HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-11164 adopting the 2019 San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water Management (IRMW) PlanR 11164
RESOLUTION NO. 11164 (2020 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2019 SAN LUIS OBISPO
COUNTY INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
AND FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS STATUTORILY EXEMPT
FROM SECTION 21000 ET SEQ. OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC
RESOURCES CODE, THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT, PURSUANT TO SECTION 15262 OF THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES
WHEREAS, the State of California has established an Integrated Regional Water
Management grant program pursuant to the Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood
Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006 (Public Resources Code Section 75001
et seq.) also known as Proposition 84; and
WHEREAS, the Regional Water Management Group for the San Luis Obispo County
Region as of the date of this resolution consists of agencies including the City of San Luis Obispo,
that have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (Exhibit A) and are listed in Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, the concepts, direction, and approach to water resources management
embodied in the State’s Integrated Regional Water Management Program guidelines closely match
those of the San Luis Obispo County Region; and
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
was initially developed and adopted by multiple agencies in the County including the City of San
Luis Obispo in 2005, 2007, and 2014; and
WHEREAS, an update to the 2014 San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water
Management Plan is needed in order to effectively and efficiently integrate the region’s water
resources management planning objectives and implementation strategies in the following five key
areas: water supply, groundwater monitoring and management, flood management, ecosystems
and watershed, and water resources management and communications; and
WHEREAS, the 2019 San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water Management
Plan was developed in accordance with the State’s Department of Water Resources 2016
guidelines and with participation from the Regional Water Management Group, the Water
Resources Advisory Committee, and the general public; and
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
has coordinated with the Regional Water Management Group to produce the 2019 San Luis Obispo
County Integrated Regional Water Management Plan in accordance with State standards; and
Resolution No. 11164 (2020 Series) Page 2
R 11164
WHEREAS, the 2019 San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water Management
Plan identifies goals, objectives, strategies, and projects designed to improve regional water supply
reliability, water recycling, water conservation, water quality improvement, stormwater capture
and management, flood management, recreation and access, wetland enhancement and creation,
and environmental and habitat protection and improvement; and
WHEREAS; the City of San Luis Obispo has reviewed the 2019 San Luis Obispo County
Integrated Regional Water Management Plan and has determined that the Plan is exempt from
Section 21000 et seq. of the California Public Resources Code, California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15262 of the CEQA Guidelines because the Plan is a planning
study which identifies potential projects, programs, and policies for possible future actions, and
includes possible actions, subject to future adoption and approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
SECTION 1. The 2019 San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water Management
Plan for the San Luis Obispo County Region is hereby adopted, and Utilities Department staff is
hereby authorized and directed to implement actions consistent with participating in updates to the
plan on a five-year cycle as a Regional Water Management Group Member as described within
the Plan.
Resolution No. 11164 (2020 Series) Page 3
R 11164
SECTION 2. The adoption of the 2019 San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional
Water Management Plan for the San Luis Obispo County Region is hereby determined to be
exempt from the requirements of Section 21000 et seq. of the California Public Resources Code
(CEQA), Section 15262 of the CEQA Guidelines.
Upon motion of Council Member Christianson, seconded by Council Member Pease and
on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Member Christianson, Pease, Stewart, Vice Mayor Gomez and
Mayor Harmon
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 15th day of September 2020.
____________________________________
Mayor Heidi Harmon
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________________
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City
of San Luis Obispo, California on _____________________.
____________________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
Exhibit A
San Luis Obispo County Region
Integrated Regional \Vater ivlanagement Program Participants
i\"lemorandum of Understanding
The undersigned agencies and organizations hereby agree as follows:
1.BACKGROUND
The State of, California has established an Integrated Regional Water Management (IR WM) planning and
grant program pursuant to the Safe Drinking \Vater, \Vater Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and
Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006 (Public Resource Code (PRC) Section 75001 et seq., also known as
Proposition 84). This program is anticipated to be perpetuated and/or modified by future Bond acts. The
JR \\'fv1 program provides guidance for collaborative efTons to manage all aspects of ,vater resources in a
region by crossing jurisdictional, \\'atershed, and political boundaries to involve multiple agencies,
stakeholders, individual s, and groups in order to address issues and differing perspectives of all entities
involved through mutually beneficial solutions. Regions that develop JR \\IM plans in accordance ,,·ith
the guidelines are eligible for certain water resources grant funding opportunities ..
In accordance ,vith PRC Section 75001 (et seq.) and State JRWM Program guidelines, a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) (dated 2009), signed by eleven agencies within San Luis Obispo County,
established a Regional Water Management Group (RWMG) for the San Luis Obispo County IR\VM
Region, and the San Luis Obispo County IRWM Region was officially accepted by the State in May
2009.
The San Luis Obispo County IR\VM Region water resources stakeholders have determined the need to
update the IRWM MOU in order to meet new State IRWM guidelines, to clarify the governance structure
for IR\V�1 planning in the San Luis Obispo County IR\VM Region, and encourage broader participation.
This f\.10U, in conjunction with the current IR\VM Plan, sets forth the San Luis Obispo County IR\VM
Region's governance structure thereby allo\ving members and other stakeholders to understand ho,v to
participate i� the IR\VM Plan development and implementation.
2.PURPOSE, GOALS, AND APPROACII
2.1 Purpose. The purpose of this MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) is to
establish the n1utual understandings among the San Luis Obispo County Region participants \Vith
respect to their joint efforts to develop and implement an Integrated Regional Water Management
(IR\VM) Plan for the San Luis Obispo County Region, including the definition of common
IR\VM terms, roles and responsibilities oflRWM Program Participants, and decision-ma king
processes.
2.2 Goals. The goal of the IR\VM program is to provide a reliable, long-term, and high
quality \Yater supply, and to establish a unified vision an1ong the participants' goals for water
qual!ty improvement, ecosystem preservation, water supply protection and enhancement, ground
water management and flood management, in the context of social justice and climate change
adap.tation, while protecting the environment. The adopted IR\Vi\1 plan will identify major
wate_r-related goals, objectives and conflicts within the region, consider a broad variety of water
management strategies, identify the appropriate mix of \;Yater demand and supply management
alternatives, water quality protections, flood management strategies, and environmental
ste,vardship actions.
2.3 r\pproach. The San Luis Obispo County Region panicipants are specifying their shared
intent to coordinate and collaborate on water management issues, giving consideration to
disadvantaged communities and Native American tribes and their v.·ater related needs. In order to
IR WM Memorandum of Understanding Page I of 8
Exhibit A
enhance participation of stakeholders, it will be necessary to· work at a sub-regional level to bener
understand the water resources needs and priorities throughout the region. \Vhen applying for
grants, the San Luis Obispo County Region \Viii strive to distribute the grant funding request
fairly across the geographic region. The goal is to distribute 8\\'arded funding from each grant
cycl� equally across the sub-regions (i.e. one quarter of the overall funding to benefit each of the
three sub-regions' projects/programs and one quarter of the overall funding to benefit regional
projects/programs), to the extent feasible.
3.DEFINITIONS
3.1 lnlegrated Regional \Vater l\1anagement Plan (Plan). A comprehensive plan for a
defined geographic area which shall satisfy the requirements of California's JR WM Program.
3.2 San Luis Obispo County Region (Region). The geographic area of San Luis Obispo
County, \Vhich is cotern1inous with the San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water
ConServation District (District) boundary.
3.3 Local Agency. Any city, county, city and county, special district,joint powers authority,
or at.her political subdivision of the state, a public utility as defined in Section 216 of the Public
Utilities Code, or a mutual \Vater company as defined in Section 2725 of the Public Utilities
Code.
3.4 Program Participants. Development and implementation of the Region's Plan is a
collaborative effort undertaken by the Region's participants, as further discussed in Section 4.
The effort is being led by the District, in partnership with the Regional \Vater l\.1anagement
Group, \Vater Resources Advisory Committee, Implementation Affiliates, and Interested
Stakeholders. Only regional projects and programs to be implemented by those agencies which
have adopted the Plan \viii be eligible for grant applications. The Region categorizes IR \VM
Program Participants into the follo\ving:
3.4.1 Regional Water l\.1anagen1ent Group (R\VMG). A group inwhich three or n1ore
local agencies, at least t\VO of \Vhich have statutory authority over \\.'ater supply or \Valer
management, as \veil as those other persons \\.'ho may be necessary for the developn1ent and
implementation of the Plan, participate by means of this memorandum of understanding, in
acco:rdance with requirements of the California \Vater Code (C\VC § 10539). The Region's
R\VMG members are signatories to this MOU, have adopted the current Plan, and may designate
a representative to participate in R\V!v1G activities and its \Vorking Group. l'he entities must be
either a Local Agency or an IRS 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. The RWMG has the capacity
to carry out projects {i.e. financial resources, management structure, adequate staffing). 'l'he
agencies/organizations that fom1 the RWMG may have planning or implementation projects
eligible for State IRWM grants.
3.4.2 \Vater Resources Advisory Committee {WRAC). l'his is the committee
comprised of water purveyor, resource conservation district. environmental and agricultural, and
other \Valer resources representatives that \Vas originally established in the 1940s to advise the
District Board of Supervisors on water resource issues. The \VRAC is a Brown t\ct con1mit1ee
that meets monthly, with the exception of July and August. Many participants are actively
engaged in issues relevant to Plan development and implementation, and will represent important
stakeholder groups throughout the progran1.
3.4.3 RWMG Working Group (Working Group). The Working Group will involve
representatives from the R\Vj\1G who have technical expertise and are able to work on the details
asso�iated with IR\VM efforts. The \Vorking Group will engage stakeholders at a sub-regional
level in order to better understand the specific \Yater resources needs and priorities of that sub
regi9n.
IR WM Memorandum of Understanding Page 2 of8
Exhibit A
3.4.4 Implementation Affiliates. These entities will adopt the Plan by resolution, but
\\'ould not be signatories of the MOU. The entities must be either a Local Agency or an IRS
50l(c)(3) nonprofit organization. The Implementation Affiliates have the capacity to carry out
projects (i.e. financial resources, management structure, adequate staffing). In order to have a
planring or implementation project eligible for State IR\Vl\1 grants, agencies must be an
lmpl,ementation Affiliate if they are not a pan of the R WMG.
3.4.5 Interested Stakeholders. 'l'hese individuals, organizations, and nonprofits
(including those that are not IRS 50l(c)(3) nonprofit organizations) who are interested in the
IRWM program. The Interested Stakeholders may sign a letter of support for the Plan, or
otherwise provide input to the R \VlvlG, but v.·ould not be eligible for directly receiving State
IRWM grant funds.
3.5 Sub-regions. The Region's IR WM program seeks to engage stakeholders and
understand the water resources needs of the Region. To adequately ensure this balanced access
and opportunity for participation in the IR \VM program, the R WMG ,viii utilize a sub-regional
geographic structure, allov.·ing more focused planning and local outreach efforts that are later
brou'ght into the context of the overall IR\VM Region. These slib-regions have been deliberately
defilled in tem1s of logical planning and ,vatershed/ hydrogeologic unit boundaries. These "sub
regions" include the North Coast, North County, and South County (see Anachment I).
3.6 Regional Projects or Programs. Projects or programs to be implemented by the
R\VMG and/or Implementation Affiliates are identified in the Plan and are based upon the State's
IR\VM Guidelines under v.·hich the current Plan ,vas adopted, ,vhich includes but is not limited
to: reducing ,vater demand through agricultural and urban ,vater use efficiency, increasing ,vater
supl)lies for any beneficial use, improving operational efficiency and water supply reliability,
improving water quality, improving resource. stewardship, and improving flood management.
3.7 Integration. Assembling into one document the water-related management strategies,
projCcts, programs, and plans of the Region. The development and implementation of the Plan
shou_ld demonstrat e the R \VMG is fanning, coordinating and integrating separate efforts in order
to [Unction as a unified effort in a collaborative n1anner that balances interests and engages a
variCty of stakeholders and seeks to efficiently integrate regional resources. The Plan
deve'Jopment will identify ,vater management strategies for the Region and the priority projects
and programs that demonstrate ho\\' these strategies work together to meet goals identified in
Section 2. It will also identify regional benefits of linkages between projects and plans that
address different primary water-related objectives (for example, identifying regional benefits of
linkages bel\veen a water supply project and a flood management project in the same watershed).
4.IRWM �ROGRAM PARTICIPANTS
4.1 Program Participant Structure. Elements of the Plan will be developed and
in1plemented by the Progran1 Participants. The R \VMG, including the District as the Lead
Agellcy, and the Implementation Affiliates are responsible for Plan development and
implementation.
4.2 Plan Development and Implementation. The Region's Plan that was adopted by the
District, developed in coordination with and approved by stakeholders in 2005, and updated in
2007, will be the basis for subsequent adopted Plans for the Region. The \Vorking Group ,viii
propose changes to the previous versions of the Plan to comply with new State guidelines and
incorporate ne,v infonnation and projects. Since a key element of the IR\VM Program is
integration, the R \VMG will ,vork ,vith Program Participants to identify water management
strategies for the Region and sub-regions and the priority projects that demonstrate how these
strategies "'Ork together to meet the purpose and goals in Section 2. How each Program
IR WM Memorandum of Understanding Page 3 of 8
Exhibit A
Parti.cipant contributes and participates i!l Plan development and implementation is described
belo�v:
4.2.1 Lead Agency. The District will act as the lead agency for Plan development, will
execute this MOU, and will adopt the Plan in accordance with 4.3 and 4.4 below. The District
will ;ultimately be responsible for the final production of the Region's Plan, hiring consultant(s) to
develop the Plan, and presentations to stakeholders, submittal oflR\VM grant applications, and
exec.ution and administration of grant agreements \Vith the State. As the Lead Agency, the
District \Viii execute and administer agreements with RWMG members and Implementation
t\ffiliates responsible for the implementation of projects that are awarded grants, including data
collection relevant to grant agreements, project reporting, etc. Efforts described in Section 4.2.1
are subject to the availability of funding.
4.2.2 R WMG. Members will execute this MOU and adopt the Plan in accordance with
4.3 and 4.4 below. R\VrvtG members will designate a representative with clear authority to
represent the agency or organization, provide expertise, provide information in a timely manner,
participate in meetings, review and approve technical documents as needed, and \\-'ill provide the
District with their designated representative's contact information. This representative will be
eligible to participate on the Working Group. All RWMG members, whether or not their
repr�sentative is participating in the Working Group, hereby agree to provide information
sufficient to meet State guidelines for their regional projects and programs to be included in the
Plan and participate in the review of the Plan. R \VMG members will consider integrating
projects and programs with other agencies when possible, especially with disadvantaged
cominunities and Native American tribes, in accordance with State IR \VM Guidelines. R \VMG
menibers responsible for the implementation of regional projects and programs a,varded grant
fund_ing will be responsible, through contract with the District, for complying with the provisions
of the District's grant agreement with the State. The RWMG will provide updates to the WRAC
and seek \\'RAC support of recommendations at key decision points.
4.2.3 WRAC. The WRAC will provide a forum for public meetings/ workshops
related to Plan development and implementation at key decision points. The WRAC will revie,v
and comment on the RWMG recommendations to the District's Board of Supervisors at key
decision points.
4.2.4 Working Group. Representatives of the Working Group will be designated by
the R\VMG member and will have clear authority to represent the agency or organization,
provide expertise, provide information in a 1imely manner, participate in meetings, review and
approve technical documents as needed, and will provide the District ,vith their designated
representative's contact information. The District ,,till provide materials V/ith sufficient lead time
for RWMG member and Working Group engagement. The Working Group will develop
information, draft documents and recommendations pertaining to the Plan update consistent with
current State IR\VM Guidelines during Plan development. Efforts are anticipated to include
stakeholder outreach, collection and incorporation of updated data, etc. The Working Group will
develop information and recommendations for IR\VM program planning and implementation,
stakeholder outreach, and pursuit of funding opportunities. All R\VMG members will participate
in t�e process to select the Region's IR\VM projects and programs for grant applications by ,vay
of the \Vorking Group, who will conduct project/program solicitations and evaluations, and will
make recommendations on grant funding allocations. The Working Group will need to conduct
sub-regional public meetings during Plan development and implementation to facilitate
stakeholder participation.
4.2.5 Implementation Affiliates. Implementation Affiliates shall adopt the Plan in
accordance with Section 4.3. Implementation Affiliates will designate a representative with clear
authority to represent the agency or organization, provide expertise, provide information in a
timely manner, participate in meetings, review and approve technical documents as needed, and
williprovide the District with their designated representa1ive's contact information. All
IRWM Memorandum of Understanding Page 4 of8
Exhibit A
Implementation Affiliates will provide infonnation sufficient to meet State guidelines for their
regional projects and programs to be included in the Plan and participate in the revie\v of the Plan
and for implementation activities, such as project status updates, project reporting, data
collection, etc. Implementation ,\ffiliates will consider integrating projects and programs with
neighboring agencies when possible, especially with disadvantaged comn1unities and Native
American tribes, in accordance with State IRWl\.1 Guidelines. Implementation Affiliates
responsible for the iinplementation of regional projects and programs awarded grant funding will
be responsible, through contract V.'ith the District, for complying \Vith the provisions of the
District's grant agreement with the State.
4.2.6 Interested Stakeholders. Interested Stakeholders may participate in the Plan
deve_lopment and implementation process by way of participation at WRAC and/or RWMG
n1eetings. Interested Stakeholders that are not WRAC members will be notified \\'hen an IR\Vrv1
program item will be revie\ved by the \VRAC if they request inclusion on the IR\VM contact list
(Section 5.6). Sub-regional meetings will be required to ensure Interested Stakeholders,
incl�ding disadvantaged communities, who may not necessarily be able to attend \.\'RAC
meetings, can participate in Plan development and in1plementation.
4.3 IRWM Plan Adoption. Plan approval and adoption will be required of the governing
bodies of RWMG members and Implementation Affiliates. Plan updates to meet new State
guidelines, add new RW�1G Members, add or remove and evaluate regional projects and
programs, or other updates to infonnation do not require Plan re-adoption. Significant changes to
the Plan, including revised goals and objectives, revised methodologies (such as methodology for
evaluating, ranking, and prioritizing projects and programs), revised regional boundaries, or other
changes deemed significant by the R\VMG and the Lead Agency, \Viii require Plan re-adoption
via the decision-making process described in Section 4.5.
4.4 Personnel and Financial H.esources. ltis expected that Program Participants \viii
contribute the resources necessary to fulfill the responsibilities listed within Section 4 of this
MO(). Program Participants that receive implementation grant funding, shall contribute a
propOrtionate share of non-project costs associated \vith the grant agreement, based on a\\.·arded
impl�mentation funding (for example, contributing toward the cost of updating the Plan, should
that be a condition of grant award) ..
4.5 Decision Making. The RWMG shall develop IRWM program materials and will make
recommendations to the Lead Agency at key decision points of the IRWM program. \Vriuen
input will be sought between the representatives of R \VMG members in the event the need for a
decision arises that cannot be brought forth to the RWl\1G before a decision needs to be made.
The District, by way or its Public Works Department, shall notify the RWMG agencies of
recommendations being taken to the District's Board of Supervisors for action. The District's
Board of Supervisors may approve, alter, or return any said recommendation of the R\VMG.
Furthennore, if the District's Board of Supervisors intends to alter an item or proposition
approved by the RWMG, the District's Board of Supervisors shall set forth in \Yriting its findings,
after which the Board will hold a public hearing. The RWMG agencies shall have the right to
app�ar and address the District's Board of Supervisors.
5.MUTUAL UNDERSTANDINGS
5.1 Need for the Region's IRWM Plan
5.1.1 To improve communication and cooperation between public and private agencies
and minimize connict-generated solutions.
5.1.2 To enhance our existing \Vater management efforts by increasing stakeholder
awareness of important issues, providing more opportunities for collaborative efforts and
improving efficiencies in government and water management.
IRWM Memorandum of Understanding Page 5 of 8
Exhibit A
5.1.3 To qualify for state grants and other funding opportunities only available to those
regions which have developed IR\VM plans.
52 Subject matter scope of the IRWM Plan. The Plan focuses on water supply, water
quality protection and improvement, ecosystem preservation and restoration, groundwater
monitoring and management, and flood management as these are the most prevalent water
reso�rce issues facing the Region.
5.3 Geographical scope of the IR WM Program. The Region for this memorandum is
cotenninous with the boundary of San Luis Obispo County. This is an appropriate geographic
regiqn for integrated regional water management planning because it encompasses all aspects of
wate.r managem ent generally \Vithin the same physical, political, environmental, social, and
econ,omic boundaries. The Region may engage stakeholders within the three sub-regions in order
to better understand the specific water resources needs and priorities of that sub-region, which
,vould then be incorporated into the context of the greater IR \VI\.1 Region planning and
implementation.
The Region is bordered by the Greater Monterey County IR\VM region to the north, the
Santa Barbara County and \Vatersheds Coalition of Ventura County IR\VM regions to the south,
and the Kem County IRWM region to the east.
\Vater resources issues that overlap neighboring regional boundaries are either covered
by existing cooperative water management plans (i.e. Nacitone \Vatershed rvtanagement Plan),
adjudication (i.e. Santa iVlaria Ground\\·ater Basin), and operational agreements (i.e. 1'.'acimiento
Reservoir), or have no defining water resource management issue. All of these items are to be
inclUded in the Region's Plan consistent ,vith the plans of neighboring regions. The R\V/lvlG will
continue to coordinate with neighbo ring regions to address additional water resources issues and
possjble integrated water 1nanagement strategies in our respective IR\VM plans.
5.4 Non-binding nature. This document and participation in the IR \ViVt program efforts are
non�inding, and in no ,vay suggest that a RWMG member or Implementation Affiliate may not
continue its own planning and undertake efforts to secure project funding from any source. An
agen,cy/ organization may ,vithdra,v fron1 participation in accordance ,vith Section 5.7.
5.5 Other on-going regional efforts. Development of the Plan is separate from efforts of
other organizations to develop water-related plans on a regional basis. As the Plan is developed,
work products can be shared \\'ith these separate efforts to provide them with current information.
5.6 Reports and communications. The WRAC, an IRWM contact list, and the District's
\\'ebSite will serve as the forum for updates and correspondence relating to the IR\Vl\.1 program
and Plan development.
5.7 Termination. Because the Plan ,viii require periodic review and updating for use into
the future, it is envisioned that the joint efforts Of those involved Y.'ill be ongoing in maintaining a
living document. Thus this i\.10U will remain as a renection of the understandings of the R \\'MG
Menibers. As indicated, parties to ttiis MOU may tern1inate their involvement at any time, but
must. provide all R \VMG agencies with 30 days' advance notice of intent to terminate.
5.8 Superseded Prior MOU. This MOU super sedes the MOU dated April 21, 2009 (2009
MOU).
5.9 Counterparts. This MOU may be executed in counterparts and has the same force and
effeCt as if all the signatures were obtained in one document.
IRWM Memorandum of Understanding Page 6 of8
6.SIGNATORIES TO THE MEMORANDUi\I OF UNDERSTANDING
Exhibit A
\Ve, the undersigned representatives of our respective agencies or organizations, acknowledge the above as our understanding of how the San Luis Integrated Regional Water Management Plan will' be developed.
--1�--F-IF--'--''----iVl'----�-----'----,����--J'-�'----signature
--�
--b.,_---'.:li"'--'--A�ll"--'--f1-'A:'-'-'R.x.--"'--'._-' ______ printed name
l / T'T' of JAw 1.4,td!" 081re.�.:, __ agency
_____ 1_1 _,_J_#_f=----,.-/���O�/�:l.-------dateI I
J.CHRISTINE DIETRICK
City Attorney
IRWM Memorandum of Understanding Page 7 of8
~VEDQORM:-
A«achmenl I -San Luis Obis o Coun · JR\\'l\.1 Re ion and Sub-Re ions l\1a
-.,_,.., .w,,,-F'laiww,g,....a Sub--Region
1,1ap1111wt1,1s1-c:J...,,.,, p;"'""Ghlt·S01m+1r w.r.i 1'111111111, ........ CJ "'-'--.. w.·-;..CJs.a ll!G)an
IR\Vtv1 t,.1emorandum of Understanding
A
«:::=-�MHes
Exhibit A
\ '--ill-" '·
\ /
\ ,,..' ' ,,
\ I l!l I
Page 8 of8
\
\
6)
' \
\
\
\
\
Jfl1eg ra1ed R1!1Jioflal
Wa1er Management Pia~
s..1 ... 0...,.Co!J\ii ~-
~·~ ... o.-s..,..,.,...,.., .. ..,,
Resolution No. 10553 (2014 Series)
Page 11
Exhibit B
Memorandum of Understanding Signatories for
San Luis Obispo County Region IR\VM Participants
Agency or Organization
San Luis Obispo County
San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
California Men's Colony
Cambria Community Services District
Central Coast Salmon Enhancement
City of Arroyo Grande
City of Grover Beach
City of Morro Bay
City of Paso Robles
City of Pismo Beach
City of San Luis Obispo
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District
Heritage Ranch Community Services District
Land Conservancy
Los Osos Community Services District
Morro Bay National Estuary Program
Nipomo Community Services District
Oceano Community Services District
Templeton Community Services District
San Miguel Community Services District
San Simeon Community Services District
S&T Mutual Water Company
Upper Salinas -Las Tablas Resource Conservation District
Resolution No. 11164 (2020 Series) Page 5
R 11164
EXHIBIT B
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Signatories for
San Luis Obispo County Region IRWM Participants,
Updated July 18, 2017
Agency or Organization
1 San Luis Obispo County
2 San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
3 Avila Beach Community Services District
4 California Men’s Colony
5 Cambria Community Services District
6 Cayucos Sanitary District
7 Central Coast Salmon Enhancement
8 City of Arroyo Grande
9 City of Grover Beach
10 City of Morro Bay
11 City of Paso Robles
12 City of Pismo Beach
13 City of San Luis Obispo
14 Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District
15 Heritage Ranch Community Services District
16 Land Conservancy
17 Los Osos Community Services District
18 Morro Bay National Estuary Program
19 Nipomo Community Services District
20 Oceano Community Services District
21 Templeton Community Services District
22 San Miguel Community Services District
23 San Miguelito Mutual Water Company
24 San Simeon Community Services District
25 Shandon-San Juan Water District
26 South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District
27 S&T Mutual Water Company
28 Upper Salinas – Las Tablas Resource Conservation District