Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/15/1988, 4 - TIME EXTENSION FOR TRACT 1261 - A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION CREATING OR ADJUSTING SEVEN LOTS ON ROSITA STREET BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND CERRO ROMAULDO AVENUE. IIIN�Iyl�lf��lll�l��ll�pAln�lll � t MEETING DATE: SII IN u I' II C,Io san tui s OBISPO 3-15488 WINQ COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT :J FROM: Michael Multari,iCommunity Development Director BY: Glen Matteson SUBJECT Time extension for Tract 1261 - a single-family residential subdivision creating or adjusting seven lots on Rosita Street between Foothill Boulevard and Cerro Romauldo Avenue. CAO RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached resolution to approve a one-year time extension, as requested. BACKGROUND: Situation In April 1985 the City Council approved the tentative map for this tract, which creates lots around several existing houses (see map) and which needed several design exceptions (see resolutions No. 565). Under state and city subdivision rules, a final map must be filed within two years of tentative map approval, or the subdivider must obtain approval of a time extension. The council approved a one-year extension in March 1987. Data Summary Address: 133 Rosita Street Subdivider: Brown Family Estate Trust Representative: Contract Survey and Design Zoning: R-1 Land Use Element map: Low-density residential Environmental status: City Council approved a negative declaration 3-2-85. The property owners have begun installation of public improvements but they probably won't be complete before the expiration date. They would prefer to get a time extension and complete the improvements before filing the final map rather than bonding and filing the final map now (see attached letter). There have been no changes in the project nor to relevant policies or ordinances since the original approval. Therefore, staff sees no reason to deny this time extension. The subdivider has submitted a final map for checking and, as noted above, the owners have begun to install subdivision improvements. The council may approve or deny the time extension. The council may not add, delete, or modify conditions. SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS: None ����►�I>I►II�Vlllllll�iljq���ll City Of San WIS OBISPO COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Page 2 CONSEQUENCES OF NOT TAKING ACTION: Map may expire and applicant would have to reapply if it does. Alternatively, the applicant could file final map and bond for incomplete improvements. There is no apparent practical benefit to the city from that approach. Attached: Draft resolution to approve time extension Vicinity map Tentative map Adopted resolution approving tentative map ds/data#l;rosita RESOLUTION NO. (1988 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO GRATING APPROVAL OF A TWELVE-MONTH TIME EXTENSION FOR TRACT 1261 LOCATED AT 133 ROSITA STREET WHEREAS, the subdivider requests a twelve-month time extension to meet conditions necessary to receive final approval. including installation of required improvements; and WHEREAS, reasonable progress has been made toward completing subdivision improvements and filing of the final map; and WHEREAS, the circumstances and findings of original tract approval are unchanged; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council resolves as follows: Section 1. That Tract 1261 is granted a twelve-month time extension to April 2, 1988, subject to original tract map findings and conditions as specified in City Council Resolution No. 5651 (1985 Series) attached hereto. On motion of seconded by , and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of , 1988. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk �-3 RESOUIPION NO. 5651 (1985 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE C7)UNCI L OF Mr CITY OF SAN LU I S OBISPO GRANTING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 1261 LOCATED AT 133 AND 155 ROSITA STREET BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as fol lois: SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after consideration of the tentative map of Tract 1261 and the Planning Commission's recanmendations, staff recommendations and reports thereon, rmakes the following findings: L . In accorddrice with state and city environmental review guidelines, an initial environmental study (ER 1-85) has been prepared and a negative declaration was approved by the Director February 13, 1985. 2. The tentative map is consistent with the general plan. 3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type and density of development allowed by the R-1 zone. 4. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. ! 5. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause public health problems. 6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. 7. Certain exceptions are granted subject to these findings: A. That the property to be divided is of such size and shape that it is impractical or undesirable to conform to the strict application of city regulations, and B. That cast to the subdivider of strict or literal compliance with the regulations is not the sole reason for granting the modification, and C. That the modification will. not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare, or be injurious to other properties in the vicinity; and D. That granting the madification is in accord with the intent and purposes of these regulations, and is consistent with the general plan. Resolution No. 5651 (1985 Series) Tract 1 .%1 Page 2 Section 2. Exceptions. That the approval of the tentative map for Tract 1261 shall be subject to the following exceptions: 1 . The areas of lots 1 and 2 are 5,000 square feet each, instead of a minimum 6,000 square feet. 2. The area of lot 3 is 6,000 square feet instead of the minimum 6,900 square feet. 3. The depth-to-width rati«s of Lots 4 and 5 are 3.2:1 instead of the maxiirLmi 3:1 . 4. The longest dimensions of lots 4 and 5 are oriented perpendicular to south, rather than within 30 degrees of south. 5. The width of sidewalk (four feet instead of six feet) and roadway (32 instead of 40 feet) of Rosita Street are less than standard. SECTION 3. Conditions. That the approval of the tentative map for Tract 1261 be subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall rerrove storage building, sheds, and garages as noted on the tentative map. 2. Applicant shall rerove or relocate outside of required setbacks the shed an lot 1. 3. Applicant shall renove the garage on lot 3. 4. Applicant shall provide off-street parking as required by the Zoning Regulations for Lots 1, 2, 3, and 6. 5. Subdivider shall pay water frontage and acreage fees as determined by the City Engineer, with credit for existing services. 6. Subdivider shall install individual water and sewer laterals for each lot. Existing water laterals and meters shall be relocated as needed to meet current standards. 7. Subdivider shall provide a private drainage easement along the east property line of lots 4, 5, and 7 to Foothill Boulevard. S. Subdivider shall provide for undergrounding of new utility services to the subdivision (except those on Cerro Romauldo and Foothill Boulevard) to the approval of the utility companies and the City Engineer. ` Resolution No. 5651 ( 1985 Series) Tract 1.261 Page 3 9. Subdivider shall install or reconstruct frontage improvements along Cerro Romauldo, Rosita Street, and Foothill Boulevard (including handicap ramps in both curb-returns at Foothill Boulevard) and one-half street improvements on Cerro Romauldo and paving on Rosita Street to meet the new gutter grade, all to the approval of the City Engineer. 10. Final map shall include the following notes: A. "The parts of lots 6 and 7 within fifty feet of Foothill Boulevard are subject to traffic noise which exceeds city standards for outdoor residential use. " B. "Houses constructed on lots 6 and 7 shall be sound-proofed consistent with the general plan Noise Element to provide interior sound levels not to exceed 45 dB(A) . " C. "On lots 6 and 7, for any new houses or for remodelling of the existing house involving more than 50% of its replacement value, measures to reduce outdoor noise to acceptable levels for active use areas shall be provided to the approval of the Community Development Department." on motion of Councilman Settle seconded by Oouncilman Dunin , and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dunin, Davey, Griffin and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 2nd day of April 1985. l ay 7elanic C. Billig ATTEST: City Clerk Pame a Vog 4=4 I I �C. w :-= • V E;8{: IVIAU / r Wo '., lad A r ' Oq a I � � Twr lox a ` ^► x x i � S I . ' 4E4 g 41 I a O Vc 8g 1SAW=�� �FOILL�LVD.\� �\ fr-3 OT�kIa4 k t I R On I C.5D Contract Survey and Design, Inc. Surveyors — Engineers 860 Walnut Street • Suite C e San Luis Obispo, California 93401 • (805) 544.7407 RECEIVED March 2, 1988 MAR 21988 CGty of San Luis ob'spo CCmmumty Gevefepment Ken Bruce Planning Department County of Sar_ Luis Obispo Subject: Time extension for Tract 1261 Dear Ken: According to our records, we are approaching the expiration date of the tentative map for Tract 1261 in San Luis Obispo. Mr. and Mrs. Brown have completed most of the improvements, however, they are not at this time in a position to complete the remaining portion and therefore they will not be able to record the map before the expiration date of April 2 , 1988 . Since they are not going to bond for the improvements and it does not seem feasible that construction will end before the expiration date, we request an extension of one (1) year. Enclosed is a check for the $100. 00 fee as required. If you have any questions, please give me a call. ,o-)Sincere y, I^ , .� Mi a Cannon ��11 MC:kr enc.