Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/24/1992, 2B - FIRE TRAINING FACILITY PROJECT MODIFICATION AND ECOSLO AGREEMENT. Original agenda rel from the meeting of 3/ 1 2 . MY Of San IDIS OBISp0 Meeting Date: 3/17/92 WINGN COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Item Number: O FROM: Robert F. Neumann, Fire Chief SUBJECT: Fire Training Facility Project modification and ECOSLO agreement. CAO RECOMMENDATION: • Authorize the Fire Department to prepare and issue a RFP for architectural services for the preparation of plans and specifications for a new training facility at the Prado Road site. • By motion, modify the existing lease agreement between the City of San Luis Obispo and ECOSLO for continued use as a recycling center. DISCUSSION: Background The City Administrative Officer directed the San Luis Obispo Fire Department in the spring of 1983 to consider developing a functional, modern fire training facility. Upon approval in August of 1983 , professional services were used to complete the concept and schematic design for a City Fire Training Facility. Richmond, Rossi and Montgomery (RRM) developed a program to study and evaluate various sites within or adjacent to the City. The RRM study prompted the City to consider a joint use training facility with California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly) . The joint use concept grew to include California Men's Colony, California Department of Forestry (CDF/County Fire Department) in addition to Cal Poly for the possible development of a regional training facility. During the FY 1985-86 CIP appropriations, Council approved funds for the final design of a fire training facility with direction that the training facility should be a regional project with multi-agency participation. Currently, 60% of the final design for a regional fire training facility at Goldtree Road (just outside the City) has been completed. However, anticipated construction funds from the State and County are unavailable. Staff finds that without their participation, the joint Training Facility is no longer feasible. A previous Council Agenda Report for a study session held on September 21, 1987 states, "Failure to build a Regional Training Facility does not eliminate the Fire Department's need for a training facility. " Essential elements for developing and maintaining emergency response skills are, a large paved area for multi-company training evolutions and a means for conducting above ground (tower) operational training. ae-� ►�����NuuIIIIIII�I ��Ill city of San WIS OBISPO COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Page 2 Currently, the Fire Department finds itself in a position of having no usable above ground (tower) facility. As pointed out in the 1987 Council Agenda Report (attached) , the present wood training tower to the rear of Fire Station #2 is decaying, very unsafe, and should be removed. Additionally, the department has marginal training grounds, due to the conflicts resulting from the ECOSLO operations. Temporary, stop-gap measures, including the use of City buildings, parking structures, and vacant parking lots available only on weekends have been adopted. However, these efforts have only served to underline the need for more appropriate facilities. Description of Proposed Site Since the late 1960's, the Fire Department has been property manager of 1.8 acres located at 60 Prado Rd. This flat, fenced site is located between the City's Corporation Yard and the Sewer Treatment drying ponds. The site is basically unimproved, with the exception of a small fire pit, two fire hydrants, and some paving. The Fire Department is currently sharing the site with two non-profit agencies. The first agency is the San Luis Gun Club which operates a small arms firing range in a 1, 300 sq. ft. building located at the rear of the parcel. The activities of the Gun Club are outside the normal operating hours of both ECOSLO and the Fire Department Drillgrounds. Their activities do not involve the property outside their cinder block building. This shared use is compatible with Fire Department operations and no change is recommended. The second agency the Fire Department shares with is ECOSLO. Since 1971, the City has allowed ECOSLO to use 10, 000 sq. ft. for the purpose of operating a recycling center. ECOSLO, for some time has been in violation of the City's month-to-month rental agreement in regards to allotted occupied area and site cleanliness. With the expanded role of recycling in our community, the recycling center is no longer able to fit within the 10, 000 sq. ft. allotted area and has expanded to 30, 000 square feet which is occupying the majority of the Fire Department's available training space. Fire Department staff finds three possible solutions to the current problem. The first is for ECOSLO to vacate the site. The gun club would be allowed to remain. vrd9.doc a�-C V1 ��u�i�i�N►Iulllll���l��ui►���N city o� san Luis a3ispo AONGs COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Page 3 • The second is for the Fire Department to relocate to a new site. While somewhat outdated, the original RRM study (1983) did find a number of other sites that still offer some potential as a drill grounds. However, all potential sites would require extensive improvements (Stenner Creek or Laguna Lake Park) or additional land purchase, at substantial expense to the City. • The third solution is to modify the existing lease with ECOSLO allowing them to expand their "contracted" square footage, but to reduce the square footage they are now actually using. The lease would also address concerns over appropriate site use and cleanliness. Fire Department staff feels that for a period of up to three years we could allow ECOSLO to use a total of 23 , 450 sq. feet which is 13 ,450 more than allowed under the existing contract. ECOSLO feels this will meet their short term needs. It should be noted that ECOSLO is currently using approximately 30, 000 sq. ft. STAFF RECOMENDATION The Fire Department, ECOSLO, Public Works and Planning Departments have agreed upon a plan which will allow ECOSLO to remain on site, moving to the front of the lot (see attached maps) . Concerns over visual impacts are to be minimized by screening with vegetation and fence slats and by the placement of yard equipment and office trailers to the rear of the expanded area. The Fire Department will be responsible for the installation of the new fence separating the new facility. ECOSLO will be responsible for the installation of one new gate and providing visual screening along the front .and sides of the expanded areas. Additionally, ECOSLO will be required to rework the front gates to accommodate the off-hours drop.;-site, the source of numerous citizen complaints, behind the fenced/screened area. ECOSLO anticipates continued .growth in their operations, and their personnel are reportedly researching the availability of sites offering more space than can be made available at the Prado Road facility. This alternative will therefore allow ECOSLO to continue operation while looking for a new site which, the Fire Department agrees, is the ultimate solution. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The training tower would consist of a building 20' x 20' and three stories in height. There would be a one story 10' x 20' room attached to provide storage of training aids. The training tower would be w-M.doc o?B-3 �►►��►�ui�ullillllliP°unu��UIU MY Of San tins OBISPO 1NooZe COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Page 4 constructed of material which would be aesthetically pleasing and acceptable for the area. The ground area surrounding this tower would be concrete and/or asphalt to provide a firm surface for the 30, 000 lbs. fire trucks. In the future the Fire Department will expand into the area used by ECOSLO for additional simulated emergency response situations, such as environmental, transportation and medical emergencies, trench and heavy rescue. FISCAL IMPACT: In 1983 the City authorized $45, 000 from the Ventures and Contingencies fund for a site analysis and feasibility study of a regional fire training facility. In the 1987-89 CIP the City funded $320, 000 for the design and construction of a facility to be located at the Goldtree site. $65, 000 of the approved funds have been spent on design work, leaving a remaining balance of $255, 000. In the 1992 mid-year budget review Council re-directed $150, 000 of the remaining $255, 000 to be used for the design and construction of a City fire training facility at 60 Prado Road. The remaining $105, 000 will remain in the Capital Outlay fund balance. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Do nothing and allow the previously approved funds to return to the capital account. Pro - This would save the City approximately $150, 000. Con - Pressing Fire Department training needs will not be met, which might lead to the injury of improperly trained Firefighters. 2. Approve a smaller amount and spread the work out over future capital budgets. Pro - The City could spread the costs over a longer period of time, thereby reducing the impact to any one budget. Con - The size of this project is not significantly large enough to efficiently spread it over a number of years. CONCURRENCE: City staff, Fire, Public Works and Planning have reached concurrence on the plan and support the movement of ECOSLO to the front of the lot. Kurt Kupper, Director of ECOSLO, has been actively involved in the development of this proposal and also concurs. vrd9.doc ae-�f "°"�►�►i�I�II�1Il�u"ui `I MY Of San LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Page 5 ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 Proposed Site Plans Attachment 2 Original Lease Agreement Attachment 3 Council Agenda Report of September 21, 1987 Attachment 4 Amended Lease Agreement. I vrd9.doc z ► ' • • ATrACHMENP #1 ECOSLO YARD DETAIL AREA 23,480 SA. FT. P R A D O R D . ENTER DAY / NIGNT DROP SITE X W : EMPLOYER ;. SIGN PARKING : :V :W v o _; . GLASS PET' CARDBOAQD ; STORAGE STORAGE SIGN STORAGE SHO t I BALER. Z r. , SORTING CARDBt I PROCE3 ARDING ,� z AREA t a PET BALERI PROCESSING OIL i OFFICE t t t t PROCESSING � AL CIO K I I r I I O x ------------- z NEWS W �IIII,I„ �II■1,1 SIGN 175, F D T R A I N I N 6 G R O U N D S o 6 to 20 40 ATTAC'nMarl' #2 �d -NAIL MAZE AGREEMENT 1 This Agreement, dated November 15, 1971 for the convenience of the parties herett 2 is between the City of San Luis Obispo, California, a chartered municipal corporation, 3 (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "City') and the Environmental Center of San Luis 4 Obispo, an association, (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "Center'); 6 WITNESSETH: 8 WHEREAS, City and Center are both interested in and committed to the protection 7 of the environment and the landscape; and 8 WHEREAS, Center desires to operate for six months a trialro p gram for reclalmit 9 and recycling glass, metal and other products as mutually agreed upon by thee.parties, 10 which program could potentially be of lasting benefit to the environment, rite landscape 11 and the City and its citizens, thereby serving a valuable public purpose; 12 NOW, THEREFORE, City and Center, for and in consideration of the mutual 13 benefits, promises and agreements set forth herein, do agree as follows: 14 1, This Agreement shall be effective as of the date it is executed by both of the 16 parties hereto, and shall terminate May 15, 1972. 18 2.• City agrees to permit Center to use up to 10,000 square feet of open space as 17 designated by the City Administrative Officer from time to time at the City's fire training I8 facilitythe at sewer plant on Prado Road in the City of San Luis Obispo. 19 3. Center agrees to use said open space only for the purposes of conducting a 20 program for the recycling of glass, metal and other products as mutually agreed upon by 21 the parties. " 22 4. Center agrees to accept suitable materials for recycling from the public at 23 month 24 least 12 hours per xwk, pursuant to a schedule posted at the recycling site. 5. Center agrees to maintain said recycling site in a manner at all times 25 f satisactory to the City Administrative Officer or his deal . grated representatives. 28 6. Center shall provide sufficient personnel and equipment to conduct its operati T 27 without undue congestion or unsightliness. 28 7. Center shallatall time provide the City Administrative Officer with a currej 29 list of three or more persons representing the Center, at least one of whom can be 30 contacted by the Administrative Officer whenever he desires information concerning the 31 operation of the Center or seeks correction of conditions at the recycling site. 32 1 1C9 01 1wi S. Center shall hold the City harmless from all claims and liability arising fror. ran[Y M NAL Y11 i1L 1ilwt{T -- I..11 isill n I"Oi 34O. iww1A!8666 1 a4a•aw ss. g28 1 :: MTUM60U #z a IAL LEASE 1 the operation of the recycling site or any ower conduct or site condition connected with .. 2 the recycling program.gra Center shall obtain and keep current a liability insurance policy -• 3 with property lama coverage ge of not less than $50,000.00 for each person on account 4 of any one occurrence, and with personal in 6 jurY coverage of not less than $100,000.00 for each person and ;3001 000,00 total for each occu�fence. The Cit shall e listed as a w,�hC. Y ll,be specificall• named insured In said policy, 7 9. Center and all of Its agents, representatives, and participants in any manner in 8 the recycling Y g program shall be independent contractors or volunteers for Center and shall 9 10 not for any purpose be considered as employees or agents of City. Center agrees to hold the City hharmless-and defend the City in any action 11 of action or claim Is based upon a claim that an proceeding or hearing wherein the cau 12 y person participating in the recycling 13 program is an employee or agent of the City, 14 10. Center shall limit or cease all operations within seventy-two (72) hours at the 15 recycling site whenever so requested by the City's Administrative Officer. Center may le appeal any such request by the Administrative Officer to the next regular meeting of the City Council. 17 11, The Center shall provide the City with monthly statements of gross revenue 18 and expenses connected with the operation of the recycling program. 19 20 12. The Center agrees to leave the premises in a condition satisfactory to City upon 21 termfnatioN.pF the recycling program normal wear and tear excepted. 22 13. If Center should fail to correct any condition at the recycling site within sevenq 25 two (72) hours after being requested to do so by the City Administrative Officer, the City 24 shall have the right to correct the condition with City forces or contract labor, or bode 25 and the Center shall be liable for all costs, both direct and Indirect, connected with such correction. 28 14• 'The City Council may y1, 28 27 motion terminate this Agreement at its sole discretior. after a publie hearing held upon ten (10) days written notice to Center. Said termination Shall be effective 29 -- fifteen (15) days after City malls notice Of termination to Center. 30 31 32 C[01 TM[ •TTOgNry ' *TR [}JILT '[1lt4 J[NIO, 81401ff .8444 Cage 2 � ae_q 5,. MuMENr #2 L. .I1vpr, LEASE 1 1S. For purposes of notice under this Agreement, all notices shall be considered 2 effective upon being sent by registered mall to the following addresses: 3 City: City Clerk 4 City Hall 990 Palm Street 6 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 6 Center: Environmental Center Box 1014 7 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement by thelz 9 proper officers duly authorized, as of the date first above written. 10 11 ATTEST: r t CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 12 13 14 yor 16 ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER OF SAN LU 18 OBISPO 17 "7 r/ 1 18 19 1 8n 20 21o-chairman 22 23 24 26 28 27 28 29 30 31 32 em[[e.r x W AT Nry CT"ALL `ALY[}\[[T [Ot lata Page 3 *Ou[ro• 'A 93401 C-ag[[ A7P!�rrr #2 0IAL LEASE , FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT I The Lease Agreement dated November 15, 1971, between the 2 City of San Luis Obispo and the Environmental Center of San Luis Obispo, which lease permits the 3 Center to conduct recycling operations uponCi ty 4 'Owned property, Is hereby amended to extend said lease for an additional period of three months. 6 The termination date of said lease set out in paragraph I thereof is amended 8 tlove'naza to read,4ugust 11972. 7 All other terms, conditions, and provisions of said lease remain !n full force B and effect. 9 IO IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement by 11 their proper officers duly authorized. 12 ATTEST: 13 ity rg CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 14 1B Date; 18 By: 17 yor 18 Dace: .. t' ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER OF 19 SAN LUIS OBISPO 20 �7 21 r� 22 n an 23 24 25 a0%pan 28 27 28 29 30 31 32 anlcr CIA""All aro.ur v.lrr •.e.!e!lau !LIM"mora. 4403) l.9340'11!031 !�!.!e!! r A'1'1'ACHMhX' #2 ` ORIGIM anuaryE 15, 1973 .bun Luis Obispo, California 1 SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT 2 The Lease Agreement dated November 15, 1971, between the City of San Luis 3 Obispo and the Environmental Center of San Luis Obispo, as amended by a First 4 Amendment thereto dated July 8, 1972, is hereby further amended as follows: 0 1. The termination date of said lease set forth in Paragraph 1 thereof is 8 hereby amended to read: "December 31, 1973." 7 2. Paragraph 3 of said lease is hereby amended to read in full as follows: 8 "3. Center agrees to use said open space only for the purposes of 9 conducting a program for the recycling of glass, metal, newspaper, 10 and other products as mutually agreed upon by the parties." 11 All other terms, conditions and provisions of said lease remain in full force 12 and effect. 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement by 14 their proper officers duly authorized. 15 18 17 ATTEST: • �i�--• CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO • r - rt 18 19 20 By: 6 . 21 yor 22 ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER OF 23 SAN LUIS OBISPO 24 25 28 Ado-Cnairman 27 28 29 :tn k ,. as-�a 4.. >Poll* A7'" "HMERr #z rr O JAL LEASE V 1 t THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT 2F The Lease Agreement dated November 15, 1971, between the City 3� of San Luis Obispo and the Environmental Center of San Luis )bispo, 4� as amended by a First Amendment dated Jul 5� Amendment dated Januaryy 8 1972, and a Second 73, is hereby further amended as 6� 15, 19follows: P 7.. 1• 8The lease termination date in Paragraph h 1 R will The be determined in accordance withfo said lease 9' provisions: the following 10; "t�. "The term .of this lease agreement shall be on a o nth basis.month-to-mo h' The agreement shall be auto- 12U matically extended on the first day Of ar 13 14 I month for an additional one month period a unlesseither' . party has perviously given to the other party written 15 notice of termination." 18 17G qll outer terms, conditions and provisions of said lease remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parti 19 as hereto have executed this Agreement by their r proper Officers duly authorized. 211 DATED:��6/� 22" CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 23II ATTEST: 24�I B ayor 25 26 ver - 27 28 ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER OF SAN LUIS 29 OBISPO I 30 , By: 31 32 YII KOI Twi GTT •TT ONNCT By: CITI Y.:L I.O.2OI.11 fIY OL 12 OIIIwO. �i GYIL uas, fai el eaa•ay�af . ATTACIMENT #3 _ Date:' 9/21/87 city o� san Luis osispo STEM NUMBER: COUNCIL. AGE OA REPORT FROM: Michael Dolder, Fire Chief By: Lewis Schmutz Training Chief SUBJECT: Consideration of Approving an Agreement between the City and Richmond, Rossi & Montgomery to Provide Architectural Services for Schematic and 60% Final Design for Regional Fire Training Facilities CAO RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving an extension of previous.agreement flowing from a request for proposal for architectural services. BACKGROUND: Early in the spring of 1983, the CAO directed the San Luis Obispo Fire Department to consider developing a functional and modernistic fire training facility. In August, 1983 the City Council adopted a Resolution approving an agreement between the City and Richmond, Rossi & Montgomery (RRM) for professional services to complete the concept and schematic design for a City fire training facility. This Resolution was based upon a request for proposal which followed established procedures for contracting professional services. RRM developed a programming study and alternative site evaluation which identified various sites within or adjacent to the city. This alternative site evaluation included the current 1.7 acre training site located on Prado Rd. A potential location was selected on Highland Dr. within the Cal Poly State University campus. RRM coordinated negotiations between the City and Cal Poly for the joint use of a training facility at this 2.6 acre university location. Cal Poly rejected this location due to its close proximity to the campus core. However, Cal Poly was receptive to the possibility of leasing land for a regional training facility near the California Men's Colony on Highway 1. During the FY85-87 CIP appropriations, Council approved funds for the final design of a fire training facility with direction that the training facility should be a regional project with joint participation. Council further directed that construction funds would only be considered when written commitments were obtained from participating agencies. Following Cal Poly's direction to consider lands near CMC and Council's direction to regionalize the training project, RRM initiated negotiations between CMC, California Department of Forestry (CDF) and Cal Poly for possible development of a regional training facility (Attachments 2-4). A 15 acre parcel on Goldtree Road (Attachment 5) was jointly agreed upon by all parties. On March 10, 1986 Cal Poly agreed, in concept, to develop a 30 year lease with options. In return CMC would allow Cal Poly to utilize adjacent.CMC land to replace the lost agricultural lands. CDF would use a portion of the parcel for relocating their headquarters fire station and administrative offices. The remaining six acres would be used for a regional training facility. This project has taken over four years to progress to the current situation (Attachment 5). The process of negotiating an agreement for land use with these agencies was complex and time consuming. Current work on the project was completed in March, 1987 with the submittal of a topographic map prepared by CDF at a cost savings to the city. v21-(22) C2$-14 �i�O� I�I�II�i�III III city o� San LUIS OBIspo-- Mi;% COUNCIL. AGENDA REPORT Originally, RRM had completed a schematic design on the 2.6 Highland rive acreage SE e. Due to the larger and more complex site, 6 acres vs. 2.6 acre RRM, must develop another schematic design to reflect the size of the expanded site and different topography. Failure to build a regional training facility does not eliminate the Fire Department's need for training facilities. The current wood training tower located in the rear of Fire Station #2 is decaying and will be torn down during Fiscal Years 1987/89 as part of station repairs. A cost analysis comparison of the Prado Road site and the Goldtree Road site was formulated by RRM (Attachment 6). This comparison used the criteria specified in the program study developed by RRM in August of 1983. To construct a fire training facility at the existing Prado Road site would cost the City approximately $1,044,000. If the same facility is.developed at the Goldtree site, the City's contribution would be as high as $430,000. The Fire Department staff has had the opportunity to work with RRM throughout this process and have been favorably impressed with their performance. They have exhibited excellent cooperation and understanding of the specific Fire Department needs. Throughout this process, RRM has developed special knowledge pertinent to the uniqueness of the project. Continuance of the professional services with RRM will save time and money which would be needed to bring a new and different company up to current speed. The concept of this proposed project is intended to be a regional fire training facility, including financial participation from other agencies and private industry. The development of a joint cost sharing agreement between interested parties will be negotiated prior to Council funding the construction phase. Input on design from all committed agencies will be necessary to meet each agency's training needs. The City's financial commitment will be to complete 60% of the final design of the project. Following completion of 60% of the project's design, the project's cost estimates and design specifics will be presented to interested agencies to obtain their written and financial commitment. Joint funding to complete the remaining 40% of final design and a funding commitment for construction of the project will be obtained prior to additional project activity. At the request of the Fire Department, RRM has submitted a proposal for architectural services based upon an understanding that the final design will be two phased. The features of this proposal (Exhibit 1) include the following: A. Complete schematic design phase of the 6 acre site utilizing input from Cal Poly, CDF, and San Luis Obispo Fire Department as well as make a presentation to City Council ($9375.00). B. After City Council approval of the schematic design, RRM will complete the final design, which would be a 2 phase process. Phase I - This phase includes preliminary drawing from structural, civil, mechanical and electrical engineers to obtain detail cost estimate. This phase will be approximately 60% of total design phase work. These cost estimates will be used for presentations to other agencies and private industry in an effort to obtain agreements for joint participation in the regional fire training facility project ($35,980.00). v21-(22) '11 11.IVI��j�Jll7 1611 MY O� Sal - LUIS OBISPO MiZe COUNCIL AGENOA REPORT Phase 2 - This phase would complete the final design and would only be implemented after Council approval and firm written financial commitments from other agencies and private industry have been made ($37,150.00). Alternatives Option #1 - Adopt Resolution approving agreement with RRM for architectural services for completing schematic design and 60% of final design of fire training facilities. Option #2 - Direct Fire Chief to initiate a new recruitment for architectural services for the fire training facilities. This option will cause further delay in the project. Option #3 - Continue review to a later date to allow Fire Chief to renegotiate the agreement and/or provide more information. This process will also delay the project. Fiscal Impact The cost of final schematic design and 60% final design (Phase 1) will be approximately $45,400. Financing for this project is available through encumbered 1986-87 CIP funds ($45,700) and approved 1987-88 CIP monies ($20,000). Phase 2, completing the remaining 40% of final design ($37,150), will be considered at a future date. The cost of Phase 2 will be financed by the participating agencies. The City's contribution beyond the 60% final design phase will depend upon a negotiated agreement between interested parties willing to financially participate in the remaining 40% of final design and future construction. CAO Recommendation: Adopt Resolution authorizing the CAO to sign agreement with RRM for architectural services for the fire training facilities. Attachments: Attachment 1 Resolution Attachment 2 Cal Poly Letter of Intent Attachment 3 CDF/County Fire Letter of Interest Attachment 4 CMC Letter of Interest Attachment 5 Goldtree Road Site Map Attachment 6 Chronological Order of Major Events Attachment 7 Fire Training Facilities Site Cost Comparison Exhibit 1 Proposal for Architectural Services a vel-(22) 1TAc1HMENfP #4 AMENDED LEASE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE The Lease Agreement dated November 15, 1971, between the city of San Luis Obispo and the Environmental Center of San Luis Obispo, as amended by a First Amendment datecr July 8, 1972, a Second Amendment dated January 15, 1973, and a Third Amendment dated April 160 1974, is hereby further amended as follows: 1. The term of the lease stated in Paragraph 1 of said lease will hereafter be determined in accordance with the following provisions: "The term of this lease agreement shall be for one year, commencing on March 1, 1992. The one-year tenancy shall be automatically extended for an additional year on March 1, 1993 and March 1, 1994 unless either party has previously given to the other party written notice of termination, or the lease is otherwise terminated pursuant to Paragraph 14 . In any event, this lease agreement shall terminate on March 1, 1995. " 2. The description of the leased premises in paragraph 2 of said lease will hereafter be determined in accordance with the following provisions: "City agrees to permit Center to use up to 21,820 square feet of open space at the City's fire training facility at the sgwer plant on 1 ae ��7 ITTALIMENYP #4 AMENDED LEASE Prado Road in the City of San Luis Obispo. The boundaries of said area is set forth in the attached Exhibit A, as the Expanded Area. " 3 . The insurance requirements stated in Paragraph 8 of said lease will hereafter be determined in accordance with the following provisions: "Center shall defend and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees, harmless from all claims and liability arising from the operation of the recycling site or any other conduct or site condition connected with the recycling program. Center shall obtain and keep current a liability insurance policy with property damage coverage of not less than $100, 000. 00 for each person on account of any one occurrence, and with personal injury coverage of not less than $1, 000, 000. 00 for each person and $1, 000, 000.00 for each occurrence. The City shall be specifically listed as a named additional insured in said policy. ,, All other terms, conditions and provisions of said lease, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Fourth Amendment by their proper officials duly authorized. 2 ae-la 1TACHMEW #4 RENEED LEASE Dated: This day of , 1992 . CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO By: Mayor Ron Dunin ATTEST: City Clerk ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER OF SAN LUIS OBISPO By• 3 ae-ig