Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-01-2013 ph3 2014 cdbg funding priorities FROM: Derek Johnson, Community Development Director Prepared By: Tyler Corey, Housing Programs Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION’S RECOMMENDED PRIORITIES FOR THE 2014 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) AND GRANTS-IN-AID (GIA) PROGRAMS RECOMMENDATION 1. As recommended by the Human Relations Commission, approve Community Development Block Grant and Grants-In-Aid funding priorities for 2014; 2. Make a determination pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) that the project is exempt by the general rule that developing priorities for funding will not possibly have a significant effect on the environment. DISCUSSION Background The City’s annual Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) review process provides Council and the public with an opportunity to provide early input in the grant award process. Establishing funding priorities is the first step in the process, which helps to maintain an open, inclusive and fair grant application process. The Human Relations Commission (HRC) is the advisor to the Council on funding priorities and funding recommendations. The four steps in the CDBG review process include: 1. HRC hosts a “Needs Workshop”: The HRC hosts a public hearing to inform the public about upcoming funding amounts and how to apply for grants, to hear community views on grant funding needs, and to recommend funding priorities (held on September 4, 2013). Attachment 1 contains the draft minutes from this hearing. 2. Council priority-setting hearing: Council holds a public hearing to set CDBG and GIA funding priorities. This is scheduled for October 1, 2013. 3. CDBG applications hearing: HRC holds a public hearing to review CDBG applications in light of the adopted funding priorities and forwards its funding recommendations to the County for Program Year 2014 (scheduled for December 4, 2013). 4. CDBG Program hearing: After the County releases the Draft One-Year Action Plan Council holds a public hearing; approves the City’s 2014 CDBG Program; and forwards its Meeting Date Item Number 10-1-13 PH3 - 1 CDBG & GIA Funding Priorities for the 2014 Program Year Page 2 recommendation to the Urban County for inclusion in the final One-Year Action Plan (tentatively scheduled for February 4, 2014). On September 4, 2013, the HRC completed the first step by holding its combined GIA and CDBG community needs hearing. An audience of about 20 persons attended the hearing and 12 speakers addressed a wide variety of community needs. The testimony provided indicated to the Commission and staff that difficult economic conditions were continuing to drive an increase in service needs. Representatives from non-profits who spoke pointed to an increase in demand for services including emergency shelter, transitional housing, hunger prevention, child care, health services, affordable housing and social programs, while funding at the federal, state and local level has significantly decreased. The increase in demand along with a decrease in grant funding has strained providers’ ability to deliver core services. The service providers stressed the importance of the GIA and CDBG programs and encouraged the HRC to continue its support. HRC Recommended CDBG Funding Priorities for Program Year 2014 After discussion of the current economy and testimony provided by the public, the Commission reviewed the 2013 CDBG funding priorities and decided to re-affirm the priorities without modification. The HRC’s recommended 2014 CDBG funding priorities are: 1. Emergency and transitional shelter, homelessness prevention and services. 2. Develop and enhance affordable housing for low and very-low income persons. 3. Economic development (to include seismic retrofit, economic stability, low and moderate income jobs). 4. Promote accessibility and/or removal of architectural barriers for the disabled and elderly. The priorities adopted by Council set the framework by which the HRC reviews grant applications and recommends funding choices to the Council. Generally, most applications for CDBG funds fit intuitively within one of the listed categories. The proposed action is to develop priorities to guide future decisions regarding the allocation of CDBG funding. Pursuant to section 15061 (b)(3), the general rule applies because developing priorities for funding will not possibly have a significant effect on the environment. HRC Recommended GIA Funding Priorities for 2014 The HRC also reviewed the 2013 GIA funding priorities and decided to re-affirm the priorities without modification. The list below is bulleted instead of numbered specifically because the HRC does not rank these recommended funding priorities to allow maximum flexibility when making funding recommendations dependent upon the applications received. • Homeless prevention including supportive services and transitional housing • Hunger and malnutrition prevention • Supportive physical and mental health services • Services for seniors and/or people with disabilities • Supportive services for youth and their development; especially targeted to youth at risk PH3 - 2 CDBG & GIA Funding Priorities for the 2014 Program Year Page 3 Next Steps The next step in the CDBG and GIA program cycles is for the Council to consider the HRC’s recommendations and to affirm or revise the City’s funding priorities. This step is important because these priorities will guide the HRC’s actions when it reviews grant applications. These priorities will also guide Council’s final funding decisions when it considers CDBG and GIA funding recommendations on February 4 and June 17, 2014, respectively. FISCAL IMPACT Decisions made regarding priorities will affect how CDBG and GIA applications are evaluated and chosen for support. The City of San Luis Obispo receives CDBG funds through the County allotment and, while this does not directly impact the general fund, to the extent that projects can be funded through CDBG, they are not otherwise requesting money from the City’s general fund. The City does designate a portion of general fund monies for the GIA program and the priorities expressed by the Council will influence how those grants will be awarded. Establishing priorities has no immediate fiscal impact but can be helpful in allocating the CDBG and GIA funding regardless of the amount. ALTERNATIVES 1. The Council may modify the proposed funding priorities. 2. The Council may continue consideration of funding priorities. Direction should be given to staff regarding additional information needed to make a decision on priorities. This alternative is not recommended because the deadline to submit a request for 2014 CDBG funds ends on October 15, 2013, and applicants to the program benefit from knowing the City’s funding priorities in advance. ATTACHMENT 1. HRC Draft Meeting Minutes from 9-4-13 T:\Council Agenda Reports\2013\2013-10-01\2014 CDBG Funding Priorities (Johnson-Corey)\CDBG 2014 Funding Priorities.docx PH3 - 3 Attachment 1 DRAFT HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION (HRC) MINUTES REGULAR MEETING September 4, 2013 5:00 p.m. 990 Palm St – Council Chambers CALL TO ORDER: 5:00 PM PRESENT: Chairperson: Hillary Trout; Vice Chairperson: Louise Matheny Commissioners: Robert Clayton, Ronald Tilley, Ivan Simon ABSENT: Commissioners: Janet Pierucci STAFF PRESENT: Greg Zocher, Human Resources Manager; Tyler Corey Housing Programs Manager CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES: ACTION: Moved by Tilley/Simon to approve the minutes of August 7, 2013 as submitted; motion carried 3:0. Commissioners Clayton & Trout arrived at 5:07 PM ______________________________________________________________ PUBLIC COMMENT No public comment for items not on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Item 1. OVERVIEW OF THE GRANTS-IN-AID AND CDBG PROCESS (ZOCHER/COREY) Commissioners received staff presentation Item 2. TESTIMONY FROM THE PUBLIC REGARDING HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICE NEEDS FOR RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO (TROUT) Commissioners heard testimony from multiple speakers. PH3 - 4 Attachment 1 Gail Stoneberg – Assistance League Operation School Bell Della Wagner – CAPSLO Maxine Lewis Homeless Shelter Shawn Ison – CAPSLO Prado Day Center Rupert Chowins – SLO Noor Foundation Shon Hand – SLO County Alamo Club Jerry Rioux – SLO County Housing Trust Fund Trish Murley – CASA Monica Grant – YMCA Rick London – United Way 211 SLO County Kelly Donohue – Creative Mediation Mary Ann Kennedy – Women’s Shelter Program Mary Parker BUSINESS ITEMS Item 3. REVIEW GIA AND CDBG FUNDING PRIORITIES (TROUT) Moved by Matheny/Simon to keep the same CDBG funding priorities; motion carried 5:0. Moved by Simon/Matheny to keep the same GIA funding non-ranked priorities; motion carried 4:1 (Clayton opposed) PH3 - 5 Page intentionally left blank. PH3 - 6