Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/16/1991, 2 - PARKING REVENUE PLAN (PHASE I) IIIIm►►qlllll f u IUIII 'h/ 1 MEETING DATE:. �piiflu►I U city o san tins o�ispo y-�� � y1 COUNCIL AGENDA -REPORT ITEM NUMBER: 42 FROM: Dave Romero Wayne Peterson Prepared by: Keith Opalewski Public Works City Engineer Parking Manager SUBJ: Parking Revenue Plan (Phase I) CAO RECONMENDATION: a) Introduce an ordinance to print amending section 10. 64. 030 (Parking Fines) of the Municipal Code to raise expired meter and overnight fines from $5 to $8 effective June 1 1991. b) Introduce an ordinance to print amending section 10.050.010 (Parking Meter Zone Rates) to increase core meters within the area described in Exhibit E from 30 to 50 cents per hour effective June 1, 1991. c) Adopt a resolution to increase the penalty for late payment of parking fines an additional $10 if unpaid 60 days from date of issuance effective June 1, 1991. d) Adopt a resolution to increase parking structure rates to 40 cents per hour with the first 90 minutes free and a maximum of $3 .20 per day effective June 1, 1991. REPORT-IN-BRIEF I To eliminate the parking program's current $3001000+ negative cash flow, a multi-faceted financial plan is recommended. The plan includes raising expired meter fines from $5 to $8 and establishing a 50 cents per hour rate for core meters. It will also increase penalties for late parking citations, which will only affect those who get tickets and ignore them. Fees from the Business License Supplemental Fee program will be earmarked for acquisition and/or expansion purposes only. Offering the first 90 minutes free in the structures will have a slight negative affect .on the . cash..tlow even with increasing the hourly rate to 40 cents. However, the positive public image from this change will far outweigh the downside of this proposal. BACKGROUND: At its February 26, 1990 study session, Council was informed that the parking program is facing a serious cash flow deficiency. Part of the final action plan from the study session included developing a financial program to correct the revenue short-fall for the present parking program. 111111111111111102111! city of San tins OBlspo 0=4 COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Council Agenda Report Page Two In September of 1990 staff presented to Council a parking revenue plan to address the short-term financial needs of the parking program, which would have eliminated the negative cash flow. The plan that was presented had gone through months of meetings with the BIA and Parking Management Committees, both of which had endorsed the proposed plan. The Chamber of Commerce also was informed of the financial plan. During the September 18, 1990 Council meeting members of the BIA and Chamber failed to support the plan. As a result, Council instructed staff and the BIA to jointly come up with a plan which could be supported by both groups. The revised plan was to return to Council within six months. A 15 member ad hoc committee was formed to address the problem. Members included top city administrators, BIA members, property owners, and former city officials. After months of intensive meetings and a plethora of discussion, the committee came up with a plan which was agreeable to the parties. DISCUSSION: The committee agreed that the parking program needs to approach its financial short-fall on a two phase basis--current and future program funding. The first phase would correct the present program's negative cash flow through the following: (Exhibit A) 1. Increase parking fines for expired meters. 2. Increase penalties for late payments of parking citations. 3. Increase meter rates in the core area. All Phase I components could be implemented by July 1991. The second phase would only apply to fund future expansion of parking lots and structures. Possible funding options staff would consider include an assessment district or expanded BIA district. It must be emphasized that without sufficient funds the parking program can not fulfill its fundamental policy of being self- supporting in order to maintain and expand parking operations. Furthermore, .preserving :prime downtown parking spaces for visitors/shoppers and protecting the character of surrounding office and residential zones would also be in serious jeopardy. To this end it is essential that additional revenues are generated as soon as possible, in order to correct the existing deficiency and protect the city's substantial investments. Without additional parking revenues the projected deficits, ranging from $304, 000 in 1991-92 to $561,000 by 1996-97, (Exhibit B) will continue to escalate. Exhibit B-1 shows the positive fund balance after the proposed increases. h 'city of san Luis osispo IftCOUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Council Agenda Report Page Three A financial plan that could eliminate the remaining negative cash flow could include a combination of the following changes: * Increase parking fines above $5. * Increase late payments for delinquent parking citations * Establish a variable rate meter system by increasing downtown core meters above 30 cents per hour. It is important to note that any increase in fines and fees should be as equitable as possible, while at the same time not becoming a deterrent to visitors. With these issues in mind, staff conducted a survey of comparable cities (Exhibits C and D) to determine market rates for parking meters and fines. FINES AND PENALTIES The City's current bail of $5. 00 for expired meters is well below the $10.00 average for all surveyed cities (Exhibit C) . Based on the fact that 80% of all tickets written are for expired meters, each dollar increase in fines could generate $40,000 annually. Expired meters $6.00 fine $40,000 annual increase $8.00 fine $120,000 annual increase $10.00 fine $200,000 annual increase Beyond the revenue enhancement of this proposal a justification for increasing parking fines is that parking enforcement is the key to effective parking management. Our current low fine has manifested a list that includes 420 people (with 10 or more tickets) who have a combined total of 7,500 outstanding parking tickets, which represents $98,000 in uncollected fines. Although the parking program has increased the number of vehicles being towed for excessive tickets (average fine $500) , and re- instituted the hold procedure for vehicle registrations, a higher fine for expired meters could also help reduce this habitual violator problem and minimize the need to tow. The latter issue of reducing the habitual offender problem is also the justification .for-increasing the penalty by an additional $10.00. Currently people have 30 days to pay the original fine on all parking tickets. If no payment is received by the due date a $10. 00 penalty is added to the original fine. Under the proposed plan an additional $10.00 would be added if the original fine and first $10. 00 penalty was not paid 60 days after the citation was issued. This process has two major advantages. First, the additional penalty will not affect the average person who diligently pays their parking citation, thereby maintaining more positive community relations. Second, the threat of an additional penalty will be an inducement for ���K��►�►i►Iulllllll�ll� ►gl��ll city of San Luis OBISPO iInazo COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Council Agenda Report Page Four more people to pay earlier as well as encourage habitual violators to pay more and/or change their abusive parking pbLtterns. Based on 30-35% who typically pay with penalty, it is estimated that the additional $10. 00 penalty will generate $100, 000 annually. METER RATES The sample cities were also surveyed for parking meter rates (Exhibit D) . They ranged from $0.25 to $0.75 per hour, with the average hourly rate at $0.50. Santa Cruz and Monterey, both tourist cities like San Luis Obispo, have higher rates in their prime tourist locations ($0.75 and $0. 50 respectively) . It is this concept of a variable rate that could be applied to the downtown area. Since the charm of downtown San Luis Obispo is the main shopper attraction, a higher rate for convenient core parking would be consistent with other California cities. This is a return to a pattern which the city previously followed for many years. This is similar to zones of benefit that are utilized by cities with assessment districts. The closer the parking space is to the visitors destination, the higher the assessment rate. In other words, if shoppers want to park at Higuera and Garden Streets, they would have to pay a higher rate than those who opt to park two blocks away and walk to their destination. An added benefit is that the higher rate will help address the problem of employees parking in prime downtown spaces, by forcing them to move to less expensive spaces in the structures or outlying meters. A $0.50 per hour rate for approximately 350 core meters (Exhibit E) provides an estimated revenue of $100,000 annually. Core Meters $0.40 per hour $50,000 annual increase (350 meters) $0.45 per hour $75,000 annual increase $0.50 per hour $100,000 annual increase PARKING STRUCTURE RATES The parking structures- have-become the focal point of the City's parking program. This is especially true of the new Marsh Street Structure. Its prime core location is ideal for both local and outside users. Therefore, it is essential to effective parking management to have the structures utilized as much as possible. With this mind, there is strong support by the business community to offer the public inexpensive parking. The option of offering the first 60 or 90 minutes free in the structures is a strong motivation for downtown shoppers. Over 50% of the current users of the Marsh Street Structure and 20% of ��������►iii�IIIIIIIIP° �Il��ll city of san Luis OBIs130 COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Council Agenda Report Page Five the Palm Street Structure park for 2 hours or less. By offering 90 minutes free parking both structures may be utilized more, and the business community will have a very effective marketing tool to entice more shoppers to the downtown. The 90 minute option (modeled after Santa Barbara's program but with lower rates) was more desirable because businesses felt 60 minutes was not enough time for customers to get things done and it sounds much longer too. Several options were explored to establish the new hourly rates to help offset the loss of revenue as a result of offering free parking. They all include 90 minute free parking and are as follows: Hourly rate Daily rate Impact on Parkins 30 cents per hour/$2.40 per day maximum -$55,000 annually 35 cents per hour/$2.80 per day maximum -$35,000 annually 40 cents per hour/$3.20 per day maximum -$15,000 annually 50 cents per hour/$4.00 per day maximum +$25,000 annually The 40 cents per hour/$3 .20 per day maximum option was chosen as the best rate because it offers the minimum loss of revenue for the program. The higher daily maximum of $3.20 also makes the $40 per month passcards more attractive to downtown employees because they can save 40% or more on monthly parking. The 50 cents/$4. 00 per day option was considered toc high at this time. FEES The concept of a business license supplemental fee program (additional surcharge to business license fees in the BIA service area) has been approved as part of the 1990 Parking Management Plan. The revised Parking Plan has recommended a deadline of no later than July 1991 to establish the fee program, even if the business tax has not been revised by that time. Based on current tax rates, the estimated annual revenue is $73, 000. It was the consensus of the ad hoc committee and the BIA Board that the monies from .this program be Specifically designated for acquisition and or expansion purposes only. The funds from this fee will allow the program to build its reserves for property acquisition for a third parking site. The program's current funds for property acquisition have been reduced to $650, 000 as a result of cost over runs, primarily for tenant improvements, on the Marsh Structure. It should be noted that if it is determined that a third parking structure is not needed or desirable, then these funds could help retire our current debt service at an earlier date. 2" �����i�►►►lulllllll�l►°�°���UIII city of San Luis OBispo i COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Council Agenda Report Page Six The combination of higher fines and penalties and core meter rates, and the supplemental fee program, would allow the parking program to obtain the needed funds to operate and maintain the existing program and provide for future operational costs and some limited expansion. FINANCING FOR ADDITIONAL CAPITAL PROJECTS The options presented address the short-term cash flow problems for increasing revenue and, with periodic adjustments, can support the program as long as no new structures are built. The approval to construct a third structure will require that a new long-term financial plan be in place in order to meet the increased debt service. Some possible ways to meet the additional revenue needs are as follows: * Create an assessment district that would establish a levy based upon benefit. * Expand the BIA district to include property owners. * Increase rates for meters, fines and fees. It is recommended that further discussion of these additional revenue sources be deferred until the Circulation Element is adopted and the need for additional parking structures has been determined. CONCURRENCES: These options to increase parking meter rates and fines and penalties have been discussed and have the concurrences of the City Parking Management and BIA Parking Committees, BIA Board of Directors, and the Departments of Public Works, Finance, and Administration. The Chamber of Commerce Board made no formal recommendations regarding any of the new rates. FISCAL IMPACT: At current rates of expenditures and with current revenue projections,. the Parking Fund's balance will be in a deficit situation by early 1992. The recommended program will provide a yearly cash infusion ranging from $325, 000 to $398,000 depending upon the new rates for fines and meters. Implementing the increases by June 1, 1991 would mean that $25,000 to $33, 000 could begin to be generated each month. The total funds available from this short-term plan will be used to operate and maintain the parking program at its current planned level of two parking structures and begin to build the program's reserves. The estimated capital cost to implement meter and parking fine increases is $22,000. The 90-91 budget has adequate funds to z-4 �����i��►uul{IllilllP°�1Qq�Ulh city of San Luis OBlspo ViN COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Council Agenda Report Page Seven complete these projects. Any additional parking structures will require that additional programs be established in order to meet long-term financial commitments. ALTERNATIVES: There are various ways to adjust the revenue sources to get a little more from one and a little less from another. Staff is recommending what it feels is a fair plan. Alternatives that could be considered would be: 1. Make-up current deficit by assessment. 2. Make-up current deficit from the General Fund. The parking program is self-sufficient and as such should obtain funds from existing sources of revenue as opposed to creating new revenue programs or relying upon tax dollars in order to maintain existing levels of service. The mechanisms for generating the needed revenue already exist, and can quickly and inexpensively solve the cash flow problem. Major alternative sources of revenue should only be considered for future capital projects. Exhibit A Summary of Recommendations Exhibit B&B-1 Parking Fund Exhibit C Parking Fine Survey Exhibit D Parking Meter Survey Exhibit E Downtown Map Exhibit F Legislative Draft Fines Exhibit G Proposed Fine Ordinance Exhibit H Legislative Draft Meter Exhibit I Proposed Meter Ordinance Exhibit J Resolution for Late Penalty Increase Exhibit K Resolution for Parking Structure Rate Increase PARKING FUND DEFICIT ELIMINATION-AND PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDED PROGRAM FOR IMPLEMENTATION (JOINT BIA/CITY COMMITTEE) ANNUAL REVENUE CHANGE ** Encourage IIIA merchants to participate in the parking validation program Unknown ** Implement IIIA program to encourage employees to park outside of core spaces $ 0 ** Converted Recreation Administration lot to metered public spaces $ 0 ** Transfer City bus pass/carpool program to General Fund $ 250 ** Review parking program for cost savings & involve BIA & PMC in budget review process Unknown ** Raise expired meter fine from $5 to $8 $120, 000 ** Raise penalty for late payment of fines (additional $10 after 60 days) $100, 000 ** Raise meter rates from 30 to 50 cents per hour (350 meters in the core area) $100, 000 ** Implement Supplemental Fee program (based on current Business License Tax) $ 73 , 000 ** Raised monthly permits and passcards to $40 $ 20, 000 ** Raise parking structures to 40 cents per hour with first 90 min. free ($3.20/day max. ) -$ 15, 000 Total $398,250 FINANCING LONG-TERM PARKING PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS ** Form an assessment district for-property owner participation ** Expand BIA district to include property owners as part of business license update or by other means ** Review feasibility of eliminating on-street meters in the core in conjunction with increased enforcement ** Review Parking in-lieu fees including annual escalator ** Review reducing cost of parking permit passcards . EXHIBIT A 2-8 CASH FLOW PARKING PROGRAM CURRENT F'EO ECTIONS rITHO4T REVENUE INCREASES ----------------------------------------------- REVENUES 1991 1992 19971 1994 1995 1796 1997 1949 IN'r'E5TMENTQ $1951000 $83,000 $56,300 $':',900 :15,400 ($24,000) ($61,000) (£104,000) +., n r n n _ FINES m;D FORFEITURES „� --� 4 YJJJ,il'J I! $':'J,U:'V $._JJ, 1_III JJJ, 3J,... J, !o 075, 0 ; Qfuj $3 ildfl S3, 0f 000 METERSt $607,900 $620,000 $615,00(1 1725,000 $7^_5,000 $7^5,000 $725,000 $925,000 PARfiING STRUCTURES 11'8,,'!0 i173,CDO $178,5iO $179,500 $119,500 £119,5011 417.3,500 $173,5,)U LONG-TERM $78,50(1 $90,0(10 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 LEASE (RILEY'S $ RR 5O) £95,)0:1 £100iii 0 $1011?,0ill 0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $10.),000 IN-LIEU FEES $35,00'! $50,040 $50,000 $SG,i!00 $50,000 $`_0,000 $5;,000 $50,000 BUSl'�rLecJ 11YSUPPLEMENT ll $0 1 £ OTHER CHARGES 115,000 ti5,000 £15,000 $15.000 515,000 $15,000 $15,40:) $15,000 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TCTAL ti,57Z,400 $1,471,500 $114991800 $11526,400 $1,5081900 $1,469,500 $1,432,500 $1,489,500 15 CENT INCREASE JANUARY AND 10 CENT INCREASE JANUARY i, 1998 EXPENDITURES PROGRAM OPERATIONS 1749,000 $798,000 $828,600 $869,000 012,000 $957,000 $1,006,000 $1,056,000 SPECIAL F'EO,IECT MANAGEMENT $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CAF'IT L PROIECTStt $I,Oi10,000 $J011000 $50,000 $`?,iiU0 °�0,000 3°fl,!00 £ 0VO $501000 DEBT SERVICE #9'01000 $.9.';0,(:1;0 $9301000 $930,000 $930,000 $930,000 $9:0,000 $930,0;10 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $7,900 $7,900 $7,900 $7,9011 $7,900 $7,900 $7,90i1 £7,900 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL $2,735,91:; $: 775,9;1;: £1,815,90:1 $1,856,900 $1,899,900 $1,944,900 $1,997,900 $:,(1431900 CEFIC_T:SURPLL'S ($316,100) 1$3'0150013391,000l !$475,404) ($561,400) ($5549400) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BOND DEBT REEERVE $1,027,00;1 $1,;x.1,000 $737,300 1421,200 $90,700 $0 $0 $L' FUND BALANCE## # BEGIN YEAR $;12;1,2"0 £14,700 $U $0 £l ($300,300) ($?75,700) ($1,;'? 140) END YEAR $14,700 (£1189.700) ($316,100) ($370,500) ($'91,000) ($715,100) ($1,3'? ,IUO)1$1,591,500; ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- tt TENANT IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NEW STRUCTURE HAS DEPLETED THE CAPITAL FUNDS ACCOUNT BY $3501000 EXHIBIT B I$tGOAL IS TO BUILD TO AND MAINTAIN A BEGINNING YEAR BALANCE EQUAL TO 20X OF TOTAL OPERATING BUDGET '1r q CASH FL."N PARKING PROGRAM CURRENT F'RL'•ECTIONS 4;ITH INCREASES EFFECTIVE JANE 1, 1991 ----------------------------------------------------------- u a -------------------UES 1991 19'92 1993 1994 1495 1?96 1997 1999 IN'VECTMENTS $!951000 1905,000 £91,000 $99,000 £1435000 $165,600 $104,000 $1011000 FINES AND FORFEITURES $7.60,000 g5J5,000 $5055,000 $JJ5,O00 $555,000 $555,600 $5055,000 $555,000 METEF:S$ 1000 $'10,090 £760,000 $910,000 $810,600 $8109000 $8!01000 59:4,000 PARKING STRUCTURES $179,500 $16J000 $15:;,000 316;,,000 $153,000 $!53,000 $163000 $1163,000 LONG-TERM $7:,000 $90,0''(,0 $90,000 $90,00d $90,000 $909000 5909000 £90,000 LEASE (RILEY'S 4 RR SO) $95,000 $1001000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $1009000 $100,004 IN-LIEU FEES $351066 £50,000 $5C,60U $50,000 $501000 £50,000 £5U,60U $050,000 BUCINESC TAX SUPPLEMENT $p $70,000 £73,500 $71,200 $31,100 $85,100u?,-CIO $43,800 OTHER CHARGES $151000 $151000 $15,000 $1,000 $15,000 $!5,000 $15,000 £15,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL $19562,500 $1,848,000 £114031500 $1,959,200 $1,967,100 $1,9731100 $11976,300 $2,077,800 15 CENT INCREASE JANUARY 1, 19?3 10 CENT INCREASE JANUARY I, 1948 EXPE!JDITULRES PROGRAM OPERATIONS $748,400 $788,000 $823,000. $869,000 $912,(,QU $951,000 $1,046,400 $1.056,000 SPECIAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT $50,!100 $0 $0 $U $0 $0 $6 $0 CAPITAL PROJEC':.S#$ $1,000,00+) $50,000 $50,1;00 $JO,000 $50,000 $501000 $50,COO $54,(00 DEBT SERVICE $430,000 $9301040 $9301000 $9;0,000 £9050,000 £470,000 £930,000 $930,000 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $/1904 $7,990 $7,960 $7,400 $7,900 $7,900 $7,900 $7,900 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL $1,855,400 $1,899,900 $1,944,900 $1,99J,900 42,043,940 DEFICIT/SURPLUC !$!,173,400! £12,100 $87,600 £102,300 $67,200 £28,200 t811,6d61 $33,900 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BOND DEBT BELE R'JE $1,027,000 31,627,000 $1,021,0110 $1,027,000 $1,027,000 $1,02',000 $1,027,000 $1,0279000 FUND BALA;JCE$2$ BEGIN YEAR $1,211,200 $43..BOO $86,800 $174,400 $276,700 $3405 900 $372,100 $'54,5011 END YEAR £43,800 $;151460 $174,400 $276,700 $343,900 $3/?,100 $1 054,0500 £368,400 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 11 TENAA'T IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NEW STRUCTURE HAS DEPLETED THE CAPITAL FUNDS ACCOUNT BY $30,000 $$$GOAL IS TO BUILD TO AND MAINTAIN A BEGINNING YEAR BALANCE EOUAL TO 20X OF TOTAL OPERATING BUDGET EXHIBIT B-1 ,2-!a PARKING CITATION BAIL OVERTIME PARKING PARKING PARKING-- SPACE LOADING PROHIBIT. NO RES. FIRE CITY: METERS: 2 HOURS: MARKINGS: ZONES: PARKING: PERMIT: LANE: San Luis Obispo $ 5.00 $10.00 $ 5.00 $20.00 $20.00 $10.00 $58.00 Average All Cities: $10.00 $10.00 $17.00 $20.00 $20.00 $18.00 $27.00 ------------- Alameda $14.00 $14.00 $14.00 $19.00 $19.00 $19.00 $19.00 Cal Poly $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $15.00 Monterey $10.00 $10.00 $25.00 $20.00 $25.00 $20.00 Salinas No Meters $10.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $25.00 Santa Barbara No Meters $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $22.00 $12.00 $32.00 Santa Cruz $14.00 $22-$41 $22.00 $30.00 $31.00 Santa Maria No Meters $ 7.00 $17.00 $14.00 $17.00 Santa Monica $13.00 $13.00 $28.00 $28.00 $28.00 $28.00 Santa Rosa $ 6.00 $10.00 $20.00 $20.00 $ 8.00 $30.00 SURVEY.WP EXHIBIT C 2'11 PARKING RATES CITY METER RATES STRUCTURE RATES LOT RATES San Luis Obispo $.30/hour $.25/hour $20-$32/mo. $33/mo. permit permit lots Average All Cities: $.50/hour $.50/hour $15 - $33/month $36/mo. permit Alameda $.40/hour None $.25/hour $60/3-mo.permit Cal Poly $.40/hour None Monterey $.25 - $.50/hour $.75/hour $5 max. $1 ticket/2 hours Salinas No Meters $2/day permits $15 - $25/mo. $20 - $40 mo. permit Santa Barbara No Meters Parking Structure and Daily Lot Fees Are: --First 90 min./Free --Next hour/$.50 --Each additional hour/$1.00 Santa Cruz $.25 - $.75/hour None Santa Maria No Meters No fees for parking in structures Santa Monica $.35 - $.75/hour $.35/hour $.75 per hour $30/mo. permit Santa Rosa $.25/hour $.75/hour $11 - $55/month $35 - $40/mo. permit EXHIBITS.WP EXHIBIT D A.". /A- rn o ❑ El El cri $ 'SS a3dd3d z a I OSNHOP 0 8 is a F t tnLn N g Ln a *is VS06 VINVS S g O 0 'IS soso I El El F111 E 'v 'IS 08NON F] W IL 8 FNI � '1S N3o21V0 oot ooe ❑ 8 O 'is a aejo v Ell ooa 000 Dolt ooze oori aor� Is HOV38 L7—j *is 13F48,90 —4P ] F EXHIBIT E L E G I S L A T I V E- D R A F T Chapter 10. 64 PARKING REVENUES, FINES AND FORFEITURES 10.64.030 Parking Fines. The fines authorized for parking violations in other sections of this code shall be as follows: Code Sections Fine--Each Offense 10.36.010--10.36.040 $20. 00 10. 36. 050--10.36.240 10.00 10.40.010--10.40.030 10.00 10.40.040--10.40.080 5. 00 ss".0 10.44.010--10.44.060 20. 00 10.52. 050--10.52.060 5.o8 M EXHIBIT F Z-/A( ORDINANCE NO. - (1991 SERIES) AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AMENDING SECTION 10. 64 .030 (PARKING FINES) OF CHAPTER 10. 64 (PARKING REVENUES, FINES AND FORFEITURES) OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Section 10.64 .030 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10. 64 .030 Parking Fines. The fines authorized for parking violations in other sections of this code shall be as follows: Code Sections Fine--Each Offense 10. 36. 010--10.36.040 $20. 00 10. 36. 050--10.36.240 10. 00 10.40. 010--10.40.030 10. 00 10.40. 040--10.40.080 8. 00 10.44. 010--10.44 . 060 20. 00 10.52. 050--10.52.060 8.00 SECTION 2. This Ordinance, together with the ayes and noes, shall be published once in full, at least three (3) days prior to its final passage in the Telegram-Tribune, a newspaper published ...and-circulated in said City arid" the same shall go into effect at the expiration of thirty (30) days after its said final passage. EXHIBIT G Ordinance No. (1991 Series) Page Two INTRODUCED AND PASSED TO PRINT by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo at a meeting held on the day of on motion of , seconded by and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: MAYOR RON DUNIN ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED: CITY A !I.NIS- TRATIVE OFFICER C T FI E D CT PUBLIC WORKS RECTOR P 'ING MANA R L E G I S L A T I V E D R A F T Chapter 10.52 PARKING METERS Section: 10.52. 010 Parking Meter Zone--Rates. A. Within the area enclosed by a dashed line on the parking meter zone map, the parking of vehicles on streets or in municipal parking lots may be controlled and regulated with the aid of parking meters. B. The parking meter rate shall be thirty cents per hour effective January 1, 1988. Parking meter rates shall be increased to the following amounts over the next 15 years: Effective Date of Increase Rate January 1, 1993 $.35 January 1, 1998 $.45 January 1, 2003 $. 60 w. . n ev area ecasedy: �:a5..:na :. n axe xeNn ? ra.nq mer zone map, Vie; ratecsr:parkx�q .... am . > ...a.. :.:::...:.. ;" tmuh .cs � .,.,0 .`'', ` � 9 k�ark ng m ? : rags q s h gh r a e zax�s �'a3,�, •tie a�t�cr�a�c�' tt� 'aha �p'��+�W��q amot��s asra��h�ri� �' ••.}H+#H?Y,::i.Ai}fui$ii::J,.::v'iii`}:?'•.:.;.:y),vi:Mux?Mvnfi#}W.O' :.:FY. 1 . ... 9:{�. :::%;:$J;:%3:2::r::.:::{:�:y[ EXHIBIT H Z-17 ORDINANCE NO. (1991 SERIES) AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AMENDING SECTIONS 10. 52.010 (PARKING METER RATES) CHAPTER 10. 52 (PARKING METERS) OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. 10.52.010 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows, effective June 1, 1991: 10.52.010 Parking Meter Zone--Rates. A. Within the area enclosed by a dashed line on the parking meter zone map, the parking of vehicles on streets or in municipal parking lots may be controlled and regulated with the aid of parking meters. B. The parking meter rate shall be thirty cents per hour effective January 1, 1988. Parking meter rates shall be increased to the following amounts over the next 15 years: Effective Date of Increase Rate January 1, 1993 $.35 January 1, 1998 $.45 January 1, 2003 $. 60 C. Within the area enclosed by diagonal lines on the parking meter zone map, the rate for parking meters on streets or in municipal parking lots shall be fifty cents per hour effective June 1, 1991. Parking meter rates for this higher-rate zone shall be increased to the following amounts over the next 15 years: Effective Date of Increase Rate January 1, 1993 $.55 January 1, 1998 $. 65 January 1, 2003 $,80 EXHIBIT I z.-1Do Ordinance No. (1991 Series) Page Two SECTION 2. This Ordinance, together with the ayes and noes, shall be published once in full, at least three (3) days prior to its final passage in the Telegram-Tribune, a newspaper published and circulated in said City and the same shall go into effect June 1, 1991. INTRODUCED AND PASSED TO PRINT by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo at a meeting held on the day of on motion of seconded by and on the following roll call vote: ' AYES: NOES: ABSENT: MAYOR RON DUNIN ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED: CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 'C Y 0 E FINAffCt .DIRECTOR PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR P NG MANAG .Z•/ 9 rn J L—jIEIO 0 --LS b3dd3d In 8 i OSNHOP o 71 Ln g N 'is oa '" ul8 x 8 13 w `n _ 2 u O o = a D_ '1S YSOC, NVS r , _ Qi 8 g O C) is soso s oaaow W '� g El . . . . . . . . . . . E ag9OPT s ^ '1S N30aVJ 0 ::1 LJ 8 E I ooc ooe O is OVoaB �/ s o � i � U 006 0001 Doll ODZI oofl DDYI uwc '1S HOV38 Ll 0 'ts 3waVa z-ao RESOLUTION NO. (1991 SERIES) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ESTABLISHING AN ADDITIONAL $10 PENALTY FOR LATE PAYMENT OF PARKING CITATIONS AFTER 60 DAYS FROM ISSUANCE OF THE CITATION WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the BIA to establish a program to discourage employees from parking in prime downtown spaces; and WHEREAS, the BIA Board of Directors and BIA and Parking Management Committees concur with the employee parking problem; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has a concern with the number of habitual violators of parking regulations; and WHEREAS, the parking program has a need to increase parking revenues; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: A. Effective June 1, 1991 all parking citations written in the City of San Luis Obispo will have an additional $10.00 penalty assessed to each ticket. B. The additional $10.00 penalty will be imposed 60 days from the date of issuance of the citation if any outstanding balance is unpaid at that time. on motion of ,seconded by , and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of 1991. MAYOR RON DUNIN EXHIBIT J z-a/ Resolution No. (1991 Series) Page Two ATTEST CITY CLERK APPROVED: CITY ADMI ISTRATIVE OFFICER Y OEY FINANCE DIRECTOR PUBLIC ORKS DIRECTOR PPIj RING MANACj�;R 2-�� RESOLUTION NO. (1991 SERIES) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE PARKING STRUCTURE RATES OF THE FIRST 90 MINUTES FREE, 40 CENTS PER HOUR AND $3 .20 PER DAY MAXIMUM WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo wishes to increase the usage of its two parking structures; and WHEREAS, the business community supports the option of offering limited free parking in the parking structures; and WHEREAS, the Ad Hoc Parking Revenue, BIA, and Parking Management Committees have considered this option and recommended 90 minute free parking in the City's parking structures. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: A. Effective June 1, 1991 all city parking structures in the downtown shall offer the first 90 minutes free parking. B. The new hourly rate for said parking structures shall be 40 cents per hour with a maximum of $3 .20 per day. On motion of , seconded by and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of ,1991. MAYOR RON DUNIN EXHIBIT K a'-� 3 Resolution N0. (1991 Series) Page Two ATTEST CITY CLERK APPROVED: C TY ADM ;NIS:T;RAT;IVE OFFICER wvo lj! TT Y FINANtE DIRECTOR PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR PARTING MANAGER -XING . AGENDA DATE STEM 0 o rusTo: � �b a Action Q � DIR. A� b FW.DIR lJ 9Ca�0 ❑lymn DIR Q-DFRF [� [� RN �/pRIc. ❑ Pouciat 16 APR , 1991 ❑ MCMMT.TMM ❑ RECDIR @Tc-� D LL-1 CHARLES J . STORNI / 772 JOHNSON AVE , SAN LUIS OBISPO CA . 93401 (805) 544-8865 To; MR . MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL , AND THE SAN LUIS OBISPO BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION , I AS A NATIVE OF SAN LUIS AND BUSINESS MAN , I FEEL THAT THE DOWN TOWN BUSINESS AREA OF SAN LUIS IS HEADED IN THE WRONG DIRECTION , MY CONCERN IS WITH THE PROPOSED COST RAISE AND OTHER CHANGES TO PARKING IN THE DOWN TOWN CORE . PART OF THIS CONCERN HAS BEEN GENERATED BY MY EMPLOYMENT AS A TOLL TAKER IN BOTH OF OUR PARKING STRUCTURES AND LISTENING TO THE CUSTOMER FEED BACK FROM TOURISTS , YOUNG CUSTOMERS , BUSINESS OWNERS AND SENIOR CUSTOMERS , 1 , THE 25 CENT PER HOUR CHARGE PLEASES EVERYONE , THEY THINK THEY ARE GETTING OFF VERY REASONABLE FOR A CLEAN CENTRALLY LOCATED PARKING FACILITY , IF YOU WANT TO GIVE ANY THING AWAY, WHY NOT DO IT WITH TOKENS WITH THE SAN LUIS LOGO ON THEM . PERHAPS ABOUT THE SIZE OF A QUARTER . THESE WOULD BE GOOD FOR ONE HOUR FREE PARKING , WITH ONLY ONE TOKEN GOOD PER DAY AND TWENTY FIVE CENTS FOR EACH ADDITIONAL HOUR . GIVE THEM TO THE MERCHANTS FREE , PUT A NOTE NEAR EVERY ONES REGISTER ANNOUNCING THE FACT THAT THE TOKENS ARE AVAILABLE . IT WON ' T HELP TO LOAD UP ON TOKENS AS YOU CAN ONLY USE ONE A DAY ANY WAY , THIS IS TO REPLACE THE STICK ON COUPONS THAT HAVE BEEN NOT BEEN SUCCESSFUL , THIS COSTS YOU ONE HOUR, NOT ONE AND A HALF HOURS , 2 . MOST OF THE TIME THE TWO TOP FLOORS OF THE STRUCTURES ARE EMPTY , THESE SHOULD BE FOR PASS CARD HOLDERS . THE PASS CARD CHARGE SHOULD BE $24, PAYABLE BY THE MONTH , CURRENTLY PASS CARDS ARE $40 DOLLARS PAYABLE ONLY FOR THREE MONTHS , $120 . THE UPPER FLOOR CARD COULD BE GREEN WITH A SECOND FLOOR CARD ORANGE FOR THOSE THAT WOULD PAY $35 FOR GUARANTEED COVERED PARKING WITH THE FIRST AND SECOND FLOORS AVAILABLE FOR IN AND OUT SHOPPER TYPE CUSTOMERS , THIS SCHEME SHOULD BRING MOST OF THE DOWN TOWN WORKERS AND SHOP OWNERS IN TO THE PARKING STRUCTURES AND FREE UP MORE OF THE CITY STREETS FOR SHOPPERS , THERE ARE SHOPPERS AND TOURISTS THAT WON ' T USE A PARKING STRUCTURE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE SO WE MUST MAINTAIN REASONABLE COST ON STREET PARKING FOR THEM . 3 , I BELIEVE RAISING THE DOWN TOWN CORE METER CHARGE AT THIS TIME IS INAPPROPRIATE WE ARE IN THE THROWS OF A RECESSION . SANTA MARIA PARKING IS FREE AT THE DOWN TOWN CENTER MALL , MADONNA MALL IS FREE , AND DOWN TOWN BAKERSFIELD HAS NO METERS AT ALL , I BELIEVE IT IS A MATTER OF SURVIVAL AT THIS POINT FOR DOWN TOWN BUSINESS TO*jf E—OURFPA®ING METERS JUST AS THEY ARE . THANK YOU , APR 151sst CHAR _S J . o. N - $AVLLV3 06ean N..