HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/02/1993, 1B - PROPERTY OWNER ANNEXATION HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS THE BROAD STREET ANNEXATION (LAFCO ANNEXATION NO. 38) ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO. �►INrIl�1111�111��p� �� ty ME aNIs 9
poA! c� o san lues oB�spo ITEM NUMBER:
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
0
FROM: Arnold Jonas Community Development Director;
BY: 9�Hook, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Property owner annexation hearing and consideration of a
resolution ordering territory designated as the Broad Street
Annexation (LAFCo Annexation No. 38) annexed to the City of San
Luis Obispo.
CAO RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the resolution ordering territory designated as the "Broad
Street Annexation Area" annexed to the City of San Luis Obispo.
BACKGROUND
On December 17, 1992 the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo)
approved the Broad Street Annexation and deleted the area from
County Service Area No. 22 (resolutions attached) . LAFCols action
is the last discretionary approval required, and it formally
transfers jurisdiction for the 78 acre annexation area from the
County to the City. This step culminates over six years of
property owner and city efforts toward annexation.
Under state law, there is one more step before the annexation
becomes effective. A public hearing must now be held by a
"conducting authority" to allow property owners a final opportunity
to comment. LAFCo designated the City of San Luis Obispo as the
conducting authority for the property owner hearing.
In this role, the City Council acts on behalf of LAFCo to receive
written property owner protests. Prior council approvals remain in
effect, and no further council approvals are needed. If a 50
percent or more landowner protest is not received, the conducting
authority must adopt a resolution approving the annexation.
Previous City Council actions on the Broad Street Annexation
include:
■ November 17, 1992: adopted Resolution No.. 8087
exchanging property revenue between the City and County
of San Luis Obispo;
■ August 4, 1992 : finally adopted Ordinance No. 1216
rezoning approximately 78 acres in the Broad Street
Annexation area to C-S-PD, C-S-S, and M-S zones;
■ July 21, 1992 : adopted Resolution Nos. 8034 and 8035
amending the general plan from Rural-Industrial and
Interim Conservation/Open Space to Service-
Commercial/Light Industrial, and recommending LAFCo
approval of the Broad Street Annexation;
X&'/
��►�����u►�uIIIIIIuI� �����I City of San tuts OBISp0
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Staff Report
Page 2
■ June 16, 1992: adopted Resolution No. 8023 certifying
the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Broad
Street Annexation.
LAFCo's action culminates several years of efforts, first by
Southern California Gas Company and annexation area property
owners, and more recently by the City, to annex this 78 acres. The
process involved extensive public review and numerous meetings
between city staff and annexation area property owners, and grew
out of the City Council's 1991 workprogram which designated the
Broad Street Annexation as an "A-1" priority.
CONSEQUENCES OF NOT TARING THE RECOMMENDED ACTION
If a 50 percent landowner protest is not received and the
resolution approving annexation is not adopted by the City Council,
responsibility for final action rests with the County Board of
Supervisors.
DISCUSSION
Annexation procedures are governed by the California Government
Code, which requires a public hearing by a "conducting authority",
acting on behalf of LAFCo, to give annexation area property owners
an opportunity to protest before an annexation becomes final. At
the protest hearing or within 30 days of the hearing, the
conducting authority must determine whether or not there is 50
percent or greater landowner protest of annexation, based on
written comments received 'at the hearing. There are two possible
outcomes:
1) 50 percent or more of the landowners do not protest
annexation: The City Council finds that the owners of
property equal to one-half or more of the total assessed value
of the annexation area ($11, 576, 819) do not protest
annexation. The council must then adopt a resolution finding
that a 50 percent landowner protest was not received, and
approving annexation and forwarding the resolution to LAFCo
for recording.
2) 50 percent or more of the landowners protest annexation:
The City Council finds that the owners of property equal to
one-half or more of the annexation area's total assessed value
protest annexation. Council would then adopt a resolution
finding that 50 percent landowner protest has occurred, and
forward the resolution to LAFCo. This would conclude
annexation proceedings, and no further action on the
annexation could be taken for one year.
�B�
1°u����►iIUIIIIIIpIpu�u�i��U�N city of San Luis OBISPO
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Staff Report
Page 3
What's Next
If there is no 1150 percent protest, " the City Clerk -then forwards
the council resolution, plus a $350 Board of Equalization fee, to
the Executive Officer of LAFCo who issues a "certificate of
completion. " The certificate is then recorded and sent to the
City, County Assessor and Auditor, State Board of Equalization, and
the Secretary of State, finalizing annexation.
The boundary change would take effect upon recording, and tax
transfer becomes effective starting with the new fiscal year on
July 1, 1993 .
ALTERNATIVES
Alternative actions available to the council include:
1. Adopt resolution approving annexation.
This would complete annexation proceedings, and the annexation
would become effective upon issuance and recording of the
certificate of completion.
2. Adopt resolution finding 5o percent landowner protest.
This would terminate annexation proceedings for at least one year.
After that time, if the City wished to pursue annexation it would
need to reapply to LAFCo.
3. Do not adopt a resolution approving annexation, even though a
50 percent or more of the area's landowners do not protest
annexation.
LAFCo's approval is considered the final discretionary approval of
annexation. Under state law, if 50 percent or more of the area's
landowners do not protest, the conducting authority must adopt a
resolution approving the annexation. If the conducting authority
does not act, the County Board of Supervisors would then have the
authority to take final action on the annexation.
4. close the public hearing and continue consideration of the
item to determine the percentage of landowner protest.
If there is substantial landowner protest at the hearing, council
may wish to close the public hearing and continue consideration of
the item for up to 30 days to determine the exact percentage of
landowner protest. In this case, staff would return with the
appropriate resolution for council action at the next available
hearing.
������ ►��IIIIII�►pui�u►►I�III City Of san LIDS OBI SPO.
NiN COUNCIL AGENDA DEPORT
Staff Report
Page 4
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the resolution ordering territory designated as the "Broad
Street Annexation Area" annexed to the City of San Luis Obispo.
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolutions
Exhibit A: Broad Street Annexation Area map
Exhibit B: Legal Description
vicinity Map
Annexation Area - assessed property values
LAFCo Resolutions
Resolution No. 1
Ordering Annexation
RESOLUTION NO. (1993 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LIIIS OBISPO
COUNTY OF SAN LIIIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TERRITORY
DESIGNATED AS THE "BROAD STREET ANNEXATION" ANNEXED TO THE
CITY OF SAN LIIIS OBISPO
WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County
of San Luis Obispo'.adopted Resolution Nos. 92-26, 92-27, 92-28, and
92-29 on December 17, 1992, making determinations and approving the
proposed annexation as described in Exhibits A and B attached
hereto and by this reference, incorporated herein; and
WHEREAS, the terms and conditions of annexation as approved by
the Local Agency Formation Commission are as provided in said
resolution; and
WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposed annexation are to
accommodate urbanized areas within the City's jurisdictional
boundaries and provide appropriate urban services; and
WHEREAS, the regular county assessment roll is utilized by
this city; and
WHEREAS, the affected territory will be subject to taxes for
existing and/or future general bonded indebtedness of this city;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council certified the Final Environmental
Impact Report for the Broad Street annexation on June 16, 1992,
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and with the
findings contained in City Council Resolution No. 8023 (1992
Series) ; and
�,8'J
Council Resolution No. (1993 Series)
Page 2
WHEREAS, a public hearing on this annexation was called for
and held by this Council at 990 Palm Street, on February 2, 1993 in
the City of San Luis Obispo, and the Council finds that the owners
of property equal to one-half or more. of the total assessed value
of the annexation area ($11, 576, 819) do not protest annexation,
based on written property owner protests presented at the hearing
and pursuant to Section 35121 of the California Government Code.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of San Luis Obispo hereby orders the territory described in
Exhibits A and B annexed, and directs the City Clerk to transmit a
certified copy of this resolution with applicable fees required by
Section 54902. 5 of the Government Code to the executive officer of
the Local Agency Formation Commission of San Luis Obispo County.
On motion of , seconded by
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of
1993.
Mayor Peg Pinard
ATTEST:
Diane Gladwell, City Clerk
�8�
Council Resolution No. (1993 Series)
Page 3
APPROVED:
w�
City A inistrative Officer
C' to ney
u�t!
Community Dev&lbpment Director
Finance Director
/�-/Pu lic Works Direct
ZA w,404
U ities Dire to
Attachments: Exhibit "A", Broad Street Annexation area map
Exhibit "B", Legal Description of annexation area
Resolution No. 2
Terminating Annexation
RESOLUTION NO. (1993 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LIIIS OBISPO
COUNTY OF SAN LIIIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT A 50
PERCENT LANDOWNER PROTEST EXISTS IN TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS THE
"BROAD STREET ANNEXATION", AND TERMINATING ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS
WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County
of San Luis Obispo adopted Resolution Nos. 92-26, 92-27, 92-28, and
92-29 on December 17, 1992, making determinations and approving the
proposed annexation as described in Exhibits A and B attached
hereto and by this reference, incorporated herein; and
WHEREAS, said commission designated the City Council as
"conducting authority" for purposes of receiving property owner
protests to annexation in the uninhabited territory designated as
the "Broad Street Annexation; and
WHEREAS, on February 2 , 1993 at 990 Palm Street, in the City
of San Luis Obispo, the City Council held a public hearing to
receive property protests of the proposed annexation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the owners of property
equal to one-half or more of the total assessed value of the
annexation area ($11, 576, 819) protest annexation, based on written
protests presented at the hearing and pursuant to Section 35121 of
the California Government Code.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of San Luis Obispo hereby orders the annexation proceedings
for territory described in Exhibits A and B be terminated, and
directs the City Clerk to transmit a certified copy of this
resolution to the executive officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of San Luis Obispo County.
Council Resolution No. (1993 Series)
Page 2
On motion of seconded by
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of
1993.
Mayor Peg Pinard
ATTEST:
Diane Gladwell, City Clerk
APPROVED:
City Ad inistrative Officer
to n
�cJ•
Community Deve o ment Director
Finance Director
Council Resolution No. (1993 Series)
Page 3
Pblic Wo ks Director
U ities Director
Attachments: Exhibit "A", Broad Street Annexation area map
Exhibit "B", Legal Description of annexation area
u
coo �
ata
:•.��. � V17 I
at N z I
00 ,hl
c e I
I . C e
ZZ c-
e�^ ZC
,w
OLL to
"o crop ny.i 7ua1 w0 „m
O •¢ywi:i}:�i3'.(6':i:•�:0:•.'f(7[ (:(•: V a}- j0
CL i Y.TiT is iYn J::,
•; O V 1I
3
0 D ' 0 cc O i
Ll
xC TO
1.
c7 0 •—
CL
.29"COL CL
1 now
k:
C1 e. z-
ly
1
C nn' ••�• '� O
t r , lye—
gr :
Wv c � :•�
C. O
O
�i U o_
O w -is a --
.02
� W 1 � �Y•y �... L7 r
r• � O. y _
' a ✓el
w n�c
74
JOSS . 4 n 41:•' e: ,rte
`a
CL
�1 �•� I � to w I «
C \ .5
'` < '
s
-i J
C_
EXHIBIT A ;
PE
July 28, 1992
too. 1x538
I. PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
Cr C;:���`p LEGAL DESCRIPTION
All of Lots 91, 92, 93 , 94 , 95, 96, 98, 99, 100, and a portion of
lots 82, 83 , 84, 85, 86, 87, and 90, and the Industrial Way
right-of-way of the SLO Suburban Tract as recorded in Book 1 of
Records of Survey, at Pg. 92, and State Route 227 (Broad Street),
more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the most easterly corner of said Lot 100, said
corner being a corner of the existing City limits (per
Industrial Annexation of May 1960) ; thence South 6500910411
West (bearings per 11 Maps 53) along the dividing line of
,Lots 100 and 101, also being the existing City limits line a
distance of 789 . 97 feet more or less to the most southerly
corner of Lot 100; thence continuing South 6500910411 West a
distance of 94 . 00 feet more or less to the westerly right-
of-way line of State Route 227 as widened by the State of
California; thence North 11°11 ' 4511 West along said State
right-of-way (bearings per State right-of-way map) a distance
of 64. 00 feet more or less to a point that is 55. 00 feet left
of the State centerline at State Station 199+85; thence
continuing along said State right-of-way North 2400010011 West
a distance of 611. 22 feet; thence continuing along said State
right-of-way on a curve to the right with a radius of 7055
feet through an angle of 0701810011 for a length of 898. 87
feet; thence continuing along said State right-of-way North
1604210011 West. a distance of 753 .72 feet; thence continuing
along said State right-of-way on a curve to the left with a
radius of 7945 feet through an angle of 0404810011 for a
length of 665 . 60 feet; thence North 6803010011 East a distance
of 15. 00 feet more or less to the old right-of-way line of
said State Route; thence North 2102610311 West along old said
right-of-way a distance of 5. 00 feet more or less to the
existing City boundary (per Edna Road Annex 12) ; thence along
said City boundary North 6703010011 East (bearings per Edna
Road Annex r#2) 84 . 00 feet more or less to an angle point on
the southerly right-of-way line of Capitolio Way; thence
continuing along said boundary and right-of-way line North
3900213211 East a distance of 34 . 04 feet; thence continuing
along said boundary and right-of-way line North 65010100 East
a distance of 168 .25 feet; thence continuing along said
boundary and right-of-way line on a curve to the right with a
radius of 230 feet through an angle of 2300412611 for a length
of 92 . 62 feet; thence continuing along said boundary and
right-of-way line on a curve to the left, tangent to last
said curve, with a radius of 270 feet, through an angle of
2300412611 for a length of. 108 .73 feet; thence continuing
along said boundary and righty-of-way line North 6501010011
East a distance of 299. 66 felt to the westerly right-of-way
line of ..Sacramento Street (Old Pacific Coast Railroad right-
of-way) being the most easterly corner of said Edna Road
Annex ,#2 ; thence along the existing City boundary and the
westerly right-of-way line of Sacramento Street, South
4702510211 East (bearings per Public Streets Annex, Parcel C)
a distance of 1, 314. 62 feet; thence continuing along said
boundary and right-of-way line on a curve to the right, with
a radius of 1402 . 39 through an angle of 32012148" for a
length of 788 .46 feet, more or less, to the most northerly
corner of Lot 97 of the San Luis Obispo Suburban' Tract;
thence South 65010100" West (bearing per SLO Suburban Tract)
along the existing City boundary and the southerly line of
Industrial Way a distance of 700.26 feet, more or less, to
the most northerly corner of Lot 98 ; thence South 240501001'
East along the northeasterly lines of Lots 98, 99 and 100,
the existing City boundary, a distance of 990 feet, more or
less, to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 78. 06 acres more or less.
tpg3/annex
by
EXHIBIT B ��-� �
t"•.1•'�;:s;'`rig`: ::::...:.:::z;,;::;r'':::4:;;�� y::.
.r:5%fir``i�;ic':;;:s;':;i:�:'>;:':;,,•'rr;•;si:
. ....... .. :
i':'.....:ie;;::;
.
ll� Ct
' ��:::::::�':�::�'::".:✓�i .l\. `CACI\
opr
G P/R 1261
VICINITY MAP
i T}:0 APN OWNER NAME LAND-. IMP AV' EXEMP-AMT
112-083 76-411-26 Jones, Melvin 66,967 9,483 0
112-085 76-411-18 French Bros. Development 145,656 0 0
112-085 76-411-20 Dewey, Duane, etal 12,475 19,742 0
112-085 76-411-40 Jones, Melvin 26,126 0 0
112-085 76-411-41 French Bros. Development 728,280 0 0
112-083 76-431-16 Union Local #403 93,017 208,274 -176,197
112-083 76-431-18 2083 Ptp., General Ptp. 470,958 45,944 0
112-083 l 76-431-22 C-Black, Ltd. 466,082 2,182,501 0
112-083 76-431-24 So. CA Gas 0 0 0
112-083 76-431-25 Valacal Company. 215,453 371,467 0
112-083 76-431-26 Parsons 288,581 1,414,944 0
112-083 76-431-27 Silva, Edward, etal 256,305 439,529 0
112-083 76-431-28 Coleman Company 675,260 1,352,520 0
112-083 76-431-20 Williams Bros. 292,801 16,891 0
112-083 76-431-15 Williams Bros. 1,033,814 918,9461 0
r
?ANNEXATION AREA - ASSESSED PROPERTY V.4LUES
TOTAL 4,772,775 6,980,241 176,197
Sheet 1 of 1 County of San Luis Obispo GRAND TOTAL ='. `:.11,576,819 '
1 ;+o la_l
IN THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Thursday, December 17, 1992
PRESENT: Commissioners, Laurence L. Laurent, Craig Pritchard, Chairman David
Blakey,Alternate Commissioner M.P. Gallagher
ABSENT: Commissioners Duane Picanco, Alternate Commissioners Evelyn Delany,
Larry Rathbun
RESOLUTION NO. 92-26
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR DETACHMENT FROM CSA
NO.22 AND ANNEXATION NO.38 TO THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
(BROAD STREET) HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND IS ADEQUATE FOR
THE PROPOSED SPHERE OF SERVICE AMENDMENT
The following resolution is now offered and read:
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 56425 and the Commission's
duty adopted"General Policies and Criteria"for spheres of influence,the Commission has
previously adopted a sphere of service for the CSA No. 22 and the City of San Luis
Obispo; and
WHEREAS, in connection with File No. 6-R-92, the Commission has been
requested to consider a revision to and amendment of its previously adopted sphere of
service for the proposed Detachment from CSA No.22 and Annexation of territory to the
City of San Luis Obispo (Broad Street); and
WHEREAS, the Executive Officer has duly prepared, noticed, and submitted a
proposed negative declaration for this project and this Commission finds,based upon the
information submitted by the Executive Officer and received at the public hearing,that this
project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the Local Agency
Formation Commission of the County of San Luis Obispo,State of California,as follows:
1. That the recitals set forth hereinabove are true, correct, and valid.
2. That the negative declaration prepared for this project is hereby approved
as complete and adequate and as having been prepared in accordance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.
3. That the Executive Officer is directed to prepare and file a Notice of
Determination for this project in the manner required by law.
Upon motion of Commissioner Laurent,seconded by Commissioner Pritchard,and
on the following roll call to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Laurent, Pritchard, Gallagher, Chairmarf Blakely
/13
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINING:
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted.
Chairman of said Local Age
Formation Commission
ATTEST
V .
Deputy Executive O icer
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL EFFECT:
JAMES B. LINDHOLM, JR.
County Counsel
By:C
Deputy County Counsel
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss.
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO )
I,Robert E.Hendrix,Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission
said County and State,do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full,true and correct copy
of the original on file in my office, and I have carefully compared the same with the
original.
WITNESS my hand this ST'S day of 19
ROBERT E. HENDRIX
Executive Officer i1 p
Deputy Executive Officer
2-
113 .17
IN THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Thursday, December 17, 1992
PRESENT: Commissioners, Laurence L. Laurent, Craig Pritchard, Chairman David
Blakely, Alternate Commissioner M.P. Gallagher
ABSENT: Commissioner Duane Picanco, Aftemate Commissioners Evelyn Delany,
Larry Rathbum
RESOLUTION NO. 92-27
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A REVISED SPHERE OF SERVICE FOR
CSA NO. 22 AND THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO (BROAD STREET)
The following resolution is now offered and read:
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Sections 56425 at seq. and the
Commission's duly adopted"General Policies and Criteria"for spheres of influence,the
Commission has previously adopted a sphere of service for CSA No.22 and the City of
San Luis Obispo (Broad Street); and
WHEREAS, in connection with File No. 6-R-92, the Commission has been
requested to consider a revision to and amendment of its previously adopted sphere of
service for the proposed Detachment from CSA No.22 and Annexation of territory to the
City of San Luis Obispo (Broad Street); and
WHEREAS, the Executive Officer has prepared a proposed revised sphere of
service for the proposed Detachment from CSA No.22 and Annexation of territory to the
City of San Luis Obispo (Broad Street); and
WHEREAS,the Executive Officer has given the notices required by law and has
forwarded copies of his report to officers, persons and public agencies prescribed by
law; and
WHEREAS,the matter was set for public hearing at 9 a.m.on December 17;1992,
and the public hearing was duly conducted and determined and decision made on
December 17 , 1992; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing, this Commission heard and received all oral and
written protests, objections and evidence,which were made, presented or filed, and all
persons present were given the opportunity to hear and be heard in respect to any
matter relating to said proposal and report; and
WHEREAS, the Commission has duty considered the negative declaration
approved for this project, and has reviewed and considered the information contained
therein and all comments received during the public hearing process; and
WHEREAS,the Commission has considered all factors required to be considered
by Government Code Sections 56425 at seq. and adopts as its written statement of
determinations therein,the determinations set forth in sections 1 through 4, on pages 4
and 5 of the Executive Officer's report dated December 17, 1992, said determinations
being incorporated by reference herein as though set forth in lull
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the Local Agency
/ �rL �
Formation Commission of the County of San Luis Obispo,State of California,as follows:
1. That the recitals set forth hereinabove are true, correct, and valid.
2. That the boundaries of the sphere of service determined and adopted by
this Commission for CSA No. 22 and The City Of San Luis Obispo (Broad Street), are
hereby revised as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by reference
herein as though set forth in full.
3. That the Executive Officer of this Commission is authorized and directed to
mail certified copies of this resolution in the manner provided by law.
Upon motion of Commissioner Laurent,seconded by Commissioner Pritchard,and
on the following roll call to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Laurent, Gallagher, Pritchard, Chairman Blakely
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINING:
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted.
Chairman of said Local Agenci
Formation Commission
ATTEST
Deputy Executive Officer
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL EFFECT:
JAMES B. LINDHOLM, JR.
CountyCounsel
BY'l/.
Deputy County Counsel
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss.
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO )
I, Robert E. Hendrix, Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission said County and State,do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full,true and
correct copy of the original on file in my office, and that I have carefully compared the
same with the original.
WITNESS my hand this S T day of -:SPc4-3 API 190%,s
ROBERT E. HENDRD(
Executive Officer
1 1
By�a�/1f V• �1w�1
Deputy Executive Officer
r.
POCH 1Yl�d avel
< V
w
W
m tu
Q Z �
O e c O
j d ¢ O < V
U) a C O
C3 m c d
Om m cl)
kvm IValsnoN D]
O i
J co
y
LL ' G
O O uJ
O
(F-0) �
•� ;
a
-0)j
a
W O WJ t H
FO m < O ~
z v
x x aO x
O m W
F S < S
O W c
O c c
S6 < V
D•�" .Annexation Area Map
° � �� Figure 2- 1. �
ATTEST
Deputy Executive Offi er
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL EFFECT:
JAMES B. LINDHOLM, JR.
County Counsel
By:
Deputy County Counsel
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss.
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO )
I,Robert E.Hendrix,Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission
said County and State,do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full,true and correct copy
of the original on file in my office, and I have carefully compared the same with the
original.
WETNESS my hand this S�'-` day of TflNuftPi 1993.
ROBERT E. HENDRD(
Executive Officer ,` -
By: ��� L.Tfc�u� 1
Deputy Executive Officer
3
��+C2)
IN THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Thursday, December 17, 1992
PRESENT: Commissioners, Laurence L. Laurent, Craig Pritchard, Chairman David
Blakey,Alternate Commissioner M.P. Gallagher
ABSENT: Commissioner Duane Picanco, Alternate Commissioners Evelyn Delany,
Larry Rathbun
RESOLUTION NO. 92-28
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR
ANNEXATION NO. 38 TO THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO (BROAD STREET)
HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND DETERMINED ADEQUATE
The following resolution is now offered and read:
WHEREAS, there has been filed with this Commission a proposal for a
Reorganization involving Annexation No.38 to the City of San Luis Obispo (Broad Street)
which proposal is further identified in the files of the Commission as File 6-R-92; and
WHEREAS, the Commission has determined that the territory should also be
Jetached from CSA No. 22
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the Local Agency
Formation Commission of the County of San Luis Obispo,State of California, as follows:
1. That the recitals set forth hereinabove are true, correct, and valid.
2. That the Environmental Impact Report prepared for this project by the City
of San Luis Obispo is hereby approved as complete and adequate and as having been
prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.
Upon motion of Commissioner Laurent,seconded by Commissioner Pritchard,and
on the following roll call to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Laurent, Pritchard, Chairman Blakely
NOES: Commissioner Gallagher
ABSENT:
ABSTAINING:
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted.
Chairman of said Local Agen
Formation Commission
1
IN THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Thursday, December 17, 1992
PRESENT: Commissioners, Laurence L. Laurent, Craig Pritchard, Chairman David
Blakely, ARemate Commissioner M.P. Gallagher
ABSENT: Commissioner Duane Picanco, Alternate Commissioners, Evelyn Delany,
Larry Rathbun
RESOLUTION NO. 92-29
RESOLUTION MAKING DETERMINATIONS APPROVING
THE DETACHMENT OF TERRITORY FROM CSA NO.22 AND
ANNEXATION NO. 38 TO THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
(BROAD STREET)
The following resolution is now offered and read:
WHEREAS,on December 8,1992 there was filed with this Commission a proposal
for Annexation of territory to the City of San Luis Obispo (Broad Street); and
WHEREAS, the Executive Officer has given the notices required by law and has
forwarded copies of his report to officers, persons, and public prescribed by law; and
WHEREAS,the matter was duty set for public hearing at 9 a.m.on Decembee 17,
1992,and the public hearing was duly conducted and determined and decision made on
December 17, 1992; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing, this Commission heard and received all oral and
written protests, objections,and evidence,which were made,presented, or filed,and all
persons present were given the opportunity to hear and be heard in respect to any
matter relating to said proposal and report; and
WHEREAS, at the hearing the Commission determined to amend the proposal to
detach the territory from CSA No. 22: and
WHEREAS, the Commission duly considered the Environmental Impact Report
approved for this project,and reviewed and considered the information contained therein
and all comments received during the public hearing process; and
WHEREAS, the Commission duty, considered the proposal and finds that the
territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited; that the distinctive short form
designation of the territory proposed to be annexed is "Reorganization involving
detachment of territory from CSA No.22 and Annexation No.38 To The City Of San Luis
Obispo;that the territory proposed for annexation Is located within the sphere of influence
and sphere of service of the City of San Luis Obispo;and that the proposed annexation
should be approved
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the Local Agency
Formation Commission of the County of San Luis Obispo,State of California, as follows:
1. That the recitals set forth hereinabove are true, correct, and valid.
i
2. That the legal description approved by this Commitsion is attached thereto,
marked Exhibit °A°, and incorporated by reference herein as though set forth in full.
3. That the Reorganization involving Detachment from CSA No. 22 and
Annexation No.38 To The City of San Luis Obispo (Broad Street),being further identified
in the files of this Commission as file No.6-R-92, Is hereby approved and the City of San
Luis Obispo is authorized to initiate proceeding to annex such territory, after notice and
hearing.
4. That the Executive Officer of this Commission is authorized and directed to
mail certified copies of this resolution in the manner provided by law.
Upon motion of Commissioner Laurent, seconded by Commissioner Gallagher,
and on the following roll call to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Laurent, Gallagher, Pritchard, Chairman Blakey
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINING:
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted.
Chairman of said Local Agen
Formation Commission
ATTEST
� Ay �
Deputy Executive Officer
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL EFFECT:
JAMES B. LINDHOLM, JR.
County Counsel
By:
Deputy County Counsel
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss.
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO )
I, Robert E.Hendrix,Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission
said County and State,do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full,true and carred copy
of the original on file in my office, and I have carefully compared the same with the
original.
WITNESS my hand this 6�` day of -NANJi\fLy 19`13.
ROBERT E. HENDRIX
Executive Officer
By.—
Deputy Executive Officer
• Qui`SSIp��,.� ` . '
cc�`Or� PET�.�SF��n
December 30, 1991
N0. 12558
c��a� 1y3 PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO
CITY. OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
Q
�f9lF Of!CA`\EO�r� LEGAL DESCRIPTION
All of Lots 91, 92 , 93 , 94 , 95, 96, 98 , 99, 100, and a portion of
lots 82 , 83 , 84 , 85, 86, 87, and 90, and the Industrial Way
right-of-way of the SLO Suburban Tract as recorded in Book 1 of
Records of Survey, at Pg. 92 , and State Route 227 (Broad Street) ,
more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the most .easterly corner of said Lot 100, said
corner being a corner of the existing City limits (per
Industrial Annexation of May 1960) ; thence South 65°09 ' 04"
West (bearings per 11 Maps 53) along the dividing line of
Lots 100 and 101, also being the existing City limits line a
distance of 789 . 97 feet more or less to the most southerly
corner of Lot 100; thence continuing South 65009104" West a
distance of 94 . 00 feet more or less to the westerly right-
of-way line of State Route 227 as widened by the State of
California; thence North 11°11 ' 45" West along said State
right-of-way (bearings per State right-of-way map) a distance
of 64 . 00 feet more or less to a point that is 55. 00 feet left
of the State centerline at State Station 199+85; thence
continuing along said State right-of-way North 24000100" West
a distance of 611. 22 feet; thence continuing along said State
right-of-way on a curve to the right with a radius of 7055
feet through an angle of 07018100" for a length of 598 . 87
feet; thence continuing along said State right-of-way North
16042100" West a distance of 753 .72 feet; thence continuing
along said State right-of-way on a curve to the left with a
radius of 7945 feet through an angle of 04048100" for
length of 665. 60 feet; thence North 68030100" East a distance
of 15 . 00 feet more or less to the old right-of-way line of
said State Route; thence North 21026103" West along old said
right-of-way a distance of 5. 00 feet more or less to the
existing City boundary (per Edna Road Annex P2) ; thence along
said City boundary North 67030100" East (bearings per Edna
Road Annex ;2) 84 . 00 feet more or less to an angle point on
the southerly right-of-way line of Capitolio Way; thence .
continuing along said boundary and right-of-way line North
39002 ' 32" East a distance of 34 . 04 feet; thence continuing
along said boundary and right-of-way line North 65010100 East
a distance of 168 . 25 feet; thence continuing along said
boundary and right-of-way line on a curve to the right with a
radius of 230 feet through an angle of 23004126" for a length ,
of 92 . 62 feet; thence continuing along said boundary and
right-of-way line on a curve to the left, tangent to last
said curve, with a radius of 270 feet, through an angle of
23004 ' 26" for a length of 108 . 73 feet; thence continuing
along said boundary and right-of-way line North 65010 ' 00"
East a distance of 299 . 66 feet to the westerly right-of-way
line of Sacramento Street (Old Pacific Coast Railroad right-
of-way) being the most easte'ly corner of said Edna Road
Annex #2 ; thence along the existing City boundary and the
westerly right-of-way line of Sacramento Street, South
47025102" East (bearings per Public Streets Annex, Parcel C)
a distance of 1, 314 . 62 feet; thence continuing along said
boundary and right-of-way line on a curve to the right, with
a radius of 1402 .39 through an angle of 32012148" for a
length of 788 .46 feet, more or less, to the most northerly
corner of Lot 97 of the San•Luis Obispo Suburban Tract;
thence South 65010100" West (bearing per SLO Suburban Tract)
along the existing City boundary and the southerly line of
Industrial Way a distance of 700. 26 feet, more or less, to
the most northerly corner of Lot 98 ; thence South 24050 ' 00"
East along the northeasterly lines of Lots 98, 99 and 100,
the existing City boundary, a distance of 990 feet, more or
less, to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 78. 06 acres more or less.
tpg3/ame:
by
-ETING AGENDA
DATE a (0-23 ITEM #
Attention: Sherry Stendal , Council Secretary
Dear Sherry:
The Advisory Committee On Joint Recreational Use Of
School District Property met today, Tuesday, January 26,
1993 At 12 : 00 noon at the Recreation Department offices -
860 Pacific.
After reviewing the Goals and Objectives submitted in
October it was decided that some small corrections , and an
addition needed to be made to the document . I am returning
the original document along with the corrected version to
be submitted to the City Council .
Thank you,
Barbara Jauregui ,
Chair Joint Recreational Use
Committee
COPLESTO:
❑•Dawto Axion ❑ FYI
6�Camdl CMDUL
CAO FIN.D11L
�i ACRO ❑ FIRE C H1U
L� ATTORNEY ❑ FW DUL
V CLERK/ORIG. ❑ POLICE CH
❑ MCAT.TEAM 0 REC MR
C READ FILE. D UTIL DIR
PILO J
RECEIVE®
JAN 2 0 1993
CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO,.Ct6
KOE
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON JOINT RECREATIONAL USE VIS
OF SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY
Goals and Objectives
Sinsheimer Park:
1 . Revise the Master Plan for Sinsheimer Park.
2. Make a decision concerning the possible inclusion,
or exclusion of railroad property in the Master Plan.
3. Repropose deferred projects during the next CIP
cycle: Swim Center improvements , Multi-Purpose Room
improvements , pool area landscaping, Sinsheimer Park
fencing, stadium outfield drainage, and stadium backstop
renovation.
Committee consensus is that the deferred projects are
essential to the Joint Use areas.
It is felt that a multi-purpose room at the swim center
would be a valuable multi-use, fund generating addition to
the Sinsheimer Park complex.
We are also concerned that the maintenance of the
baseball stadium not be minimized . It is heavily used by
semi-pro teams, youth baseball , the high school , Cal Poly,
Babe Ruth, and the Recreation Department.
Laguna Junior High:
1 . That Laguna Junior High become a Joint Use Site.
This location is needed to provide playing space for
SLO Girls Softball.
There are committed funds in the Sinsheimer Park Fund
of $7 , 500 . 00 for this project contingent upon Laguna Junior
High becoming a Joint Use Site.
C.L. Smith:
1 . Playground improvements are needed . Outdated
equipment must be replaced .
2 . Baseball fields need to be upgraded .
Respectfully submitted ,
Barbara Jauregu ,
Chair Rec. Joint Use Committee
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON JOINT RECREATIONAL USE
OF SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY
Goals and. Obiectives
Sinsheimer Park:
1 . Complete the General Plan for Singheimer Park.
2 . Vake a decision concerning the possible inclusion,
or exclusion of railroad property in the general plan .
3. Repropose deferred projects during the next CIP
cycle: Swim Center Improvements--Multi-purpose Room
improvements and landscaping; Sin:heimer Park fencing;
stadium outfield drainage; stadium backstop renovation, and
tennis court lights.
Committee consensus is that the deferred projects are
essential• to the joint use areas .
It is felt that a multi-purpose room at the swim center
would be a valuable multi-use , fund generating addition to
the Sinsheimer Park complex.
We are also concerned that the maintenance of the
baseball stadium not be mi.nimized . It is heavily used by
semi-pro teams, youth baseball , the high school , Cal Poly,
Babe Ruth, and the Recreation Department.
Laguna Junior High:
1 . That Laguna Junior High become a Joint Use Site.
This location is needed to provide playing space for
SLO Girls Softball .
There are committed funds in the Sinsheimer Park Fund
of $7, 500. 00 for this project contingent upon Laguna Junior
High becoming a Joint Use' Site .
C.L. Sm-ith:
1 . Playground improvements are needed . Outdated
equipment must be replaced .
Respectfully submitted ,
Barbara Jauregui
Chair, Joint Recreation Use Committee
OCT 2 7 1992
-r r1 vnv l