The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02/16/1993, C-3 - ""BIKE LANE/STREET RESURFACING PROJECT, SANTA ROSA AND SANTA BARBARA STREETS, CITY PLAN NO. S-41A."""illl�IQ�a�� city of San Is OBISpo . NIEE'C1Vir: NiiS COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITlE�M1NU /9M3_ FROM: J Wayne A. Peterson, Acting Director of Public Works Prepared by: Bridget O. Fraser, Engineering Assistant SUBJECT: "Bike Lane /Street Resurfacing Project, Santa Rosa and Santa Barbara Streets, City Plan No. S -41A." CAO RECOMMENDATION: By Motion, Approve Plans and Specifications for "Bike Lane /Street Resurfacing Project, Santa Rosa and Santa Barbara Streets, City Plan No. S -41A11; Authorize Staff to Advertise for Bids, and Authorize CAO to Award a Contract if Lowest Responsible Bid is Within Engineerfs Estimate. DISCUSSION: The project includes the resurfacing and restriping of Santa Rosa and Santa Barbara streets to provide for bike lanes. The Bike Committee Report, adopted by the City Council on May 5, 1992, Resolution 8010, identifies a need for bike lanes on both Santa Rosa Street, between Walnut and Murray Streets (Project 4) and Santa Barbara Street between Leff and Broad (Project 7). The Council Agenda Report for that item contained an extensive dicussion of the issues involved with the individual projects. The Planning Department has given this project a categorical exemption. FISCAL IMPACT: The 1991 -1993 Capital Improvement Program identifies $400,000 for bicycle projects of which $280,000 is budgeted for bike lanes and bike lane improvements. The Bike Committee Report called for $90,000 to be spent on Santa Rosa Street. On September 1, 1992, Council authorized the mayor to sign a Cooperative Agreement with Caltrans in which Caltrans agrees to participate in the cost of improvements on Santa Rosa Street up to a maximum of $48,400. The Bike Committee Report did not specify monies to be spent for the resurfacing.and striping of Santa Barbara, but instead indicated that as it was scheduled for the 192 -193 Street Reconstruction Project, the work should be funded through those means. Approximately $6000 of additional costs will be incurred by the installation of bike lane markings. The FY 1992 -93 CIP Budget identified $700,000 for Street Reconstruction and Resurfacing (page E -8 of the FY 1991 -93 Financial Plan). The current balance is $623,718.88. The City has applied for funds from the State -Local Transportation Partnership Program (SB300) but has not received a response yet. Funds from SB300 for this project are estimated to be $25,000. The engineer's estimate for the project is $187f560. /J p ��u��►�►iilulllllll��° ��d�ll city o f San I 3 OBISpo COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Although at the meeting of May 30, 1992, Council listed the 192 -193 street reconstruction as a potential deferral, the balance of bikeway projects was given the go ahead (See attached Exhibit B.1 & B.2). The available project funds are as follows: Caltrans SB300 Caltrans Cooperative Agreement Bike Committee Report Street Reconstruction approx. $ 25,000 up to $ 48,400 up to S 90.000 S 24.160 TOTAL: $ 157,560 The Utilities Department will be contributing a small amount for the upgrade of some of their facilities. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit B.1 Exhibit B.2 g:staftrpt\s41 a -sr.wp =3 EXhibiL�'_s . General Fund Car 1 Project Deferrals PROJECTS RECOMIMENDED FOR IM:IIEDIATE DEFERRAL Public Safety Fire Station No. 2 Storage S 65,000 Transportation 205,000 Bikeway Projects 99,000 • Offsetting grant from State (540,000) 700,000 • Higuera - South to Madonna (519,000) 100,000 • Orcutt - Broad to Bullock (540,000) Murray /Broad Circulation Improvements 107 000 Other Neighborhood Traffic Improvements 100,000 Grand Avenue Medians , 1232000 Leisure, Cultural & Social Services 6003000 Swim Center Improvements 99,000 • Multi Purpose Room Improvements (585,000) 49,000 • Landscaping (514,000) 64,900 Picnic Table Replacements - various park sites 19,000 Meadow Park Improvements (parking lot improvements, etc.) 28,000 Santa Rosa Park Improvements - Campfire Area 12,000 Sinsheimer Park Improvements 81,000 • Park Fencing (515,000) • Outfield Drainage (516,000) • Backstop Renovation (550,000) Laguna Lake Dredging Equipment 2002000 General Government Corporation Yard Bulk Storage & Composting Area 120,000 Radio Transmission Facilities (Phase II) 39,000 Total Immediate Deferrals $1,092,000 POTENTIAL PROJECT DEFERRALS Public Safety Fire Heavy Rescue Trailer S 15,000 Fire Training Facility 205,000 Transportation Street Reconstruction Program (1992 -93) 700,000 Traffic Signal Upgrade Projects 100,000 Madonna @ Oceanaire (570,000) Johnson @ Lizzie ($30,000) Laguna Lake Sediment Removal (Zone 9 flood control project) 1302000 Leisure, Cultural & Social Services Open Space Acquisition (from $1.5 million total budget) 6003000 Santa Rosa Park Softball Field Restrooms 539000 Johnson Park Irrigation Project 49,000 Public Art Projects 64,900 General Govenment Corporation Yard Trash Transfer and Drainage Improvements 502000 Corporation Yard Landscape 30.000 Total Potential Deferrals $19996,900 92-93BUDGET \2DEFERALS.YP r Exhibitl—Z General Fund Capital Projects that Should Go Forward I Public Safety Police station HVAC impry Fire station T 1 repkcement Underground tank monitoring & removal Transportation Orcutt read widening Traffic signal upgrades ?Monterey @ Santa Rosa Palm @ Santa Rosa Mill @ Santa Rosa Elk's lane bridge Nipomo street bridge Balance of B3:ewayprojects Street reconstruction — 91192 Leisure, Cultural & Social Sery Recreation admin facility Playground improvements French park — final phase Mission playlot Park sand & edging replcmnt Parks irrigation telemetryss Sinsheimer park energy impry Stadium lights Tennis court lights Swim center filter replacement Golf course irrigation project Balance of open space funding Performing arts center Mission plaza improvements General Government Energy impn tnenu— City bldgs Seismic safely corrections City Hall fire alarm replacement Information system inpry Notes I x x Criteria for Retatntn tb�e Pio x X :: : z Longstanding x x x Outside Design Contractural Sim ificrnt Maint I Public Funding Substantially or Policy Operating of Existing Safety Available Underway Commitment S2Ninrs F207ities . ......... ............ .... x x I x x x x x X :: : z 'z x x x x x x x z:: x x x I x z z x x x x 'z x x x x x I x z..... z 1. It is recommended that CJPprojects funded tbrou =b the enterprise and agency funds (eater, sewer, parling, transit, and xhale rock-) also go forward based on tbeir independent funding from the General Fund 2. Detai7project descriptions asprepared during the budget review process are at2t7able upon request from Me Department of Finance. z x ... ............_ x 'z x x I x z..... z 1. It is recommended that CJPprojects funded tbrou =b the enterprise and agency funds (eater, sewer, parling, transit, and xhale rock-) also go forward based on tbeir independent funding from the General Fund 2. Detai7project descriptions asprepared during the budget review process are at2t7able upon request from Me Department of Finance. z x x x z: z x I x z..... z 1. It is recommended that CJPprojects funded tbrou =b the enterprise and agency funds (eater, sewer, parling, transit, and xhale rock-) also go forward based on tbeir independent funding from the General Fund 2. Detai7project descriptions asprepared during the budget review process are at2t7able upon request from Me Department of Finance. z x I x z..... z 1. It is recommended that CJPprojects funded tbrou =b the enterprise and agency funds (eater, sewer, parling, transit, and xhale rock-) also go forward based on tbeir independent funding from the General Fund 2. Detai7project descriptions asprepared during the budget review process are at2t7able upon request from Me Department of Finance.