rate costs are projected to increase by approximately 10% annually from FY18-19 to
FY21-22.
c. Contract Services cost adjustments reflect projected annual CPI increases of 2.5% and
additional of other contracted services.
d. General Government expenses are projected to decrease slightly beginning FYI 7-18.
e. The Operating Transfers Out includes the citywide Motion Project which has a two
year allocated cost but no projected ongoing costs of the project.
f. Staffing costs are expected to increase 3.0% annually starting in FYI 7-18.
g. The opening of the Palm Nipomo Structure is anticipated to add approximately
$200,000 in annual expenses to the base budget beginning in FY20-21.
11. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Expenses
a. The Palm Nipomo parking structure construction cost is estimated at $23.6 million in
FY19-20. A $6,000,000 contribution from working capital and $17,600,000 proceeds
from debt financing or bond issuance will be used to fund this amount. Final amounts
will be determined as the project construction documents move forward in the City
process. These amounts will change based upon revised project estimates and final ratio
of capital outlay versus debt financing amounts.
b. Assumes Finance and Information Technology capital projects that have associated
Parking Fund support will occur in the projected years.
c. Funding for the Marsh Street Structural Maintenance project ($575,000) is budgeted in
FY17-18.
d. Additional funding of $650,000 is included in FY18-19 to augment the prior funding
amount of $113,000 for the Parking Access and Revenue Control System (PARCS)
replacement project.
e. The vehicle license plate recognition pilot program ($135,000) will occur in FYI 7-18
and help reduce operational costs of and improve enforcement in the Downtown and
residential neighborhoods.
f. Additional capital improvement projects not included in the current projections may
arise from the Parking Structure Assessment project scheduled to be completed in
FY17-18.
12. Debt Service
a. Assumes a 30 -year level debt service payment, borrowing of $17,600,000 and bond
issuance in FY19-20. Interest and principal payments are due beginning in FY19-20
and estimated at $1.45 million annually.
Packet Pg 323
17
Attachment A
Page 10
2017-19 PARKING FUND
FINANCIAL SCHEDULES & TABLES
IV. Exhibit A: FY2017-19 Financial Plan - Changes in
Financial Position
V. Exhibit B: FY2017-19 Financial Plan with Proposed
Parking Rate & Fine Adjustments
VI. Exhibit C: Proposed Parking Rate & Fine Adjustments
Packet Pg 324
O
^O
n
U
O:
LL
c
U
m
/
n
U
co
O
r
1
ti
O
N
Q
m
2
x
W
oo o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0
Ln N c -I M 00 N V N N c -I
U Lf1rl r- rl ei 00 M NN
rl
cN-I n W W LO m M01 rq m LO
O o o O O O o O o O op
0 0 0 0 w 00 O n Ot o c -I
Izi 00 tD Oi Ize rl 1-�t0 � Lri
ci lD Ln 00 Ln m m N N l0
O o o o o o 0 0 o o 0 0
OO O O O W O O O
Ci ,--I Ln
N rl m O N O LO i -I m O1
H M Ln W LO m Ln Ln N
rl rl N
o o o 0 0 o 0 0 0 00 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0O
m I- .* M 00 o o M o N tO
It l00 O O ON 001 m im11 OO
ml M)
H t0 Ln 00 Ln M Ln r1
ri ri l V
o o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0
O O O O O O O O O O O O
1 `-1 111 o m't rl N o m r1 t0
O 00 Ol 111 N O Ql P� 00 I -Z N
H LSO r Ln Ln N W 10 Ln V-4
rl rl � l!1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N rl Il m Ln N H N N m - 00
l00 M LLnn M 0 ON r -I q 00 M
ei 111 0 R' m I, t0 d'
ri ri tri
R
M
M
N
L
W
T-1
0 0
0
0
o
0 0 0
o
UD 18,
tM0 O
w
W I�t
m u1
lzt
N l0
N m 111
OM1 Ln O
N C
N t0
M a
1l1 N
M
M N
0 0
0 0 0
S rn O
rl
lf1
M I.11
ON
two O
N
ON
p l�0
O g
w rm-I
M N
N LD
11 r1 q
LK N
N
M N'
O o o o o o 0 0 o o 0 0
OO O O O W O O O
Ci ,--I Ln
N rl m O N O LO i -I m O1
H M Ln W LO m Ln Ln N
rl rl N
o o o 0 0 o 0 0 0 00 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0O
m I- .* M 00 o o M o N tO
It l00 O O ON 001 m im11 OO
ml M)
H t0 Ln 00 Ln M Ln r1
ri ri l V
o o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0
O O O O O O O O O O O O
1 `-1 111 o m't rl N o m r1 t0
O 00 Ol 111 N O Ql P� 00 I -Z N
H LSO r Ln Ln N W 10 Ln V-4
rl rl � l!1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N rl Il m Ln N H N N m - 00
l00 M LLnn M 0 ON r -I q 00 M
ei 111 0 R' m I, t0 d'
ri ri tri
R
M
M
N
L
W
T-1
0 0
0
0
m O LO m
01 m m
0
0
tM0 O
w
W I�t
m u1
lzt
OLn
01
O �t
�•1 N
00
Q1 00 I�
�f
M
Ci
tD N N
l0 tf1 00
c�
rl
lf1
M I.11
ON
two O
n
N
N
� O
%D r-
M m N
00
M -i-I
a Lr)
u
N
N
0 * 0 --
tD rl Ln
ci
N
00 N
M Ol
oN
m q
rl ri
N
0t�0
000
�
a 0 Ln
ami o
N1
bz
@
ry)
No�
LI)0�
Ln
O
rl
0
01 0 O1
N v
N
U
C
N
V
00 O
O
0)
N O O
n O
00 Om
O d v
00
O
U~
N O �
t^O O
i
-Q
00) to
Lr)
N
M N 00
N Ln
O1
h
0
00 00 01
tO v
�
EL°
N
�
E
3 w
a
L
O
L
a)
0 0
=
L O
O M
0
_0
0000rl
L j
}
X00
rf
0p
LD
I. d' 't
M
S
M
m
W
M
tL0
v0) CL
000
JO
000
tM
0 m LO
N
m
O
0
O N Ol
N
N
cL
m
M N
t0
Ln N
c a)
N Q n
c N
O u a) N
v > �
O N W
obio>
v �
U N L Y LL u
L L v u T
Y u m 7 a) () t+
} o Y 0 a c 1D u
J (n a)
L-E>c�Nov
w on 0) Cr U cn �' o
c c'7 v c L a +�
a,t_ a)
Y� m 12t U c a)
a a a 0 u I- v
0 >
vE c cc
V1 ) 0 L
a a)
> c
I� c iL O
00
O m
N -zr
M
Q)
i.+ L
v1 p ♦+
c U u
p u �
L Y a)
a
o a
d X
E
W
CO .Q 3 i N
U •a u> a a O
+ J O +, I-
E o n v �° v
i E
m a y c W 4
o s ti a c c>
a H c U (D O Q u
aco a -1
O Ul
a
CL
QJ
v O u o
3
C
v
a
x
W
0
O
O
Ln
N N
m O LO m
01 m m
It
m
m Il
n c -I
LO �
W m (N
00 00
00 m m t0
lt
V N N
l0
m
LO 00
I�
q O
N
� It
M
Ci
tD N N
l0 tf1 00
c�
rl
lf1
M I.11
ON
.�
O
N 00
N
� O
%D r-
t0
000
M -i-I
a Lr)
u
m
Ln r1
0 * 0 --
tD rl Ln
ci
N
00 N
M Ol
0 Q
m q
rl ri
N
t0
0 00
r-
rl
N
Ln N
c a)
N Q n
c N
O u a) N
v > �
O N W
obio>
v �
U N L Y LL u
L L v u T
Y u m 7 a) () t+
} o Y 0 a c 1D u
J (n a)
L-E>c�Nov
w on 0) Cr U cn �' o
c c'7 v c L a +�
a,t_ a)
Y� m 12t U c a)
a a a 0 u I- v
0 >
vE c cc
V1 ) 0 L
a a)
> c
I� c iL O
00
O m
N -zr
M
Q)
i.+ L
v1 p ♦+
c U u
p u �
L Y a)
a
o a
d X
E
W
CO .Q 3 i N
U •a u> a a O
+ J O +, I-
E o n v �° v
i E
m a y c W 4
o s ti a c c>
a H c U (D O Q u
aco a -1
O Ul
a
CL
QJ
v O u o
3
C
v
a
x
W
0
O
O
0 00 ) 00 O
0
toO11
W
00 l0 N
leI ItT
LO
00
O l00
w M
Lr)
LO �
W m (N
N
O6
000 c^ -I
v Ln
N n
a �
� It
d
R R
m
O m
t0 O1
111 It
a.+
o O1
Il tD
` N
111 0
O W
t0 O
rl m
N
001 t^0
It
00
tor - n
m q
a
m
00 It
0 00
v
a R
N1
0 00 ) 00 O
0
toO11
W
00 l0 N
leI ItT
00 O 00 ri
-1 O H 0)
-- Ln Ln Ln m
N
0o m
m rl
(Y1 O1
Ln
rf
(1 01 a)
rt
f� W lzT N
t0 1% 01 00
LK N O ci Ol
N m 0 N
N 01 O1
Ln a W
k6 6 LK
* N N
00 N
a,
00
O l00
w M
It W
6 M)
Ln N w
O6
000 c^ -I
v Ln
N n
LO N
O m
t0 O1
111 It
o O1
Il tD
` N
111 0
O W
t0 O
rl m
01 N
Ln r�
00 O 00 ri
-1 O H 0)
-- Ln Ln Ln m
N
0o m
m rl
(Y1 O1
Ln
rf
(1 01 a)
rt
f� W lzT N
t0 1% 01 00
LK N O ci Ol
N m 0 N
N 01 O1
Ln a W
k6 6 LK
* N N
00 N
a,
d
L
3
O
H
bz
@
v v
c>
0
+'
O
U
C
a
?
7
O
c
LL
Q
O d v
iO
v
U~
O�
Y
}
i
-Q
/1 O
O
L
a)
ti
a)
D
U
EL°
E
3 w
a
L
O
L
a)
0 0
=
L O
O M
N tl0
_0
�
L j
}
X00
U 'a
Q
0p
vii Y
S
M
m
W
tL0
v0) CL
V
0t
JO
O ai
-0 a
f6
L ns
O=
O
y
O
a O
0
m w
m=
cL
m
3
u
a, u
a,
c
E c
to
41
L
S
i
>
L
3 L
o
3a3
L
Q
U N
Q a_
r
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
p 0 0 0
p 0 0 0 0 o
o O O O
p m o
o
m
.-1
n o0
0 on
n
0 0 0 0 0 0 0$
C:Vl to
0 0 0
O O
M
O
N r� M
a
N
ui
P
N O Ln N O N m O
lD Ql O N 00
N M 00
a N lD N M ill
Ol al
Ql O O
00
N
N
N' lD
1l mI,
01 lD
.--�
N
w
Y
N w
M o V
7
01
M N
lD lD
Ol
NO .O N N c -I
lD
1l N'
M N
%D
a J
n W
n
N
�
a
�
O O O O O O o
O O O O$
114
O
0 0 0 0 m 0 m
O V ul c -I lD Ol N V1
0 m 0 0
N ul ul a -I
o 0 0 0 0
M h r1 ill l+1 d'
o m o
N a -I u)
m
00
M
� V
n
tD O
M
l0
N
01
N O u1 N Ol e o O r -F
LD Lh M N O N M
N N' lD
W M M
O � O N g
C
q. .N -I
ko Ln
m
M
l^O
g 1pr r
M M
m m
N N N Vl N
N lD
O N N
-1
W
to M
Q1
N .� N N N .__.
tD
n N
M N
tD
tD n
lD
O o
rq
L
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cD
O O O O o 0 o
o 0 0 0
M r1 c �--1
0 O O O O o
I� Ol ��F` M ul a
o� o
Ln u1 L/1
tM0 O
1!1 O
O
O oo
n
�' w
O
01 1,
W
M
O N N M ui o 0 o
O O
0
N O
ti a
V
o
o a
L
o o
Ln
-1 Il oc co o N M
�--1 Ol 00 O Ill �
iry�i
w
O t0 lD
R �O
M O lO OM1\
a -I �-i lD
.4 .�-I
O N O
ONO
N l0
l0 to
O u1
lO 01
oo
a) .� .-i V
LK
lD N
M N N
N
l!1
N lD
V1
R4 .2
c^-1
�^-I
D
O O O O O O o`
o o o
0 o 0 0 0 0
0 Ln o
Zt
f"
C O c -I M Ln Opal N lD
g :e
O
RRoo
b
o
o
a
o O^1
W
.Q OM1 Vl cM-I
M m w
O O b �^-I w
0 LO LO
m w m
Vr4
Ml .�-�
.�-i O
t00 O
m a
w
06
0�0 N
u ri c -i
N
a --i
o •O
N
N N
N
D_
O O O O O O o
0
O c� 0 0 0-
o o o
0 c O O
o O o 0 0
a cy M n N
o m o
M lD V
m o
M O
o l^D
O O
lLD M
I, W
w n
V m
Ln
V
oo O N I� w o O o m
w o w
M lD' �-i n N
n c -I I�
lD c -I
c -I lD
P M
I- lD
lfl
.� Vl w ul m O N .�
a -i r- O co Vl
m to
oo lD
l0 Ol l0 111 N
tl1 Ol H w
M M lD
w m
M V1
w c-1
Ln r�
c -I r,
O 00
01 �G
lD a -I
Ln
Ol
lD
u Z
ti v ri c -i
o
Ln c -i
N
v v
Oi O
O
o .o
N
�
o 0 0 o o 0 o
0 0 0
O lD M
m 8 O
M W O
o0 c-1
P w
N-ZT
aJ o o o o o o o
w N N I� Ql Ill N N
G O O
I� N Ol
G O O
00 N lD
O O O
1� V
N Ol O
l!1 N O
Ol e-1
N al
1� t0
t0 I-
N
Ql 00
wm V V O O
1!1 o0 al
M Ln 7
6.ti al
O .--i O
�--i i,
U P�
m' M
W m V) m O N
O V Ln
N lD
P lD
M oo w
V M <D
lD m w
O N m
P .--I o
N Ln
.--I r
Ln en
IA O
N M
a -I 01
lD N
M
o N
M N
l0'
N
N' 01
al
ON a)
'i
•
• M N N M O lD Q1
01 M M
mm mw
Ol M I-
O n N
w 00
00 M
I, ^ n
Zt W w w m m lD
M c-1 Ol cy' lD N N
N N W
.-I
M Ln w
N rm Ln
V V o
M u1 N
00 w
O m
lD o
m ll
to rl 1,
M ' lD
LD N N M'
l0' N' 01 .--�
O ill' .-i
1� O Oi
P' M
m Ol
l0' 01 V1
r0 N lD O .-i
O w n lD
00 M �--�
N Ul
N I,
n n
M M N
M ill c -I lD �--
t0 .� Vl a -I
lA 00 I�
In Q1
l!1 a
V ill
R N N
a0+
N
o Q
lD
N
M
M
o N
N
N
FO
a
co
N
M
a
Y
m
IL
N
c n1
C
O 3
�
Q
u N
N
N
v
o �
c
U to
O W
N
i1
3 Y
N
v 7 u
v
Y
mon v
on
c
c
nn v�
c
a aQ`
a n
v W
a
a J
J a O
u ,o v
c
�
�
> c
FO
a
co
N
M
a
Y
m
IL
ti
N
M
CD
a
a�
ca
a
�o
w N
O
kn
kn
O
kn
O
H
O
O
O
O
~
O
N
l-
N
to
O
O
O
O
(P
°�
N
N
C�
C
0.0,
b4
bR
bR
64
69
GR
69
69
69
bA
0
a
a>
O
00
0
69
O �
iw
Q
Q
�
y
00
_
rl
06
w N
B
O
O
kn
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
kr)
O
N
kn
O
Wn
kn
kn
O
in
O
O
kn
••
y
co
00
r-
d
d
69
69
69
59
69
rn
69
69
69
bF3
69
64
69
69
6s
N
Q.
L
y
a
O
In
V)
N
kn
l�
O
Cl
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C
kn
O
O
O
O
O
M
Mm
M
00
r -
6R
69
69
6969
59
6F?
b4
64
69
69
69
6R
69
�
U
O
o
� w
0
U �i
by
(� eC
o
a
cd
o
tb
ti
n
•�
a�
ooyea
Qm�
p
Ci
N
M
e�
°
W
aE
F'H
aaA�
i
°
Eyj
°
W
�xA
o>
wwoaaz
ti
N
M
CD
a
a�
ca
a
17
CITY OF SHIR LUIS OBISPO
990 Palm Street ■ San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
INAL
Notice Requesting Proposals for
PARKING STRUCTURE ASSESSMENT AND MAINTENANCE REPORT
Specification No. 91546
The City of San Luis Obispo is soliciting proposals from qualified vendors to prepare a Parking
Structure Assessment and Maintenance Report pursuant to Specification No. 91546. All
proposals must be received by the Finance Department, City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis
Obispo, CA no later than 3:30 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time, August 3, 2017.
Proposals received after said date and time will not be considered. To guard against premature
opening, each proposal shall be submitted to the Finance Department in a sealed envelope
plainly marked with the proposer's name, specification number, proposal title and due date of
proposal opening. Hard copied proposals shall be submitted along with the required forms
provided in the specification package and following instructions contained herein.
Proposals packages may be obtained at either:
The City's website: www.SLOCitV.org — Doing Business — Bids & Proposals Page; or a
http://www.slocitV.org/government/department-directory/public-works/public-works-bids-proposals
Additional information may be obtained by contacting:
Scott Lee, Parking Manager, (805) 781-7234 or slee@slocity.org
Bill Humphrey, Parking Coordinator, (805) 781-7236 or BHumphrey@slocity.org
Nicole Lawson, Supervising Administrative Assistant, (805) 781-7059 or nlawson@slocity.org
For Public Records requests see Section 1.14
Page
Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 328
17
Specification No. 91546
1.
NOTICE TO PROPOSERS — PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS.................................................. 5
1.1.
Summary and Requirement to Meet All Provisions......................................................................... 5
1.2.
Contract Term and Optional Extensions.......................................................................................... 5
1.3.
Important Dates............................................................................................................................... 5
1.4.
Proposal Submittal and Format....................................................................................................... 5
1.5.
Labeling............................................................................................................................................5
1.6.
Insurance Certificate........................................................................................................................ 5
1.7.
Submittal of References................................................................................................................... 6
1.8.
Statement of Contract Disqualifications.......................................................................................... 6
1.9.
Withdrawal or Revision of Proposals............................................................................................... 6
1.10.
Multiple Proposals........................................................................................................................... 6
1.11.
Procuring Agency/Personnel............................................................................................................ 6
1.12.
Inquiries and Clarifications............................................................................................................... 6
1.13.
Addenda........................................................................................................................................... 7
1.14.
Public Records.................................................................................................................................. 7
2.
CONTRACT AWARD AND EXECUTION................................................................................... 7
2.1.
Proposal Retention and Award........................................................................................................ 7
2.2.
Competency and Responsibility of Proposer................................................................................... 7
2.3.
Form of Agreement.......................................................................................................................... 7
2.4.
Insurance.......................................................................................................................................... 8
2.5.
Business License and Tax.................................................................................................................. 8
2.6.
Failure to Accept Contract................................................................................................................ 8
2.7.
Oral Presentations / Site Visits / Meetings....................................................................................... 8
2.8.
Proposer's Responsibility................................................................................................................. 8
3.
CONTRACT PERFORMANCE...................................................................................................... 8
3.1.
Ability to Perform.............................................................................................................................8
3.2.
Laws to be Observed........................................................................................................................ 8
Page 2 Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 329
17
3.3.
Payment of Taxes............................................................................................................................. 8
3.4.
Permits and Licenses........................................................................................................................ 9
3.5.
Safety Provisions.............................................................................................................................. 9
3.6.
Public and Employee Safety............................................................................................................. 9
3.7.
Preservation of City Property........................................................................................................... 9
3.8.
Immigration Act of 1986.................................................................................................................. 9
3.9.
Proposer Non-Discrimination.......................................................................................................... 9
3.10.
Work Delays..................................................................................................................................... 9
3.11.
Payment Terms..............................................................................................................................
10
3.12.
Inspection.......................................................................................................................................
10
3.13.
Audit...............................................................................................................................................10
3.14.
Interests of Proposer......................................................................................................................
10
3.15.
Hold Harmless and Indemnification...............................................................................................
10
3.16.
Contract Assignment......................................................................................................................
10
3.17.
Termination....................................................................................................................................10
4.
PROPOSAL CONTENT AND SELECTION PROCESS.............................................................11
4.1.
Overview........................................................................................................................................
11
4.2.
Calendar of Events.........................................................................................................................
12
4.3.
Background....................................................................................................................................
12
4.4.
Objectives.......................................................................................................................................
14
4.5.
Functional and Technical Requirements........................................................................................
14
4.6.
Scope of Work................................................................................................................................
14
4.7.
Selection Process............................................................................................................................
15
S. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS AND CONTENT OF PROPOSALS..............................................16
Chapter1: Title Page...................................................................................................................... 16
Chapter 2: Table of Contents......................................................................................................... 16
Chapter 3: Executive Summary...................................................................................................... 16
Chapter 4: Project Manager........................................................................................................... 16
Chapter 5: Organizational Experience........................................................................................... 17
Chapter 6: Organizational Chart and Project Team...................................................................... 17
Chapter7: References.........................................................................................................................17
Chapter 8: Customer Service and Technical Support..................................................................... 17
Page 3 1
Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 330
17
Chapter9: Sub Proposers............................................................................................................... 17
Chapter 10: System Specifications................................................................................................. 17
Chapter 11: Implementation.......................................................................................................... 17
Chapter12: Risks............................................................................................................................ 18
Chapter 13: Disclosure of Past Contract Failures and Litigation.................................................... 18
Chapter 14: Proposer's Financial Stability Assurance.................................................................... 18
Chapter15: Fee Proposal............................................................................................................... 18
Chapter 16: Additional Required Forms......................................................................................... 19
REQUIREDFORMS................................................................................................ 20
FORM A: SIGNATURE AFFIDAVIT.........................................................................................................20
FORM B: VENDOR PROFILE............................................................................................................ 21
FORMC: REFERENCES....................................................................................................................22
FORM D: STATEMENT OF PAST CONTRACT DISQUALIFICATIONS................................................ 25
FORM E: COST PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL FORM.............................................................................. 26
APPENDICES...................................................................................................... 27
APPENDIX A: SAMPLE AGREEMENT............................................................................................... 27
APPENDIX B: INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS.................................................................................... 29
Page 4 I
Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 331
17
1.1 Summary and Requirement to Meet All Provisions
The City of San Luis Obispo ("City") is soliciting proposals from qualified vendors for the
preparation of a Parking Structure Assessment and Maintenance Report. Vendors
submitting proposals ("Proposers") are required to read this Request for Proposals ("RFP")
in its entirety and follow the instructions contained herein and shall meet all of the terms,
and conditions of the RFP specifications package. By virtue of its proposal submittal, the
Proposer acknowledges agreement with and acceptance of all provisions of the RFP
specifications.
1.2 Contract Term and Optional Extensions
The contract term shall be for a period of one (1) year ("initial term"). The City will have
the option renewing the contract for up to five (5) successive one-year term renewals at
the sole discretion of the City.
1.3 Important Dates
Deliver proposals no later than the due date and time indicated below. The City will reject
late proposals:
Issue Date: June 9, 2017
Due Date: August 3, 2017
1.4 Proposal Submittal and Format
Each proposal must be submitted in hard copy form (i.e. printed) with a total of five (5)
copies provided in the order provided in the specifications and accompanied by any other
required submittals or supplemental materials. Proposal documents shall be enclosed in
an envelope that shall be sealed and addressed to:
Finance Department
Attn: Lorraine Colleran
City of San Luis Obispo
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
No FAX submittals will be accepted.
1.5 Labeling
All proposals must be clearly labeled:
Proposer's Name and Address:
Specification # 91546
Title: Parking Structure Assessment and Maintenance Report
DUE: August 3, 2017
1.6 Insurance Certificate
Each proposal must include a certificate of insurance showing:
A. The insurance carrier and its A.M. Best rating.
B. Scope of coverage and limits.
C. Deductibles and self-insured retention.
Page 5 Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 332
17
The purpose of the submittal is to generally assess the adequacy of the Proposer's
insurance coverage during proposal evaluation; as discussed below, endorsements are not
required until contract award. The insurance requirements are detailed in Section 2.4.
1.7 Submittal of References
Each proposer shall submit a statement of qualifications and references on the form
provide in the RFP package as Form C.
1.8 Statement of Contract Disqualifications
Each Proposer shall submit a statement regarding any past government disqualifications on
the form provide in the RFP package as Form D.
1.9 Withdrawal or Revision of Proposals
Proposers may, without prejudice, withdraw proposals by requesting such withdrawal prior
to the time specified for the proposal opening, by submitting a written request to the Bid
Administrator for its withdrawal, in which event the proposal will be returned to the
Proposer unopened. All proposals will be opened and declared publicly. Proposers may
modify their proposal at any time prior to the due date and time of submission for
proposals.
1.10 Multiple Proposals
Multiple proposals from Proposers are NOT permitted.
1.11 Procuring Agency/ Personnel
The City of San Luis Obispo is the procuring agency:
Scott Lee, Parking Manager
City of San Luis Obispo
(805) 781-7234
slee@SLOCity.org
The City of San Luis Obispo Finance Department administers the procurement function:
Lorraine Colleran (Bid Administrator)
Finance Department
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
(805) 781-7435
LColleran@SLOCity.org
1.12 Inquiries and Clarifications
Proposers are to raise any questions they have about the RFP document without delay.
Direct any questions concerning due dates and/or actual submittals to the bid administrator
either by phone or in writing. Direct all technical questions, those concerning specifications
and/or scope of work, to the procuring agency, either by phone or in writing.
Furthermore, Proposers finding any significant ambiguity, error, conflict, discrepancy,
omission, or other deficiency in this RFP document shall immediately notify the procuring
agency and request clarification.
Page 6 I Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 333
17
1.13 Addenda
In the event it is necessary to provide additional clarification or revision to the RFP, the
City will post addenda to the City website and to EBIDBOARD.COM website. It is Proposer's
sole responsibility to regularly monitor the websites for any such postings. Failure to
retrieve addenda and include their provisions may result in disqualification.
1.14 Public Records
Proposers are hereby notified that all information submitted in response to this RFP may
be made available for public inspection according to the Public Records Act of the State of
California and the California Constitution. Information qualifying as a "trade secret" —
defined in California Public Records Act of 2004 — may be held confidential. Proposers shall
seal separately and clearly identify all information they deem to be "trade secrets," as
defined by the State of California Statutes. Do not duplicate or comingle information,
deemed confidential and sealed, elsewhere in your response.
The City cannot ensure that information will not be subject to release if a request is made
under applicable public records laws. The City cannot consider the following confidential:
a bid in its entirety, price bid information, or the entire contents of any resulting contract.
The City will not provide advanced notice to Proposers prior to release of any requested
record.
To the extent permitted by such laws, it is the intention of the City to withhold the contents
of proposals from public view — until such time as competitive or bargaining reasons no
longer require non -disclosure, in the City's opinion. At that time, all proposals will be
available for review in accordance with such laws.
2.1 Proposal Retention and Award
The City reserves the right to retain all proposals for a period of 90 days for examination
and comparison. The City also reserves the right to waive non -substantial irregularities in
any proposal, to reject any or all proposals, to reject or delete one part of a proposal and
accept the other, except to the extent that proposals are qualified by specific limitations.
2.2 Competency and Responsibility of Proposer
The City reserves full discretion to determine the competence and responsibility,
professionally and/or financial stability, of Proposer. Proposer will provide, in a timely
manner, all information that the City deems necessary to make such a decision.
2.3 Form of Agreement
Proposers are responsible for reviewing this Form of Agreement prior to submission of their
proposal. The Form of Agreement shall serve as the basis for the contract resulting from
this RFP. The terms of this template contract shall become contractual obligations following
award of the RFP. By submitting a proposal, the contract shall become contractual
obligations following award of the RFP. By submitting a proposal, Proposers affirm their
willingness to enter into a contract containing these terms.
Page 7 I
f Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 334
17
2.4 Insurance
Proposers shall provide proof of insurance in the form, coverages and amounts specified in
Appendix B of these specifications within ten (10) calendar days after notice of contract
award as a precondition to contract execution.
2.5 Business License and Tax
The Proposer must have a valid City of San Luis Obispo business license and tax certificate
before execution of the contract. Additional information regarding the City's business tax
program may be obtained by calling (805) 781-7134.
2.6 Failure to Accept Contract
The following will occur if the Consultant to whom the award is made (Consultant) fails to
enter into the contract: the award will be annulled; any bid security will be forfeited in
accordance with the special terms and conditions if a Consultant's bond or security is
required; and an award may be made to the next highest ranked Consultant with whom a
responsible compensation is negotiated, who shall fulfill every stipulation as if it were the
party to whom the first award was made.
2.7 Oral Presentations / Site Visits / Meetings
Proposers may be asked to attend meetings, make oral presentations, inspect City locations
or make their facilities, or those of existing clients with similar operations, available for site
inspection as part of the RFP process. Such presentations, meetings, or site visits will be at
the Proposer's expense.
2.8 Proposer's Responsibility
Proposers shall examine this RFP and shall exercise their judgment as to the nature and
scope of the work required. No plea of ignorance concerning conditions or difficulties that
exist or may hereafter arise in the execution of the work under the resulting contract, as a
consequence of failure to make necessary examinations and investigations, shall be
accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the Proposers to fulfill the
requirements of the resulting contract.
3.1 Ability to Perform
The Proposer warrants that it possesses, or has arranged through subcontracts, all capital
and other equipment, labor, materials, and licenses necessary to carry out and complete
the work hereunder in compliance with any and all federal, state, county, city, and special
district laws, ordinances, and regulations.
3.2 Laws to be Observed
The Proposer shall keep itself fully informed of and shall observe and comply with all
applicable state and federal laws and county and City of San Luis Obispo ordinances,
regulations and adopted codes during its performance of the work.
3.3 Payment of Taxes
The contract prices shall include full compensation for all taxes that the Proposer is required
to pay.
I Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Page g
Packet Pg 335
17
3.4 Permits and Licenses
The Proposer shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges and fees, and give all
notices necessary.
3.5 Safety Provisions
The Proposer shall conform to the rules and regulations pertaining to safety established by
OSHA and the California Division of Industrial Safety.
3.6 Public and Employee Safety
Whenever the Proposer's operations create a condition hazardous to the public or City
employees, it shall, at its expense and without cost to the City, furnish, erect and maintain
such fences, temporary railings, barricades, lights, signs and other devices and take such
other protective measures as are necessary to prevent accidents or damage or injury to the
public and employees.
3.7 Preservation of City Property
The Proposer shall provide and install suitable safeguards, approved by the City, to protect
City property from injury or damage. If City property is injured or damaged resulting from
the Proposer's operations, it shall be replaced or restored at the Proposer's expense. The
facilities shall be replaced or restored to a condition as good as when the Proposer began
work.
3.8 Immigration Act of 1986
The Proposer warrants on behalf of itself and all sub Proposers engaged for the
performance of this work that only persons authorized to work in the United States
pursuant to the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 and other applicable laws shall
be employed in the performance of the work hereunder.
3.9 Proposer Non -Discrimination
In the performance of this work, the Proposer agrees that it will not engage in, nor permit
such sub Proposers as it may employ, to engage in discrimination in employment of persons
because of age, race, color, sex, national origin or ancestry, sexual orientation, or religion
of such persons.
3.10 Work Delays
Should the Proposer be obstructed or delayed in the work required to be done hereunder
by changes in the work or by any default, act, or omission of the City, or by strikes, fire,
earthquake, or any other Act of God, or by the inability to obtain materials, equipment, or
labor due to federal government restrictions arising out of defense or war programs, then
the time of completion may, at the City's sole option, be extended for such periods as may
be agreed upon by the City and the Proposer. In the event that there is insufficient time to
grant such extensions prior to the completion date of the contract, the City may, at the time
of acceptance of the work, waive liquidated damages that may have accrued for failure to
complete on time, due to any of the above, after hearing evidence as to the reasons for
such delay, and making a finding as to the causes of same.
Page 9 1
Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 336
17
3.11 Payment Terms
Payments will be made consistent with the Agreement. The City's standard payment terms
are 30 days from the receipt of an original invoice and acceptance by the City of the
materials, supplies, equipment or services provided by the Proposer (Net 30).
3.12 Inspection
The Proposer shall furnish City with every reasonable opportunity for City to ascertain that
the services of the Proposer are being performed in accordance with the requirements and
intentions of this contract. All work done and all materials furnished, if any, shall be subject
to the City's inspection and approval. The inspection of such work shall not relieve Proposer
of any of its obligations to fulfill its contract requirements.
3.13 Audit
The City shall have the option of inspecting and/or auditing all records and other written
materials used by Proposer in preparing its invoices to City as a condition precedent to any
payment to Proposer.
3.14 Interests of Proposer
The Proposer covenants that it presently has no interest, and shall not acquire any
interest—direct, indirect or otherwise—that would conflict in any manner or degree with
the performance of the work hereunder. The Proposer further covenants that, in the
performance of this work, no sub Proposer or person having such an interest shall be
employed. The Proposer certifies that no one who has or will have any financial interest in
performing this work is an officer or employee of the City. It is hereby expressly agreed
that, in the performance of the work hereunder, the Proposer shall at all times be deemed
an independent Proposer and not an agent or employee of the City.
3.15 Hold Harmless and Indemnification
The Proposer agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold the City and its agents, officers
and employees harmless from and against any and all claims asserted or liability established
for damages or injuries to any person or property, including injury to the Proposer's
employees, agents or officers that arise from or are connected with or are caused or claimed
to be caused by the acts or omissions of the Proposer, and its agents, officers or employees,
in performing the work or services herein, and all expenses of investigating and defending
against same, provided, however, that the Proposer's duty to indemnify and hold harmless
shall not include any claims or liability arising from the established sole negligence or willful
misconduct of the City, its agents, officers or employees.
3.16 Contract Assignment
The Proposer shall not assign, transfer, convey or otherwise dispose of the contract, or its
right, title or interest, or its power to execute such a contract to any individual or business
entity of any kind without the previous written consent of the City.
3.17 Termination
If, during the term of the contract, the City determines that the Proposer is not faithfully
abiding by any term or condition contained herein, the City may notify the Proposer in
writing of such defect or failure to perform. This notice must give the Proposer a 10 (ten)
calendar day notice of time thereafter in which to perform said work or cure the deficiency.
Page IO Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 337
17
If the Proposer has not performed the work or cured the deficiency within the ten days
specified in the notice, such shall constitute a breach of the contract and the City may
terminate the contract immediately by written notice to the Proposer to said effect.
Thereafter, neither party shall have any further duties, obligations, responsibilities, or rights
under the contract except, however, any and all obligations of the Proposer's surety shall
remain in full force and effect, and shall not be extinguished, reduced, or in any manner
waived by the termination thereof.
In said event, the Proposer shall be entitled to the reasonable value of its services
performed from the beginning date in which the breach occurs up to the day it received the
City's Notice of Termination, minus any offset from such payment representing the City's
damages from such breach. "Reasonable value" includes fees or charges for goods or
services as of the last milestone or task satisfactorily delivered or completed by the
Proposer as may be set forth in the Agreement payment schedule; compensation for any
other work, services or goods performed or provided by the Proposer shall be based solely
on the City's assessment of the value of the work -in -progress in completing the overall work
scope.
The City reserves the right to delay any such payment until completion or confirmed
abandonment of the project, as may be determined in the City's sole discretion, so as to
permit a full and complete accounting of costs. In no event, however, shall the Proposer
be entitled to receive any amount in excess of the compensation quoted in its proposal.
4.1 Overview
The City of San Luis Obispo ("City") is soliciting proposals from qualified vendors
("Proposers") for an assessment to evaluate existing conditions of the three municipal
parking structures, prepare a detailed assessment of the conditions of each facility and a
prioritization of corrections that may be necessary, recommend a maintenance and repair
schedule for each structure, and provide detailed fiscal analysis with cost estimates for the
recommendations. The assessment will also include life cycle calculations of the facilities
and make recommendations for potential enhancements/modernizations that may lead to
more efficient or longer lives of each facility. Recommended maintenance and repairs shall
be prioritized by need and severity of deficiency using short-term (1-2 years), mid-term (3-
5 years), and long-term (6-10 years) time frames. Cost estimates will assist in the financial
planning process for the Parking Enterprise Fund. The final deliverable will be a Parking
Structure Assessment and Maintenance Report that will serve as a comprehensive master
maintenance plan for the next 10 years.
The City requires well-managed and financially sound Proposers with demonstrated skills
and technical ability, and high levels of customer service and satisfaction, to fulfill the
requirements outlined in this RFP. Proposers must have at least five years of experience
with municipalities and/or college institutions, and provide references demonstrating
relevant services were provided. Only those firms with verifiable structural, parking
equipment and operations, and mechanical operations experience and expertise will be
considered during this proposal process. Project teams may need specialists in certain
Page II Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 338
17
fields that may include, but not be limited to: structural engineering, materials science,
parking control systems, utilities, HVAC/cooling systems, financial systems, etc.
4.2 Calendar of Events
Listed below are specific and estimated dates and times of RFP events, all of which are
subject to change. Proposers must complete events by specific dates as indicated unless
revised by the City. The City may or may not issue a formal notification for changes in
estimated dates and times.
Figure 4-2: Calendar of Events
Date
Event
Friday, June 9, 2017
Issue date of RFP
Tuesday June 22, 2017 OR
Thursday June 24, 2017
Mandatory Pre -Bid site visit with
City Parking Staff
Thursday August 3, 2017 3:30pm PST
Proposals due
August- September 2017
Evaluation of proposals
September — October 2017
Interviews and Recommendations
November 2017
Negotiation and award contract
November - December 2017
Contract Routing to City Council
December 2017
Contract Award
January 2018
Contract begins
4.3 Background
The City of San Luis Obispo's Parking Services Division is seeking a professional
engineering consultant to perform a structural and facility systems conditions assessment
of the City's three (3) multi -deck parking structures. See map below for locations of the
parking structures. The ideal consultant will have extensive experience evaluating the
condition of buildings primarily used for parking services and developing maintenance
schedules for parking structures with post -tensioned cast -in-place concrete slab
construction. To date, no structural and facility systems conditions assessment has been
performed on the City of San Luis Obispo's parking structures. The City has performed
maintenance and repairs on an as -needed basis for each structure.
The three (3) parking structures included in this project are identified on the map below
and a brief description is provided for each:
Page I2 Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 339
17
The 842 Palm Street parking structure is a multi-level post -tensioned cast -in-place
concrete construction that went into operation in 1988. This parking structure has
capacity for 415 vehicles. There are no elevators at this location.
The 871 Marsh Street parking structure is a multi-level post -tensioned cast -in-place
concrete construction that went into operation in 1990 and was expanded (horizontally)
in 2002. This parking structure has capacity for 520 vehicles (252 in the original structure
and 268 in the expansion). There are two elevators at this location. The original portion
of the structure includes 15,000 sq. ft. of retail space and 4,000 sq. ft. of office space on
the ground level. The retail and office spaces are not part of the scope of services.
The 919 Palm Street parking structure is a multi-level post -tensioned cast -in-place
concrete construction that went into operation in 2006. This structure has capacity for
242 vehicles (192 are for public use and 50 are for City employee use only in a separate
basement area). There are two elevators at this location. The structure includes 16,000
sq. ft. of office space. The office space is not part of the scope of services.
It is important to note that the City has plans to construct a fourth parking structure that
will be built near Nipomo Street between Palm Street and Monterey Street. The
anticipated capacity for the structure is 406 vehicles.
Figure 4.3: Location of Existing Parking Structures
Page 13 Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 340
17
4.4 Objectives
The City seeks to achieve the objectives stated herein through the Proposers scope of
services which will be defined during the negotiation process.
4.5 Functional and Technical Requirements
The requested Functional and Technical Requirements will be determined during
consultation with selected vendor.
4.6 Scope of Work
The Parking Structure Assessment and Maintenance Report will provide a detailed review
of the condition of the three existing parking structures. The results will be summarized
in a report that will prioritize the preventative maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation
needs for each parking structure using the time frames provided below. Estimated costs
for the recommended repairs and a ten-year implementation plan to complete the work
will be the expected final deliverable, but City will rely on the Consultant to provide
recommendations for additional deliverables to be included.
The tasks outlined below comprise the draft scope of work for the proposed project. It is
the intent of the City to draw upon the experience and expertise of firms submitting
proposals as to their recommendations for the exact tasks that will be included in the
scope of work to meet the needs of the City. The City will negotiate the final scope of
work with the firm contracted to perform the work.
1. Data Gathering and Inspection
a. The consultant will gather data on existing conditions of the parking structures
through the following methods:
1. Site visits
2. Review of existing as -built plans
3. Interviews with City staff
4. Interview with building tenants, if necessary.
b. The consultant will visually inspect, survey and report on the structural
elements of the parking structures including, but not limited to, the following:
1. Post -tensioned cast -in-place concrete slab systems
2. Expansion joints
3. Control joints
4. Columns, beams, and ceilings
5. Waterproofing
6. Railings
7. Stairwells and walkways
8. Elevator shafts and equipment
9. Exterior facade
c. The consultants will inspect, survey and report on the facility systems of the
parking structures including the following:
1. Mechanical systems
2. Electrical systems
Page 14 Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 341
17
3. Plumbing systems
4. Fire protection systems
5. Elevator systems
6. Parking access and revenue control systems
7. HVAC/Cooling systems
8. Parking Control and telemetry
9. Architectural elements
2. Data Analysis
The consultant will analyze the data obtained from existing plans, site visits, visual
inspections, and surveys necessary for the development of an improvement plan.
3. Reporting
The consultant will provide the City with a detailed report referred to as the
PARKING STRUCTURE ASSESSMENT AND MAINTENANCE REPORT. The REPORT will
contain, at a minimum, the following elements:
a. Summary of existing conditions — A description of existing conditions will be
provided for each structure including photos, tables, and charts as needed.
Results from inspections and surveying
b. Summary of results:
1. Description of all deficiencies detailed with photos including causes of
deterioration, if applicable.
2. Prioritization of repairs by phase using short-term (1-2 years), mid-term
(3-5 years), and long-term (6-10 years) time frames. The cost estimates
for each identified or proposed repair for each structure will be
provided.
3. Annual maintenance program and cost estimates for each structure.
4.7 Selection Process
The City may shortlist up to four (4) Proposers based on the submitted proposals
and invite them to an interview process. In addition, the City may request that
Proposers provide copies of prior work product either as part of the interview
process or separately from it. The City, at its discretion, may make site visits to
locations where the Proposers have completed similar reports. The Proposers shall
be evaluated on the following:
o Understanding of the work required by the City;
o Quality, clarity and responsiveness of the proposal;
o Demonstrated competence and professional qualifications necessary for
successfully performing the work required by the City;
o Recent experience in successfully performing similar services;
o Proposed approach in completing the work;
o References;
o Background and experience of the specific individuals to be assigned to this
project;
o Interviews; and
o Compensation and total cost
Page 15 Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 342
17
As reflected above, contract award will not be based solely on price, but on a combination
of the factors determined to be in the best interest of the City. After evaluating the
proposals and discussing them further with the finalists or the tentatively selected
Proposers, the City reserves the right to further negotiate the proposed work and/or
method and amount of compensation. Once prospective Proposers have been evaluated
by the evaluation panel, negotiations shall begin. If negotiations are unsuccessful, talks
with that Proposer will be abandoned and negotiations will then commence with the next
qualified Proposer, and so on, until a final agreement has been reached and a contract
prepared. Staff will present their findings to the City Council, which, at its discretion, will
award a contact.
Proposing companies desiring to respond to this Request for Proposal (RFP) shall submit their
proposal in sufficient detail to allow for a thorough evaluation and comparative analysis. The
City shall use the responses as the basis of its evaluation. The proposals should be as brief and
concise as possible without sacrificing clarity. Proposals containing irrelevant material or an
abundance of excessively vague language may be penalized in the screening process.
Arrange proposals to match the following outline. Respond to each and every question and/or
statement. In the context of this section "you" and "your" is the same as "Proposer" and
"Proposer's", respectively.
Chapter 1: Title Page
The title page shall contain at a minimum the name of the Proposer, RFP Title, and Due Date.
Chapter 2: Table of Contents
The Table of Contents outlines in sequential order the chapters of your proposal.
Chapter 3: Executive Summary — Description of Organization
Provide an executive summary introducing your firm. Limit your response to three pages. At a
minimum, include the following information:
o Briefly describe your firm's organization and size (e.g. local, regional, national and
international) in relation to providing Parking Structure Assessment and Maintenance
Report similar to the services described in this RFP.
o Your experience including the number of years in business, and in the provision of
professional engineering services.
o The location of the office from which this engagement will be serviced and the range of
activities performed at that office.
o Reaffirm required experience in providing systems and performing services similar to those
outlined in this RFP.
Chapter 4: Project Manager
Identify the Project Manager you propose to assign to the engagement. Provide background on
the experience of the Project Manager, including projects lead. Limit your response to three
pages plus resume. The City expects that the Project Manager shall be available by telephone on
Page If 1
Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 343
17
all occasions for discussion with City staff, and shall be locally available for meetings in person on
short notice (one day).
Chapter 5: Organizational Experience
Provide a description of relevant organizational experience, especially in engagements of
similar size and scope that are currently being serviced or took place within the last five years,
from the same office that will serve the City. Describe briefly the nature of services provided
to each organization listed. Include a clear statement of your firm's specific role in the
engagement. Limit your response to five pages.
The City may utilize additional sources of information about your qualifications.
Chapter 6: Organizational Chart and Project Team
Submit an organizational chart showing the name of the Project Manager, other key personnel,
and all supporting staff to be assigned to the project. The team should demonstrate capabilities,
experience, and qualifications sufficient to successfully perform the scope of work included in this
RFP. The City reserves the right to approve the final staffing plan.
Identify the key project team staff. Include the members' qualifications, experience and training
that will benefit the project.
Chapter 7: References
Provide three references from similar projects and clients. Limit your response to three pages
tota I.
Chapter 8: Customer Service and Technical Support
N/A
Chapter 9: Sub Proposers (if any)
Identify any sub -Proposers that would be used. Give a detailed description of their involvement,
scope of work, background, and responsibilities. The price proposed shall include any and all work
to be done by sub -Proposers, and the City will only process claims and payments to the Proposer.
A list of sub -Proposers to be hired shall be submitted as a part of the proposal. Also disclose
whether or not the sub Proposer is a subsidiary or is financially tied to the Proposer in any other
manner. Use of sub -Proposer does not relieve the Proposer of overall responsibility. City reserves
the right to approve all proposed sub -Proposers.
Chapter 10: System Specifications
N/A
Chapter 11: Implementation
Submit an overview of your approach to implementation. Limit your response to ten
pages. At a minimum, include:
o A project schedule including phases, activities, tasks, milestones, decision points,
deliverables, etc.
o A description of how your project management will keep the implementation on schedule
and ensure the end result is a satisfactorily functioning system.
o Expected use of City resources including City hardware and assistance from City Staff.
o Information or data to be used or obtained from the City.
Page I'] Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 344
17
Chapter 12: Risks
Identify in detail any anticipated or potential concerns or risks in implementing your system; your
approach to resolving these concerns; and any special assistance required from the City. Limit
your response to two pages.
Chapter 13: Disclosure of Contract Failures and Litigation
Disclose any alleged significant prior or ongoing contract failures, contract breaches, any civil or
criminal litigation or investigation pending which involves your firm or in which your firm has
been judged guilty or liable, or which may affect the performance of the services to be rendered
herein, in which your firm, any of its employees, sub -Proposers, or sub consultants is or has been
involved in within the last three (3) years.
Chapter 14: Proposer's Financial Stability Assurance
N/A
Chapter 15: Fee Proposal
Include detailed pricing information for preparation of the Parking Structure Assessment and
Maintenance Access Report as described in this RFP.
Quote fees as all inclusive, not -to -exceed, fixed fees for each relevant aspect of the Parking
Structure Assessment and Maintenance Access Report. The fee could be a one-time fee, fee per
use, fee per year, fee per contract period, fee per citation issued, percentage of revenue
generated via citations, etc.
Clearly explain your pricing model. The City will consider alternative pricing models. Also,
identify all other costs beyond the usage cost such as a fee for training, system maintenance, etc.
As noted above, prepare the fee proposal as all inclusive, not -to -exceed, fixed fees:
o All Inclusive — Covers all direct and indirect expenses incurred by the Proposer including but
not limited to; travel, telephone, copying and other out-of-pocket expenses.
o Not To Exceed — The actual fees shall not exceed the amount specified in fee proposal.
o Fixed Fee — All prices, rates, fees and conditions outlined in the proposal shall remain
fixed and valid for the entire length of the contract and any/all renewals.
Provide exact fees - not a range. Take advantage of the opportunity to ask questions and receive
answers to gain clarification. Furthermore, document any significant assumptions for arriving at
fee estimates. You are responsible for verifying the correctness of calculations in your fee
proposal.
Each of the following is a component of the fee proposal. Proposers shall provide a numerical fee
and narrative explanation for each component. Provide as much detail as possible in your
narrative responses.
o Travel — List the fees for visits to the City for onsite inspections, planning, presentation, etc.
List travel fees as a not -to -exceed travel allowance.
o Design/Planning — List the fees for time spent working with the City in determining
workflows, analyzing processes, planning, envisioning how the report will be prepared and
documenting the results.
Page I g
Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 345
17
o Support and Maintenance — Present the fees of ongoing support and maintenance for the
final report. If you offer different levels of support, price the level of support that you
recommend the City purchase. Furthermore, provide detailed fees for all levels of support
and maintenance you offer. Support and maintenance fees should start in Year 1, which is
the first 365 days after the system is live and accepted by the City.
o Other Fees — Detail any and all other fees associated with the proposal.
o City Support — Provide the number of City staff and hours needed to support your
proposal. Detail the tasks they will be expected to perform.
o Ongoing Professional Services & Support — Please include the discounted hourly rate
for professional services and support. Include the different rate classes or titles as
appropriate.
The City reserves the right to make an award without further discussion of the fee proposal
submitted. Therefore, the Proposer should submit the fee proposal on the most favorable terms
they can offer. However, this does not limit the City from negotiating with the selected Proposer.
Fees will be evaluated on both initial and ongoing fees.
Configuration Adjustment: The City reserves the right to select and exclude any software for the
acquisition regardless of the configuration proposed. As part of the evaluation process, the City
may find it necessary to add or delete software or services from proposals to make equivalent
comparisons.
A finalization of the specifications and scope of services is expected as a part of final contract
negotiation or through a Best and Final Offer (BAFO) process. By the BAFO the Proposer(s)
remaining in the process will have met with the City and or demonstrated their product giving
them the opportunity to obtain a complete understanding of all requirements.
Chapter 16: Additional Required Forms and/or Attachments
Include the following required forms and/or attachments to your Proposal. Forms are included
in the RFP.
o Form A — Signature Affidavit — A company representative with authority to bind the
Proposer to the City by contract shall sign the form, attesting the proposal has been
submitted in conformance to stated requirements.
o Form B — Vendor Profile — complete the information about your firm.
o Form C — References
o Form D — Statement of Past Contract Disqualifications
o Form E — Cost Proposal Submittal Form
Page 19 Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 346
17
FORMA: SIGNATURE AFFIDAVIT
Note: This form must be returned with your response.
In signing proposals, we certify that we have not, either directly or indirectly, entered into any
agreement or participated in any collusion or otherwise taken any action in restraint of free
competition; that no attempt has been made to induce any other person or firm to submit or
not to submit proposals, that proposals have been independently arrived at, without collusion
with any other Proposers, competitor or potential competitor; that proposals have not been
knowingly disclosed prior to the opening of proposals to any other Proposers or competitor;
that the above statement is accurate under penalty of perjury.
The undersigned, submitting this proposal, hereby agrees with all the terms, conditions, and
specifications required by the City in this Request for Proposal, declares that the attached
proposal and pricing are in conformity therewith, and attests to the truthfulness of all
submissions in response to this solicitation.
Proposers shall provide the information requested below. Include the legal name of the
Proposer and signature of the person(s) legally authorized to bind the Proposers to a contract.
SIGNATURE AND DATE OF AUTHORIZE REPRESENTATIVE
FIRM (PROPOSER) NAME:
Page 20 I Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 347
17
FORM B: VENDOR PROFILE
Company Information
Company Name (Proposer)
FEIN:
(If FEIN is not applicable, SSN collected
upon award)
Contact Name
Title
Telephone
Fax
Email
Address
City
State
Zip
Primary Individual Contact Information
Contact Name
Title
Telephone
Fax
Email
Address
City
State
Zip
Page 2I Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 348
17
FORM C: REFERENCES
IF _
Describe fully three contracts performed by your firm that demonstrate your ability to provide
the services included with the scope of the specifications. Two of the three shall have been in a
Municipal or University setting. Attach additional pages if required. The City reserves the right
to contact references listed for additional information regarding your firm's qualifications.
Reference No. l
Customer Name
Contact Individual
Telephone & Email
Street Address
City, State, Zip Code
Date of Services
Contract Amount
Description of services
Project Outcome
Page 22 Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 349
17
Reference No. 2
Customer Name
Contact Individual
Telephone & Email
Street Address
City, State, Zip Code
Date of Services
Contract Amount
Description of services
Project Outcome
Page 23 Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 350
17
Reference No. 3
Customer Name
Contact Individual
Telephone & Email
Street Address
City, State, Zip Code
Date of Services
Contract Amount
Description of services
Project Outcome
Page 24 Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 351
17
FORM D: STATEMENT OF PAST CONTRACT DISQUALIFICATIONS
The Proposer shall state whether it or any of its officers or employees who have a proprietary
interest in it, has ever been disqualified, removed, or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or
completing a federal, state, or local government project because of the violation of law, a safety
regulation, or for any other reason, including but not limited to financial difficulties, project
delays, or disputes regarding work or product quality, and if so to explain the circumstances.
■ Do you have any disqualification as described in the above paragraph to declare?
Yes ❑ No ❑
■ If yes, explain the circumstances.
Executed on at under
penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing is true and correct.
Signature of Authorized Representative of Proposer
Print name of Authorized Representative of Proposer
Page 25I Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 352
17
FORM E: COST PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL FORM
The City is requesting proposals for a Parking Structure Assessment and Maintenance Access
Report. Each Proposer shall fill out the following cost proposal in it's entirely. Cost proposals
that are not complete will not be accepted, and the submitted proposal will be deemed
incomplete. If there are any additional costs not included in this Cost Proposal, those costs
must be identified on a separate sheet of paper and included as stated in this Request for
Proposal. On a separate page, a detailed breakdown of the costs below as well as a detailed
price list shall also be provided.
Item
Description -Parking Structure Assessment and
Maintenance Report
Total Cost
Estimate
Item
Description- (OPTIONAL)
Total Cost
Estimate
Page 26 Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 353
17
ADDendix A: FORM OF AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into in the City of San Luis Obispo on [date],
by and between the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, a municipal corporation, hereinafter
referred to as City, and [CONTRACTOR'S NAME IN CAPITAL LETTERS], hereinafter
referred to as Contractor.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, on [date], City requested proposals for the preparation of a
Parking Structure Assessment and Maintenance Report per Specification No. 19546.
WHEREAS, pursuant to said request, Contractor submitted a proposal which
was accepted by City for said [supplies, equipment, services, project, whatever].
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises, obligations,
and covenants hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date this Agreement is made and
entered, as first written above, until acceptance or completion of said [supplies,
equipment, services, project, whatever].
2. INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE. City Specification No. 19546 and
Contractor's proposal dated [date], are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this Agreement.
3. CITY'S OBLIGATIONS. For providing [supplies, equipment, services, project,
whatever] as specified in this Agreement, City will pay and Contractor shall receive therefor
compensation in a total sum not to exceed [$ .001.
4. CONTRACTOR'S OBLIGATIONS. For and in consideration of the payments and
agreements hereinbefore mentioned to be made and performed by City, Contractor agrees with City to
do everything required by this Agreement and the said specification.
5. AMENDMENTS. Any amendment, modification, or variation from the terms of this
Agreement shall be in writing and shall be effective only upon approval by the Council [or other official]
of the City.
Page 27 Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 354
17
6. COMPLETE AGREEMENT. This written Agreement, including all writings specifically
incorporated herein by reference, shall constitute the complete agreement between the parties hereto.
No oral agreement, understanding, or representation not reduced to writing and specifically
incorporated herein shall be of any force or effect, nor shall any such oral agreement, understanding,
or representation be binding upon the parties hereto.
7. NOTICE. All written notices to the parties hereto shall be sent by United States mail, postage prepaid
by registered or certified mail addressed as follows:
City City Clerk
City of San Luis Obispo
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Contractor [
1. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT. Both City and Contractor do covenant
that each individual executing this agreement on behalf of each party is a person duly authorized and
empowered to execute Agreements for such party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be executed the day and
year first above written.
ATTEST: CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
By:
City Clerk City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONTRACTOR
City Attorney
Page 28 Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 355
17
Appendix B: INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
The Proposer shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims
for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the
performance of the work hereunder by the Proposer, its agents, representatives, employees or
sub Proposers.
Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 20
10 Prior to 1993 or CG 20 10 07 04 with CG 20 37 10 01 or the exact eauivalent as
determined by the City).
2. Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability,
code 1 (any auto).
3. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's
Liability Insurance.
4. Errors and Omissions Liability insurance as appropriate to the consultant's profession.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
1. General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and
property damage. If Commercial General Liability or other form with a general aggregate
limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this
project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence
limit.
2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
3. Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
4. Errors and Omissions Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be
declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce
or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of
losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain,
or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
1. The City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as
insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the
Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned,
occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of
protection afforded to the City, its officers, official, employees, agents or volunteers.
2. For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be
primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and
volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials,
Page 29 I Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 356
17
employees, agents or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall
not contribute with it.
3. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is
made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
4. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage
shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits
except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt
requested, has been given to the City. The Consultant agrees to notify the City in the
event that the policy is suspended, voided or reduced in coverage or limits. A minimum of
30 days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, will be provided.
Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating
of no less than ANIL
Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with a certificate of insurance showing
maintenance of the required insurance coverage. Original endorsements effecting general
liability and automobile liability coverage required by this clause must also be provided. The
endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its
behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences.
Sub -consultants. Consultant shall include all sub -consultants as insured under its policies or shall
furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each sub -consultant. All coverages for sub -
consultants shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.
Page 30 1
Structural Assessment and Maintenance Report RFP
Packet Pg 357
17
ORDINANCE NO. (2017 SERIES)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.52.010 (PARKING
METER ZONE RATES) OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, State law provides, in Vehicle Code Section 22508, that cities must establish
parking meter rates by ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the parking program needs to continue to be self-sufficient for its financial
commitments; and
WHEREAS, the City needs to continue to financially support the operation and debt service of
the next City parking structure; and
WHEREAS, the Council considered the staff report and considered the proposed changes to the
parking meter rates at a public meeting on June 6, 2017.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. Section 10.52.010 (Parking meter zone —rates) of the San Luis Obispo Municipal
Code is hereby amended as follows:
10.52.010 Parking meter zone — Rates.
A. Within the area enclosed by a solid line on the parking rate zone map (Exhibit A) and the area
enclosed by the shaded line on Slack Street parking meter zone map (Exhibit B) (more particularly
described as: the north side of Hathway Avenue adjacent to Cal Poly to Longview Lane, the east side of
Longview Street from Hathway Avenue to Slack Street, the north side of Slack Street from Longview
Lane to Grand Avenue, and the south side of Slack Street adjacent to the San Luis Coastal Unified School
District parcel from the midblock point of Slack Street (between Longview Lane and Grand Avenue) to
Grand Avenue), the parking of vehicles on streets or in municipal parking lots may be controlled and
regulated with the aid of parking meters.
B. Unless established otherwise below, the parking meter rate on streets or in municipal parking lots
in the lower rate zone shall be seventy five een4s one dollar per hour.
C. Within the area designated on the parking rate zones map (Exhibit A) the rate for parking meters
on streets or in municipal parking lots shall be one dollar and twms fifty per hour.
D. Within the area designated on the parking rate zones map (Exhibit A), the rate for parking meters
on streets or in municipal lots shall be one dollar and fifty seventy. -five cents per hour.
E. Within the shaded area of the map entitled Slack Street parking meter zone map (Exhibit B) the
parking of vehicles on streets may be controlled and regulated with the aid of parking meters. The
parking meter rate shall be seventy five eents one dollar per hour if controller by meter.
X
Packet Pg 358
17
Ordinance No. (2017 Series) Page 2
SECTION 2. Severability. If any subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this
ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforcement of the remaining portions
of this ordinance, or any other provisions of the city' s rules and regulations. It is the city' s express intent
that each remaining portion would have been adopted irrespective of the fact that any one or more
subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid or unenforceable.
SECTION 3. A summary of this ordinance, together with the names of the Council members
voting for and against it, shall be published at least five (5) days prior to its final passage, in the
Telegram -Tribune, a newspaper published and circulated in this City. This ordinance will go into effect
at the expiration of thirty (30) days after its final passage.
INTRODUCED on the 6th day of June 2017, AND FINALLY ADOPTED by the Council of
the City of San Luis Obispo on the 20th of June 2017, on the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor Heidi Harmon
ATTEST
Carrie Gallagher
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo,
California, this day of ,
Carrie Gallagher
City Clerk
O
Packet Pg 359
ti
Ordinance No. (2017 Series)
Page 3
w
................
UJ
T
EXHIBIT A
o
:r
BROAD
to
J
TORO
Mev
0
m
a
�
w
�
ec
t
fL
0
0
8
m
w
NIPOMO
Ca
uj
�J
a
Rte-
IL
S .A N T .A
�
-
s
Ku SA
SANTA
}
z
iz—
4L
ROSA
::::
Co
Z3
J
05
e s e s
M 0 R R 0
X11
t7
GHORR0
: �. .
GARDEN
� S7
CHORRO
L
Page 3
w
................
UJ
T
EXHIBIT A
o
:r
BROAD
to
J
M
Mev
0
m
a
fL
0
0
8
v
NIPOMO
Ca
NIPOMO
�J
a
Rte-
S .A N T .A
Ku SA
}
z
iz—
4L
Q
::::
Co
Z3
05
e s e s
M 0 R R 0
X11
t7
GHORR0
: �. .
GARDEN
w
................
UJ
T
°i 3 R O A D
:r
BROAD
J
LO
0
;BEACH
fL
0
NIPOMO
Ca
NIPOMO
w
................
UJ
T
_S}
411
LL0
IL
0
;BEACH
0
4
Ca
Rte-
:`'
iz—
11 E DO
::::
Co
ti
r
Ordinance No. (2017 Series) Page 4
EXHIBIT B
��a Q
J �
\ -=ZD aNVMD
J
LL
J
� � v
2
L
0
U QP' 1N381
4 u Q
Ell \
yZ CD C /\
a
U a -2 C 2
ai v) w ` 4►r
®� r
M31AJN071
Tz—
IV
M31AJN01 m
1
/ % J1monlN3M
17
RESOLUTION NO. (2017 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARKING FEES IN THE CITY'S
PARKING STRUCTURES
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo wishes to maintain effective usage of its three parking
structures; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to provide secure and user friendly parking for all users of the
parking structures; and
WHEREAS, the parking program needs to continue to be self-sufficient for its financial
commitments; and
WHEREAS, the Council considered the Parking Revenue Enhancements staff report and held a
public meeting on the proposed changes to the parking structure rates and hours of operation.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. Effective January 1, 2018, all hourly parking structure rates shall increase to $1.25
an hour, including Sundays, with the first hour free.
SECTION 2. Effective January 1, 2018, the maximum daily parking structure rate shall increase
to $12.50 per day, Monday through Saturday and $6.25 per day on Sundays.
SECTION 3. Effective July 1, 2020, the hourly parking structure rates in the 842 Palm, 919
Palm and Marsh Street Structures shall increase to $1.50 an hour, including Sundays, with the first hour
free.
SECTION 4. Effective July 1, 2020, the maximum daily parking structure rate in the 842 Palm,
919 Palm and the Marsh Street Structures shall increase to $15.00 per day, Monday through Saturday
and $7.50 per day on Sundays.
SECTION 5. Upon the opening of the new Palm Nipomo Parking Structure, the hourly rate
shall be $1.00 an hour, including Sundays, with the first hour free.
SECTION 6. Upon the opening of the new Palm Nipomo Parking Structure, the maximum daily
parking structure rate shall be $10.00 per day, Monday through Saturday and $5.00 per day on Sundays.
Packet Pg 362
Resolution No. (2017 Series)
Upon motion of
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
seconded by
Page 2
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of , 2017.
Mayor Heidi Harmon
ATTEST
Carrie Gallagher
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
17
and on the
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo,
California, this day of ,
Carrie Gallagher
City Clerk
r7
Packet Pg 363
17
RESOLUTION NO. (2017 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INCREASED PARKING
CITATION FINES
WHEREAS, State law provides, in Vehicle Code Section 40203.5, that cities establish the
amount of parking penalties, fees, and surcharges; and
WHEREAS, State law authorizes the City to recover administrative fees, parking penalties, fees
and collection costs related to civil debt collection, late payment penalties, and other related charges;
and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to provide secure and user friendly parking for all users of the
parking structures; and
WHEREAS, the parking program needs to continue to be self-sufficient for its financial
commitments; and
WHEREAS, the Council considered the Parking Revenue Enhancements staff report and held a
public meeting on the proposed changes to the parking citation fines and the establishment of additional
fees.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. Effective January 1, 2018, parking fines shall be modified (see Exhibit A) as
follows:
1. Increase expired meter violation (SLOMC 10.52.050) from $33 to $40;
2. Increase overtime parking violation (SLOMC Section 10.040.010) from $43 to $50;
3. Increase passenger loading zone violation (SLOMC 10.44.040) from $33 to $40;
4. Increase parking space markings violation (SLOMC 10.40.060) from $33 to $40;
5. Increase no permit lot violation (SLOMC 10.36.235) from $38 to $45
Upon motion of
on the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
seconded by
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of , 2017.
ATTEST
and
Mayor Heidi Harmon
Packet Pg 564—
Resolution No. (2017 Series) POf 2
Carrie Gallagher
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo,
California, this day of ,
Carrie Gallagher
City Clerk
Packet Pg 1565
Resolution No. (2017 Series)
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PENALTY SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE DATE: 01101/2018
CODE & SECTION DESCRIPTION
P1gf 3
EXHIBIT A
PENALTY PENALTY & LATE FEE
SLMC 10.12.050
INTERFERENCE WITH POLICE/AUTHORIZED OFFICER
93
123
SLMC 10.14.030
OBEDIENCE TO TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
58
88
SLMC 10.14.090
UNAUTHORIZED PAINTING ON CURBS
58
88
SLMC 10.34.020
OVERNIGHT CAMPING (10pm - 6 am)
100
130
SLMC 10.36.020
STOPPING OR STANDING IN PARKWAYS PROHIBITED
33
63
SLMC 10.36.030
STOP/STAND/PARK IN VIOLATION OF CHAPTER
33
63
SLMC 10.36.040
NO PARKING ZONE - PROHIBITED PARKING - Also Taxi Zone (d)
53
83
SLMC 10.36.050
USE OF STREETS FOR STORAGE OF VEHICLES PROHIBITED
23
53
SLMC 10.36.070
REPAIRING OR GREASING VEHICLE ON PUBLIC STREET
23
53
SLMC 10.36.080
WASHING OR POLISHING VEHICLES
23
53
SLMC 10.36.090
PARKING ADJACENT TO SCHOOLS
23
53
SLMC 10.36.100
PARKING PROHIBITED ON NARROW STREETS
23
53
SLMC 10. 36.110
PARKING ON GRADES
23
53
SLMC 10.36.120
UNLAWFUL PARKING - PEDDLERS, VENDORS
23
53
SLMC 10.36.130
EMERGENCY PARKING SIGNS
23
53
SLMC 10.36.140
LARGE/COMMERCIAL VEHICLE PARKING NEAR INTERSECTION
23
53
SLMC 10.36.150
NIGHTTIME PARKING OF LARGE VEHICLES
23
53
SLMC 10.36.160
NIGHTTIME PARKING OF VEH W/OPERATING AIR/REFRIGERATION
23
53
SLMC 10.36.200
PARKING IN A RESIDENTIAL PERMIT PARKING AREA
38
68
SLMC 10.36.230
PERMITS - DISPLAY OF PERMITS
28
58
SLMC 10.36.235
NO PERMIT LOT
45
75
SLMC 10.40.010
TIMED PARKING 10 MINUTES TO 10 HOURS (Overtime Parking)
50
80
SLMC 10.40.020
BACKING INTO PARKING SPACE PROHIBITED
28
58
SLMC 10.40.040
PARKING PARALLEL ON ONE-WAY STREETS
21
51
SLMC 10.40.050
DIAGONAL PARKING
21
51
SLMC 10.40.060
PARKING SPACE MARKINGS
40
70
SLMC 10.40.070
NO STOPPING ZONE
21
51
SLMC 10.40.080
ALL NIGHT PARKING PROHIBITED (3-5am)
38
68
SLMC 10.44.020
CURB MARKING TO INDICATE NO STOPPING/PARKING REGS.
23
53
SLMC 10.44.030
EFFECT OF PERMISSION TO LOAD/UNLOAD IN YELLOW ZONE
53
83
SLMC 10.44.040
EFFECT OF PERMISSION TO LOAD/UNLOAD IN WHITE ZONE
40
70
SLMC 10.44.050
STANDING IN ANY ALLEY
33
63
SLMC 10.44.070
DISABLED PARKING
338
368
SLMC 10.48.010
CERTAIN VEHICLES PROHIBITED IN CENTRAL DISTRICT
58
88
SLMC 10.48.020
ADVERTISING VEHICLES
33
63
SLMC 10.48.030
ANIMAL DRAWN VEHICLES
33
63
SLMC 10.48.040
TRUCK ROUTES
88
118
SLMC 10.48.050
COMM. VEHICLES PROHIBITED FROM USING CERTAIN STREETS
88
118
SLMC 10.48.060
MAX GROSS WT. LIMITS OF VEHICLES ON CERTAIN STREETS
88
118
SLMC 10.52.040
PARKING METERS - OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES
23
53
SLMC 10.52.050
UNLAWFUL TO PARK AFTER METER TIME HAS EXPIRED
40
70
SLMC 10.52.060
UNLAWFUL TO EXTEND TIME BEYOND LIMIT
15
45
SLMC 10.52.070
IMPROPER USE OF METER
15
45
SLMC 10.52.080
PARKING METERS/STANDARDS - PROPER USE
15
45
SLMC 10.52.110
MOTORCYCLE SPACES
15
45
CVC 5204(a)*
CURRENT TAB IMPROPERLY ATTACHED
"25
CVC 21113(a)
VEHICLE OR ANIMAL ON PUBLIC GROUNDS -MOVING
116
146
CVC 21113(b)
VEHICLE OR ANIMAL ON PUBLIC GROUNDS -PARKING
33
63
CVC 21113 (c)
DRIVEWAYS, PATHS, PARKING FACILITIES ON GROUNDS
33
63
CVC 22500.1
STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: FIRE LANE
116
146
CVC 22500(a)
STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: WITHIN INTERSECTION
33
63
CVC 22500(b)
STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: ON A CROSSWALK
33
63
CVC 22500(c)
STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: BETWEEN SAFETY ZONE
33
63
CVC 22500(d)
STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: W/IN 15' FIREHOUSE ENTRANCE
33
63
CVC 22500(e)
STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: PUBLIC/PRIVATE DRIVEWAY
33
63
CVC 225000
STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: ON SIDEWALK
33
63
CVC 22500(8)
STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: ALONG/OPPOSITE OBSTRUCT
33
63
CVC 22500(h)
STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: ON ROADWAY SIDE OF VEHICLE
33
63
CVC 22500(i)
IMPROPER PARKING IN BUS ZONE
263
293
CVC 225000)
STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: IN TUBE OR TUNNEL
33
63
CVC 22500(k)
STOPPING/STANDING/PARKING: UPON BRIDGE EXCEPTAUTH
33
63
Packet Pg 13SR
Resolution No. (2017 Series)
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PENALTY SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE DATE: 01/01/2018
CODE & SECTION DESCRIPTION
P1gf 4
PENALTY PENALTY & LATE FEE
CVC 22500(1)
IMPROPER PARKING IN WHEELCHAIR ACCESS
263
293
CVC 22502(a)
CURB PARKING
33
63
CVC 22502(b)
PARKING OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
33
63
CVC 22502(c)
CURB PARKING - WHEELS MORE THAN 18 INCHES FROM CURB
33
63
CVC 22504(a)
UNINCORPORATED AREA PARKING
33
63
CVC 22505(a)
PARKING ON STATE HIGHWAY WHERE SIGN POSTED
33
63
CVC 22505(b)
POSTED NO PARKING - STATE HIGHWAY
33
63
CVC 22507
UNLAWFUL PARKING
33
63
CVC 22507.8 (a)
PARKING IN SPACE FOR DISABLED
338
368
CVC 22507.8 (b)
PARKING IN SPACE FOR DISABLED - OBSTRUCT/BLOCK
338
368
CVC 22507.8 (c)(1)
PARKING IN SPACE FOR DISABLED - ON LINES MARKED
338
368
CVC 22507.8 (c)(2)
PARKING IN SPACE FOR DISABLED - CROSSHATCHED LINES
338
368
CVC 22510
PARKING IN SNOW REMOVAL AREAS
3
33
CVC 22511.7
DISABLED ZONE
338
368
CVC 22512
VEHICLE UNATTENDED
116
146
CVC 22513
TOW CARS - PARKING ON FREEWAY
33
63
CVC 22514
FIRE HYDRANTS
63
93
CVC 22515(a)
UNATTENDED VEHICLES - SET BRAKES/STOP MOTOR
33
63
CVC 22515(b)
UNATTENDED VEHICLES - SET BRAKES/WHEELS/PREVENT MOVE
33
63
CVC 22516
LOCKED VEHICLE
116
146
CVC 22517
OPENING AND CLOSING DOORS
116
146
CVC 22520.5
VENDING ON FREEWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY
116
146
CVC 22520.5(a)
VENDING ON FREEWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY
116
146
CVC 22521
ILLEGAL TO PARK ON RAILROAD TRACKS
33
63
CVC 22522
PARKING NEAR SIDEWALK ACCESS RAMPS
288
318
CVC 22523(a)
VEHICLE ABANDONMENT- On Highway
283
313
CVC 22523(b)
VEHICLE ABANDONMENT
283
313
CVC 22650
UNLAWFUL REMOVAL OF UNATTENDED VEHICLE
116
146
CVC 22651(b)
VEHICLE PARKED/LEFT STANDING TO OBSTRUCT TRAFFIC
116
146
CVC 40225*
PROCESSING OTHER VIOLATIONS
*10
CVC 40226*
FAILURE TO DISPLAY DISABLED PLACARD - ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
*25
LATE PAYMENT PENALTY
30
* Fine or fee amounts are set by the Uniform Bail & Penalty Schedule or by specific CVC section
All other fine amounts set by City Council pursuant to CVC 40203.5
Packet Pg 1367
Page intentionally left
blank.
17
Packet Pg 368