HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/16/1991, 2 - PARKING REVENUE PLAN (PHASE I) IIIIm►►qlllll f u IUIII 'h/ 1 MEETING DATE:.
�piiflu►I U city o san tins o�ispo y-�� � y1
COUNCIL AGENDA -REPORT ITEM NUMBER:
42
FROM:
Dave Romero Wayne Peterson Prepared by: Keith Opalewski
Public Works City Engineer Parking Manager
SUBJ:
Parking Revenue Plan (Phase I)
CAO RECONMENDATION:
a) Introduce an ordinance to print amending section 10. 64. 030
(Parking Fines) of the Municipal Code to raise expired meter and
overnight fines from $5 to $8 effective June 1 1991.
b) Introduce an ordinance to print amending section 10.050.010
(Parking Meter Zone Rates) to increase core meters within the
area described in Exhibit E from 30 to 50 cents per hour
effective June 1, 1991.
c) Adopt a resolution to increase the penalty for late payment
of parking fines an additional $10 if unpaid 60 days from date of
issuance effective June 1, 1991.
d) Adopt a resolution to increase parking structure rates to 40
cents per hour with the first 90 minutes free and a maximum of
$3 .20 per day effective June 1, 1991.
REPORT-IN-BRIEF I
To eliminate the parking program's current $3001000+ negative
cash flow, a multi-faceted financial plan is recommended. The
plan includes raising expired meter fines from $5 to $8 and
establishing a 50 cents per hour rate for core meters.
It will also increase penalties for late parking citations, which
will only affect those who get tickets and ignore them. Fees from
the Business License Supplemental Fee program will be earmarked
for acquisition and/or expansion purposes only. Offering the
first 90 minutes free in the structures will have a slight
negative affect .on the . cash..tlow even with increasing the hourly
rate to 40 cents. However, the positive public image from this
change will far outweigh the downside of this proposal.
BACKGROUND:
At its February 26, 1990 study session, Council was informed that
the parking program is facing a serious cash flow deficiency.
Part of the final action plan from the study session included
developing a financial program to correct the revenue short-fall
for the present parking program.
111111111111111102111! city of San tins OBlspo
0=4 COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Council Agenda Report
Page Two
In September of 1990 staff presented to Council a parking revenue
plan to address the short-term financial needs of the parking
program, which would have eliminated the negative cash flow. The
plan that was presented had gone through months of meetings with
the BIA and Parking Management Committees, both of which had
endorsed the proposed plan. The Chamber of Commerce also was
informed of the financial plan. During the September 18, 1990
Council meeting members of the BIA and Chamber failed to support
the plan. As a result, Council instructed staff and the BIA to
jointly come up with a plan which could be supported by both
groups. The revised plan was to return to Council within six
months.
A 15 member ad hoc committee was formed to address the problem.
Members included top city administrators, BIA members, property
owners, and former city officials. After months of intensive
meetings and a plethora of discussion, the committee came up with
a plan which was agreeable to the parties.
DISCUSSION:
The committee agreed that the parking program needs to approach
its financial short-fall on a two phase basis--current and future
program funding. The first phase would correct the present
program's negative cash flow through the following: (Exhibit A)
1. Increase parking fines for expired meters.
2. Increase penalties for late payments of parking citations.
3. Increase meter rates in the core area.
All Phase I components could be implemented by July 1991. The
second phase would only apply to fund future expansion of parking
lots and structures. Possible funding options staff would
consider include an assessment district or expanded BIA district.
It must be emphasized that without sufficient funds the parking
program can not fulfill its fundamental policy of being self-
supporting in order to maintain and expand parking operations.
Furthermore, .preserving :prime downtown parking spaces for
visitors/shoppers and protecting the character of surrounding
office and residential zones would also be in serious jeopardy.
To this end it is essential that additional revenues are
generated as soon as possible, in order to correct the existing
deficiency and protect the city's substantial investments.
Without additional parking revenues the projected deficits,
ranging from $304, 000 in 1991-92 to $561,000 by 1996-97, (Exhibit
B) will continue to escalate. Exhibit B-1 shows the positive fund
balance after the proposed increases.
h
'city of san Luis osispo
IftCOUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Council Agenda Report
Page Three
A financial plan that could eliminate the remaining negative cash
flow could include a combination of the following changes:
* Increase parking fines above $5.
* Increase late payments for delinquent parking citations
* Establish a variable rate meter system by increasing
downtown core meters above 30 cents per hour.
It is important to note that any increase in fines and fees
should be as equitable as possible, while at the same time not
becoming a deterrent to visitors. With these issues in mind,
staff conducted a survey of comparable cities (Exhibits C and D)
to determine market rates for parking meters and fines.
FINES AND PENALTIES
The City's current bail of $5. 00 for expired meters is well below
the $10.00 average for all surveyed cities (Exhibit C) . Based on
the fact that 80% of all tickets written are for expired meters,
each dollar increase in fines could generate $40,000 annually.
Expired meters $6.00 fine $40,000 annual increase
$8.00 fine $120,000 annual increase
$10.00 fine $200,000 annual increase
Beyond the revenue enhancement of this proposal a justification
for increasing parking fines is that parking enforcement is the
key to effective parking management. Our current low fine has
manifested a list that includes 420 people (with 10 or more
tickets) who have a combined total of 7,500 outstanding parking
tickets, which represents $98,000 in uncollected fines.
Although the parking program has increased the number of vehicles
being towed for excessive tickets (average fine $500) , and re-
instituted the hold procedure for vehicle registrations, a higher
fine for expired meters could also help reduce this habitual
violator problem and minimize the need to tow.
The latter issue of reducing the habitual offender problem is
also the justification .for-increasing the penalty by an
additional $10.00. Currently people have 30 days to pay the
original fine on all parking tickets. If no payment is received
by the due date a $10. 00 penalty is added to the original fine.
Under the proposed plan an additional $10.00 would be added if
the original fine and first $10. 00 penalty was not paid 60 days
after the citation was issued. This process has two major
advantages. First, the additional penalty will not affect the
average person who diligently pays their parking citation,
thereby maintaining more positive community relations. Second,
the threat of an additional penalty will be an inducement for
���K��►�►i►Iulllllll�ll� ►gl��ll city of San Luis OBISPO
iInazo COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Council Agenda Report
Page Four
more people to pay earlier as well as encourage habitual
violators to pay more and/or change their abusive parking
pbLtterns. Based on 30-35% who typically pay with penalty, it is
estimated that the additional $10. 00 penalty will generate
$100, 000 annually.
METER RATES
The sample cities were also surveyed for parking meter rates
(Exhibit D) . They ranged from $0.25 to $0.75 per hour, with the
average hourly rate at $0.50. Santa Cruz and Monterey, both
tourist cities like San Luis Obispo, have higher rates in their
prime tourist locations ($0.75 and $0. 50 respectively) . It is
this concept of a variable rate that could be applied to the
downtown area. Since the charm of downtown San Luis Obispo is
the main shopper attraction, a higher rate for convenient core
parking would be consistent with other California cities. This
is a return to a pattern which the city previously followed for
many years.
This is similar to zones of benefit that are utilized by cities
with assessment districts. The closer the parking space is to
the visitors destination, the higher the assessment rate. In
other words, if shoppers want to park at Higuera and Garden
Streets, they would have to pay a higher rate than those who opt
to park two blocks away and walk to their destination. An added
benefit is that the higher rate will help address the problem of
employees parking in prime downtown spaces, by forcing them to
move to less expensive spaces in the structures or outlying
meters. A $0.50 per hour rate for approximately 350 core meters
(Exhibit E) provides an estimated revenue of $100,000 annually.
Core Meters $0.40 per hour $50,000 annual increase
(350 meters) $0.45 per hour $75,000 annual increase
$0.50 per hour $100,000 annual increase
PARKING STRUCTURE RATES
The parking structures- have-become the focal point of the City's
parking program. This is especially true of the new Marsh Street
Structure. Its prime core location is ideal for both local and
outside users. Therefore, it is essential to effective parking
management to have the structures utilized as much as possible.
With this mind, there is strong support by the business community
to offer the public inexpensive parking.
The option of offering the first 60 or 90 minutes free in the
structures is a strong motivation for downtown shoppers. Over
50% of the current users of the Marsh Street Structure and 20% of
��������►iii�IIIIIIIIP° �Il��ll city of san Luis OBIs130
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Council Agenda Report
Page Five
the Palm Street Structure park for 2 hours or less. By offering
90 minutes free parking both structures may be utilized more, and
the business community will have a very effective marketing tool
to entice more shoppers to the downtown. The 90 minute option
(modeled after Santa Barbara's program but with lower rates) was
more desirable because businesses felt 60 minutes was not enough
time for customers to get things done and it sounds much longer
too. Several options were explored to establish the new hourly
rates to help offset the loss of revenue as a result of offering
free parking. They all include 90 minute free parking and are as
follows:
Hourly rate Daily rate Impact on Parkins
30 cents per hour/$2.40 per day maximum -$55,000 annually
35 cents per hour/$2.80 per day maximum -$35,000 annually
40 cents per hour/$3.20 per day maximum -$15,000 annually
50 cents per hour/$4.00 per day maximum +$25,000 annually
The 40 cents per hour/$3 .20 per day maximum option was chosen as
the best rate because it offers the minimum loss of revenue for
the program. The higher daily maximum of $3.20 also makes the
$40 per month passcards more attractive to downtown employees
because they can save 40% or more on monthly parking. The 50
cents/$4. 00 per day option was considered toc high at this time.
FEES
The concept of a business license supplemental fee program
(additional surcharge to business license fees in the BIA service
area) has been approved as part of the 1990 Parking Management
Plan. The revised Parking Plan has recommended a deadline of no
later than July 1991 to establish the fee program, even if the
business tax has not been revised by that time. Based on current
tax rates, the estimated annual revenue is $73, 000. It was the
consensus of the ad hoc committee and the BIA Board that the
monies from .this program be Specifically designated for
acquisition and or expansion purposes only. The funds from this
fee will allow the program to build its reserves for property
acquisition for a third parking site.
The program's current funds for property acquisition have been
reduced to $650, 000 as a result of cost over runs, primarily for
tenant improvements, on the Marsh Structure. It should be noted
that if it is determined that a third parking structure is not
needed or desirable, then these funds could help retire our
current debt service at an earlier date.
2"
�����i�►►►lulllllll�l►°�°���UIII city of San Luis OBispo
i COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Council Agenda Report
Page Six
The combination of higher fines and penalties and core meter
rates, and the supplemental fee program, would allow the parking
program to obtain the needed funds to operate and maintain the
existing program and provide for future operational costs and
some limited expansion.
FINANCING FOR ADDITIONAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
The options presented address the short-term cash flow problems
for increasing revenue and, with periodic adjustments, can
support the program as long as no new structures are built. The
approval to construct a third structure will require that a new
long-term financial plan be in place in order to meet the
increased debt service. Some possible ways to meet the
additional revenue needs are as follows:
* Create an assessment district that would establish a levy based
upon benefit.
* Expand the BIA district to include property owners.
* Increase rates for meters, fines and fees.
It is recommended that further discussion of these additional
revenue sources be deferred until the Circulation Element is
adopted and the need for additional parking structures has been
determined.
CONCURRENCES:
These options to increase parking meter rates and fines and
penalties have been discussed and have the concurrences of the
City Parking Management and BIA Parking Committees, BIA Board of
Directors, and the Departments of Public Works, Finance, and
Administration. The Chamber of Commerce Board made no formal
recommendations regarding any of the new rates.
FISCAL IMPACT:
At current rates of expenditures and with current revenue
projections,. the Parking Fund's balance will be in a deficit
situation by early 1992. The recommended program will provide a
yearly cash infusion ranging from $325, 000 to $398,000
depending upon the new rates for fines and meters. Implementing
the increases by June 1, 1991 would mean that $25,000 to $33, 000
could begin to be generated each month. The total funds available
from this short-term plan will be used to operate and maintain
the parking program at its current planned level of two parking
structures and begin to build the program's reserves. The
estimated capital cost to implement meter and parking fine
increases is $22,000. The 90-91 budget has adequate funds to
z-4
�����i��►uul{IllilllP°�1Qq�Ulh city of San Luis OBlspo
ViN COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Council Agenda Report
Page Seven
complete these projects. Any additional parking structures will
require that additional programs be established in order to meet
long-term financial commitments.
ALTERNATIVES:
There are various ways to adjust the revenue sources to get a
little more from one and a little less from another. Staff is
recommending what it feels is a fair plan. Alternatives that
could be considered would be:
1. Make-up current deficit by assessment.
2. Make-up current deficit from the General Fund.
The parking program is self-sufficient and as such should obtain
funds from existing sources of revenue as opposed to creating new
revenue programs or relying upon tax dollars in order to maintain
existing levels of service. The mechanisms for generating the
needed revenue already exist, and can quickly and inexpensively
solve the cash flow problem. Major alternative sources of
revenue should only be considered for future capital projects.
Exhibit A Summary of Recommendations
Exhibit B&B-1 Parking Fund
Exhibit C Parking Fine Survey
Exhibit D Parking Meter Survey
Exhibit E Downtown Map
Exhibit F Legislative Draft Fines
Exhibit G Proposed Fine Ordinance
Exhibit H Legislative Draft Meter
Exhibit I Proposed Meter Ordinance
Exhibit J Resolution for Late Penalty Increase
Exhibit K Resolution for Parking Structure Rate Increase
PARKING FUND DEFICIT ELIMINATION-AND PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT
RECOMMENDED PROGRAM FOR IMPLEMENTATION
(JOINT BIA/CITY COMMITTEE)
ANNUAL
REVENUE
CHANGE
** Encourage IIIA merchants to participate in the
parking validation program Unknown
** Implement IIIA program to encourage employees
to park outside of core spaces $ 0
** Converted Recreation Administration lot to metered
public spaces $ 0
** Transfer City bus pass/carpool program to General Fund
$ 250
** Review parking program for cost savings & involve
BIA & PMC in budget review process Unknown
** Raise expired meter fine from $5 to $8
$120, 000
** Raise penalty for late payment of fines
(additional $10 after 60 days) $100, 000
** Raise meter rates from 30 to 50 cents per hour
(350 meters in the core area) $100, 000
** Implement Supplemental Fee program (based on current
Business License Tax) $ 73 , 000
** Raised monthly permits and passcards to $40
$ 20, 000
** Raise parking structures to 40 cents per hour
with first 90 min. free ($3.20/day max. ) -$ 15, 000
Total $398,250
FINANCING LONG-TERM PARKING PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS
** Form an assessment district for-property owner participation
** Expand BIA district to include property owners as part of business
license update or by other means
** Review feasibility of eliminating on-street meters in the core in
conjunction with increased enforcement
** Review Parking in-lieu fees including annual escalator
** Review reducing cost of parking permit passcards
. EXHIBIT A
2-8
CASH FLOW PARKING PROGRAM CURRENT F'EO ECTIONS rITHO4T REVENUE INCREASES
-----------------------------------------------
REVENUES
1991 1992 19971 1994 1995 1796 1997
1949
IN'r'E5TMENTQ $1951000 $83,000 $56,300 $':',900 :15,400 ($24,000) ($61,000) (£104,000)
+., n r n n _
FINES m;D FORFEITURES „� --� 4
YJJJ,il'J I! $':'J,U:'V $._JJ, 1_III JJJ, 3J,... J, !o 075,
0 ; Qfuj $3 ildfl S3, 0f 000
METERSt $607,900 $620,000 $615,00(1 1725,000 $7^_5,000 $7^5,000 $725,000 $925,000
PARfiING STRUCTURES 11'8,,'!0 i173,CDO $178,5iO $179,500 $119,500 £119,5011 417.3,500 $173,5,)U
LONG-TERM $78,50(1 $90,0(10 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000
LEASE (RILEY'S $ RR 5O) £95,)0:1 £100iii
0 $1011?,0ill 0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $10.),000
IN-LIEU FEES $35,00'! $50,040 $50,000 $SG,i!00 $50,000 $`_0,000 $5;,000 $50,000
BUSl'�rLecJ 11YSUPPLEMENT ll $0 1
£
OTHER CHARGES 115,000 ti5,000 £15,000 $15.000 515,000 $15,000 $15,40:) $15,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TCTAL ti,57Z,400 $1,471,500 $114991800 $11526,400 $1,5081900 $1,469,500 $1,432,500 $1,489,500
15 CENT INCREASE JANUARY
AND 10 CENT INCREASE JANUARY i, 1998
EXPENDITURES
PROGRAM OPERATIONS 1749,000 $798,000 $828,600 $869,000 012,000 $957,000 $1,006,000 $1,056,000
SPECIAL F'EO,IECT MANAGEMENT $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
CAF'IT L PROIECTStt $I,Oi10,000 $J011000 $50,000 $`?,iiU0 °�0,000 3°fl,!00 £ 0VO $501000
DEBT SERVICE #9'01000 $.9.';0,(:1;0 $9301000 $930,000 $930,000 $930,000 $9:0,000 $930,0;10
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $7,900 $7,900 $7,900 $7,9011 $7,900 $7,900 $7,90i1 £7,900
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL $2,735,91:; $: 775,9;1;: £1,815,90:1 $1,856,900 $1,899,900 $1,944,900 $1,997,900 $:,(1431900
CEFIC_T:SURPLL'S ($316,100) 1$3'0150013391,000l !$475,404) ($561,400) ($5549400)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOND DEBT REEERVE $1,027,00;1 $1,;x.1,000 $737,300 1421,200 $90,700 $0 $0 $L'
FUND BALANCE## # BEGIN YEAR $;12;1,2"0 £14,700 $U $0 £l ($300,300) ($?75,700) ($1,;'? 140)
END YEAR $14,700 (£1189.700) ($316,100) ($370,500) ($'91,000) ($715,100) ($1,3'? ,IUO)1$1,591,500;
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tt TENANT IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NEW STRUCTURE HAS DEPLETED THE CAPITAL FUNDS ACCOUNT BY $3501000 EXHIBIT B
I$tGOAL IS TO BUILD TO AND MAINTAIN A BEGINNING YEAR BALANCE EQUAL TO 20X OF TOTAL OPERATING BUDGET
'1r q
CASH FL."N PARKING PROGRAM CURRENT F'RL'•ECTIONS 4;ITH INCREASES EFFECTIVE JANE 1, 1991
-----------------------------------------------------------
u a
-------------------UES
1991 19'92 1993 1994 1495 1?96 1997 1999
IN'VECTMENTS $!951000 1905,000 £91,000 $99,000 £1435000 $165,600 $104,000 $1011000
FINES AND FORFEITURES $7.60,000 g5J5,000 $5055,000 $JJ5,O00 $555,000 $555,600 $5055,000 $555,000
METEF:S$ 1000 $'10,090 £760,000 $910,000 $810,600 $8109000 $8!01000 59:4,000
PARKING STRUCTURES $179,500 $16J000 $15:;,000 316;,,000 $153,000 $!53,000 $163000 $1163,000
LONG-TERM $7:,000 $90,0''(,0 $90,000 $90,00d $90,000 $909000 5909000 £90,000
LEASE (RILEY'S 4 RR SO) $95,000 $1001000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $1009000 $100,004
IN-LIEU FEES $351066 £50,000 $5C,60U $50,000 $501000 £50,000 £5U,60U $050,000
BUCINESC TAX SUPPLEMENT $p $70,000 £73,500 $71,200 $31,100 $85,100u?,-CIO $43,800
OTHER CHARGES $151000 $151000 $15,000 $1,000 $15,000 $!5,000 $15,000 £15,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL $19562,500 $1,848,000 £114031500 $1,959,200 $1,967,100 $1,9731100 $11976,300 $2,077,800
15 CENT INCREASE JANUARY 1, 19?3
10 CENT INCREASE JANUARY I, 1948
EXPE!JDITULRES
PROGRAM OPERATIONS $748,400 $788,000 $823,000. $869,000 $912,(,QU $951,000 $1,046,400 $1.056,000
SPECIAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT $50,!100 $0 $0 $U $0 $0 $6 $0
CAPITAL PROJEC':.S#$ $1,000,00+) $50,000 $50,1;00 $JO,000 $50,000 $501000 $50,COO $54,(00
DEBT SERVICE $430,000 $9301040 $9301000 $9;0,000 £9050,000 £470,000 £930,000 $930,000
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $/1904 $7,990 $7,960 $7,400 $7,900 $7,900 $7,900 $7,900
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL $1,855,400 $1,899,900 $1,944,900 $1,99J,900 42,043,940
DEFICIT/SURPLUC !$!,173,400! £12,100 $87,600 £102,300 $67,200 £28,200 t811,6d61 $33,900
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOND DEBT BELE R'JE $1,027,000 31,627,000 $1,021,0110 $1,027,000 $1,027,000 $1,02',000 $1,027,000 $1,0279000
FUND BALA;JCE$2$ BEGIN YEAR $1,211,200 $43..BOO $86,800 $174,400 $276,700 $3405 900 $372,100 $'54,5011
END YEAR £43,800 $;151460 $174,400 $276,700 $343,900 $3/?,100 $1 054,0500 £368,400
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11 TENAA'T IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NEW STRUCTURE HAS DEPLETED THE CAPITAL FUNDS ACCOUNT BY $30,000
$$$GOAL IS TO BUILD TO AND MAINTAIN A BEGINNING YEAR BALANCE EOUAL TO 20X OF TOTAL OPERATING BUDGET EXHIBIT B-1
,2-!a
PARKING CITATION BAIL
OVERTIME PARKING
PARKING PARKING-- SPACE LOADING PROHIBIT. NO RES. FIRE
CITY: METERS: 2 HOURS: MARKINGS: ZONES: PARKING: PERMIT: LANE:
San Luis Obispo $ 5.00 $10.00 $ 5.00 $20.00 $20.00 $10.00 $58.00
Average All Cities: $10.00 $10.00 $17.00 $20.00 $20.00 $18.00 $27.00
-------------
Alameda $14.00 $14.00 $14.00 $19.00 $19.00 $19.00 $19.00
Cal Poly $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $15.00
Monterey $10.00 $10.00 $25.00 $20.00 $25.00 $20.00
Salinas No Meters $10.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $25.00
Santa
Barbara No Meters $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $22.00 $12.00 $32.00
Santa
Cruz $14.00 $22-$41 $22.00 $30.00 $31.00
Santa
Maria No Meters $ 7.00 $17.00 $14.00 $17.00
Santa
Monica $13.00 $13.00 $28.00 $28.00 $28.00 $28.00
Santa
Rosa $ 6.00 $10.00 $20.00 $20.00 $ 8.00 $30.00
SURVEY.WP EXHIBIT C
2'11
PARKING RATES
CITY METER RATES STRUCTURE RATES LOT RATES
San Luis Obispo $.30/hour $.25/hour $20-$32/mo.
$33/mo. permit permit lots
Average All Cities: $.50/hour $.50/hour $15 - $33/month
$36/mo. permit
Alameda $.40/hour None $.25/hour
$60/3-mo.permit
Cal Poly $.40/hour None
Monterey $.25 - $.50/hour $.75/hour $5 max. $1 ticket/2 hours
Salinas No Meters $2/day permits $15 - $25/mo.
$20 - $40 mo. permit
Santa Barbara No Meters Parking Structure and Daily Lot Fees Are:
--First 90 min./Free
--Next hour/$.50
--Each additional hour/$1.00
Santa Cruz $.25 - $.75/hour None
Santa Maria No Meters No fees for parking
in structures
Santa Monica $.35 - $.75/hour $.35/hour $.75 per hour
$30/mo. permit
Santa Rosa $.25/hour $.75/hour $11 - $55/month
$35 - $40/mo. permit
EXHIBITS.WP EXHIBIT D
A.". /A-
rn
o ❑
El El cri
$
'SS a3dd3d
z
a I OSNHOP
0
8
is a
F t
tnLn
N g
Ln
a
*is VS06 VINVS
S g
O 0
'IS soso
I El El F111 E 'v
'IS 08NON
F]
W
IL
8
FNI
� '1S N3o21V0
oot ooe ❑ 8 O
'is a aejo
v
Ell
ooa 000 Dolt ooze oori aor�
Is HOV38
L7—j
*is 13F48,90
—4P ] F
EXHIBIT E
L E G I S L A T I V E- D R A F T
Chapter 10. 64
PARKING REVENUES, FINES
AND FORFEITURES
10.64.030 Parking Fines.
The fines authorized for parking violations in other sections
of this code shall be as follows:
Code Sections Fine--Each Offense
10.36.010--10.36.040 $20. 00
10. 36. 050--10.36.240 10.00
10.40.010--10.40.030 10.00
10.40.040--10.40.080 5. 00 ss".0
10.44.010--10.44.060 20. 00
10.52. 050--10.52.060 5.o8 M
EXHIBIT F
Z-/A(
ORDINANCE NO. - (1991 SERIES)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AMENDING SECTION 10. 64 .030 (PARKING FINES)
OF CHAPTER 10. 64 (PARKING REVENUES, FINES AND FORFEITURES)
OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 10.64 .030 of the San Luis Obispo
Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
10. 64 .030 Parking Fines.
The fines authorized for parking violations in other sections
of this code shall be as follows:
Code Sections Fine--Each Offense
10. 36. 010--10.36.040 $20. 00
10. 36. 050--10.36.240 10. 00
10.40. 010--10.40.030 10. 00
10.40. 040--10.40.080 8. 00
10.44. 010--10.44 . 060 20. 00
10.52. 050--10.52.060 8.00
SECTION 2. This Ordinance, together with the ayes and noes,
shall be published once in full, at least three (3) days prior to
its final passage in the Telegram-Tribune, a newspaper published
...and-circulated in said City arid" the same shall go into effect at
the expiration of thirty (30) days after its said final passage.
EXHIBIT G
Ordinance No. (1991 Series)
Page Two
INTRODUCED AND PASSED TO PRINT by the Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo at a meeting held on the day of
on motion of , seconded by
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
MAYOR RON DUNIN
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED:
CITY A
!I.NIS- TRATIVE OFFICER
C T
FI E D CT
PUBLIC WORKS RECTOR
P 'ING MANA R
L E G I S L A T I V E D R A F T
Chapter 10.52
PARKING METERS
Section:
10.52. 010 Parking Meter Zone--Rates.
A. Within the area enclosed by a dashed line on the parking
meter zone map, the parking of vehicles on streets or in
municipal parking lots may be controlled and regulated with the
aid of parking meters.
B. The parking meter rate shall be thirty cents per hour
effective January 1, 1988. Parking meter rates shall be
increased to the following amounts over the next 15 years:
Effective Date of Increase Rate
January 1, 1993 $.35
January 1, 1998 $.45
January 1, 2003 $. 60
w. .
n ev area ecasedy: �:a5..:na :. n axe xeNn ? ra.nq
mer zone map, Vie; ratecsr:parkx�q .... am
. > ...a.. :.:::...:..
;" tmuh .cs � .,.,0 .`'', `
� 9 k�ark ng m ? : rags q s h gh r a e zax�s
�'a3,�, •tie a�t�cr�a�c�' tt� 'aha �p'��+�W��q amot��s asra��h�ri� �'
••.}H+#H?Y,::i.Ai}fui$ii::J,.::v'iii`}:?'•.:.;.:y),vi:Mux?Mvnfi#}W.O' :.:FY.
1 . ... 9:{�.
:::%;:$J;:%3:2::r::.:::{:�:y[
EXHIBIT H
Z-17
ORDINANCE NO. (1991 SERIES)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AMENDING SECTIONS 10. 52.010 (PARKING METER RATES)
CHAPTER 10. 52 (PARKING METERS) OF THE
SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
SECTION 1. 10.52.010 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code
is hereby amended to read as follows, effective June 1, 1991:
10.52.010 Parking Meter Zone--Rates.
A. Within the area enclosed by a dashed line on the parking
meter zone map, the parking of vehicles on streets or in
municipal parking lots may be controlled and regulated with the
aid of parking meters.
B. The parking meter rate shall be thirty cents per hour
effective January 1, 1988. Parking meter rates shall be
increased to the following amounts over the next 15 years:
Effective Date of Increase Rate
January 1, 1993 $.35
January 1, 1998 $.45
January 1, 2003 $. 60
C. Within the area enclosed by diagonal lines on the parking
meter zone map, the rate for parking meters on streets or in
municipal parking lots shall be fifty cents per hour effective
June 1, 1991. Parking meter rates for this higher-rate zone
shall be increased to the following amounts over the next 15
years:
Effective Date of Increase Rate
January 1, 1993 $.55
January 1, 1998 $. 65
January 1, 2003 $,80
EXHIBIT I
z.-1Do
Ordinance No. (1991 Series)
Page Two
SECTION 2. This Ordinance, together with the ayes and noes,
shall be published once in full, at least three (3) days prior to
its final passage in the Telegram-Tribune, a newspaper published
and circulated in said City and the same shall go into effect
June 1, 1991.
INTRODUCED AND PASSED TO PRINT by the Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo at a meeting held on the day of
on motion of seconded by
and on the following roll call vote: '
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
MAYOR RON DUNIN
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED:
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
'C Y 0 E
FINAffCt .DIRECTOR
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
P NG MANAG
.Z•/ 9
rn
J L—jIEIO
0
--LS b3dd3d
In
8
i OSNHOP
o
71
Ln
g
N
'is oa
'" ul8
x 8 13 w `n _
2 u O
o = a
D_ '1S YSOC, NVS r , _ Qi
8 g
O C)
is soso
s oaaow
W '�
g
El . . . . . . . . . . . E
ag9OPT
s
^ '1S N30aVJ
0 ::1 LJ 8
E I
ooc ooe O
is OVoaB �/
s
o � i � U
006 0001 Doll ODZI oofl DDYI
uwc
'1S HOV38
Ll 0
'ts 3waVa
z-ao
RESOLUTION NO. (1991 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ESTABLISHING AN ADDITIONAL
$10 PENALTY FOR LATE PAYMENT OF PARKING CITATIONS AFTER
60 DAYS FROM ISSUANCE OF THE CITATION
WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the BIA to establish a
program to discourage employees from parking in prime downtown
spaces; and
WHEREAS, the BIA Board of Directors and BIA and Parking
Management Committees concur with the employee parking problem;
and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has a concern with the
number of habitual violators of parking regulations; and
WHEREAS, the parking program has a need to increase parking
revenues; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San
Luis Obispo as follows:
A. Effective June 1, 1991 all parking citations written in the
City of San Luis Obispo will have an additional $10.00 penalty
assessed to each ticket.
B. The additional $10.00 penalty will be imposed 60 days from
the date of issuance of the citation if any outstanding balance
is unpaid at that time.
on motion of ,seconded by ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of
1991.
MAYOR RON DUNIN
EXHIBIT J
z-a/
Resolution No. (1991 Series)
Page Two
ATTEST
CITY CLERK
APPROVED:
CITY ADMI ISTRATIVE OFFICER
Y OEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
PUBLIC ORKS DIRECTOR
PPIj RING MANACj�;R
2-��
RESOLUTION NO. (1991 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE PARKING STRUCTURE RATES OF
THE FIRST 90 MINUTES FREE, 40 CENTS PER HOUR AND $3 .20 PER DAY MAXIMUM
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo wishes to increase the
usage of its two parking structures; and
WHEREAS, the business community supports the option of
offering limited free parking in the parking structures; and
WHEREAS, the Ad Hoc Parking Revenue, BIA, and Parking
Management Committees have considered this option and
recommended 90 minute free parking in the City's parking
structures.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San
Luis Obispo as follows:
A. Effective June 1, 1991 all city parking structures in the
downtown shall offer the first 90 minutes free parking.
B. The new hourly rate for said parking structures shall be 40
cents per hour with a maximum of $3 .20 per day.
On motion of , seconded by
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day
of ,1991.
MAYOR RON DUNIN
EXHIBIT K
a'-� 3
Resolution N0. (1991 Series)
Page Two
ATTEST
CITY CLERK
APPROVED:
C TY ADM ;NIS:T;RAT;IVE OFFICER
wvo
lj! TT Y
FINANtE DIRECTOR
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
PARTING MANAGER
-XING . AGENDA
DATE STEM 0
o rusTo: � �b a
Action Q
�
DIR.
A� b FW.DIR
lJ 9Ca�0 ❑lymn DIR
Q-DFRF
[� [�
RN
�/pRIc. ❑ Pouciat 16 APR , 1991
❑ MCMMT.TMM ❑ RECDIR
@Tc-� D LL-1 CHARLES J . STORNI
/ 772 JOHNSON AVE ,
SAN LUIS OBISPO CA . 93401
(805) 544-8865
To;
MR . MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL , AND
THE SAN LUIS OBISPO BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION ,
I AS A NATIVE OF SAN LUIS AND BUSINESS MAN , I FEEL THAT THE DOWN
TOWN BUSINESS AREA OF SAN LUIS IS HEADED IN THE WRONG
DIRECTION , MY CONCERN IS WITH THE PROPOSED COST RAISE AND OTHER
CHANGES TO PARKING IN THE DOWN TOWN CORE . PART OF THIS CONCERN
HAS BEEN GENERATED BY MY EMPLOYMENT AS A TOLL TAKER IN BOTH OF
OUR PARKING STRUCTURES AND LISTENING TO THE CUSTOMER FEED BACK
FROM TOURISTS , YOUNG CUSTOMERS , BUSINESS OWNERS AND SENIOR
CUSTOMERS ,
1 , THE 25 CENT PER HOUR CHARGE PLEASES EVERYONE , THEY THINK THEY
ARE GETTING OFF VERY REASONABLE FOR A CLEAN CENTRALLY LOCATED
PARKING FACILITY , IF YOU WANT TO GIVE ANY THING AWAY, WHY NOT DO
IT WITH TOKENS WITH THE SAN LUIS LOGO ON THEM . PERHAPS ABOUT THE
SIZE OF A QUARTER . THESE WOULD BE GOOD FOR ONE HOUR FREE PARKING ,
WITH ONLY ONE TOKEN GOOD PER DAY AND TWENTY FIVE CENTS FOR EACH
ADDITIONAL HOUR . GIVE THEM TO THE MERCHANTS FREE , PUT A NOTE NEAR
EVERY ONES REGISTER ANNOUNCING THE FACT THAT THE TOKENS ARE
AVAILABLE . IT WON ' T HELP TO LOAD UP ON TOKENS AS YOU CAN ONLY USE
ONE A DAY ANY WAY , THIS IS TO REPLACE THE STICK ON COUPONS THAT
HAVE BEEN NOT BEEN SUCCESSFUL , THIS COSTS YOU ONE HOUR, NOT ONE AND
A HALF HOURS ,
2 . MOST OF THE TIME THE TWO TOP FLOORS OF THE STRUCTURES ARE
EMPTY , THESE SHOULD BE FOR PASS CARD HOLDERS . THE PASS CARD
CHARGE SHOULD BE $24, PAYABLE BY THE MONTH , CURRENTLY PASS CARDS
ARE $40 DOLLARS PAYABLE ONLY FOR THREE MONTHS , $120 . THE UPPER
FLOOR CARD COULD BE GREEN WITH A SECOND FLOOR CARD ORANGE FOR
THOSE THAT WOULD PAY $35 FOR GUARANTEED COVERED PARKING WITH THE
FIRST AND SECOND FLOORS AVAILABLE FOR IN AND OUT SHOPPER TYPE
CUSTOMERS , THIS SCHEME SHOULD BRING MOST OF THE DOWN TOWN
WORKERS AND SHOP OWNERS IN TO THE PARKING STRUCTURES AND FREE UP
MORE OF THE CITY STREETS FOR SHOPPERS , THERE ARE SHOPPERS AND
TOURISTS THAT WON ' T USE A PARKING STRUCTURE UNDER ANY
CIRCUMSTANCE SO WE MUST MAINTAIN REASONABLE COST ON STREET
PARKING FOR THEM .
3 , I BELIEVE RAISING THE DOWN TOWN CORE METER CHARGE AT THIS TIME
IS INAPPROPRIATE WE ARE IN THE THROWS OF A RECESSION . SANTA MARIA
PARKING IS FREE AT THE DOWN TOWN CENTER MALL , MADONNA MALL IS
FREE , AND DOWN TOWN BAKERSFIELD HAS NO METERS AT ALL , I BELIEVE
IT IS A MATTER OF SURVIVAL AT THIS POINT FOR DOWN TOWN BUSINESS
TO*jf E—OURFPA®ING METERS JUST AS THEY ARE . THANK YOU ,
APR
151sst CHAR _S J . o. N -
$AVLLV3 06ean N..