HomeMy WebLinkAbout7-29-2022 SB 932 - Oppose
July 29, 2022
The Honorable Chris Holden
Chair, Assembly Committee on Appropriations
1021 O Street, Suite 8220
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: SB 932 (Portantino): General plans: circulation element: bicycle and
pedestrian plans and traffic calming plans.
Notice of OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED (As amended June 20, 2022)
Dear Assembly Member Holden,
The City of San Luis Obispo must respectfully oppose unless amended SB 932
(Portantino), which would create unfunded mandates for costly improvements to local
transportation infrastructure without providing funding for implementation. Also, this bill
would expose many local governments to new legal risks that may result in litigation costs
to defend and settle.
Local agencies support active transportation projects and have been leading the charge
to improve local streets and roads, while also retrofitting them to improve safety for all
roadway users. According to the California Transportation Commission, during just the
first two and a half fiscal years when SB 1 (Beall, 2017) funds were available, cities and
counties reported spending $1.5 billion to complete over 3,100 projects,
Despite the significant progress that local governments have made to develop active
transportation projects in their communities, SB 932 takes a top -down approach that
dictates both the type of improvements required and the timing for implementing such
improvements. The timeframes in SB 932 do not account for existing funding gaps, much
less the additional capital costs of the improvements the bill mandates.
Recent amendments to SB 932 would create new legal risks for the largest ten counties
and the cities located within those jurisdictions that fail to meet the bill’s arbitrary
implementation timeframes. The provisions of SB 932 upend design immunity in the Tort
Claims Act (Government Code § 890) that prohibit a local government from being sued
for negligence. SB 932 would create a mandatory duty and thus would establish
“dangerous conditions” for local streets and roads that may jeopardize a city’s liability
coverage after being recategorized as very high risk due to the provisions of SB 932.
It is more appropriate to solicit local government input and planning for incorporation into
the state’s active transportation plans, which are not required to be updated, rather than
creating the new private right of action. Simply put, every additional dollar tha t goes
Letter - Opposing SB 932
July 29, 2022
Page 2
toward defending against litigation is one fewer dollar available for improving our local
streets and roads. As a result, we recommend that this new private right of action be
completely removed.
SB 932 does not contain a funding mechanism despite the Legislature proposing $1.5
billion in the state budget for active transportation projects. SB 932 should be amended
to create a grant program tied to the $1.5 billion allocated for these projects.
The City of San Luis Obispo has invested heavily in bicycle infrastructure. Earlier this year
The City opened the Railway Safety Trail Bridge which creates a safer connection
between Cal Poly and downtown for bicyclists and pedestrians. In July the City Council
approved going to bid for the North Chorro Neighborhood Greenway that will have
protected two-way bicycle infrastructure, creating another safe pathway for students to
get to school and families to access downtown San Luis Obispo. We believe in investing
in bike infrastructure. But this bill is not the way to achieve our bicycle transportation goals.
Decisions about the timing and type of investments should be left to individual
communities, not dictated in a top down manner.
For these reasons, the City of San Luis Obispo opposes, unless amended, SB 932.
Sincerely,
Erica A. Stewart
Mayor
City of San Luis Obispo
c: Members, Assembly Committee on Appropriations (via email:
approps.committee@assembly.ca.gov
The Honorable Anthony Portantino, Senator
Jay Dickenson, Chief Consultant, Assembly Committee on Appropriations
Daniel Ballon, Fiscal Consultant, Assembly Minority Caucus
League of California Cities (via email: cityletters@calcities.org)