Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/02/1993, C-6 - CONSIDERATION OF A ONE-YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR FILLING THE FINAL MAP FOR VESTING TACT MAP NO. 2010 (CORNERSTONE) A 15-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECT PROPOSED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BROAD STREET AND ROCKVIEW PLACE (3360 ROCKVIEW 11111ul1111Q111AIIIII`I C��, / O� SaI1 ��I�� OU�SpO MEETING DATE: IM COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM NUMBER l a fo FROM: Arnold Jona Community Development Director By: Pam Ricci4 Associate Planner P� SUBJECT: Consideration of a one-year time extension for filing the final map for Vesting Tract Map No. 2010 (Cornerstone) , a 15-unit residential condominium project proposed on the northwest corner of Broad Street and Rockview Place (3360 Rockview Place) . CAO RECOMMENDATION: Adopt attached Resolution "A" approving the requested one year time extension for filing the final map for Vesting Tract Map No. 2010, subject to all the findings and conditions of tentative map approval. DISCUSSION Situation The tentative map was approved on March 5, 1991. Tentative map approval is good for two years. A final map must be filed before the expiration date or the tentative map approval becomes null and void, unless an extension of time is requested and granted. The city may grant time extensions for filing final maps totalling no more than two years. This is the first request for a time extension. With approval of the requested time extension, the map will remain valid until March 5, 1994 . Data Summary Address: 3360 Rockview Place Subdividers: John and Kelly Mitchell; Douglas and Susan Redican Applicant/Representative: John Mitchell Zoning: R-2-S General Plan: Medium Density Residential Environmental Status: A Negative Declaration of environmental impact with mitigation was granted by the Director on September 12 , 1990 , and ratified by the City Council on March 5, 1991. Site Description The triangular-shaped project site consists of 1. 56 acres (68 , 083 square feet) and has frontages on Rockview Place and Broad Street. The site is composed of 4 lots of record. These existing lot lines will be eliminated through the required subdivision map process to create the condominiums. ev- ��IIiIIIUI��nj1IIB�N city O� san u.II s Oso SPO inI,�,�Ja1V�C � N4 ► REPORT Page 2 The site's topography is not uniform. It is steeply sloping in the northwestern corner before flattening out to a terrace in the central portion of the site. Topography is again steep within an existing drainage channel that crosses the site. The site beyond the top of the channel's bank to Broad Street is fairly flat. Average site cross slope is just under 15%. A two-bedroom house exists on the northeastern portion of the site between the drainage channel and the Broad Street frontage. The house is proposed to be removed with development of the condominiums. Several mature trees and shrubs exist on the site. The most notable specimen is a 24-inch Monterey Pine located near the site's entrance off of Rockview which is proposed to be retained. The Ridgepoint condominiums are located,adjacent to the site on the north. The surrounding neighborhood on the same side of Broad Street is composed of single family homes and apartments. Cattle grazing occurs on the open land across Rockview Place to the south. The southerly side of Rockview Place is the southerly city limit line. Conclusion It has been the city's policy to support time extensions if there are extenuating circumstances that have delayed the filing of the final map. In his request for a tract map time extension, the subdivider notes that the poor state of the economy has been the chief reason for the delay in filing the final map. Staff feels that the subdivider has a legitimate reason for delaying pursuit of the project. ALTERNATIVES 1. Deny the requested one-year time extension. If the council denies the time extension, the tentative tract map becomes null and void. The project then could not be developed as a condominium project with the sale of individual units. However, the site could be developed as an apartment project. NOTE: The City Council may approve or deny the request for an extension of time. However, the City Council may not change, delete or add conditions of approval (E1 Patio v. Permanent Rent Control Board of the City of Santa Monica, Court of Appeals, 2nd District Division 1, October 6, 1980) . 2 . Continue consideration of the request with direction on information needed to render a decision. 1111111IIII11IWJJcity of San LAS OBISPO A i �iea�t�v� FrNP,L REPORT Page 3 Attached: Resolution "A" approving time extension Resolution "B" denying time extension Vicinity map Reduced size copy of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 2010 City Council Resolution No. 6944 (1991 Series) Time extension request dated 1-11-93 I I �-G-3 Approving Resolution "A" RESOLUTION NO. (1993 Series) ,• A .RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING A ONE-YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR FILING THE FINAL TRACT MAP FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 2010 LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BROAD STREET AND ROCKVIEW PLACE (3360 ROCKVIEW PLACE) BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after consideration of public testimony, the subdivider's request, staff recommendations and reports thereon, found that the one-year time extension is justified. SECTION 2 . Action. That Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 2010 is granted a one-year time extension to March 5, 1994 , subject to the original findings and conditions, as specified in City Council Resolution No. 6944 . On motion of seconded by and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Resolution No. Page 2 the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of 1993 . Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED: City A ministrative Officer Ci Attor 0 y Community Dev4ljpment Director Denying Resolution "B" RESOLUTION NO. (1993 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO IMMIR01 A ONE-YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR FILING THE FINAL TRACT MAP FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 2010 LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BROAD STREET AND ROCKVIEW PLACE (3360 ROCKVIEW PLACE) BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after consideration of public testimony, the subdivider's request, staff recommendations and reports thereon, found that the one-year time extension is not justified because: 1. There are not extenuating circumstances that justify project delays. SECTION 2. Action. That a one-year time extension for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 2010 is denied. On motion of seconded by and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: C-d Resolution No. Page 2 the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of 1993 . Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED: City A inistrative Officer C ' yto ney Community Develkp ent Director �a c• �y►!! Gi go .so _ m S®S a 6 �Y OOL v O 5 Dy1 J' S.j GO a f by• Rg�.t. • r C ' {Pg unar6 .d . .I'•�rf, eL i .p4•.... •• a �1 14 •G R r 1�.J ! � •••:••:J:i:•i�:�i�•••••••'�••.:ice'.:•i •� O 00 o ,•'••. LACE .� a i. R-2_SLn o ►. Q • J d► C/OS-40 A '� UGRAPMC SCAM o so \ao mo wo VICINITY MAP "°R ' TRACT No. 2010 /-� ti te.. � LLJ ♦ °f F6 qu �t • , \� \� d J JQJ� $ \ Q ZE A.vvr%;vvvC\vl'\vvv .V c� - /• I ` \� �\ \` �. F" Wa w•a•wa awwwaw wwww 4 e� i / - I \°3� W pwiwa R,+•�OP FQ^M1 0.. �C / / ,• •/ O ♦ / \♦ ��\ \.\ w � V ~ =00 W 1i 2!qqidtwe�aniC�• ° a . / /f r 'V / ° q� + 3 Ly,J Q W cn /.a y\a U J of r All it it p n a = r f �' • l I • L� e S .ti�� Itf •. '/• � iY 7 I •r • gO e h M � �� a lull V w i $d � c�FF�� `mow '1` 110 eat �' �` ��� ��� '• / �C .° Zvi `3V < I /� I •x i t q RESOLUTION NO. 6944 . (1991 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO GRANTING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 2010 LOCATED AT 3360 ROCKVIEW PLACE X BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after consideration of the tentative map of Tract 2010 and the Planning Commission's recommendations, staff recommendations, and reports thereof, makes the following findings: 1. The design of the tentative map and proposed improvements are consistent with the general plan. 2. The site is physically suited for the type and density of development allowed in an R-2-S zone. 3. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause serious health problems, substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvement will not conflict with easement for access through (or use of property within) the proposed subdivision. 5. The proposed project has been granted, and the City Council hereby approves, a negative declaration of environmental impact based on the following mitigation measures being incorporated into the project: a. The existing northbound left-turn lane in Broad Street at .Rockview shall be lengthened with project development to. the approval of the City Engineer and Caltrans. b. The applicant shall install a six-foot high masonry sound wall along the north property line to the rear of the outside living areas provided behind Building 4 (Lot 6) . C. The recommendations contained in the submitted soils report regarding ground preparation for foundations, dewatering techniques for wet underground soils, compaction and maximum cut and fill slopes shall be followed. Vegetation removal as preparation for Resolution No-6944 (1991 Series) .Tract 2010 Page 2 grading shall be consistent with tree removals shown on plans approved by the Architectural Review Commispion. d. Consistent with Municipal Code Section 15.44. 270, all graded surfaces shall be wetted, protected or contained in such a manner as to prevent dust or spill upon any adjoining property or street. The following measures shall constitute the project's dust management plan and shall remain in effect during all phases of that project' s construction: (1. ) Regular wetting of roads and graded areas (at least twice daily with complete coverage of all active areas) ; (2. ) Increasing frequency of watering whenever winds exceed 15 mph; (3 . ) Cessation of grading activities during periods of winds over 25 mph; (4. ) Direct application of water on material being excavated and/or transported on-site or off-site; (5. ) Watering material stockpiles; and (6. ) Periodic washdowns, or mechanical streetsweeping, of Broad Street and Rockview Place in the vicinity of the construction site. e. The applicant shall modify plans to show a minimum of a 10-foot setback between top of bank of the drainage channel and structures. This would provide an adequate area for growth of mature trees, and assist in the re- establishment of the riparian habitat. f. Prior to consideration of the tentative map for the project, the applicant shall submit appropriate hydraulic calculations indicating that: a) projected flow can be adequately accommodated. in the modified channel; and b) possible alternatives to proposed culverting. g. The drainage shall be incorporated into the landscaping design and native riparian plants shall be planted along its banks. Resolution No. 6944 (1991 Series) Tract 2010 Page 3 h. The applicant shall incorporate new trees into the landscaping plan to compensate for trees removed -Po the approval of the Architectural Review Commission. i. If the Community Development Director determines that the above mitigation measures are ineffective or physically infeasible, he may add, delete or modify the mitigation to meet the intent of the original measures. 6. Reduced street yard setbacks for Building 1, Lot 1, (no less than 16 feet) and Building 9, Lot 16, (no less than 14 feet) along Rockview Place as shown on the submitted site plan are hereby approved because: a. The requested exceptions are of a minor nature. b. The reduced street yard will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of persons residing on the site or in the vicinity. C. The street yard reduction is appropriate at the proposed location given the inordinate amount of street frontage and will be compatible with surrounding land uses. d. The requested street yard exception is important to the design and is consistent with plans schematically approved by the Architectural Review Commission. 7. Reduced street yard setbacks to accommodate private yard areas for Lot 1 and Lots 12-16 (Buildings 1, 71 8 and 9) along Rockview Place (no less than 10 feet) are hereby approved because: a. There are circumstances of the site, such as its steep topography, odd shape and multiple street frontages that do not apply generally to land in the vicinity with the same zoning which limit the development potential of the site and it make it more difficult to comply with all city development requirements. b. The- encroaching yard areas are fairly well spaced apart so there would be a break between walls defining private yards. Given spacing, topography and proposed landscaping, the encroaching yard areas will not be visually overwhelming. Resolution No. 6944 (1991 Series) Tract 2010 Page 4 8. A wall height exception for the proposed masonry sound wall located in the street yard along Broad Street as shownron the submitted site plan is hereby approved because: a. The proposed wall will not create any safety or visibility hazards. b. No public purpose would be served by strict compliance with Section 17.16.050 of the zoning regulations in this case. 9. An exception to the property improvement standards contained in the condominium regulations to allow other energy-saving construction techniques in lieu of solar water heating is approved based on the following: Findings a. There are circumstances of the site, such as size, shape, topography, distinct from land in the same zoning, or compliance would not be practical because of the location or site design; b. The variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege; an entitlement inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning; and C. No feasible alternative to authorizing the exception would satisfy the intent of city policies and regulations. d. Applicant is incorporating energy conservation measures that meet or exceed those provided by solar water heating above and beyond Title 24 requirements. SECTION 2. Conditions. The approval of the tentative map for' Tract 2010 be subject to the following conditions: 1. All lots shall be served by individual sewer, water and utilities. All new utilities within the tract shall be placed underground in easements to the approval of the appropriate utility company and the City Engineer. Water meters shall be clustered in the public sidewalk to the approval of the Public Works Department and the Utilities Department. Resolution No.6944 (1991 Series) Tract 2010 Page 5 2. Sewer and water mains shall be public and to city standards. Easements over the main and access to mains shall be to the approval of the City Engineer. 3. Final map shall note entire common lot area as a blanket utility easement (exclusive of buildings) acceptable to the utility companies and City Engineer. 4. All on-site driveways, nonstructural parking improvements, and utilities shall be installed as subdivision improvements. 5. Subdivider shall remove and construct full width roadway on Rockview Place per city standards with integral curb, gutter and 4-foot sidewalk along the project side of the street, and city standard asphaltic concrete berm on the opposite side of the street to control drainage. 6. Subdivider shall install new 6-foot integral sidewalk along the project's Broad Street frontage to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Caltrans. 7. Subdivider shall dedicate an easement over the drainage channel for access and maintenance to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. The California Department of Fish and Game shall review and approve all proposed culverting or bridging of the drainage channel. Subdivider shall be responsible for payment of all fees for such review as required by the Department of Fish and Game. 9 . Subdivider shall upgrade two existing fire hydrants to the approval of the City Fire Chief and Utility Engineer. Automatic fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in all units. 10. Subdivider shall prepare conditions, covenants, and restrictions (CC&R's) to be approved by the City Attorney and Community Development Director prior to final map approval. CC&R's shall contain the following provisions: ' a. Creation of a homeowners' association to enforce the CC&R's and provide for professional, perpetual maintenance of all common area including private driveways, drainage, parking lot areas, walls and fences, lighting, and landscaping in a first class condition. Resolution No. 6944 (1991 Series) r' Tract 2010 Page 6 b. Grant to the city the right to maintain common area if the homeowners' association fails to perform, and..to assess the homeowners' association for expenses incurred, and the right of the city to inspect the site at mutually agreed times to assure conditions of CC&R's and final map are being met. C. No parking except in approved, designated spaces. d. Grant to the city the right to tow away vehicles on a complaint basis which are parked in unauthorized places. e. Prohibition of storage or other uses which would conflict with the use of garages for parking purposes. f. No outdoor storage of boats, campers, motorhomes, or trailers nor long-term storage of inoperable vehicles. g. No outdoor storage by individual units except in designated storage areas. h. No change in city-required provisions of the CC&R's without prior City Council approval. i. Homeowners' association shall file with the City Clerk the names and addresses of all officers of the homeowners' association within 15 days of any change in officers of the association. j . Provision of appropriate "no parking" signs and red-curbing along interior roadways as required by the City Fire Department. 11. All units shall be numbered in accordance with an addressing plan approved by the Community Development Department. 12. Subdivider shall install a unit identification plan with directory at the project entrance to the approval of the Community Development Department. 13. Subdivider shall install a . 6-foot high masonry sound wall along the site's northerly property line to the rear of the outside living areas behind Building 4 (Lot 6) to attenuate exterior noise to acceptable levels. Materials and design of the wall shall be to the approval of the Architectural Review Commission. Resolution No. 6944 (1991 Series) ' Tract 2010 Page 7 14. Subdivider shall pay any applicable traffic impact fees that are adopted by the City Council prior to the recordation of the final map. 15. All garages shall be equipped with automatic garage door openers and occupants shall be provided with two remote- control units. 16. A report from a qualified mechanical engineer shall be submitted outlining how units will be constructed to provide a minimum point value of +16 to in accordance with State Energy Code to save energy equal to or exceeding the energy savings gained from installation of a solar water heating system. If the preceding condition cannot be acceptably met, then solar water heating shall be required. Design and details of collectors and systems shall be reviewed and approved by the ARC and staff. Energy savings shall exceed Title 24 requirements. On motion of ?J=r Din in , seconded by rhimri loran Rci ca and on the following roll call vote: AYES: rlayor Dunin, (buncilmembers Reiss, and Pinard NOES: Councilmerber Roalnan ABSENT: Councilmember Rappa the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 5th day of March , 1991. ti �� r`Tra-yor' Ron DLmin ATTES a., City �lerk Pam Vo lo'��o Resolution No. 6944 (1991 Series) Tract 2010 Page 8 APPROVED: City A 'nistrative Officer y ton / Community DevelonGent Director - i JOHN ROBERT MITCHELL ARCHITECTURE d DEVELOPMENT ,I 3211 BROAD STREET.SUITE 203 SAN LUIS OBISPO. CA 93401 (805)544-9727 . 11 January 1993 Community Development Department City of San Luis Obispo P. O. Box 8100 San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 RE: Request for Extension Tentative Map 2010 At the March 5, 1991, meeting of the City Council, Resolution No. 6944 was adopted. This resolution approved the tentative map for Tract 2010, located at 3360 Rockview Place, subject to the Council's findings and conditions listed. Due to persistent slow economic conditions, we have been unable to proceed with Tract 2010. Therefore, we are requesting an extension for recording the map. Enclosed is the map fee of $1568.50. This represents one- half of the $1577.00 filing fee and $52.00 per lot (15 lots) . $ 788.50 ($1577. x 50%) S 780.00 ($52. x 15 lots) $ 1568.50 Thank you for processing our request for this tract map recording extension. Sincer , J i s 11 02/01/93 4:30PM 101#7524 A03 PIAN APDL FEES1568.50 rockwap.93