HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/09/1988, 3 - COASTAL STREAMS DIVERSION AND STORAGE PROJECT MEETING DATE:
November 9, 1988
WHALE ROCK COMMISSION REPORT ITE UMBER: 17
FROM: William T. Hetland Prepared by: Harold Fones
U "1'
SUBJECT:
Coastal Streams Diversion and Storage Project
BACKGROUND:
The concept of diverting eight coastal streams into the Whale Rock
reservoir was the topic of a joint meeting of City Councils of
Morro Bay and San Luis Obispo on June 26, 1986. As a result of
that meeting, the Whale Rock Commission and the City of Morro Bay
signed an agreement to share the expenses of the study, and
executed a contract with Leedshill-Herkenhoff, Inc. , to conduct the
study on our behalf.
The feasibility study was completed and submitted to the Whale Rock
Commission in June 1988. Local agencies were contacted and they
expressed interest in securing water, if sufficient supplies were
developed. The next requirement is to conduct the Environmental
Impact Report and the Watershed Surveys. In addition, there was
interest in further studies on Alternate Diversion and Storage
Plans, and Institutional and Financial Issues.
A meeting was held with staff members of the Whale Rock Commission,
the City of Morro Bay, Leedshill-Herkenhoff and representatives of
the Department of Fish and Game. The scope of work for this study
was developed as a product of the meeting. The attached contract
was reviewed by the staff of the City of Morro Bay. The contract
amount is not to exceed $167,000, with the Whale Rock share not to
exceed $83,500.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Commission approve the contract,
authorize the Chairman to sign the contract, and request Morro Bay
to approve and sign the contract..
coaststream/hal4
jj
LEEDSHILL-HERKENHOFF, INC.
303 Second Street,Suite 880 North
San Francisco,California 94107
41512439980
October 31, 1988
Mr. Harold Fones Mr. G.H. Nichols
Utilities Engineer Director of Public Works
City of San Luis Obispo City of Morro Bay
955 Morro Street 695 Harbor Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Morro Bay, CA 93442
Subject: Coastal Streams Diversion and Storage Project
Proposal for EIR and Related Studies
Dear Gentlemen:
As requested; Leedshill -Herkenhoff, Inc. has prepared a contract agreement
for providing professional services for preparation of an Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) and related studies for the Coastal Streams Diversion
and Storage Project. The following agreement was prepared in accordance
with our proposal of September 1988 and is generally consistent with the
format of the previous contract agreement for the feasibility study of the
Coastal Streams Project.
We have enclosed one signed original copy to each of the above addressees.
If you agree with the terms and conditions set forth, please sign and return
one fully executed copy at your earliest convenience.
Respectfully submitted,
l
William J. ardin
Executive Vice-President
Attachment
p880-53/ros
SAN FRANCISCO • SAN DIEGO 9 DENVER 9 ALBUQUERQUE SANTA FE PHOENIX
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
This agreement, made this day of ,
1988, by and between the Whale Rock Commission (hereinafter referred to as
"Commission") , City of Morro Bay (hereinafter referred to as "City") , and
Leedshill -Herkenhoff, Inc. , a New Mexico Corporation (hereinafter referred
to as "Engineer") .
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, Commission & City desire to prepare an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) and related studies for the Coastal Streams Diversion and
Storage Project (hereinafter referred to as "Project") ; and
WHEREAS, Commission & City desire to engage Engineer to provide the
engineering services necessary to prepare the Project by reason of the
Engineer's qualifications and experience; and WHEREAS, Engineer has avail-
able and offers to provide personnel and facilities, including that of
subcontractors, necessary to accomplish the work within the required time.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual covenants, the par-
ties hereto agree as follows:
1 . PROJECT COORDINATION
a. Commission & City. The Utilities Manager of the City of San Luis
Obispo and the Public Works Director of the City of Morro Bay
shall be the representatives of the Commission & City, respec-
tively. These representatives shall supervise the progress and
execution of this agreement.
b. Engineer. Engineer shall assign a single Project Manager to have
overall responsibility for the progress and execution of this
agreement for Engineer. Mr. Bill Bardin is hereby designated as
the Project Manager for Engineer. Should circumstances or condi -
tions subsequent to the execution of this agreement require a
substitute Project Manager for any reason, the Project Manager
designee shall be subject to the prior written acceptance and
approval of the Utilities Manager. Key members of the Engineer's
Project Team are further described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference. •The individuals iden-
tified and the positions held as described in Exhibit "A" shall
not be changed except by prior approval of the Commission & City
representatives.
-1-
2. DUTIES OF ENGINEER
a. Services to be furnished. Engineer shall provide all the planned
engineering services as set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference.
b. Laws to be observed. Engineer shall :
(1) Procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges and fees,
and give all notices which may be necessary and incidental to
the due and lawful prosecution of the services to be per-
formed by Engineer under this agreement;
(2) Keep itself fully informed of all existing and proposed
federal , state and local laws, ordinances, regulations,
orders, and decrees which may affect those engaged or em-
ployed under this agreement, any materials used in- Engineer's
performance under this agreement, or the conduct of the
services under this agreement;
(3) At all time observe and comply with, and cause all of its
employees to observe and comply with all of said laws, ordi-
nances, regulations, orders, and decrees mentioned above.
(4) Immediately report to the Commission & City representatives
in writing any discrepancy or inconsistency it discovers in
said laws, ordinances, regulations, orders, and decrees
mentioned above in relation to any plans, drawings, specifi -
cations, or provisions of this agreement.
c. Release of reports and information. Any reports, information,
data, or other materials given to, or prepared or assembled by
Engineer under this agreement shall be the property of Commission
& City and shall not be made available to any individual or orga-
nization by Engineer without the prior written approval of the
Commission & City's representative.
d. Copies of reports and information. If Commission & City request
additional copies of reports, drawings, specifications, or any
other material in addition to what the Engineer is required to
furnish in limited quantities as part of the services under this
agreement, Engineer shall provide such additional copies as are
requested, and Commission & City shall compensate Engineer for the
costs of duplicating of such copies at Engineer's direct expense.
e. Qualifications of Engineer. Engineer represents that it, along
with its subcontractors, is qualified to furnish the services
described under this agreement.
-2-
3. DUTIES OF COMMISSION & CITY
Commission & City agree to cooperate with Engineer and to perform that
work described in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated by this
reference.
4. COMPENSATION
For the services described in Exhibit "B" which are to be performed by
the Engineer., the Commission & City agree to pay, in eoual portions, and
the Engineer agrees to accept compensation in accordance with the methods
and schedules set forth in Exhibit "D" attached hereto and incorporated
by this reference.
Engineer will invoice Commission & City on a monthly basis and Commission
& City will pay within 30 days of receipt. The Engineer may not charge
more than the amount shown in Exhibit "D" without prior approval of the
Commission & City.
5. TIME FOR COMPLETION OF THE WORK
Subject to prompt reviews by Commission & City and avoidance of major
delays associated with regulatory or public agencies, Engineer shall
complete the Draft EIR within 250 days of official receipt of the Notice
to Proceed. The Final EIR shall be completed within 45 days after
receiving all comments from regulatory and public agencies. The related
studies described in Sections A, C, and D of Exhibit "C" will all be
completed within 180 days after official receipt of the Notice of
Proceed.
Time extensions may be allowed for delays caused by Commission & City,
other governmental agencies, or other factors not directly brought about
by the negligence or lack of due care on the part of the Engineer.
6. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION
The Commission & City shall have the authority to suspend this agreement
wholly or in part, for such period as he deems necessary due to unfavor-
able conditions or to the failure on the part of the Engineer to perform
any provision of this agreement. Engineer will be paid the compensation
due and payable to the date of temporary suspension.
7. SUSPENSION/TERMINATION
a. Right to suspend or terminate. The Commission & City retain the
right to terminate this agreement for any reason by notifying
Engineer in writing seven (7) days prior to termination and by
paying the compensation due and payable to the date of termina-
tion; provided, however, if this agreement is terminated for fault
-3-
of Engineer, Commission & City shall be obligated to compensate
Engineer only for that portion of consultant services which could
be of benefit to the Commission & City. Said compensation is to
be arrived at by mutual agreement of the Commission and City and
Engineer should they fail to agree, then an independent arbitrator
is to be appointed and his decision shall be binding upon the
parties.
b. Return of materials. Upon such termination, Engineer shall turn
over to the Commission & City immediately any and all copies of
studies, sketches, drawings, computations and other data, whether
or not completed, prepared by Engineer, and for which Engineer has
received reasonable compensation, or given to Engineer in connec-
tion with this agreement. Such materials shall become the perma-
nent property of Commission & City. Engineer, however, shall not
be liable for Commission & City's use of incomplete materials or
for Commission or City's use of complete documents if used for
other than the project contemplated by this agreement.
8. INSPECTION
Engineer shall furnish Commission & City with every reasonable oppor-
tunity for Commission & City to ascertain that the services of Engi-
neer are being performed in accordance with the requirements and
intentions of this agreement. All work done and all materials fur-
nished, if any, shall be subject to the Commission & City's inspection
and approval . the inspection of such work shall not relieve Engineer
of any of its obligations to fulfill its agreement as prescribed.
9. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS
All original drawings, plans, documents, and other materials prepared
by or in possession of Engineer pursuant to this agreement shall
become the permanent property of the Commission & City and shall be
delivered to the Commission & City upon demand.
10. INDEPENDENT JUDGEMENT
Failure of Commission & City to agree with Engineer's independent
findings, conclusions, or recommendations, if the same are called for
under this agreement, on the basis of differences in matters of judge-
ment shall not be construed as a failure on the part of Engineer to
meet the requirements of this agreement.
11 . ASSIGNMENT: SUBCONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES
This agreement is for the performance of professional engineering ser—
vices of the Engineer and is not assignable by the Engineer without
prior consent of the Commission & City in writing. The Engineer may
-4-
employ other specialists to perform special services as required with
prior approval by the Commission & City. Commission & City has ap-
proved Engineer's use of Harvey & Stanley Associates and Woodward-
Clyde Consultants to conduct work on the EIR related to the biological
resources and cultural resources, respectively.
12. NOTICE
All notices hereinunder shall be given in writing and mailed, postage
prepaid, by Certified Mail , addressed as follows:
To Commission: City Utilities Manager
City of San Luis Obispo
P.O. Box 8100
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403-8100
To City: Public Works Director
City of Morro Bay
695 Harbor Street
Morro Bay, CA 93442
To Engineer: d
303Second HStreet, Suite880North
San Francisco, CA 94107
13. INTEREST OF ENGINEER
Engineer covenants that it presently has no interest, and shall not
acquire any interest, direct or indirect, financial or otherwise,
which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of
the services hereunder.
Engineer further covenants that in the performance of this agreement,
no subcontractor or person having such an interest shall be employed.
Engineer certifies that no one who has or will have any financial
interest under this agreement is an officer or employee of Commission
or City. It is expressly agreed that, in the performance of the
services hereunder, Engineer shall at all times be deemed an indepen-
dent contractor and not an agent or employee of Commission or City.
14. INDEMNITY
Engineer hereby agrees to indemnify and save harmless Commission &
City, its officers, agents, and employees of and from:
1 . Any and all claims and demands which may be made against Commis-
sion, and City, their officers, agents or employees by reason of any
injury to or death of any person or corporation caused by any negli-
gent act
or omission. of Engineer under this agreement or of Engineer em-
ployees or agents;
2. Any and all damage to or destruction of any property, including
the property of Commission or City, its officers, agents, or
employees, occupied or used by or in the care, custody, or control
of the Engineer, or in proximity to the site of Engineer's work,
caused by any negligent act or omission of Engineer under - this
agreement or of Engineer's employees or agents;
3. Any and all claims and demands which may be made against Commis-
sion or City, its officers, agents, or employees by reason of any
injury to or death of or damage suffered or sustained by any
employee or agent of Engineer under this agreement, however
caused, excepting however, any such claims and demands which are
the result of the negligence or willful misconduct of Commission
or City, its officers, agents, or employees;
4. Any and all claims and demands which may be made against Commis-
sion or City, its officers, agents, or employees by reason of any
infringement or alleged infringement . of any patent rights or
claims caused by the use of any apparatus, appliance, or materials
furnished by Engineer under this agreement; and
5. Any and all penalties imposed or damages sought on account of the
violation of any law or regulation or of any term or condition of
any permit, when said violation of any law or regulation or of any
term or condition of any permit is due to negligence on the part
of the Engineer.
Engineer, at its own costs, expense, and risks, shall defend any
and all suits, actions, or other legal proceedings that may be
brought against or for employees on any such claim or demand of
such third persons, or to enforce any such penalty, and pay and
satisfy any judgement or decree that may be rendered against
Commission or City, its officers, agents, or employees in any such
suit, action or other legal proceeding, when same were due to
negligence of the Engineer.
15. WORKERS COMPENSATION
Engineer certifies that it is aware of the provisions of the Labor
Code of the State of California, which require every employer to be
insured against liability for workers compensation or to undertake
self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and it
certifies that it will comply with such provisions before commencing
the performance of the work of this agreement.
-6-
16. INSURANCE
Engineer shall provide proof of comprehensive general liability insur-
ance ($500,000) (including automobile) and professional liability
insurance ($250,000) satisfactory to the Commission & City.
17. AGREEMENT BINDING
The terms, covenants, and conditions of this agreement shall apply to,
and shall bind, the heirs, successors, executors, administrators,
assigns, and subcontractors of both parties.
18. WAIVERS
The waiver by either party of any breach or violation of any terms,
covenant, or condition of this agreement or of any provision, ordi-
nance, or law shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent
breach of violation of the same or of any other term, covenant, condi -
tion, ordinance, or law. The subsequent acceptance by either party of
any fee or other money which may become due hereunder shall not be a
waiver of any preceding breach or violation by the other party of any
term, covenant, or condition of this agreement or of any applicable
law or ordinance.
19. COST AND ATTORNEY'S FEES
The prevailing party in any action between the parties to this agree-
ment brought to enforce the terms of this agreement or arising out of
this agreement may recover its reasonable costs and attorney's fees
expended in connection with such an action from the other party.
20. DISCRIMINATION
No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons under
this agreement because of the race, color, national origin, ancestry,
religion or sex of such person.
If Engineer is found in violation of the nondiscrimination provisions
of the State of California Fair Employment Practices Act or similar
provisions of federal law or executive order in the performance of
this agreement, it shall thereby be found in material breach of this
agreement. Thereupon, Commission shall have the power to cancel or
suspend this agreement, in whole or in part, or to deduct from the
amount payable to Engineer the sum of Twenty-five Dollars ($25) for
each person for each calendar day during which such person was dis-
criminated against, as damages for said breach of contract, or both.
Only a finding of the State of California Fair Employment Practices
Commission or the equivalent federal agency or officer shall consti-
tute evidence of a violation of contract under this paragraph.
-7-
If Engineer is found in violation of the nondiscrimination provisions
of this agreement or the applicable affirmative action guidelines
pertaining to this agreement, Engineer shall be found in material
breach of this agreement. Thereupon, Commission & City shall have the
power to cancel or suspend this agreement, in whole or in part, or to
deduct from the amount payable to Engineer the sum of Two Hundred
Fifty Dollars ($250) for each calendar day during which Engineer is
found to have been in such noncompliance as damages for said breach of
contract, or both.
21. AGREEMENT CONTAINS ALL UNDERSTANDINGS
This document represents the entire and integrated agreement between
Commission & City and Engineer and supersedes all prior negotiations,
representations, or agreements, either written or oral . This document
may be amended only by written instrument, signed by Commission, City,
and Engineer. All provisions of this agreement are expressly made
conditions. This agreement shall be governed- by the laws of the State
of California.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Commission, City, and Engineer have executed this
agreement on the day and year first above written.
LEEDSHILL-HERKENHOFF., INC. WHALE ROCK COMMISSION
By. . By
William JBardin E. Douglas Gerard
Executive Vice President Chairperson
Whale Rock Commission
CITY OF MORRO BAY
By:
City Manager
CIty of Morro Bay
p880-53.agr/ros53b,erl229c
-8-
E X H I B I T "A"
Project Team
LEEDSHILL-HERKENHOFF, INC.
Project Manager William Bardin
Project Engineer Robert Sverak
Engineering Support Polly Boissevain, Ed Boscacci ,
Joan Kersnar, Elizabeth Teien,
Cynthia Wetmore, and Mark
Williamson
HARVEY & STANLEY ASSOCIATES
Principal John Stanley
Project Manager Donald Alley
Fishery Biologist Dr. Jerry Smith
Botanist K. Lyons
Wildlife Biologist D. Suddjian
WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS
Project Manager R. Keith Julian
EXHIBIT ''W'
Engineering Services
SCOPE OF WORK
A. ALTERNATIVE DIVERSION AND STORAGE PLANS
This work is included as a result of the San Luis Obispo City Council 's
request to evaluate alternative storage sites and/or diversions to the
proposed concept which would not rely on the use of Whale Rock Reservoir,.
LH will draw extensively on the knowledge and experience gained during the
feasibility study to conduct the following tasks in a prompt and cost-
effective manner.
Task 1: Evaluate Feasibility of Alternative Concepts
In this task, specific alternatives to the proposed plans described and
evaluated in the feasibility study, which focused on use of Whale Rock
Reservoir, will be identified. Using the hydrologic data previously devel-
oped, LH will evaluate the general feasibility of the following two alter-
native plans which will not require the use of Whale Rock Reservoir:
(1) Use, of a hypothetical allocation of storage from .San Bernardo
Creek Reservoir to develop a firm yield for the Coastal Streams
Project;
(2) Use of Chorro Reservoir and direct diversions (i .e. , no storage)
in lieu of Whale Rock Reservoir.
Because these additional storage facilities will be linked to the existing
Whale Rock Pipeline, the stream diversions will again be assumed to come
from the four northerly streams which include the two largest project
streams. In this task, the two alternative plans will be reviewed to
identify hydraulic operations, evaluate potential yield, and identify
environmental , regul.atory, legal , and institutional considerations. Much
of the background data and methodologies needed for this work were previ-
ously developed in LH's recently completed feasibility study on the Proj-
ect. The costs associated with utilizing a portion of the San Bernardo
Creek Reservoir are assumed to be developed independently by the CITY's
consultant on the San Bernardo Creek Reservoir.
Task 2: Prepare Report
The results of these additional feasibility studies will be documented in a
supplement to the final report on the feasibility study for the project.
Six (6) copies of a draft report will be issued to the COMMISSION & CITY
for their review. Following incorporation of comments, twenty (20) copies
of the supplemental report will then be provided to the COMMISSION & CITY
for distribution. The report will be similar in format to. the final report
of the feasibility study but much of the background and general discussions
will be omitted in order to simplify the report. LH has assumed that a
formal presentation of the report will not be necessary.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR)
Six major tasks have been identified to describe the anticipated work
effort required to conduct a complete environmental review of the project,
including numerous studies, compliance with all CEQA procedures and regula-
tions, and preparation of the actual EIR documents. Each of these six
major tasks are described in detail below.
LH will coordinate the following work with ongoing studies for San Bernardo
Creek Dam by the CITY'S consultant in order to minimize costs and avoid
duplication of effort to the greatest extent possible. If possible, LH
will also draw upon the State Department of Water Resources' work on the
EIR for the Coastal Branch of the State Water Project (currently underway)
and the Soil Conservation Service's ongoing work on sedimentation in the
Chorro Creek drainage area.
Task 1: Conduct Preliminary Project Assessment
The purpose of this task is to determine the scope of the EIR prior to
commencing work on the EIR or initiating environmental studies. Local
environmental regulations will also be reviewed to determine local environ-
mental requirements for the project in addition to requirements set forth
in CEQA. Three subtasks describe the work to be performed in this task:
Subtask la: Diversion Dam Site Location
The purpose of the site location and definition subtask is to select
potential sites for project diversion dams, with consideration given
to general technical issues, including topography and geology, and to
be able to define the project's impacted area as precisely as possible
for further environmental studies. Technical areas of interest in-
clude analysis of alluvial material and bank location and stability.
A general location for each diversion structure will also help to
define the scope of the studies of biological resources. DFG has
indicated that in order to be able to assess impacts, they would like
to know the location of project diversion facilities within ±100
yards.
LH personnel will inspect proposed diversion sites on each of the four
northerly streams. If appropriate, alternative sites will be identi-
fied and evaluated based on the field inspection, discussions with
regulatory agencies, and cost implications.
The COMMISSION & CITY are expected to assist LH in identifying and
contacting landowners directly affected by the project. The COMMIS-
SION & CITY will also be expected to obtain any necessary right-of-
entry and field testing approvals or permits from landowners. De-
tailed aerial mapping, which definitely will be needed later in the
design phase of project implementation, has not been included in the
scope of work and associated fee estimate for this task.
Subtask 1b: Conduct Local Environmental Review
In this subtask, local environmental requirements will be reviewed to
determine what local permits and/or procedures may be needed for the
project. Several environmental documents or review procedures re-
quired by San Luis Obispo County have been identified.
All necessary forms, guidelines, and applications will be obtained and
reviewed to determine local requirements. In addition, the appropri-
ate county agencies will be contacted to determine additional require-
ments.
Subtask lc: Identify Responsible Agencies for EIR Process
CEQA requires that agencies with jurisdiction over or interest in any
resources affected by the project must be contacted. Responsible
agencies are those federal , state, or local agencies which have juris-
diction by law over some aspect of the project approval procedures.
The agencies listed below will be contacted:
Federal Agencies
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
State Agencies
- State Department of Fish and Game - biological resources
- State Water Resources Control Board - water rights, water
quality, cultural resources
- State Coastal Commission - lands within coastal zone
- State Department of Health Services - water supply
- State Department of Transportation - lands within Highway 1
right-of-way
Local Agencies
County of San Luis Obispo - local regulations
City of Morro Bay - local regulations
The California State Office of Permit Assistance will be contacted to
determine if any other agencies have jurisdiction over the project.
Task 2: Prepare Notice of Preparation (NOP)
The NOP is the procedural device used to formally announce that an EIR will
be prepared, and, hence, to initiate consultations with interested public
agencies and private interests. The NOP also gives notice on the location
and date for a scoping meeting to receive public comments on the scope of
the EIR. While a scoping meeting is not required by CEQA, LH recommends
conducting one in order to expedite the EIR process and minimize potential
conflicts. The NOP provides information on the project and must be sent to
any federal , state, or local agency with jurisdiction over the Project.
Once received, agencies have 30 days to respond with comments on the scope
and content of issues which need to be addressed in the EIR.
LH will prepare the NOP by drawing on its prior work on the Coastal Streams
Project Feasibility Study. The NOP will include a Project description,
location maps, and a list of anticipated environmental effects from the
project.
A total of six (6) copies of the draft NOP will be sent to the COMMISSION &
CITY for their review. Following incorporation of comments, a finalized
version of the NOP will be provided to the COMMISSION & CITY. The COMMIS-
SION & CITY will then be responsible for transmitting official copies of
the NOP to each Responsible Agency by certified mail or any other method
which provides a record of receipt. LH will supply the COMMISSION & CITY
with a complete list of addresses for the Responsible Agencies. The COMMIS-
SION & CITY will also be responsible for notifying the State Office of
Planning and Research, and transmitting copies of the NOP.
Task 3: Conduct Environmental Studies
As part of the EIR process, several environmental studies will need to be
conducted in order to assess the potential impacts of the Project. These
studies are addressed in three subtasks, outlined below.
Subtask 3a: Hydrologic & Hydraulic Studies
Various hydrologic and hydraulic data will be needed to evaluate
impacts on biological resources such as fish, vegetation, and wild-
life. Again, much of the required data have already been developed by
LH in the feasibility study. The following work will be performed
using the available data as a starting point:
comparative analyses of daily, monthly, and annual flow volumes
for "with" and "without" project conditions on each stream;
comparative analyses of typical streamflow depths and velocities
in each stream;
- assessment of potential flood hazards using basic hydraulic
calculations;
re-evaluation of project yield using recommended in-stream re-
leases from biological resources.
Rough topographic information will also be collected from field in-
spections as part of this task.
Subtask 3b: Fisheries Studies
A thorough study of fisheries habitats will be conducted to assess
types and approximate numbers of native fish using project streams,
the anticipated impacts on these fisheries from implementation of the
Project, and the required in-stream releases to avoid significant
adverse impacts. If necessary, potential mitigation measures will be
suggested.
The following work items will be performed:
Records search and field reconnaissance study to identify fish-
ery resources in all project streams below diversion points, in
upper reach of Little Morro Creek, and in lagoon areas identified
at mouths of project streams;
- Determine timing and extent of lagoon formation at mouth of Toro
and Morro Creeks using observations by CITY personnel ;
- Determine in-stream releases and associated requirements for
steelhead passage and migration on each project stream;
- Perform In-stream Flow Incremental Methodology (IFIM) modelling
below the diversion point on Morro Creek to assess steelhead
habitat conditions as a function of stream discharge;
- Assess potential impacts of in-stream construction of diversion
facilities and fish ladders; also assess potential impacts on
fish life of pumping water into Whale Rock Reservoir;
- Evaluate alternative project designs and identify potential
release schedules to avoid significant adverse impacts to fishery
resources.
COMMISSION & CITY will assist in these studies by notifying LH when
lagoons first open in fall and permanently close in spring. COMMIS-
SION & CITY will also check the mouths of stream on a weekly basis to
record whether sandbars are open or closed and will provide any knowl-
edge on past observations regarding the lagoon areas. If desired,
C014MISSION & CITY could also provide personnel to assist in collection
of field data for the IFIM studies and thereby defray a significant
amount of costs.
Depending on the findings of the Little Morro Creek fishery survey,
DFG may require an IFIM study for Little Morro Creek. This item has
not been included in the above scope of work or associated fee.
Accordingly, it has been identified under Section E as a potential
Additional Service.
Subtask 3c: vegetation Study
The purpose of the vegetation study will be to describe the vegetation
within the project area and to identify any rare, threatened or endan-
gered plant species which occur in the project construction area.
The following work items will be performed:
Perform field reconnaissance of project streams from the inun-
dated area at the diversion points to stream mouths in order to
characterize principal plant species. Information on plant
community types and extent will be mapped and a plant species
list will be prepared;
Evaluate the potential occurrence of rare, threatened or endan-
gered plant species. The evaluation will include a review of the
California Natural Diversity Data Base, discussions with bota-
nists and regulatory agencies, a habitat assessment to determine
potential of occurrence, and a spring survey. Findings will be
included in the mapping and lists described above;
Evaluate the potential impacts of the proposed project on vegeta-
tion, including impacts due to changes in stream levels and
frequency of inundation and project construction. DFG will be
consulted to identify concerns of potential impacts to vegetation
resources.. Alternative measures to mitigate significant im-
pacts will be suggested.
Subtask 3d: Wildlife Study
The purpose of the wildlife study will be to describe wildlife habitat
and use in the project area. The following work items will be per-
formed:
Perform field reconnaissance of project streams from the inun-
dated area at diversions to stream mouths in order to character-
ize principal wildlife species. Site visits will be conducted in
winter and early spring, both to correspond to the extent of the
diversion season, and to survey the site when wildlife use is
expected to be the greatest;
Prepare list of observed and predicted wildlife species, using
field observations, data base information, discussions with other
regional biologists, and other readily available information;
Identify potential presence of species of special concern, and
map sensitive and/or critical habitat areas, as applicable.
Evaluate potential impacts of the proposed project on wildlife
resources and identify options for mitigation of significant
impacts.
Subtask 3e: Cultural Resources Study
A cultural resources study is required to determine whether any ar-
chaeological resources will be affected by the project. The study
will consist of the following work items:
Perform records search of the California Archaeological Inventory
to determine whether the Project area has been surveyed previ-
ously and the findings of such a survey;
Perform field reconnaissance of project area from the inundated
area at the diversions to the stream mouth in order to identify
the potential presence of significant archaeological resources;
Recommend options for mitigating impacts of significant archaeo-
logical resources which have been identified;
Document research, finding and recommendations.
As indicated, all of the above environmental studies include identifying
or suggesting potential mitigation options to be explored in the event that
unavoidable adverse impacts are discovered. However, based on our current
knowledge of the impacted area, such impacts are not expected to occur.
Development and detailed analysis of potential mitigation measures are not
included in the scope of work or in associated fee estimates.
Task 4: Prepare Draft EIR
The EIR is an informational document which will inform decision-makers and
the public of the significant environmental effects of the proposed proj-
ect, identify possible ways to minimize the significant effects, and de-
scribe reasonable alternatives to the project. It will ultimately be a
decision-making tool for the COMMISSION & CITY in determining whether to
formally approve the proposed project.
This task involves the work effort required in preparing and circulating
the Draft EIR. Findings and results from the studies conducted in Task 3
and other analyses within this task will be incorporated into the Draft EIR
in accordance with CEQA regulations.
This task has been divided into three main subtasks: (1) Literature Re-
view, (2) Prepare Draft EIR, and (3) Circulate Draft EIR. Work items for
each Subtask are discussed in the sections below.
Subtask 4a: Literature Review
A literature review will be conducted to derive benefit from previous
studies, and to avoid duplication of work. The literature review will
include, but not be limited to, the following:
Coastal Streams Diversion and Storage Project, Feasibility
Study, Final Report, LEEDSHILL-HERKENHOFF, INC. , 1988.
Toro Creek Groundwater Resource Study for City of Morro Bay,
Woodward-Clyde Consultants, 1986.
Draft Environmental Impact Report, City Applications for
Appropriative Water Rights to 1 ,723.5 acre-feet per year of
Morro Creek and Chorro Creek Underflow, Michael Brandman
Associates, Inc. , 1985.
- Proposed Land Use Plan of the Local Coastal Program, City of
Morro Bay, 1982.
Subtask 4b: Prepare Draft EIR
LH will prepare the complete Draft EIR in accordance with CEQA regula-
tions. LH will provide the COMMISSION & CITY with ten (10) copies
for preliminary review of the Draft EIR.
The Draft EIR will include all necessary contents and analyses as
required by the CEQA statutes and guidelines governing EIR prepara-
tion:
Executive Summary - A brief summary of the proposed project and its
consequences which identifies each significant impact with proposed
mitigation measures and alternatives, areas of controversy, and issues
to be resolved.
Project Description - Identifies the location and boundaries of the
proposed project on a map, the objectives of the proposed project, a
general description of the technical , economic, and environmental
characteristics of the project, and the intended uses of the EIR.
Environmental Setting - A description of the environment in the vicin-
ity of the project, prior to the commencement of the project, from
both a local and regional perspective.
The Environmental Setting will cover the following areas:
- Geographical setting
- Hydrology
- Soils and geology
- Water quality
- Biological resources (aquatic and terrestrial issues, rare
and endangered species)
- Cultural resources
- Socio-economic impacts
- Energy use
- Local Planning Issues
- Land Use
Environmental Impacts - Description of the direct and indirect signif-
icant impacts of the proposed project, including a discussion of
resource's involved, physical changes, alterations of ecological sys-
tems, health and safety problems caused by the changes and other
aspects such as scenic quality and public services.
If the assessment of the environmental impacts identifies any signifi-
cant adverse impacts which cannot be avoided if the proposal is imple-
mented, a discussion of mitigation measures proposed to minimize the
significant impacts will be included. The potential for growth induc-
ing impacts of the project must also be addressed.
Cumulative Environmental Impacts - Discussion of significant cumula-
tive impacts from the project.
Effects Not Found to be Significant - A brief statement of reasons
that various possible significant effects were found not to be signif-
icant.
Alternatives to the Proposed Project - A description of reasonable
alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which
would attain the same basic objectives of the project. LH will com-
pare the merits of the Coastal Streams Project against reasonable
alternatives such as the State Water Project, a Nacimiento Pipeline,
and additional groundwater development.
Organizations and Persons Consulted - Identification of all federal ,
state or local agencies, other organizations and private individuals
consulted in preparing the Draft EIR.
Economics and Social Effects - Address social or economic effects
caused by the proposed project. This work element will include an
evaluation of local water demands and current supplies and how they
relate to water supply costs and municipal water rates.
Subtask 4c: Circulate Draft EIR for Public Review
Once completed, the public must be notified that the Draft EIR is
available for review and that a public hearing will be conducted to
receive comments on the document. Copies of the Notice of Completion
(NOC) and Draft EIR are provided to the State Clearinghouse, which
circulates the Draft to appropriate state agencies. Other agencies
must also be contacted, and the Draft must be made available for
public review. CEQA requires a minimum of 45 days review time for the
Draft EIR when State agencies are involved.
The NOC will include a brief description of the project, the location
of the project, an address where copies of the Draft EIR are avail -
able, the period during which comments will be received on the Draft
EIR, and the time and location of a public hearing to receive comments
on the document.
LH will prepare the NOC and will provide COMMISSION & CITY with a
finalized version of the NOC and Draft EIR. The COMMISSION & CITY
will be responsible for reproduction of the Draft EIR, transmittal to
Responsible Agencies and interested parties, and public notification
of the availability of the document, as outlined below.
The COMMISSION & CITY will be responsible for the following:
Transmittal of NOC and ten (10) copies of the Draft EIR to the
Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and copies of the NOC to
all other interested parties. OPR will then contact all Respon-
sible State Agencies and transmit the Draft EIR for comments.
Furnishing copies for public viewing at local public libraries
and COMMISSION & CITY offices.
In accordance with CEQA, the COMMISSION & CITY must also perform at
least one of the following:
- At least one advertisement of public notice in a newspaper of
general circulation in the area affected by the proposed proj-
ect.
Posting of notice by the public agency on and off site in the
proposed project area.
- Direct mailing notifying owners of property contiguous to the
proposed project.
Task 5: Conclude EIR Process
The conclusion of the EIR includes preparation of the Final EIR, certifi-
cation and adoption of the EIR by the COMMISSION & CITY, and filing of' the
Notice of Determination (NOD) with appropriate parties. LH will prepare
the Final EIR and NOD. The work effort for these subtasks is described
below. Tasks required to .complete certification, adoption, and filing of
the EIR are enumerated under COMMISSION & CITY responsibilities.
Subtask 5a: Prepare Final EIR
The Draft EIR will be revised to incorporate comments received during
the public review period and proposals for or revisions to mitigation
plans. LH will prepare a preliminary version of the Final EIR which
includes the contents as specified below. LH will provide ten (10)
copies of the preliminary document to the COMMISSION & CITY for their
review. LH will incorporate comments from the review process and
provide the COMMISSION & CITY with a finalized version of the Final
EIR for certification, reproduction, and distribution.
The Final EIR will include the following items:
- The Draft EIR or a revision of the Draft.
- Comments and recommendations received on the Draft EIR
either verbatim or in summary.
- A list of persons, organizations, and public agencies com-
menting on the Draft EIR.
- The responses of the COMMISSION & CITY to significant envi-
ronmental points raised in the review and consultation
process.
- Other information added by the COMMISSION & CITY, deemed
required as a result of the public comment process.
Subtask 5b: Prepare Notice of Determination (NOD)
An NOD must be prepared and filed to signify the official ending of
the EIR process. LH will prepare the NOD and will provide the COMMIS-
SION & CITY with a completed copy for filing. The NOD will include
all required aspects as stipulated by CEQA.
Once the final EIR is completed, the COMMISSION & CITY must "certify" it.
The certification process includes a review to determine the document is in
compliance with CEQA requirements, and review and consideration of the
content of the EIR, prior to its adoption by the COMMISSION & CITY. LH
will assist the COMMISSION & CITY in assuring that all CEQA regulations
have been followed.
In this task, the COMMISSION & CITY will be responsible for the following:
- Certification of the EIR including a review to determine the
document is in compliance with CEQA, and review and consideration
of the content of the EIR.
- Filing copies of the Notice of Determination with the County
Clerk in San Luis Obispo County and the State Office of Planning
and Research.
- Reproduction of copies of the Final EIR for distribution.
- Filing a copy of the Final EIR with city and county planning
agencies and distribution to Responsible Agencies.
The extent of the required work effort to finalize an EIR is almost entire-
ly dependent on the number and nature of public comments and protests
resulting from review of the Draft EIR. However, since LH will maintain
close contact with the regulatory agencies and interested parties through-
out the work, unanticipated comments and protests should be minimal .
Task 6: Attend Meetings and Prepare Presentations
Due to the importance of the project and the public interest it will gener-
ate, close communication and coordination with the various organizations
involved will be emphasized throughout the study to ensure that valuable
knowledge is shared. and all interested parties are kept well -informed at
all times.
As required by job progress and/or requested by the COMMISSION & CITY,
appropriate members of the project team will make presentations to . and/or
attend meetings of the COMMISSION & CITY and will assist COMMISSION & CITY
staff in public meetings as necessary.
LH anticipates that the following six (6) meetings will be sufficient to
carry out the EIR process:
(1) A "kick-off" meeting to review the scope of work, define respon-
sibilities and communication links, and review the project sched-
ule.
(2) Scoping Meeting to present the project and receive comments on
scope of EIR.
(3) One public hearing as recommended in CEQA to present the Draft
EIR and receive public comment.
(4) Three (3) separate, additional meetings with COMMISSION & CITY
(staff, Councils, etc. ) to present findings, discuss approach,
and receive input.
In addition to the above meetings, project personnel will have the opportu-
nity to meet with COMMISSION & CITY on other occasions when field work is
being conducted. LH will coordinate closely with COMMISSION & CITY staff
to keep them informed of all new developments, and to actively involve them
in EIR process.
C. WATERSHED SURVEYS
As part of the State Department of Health Services (DOHS) permitting pro-
cess for municipal water supply projects, a watershed survey will be re-
quired for each project stream. The purpose of the survey is to describe
each watershed, identify land use within each drainage area of the project,
and identify any potential sources of contaminants to the water supply in
order to characterize existing water quality and to assess treatment re-
quirements. Examples of problem sources include discharges from septic
tanks, dairies, mines, agricultural return flows, or waste disposal sites.
The extent of the work effort required for this task is relatively propor-
tional to the number of streams and size of the watersheds to be included
in the environmental review.
Three tasks have been identified for the watershed surveys. These tasks
are discussed below.
Task 1: Review and Comaile Relevant Data
Relevant data will be compiled to make maximum use of available water
quality information for the watersheds. Data to be provided by the COMMIS-
SION & CITY include land use/ownership information and maps, and water
quality sampling data, if available. Most of this information should be
readily available.
Task 2: Conduct Field Investigation of Watershed
A field investigation will be conducted to identify potential naturally
occurring and man-made sources of contamination to the water supply. In
the field investigation, land uses and activities detrimental to water
quality will be documented. Issues of concern in the survey are:
- effect of precipitation, terrain, soil types and land cover;
animal populations and potential for Giardia contamination;
point sources of contamination such as private septic systems or
industrial discharges;
non-point sources of contamination such as pesticide usage,
grazing animals, or recreation activities.
Task 3: Conduct Water Quality Sampling Program
A water quality sampling program will be performed to assess existing water
quality. Sampling will be on a one-time basis effort and will be timed to
correspond with the diversion season and when flows are in the range of
Project divertible flows. Water quality tests to be performed are:
- bacteriological
- general mineral
- general physical
- inorganics
- vol'atile organics
- Title 22 organics
- radioactivity
It is assumed that the City of San Luis Obispo will conduct laboratory
testing for the bacteriological , general mineral and general physical
analyses.
The water quality of the project watersheds is expected to be similar to
that in the Whale Rock Reservoir watershed and, therefore, should not
present any unusual problems.
Task 4: Prepare Report and Watershed Maps
A report and watershed maps will be prepared documenting findings of the
research and field investigation. The report and maps will consist of:
limits and types of development in the watershed;
- potential point or non-point pollutant sources which have been
identified;
land use and ownership within the watersheds.
The report will be incorporated into the EIR as an appendix.
i
D. INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL ISSUES
This work element is included as a result of the San Luis Obispo City
Council 's request to include an evaluation of institutional and financial
issues in the EIR. Each of these issues, and some possible institutional
arrangements were briefly examined in the Feasibility Study Final Report
(see sections 7.1 and 7.2) . This work element will involve the following
three tasks:
Task 1: Analyze Institutional and Financial Issues
This task will consist of an in-depth analysis of the many complex institu-
tional and financial issues related to potential implementation and opera-
tion of the project. Several alternatives for potential arrangements for
use of the Whale Rock System and financing new facilities for the Coastal
Streams Project will be examined. These arrangements involve provisions
for cost-sharing of capital construction costs, allocation of reservoir or
Project yield, and sharing of annual operations and maintenance costs and
responsibilities. In evaluating these issues, LH will consider the value
of the existing Whale Rock facilities and the proposed financing which the
CITY has obtained from the State .and the City's .application for appropriative
water rights:
LH recognizes the need for and importance of an equitable agreement which
protects the current interests of the COMMISSION relative to the existing
Whale Rock system while also distributing the costs and benefits of the
Coastal Streams Project to participating entities in a fair and reasonable
manner.
LH will review agreements of similar water supply projects and the basic
principles underlying such agreements in order to provide the COMMISSION &
CITY with a sound basis for developing necessary contractual agreements for
implementation and operation of the Project. Alternative arrangements for
sharing of costs and yield will be analyzed and hypothetical results will
be presented. Both capital and 0&M costs will be allocated to each in-
volved agency under a variety of potential arrangements for consideration
by the COMMISSION & CITY.
Task 2: Prepare Report
LH will prepare a complete report which summarizes the various institution-
al and financial issues and various alternative means for resolution of
these issues. Tabulations of projected costs and water supply availability
to each agency will be presented in a draft report. Twenty (20) copies of
the draft report will be provided to the COMMISSION & CITY for distribution
to all interested parties. After meeting to review and discuss the alter-
native methodologies, LH will prepare a set of recommendations for prepara-
tion of fair, equitable contract agreements for implementation and opera-
tion of the Coastal Streams Project. These recommendations will then be
incorporated into a final report. Twenty (20) copies of the draft report
will be provided to the COMMISSION & CITY for distribution. The report
will be included in the EIR as an appendix, if appropriate.
Task 3: Prepare Presentation and Attend Meeting
LH will prepare a formal presentation based on the draft or final report,
at the option of the COMMISSION & CITY, and present it to a joint meeting
of the COMMISSION & CITY. The purpose of this meeting will be to review
and discuss alternative arrangements and/or LH's recommendations for devel -
oping cost-sharing and operating agreements between the various entities
involved.
E. ADDITIONAL SERVICES
If requested and authorized by COMMISSION & CITY, the following additional
services will be provided:
1 . Electro-'fishing surveys to identify fish species occurring within the
Project area.
(Based on H&S's understanding of DFG's requests, these surveys are not
expected to be required on the four northerly streams. However, if
concerns over introduction of new species of fish into Whale Rock
Reservoir become critical , such surveys may be necessary.)
2. Detailed topographic and boundary surveys and/or aerial mapping of
the project area.
3. Detailed hydraulic analysis of potential flood hazards using the HEC-2
or similar program.
(Depending on .their location, the diversion structures may cause a
significant increase in inundated lands during major storms. However,
based on preliminary locations and knowledge of surrounding land use,
this concern does not appear to be critical .)
4. In-stream flow incremental methodology (IFIM) modelling for Little
Morro or Willow Creeks and/or additional stations on Morro Creek.
(DFG has indicated that IFIM modelling may be requested if steelhead
are found in Little Morro Creek.)
5. Soils investigations and testing.
6. Development and detailed analysis of mitigation measures which are not
within the scope of the project defined in LH's feasibility study.
(Unavoidable adverse impacts can sometimes be mitigated by improving
habitats elsewhere -- possibly on other non-project streams. Due to
the obvious uncertainties involved, this item was not included in the
fee estimate. Furthermore, unavoidable adverse impacts are not antic-
ipated.)
7. Additional meetings or presentations not specified in Task B.6 or Task
D.3.
8. Fish sampling and analysis at Whale Rock Reservoir.
9. Developing monitoring program for riparian and/or fisheries habitat.
(Such a program is sometimes stipulated as a mitigation measure.)
10. Conducting in-depth baseline study of riparian- vegetation.
(Such a study will provide COMMISSION & CITY with a detailed
inventory of existing conditions -- used as "insurance" in case
of future protests over impact of project.)
11. Preparation of construction designs for diversion, intake, and fish
ladder structures.
(Conceptual designs for DFG review are included in Scope of Work but
complete engineered design is expected to occur in the project design
phase.) -
12. Preparation of progress reports or other written documents not speci-
fied in the Scope of Work.
13. Sampling and in-depth analysis of sediment transport in project
streams.
14. Any other items not specifically mentioned above which were not clear-
ly anticipated in the Scope of Work.
EXHIBIT
Commission. & Ci:ty=Furni'shed Serv.i:ces.
F. COMMISSION & CITY-FURNISHED SERVICES
The COMMISSION & CITY will provide the following:
1 . Right-of-entry permits/agreements for site inspections, surveys, or
geotechnical investigations.
2. Assistance with land ownership surveys and contacts as specified in
Subtask B.la.
3. Assistance with collection of field data including lagoon surveys as
outlined in Subtask B.3b.
4. Public notification of the Draft EIR as specified in B.4c.
5. Furnishing copies of the Draft EIR for public viewing at local public
libraries and COMMISSION & CITY offices.
6. Scheduling facilities for the scoping meeting and public hearings and
providing equipment, such as public address system and overhead pro-
jector, for the meetings.
7. Reproduction and transmittal of Notice of Preparation to the State
Office of Planning and Research, Responsible Agencies, and interested
parties.
8. Reproduction and transmittal of the Notice of Completion and Draft EIR
to State Office of Planning and Research, Federal and Local Responsi-
ble Agencies, and other interested parties.
9. Certification and approval of the Final EIR.
10. Reproduction of copies of the Draft and Final EIR for distribution.
11. Filing copies of the Notice of Determination with the County Clerk in
San Luis Obispo County and the State Office of Planning and Research,
filing copies of the Final EIR with city and county planning agencies
and distribution of the Final EIR to Responsible Agencies and inter-
ested parties.
12. Water quality sampling and testing ,at the City of San Luis Obispo's
existing treatment plant.
E X H I B I T "D"
Compensation
1 . Consulting engineering services will be provided in accordance with
Standard Fee Schedules of LEEDSHILL-HERKENHOFF, INC. , and its two
subcontractors, Harvey & Stanley Associates, and Woodward-Clyde
Consultants.
2. ' The total fee for all work specifically described in Sections A through
D in Exhibit "B" is estimated at $167,000. LEEDSHILL-HERKENHOFF, INC.
and its subcontractors will work on a "time and materials" basis with
total billings not to exceed $167,000. LEEDSHILL-HERKENHOFF, INC. 's
total fee will not exceed $167,000 without written authorization from
the Whale Rock Commission and the City of Morro say.
3. Fees for Additional Services will be established at the time such
services are requested and authorized by the Whale Rock Commission and
the City of Morro Bay.
MLEEDSHILL•HERKENHOFF, INC.
1988 STANDARD SCHEDULE OF FEES
LEEDSHILL-HERKENHOFF follows the method set forth in Manual No. 45 of the American
Society of Civil Engineers for establishing fees. A new schedule of charges is
issued at the beginning of each year. Unless other arrangements have been made,
fees for all work, including projects initiated in the prior year, are based on the
new schedule of charges.
PERSONNEL
Personnel charges for staff time spent on technical work, including typing and
preparation of reports, are computed by multiplying salary cost by 2.5. Salary cost
includes direct payroll costs, payroll taxes, vacation, holidays, sick leave, re-
tirement, and employee insurance. Current rates are as follows:
Classification Hourly Salary Cost
Technical typing and aides $11.00 to $20.00
Technical Librarian 12.00 to 20.00
Drafter 12.00 to 20.00
Designer 18.00 to 25.00
Design Engineer 16.00 to 24.00
Assistant Engineer 19.00 to 27.00
Engineer 22.00 to 30.00
Senior Engineer 24.00 to 34.00
Principal Engineer/Geologist 30.00 to 48.00
Time spent in travel in the interest of the client is charged at standard rates but
no more than 8 hours travel time is charged for any day. Time spent in court,
hearings or depositions on behalf of the client is charged at 150% of the above
rates, with a minimum of 4 hours charged for an a.m. or p.m. appearance and a
minimum of 8 hours charged for an a.m. and a p.m. appearance.
SERVICES OF CONSULTING SPECIALIST AND SUBCONTRACTORS
For reimbursement for the amounts paid by the Engineer to each consultant and sub-
contractor for services and expenses directly connected with the work: Actual cost
plus 10% service charge.
DIRECT EXPENSES
For reimbursement of direct expenses incurred solely in performance of the work
including, but not limited to, subsistence, lodging, and transportation expenses for
personnel while working in the field; communication expenses; in-house computer
operations; and charges for printing and reproduction: Actual costs plus 10% ser-
vice charge. Charges are not made for general secretarial service, office manage-
ment, accounting, and maintenance since these items are included in overhead.
INVOICES
Invoices are rendered monthly, either as a final or partial billing, and are payable
upon receipt unless other arrangements have been made previously.
880601/schedule.fee/2a
HARVEY AND STANUEY. ASS®CIATES, INC.
LCCLC .:b Q C'JNSULT. NiS • Ef•dVIRONMEit\I <=i PLANNEPS . PESOUKE MANAGERS
❑ MAIN OFFICE: ❑ CENTRAL COAST OFFICE:
906 ELIZABETH ST., P.O.DRAWER-E 6001 BUTLER LANE,SUITE#1
ALVISO.CA 95002 SCOTTS VALLEY,CA 95066
(408)263-1814 (408)438-4102
FEE SCHEDULE. - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Professional and Technical Personnel
Principal - H . T. Harvey (P) . . . . . . $ 95 . 00 per hour
J. T. Stanley ( P ) 85 . 00 per hour
R. R. Duke ( P) 85 . 00 per hour
Senior Associate ( SA) . . . . . . . . . 90 . 00 per hour
Associate ( A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 . 00 per hour
Division Head ( DH ) . . . . . . . . . . . 50 . 00-70 . 00 per hour
Senior Project Manager ( SPM ) . . . . . . 50 . 00 per hour
Project Manager ( PM) . 40 . 00 per hour
Assistant Project Manager (APM ) . . . . 40. 00 per hour
Field Supervisor ( FS ) . . . . . . . . . 40 . 00 per hour
Field Investigator ( FI ) . . . . . . . . 30 . 00-40 . 00 per hour
Field Assistant (FA) . . . . . . . . . . 25 . 00 per hour
Support Staff (word processing ,
graphics, etc . ) ( SS ) . . . . . . . . 30 . 00 per hour
Subcontractural Consultants ( SC ) . . . . Cost + 20%
Direct Expenses*
Blueprints , Reproduction . . . . . . . . . . At Cost
Materials & Supplies . . . . . . . . . . . . At Cost
Transportation ( 2-wheel drive vehicle ) . . . $ . 25 per mile
Transportation ( 4-wheel drive or heavy
duty truck ) to and from job-site . . . . $ . 35 per mile
Transportation ( 4-wheel drive or heavy
duty truck ) on job-site . . . . . . . . . $55 . 00 per day
plus . . . . . . . . . . . 35 per day
Travel Per Diem-( field/rural/urban ) . . . . $50/75/100 per day
Computer Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . Variable
Field Equipment Operation Fee . . . . . . . Variable
Other Outside Charges and/or Services . . . At Cost
* 10% Service Fee on all direct expenses
Effective August 1 , 1988
1988 SCHEDULE OF CHARGES
This Schedule of Charges applies to services rendered in the current year and until a new schedule of charges is issued. 1,
new schedule of charges is issued at the beginning of each year. Unless other arrangements have been made, charges for all
services, including continuing projects initiated in the prior year,will be based on the new schedule of charges.
Service of Personnel
Personnel charges are for professional, technical, and support services at an hourly rate for time directly related to pro-
jects. Charges are made for technical typing in the preparation of reports and the time for printing as in the production of
reports or related documents. Direct charges are not made for ordinary secretarial services, office management,
accounting, end maintenance since these items are included in our overhead. Current personnel classifications and rates
are as follows:
Personnel Category Hourly Rate
01 Principal, Senior Consultant ....................... $130
02 Senior Associate,Senior Project Manager............ 120
03 Associate,Project Manager,Staff Consultant........ 105
04 Senior Project* .................................. 98
05 Project* ........................................ 85
06 Assistant Project* ............................... 75
07 Senior Stoff• ..................................... 65
08 Staff* ............................................ 60
09 Office, Field or Laboratory Supervisor .............. 65
10 Office, Field or Laboratory Technician.............. 56
I I Office, Field or Laboratory Assistant ............... 42
12 Draft person,Editor.............................. 50
13 Technical Typist, Word Processor,Printer ........... 40
•Includes Engineer, Geologist,Chemist,Scientist,Etc.
A premium of $15.00 per hour will be added to the hourly rates of non-exempt personnel for overtime. Overtime work is
defined as time charged to a project in excess of 8 hours per day, and any time worked on weekends, holidays, or night
s9ifts. Time spent in travel in the interest of the client will be charged at the hourly rate. When it is necessary for an
employee to be away from the office overnight, subsistence will be charged. Contract personnel will be charged according
to the hourly rate for their category.
Court appearances as an expert witness will be charged at a rate of$1,200 per day plus expenses. The full day rate will be
the minimum charge for any portion of a day. Preparation for a court case will be charged at regular hourly rates.
Communications
The cost of communications, including telephone, telex, postage, and in-house reproduction will be billed at 2% of the total
direct charge for WCC personnel.
WCC Laboratory and Computer Services
Services rendered by WCC laboratories and computer facilities are charged in accordance with the applicable Schedule of
Laboratory Charges and Schedule of Computer Charges, which are available upon request.
WCC Equipment and Vehicle Rentals
Automobile, vans, small trucks..................... $7/hour (4 hr. minimum)
Geotechnical exploration equipment
including small trucks......................... 15/hour
Field density tests................................ S/test
Microcomputer .................................. IO/hour
WCC equipment (such as surveying,geotechnical,geology, water resources, geophysical,seismology, microcomputer, health
and safety, etc-) and WCC vehicles used on a project are charged in accordance with the applicable Schedule of Equipment
and Vehicle Rentals which is available upon request.
Other Direct Expenses
Other direct expenses identifiable to the project including (but not limited to)the examples listed below will be charged at
cost times 1.15.
Personnel Expenses(travel, subsistence and vehicle rentals incurred
by personnel while on project activities)
Subcontracts
Outside Consultants and Services
Equipment or Sample Shipping
Special Supplies(drafting and printing,photos,and reference
materials)
Expendable materials such as containers and chemicals
Report Reproduction
Special Fees,Licenses,Permits, Insurances, etc.
GEO-1988 (JRN) GEO - TXS