HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/27/1991, 2 - THE THREE ALTERNATIVE DESIGNS FOR LAGUNA LAKE PARK II,IN�I��III�IIIII�I�II I�I MEETING GATE:
city o� san Luis OBIsPO
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TEM NUMBER:
FROM: Arnold B. Jonas,/Community Development Director
by: Jeanette i Leo, Long Range Planner
SUBJECT: The Three Alternative Designs for Laguna Lake
Park
CAO
RECOMMENDATION: By minute action adopt the Park and Recreation
Commission's recommendation which supports
Alternative 1 with some changes and additions
(see Attachment E) .
DISCUSSION:
The purpose of this hearing is to allow the City Council to (1)
hear public input regarding Laguna Lake Park' s future design, and
(2) comment on the three proposed alternative park designs.
i
BACKGROUND:
In September, 1990 a group of consultants (i.e. , Crawford Multari
& Starr, SEDES, and Leisure visions) were hired to prepare a master
plan for Laguna Lake Park. The master plan was to include a report
and a physical park plan which would depict future park facilities
and potential park expansion areas. The project's work scope
included three phases as indicated below:
1. Phase I of the project included research, data collection, and
the development of guidelines for future park development,
i.e. , planning principles. This phase included determining
site constraints and assessing community preferences by
conducting surveys and workshops. As a result of the
completed research, data collection, and community input, Draft
Planning Principles were developed (see Attachment B) . These
principles were developed not only to direct future development
and expansion of the park but also to respond to community
concerns and site constraints.
In January, 1991, the Park and Recreation Commission (PRC) held j
a public hearing to discuss the Draft Planning Principles.
Amendments were made to the principles based on this hearing
(see Attachment A) . In February, 1991 the City Council adopted
the Draft Planning Principles, incorporating the changes
recommended by the PRC and staff (as noted in Attachment A) .
2 . Phase II of the project required that three alternative park
designs be developed by the consultants. These alternative
designs were to be based on the policies contained within the
2-I
�ii�j�h►��illlllllll�° llUhl City of San lLsS OBISpo
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
City Council Report - Laguna Lake Park
page 2
adopted Planning Principles. It was planned that these
alternative designs would be reviewed by the project's Steering
Committee (composed of City staff) , the PRC, the ARC, the
Planning Commission, and the City Council.
The project is presently in its second phase. The three
alternative designs were reviewed by the Steering Committee on j
April 25, 1991, the ARC on June 3, 1991, the Planning
Commission on June 27, 1991, and the PRC on May 15, June 5, and
July 10, 1991. Draft minutes from the ARC and Planning i
Commission meetings are attached for City Council review. The
May 15, 1991 PRC meeting was held to receive public testimony
and initiate PRC review. At the June 3, 1991 meeting, the PRC i
identified design features that they considered important. At j
the July 10, 1991 meeting the PRC considered input from the
Planning Commission and ARC, and as a result of this and public
input compiled a memo to the City Council delineating their
recommendation (see Attachment E) .
3 . Phase III (the final phase of the project) will involve
developing one final draft plan, cost estimates for this plan,
and a report. The final draft park plan will combine those
components of the three alternative plans that the City Council
recommends be incorporated. The cost estimates, report, and
the final design will be reviewed by staff, the various
commissions, and the City Council.
i
CON WENTS: i
In general, the alternatives incorporate various levels of
development. Alternative 1 proposes wind breaks, some additional
trails, acquisition of marsh area, and a change in road circulation j
along the lake. Alternative 2 adds structural development (a
Community Center and Children's Museum) adjacent to Madonna Road,
more intense use of the park in the form of trails, picnic and play
areas; acquisitions; and a changed road alignment. Alternative 3
incorporates a neighborhood center; additional acquisitions; more
intense trails, picnic and play areas; and a changed road
alignment. The plans will be explained in more detail by the
consultant at the August 27, 1991 City Council meeting.
It is not anticipated that the City Council will adopt any one
alternative in its entirety, but rather that a discussion will
occur regarding components of each plan that the Council either
likes or dislikes. Consistent with the Park and Recreation
Commission's recommendation, it is thought that the final draft
plan will likely contain components of all three alternatives.
I
2-z
city or sar. .ais OBISpo
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
City Council Report - Laguna Lake Park
page 3
FISCAL EWPACTS
There are not any fiscal impacts associated with reviewing the
draft alternatives. These alternatives represent the second phase
in the preparation of the Laguna Lake Park Master Plan. The review
of the three alternative designs is supported by a contract already
approved by the City Council.
i
ALTERNATIVES:
Other options are available to the council in addition to the
recommended action:
A. The Council could support another alternative or changes to i
the Park and Recreation Commission recommendation.
B. The Council could support additional studies of Laguna Park
and/or surrounding property. Such an action would likely
result in alterations to the consultant contract.
I
Attachments:
Attachment A - Adopted Changes to the Draft Planning Principles
i
Attachment B - Original Draft Planning Principles
Attachment C - ARC Minutes (June 3, 1991) j
Attachment D - Draft Planning Commission Minutes (June 27,
1991)
Attachment E - PRC Memo to City Council
Set of Plans - The front sheet (not numbered) depicts the park
as it presently exists, sheets 1 through 3 depict the three
alternatives, sheet four provides concept sections, and sheet
i 5 depicts proposed acquisitions and trail corridors.
I
Laguna Lake Park Master Plan Programming and Conceptual
Alternatives
I
i
cc.lad
2-3
ATTACHMENT A
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDED CHANGES
AND COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMENT
The principles listed below are those that the Park and Recreation
Commission had comments or concerns about. In addition, on the
final page of this exhibit is a comment by the County of San Luis
Obispo. Each principle discussed below is referenced by the page
number the principle is located on and its item number. For
clarification, the original principle is provided in italics.
Corrections or proposed rewording is underlined, deletions are
cross-hatched.
page 20, item 5
Existing wording:
The City should investigate expanding the park in the following
priority:
o protection of the portions of the lake and wetlands in private
ownership.
comment: The reference to private ownership is not clear. As
presently written there was concern that it could mean
easements or acquisition of the single family lots
located south of the lake. The intent was to expand the
park to include a northern portion of the lake presently
located on private property.
new wording:
The City should investigate expanding the park in the following
priority:
0 protection of the privately held portions of the lake and
wetlands along the northern most region of Lacuna Lake (the
intent is not to include the Yards of single family dwellings
located along the southern shoreline of Laguna Lake)
page 21, item 5
Existing Wording:
o easements restricting development on open areas outside the
park.
- 1 -
;ZI
comment: It was noted by the public and the consultant that the
eucalyptus grove across Madonna Road should be considered
as an addition to the park due to its habitat value.
new wording:
o easements restricting development on open areas outside the
park, including the eucalyptus grove south of Madonna Road.
Easements or acquisition of the eucalyptus grove could occur
as a result of adoption of the Dalidio specific plan.
page 241 item 30
The southern lake shore should be evaluated in detail for
opportunities to provide passive recreation, access and view points
for the public.
comment: It was thought that this principle should be clarified
to indicate these would be viewing points on city owned
land along the southern lake shore, e.g. , not viewing
points on private property in this area.
new wording:
The southern lake shore should be evaluated in detail for
opportunities to provide passive recreation, access and view points
for the public on publicly owned land.
page 24, item 31
Vehicular access should be limited; in general, new roads should
not be planned for the park. However, if after more detailed
analysis a new park road is deemed necessary, it must be carefully
sited and designed to ensure it will not significantly impact
habitat, aesthetic or recreational values.
comment: It was noted that this principle should reference that
the park should be orientated to pedestrian and bike
traffic.
new wording:
The park should be oriented to pedestrian and bike traffic
Vehicular access should be limited; in general, new roads should
not be planned for the park. However, if after more detailed
analysis a new park road is deemed necessary, it must be carefully
sited and designed to ensure it will not significantly impact
habitat, aesthetic or recreational values.
page 24, item 34
A trail system should be developed with the following features:
2 -
access around the lake; access to the ridge and saddle; integration
of park paths with a comprehensive trail system which links the
park .with the Los Osos Valley Road and the neighborhood around
junior high school, Foothill Boulevard and downtown. Another
potential linkage, provided habitat values can be adeguately
protected, would be along Perfumo Creek corridor (upstream and
downstream) .
comment.: The first portion of this principle references a trail
system "around the lake. " The intent of the statement
was that a trail would be located on the north side of
Laguna Lake (from Madonna Road) and extend to Los Osos
Valley Road and to Foothill Boulevard. It was never
intended that the trail would circle the lake.
new wording:
A trail system should be developed with the following features:
____ _-_..-d the , _,__; access to the ridge and saddle; integration
of park paths� with a comprehensive trail system which links the
park with t*e Los Osos Valley Road, and the neighberheed areund
junler high , Foothill Boulevard, and the downtown. Another
potential linkage, provided habitat values can be adequately
protected, would be along Perfumo Creek corridor (upstream and
downstream) . In addition a trail link to existing Lacuna Lake
neighborhoods should be explored.
page 25, add 38 a
comment: In general it was mentioned that an additional planning
principle or revision of .a planning principle should
occur such that handicap access is encouraged within the
park and adjacent to the lake.
new principle:
Handicap access should be Provided within the Park and adiacent to
Lacuna Lake.
page 26, add 49 a
comment: It was recommended that once grazing was removed the park
plan should include methods to control potential fire
hazards, e.g. , planned irrigation breaks, areas mowed,
or scraped, or other methods.
new principle:
To Protect any developed areas and structures within the Park from
wildland fires the Park' s design should include planned irrigation
.breaks, mowed areas and/or other similar preventive measures.
3 -
2-�
page 26, item 5o
The park should be better maintained.
comment: This principle was generated at a workshop meeting. The
intent of the principle was that more litter control
should occur, bathroom facilities should be maintained
more often, and that landscaping should be managed and
enhanced.
new wording:
The park should be better maintained, areas of concern include
litter control better upkeep of bathrooms and other facilities
and management and enhancement of landscalping.
page 26, add 52 a (County Comment)
comment: The County of San Luis Obispo Parks Department provided
comments on February 4, 1991. As noted in the planning
principles, the city may be interested in acquiring land
or obtaining easements within the county's jurisdiction.
Since such easements and/or acquisitions would be on
county land, the county should review and comment on
proposed easements and/or acquisitions.
new principle:
Facilities , acquisitions , and/or easements promosed outside the
city' s boundary should be reviewed and coordinated with the County
of San Luis Obispo Parks Department and the County Planning
Department.
4
2�
Laguna Lake Masrer Plan
Initial Analyses and Draft Planning Principles
December, 1990
Attachment H
Draft Planning Principles
A note on directions: in these principles, "east"is considered the direction
toward Madonna Road, "west"is the direction toward Foothill Boulevard, "south"
is the direction of the developed side of the lake, toward Los Osos Valley Road,
"north"means the direction away from the lake and toward the hillsides.
General.
1. The long-term viability of the lake as a lake is very important; planning for the
park should be coordinated with the long-term protection and maintenance of
the lake; the on-going implementation measures prescribed by the adopted
lake management plan (namely, weed control, siltation control and raising the
level by log dams) should continue to be followed.
2. The lake and associated wetlands constitute a rare -and extremely limited
.habitat; this resource should be protected and managed to ensure its habitat
values for the long-term.
I Continued community access to portions of the lake for water-related
recreation is important.
4. Besides the lake itself, the most important feature of the park area is its open
space; any new uses must not overwhelm feelings of openness.
5. The City should investigate expanding the park in the following priority:
• protection of the portions of the lake and wetlands in private ownership
• access easements for trails (walking and bike) to Foothill Boulevard, the
downtown and Los Osos Valley Road
seder Crawford Multarl & Starr Leisure Visions Q
20 2-�
Laguna Lake Master , ,an
Initial Analyses and Draft Planning Principles
December, 1990
• access easements or acquisition of prominent knolls
• easements restricting development on open areas outside the park
• acquisition of hillsides and other open areas west of the park
6. Planning should always take the long term view of the park, recognizing it as
a major resource of the community in terms of aesthetics, land, open space,
recreation and wildlife habitat.
Land and Water Use.
7. Human encroachment in and around the western part of the lake should
minimized; this area (the western portion of the lake and wetlands) should be
set aside as the City's first officially recognized wildlife preserve; boating and
windsurfing in this portion of the lake should be prohibited.
8. Highest priority in terms of expanding the park should be given to placing the
privately held portions of the lake and wetlands into the wildlife preserve.
9. Uses in the preserve should be limited to (a) those activities required to
maintain the habitat values for the long-term; (b) wildlife observation from
designated paths and blinds only; and (c) small interpretive exhibits which
encourage the protection of the resource.
10. The eastern part of the lake should be used for aquatic recreation; gas
powered boats- should continue to be prohibited; adequate public docks and
ramps should be provided on the park side of the lake.
11. Grazing should be discontinued in the park; existing fences, pipes and tanks
should be removed.
12. The steep hillsides should be kept open and uses there should be limited to
hiking and ancillary facilities; hiking there shall be limited to designated paths
sedes Crawford Multarl & Starr Leisure Visions
21
A07
Laguna Lake Masrer Plan
Initial Analyses and Draft Planning Principles
December, 1990
only, to minimize erosion and to protect springs and endangered species (see
below). Seating and viewing stations, for enjoying the views of the lake,
morros and Los Osos Valley, should be provided.
13. Sensitive habitat areas on the hillsides, including sites of rare or.
endangered species and the springs, will be protected; approaches should
include signs to encourage people to stay on paths, opportunities to see the
springs from designated areas, interpretive exhibits to educate people about the
sensitive nature of these locations, and, if necessary, barriers to discourage
human intrusion.
14. The great majority of the park should be kept in open space.
15. Buildings and active recreation facilities should be limited to a small
proportion of the total parkland, and (except for rest rooms, small interpretative
exhibits and picnic shelters) may be located only in the eastern part of the park.
In general, the more developed or active the use, the more easterly it should be
located.
Habitat Protection.
16. The marsh areas should be preserved as an environmentally sensitive
habitat area. Uses should be limited to paths or raised walks which do not
significantly threaten the habitat value, viewing blinds and small interpretive
exhibits. Where deemed necessary to restrict human encroachment, barriers
should be installed around especially sensitive areas.
17. A buffer zone should be created landward of the marsh. This buffer should
be re-vegetated with a variety of native plant species. Uses in the buffer zone
should be restricted to paths and recreation uses which would not significantly
impact the wetlands, such as an exercise trail.
sedes Crawford Multari & Starr Leisure Visions
22 L-10
Laguna Lake Master an
Initial Analyses and Draft Planning Principles
December, 1990
18. Additional interpretive exhibits of the cultural history and natural history of
the area should be located elsewhere in the park. Buildings should generally
be located near parking and in the eastern portion of the park.
19. Dogs should be prohibited in the nature preserve.
20. Suitable tree species, emphasizing natives and endemics, should be
planted in the vicinity of the lake and within the preserve which may provide
future nesting (rookery) opportunities for herons and egrets.
21. Additional plantings should occur in the nature preserve using native
species, to enhance the natural habitat values thdre. Additional plantings, with
suitable species, should occur throughout the park for habitat enhancement,
human comfort (windbreaks and shade), spatial organization of uses, aesthetics
and view control (ie: framing exceptional views, hiding unattractive views, or
screening activity areas or facilities).
22. Wildlife corridors should be maintained and, where feasible, enhanced
including along Prefumo Creek, both upstream and downstream of the lake.
23. An active fish management program should be implemented for the lake
which would include stocking the lake with suitable species.
Recreation.
24. Because of habitat values and potential impacts on nearby neighborhoods,
lighted recreation fields or sports facilities should not be part of this park.
25. Unlighted play fields may be located in the eastern portion of the park and
away from the lake shore.
26. Individual picnic areas may be located anywhere in the park, outside the
nature preserve and sensitive habitat areas. Small-scale sports courts (eg:
sedes Crawford Multari & Starr Leisure Visions
23 ��"
Laguna Lake Mas. . Plan
Initial Analyses and Draft Planning Principles
December, 1990
volleyball, horseshoes) may be permitted on the flatter areas of the park,
outside the nature preserve, and usually in conjunction with group picnic areas.
27. Wind breaks should be planted or built around all picnic areas and play
fields.
28. Fishing should continue to be an activity allowed in the park.
29. The park should provide more and better playgrounds, especially for
younger children.
30. The southern lake shore should be evaluated in detail for opportunities to
provide passive recreation, access and view points for the public.
Access and Circulation.
31. Vehicular access should be limited in the park; in general, new roads
should not be planned for the park. However, if after more detailed analysis a
new park road is deemed necessary, it must be carefully sited and designed to
ensure it will not significantly impact habitat, aesthetic or recreational values.
32. Additional parking should generally be located in the eastern part of the
park, away from the lake shore.
33. Walk ways and bike paths should be separated, wherever possible, from
automobile roadways.
34. A trail system should be developed with the following features: access
around the lake; access to the ridge and saddle; integration of park paths with a
comprehensive trail system which links the park with the Los Osos Valley Road
and the neighborhood around junior high school, Foothill Boulevard and
downtown. Another potential linkage, provided habitat values can be
adequately protected, would be along the Perfumo Creek corridor (upstream
and downstream).
sedes Crawford Multarl & Starr Leisure Visions
24 z-1z-
Laguna Lake Master . .-in
Initial Analyses and Draft Planning Principles
December, 1990
35. A bike path should be installed in the park with links to Foothill Boulevard,
the downtown and Los Osos Valley Road.
36. The City should attempt to acquire access easements over adjacent
properties to create the off site linkages described above (ie: Foothill, Los.Osos
Valley Road and downtown).
37. No Highway One "by-pass" or other major roadway should be permitted
within the park.
38. Public transit links to the town and to the region should be improved.
Aesthetics.
39. The existing memorial grove should be expanded; more trees should be
planted especially near Madonna Road.
40. The park entrance and Madonna Road frontage should be better designed
to make it more "park like" and inviting. Major view opportunities from Madonna
Road, over the lake, and down Los Osos Valley should be preserved.
41. The City should re-evaluate using reclaimed water to facilitate increased
planting, and possibly for maintaining the water level in the lake.
42. Where buildings are proposed, they should reflect a continuity of design
elements and materials. Furthermore, the design of buildings and other
facilities such as play areas should reflect the over-arching character of the park
as a natural place: the choice of materials, colors, plantings, and the scale,
architecture and orientation of these facilities should emphasize elements of the
surrounding natural environment.
43. All built elements should be designed as low-scale and relatively
unobtrusive nodes placed amid plants and other natural materials; any active
sedes Crawford Naltarl & Starr Leisure Visions
25
,Z-13
Laguna Lake Mast_, Plan
Initial Analyses and Draft Planning Principles
December, 1990
recreation areas or buildings should be buffered and screened from open areas
elsewhere in the park.
Safety.
44. The park should be closed at night; a gate should be used to keep out cars.
45. More telephones should be installed, especially near boating and wind-
surfing facilities.
46. More rest rooms should be provided, especially near activity areas; the
design of rest rooms and other features should provide security for the users,
especially children.
47. Safe crossing for bikes and pedestrians should be provided across roads.
48. Areas of the lake shore subject to erosion and storm damage, outside the
nature preserve, should be protected; shore line protection should emphasize
techniques which most closely relate to the natural environment, such as
plantings and use of native materials.
49. Traffic in the park should be kept as slow as possible, to reduce noise and
enhance safety.
Implementation
50. The park should be better maintained.
51. The park master plan should be realistic with goals that can be put into
effect within a specified time frame; implementation should be phased to match
funding ability.
52. Long-term funding sources and management approaches must be
identified.
series Crawford Multarl & Starr Leisure Visions
26
ATTACHMENT C
ARC Minutes
June 3 , 1991 Meeting
Item 9 - Laguna Lake Park Alternatives
Jan Di Leo introduced this item, explaining that the purpose of
this hearing was to receive ARC input on the three alternative
designs. She explained that no formal action was required from the.
ARC at this time, only their input. Di Leo stated that three
consulting firms were working on this project (i.e. , Crawford
Multari and Starr, Leisure visions, and SEDES) , and that two
representatives were here to explain the project in more detail.
The representatives were than introduced.
Mike Multari (from Crawford Multari and Starr) provided background
on how the alternatives were developed.
David Foote (from SEDES) explained the difference between the three
plans and plan concepts.
The following represents a synopsis of ARC comments:
Commissioner Cooper -
The proposed community center's location should have a
relationship to the water related activities that will or do
occur at Laguna Lake Park. A center near the water can provide
assistance and/or security.
Commissioner Illingworth -
A Community center should have a lot of small children
facilities. If so, there are safety concerns with having the
facility near water. A community center would be an essential
part of the park that will draw people. Presently I do not
use the park because there is nothing that draws me there.
Because the weather at the park is so poor I cannot imagine
the park too populated. Supports the idea of an entrancing
shoreline and the community center out by Madonna Road. Right
now the park does not say anything in terms of facilities.
Supports the ponds and the removal of vehicular circulation
from the lake.
Commissioner Combrink -
Anything you do to give it a park look from Madonna Road would
be helpful. Provide for more use of the park. Would the green
areas be green? If so, how?
- 1. -
David Foote -
A certain amount of turf is essential.
Commissioner Gates -
Concerned whether the hiking trail proposed in the northern
area of the park was planned on Cerro San Luis. In addition
please define the adventure playground.
David Foote
The proposed trail is on park property (not Cerro San Luis) .
Under one alternative the city would pursue an easement to .
access Cerro San Luis.
The adventure playground is a playground which includes an
education and/or participatory component.
Commissioner Bradford—
There is a conflict with calling the park a .wildlife preserve
and then increasing public use of the park. The park
alternatives do not provide proper orientation for preserving
nature, i.e. , a boat ramp is planned right around the corner
from the sensitive nature area, etc. All active park
facilities can be provided somewhere else - the birds have only
one place. This is the only wetland the City has. We will end
up consuming this open space piecemeal if we are not careful.
Recommend: fewer roads, a parking setback from the lake, new
vegetation limited to revegetation of the area, and that
grazing be stopped. The City needs to make a commitment
regarding the dredging of the lake. Extending the eucalyptus
grove on the Dalidio property is important. Even concept 1
goes too far.
Commissioner Underwood -
Impressed with Melinda's concept except that there should be
some provision for humans. Human use should be concentrated
toward Madonna Road. Seeing and being part of wildlife is a
valuable experience. Some area (a small area) should be
designed as a nature preserve. The Children's Museum should
not be at Laguna Lake Park but should be located downtown. The
community center is okay, but it should be near Carl's Jr. The
park should provide a blend of both nature and people.
Commissioner Cooper -
Hiking in that area tends to be boring because it is so open.
I would like a comfortable place near the water where I could
watch the sunset. The park should not be too contrived, too
developed, it should look natural. The park is a place where
people can find their back yard, nature. The park should be
preserved for wildlife and those people that need to find
nature.
2
I�
Commissioner Bradford -
Get rid of grazing on the property. The park cannot be a
nature preserve with all the planned uses.
Commissioner Underwood -
Dredging of the lake should be implemented.
Commissioner Cooper -
Commented on the existing scheme of the roads. Right angle
configuration of one road seems incongruous to the design of
the park. The 'road seems like the beginning of a subdivision.
3
ATTACHMENT D
DRAFT M MUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP
June 27, 1991
Item 1 - Laguna Lake Park Alternatives
(Discussed from 330 pm to 5:00 pm)
Di Leo: Provided background on the Laguna Lake Master Plan process. She then
introduced David Foote (from SEDES) and Dave Moran (from Crawford
Multari & Starr)*
Schmidt: The Draft Planning Principles talk about preservation, the plans do not seem
to represent preservation. Were people informed as to the unique character
of the park?
Di Leo: Natural resources within the park were discussed at the various workshops.
A consideration is that different people have different ideas of how to preserve
that unique resource and what constitutes preservation.
Foote: The public indicated they wanted features of the natural environment
preserved; however, they also indicated that they wanted some desired
facilities such as playgrounds, picnic areas, etc. The principles also discuss
these components.
Foote then went into his presentation. He provided information regarding
the three alternatives. He noted that each alternative reflected a different
level of usage. It was clarified that it was not intended that the Planning
Commission choose any one alternative,but rather that they provide comments
on each alternative.
Kourakis: Are there portions of the park still being grazed?
Foote: Showed areas presently grazed. He noted that the land was leased to Alex
Madonna.
Kourakis: Explain animal/wildlife components of the park.
Foote: Main wildlife component is bird life. Some animals considered for listing
(such as the burrowing owl) do inhabit the site. Foote then discussed marsh
land and open water relationship. He noted that some dredging may be
necessary to maintain and extend the life of the existing water fowl habitat.
Kourakis: Is the heron rookery part of the park?
Foote: Not presently, but Dalidio's property should be considered for acquisition due
- 1 -
2-18
Planning Commission Minutes
Laguna Lake - June 27, 1991
to the biological relationship between the rookery site and Laguna Lake.
Kourakis: Tell me more about the bird life. How significant is it?
Foote: Most of the birds would go elsewhere if this resource were removed.
Schmidt: Fish and Game thinks this site is valuable.
Gurnee: What part. of the lake would be dredged? Where would the spoils be
deposited?
Foote: It is proposed that the entire lake be dredged and that dredge materials be
deposited in the back portion of the park (in the open space area covering
roughly 25 acres).
Di Leo: The dredging plan is starting environmental review. What areas of the lake
should be dredged will be assessed in the document as well as what impacts
dredge materials may have.
Gurnee: Is Alternative 1 the only plan that provides for richer wetlands?
Foote: All the alternatives do. He then explained how each plan provides for wetland
protection.
Gurnee: Mitigation banking should be considered where wetlands are destroyed as a
result of development. Monies used for banking could buy additional wetlands
at the Laguna Lake site.
Schmidt: What is the source of water for the adventure playground ponds?
Foote: The lake probably.
Schmidt: Explain the adventure playground concept.
Foote: Explained that such a playground could provide education and fun. The
system would be similar to the creek area in Mission Plaza. A stream would
be created that children could play in. The system would be artificial but
educational, having wildlife, etc.
Kourakis: Why were the Children's Museum and overnight camping considered at the
park?
Foote: The Steering Committee directed that these facilities be considered.
- 2 -
Planning Commission Minutes
Laguna Lake - June 27, 1991
Di Leo: This direction came from numerous sources. Since other studies were being
conducted (e.g.,the Community/Senior Study)or because a need had occurred
(e.g., the Children's Museum had to move) it was felt that the alternatives
should explore some different options.
Williams: The Children's Museum belongs downtown. If other facilities were used
sparingly, they might be acceptable at the park. The park needs to be
maintained for the most part in its natural state.
Hoffman Explain the Nature Center.
Foote: It was thought that it could be a small building. Docent lead tours could be
part of the nature center. The center could possibly be run by a private, non-
profit foundation.
Williams: If the City could find an organization to manage the center it would be a
good idea.
Foote: Alternative 2 includes a smaller scale nature center than Alternative 3.
Di Leo: The Native Plant Society has discussed certain areas of Laguna Lake Park with
City staff. There is a thistle on the property that they would like to see
protected. They offer some services for protection.
Williams: Stop the grazing.
Schmidt: The seeps were supposed to be fenced.
Di Leo: They have been. The other seeps are not on city property.
Williams: Likes the proposed play areas for children. The existing play areas need
improvement. The entrance to the park needs to be redone. Where would
bike paths be?
Foote: Circular paths would be included in the design if the paths did not have a
connection to Foothill or Los Osos Valley Road. The path would be kept out
of the marsh area.
Williams: I do not think mountain bikes should be allowed due to habitat concerns.
The problem is that they do not always stay on the designated trails. Bike
links would be important.
- 3 -
z ZO
Planning Commission Minutes
Laguna Lake - June 27, 1991
Hoffman: If we could get bike links they would be an excellent contribution to the city.
Problems, such as people going off the trail, could be resolved later.
Di Leo: When the Dalidio property develops a bike path could continue from Laguna
Lake Park to Highway 101 along Perfumo Creek. It may be possible that a
linear park would be provided on the Dalidio Property along Perfumo Creek.
In addition, protection of the rookery would likely occur at that time. It was
noted by the Park and Recreation Commission that the Dalidio property may
be a better site for a neighborhood center.
Gurnee: At the time the Dalidio property develops, the EIR for that development
would require protection of the heron rookery.
Kourakis: There is a connection between Laguna Lake Park and the rookery, but I am
not getting that feedback.
Foote: The heron rookery is important. There is a relationship between the park and
the rookery. Such rookeries are high on Fish & Games list to preserve.
There are only three areas in San Luis Obispo county where such rookeries
exist.
The lower portion of the park is degraded, and is basically urban. This lower
area is not as environmentally sensitive. How close can the interface between
the rookery and humans be? The site is now impacted by Madonna Road and
use of the park In addition, other rookies have some interface. The attempt
should be to minimise encroachment and protect these areas where possible.
Some interface can occur.
Gurnee: Rookeries for heron are primarily human made environments, planted with
non-native Eucalyptus trees.
Kourakis: How close can development be before impacting the rookery?
Foote: Need to provide some protection,herons need some amount of personal space.
Schmidt: When development occurred on the west side of lake it was promised that the
lake would be kept as a natural environment. Development at the park should
be kept minimal, no community center or museum should be provided at the
park. Confine landscape development and human activities to the front of the
park. Back part of the park should be kept natural with some landscape
enhancement for habitat. One concern, if we start planting a lot of large non-
- 4 -
z-z�
Planning Commission Minutes
Laguna Lake - June 27, 1991
natives trees we could ruin the view and destroy the character of the area.
Would like acquisitions pursued.
Gurnee: Tend to agree with Richard, Dodie, and Janet, the less developed the better.
I agree that the acquisitions should be pursued, particularly as noted in
Alternative 3. Acquisition by purchase is probably the only option. Make
these acquisitions a priority. Actually the acquisitions may not be bold
enough.
Enrich the environment, provide for mitigation banking In terms of trails,
have controlled bicycle paths. Grazing should be discontinued as soon as
possible. Dredging spoils could be used in creative ways. There is a new idea
regarding dredging spoils. It is called "land art." The idea is to use dredge
materials to create compelling, well designed land forms. Can create natural
forms (arroyo's, hills) in sensitive areas, and more formal and artistic forms
closer to the park's developed area.
Schmidt: Stop the grazing, let the habitat repair itself.
Hoffman: Acquisitions are not bold enough. Keith represents my opinions regarding
park development.
Foote: Discussed land acquisitions.
Williams: Look at acquisitions as soon as possible. The cost of land will only go up in
the future.
Karleskint: Keith's comments - ditto for him. Grazing should be gone. Keep the
developed park area visible. People need to see that there is a park there
when they are driving by. The front portion of the park should be more park-
like. Other than that Alternative 1 looks good. Embellish the kiosk into a
better facility. The kiosk does not necessarily need to be a building but it
should be a site from which the park's natural resource can be managed.
Foote: Talked about lake shore alterations shown in the different alternatives. The
lake shore is presently unusable except for throwing stuff to the ducks. The
revised plan would allow a beach area and human access in certain areas.
The Park and Recreation Commission did not discuss the shore to a large
degree.
Di Leo: The Park and Recreation Commission did discuss alternative shorelines, they
preferred Alternative 1.
- 5 -
z zz,
Planning Commission Minutes
Laguna Lake - June.27, 1991
Gurnee: Shoreline changes are a good idea to explore.
Kourakis: Would the beach areas be a place for people to sun themselves?
Foote: More of a place to get out of the wind, watch the lake, maybe picnic areas.
Williams: Good idea. Presently there is a problem with wind exposure on any of the
beach areas.
Kourakis: It is a question of scale. How many recreation users will the shoreline
alterations bring into the lake area? Will this increase the number of
windsurfers on the lake?
Karleskint: This would not increase the number of windsurfers.
Foote: This would not increase the number of windsurfers, but would enable people
with them to enjoy the area more.
Karleskint: If done carefully it may be a good idea.
Hoffman: It is an idea worth exploring. In terms of the nature center, Midland,
Michigan has one and it is a good area to learn about nature. The center
need not be an intrusion into the area.
Karleskint: It can enhance the natural aspect of the park.
Schmidt: Nature centers provide passive interpretative display.
Karleskint: Has a concern about the ponds. They should not be structured so that a child
feels so comfortable there that they transfer this comfort level out to the lake.
Kourakis: I second that.
Foote: The ponds could be made wet seasonally. They could be more of a creek
versus a pond. They could provide an educational concept.
Williams: Nice for a day camp sort of experience which is very valuable.
Kourakis: I heard a rumor that Park Department Offices would possibly go into Laguna
Lake Park. I would suggest that they are inappropriate.
Di Leo: If a community center or neighborhood center were approved for the site,such
a center might contain Park Department Offices. Other than that component
- 6 -
0 17/C Z
Planning Commission Minutes
Laguna Lake - June 27, 1991
there were no plans to relocate Park Department Offices to Laguna Lake
Park.
Williams: How do we keep dogs out of the preserve area?
Foote: Education.
Williams: People in the area walk their dogs in the park. Leash laws should be
enforced.
Eve Vigil: Walking dogs is a legitimate recreational activity. We should not restrict dog
walldng. People would not walk in some instances if their dog was not
allowed there. Definitely animals should be kept out of wildlife preserve
areas.
Gurnee: Congratulate the Committee and Consultants on a fine piece of work.
- 7 -
Atachment E
I'I!;!!ii�! ��i��!!►!�'�i °�ill i ji�;� j I ilii
�,:�� �!�I� ► ;i► I� uI a tof sAn WIS OBISPO
� 4--
Park and Recreation Commission Memo
page 2
4 . Windbreaks and Other Features. The Commission generally
supports the concept of improvements to the park aimed
at providing a more enjoyable outdoor experience. These
include: dredging the lake, berms and windbreaks, a
small scale nature/interpretive center, bank
stabilization and improvements to the boat ramp area,
paths and blinds to view wildlife, a "kiddie pond" ,
some picnic/playground areas, and restrooms/changing
rooms. The interpretive center should provide
information and exhibits about the unique biological
features of this park.
5. Habitat and Marsh Protection. The Commission supports
the peninsula design as depicted in Alternative 1 as it
provides protected marsh and habitat areas. The
Commission supports revegetation and the creation of
additional wildlife habitat where appropriate. Only
endemic plants should be used in this effort. To
reclaim terrestrial habitat areas, grazing should be
discontinued within the park and degraded grazing lands
should be reclaimed.
Design aspects or features that should be incorporated into
Alternative 1 are noted below:
1. Property Acquisitions/Easements. The purchase of
easements or outright purchase of additional surrounding
parkland is highly desirable. The City should pursue
at least the acquisitions for additional open space and
parkland as proposed under Alternative 3 . Lake and
marshland areas should be considered a high priority for
acquisition.
2 . Handicap and Elderly Access. Handicap and elderly
access should be an important design feature of the
plan.
3 . Park Entrance. The area directly adjacent to Madonna
Road should have a friendlier, park-like edge.
4 . Dredging. Any future dredging operation should not
degrade or diminish the integrity of the master plan.
5 . Berms and Landscaping. Berms and landscaping features
should be compatible with the overall intrinsic
character of the park. Berms should be contoured to
appear natural and endemic to the site. Landscaping
should appear natural and not impair scenic view
corridors.
z-z�
Park and Recreation Commission Memo
Page 3
6. Park Roads. Park roads should not incorporate overly
long straight lines and sharp angles. In addition, park
roads should not focus attention on the power lines.
7 . Boat and Sail Ramps. The boat and sail ramps should be
moved away from the wildlife area to provide adequate
separation from human activities associated with such
ramps.
8. Perfumo Creek Inlet. The Perfumo' Creek Inlet should be
designed consistent with Planning Principles 22 and 34.
If any member of the City Council has questions regarding this memo
or other items please feel free to contact members of the Park and
Recreation Commission or myself.
cc: Planning Commission
ARC
11MP.cc
z-z.7
sedes
site and..environmental design
' Crawford. Multari & Starr
planning•architecture•public polity
Lei"sure Visions
' recreation and tourism planning
LAGUNA LAKE PARK MMASTER PLAN
Programming & Conceptual Alternatives
I4ril 1991
I
IINTRODUCTION TO THE CONCEPTUAL ALTERNATIVES
The Programming and Conceptual Alternative segment of the Master Plan for Laguna Lake Park
' provides a bridge between the Initial Analysis and Planning Principles and the final Master Plan.
Three alternative conceptual park designs accompany this document along with concept sketches
and exhibits illustrating possible land acquisition and trail easements.
I Each alternative depicts a somewhat different level of development and mix of uses. However many
program elements are common to all the designs. It is expected that the final design would
synthesize all the schemes, possibly adding new program elements and eliminating others. A
I general projection of the number of users served is included on each plan along with projected
parking needs.
The following narrative provides some background on the evolution of the development program for
I the park and ideas on long term strategies for the management of the large open space areas of the
park.
' PARK PROGRAM
The City Parks and Recreation element of the General Plan indicated ten years ago that the city has a
' shortage of park land and park facilities. Since that time only a few new parks have been constructed
and the City has been unable to meet its schedule to provide more parks for its residents.
In particular,only a small portion of the district park priority list which includes Laguna Lake Park has
I been accomplished. Facilities in this adopted plan for Laguna Lake include community building,
tennis courts, swimming pool, balifields,and private recreation facilities. This program of uses was
derived from a community survey and workshops with the Parks and Recreation Commission and
Planning Commission.
IIt should be noted that the Laguna Lake Park boundary in the Parks Element did not include the
hillside or the northern undeveloped portions of the park, and were not considered In the
' development of the overall park strategy for the City. These areas are being considered in the
present Master Planning effort
The County of San Luis Obispo Parks Master Plan done In 1987 Included telephone and field
' surveys that indicates those facilities at parks in the County that are most important to the residents
and visitors. Many of the residents surveyed are from the city of San Luis Obispo. Laguna Lake Park
has the potential to provide the majority of the types of facilities considered important in this survey.
The following is a list of activities that might be accommodated in the park. They include eighteen of
Ithe nineteen activities most favored in the County Parks Master Plan Survey of recreation users.
1. Picnicking
I 2. Nature enjoyment
3. Hiking/walking
4. Sightseeing
5. Playground
I 6. Jogging and running
7. Horseshoes
The above activities are low impact and could generally occur in most areas of Laguna Lake Park
Iwithout a loss of open space value.
I
I
I
' Additional activities that might be considered on a limited scale that would not compromise the open
space quality of the park include:
8. Camping
I 9. Baseball
10. Softball
11. Tennis
' 12. Equestrian trails
Finally,those activities that require lake access include:
' 13. Swimming
14. Boating
15. Canoeing
16. Sailing (small scale)
I 17. Windsurfing
18. Fishing
' The programs for development shown on the three Conceptual Alternatives do not reflect all these
uses and include others not listed. These programs were derived from the most recent community
survey conducted as part of the current Master Planning effort
' This included a community survey and workshops to develop Planning Principles to guide the
physical design of the Park. The consensus at this point in time seems to favor a significantly less
intensive approach to Laguna Lake Park than previous. The Conceptual Alternatives prepared for
this stage of the planning process reflect this consensus. Generally development is concentrated in
' distinct areas with hundreds of feet of natural open space between use areas. Shoreline roads have
been eliminated and extensive trail loops created. Development northwest of the main windrow
(currently grazed land)is extremely limited in all aftematives.
ILONG TERM STRATEGIES
The area northwest of the windrow seems to be highly valued for its openness and visual relation to
' the surrounding hills. It does not have any natural or biological value in its current overgrazed
condition. Each alternative shows measures to enhance the natural character of this area.
Although the general feeling at this point in time is to maintain this vast segment of the park in a
I relatively undeveloped state, it is possible that in the future, the perception and needs of the
community will change. One possible direction this portion of the park could take is toward the
creation of an Ecological Park The City could investigate joint management of this area with one or
I more organizations or foundations such as the Audubon Society or Nature Conservancy. In this
approach, capital expenditures would initially be towards revegetation and creation of a series of
natural environments including wetland, riparian edges and corridors,oak woodland,grassland,etc.
The Park could ultimately include wildlife exhibits and a staffed nature center. Tours of sensitive
' areas would be docent led.
Another approach would be to initially establish an adequate open space/wildlife buffer along the
marsh and reserve the hillside areas in open space. The approximately 35 acre, relatively flat,open
' area in the center could then be set aside as park land to be developed more intensively In the
future. This approach would ensure preservation of the sensitive natural areas, maintain the open
space quality, and allow flexibility in future development. The planting of windbreaks in this area
would begin now to create the micro-climate modifications that will eventually be needed for this area
Ito be enjoyed.
As the City's opportunities for acquiring more acreage for active parks diminish this area of Laguna
' Lake Park may become more desirable for development in the future. The possibility exists that it will
remain the Clys only opportunity for major park and recreation activities.
I
I
I
I PROGRAM ELEMENT DESCRIPTIONS
The physical forms of parking areas, buildings and use areas depicted on the plans are Intended to
be very schematic at this stage. Evaluation of the designs should focus on relative sizes and
' juxtaposition of uses rather than physical form The final Master Plan will address form In more detail.
PLAYFIELDS/TURF: Turf grass areas provide a suitable surface for Informal games,frisbee,touch
I football and so forth. These areas are related to family and group picnic areas and are primarily
intended for the users of these picnic facilities. Turf also provides a durable and maintainable
Lakeshore edge for designated shoreline use areas. The use of reclaimed or lake water for Irrigation
should be considered.
' FAMILY PICNIC: These areas consist of scattered and clustered tables and barbecues for groups of
one to three families. They generally are situated on the leeward side of windbreaks. Parking should
be no more than 200 feet away from tables.
GROUP PICNIC: Generally several group picnic areas are shown on each scheme. These could
range In size from areas to accommodate over 100 persons to smaller areas suitable for 20 to 50
persons. These areas would Include a decomposed granite or concrete surface,tables, barbecue,
I electric power, lighting;and for the larger areas perhaps a pergola or shelter. In the schemes with a
community center a group area is shown that could be used in conjunction with a kitchen in the
center.
I PLAY AREA: Play areas include play equipment for various age children and would be situated in
two or three locations around the park primarily as an adjunct to the family picnic areas. A play area
could be situated near a neighborhood or community center where recreation programs might occur.
I One play area could be developed as an adventure playground. This might Include a naturalistic
environment of boulders, reeds and a recirculating stream course feeding the proposed pond. The
Idea would be to create a replica of other natural environments In the park suitable for learning and
play.
IGAMES: Game facilities include horseshoes and volleyball and would occur near group and family
areas.
I NATURE CENTER: The level of development of a 'nature center' might be as simple as an
interpretive display panel or kiosk that includes a map of nature walks at the park and Information on
natural features. This concept could be expanded to include an open shatter or pergola with a series
I of displays situated on a patio or terrace. Another approach might include a staffed nature center
operated by a wildlife foundation or group. Docent led nature walks would be staged from the center.
CANOE AND BOAT LAUNCHES: Because of the differing natures of canoes and light motorized
I craft separate launches might be appropriate. Small craft that can be carried and are easy to launch
seem to be predominant at the lake, however provision for launching fishing boats should be
Included in the form of docks and a launch ramp. Parking and turnaround areas need to be provided.
I SAILBOARD LAUNCH: The fairly intense shore activity Involved In sailboard portage,assembly,and
launch requires a durable surface. The sailboard launch area would include a geotextile reinforced
turf edge with the covered geotextile membrane extending into the water to maintain the lake edge
Iwhen water levels fluctuate.
WALKINGIJOGGING AND BIKE PATH: Paths for walkers,joggers and bikers would be decomposed
granite and asphalt. Most of the existing shoreline road would be converted to a biketwalking route.
I Exercise stations as well as sheltered rest areas should be included along the paths. Paths would
link all the major park elements and perimeter routes.
I HIKING TRAIL, This path occurs on the hills in the park and would be an unsurfaced, but Improved
foot trail. Benches might be included at the top of the Nil.
INTERPRETIVE DISPLAY. Durable, low key displays describing natural features and wildlife would
Ibe situated at key points on paths and trails.
I
1 -
' RESTROOM: New and additional restrooms would be sized to accommodate the Intensity of activity
in the area of the park served. New restrooms should use more natural building materials and take
security into accourd.
' COMMEMORATIVE GROVE: The existing grove can be expanded over time to create an impressive
grove.
' DAY CAMP, This area would be a combination group area/play area that could be reserved for
recreation department children's programs for summer and vacations or used by groups such as Cub
Scouts or Campfire Girls.
' ORGANIZATIONAL CAMP: These remote areas located in the north end of the park would be used
by organizations on a reservation basis. Availability could be limited to certain days or seasons to limit
impacts. These would be overnight tent camping areas and include water supply and pit toilets.
Parking would be back in the developed part of the park. Improvements might include a small
' amphitheater.
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: A neighborhood center would include facilities such as a multi-purpose
' room, activity rooms for recreation department programs and a kitchen. The structure would be in the
range of 5,000 sq.it and accommodate up to 100 persons.
COMMUNITY CENTER AND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: A large scale center might Include a
' gymnasium sized multi-purpose room,activity rooms,a kitchen and Recreation Department offices.
Total square footage might be 15,000 sq. ft., and would accommodate several hundred people.
Outdoor eating and play areas would be associated with the center. A site for the children's museum
might be included in this complex,and related to an adventure playground.
I
1
I
I
I
TIME IS RUNNING OUT FOR OUR
LIVING NATIONAL TREASURES
N
early 400 years ago, when the
�.
�;,,N pilgrims arrived, North America
'"-�•__-- ,��J ,,.-. .r� was covered with 850 million acres of
••t' - - - ,:, virgin forests. But as you can see from
`
these maps, today less than one in ten
trees still stands. In the Pacific.
Northwest alone, enough virgin trees
Virgin Forests 1620 are cut down each year to fill a convoy
of trucks 20,000 miles long! This rate is
faster than the destruction of the
' Brazilian rainforests. And with the
''- - - profit-hungry timber barons logging
--
'
2,000 acres a week all our Ancient
Forest ecosystems will be effectively
,
destroyed in less than five years.
~` he ugly rubble and stumps — all
T
Virgin Forests 1850 that remain of an annihilated
Ancient Forest — are a common sight
U r
throughout the Pacific Northwest as
LL �J• ,#. ;._� Americas Cathedrals fall victim to
the chain saw. This carnage, this total
�''•,, r• .a- _; `-6, - annihilation of our priceless natural
heritage must be stopped. And
i stopped immediately ... before it is too
late!
FOR FREE TREE 'S , Cot\i TACT" o SLO TREES
60Y 1671 SL01 Ca , q3`166
®Regrded Paper
COPIESTo:
❑ Action FYI
WAO
CDDDUL Robert &Anne PhiffTs
❑ FIN.DIR 1309 Vega 'Way
❑ FIRECI11EF San Luis Obispo, CA 93405
rCLMGTM0TTFA1
.IVEY El FW DQt.
ERK/OIZIC. ❑ POLICE CFL August 23 , 1991
1 ❑ KEC.DIR.
City Council ❑ CRSADAL; ❑ `CILDIP.
990 Palm Stree VTr- P"-6KLE KET2&7.2nffm
GENDA
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 DATE ��--
Dear Mayor Dunin and Council Members:
I have read the PRC's recommendations for development of
Laguna Lake Park, and am delighted to see their preference
for Alternative 1. It offers the most protection of the
natural assets of Laguna--which we all know is not just a
typical city park, but a precious "wetland" as well. SLO
is now an urban area of 50, 000 people (T-Tr last week) ;
more and more people will be using the Park. But I think
it will still be possible to keep most human activity in
the southeast end, as it is now. This will--we hope--
preserve the "habitat" function of the northwest end.
I would support trails, restoration, and enhancement--as
long as this work is done carefully, with first priority
given to habitat and natural scenic values.
I live 2 blocks from the upper end of the Park. Since I
walk there nearly every day, year-round, I can observe use
(and some abuse! ) . May I offer the following suggestions?
1. If the northwest end will be respected as a wildlife
habitat, it may have to be almost closed to the public.
For example, before the March rains, people tromped all
over it. Some even tore around on the mud in cars and
pickups. More recently: rowboats and wind-surfers can be
seen on the upper reaches (across from Vista Arroyo, Diablo
Dr. etc. ) One man had his BIRD DOG in the bow of his
boat. Between such use and the cattle grazing on the
flats, wild birds and other wildlife have little space.
2 . A through-trail to Foothill would be convenient. But
people and their dogs, mountain bikes etc. will undoubtedly
wander off trail and go everywhere. Again, wildlife
habitat is not compatible with heavy human/dog use in such
a small area.
Nature walks in this sensitive portion have been
proposed--only when led by docents. If controlled by
naturalists, this use might be acceptable. I think the
public must be restrained by some kind of barrier(s) ,
across not just land but water too (or mud! )
3 . Fire suppression will be urgent, I think. We do not
have here a vast Yellowstone Park--we have a very small
area, with little cover for nesting birds and other
species. This spring I already saw greatly reduced numbers
of birds and nests over spring 1990, before the 3 arson
fires took out a lot of the tules.
4 . Few people heed the "dogs must be leashed" signs. (My
husband and I walk our dog there sometimes, but we keep him
ED
t;
OUNCIL __
on lead--also pick up after him. ) I have seen loose dogs
running deer and even cattle in the pasture. owners train
their dogs to swim and fetch in all parts of the Lake--nice
for the resident waterfowl! When I was stuck in traffic
one day last June, I saw 3 dogs attack, kill and devour a
goose in about 5 minutes. Occasionally I see ominous piles
of feathers in the same area.
5. Also in June I saw a badger--my first!--trying to cross
Foothill Rd. from the wetlands side. Don't know if he/she
made it. Maybe we should consider sheep or chicken wire
fencing to keep wild dogs out, wildlife in. What do the
scientist-consultants say?
Sorry to be so long-winded on this subject. But I'm in
love with Laguna.
Sincerely,
Anne G. Phillips (541-583 )