The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10/17/1995, - AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION �lE9ramLftbunE- 3825 South Ifiguera -Post Office Box 112-San Luis Obispo, California 93406-0112- (805) 781-7800 In The Superior Court of The State of California In and for the County of San Luis Obispo AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION DVI-109640-2 rii cit losisPo CITY OF SLO - CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS On Tuesday,October 17, 1995,the San Luis Obispo STATE OF CALIFORNIA, City Council will hold public SS. hearings beginning at 7:00 Chem- County of San Luis Obispo be of Citin y ll ,ncil 990 Palm Street, on the items listed below. The reports will be I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of available for review In the the County aforesaid; I am over the age Of eighteen City Clark's Department on the Wednesday before the and not interested in the above entitled matter; I am meeting.For more Informa- now, and at all times embraced in the publication don,please call 781-7103.The Council may also herein mentioned was, the principal clerk of the discuss other hearings or business Items before or printers and publishers of the SAN LUIS OBISPO after those listed. If you COUNTY TELEGRAM-TRIBUNE, a newspaper of challenge any one of the propoed general circulation, printed and published daily, below n court,you may be below In court,you they be Sundays excepted, at the City of San Luis Obispo in limited to raising only those Issues you or someone else the above named county and state; that notice at raised at the public hearing which the annexed clippings is a true printed copy, described in this notice, or in written correspondence was published in the above-named newspaper and delivered to the City Council not in any supplement thereof - on the following at, or prior to, the public dates, to-wit: OCTOBER 7 PARKING FINE that said newspaper was duly and regularly INCREASE - to consider a request to amend the Mu- ascertained and established a newspaper of general nlclpal Code to authorize circulation by Decree entered in the Superior Court setting of parking fines by and Increasing of San Luis Obispo County, State of California, on ,resolution, enes to $20.00 for viola- June 9, 1952, Case #19139 under the provisions of dons within residential park- Ing permit districts. (30 Chapter 1, Division 7, Title of the Government Code jmin.). llcANsmrrloisA of the State of California. AMERICANS TRANSITION PLAN-to consider a trensi- don plan for implementa- 1 certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that eon of standards as re- the foregoing is true and correct. quired by the Americans with Disabilities Act. (15 min.) CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Klm Condon, Acting City Clerk. 0ct7,10 dvIM4' (Signature of Principal Clerk) Date: OCTOBER 7, 1995 MEETIk AGENDA DATE ITEM # qn5 r _ -r�rest street San Lui:_: Obi Spa Califrrnia 93405 IJCtober 1" 11)95 San Luis Obispo City Council Members.. Attached is a petition signed.my most of the residents of Lincoln Street and '-Plest Street. vith a fer`f interested res=idents residing on adiacert Streets, concerning the possibility of increased vehicular- traffic nn Lincoln Street and %.%-est Street should traffic flo'v'v restrictions Ge placed on Chorro Street bet,•rr'een Lincoln Street and NUrray Street. I plan on beim, at the October 171, meeting to speak., to you briefly about our concerns so you are a7-are oT them prior to any restriction installation on Chorro Street. 'Sincerely, F. Michael Lacey UNCIL ❑ COL)UiR IAO ❑ FIN DIR j V CAO ❑ FIRE CHIEF VDIR pp� r f �Y ERK/ORIG 0 PPOLICE CHF 9"t C Y I„ ❑ MGMT TEAM ❑ REC DIR I.� 11 CC READ FU 0 UTIL DIR OCT 1 1 1"5 ". `-v'�-- ❑ PERS DIR 11 1 CITY CLERK SAN L.0I,OBISPO.CA Y PETITION FROM RESIDENTS OF LINCOLN STREET AND WEST STREET TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL CONCERNING TRAFFIC FLOW RESTRICTIONS ON CHORRO STREET. We, the undersigned residents of Lincoln Street and West Street, Y. to voice our opposition to any traffic flow restrictions on Chorro !et which would cause increased vehicular traffic on Lincoln Street and West Street. We understand, and appreciate, the concern the Chorro Street residents have for the volume and speed of traffic on Chorro Street. While Chorro Street has historically been a route for Foothill area drivers to and from downtown,West Street and Lincoln Street have been used soley to serve those residences between Chorro Street and Stenner Creek between Highway 101 and West Street. We would further expect that before any restrictions are placed on Chorro Street that a study of traffic flow on West Street and Lincoln Street be made. In addition, should restrictions be placed on Chorro Street, that a follow-up traffic flow study be made and if a 108 or greater increase in traffic is found, the restrictions on Chorro Street be removed. DATE NAME ADDRESS //()'TRA a. . A 'gb 69. � • � �.- 9� �.L- y �J.�.-� �9 X52. �� 'b r -a - !a_o , ?65 Wort sf _l.0 G 15 Love uze4 (�'WAAPCI 6i ,cel, J10 OF 5 PETITIOI. .cOM RESIDENTS OF LINCOLN STREET . WEST STREET TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL CONCERNING TRAFFIC FLOW RESTRICTIONS ON CHORRO STREET. We, the undersigned residents of Lincoln Street and West Street, wish to voice our opposition to any traffic flow restrictions on Chorro Street which would cause increased vehicular traffic on Lincoln Street and West Street. We understand, and appreciate, the concern the Chorro Street residents have for the volume and speed of traffic on Chorro Street. While Chorro Street has historically been a route for Foothill area drivers to and from downtown,West Street and Lincoln Street have been used solely to serve those residences between Chorro Street and Stenner Creek between Highway 101 and West Street. We would further expect that before any restrictions are placed on Chorro Street that a study of traffic flow on West Street and Lincoln Street be made. In addition, should restrictions be placed on Chorro Street, that a follow-up traffic flow study be made and if a 108 or greater increase in traffic is found, the restrictions on Chorro Street be removed. DATE NAME ADDRESS io f L O '� •5 �� • � 3� l �lNCoG/cJ S Lc� rz d�G. � 7 Jo S � • Ga �� o ��In �.� S �- Ii IhT•,�� 1�4i(� �4,1 � P ��I tl�� `�( L•(61m�L1 `� r1 � J S S �.. �"Lc .GtaL,� A t�E�^ 715 � GUI f✓ .S�' /D aAp 5— L,17CO to f a� y7 cin�co�� sc iol�l`i5 �� u V1 L,v\cojVN 5LC 1O 'f� 15 tzl Y ". 61n L,a,cIh SL() PAGE 2 OF 5 ' Y PETITION FROM RESIDENTS OF LINCOLN STREET AND WEST STREET TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL CONCERNING TRAFFIC FLOW RESTRICTIONS ON CHORRO STREET. We, the undersigned residents of Lincoln Street and West Street, i to voice our opposition to any traffic flow restrictions on Chorro eet which would cause increased vehicular traffic on Lincoln Street and West Street. We understand, and appreciate, the concern the Chorro Street residents have for the volume and speed of traffic on Chorro Street. While Chorro Street has historically been a route for Foothill area drivers to and from downtown,West Street and Lincoln Street have been used soley to serve those residences between Chorro Street and Stenner Creek between Highway 101 and West Street. We would further expect that before any restrictions are placed on Chorro Street that a study of traffic flow on West Street and Lincoln Street be made. In addition, should restrictions be placed on Chorro Street, that a follow-up traffic flow study be made and if a 108 or greater increase in traffic is found, the restrictions on Chorro Street be removed. DATE NAME ADDRESS r� as e (jr)cacN io C5 el LI GAF 10 l ls5 de _t 1(o5 Lire S 9r c k . r ,b 4NC,Aa, T. LZ ijh L. s If 14 U g j :Z 7V V /L7 S 760 ' ."• . !Lf) ( /Ol( /7 PETITION _dOM RESIDENTS OF LINCOLN STREET e,..� WEST STREET TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL _CONCERNING TRAFFIC FLOW RESTRICTIONS ON CHORRO STREET. We, the undersigned residents of Lincoln Street and West Street, wish to voice our opposition to any traffic flow restrictions on Chorro Street which would cause increased vehicular traffic on Lincoln Street and West Street. . We understand, and appreciate, the concern the Chorro Street residents have for the volume and speed of traffic on Chorro Street. While Chorro Street has historically been a route for Foothill area drivers to and from downtown,West Street and Lincoln Street have been used soley to serve those residences between Chorro Street and Stenner Creek between Highway 101 and West Street. We would further expect that before any restrictions are placed on Chorro Street that a study of traffic flow on West Street and Lincoln Street be made. In addition, should restrictions be placed on Chorro Street, that a follow-up traffic flow study be made and if a 108 or greater increase in traffic is found, the restrictions on Chorro Street be removed. DATE NAME ADDRESS o -y5 1G -i ;2q 4 L/t7,-' <._ �3YoS - ysS4f Z)X _5eks cQ.AGh, gas �a -y- % 5 % _ % � 3��rp .� stn c &�&.. 17 le I 41,11 1 Sak � �i j ryi�.ni�i3 r,59,� /� q SS �L U piz nn �6 � 100 hi TM U**S'eL' -- Lu s G ,5'/;v 9';6c PAGE 4 OF 5 PETITION FROM RESIDENTS OF LINCOLN STREET AND WEST STREET TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL CONCERNING TRAFFIC FLOW RESTRICTIONS ON CHORRO STREET. We, the undersigned residents of Lincoln Street and West Street, 4 to voice our opposition to any traffic flow restrictions on Chorro _eet which would cause increased vehicular traffic on Lincoln Street and West Street. We understand, and appreciate, the concern the Chorro Street residents have for the volume and speed of traffic on Chorro Street. While Chorro Street has historically been a route for Foothill area drivers to and from downtown,West Street and Lincoln Street have been used soley to serve those residences between Chorro Street and Stenner Creek between Highway 101 and West Street. We would further expect that before any restrictions are placed on Chorro Street that a study of traffic flow on West Street and Lincoln Street be made. In addition, should restrictions be placed on Chorro Street, that a follow-up traffic flow study be made and if a 108 or greater increase in traffic is found, the restrictions on Chorro Street be removed. DATE NAME ADDRESS '018195- 5;1 l5 I L. s Io61qr 1, IDIOS 27 sT / 5 ..16% i D�DJ 9� rl5har�c, I b�►c�km 957 -si- PAGE 5 OF 5