Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/27/1991, 2 - THE THREE ALTERNATIVE DESIGNS FOR LAGUNA LAKE PARK II,IN�I��III�IIIII�I�II I�I MEETING GATE: city o� san Luis OBIsPO COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TEM NUMBER: FROM: Arnold B. Jonas,/Community Development Director by: Jeanette i Leo, Long Range Planner SUBJECT: The Three Alternative Designs for Laguna Lake Park CAO RECOMMENDATION: By minute action adopt the Park and Recreation Commission's recommendation which supports Alternative 1 with some changes and additions (see Attachment E) . DISCUSSION: The purpose of this hearing is to allow the City Council to (1) hear public input regarding Laguna Lake Park' s future design, and (2) comment on the three proposed alternative park designs. i BACKGROUND: In September, 1990 a group of consultants (i.e. , Crawford Multari & Starr, SEDES, and Leisure visions) were hired to prepare a master plan for Laguna Lake Park. The master plan was to include a report and a physical park plan which would depict future park facilities and potential park expansion areas. The project's work scope included three phases as indicated below: 1. Phase I of the project included research, data collection, and the development of guidelines for future park development, i.e. , planning principles. This phase included determining site constraints and assessing community preferences by conducting surveys and workshops. As a result of the completed research, data collection, and community input, Draft Planning Principles were developed (see Attachment B) . These principles were developed not only to direct future development and expansion of the park but also to respond to community concerns and site constraints. In January, 1991, the Park and Recreation Commission (PRC) held j a public hearing to discuss the Draft Planning Principles. Amendments were made to the principles based on this hearing (see Attachment A) . In February, 1991 the City Council adopted the Draft Planning Principles, incorporating the changes recommended by the PRC and staff (as noted in Attachment A) . 2 . Phase II of the project required that three alternative park designs be developed by the consultants. These alternative designs were to be based on the policies contained within the 2-I �ii�j�h►��illlllllll�° llUhl City of San lLsS OBISpo COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT City Council Report - Laguna Lake Park page 2 adopted Planning Principles. It was planned that these alternative designs would be reviewed by the project's Steering Committee (composed of City staff) , the PRC, the ARC, the Planning Commission, and the City Council. The project is presently in its second phase. The three alternative designs were reviewed by the Steering Committee on j April 25, 1991, the ARC on June 3, 1991, the Planning Commission on June 27, 1991, and the PRC on May 15, June 5, and July 10, 1991. Draft minutes from the ARC and Planning i Commission meetings are attached for City Council review. The May 15, 1991 PRC meeting was held to receive public testimony and initiate PRC review. At the June 3, 1991 meeting, the PRC i identified design features that they considered important. At j the July 10, 1991 meeting the PRC considered input from the Planning Commission and ARC, and as a result of this and public input compiled a memo to the City Council delineating their recommendation (see Attachment E) . 3 . Phase III (the final phase of the project) will involve developing one final draft plan, cost estimates for this plan, and a report. The final draft park plan will combine those components of the three alternative plans that the City Council recommends be incorporated. The cost estimates, report, and the final design will be reviewed by staff, the various commissions, and the City Council. i CON WENTS: i In general, the alternatives incorporate various levels of development. Alternative 1 proposes wind breaks, some additional trails, acquisition of marsh area, and a change in road circulation j along the lake. Alternative 2 adds structural development (a Community Center and Children's Museum) adjacent to Madonna Road, more intense use of the park in the form of trails, picnic and play areas; acquisitions; and a changed road alignment. Alternative 3 incorporates a neighborhood center; additional acquisitions; more intense trails, picnic and play areas; and a changed road alignment. The plans will be explained in more detail by the consultant at the August 27, 1991 City Council meeting. It is not anticipated that the City Council will adopt any one alternative in its entirety, but rather that a discussion will occur regarding components of each plan that the Council either likes or dislikes. Consistent with the Park and Recreation Commission's recommendation, it is thought that the final draft plan will likely contain components of all three alternatives. I 2-z city or sar. .ais OBISpo COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT City Council Report - Laguna Lake Park page 3 FISCAL EWPACTS There are not any fiscal impacts associated with reviewing the draft alternatives. These alternatives represent the second phase in the preparation of the Laguna Lake Park Master Plan. The review of the three alternative designs is supported by a contract already approved by the City Council. i ALTERNATIVES: Other options are available to the council in addition to the recommended action: A. The Council could support another alternative or changes to i the Park and Recreation Commission recommendation. B. The Council could support additional studies of Laguna Park and/or surrounding property. Such an action would likely result in alterations to the consultant contract. I Attachments: Attachment A - Adopted Changes to the Draft Planning Principles i Attachment B - Original Draft Planning Principles Attachment C - ARC Minutes (June 3, 1991) j Attachment D - Draft Planning Commission Minutes (June 27, 1991) Attachment E - PRC Memo to City Council Set of Plans - The front sheet (not numbered) depicts the park as it presently exists, sheets 1 through 3 depict the three alternatives, sheet four provides concept sections, and sheet i 5 depicts proposed acquisitions and trail corridors. I Laguna Lake Park Master Plan Programming and Conceptual Alternatives I i cc.lad 2-3 ATTACHMENT A PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDED CHANGES AND COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMENT The principles listed below are those that the Park and Recreation Commission had comments or concerns about. In addition, on the final page of this exhibit is a comment by the County of San Luis Obispo. Each principle discussed below is referenced by the page number the principle is located on and its item number. For clarification, the original principle is provided in italics. Corrections or proposed rewording is underlined, deletions are cross-hatched. page 20, item 5 Existing wording: The City should investigate expanding the park in the following priority: o protection of the portions of the lake and wetlands in private ownership. comment: The reference to private ownership is not clear. As presently written there was concern that it could mean easements or acquisition of the single family lots located south of the lake. The intent was to expand the park to include a northern portion of the lake presently located on private property. new wording: The City should investigate expanding the park in the following priority: 0 protection of the privately held portions of the lake and wetlands along the northern most region of Lacuna Lake (the intent is not to include the Yards of single family dwellings located along the southern shoreline of Laguna Lake) page 21, item 5 Existing Wording: o easements restricting development on open areas outside the park. - 1 - ;ZI comment: It was noted by the public and the consultant that the eucalyptus grove across Madonna Road should be considered as an addition to the park due to its habitat value. new wording: o easements restricting development on open areas outside the park, including the eucalyptus grove south of Madonna Road. Easements or acquisition of the eucalyptus grove could occur as a result of adoption of the Dalidio specific plan. page 241 item 30 The southern lake shore should be evaluated in detail for opportunities to provide passive recreation, access and view points for the public. comment: It was thought that this principle should be clarified to indicate these would be viewing points on city owned land along the southern lake shore, e.g. , not viewing points on private property in this area. new wording: The southern lake shore should be evaluated in detail for opportunities to provide passive recreation, access and view points for the public on publicly owned land. page 24, item 31 Vehicular access should be limited; in general, new roads should not be planned for the park. However, if after more detailed analysis a new park road is deemed necessary, it must be carefully sited and designed to ensure it will not significantly impact habitat, aesthetic or recreational values. comment: It was noted that this principle should reference that the park should be orientated to pedestrian and bike traffic. new wording: The park should be oriented to pedestrian and bike traffic Vehicular access should be limited; in general, new roads should not be planned for the park. However, if after more detailed analysis a new park road is deemed necessary, it must be carefully sited and designed to ensure it will not significantly impact habitat, aesthetic or recreational values. page 24, item 34 A trail system should be developed with the following features: 2 - access around the lake; access to the ridge and saddle; integration of park paths with a comprehensive trail system which links the park .with the Los Osos Valley Road and the neighborhood around junior high school, Foothill Boulevard and downtown. Another potential linkage, provided habitat values can be adeguately protected, would be along Perfumo Creek corridor (upstream and downstream) . comment.: The first portion of this principle references a trail system "around the lake. " The intent of the statement was that a trail would be located on the north side of Laguna Lake (from Madonna Road) and extend to Los Osos Valley Road and to Foothill Boulevard. It was never intended that the trail would circle the lake. new wording: A trail system should be developed with the following features: ____ _-_..-d the , _,__; access to the ridge and saddle; integration of park paths� with a comprehensive trail system which links the park with t*e Los Osos Valley Road, and the neighberheed areund junler high , Foothill Boulevard, and the downtown. Another potential linkage, provided habitat values can be adequately protected, would be along Perfumo Creek corridor (upstream and downstream) . In addition a trail link to existing Lacuna Lake neighborhoods should be explored. page 25, add 38 a comment: In general it was mentioned that an additional planning principle or revision of .a planning principle should occur such that handicap access is encouraged within the park and adjacent to the lake. new principle: Handicap access should be Provided within the Park and adiacent to Lacuna Lake. page 26, add 49 a comment: It was recommended that once grazing was removed the park plan should include methods to control potential fire hazards, e.g. , planned irrigation breaks, areas mowed, or scraped, or other methods. new principle: To Protect any developed areas and structures within the Park from wildland fires the Park' s design should include planned irrigation .breaks, mowed areas and/or other similar preventive measures. 3 - 2-� page 26, item 5o The park should be better maintained. comment: This principle was generated at a workshop meeting. The intent of the principle was that more litter control should occur, bathroom facilities should be maintained more often, and that landscaping should be managed and enhanced. new wording: The park should be better maintained, areas of concern include litter control better upkeep of bathrooms and other facilities and management and enhancement of landscalping. page 26, add 52 a (County Comment) comment: The County of San Luis Obispo Parks Department provided comments on February 4, 1991. As noted in the planning principles, the city may be interested in acquiring land or obtaining easements within the county's jurisdiction. Since such easements and/or acquisitions would be on county land, the county should review and comment on proposed easements and/or acquisitions. new principle: Facilities , acquisitions , and/or easements promosed outside the city' s boundary should be reviewed and coordinated with the County of San Luis Obispo Parks Department and the County Planning Department. 4 2� Laguna Lake Masrer Plan Initial Analyses and Draft Planning Principles December, 1990 Attachment H Draft Planning Principles A note on directions: in these principles, "east"is considered the direction toward Madonna Road, "west"is the direction toward Foothill Boulevard, "south" is the direction of the developed side of the lake, toward Los Osos Valley Road, "north"means the direction away from the lake and toward the hillsides. General. 1. The long-term viability of the lake as a lake is very important; planning for the park should be coordinated with the long-term protection and maintenance of the lake; the on-going implementation measures prescribed by the adopted lake management plan (namely, weed control, siltation control and raising the level by log dams) should continue to be followed. 2. The lake and associated wetlands constitute a rare -and extremely limited .habitat; this resource should be protected and managed to ensure its habitat values for the long-term. I Continued community access to portions of the lake for water-related recreation is important. 4. Besides the lake itself, the most important feature of the park area is its open space; any new uses must not overwhelm feelings of openness. 5. The City should investigate expanding the park in the following priority: • protection of the portions of the lake and wetlands in private ownership • access easements for trails (walking and bike) to Foothill Boulevard, the downtown and Los Osos Valley Road seder Crawford Multarl & Starr Leisure Visions Q 20 2-� Laguna Lake Master , ,an Initial Analyses and Draft Planning Principles December, 1990 • access easements or acquisition of prominent knolls • easements restricting development on open areas outside the park • acquisition of hillsides and other open areas west of the park 6. Planning should always take the long term view of the park, recognizing it as a major resource of the community in terms of aesthetics, land, open space, recreation and wildlife habitat. Land and Water Use. 7. Human encroachment in and around the western part of the lake should minimized; this area (the western portion of the lake and wetlands) should be set aside as the City's first officially recognized wildlife preserve; boating and windsurfing in this portion of the lake should be prohibited. 8. Highest priority in terms of expanding the park should be given to placing the privately held portions of the lake and wetlands into the wildlife preserve. 9. Uses in the preserve should be limited to (a) those activities required to maintain the habitat values for the long-term; (b) wildlife observation from designated paths and blinds only; and (c) small interpretive exhibits which encourage the protection of the resource. 10. The eastern part of the lake should be used for aquatic recreation; gas powered boats- should continue to be prohibited; adequate public docks and ramps should be provided on the park side of the lake. 11. Grazing should be discontinued in the park; existing fences, pipes and tanks should be removed. 12. The steep hillsides should be kept open and uses there should be limited to hiking and ancillary facilities; hiking there shall be limited to designated paths sedes Crawford Multarl & Starr Leisure Visions 21 A07 Laguna Lake Masrer Plan Initial Analyses and Draft Planning Principles December, 1990 only, to minimize erosion and to protect springs and endangered species (see below). Seating and viewing stations, for enjoying the views of the lake, morros and Los Osos Valley, should be provided. 13. Sensitive habitat areas on the hillsides, including sites of rare or. endangered species and the springs, will be protected; approaches should include signs to encourage people to stay on paths, opportunities to see the springs from designated areas, interpretive exhibits to educate people about the sensitive nature of these locations, and, if necessary, barriers to discourage human intrusion. 14. The great majority of the park should be kept in open space. 15. Buildings and active recreation facilities should be limited to a small proportion of the total parkland, and (except for rest rooms, small interpretative exhibits and picnic shelters) may be located only in the eastern part of the park. In general, the more developed or active the use, the more easterly it should be located. Habitat Protection. 16. The marsh areas should be preserved as an environmentally sensitive habitat area. Uses should be limited to paths or raised walks which do not significantly threaten the habitat value, viewing blinds and small interpretive exhibits. Where deemed necessary to restrict human encroachment, barriers should be installed around especially sensitive areas. 17. A buffer zone should be created landward of the marsh. This buffer should be re-vegetated with a variety of native plant species. Uses in the buffer zone should be restricted to paths and recreation uses which would not significantly impact the wetlands, such as an exercise trail. sedes Crawford Multari & Starr Leisure Visions 22 L-10 Laguna Lake Master an Initial Analyses and Draft Planning Principles December, 1990 18. Additional interpretive exhibits of the cultural history and natural history of the area should be located elsewhere in the park. Buildings should generally be located near parking and in the eastern portion of the park. 19. Dogs should be prohibited in the nature preserve. 20. Suitable tree species, emphasizing natives and endemics, should be planted in the vicinity of the lake and within the preserve which may provide future nesting (rookery) opportunities for herons and egrets. 21. Additional plantings should occur in the nature preserve using native species, to enhance the natural habitat values thdre. Additional plantings, with suitable species, should occur throughout the park for habitat enhancement, human comfort (windbreaks and shade), spatial organization of uses, aesthetics and view control (ie: framing exceptional views, hiding unattractive views, or screening activity areas or facilities). 22. Wildlife corridors should be maintained and, where feasible, enhanced including along Prefumo Creek, both upstream and downstream of the lake. 23. An active fish management program should be implemented for the lake which would include stocking the lake with suitable species. Recreation. 24. Because of habitat values and potential impacts on nearby neighborhoods, lighted recreation fields or sports facilities should not be part of this park. 25. Unlighted play fields may be located in the eastern portion of the park and away from the lake shore. 26. Individual picnic areas may be located anywhere in the park, outside the nature preserve and sensitive habitat areas. Small-scale sports courts (eg: sedes Crawford Multari & Starr Leisure Visions 23 ��" Laguna Lake Mas. . Plan Initial Analyses and Draft Planning Principles December, 1990 volleyball, horseshoes) may be permitted on the flatter areas of the park, outside the nature preserve, and usually in conjunction with group picnic areas. 27. Wind breaks should be planted or built around all picnic areas and play fields. 28. Fishing should continue to be an activity allowed in the park. 29. The park should provide more and better playgrounds, especially for younger children. 30. The southern lake shore should be evaluated in detail for opportunities to provide passive recreation, access and view points for the public. Access and Circulation. 31. Vehicular access should be limited in the park; in general, new roads should not be planned for the park. However, if after more detailed analysis a new park road is deemed necessary, it must be carefully sited and designed to ensure it will not significantly impact habitat, aesthetic or recreational values. 32. Additional parking should generally be located in the eastern part of the park, away from the lake shore. 33. Walk ways and bike paths should be separated, wherever possible, from automobile roadways. 34. A trail system should be developed with the following features: access around the lake; access to the ridge and saddle; integration of park paths with a comprehensive trail system which links the park with the Los Osos Valley Road and the neighborhood around junior high school, Foothill Boulevard and downtown. Another potential linkage, provided habitat values can be adequately protected, would be along the Perfumo Creek corridor (upstream and downstream). sedes Crawford Multarl & Starr Leisure Visions 24 z-1z- Laguna Lake Master . .-in Initial Analyses and Draft Planning Principles December, 1990 35. A bike path should be installed in the park with links to Foothill Boulevard, the downtown and Los Osos Valley Road. 36. The City should attempt to acquire access easements over adjacent properties to create the off site linkages described above (ie: Foothill, Los.Osos Valley Road and downtown). 37. No Highway One "by-pass" or other major roadway should be permitted within the park. 38. Public transit links to the town and to the region should be improved. Aesthetics. 39. The existing memorial grove should be expanded; more trees should be planted especially near Madonna Road. 40. The park entrance and Madonna Road frontage should be better designed to make it more "park like" and inviting. Major view opportunities from Madonna Road, over the lake, and down Los Osos Valley should be preserved. 41. The City should re-evaluate using reclaimed water to facilitate increased planting, and possibly for maintaining the water level in the lake. 42. Where buildings are proposed, they should reflect a continuity of design elements and materials. Furthermore, the design of buildings and other facilities such as play areas should reflect the over-arching character of the park as a natural place: the choice of materials, colors, plantings, and the scale, architecture and orientation of these facilities should emphasize elements of the surrounding natural environment. 43. All built elements should be designed as low-scale and relatively unobtrusive nodes placed amid plants and other natural materials; any active sedes Crawford Naltarl & Starr Leisure Visions 25 ,Z-13 Laguna Lake Mast_, Plan Initial Analyses and Draft Planning Principles December, 1990 recreation areas or buildings should be buffered and screened from open areas elsewhere in the park. Safety. 44. The park should be closed at night; a gate should be used to keep out cars. 45. More telephones should be installed, especially near boating and wind- surfing facilities. 46. More rest rooms should be provided, especially near activity areas; the design of rest rooms and other features should provide security for the users, especially children. 47. Safe crossing for bikes and pedestrians should be provided across roads. 48. Areas of the lake shore subject to erosion and storm damage, outside the nature preserve, should be protected; shore line protection should emphasize techniques which most closely relate to the natural environment, such as plantings and use of native materials. 49. Traffic in the park should be kept as slow as possible, to reduce noise and enhance safety. Implementation 50. The park should be better maintained. 51. The park master plan should be realistic with goals that can be put into effect within a specified time frame; implementation should be phased to match funding ability. 52. Long-term funding sources and management approaches must be identified. series Crawford Multarl & Starr Leisure Visions 26 ATTACHMENT C ARC Minutes June 3 , 1991 Meeting Item 9 - Laguna Lake Park Alternatives Jan Di Leo introduced this item, explaining that the purpose of this hearing was to receive ARC input on the three alternative designs. She explained that no formal action was required from the. ARC at this time, only their input. Di Leo stated that three consulting firms were working on this project (i.e. , Crawford Multari and Starr, Leisure visions, and SEDES) , and that two representatives were here to explain the project in more detail. The representatives were than introduced. Mike Multari (from Crawford Multari and Starr) provided background on how the alternatives were developed. David Foote (from SEDES) explained the difference between the three plans and plan concepts. The following represents a synopsis of ARC comments: Commissioner Cooper - The proposed community center's location should have a relationship to the water related activities that will or do occur at Laguna Lake Park. A center near the water can provide assistance and/or security. Commissioner Illingworth - A Community center should have a lot of small children facilities. If so, there are safety concerns with having the facility near water. A community center would be an essential part of the park that will draw people. Presently I do not use the park because there is nothing that draws me there. Because the weather at the park is so poor I cannot imagine the park too populated. Supports the idea of an entrancing shoreline and the community center out by Madonna Road. Right now the park does not say anything in terms of facilities. Supports the ponds and the removal of vehicular circulation from the lake. Commissioner Combrink - Anything you do to give it a park look from Madonna Road would be helpful. Provide for more use of the park. Would the green areas be green? If so, how? - 1. - David Foote - A certain amount of turf is essential. Commissioner Gates - Concerned whether the hiking trail proposed in the northern area of the park was planned on Cerro San Luis. In addition please define the adventure playground. David Foote The proposed trail is on park property (not Cerro San Luis) . Under one alternative the city would pursue an easement to . access Cerro San Luis. The adventure playground is a playground which includes an education and/or participatory component. Commissioner Bradford— There is a conflict with calling the park a .wildlife preserve and then increasing public use of the park. The park alternatives do not provide proper orientation for preserving nature, i.e. , a boat ramp is planned right around the corner from the sensitive nature area, etc. All active park facilities can be provided somewhere else - the birds have only one place. This is the only wetland the City has. We will end up consuming this open space piecemeal if we are not careful. Recommend: fewer roads, a parking setback from the lake, new vegetation limited to revegetation of the area, and that grazing be stopped. The City needs to make a commitment regarding the dredging of the lake. Extending the eucalyptus grove on the Dalidio property is important. Even concept 1 goes too far. Commissioner Underwood - Impressed with Melinda's concept except that there should be some provision for humans. Human use should be concentrated toward Madonna Road. Seeing and being part of wildlife is a valuable experience. Some area (a small area) should be designed as a nature preserve. The Children's Museum should not be at Laguna Lake Park but should be located downtown. The community center is okay, but it should be near Carl's Jr. The park should provide a blend of both nature and people. Commissioner Cooper - Hiking in that area tends to be boring because it is so open. I would like a comfortable place near the water where I could watch the sunset. The park should not be too contrived, too developed, it should look natural. The park is a place where people can find their back yard, nature. The park should be preserved for wildlife and those people that need to find nature. 2 I� Commissioner Bradford - Get rid of grazing on the property. The park cannot be a nature preserve with all the planned uses. Commissioner Underwood - Dredging of the lake should be implemented. Commissioner Cooper - Commented on the existing scheme of the roads. Right angle configuration of one road seems incongruous to the design of the park. The 'road seems like the beginning of a subdivision. 3 ATTACHMENT D DRAFT M MUTES PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP June 27, 1991 Item 1 - Laguna Lake Park Alternatives (Discussed from 330 pm to 5:00 pm) Di Leo: Provided background on the Laguna Lake Master Plan process. She then introduced David Foote (from SEDES) and Dave Moran (from Crawford Multari & Starr)* Schmidt: The Draft Planning Principles talk about preservation, the plans do not seem to represent preservation. Were people informed as to the unique character of the park? Di Leo: Natural resources within the park were discussed at the various workshops. A consideration is that different people have different ideas of how to preserve that unique resource and what constitutes preservation. Foote: The public indicated they wanted features of the natural environment preserved; however, they also indicated that they wanted some desired facilities such as playgrounds, picnic areas, etc. The principles also discuss these components. Foote then went into his presentation. He provided information regarding the three alternatives. He noted that each alternative reflected a different level of usage. It was clarified that it was not intended that the Planning Commission choose any one alternative,but rather that they provide comments on each alternative. Kourakis: Are there portions of the park still being grazed? Foote: Showed areas presently grazed. He noted that the land was leased to Alex Madonna. Kourakis: Explain animal/wildlife components of the park. Foote: Main wildlife component is bird life. Some animals considered for listing (such as the burrowing owl) do inhabit the site. Foote then discussed marsh land and open water relationship. He noted that some dredging may be necessary to maintain and extend the life of the existing water fowl habitat. Kourakis: Is the heron rookery part of the park? Foote: Not presently, but Dalidio's property should be considered for acquisition due - 1 - 2-18 Planning Commission Minutes Laguna Lake - June 27, 1991 to the biological relationship between the rookery site and Laguna Lake. Kourakis: Tell me more about the bird life. How significant is it? Foote: Most of the birds would go elsewhere if this resource were removed. Schmidt: Fish and Game thinks this site is valuable. Gurnee: What part. of the lake would be dredged? Where would the spoils be deposited? Foote: It is proposed that the entire lake be dredged and that dredge materials be deposited in the back portion of the park (in the open space area covering roughly 25 acres). Di Leo: The dredging plan is starting environmental review. What areas of the lake should be dredged will be assessed in the document as well as what impacts dredge materials may have. Gurnee: Is Alternative 1 the only plan that provides for richer wetlands? Foote: All the alternatives do. He then explained how each plan provides for wetland protection. Gurnee: Mitigation banking should be considered where wetlands are destroyed as a result of development. Monies used for banking could buy additional wetlands at the Laguna Lake site. Schmidt: What is the source of water for the adventure playground ponds? Foote: The lake probably. Schmidt: Explain the adventure playground concept. Foote: Explained that such a playground could provide education and fun. The system would be similar to the creek area in Mission Plaza. A stream would be created that children could play in. The system would be artificial but educational, having wildlife, etc. Kourakis: Why were the Children's Museum and overnight camping considered at the park? Foote: The Steering Committee directed that these facilities be considered. - 2 - Planning Commission Minutes Laguna Lake - June 27, 1991 Di Leo: This direction came from numerous sources. Since other studies were being conducted (e.g.,the Community/Senior Study)or because a need had occurred (e.g., the Children's Museum had to move) it was felt that the alternatives should explore some different options. Williams: The Children's Museum belongs downtown. If other facilities were used sparingly, they might be acceptable at the park. The park needs to be maintained for the most part in its natural state. Hoffman Explain the Nature Center. Foote: It was thought that it could be a small building. Docent lead tours could be part of the nature center. The center could possibly be run by a private, non- profit foundation. Williams: If the City could find an organization to manage the center it would be a good idea. Foote: Alternative 2 includes a smaller scale nature center than Alternative 3. Di Leo: The Native Plant Society has discussed certain areas of Laguna Lake Park with City staff. There is a thistle on the property that they would like to see protected. They offer some services for protection. Williams: Stop the grazing. Schmidt: The seeps were supposed to be fenced. Di Leo: They have been. The other seeps are not on city property. Williams: Likes the proposed play areas for children. The existing play areas need improvement. The entrance to the park needs to be redone. Where would bike paths be? Foote: Circular paths would be included in the design if the paths did not have a connection to Foothill or Los Osos Valley Road. The path would be kept out of the marsh area. Williams: I do not think mountain bikes should be allowed due to habitat concerns. The problem is that they do not always stay on the designated trails. Bike links would be important. - 3 - z ZO Planning Commission Minutes Laguna Lake - June 27, 1991 Hoffman: If we could get bike links they would be an excellent contribution to the city. Problems, such as people going off the trail, could be resolved later. Di Leo: When the Dalidio property develops a bike path could continue from Laguna Lake Park to Highway 101 along Perfumo Creek. It may be possible that a linear park would be provided on the Dalidio Property along Perfumo Creek. In addition, protection of the rookery would likely occur at that time. It was noted by the Park and Recreation Commission that the Dalidio property may be a better site for a neighborhood center. Gurnee: At the time the Dalidio property develops, the EIR for that development would require protection of the heron rookery. Kourakis: There is a connection between Laguna Lake Park and the rookery, but I am not getting that feedback. Foote: The heron rookery is important. There is a relationship between the park and the rookery. Such rookeries are high on Fish & Games list to preserve. There are only three areas in San Luis Obispo county where such rookeries exist. The lower portion of the park is degraded, and is basically urban. This lower area is not as environmentally sensitive. How close can the interface between the rookery and humans be? The site is now impacted by Madonna Road and use of the park In addition, other rookies have some interface. The attempt should be to minimise encroachment and protect these areas where possible. Some interface can occur. Gurnee: Rookeries for heron are primarily human made environments, planted with non-native Eucalyptus trees. Kourakis: How close can development be before impacting the rookery? Foote: Need to provide some protection,herons need some amount of personal space. Schmidt: When development occurred on the west side of lake it was promised that the lake would be kept as a natural environment. Development at the park should be kept minimal, no community center or museum should be provided at the park. Confine landscape development and human activities to the front of the park. Back part of the park should be kept natural with some landscape enhancement for habitat. One concern, if we start planting a lot of large non- - 4 - z-z� Planning Commission Minutes Laguna Lake - June 27, 1991 natives trees we could ruin the view and destroy the character of the area. Would like acquisitions pursued. Gurnee: Tend to agree with Richard, Dodie, and Janet, the less developed the better. I agree that the acquisitions should be pursued, particularly as noted in Alternative 3. Acquisition by purchase is probably the only option. Make these acquisitions a priority. Actually the acquisitions may not be bold enough. Enrich the environment, provide for mitigation banking In terms of trails, have controlled bicycle paths. Grazing should be discontinued as soon as possible. Dredging spoils could be used in creative ways. There is a new idea regarding dredging spoils. It is called "land art." The idea is to use dredge materials to create compelling, well designed land forms. Can create natural forms (arroyo's, hills) in sensitive areas, and more formal and artistic forms closer to the park's developed area. Schmidt: Stop the grazing, let the habitat repair itself. Hoffman: Acquisitions are not bold enough. Keith represents my opinions regarding park development. Foote: Discussed land acquisitions. Williams: Look at acquisitions as soon as possible. The cost of land will only go up in the future. Karleskint: Keith's comments - ditto for him. Grazing should be gone. Keep the developed park area visible. People need to see that there is a park there when they are driving by. The front portion of the park should be more park- like. Other than that Alternative 1 looks good. Embellish the kiosk into a better facility. The kiosk does not necessarily need to be a building but it should be a site from which the park's natural resource can be managed. Foote: Talked about lake shore alterations shown in the different alternatives. The lake shore is presently unusable except for throwing stuff to the ducks. The revised plan would allow a beach area and human access in certain areas. The Park and Recreation Commission did not discuss the shore to a large degree. Di Leo: The Park and Recreation Commission did discuss alternative shorelines, they preferred Alternative 1. - 5 - z zz, Planning Commission Minutes Laguna Lake - June.27, 1991 Gurnee: Shoreline changes are a good idea to explore. Kourakis: Would the beach areas be a place for people to sun themselves? Foote: More of a place to get out of the wind, watch the lake, maybe picnic areas. Williams: Good idea. Presently there is a problem with wind exposure on any of the beach areas. Kourakis: It is a question of scale. How many recreation users will the shoreline alterations bring into the lake area? Will this increase the number of windsurfers on the lake? Karleskint: This would not increase the number of windsurfers. Foote: This would not increase the number of windsurfers, but would enable people with them to enjoy the area more. Karleskint: If done carefully it may be a good idea. Hoffman: It is an idea worth exploring. In terms of the nature center, Midland, Michigan has one and it is a good area to learn about nature. The center need not be an intrusion into the area. Karleskint: It can enhance the natural aspect of the park. Schmidt: Nature centers provide passive interpretative display. Karleskint: Has a concern about the ponds. They should not be structured so that a child feels so comfortable there that they transfer this comfort level out to the lake. Kourakis: I second that. Foote: The ponds could be made wet seasonally. They could be more of a creek versus a pond. They could provide an educational concept. Williams: Nice for a day camp sort of experience which is very valuable. Kourakis: I heard a rumor that Park Department Offices would possibly go into Laguna Lake Park. I would suggest that they are inappropriate. Di Leo: If a community center or neighborhood center were approved for the site,such a center might contain Park Department Offices. Other than that component - 6 - 0 17/C Z Planning Commission Minutes Laguna Lake - June 27, 1991 there were no plans to relocate Park Department Offices to Laguna Lake Park. Williams: How do we keep dogs out of the preserve area? Foote: Education. Williams: People in the area walk their dogs in the park. Leash laws should be enforced. Eve Vigil: Walking dogs is a legitimate recreational activity. We should not restrict dog walldng. People would not walk in some instances if their dog was not allowed there. Definitely animals should be kept out of wildlife preserve areas. Gurnee: Congratulate the Committee and Consultants on a fine piece of work. - 7 - Atachment E I'I!;!!ii�! ��i��!!►!�'�i °�ill i ji�;� j I ilii �,:�� �!�I� ► ;i► I� uI a tof sAn WIS OBISPO � 4-- Park and Recreation Commission Memo page 2 4 . Windbreaks and Other Features. The Commission generally supports the concept of improvements to the park aimed at providing a more enjoyable outdoor experience. These include: dredging the lake, berms and windbreaks, a small scale nature/interpretive center, bank stabilization and improvements to the boat ramp area, paths and blinds to view wildlife, a "kiddie pond" , some picnic/playground areas, and restrooms/changing rooms. The interpretive center should provide information and exhibits about the unique biological features of this park. 5. Habitat and Marsh Protection. The Commission supports the peninsula design as depicted in Alternative 1 as it provides protected marsh and habitat areas. The Commission supports revegetation and the creation of additional wildlife habitat where appropriate. Only endemic plants should be used in this effort. To reclaim terrestrial habitat areas, grazing should be discontinued within the park and degraded grazing lands should be reclaimed. Design aspects or features that should be incorporated into Alternative 1 are noted below: 1. Property Acquisitions/Easements. The purchase of easements or outright purchase of additional surrounding parkland is highly desirable. The City should pursue at least the acquisitions for additional open space and parkland as proposed under Alternative 3 . Lake and marshland areas should be considered a high priority for acquisition. 2 . Handicap and Elderly Access. Handicap and elderly access should be an important design feature of the plan. 3 . Park Entrance. The area directly adjacent to Madonna Road should have a friendlier, park-like edge. 4 . Dredging. Any future dredging operation should not degrade or diminish the integrity of the master plan. 5 . Berms and Landscaping. Berms and landscaping features should be compatible with the overall intrinsic character of the park. Berms should be contoured to appear natural and endemic to the site. Landscaping should appear natural and not impair scenic view corridors. z-z� Park and Recreation Commission Memo Page 3 6. Park Roads. Park roads should not incorporate overly long straight lines and sharp angles. In addition, park roads should not focus attention on the power lines. 7 . Boat and Sail Ramps. The boat and sail ramps should be moved away from the wildlife area to provide adequate separation from human activities associated with such ramps. 8. Perfumo Creek Inlet. The Perfumo' Creek Inlet should be designed consistent with Planning Principles 22 and 34. If any member of the City Council has questions regarding this memo or other items please feel free to contact members of the Park and Recreation Commission or myself. cc: Planning Commission ARC 11MP.cc z-z.7 sedes site and..environmental design ' Crawford. Multari & Starr planning•architecture•public polity Lei"sure Visions ' recreation and tourism planning LAGUNA LAKE PARK MMASTER PLAN Programming & Conceptual Alternatives I4ril 1991 I IINTRODUCTION TO THE CONCEPTUAL ALTERNATIVES The Programming and Conceptual Alternative segment of the Master Plan for Laguna Lake Park ' provides a bridge between the Initial Analysis and Planning Principles and the final Master Plan. Three alternative conceptual park designs accompany this document along with concept sketches and exhibits illustrating possible land acquisition and trail easements. I Each alternative depicts a somewhat different level of development and mix of uses. However many program elements are common to all the designs. It is expected that the final design would synthesize all the schemes, possibly adding new program elements and eliminating others. A I general projection of the number of users served is included on each plan along with projected parking needs. The following narrative provides some background on the evolution of the development program for I the park and ideas on long term strategies for the management of the large open space areas of the park. ' PARK PROGRAM The City Parks and Recreation element of the General Plan indicated ten years ago that the city has a ' shortage of park land and park facilities. Since that time only a few new parks have been constructed and the City has been unable to meet its schedule to provide more parks for its residents. In particular,only a small portion of the district park priority list which includes Laguna Lake Park has I been accomplished. Facilities in this adopted plan for Laguna Lake include community building, tennis courts, swimming pool, balifields,and private recreation facilities. This program of uses was derived from a community survey and workshops with the Parks and Recreation Commission and Planning Commission. IIt should be noted that the Laguna Lake Park boundary in the Parks Element did not include the hillside or the northern undeveloped portions of the park, and were not considered In the ' development of the overall park strategy for the City. These areas are being considered in the present Master Planning effort The County of San Luis Obispo Parks Master Plan done In 1987 Included telephone and field ' surveys that indicates those facilities at parks in the County that are most important to the residents and visitors. Many of the residents surveyed are from the city of San Luis Obispo. Laguna Lake Park has the potential to provide the majority of the types of facilities considered important in this survey. The following is a list of activities that might be accommodated in the park. They include eighteen of Ithe nineteen activities most favored in the County Parks Master Plan Survey of recreation users. 1. Picnicking I 2. Nature enjoyment 3. Hiking/walking 4. Sightseeing 5. Playground I 6. Jogging and running 7. Horseshoes The above activities are low impact and could generally occur in most areas of Laguna Lake Park Iwithout a loss of open space value. I I I ' Additional activities that might be considered on a limited scale that would not compromise the open space quality of the park include: 8. Camping I 9. Baseball 10. Softball 11. Tennis ' 12. Equestrian trails Finally,those activities that require lake access include: ' 13. Swimming 14. Boating 15. Canoeing 16. Sailing (small scale) I 17. Windsurfing 18. Fishing ' The programs for development shown on the three Conceptual Alternatives do not reflect all these uses and include others not listed. These programs were derived from the most recent community survey conducted as part of the current Master Planning effort ' This included a community survey and workshops to develop Planning Principles to guide the physical design of the Park. The consensus at this point in time seems to favor a significantly less intensive approach to Laguna Lake Park than previous. The Conceptual Alternatives prepared for this stage of the planning process reflect this consensus. Generally development is concentrated in ' distinct areas with hundreds of feet of natural open space between use areas. Shoreline roads have been eliminated and extensive trail loops created. Development northwest of the main windrow (currently grazed land)is extremely limited in all aftematives. ILONG TERM STRATEGIES The area northwest of the windrow seems to be highly valued for its openness and visual relation to ' the surrounding hills. It does not have any natural or biological value in its current overgrazed condition. Each alternative shows measures to enhance the natural character of this area. Although the general feeling at this point in time is to maintain this vast segment of the park in a I relatively undeveloped state, it is possible that in the future, the perception and needs of the community will change. One possible direction this portion of the park could take is toward the creation of an Ecological Park The City could investigate joint management of this area with one or I more organizations or foundations such as the Audubon Society or Nature Conservancy. In this approach, capital expenditures would initially be towards revegetation and creation of a series of natural environments including wetland, riparian edges and corridors,oak woodland,grassland,etc. The Park could ultimately include wildlife exhibits and a staffed nature center. Tours of sensitive ' areas would be docent led. Another approach would be to initially establish an adequate open space/wildlife buffer along the marsh and reserve the hillside areas in open space. The approximately 35 acre, relatively flat,open ' area in the center could then be set aside as park land to be developed more intensively In the future. This approach would ensure preservation of the sensitive natural areas, maintain the open space quality, and allow flexibility in future development. The planting of windbreaks in this area would begin now to create the micro-climate modifications that will eventually be needed for this area Ito be enjoyed. As the City's opportunities for acquiring more acreage for active parks diminish this area of Laguna ' Lake Park may become more desirable for development in the future. The possibility exists that it will remain the Clys only opportunity for major park and recreation activities. I I I I PROGRAM ELEMENT DESCRIPTIONS The physical forms of parking areas, buildings and use areas depicted on the plans are Intended to be very schematic at this stage. Evaluation of the designs should focus on relative sizes and ' juxtaposition of uses rather than physical form The final Master Plan will address form In more detail. PLAYFIELDS/TURF: Turf grass areas provide a suitable surface for Informal games,frisbee,touch I football and so forth. These areas are related to family and group picnic areas and are primarily intended for the users of these picnic facilities. Turf also provides a durable and maintainable Lakeshore edge for designated shoreline use areas. The use of reclaimed or lake water for Irrigation should be considered. ' FAMILY PICNIC: These areas consist of scattered and clustered tables and barbecues for groups of one to three families. They generally are situated on the leeward side of windbreaks. Parking should be no more than 200 feet away from tables. GROUP PICNIC: Generally several group picnic areas are shown on each scheme. These could range In size from areas to accommodate over 100 persons to smaller areas suitable for 20 to 50 persons. These areas would Include a decomposed granite or concrete surface,tables, barbecue, I electric power, lighting;and for the larger areas perhaps a pergola or shelter. In the schemes with a community center a group area is shown that could be used in conjunction with a kitchen in the center. I PLAY AREA: Play areas include play equipment for various age children and would be situated in two or three locations around the park primarily as an adjunct to the family picnic areas. A play area could be situated near a neighborhood or community center where recreation programs might occur. I One play area could be developed as an adventure playground. This might Include a naturalistic environment of boulders, reeds and a recirculating stream course feeding the proposed pond. The Idea would be to create a replica of other natural environments In the park suitable for learning and play. IGAMES: Game facilities include horseshoes and volleyball and would occur near group and family areas. I NATURE CENTER: The level of development of a 'nature center' might be as simple as an interpretive display panel or kiosk that includes a map of nature walks at the park and Information on natural features. This concept could be expanded to include an open shatter or pergola with a series I of displays situated on a patio or terrace. Another approach might include a staffed nature center operated by a wildlife foundation or group. Docent led nature walks would be staged from the center. CANOE AND BOAT LAUNCHES: Because of the differing natures of canoes and light motorized I craft separate launches might be appropriate. Small craft that can be carried and are easy to launch seem to be predominant at the lake, however provision for launching fishing boats should be Included in the form of docks and a launch ramp. Parking and turnaround areas need to be provided. I SAILBOARD LAUNCH: The fairly intense shore activity Involved In sailboard portage,assembly,and launch requires a durable surface. The sailboard launch area would include a geotextile reinforced turf edge with the covered geotextile membrane extending into the water to maintain the lake edge Iwhen water levels fluctuate. WALKINGIJOGGING AND BIKE PATH: Paths for walkers,joggers and bikers would be decomposed granite and asphalt. Most of the existing shoreline road would be converted to a biketwalking route. I Exercise stations as well as sheltered rest areas should be included along the paths. Paths would link all the major park elements and perimeter routes. I HIKING TRAIL, This path occurs on the hills in the park and would be an unsurfaced, but Improved foot trail. Benches might be included at the top of the Nil. INTERPRETIVE DISPLAY. Durable, low key displays describing natural features and wildlife would Ibe situated at key points on paths and trails. I 1 - ' RESTROOM: New and additional restrooms would be sized to accommodate the Intensity of activity in the area of the park served. New restrooms should use more natural building materials and take security into accourd. ' COMMEMORATIVE GROVE: The existing grove can be expanded over time to create an impressive grove. ' DAY CAMP, This area would be a combination group area/play area that could be reserved for recreation department children's programs for summer and vacations or used by groups such as Cub Scouts or Campfire Girls. ' ORGANIZATIONAL CAMP: These remote areas located in the north end of the park would be used by organizations on a reservation basis. Availability could be limited to certain days or seasons to limit impacts. These would be overnight tent camping areas and include water supply and pit toilets. Parking would be back in the developed part of the park. Improvements might include a small ' amphitheater. NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: A neighborhood center would include facilities such as a multi-purpose ' room, activity rooms for recreation department programs and a kitchen. The structure would be in the range of 5,000 sq.it and accommodate up to 100 persons. COMMUNITY CENTER AND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: A large scale center might Include a ' gymnasium sized multi-purpose room,activity rooms,a kitchen and Recreation Department offices. Total square footage might be 15,000 sq. ft., and would accommodate several hundred people. Outdoor eating and play areas would be associated with the center. A site for the children's museum might be included in this complex,and related to an adventure playground. I 1 I I I TIME IS RUNNING OUT FOR OUR LIVING NATIONAL TREASURES N early 400 years ago, when the �. �;,,N pilgrims arrived, North America '"-�•__-- ,��J ,,.-. .r� was covered with 850 million acres of ••t' - - - ,:, virgin forests. But as you can see from ` these maps, today less than one in ten trees still stands. In the Pacific. Northwest alone, enough virgin trees Virgin Forests 1620 are cut down each year to fill a convoy of trucks 20,000 miles long! This rate is faster than the destruction of the ' Brazilian rainforests. And with the ''- - - profit-hungry timber barons logging -- ' 2,000 acres a week all our Ancient Forest ecosystems will be effectively , destroyed in less than five years. ~` he ugly rubble and stumps — all T Virgin Forests 1850 that remain of an annihilated Ancient Forest — are a common sight U r throughout the Pacific Northwest as LL �J• ,#. ;._� Americas Cathedrals fall victim to the chain saw. This carnage, this total �''•,, r• .a- _; `-6, - annihilation of our priceless natural heritage must be stopped. And i stopped immediately ... before it is too late! FOR FREE TREE 'S , Cot\i TACT" o SLO TREES 60Y 1671 SL01 Ca , q3`166 ®Regrded Paper COPIESTo: ❑ Action FYI WAO CDDDUL Robert &Anne PhiffTs ❑ FIN.DIR 1309 Vega 'Way ❑ FIRECI11EF San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 rCLMGTM0TTFA1 .IVEY El FW DQt. ERK/OIZIC. ❑ POLICE CFL August 23 , 1991 1 ❑ KEC.DIR. City Council ❑ CRSADAL; ❑ `CILDIP. 990 Palm Stree VTr- P"-6KLE KET2&7.2nffm GENDA San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 DATE ��-- Dear Mayor Dunin and Council Members: I have read the PRC's recommendations for development of Laguna Lake Park, and am delighted to see their preference for Alternative 1. It offers the most protection of the natural assets of Laguna--which we all know is not just a typical city park, but a precious "wetland" as well. SLO is now an urban area of 50, 000 people (T-Tr last week) ; more and more people will be using the Park. But I think it will still be possible to keep most human activity in the southeast end, as it is now. This will--we hope-- preserve the "habitat" function of the northwest end. I would support trails, restoration, and enhancement--as long as this work is done carefully, with first priority given to habitat and natural scenic values. I live 2 blocks from the upper end of the Park. Since I walk there nearly every day, year-round, I can observe use (and some abuse! ) . May I offer the following suggestions? 1. If the northwest end will be respected as a wildlife habitat, it may have to be almost closed to the public. For example, before the March rains, people tromped all over it. Some even tore around on the mud in cars and pickups. More recently: rowboats and wind-surfers can be seen on the upper reaches (across from Vista Arroyo, Diablo Dr. etc. ) One man had his BIRD DOG in the bow of his boat. Between such use and the cattle grazing on the flats, wild birds and other wildlife have little space. 2 . A through-trail to Foothill would be convenient. But people and their dogs, mountain bikes etc. will undoubtedly wander off trail and go everywhere. Again, wildlife habitat is not compatible with heavy human/dog use in such a small area. Nature walks in this sensitive portion have been proposed--only when led by docents. If controlled by naturalists, this use might be acceptable. I think the public must be restrained by some kind of barrier(s) , across not just land but water too (or mud! ) 3 . Fire suppression will be urgent, I think. We do not have here a vast Yellowstone Park--we have a very small area, with little cover for nesting birds and other species. This spring I already saw greatly reduced numbers of birds and nests over spring 1990, before the 3 arson fires took out a lot of the tules. 4 . Few people heed the "dogs must be leashed" signs. (My husband and I walk our dog there sometimes, but we keep him ED t; OUNCIL __ on lead--also pick up after him. ) I have seen loose dogs running deer and even cattle in the pasture. owners train their dogs to swim and fetch in all parts of the Lake--nice for the resident waterfowl! When I was stuck in traffic one day last June, I saw 3 dogs attack, kill and devour a goose in about 5 minutes. Occasionally I see ominous piles of feathers in the same area. 5. Also in June I saw a badger--my first!--trying to cross Foothill Rd. from the wetlands side. Don't know if he/she made it. Maybe we should consider sheep or chicken wire fencing to keep wild dogs out, wildlife in. What do the scientist-consultants say? Sorry to be so long-winded on this subject. But I'm in love with Laguna. Sincerely, Anne G. Phillips (541-583 )