HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/05/1995, 1 - CONSIDERATION OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT, SUCH AS CELLULAR TRANSCEIVER FACILITIES, BEYOND THE URBAN RESERVE LINE UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS. (GP 105-95) MEET NG DATE:
mhm�►�I�IIIIII�IJI� 111 city of San LUIS OBISPO
_ r
MOZe COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM NU BER:
FROM: Arnold Jonas, Communvelopment Director
By: Whitney McIlvaine ssociate Planner
SUBJECT: Consideration of a General Plan amendment to allow development, such as cellular
transceiver facilities, beyond the urban reserve line under certain conditions. (GP 105-95)
CAO RECOMMENDATION
Deny the amendment to the Land Use Element, based on the following finding:
1. The proposed amendment is not consistent with the General Plan hillside protection policies
(specifically, Land Use Element Policy 6.2.2 and Open Space Element Policies II.A.1.A. and
II.J.1.C.1. and 6.), and will compromise City policies which seek to minimize physical
disturbance and visual intrusion resulting from hillside development.
DISCUSSION
Data Summary
Applicant: SLO Cellular, Inc. - a division of Cellular One
Property Owners: Lewis and Helen Wise
Representative: Adrianne Patnaud, Tynan Group
Zoning: Open Space (C/OS - 40)
General Plan: Open Space
Environmental Status: Not yet completed.
Project Action Deadline: Legislative actions are not subject to processing deadlines.
Situation
SLO Cellular is interested in locating a transceiver and antennas inside a 3-acre leasehold on top of
South Street hills. The leasehold is on a knoll just below and to the west of the main ridge line and
above the development limit line. The site is accessed by a graded dirt road leading up the hill from
Calle Jazmin. It is currently developed with a commercial radio broadcasting antenna and the City's
radio/repeater facilities, used by Fire, Police, and Public Works staff.
SLO Cellular would like to install a 9-foot tall 150-square-foot equipment building and a 50-foot tall
monopole capable of supporting 3 whip antennas and 2 grid-type digital relay dish antennas immediately
adjacent to the existing City facilities. A picture of a typical site installation is attached as part of the
applicant's project description.
The project is not consistent with hillside protection policies in both the Land Use Element and the Open
Space Element, which state that hillside areas, such as South Street Hills, above the development limit
line should be preserved as undeveloped open space; that structures on a ridgeline should be prohibited
unless no practical alternative is available; and that development shall be entirely within the urban
city of san -pis oBispo
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
reserve or development limit line. In order to be found consistent with the General Plan, either the
project must change or the General Plan must be amended.
Staff is recommending denial of the requested General Plan amendment because the Land Use Element
policy proposed to be changed was so recently adopted and outlines very specific criteria for hilltop
development, many of which could not be met by this proposal. Environmental review has not been
done because a recommendation for denial does not require environmental review. If the Council
supports proceeding with an amendment to the General Plan to allow telecommunication facilities on
hilltops, staff will need to complete environmental review before returning to the Council for action.
The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed amendment on October 11, 1995. A motion to direct
staff to process the amendment failed on a 2-2 vote. The Commission then acted to forward the matter
to Council with a recommendation for denial based on inconsistency with the General Plan.
Commissioners were concerned, however, about how to best accommodate necessary
telecommunications facilities.
Proposed Amendment
The applicant is proposing to change Land Use Element Policy 6.2.2 by adding the redlined text as
follows:
6.2.2 Development Standards Development --including buildings, driveways, fences, and graded
yard areas-- on hilltop parcels shall:
A. Be entirely within the urban reserve line or development limit line, whichever is more
restrictive (though parcel boundaries may extend beyond these lines when necessary to
meet minimum parcel-size standards);
1 F�evelogmer►t outsrde+�f therbn resexx++ itae+ �deMelipment limit ltni?mar be approia#e
s all of:the fol{owirgntrs ear be iMet:
::....:................................:....................:.....................:.........:.......::.....:........
a laevel�pent istr to,estttguses iii the safe:;
b Necessary semis ors: water, Pxt' east an the Site:
da"3e `".:iri fit 9< l " a0'<€` Tiit';:;:•.>:,:»;::
op _ deet arc..: eet1, rvie and
e Ueveoprr�entsubject m review by aseumrnunlt ....Deyclbprner#t Iireetor and
reguues W400. appFo.. ..
f Develo}�raent cx3es vttt offer pxavasxans Irl~tlirseort:;
B. Keep a low profile and conform to the natural slopes;
����►niii��IIIIIIIIIP�P1°��IIIIIU City Of Sark JAS OBISPO
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
C. Avoid large, continuous walls or roof surfaces, or prominent foundation walls, poles, or
columns;
D. Minimize grading of roads;
E. Minimize grading on individual lots; generally, locate houses close to the street; minimize
the grading of visible driveways;
F. Include planting which is compatible with native hillside vegetation and which provides a
visual transition from developed to open areas;
G. Use materials, colors, and textures which blend with the natural landscape and avoid high
contrasts;
H. Minimize exterior lighting.
Analysis of Proposed Amendment
Even with the proposed amendment, it seems the project would still be inconsistent with criteria
described in subsections B, C, and most likely D.
Amendments to relevant Open Space Element policies (II.A.1.A. p.14; II.J.1.C.1. and 6. p.74) which
address hillside protection are not being proposed at this time. The Open Space Element would allow
approval of this project if it can be found that no practical alternative exists. Discussions with the
applicant's representatives indicate that there are practical alternatives, albeit less desirable and more
costly to the applicant. Therefore, if staff is directed by Council to continue processing the amendment
request, the above referenced (and attached) policies should also be changed.
Practical Repercussions
The advantage in using this site for cellular and other wireless service providers is the large,
unobstructed range of transmission and reception it allows. According to SLO Cellular representatives,
this is the only single-site option available that can serve the entire South Higuera, Madonna, and
Stoneridge area. If a transceiver facility can not be established at this site, multiple facilities will be
necessary to cover the same area. To provide the same coverage as the South Street Hills site, facilities
would conceivably need to be constructed in the Irish Hills, in the hills above Johnson Avenue, and on
top of strategically located buildings within or beyond City limits. A lower elevation site could also
be part of a coverage solution by erecting a tower roughly 150 feet high for the antennas. Because of
its ability to provide wide coverage and its historic use for radio broadcasting and receiving, it might
be reasonable to designate this site as the one hilltop within the city limits where wireless
telecommunication facilities can be located, provided they operate at frequencies that do not interfere
with the City's emergency services communication.
The two disadvantages to opening up this site for Cellular One and other wireless providers are related
to aesthetic impacts and public health and safety. Aesthetic impacts could be reduced, but not entirely
__ /
+n,n►►►I�'Illllllll�1°j��illll MY Of San -AIS OBISPO
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
eliminated, through landscaping and building colors. The public health and safety concern is not as
easily addressed. The Fire, Police, and Public Works Departments object to any change in policy
language that would accommodate additional radio facilities at this location since new facilities may
interfere with the City's public works and emergency services communications systems. Please refer
to the attached memo from these departments. The County of Santa Barbara has collocated its
emergency services radio facilities with Cellular One in four locations. According to the
Communications Manager, there has been no problem with interference. The Electronics
Communication Supervisor for the City of Santa Barbara also reported no problems with having a
facility located near Cellular One's facility. The issue of potential interference will need more detailed
study if Council decides the General Plan should be amended to accommodate development of new
telecommunications facilities on hillsides within city limits and on South Street Hills in particular.
CONCURRENCES
A memo is attached from the Fire Chief, the Police Chief, and the Public Works Director stating their
opposition
ALTERNATIVES
The Council needs to determine whether the proposal has merit and should continue to be processed or
if the request should be denied based on inconsistency with City hillside protection policies in the Land
Use and Open Space Elements. Therefore, alternative actions are:
1. Deny the proposed amendment based on inconsistency with the General Plan. A draft resolution
for denial is attached.
2. Direct staff to continue to process the project application.
Note: The Council cannot take an action to approve the request prior to completion of an
environmental document(Section 15004. (a)of CEQA Guidelines). However, the Council could
indicate support for an amendment with direction to staff to complete the environmental
document and return with a more detailed project analysis.
Attachments:
resolution for denial
memo from other City departments
letters from radio engineers
applicant's statement and technical project description
general plan policies
minutes of the 10/11/95 Planning Commission meeting
excerpt from California Planner
A reading file containing articles on wireless telecommunications is available in the Community
Development Department general files. ,/
Draft resolution for denial
R 122-95
RESOLUTION NO. (1995 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DENYING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT, SUCH AS
CELLULAR TRANSCEIVER FACILITIES, BEYOND THE URBAN RESERVE LINE UNDER
CERTAIN CONDITIONS.
GP 105-95
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. The Council, after consideration of the proposed amendment GP
105-95 and staff recommendations, public testimony, and reports thereof, makes the following
findings:
1. The proposed amendment is not consistent with the General Plan hillside protection policies
(specifically, Land Use Element Policy 6.2.2 and Open Space Element Policies II.A.1.A.
and II.7.1.C.1. and 6.), and will compromise City policies which seek to minimize physical
disturbance and visual intrusion resulting from hillside development.
The Council may specify additional findings.
SECTION 2. Denial. The request for approval of the General Plan amendment GP 105-95
is hereby denied.
.On motion of , seconded by , and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this _ day of 1995.
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED:
City Clerk
i troy e
MEMORANDUM
TO: Whitney McIlvaine, Associate Planner ✓
FROM: R. Neumann. ire Chief; J. Gardiner, Police Chief; M. McCluskey, P.W. Director
DATE: September 27, 1995
SUBJECT: Cellular One's request to Amend the City Land Use Policy
We have discussed Cellular One's request to amend our land use policy. We realize this is their first
step in the process that would result in the placement of radio transmitting equipment adjacent to our
new South Hills Radio Facility. We have serious concerns about that prospect. We have just placed
our facility on line after a five year struggle to overcome interference and reliability problems. We
now have a effective system and frankly don't relish the thought of allowing any project with the
potential for interference to be located near us. On the surface it would appear we could in theory
regulate the transmitters they place there. However, as a practical matter, we lack the resources or
time to police such restrictions and any interference during our emergency operations could be
disastrous.
Additionally, the road to the site was constructed by the city at a significant expense. Even the
limited traffic it currently gets is hard on it. Additional traffic will only exacerbate its condition.
Finally, their are several other sites in and around the city that would not have the potential to effect
us and could be utilized by Cell One. Accordingly, all things considered, it would be best to deny
Cell One's request now rather than attempt to develop agreements to protect us that are impossible
to enforce.
pRl
NIL-
CECIL
LYNCH
� � adtast Phone 523-3955(Area 209)
2460 Illinois Avenue
MODESTO, CALIFORNIA
95358
March 21, 1995
Mr. Stan Wood
Cellular One of San Luis Obispo
825 Marsh Road, Suite E
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Dear Mr. Wood;
You requested our expert opinion on the potential for cellular transmissions causing interference
with emergency broadcast services in the 154.xx MHz band at a common transmission facility,
and to describe our experience at facilities, known as an antenna farms,currently operating with
such arrangements. Specifically what would be the potential of Cellular One operating at the
transmitter site of Radio Station KID-AM causing interference with the San Luis Obispo Fire
Department(SLOFD)currently operating at this site. Radio Station KIID, located at North
Latitude 35-15-51, West Longitude 120-39-56,operates on a frequency of 1400 kHz(1.4 MHz)
with an authorized power of 1000 watts into a single tower. Cellular carriers are authorized to
transmit at several frequencies between 869 and 894 MHz. The SLOFD is currently operating at
the KIID,and is currently experiencing some interference,posibly from the KIID signal.
Therefore, the SLOFD is concerned about interference from the proposed Cellular One use of
this site.
There are two possible ways for interference to occur at common transmitter sites. Interference
can be caused by one of the services transmitting an unwanted(out of band)signal on the receive
or transmit frequency of another service or by insertion of high levels of Radio-Frequency(RF)
energy into the electronics of any nearby operation.
Transmitters can produce low level out of band transmissions on their own on harmonic
frequencies or other frequencies due to the mixing of two RF signals known as intermodulation
products. Harmonics are unwanted signals at multiples of the authorized operating frequency
(i.e. 2, 3,4, 5, 6, etc. ... times the carrier frequency) termQ_ u a o is created at frequencies
which are the sum and difference of two frequencies(i.e. f, + f or f, -g. The FCC rules require
either of these out of band transmissions to be at very low levels(at least 80 dB below [1/10,000]
the authorized power) from any service operating with an FCC license.
FM
Tv
1-7
Harmonics are all at frequencies above the authorized transmit frequency,and therefore, cellular
transmissions at 869 to 894 MHz harmonics can not themselves affect a transmitter or receiver
operating at 154 MHz. There are no two cellular frequencies which add or subtract to 154 MHz.
And the difference between the cellular and 154 (harmonics)do not yield a frequency within the
band of concern. (e.g. 869- 154 x 5 =99, and 894- 154 x 5 = 124).
The only other means for interference would be for the Cellular One signal to get into the
SLOFD electronics directly. This is highly unlikely,but if present there are many techniques to
filter out the undesired signal and correct the situation.
We are directly aware of many such installations,and I personally queried other operator/service
personnel at sites with cellular and emergency services operating together. In this experience
base there is no case where either emergency services or cellular service has been affected
by the broadcasts of the other. The only complaint that was mentioned was the interference
from a defective switching power supply which generated noise over a wide band(30 to 70
MHz) causing interference with operations on 45 MHz. When the defective supply was repaired
or replaced the problem was immediately cleared. Even this would not have caused interference
to operations at 154 MHz.
The undersigned Gerald L.Moore has a BSEE from the University of the Pacific, Stockton,
California and an MBA from the University of Santa Clara, Santa Clara, California, and 20 years
experience in Lockheed Corporation working with RF transmissions and Electro Magnetic
Interference. I and Cecil Lynch of Cecil Lynch Consulting Engineers have a combined 50 years
of experience in broadcast engineering including installation and operation of multiple user
transmitter facilities.
Respectfully submitted by,
Gerald L. Moore,Technical Associate
Cecil Lynch Consulting Engineers
AT&T
Cellular Division AT&T Wireless Services
Suite 116
751 Daily Drive
Camarillo.CA 93010
805 987.0955
To: Sandy Duff Adrianne Patnaud Tuesday,October 10, 1995
of the Tynan Group
From: Jim Hollister
System Engineer-AT&T Wireless Services
Subject: Whitney McIlvaine's letter about interference
The transmission equipment that Cellular One uses in their cellular facilities is FCC type
approved. The frequencies that we utilize range from 869.01 Mhz to 891.48 Mhz. We employ a multi-
carrier combining network manufactured by Allgon systems that allows us to have more than one
transmitter (up to 24) on one transmit anterum This combining system adds even more roll off of the
carriers than the radio alone can do, (remember,the radio is FCC type accepted already).
AT&T Wireless Service has been most successful with not only locating our transmission facility
in the vicinity of Santa Barbara County and City transmitters, but Santa Barbara County and City has
located their antennae on our antenna structures as well, and have not experienced any degradation of
service.
The receiving network that is employed by our Ericsson radios is very sensitive, usually having a
usable sensitivity< -122 dBm. Most commercial radio equipment that I've had experience with is in the
vicinity of -118 dBm to -116 dBm. This means that our cellular equipment is 4 dB more sensitive than
the commercial equipment, and we (the cellular carrier) are more susceptible to interference than the
commercial equipment.
The cellular equipment is also alarmed and monitored for interference from a central control
point. So,when the site is being interfered with, we know about it, and then start to investigate possible
sources. Locate carrier operators to isolate problem transmitters and rectify the situation.
We have not had a case of cellular carriers causing interference to other carriers and or
commercial operators. More often than not the commercial operators create interference for us.
Sincerely,
Jim Hollister
System Engineer
r��
� j Recycled Paper
CELWLARONE®
KIID Cellular Facility
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project Details
KIID Cellular Facility
Overview
The Federal Communications Commission(FCC) licenses two cellular companies to operate
in each of the 735 cellular markets across the United States. Cellular One of San Luis Obispo
is licensed as the non-wireline provider of cellular service for San Luis Obispo County by the
FCC and is also recognized as a Public Utility regulated by the California Public Utilities
Commission. Under the directive of the FCC,Cellular One is required to provide cellular
service to San Luis Obispo County. In order to achieve this directive,Cellular One must
provide coverage to the City of San Luis Obispo as well as many areas of the surrounding
communities.
Cellular One of San Luis Obispo is locally owned and operated with offices at 733 Marsh
Street, Suite B in San Luis Obispo and affiliated with the largest provider of cellular service
in the nation, Cellular One".
Project Description
Cellular One of San Luis Obispo proposes to install a cellular transceiver facility on property
owned by Dr. Lewis Wise. Cellular One has entered into a lease agreement with Mr. Guy
Hackman, lessee of a 3 acre parcel from Dr. Lewis Wise, for approximately 1000 square feet
of land for the purpose of constructing a 50' self-supporting antenna structure and related
facilities, including a pre-fabricated radio equipment building within the leased area. This
site, identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 053-021-031, is located in the City of San Luis
Obispo Planning Area and is currently zoned Conservation/Open Space40.
`:• /1"- 14
1 .190
u•A' 30,i.
0.
\\
(\'• <„�+`„ .�\,\t '� Fiber _ Park �_.. t,-- -'••• hfIf150 y
\`\1 aryl oRadio Tower.. F 'f -Siiu� my 1 Park
\� .1 f ,- •aY: �.Sintheimer i..ay..%; ^;
evsv.,`p •'`� ��, g i .�. .. Park _ f :• .
A.
14— %Tank ao
<.7<
-�-=s
.p' � �,^ -�\ti. •...-.. •v�h 1 1 I` ✓ N''
q 4� ,e .Ta k r.
� ��`. �� `�'-'_� ;\� '\,; � \� �• I, i _ •.r/•••
pia P��� •.• `. . r. I1 ' ( `iil,
0 i ., •�: .� dNCVTT ....O
,\•, '��"'-1 •". j �.'_:' I:r ,�� ' �. )'�• Trail
r;:•• ,; J G SII ..I •I•,• BM 221 •t Park
Dtire in 1T1�.railer
ell 1 jhei tlt �- -J J•ark ''4� `.4i. ••�• .\ •<• :
•• � _ � .11. .� _ • .':tea
Par
nailer
1 K Sewage —+Park •II .-• --------
SITE
' --SITE MAP
Purpose of the Facility
The proposed site will provide cellular telephone coverage vital to the city of San Luis
Obispo, airport area, Hwy 227, and the Laguna Lake area,as well as many other surrounding
areas. Currently the signal strength in most of these areas is not adequate to place or
maintain acceptable communications. Cellular calls already in progress as they enter these
areas are often terminated due to loss of signal strength.
Our engineering teams have been working extensively, over the past year, on arriving at a
cell site location that would fill in the holes of existing coverage in these areas. We have
endeavored to find a site that would not only meet our technical requirements but also would
be considered an appropriate location for such a facility within a very sensitive community.
The topographical and coverage constraints limit the possible locations that will provide the
necessary signal coverage. Locating a facility at the KIID site would not only provide a
technical solution to improving cellular service in San Luis Obispo,but would also appear to
be an appropriate location, from the community's standpoint, for the following reasons;
The proposed site is consistent with the City of San Luis Obispo's General Plan Land
Use Element, and a communication transmission and receiving facility is an
allowable use in the Conservation/Open Space land use category under Table 9-Title
17.
• The establishment and subsequent operation or conduct of the KUD site will not be
detrimental to health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing or
working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity of the use,because the project is designed and
conditioned to address health, safety, and welfare concerns.
• The proposed project will not be inconsistent with the character of the immediate
neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development.
• The proposed KIID site will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity
of all roads providing access to the project.
Why This Site Was Selected
Many sites were investigated, analyzed, and tested prior to arriving at this location. The
potential sites were evaluated on their ability to meet the technical needs of the system. A
cellular facility must be located in the City of San Luis Obispo to fill the holes of coverage in
the community and to augment the coverage to the surrounding areas. The proposed KIID
site is the best location for Cellular One's facility for the following reasons:
• Due to its elevation,the site provides the necessary coverage for San Luis Obispo
while also enhancing coverage throughout many other areas of the surrounding
communities.
Construction of a road to the KHD site is unnecessary as an existing utility road will
provide access to the site.
• The proposed site will provide essential communication services to areas otherwise
cut off from the wireline system during emergencies.
• The project is of a limited size and scope and will not be located in close proximityto
significant wildlife habitats.
• The KIID site offers a line-of-sight path to Cellular One's facility at Cuesta Peak that
will allow the site a wireless means of interconnecting into the Public Switched
Telephone Network("PSTN").
This facility will work in coordination with existing facilities in the network,therefore , the
site's precise placement is imperative.
/-/3
ift'J'YiMv�M^ \'
T _
1 -
,��� A ��� - i _ ��._��. _'^amu � __—.� :,•_
r
f _L.
1 1 11 1
-
y:
- Mti
. �++^/ry •` !Leh. � �1�.1.f ..
Facility Specifications
Equipment Building
The prefabricated building is constructed out of concrete with an earth-tone aggregate rock
finish exterior. The building's dimensions are 10 feet in width, 15 feet in length, and 9 feet in
height. The building will be mounted on a slab foundation at 6" above existing grade.
The building is specifically manufactured to house cellular radio equipment and is highly
flame retardant. The building is designated by the Uniform Building Code as a Group B4
Use, Type V construction. The building is pre-approved by the State of California for
installation and does not require plan check approval by the County.
The shelter will contain micro-processor controlled electronic equipment including systems
to detect intrusion, fire, and power failure on a 24-hour basis. The alarm system will include
an FM 200 internal fire suppression system with smoke and ionization detectors. The system
will operate on a 24-hour, 7-day a week remote sensing basis that will be monitored at
Cellular One's Mobile Telephone Switching Office (MTSO) located in Goleta.
r
AIIWI
x� e
Typical Site : Concrete Shelter with Aggregate Rock Finish
Antenna Support Structure
The mast will serve to elevate the cellular antennas to the height necessary for the antennas to
provide the needed signal coverage. The support mast will be a singular, self-supporting 50'
wood or steel monopole. The monopole will be painted horizon blue to mitigate the visual
impact and provide a transparent quality at a distance.
Antennas
This facility will utilize three(3)whip antennas and two (2) grid-type digital relay dish
antennas. Visually,these antennas will provide a transparent quality at a distance. The whip
antennas will be painted horizon blue to blend in with the natural color of the horizon and are
3" in diameter. One of the whip antennas will act as a transmitting antenna that will
broadcast cellular radio signals to be received by any cellular phone users within the
coverage area. The other two whip antennas will act as receiving antennas to receive signals
from cellular phones within the area of coverage. The grid-type relay dish antennas will act
to transmit and receive information that is routed back to the Mobile Telephone Switching
Office(MTSO)via Cellular One's Cuesta Peak facilities.
Batteries
Cellular One utilizes stationary batteries to run the electronics equipment. These batteries are
in constant use and are charged by rectifiers located within the building. The rectifiers
receive their power from the power source.
Cellular One utilizes the GNB Industrial Battery Company's "ABSOLYTE II" batteries in the
horizontal stacking mode,with two parallel 24 volt stack Each stack contains 12 individual
2.25 volt cells. These batteries are not "jug" or"gel" type batteries. The batteries are
classified as "immobilized electrolyte" batteries, in which the liquid electrolyte (sulfuric acid)
is absorbed into a mat(or matrix)which suspends the electrolyte against the lead plates. As
manufactured, the sealed battery case has less than two tablespoons of electrolyte in liquid
form at the bottom of the sealed case. Within three to six months of service,the electrolyte is
100%absorbed leaving no liquid free at the bottom of the sealed container. These batteries
utilize the "oxygen recombination" principle by which internal gases are recombined into
liquid and re-absorbed into the fiber matrix.
In addition,the GNB Absolyte batteries have the following characteristics:
1. They are sealed and never require the addition of water or additional
electrolyte.
2. They are spill proof and leak proof.
3. No gases escape from the sealed case during normal charging.
4. They are resistant to explosion and operate at a low internal pressure
(6 psi)
5. They can accept a high rate of charging and require no equalization.
6. They meet Seismic Zone 4 requirements.
The batteries described above have been extensively tested to meet safety standards.
Access
Access to the property is via an existing unimproved road which Cellular One will utilize for
access to the site. Cellular One will share maintenance costs for upkeep of the road.
Power Requirements
Cellular One will install and separately meter, at its own expense, single phase 110/220 volt
200 amp power service. Power will be run underground to the facility from the closest
source so as to minimize the aesthetic impact on the property.
Interconnect
Each remote Cellular Facility("Cell Site")must have a means of sending and receiving
information and cellular calls to the Mobile Telephone Switching Office. The MTSO is the
central processor and "switch" to route calls to other mobile users or into the PSTN (Public
Switched Telephone Network). There are two means to provide for a remote cell site to be
connected(or"interconnected")with the MTSO.
1. Using dish antennas, a wireless digital relay path can send and receive
information that is routed back to the MTSO through the air waves as opposed
to utilizing telephone lines. When a line-of-sight path exists,this method is
the most reliable and cost efficient means of interconnecting a remote cell site.
2. A specially conditioned digital telephone line(known as a T-1)can route two-
way voice traffic and data between the cell site and the MTSO. This method
is not as reliable in times of disaster since Cellular One would not have
control over the T-I path from the cell site to the MTSO. If a T-I telephone
line fails due to earthquake, fire,or other incident,it can take hours and
possibly days to re-establish the link from the cell site to the MTSO. During
this time the cell site would be inoperative leaving a gap in cellular coverage.
Cellular One will interconnect this facility with its MTSO, located in Goleta,via digital relay
dish path between the KIID Facility and its Cuesta Peak site.
Aesthetics
The proposed shelter and antenna support mast have been selected specifically to blend with
the existing natural vegetation, and views of the site.
The nature of the monopole provides for a minimal profile against the horizon. Cellular One
proposes to paint the antennas, associated pipe mounts, and monopole a horizon blue color to
blend in with the background.
Cellular Radio
Cellular service allows a customer to communicate using a vehicle mounted or hand-held
portable telephone. A call initiated from a portable phone goes from the portable unit to the
nearest cellular communication facility ("cell site"),then to the mobile telephone switching
office("MTSO"), which routes the call to the public switched land line telephone
network("PSTN').
The cell sites utilize cellular radio transceivers that transmit and receive radio signals
operating in the UHF (Ultra High Frequency) spectrum in the 800 MHZ(Megahertz)cellular
Band "A" range. More specifically,the radios transmit FM (Frequency Modulated)radio
signals (identical in nature to television and radio broadcast)from 869-880 MHz and
890-891.5 MHz. The facility receives signals transmitted from cellular phones from
824-835 MHz and 845-846.5 MHz. The facility will utilize 15 to 45 transceivers(channels)
depending upon traffic capacity requirements at any given time. Each transceiver will
operate at a maximum of 100 watts ERP (Effective Radiated Power)per channel. Radio
frequency transmissions generated by this facility are non-ionizing and not harmful to
humans.
Site Traffic
The proposed facility will be unmanned. Due to the low intensity of construction needed to
establish the facility, very light vehicular traffic will be generated during the one month
construction period . After the site is constructed, a Cell Site Technician will visit the facility
in a standard 4-wheel drive vehicle approximately once a month. The average on-site time,
during routine maintenance, is less than three hours.
Water/Plumbing
There are no plumbing facilities serving the project or requirements for water.
Air/Noise Quality
This project will have no adverse effect on local air quality or create unacceptable noise
pollution. The only source of sound is the air conditioning equipment used for
environmental control of the sensitive radio electronics located in the equipment building.
The sound pressure levels associated with air conditioners are very low, operated only on a
as-needed basis, and diminish rapidly with increased distance from the unit.
Fire/Security
The equipment building is highly fire retardant and comes with an installed FM200 Fire
Suppression System. In addition, a portable FM200 fire extinguisher will be provided within
the shelter. All alarms and annunciators associated with the fire suppression system are
monitored remotely, twenty-four hours a day. In addition,the facility is provided with a
security system that is remotely monitored for intrusion.
For added security and safety, a stoop light will be mounted adjacent to the entrance to the
facility. The light will be mounted no more than ten feet above the grade and will utilize a
hood shield to provide light only to the stoop area. The light will utilize a manual on/off
timer switch. Thus,the stoop light will only be on during the short period of time that a
technician is on-site in periods of darkness.
Health
The power densities associated with transmissions from this facility will not exceed the
current American National Standards Institute(ANSI)recommended maximum exposures
for cellular transmission frequencies. Cellular One has had various recognized experts within
the medical and scientific community evaluate various facilities similar to the proposed MID
Cellular Facility. These studies have measured the calculated power densities at various
locations and evaluated the facility's potential to significantly impact the neighboring
properties or the community at large. In all cases, the effective radiated power and its
associated electromagnetic radiation power densities(expressed in mW/cm=)have been only
a fraction of the maximum permissible exposures set by ANSI or the more restrictive
exposure standards put forth by the National Commission on Radiation Protection and
Measurement(NCRP). Typically, levels of electromagnetic energy associated with cellular
telecommunications systems in areas occupied by the public are several hundred times below
even the most stringent safety standards or proposed standards. Measurements have provided
reassurance that even the maximum effective radiation broadcast power would produce only
very weak electromagnetic fields that would not substantially add to ambient fields or to any
significant degree of risk to humans or to the environment.
Site Abandonment
At such time as Cellular One abandons the cellular telephone site,Cellular One's project site
would be restored to its pre-project state,normal wear and tear excepted.
SCENIC RESOURCES POLICY GUIDE
Refer to the following Scenic Resources Section for background and other policies.
MAINTAIN & ENHANCE TOURISM REQUIRE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
BY PROTECTING THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENTTO:
SCENIC QUALITY,
PROHIBIT STRUCTURES ALONG
PROTECT IMPORTANT VIEW RIDGELINES, STEEP SLOPES, OR IN
CORRIDORS, VIEWSHEDS, AND OTHER HIGHLY VISIBLE
GATEWAYS. LOCATIONS UNLESS NO
PRACTICABLE ALTERNATIVE IS
AVAILIBLE, OR IN SUCH A
LOCATION IS NECESSARY TO
PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH AND
PRESERVE SCENIC RESOURCES IN SAFETY.
THE CITY AND THE PLANNING
AREA AS OPEN SPACE.
UTILIZE NATURAL LANDFORMS
AND VEGETATION TO SCREEN
STRUCTURES.
RESTORE SCENIC RESOURCES
WHICH HAVE BEEN DEGRADED.
UTILIZE LANDSCAPING TO
PROVIDE A TRANSITION
PROHIBIT BILLBOARDS AND BETWEEN DEVELOPED AND
OBTRUSIVE SIGNS. UNDEVELOPED AREAS.
MINIMIZE LAND ALTERATIONS.
DESIGN ROADS, PARKING,
AND UTILITIES TO MINIMIZE
VISUAL IMPACTS.
1222/93
pdosll..3.agriculture
-72-
Open Space Element
Policies Within the City Limit Line the Urban Reserve Line the Greenbelt, and Outer Planning
Area
1. Within the city limits the City should, and outside the city limits the City will encourage the State
and County to:
A. Preserve scenic resources consistent with the policies in this Element.
B. Prohibit billboards and obtrusive signs.
C. Require public or private development to protect scenic resources by:
1. Prohibiting structures along ridgelines, steep slopes, or in other highly visible locations
unless no practicable alternative is available, or such a location is necessary to protect
public health and safety.
2. Utilizing natural landforms and vegetation for screening structures, access roads, building
foundations, and cut and till slopes.
3. Including landscaping which: (A) provides a landscape transition between developed areas
and adjacent open space or undeveloped areas; and (B) is compatible with the scenic
resource being protected.
4. Incorporating sound Soil Conservation Service practices and minimizing land alterations.
Land alterations should be minimized by: (A) keeping cuts and fills to a minimum; (B)
limiting grading to the smallest practical area of land; (C) limiting land exposure to the
shortest practical amount of time; (D) replanting graded areas to insure establishment of-
plant cover before the next rainy season; and (E) creating grading contours that blend with
the natural contours on site or look like contours that would naturally occur.
5. Designing roads, parking, and utilities to minimize visual impacts. If possible, utilities
should be underground. Roadways and parking should fit the natural terrain.
6. Designing projects to fit the site's scale and character. Structures should be designed and
located so: (A) they do not silhouette against ridgelines, mountaintops, or hilltops, (B)
roof lines and vertical architectural features blend with and do not detract from the natural
background or ridge outline, (C) residential density and massing is decreased with
increased elevation where it would mar the scenic quality of the scenic resource, (D) they
fit the natural terrain, and (E) they utilize building materials, colors, and textures that
blend with the natural landscape and avoid the creation of high-contrast situations,
pdosII.3.scenic resources - 74 - 12/22/93
Open Space Element
Preserve and enhance the aesthetic quality of mountain and hill resources.
Protect hill and . mountain properties from potentially hazardous or visually degrading
development conditions.
Policies Within the Urban Reserve Line and the City Limit Line:
1. The City shall preserve the following existing open space areas as open space:
A. South Street Hills (see site # 1, Site Map) above the development limit line as defined
by the Land Use Element and the South Street Hills-Specific Plan.
B. Terrace Hill (see site #2, Site Map) in compliance with existing open space easements.
2. The City should:
A. Annex mountains or hills (such. as Mine Hill, Islay Hill, Santa Lucias, the Irish Hills,
the Davenport Hills, Cuesta Ridge, Cerro San Luis, or Bishop Peak) only when
consistent with the Land Use Element.
B. Annex the northern portion of the Foothill property (see site #3, Site Map) and the creek
area as open space. Development on this site should be clustered or located near Foothill
Boulevard, with the northern portion of the site and creek area preserved as open space.
C. Within the city limits require, and outside the city limits encourage the County to require
public or private development to:
1. Locate structures, accessory structures, paving, and grading at the base of a hill or
mountain (generally that area below 20 percent slope) unless: (A) no practicable
alternative is available, (B) the location on a greater slope or at a greater elevation
provides more aesthetic quality, or (C) the location is necessary to protect public
health and safety (see Figure 3).
2. Utilize design, construction, and maintenance techniques that: (A) minimize
disturbance of and enhance hill or mountain resources; (B) ensure that development
near or on portions of a hill or mountain do not cause, or make worse natural
hazards (such as erosion, sedimentation, fire, or water quality concerns); (C) include
erosion and sediment control practices including temporary vegetation sufficient to
stabilize disturbed areas; (D) minimize risk to life and property from slope failure,
landslides, and flooding; (E) maintain the character and visual quality of the adjacent
pdosIl.3.hills & mountains - 14 - 12/22/93
m
m .
N
it
Lo cc
g�
W
O
H
2
W
a
- o
J
>W
W
O
O
U
O
a
1� O
® =N
W
O
C U
1U0
m 1
N i
Wcc
LL s r W 1
a r• �. �.o�s. r I
W
In� j
r o P
•tl7117111 1
a yM F'
---------------------
.43
op
n Lr •J� i
° ✓ DZQ
S U u
1-2-3
61
6.2 Hillside Policies
6.2.0 Introduction As discussed in the open space section,
San Luis Obispo wants to keep
open its steeper, higher, and most visible hillsides. Some of the lower and less steep hillside
areas, however, are seen as suitable for development, particularly where development is coupled
with permanent open space protection of the more sensitive areas. This section focuses on
where and how some hillsides may be developed.
The City establishes comprehensive standards and policies for hillside development for the
following reasons:
A. To protect and preserve scenic hillside areas and natural
and features st u P
halo a areas that
as the volcanic
Morros, ridge lines, plant communities, rock outcroppings P
function as landscape backdrops for the community.
B. set the eof trprresidential
development
areas by
establishing aprmanenopen space green belt at the edge of the communty.
C. To protect the health, safety and welfare of community residents by directing
development away from areas with hazards such as landslides, wildland fires, flooding
and erosion.
6.2.1 Development Limits Hillsides planning areas should have carefully chosen development
limit lines, and special design standards for the areas which can be developed. The location of
the development limit and the standards should cause development to avoid encroachment into
sensitive habitats or unique resources as defined in the Open Space Element, and public health
and safety problems related to utility service, access, wildland fire hazard, erosion, flooding,
and landslides and other geologic hazards. Also, the development limit line and the standards
should help protect the City's scenic setting. (Locations of hillside planning areas are shown
in Figure 6. More precise locations of the development limit line and the urban reserve line are
shown on large-scale aerial photographs on file at the Community Development Department;
these are part of the �and Use Element.)
6.2.2 Development Standards Development —including buildings, driveways, fences and
graded yard areas— on hillside parcels shall:
A. Be entirely within the urban reserve line or development limit line, whichever is more
restrictive (though parcel boundaries may extend beyond these lines when necessary to
meet minimum parcel-size standards);
B. Keep a low profile. and conform to the natural slopes;
C. Avoid large, continuous walls or roof surfaces, or prominent foundation walls, poles,
or columns;
D. Minimize grading of roads;
-2y
by
62
E. Minimize grading on individual lots; generally, locate houses close to the street;
minimize the grading of visible driveways;
F. Include planting which is compatible with native hillside vegetation and which provides
a visual transition from developed to open areas;
G. Use materials, colors, and textures which blend with the natural landscape and avoid
high contrasts;
H. Minimize exterior lighting.
6.2.3 Parcels Crossing the Limit Lines Before development occurs on any parcel which
crosses the urban reserve or development limit lines, the part outside the lines shall be protected
as permanent open space.
6.2.4 Development Credit Transfer Any residential development credit obtained from Open
Space designations outside the urban reserve line or development limit line should be transferred
to land inside the lines.
6.2.5 Homesites Outside the Limit Lines Where homesites are to be developed outside the
urban reserve or development limit lines, and beyond the City's jurisdiction, they should:
A. Be on land sloping less than 15 percent;
B. Have effective emergency-vehicle access from a City street or County road;
C. Be on a geologically stable site;
D. Have adequate water supply for domestic service and fire suppression;
E. Avoid areas with high wildland fire hazard;
F. Be next to existing development;
G. Avoid significant visual impacts.
6.2.6 Hillside Planning Areas Hillside policies apply to all hills in and around the City. Specific
policies to address particular concerns for the areas as shown on Figure 6, listed below. Egr each
of these areas, land above the development limit line should be secured as permanent open space.
A. The Cal Poly - Cuesta Park area includes the hill east of Cal Poly and north of
Highway 101 near Cuesta Park. Development should be separated or protected from
.highway traffic noise and should have adequate fire protection. Architectural review
should be required for development of lots fronting Loomis Street.
Planning Commission Meeting
October 11, 1995
Page 5
Commissioner Senn aske s. Simer what the normal length of stay is and how many guests arrive
by car.
Ms. Simer stated guests stay one to hree days. The hostel has a policy limiting stays to three days.
She does let Cal Poly students who are oking for housing stay a little longer. The hostel is subject
to the bed tax. Guests who arrive by c is at 20% to 30%. With the increased space, she will be
promoting bicycle tours. Right now only 30 o if the guests arrive by bike. The price for a one-night
stay is $13.00. The hostel is open for check-i om 5:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M., with an 11:00 P.M.
curfew.
COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS:
Commissioner Senn stated he is in support of this project. It lls a need in our community.
Commissioner Whittlesey made a motion to approve the Use Perm based upon the findings in the
staff report; Condition #1 be amended to read, "A minimum of 6 sp es shall be provided for 20
guests'; Condition#7 be modified to read, "The site must be cleared of c struction debris prior to
occupancy of the moved building and construction material shall be store 'n compliance with the
City Property Maintenance Ordinance";and with the finding that no public pu se would be served
by requiring vehicles to exit in a forward direction. Commissioner Senn second the motion.
AYES: Commissioners Kourakis, Senn, Cross, Whittlesey, and Chairman Kar kint.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioners Hoffman and Ready
ABSTAIN: None.
3. 0 Higuera Street: (GP 105-95): General Plan Text Amendment to amend hillside planning
standards to allow cellular transceiver facility; C/OS-40 Zone; SLO Cellular, Inc., applicant.
Commissioner Whittlesey stepped down from this issue due to a potential conflict of interest.
Associate Planner McIlvaine presented the staff report.
Commissioner Kourakis asked staff to comment on the "no practicable alternative" provision.
Associate Planner McIlvaine stated there is a provision in the Open Space Element for allowing
exceptions if, in fact, there are no practical alternatives. Cellular transmissions operate in a line of
sight manner. This automatically puts them up on ridge fines, hillsides, and the tops of buildings.
There is specific language in the Land Use Element that is of concern. The "no practical alternative"
Planning Commission Meeting
October 11, 1995
Page 6
argument would be a way for allowing a facility such as this under the open space policies. The Land
Use Element is very specific and the staff felt that to allow something like this, an amendment would
be needed.
Commissioner Cross stated this is bringing potential for a number of other users to move to that site.
Bob Neumann,Fire Chief for the City of San Luis Obispo, presented the fire department's technical
report. He stated that as the Fire Chief, he has an absolute responsibility to make sure that this
community's radio systems work on a 24-hour basis, and he has serious reservations and concerns
about this project which haven't been resolved.
Commissioner Senn asked if there has been dialog between Mr. Neumann's group and applicants.
Mr.Neumann stated there were initial discussions. Now there is an entirely new group representing
the applicant. He is willing to continue with further discussions.
Commissioner Senn asked Mr. Neumann when he started operations on the hill.
Mr. Neumann stated operations started in 1977. This spring it started working properly with the
1,000' move.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Adrianne Patnaud, on behalf of Cellular One, stated last March an application was submitted to the
City for the proposed facility on the site. Because of the language in Land Use Element, this kind of
facility would be in conflict with the policy currently in existence. A Text Amendment has been
developed that would allow the City to at least consider the application. Ms. Patnaud stated the last
thing Cellular One would want to do is interfere with the fire department or emergency services that
provide service for the residents of San Luis Obispo. Ms. Patnaud gave a computer-generated
presentation for the proposed Cellular One facility. She urged the Commission to consider the Text
Amendment. It will not jeopardize the intent of the Hillside Policy. It will allow room for an
important and necessary use that will benefit the community.
Commissioner Cross asked how Cellular One is currently providing service to the San Luis Obispo
area.
Ms. Patnaud stated there is a site now on the Cal Poly tower. It is a temporary location.
Commissioner Kourakis asked Ms. Patnaud to respond to Fire Chief Neumann's difficulties with the
Cal Poly site.
1-.27
Planning Commission Meeting
October 11, 1995
Page 7
Ms. Patnaud stated she would talk to an engineer to get a response with regards to that concern.
Commissioner Senn stated that he sees the Commission being put in a very difficult position. There
has been a huge lack of dialog between the Fire Department and the applicant. This is both a
significant land use decision and at the same time a technical issue. The City needs to be prepared
for changing electronic technology.
Development Review Manager,Whisenand stated that the issue of interference needs to be addressed
after the Commission and Council first address the policy issue of whether these facilities are
appropriate on the hillside. If the policies are amended, then studies could be performed to assess
interference issues as.part of project review.
Commissioner Senn asked if the existing City facility is in violation of the policy.
Development Review Manager Whisenand stated no. That approval occurred before the adoption
of.the Land Use Element, but would be in violation of existing policy.
Commissioner Kourakis asked Ms. Patnaud if this particular hillside is needed because of its height
and land configuration.
Ms.Patnaud stated a site is needed that will topographically work with the necessary elevation and
cover a broad area. This hillside is unique in its location.
Development Review Manager, Whisenand stated there are other location options. Because of
Cellular One's coverage, this site would require only one antenna and allow them to cover a large
area.
Fire Chief Neumann stated he has significant experience in trying to make radio coverage. In order
to get 100% coverage, there is only one spot and that is Cerro San Luis. This location is
environmentally sensitive and it would be too difficult.
Steve Smith, Battalion Chief of the San Luis Obispo Fire Department, stated he is responsible for
technical services within the fire department and he is now charged with running the three
department's radio systems. He has been working with radio systems since 1975. From experience,
the city cannot be covered by one site.
Ms. Patnaud stated in any given area it is almost impossible to provide 100% coverage. She doesn't
expect this one site to cover everything. Given the topography of San Luis Obispo, this site would
allow them to provide service without having to locate at many other sites.
Planning Commission Meeting
October 11, 1995
Page 8
Chairman Karleskint stated 100% coverage is not a necessity for a commercial venture as opposed
to public safety considerations.
Steve Gordon, representative of Sonic Cable Television, expressed concerns regarding the
transmitted frequency of Cellular One and future paging services. There are many issues that need
to be addressed and considered by the Commission. Mr. Gordon offered to answer questions of the
Commission and staff.
Commissioner Senn asked Mr. Gordon if there are frequency experts with knowledge in meeting the
needs of Cellular One, Sonic Cable, and the fire department.
Mr. Gordon stated there are companies that do studies for frequency use and provide frequency use
analysis. The company that Sonic uses is located in Virginia.
Steve Smith, Battalion Chief, stated they all are governed by frequency coordination committees; a
requirement of the FCC. Each band of the radio spectrum has a different coordinating group, non
of which talk to each other. In the FCC's view, the interference problem that can be generated is a
problem of local concern.
COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS:
Commissioner Cross stated he could not support a change in the Land Use Element. The fire
department needs to be satisfied that their service will not be jeopardized.
Commissioner Senn stated the environmental review will be a big part of this. This is not a decision,
but allows possible processing so the City has a provision for electronic and emergency technology
if necessary and appropriate.
Chairman Karleskint feels the amendment is appropriate. The concept of cellular was not even
considered when the lieu was adopted; however, public safety must be secure.
Commissioner Kourakis said she cannot support the amendment for several reasons: (1.)The City
must protect its emergency broadcast system and satisfy Fire Chief Neumann and Battalion Chief s
Smith's concerns. (2.) The prime issue according to the testimorry is how the problem of interference
with the emergency system can be regulated by the City. (3.) However, the City has little or no
experience in the highly technical and specialized field of regulating radio frequencies. (4.) I'm not
sure CEQA is the proper way for the City to move into such a difficult area.
Commissioner Senn made a motion to have the City Council direct staff to continue to process the
project application with the suggested modification to Item A, that development is similar to and
compatible with existing uses on the site. The motion was seconded by Chairman Karleskint.
Planning Commission Meeting
October 11, 1995
Page 9
AYES: Commissioner Senn and Chairman Karleskint.
NOES: Commissioners Kourakis and Cross.
ABSENT: Commissioners Hoffman and Ready.
ABSTAIN: None.
Commissioner Kourakis feels that the Commission needs direction from the City Council. In many
ways this is a political decision. No matter what the Commission does, this matter will go to the City
Council.
Chairman Karleskint expressed reservations about sending this item to the Council without any
direction from the Commission.
Ms. Petnaud stated that the chances are that this will go to the City Council anyway. She asked that
the Commission to forward this to the City Council with the note that there was a 2:2 vote, and let
the Council decide if it should continue on with an environmental review report.
Commission Senn made a motion to recommend that City Council deny the proposed General Plan
Amendment based on inconsistencies with the General Plan. Commissioner Cross seconded the
motion.
Commissioner Senn withdrew his previous motion.
Commissioner Kourakis made a motion to forward this matter to the City Council with the Planning
Commission's recommendation to deny, based on inconsistencies with the General Plan and with
discussion of the split Commission decision on the issue. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
Cross.
AYES: Commissioners Kourakis, Senn, Cross, and Chairman Karleskint.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioners Hoffman and Ready
ABSTAIN: Whittlesey(Due to a conflict of interest).
AGENDA FORECAST:
Development Review Manager Whisenand stated there is only on item on the next agenda.
ADJOURN to a regular meeting of the Planning Commission scheduled for October 25, 1995 at 7:00
p.m. in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
Respectfully submitted,
/- 30
acquiring and permitting wireless
Planners Should Prepare for telecommunications sites in 46 states
in
and 4 countries, 1 see chaos in the near
future resulting in absolute gridlock
Wireless Invasion for all parties involved. The only way
to avoid a standoff situation in which
by Gregory Siveet engineering objections, many of the everyone will lose is for the wireless
wireless carriers are opposed to co- carriers to adopt a "win-win" philoso-
n March 13, 1995, the locations with competitors. As a mac- phy toward dealing with the citizens
Clinton AdminiMation, ter oFconscience, there is little desire and the municipalities in which they
through the Federal by the carriers to screen or hide these wish to place their wireless facilities.
Communications Commission, com- facilities from the outset. They are Planners and citizens alike will need to
plcted the bidding process oil the usually forced to do so by public or learn the benefits of these wireless
long-awaited airwaves auction For a municipal pressure rather than by tak- sites, especially in the area of public
ncsv generation of wireless comnntni- ing their best shot up Front. safety. The wireless carriers will have
cations called PCN/PCS of"Personal The tine to prepare for the wire- to take steps to co-locate and screen
Communications Network/Personal less invasion is immediate. Applica- their facilities at First rather than wait
ComnUnlCltlnn5 Services". Although tions for many PCN/PCS Planning For public outcry. A proactive rather
most planning and zoning officials are and Building permits arc currently than reactive position must be taken in
currently handling applications from being filed by contractors for these many municipalities. Empathy For
existing wireless carriers For cellular new wireless carriers. By this Fall, the visual and health concerns of people
telephone and paging services, few activity to build these sites will be in who live and work near these antenna
municipalities are prepared for what full swing. Facilities will be primary.
is facing them as a result of these Unless our nation's planners pre-
auctions.
re-
atactions pare now For this wireless invasion,
At least two and possibly as many Unless our nations planners everyone will suffer. Municipalities
as eight new wireless carriers will be prepare now for this wireless will be involved in controversial appli-
racing to acquire, permit and build cations by wireless carriers that will
new wireless Communications Facilities invasion, everyone will suffer drain scarce human, legal and Financial
in every major city in the United resources. Wireless carriers will
States. With clic staggering sums of APA members must learn about become embroiled in controversial and
money most of these companies have the technology, design and use of these lengthy zoning battles that will often
paid the US Government for licenses wireless sites quickly. '['he tciceommu- lead to appeals and perhaps lawsuits.
to operate, there is enormous pressure nications industry trust help local Permanent damage will be done to
to build these sites so that they arc eonhnuuiitics understand what is hap- relationships between the wireless car-
quicld% producing revenue. 'fhe exist- peeing so that these conutiunitics will ricrs and local municipalities.
ing cellular and paging companies choose to embrace rather than to Moreover, America will lose. America
have a 5-10 year head start in building oppose this thew generation of wireless needs this wireless technology to give
and nper:uing their networks, and the technology along with the antenna its citizens the finest and least cxpcn-
ncw C.arrices will :tempt to play sires. sive telecommunications service possi-
"c;uch up" .as quickly as possible. Because of current problems in ble and keep the country. the fore-
'I'hc existing cellular and paging obtaining zoning and building permits Front of global leadership in the
companies are not going to sat-still nationwide for wireless sites and to telecommunications field.
while this "ncw wane" oFstart-ups clear the way For a quick build of these It will be the tciccommunications
conic on line to conipetc with them. wireless networks, chert is pressure on industrys responsibility to help plan-
The existing carriers are proliferating the federal government to pass ricrs understand this complex problem.
their networks :it a breakneck pace to legislation through the Federal You may not be able to count on it
prepare for the competition. Communications Commission (FCC) being brought to your door. Planners
What this nicans for municipal to override state and Municipal con- must take steps to educate themselves
govcninienrs and planning and zoning trol, i.e., State Public Utility and their constituents, where neccs-
agencies in every medium and large Commissions and local zoning and sary, by seeking information from
city in the Unitcd States is an inunda- permitting agencies. telecommunications trade magazines
cion of new ;applications that many Senator Larry Pressler of South such as RC2, Cellular Business. Cellular
ntuaicil'Aities will experience diffacul- Dakota introduced a bill that is cur- Marketingand Telephony. In addition,
ties in understanding and processing. rently before Congress to deregulate planners should take classes and seek
I'hc sheer load of these applications the tciccommunications industry. It education from the wireless carriers
(2,000-2,500 new sites in each metro- contains a provision that would allow themselves. The more you know
polirm area) will overload many juris- wireless carriers to supersede states' about the technology and plans for
dictiuns. Furthermore, with the grow- rights in order to expedite the comple- these wireless sites the better you will
ing opposition to wireless sites from tion of these wireless networks. The be prepared to handle the enormous
both a visual :aspect and the perceived CcllularTelephonc Industry challenge that ties ahead.
threat of biological effects to the body Association (CTIA) and most of the
front radio frequency radiation, the wireless carriers who would benefit
backlash could turn to outrage. From the passage of the bill support it. Gregory C Sweet is owner ofAcguire
l)uc to competitive or radio With over 20 years of experience Telecom Services in San Francisco.
_V
(WAFORNIA PLANNER — 13 — Si:l,'I'I:MBEWOC -OBER 1995
"'SETING AGENDA f
_JE 161-5-2L ITEM #
CELWLARONE®
of San Luis Obispo
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 5, 1995
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Adrianne Patnaud, Project Manager, Cellular One
RE: Cellular One's Proposed Text Amendment
It has come to my attention that the staff report which has been distributed to you in
association with Cellular One's proposed text amendment reflects that the Fire
Department is opposed to our proposal because of concerns regarding potential
interference with their radio equipment. As I have relayed to you in previous
correspondence, we have been working with the City Fire Department to successfully
resolve these concerns. Chief Bob Neuman will be at the City Council meeting this _- .
evening to address this issue should you have any questions. Please don't hesitate to call
me at(805)783-0134 if you have any questions or comments relating to this issue.
RECEIVED
� NCIL Utt; lyy5
CDD DIR -
CAO O,�N DIR ..:1RrAQA0 Ild'RRECHIEF cCrrY COUNCIL'
a►�
�TMRNEY p
Q Mq W POLICE OHF
GMTTEAM 13REC DIR
_ IFILE O UTIL DIR .
— O PERS DR
733 Marsh Street, Suite B San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 543-OJ00 Fax (805) 543-0197 ��