HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/04/1997, C-6 - REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO FURNISH FIXED ROUTE TRANSIT SERVICES SPECIFICATION NO. 9733 Council "�""2'14
j acEnaa nEpout 1� N C -�O
C I T Y OF S AN L U IS O B 1 S P 0
FROM: Michael D.McCluskey, Public Works DirectoiPw�_
Prepared By: Al Cablay,Public Works Manager
David Elliott,Administrative Analyst `
Reinie Jones,Transportation Technician
Harry Watson,Transit Manager -�
SUBJECT: Request for Proposals to Furnish Fixed Route Transit Services
Specification No. 9733
CAO RECOMMENDATIONS
1) Approve the"Request for Proposals to Furnish Fixed Route Transit Services, Specification
No. 9733"
2) Authorize Public Works to distribute the request for proposals
DISCUSSION
Background
The City now contracts with Laidlaw/Mayflower to provide all vehicle operations and vehicle
maintenance for SLO Transit, using City-owned buses and the City-owned bus operations and
maintenance yard. The existing contract for these services expires on June 30, 1997 and cannot be
extended because of federal limitations on the length of contract periods. The request for proposals
covers the next four-year contract term, which will start on July 1, 1997 and run through June 30,
2001. This term will align the contract with the City's financial plan periods and allow easier
budgeting.
Specification Changes
As explained to the Council at three recent Council meetings, the City expects permanent reductions in
federal transit operating assistance and Cal Poly contributions for transit operations. Recent fare
increases and a one-time reprieve from the federal cutbacks(described in the"Fiscal Impact" section of
this report)will soften the effect of these reductions temporarily. But SLO Transit will eventually face
substantial operating budget shortfalls, which will require service reductions. To limit service cutbacks
as much as possible, the specification tries to reduce contract costs by a)allowing more staffing
flexibility for the contractor and b)lifting some of the capital cost required of the contractor.
Allowing Staffing Flexibility. The existing specification requires the contractor to provide a full-
time site supervisor dedicated to SLO Transit operations. But the contract does not specify
exactly what this employee should do other than"monitoring all aspects of the system operation
and maintenance". The new specification describes the contractor's duties and responsibilities in
detail, but it does not specify a staffing plan or staffing level and in particular does not specify the
need for a full-time site supervisor. The contractor may be able to manage the contract with a
supervisor visiting the site only once or twice a week or with no supervisor at all. This strategy
could result in overhead cost savings of up to $60,000 each year, which could be more
productively applied to preserving transit service.
C � �'1
Council Agenda Report - RFP to Furnish Fixed Route Transit Services
Page 2
To further moderate the contractor's need for site supervision, Public Works is considering plans
to relocate the Transit Manager from 955 Morro to the bus operations and maintenance yard.
Lifting Capital Costs. The existing specification requires the contractor to furnish the following
equipment:
• a passenger van for transporting drivers at shift changes
• a service truck for responding to breakdowns and picking up parts
• a radio base station
• two-way radios on buses plus three portable radios
The new specification requires the City to furnish this equipment so the contractor can avoid
expensive startup costs which would have to be passed on to the City. This approach is
particularly appropriate because the City currently has surplus money for transit which is
restricted to capital outlay and cannot be used for operations. It is difficult to estimate how much
cost savings might accrue from this change.
FISCAL IMPACT
SLO Transit receives nearly all of its annual revenue from four sources.-
State
ources:State Transportation Development Act (TDA) allocations
• Federal Transit Administration (FTA) grants
• In-lieu fare contributions from Cal Poly
• Cash and pass fare revenue
As mentioned, reductions in FTA operating assistance grants and in-lieu contributions from Cal Poly
will cause future budget shortfalls and require service cutbacks. Two recent developments should
allow the City to postpone service reductions until July 1998. First,FTA representatives advised the
City to expect only$180,000 in FTA operating assistance grants for 1996-97. But because other
cities in other states did not claim their full operating apportionments in the past, grant
administrators made this unclaimed money available for small California cities in 1996-97, and San
Luis Obispo received one-time approval for $440,000. Second, the annual audit required for
TDA recipients found that there was $436,600 in TDA allocations from previous years available
for 1996-97. Over the last three years the City has used TDA allocations to temporarily cover
operating costs pending receipt of FTA operating assistance, which typically arrives in a lump sum
after the end of the fiscal year. The auditors pointed out that once the FTA assistance is received,
the TDA allocations become excess revenue available during the following year. These two one-
time revenue windfalls should allow the City to continue operations at current service levels for
the first year of the four-year contract period.
The table on the following page estimates operating revenues and expenses for SLO Transit from
1996-97 to 1998-99 based on current information and the following assumptions:
• FTA operating assistance grants will fall to their ongoing expected levels in 1997-98.
• TDA allocations for operations will increase three percent each year.
• Cal Poly in-lieu contributions will remain at current levels.
• Cash fares and pass sales will increase as the 111197, fare increases take effect over a full year.
• The bus operations and maintenance contract prices will increase three percent each year.
• Direct and indirect administration costs will increase three percent each year.
C�6_Z
Council Agenda Report - RFP to Furnish Fixed Route Transit Services
Page 3
Projected Estimated Estimated
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99
Revenues:
FTA Operating Assistance Grants $440,000 $180,000 $1802000
Deferred TDA Allocations from Previous Year 436,600 221,600 29,400
TDA Allocations for Operations 131,500 606,600 6551400
Cash Fares and Pass Sales 120,800 159,800 159,800
Cal Poly In-lieu Fare Contribution 169,000 1699000 1697000
Other Sources (mostly interest) 2,600 2,600 200
Unused TDA Allocations from Current Year 221,600 29,400
$1,522,100 $1,369,000 $1,196,200
Expenses:
Bus Operations and Maintenance Contract 989,800 $1,019,500 866,500
Direct Administration 122,100 125,800 129,600
Indirect Administration 188,600 194,300 2002100
TDA Allocations Deferred to Next Year 221,600 29,400
$1,522,100 $1,369,000 $1,196,200
Projections in the table show that one-time recognition and use of deferred TDA allocations
should allow postponement of service reductions until 1998-99. If strong competition and the
specification changes described earlier in this report result in lower contract prices, service
reductions could be postponed even longer. On the other hand, a lack of competition could result
in higher contract prices and the necessity to reduce service in 1997-98.
Although the annual Cal Poly in-lieu fare contributions are projected to remain constant at
$169,000, Cal Poly has stated that without some new revenue sources it may be able to contribute
only$126,000 each year. In that case, some service reductions might be necessary in 1997-98.
The proposed contract is structured so that each month the contractor is paid:
• a lump-sum amount to cover fixed costs
• an amount per hoar operated to cover vehicle operation costs
• an amount per mile operated to cover vehicle maintenance costs
This arrangement allows the City unlimited flexibility to add or reduce service without unduly hurting
or benefiting the contractor.
A copy of the request for proposals is available-for review in the City Clerk's office.
C - 6 -3