HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/18/1991, 2 - APPEAL OF AN ACTION BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING A USE PERMIT REQUEST TO MODIFY THE SAN LUIS MOBILEHOME PARK, A LEGAL NONCONFORMING USE AT 2994 SOUTH HIGUERA BETWEEN ELKS LANE AND PRADO ROAD. IIIN�lylll�llllllllll II MEETING DATE:
N �j�ll�l
city
Of San IUIS OBISPO
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM NUMBER:
FROM: Arnold B. Jonas, gmmunity Development Director
µ1
PREPARED BY: Whitney McIlvaine `Assistant Planner 13�o
SUBJECT: Appeal of an action by the planning commission
denying a use permit request to modify the San Luis
Mobilehome Park, a legal nonconforming use at 2994
South Higuera between Elks Lane and Prado Road.
CAO RECOMMENDATION
Adopt resolution denying the appeal and upholding the planning
commission's action.
DISCUSSION
Situation
On May 8, 1991, the planning commission denied a request, on a vote
of 6 to 1, to modify the San Luis Mobilehome Park, a nonconforming
use in the commercial service zone. The applicant is proposing to
replace a trailer in the park with an apartment. The planning
commission found the proposal to be an intensification of a legal
nonconforming use, and therefore not consistent with the general
plan or with the city's zoning regulations. Commissioners felt an
additional permanent structure on the site would postpone the
eventual phasing-out of this nonconforming use. The commission
also found that the proposed project poses a significant danger to
the mature Cypress tree along the northern property line.
Consequences of Not Taking the Recommended Action
Approval of the appeal would allow the expansion of a legal i
nonconforming use. Building the proposed permanent structure is
likely to damage the root system of a mature Monterey Cypress.
Proiect Description
The applicant wants to replace a trailer space with a one bedroom
apartment inside a mobilehome park. The apartment would be
attached to an existing duplex. It would be approximately 300
square feet in size and a typical Type V, wood frame construction.
Replacing the trailer with an attached apartment would enable the
applicant to comply with setback standards for mobilehome parks,
specified by the Health and Safety Code (attached) , without
reducing the number of units in the park.
Site Description
The site is relatively flat. It is bordered on the west by San
Luis Creek; on the north by an auto repair shop; and on the south
by a planning and design consulting firm. Across Higuera Street
����in��il�IIIiIIIIIII��� �Il�lll city of San �_.�s OBIspo
ASWAN muffiammma
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Page 2
are various residential and commercial developments. Significant
on-site vegetation includes Eucalyptus, Monterey Cypress, and
Liquidambar trees in addition to ornamental shrubbery.
Data Summary
I
Address: 2994 South Higuera
Applicant/Appellant/Property Owner: Glen Johnston
Zoning: C-S
General Plan: Service Commercial/Light Industrial
Environmental Review Status: Exempt
Action Deadline: 10/26/91
Citizen Participation
• i
On May 8, 1991, the planning commission conducted a public hearing
to consider this request. Meeting minutes are attached.
EVALUATION
Number of Units -- There are 15 mobilehomes and 2 apartments on
site. A use permit for this number of units was approved by the
planning commission in 1981. This project does not propose to
increase the number of units, but to substitute an apartment for
a trailer.
Code Requirements -- The applicant is trying to better comply with
the setback standards for mobilehome parks set forth in the Health
and Safety Code. Specifically, mobilehomes must be located ten
feet from permanent structures and from each other (side to side) .
The trailer in space 12 does not meet that standard. While it is i
ten feet from the trailer in space 11, it is less than ten feet i
from the apartment structure. (see attached site plans. )
An apartment attached to the existing duplex would enable the
applicant to maintain the same number of units, and allow for a ten
foot setback between the new apartment and the trailer in space 11. '
i
Relative Impact -- The impacts of a one bedroom apartment and a
trailer are similiar in terms of noise, traffic, density and
parking. Visual compatibility is not really an issue since this
area of the park cannot be seen from the street. The planning
commission made the finding that an attached apartment, being a
more permanent structure than a trailer, represents an expansion
of a nonconforming use.
Any construction under the drip line of the Monterey Cypress trees
along the northern property boundary would be harmful to the trees'
root system and would violate condition #3 of use permit U0945
(attached) , which states:
�ii���iiililllllllllll�� IIIIIU MY Of San L.As OBISPO
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
01323 Appeal
Page 3
All existing trees shall be retained. There shall be no
cutting or filling within the dripline of existing trees.
At the planning commission meeting, the applicant pointed out that
the city installed sidewalks well within the dripline of two
Cypress trees just outside the mobilehome park. The arborist has
noted that those two trees are obviously deteriorating as a result.
i
Floor Plan -- The apartment cannot be situated as originally
proposed because the building code requires a 5 foot setback from
the property line for a three unit complex. The application
requests a "studio" but the floor plan diagrams a one bedroom
apartment. Because of the limited space available for any type of
construction, staff would prefer to see a studio rather than a one
bedroom apartment. The rear wall of the studio, if allowed, should
be located as far away from the Cypress trees as possible.
"Studio" Definition -- A one-room dwelling unit with not more than
450 square feet of gross floor area, designed for occupancy by not
more than 2 people. The floor area in a loft is included as part
of the gross floor area calculation.
Revised Site Plan - The appeal filed by Mr. Johnston includes a
site plan showing a project different from that reviewed by the
planning commission. The council may wish to refer the revised
plan back to the planning commission.
The revised site plan shows an addition on the end of apartment
"B" . This would eliminate two windows from apartment "B". It
would still require construction activity inside the dripline of
the Cypress.
The revised site plan also shows changes to the current parking
layout, and possibly a net loss of 1 space. Zoning regulations
require 1.5 spaces for each mobile home in a park. As a legal
nonconforming use, this park was allowed to provide only one space
for each unit (U0945A) . Because parking is already at a minimum for
this use, staff cannot support any project which would further
reduce available parking. Furthermore, reconfiguring the parking
to eliminate the landscaped area in front of apartment "B" does
not seem like a desireable solution.
General Plan and Zoning Ordinance - The general plan states that,
"[r]esidential neighborhoods should be separated from incompatible
nonresidential land uses. . . " The general plan land use map and the
zoning map designate this area as service-commercial/light-
industrial. Uses allowed in this zone typically are not compatible
with residential uses. Because the mobilehome park was established
prior to current regulations, it is legally nonconforming.
A nonconforming use may be replaced by another nonconforming use,
�I����si►i1►11lIIII1Pi°1°'i�il�lU city of san L.-Ais OBlspo
Nii% COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Page 4
I
but only if the new use has similiar or less severe impacts on its
surroundings. The planning commission found that the apartment _
addition would have more severe impacts on its surroundings than
the existing trailer.
t
OTHER DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
Comments from other departments have been incorporated into the
recommended conditions in draft resolution No. 2. A memo from the i
Arborist is attached.
ALTERNATIVES
I
1. Concur with planning commission action and adopt a resolution
denying the appeal (Draft Resolution #1) .
2. Uphold the appeal with appropriate findings and conditions.
3 . Continue for further consideration with direction to staff and
applicant.
4. Because the appellant has submitted a revised plan, the
council may wish to refer this item back to the planning
commission for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the council concur with planning commission action
and adopt a resolution denying the appeal (Draft Resolution #1) .
Attachments•
iftinity map
ginal site plan proposal and floor plan
ellant's statement
council resolutions
planning commission resolution No. 5059-91 j
minutes
memo from the arborist
use permit U0945 conditions
health and safety code setback standards
!
I
d:wm\appea1\U1523
- i
Draft Resolution No. 1
Appeal Denied
RESOLUTION NO. (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ACTION
TO DENY CHANGES TO THE SAN LUIS MOBILEHOME PARK,
A LEGAL NONCONFORMING USE, AT 2994 SOUTH HIGUERA STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after
consideration of public testimony, the applicant's request U1523,
the appellants' statements, the Planning Commission's action, staff
recommendations and reports thereon, makes the following findings:
1. Because a structural addition to the existing duplex is
more permanent in nature than the trailer in space 12, this
project would result in the expansion or intensification
of a nonconforming use.
2. The proposed project is not consistent with the general
plan or the zoning ordinance.
3. The proposed project poses a significant danger to the
mature Cypreds tree along the northern property line.
SECTION 2. The request for approval of a planning
commission use permit, U1523, to allow proposed changes to the San
Luis Mobilehome Park, a legal nonconforming use at 2994 south
Higuera Street, is hereby denied.
on motion of ,
seconded by , and on the following roll
call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
�-S
Draft Resolution No. 1
Appeal Denied
Page 2
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day
of , 1991.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED:
ity Admi is ratio Officer
tt Z
Community Dev4jpment Director
Draft Resolution No. 2
Appeal Upheld
RESOLUTION NO. (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
UPHOLDING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ACTION AND
APPROVING A REQUEST FOR CHANGES TO THE SAN LUIS MOBILEHO14E PARK,
A LEGAL NONCONFORMING USE, AT 2994 SOUTH HIGUERA STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after
consideration of public testimony, the applicants' request A 40-
90, the appellants' statements, and the . Planning Commission's
action, staff recommendations and reports thereon, makes the
following findings:
1. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health,
safety, and welfare of persons living or working in the
vicinity.
2. The project does not result in an increase in the total
number of units and is, therefore, not considered to be an
expansion or intensification of a nonconforming use.
3. The proposed use conforms to the general plan and the
zoning ordinance.
4. The proposed use is categorically exempt from environmental
review (CEQA Section 15303) .
SECTION 2. Conditions.
The proposed changes to the San Luis Mobilehome Park, a legal
nonconforming use at 2994 South Higuera Street, U1523 , are hereby
approved, subject to the following conditions:
1. The apartment shall be set back from the northern property
line a minimum of 10 feet, and shall be set back 10 feet
from the adjacent trailer.
2. The footings for the foundation shall be hand dug. The
Draft Resolution No. 2
Appeal Upheld
Page 2
foundation shall not damage major tree roots. A licensed
arborist shall be on site during any groundwork for
construction.
3 . The proposed apartment shall be a "studio" as defined by
the zoning ordinance.
4. A minimum of 17 parking spaces shall be provided on site
to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.
On motion of _,
seconded by , and on the following roll call
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day
of , 1991.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
0 D:
City Admi ist ive Officer
C' to ey
Community Devel ent Director
m
S rt
M
Ck
% CA
0,
r�y03
GR`
N
m F'O N TA
c _ sw_ s
'� T'ucr 7�
N M1�P• 5:�
L010
pft�7 i•`•`e v
+ ::e:
7 GrJ W
' yV7CY�'t�• 1 �
Nt874-Gd-L
m
\ svrrw
cums
a N
J
V.V`rf S� m
~� N
•\ LY
V
N
r
_ 10 •.�
VICINITY MAP U1523 NORTH
- 2994 S. HIGUERA
A
�r /
xaO � iJ0
. • � o
11 Ov
_ r
• o/i nTt�
i
IF
n
v
f1. 1
ell• I
�^ flu
-•-. - . of . . � - �
T C
e cr,N�,vo Ln
Q 9.r�►as �i
u N
Q, ti v t V
Q, ie n 1
—r
167•7C/ ]50,6i, Z V
V
r
RS }
I Gomer/ T
RAF
LIVIf.1G � .
I DE�IG� r VOIT100 AT : a44�A : MIS• 6L-PW J,40s aP
2.01M4 'GOuTR Hieupr�A iI2 (M5 Lasmo VAUwE7rK-P 31-A
W K oVsPO,
city Of San luis OBISPO
990 Palm Slr9eUPOst Office Box 8100 • San Luis Obispo, CA 93403.8100
APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL
In accordance with the appeals procedure as authorized by Title 1 . Chapter
1 .20 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, the undersigned hereby appeals
from the decision .of SLO pl flnvrlmr Cnmm1 aci nm rendered
on 8T ;:991 which decision consisted of the following ( I .e.
set forth factual situation and the grounds for submitting this appeal .
Use additional sheets as needed) :
Res. S. L. Mobile Park
2994 S. Higuera
In an effort to provide low cost housing without loss of inc-ome,.
and comply with code, I wish to appeal Planning Commission ruling..
I 15111 be consulting with..
I. City Planning Dept.
2. State housing & Community Development Dept;.
3. A contractor
4. Arr arborist
After above consultations I will be altering my plans to comply
with the City and State.
Kindly favor me with additional time to consult with the above.
The undersigned discussed the decision being appealed from with: TF,.4I�TKS
QPr. / lizrnP on —�Il
DATE & TIME APPEAL RECEIVED: A
PPellant:
RECEIVED Glerr W. Johnston % Owner
jp; ld OL .- Name/Title('
MAY 1 5 1Qyl
CITY CLERK Representative
SAN LUIS OBISPO.CA 1595 L. 0. Valley Ad. 31 A Los Osos
Address
(805) 528_6128
Phone
Original for City Clerk
/�—A/ Copy to City Attorney
Cal n red for: ! J' Copy to City Administrative Officer
Copy to the follow ng department(s) :
4. JcuR7S
City Cle
J-/017,
I:
v 4I Y
d ;
� W i+�yiYldYdY
f< ,Gb'M 3N0
\
05 I
W
C
= n
b
r
sods x �
LU
J
W
2 •u u
$ vLUl
ILL
J � a
I
,6Z-Trl w.90,6;.T&W - — ,
SAN LUIS OBISPO PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 5059-91
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo
did conduct a public hearing in the City Council Chamber of the San Luis Obispo
City Hall, San Luis Obispo, California, on May 8, 1991, pursuant to a proceeding
instituted under application No. U1523 by Glen Johnston, applicant.
USE PERMIT REQUESTED:
To modify the existing San Luis Obispo Mobile Home Park, a legal non-
conforming use.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
On file in the office of Community Development, City Hall.
GENERAL LOCATION:
2994 South Higuera Street.
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT:
Service-Commercial/Light Industrial.
PRESENT ZONING:
C-S.
WHEREAS, said commission as a result of its inspections, investigations,
and studies made by itself, and in behalf and of testimonies offered at said hearing,
has established existence of the following circumstances:
1. Because a structural addition to the existing duplex is more permanent in
nature than the trailer in space 12, this project would result in the expansion
or intensification of a nonconforming use.
2. The proposed project is not consistent with the general plan or the zoning
ordinance.
3. The proposed project poses a significant danger to the mature Cypress tree
along the northern property line.
Resolution No. 5059-91
Use Permit .0 1523
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE rr RESOLVED that application No. U1523 be
denied.
The foregoing resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission of the City
of San Luis Obispo upon the motion of Commr. Kourakis, seconded by Commr.
Karlesldnt, and upon the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commrs. Kouralds, Karleskint, Peterson, Gurnee, Hoffman, Williams
NOES: Commr. Schmidt
ABSENT: None
Arnold B. Jonas, Secretary
Planning Commission
DATED: May 8, 1991
draft
P .C. Minutes
Mav 6, 1991
----------------------------------------------------------------
Item S . ifRr_. permit u1 5'%j , Request to modify the e;•;i�•t1I1'J
;ail Luis Mobile Horne. Park, a legal non-conforming Lise ;
29194 South Hiquera Street; C-S zone. ; Glen Johnston,
applicant .
----------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Smith presented the staff report and recommended the
Commission deny the use permit based on a finding that the
structural addition to the duplex is more permanent than the
temporary mobile home space, which constitutes an expansion or
intensification of a non-conforminq use which is not in
conformance with the intent of zoning regulationsand based on
that the addition would endanger a mature cypress tree near the
property line . He said if the Commission prefers to grant the
request, staff recommends requiring a 10-foot setback from the
cypress tree . He added the arborist did not specify the 10-foot
limit, but the arborist felt a 5-foot setback was not adequate .
In answer to a question of Commr . Gurnee, Greg Smith said the
city is honing to phase out the mobile home park and encourage a
conversion to service/commercial . He said he believed the site
is located in the flood plain .
Chairman Hoffman opened the public hearing .
Glen Johnston, 2994 South Higuera Street, applicant, said he has
improved the property by putting in a sidewalk, painting fences
and the laundry, increasing lighting, planting and installing_ a
drip system. He said he would like to meet the code as best he
can by replacing the travel trailer with the addition . He added
the use of propane by the travel trailer increases his liability
insurance . He said under Title 25, the travel trailer is not
legal and he will have to move it soon . He mentioned that when
the sidewalk was put in by the city, two roots were chopped off
the tree .
Greg Smith said the arborist felt whoever was responsible for
installing the sidewalk may have damaged the cypress tree .
In answer to a question by Commr . Gurnee, Glen Johnston he could
not replace the travel trailer with a coach and move it further
bark because a distance of 10 feet is required to be kept between
trailers , and there is now only 10 feet between the travel
trailer and adjacent coaches . He said he would have to lose that
space .
Greg Smith said after reviewing a memo from the city engineering
staff, the flood zone stops outside the property line of the
mobile home park so the -site is not subject to flooding.
(;�-_`
Juan Hidari Su,ce 48, 2994 South Higuera Jcrett, said he
recently received a letter from the park owner stating the owner
wants to modify the park and is requiring trailers to be moved
off the premises whin trailers are sold . He said he bought the
trailer as an investment, and now he can ' t Sell it because it
would lose value if he had to move .it out of the park because
trailer value is determined by where it is located . He added the
trailer park is changing from a park where residents own their
trailers to a rental park that is becoming similar to an apartment
complex. He requested the use permit be denied .
Chairman Hoffman closed the public hearing .
In answer to a question of Commr . Gurnee, Greg Smith said he did
not know if the state is requiring the removal of the travel
trailer on space 12 .
Commr . Gurnee said he would like to know the answer to that
question before making a decision . He added he did not have a
significant problem with the request, if it complied with the
arborist ' s recommendations .
Commr . Schmidt expressed concern that there might be more to this
request than the proposal to this unit, and was at a loss how to
deal with that question.
Chairman Hoffman re-opened the public hearing .
Juan Hidari ( ?? ) said he believed there was a bigger picture
than just this request because he had received the letter saying
his trailer would have to be moved if it was sold . He said he
had a customer to buy it, but had to turn down the offer because
the trailer would have to be moved off the lot .
Glen Johnston said RVs increase his insurance cost . He said the
mobile home residency law states if an owner wants to improve the
property, it can be asked that RVs less than 10-feet wide be
removed from the premises .
In answer to a question of Commr . Williams, Glen Johnston said
the coach in space 412 is an RV. He said he owns the r_.oachL- on
spaces 7, 9 , 11 & 12 . He said he is trying to upgrade the Dark .
In response to a question by Conimr . Schmidt, Glen .Johnston s-YiG
ilc plans to T')ut in a 10-foot wide trailer in the space now
occupied by the trailer he has asked to be removed from the Dark
upon its sale . He said he had plans to move spaces 7 , 8 and 9
by rotating their positions to comply with codes . He added 48 1s
now not legal .
Greg Smith said the Planning commission does have jurisdiction
over the number and location of coaches .
Commr . Schmidt felt an overall site plan was needed for the
commission ' s consideration .
Greq Smith confirmed there was an existing use permit and added
that staff would need more time to research mobile home
leaisiation to make d recommendation to the co ,..A cion. He said
if that information would enable the commission to approve the
use permit, he would suagest a continuance for two weeks for
staff to research the issues .
Commr . Karleskint said he had a problem determining if this was a
request for modifying and upgrading, or for expansion and
intensificatlon . He paid the major cr-ranges , inclll .ing biggrr
trailers, appeared to be Intensification .and If he was oorrect i:,
that assumption, he couldn ' t approve the recluest .
Commr . Kourakis said she agreed with staff because a structural
addition to the existing duplex was more permanent than a trailer
and would result in the expansion and intensification of a
non-conforming use and would be inconsistent with the General
Plan and the zoning ordinance .
Commr . Kourakis moved to deny the use permit subject to the
finding on page 3 .
Commr . Karleskint seconded the motion.
Commr . Schmidt noted a non-conforminq use similar and close to
this request, village Park , was allowed by the Commission . He
said he was not particularly concerned with the non-conforming
use aspect of the request .
Chairman Hoffman re-opened the public hearing .
Glen Johnston said the coaches would be replaced with one-bedroufn
units that would not be using any more water than current units .
Chairman Hoffman closed the public hearing.
Commr . Peterson said, if the request was denied and the State Housing and
Community Development Department Housing Authority found the trailer to be non-
conforming, it would come back to the commission. He felt a denial was inappropriate
to await a determination by the State Housing Authority.
VOTING: AYES - Commrs . Kourakis , Karleskint, Gurnee, Peterson ,
Williams, and Hoffman .
NOES - Commr . Schmidt .
ABSENT - None .
The motion passed .
Ae
at sAn tuis oBi�� y �
990--Palm Street/Post Office Box 8100 • San Luis Obispo,CA 93403.8100
TO: Toff menwl vaine'�-T DATE: April 22, 1991
FROM: Todd Martin, City Arborist SUBJECT: 2994 South Higuera
(805)549-7220 U1523
Construct small studio apartment
I_I One tree required per 35 lineal feet of street frontage or any part
thereof.
I_I Trees are to be planted in the sidewalk with lids and a deep root planter.
I_I Trees are to be planted 7.5 feet to 10 feet behind the sidewalk with no
deep root planter.
1_1 Trees are to be planted within 7.5 feet behind the sidewalk with a deep
root planter.
1_1 Trees are to be planted in the parkway with a deep root planter.
1_1 Trees are to be planted to City specifications.
1_1 City is to inspect the tree(s) and planting hole(s) prior to planting.
1�1 Existing trees: This proposed building comes much too close to the
large Cypress located at the fence line behind the proposed structure.
Unless the structure can be relocated with respect to the trees, I urge
Planning to reject this project as shown.
1_1 15-gallon stock.
I_1 Other than 15-gallon stock:
Type of trees:
1_1 30 ft. corner cut offs (see following example):
PRonmy
NO =4 T tme
OVER IN3' G 30.
THIS AREw
�(1SCIt�G �.�trUO°�5 Go�1D+Ft1�1S
Off-
Resolution No. 1718-81
Use Permit 00945
Page 2
2. Spaces in the r -V shall not exceed 15.
3. All existing trees shall be retained. TI.-ere shall be no cutting or filling
within the drip line of existing trees.
4. Applicant shall plant four street trees to city standards along South
Riguera Street frontage to the approval of the Public Services Department
staff.
5. Driveways shall be posted with signs prohibiting parking to the satisfaction
of the Fire Department and City Engineer.
6. Address directory board shall be provided at driveway entrances :o the
approval of the Community Development Department staff. Each mobile
homelcoach shall have address clearly posted at the front of the .mit.
7. Property shall be kept in a clean and orderly manner. All plant materials
shall be maintained and replaced as necessary.
B. Occupancy of all mobile homes in the park and shall not be restricted to ani
age group.
9.. All mobile homes located within the project regardless of age, shall be
equipped with heat and smoke detectors to the approval of the Fire
Department.
IC. All new utilities shall be underground.
I. rroject's interior driveways shall be constructeL to city standards and be
approved by the City Engineer.
I
12. Trafiic directional signs shall be provided at driveway entrances to the
approval of the Community Development Director.
'- 13. Applicant shall construct standard city sidewalk along entire South Rig.aers
Street frontage to the approval of the Public Services Department. A
( temporary waiver :or the sidewalk installation is hereby granted, subject to
the applicant signing a city agreement stating that the sidewalk shall be
installed vith:p 30 days' notice by the City Engineer.
TSe feregoinL resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission of the
1 City o' San Luis Obispo upon the motion of Comer. Bullock, .eccnded by Comr.
Andrews.
VOTING: ATW- Comrs. Bullock, Andrews, and rindley
�1 NOES: Commr. Drucker
i ABSENT:. Pone
f VACANCIES: One
Renry Engen, Secretary
P:arming Commission of the
City of Sam Luis Obispo
l bated: May 13, 1981
• 1
pC 42
CCDL i'*`iWtONS
Paris Inspections Page two
B. Informal conference,subsequent hearings or appeals shall be conducted as specified in
existing law and regulations.
V. Preparing for Inspection
b A. Lot lines (Article 10, Section 1616 of Title 25)
1. All mobilehome lot lines shall be numbered or designated by street numbers or other
suitable means and the lot lines defined. The lot designation shall be maintained in a
conspicuous location facing the driveway,or on the front side of the mobilehome
nearest the driveway.
2. Lot lines shall be maintained permanently by corner markers or other suitable means.
Lot lines shall be considered to be the inside surface of any fence or windbreak erected
parallel to and delineating the lot boundaries,or of any perimeter wall or enclosure of
the park erected inside the property line.
3. Lot lines shall not be moved, shifted, or altered without written authority from the
local planning department and the occupants of the mobilehome lots affected.
B. Mobilehome location (set backs) (Article 7,Section 1330 of Title 25)
1. 10' from permanent bulding.
2. 10' side to side
3. 8' side to front or rear of another mobilehome
4. 6' from rear to rear, front to front,or front to rear of another mobilehome,
5. 3' from all lot lines minimum, except a lot line-bordering a roadway.
EXCEPTION: In mobilehome parks constructed prior to September 15, 1961,a
mobilehome shall not be located closer than 6' from any permanent building or another
mobilehome.
C. Accessory structures (Article 9)
1. Garages located at least 3' from any lot line which does not border a driveway (Sec-
tion 1424(c)).
2. Storage buildings located 6' from any mobilehome and 3' from any lot line whch does
not border a driveway (Section 1424(d)).
3. Storage cabinets(does not support combustion- 100 square feet or less (Section 1512))
located to the lot line if at least 3' from any mobilehome,mobilehome accessory struc-
ture, or any building. (Section.-1428 (a) and Section 1510).
4. Awnings/carports (does not support combustion) may be located to the lot line if at
least 3' from any mobilehome or accessory structure on an adjacent lot (Section 1428 (a)
and Sections 1466 through 1474).
D. Mobilehome exits,stairs,porches,etc(Article 9)
L Where a mobilehome door swings outward, a landing shall be provided no more than
one inch lower than the bottom of the door. (Section 1498 (b))
2. The rise of every step in a stairway shall not exceed 8" and the run shall not be less
than 9". All risers shall have the same height with a maximum allowable variation of
1/4". (Section 1498 (e))
3. Guard rails are required where porches and decks are 30"or more above surrounding
grade. Guardrails shall be 36" in height above the floor with no openings between inter-
mediate rails of more than 9" (Section 1502).
SETING AGENDA
uATE '/ ITEM #
LLQ
ax-.3;8
Tsi
• - ei .
r r
r `
cO�rD:
- ANS F„
- �O ..
❑ FKDR
- - - -La' cnO.. -0 ME
❑ FWo�. RECEIVED
�rvOxrc. ❑ Poua at
❑ M-�G-MT 7FgN1 ❑ MC DM,,..,FIU JUN 1 0 91
U7IlrD3R�
CI CLERK
- , . SAN L OBISPO,CA
STATE OF CAUFORk fe P. a 31 DEPARTMENT USE ONLY
.ANT OF HOUSING AND CO UNITY DEVELOPMENT ❑ Socrdmenro,CA 95801
DIVISION OF CODES AND STANDARDS COL NO.
MANUFACTURED HOUSING SECTION6007 Falsotn Blvd.
❑ Swomwto,CA 95819 FEE RECD.
1350"O"Street DATE f
SUBMIT THIS FORM WITH APPLICABLE FEES TO THE Room 202
NEAREST MANUFACTURED HOUSING SECTION Fresno,CA 93721 AA NO.
OFFICE TO INITIATE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING
ACTIONS. (PLEASE REFER TO THE BACK OF THIS 28 Civic Cen)Sr Plaza RT TO
FORM FOR INSTRUCTIONS) ❑ Room 639
/� Santa Ana,CA 92701 RT BY
MANUFACTURED HOMES (MOBILEHOMES) OWNER v
MANUFACTURED HOME (MOBILEHOME) j�
❑ COMPONENT STRUCTURES Address /
O ❑ RECREATIONAL VEHICLES City J405County /t!!!�!/`1
W ❑ COMMERCIAL COACHES(Occupancy Group_) Home Phone No. LP 7`c/.vZ'
❑ FACTORY-BUILT HOUSING ona No.
FACTORY-BUILT HOUSING C«anon oaros, J
❑ COMPONENT SYSTEMS
C
❑ REQUESTED INSPECTION APPLICANT
APPLICATION FOR ALTERATION, ADDITION, Address
OR CONVERSION
❑ APPLICATION FOR ALTERNATE APPROVAL Gjy
❑ REQUEST FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES Telephone Zip
❑ REQUEST FOR REPLACEMENT INSIGNIA/LABEL Con. tic. No. Class
UNIT SERIAL YEAR OF DECAL OR MANUFACTURER'S NAME CALIFORNIA INSIGNIA
NUMBER(S) MFG. LICENSE NO. —MAKE/MODEL OR HUD LABEL NO.(S)
Nate. Allow a moummn of len(10)days for scheduling.
g.
AN INSPECTION IS REQUESTED FOR THE FOLLOWING DATE n QS THE PURPOSE OF THE INSPECTION
IS TO: ❑ OBTAIN INSIGNIA ❑ CLEAR NOTICE OF VIOLATIONS XDETERMINE COMPLIANCE OF ALTERATIONS, ETC.
A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT WILL CONTACT YOU TO CONRRM THE DATE OF INSPECTION.
ALTERATION, ADDITION, CONVERSION: Describe the proposed work in detail in the space provided in Item Number 5. Use additional pages if
aecessmy.Where structural alterations or additions are proposed,complete plans,specifications,details,and calculations are required to be attached
to this form.Provide the make and model of any appliance to be installed and proride complete electrical calculations for any electrical alterations or
additions. 7%
INDICATE THE TOTAL COST OF THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED
DESCRIPTION 424 o , r
J
REPLACEMENT CALIFORNIA INSIGNIA OR HUD LABEL: I/WE HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR REPLACEMENT OF A LOST INSIGNIA
OR LABEL FOR THE UNIT INDICATED IN ITEM NO. 2 ABOVE. //WE CERTIFY THAT THERE HAVE BEEN NO ALTERATIONS, ADDITIONS,
OR MODIFICATIONS TO THE UNIT WHICH WOULD AFFECT COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA OR FEDERAL LAW OR THE RULES AND
REGULATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT: (Where aBerations or madifscafions have bow maw,Items 3 and I must be comphtted.)
SIGNATURE
DEPARTAUNT USE ONLY
DATE OF
❑ APPROVED ❑ CONDITIONS• ❑ DISAPPROVED-
App
s
6omY ✓I!_4 M f� Sqm�ls rte. ,re Date