HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/28/1995, 1 - MID-YEAR BUDGET REVIEW It should be noted that a comprehensive analysis will be performed in May of 1995 addressing
water, sewer, parking, transit, and golf fr :d revenues and expenditures, which is consistent
w~L the City's policy of annually reviewing our enterprise fund rates. Accordingly, this mid-
ve--- budget review primarily focuses on programs and projects financed through the General
Fetid. However, as discussed later in this report, there are significant fiscal challenges facing
two of our enterprise funds - Sewer and Golf- which will be the focus of our review in May.
FINANCIAL CONDITION SUMMARY
For reference purposes, the transmittal memorandum, changes in fund balance, and operating
program expenditure summary from the December Quarterly Financial Report have been
included in Section B of the Mid-Year Budget Review document. These excerpts summarize
the City's financial condition at the mid-point of the fiscal year and provide an overview of
any significant exceptions to expected results. The following provides a comprehensive
discussion of revenue trends and the projected financial position at the end of 1994-95.
Revenues
Included in Section C of this report is a summary of revenues by major source which provides
actuals for 1993-94 along with a comparison of the 1994-95 original budget estimates and
current revenue projections. The following summarizes revisions in key General Fund
revenues:
Sales & use tax. Sales tax estimates for 1994-95 are on track. Our sales tax advisor
(Hinderliter, deLlamas and Associates) projects that we will have a modest increase of
$11,500 from our initial projections. At $6.4 million, current projections reflect a modest
recovery in point-of-sale revenues.
Property tax revenues. Original estimates for property tax revenues reflected a 4.5% increase
based on a modest rec,. vary in the economy. The revised projection is based on the December,
1994 assessed values from the County Auditor Controller's office, reflecting an increase of
only 2.7% in values from 1993-94.
Business tam Over the past few years the City has experienced the loss of several businesses -
but it appears the tide is turning. New businesses are bac :filling .for those closed businesses
and several of these new businesses are now in their second year, requiring that business taxes
be paid on gross receipts rather than the flat $25 for new businesses in their first year of
operations. Both the General Fund and the BIA are experiencing business tax growth in fiscal
year 1994-95.
Transient occupancy taxes The revised downward projection for transient occupancy tax
revenues is based upon 1993-94 actual sales, :✓hich were down by 4.5% from the prior year.
Utility users tam The increased projection for utility users tax is based on a 5.6% increase
from the 1993-94 fiscal year. This reflects a consumer price index (CPI) adjustment and
population growth increase.
A-2
Franchise fees. The projected revenue for franchise fees is adjusted downward by $96,100
based upon the actual revenue received in 1993-94, which did not increase at the anticipated
rate. A significant portion of this shortfall ($40,000) is attributable to Cable TV revenues,
which were projected at a 5% tax rate (rather than the existing 4% rate), which has been
delayed as a result of slower than anticipated negotiations with the cable company.
Subventions and grants The revised projection for subventions and grants in the General
Fund reflects an increase of$71,500, which is the net effect of an increase in motor vehicle
in-lieu (VLF) of$25,700, an increase of$92,700 for FEMA reimbursement, and a decrease in
trailer coach in-lieu and other grants of$46,900. The revised projection in the Capital Outlay
Fund (which reduces General Fund capital contributions), reflects an increase of $2,019,800
which is comprised of the following:
■ Carry-over grant funding from Proposition 116 in the amount of $400,000 for the
Jennifer Street project.
■ Grant for the Headquarters Fire Station in the amount of $611,000.
■ Carry-over grant funding from the Surface Transportation Program (STP) in the amount
of$540,000 for Garden Street improvements, traffic signals, and bike lane striping.
■ Carry-over grant funding from Transportation Enhancement Activities (TEA) in the
amount of $150,000 for railroad crossing improvements and railroad tower
rehabilitation.
The revised projection in the Gas Tax Fund indicates an increase of$33,600, which is based
on prior year actual revenue and current trending of the revenue received in 1994-95.
Service charges. The revised projections for General Fund service charges reflect a net
increase of$2,400 which is comprised of the following:
■ An increase in fire service charges of$40,800.
■ An increase in Zone 9 reimbursements of$62,000.
■ A net decrease in recreation service charges of $98,400. This reflects less revenue in
the areas of athletic fees, instruction fees, special event fees, trips & outings, and
aquatics ($156,000) with increased revenue in the areas of rental & use fees and child
care. As discussed below, $50,000 in additional child care revenues are projected as
a result of increased program participation; however, these increased revenues are offset
by $47,500 in additional costs.
Other revenues The revised projection for other General Fund revenue indicates a slight
increase based upon insurance refunds. In both the Capital Outlay and Equipment Replacement
Funds, the revised projection indicates an increase in other revenue from the sale of surplus
property: in the Capital Outlay Fund the revised projection increases by $235,000, reflecting
the sale of the 860 Pacific site to the Parking Fund; and in the Equipment Replacement Fund
by $31,400 due to the sale of surplus police vehicles.
A-3
Operating Program Expenditures
Section C also includes an overview of changes to the operating program budgets. Organized
by function and program, the schedule includes the original budget, encumbrances/carry-overs,
previously approved budget amendments, and the mid-year requests being submitted to Council
as discussed later in this report.
Capital Outlay Budgets
This part of Section C reflects the original budget for 1994-95, encumbrances/carry-overs,
previously approved budget amendments, and the mid-year requests being submitted to Council
as discussed later in this report.
Projected Fund Balance
Based on the revised revenue projections and expenditure summaries, this part of Section C
includes a summary of projected changes in fund balance for each of the City's operating funds
which allows the Council to review the impact of the revised projections on the fund balances
for the 1994-95 fiscal year.
The following is a summary of highlights and concerns regarding the City's projected financial
position for key funds at the end of 1994-95:
General Fund The total projected fund balance at the end of the 1994-95 fiscal year for the
General Fund is $4,002,400, which represents an unreserved fund balance of 20% of operating
expenditures. Based on projected revenue and expenditure trends, this level of financial
strength is consistent with Financial Plan policies and is recommended in order to prudently
position us for the 1995-97 Financial Plan. As noted above, this projection is exclusive of any
supplemental funding that may be necessary for the Headquarters Fire Station.
Business Improvement Area Fund The revised projection for service charges has been
increased by $20,900 to reflect additional revenue from the business tax surcharge and
promotional activities. As indicated previously, downtown is experiencing some new business
openings, some of which are in their second year requiring the surcharge be paid on gross
receipts rather than the new business flat fee of $25.00. Projected ending fund balance for
fiscal year 1994-95 of $34,900 is higher than originally anticipated due to the increased
revenue projection and the Council approved transfer of $30,000 for Decemberfest from
Community Promotion.
Parkland Deveiapment Fund The revised ending fund balance for 1994-95 for the Parkland
Development Fund is slightly higher than originally budgeted at $25,700. An additional
Parklands Act grant is anticipated which has already been programmed for park renovations.
Water Fund As we discussed in the Overview Section, a comprehensive evaluation of the
enterprise funds will be presented in May, 1995. For this mid-year review there are no
significant changes in the assumptions originally used in preparing the 1994=95 Budget.
A-4
I
Sewer Fund The projected working capital balance for the sewer fund is a negative $381,500.
This negative fund balance reflects a lower than anticipated beginning fund balance of
$690,800, which off-set in part by additional State Loan proceeds and anticipated expenditure
savings. Capital improvement project carry-over balances for sewer main replacements have
been reduced by $166,100 in order to minimiworking capital problems in this fund. While
we anticipate that Cal Poly will reimburse the City about $3.0 million for its share of the
capital costs of recent plant improvements in accordance with previous financing plans once
the State's 1995-96 budget is approved, we will be addressing this concern in the annual rate
review coming to the Council in May of 1995.
Parking Fund The Parking Fund unreserved ending working capital balance at the end of
1994-95 is projected to be $1.9 million. This fund balance is $198,300 less than originally
budgeted due solely to funding two mid-year requests for capital improvement projects -
purchase of the Parks & Recreation Administration building ($235,000) and the new parking
lot at Palm and Morro ($25,000).
Transit Fund The working capital balance projected for the Transit Fund is $87,200, which
is $38,200 less than originally estimated. The revised projection includes carry-over capital
projects and revenue from fiscal year 1993-94. In preparation for the May enterprise funds
review, we will be updating the financing plan component of the Short Range Transit Plan.
Goy'Fund The working capital balance projection for the Golf Fund shows a negative fund
balance of $29,800 due to a projected revenue shortfall of $103,400 and a beginning of the
year fund balance that was $52,200 less than anticipated. The rate review presented to Council
in May will include alternatives for resolving these shortfalls in the short-term and long-term.
MID-YEAR BUDGET REQUESTS
Several operating and capital budget requests are being submitted for Council approval which
are necessary to meet current service levels, summarized as follows:
By Function
Function Operating Capital
Public Safety 64,700 95,000
Public Utilities 30,000
Transportation 855,000
Leisure, Cultural & Social Services 47,500 372,000
Community Development 7,600
General Government 16,900 34,800
TOTAL $1669700 $1,3569800
A-5
By Funding Source
F:.,riding Source Operating Capital
General Fund - Child care fees 50,000
General Fund - FEMA reimbursements 92,700 76,800
General Fund - Fund balance 24,000 985,200
Equipment Replacement Fund 34.SL)O
Parking Fund 260,000
11 TOTAL $1669700 $193569800
As reflected above, these mid-year adjustments will reduce ending fund balances by $1,009,200
in the General Fund, $3=:.SOO in the Equipment Replacement Fund, and by $260,000 in the
Parking Fund. In all cases, however, ending balances will be in conformance with the City's
Financial Plan policies. Supporting documentation which fully describes the need for these
adjustments is provided in Section D and summarized below:
Operating Program Mid-Year Requests
Public Safety
■ Disaster response costs ($64,700). In response to the "Highway 41 Fire" in August
of 1994, the City .;et-up its Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and Staging Area at
San Luis Obispo High School. It cost the City $64,700 in direct costs for personnel,
food, and equipment to maintain this EOC and Staging Area. An additional $58,300
in regular staffing and indirect costs were also incurred, resulting in a total cost of
$123,600. Of this amount we anticipate that 75% ($92,700) will be reimbursed by
FEMA.
Public Utilities
■ Solid waste franchise renewal consultant services ($30,000). Staff is seeking expert
assistance in identifying an appropriate strategy to ensure the long term solid waste and
recycling services that meet the community's goals. Once the strategy is developed, the
consultant would assist staff by ensuring the agreements are legally defensible and
environmentally appropriate, as well as advising during negotiations. The use of the
consultant will be minimized, as staff intends to perform as much of the work as
possible. Currently, $10,000 for this purpose is available in existing budgets. An
additional $30,000 is requested to begin negotiations with the current solid waste
franchisee as directed by the Council at their January 3, 1995 meeting.
Leisure, Cultural & Social Services
■ Childcare ($47,500). In order to maintain staff to participant ratios required to comply
with California Licensing regulations and meet newly mandated training requirements,
A-6
an additional $47,500 for this program is requested. As discussed above, it is projected
that this increased cost will be off-set by $50,000 in additional childcare revenues.
Community Development
■ Computer mapping projects ($7,600). Staffing for map production and maintenance
has been reduced from two full-time positions into a single position in Community
Development shared with the Fire Department. This limited staffing means that
Community Development is only able to maintain existing maps or defer maintenance
in order to produce new maps. With the use of computerized drafting and mapping, the
department has an opportunity to improve efficiency in maintaining and eliminating
redundant manual mapping systems. As such, $7,600 is requested to expedite this
conversion.
General Government
■ Support services reorganization ($2,200). An additional half-time regular position is
requested in accordance with previous Council direction regarding various support
service responsibilities and staffing levels resulting from changes in the City Clerk's
Office. For the balance of 1994-95, the additional half-time position will cost $2,200;
on an annual basis, it will cost $17,700.
■ Ethernet migration at 955 Morro, City Hall and Police Station ($14,700). Ethernet
cabling has been the City standard since 1991. However, much of the cabling for data
communication in City offices continues to be ArcNet, which is obsolete, unreliable and
lacks in the throughput capacity and management tools required for current and future
networking. Currently, staff have experienced repeated network failures. While the
estimated cost for removing existing ArcNet cabling with the City standard Ethernet
cabling is $34,700, fiords in the amount of $20,000 are available from existing
resources. Accordingly, this request is for $14,700.
Capital Project Requests
Public Safety
■ Communication system replacement ($95,000). During the Highway 41 fire, millions
of dollars of communications equipment were destroyed at the Tassajara Peak
Electronic Site. Among that equipment was the City Fire Department's emergency call-
back paging and tactical communications systems. This request is for $95,000 to
replace the equipment lost in the fire. The City has applied to the State for financial
disaster assistance to recoup a portion of this money, and as such, offsetting revenue
in the amount of$76,800 for FEMA reimbursement is projected in the Capital Outlay
Fund.
Transportation
■ Street light acquisition services ($35,000). The City currently owns 51 street lights
within the City and pays PG&E for electricity and maintenance. PG&E owns the
A-7
remaining 1,813 lights, and the City pays PG&E for rent plus electricity and
maintenance. This request is for one-time costs of $35,000 to hire an attorney for
negotiation. and condemnation services to acquire street lights from PG&E ($20,000)
and to hire an appraiser for appraisal and negotiation services ($15,000). It is
anticipated that approximately $120,000 annually will be saved in street light operating
costs when this transaction is completed.
IN Marsh Street reconstruction and storm drain improvements ($560,000).
Reconstructing/resurfacing Marsh Street from Nipomo to Santa Rosa and making related
improvements (improving storm drainage, installing bulbouts at three intersections,
installing a mid-block crossing, and improving access for disabled persons) will cost
$710,000. Of this amount, it is proposed that $560,000 be financed from the General
Fund in 1994-95 and $150,000 from the CDBG program in 1995-96. (Considering
proposed uses of 1995-96 CDBG funds in their entirety - projected at $950,000 - is
scheduled for Council review on March 21, 1995.) While we believe that the proposed
project scope best meets the City's short and long-term needs for street, sidewalk and
drainage improvements along this section of Marsh Street, a number of alteratives are
fully described in the project request, and will be discussed with Council during the
presentation of the mid-year budget review.
■ Acquisition of property at 860 Pacific ($235,000). With the Downtown Centre
completed and as the local economy begins to fully recover from the current recession,
there will be increasing pressure to develop additional downtown parking. To
accomplish this, the parking program will need the 860 Pacific site for expansion of the
Marsh Street parking structure. Estimated market value for the 860 Pacific site has
been established by a independent real estate appraiser at $485,000. Initial funding
plans were to transfer the outstanding debt on this facility to the Parking Fund;
accordingly, the estimated purchase price was net of this amount (previously estimated
at $250,000 and approved in the 1994-95 budget at this amount). At this time,
however, we are recommending that the General Fund retain the debt and sell the site
to the Parking Fund for the full value. Accordingly, this request is for the remaining
$235,000 to complete the acquisition. This increase in proceeds from this sale have
been reflected as revenues in the Capital Outlay Fund.
■ New parking lot at Palm and Morro ($25,000). The Kozak Garage at this location
is being demolished and the site is being regraded in order to prevent damage from
chronic rainwater intrusion into the adjacent 955 Morro building. A metered parking
lot would be a good interim use pending ultimate development of this site. It would
provide additional downtown parking and bring additional ongoing revenue into the
Parking Fund. This request is for a one-time cost of$25,000 to construct a 22 space
parking lot, install parking meters and extensive landscaping long the perimeter, and
install additional lighting, if necessary.
Leisure, Cultural & social services
• Islay Hill Park fee refunds ($186,000). Under the subdivision agreement for Tract
1750 approved by the Council in 1990, the subdivider has dedicated the land for Islay
Hill Park and assumed full responsibility for constructing the park. In exchange for
A-8
dedicating the land and building the park, the City has agreed to pay to the subdivider
all related fees and interest earnings (about $186,000) that have been previously
collected and earned for this purpose.
■ Pick-up truck and mower for new park maintenance ($35,000). After soliciting
quotations for contract maintenance on French and Islay Hill Parks, an analysis of costs
showed that it would be cheaper to perform the work in-house by hiring a maintenance
worker and buying the needed equipment. In December 1994 the Council approved the
maintenance worker position and the anticipated costs, including the amortization for
a pick-up truck and mower. This budget request is for one-time costs of$20,000 for
the pick-up truck and $15,000 for the mower.
■ Parks and Recreation office building ($151,000). Plans and specifications have been
completed, and all planning and building reviews have been completed for the Parks
and Recreation Administration building at the comer of Nipomo and Pacific Streets.
The current budget already contains an appropriation for $439,000 for design and
construction costs. However, this project requires construction of various required site
improvements (driveways, curbs, parking lot, irrigation, landscaping, etc.), which is
estimated to cost an additional $151,000. As such, these funds are being requested
through the mid-year process. As noted above, approval of plans and specifications for
this project is scheduled for concurrent review by the Council at the February 28, 1995
meeting.
General Government
■ Replace/Upgrade file servers ($34,800). Replacing file servers at the Corporation
Yard and Park & Recreation Administration offices and increasing disk space on the
City Hall file server in order to ensure reliable operations at these sites will cost
$34,800.
SUMMARY
The Mid-year budget review for 1994-95 has been prepared in order to present the Council
with a formal review of the City's financial condition six months into the second year of our
two year budget process. The Department of Finance will be prepared to respond to any
questions the Council may have regarding this report at their February 28, 1995 meeting. If
you have any questions in the interim, or require additional information, please do not hesitate
to contact us.
A-9
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
A-10
Section 'B
EXCERPTS FROM THE DECEMBER QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
MEMORANDUM
January 17, 1994
To: All Financial Report Users
From: William C. Statler, Director of Finance [�
Prepared by. Carolyn Dominguez,Accounting Manager C
Subject: DECEMBER 1994 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
OVERVIEW
The accompanying financial statements reflect the City's overall financial position for the fiscal year through
December of 1994. With 50% of the fiscal year complete, revenues are at 49% of projections, and operating
expenditures are at 47% of budgeted amounts. Except as noted below, budget variances for revenues and
operating expenditures are distributed relatively evenly by sources, function, and type.
The City's overall revenue and expenditure picture will be discussed in greater detail during the Mid-Year Budget
Review currently scheduled for Council consideration
February 28, 1995.
REVENUE HIGHLIGHTS
Tax Revenues
Total receipts from tax revenues halfway through the fiscal year are at 51%of projections. Business tax receipts
are at 99% of projections because the billing cycle for that program is nearly complete.Sales tax revenues for
the first two quarters of the fiscal year are at 50% of projections.
Licenses and Permits
Continuing a trend we noticed during the last fiscal year, this revenue source is doing better than anticipated at
70% collected.
Subventions and Grants
This revenue source is at 32%of projections primarily due to projected Community Development Block Grant
funds of$857,500 which have not yet been drawn upon.
EXPENDITURE HIGHLIGHTS
Expenditure are relatively evenly distributed between the six major functions of Public Safety, Public Utilities,
Transportation, Leisure & Cultural Services, Community Development, and General Government, and are
generally on target with budget projections.As noted above,a detailed analysis will be forthcoming with the mid-
year budget review process.
SUMMARY
As noted in the Table of Contents,all of the schedules provided in the Quarterly Financial Report are generated
from more detailed transaction reports produced by the City's Governmental Financial System (GFS). As such,
additional supporting or detail information is available from the Department of Finance upon request.
If you have any questions concerning the Quarterly Financial Report for December 1994,or require additional
information, please do not hesitate to contact us.
B-1
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
ALL FUNDS COMBINED
December 31, 1994
SPECIAL CAPITAL DEBT ENTERPRISE
GENERAL REVENUE OUTLAY SERVICE &AGENCY TOTAL
REVENUE
Taxes 9,022,700 9,022,700
Licenses and Permits 223,500 73,300 296,800
Fines and Penalties 52,800 232,400 285,200
Investment and Property 203,200 1,600 105,200 429,700 739,700
Subventions and Grants 784,500 417,000 16,000 546,800 1,764,300
Service Charges 696,400 56,900 33,100 7,534,800 8,321,200
Other Revenue 500,800 32,000 86,600 619,400
Total Revenue 11,483,900 548,800 186,300 8,830,300 21,049,300
EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenditures
Staffing 8,224,400 46,500 1,644,600 9,915,500
Contract Services 936,500 149,400 1,224,700 2,310,600
Office Expenses 142,400 2,200 15,700 160,300
Travel,Meetings and Dues 107,700 4,600 14,700 127,000
Communications&Utilities 503,600 2,800 577,000 1,083,400
Rents and Leases 25,900 7,400 3,000 36,300
Insurance 709,600 709,600
Operating Materials&Supplies 342,600 11,900 327,100 681,600
Minor Capital Outlay 29,400 14,400 43,800
Subtotal 11,022,100 224,800 3,821,200 15,068,100
Expense Reimbursement (1,079,200) 42,900 1036 300
Total Operating Expenditures 9,942,900 267,700 4,857,500 15,068,100
Debt Service 313,500 2,691,000 3,004,500
Capital Outlay 7,500 1,W,200 2,414 600 3.962,300
Total Expenditures 9,942,900 275,200 1,540,200 313,500 9,963,100 22,034,900
OTHER SOURCES(USES)
Operating Transfers In 417,200 1,068,300 313,500 1,799,000
Operating Transfers Out (1,341,800) (417,000) (40,200) (1,799,000)
Other Sources(Uses) 14,300 7,500 (173,900) 12-3,600 (28500)
Total Other Sources(Uses) (910,300) (409,500) 1,068,300 139,600 83,400 (28,500)
Revenues Over(Under)Expenditures 630,700 (135,900) (285,600) (173,900) (1,049,400) (1,014,100)
Fund Balance,beginning 4,666,800 31,000 7,054 400 980,300 10,048,600 22,781,100
Fund Balance,ending 5,297500 (104,900) 6,768,800 806 400 8,999,200 21 767 000
B-2
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
December 31, 1994
TDA
BIA GAS TAX BIKEWAY CDBG TOTAL
REVENUE
Licenses and Permits 73,300 73„300
Investment and Property 1,600 1,600
Subventions and Grants 408,700 8,300 417,000
Service Charges 56,900 56,900
Other Revenue
Total Revenue 131,800 408,700 8,300 548,800
EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenditures
Staffing 37,800 8,700 46,500
Contract Services 89,400 60,000 149,400
Office Expenses 2,200 2,200
Travel,Meetings and Dues 4,600 4,600
Communications&Utilities 2,800 2,800
Rents and Leases 7,400 7,400
Insurance
Operating Materials&Supplies 10,300 1,600 11,900
Minor Capital Outlay
Subtotal 154,500 70,;00 224,800
Expense Reimbursement 42,900 42,900
Total Operating Expenditures 154,500 113,200 267,700
Capital Outlay 7,500 7,500
Total Expenditures 154,500 120,700 275,200
OTHER SOURCES(USES)
Operating Transfers In
Operating Transfers Out (408,700) (8,300) (417,000)
Other Sources 7,500 7,500
Total Other Sources(Uses) (408,700) (8,300) 7,500 (409,500)
Revenues Over(Under)Expenditures (22,700) (113,200) (135,900)
Fund Balance,beginning 31,000 31,000
Fund Balance,ending 8';00 (113,200) (104,900)
B-3
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
CAPITAL OUTLAY FUNDS
December 31, 1994
CAPITAL PARKLAND EQUIPMENT
OUTLAY DEVELOPMENT REPLACEMENT TOTAL
REVENUE
Investment and Property 3,100 61„300 40,800 105,200
Subventions and Grants 16,000 16,000
Service Charges 31,400 1,700 33,100
Other Revenue 20,000 12,000 32,000
Total Revenue 70,500 63,000 52,800 186,300
EXPENDITURES
Capital Outlay 652,600 450,700 436,900 1,540,200
OTHER SOURCES(USES)
Operating Transfers In 875,000 193,300 1,068„300
Operating Transfers Out
Total Other Sources(Uses) 875,000 193,300 1,068,300
Revenues Over(Under)Expenditures 292,900 (387,700) (190,800) (285,600)
Fund Balance,beginning 2,796,700 2,544,100 1,713,600 7,054,400
Fund Balance,ending 3,089,600 2156 400 1522 800 6,768,80(
B-4
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
ENTERPRISE& AGENCY FUNDS
December 31, 1994
WHALE
WATER SEWER PARKING TRANSIT GOLF ROCK TOTAL
REVENUE
Taxes
Licenses and Permits
Fines and Penalties 232,400 232,400
Investment and Property 288,200 133,900 1„300 1,100 5,000 429,700
Subventions and Grants 546,800 546,800
Service Charges 3,647,600 2,560,000 699„300 66,900 149,500 411,500 7,534,800
Other Revenue 18,200 68,400 86,600
Total Revenue 3,954,000 2,628,400 1,065,600 615,000 150,800 416,500 8,830,300
EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenditures
Staffing 613,000 609,000 183,200 33,700 98,200 107,500 1,644,600
Contract Services 775,300 68,500 69,900 297,800 4,400 8,800 1,224,700
Office Expenses 5,700 4,500 500 4,100 800 100 15,700
Travel,Meetings and Dues 4,800 6,800 1,000 1,300 700 100 14,700
Communications&Utilities 115,600 186,000 19,600 1,300 15,400 239,100 577,000
Rents and Leases 1„300 700 1,000 3,000
Operating Materials&Supplies 58,400 196„500 12,500 30,200 22,200 7:300 327,100
Minor Capital Outlay (3,500) 17,900 14,400
Subtotal 1,569,300 1,071,300 304,600 369,700 142,400 363,900 3,821,200
Expense Reimbursement 444,000 344,200 85,100 83,000 41,400 38,600 1,036,300
Total Operating Expenditures 2,013,300 1,415,500 389,700 452,700 183,800 402,500 4,857,500
Debt Service 495,200 2,120,600 75,200 2,691,000
Capital Outlay 2,004„300 343,400 66,100 800 2,414,600
Total Expenditures 4,512,800 3,879,500 464,900 518,800 183,800 403,300 9,963,100
OTHER SOURCES(USES)
Operating Transfers In
Operating Transfers Out (8,400) (24,800) (2,300) (2,300) (2,400) (40,200)
Gain on investment sale 48,800 48,800
Proceeds From Debt Financing 198,000 198,000
Issuance Costs of Debt Financing (123,200)
(123,200)
Total Other Sources(Uses) (8,400) (24,800) 121,300 (2,300) (2,400) 83,400
Revenues Over(Under)Expenditures (567,200) (1,275,900) 722,000 96,200 (35,300) 10,800 (1,049,400)
Working Capital,beginning 6,978,400 91,900 2,633,600 35,400 40,800 268,500 10,048,600
Working Capital,ending 6,411,200 (1,184,000) 3,155,600 131600 5,500 279 300 8,999,200
B-5
CITY OF SAN LUIS uBISPO
OPERATING REVENUES
'LILY 1, 1994 - DECEMBER 31, 1994
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ESTIMATED YTD ACTUAL X
1994-95 1994-95 REALIZED
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------
ttt GENERAL FUND ttt
----------------------------------
1AX REVENUE
PROPERTY TAX 3,666,100.00 1.829,466.96 47
SALES AND USE TAX 6,368,500.00 3,239,261.46 50
SALES TAX-SAFETY ;PROP 172) 129.000.00 759628.22 58
TRANSIENT LOOSING TAX 21614,600.00 1,391,327.81 53
FRANCHISE TAX 8261100.00 2695066.00 34
BUSINESS TAX RECEIPTS 756.000.00 755,289.84 99
REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX 75,000.00 53,208.05 70
UTILITY USERS TAX 2,7309000.00 1,389,442.54 50
ttttlt TOTAL TAX REVENUES ttlltt 17,385,500.00 99022,692.88 51
LICENSES AND PERMITS
CONSTRUCTION PERMITS 204,000.00 135,131.89 66
PLAN CHECKING FEES 93,500.00 77,141.62 82
STREET & CURB PERMITS 20,000.00 111223.40 56
OTHER LICENSES & PERMITS 19000.00 10.00 1
tt TOTAL LICENSES AND PERMITS 12 3189500.00 223,506.91 70
FINES AND FORFEITURES
VEHICLE CODE FINES 759100.00 37,600.49 50
OTHER COURT FINES 601000.00 12,647.86 21
"ISC FORFEITS & PENALITIES 40,000.00 2,352.22 5
t TOTAL FINES AND FORFEITURES 1 1751100.00 52,800.57 30
INVESTMENT AND PROPERTY REVENUES
INVESTMENT EARNINGS 398,300.00 193,424.64 48
RENTS & CONCESSIONS 15,000.00 99760.31 65
1 INVESTMENT & PROPERTY REVENUE t 4139300.00 203,184.95 49
SUBVENTIONS AND GRANTS
MOTOR VEHICLE IN-LIEU 1,424,300.00 713,776.19 50
HOMEOWNERS PROP TAX RELIEF 729500.00 12,695.51 17
STATE TRAILER IN-LIEU 159000.00 1,723.62 11
SH 90 REIMBURSEMENTS 21,100.00
POLICE TRAINING [POST) 46,800.00 13,026.50 27
OTHER STATE GRANT REVENUES 81,900.00 4,957.79 6
COUNTY REVENUE GRANTS
rTHER IN-LIEU TAX REVENUE 38,362.53
z TOTAL SUBVENTIONS AND GRANTS 1 19662,200.00 7849542.14 47
B-6
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
OPERATING REVENUES
JULY 1, 1994 - DECEMBER 31, 1994
7---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ESTIMATED YTD ACTUAL I
1994-95 1994-95 REALIZED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
SERVICE CHARGES
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
PLANNING FEES 1109000.00 301389.83 27
ENGINEERING FEES 39,100.00 27,513.14 69
PUBLIC SAFETY
POLICE DEPARTMENT SERVICES 154,000.00 58,881.15 38
FIRE DEPARTMENT SERVICES 2079700.00 148,707.34 71
WEED & LOT CLEANING SERVICES 197000.00 30,193.32 158
RECREATION
SWIMMING POOL REVENUE 1449500.00 56,450.36 39
PARK & RECREATION FEES 649,600.00 263,025.10 40
OTHER PARK & REC REVENUE 818.00
OTHER SERVICE CHARGES 97,779.00 76,553.90 78
SALE OF PUBLICATIONS 55000.00 31830.55 76
tttt TOTAL SERVICE CHARGES tttt 1,427,279.00 696,362.69 48
OTHER REVENUE
SALE OF PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT 4,380.00
NON-GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTIONS
OTHER REVENUE 415,500.00 496,443.93 119
tttttt TOTAL OTHER REVENUE ttttt 415,500.00 5009823.93 120
ttt GENERAL FUND TOTAL Itt 21,7979379.00 11,483,914.07 52
----------------------------------
ttt SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS ttt
----------------------------------
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA (BIA)
BIA SURCHARGE ASSESSMENTS 67,300.00 73,265.71 108
INVESTMENT & PROPERTY REVENUES 29000.00 19562.00 78
SERVICE CHARGES 57,800.00 56,956.33 98
ttt BIA FUND TOTAL ttt 1279100.00 131,784.04 103
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK BRANT
SUBVENTIONS & GRANTS 857,500.00
ttt CDBG FUND TOTAL ttt 857,500.00
GAS TAX FUND
SUBVENTIONS & GRANTS 781,400.00 408,678.95 52
tit GAS TAX FUND TOTAL ttt 781,400.00 4089678.95 52
B-7
CITY OF SAN LUIS DBISPO
OPERATING REVENUES
JULY 19 1994 - DECEMBER 31. 1994
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
ESTIMATED YTD ACTUAL X
1994-95 1994-95 REALIZED
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TDA/BIY.EWAY FUND
SUBVENTIONS & GRANTS 17,800.00 8,257.17 46
ttt TDAiBIY.EWAY FUND TOTAL tt 17,800.00 81257.17 46
---------------------------------
ttt CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS ttt
----------------------------------
CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND
INVESTMENT & PROPERTY REVENUES 3,150.00
SUBVENTIONS & GRANTS 337,500.00 16,000.00 4
SERVICE CHARGES 294,500.00 31,388.88 10
OTHER REVENUE 2901000.00 20,000.00 6
It CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND TOTAL ti 922,000.00 70,538.88 7
PARKLAND DEVELOPMENT FUND
INVESTMENT & PROPERTY REVENUES 1201000.00 61,299.00 51
SUBVENTIONS & GRANTS
SERVICE CHARGES 20,000.00 1,666.00 8
tPARKLAND DEVELOPMENT FUND TOTALt 1409000.00 62,965.00 44
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
INVESTMENT & PROPERTY REVENUE 1209000.00 40,848.00 34
SALE OF PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT 209000.00 12,040.50 60
$EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND TOTAL 1407000.00 52,888.50 37
itt ENTERPRISE FUNDS tit
----------------------------------
NATER FUND
INVESTMENT & PROPERTY REVENUES 250.000.00 288,213.55 115
SERVICE CHARGES 1,274,600.00 3,647,64`.89 50
OTHER REVENUES 80,500.00 18,145.60 22
1t$ NATER FUND TOTAL it$ 7,605,300.00 39954,005.04 51
SEWER FUND
INVESTMENT & PROPERTY REVENUES 259000.00
SERVICE CHARGES 5,3919100.00 2,5599946.64 47
OTHER REVENUE 212,900.00 68.39B.00 25
t$$ SEWER FUND TOTAL ttt 5,695,000.00 2,628,344.64 46
•h'
8-8
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
OPERATING REVENUES
JULY 1, 1994 - DECEMBER 31, 1994
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ESTIMATED YTD ACTUAL Y
199445 1994-95 REAL17ED
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PARKING FUND
PARKING FINES 468,000.00 232.383.15 49
IN'V'ESTMENT & PROPERTY REVENUES 200,000.00 133,886.48 66
SERVICE CHARGES 15358000.00 699,325.96 51
ttt PARKING FUND TOTAL tit 2,026,000.00 1,065,595.59 52
TRANSIT FUND
INVESTMENT & PROPERTY REVENUES 51000.00 1,260.00 25
SUBVENTIONS & GRANTS 1,102,500.00 546,796.45 49
SERVICE CHARGES 2331300.00 66,852.89 28
ttt TRANSIT FUND TOTAL tit 1,340,800.00 614,929.34 45
GOLF FUND
INVESTMENT & PROPERTY REVENUES 3,600.00 1,346.00 37
SERVICE CHARGES 408,800.00 149,453.93 36
ttt GOLF FUND TOTAL tit 412,400.00 150,799.93 36
---------------------------------
ttt AGENCY FUND ttt
------------------------------
NHALE ROCK COMMISSION
INVESTMENT & PROPERTY REVENUES 109000.00 5,004.00 50
SERVICE CHARGES 626,600.00 411,466.57 65
t WHALE ROCK COMMISSION TOTAL t 636,600.00 416,470.57 65
TOTAL REVENUES 42,574,279.00 21,049,171.72 49
$-9
CITY F SYN LLT HISTO
5PE5ATI,45 PSCC?HMS EAXIFEN?ITU2E SUMMARY
2U.Y 1 14?4 - DECURER 31 1'144
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Y?D Fn: ryi.
�;E
u.L.iE,**IBES E1;?EUED E KCU'',PRAN2E'3 net: lNiii41
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RLIFLIC SAFETY
"OLICE PROTEC?IOIi
F'aLice Adr=iii5tro::on ':w,31L'i0 3',8.536,88 CO a x,"�.97' ;:� ,
•- .671..75
Fa`rol cervices 3,'13,303.00 I,IJ9,`'?r.lG 44
3,703.83,
Inveatioatioris .,5.6)4.4'0 324,705.21 17 1001418.14
Fo_ice Support Servicss 1,029,574.00 4,2.0'27.1?.l4 4�, 1,450.00 564,135.21
Tc•ti.I P;,.:ce Pro tec ti un J,091,562.1.0 I'M +-0 ', 48 � �:?: _
1�, ,97 3,01.•,030.:3
FIRE ANOEINPIFONMENTNL SAFETY
Hdr2iristre for, 2?1,'40.00 47,407.37 43 12;
,532,53
EaergercY Response 3,242.144..00 1,6:;1,424.54 44
1,640.1-.9.46
He-ard Preven?ion 351,:'44.09 185,31:.23 51 5I0rX0.00 170,9S
I.86
T.,:i ing Services 50,752.010 25,052.65 51 8,152.00 15,93).35
TI:c4rical Services 217,800.00 115,:7:.32 52 01.02C..00 r&1506.08.
015x5`-er Preparedness 25,400.00 :14. 5.33 5 26967
, 17.67
.nal Fire & Environmental 4.1'1 2.026,84 .44
49 2x,712".00 2,071,661.65
n,,CACT
4 .ER -'PEND! t� 35.63 15,2^:.4 (a0
2
52
TOTAL
r PU SAFETY aL h�FLIC anrE Y
C' 114,132.129 4,4?7 412.0.7 4? =0 717.34
4 � , .•,066,052,8:;
B-10
CITY OF S'[1 LUIS 08ISP0
E9:ATIKS ?R'NRAr;S ErPEI;DiT'!Rc S Mt:HF.Y
�L!LY 1, 1995 - OECENBcF: 31 19'4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Y-0 BJA:AN'CE
BUI.fiET E};PENSE5 E.`:?Etq.= EkCL!r.3r�'CES 3E;":n IN I Kb
-----------------------------------------------------------------------=-----------------------------------
PUBLIC UTILITIES
WATER SERVICE
Erin'r:Earirig/Adeinisva,.or, r15,J40.00 .__,8,1.06 S„ .at.u0 3%92._43.94
rCL'r_E ur 30G 'Y Jti,bG�.JJ 4':,,
i:+�.L'1 4! a- :•t17 .JO 1 •b,c.a..�
2, 5 <3.95 1: 218, 35. 6
"ell Jr�Ei ati�n5 .. 5 9.00 .'•4.0 ,,
:on-erv; on .119.BO0.00 =9 5n6.25 27 230,233).7;,
T re atoeni 9.1,370.00 304 `6 5.;,l 33 46,286.59 570.417.47
-5istrintior, 602,520.00 .,°3,8:•7.24 50 298.052 7b
UL_nasr ServicE 227,699.00 55 106._1 24 111,99..79
Total nater Service 3,998,082.00 i,509'.265.65 39 390,168.59 2,038,654.76
SEWER SERVICE
Encineering{FB�iniStratian 1991576.35 59,505.82 29 18,'42.65 121,761.88
Collection 445,994.00 2148.973.01 55 657.119 196,163.80
Pre-Treatment 135.249.00 59,607.81 44 '.920.00 71,121.10
TrEatrxvt 1,1621616.63 703,06.81 39 264.954.00 794,345.82
Total Sauer Service 2,553,435.98 1,011.373.55 42 238,:;63.84 1,1'33,998.69
SOLi0 HASTE MANAGEMENT 905323.00 479021.68 52 43.241.32
WHALE ROCK RESERVOIR
Reservoir Operations 546,:55.00 351,1:5.63 e62,.511.!)0 183.189.37
Fishing Program 21100.00 21.705.31 100
Total Whale Rack Reservoir 549,055.00 33,820.94 66 2,^50.00 183,i84.C6
TOTAL PUBLIC UTILITIES 7,180,901.98 39051,540.71'2 42 680,:22.43 33459,678.83
8-11
CITY OF SAN LUIS OPISPO
OPEF.AT INN PRI-RAMS UPEaOITU E Uw,A'Y
JULY 1. 1994 - DECEMBER 3.1 i0%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YTD 'r: BALAi;CE
BUDSET EXPU3ES EY.PENDIED ENCUMERAN-6E3 ^:EMAIN US
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRANSPOR- TiLIN
STREETS AND ROOD CONTROL
StraEts-0ene r] :54,705.00 167 991. 3 42 10 979.93 :151007.:4
Str__ts-Fzveee�t 660q,4.6.,v 3?7,654,20 49 3-1,841.74
S:Gria's and Street LicCt5
Fiaod Control 61,096. C :1.`75,21 61
.e,.c
7.'Er•c n r tc t l c 4 '1cEri1n0 i 3.OE,.00 b 181.24
Iota? Street= 4 Find Control ±,c78,?55.00 703,301.73 46 10,974.93 884,573.34
Dperetions 8: Enferccment 6ES.=
TY OF 'N LUIS u:. P4
C'PER9.TInB F'Fv8nAC5 ESPEfiDsTURE SUMNFri'Y
LILY 1, 1994 - LECEKFER 31 1904
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Er.A,l
NCE
sU�AET E"p'EINSES E1:HN EL ENC's`..,PANCES REn�1N,1';y
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
!EiSRE, CULTURAL A. S5C1=L �E3t10E
Aloe pnr r,r 7-.N
GGi.:S,i 581 Ci5 Zvi!&i'_Ce5 3,Ut C. (1 963 32
•U36.J9
H2CraatlGn !7CniGlairaLi C•n 414.973.05 21!2.01:•t7 :a 2iL0].!."
,,:..aatien F'rr,.�rad.5
Aeneral Recreation =.580.00 251979.22 63 4260i'.18
Special InstrUnion 61.i11?.0'0 25 56.S? 37 41 "
IJ..•ii
r-, and " tinu= 5.1!1,00 j,i�9,`.;1 17 4.:0').43
Athletic LEag,es ic4,UA6.40 77,401.53 45. 91,6E4.11
�r'c C:a] EYente an nq n c-r 4c
„� .2. 31.50 le,, l v 31 30,401.`5
Sun and Fen 321,857.00 217,472.18 67 104 3gt,22
Aquatics Progras 170,520.00 991965.42 58 7i.A54.5S
Special Youth Services 80,000.0010 222. r
, 3d is
Maintenance Services
Landscape & Park Mair!tenaace 9671322.52 467,564.13 4S 11,9;!0.00 4E%.c52.39
5wi® Center Maintenance 212,63b.vU 83,682.77 39 189420.15
Tree Maintenance 173,711.00 771425.34 44 96.29"-.66
5?if Course292,336.00 12.2.432.47 48 149x91.5
Total Parks and Recreatior! 3,i-73,900.52 1,512,386.33 49 30,381'%i5 1,53+,434.44
CULTURAL SERVICES
Cultural Activities 75,500.00 73,100.00 96
Tntal Cultural Services 75,840.00 73400.00 96 ^,700.00
SOCIAL SERVICES
Huc;r; Relations Program 909054.00 4194'9.14 K. 39.429.00 3.'55.26
Horiele55 Shelter ln• 000-.00 609000.06 50
Total Socia] Services 210,054.00 107,439,14 51 991429.00 3,1a5.86
LEISURE, CULTURAL 4 SOCIAL SERVICE 3,359,754.52 19692,925.41 50 1.9,259.15 1,531,:1?.9U
B-73
?T} Jf JMI1 LU1. Eiii SPO .
ER '1't6 PBCjrr,pS EXPEis.9iiTtRE 6JwMcRY
JULY 1. :=•54 - BECEKiER 311 1454
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
}•id 1. N_§4rE
PUNS E:;P-1 S EX 'EI;i E9 Eti'._'N?F'Al CES F'Er'e?Nil u
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CuQ:i551CGc LVullti?EE cb,5C0.�!� 1c2,�9 ^6 •n,
C L774 :!
�. 2
hE6iIn ra ii Cl .1; o,„(1111 �115,ia+. .
De p §, 1 5,2:'3.11
v,i.i De VA E•pL_r!t ",.AV:1 2-5.x.0 V .a.,� ,.b� 50
„ _ b
L:_^'y Fa^c- rn7ar,r_ny _,5,2-4 00
?Ctai r' r.r,inp :2,i�7.4;. :`v1,i•4,6` 43 .s91.C��9 :.`
:RyiSeErLO, CJ,�i�.C'o 0'79,:-6.09 479
_SQ `.'•aiet'X §32,955.00 2131 o96.e< 19 215,258.33
LE•'ia'.r8Ct16h Deve!CPAEnt i,:'C,:44.(%U511 6'�' b"F.iC
..
ECOUN-MIC .E'JELOPYE6T
2e_:ceEE lmprnvexart Rreg 1;§,1411.42 '5'4,`22.'0' 88 !000 00 i6 b25.i2
`;,Gw-uni ly PrOC:tiv i•rinraii 2%S,Q5j c1
t , .en [. ! ,
e �
-i _ 19.08 _•015E8.-6
ECorJr.iC Sn5:,ity e '•'n / b a. 4.669.'•5 94 ,}
6,.v .JO iJ 41 i '^ 0 110
SZ'_E"tC Sa':Et}' C"e-red .Jars _:'C,t!?U.JJ 112:1 UCC.00
i•tal CCt'IIEM'C . r ,..v.. 44
'c AL C�"�JN7TY DUE OP"ENT 2 i3b ;;55.93 1 9•?' 410.24 46 15^ ;"�
B-14
C`71LUIS OB
C`-` F "N ISPO
:- _. �h A
"IFE-RATING �Ri_'L_IRA�S UPENDITURE SUMMARN
-3-JI-V .'_94 - -.-I I9Ci4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VT r,
E i.P UND E Ir, E NC P A K PEM N' N
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ON AND 7LICY
4 7c
3,40t,'O -6
3V
V
Ait.
cI'L A hnl�,;b4-'T9 L7-C.N
tv L�a;n:strs,lve Nficer
49
203,: :5.'.7�
2, .,54.3Jv1
'ubiic Wcrvs .'6rinisf r;tion "A6,132,C-5 156.:'9.03
TGici 9enpr;, gldunatration 7115.5E1.07
6 8,2?7.71 8 4,
14
LEGUAL HRVICES
City :attorney 24,),852.00 1'6,w-57.47 -It a 424,•94.505
CITY CLERK SERVICES
and Records 289,943.00 175.7,41.506 46
-1) 1100.00 3, V
46".,12 io
Elections
:0 tai
T City Clerk Servii2s M4jata,00 138,804.58 43 !@3 ';.42
GRGMA k I ERVI CES
F A4 narcal AftiniFt-at -.'•,:74.00 I-74.00 80.266.16 30
42,000.00 10,107.G.
France Revenue Management
42L84",0' 174,675.94 41 25.00 92
Fir-ance Accounlino 5091600.00 75,JSO.-4 56
3,7.0.0 130,49.66
in4ormation Sys-.tees ManageReit 288,904.00 11.41818.557 43 164,0K.43
Personnel AdKinis4ra'ion 325,114,07 11,911000.06 42 6.105.32 119.108.67
kcllne-s Program 39le7(1.18 0j"18.77 33 9,243,26 1111298.i5
;isk r.;r.;gmnt
.41.)04.71 87 !Ga 58@.2'9
,
755085.00 1155. .
25919 31 1,79, 7IJ
6
D'her Support -ervices _,.Sj
Total Gra?%:Etion Services 2,724,413.25 15525)0671.74 55 61,123.58 1,1I _25.93
BUILDINGS AND EQJIPP..ENT
Building Maintenance 47515(19.00 228,901.01 48 24t.607.99
VeniCie & EqdOACIt mint.
J541972.00 176,511.47 43 177,-460.53
Total juildirgs & Equipa.xt 929,91.00 40,412.4B 48 4424,068.E2
jUMAL SENERAL GOVERMENT 5,011,005.32 295M,377.85 51
TOTAL PKGRAIM EXPENDITURES 6.14 15,')63,722.87 47
B-15
i
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANR
-B-16.
Section C
FINANCIAL CONDITION SUMM MS
REVENUE PROJECTi%.AS
REVENUES BY MAJOR CATEGORY AND SOURCE
,5u 3 9•:?:r.:o.^.S.:i:S:'<t::::tR::, :.ro.: :^t'
:..:tr;...d.:::.•.'5y....,.,�.:...`.�%'vSf'.a�^1$,d:p•kG:vy.y:u.�:•.s�l.em::;xti<Yw:tr:.d..5ta..st:.J;v.?..3:¢,.,:aG:?>n'.S•..k':'::.,,:,;s..::..:n,Y5t.,.;..::.::,a::.:n,.,.:,::+?,..:.:.•::.+ynw.:R.,:.tt:,%.fv.'.y:t.i,r.:,3..r.t^:e:..':...:>.'.:E...\:i:�::...w:k.x�.;t..'tr:.;
.:,.,��:,X Cotr`:.a;:;:l,K:t3r?^.?`:eea...::,::.:.f:..•..Y.•.�.3...::a.it:ni::'...:..,.,k^^:.t:\;n...:.".:,..'.:'0 .:..:t>::•atr::.:k.�xY:r.:n.to.`v.t"``:a::::.'.::':..,`r�R::;.,�.:..`�.tIX.
0.1
.r:.;,:.n:trt.'t....fi,:�o.3...?.::'>n:.<trtrr.::,%:t3iac:i£3C`'aktr.k:•.;3.;`;6,•:?.;:,'t.:{•kk,:a::.wt.:3. `%..,'<$,•tiiw,^..Ytri3.:.,�,:':},,:3:'.s.:..� .rotrF.`.t?: :o- +'wk,'M:.•'S:3::,.i:b,k•i:`?.•:,�:i:,x:%w...;::.::V:;:t+.'i�+:..:>
::+,.c:..ia..:ti..tr;:;;:r:..:''k.•r.'
3trr5'.F..•,,..
..
S t. •tr> \
.t3:..atrG'6:,,.:r......,�:,:o:�.: .^1�,:.rp^;c No,..a.25�'.:w:'�':>h •o: @:::t+k6:te: },:tfk;sw4;n.t; 'nbo,��:, `:;�t?tr:xtr�.
GENERAL FUND
Tax Revenues
Sales&use tax
General 6,029,900 6,388,500 6,400,000 11,500
Public safety(Proposition 172) 106,700 129,000 129,000 0
Property tax
General 3,647,500 3,866,100 3,743,400 (122,700)
Teeter plan 515,600
Transient occupancy tax 2,337,100 2,614,800 2,470,000 (144,800)
Utility users tax 2,698,100 2,730,000 2,850,000 120,000
Franchise tax 714,200 826,100 730,000 (96,100)
Business tax certificates 746,800 756,000 775,000 19,000
Real property transfer tax 84,900 75,000 85,000 10,000
Total Tax Revenues 16,880,800 17,385,500 17,182,400 (203,100)
Licenses and Permits
Construction permits 359,800 297,500 410,000 11200
Other licenses&permits 17,200 21,000 21,000 0
Total Licenses and Permits 377,000 318,500 431,000 112,500
Fines and Forfeitures
Vehicle code fines 55,200 75,100 75,100 0
Other fines and forfeitures 58,400 100,000 80,000 (20,000)
Total Fines and Forfeitures 113,600 175,100 155,100 (20,000)
Investment and Property Revenues
Investment earnings 606,900 398,300 398,300 0
Rents&concessions 20,300 15,000 15,000 0
Total Investment and Property Revenues 627,200 413,300 413,300 0
Subventions and Grants
Motor vehicle in-lieu 1,559,700 1,424,300 1,450,000 25,700
Homeowners&other property taxes in-lieu 72,800 72,500 72,500 0
Trailer coach in-lieu 1,700 15,000 1,700 (13,300)
Other in-lieu taxes
Water Fund 26,900 27,400 27,400 0
Housing Authority 10,700 10,900 10,900 0
FEMA Reimbursement 92,700 92,700
SB 90 reimbursements 55,300 20,000 20,000 0
Police training(POST) 44„300 46,800 46,800 0
Other grants 43,600 10,000 (33,600)
Total Subventions and Grants 1,771,400 1,660,500 1,732,000 71,500
C-1
REVENUE PROJECI vjNS
REVENUES BY MAJOR CATEGORY AND SOURCE
.r$..,, ..,YAS "{....'.r.:. :.s
S::::s .:q:;kvi';k:..: .::s.;:._ik:i;,: .,::ks.<.,.. •.;.i:x•:•.
...k+ .i:'y.::• ..v.. a:;.{ ..:,.::}.':i?'. ...i;:'k"'; ::c:v.
'•'YC`g:'. •::c:.. ...i.
. vj +n.....c:i:. :is: ..f.v. ...�;y'`... `><.. ,A:' ,'��:;x;,:•:.. .:ti':;.:i:;:r.:i?+;Lv
i\ ?'[:i+IX:)QQ., .h�}•>' ::,,�':•." R�'O •�•::, 55
e{i' Y .k. ,:.ynisiLk,.{.,.n t.: "�+.+.::�\.r. :.�.. x.:p,>:.`::)i.<.ii�nk;^i:C: �; +�`n*;S•ki,..:•p:a:
vyk:i 'i
.ets, .. �` kk..�x;�;;.:i:'.:'v:::i:rx.... >.ti':i v vv:' :8io,;:;tC+,>$:.?§i;!°::• �i �:y;:..';�:. }:iii<k:'i;::�•.xS;; ,..k:nsiy;i
.np., .s ....,..x. • �. a...; ov::.c.�,. .'i::.C::'i:k:ioi':i:C:i:'i'k%:`v;^..ik:.s:S:C':'. :2::•ii':;:s:�....i's:i::.:c;n:t:
$ 'ft .:y; 4s+6:;`:c::i�'sRx:). :?x xn,o' v•:o.°:: .<... ,..:i:., ttsh `."ti::ii>: .kk::i is?:i:
:.oi)io:ii tw,',Sk:C''.,:x:L. " 2'J:>7,'��..,. \:i:.4:, ,rS�;. .s..nC'�i4,.y..:i iS i:..i;:ki`.':.e�TM:•,>.':' ::`�Ji:;s:jy::`.$i `•:i.. ;.+4.,.:.:i..
tik,� .y fi•.;'�x ,vk. :\�°:F'.. ,:rbe'i';,,.t,< �{u';.:..: :,.� :�:' ,v,>S �,++� y£:`�i•+�i?fi�, .:..:.,.. '�`> h.:x:£.'ax'.�, ..o,�.
§.;y�� ++.$:$tt,X,::,. ;:.R:lk;+y�C'.�:. ,i>i'�.,,,,,.i. M. ,i L7; arN" '+F..+vu.. S s,$•.C;.Y•;{?'.: �` ::.o.. F,C.'tik.;:.o+,:. kb8'
.t :u `i`f;. .o:A.a:.'c, ..,y::"k:..:•+'�: ,k:.�:i>o.,A's., �y..�:::.G:`ib�x:' h:i, #+.?+dia>a1�. 'se`:.;dL.v .:xc:0. .+'�k'{S:. }.
i:S:r. ..y',F�;:: :'y;.>:.x::iz:k;.;:::.k�::iy. rF.c:o ,3'.. <$:>...k;.\93i:J i,..d?�kks ;:. :w. •'y''. :C,4Q�'.':�c...,.�x•:.. s.<.,:::t, :.�Lc:i�Y:•,:'
.......xokr:t;...s\k:;.;...sv..'<,3�..:.....�� .n,u..::..s:sS::.." S*a;+.'k,is?:;;:5:. :<. ..ka:•:>:c
x.
GENERAL.FUND continued
Service Charges
Planning fees 107,700 110,000 110,000 0
Sales of publications 14,500 5,000 8,000 3,000
Police services
Crossing guards 20,000 45,000 45,000 0
Other police services 79,400 109,000 98,100 (10,900)
Fire services
Cal Poly fire services 101,000 100,000 100,000 0
Weed&lot cleaning 5,400 0 30,000 30,000
Other fire services 105,600 107,700 118,500 10,800
Public Works services
Engineering fees 40,400 39,700 45,600 5,900
Maintenance of State highways 23,700 30,000 30,000 0
Zone 9 reimbursements 28,300 0 62,000 62,000
Recreation services
Athletic fees 128,600 147,700 130,000 (17,700)
Instruction fees 79,300 112,100 55,000 (57,100)
Special event fees 43,600 68,200 43,600 (24,600)
Rental&use fees 26,200 20,400 28,000 7,600
Day care 250,600 260,500 310,500 50,000
Trips&outings 12,900 40,700 3,000 (37,700)
Aquatics 125,600 144,500 125,600 (18,900)
CCCJPA reimbursements 74,200 41,600 41,600 0
Other service charges 18,600 22,000 22,000 0
Total Service Charges 1,285,600 1,404,100 12406,500 2,400
Other Revenues
Payroll revolving fund 380,900
PERS refunds 7,700 363,700 359,900 (3,800)
Liability&workers comp insurance refunds 83,300 21,800 34,400 12,600
Other revenues 101,100 30,000 30,000 0
Total Other Revenues 573,000 415,500 424,300 81800
Total General Fund $21,628,600 $21772,500 $21,744L600 (27,900)
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Business Improvement Area (BIA) Fund
Investment and Property Revenues 2,100 2,000 2,000 0
Service Charges 208,200 125,100 146,000 20,900
Total BIA Fund 210,300 127,100 148,000 20,900
C-2
REVENUE PROJECTiUNS
REVENUES BY MAJOR CATEGORY AND SOURCE
vitt E' v: :i::Y::i:::&.Y':S3d:; :a?.r.k•: 'S.. '''Mdk:a ` '$•?:
yyff :aiC:v:i.vvf.n.n .C•�..... ,..F;•.. :Y i. �;:::C tiC::Vii::Y 'a
.,,C'r•? ; ^E:»,. .ak'#sf\.,. ,.urn$#..{`'•.:SY iS.x, .:c f:2•.o,{,$:;....a.. #:�'tark:,:yc ri:Yt:: :•:F +..:•cr:".l:bn•:
2r:pr'�``. +S>c' v.,;. Sti:Y.. .a c.: :t;n:.ai •.
tO'1`g.;2f2.•M1i..fi\...f4Y..i:..y.Y:x vfi.K.'.a.„a..�..#;I:nYt.:,vqy+$:Y:,¢L:.t:;v:R:'..`a.:r:#:'r..n::..:•rYYy'.„}..nnS;Sr::..C..,.a\wtx..Yun.:.:rtK..,.t a<;y'§v,..,.t'r;:r;n..,#;a3f;.ra{:'�'.::S:�,:.a�.;�.:..;.rx.:.k;:.v....t».<>:ka.).•):i'�2Y'.vv...::.;f�'v'Nr�1•.:aaYn.;YD.R�:�'Yof;;::fl.r.:'oy•r.:„.....a..,•�fiY`tY.?;...�,..ia:4.:..t;:.::t....a..y::.$$..F:..,'Y.'rv#..ryn.>;,.v:i:;t,;Y.;T..;n.:.::$.a#."..£:u.A.;#.;ti.a.:n':{::r:t:.v.a.:r.:,:..m:":o+.:i.•::;�...>^'.:..¢YFv.,...:::.a.Y.yt..:.:N..,.:v:..:Y.....::»:.:...:cYo.::'.n..Y,t i:.''fi'::$.�n...a:$:...•.>:'s.:5. .$tY:'q'.fb•'Y;.S::;n�.•t.\,;.:a
`::Yy....:.a:.fi..e.+,..�tL.:4.t.r::•:}.."F,',s..Y<u.o..°•.f.`»'�;,'.°
.rr.;fd;:^:»xU.t�:ra..:.,3;:i':..a.,r:4Sw::.r>;A;'h.:'{#t•..�f2j.K�:};.2:Y.e.;�
zu,oz.a..��3;°:$•:9.:..<'•,.r+a�v
> ?�.�.Y0c'`:
".,�;:A:>:f.•§:3$:',f.ice)$:"n'.•:'o7N:,i:,7N�:w".�;`.Y'S'kt;•:ce:^.?Y'"�";k.::+:.no:<a:�,:»'',Y•:r.c[';°.i;:,:2'::Rexr..:.Va.sS;.Y?S,Y....n iO:.
:.:..::
'�:•k:.aY;rx%'QR.<a..'.3k.i.r:i..;.
:
•:x. fi.::. :rtau.fi::.rNYn.;
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS cont'd
Community Development Block Grant Fund
Subventions and Grants 857,500 857,500 0
Gas Tax Fund
Subventions and Grants 789,200 781,400 815,000 33,600
Transportation Development Act Fund
Subventions and Grants 16,700 17,800 17,800 0
CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
Capital Outlay Fund
Subventions and Grants
State of California
Transportation partnership program 175,100
Proposition 116 400,000 400,000
Headquarters Fire Station Grant 611,000 611,000
Federal Government
Surface transportation program(STP) 280,000 820,000 540,000
FEMA reimbursement 76,800 76,800
Transportation enhancement
activities(TEA) 150,000 150,000
Highway and bridges rehabilitation and
replacement(HBRR) 20,000 67,000 47,000
Service Charges
Zone 9 Reimbursements 190,000 150,000 (40,000)
Resident park fees 34,500 34,500 0
Street services 14,300 25,000 25,000 0
Other Revenues
Assigned FAU from other agencies 20,000 20,000 0
Contributions 20,000 20,000 20,000 0
Sale of surplus property 250,000 485,000 235,000
Other Revenues 19,100 0
Total Capital Outlay Fund 228,500 839,500 2,859,300 2,019,800
Parkland Development Fund
Investment and Property Revenues 128,400 120,000 120,000 0
Subventions and Grants - Parklands Act 0 100,000 100,000
Service Charges
Park In-Lieu Fees 22,600 5,000 5,000 0
Dwelling Unit Tax 15,800 15,000 15,000 0
Total Parkland Development Fund 166,800 140,000 240,000 100,000
Equipment Replacement Fund
Investment and Property Revenues 80,700 120,000 96,000 (24,000)
Other Revenues
Sale of Surplus Property 29,000 20,000 51,400 31,400
Non-Governmental Contributions 181.100
Total Equipment Replacement Fund 290,800 140,000 147,400 7,400
TOTAL-GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS $23,330,900 $24,675,800 $26,829,600 $2,153,800
C-3
REVENUE PROJECTwNS
REVENUES BY MAJOR CATEGORY AND SOURCE
o. :k�,;>sod.":'. jn>� isk�:yuvk•s:;?'ssv:::::v.s:ii::R:;;' ;{fi3:is r ::'.c` k,:i4,.s.f,:aiii:;:is •..:s..
+f-0'�"•• n:MeCi.i%''. .3i,:vJ .Cii}Wi`�'..:ip` :;V'.4.x:(f:: Jn%;s;ny. �}.� `Vn(3`3::3 i::4:::{3:ki"' ^:\<i`!:'v�:'
a A.:°<:k3:c+nirr �'�s`', :c>r.K9�'.W:.` '.»:k.v yr '';»: ti;'iYv,.'+::.�.r.::,A.`..vv4i:i:.>:;r.;:s.: `.:3Rk•.Sx
�. w;;',°^ ..w�,x ;;::.,. :eC.. ^;lY �'$ v:;c...,:.,yr. ;.o,;.,..rY.,...uK'...c.•: 7V,...�6'.ab w.•:w. ..as>o:.. .r+\kcb:':."wGY(.$`•c ^ki}}
.,'.v., x'+�f'..,. .•v::y.,:3" n,;.(.:,§` .`'.ti2"::::v':?i�v3::3:i::Y:s..ik;..0 a:'.:sc:: .:Y r.to..va.. ...Y.•.w:o. .:�.`, k;rn:ac.'%"Ck".':c:#+.tin c.
::;.^.:>s.::r:off' :.::::::i`:{':.. ',Gt.,:;':•:.s:::.^.: ;p;£
:C'i ':a:.
,.Si.. .;i•i � ,s::+ fk':i n :R2.�:i ''::L:,' i:F' .4 Rb:• ;C::� ":i:kb
�.i'$. ;' ...;
:'�: ''�Q`iC:':�.
S` .,k, ..e.r ,;:,�, ..:k;.: :..i;+,kQ. .":,+� `.3 r.}.::ir.:. ..,E:o;.;4e.;r.::; ``vi :$i k`is.cn k .;�`• ;tri,
r:R:,`,kk4^' 'iS..a'y ":\:R:39 ::c+ 't ..C.. •s{..,.. ..�. + iA:S+or 2".
S: �'-0�v..'. :y. 'oro: .:�..<t�,.ix.'kvs:3:` ':i?:. .:?Ys.' u`?: s`>`i'6!. :::9t`•.,: "�'•.�..c.. ..:ke .
. .34�.0;.x.w^..:•• ; ;..�s!p:!aLo.:..'.. r,'?�r�.k <3$:4,�r;... r;y "u•.*:,;: ��;�: .u.. a.:aQr�i3 :.;t s:s. 6�;3C.#5..x$:3'
ENTERPRISE & AGENCY FUNDS
Water Fund
Investment and Property Revenues 520,500 250,000 350,000 100,000
Subventions&Grants - FEMA Reimbursement 0 7,800 7,800
Service Charges 6,050,700 7,322,500 7r 322,500 0
Other Revenues- PERS Refund 76,400 32,800 32,800 0
Total Water Fund 6,647,600 7,605,300 7,713,100 107,800
Sewer Fund
Investment and Property Revenues 19,000 25,000 0 (25,000)
Service Charges 4,935,900 5,632,700 5,632,700 0
Other Revenues- PERS Refund 97,700 37,300 37,300 0
Total Sewer Fond 5,052,600 5,695,000 5,670,000 (25,000)
Parking Fund
Fines and Forfeitures 495,300 468,000 468,000 0
Investment and Property Revenues 166,300 200,000 200,000 0
Service Charges 1,244,800 1,.350,000 1,350,000 0
Other Revenue - PERS Refund 8,000 8,000 0
Total Parking Fund 1,906,400 2,026,000 2,026,000 0
Transit Fund
Investment and Property Revenues 1,700 5,000 5,000 0
Subventions and Grants 1,406,000 1,102,500 1,665,400 562,900
Service Charges 335,700 230,000 319,000 89,000
Other Revenues - PERS Refund 3,300 3,300 0
Total Transit Fund 1,743,400 1,340,800 1,992,700 651,900
Golf Fund
Investment and Property Revenues 3,400 3,600 3,600 0
Service Charges 329,000 404,400 301,000 (103,400)
Other Revenues- PERS Refund 4,400 4,400 0
Total Golf Fund 332,400 412,400 309,000 (103,400)
Whale Rock Commission
Investment and Property Revenues 13,600 10,000 10,000 0
Subventior--&Grants - FEMA Reimbursement 0 6,800 6,800
Service ChLzges 478,200 626,600 776,600 150,000
Total Whale Rock Commis ion Fund 491,800 636,600 793,400 156,800
Total Enterprise &Agency Funds $16,174,200 $17,716,100 $18,504300 788,100
TOTAL - ALL FUNDS $39,505,100 $42,391,900 $45,333,800 $2,941,900
C-4
COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATING PROGRAM EXPENDITURES
33•{' L':':;\'l kAS{i,: ...:3.3:}. �'\tr i3:x' .::3::!::;':C..
,...\ , .f�.fikk!... .... ...n ....: :....v,...v .....: ::3:::'.... :.:...•n.vn.v .i3'3 ni%.YY:v}:vf:..... .3.3.{::}:C::.'k .%
,:)."}. .avi N.: w .''4}+`•�.>,)- f#;`Q. 33':,. .r:')i::;:3.{;.:<Cs..,r ::.a:r;r+ ".3%;.3,��� �y a.f,r3 ':�'». ,.
.. .:.3:L) :.• ;,f, }.xf. �{�;�,: ak�'P(/>.Lr;Y:.,.3.,.:,:,$i2.. :`V. ::2y: !� :.,u.';..
S4. Sf' s:: :;.f.:::�..s... +�v :,*.D.:, ':: :. ...:::'.. 3:..: ;c:S:rvt `L.xG?• iX:'.'.r':x..+3:
!.i:' 3'a. ,S9n :).{.,^.':�:<::k<"oY:3;.;o`.t:::.::a;+,,.4.n'�q:`.�:.:..:.3.i:.i:{kkk+'.Y':3"'•:.. a. n:::.�.i'.::::k..,'.. (.,^.3�^3v::^3-'.!>/•}.,.u:V`'3ae''a,Y3.{C.} p,%. w,tt )}f :3. ...
, "I". f� .n, "k.3`jk:. ...r AL,.C.: .4 k:n .vv..:x 3; +tC.. ..Y,"�,m ::.�w :w{':3'3`::.*+v::,}.�>.�. 'I:':i., f;`. 3:3�.$,•<`{bX•::t4:. :� J:� 3'.>v�;.:""Cv U4.,�yv�.k.' .\,"
+'-0'k'o ..�'C`�.r.'.;�':Y•r�'at`aEs�' 3:;3'�S: Af}:�C;�)°::rE"i:S+,3�;Yf:�3.�`. ,;cf.. rf:ot,�`°...'+,j�. t+Y''.':' ""t'�x L°:.r:a:�t<ii':"s'�.{:$k�`�
Public Safety 9,973,800 70,300 69,800 64,700 .10,178,600
Public Utilities 6,791,500 367,000 173,500 30,000 7,362,000
Transportation 3,185,800 131,200 (6,100) 3,310,900
Leisure,Cultural&Social Services 3,353,000 14,300 (7,600) 47,500 3,407,200
Community Development 2,612,400 102,300 21,600 7,600 2,743,900
General Government 4,793,7.00 169,400 47,400 16,900 5,027,400
Total Combined Statement of
Operating Program Expenditures $30,710,200 $854,500 $298,600 $166,700 $32,030,000
r.,
3•.
Budget Amendments
Operating Other Revenue
Encumbrances Carryovers Changes Offsets Total
GENERAL FUND
Public Safety 15,100 55,200 60,400 9,500 140,200
Solid Waste 4,000 11,600 400 16,000
Transportation 56,500 11,800 6,200 74,500
Leisure,Cultural&Social Services 91000 4,000 (81500) 4,500
Community Development 3,900 89,100 (8,400) 84,600
General Government 31,800 147,400 45,700 1,700 226,600
Total General Fund 63,800 363,800 101,400 17,400 546,400
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
ASSOCIATION FUND 9,300 30,000 39,300
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Water 64,000 261,100 10,600 335,700
Sewer 25,200 11,000 36,200
Parking 13,400 52,800 1,900 68,100
Transit (26,000) (26,000)
Whale Rock 1,100 151,500 152,600
Golf 900 900
Total Enterprise Funds 102,600 315,000 149,900 0 567,500
TOTAL $175,700 $678,800 $281,300 $17,400 $1,153,200
.... :.:..:..::.
Other Revenue
Purpose Chances Offsets Total
MOA Adjustments 158,300 158,300
Weed Abatement Program 9,500 9,500
City Hall Display Case 1,700 1,700
Replace Damaged Traffic Signal 6,200 6,200
ransit Operating Savings (27,000) (27,000)
Whale Rock Pumping Charges 150,000 150,000
Total $291,300 $17,400 $298,700
C-5
OPERATING PROGRAMS
EXPENDITURES BY PROGRAM - PUBLIC SAFETY
IMMUNE
. .. . .... g
....... ..
m9nlll
=IONIC
POLICE PROTECTION
Administration 692,300 55,200 5,800 753,300
Support Services 1,028,500 1,100 1,029,600
Investigation 684,500 1,100 685,600
Patrol 3,518,200 5,100 3,523,300
Total Police Protection 5,923,500 55,200 13,100 0 5,991,800
FIRE &ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
Administration 214,000 7,900 221,900
Emergency Response 3,230,000 12,100 64,700 3,306,800
Hazard Prevention 340,300 5,400 15,600 361,300
Training Services 41,000 9,700 50,700
Technical Services 196,600 21,100 217,700
Disaster Preparedness 28,400 28,400
Total Fire&Environmental Safety 4,050,300 15,100 56,700 64,700 4,186,800
TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY $9,973,800 $70,300 $69,800 $64,700 S10178600
C-6
OPERATING_PROGRAMS
EXPENDITURES BY PROGRAM - PUBLIC UTILMIES
v...s.. ♦ v t'}:::•:::5:;:::isc:s.}iv}.s}'i•;}:.}'. :'. .::'. ,r.s+. :o�
...r.nUv
....., .ca+.. .. ,.. ......f. ... ...... v�4..::i. :...,... ,::ii i"C ..xs0�}.i :di'e:.w ir.Sl}•,w: :f:k,.�
t}c+ {f: :. .n3:s`Y'to..`,' � +k.:`,:.Sx•kk.a', r..s..
{
..n:.}:. .'.x.y.}'s}'r.:tt: ;9.'tki.: �.�:':E •iicc�ti
-. °d`�€.v .♦r. ,,.ate}:e:2. kik'
...rr.. ...3ot•.r�;.
r.x..z}v....,f.>,$f..a,.:,.:::>t:}.::....:.
:. o :...0r. }`$g .�'.:.:.)r........:: :.. � . . 't'>., <.s:a:;,.•.:. .: s..o:' :.
/Y): ,::9c K.(xw ,..}.ky...aa.. v. .,<.s .T.. .::CXc'Y.. y'1:y: x:.av ";:..' ,:::63,o?}n•:k
:.pr c..,cSi.O.. ,.y ,or:'..+:`R` . '. ,ak: ...,},`.: ::t'+`,+:;:. Y"t k'3,'
}x.',6.x°w}::., }:,rt•:c}':::,
.o.s:.}.. ,s:. :.3. G}};:,;'t.o.::. :. .,.:}};:x.}:::u:. :i...v:.'k.o:: ..v:.::v.:..
.Y.. h... ;.+. n�.. >.y::::q}:...�.v iryYt,v �,::�.:Axn Fn.:.:n.'..�.:. ....... .:'...}vy.: .
I.....}..�..'.... $�
.y ..'Y.:.taayye� *,'tN,:`,•:'::,".., xk t...6'. .L'
r n,. c'. :i}}.CS, ..o.. .a:,. .vNi.Y..?a. .'+:F:k�.s;k:y ^,^.L:O .¢>6' :::5.+S�x ♦,ff
.,..x.}:..a' :.::..Y:S.}."^ o;;}:a.•:..• :.>;nn':.. '��::X.. :3'� �:.u`k:::. .t. ':.}R' .:A.+:,::<}}`:.�:•�.
:k'. "F•>,^^• is<:n'::2}.':<:,x''.'<':?F.� .r.0..,.;0.., :>a" �s"o ..x.�':Jf:3n;h... .::a.. "`$:,^::k�£;}i♦4.}'. '.4 r.w;Fg�.. ,..i�..
^:; ....t}:+:*:e k •Jk<;v¢:�k<:?:;.'
}}v:,,,...'�::}.
WATER:SERVICE
Water Source of Supply 959,600 959,600
Groundwater Supply 254100 500 252,600
Water Conservation 269;500 50,300 319,800
Water Treatment 917;700 3,700 921,460
Water Distribution 535;900 64;000 2,600 602,500 '
Water customer Service 226,500 1,200 .227,700
Water Administration/Engineering 501,100 210;800 2,600 _ 114,500
Total Water Service 3,662,400 . 325,100 10,600 U 3,998,100
WASTEWATER SERVICE
Wastewater Collection 443,600 .2,400 446,000
Wastewater Pretreatment 133,800 1,400 135,200
Wastewater Treatment&Disposal 1,749,700 6;300 6,600 1,762;600
Wastewater Admin/Engineering 180;100 18,900- - _ 660 199,600
Total Wastewater Service 2,507,200 25,200 11,000 6' 2,543,400
WHALE ROCK RESERVOIR
Reservoir Operations 544,960 151,500 696,400
Fishing Program 2;700 -- 1,100 3,800
Total Whale Rock Reservoir 547,600 1,100 151,500 - 700.200
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
Solid Waste Management 74,300 15,600 400 30,000 120,300
TOTAL PUBLIC UTILITIES . $6,191,560 $367,000 $173,500 $30,000 $7 362 000
C-7
OPERATING PROGRAMS
EXPENDITURES BY PROGRAM - TRANSPORTATION
5:;:•f .k3.:+; ,'c'SCOsi+�'iiA6:'Y`ic....:::�';c ::,,}:+:,
2. :3 iC4i:p ,•4••.
..w•.a}n: .>. Y".?:{•� ��`:a�:�:J:`:,...,..;•:{:�:.
s:�;:rs... ,:.F:..x..:L`.'s: x...,n....4:
+t. : .. �`... : ..:,•J..Y..fF34,A.. :n �. } n.: .. ... ..., .�.v. ...
.S.
v y. ��. nn..n .::�t 43..v.J......,n•...> :.Fn..:::'.h,,.:rf. .nnk .. { A.. .:fi'�i ..'{•x• 4:;({• �\ 1.... .),
})v n. vv .1., .}+..���v�:�v...:� �:.;:r .:}.x.. }.:A; ����..}}rx4:iJ::: ., •:;ti:rJ �..{,:i:::• a,:Y:,:>{::{'y..
:..;. :;...: �.: .+. '.\`J`ya:. �• .'o-':.:,..r{:: .:;.43;°<. .�.k�.?:.?..:.., .... .,.... .'4Ks:. � ;:::k:3;•; is?:s:: a.:k:::. � s':.a�'s}.
..::. � „G� .. E. ......:.. .. f.. .nu... , .x.,.;s}va#y:;;:.:{...i,.,...�,n.�'.+i•:;•;..',.....:..:.�,.:.'.:'....[., yQ��'�� pp �y y�yC �q
...�. n�.. �4.... ..i. �`�. 3D+ LYC`; S +t.w F.x...a.. n\... •:.Vt�v v.3:4: �4:.F:�\s:v,�Q':h ixr ,..��: :,.5•'i. FlA�k':a .'{'vi
v��� •.vJ.:.w::).i'r,:+�;{.n .:�C.: :QAv .'ie. �:\i:,.:�qn .G.. n.v,:�::,J^.\.3}i"L. t � ..
..L..�. '�":� .O :q.:C::3.: a.:.i::{:.:;.:,:§:i::{l{5•.'•'".,v'::i�`�:£:;'.';`•;{}kr r};Y,..o ...} :..,;,�, 4 � s.,:
<^g. .,:.svc. � ��. ,:F.�;,.. ~:<.:.. :.:::a�: ':, ,u. ::. ... .1i�4;t": .a.r r.'�y$eJw:. SK ..;; •� s.
TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT
Planning&Engineering 153,900 20,100 1,700 175,700
STREETS AND FLOOD CONTROL
S;._. ., 0
Pavement 621,600 36,400 2,500 660,500
General 388,000 6,800 394,800
Traffic Signals& Street Lights 365,100 8,500 6,600 380,200
Flood Control 67,300 400 67,700
Total Streets& Flood Control 1,442,000 44,900 16,300 0 1,503,200
PARSING
Operations,Maint&Enforcement 620,700 66,200 1,900 688,800
MUNICIPAL TRANSIT SYSTEM
Operations and Maintenance 969,200 (26,000) 943,200
TOTAL TRANSPORTATION $3,185,800 $131,200 ($6,100) $0 $3,310,9(Y
C-8
OPERATING PROGRAMS
EXPENDITURES BY PROGRAM - LEISURE, CULTURAL & SOCIAL SERVICES
51-W
mg
g . . ......
'oXg
0.
MX w....
M 0 rm.-�....... . ...........E. ..,
IME WR 0 •
PARKS AND RECREATION
Commissions&Committees 3,000 3,000
Recreation Programs
Recreation Administration 412,400 2,600 415,000
General Recreation 1.34,300 300 134,600
Aquatics 170,900 (100) 170,800
Special Instruction 67,100 67,100
Trips&Outings 17,500 17,500
Athletic Leagues 168,500 600 169,100
Special Events 49,000 49,000
Day Care 321,400 500 47,500 369,400
Special Youth Services* 80,000 80,000
Golf Course Operations&Maint 291,400 900 292,300
Maintenance Services
Landscape&Park Maint 956,300 8,000 3,000 967,300
Swim Center Maintenance 225,300 3,500 (16,200) 212,600
Tree Maintenance 172,900 800 173,700
Total Parks and Recreation 3,070,000 11,500 (7,600) 47,500 3,121,400
CULTURAL SERVICES
Cultural Activity Grants 75,800 75,800
SOCIAL SERVICES
Human Relations 87,200 2,800 0 90,000
Homeless Shelter* 120.000 120,000
Total Social Services 207,200 2,800 0 0 210,000
TOTAL LEISURE, CULTURAL&
SOCIAL SERVICES $3,353,000 $14,300 ($7,600) $47,500 !3 I072200
New Community Development Block Grant(CDBG)program beginning 1994-95
C-9
OPERATING PROGRAMS
EXPENDITURES BY PROGRAM - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
.L.,`.,"C":.;rK;}.,...s.,?.R::.F:,.F, '.�.`,,.w.,y ,;�.nit §�,f %i';ik:,£ $.,v,raf.< f• :ck ..4t... .'a�.::
............
.....
.r i.. :w: 'c:f•.:tvr;::..::...rc<>:.,:;r.V.. 'rr..':v's,.•:<t.r.y s..� .:,'4,.;r .:of... ..t:.rC ... �4:.;.s`J,f '.ti svv •`:J
ii r i:Jir':..'v.:: v:'i��f� +f$:�:"ljiQ.r:t'•rr.
i?+'ifl.i:.;k.Y.:i:::;R?�.,.:v�?;x:Rfit`x;.'+;p.y,: :yg. ..:is<��':p': ;5 'ti'`w�`:r k:�'•t.^':vH:j.. a�>}.,. ..rfir:y`'.
,; s. ,..:..w,...>.,:.:.t.::3 'r9:w:...; ,..K:. .. v.o^rSS'2v."�".,.•:;Qs::+t.. f.:?,:2}:°f..:'%r•;,.:: ..:?:,j%, ..�:r .'h,. ..:.C`:,.'F„�.o,:. r ': :
',.. .. .r..:., +r..`3 *' ::...)..... A nc ..,;.:n:a•fi;:�::�;tr•c'.:r:.>3:Xr�'i' ,,�>• :.p.�'nyr.:e ? •n,i:9::,ei>,,:,..r:.::r.:.$: .r;,:.:.9:$E'�J. ,�.,Y;,�,,. .., '.
+\�^r. , L'�)t kw, y v.�+, +r .,rv,.;:�': w�. O:\:v .$i, .rfa:oi:.�f...';vif:k t".:',#o' »'�> •r,`f ;,'d`..x.,cr �'{<.,.x ,•: a:;�'Y n:.r w}
:r•..f.:r, ...,"', {. .:t .r+w...; •. ?.. t`$`,. �f}` .xj. •:.itr:if`:'��:'"'' A
PLANNING
Commissions&Committees 26,900 26,900
Community Development Admin 357,000 12,000 5,900 7,600 482,500
Development Review 242,500 2,500 245,000
Long Range Planning 246,200 28,100 900 275,200
Total Planning 872,600 40,100 9,300 7,600 929,600
CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT
Building and Safety 427,700 2,5W 2,800 433,000
Engineering 756,100 9,500 765,600
Total Construction Development 1,183,800 2,500 12,300 0 1,198,600
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Business Improvement Area(BIA) 134,800 9,300 30,000 174,100
Community Promotion 301,200 3,900 (30,000) 275,100
Economic Stability 46,500 46,500
Seismic Safety Deferred Loan Prog• 120,000 120,000
Total Economic Development 556,000 59,700 0 0 615,70'
TOTAL COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT $2,612,400 $102,300 $21,600 $7,600 S2,743,900
' New CDBG program for 1994-95
C-10
OPERATING PROGRAMS
EXPENDITURES BY PROGRAM - GENERAL GOVERNMENT
: R.... :: :. ..;..:c}:;::'i;.}.,.}•:K::k::2#'ik:::" r.i}:t:t}i'>:k%t'..' ,:.}}
.v. ., .....v... ..:......:..:....} .:..:,..: ....r:c>:�:.::.. :n;::.::::::..:.::: n•..r.}v..., r.o.. ..a `».vr:. .t:
n, .. >.#�: ...�,.>.f.i:..r.::b..........c .. ...: ...:..t.\...:::.:.......: ....o:. .. . ::.o...:.....::..::.... :x., `;t5o:.n:.u... •fs't:;3: .S:f;:0..wa:>.x':'iknf.•,c
;:.�.:.t;..v.tL:.:. .:, .:}:n.r.,v....t•. :}:,::?.:::,.:.r .'�..:.:.v:::n,m;.... ...v C::, ..t:. ::}.un ;k:a..":if +.tbf.::::: ,k.:..c:.#.,�:ti.2<.i63...uR:o yy....n0kt{:::}:
v;.
•.q}n;r
.t:.. �..: ,.:h. �,v'�',........ :..y: p... �+r. c.+J?•�,` :AoL:t�,.>.9>Gk'. ..,:}ti}: :.t,�b{,+n.$. .x;: "t�;.of,.i::,:Le.o :ac' •,;:*%}� :mfv.;:k:.::
;t:x..}::.}'ai:::S$}:c:}.int :'iS : .;'S• .�} ..,d . y� ...'�..�. .':+,f. .'�';v:{•n•• j���i� ::-0St::'�;#:��.
�` 'b'. '^>Yr 3e:0�::.}^*•}'»,.;}:.: \ ".3';>�'��:�..'�.:.. .+f.�':`i<..�': a:$k;..".iYVluf:..2:R}>$::t'i. �!!''�:,��,�'k.
�$+� •. ka '�e03k� .r�..f.x+l•'J:. :di:j�:.;A;<.�., :.,b:. :.}}:..r,...c:cnY.:f,�:c`+k4,'�k.,s..k. :.<:t:.,..i 3...:.u.�,p rv�:.::.: c;>:a...i r..O..:.f:.a}.:::......::::..o.c..rr..::::n..d;,t :t:s:
:,*:fct�p. r Q:.tori}•..�$J�:�'': :::�:. n,. :f :>;. ..Mka+; v�`,.�v+'ia::•.�?c}.:;::t•:: na.::}:e �x...:ss. .:.O,i�ne'nr.}::
:..•. ,}��.pp b:k �t33. 5:.:::.::..,s.h:a"Es o ,.::.:.. :s6. +::x.:..},:t.x:� .o
R3"4.,., ..;. ... f'i;'�w .. }+�`.s.+"k'}k..:.c;s;a;}+c:c:wi:,}..; :#:o,y R, ,�;sf c;:�, ,i:;;;^$i'f;••. .,kj:::::
: w 2.' .�.:::cSo::,..:t„}ic.�,,.'k,cn:•:}:.:..o.n.. ::jkLt: I� .,.f¢:,. :aA;;,��+.;�...`�
�::n.:::. � ... ..}.i•...+f•tr..xC v:..C.:f:b:}:J.:....$C:tnn,.:oY.:::}}':}k$<k vv',"::•'}� .M�'\O. '��#
n
LEGISLATION AND POLICY
City Council 118,000 118,000
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
City Administrative Officer 369,400 13,600 46,500 429,500
Public Works Administration 300,600 39,900 5,600 346,100
Total General Administration 670,000 53,500 52,100 0 775,600
LEGAL SERVICES
City Attorney 234,600 6,200 240,800
CITY CLERK SERVICES
Administration and Records 282,300 100 7,500 2,200 292,100
Elections 32,200
32,200
Total City Clerk Services 314,500 100 7,500 2,200 324,300
ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES
Personnel Administration 282,000 34,900 8,200 325,100
Risk Management 853,800 29,700 8,000 891,500
Financial Administration 208,400 11,300 7,700 227,400
Accounting 302,600 4,200 2,800 309,600
Revenue Management 320,000 5,600 1,300 326,900
Information Systems Management 257,300 20,900 10,700 14,700 303,600
Support Services 435,200 6,200 (86,300) 355100
Total Organ Support Services 2,659,300 112,800 (47,600) 14,700 2,739,200
BUILDINGS AND EQUIPMENT
Building Maintenance 446,400 3,000 26,100 475,500
Vehicle&Equipment Maintenance 350,900 3,100 354,000
Total Buildings and Equipment 797,300 3,000 29,200 0 829,500
TOTAL GENERAL GOVT 54,793,700 $169,400 S47,400 $16,900 $5,027,400
C-11
CAPITAL OUTLAY - ALL FUNDS COMBINED
?:'vf`➢.r.:$Y` '+)y, / `,'*.t','chrt '}!,r.:s.Y:':'.f:�'i5J '`i,` 'k:r.H:..�,:. �,
F%: fniCi. .. �'l'.4'!V`Y .C. :: v :it.... h...r :>�j .•rt.,` .:fwY:...:fi::J...\'::' k::4..vnr:J.i.n..
,aYY�..•. .:.:F::s..,. .t6:'<#.?,�`,:.s::.:..<.Y•.,:r�s: s: 'c?,: ,,ti .:�.e. `.wi? n$"�%k.' .t:..r.r::>;?`.:::
,
: sY.,y+ab.. ikC, :s..,..c..ZO.n K�4..s`.:;•, : .,..r:. .Si.. Y:.3.i�::k::� .w<.q��o z::k:;Y.:i:.;:::.:�.v:A,.¢:�`,rsik:$:::;:>,i:ks<y.;�r, k...::.v:..
. :?3n..:ti.:`i .L.a�a ,�4� •E;(Y:,+ry r:^.:i a.;r:::. .yQ; nti..{:k`.. riCti. .h.
.r: .4. \ �::'h''h.�,?,`: *C:. � V'M1` a n,:�E.j•j{ K, WYr.,Yii
.fi' Yrv.� ..�: ,#>..> o...te:,�„' y, •+.E..\i:e�.::. S3 }. c.#,. ..s: ok,
. x ..cr. v'�.n r{..:•,�$. s ,.�: ) ..C. .as.Y..: ,,@,":{,..: .r'Y;.
s''#:Y wX•.' • :i#;", ,::2.t:r Y�:'4a:::i.'s':r'<'.':.. :.�y,. :t:...>t.n..oR. :�:v.'....,
Y2 o-•k�i�:ksr: ;s.k��,;::cc}c, su ',Y•:i9:. ::�s�, �r.� '�.y'.w..,si;. ,. �:•;:•s^ ?.,.,L`,.
%��k. t .� ,'kC<;k:: .�vr:ti. ":•�G. ,S.• ...�k' .�Y'A:�: •`;,�j?�.�c;,.:�. u :x.,;,vs:�.n: s.Yr .iII?. ':#:: "`3'C:J: $'i$Y.
-apital Outlay 2,589,500 5,762,400 1,062,000 9,413,900
Parkland Development 252,000 2,525,400 (19,000) 2,758,400
Equipment Replacement 297,300 519,000 34,800 851,100
CDBG 451,700 451,700
Water 2,134,000 3,694,600 95,200 5,923,800
Sewer* 474,400 685,700 (166,100) 994000
Parking 250,000 6,700 260,000 516,700
Transit 351,800 480,000 831,800
Golf
0
Whale k.:ck 107,300 (106,500) 800
Total y.Air.,00 $13,781,100 ($196,400) $1,356,8W $21,742,200
SUMMARY' F MID—YEAR ADJUSTMENTS
Capital OntL.1
Emergency Communication System for Fire Department 95,000
Street Light Acquisition Study 35,000
Marsh Street Reconstruction 560,000
Islay Hills Park Fee Refunds 186,000
Pick—up Truck&Mower 35,000
Parks&Recreation Office Building 151,000
Equipment Replacement 1,062,000
Replace/Upgrade File Servers 34,800
Parking
Acquisition of Property 235,000
New Parking Lot 25,000
260,000
Total Mid—Year Adjustments $1,356,800
' Project carryover balances for sewer main replacements have been reduced by$166,100
in order to minimize working capital problems in this fund.
C-12
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
ALL FUNDS COMBINED
Wenucs: wa$�`'!"to GR•:{i�n"�.a..< .�•3<.nvw .:.n iC.::.>,::;:;"�:„.'I}`,c. . ?�":.: . . '.:5�::?enues :, ...
Tax Revenues 16,880,800 17,385,500 17,182,400 (203,100)
Licenses and Permits 377,000 318,500 431,000 112,500
Fines and Forfeitures 608,900 643,100 623,100 (20,000)
Investment and Property Revenues 1,562,900 1,148,900 1,199,900 51,000
Subventions and Grants 4,158,400 4,719,700 7,327,100 2,607,400
Service Charges
Governmental Funds 1,546,500 1,798,700 1,782,000 (16,700)
Enterprise Funds 13,070,200 14,939,600 14,925,200 (14,400)
Trust and Agency Revenues 478,200 626,600 776,600 150,000
Other Revenues 822,200 811,300 1,086,500 275,200
Total Revenues 39,505,100 42,391,900 45,333,800 2,941,900
Expenditures
Operating Programs
Public Safety 9,792,600 9,973,800 10,178,600 204,800
Public Utilities 5,552,400 6,791,500 7,362,000 570,500
Transportation 3,044,700 3,185,800 3,310,900 125,100
Leisure,Cultural,& Social Services 3,221,100 3,353,000 3,407,200 54,200
Community Development 2,652,.300 2,612,400 2,743,900 131,500
General Government 4,591,600 4,793,700 5,027,400 233,700
Total Operating Programs 28,854,700 30,710,200 32,030,000 1,319,800
Capital Projects 20,221,300 6,800,700 21,742,20() 14,941,500
Debt Service 5,374,900 4,960,200 4,661,800 (298 400)
Total Expenditures 54,450,900 42,471,100 58,434,000 15,962,900
Other Sources(Uses)
Operating Transfers In 6,687,300 3,708,100 3,970,800 262,700
Operating Transfers Out (6,599,800) (3,708,100) (3,970,800) (262,700)
Proceeds from Debt Financings 1,619,000 0 1,909,600 1,909,600
Potential MOA Adjustments 0 (365,100) (187,800) 177,300
Expenditure Savings 0 241,500 264,600 23,100
Total Other Sources(Uses) 1,706,500 (123,600) 1,986,400 2,110,000
Revenues and Other Sources Over(Under)
Expenditures and Other Uses (13,239,300) (202,800) (11,113,800) (10,911,000)
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 36,021,600 13,603,600 22,782,300 9,178,700
Fund Balance,End of Year
Reserved for Debt Service 2,169,700 2,169,700 2,169,700 0
Unreserved 20,612,500 11,231100 9498800 (1732,300)
Fund Balance, End of Year $22,782,300 $13,400,800 $11,669,500 ($1 732 300)
C-13
E
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS COMBINED
.K`v:.ti.;:K.p{... .�.0:+:{'h>: 4:Oi .:•ti.:x. v.Q{" :?3::,.�; ..>.v ..0. �^..+'t.
.a.... .f.. ,t: x.. ,n:o:iv ,'a.{. .;+:`. .a. .:'E?i'•:? .�". ..o:;:.c: fac:,,. .:o.c2'::3:' •'.v.4 �+.,
:'^:•tv.:.:4f;, h 'f. •.>:o\�v. ..{•r:{:S`ti:@, `: Y<.\: e•o:\: >{?: x ..5. ..L.kf,::a?.�,::.,v.;:. .u:Rf�'` va+c{$,
, ...:�.y. + `.0. ..t. ::.:..>.`x.Y f,,;,:x;•, ,...i .:�.::..7:f'f:.x,�f.;fSp:. .O;i{Sx{ r ;:>;"• ::::'E;.o. e.� .:4.':yq{'av:.' :..s..�:;;�::
;l4'.Oi+.:<•f• :k .:..5:^'i,...hi.a. .ai ,�' ..;�f.".o:;?M...,.Q'f. •;�:.. .:.a:a..,.: », v M.
.+f+.i • +}.y2 ���r :k.`•�'+k: N• ,�` \�nf�
'.f,..O i4.���n>':0. .C.?i\xn:'i J'+. O..$T..ii.. .M�:. f.:'(?:. '.<?>• p$E:$G .<C }t"+f �', ..•Yi4: j �qy :n.. f2
'i•'<� "Q:*:^s,SJ ',h f::Q\�t nv Q �V`Qf+. ::'�' �:.:. .� Fi": 4 1.,
:a;'\v,a:+::�:w:.;,q?3:::o;r.f.f,oyane'.:`tf C>Q ..."+f.. .<;•+4 ;;c f;'W. ..�.i:';;: .?L, .fi.:0 .oa.>+,2vy{?::'p•:x+ffs. . Q. ?c;; S,o 3'
.\yrc::..{S:n.i�i •:4: +n i.:..h: .C., %.+c:-Y., .R :{i'%{'X;
iQ i�
......( 2o:.ffb:R:$....E.:f� •.x: : ... v+:r$.. .. '3f:„ ;.$h.
Revenues
Tax Revenues 16,880,800 17,385,500 17,182,400 (203,100)
Licenses and Permits 377,000 318,500 431,000 112,500
Fines and Forfeitures 113,600 175,100 155,100 (20,000)
Investment and Property Revenues 838,400 655,300 631,300 (24,000)
Subventions and Grants 2,752,400 3,617,200 5,647,100 2,029,900
Service Charges 1,546,500 1,798,700 1,782,000 (16,700)
Other Revenues 822,200 725,500 1,000,700 275,200
Totz! Revenues 23,330,900 24,675,800 26,829,600 2,153,800
Expenditures
Operating Programs
Public Safety 9,792,600 9,973,800 10,178,600 204,800
Public Utilities 105,300 74,300 120,300 46,000
Transportation 1,514,600 1,595,900 1,678,900 83,000
Leisure,Cultural,& Social Services 2,936,700 3,061,600 3,114,900 53,300
Community Development 2,652,300 2,612,400 2,743,900 131,500
General Government 4,504,100 4,879,500 5,113,200 233,70r
Total Operating Programs 21,505,600 22,197,500 22,949,800 752,301.
Reimbursed Expenditures (1,989,900) (2,158,200) (2,158,200) 0
Total Operating Expenditures 19,515,700 20,039,300 20,791,600 752,300
Capital Projects 7,920,300 3,590,500 13,475,100 9,884,600
Debt Service 947,400 772,300 663,600 (108,70
Total Expenditures 28,383,400 24,402,100 34,930,300 10,528,200
Other Sources(Uses)
Operating Transfers In 6,610,900 3,708,100 3,970,800 262,700
Operating Transfers Out (6,522,600) (3,628,000) (3,890,700) (262,700)
Proceeds from Debt Financings 0 0 1,700,000 1,700,000
Potential MOA Adjustments 0 (320,000) (187,800) 132,200
Expenditure Savings 0 214,600 214,600 0
Total Other Sources(Uses) 88,300 (25,300) 1,806,900 1,832,200
Revenues and Other Sources Over(Under)
Expenditures and Other Uses (4,964,200) 248,400 (6,293,800) (6,542,200)
Fund Balance,Beginning of Year 17,697,800 6,615,200 12,733,600 6,118,400
Fund Balance,End of Year
Reserved for Debt Service 0
Unreserved 12,733,600 6,863,600 6,439,M (423 800
Fund Balance, End of Year $12,733,600 $6,863,600 $6,439,800 ($423,800)
C-14
CHANGES IN.FUND BALANCE
ALL ENTERPRISE AND AGENCY FUNDS COMBINED
:c.:•Axa'.*k:gsx+.-{<'t.;Y;�:{ �: tn,:. :.'a} . :.:..:m• .x,y::.: -- - __ - -
.d;.. a•:x �:;c ..a:n Y.: exY.o
:o:,$,r,. .XO:;' wiiot v:YG:`� :^.•t :.<.wAi;es}{:}JxY:b.:.Y':.'E;'.k>�{�`::SCy .:;R,;t:'.;.;.:,..:;;a}'a......;:::.:.:... - -__
.aa;.,;,. La..yoef`":�:rXk}. .�.a.. ::�.:. x, "?',Sf} '%t:t:i4•t;; ':•>:<ro•>ta.: :.3....: :.u,.t: :v9>:oYrn•:: ,e:,.;
».S'. F.{'. .•.;kx.C�.. '•:'c`k}`: ..t,�;�y.a5'?:%'k .v$.� :;$'>.:n:.9.... ,.,ya:.:....anS:t!: ::'Y.».^" O. :o. ::�v::.in::.>::
)v'.. :.Y.::^.�{.:O.:\ •'}*n :O. :.*:q::i: ¢¢ •:}:.x:, �SX: .:1' 3••J';i:;3fJ.i::W:k::::'{0:...v
::ri. ..stGG,t..:/� xw>r.•nva;{.....:.i.:.. �}���fru :ti":;� .,.:.i..9.. :�Aenge�kfr{;�S;e'. �,::�;?`::�` w.op.�k:. ::.a.N.
p.. :nR:iv:w, ..•':�,... �.•:�•':k o:.��� ..4`.f :}�'::: 'OfW:ii. upP�V FJ}:O:
.:.r.o.:.'t.. :::::{{;9.r:>.�ik';,..'�. : :,.gt•, ;:�'{:: .3.:.. ;:y3;k;:::f co."k`• M1':u}3i[':
.,,;: .0:. w Jfr,�: w$R� k"i': .a..3. :R.o. .3?: .s.3:'3'`•,g '.,�Y...;'3:'.c', ,3`•:t}6: ,t• .+f.4�'.a{: 2tY•;i.`::' o:R.;3:ti:;}• ,}:+.
..�x�";�,fi��i.. :*cJx.f:<F;�o',. �'3i.Y#.: .'.4.. x! ... x::xf;)t��nk..; .:e`.�':YxFk}. .}. :f� '3w. :rt .a•`.<• :::.`. .
'w..r...:...t<.:.:,f...o:::xnx.�.o::�:., :s..:..d}:`:�R:ic�9:;.�,., ;;:. .c:.n,....�,. ..ti:'.Yfi;. ,':�,L,{ '•:,,{t � 5»;. y� '. f�£ � �`3hR•^'c;k., �,�,^Jy: :.::t
x:x:.:.::•:.r Y::..�. x.::...:..:::::.:. ': :. ..:: ,....:: n:.. ... a•x..: 'k�':3t `.�Zi�.N' '3' ::;k;'�'. <n y$� +kh'k'
::� ..t x.v:.s.:..'�w3 a'�,,.7 w ik... nCkc< �k;3 :;t '�� k •n;.�;� •.-0ro�;��,2C.. '.,:S3:.. �� ?{:;>..� ;.�: �:'�".r. .:e.J.
r:;{f.n ;o' '.kha.3...nA }fo5'3;JAc. .:G: ^to.."oA{Y.;.t,...t:�{.: ;:,h. '�� ''>f'�o.:...� :Y.„.:��,.�.�i,�"�.'�,o;J.e.,..xk.;Yk.,..�:....:J?y v:o'.5.:b�.•t.y •'�i:�.o:..s...'�.> x.lf: :.t;.�.s
':a. .�• v�.'S': f..}�..4Ct:�:^.<3u.'(„,�;;L...yy :i Y.;3R>..x�.'.;.}v .:.`;,�`.. ., '•.•X�. '{o.. .Y:ir•:. ,} <cfrun �;.a,r;; a.:c s:+k: e.::. .+..}. .{,Y�,` JJ?:.C"v'c >)::+,Y*�:'�JJr.p
�MM
Revenues
Fines and Forfeitures 495,300 468,000 468,000 0
Investment and Property Revenues 724,500 493,600 568,600 75,060
Subventions and Grants 1,406,000 1,102,500 1,680;000 577,500
Service Charges 13,010,200 14,939,600 14,925,200 (14,400)
Other Revenues PERS Refund. 0 85,806 85,800 0
Trust and Agency Revenues 478;200 . 626,600 776,600 150,000
Total Revenues 16,174,200 17,716;100 - 18,50000 788,100
Expenditures
Operating Programs
Public Utilities 5,447,100 6,717,200 7,241,700 524,500
Transportation 1,5.30,100 1,589,900 1,632,000 42,106
Leisure,Cultural&Social Services 284,400 291,400 292,300 ..900
General Government 2,077,400 2,072,400 2,072,400 0
Total Operating Programs 9,339,000 10,670,900 11,738,400 567,500
Capital Projects 12;301,000 3,210,200 8,261,100 5,056,900
Debt Service 4,427,500 4187 900 3,998,200 (189,70
Total Expenditures - -
26,067,500 18,069,000 23,503,700 5,434,700
Other Sources(uses)
Operating Transfers In 76,400
0 0
Operating Transfers Out (77,00) ( �1�) 00400) 0
Proceeds from Debt Financings 1,619,000 0 209,600 209,600
Potential MOA Adjustments 0 (45,100) 0 45,100
Expenditure-Savings/Project Deferrals - - 0 26,900 50,000 _ 23,_1.00
Total Other Sources(Uses) 1,618,200 (98,300) 179,500 277800
Revenues and Other Sources Over(Undei)
Expenditures and Other Uses (8,275,100) (451,200
(4,820,000) (4,368,800)
Fund Balance,Beginning of Year 18,323,800 6,988,400 10,048,700 3,060,.300
Fund-Balance,End of Year
Reserved for Debt Service 2,169,700 2,169,700 2,169,700 0
Deserved 7,878,900 4,367,500 3,059,000 (1 308 500)
Fund Balance, End of Year $10,048,700__ $6,537,200 $5,228,760 ($1 308 500)
- C-15
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
GENERAL FUND
f.f: ::o::d r.?`�''fC..>� .kS:>=i}�:f;`:i•}'..:{„•.}. :,'•' ,§� }:a` ;�:•h
S"v�h?�'.. •.:J•. �:�,.±i}vJ$�n:v:{+�?'.'Yi'�f:.'\:. ;�; t:ff. .>! '\.n:: f;.:Ji.'. Jf Y:' :��.'�i"•:R';\.,:,i�,,•^.`,x;,:�
„ik:ui{^;`t,J,..:f, :2:: .� L<„Ai.a ,YQ %;C. YY.: Ji:.Y:C?:;.ti`Rf.n..o.mvL.:s.... ::.`f •,,tiR.::, `S3e:" .�?:
'4�.':i
}Y.•,d'i;.. Of .n.��s,� .`,�.-{,vZv..
ty fAyc, •: p:»';:F> 'k: .fP ...:
c•.>:o'•,+wat,,}_' :i.>*'; .it..':C:. ?t.ar}a.•.:oib{,:J ;:_� ni ..k. �.�A •a :,t,., 3q."y t.'.{g: `sy<'::�;Y,C:"� .�:{' .{+o- .•a':y.�it:x�;� .2a:M;.
`:Yr,.: :.},t`�,$
.�. J`>:i•:�.:{:.�}.Y:::,,: ..Y Q:f X. }c ::: "'f:
Revenues
Tax Revenues 16,880,800 17,385,500 17,182,400 (203,100)
Licenses and Permits 377,000 318,500 431,000 112,500
Fines and Forfeitures 113,600 175,100 155,100 (20,000)
Investment and Property Revenues 627,200 413,300 413,300 0
Subventions and Grants 1,771,400 1,660,500 1,732,000 71,500
Service Charges 1,285,600 1,404,100 1,406,500 2,400
Other Revenues 573,000 415,500 424,300 8,800
Total Revenues 21,628,600 21,772,500 21,744,600 (27.900)
Expenditures
Public Safety 9,792,600 9,973,800 10,178,600 204,800
Public Utilities 105,300 74,300 I.W00 46,000
Transportation 1,514,600 1,595,900 1,678,900 83,000
Leisure,Cultural,and Social Service; 2,936,700 2,861,600 2,914,900 53,300
Community Development 2,452,000 2,357,600 2,449,800 92,200
General Government 4,504,100 4,793,700 5,027,400 233,700
Total Program Expenditures 21,305,300 21,656,900 22,369,900 713,000
Reimbursed Expenditures (1,989,900) (2,158,200) (2158,200) 6
Total Expenditures 19,315,400 19,498,700 20,211.700 713,000
Other Sources(Uses)
Operating Transfers In 805,900 799,200 832,800 33,600
Operating Transfers Out (5,356,200) (2,828,800) (3,057,900) (229,100)
Potential MOA Adjustments 0 (320,000) (187,800) 132,200
Expenditure Savings 0 214,600 214,600 0
Total Other Sources(Uses) (4450,300) (2,135,000) (2,198,300) (63.300)
Revenues and Other Sources Over(Under)
Expenditures and Other Uses (2,237,100) 138,800 (665,400) (804,200)
Fund Balance,Beginning of Year* 6,904,900 3,817,200 4,667,800 850,600
Fund Balance, End of Year $4,667,800 $3,956,000 $4.002.400 $46,400
# Reflects the audited budget for ending fund balance at June 30, 1994
re-the 1993-94 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
C-I6
I
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA FUND
g`•.�5:...,.. 'c<>,n:2sYi' :Sc.....M°`• y:.':v ,.}:<2;;.>.::;::. :.#> •,:>:,..,}3 ,:;,y.:..
.t::'f:.ro.. :>'.,,v,;F:: „ .:n:GrQ?:.::o:: ..u:,.,v,�f•:
2^ f,4',o}.ge:k: .c... '; i',n,',k?:u.:(:` .}�.;:a.,,i;W.tr x.,4,r... o:.' .w: n:i;:y•o':, >.. ,.
:M > yy.. �€:^:W:• w;n,o.m}:}'}:�:.. `.;y 3n :�#:;T.....;.Y�'i,.'.,.< .n.v..: :a`.�:'3.3:^.•
nA."v:i\ �'i}Ji�•f••�f,}..xi..Ov ik}.n f;::fi 2 q., J..
' ^`Jin•••,.nn� '
i.. +r.,v,WNW..
..v.+S.i}.k' `.7:•i:3:i:.y(;},.C•::.3:� .:il. .c:,}�,k• d�C� i:�%i$;�.<:'� #}�rw.,.>, f...a,
:3:n3.n..9,,,.. a.:.a,.. 3.c;a::,. .:,iL.. .'::.f:
v:.. .:(6i. .��,:i..J h, ;•,•�.•''„'�:�.��''.r�� �'.v'''�"'. •.},;j..�A�,�
•> ::3LYY,' S*:'.:plk.: Fwc;..
moo=
`+t'•j3':k5`:f:k:.r.;i.,. n<;'. y:. .,. ',,.n+c
,r.;3.}:.,.. 'k 'u .<:, :o}" :*"t> .. � .i.�$ 3. F.. w .:f•:.. �... 5:::' :.>. �f'^On•n. ;t..�.�J.,...0
�1�" ��'fi.,[.i�kj .`�5``.'� ::».:n.:< •,2 � b,,� : �,k N'bft.: ,:'!�F,.;.. lk' ,i,;. .i�2r:t.;:$.::r'..� .t 6:} v:;#• .7<.v';u. .�
": v3:i:::.; }:,�,.vs #,,y .•,',.: '::$°•{Y:.un r��3. x :.;4:. :.":,{.,xf)iay�:; �.: •;tt'
.C' +9}>nq:2:F:. +;C:6 :}>,,:\,;.,�5? u... �.<..
nf.
Revenues
Investment and Property Revenues 2,100 2,000 2,000 0
Service Charges
Business Tax Surcharge 64,300 67,300 76,000 8,700
Miscellaneous Fees 143,900 57,800 70,000 12,200
Total Revenues 210,300 127,100 148,000 20,900
Operating Expenditures
Community Development 200,300 1.34,800 174,100 39,300
Total Expenditures 200,300 134,800 174,100 39,300
Other Sources(Uses)
Operating Transfer In 15,400 0 30,000 30,000
Revenues and Other Sources Over(Under)
Expenditures and Other Uses 25,400 (7,700) 3,900 11,600
Fund Balance,Beginning of Year 5,600 8,300• 31,000 22,700
and Balance, End of Year $31.000 $600 $34,900 $34,300
C-17
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG) FUND
gg
"'M
INN
.10
.1
Mil
'iu
TIM ::'.:•:,1.4:.:0:\\;I: I
Revenues
Subventions and Grants 857,500 857,500 0
Expenditures
Operating Programs
Leisure,Cultural,& Social Services 200,000 200,000 0
Community Development 120,000 120,000 0
General Government 85,800 85,800 0
Total Operating Programs 0 405,800 405,800 0
Capital Projects 451,700 451,700 0
Total Expenditures 0 857,500 957,500 0
Other Sources(Uses)
Operating Transfers In
Operating Transfers Out 0
Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 0 0 0
Revenues and Other Sources Over(Under)
Expenditures and Other Uses 0 0 0
Fund Balance,Beginning of Year 0 0 0
Fund Balance,, End of Year so so so so
C-18
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
GAS TAX -
... ..n. ..o..'Y o:y.;x.f.N<�.::::::..>:o:n:;�•:•;�.:ok::..i:Y,:-t.ri.::n;;•;.:::.-� - -
..a g ••.4.::,n..:.i:.:: '::;hi.:,;.., .#{;:,: ,t•r,.i.,.:.:'o.:.<:;::.ki::>.':.:e:o>'.:•:..: ,..t.:�tok:�::..
.., �'• ? ", n..,A.k:<::S.Feo-'�;.S.,+>xc`....y+.n•"'to.ti..>:,4.e�;i.:sY•:::�::,4:S.<�;.FR:f.'o.#:•;•i,3?�:.�.:.#;:t?�,i::�.:^�?'.A3..:::;.»:.::.`r<'�<.S::':.nF:.:.�.:.::,s.:.ri:k.$.�.SSA..'fr:f'o:.;..::i.o:�..:..or::u>ei::o:::;:n..F,... . : .,: t:f:.:.:::•:.::>';::.,.„>.:a...r:.:,.:r::.kN.,S.<rp.,,.'.5c•r.au.^r;.k.a:oh:::E..a.o::.xi.s.X: '!iw �#� 1,7't.k..•>.:b•�2
.k:r R..Lk.;..f•r:.'..
�^
. :.y:.,,u., n.A.:,:.'b.;t, ..•.:o':.. .„t,c.e::o:.v;.xt..u`: ..:n..xn.o:..;;.:•.{.+.: .r..or..:r ey..v;N:.c.. :kA•' ,>:c:,v
. .. >.. '•l.`.el.....o:. v. ...o.......<....o,.., .} .R..: .::......:.....:.::'k:<.;,'o. ..t:. t o �>. f '�<^::
,.w L�t: :..h. ,.k.. x.. .R........<. .$f.:.t ..N,. Y':5??� )i:.:.>n. n't •., .�., .>: kn`,$u;'
�. :.::... ...,nun.,,.::.::..;,.,.n..nf. .,..,.:.:,::......,,...n:.to:::::...... .::.:.::. .t, ..0 .,.:�•.
"?x..>;...:.;.,x'+.:•n":krn n'•,;..;... ::•.�::. :n :?%1::::�::, :i::�:. ,::v..•...n ..p.
y
?:.:., ..,.. 4 i/. �.::.F.;':.5•.:�.,6.;.;t�:G:: ....:..,:.,;oo::.::.::'.,:t:.:..x::o:e..:..:..:.:. :5:,#.::r..: n ,:..n::::o,:..:v.J. :oo ;:ii:f..,...:...,....::Sn .:;*.:S•k <:%i,+,...�;' ::::o. ,:.� 4
,,,>:.:a;C;;�;.;.opt;....\'•.'':. :.v.:n.:,. ;...:::.'t•,...;n.:•. ,:,•..�::;>::.;;.;..;}::.>.,.::.::x.� ;..,.:!„S.; .�4,�., ;. ,. .x ..',m•: �:,., .k�,r, ?..v..x:::::k::>::f..a::.: ..f..<c Y.'+`:,:on;,..,.. :..>,.
t"oo ?w..:,.q<: ;.. .L. .,: ,...:.ovwox„ :a:..o;;: #:,:,. h....
J k�.t"�
:;;x:.:.•w:}'.Ch :: .;i.. .o�c;ii �"�;�:><.
Mm
Reveaucs
Subventions and Grants
Gasoline'Tax 789;200 781,400. 815,000 33,600
Total Revenues 789,200' 781,400 815,000. 33,600
Other Sources(Uses)
Operating Trausfers Out (789;200) (781,400) (815,000
(33,600)
Revenues and Other Sources Over(Under)
Expenditures and Other Uses 0 0 0 0
Fund Balance,Beginning of,Year - 0
Fund Balance, End of Year $o so _ $o so
C-1..9
CHANGES IN F JND BALANCE
7,ANSPORTA77ON DEVELOPMENT ACT FUND
IN :
POISON
M
Revenues
Subventions and Grants 16,700 17,800 17,800 0
Other Sources(uses)
Operating Transfers Out (16,700) (17,800) (17,800) 0
Revenues and Other Sources Over(Under)
Expenditures and Other Uses 0 0 0 0
Fund Balance,Beginning of Year 0 0 0 0
Fund Balance, End of Year $0 $0 $0 so
C-20
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND
i?i6:.'.\�:.:nv:,r.`.: ;}�;;Ye. iRo` .u::}: 4J+w•.3?,.,,:Y;... .:4}•chi??.•}`: 4::
•.: �:n,...r„o�"S }},e}x. .i•:. 3;.�$;.6:.*, .?`E, Y ..�; v}u...n:..6:>:i:.;T4 v2}k:�iE<:: .4:A:t n,9,i.J;;i:.::.,.
xQ',q. .}:4.:,}.. .w' a";$:i' Y4 .'E:. }'.n: by��e •&" n.4.4i;.r :\" �; •T§'
.n"�}. �••.7;5.'::v q'`pi:.xt }:.o.;..?S; o .'.'.'�.;.�.+�.`�. ::J;:,, .%�: k+.u;t;JY.$$:}1.•}y:%.
':i:.rtt...:.: }':4 ..F iYJ:i .}...:n:Y.:4}x.}x?}'F.in.:J'.;::+`.•�....v:
Y
` }.: ^. ✓: :iSY�•9: '$..v ::.E.:w}t.}}•.}}'n:ibr..b: ""o':Y.:.Y :a.v: ,::: '
?}L:x. .Y,.a ;4:. .?�.,�x.:.S:: .c:C:o n �..r.}?� ��. n+�3!;.;4... `.::1'}:$i::;.. .,.x`£:�i:;:. ,.> o:•,:.;r:}rv..r.,,:.....}»:•:�.: :r.:
�y.,..•:?ff:d•°:•6Y�
}:,o`,3COJ: '.\}i`,.'. En;8.4',;++rtii`.:. 6.'�`G� n:;i:44. ....}. :a r::,,4, .:9:i8}:':Yi`�; '7',''.,.vJ,�.,•„�,:.'.' .n4.`++�\. ..�4,�
:b" n ; .:o�,;a:nxgk•;:S�Fb:i:)�r;.}r�$}}.4. .>6'�.a :.o.. .;;rod:c'}.::?:?'v.:, Y+P"?:. .4 5?}: ::?:::x.x;:'a: S'tn++ek{.;+:�. ... {j sE ...u,r,fi,..j;?O. ::.+.S
Ci>.iii4�::?i:}.v r.4Yit,'l� v.bf 6:•$.:n:i:� •�''::nv':{x.iv}2v}'}��`� u�Y ` ul AAO���r.. :..� x"•�'�..a.,t�,.'
Revenues
Subventions and Grants 175,100 300,000 2,124,800 1,824,800
Service Charges 14,300 249;500 209,500 (40,000)
Other Revenues 39,100 290,000 525,000 235,000
Total Revenues 228,500 839,500 2,859,300 2,019,800
Expenditures
Capital Projects 7,235,500 2,589,500 9,413,900 6,824,400
Other Sources(Uses)
Operating Transfers In 4,337,900 1,750,000
2,057,800 307,800
Operating Transfers Out (54,500) 0
Proceeds from Debt Financing 1,700,000 1700 000
Total Other Sources(Uses) 4,283,400 1,750,000 3,757,800 2,007,800
Revenues and Other Sources Over(Under)
Expenditures and Other Uses (2,723,600) 0 (2,796,800) (2,796,800)
mound Balance,Beginning of Year 5,520,400 0 2,7%,800 2,796,800
Fund Balance, End of Year $2,796,800 $o so $0
C-21
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
PARKLAND DEVELOPMENT FUND
�,o.. 3:>k^?::'.C:k�.:R�'?':°}.• ..?�':$+ x..1,4.y�.rdv.a^. +.:o•?:E+' ar," :.v:::..y
�`��. s. ;. a.ft,:'`c.i. ;C � : +}�'�,:, •bio}.. a..::. :wi. 'k `:�:}.ka§�': Ki`•:.0 w:�iT'�i
s'
..: .+�yy;. .♦ .a.y},. ;4°a.. : .,e.::yry ` {N ry, a:.. „f..,,.
'r;L.+�C.'�.: �,. ,...u.}' }}yy,,.�:;:Y:•a �;� �;}.f:.' k.' :s:a;a::�{.,✓n,',;Y:�sis,°�'L•wa'.? .a,.. }:: :a.' �..�.
'?�.'a;;syx'.' b. 'x.:w "k23;;,..? ya�.f..9:.'�.'.?y.'u::4 v:✓<`i�:. ;::}a !S:':}i)'.' ..,;`,s,.WR,;::,+,:{;$.nv+.����. ":>'. '.v;:'v,:o:E::Rn;a�'S`Ss�•"fi.;;..
.,.any } r: `k:;>."Qx:•Ac'\.,:.rte.,' +�.;r..a,}..,o:J ':}J.1� :4a" +:�: .�.,.a;0 3,.:`yi?�.�::o;;:::a;Cp .:<:. y�y�� 5 '�y'I "'b�•
::;'iYq?\:) ::>a)i<\�qU..$na' A .;J J'} -0""v $' '::\:::.{,3:.v a,'•1S \...::a '',a4 4;}'� `V:v,R'•: `v'h'N. n
:..;x. '£\f>t.�:oi..� ;$'.'u. <:s• a5t,:k ;':u• ,.Rbur., );u}.3,:?r,`.,;}:i::ti..�:• 'n'�t`';. ,'tr� ;s}scw":L�+'�:jj2;::S� ,o v�.,.. ...,'`^V.
Revenues
Investment and Property Revenues 128,400 120,000 120,000 0
Subventions and Grants 100,000 100,000
Service Charges 38,400 20,000 20,000 0
Total Revenues 166,800 140,000 240,000 100,000
Expenditures
Capital Projects 190,200 252,000 2,758,400 2,506 400
Total Expenditures 190,200 252,000 2,758,400 2,506,400
Other Sources(Uses)
Operating Transfers In 54,500
Operating Transfers Out (306,000)
Total Other Sources(uses) (251,500) 0 0 0
Revenues and Other Sources Over(Under)
Expenditures and Other Uses (274,900) (112,000) (2,518,400) (2,406,400)
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 2,819,000 134,600 2,544,100 2,409,5(X
Fund Balance, End of Year s2,5aa,100 $22,600 $25,700 s3100
C-22
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
\'.Y .}.:'if.$<$$:' x;• ..4:^4:..vi i r:iw:'4':O$'i i.U'.F.:i}'$+i'k}k}:......... v} ::.4
,i%4.. '$'f.%: a(.::.:n?$.r ..:\y:4�:;?ink.$}yri:4... }ifv'i ii.¢ :h%... ..4 f. 4'4•.i(MA.i .f...:'..}::.v,:}i$$`kY::iii+'^'•n:i:':
• •.. .. ..�1\ .:$c,k:+A:v.;,v{....me:4.....4f:.:::�.'�::v::.:4 x::i:}i<t:i..... :,4`: :'.. : "r ..:i..}}}.�':? 4
4 i!�..'�'i..on`'...n'. :..t:•yn..:.y 1.GtSi:`\..:3..,:�...:.:..f.?.i..:.v.^..A.$yr`..:..., }.,.i\rn..::4n4.:;4.:�:i..r f.,.�:..?::....fn.n...:in..:}.}:•,.,.:..:.;n,.::.i:.:.:...r.4.:::f...yn..::f..}..:...:f....}..fi..f...i.r^.•::.'+'..::t{$}:.,...x..r.,..}}h.:n`+.i•..:.4,r..'fn3.:m'v'.
4{a'•,::..+}b:::::v..sv.'>i.:.s.:kk:..':;v.:.i.M+•niii}Mi.}4:.}iX:i:
lk'ti:}J2::.t.}•..}•:i:;$:$:C;:f:I:f'.a+'\•':k:�}.:r. ^•:4<V<iri:""::c:i' :fyi.•"n$\:'.:yY.::.:<.?,..:4u.::4..$:'.:..n4;s..¢p9.:.�:::9.+.4f'4;r:$.4
:<'k}n'•'4k.:r..:....f..v.�..,..c.
.:.i ... .. .. >..,..b:v.:}w...,.:..:4. A.:..v .......:::.r.::::::..:.. {i.C:}.. .o.:.::.:�.. r4.C:Y•i'} .�..., @' �''.w'." O.f..: v:}'.v.}:.
y.�;}.k�,,n.:.... .$::.. ..Fi...\..4': `:4Wn .f.n / ^.:{:.fin? .'G: ',Q.}.xif:` a.1.x}v::4'�:C• t;:_ �•�
:. :' �. x n.i.::r.::..v..:..5iw:.i}Ik2.. : ai:•, i:2":>?:.n'; +'.'S'::.f ggid .'3f.�n. Ri 'L1. .
..k: : •y:vv':,.:E.:.i e :.}i:.::a:.':::4:::;:t?...:. k:.': :::0+'::3}}'v: ••iR :,.??.; �.yy ,}?:::..'.:4:kL:4.r.,.. ,k:2`,C�.'i�`:+. ,
"`o'o`ec?sv,.:J..$. v4. .:.,t r..ia;i. .2.. •.'}.4. t:4.:.iv...4 :,t:. ..�.:4~ ;}`i> :f..n .x:..
4:'+�3:,kv.;v:::•:+$..". `..o. :.4.'•� v§§r. .x 4: }42 N4$'Q. ..4 ..4..?f::
}. 'k{;.:..4:}:::.. "kn r ti:`:i':}.n'v...t.i :4.v:J?;i$::i::R:'r.}.4:.:.e:. .'[a �'' i4:`. }.:k•}'.}:i4:w :r.4... p
.10- 4. <. :N.9.:.., .fiii. .:i..+ .1 f.1.:..,i. 1i R.�f.,�'�4.,. ...4.: ?•.}.r,\.., � rcfi.. U}w..4.C, ::�`Ri:;.^:.;;$•?.Saw;. ::e;}'�'i,�en.,i;'';.,;':,b+f, :.T`;6;:•o}3.^S;ny
:.'.en.... .[1 :,a::}'}.)i::ti Y;r• :.}.. , �n,D': ��: '�1S.r..,3;C: 'kt»C;'::r.koD+. t,?.?.3^k f�' � '.w:,Cf.
Revenues
Investment and Property Revenues 80,700 120,000 96,000 (24,000)
Other Revenues 0
Sale of Surplus Property 29,000 20,000 51,400 31,400
Nongovernmental Contributions 181,100 0
Total Revenues 290,800 140,000 147,400 7,400
Expenditures
Public Safety 233,000 213,100 251,200 38,100
Public Utilities 187,500
Transportation 188,800 192,500 192,500
Leisure,Cultural& Social Services 31,700 26,700 26,700
General Government 41,100 84,200 193,200 109,000
Total Expenditures 494,600 297,300 851,100 553,800
Other Sources(Uses)
Operating Transfers In
General Fund 296,100 306,500 306,500 0
Water Fund 16,200 16,800 16,800 0
Sewer Fund 124,300 49,500 49,500 0
Parking Fund 4,.300 4,500 4,500 0
Golf Fund 4„300 4,500 4,500 0
Whale Rock Fund 4,600 4,800 4,800 0
Operating Transfers Out
0
Total Other Sources(Uses) 449,800 386,600 386,600 0
Revenues and Other Sources Over(Under)
Expenditures and Other Uses 246,000 229,300 (317,100) (546,400)
Fund Balance,Beginning of Year 1,495,500 1,259,200 1,713,600 454,400
Residual Equity Transfer (27,900) 0
Fund Balance, End of Year $1,713,600 $1,488,500 $1,396,500 ($92,000)
C-23
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
DEBT SERVICE FUND
Expenditures
Debt Service
1986 Lease Revenue Bonds 543,500 363,500 254,800 (108,700)
1990 Certificates of Participation 40.3,900 408,800 408,800 0
Total Expenditures 947,400 772,300 663,600 (108,700)
Other Sources(Uses)
Operating Transfers In 947,400 772,300 663,600 (108,700)
Proceeds from Debt Financing 0
Total Other Sources(Uses) 947,400 772,300 663,600 (108,700)
Revenues and Other Sources Over(Under)
Expenditures and Other Uses 0 0 0 0
Fund Balance,Beginning of Year 980,300 980,300 980,300 0
Fund Balance, End of Year $980,300 $980,300 $980,30o so
C-24
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
WATER FUND
Y%. gg
Revenues
Subventions& Grants - FEMA Reimbursement 7,800 7,800
Service Charges
Water Sales
Water Service Charges 5,751,400 6,824,300 6,824,300 0
Sales to Cal Poly 133,700 214,200 214,200 0
Sales to Cuesta 36,100 60,800 60,800 0
Capital Improvement Charges 75,500 47,700 47,700 0
Connection Charges and Meter Sales 18,000 50,500 50,500 0
Hydroplant Revenues 23,000 30,000 30,000 0
Other Service Charges 89,400 95,000 95,000 0
Total Service Charges 6,127,100 7,322,500 7,322,500 0
Other Revenues- PERS Refund 32,800 32,800 0
Investment and Property Revenues 520,500 250,000 350,000 100,000
Total Revenues 6,647,600 7,605,300 7,713,100 107,800
Expenditures
Operating Programs
Public Utilities 2,832,700 3,662,400 3,998,100 .3.35,700
General Government 909,700 888,100 888,100 0
Total Operating Programs 3,742,400 4,550,500 4,886,200 335,700
Capital Projects 8,641,100 2,134,000 5,923,800 3,789,800
Debt Service 1,345,400 1,435,400 1,435,400 0
Total Expenditures 13,728,900 8,119,900 12.245,400 4,125,500
Other Sources(Uses)
Operating Transfers Out (16,200) (16,800) (16,800) 0
Other Sources(Uses)
Potential MOA Adjustments (16,200) 0 16,200
Total Other Sources(Uses) (16,200) (33,000) (16,800) 16,200
Revenues and Other Sources Over(under)
Expenditures and Other Uses (7,097,500) (547,600) (4,549,100) (4,001,500)
Fund Balance,Beginning of Year 14,075,900 2,977,600 6,978,400 4,000,800
Fund Balance,End of Year
Reserved for Debt Service 1,245,500 1,245,500 1,245,500 0
Unreserved 5,732,900 1,184,500 1,183,80o (700
27 und Balance, End of Year $6,978,400 $2,430,000 ',&$2,429,300 ($700)
C-25
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
SEWER FUND
.�.F'.J a.dei:: '.#i,.;.r. ,::}i¢•r:: .;.<:G:'�":�:::.<J4'ro:go-.::`s,'g;•nS:..:4;. :.y' ,t.
.S ,.G, .k. said». .:#k6:. .ff.'v'••if}'
N Jn:a.; n.`�n } }.N:{.:K... .i\'.,().. :'ly.4 .:2:'. ..4....: .'\k.,.:y. A}�'itf::k}.:.t:.'.3..) �•ijv..:+w•'..
;.J.A}.:2}.:ki. .k.} .:t2U::r,. � :..4�'`\..,:, •.:4..: .yF.nV_; � .Y ,f .Cv:ii::•.:::. .n;vr.f
rd k
k ?
'::p:i::r{::::`"} s•..:a\%"k::>::r n:::`' :..'�a.•;4n4,. ::.2}fF ':.:. �:S7a,'•nYv^K!�++uiuca'
s:
Y• :YS•>:. ;+}vT� �.: .w•'.�:. k:v. .:c; •F';JJ f}:•'f.}}'i'n:.:'4}:':'
."a,".'�'� y R..'C. ;�k r. r:.. ''<< .ai;i.. : ..'.:4V ::o'`£k`.. ..• r:4}.x..:.i '4'.i..i Ss:.44....: .c .0.",... .k.:�:::,}.;.:•.+•v: ';D:
.?„ . .rY.r ?}3.:t:J;v:, °.,4,. R}j. .t: ;.� pyy ..5.:.x...:.2":.2 v'"+o-:3'>. "�`fa': ':t'F.+Tt .0:: 29}•:k..v.�``:• 4e;* r,.:
:�. ..:�`�k ;k.r..ri.rr 2.F'.'k. pv •:d: '.: •.::c}k: c.:'� �. •::4�.
2� 'kk.:4'f✓•� .C x.v� '� `,'4., n'.: ':Y:}}}(€} v' ix'J...: .�'.; ',';'n:�.:.'. . "'%}:}: .�y .OA4
nkiRYf:. `':y+�}}V,.vk �`a..sn:4.. 4:4.v ;::�:.� } y, }:`k;'„•: } y 2+. �:::. .v2.�i.?.�., �r,t:. .vR .` i'�.:N$4...}.
"� .4. '1'Sr.. ,��4"`�:.}..•n A: n`R"2:�SlJ.v.vS.. :'�i •F < � ,,�f'fe'e� :�.4xv..�.:�(ti'
:
Revenues
Service Charges
Customer Sales
Sewer Service Charges 4,818,400 5,219,300 5,219,300 0
Sales to Cal Poly 82,000 125,500 125,500 0
Industrial User Charges 33,500 37,200 37,200 0
Capital Improvement Charges 97,700 235,600 235,600 0
Other Service Charges 2,000 15,100 15,100 0
Total Service Charges 5,033,600 5,632,700 5,632,700 0
Other Revenue PERS Refund 37,300 37,300 0
Investment and Property Revenues 19,000 25,000 0 (25,000
Total Revenues 5,052,600 5,695,000 5,670,000 (25,000)
Expenditures
Operating Programs
Public Utilities 2,189,400 2,507,200 2,543,400 36,200
General Government 692,300 688,300 688,300 0
Total Operating Programs 2,881,700 3,195,500 3,231,700 36,200
Capital Projects 2,611,000 474,400 994,000 519,60L
Debt Service 2,122,000 2,127,800 2,127,800 0
Total Expenditures 7,614,700 5,797,700 6,353,500 555,800
Other Sources(Uses)
Operating Transfers Out (47,800) (49,500) (49,500) 0
Proceeds from State Loan 1,619,000 209,600 209,600
Potential MOA Adjustments (18,300) 0 18,300
Expenditure Savings 26,900 50,000 23,100
Total Other Sources(Uses) 1,571,200 (40,900) 210,100 251,000
Revenues and Other Sources Over(Under)
Expenditures and Other Uses (990,900) (143,600) (473,400) (329,800)
Fund Balance,Beginning of Year 1,082,800 782,700 91,900 (690,800)
Fund Balance, End Of Year $91,900 $639,100 (5381,500) ($1,020,6001
C-26
CHANGES IN FUND BALNCE
PARKING FUND
'v..'>.n�:g..F:u'<;4:4kw::o;::r..: �..3�}'?kS?o�:`� 3<::5:. s'.';.:4i,;•
•R..:Y'rr' '.4?�}:'n:v' v.{..). .::...n.r:1..
' :n.r.::Jn•v
.. :..v...p i.y:;'v"x :SS. 'k.Si}i)...
:...�...4.... .4 >..4 n ..r.:...:i:.}:.;'if!•i:;,:.;?;;:�s:: :�11: ':.\.:::f^J'�{t;.
};:•:.<.:s.,u$:.,f.:.:'rt.: ..3•)1.x.,po:xi.::.. .:ts:2:::::.. ...<.,.:.4.tl.;k.:.. .:y':,`+.;•x' o•c}+'o": } ..,c;�."'
:v. : � .,:+`•}<�}. ;.::t:•}�::1. '.r$:•s:f i3{:i}sjx•:;):S.S
...r•f.,.: .... w�•:.. 4.. .:. ...nv....} n}.v.3 .n•.:......::::Sy}..4:.:nv 3. .. .S}:'i. Mq:'Sti'ti.;: n:IX.;:;:\{' ..\n ..,e,1,Q1W'i714YNiK
...i:n .. :. ..v..vyr..4 .3......... .t ...:h.r..::..........n......i.v.>`G.!'3xx..J. {}. ....:. }::4. r.}'.}•. �.:�}•,�M,MMiIk 1Mi
v:...v v...:.. .. ..n....)44n n:'.i}S}.: .\v' `:4.
.....: }3:;s 0.. ..:..t ......x.,..n,i r.3.s:.......... ..... .4 x.... ........,...,.. +:e,x.o•.
:3� {..v}..q:?f�{...,
,.�.. ;:.•.o. x: .'�. J4 .£:. ::.M' x':;'6i$' ?]s.x.}}o.;;3'.+'3wt6::':4osF1";,yRs:}$S{;:;':i,'�
;t,.:`:... .>:.xi:f:':i.'i}::':: .:.4� ..•N., ;'fit.:•:4:h' :J�'..',:i4o 0 3:3.4.:,s.::..:r ns.K:r. :4.�k: t+
.3n'^.:• r.}>:}'�+f:,fo;9.xC4. I( i:.:v.: .�r,.C: .`$"•. .}E,3};.
.:.4.v.�x.o .'•�;':w'. :s.x.: \4. , :C..i.?.,3..$30.. .,:.:}.<.w,,,.r. :R•. <}:r:.:o::.. 4�. .,.4}^;•ti�ir.?:::`:{<::'u..,.�.o: r.?4..•: ::ko ..'.^.,>.;}. 4 :.,
.,;r��+�,::•'£.:•�•'�u...;' .54: :.4•:.: :r.x:w:.:, 4•,Y,.y....,+:.<: .k.o.: v..ti .t, ..�:�;;;..<:}::�'. ,.3.}...:. x:,..:.*•x;o.p.. ::4n..'.,.:} :4::.,,... »`.5i;. x...o
+:'n:t5}x'.;:n:�n,°:k: .�.,. :.};..:.}.;» .".:")�or k:,u...:.v.r.:v::.: ::sk:Jr,''&x�, .:;:k.'.�,; ,.:x}� ... ,• :.). .$:k:" .4i:..:.�'4
.;1:F'.'f•);t .'''1 r::.g.3•}:;... i;:{?;' •::wYn6Y.:'G•}.x...}�}S.•}}:{j43 Y:'sC.,rv.a:+f?3.o-
+::....v\. :4,;.}..':: < 4};fo• ql+'�:• :F..•n):h.4..A})::. r•" ,'.:y?.: :4iJ Y.3 �:: v.4.\k:*,.' i,3
4..n
Revenues
Service Charges
Parking Meter Collections
Lots 375,200 350,000 350,000 0
Streets 373,200 550,000 550,000 0
Parking Structure Collections 181,900 165,000 165,000 0
Long-Term Parking Revenues 102,800 85,000 85,000 0
Lease Revenues 106,500 100,000 100,000 0
Parking In-Lieu Fees 39,000 60,000 60,000 0
Other Service Charges 66,200 40,000 40,000 0
Total Service Charges 1,244,800 1,350,000 1,350,000 0
Other Revenue - PERS Refund 8,000 8,000 0
Investment and Property Revenues 166,300 200,000 200,000 0
Fines and Forfeitures 495„300 468,000 468,000 0
Total Revenues 1,906,400 2,026,000 2,026,000 0
Expenditures
Operating Programs
Transportation 660,600 620,700 688,800 68,100
General Government 163,200 170,200 170,200 0
Total Operating Programs 823,800 790,900 859,000 68,100
Capital Projects 128,300 250,000 516,700 266,700
Debt Service 960,100 624,700 435 000 (189,700
Total Expenditures 1,912,200 1,665,600 1,810,700 145,100
Other Sources(Uses)
Operating Transfers Out (4,300) (4,500) (4,500) 0
Potential MOA Adjustments (4.000) 0 (4 000)
Total Other Sources(Uses) (4,300) (8,500) (4,500) (4,000)
Revenues and Other Sources Over(Under)
Expenditures and Other Uses (10,100) 351,900 210,800 (145,100)
Fund Balance,Beginning of Year 2,643,700 2,690,800 2,633,600 (57,200)
Fund Balance,End of Year:
Reserved for Debt Service 924,200 924,200 924,200 0
Unreserved 1,709,400 2118 500 1,920,200 (198,300
Fund Balance, End of Year $2,633,600 $3,042,700 $2,844,400 ($198,300)
C-27
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
'T'RANSI'T FUND
ver ?':.. ,.u:::.. :;<S.s.: :;;z•a
:::h:%,:::'....CA..:.^:%i:.$.'J.:t,:;}�\'(::..:�A:.•.::Ly`.nr..$:.:',U3t..}.'.'y.Vi.+}.,.,}i:}CiJN}..:•'..d.'�v hvv.tr.1'{.,.°f.�^�:JS:hIXtt:.i?4.F4:.::,,\.\i'�,w....f.'k...�.n.:v{;..,4\J.'.;::...{4iN.:��.:i..".:.}FH.i..}`.2..:i?•,ti.i T•}>:.n:r:�i:f.::vw..ne,v...:},uv.n;ik i.\\'iJ,y,v.}.::...:,.:S;}..f:rn:�,,f.4.G}b#n}.r..i:?J..}.v h..r....,,.'rtti.J+.J}f.'<'..L:..<:'•>}+J:n.::•:A;v}..,.:OJ':O.:rJ::f�.J;.;`.::..f>.:S,:hC.>,.r':C},.f".JW..>>K•.s,'.h Anr.�:p:Pf.f..,�,...#r....:vu.n:..?.n....;vC}}.`qp'EY.::.;h}.}n:,{:6:.n5:'{'.r:J::„:�..#..+».;�#v.::
...'..: ry} .•.{:j•39I0.>::'�;tK• ' h:�.:
.�e,�`;.y",v':'}:};'^?2:J4t}t.:y..•.r.Y..•','�:'+\t:n..'r}})'{•J:^.'hO�:}.'i'}.O`�:O'iJ:�3.`.qi`'r'J.:fr:.Q?v:.•?.vf{iJ'.h..y'.:'._?:v:.'.
::kwhY:•i.tt^:e..?��.:^x'S.Mwrnt. Jv .'^
J\}r4
. -.0
;.0 .
.^.'`•.q4
'
.
.
lr✓J\":
Revenues
Investment and Property Revenues 1,700 5,000 5,000 0
Subventions and Grants
TDA Revenues 356,500 627,500 646,300 18,800
Other Grants 619,000 75,000 75,000 0
Section 9 430,500 400,000 944,100 544,100
Service Charges 335,700 230,000 319,000 89,000
Other Revenues- PERS Refund 0 3,300 3,.300 0
Total Revenues 1,743,400 1,340,800 1,992,700 651,900
Expenditures
Operating Programs
Transportation 869,500 969,200 943,200 (26,000)
General Government 159,500 165,900 165,900 0
Total Operating Programs 1,029,000 1,135,100 1,109,100 (26,000)
Capital Projects 687,600 351,800 831,800 480,000
Total Expenditures 1,716,600 1,486,900 1,940,900 454,000
Other Sources(Uses)
Potential MOA Adjustments 0 (1,600) 0 1,600
Revenues and Other Sources Over(Under)
Expenditures and Other Uses 26,800 (147,700) 51,800 199,500
Fund Balance,Beginning of Year 8,600 273,100 35,400 (237,70
Fund Balance, End of Year $35,400 $125,400 $87,200 ($38,2001
C-29
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
GOLF COURSE FUND
M-10. MINIM..........
Revenues
Service Charges
Retail Sales 16,900 .32,000 16,000 (16,000)
Green Fees 260,300 .329,400 260,000 (69,400)
Other Fees 51,800 43,000 25,000 (18,000
Total Service Charges 329,000 404,400 .301,000 (103,400)
Other Revenue - PERS Refund 4,400 4,400 0
Investment and Property Revenues 3,400 3,600 3,600
Total Revenues 0
332,400 412,400 309,000 (103,400)
Expenditures
Operating Programs
Leisure,Cultural&Social Services 284,400 291,400 292,300 900
General Government 79,200 82,800 82,800 0
Total Operating Programs 363,600 374,200 375,100 900
Capital Projects
0
Total Expenditures 363,600 374,200 375,100 900
ther Sources(Uses)
Operating Transfers In 76,300
Operating Transfers Out (4,300) (4,500) (4,500) 0
Potential MOA Adjustments (;20-0) 0 2,200
Total Other Sources(Uses) 72,000 (6.700) (4.500) 2,200
Revenues and Other Sources Over(under)
Expenditures and Other Uses 40,800 31,500 (70,600) (102,100)
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year - 93,000 40,800 (52=)
Fund Balance, End of Year $40,800 $124,500 ($29,800) ($154,300)
C-29
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
WHALE ROCK CONMSSION
Revenues
Subventions& Grants - FEMA Reimbursement 6,800 6,900
Service Charges
Member Agency Contributions 336,500 3.39,800 339,800 0
Water Distribution Charges 137,700 279,000 429,000 150,000
Other Revenues 4,000 7,800 7,800 0
Total Service Charges 478,200 626,600 776,600 150,000
Investment and Property Revenues 13,600 10,000 10,000 0
Total Revenues 491,800 636,600 793,400 156,800
Expenditures
Operating Programs
Public Utilities 425,000 547,600 700,200 152,600
General Government 73,500 77,100 77,100 0
Total Operating Programs 498,500 624,700 777,300 I52,600
Capital Projects 233,000 800 800
Total Expenditures 731,500 624,700 778,100 153,400
Other Sources(Uses)
Operating Transfers Out (4,600) (4,800) (4,800) 0
Potential MOA Adjustments (2,800) 0 2,800
Total Other Sources(Uses) (4,600) (7.600) (4.800) 2,900
Revenues and Other Sources Over(under)
Expenditures and Other Uses (244,300) 4,300 10,500 6,200
Fund Balance,Beginning of Year 512,800 171,200 268,500 97,300
Fund Balance, End of Year $268,500 $175,500 $279,000 $10325W
C-30
- Section D
MM"YEAR BUDGET REQUESTS
MID-YEAR BUDGET REQUESTS
SUMMARY OF 1994-95 REQUESTS
OPERATING PROGRAMS
Public Safety
• Disaster response costs (Highway 41 fire) 64,700
Public Utilities
• Solid waste franchise renewal consultant services 30,000
Leisure, Cultural & Social Services
• Childcare — increased participation and new training requirements 47,500
Community Development
• Computer mapping projects 7,600
General Government
• Support services reorganization 2,200
• Ethernet migration at 955 Morro, City Hall and Police Station 14,700
Total Operating Program Requests $166,700
CAPITAL OUTLAY
Public Safety
• Communications system replacement(Highway 41 fire) 95,000
Transportation
• Street light acquisition services 35,000
• Marsh Street reconstruction and storm drain improvements 560,000
• Acquisition of property at 860 Pacific(Parking Fund) 235,000
• New parking lot at Palm and Morro (Parking Fund) 25,000
Leisure, Cultural & Social Services
• Islay Hill Park fee refunds 186,000
• Pick—up truck and mower 35,000
• Parks & Recreation office building (supplemental funding) 151,000
General Government
• Replace/upgrade file servers (Equipment Replacement Fund) 34,800
Total Capital Outlay $1,356,800
D-a
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
D-6
1993-95 FINANCIAL PLAN
REQUEST FOR SIGNIFICANT EXPENDITURE OR STAFFING CHANGE
PROGRAM: Disaster Expenditures
REQUEST TITLE: Disaster Response Costs
REQUEST SUMMARY
Provide funding in the amount of$64,700 to recoup direct costs expended by City Departments on
the Highway 41 Fire. It should be noted that the City has requested to recover these funds as well
as indirect costs which total $123,600 through an application for disaster relief from the State of
California. If granted, the City may be reimbursed for up to 75% of these costs, which amounts to
$92,700.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE
Recover costs spent on the Highway 41 Fire.
SUMMARY OF FACTORS DRIVING THE REQUEST FOR CHANGE
■ On August 15, 1994 a fire that originated in the County, the "Highway 41 Fire" escalated
and presented a condition of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within our
City.
■ To protect our citizens, the City set-up its Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and Staging
Area at San Luis Obispo High School. One hundred and thirty-five fire engines from all
over the State of California responded and remained in our City for three days. Most off-
duty personnel were called back. $64,700 was spent in personnel, food, and equipment costs
to maintain this EOC and Staging Area.
■ On November 8, 1994, the City sent an application to the State of California requesting these
funds be reimbursed. It is possible that the City could receive up to 75% of its costs spent
on this fire. The State has not yet responded to our request. A significant backlog in
disaster relief has developed as a result of the earthquake in 1994 and the flooding in 1995.
COST SUMMARY
Staffing
Overtime 45,600.
Operating Materials & Supplies 11,100.
Contract Services 49500.
Minor Capital 3.500,
TOTAL 64,700.
G:\C0MM0N\ADM1N\WP\VRD49.D0C
D-1
1994-95 Mid-Year Budges Request
SIGNIFICANT OPERATING PROGRAM CHANGE
PROGRAM: Solid Waste (100-5570)
REQUEST TITLE: Franchise Renewal Consultant Services (200-053)
Request Summary
Approval of this request would identify$40,000 for consulting and environmental legal services associated with franchise
renewal and negotiations for solid waste hauling and recyling activities. (Of the $40,000, only $30,000 would need to be
appropriated from fund balance as $10,000 would come from existing budget.) Staff is seeking expert assistance in the
identifying an appropriate strategy to ensure the long term solid waste and recycling services that meet the community's
goals. Once the strategy is developed,the consultant would assist staff by ensuring that the agreements are legally defensible
and environmentally appropriate, as well as advising during negotiations. The use of the consultant will be minimized, as
staff intends to perform as much of the work as possible.
At their January 3, 1995 meeting, Council directed staff to begin negotiations with the current solid waste franchisee for the
performance of solid waste hauling. In addition, Council directed staff to analyze the alternatives for providing recycling
services. At present, the current franchisee performs both solid waste collection and hauling as well as recycling services.
The current franchise period was for ten years, but the Charter allows franchise periods up to 35 years.
Solid waste collection and disposal, and recycling and materials processing, is a $5.1 million operation in 1995. In 1996,
it is projected to be a $5.48 million operation. The amount of money involved, as well as the constantly evolving state of
the law regarding solid waste and recycling,have persuaded staff that a solid waste consultant expert in franchise negotiations
and an environmental attorney with specific knowledge of solid waste law, will best serve the long term interest of the
community.
Project Objectives, Goals and Policy Links
■ Council direction on January 3, 1995, to proceed with franchise contract renewal negotiations.
■ City Charter, Article X, regarding franchise authorization.
■ Compliance with AB 939.
Primary Factors Driving the Request
■ Need to develop a long-term solid waste/recycling franchise to best serve the community.
■ Letter from San Luis Garbage Company requesting that franchise negotiations begin.
■ Request from Council that staff analyze and present the alternatives for providing recycling services.
Alternatives
■ Staff can develop a plan and alternatives for providing solid waste and recyling services, and draft a franchise
agreement. However, staffs recommendation for developing the best long term strategy that considers an array of
important factors, including cost, stability, future program implementation, compliance with city SRRE and HWWE
goals,legal defensibility,environmental protections,enforceability,and long term flexibility,is to request expert help.
It has been staffs experience, given the amount of money, complexity and duration of these franchise arrangements,
that contracting with technical/legal experts is the smartest course. They offer objectivity, comprehensive subject
knowledge, and, often, have suggestions that result in savings that more than pay for the contracting cost.
D-2
Cost Summary
Amount of
Budget Request Total
1994/95 1994/95 1994/95
CONTRACT SERVICES
200-053 $10,000 $30,000 $40,000
Implementation
The City's purchasing and procurement policy will be followed in obtaining these services. A request for proposal will be
prepared and mailed to industry experts. Following review of submittals and oral interviews, staff will recommend to the
City Administrative Officer the appropriate consultant.
D-3
1994-1995 Mid-Year budget Adjustment
SIGNIFICANT OPERATING PROGRAM CHANGE
PROGRAM: Childcare (6025)
REQUEST TITLE: Increased Program Participation
New Training Requirements
Request Summary
Sun and Fun serves nearly 1200 children annually on San Luis Coastal Elementary School sites before, during and after
school. Identified as a State of California Licensed Childcare program, daily program design fouces on social guidance,
at-risk prevention and academic support through recreationally planned activities. In order to maintain staff to participant
ratios required to comply with California Licensing regulations and meet newly mandated training requirements an
additional $47,500 is requested.
Factors driving this mid year adjustment request include increased participation and recently adopted training standards
by the State of California. Current participation is up 17% over fiscal year 1993-94. Increased participation has required
additional costs in temporary salaries. In order to remain in compliance with California State Childcare Licensing
Guidelines for staffing ratios, and train staff in accordance with new health issues an increase in temporary salaries of
$39,500 plus $5,500 in associated benefit costs is needed. Recently adopted training mandates, effective 1/1/95, from the
State of California requiring all staff to receive 16 hours of training in Pediatric First Aid, CPR, Infectious Diseases and
Prevention of Childhood Injuries requires an additional $2500 for registration fees and materials and $3500 of temporary
salaries plus associated benefit costs.
This request will be offset by revenue. Program revenue for the first six months of the budget year has increased by
$35,000 in comparison to the same time period, July through December in fiscal year 1993-94. A total of$47,500 is
requested which will be partially compensated by a$50,000 annual estimated revenue offset which makes the net cost of
operating this program $67,400. Total revenues are currently $166,000. Conservative estimates and program participation
indicate that this should continue throughout the remainder of the fiscal year which would completely cover the cost of
this request.
Primary Objectives
■ Continue to meet the demand for elementary school children for prevention and intervention activity programming
on school sites.
• Maintain existing levels of service to parents and their children in the City.
■ Provide training to existing staffing order to comply with State of California Regulations effective 1/1/95.
Primary Factors Driving The Request For Change
■ A 17% enrollment increase which translates into an average of 60 more children attending the six program
locations on a daily basis. State guidelines require a ratio of 1 staff member per 14 children in attendance.
Additional staff has been hired in order to maintain staffing ratios at each program site.
■ Effective January 1, 1995 the State of California requires all staff working in a licensed children's program to
be trained in Pediatric First Aid, CPR, Infectious Diseases and Prevention of Childhood Injuries. The training
fee varies depending on the number of staff people being trained. There are currently 35 staff members requiring
the training.
D-4
Alternatives
■ Eliminate staff and reduce service to 35 children per day which would also reflect in an estimated revenue
reduction of nearly $35,000 for the remaining six months of the fiscal year.
■ Chose not to comply with newly adopted training guidelines and operate in non-compliance with California State
regulations.
Cost Summary
Current Costs Additional Costs
1994-95
Salaries: Temporary Employees $198,000 $ 39,500
Workers Compensation (.1179) $ 15,800 $ 4,700
SUI (.004) $ 900 $ 200
Medicare (.0145) $ 3,000 $ 600
Contract Services $ 6,100 $ 2,500
TOTAL REQUEST $ 47,500
TOTAL BUDGET $321,900 $369,400
Revenue Estimate (252,000) (302,000)
Net Cost $ 69,900 $ 67,400.
D-5
1994-95 Mid-Year Budget
SIGNIFICANT OPERATING PROGRAM CHANGE
PROGRAM: Community Development Administration
REQUEST TITLE: Computer Mapping Projects
Project Description
Convert existing hand-drawn maps into computer format ($7,600).
Request Summary
As part of the department's reorganization two years ago,staffing for map production and maintenance has been reduced from
two full-time positions into a single Graphics Technician position shared with the Fire Department. Such limited staffing
means that the department is only able to maintain existing maps or must defer such maintenance in order to produce new
maps (as was the case with the general plan Land Use Element map).
With the use of computerized drafting and mapping,the department has an opportunity to improve efficiency in maintenance
and eliminate redundant manual mapping systems. Even though this will save time and improve accuracy in the long run,
the department can't afford the "up-front" investment in labor to convert existing hand-drawn maps into the more efficient
computer format.
Funds are b::-- requested to acquire the following mapping from outside vendors. All mapping would be done using City
standard Aui _:,d software, drawn on the new City base map. As such,these maps would be compatible with existing City
standard mapping systems and any other system the City may implement in the future, including Geographic Information
Systems (GIS). The first two projects are one-time in nature and will replace maps that staff now maintains by hand. The
third project will serve as the basis for a comprehensive program to consolidate two separate hand-drawn mapping systems
and convert them into computer format. The three projects are:
1. Convert the Generalized Zone Mau to computer format($1 000). The original of this map is over 10 years old,and can't
be used for much longer without being re-drawn. The Engineering Division has completed a new, more accurate city-
wide base map in computer format that would serve as the basis for adding zone boundaries.
2. Convert the Downtown Conceptual Physical Plan to computer format (S3.100). When reviewing new planning
applications in the downtown,staff is finding it difficult to visualize the collective changes to the downtown design plan
as development occurs in that area. Each new project affects the overall plan, yet there isn't a tool to portray those
changes other than looking at the draft "poster" of the plan and extracting information from other sources. Creating a
computer model of the downtown design plan will give staff the tool necessary to adequately evaluate new projects for
compliance with the plan.
3. Begin consolidating Counter Book and Fire Response Book in computer format($3.500). Eighty percent of the contents
in the Community Development Counter Book and the Fire Response Book are similar, resulting in two redundant
maintenance systems. Limited staffing doesn't allow the consolidation the two systems or converting the maps to
computer format. Using mid-year funding we can begin the process in the areas of greatest need and gather valuable
information on which a comprehensive RFP can be developed for a full mapping program in the 1995-97 Financial Plan.
Cost Summary
Funding(a total of$7,600)would be used to have local engineering/drafting firms provide AutoCad mapping services using
a City base map. This would not require any additional City staffing or resources. Carry-over funds are already committed
for other programs.
Implementation ti
Depending on the project and the availability of local vendors, mapping would be completed within three months.
D-6
1994-95 Mid-Year Budget Request
SIGNIFICANT OPERATING PROGRAM CHANGE
PROGRAM: City Administration, City Clerk Records & Administration and Accounting
REQUEST TITLE: Support Services Reorganization
Request Summary
An additional half-time regular position is requested in accordance with previous Council direction to transfer two full-time
positions from the City Clerk's Office along with certain activities while retaining one half-time regular position in the
City Clerk's Office. The following summarizes support service responsibilities that have been reorganized along with
departmental assignments:
■ Special event coordination Parks & Recreation
■ Bid administration - construction projects Public Works
■ Bid administration - all other purchases Finance
■ Mail (interoffice & U.S. postal service) Finance
■ Council support - phones, computers, faxes Finance
■ Council support - clerical, budget, advisory bodies Administration
For the balance of 1994-95, the additional half-time position will cost $2,200; on an annual basis, it will cost $17,700.
Primary Objectives
Improve overall organizational efficiency and productivity by implementing the support services reorganization as
conceptually approved by the Council in January of 1995.
Key Factors Driving the Request for Change
In arriving at the recommended departmental assignments for the transferred responsibilities, all affected department heads
(Parks & Recreation, Public Works, Finance, Administration and City Clerk) met to consider how to best organize these
services and allocate resources. All agreed on the following resource allocations in assigning the responsibilities outlined
above in accordance with overall Council direction regarding regular staffing levels:
■ Transfer Council Secretary position to Administration
■ Transfer incumbent Office Assistant who currently coordinates special events to Parks & Recreation
■ Transfer Office Assistant position to Finance (Accounting Division)
■ Retain half-time regular Office Assistant position in the City Clerk's Office
Based on the efficiencies in operations that these changes will make possible, all affected department heads believe that
they will be able to effectively provide their new scope of duties with the recommended resources.
Alternatives
■ Make no organizational changes. Based on the organizational improvements that will result from this change,
this option is not recommended.
■ Implement reorganization but do not increase regular staffing levels. This would impact the City Cleric's ability
to deliver remaining services and would be contrary to previous Council direction. As such, this option is not
recommended.
Cost Summary
The cost impact of this reorganization for the balance of 1994-95 will be minimal ($2,200) for two reasons:
■ Except for the cost of a regular half-time Office Assistant position, all of the changes involve simply transferring
existing funds between program area and line items.
D-7
Support Services Reorganization (cu„cmued)
■ Since the addition of the half-time onsition is occurring so late in the fiscal year (it will not filled until at least
the middle of May), only $2,200 w:i: be incurred this fiscal year.
On an ongoing basis, however, this authorization for an additional half-time regular position will have an annual cost of
about $17,700 beginning in 1995-96.
Implementation
■ Transfers can be completed by March 1, 1995.
■ Filling the half-time regular Office Assistant position can be completed by mid-May, 1995.
H:CCRF.ORG
D-8
1994-95 Mid-Year Request
SIGNIFICANT OPERATING PROGRAM CHANGE
PROGRAM: Information Systems Management
REQUEST TITLE: Ethernet Migration at 955 Morro, City Hall and Police Station
Request Summary
Remove existing ArcNet cabling with associated hardware at 955 Morro, City Hall and the Police Station and replace them
with the City standard Ethernet cabling and equipment at an estimated cost of$34,700. Of this amount, $20,000 is
available from existing resources; accordingly, this request is for $14,700.
Primary Objectives
■ Improve and maintain the City's local area networks with reliable equipment that operates at acceptable speeds
of transmission.
• Increase productivity at all administrative offices and generally reduce cable faults and business interruption.
Primary Factors Driving Request for Change
Ethernet cabling has been adopted as the City standard by the MIS Steering Committee. However, much of the cabling
for data communications in City offices continues to be ArcNet, which is obsolete, unreliable and lacks in the throughput
capacity and management tools required for current and future networking. Currently, staff in Personnel and Utilities have
experienced repeated network failure. During recent power outages, some staff on ArcNet at the Police Department were
not able to reconnect to network services without technical assistance while those on ethernet re-established network
connection instantaneously.
Based upon the adoption of the ethernet IOBaseT cabling standard by the MIS Steering Committee in April of 1992,
Corporation Yard and Parks&Recreation Administration sites have fully implemented this standard and some departments
have migrated with the assistance of Information Systems staff using their own funding. Information Systems recommends
and System Administrators support city-wide migration to standard ethernet to provide consistent network performance,
easier troubleshooting and centralized network management over the wide area network. Equipment installed during the
wide area network (i.e. Cabletron hubs with ethernet ports) makes it cheaper to migrate computers than previous cost
estimates. The cost of moving to ethernet was a major factor in the past in deferring migration to this standard. Ethernet
migration is mandatory for adequate performance of Windows workstations when file serving across the local and wide
area networks. Current applications used across the WAN are: email, calendaring and FoxPro programs, like work order
and land use inventory. In the near future, database integration and sharing of plans and maps will require more
bandwidth than ArcNet can provide.
Alternatives
Do Nothing or Defer Project. During the past months, cable faults have occurred which have caused work to cease for
many staff members at these sites. Further delay in implementation will cause significant decrease in productivity and
increases in support costs.
Cost Summary
Location 199495
955 Morro $ 9,200
Police 10,600
City Hall 14,900
Total $ 34,700
y,
Recommended Funding Source:
D-9
Affected departments will be responwole for all network card costs ($5,400) and hau of cable plant costs ($14,600) from
existing operating budgets. This request is for the balance of this project (50% of cable plant costs)that cannot be funded
from existing budgets ($14,700).
Implementation
Information Systems has received an acceptable proposal to perform this work which will be covered within our existing
maintenance agreement for the wide area network. Because we have already experienced major network failures at some
sites, work on this project has already been initiated in some cases as it was more cost effective to move to this standard
than repair the ArcNet connections.
An estimated 30 hours of staff time will be used to install network cards, configure software and oversee cable plant
implementation. Productivity of staff at these sites will be increased by improved network reliability and performance.
D-10
1993-95 FINANCIAL PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN REQUEST
FUNCTION: Public Safety PROGRAM: Emergency Response
DEPARTMENT: Fire TYPE:
Project Title - Tactical Communications System and Emergency Call-Back Paging
oject Description - Replace the Fire Department's Emergency Call-Back Paging and Tactical
Communications System that were consumed in the Highway 41 Fire.
eject Objective - Provide an adequate radio and call-back paging system.
Existing Situation - During the height of the Highway 41 Fire, which occurred August 15-16, 1994,
millions of dollars of communications equipment were consumed at the Tassajara Peak Electronic
Site in the Los Padres National Forest. Among that equipment was the City Fire Department's
emergency call-back paging and tactical communications systems.
Paging: .
In order to call-back off-duty personnel, the Department has contracted with a private paging
company to call our off-duty personnel back to duty during emergencies. Unfortunately, the private
system is not designed to the level of reliability required by the nature of our emergency service.
Their system lacks adequate emergency backup and uses telephone lines to access the transmitter. In
just the few months since the fire, both weaknesses have caused the system to fail. Accordingly, a
more reliable system is required if we are to reliably augment our on duty forces during any
emergency of significance. A new system can be utilized by all City departments, many of whom
are currently using private vendors saving the City approximately $6,000 a year and increasing our
communications system city-wide. The new system can be expanded to include Departments
currently unable to afford paging services.
Radio:
With the loss of the high elevation Tassajara site, our tactical radio system has also been crippled
and is of limited use. Many of the areas in which we may be required to operate have poor to no
coverage now. The Fire Department does have another radio frequency in use. It is used for
dispatch and primary emergency coordination. It is totally dependent upon a repeater. That repeater
has been in continuous operation, twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, for the last sixteen
years and is in need of major maintenance. However, we are unable to remove it from service for
the needed maintenance due to the lack of adequate replacement. The only available replacement
for the repeater is our impaired tactical system. Its coverage is too poor to serve as even a
temporary replacement. Finally, should a major emergency occur with our current tactical system
coverage, our communications, on-scene operations and employee safety could be severely affected,
thus, jeopardizing our service to the community. Based on these needs, the destroyed portion of our
tactical system should be replaced immediately.
G:\C0MM0N\ADMWWP1 VRD49.DOC
V-11
Goal and Policy Link - The new systems are critical to the delivery of emergency services to the
citizens of San Luis Obispo.
RMject Work Completed - We are currently in the process of pursuing two funding sources to help
alleviate these costs:
■ On November 14, 1994 the City submitted an application to the State for financial
disaster assistance to recoup monies lost during the Highway 41 fire. Among the
replacement items listed was communications equipment. The City could receive as
much as 75% reimbursement for the cost of replacing this equipment.
■ The City's Risk Manager has submitted a claim to the City's insurance carrier to
ascertain if a portion or the total replacement cost could be recovered through our
insurance.
Schedule and Project Costs
The projected cost of replacing the Fire Department's Emergency Call Back Paging and Tactical
Communications System is $95,000.
Staff is working with Motorola in the design and implementation of a construction schedule.
G:\COMMON\ADMIN\WP\VRD49.DOC
V-12
1994/95 Midyear Budget Request
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
OPERATION: Streets and Flood Control
REQUEST TITLE: Street Light Acquisition Services
Description
Hire an attorney for negotiation and condemnation services to acquire street lights from PG&E ($20,000). Hire
an appraiser for appraisal and negotiation services ($15,000).
One-time cost: $35,000
Objective
Save about$120,000 each year in street light operating costs
Background
There are 1,864 street lights within the City. The City owns 51 of these lights and pays PG&E for electricity
and maintenance on those 51 lights. PG&E owns the remaining 1,813 lights, and the City pays PG&E for rent
plus electricity and maintenance on those 1,813 lights.
In fall 1994 the City hired two consultants for advice on acquiring street lights from PG&E in order to reduce
operating costs. An accredited public utilities appraiser prepared a capitalized income appraisal to establish a
preliminary value for the system. An electric utilities consultant prepared a report to determine the feasibility of
the City 1) acquiring the 1,813 street lights owned by PG&E and 2) assuming maintenance responsibility for all
1,864 lights. The feasibility report included the following findings:
■ The City now pays PG&E about$228,000 each year for rent, electricity, and maintenance on the 1,864
street lights within the City.
• Following an acquisition, the City would pay PG&E about$70,100 each year for electricity only.
■ Following an acquisition, the City would pay between $37,700 and $43,200 each year for maintenance,
depending on whether this service were provided by a contractor or a City employee.
• By acquiring the PG&E-owned street lights and taking over maintenance, the City would save between
$114,700 and $120,200 each year in operating costs.
• Acquisition cost would probably fall somewhere between $572,000 and $729,000, based on comparable
sales.
• "Me estimated payback period on an acquisition would be 4.8 to 6.4 years.
The preliminary report shows that acquiring the PG&E-owned street lights probably makes sense depending on
the acquisition cost and the condition of the system. The next step for the City will be to enter preliminary
negotiations with PG&E with an offer based on the rudimentary capitalized income appraisal already prepared.
Typically these preliminary negotiations stall, the municipality files a condemnation lawsuit, and the parties
eventually negotiate a settlement based on more refined appraisals prepared jointly by PG&E and the City's
appraiser.
Policy Links
Adopted general budget policy about using capital investment to improve productivity and reduce ongoing costs
D-13
Street Light Acquisition Services (continued)
Project Work Completed
An electric utilities consultant has prepared a preliminary feasibility report on the acquisition. An accredited
public utilities appraiser has completed a preliminary capitalized income appraisal, which will be used as the
basis for an initial purchase offer as the City enters negotiations.
Schedule and Project Costs
Prior Project
Bud eets 1994/95 Total
Phasing
Shy 9,000 35,000 44,000
Recommended Financing Sources
General Fund 9,000 35,000 44,000
Acquisition cost is liberally estimated between $572,000 and $729,000, based on comparable sales. The actual
price may be much lower but must negotiated or settled through condemnation proceedings.
D-14
1994/95 Midyear Budget Request
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
OPERATION: Streets and Flood Control
REQUEST TITLE: Marsh Street Reconstruction and Storm Drain Improvement
Description
Reconstruction and Resurfacing:
• From Santa Rosa to Chorro, grind off the existing asphalt overlay and some of the underlying concrete
pavement, seal joints and cracks, install reinforcing fabric mesh, and place three inches of asphaltic
concrete
• From Chorro to Nipomo, grind off enough of the existing asphalt overlay to ensure a smooth surface,
seal joints and cracks, install reinforcing fabric mesh, and place one-and-a-half inches of asphaltic
concrete
One-time cost: $305,000
Storm Drain Improvement:
• Extend an existing storm drain in Marsh Street by installing about 300 feet of storm drain pipe to rum
from mid-block between Chorro and Morro to the intersection of Marsh and Morro; install new catch
basins
• Install about 600 feet of storm drain pipe to rum from the intersection of Osos and Pacific, north on
Osos to Marsh, then east on Marsh to an outfall into San Luis Obispo Creek; install new catch basins
One-time cost: $145,000
Sidewalk Ramp and Bulbout Installation:
■ Construct 16 standard sidewalk ramps required for disabled accessibility
• Construct 12 sidewalk bulbouts with integral sidewalk ramps where Marsh Street intersects Chorro,
Garden, and Broad
■ Lower street grades near sidewalk ramps to make the ramps slope correctly
■ Remove under-sidewalk storm drains and adjacent catch basins to make room for new sidewalk ramps
• Replace under-sidewalk drains with about 250 feet of storm drain pipe and new catch basins
One-time cost: $210,000($150,000 for sidewalk ramps and $60,000 for bulbouts)
Mid-Block Bulbout and Crosswalk Installation:
• Construct sidewalk bulbouts and a textured concrete crosswalk across Marsh Street between Morro and
Chorro
• Construct street tree wells and raised planter boxes
• Install benches, landscaping, street trees, drinking fountains, and bike racks
One-time cost: $50,000
D-15
Marsh Street Resurfacing and Storm Drain Improvement (continued)
Objectives
■ Improve street appearance and ride quality
■ Prevent movement of the concrete street slabs by halting deterioration of the underlying base material
■ Prevent street flooding by increasing street drain capacity
■ Improve accessibility for disabled people at street crossings
■ Improve pedestrian circulation
Background
Reconstruction and Resurfacing: The underlying street section along Marsh Street is long-wearing concrete,
which can last almost perpetually if joints and cracks can be sealed to prevent moisture penetration. As part of
the Mission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa bicentennial celebration in 1972, the City placed a one-inch asphalt
overlay on this street to improve appearance. But as this overlay has deteriorated, moisture has found its way
through the asphalt, through the hidden joints and cracks, and into the base material under the thick concrete.
This moisture has destabilized the base material, allowing the concrete slabs to shift and create an uneven street
surface. At the same time, the asphalt overlay in some areas has peeled off and moved around, and heavy
traffic has worn grooves in it. As a consequence, appearance and ride quality have deteriorated enough to rouse
chronic citizen complaints.
The reconstruction and resurfacing portion of the overall project is divided into two sections:
• The first section, from Santa Rosa to Chorro, will undergo a full reconstruction which will extend
expected pavement life to 50 years with the periodic preventive maintenance specified in pavement
management policies. Reconstruction is feasible in this section because there should be no damaging
sawcuts made to the pavement for several years. There is no water, wastewater, or fire suppression
line work planned during the next 20 years, although there might be unanticipated emergency repairs.
■ The second section, from Chorro to Nipomo, will receive a temporary cosmetic overlay to smooth the
surface and stop moisture penetration until future reconstruction after completion of several major
utilities projects, including replacement of a water main and installation of fire sprinkler laterals for
commercial buildings. This work should ensure a good street surface for no more than about 15 years,
because the trenching and sawcutting required for utility improvements will disturb the base material
and allow moisture penetration. In general, utility sawcuts cause more pavement deterioration than any
other factor. Although the street surface between Broad and Nipomo is in fairly good condition, the
resurfacing will provide a uniformly smooth new surface over the entire downtown portion of Marsh
Street between Santa Rosa and Nipomo.
Storm Drain Improvement: The large 24-inch storm drain in Marsh Street, which runs southwest toward
Higuera, starts mid-block between Chorro and Morro. Extending the starting point back to the intersection of
Marsh and Morro will alleviate street flooding in this area. Also, storm drainage in the Osos/Marsh area
depends on surface flow and small drains under the sidewalks at corners. Because of the configuration and
small size of this storm drain system, the streets in this area flood four or five times a year during periods of
average rainfall. Both of these improvements should prudently be completed before pavement reconstruction.
The improvements at the Osos/Marsh location supersede a project titled 'Storm Drain - Osos Street (Pismo-
SLO Creek)" previously scheduled for construction in 1996/97.
D-I6
Marsh Street Resurfacing and Storm Drain Improvement (continued)
Background (continued)
Sidewalk Ramp and Bulbout Installation: Recent court decisions have ruled that approved sidewalk ramps must
be installed during street reconstruction and resurfacing projects in order to comply with the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA). This reconstruction project needs 28 new ramps to comply with ADA provisions. 12
of these ramps will be incorporated into sidewalk bulbouts where Marsh Street intersects Chonro, Garden, and
Broad. The conceptual plan for the downtown recommends these bulbouts, along with textured concrete
crosswalks, to improve pedestrian circulation. (The textured concrete crosswalks will be installed later, after
utilities projects are completed.) Making all these ramps comply with ADA provisions will require extensive
related improvements to relocate storm drain structures and establish new curb grades. These additional
improvements will boost the cost per ramp from $3,500 to $5,400.
Mid-Block Bulbout and Crosswalk Installation: Most patrons of the Downtown Centre park in the Marsh Street
Parking Garage, but there is no good pedestrian access across Marsh Street. Installing bulbouts and a crosswalk
will provide an easily identified path and will shorten the walk across Marsh Street, which is now perceived as a
strong barrier to pedestrian traffic. This installation will also complete a pedestrian path that will run from the
Marsh Street Parking Garage, across the Marsh Street bulbout and crosswalk, through the Downtown Centre,
across the Higuera Street bulbout and crosswalk, through the Ross store, and across the Monterey Street bulbout
and crosswalk. Based on experience with the bulbouts and crosswalks on Higuera and Monterey, there will be
no traffic signal at this location.
Policy Links
• Downtown Improvement Manual(street resurfacing)
■ 1991193 Financial Plan, page E-8 (street resurfacing)
■ 1993195 Financial Plan, page E-6 (storm drain improvement)
• Americans with Disabilities Act (sidewalk ramp installation)
• A Conceptual Physical Plan for the City's Center(sidewalk bulbouts at intersections)
Justification for the reconstruction and resurfacing portion of this project rests on citizen complaints about
appearance and ride quality rather than engineering analysis of stmt condition. This work is not recommended
in the pavement management plan, which emphasizes strength and durability over appearance and ride quality.
An exception to the City's calculated reconstruction priorities might be warranted by the unique character and
condition of the downtown streets.
Concurrences
The Downtown Business Improvement Association surveyed its members and found that half favored
construction during the summer and half favored construction during the fall. The public works staff is
planning to design and bid this project so that construction can start in July 1995, immediately following
completion of water and wastewater improvement projects in Marsh Street.
Project Work Completed
The engineering staff has completed some hydraulic study of the storm drain system in this area and conceptual
design for the entire project.
D-17
Marsh Street Resurfacing and Storm Drain Improvement (continued)
Schedule and Project Costs
Prior Project
Budgets 1994/95 1995/96 Total
Phasing
Construction 560,000 560,000
Construction (Sidewalk Ramps) 150,000 150.000
710,000
Recommended Financing Sources
General Fund 560,000 560,000
CDBG Fund (Sidewalk Ramps) 150,000 150.000
710,000
If it is not feasible to budget for this work as a separate new project, planned street reconstruction and
resurfacing work could be deferred for one year. The 1994/95 appropriation is $740,000, and the proposed
1995/96 appropriation is $765,000.
Alternative Projects
■ Project as Proposed plus Improvements on Marsh Street from Nipomo to Higuera ($910,000). This
project would extend the temporary overlay on Marsh Street from Nipomo to Higuera and add eight
sidewalk ramps. Current pavement condition is fairly good, and significant utility work is planned
during the next 20 years.
• Project as Proposed except Substitution of a Temporary Overlay on Marsh Street from Santa Rosa to
Chorro ($660,000). This project would eliminate the long-term reconstruction on Marsh Street from
Santa Rosa to Chorro and substitute the same temporary overlay proposed for the stretch between
Chorro and Nipomo. Storm drain and sidewalk ramp work would not change. Although there would
be a $50,000 cost savings, the expected pavement life from Santa Rosa to Chorro would be only 15 to
20 years, compared to 50 years for the reconstruction.
• Project as Proposed less Improvements on Marsh Street between Broad and Nipomo ($660,000). This
project would delete the temporary overlay on Marsh Street between Broad and Nipomo along with
four of the required sidewalk ramps.
D-lk
1994/95 Midyear Budget Request
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
OPERATION: Parking
REQUEST TITLE: Acquisition of Property at 860 Pacific
Description
Acquire the property at 860 Pacific Street for future expansion of the Marsh Street Parking Garage.
Objective
Satisfy the additional downtown parking demand created by the Downtown Centre
Background
To provide for future parking development, in February 1988 the City used 1986 lease revenue bond issue
proceeds to buy the 860 Pacific property for$445,000. Debt service on this acquisition has been paid from the
general fund, so technically the general fund owns the property. The Downtown Centre has been completed,
and as the local economy begins to fully recover from the current recession, there will be increasing pressure to
develop additional downtown parking. For that purpose the parking program will need the 860 Pacific site in
the next few years for expansion of the Marsh Street Parking Garage.
To avoid paying rent at the old junior high school, shortly after acquisition the recreation offices moved into the
building at 860 Pacific, an older residence which had been converted to office space. Although these new
quarters were crowded and inefficient, they were also considered temporary, pending development of new
permanent offices. With new permanent offices at Emerson Park scheduled for construction in 1995, this would
be a convenient time for the parking fund to acquire the property.
Policy Links
Parking Master Plan
Project Work Completed
An appraisal has been prepared.
Schedule and Project Costs
Prior Project
Budgets 1994/95 Total
Phasing
Acquisition 250,000 235,000 495,000
Recommended Financing Sources
Parking Fund 250,000 235,000 485,000
The$485,000 acquisition cost is the estimated market value established by a commercial real estate appraiser.
D-19
1994/95 Midyear Budget Request
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
OPERATION: Buildings and Equipment
REQUEST TITLE: New Parking Lot at Palm and Morro
Description
Construct a new parking lot with 22 spaces at the corner of Palm and Morro Streets next to the 955 Morro
Building; install parking meters; install extensive landscaping along the perimeter; install additional lighting if
necessary.
One-time cost: $25,000
Objectives
• Provide additional parking in the Civic Center area
■ Increase revenue for the parking find
• Improve the appearance of the vacant lot at the comer of Palm and Morro
Background
The Kozak Garage at this location is being demolished and the site is being regraded in order to prevent damage
from chronic rainwater intrusion into the adjacent 955 Morro Building. A metered parking lot here would be a
good interim use pending ultimate development of this site. It would provide additional downtown parking and
bring additional ongoing revenue into the parking find.
Policy Links
Adopted parking program goals:
0 adequate, safe, and attractive parking for visitors, customers, and employees in the downtown
• recovery of all parking program costs through user charges and other program revenue
Project Work Completed
The demolition contract has been awarded. Construction documents for the new parking lot are about 50
percent complete.
Schedule and Project Costs
Prior Project
Phasing Budeets 1994/95 Total
Construction 40,000 25,000 65,000
Recommended Financing Sources
General Fund 40,000 40,000
Parking Fund 25,000 25,000
The general fund owns the site and has paid for demolition and regrading. The parking fund will benefit from
the parking lot improvements and should pay for them. Revenue from the parking meters should bring in
$10,000 to$20,000 per year to the parking fund, so construction costs should be recovered in 16 to 30 months.
D-20
1994/95 Midyear Budget Request
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
OPERATION: Parks and Recreation
REQUEST TITLE: Islay Hill Park Fee Refunds
Description
Refund to the subdivider of Tract 1750 about$186,000(depending on final calculations of accrued interest)in
fees collected for development of Islay Hill Park. The subdivider has assumed responsibility for park
construction from the City.
Objectives
• Develop a neighborhood park to serve the Islay area of the Edna/Islay Specific Plan
• Comply with stipulations of the subdivision agreement for Tract 1750
Background
The Edna/Islay Specific Plan called for construction of a four-acre neighborhood park in the Islay area, later
named Islay Hill Park. The plan stipulated that after dedication of park area to the City, the cost of develop-
ment was to be evenly divided among the subdivider, the homeowners, and the City. The subdivider's portion
was to come through construction of the first phases of the park. The homeowners were to pay park
development fees assessed upon the original sale of their residences (in the amount of$750 per home). And the
City was to pay the balance needed for construction from general fund taxes.
Tract 1376 was the first tract developed in the Islay area. When this development occurred in the late 1980's,
the City collected $57,452 in park-in-lieu fees to ensure future dedication of the park area. The city also
collected $76,500 in part development fees from the homeowners.
In 1992 the City entered into a subdivision agreement for Tract 1750, the second tract developed in the Islay
area. By this agreement the subdivider dedicated the park area and assumed full responsibility for constructing
Islay Hill Park. In turn the City agreed to refund to the subdivider the park-in-lieu fees and park development
fees collected for Tract 1376, along with any interest accrued. According to the subdivision agreement the
park-in-lieu fee refund was due when the final map was recorded, so the City paid that portion in July 1994,
after Tract Map 1750 was recorded. With interest this refund amounted to$85,030. The park development fee
refund will be due when the park is completed and accepted in late Spring 1995. With estimated interest this
refund should total about $100,700.
Although these payments are technically refunds, the fees collected over the past nine years for development of
Islay Hill Park were recorded as revenues. Because of their size and purpose, these payments should be made
from an appropriation approved by the Council.
By any measure the arrangement transferring park construction responsibility to the subdivider was a good deal
for the City. The original concept called for the City to pay for one-third of the park construction costs, but the
new agreement requires no City money. How much did the City save? Conservative estimates of the
construction cost for Islay Hill Park range from $550,000 to$640,000. Consequently, the City probably
avoided an outlay of at least $180,000 to$215,000 from general fund tax revenue. Has the City lost anything?
No, because the$134,000 originally collected will have earned about$52,000 in interest by the time both
refunds have been made. The calculation of interest earned is the basis for determining the amount of interest
owed.
D-21
Islay Hill Park Fee Refunds (continued)
Policy Links
• Edna/Islay Specific Plan
• General Plan Parks and Recreation Element
• Subdivision Agreement for Tract 1750 approved by the Council in 1992
Schedule and Project Costs
Prior Project
Bud= 1994195 Total
Phasing
Acquisition 186,000 186,000
Recommended Financing Sources
General Fund* 186,000 186,000
*refund of previously collected fees with accrued interest
D-22
1994/95 Midyear Budget Request
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
OPERATION: Parks and Recreation
REQUEST TITLE: Pickup Truck and Mower for New Park Maintenance
Description
Purchase a pickup truck and rotary mower for maintenance of French Park and Islay Hill Park.
One-time costs: $20,000 for the pickup truck and $15,000 for the mower
Objective
Keep French Park and Islay Hill Park safe, useful, and attractive.
Background
French Park was completed in November 1993. For one year after completion the construction contractor was
obligated to maintain the turf, trees, shrubs, and other improvements. That maintenance period ended in
November 1994, and the City then assumed full maintenance responsibility. Islay Hill Park is under construc-
tion and will be completed in May 1995. Because there is no initial maintenance obligation for the developer or
the construction contractor, the City will assume maintenance responsibility upon completion.
After soliciting quotations for contract maintenance on these parks, staff determined that it would be cbeaper.to
perform the work in-house by hiring a maintenance worker and buying the needed equipment. In December
1994 the Council approved an additional maintenance worker position and made the operating budget
adjustments required to cover salaries and materials expenses.
The costs of in-house maintenance shown in the December 1994 agenda report covered not only the anticipated
salaries and materials expenses, but amortization of capital costs for a pickup truck and mower as well. This
budget request covers these anticipated capital costs and implements the previous Council decision to have the
park maintenance work performed in-house. The maintenance worker needs a pickup truck and a rotary mower
to maintain these two parks. Currently this worker is driving a ranted pickup, but the rental rate is $450 per
month vs. $133 per month amortization on a new truck acquisition. Also, this worker is using a mower which
is only temporarily available because the turf in other parks does not need mowing very often during the winter
months. This mower will not be available in the spring when the turf in other parks returns to warm season
growth and requires more frequent mowing.
Policy Links
Adopted parks and landscape maintenance program goal: safe, useful, and attractive parks.
Schedule and Project Costs
Prior Project
Budgets 1994/9 Total
Phasing
Acquisition 35,000 35,000
Recommended Financing Sources r
General Fund 35,000 35,000
D-23
1994/95 Midyear Budget Request
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
OPERATION: Parks and Recreation
REQUEST TITLE: Parks and Recreation Office Building
Description
Construct a 4,190 square foot office building using about 24,000 square feet at the corner of Nipomo and
Pacific Streets on the old Emerson School site. Construct various required building site improvements
(driveways, curbs, parking lot, irrigation, landscaping).
One-time cost: $590,000
Objectives
• Improve public awareness about recreation services
• Improve service to recreation customers
• Provide flexible long term workspace for recreation administration
• Improve the productivity of recreation employees
• Enhance the architectural character of the surrounding neighborhood
■ Set a positive example for responsible energy and water use
• Ensure that the project does not hinder recreation development for the balance of the Emerson School
site
Background
To provide for future parking development, in 1988 the City bought the 860 Pacific property. To avoid paying
rent at the old junior high school, the parks and recreation offices moved into the building at 860 Pacific, an
older residence which had been converted to office space. Although these new quarters were crowded and
inefficient, they were also considered temporary, pending development of new permanent offices.
The Downtown Centre has been completed, and as the local economy begins to fully recover from the current
recession, there will be increasing pressure to develop additional downtown parking. For that purpose the
ping program will probably need the 860 Pacific site in the next few years, and the parks and recreation
offices will need another location, preferably downtown and preferably permanent. Visibility, convenience, and
availability make the Emerson site an excellent location.
Policy Links
• San Luis Obispo Facilities Master Plan
• Parlang Management Plan
• Adopted building program goals: attractive buildings,productive work environments, safe and energy-
efficient buildings, and a positive image for the City
Project Work Completed
Plans and specifications have been completed, and all planning and building reviews have been completed. This
project will be presented to the Council on February 28, 1995 for authorization to bid. The agenda report for
that meeting will more fully discuss the evolution of this project since its inception and the calculation of final
cost estimates.
I
D-24
Parks and Recreation Office Building(continued)
Schedule and Project Costs
Prior Project
Budgets 1994/95 Total
Phasing
Design 38,000 38,000
Construction 401,000 151,000 552,000
Recommended Financing Sources
General Fund 439,000 151,000 590,000
$485,000 of this cost will be covered by selling the 860 Pacific property to the parking fund for future
expansion of the adjacent parking garage, (See the 1994/95 midyear budget request for acquisition of property
at 860 Pacific.) Debt service on the original acquisition of the 860 Pacific property has been paid from the
general fund. The remaining $105,000 must come from the general fund unappropriated balance. To receive
the full sales price of$485,000, the general fund will continue to pay the debt service remaining on the
property. Net annual debt service payments have amounted to$65,000 in the past, but have fallen to$35,000
after refinancing.
D-25
1994-95 Mid-Year Request
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT REQUEST
PROGRAM: Information Systems
REQUEST TITLE: Replace/Upgrade File Servers at City Hall, Corporation Yard and Parks & Recreation
Administrative Offices
Project Description
Replace the existing fileservers at the Corporation Yard and Parks & Recreation Administration Office with a new City-
standard fileserver at a cost of$32,800; increase the disk space on the City Hall fileserver at a cost of$2,000.
Project Objectives
Ensure the reliability of the local area networks at Corporation Yard, Parks & Recreation Administration and City Hall.
Existing Situation
■ Requested frleserver upgrades and replacerrrenm During the 1992 network improvement and replacement
project, the fileserver at the Corporation Yard was replaced with an older, non-standard computer with
miscellaneous parts in order to minimize project costs. The addition of users on the network from the Water
Reclamation Facility and the age of the computer warrant its replacement. The fileserver at the Parks &
Recreation Administration Offices - which was a "non-standard", "hand-me-down" fileserver from City Hall -
failed last year and was replaced with a Recreation staff computer as a temporary measure. This fileserver should
be replaced with a City standard fileserver. The fileserver at City Hall meets the City's standard but is currently
at capacity. The fileserver has "crashed" once when a user attempted to copy large files to the fileserver and the
disk space became full during the process.
■ Parking Administration Office- The fileserver at Parking Administration is an older, non-standard fileserver
which should also be replaced. However, Parking staff will soon use the new, standard fileserver at 955 Morro
over the fiber optic cable between Parking and City Hall,reducing the need for an additional LAN site and related
support requirements. Therefore, replacement of this fileserver is not required. If this link were to be damaged,
Par!®g staff could quickly be returned to service on the older fileserver which will remain at their site. A
general strategy for network recovery will be included in the information systems master plan which will be
presented for Council approval by the end of March.
■ Other fddervem Fileservers at 955 Morro, the Police Station, and the Fire Station are City standard fileservers
with sufficient disk space at this time. The Police Station fileserver operates under significantly higher stress than
the other fileservers due to the size of their database application, CRIS. The Information Systems master plan
is expected to give recommendations for better performance and reliability of Police systems.
Goals and Policy Links
MIS policy to standardize fileservers with Compaq Proliant fileservers for performance, redundancy and fault tolerance
by an industry-accepted manufacturer.
Project Work Completed
The project scope has been defined and specifications prepared.
Schedule and Project Costs
The equipment required to replace and upgrade the fileservers at the Corporation Yard, Parks&Recreation Administration
and City Hall are summarized below:
1995
Two City standard fileservers $28,500
Two tape backup units and software $3,500
Two uninterruptible power supplies 800
Two 1 gig drive with disk mirroring (City Hall) )nnn
Total request $34,800
D-26
Alternatives
■ Defer or deny this acquisition. All City staff are dependent upon the reliability of the local area networks. These
computers are designed to be fault tolerant and save files to mirrored drives. Failure of the existing temporary
fileservers could result in the lost of several hundred hours of staff time before a replacement could be installed.
■ Use non-standard hardware. This is contrary to the City's MIS policy that all City fileservers must be highly
reliable and fault-tolerant (much more so than individual workstations). This is accomplished by setting high
standards and purchasing fileservers from industry-accepted vendors. This strategy reduces the possibility of
failure and improves response-time when failure does occur by ensuring that critical systems can be efficiently
maintained by Information Systems staff.
Project Effect on the Operating Budget
This equipment will be purchased and installed by Information Systems staff. The City has certified network engineer
on staff who will spend less than 20 hours on this project. After installation, system performance and reliability will be
increased at these sites, resulting in increased productivity.
D-27 I
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
D=2.8