HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/03/1993, C-17 - LIGHTING RENOVATION PROJECT, VARIOUS CITY FACILITIES, SPECIFICATION NUMBER 93-23 MEETING DATE:
�����► ��II�IIIIIpq�Ill city of San LUIS OBISpo August 3 1993
j COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM NUMBER: A_17
FROM:
Mike McCluskey, Public Works Directo
Prepared by: Bridget O. Fraser, Engineering Assistant
SUBJECT:
Lighting Renovation Project, Various City Facilities, Specification
Number 93-23
CAO RECOMMENDATION:
By motion, Approve the Plans and Specifications for "Lighting
Renovation Project, Various City Facilities, Specification No. 93-
23" (Bid A) and the Invitation to Bid for "Materials Solicitation
for Lighting Renovation Project, 93-23" (Bid B) ; authorize
soliciting of bids and authorize the CAO to award contracts) to the
lowest responsible bidder(s) , if bids fall below the Engineer's
Estimate.
DISCUSSION:
This project is one of the last remaining comprehensive projects for
energy cost savings based on current available technology. It represents
a continuation of City efforts to provide safe energy-efficient
buildings.
The project includes replacing existing lamps and older inefficient, and
in some cases, toxic ballasts with T8 lamps and electronic ballasts. The
result will be improved lighting and energy savings. This project
integrates with the lighting maintenance program that is already in
place, which specifies that equipment shall be cleaned and replaced on a
regular basis. to reduce energy consumption. Project life is 15 years,
with regularly scheduled lamp replacement every 5 years.
Two Bid packages have been prepared for this project. Bid package "A"
solicits bids from Contractors for providing all labor and materials and
provides an alternate bid for providing labor and materials with the
exception of the lamps and ballasts. These would be procured by the City
via Bid Package "B" or through the State Buy List. Bid Package "B"
solicits bids for the lamps and ballasts directly from suppliers. Three
possible contract combinations exist, depending on the outcome of the
bids:
1. City awards contract to a contractor to supply labor and all
materials for the project.
2. City awards contract to a contractor for the alternate bid (labor
and materials except lamps and ballasts) , and City furnishes lamps
and ballasts by purchasing through the State Buy List.
3. City awards contract to a contractor for the alternate bid and
awards contract to a supplier for lamps and ballasts.
,i�i�►nii►�►IIIIIiIIi� 9I��11 city of San L.is OBISp0
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Specification No. 93-23
Meeting of August 3, 1993
Page Two.
FISCAL IMPACTS: j
The 93-95 Financial Plan (E-9, E-101 E-11 and E-22) designates $60, 000
for this project, with $21, 000 to be funded by donations and the balance
of $39,000 to come from the Capital Outlay Fund. The Draft Capital
Improvement Plan (page 119) provides a detailed explanation of
recommended funding sources. The $21, 000 donation was to come from
reimbursements through a PSP contract with PG&E. If the PSP contract with
PG&E fell through, the City could still take a one-time PG&E rebate, at
that time, estimated to be $12, 000 with the remainder of the project
costs coming from the Capital Outlay fund. Staff was unsuccessful in
obtaining the PSP contract with PG&E. In lieu of this funding
opportunity, the City will take advantage of the PG&E rebate now
estimated to be $15, 000.
The Engineer's Estimate is $60, 000 including contingencies. The budgeted
amount was $60, 000. As it is prudent to allow for unforeseen developments
during construction, .staff recommends 10% of the budget be set aside for
contingencies.
Total estimated project costs are as follows:
Engineer's Estimate: $54,000
10% Contingencies: 6, 000
Total Project Cost: $60, 000
Available funding sources are as follows:
Donations (PG&E Rebate) : $15, 000
General Fund: 39 , 000
Total Available Funds: $54 , 000
As shown above, additional funding of $6, 000 is required for this
project. Staff recommends $6, 000 be appropriated from the General Fund ,
Unappropriated Fund Balance to this project and if not used, in total or
in part, be returned to that fund. This alternative funding was
envisioned in the draft CIP(Page 119) . i
Based on the Estimated costs of $60, 000, an estimated annual energy
savings of $5, 108, reduced maintenance costs of $5, 000 and a one-time
PG&E rebate of $15, 000, the return on investment is 31.59%, with a simple
payback of 3 .92 years. Savings over the 15-year project life are
estimated to be more than $70, 000. This includes energy savings and
maintenance costs (refer to Attachment A) .
ALTERNATIVES;
The alternative is to do nothing and lose the opportunity for investment .
of City funds that will provide long-term benefits and cost savings of
more than $70,000 over the life of the project.
c-� -a
j��� city Of San . is OBispo
ONNERN WA COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Specification No. 93-23
Meeting of August 3 , 1993
Page Three.
I
Another alternative the council could consider would be to receive bids
and award only that portion of the project that can be covered in the
current project budget ($54 , 000) . This would still result in significant
savings to the city and would be better than no project at all.
g;dp\sM*pA9323adv
Attachment A: Lighting Project Financial Analysis
i
'i
I
I
I
I
i
I.
I
i
I
I
i
I
C-1 -3
ATTACHMENT "A"
IGHTING PROJECT FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 06-08-93
Project ID : CIP
Project Name = Lighting
Scenario : BASE CASE
Payback Period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 .92 years ( 4 years 0 months
Internal Rate of Return ( IRR ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 .59 percent
Net Present Value ( NPV )
@ 10 .50% Discount Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $29224 .
Cost of Conserved Energy ( CCE )
@ 10 .50% Discount Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $0 .03 per kwh
of Electricity
LIGHTING PROJECT CASH FLOW 06-08-93
Project ID : CIP
Project Name : Lighting
Scenario : BASE CASE
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
START-UP 1993 1994 1995 1996
INVESTMENT OUTLAYS
Materials & Labor 45000
ENERGY USE
( ENERGY UNITS )
kwh-Electricity -60000 -60000 -6000 -60000
ENERGY USE
( DOLLARS )
Electricity -5108 -5112 -5116 -5120
ELECTRIC DEMAND CHARGES
GENERAL SERVICE -1263 -1::14 -i366 -1421
OTHER COSTS ( BENEFITS )
MAINTENANCE -5000 -5010 -5020 -50J0
INCOME BEFORE TAXES 11371 11436 11502 1157
INCOME TAXES ( 0% ) 0 0 0 0
INCOME AFTER TAXES 11371 11436 11502 11571
CASH FLOW BEFORE TAXES 0 -33629 11436 11502 11571
CASH FLOW AFTER TAXES 0 -33629 11436 11502 11571
CUMULATIVE CASH FLOW
AFTER TAXES 0 -33629 -22193 -10691 880
C-I�5
' IGHTING PROJECT CASH FLOW 06-08-93
Project ID : CIP
Project Name : Lighting
Scenario : BASE CASE
Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 .'ear S Year 9
1997 1998 i-)99 2000 2001
INVESTMENT OUTLAYS
Materials & Labor
ENERGY USE
( ENERGY UNITS )
kwh-Electricity -60000 -60000 -60000 -60000 -60000
ENERGY USE
( DOLLARS )
Electricity -5124 -5128 -5133 -5137 -5142
ELECTRIC DEMAND CHARGES
GENERAL SERVICE -1478 -1537 -1598 -1662 -1729
OTHER COSTS ( BENEFITS )
MAINTENANCE -5040 -5050 -5060 -5070 -5081
JCOME BEFORE TAXES 11642 11715 11792 11870 11952
_NCOME TAXES ( 0% ) 0 0 0 0 0
INCOME AFTER TAXES 11642 11715 11792 11870 11952
CASH FLOW BEFORE TAXES 11642 1.1715 11792 11870 11952
CASH FLOW AFTER TAXES 11642 11715 11792 11870 11952
CUMULATIVE CASH FLOW
AFTER TAXES 12522 24238 36029 47899 :,9051
LIGHTING PROJECT CASH FLOW 06-08-93
Project ID : CIP
Project Name : Lighting
Scenario BASE CASE
Year 10
2002
INVESTMENT OUTLAYS
Materials & Labor
ENERGY USE
( ENERGY UNITS )
kwh-Electricity -60000
ENERGY USE
( DOLLARS )
Electricity -5148
ELECTRIC DEMAND CHARGES
GENERAL SERVICE -1798
OTHER COSTS ( BENEFITS )
MAINTENANCE -5091
PNCOME BEFORE TAXES 12036
INCOME TAXES ( 0% ) 0
INCOME AFTER TAXES 12036
CASH FLOW BEFORE TAXES 12036
CASH FLOW AFTER TAXES 12036
CUMULATIVE CASH FLOW
AFTER TAXES 71888
MEETING AGENDA
DATE _ # C
July 21, 1993
MEMORANDUM
TO: Council Colleagues
FROM: Council Members Bill Roalman and Dave Romero
Council Liaison Subcommittee to the `
Airport Area Annexation
SUBJECT: COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT:
AIRPORT AREA ANNEXATION DISCUSSIONS
Background
On June 9, 1993, the City Council agreed to enter into discussions with property owners in
the airport area in order to develop a specific program for annexation and incremental
development of that area. On July 6th, the City Council formally appointed its
Subcommittee to the Airport Area Annexation discussions. Other members of the City
team include the City Attorney, the Assistant City Administrative Officer, the Public Works
Director, and the advance planning manager. In addition, to ensure adequate internal
communication and planning, meetings are being held between negotiation sessions to
include the City Administrative Officer, Community Development Director, Utilities
Director, and Finance Director.
The Council Subcommittee feels that it is also very important that the full City Council be
kept abreast of our discussions as they proceed, and therefore, status reports shall be placed
on the regular City Council agenda on an approximate monthly basis. This is the first such
status report.
Status
The first meeting with representatives of the airport area property owners was held on
Monday, July 19th. The primary purpose of the meeting was for the various participants to
get acquainted and to develop a schedule and process for the discussions. With regard to
the schedule, it was agreed that sessions will be held every other Monday from 10:00 - 12:00
noon. The goal will be to have a draft agreement prepared sometime during the month of
October. Overall, the first meeting was positive and congenial.
The next meeting will be held on August 2nd. Key items to be discussed include options
relative to the form of an eventual agreement; property owners perspective on appropriate
timing and phasing; City involvement in the County's specific planning process; public
education/information; and examples of complex annexations in other cities.
The Council Subcommittee will be available to answer questions and provide further status
information during the Council Liaison section of the August 3rd City Council meeting.
KH:ss g:airport.anx