The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11/01/1988, 4 - HEARING TO PASS UPON OBJECTIONS RAISED BY PROPERTY OWNERS TO CITY REQUIREMENT THAT PROPERTY OWNERS INSTALL CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS WHERE MORE THAN 50% OF THE BLOCK IS ALREADY IMPROVED ��n��►i�IIIIIpIIp �dlll MY Of son tins OBS SPO MEETING GATE: Nov. 1, 1988 COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM NUMBER: FROM: David F . Romero Dennis Cox Prepared by : Tony Heller Public Works Dir . Streets Manager SUBJECT: Hearing to pass upon objections raised by property owners to city requirement that property owners install curb , gutter and sidewalk improvements where more than 50% of the block is already improved CAO RECOMMENDATION : By motion, after making modifications desired , direct Staff to proceed. BACKGROUND: Resolution No . 6031 ( 1986 Series ) calls for the Staff to bring to Council attention those properties where more than 50% of the frontage of a block has been improved , thereby meeting 1911 Act criteria for completion of improvements within a block . A Staff survey of sidewalk improvements within the community resulted in the list shown on Exhibit A (attached) . At its meeting of August 10� 1988, the City Council approved the list as submitted , and the Staff has sent out appropriate notices to construct improvements . Provisions of the 1911 Act call for a public hearing when the legis- lative body will hear and pass upon objections or protests raised by the property owner or other interested parties . At the public hearing, the Council may make those adjustments it feels are appropriate . Fiscal_Impact If the property owner does not make the improvements within the time allotted in the Act , the City has the work done . Upon completion of the work, the property owner has an opportunity to pay for his costs . On major improvments , the property owner may opt to make a three year repayment in accordance with a Council approved funding arrangement. If the property owner takes no action, the cost of the improvements becomes a lien against the property collectable with taxes . If the City finances all .the work , total cost would be approximately $62 ,743.70. Past experience is that approximately 70% of owners either have the work done or pay their share in cash . If past history holds , the City could expect to finance approximately $18, 823. 11 . Currently, there is approximately $58 ,965 . 00 remaining in the sidewalk revolving fund . `l city of San Luis OBispo i COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Sidewalk improvements Page 2 Alternatives 1. Option 1 - Approve list as submitted. 2. Option 2 - Council may remove individual properties or entire blocks from list. Recommendation Staff recommends that Council , after making modifications as desired, direct Staff to proceed with the work. Attachments: Resolution 6031 (1986 Series) Exhibit A (New sidewalk locations) Exhibit B (Cost breakdown) APPROVED: --- C'� -- --- ---------- C' ty Administrative Officer -- - --- -- ------------- City t ey Finance Director - -"= -------------------- Projece t Manager dh b/cox/agd-50%sidewalk RESOLUTION NO. 6031 (1986 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADOPTING GENERAL CRITERIA AND SITE SELECTION PRIORITIES FOR THE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City desires that its citizens have available safe, convenient and suitably located sidewalks; and 4IITERE•.AS, many areas of the City do not have such sidewalks; and WHEREAS, the City desires such areas to be improved considering needs, hazards and the wishes of the neighborhoods, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby adopts the following: GENERAL PROGRAM CRITERA a. Sidewalk program should integrate repair and construction. b. Sidewalk program should emphasize safety, particularly safety of children. To this effect, City staff should consult with school authorities and PTAs in preparing specific donstruction priorities. c. City-initiated sidewalks should be installed only where there is a demonstrated pedestrian need. d. City should respond favorably when it is petitioned for sidewalk improvements by more than 50% of the owners of a block (those portions already improved are considered a favorable vote) . e. Sidewalk program should consider topography and significant trees. f. Council may consider scenic nature of area, desires of the neighborhood, traffic flow and other judgement items in its determinations. o LA'!1 Resolution No. 6031 (1986 Series) g. Staff will bring to Council attention those properties where more than 50% of the frontage of a block has been improved, thereby meeting 1911 Act criteria for completion of improvements within a block. SITE SELECTION PRIORITIES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW SIDEWALKS 1. In areas with safety hazards or heavy pedestrian use, especially children. 2. Along arterial and collector streets near spools, parks, churches, and neighborhood commercial centers. 3. Along local streets near schools, parks, churches, and neighborhood commercial centers. 4. In other residential and commercial areas as necessary. on motion of Councilman Griffin . seconded by Councilman Settle and on the folla4ing roll call vote: , AYES: Councilmembers Griffin, Settle, Dovey and Mayor Dunin NOES: None ASST: Councilwoman Rappa the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 15th day of July 1986. . rMAYOR RON DUNIN A CT CLEPX P VOGE4 API' OVF�D: City Administra i e fiver City�At� rney� Public Works Director Exhibit A List of properties lacking standard improvements where more than 50% of the block is already improved. Note: C = curb and gutter , S = sidewalk, D = driveway ramp Location Parcel No. Owner Improvement Req'd 2280 Meadow St. 04-832-03 Church of Christ S,C 521 Funston (and 04-833-01 M. & M. Cote S ,C Meadow St. side) *has 4 ' high dirt bank - slope 2 : 1 506 Caudill 04-902-09 J.P. & N.M. Hobbs S,C (Meadow St. side) *has asphalt berm 188 Lincoln Ave. 01-107-02 J. & M. Coia S 194 Lincoln Ave. 01-107-03 J.F. Sachs % R. Keenan S 200 Lincoln Ave. 01-107-04 J. & M. Johnson S 210 Lincoln Ave. 01-107-05 M. & J . Kaney S *has 4 ' wide brick sidewalk 226 Lincoln Ave. 01-107-07 L. P. Chrysler S *hedge across side- walk area to curb face 260 Lincoln Ave. 01-107-11 F. & M. Thompson S *two large trees in sidewalk area 777 Lincoln Ave. 01-193-04 M.M. Mello S 495 Broad Street 01-183-12 R.A. Brooks S, C, D (Lincoln St . side) 875 Mountain View 01-192-06 J. & E. Lehman S *rail fence to be moved to back of new sidewalk Vacant lot - south 01-181-12 C.B. Dalidio C,S,D side Lincoln Ave. between Broad & Hill 580 Serrano Dr. 52-163-04 J.R. & M.E. Ross S *very steep bank down into prop. fire hydrant 11--4 Exhibit A ( cont . ) LocationParcel No . _________OwnerImprov_ement_Reg ' d ----- ---------- 518 Serrano Dr . 52-543-06 B . C . Farmer , et al . S 510 Serrano Dr . 52-543-05 J . Enetsinger S 502 Serrano Dr . 52-534-08 W .R . & A. Troutner S 2146 Cypress St . 03-732-14 E . & A . Skinner S , C (Branch St . side) *four feet detached 2145 Cypress St . 03-723-26 B . & M. Jones S , C 2077 Cypress St . 03-722-24 H . Sathre S , C , D c/o H . Phillips 2031 Cypress St . 03-722-41 S . S . Oberoi S , C , D 2145 Price St . 03-732-12 Q . & J . Schopper S , C ( Branch St . side) 2n8 Patricia Dr . 52-011-25 R . & S . Schriner S , C , D rro Romauldo side) *tree in s/w area , PG&E control box in s/w area #208 , PG&E power pole in s/w area 1105 Marsh St . 02-445-0.1 P .M. Kardel S ( Santa Rosa side) 1106 Pacific St . 02-445-11 J . C . Kundert S ( Santa Rosa side ) *four feet detached 313 South Street 04-811-13 McCarthy Properties S , C , D *203-05 South St . 04-811-11 M . J . Silva S , C (This property is in a special category of : *extensive work req ' d "Committed but not yet improved" Handicapped ramp s/e corner of Beebee and South dh b/streets/heller3 Approximate cost to have work done at city contractor ' s bid prices . Goii out to formal bid, the cost may be more or less . Note: We will have new bid prices after 60 days are up. Location Owner Approximate cost 2280 Meadow Street Church of Christ 4 , 211 . 25 521 Funston Avenue Add Cote 6,032 .75 (Meadow St . side) 506 Caudill Street• Hobbs 3 , 216.05 (Meadow St . side) 188 Lincoln Avenue Coia 562 . 50 194 Lincoln Avenue Sachs, et al . 562 . 50 200 Lincoln Avenue Johnson 703 . 13 210 Lincoln Avenue Kaney 703 . 13 226 Lincoln Avenue Chrysler 703 . 13 260 Lincoln Avenue Thompson 1 , 033 . 50 777 Lincoln Avenue Mello 825 . 00 495 Broad Street Brooks 3 , 254 . 30 (Lincoln Ave. side) 875 Mountain View Lehman 907 . 50 Vacant Lot - south Dalidio 2 , 398 . 63 side Lincoln Avenue 580 Serrano Drive Ross 1 , 224 .30 518 Serrano Drive Farmer 951 . 03 510 Serrano Drive Enetsinger 951 . 03 502 Serrano Drive Troutner 1 , 311 .75 2146 Cypress Street Skinner 1 ,425 .00 (Branch St. side) 2145 Cypress Street Jones 1 ,706 . 25 2077 Cypress Street Sathre 1 , 613 . 67 2031 Cypress Street Oberoi , et al . 2 , 568 . 13 e Location _______OwnerApproximate cost 2145 Price Street Schopper 2 , 408 . 80 ( Branch St . side) 208 Patricia Drive Schriner 3 , 815 . 80 ( Cerro Romauldo side ) 1105 Marsh Street Kardel 601 . 94 ( Santa Rosa St . side) 1106 Pacific Street Kundert 1 , 065 . 00 ( Santa Rosa St . side) 313 South Street McCarthy Properties _141050_13 TOTAL 58 , 806 . 20 203-05 South Street Silva __31937_50 (being worked out in conjunction with street widening) APPROXIMATE TOTAL WITH SILVA PROPERTY 62 , 743 . 70 dh b/cox/heller2 WEETINGAGENDA WV ' '89 ITEM # M. LUCILE THOMPSON DATE 260 Lincoln Avenue San Luis Obispo, CA 93,40' C i�ilC' De Person Res d/by: ourIcil %�-,rJv �'•jr/� .S /o c� "'i�` c,��i?'LLE;ty qty larkg. T-T' ' n Fc, 17 �t�� cy •Tif�,cct�✓ -�// �v�•.cix,c_.eL�.v �ix� c�•4-ate -'EC�c1_rc__ Z7 ee !1 �,� /�-Cc�7.�.�.t--CL '��t-� '?�Lr�•��-z'�t-r�(� �l�e�..��e24/,�s'�—� .�'r��r�� , G?4Cls? G,l7� -i`z�� • L L�-�/-Q�- 1 �G<-'L' !'' �CrIG � 1- -[•c<�-��L_: . .� �•�-'�T� /�L-C_' //: ��C��«tom' `�t-!� L� /L�-•Q-/'�L'C�[�R-� K�F� �c�_ �'{'Zi-G�-�� / .`� .�Ge�•c2e .,Ci/L�ey/E,_J �. .�-� iC�tc-G� L�..t.L— ��" , . r �, Wt C:E 1 V t I 0 frx—u L�+L J OCT,2 7 1988 • ��. eCITYCLERK SAN LUIS OBISPO.CA