HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/04/1997, 3 - STATE AND FEDERAL TRANSIT GRANTS FOR 1997-98 PUBLIC HEARING ON FEDERAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FOR 1997-98 council
j acEnaa RCPORt bm
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
FROM: Michael D.McCluskey,Public Works Direct
Prepared by: David Elliott,Administrative Analyst' \
SUBJECT: State and Federal Transit Grants for 1v997-98
Public Hearing on Federal Program of Projects for 1997-98
CAO RECOMMENDATIONS
1) By resolution, approve the 1997-98 Annual Claim for Local Transportation Funds in the
amount of$863,509
2) By resolution, authorize the Public Works Director to apply for a grant from the Federal
Transit Administration in the amount of$1,068,900
3) By motion,reinstate a$40,000 capital project to purchase a new radio system for SLO
Transit
4) By motion, approve a$50,000 capital project for ongoing capital bus maintenance
5) By motion,approve amendments which will bring the 1997-98 budget into conformance
with anticipated revenues and expenses
DISCUSSION
Background
SLO Transit receives nearly all of its annual revenue from four sources:
1) State Transportation Development Act(TDA)grants
2) Federal Transit Administration(FTA)grants
3) Contributions from Cal Poly
4) Cash and pass fare revenue
Each year the City must submit a claim for TDA grants and an application for FTA grants. Also,
because the amounts available sometimes differ from the amounts budgeted,appropriations must
be adjusted.
TDA Claim
The Transportation Development Act of 1972 annually apportions state sales tax revenue to local
agencies for their approved transportation programs and projects. This apportionment is made
through two local funds,the Local Transportation Fund(LTF)and the State Transit Assistance
Fund(STAF), which are administered in this county by the San Luis Obispo Council of
Governments(SLOCOG). City policy (page B-11 of the 1997-99 Financial Plan)restricts use of
all TDA revenue to alternative transportation, such as transit,bike, and pedestrian programs and
projects. TDA stipulates that at least two percent of the LTF apportionment(after deducting
initial contributions for regional agencies)be used for bicycle and pedestrian projects.
The TDA apportionment available to the City in 1997-98 amounts to$863,509 from the LTF,
and the City's 1997-98 annual claim requests allocation for the purposes shown on the next page.
Council Agenda Report- State and Federal Transit Grants for 1997-98
Page 2
City Share of Regional Transit Cost $286,521 (1)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Education 17,270
Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning 21,717 (2)
Local Share of SLO Transit Operations in 1997-98 500,401
Local Share of Passenger Van 4,000
Local Share of Service Truck 4,000
Local Share of Radio System 8,000
Local Share of Capital Cost of Contracting 10,000
Transit Share of Access Road Security Gate 10,000
Transit Share of Financial Mgmt. Information System 1,600
Total TDA Allocations $863,509
(1) This amount does not come to the City but goes directly to Regional Transit
(2) This amount is one half the total compensation for the transportation technician,who works half-
time in the transportation planning and engineering program.
The STAF apportionment for 1997-98 amounts to $59,851,but TDA regulations prohibit the
City from claiming this money in 1997-98 because SLO Transit's operating cost per hour for
1996-97 increased more than the Consumer Price Index. SLOCOG will reserve this money for
allocation in 1998-99,when the City should be eligible to claim it. Capitalizing a portion of bus
maintenance costs,as explained later.in this report, should reduce operating cost per hour enough
to ensure eligibility for STAF revenue.
Ineligibility to receive this apportionment results in having to use more of the 1997-98 FTA
apportionment for operations than was originally planned. But when this STAF revenue is later
claimed in 1998-99,it will allow a corresponding reduction in the amount of the FTA
apportionment needed for operations in that year.
FTA Grant Application
After the 1990 census,the City was classified as an urbanized area and became eligible to receive
FTA formula grants for operating and capital assistance. To apply for these grants,the Council
must annually 1)hold a public hearing on the proposed "program of projects" which.will use
federal transit assistance and 2) adopt a resolution authorizing the Public Works Director to file a
grant application and execute the grant agreement. The grant agreement requires annual
certifications of compliance with regulations regarding civil rights,procurement procedures,and
substance abuse. Authorizing the Public Works Director to apply for the grant and execute the
agreement is the procedure recommended by state and federal officials who administer these
grants.
The FTA grant application for 1997-98 will request$1,068,900 for the following purposes:
FTA Share of SLO Transit Operations in 1997-98 $364,900
FTA Share of Multi-Modal Transportation Terminal 600,000
FTA Share of Passenger Van 16,000
FTA Share of Service Truck 16,000
FTA Share of Radio System 32,000
FTA Share of Capital Cost of Contracting 402000
Total FTA Allocations $1,068,900
,�z
Council Agenda Report-State and Federal Transit Grants for 1996-97
Page 3
The last four projects listed on the previous page all have corresponding local shares covered by
TDA allocations. The financing ratio for these projects is 80 percent FTA and 20 percent TDA.
The federal legislation authorizing FTA grants each year is typically enacted well after the start
of the City's fiscal year. (The federal fiscal year starts on October 1.) Nonetheless, it has been
extraordinarily late this year. At the time this agenda report was written, an interim
transportation bill had passed from Congress to the President for his signature,and most
observers expected the President to sign it. This legislation contained two provisions important
to SLO Transit:
1)maintenance of apportionments at previous levels
2)abolishment of restrictions on how much of the apportionments can be used for operations.
The recently adopted Short Range Transit Plan anticipated these provisions and stated they
would have to be included in order for SLO Transit to continue operations in 1997-98 at existing
service levels. The second provision allows SLO Transit to use up to 100 percent of the annual
FTA apportionment for operations,if necessary. Despite the advantages of this flexibility,the
City should continue to reserve part of each annual apportionment for needed capital
improvements, such as bus replacements and bus stop improvements. (The estimated FTA
apportionments available are$533,000 from previous years and$545,000 from 1997-98.
$364,900 will be used for operations, and the rest will be used or reserved for capital
improvements.)
Radio System Project
Public Works is requesting reinstatement of this $40,000 CIP project, which the Council
originally approved in the 1996-97 Mid-Year Budget Review. The original appropriation was
made to the operating budget rather than the CIP budget, so the appropriation lapsed on June 30,
1997.
The current transit operations contract requires the City to furnish a radio base station, 15 two-
way radios for the buses, and three portable radios. This contract provision was included so the
contractor could avoid expensive startup costs. The radio purchase was postponed for the
following three reasons:
1) It made more sense to use FTA grants rather than TDA grants,because there was more
FTA capital money available.
2) The purchase had to await approval of the next FTA grant cycle.
3) The operations contractor had a radio system in place which could continue to be used for
a short time until replacement.
Capital Proiect for Ongoing Bus Maintenance
Public Works is also requesting anew$50,000 CIP project for ongoing capital bus maintenance.
The purpose of this project is to shift a portion of the operations contract payment from operating
cost to capital outlay. This is simply an accounting procedure;the payment to the operations
contractor will not change.
Starting in 1997-98, FTA allows a calculated portion of contract bus service cost to be
considered capital maintenance. The rationale is that when an operations contractor replaces a
large bus component, like a compressor or a transmission,the cost should be capitalized because
3-3
Council Agenda Report-State and Federal Transit Grants for 1996-97
Page 4
such a replacement extends the bus's service life. The practical benefit is that calculated
operating cost is reduced, and certain required performance measures (like the fare revenue to
operating cost ratio and the operating cost per hour)are easier to attain. By using this
opportunity,the City should be able to reduce operating cost enough to reestablish eligibility to
receive STAF allocations in 1998-99.
Consultation with the operations contractor led to calculation of a$50,000 annual cost(including
parts and fully loaded labor)for replacing major bus components.
FISCAL IlVIPACT
As mentioned,there will apparently be enough money available to operate SLO Transit at
current service levels during 1997-98.
Because the.amounts for both TDA and FTA grants differ from the amounts in the 1997-98
budget, the amendments shown on the next page are needed to bring the budget into
conformance with the TDA claim and the FTA grant application.
Current Amended
Budget Budget Reason for Change
Adiustments for Capital Outlays:
Multi-Modal Terminal $2,676,473 $2,725,000 more money available
Highway 101 Landscape (9089) 12400 0 project completed
Bus Replacement(9090) 64,268 0 project completed
Maintenance Bldg.Expansion(9601) 355,235 210,700 less money available
Montalban Street Bridge(9616) 20,000 0 federal grants available
Bus Replacement(9742) 775,000 755,900 actual cost lower
Passenger Van(9743) 28,000 20,000 estimated cost lower
Service Truck(9744) 33,000 20,000 estimated cost lower
Radio Equipment 0 40,000 new project
Capital Bus Maintenance 0 50,000 new project
Total for Capital Outlays $3,953,376 $3,821,600
Adiustments for Operating Expenses:
Purchased Transportation $1,018,000 $968,000 part capitalized
Total for Operating Expenses $1,018,000 $968,000
Adiustments for Fund 230 Revenues:
TDA for Bicycle/Pedestrian $382200 $39,000 different amount required
Total for Fund 230 Revenues $38,200 $39,000
3-�
Council Agenda Report-State and Federal Transit Grants for 1996-97
Page 5
Adiustments for Fund 530 Revenues:
TDA for Transit Operations $553,200 $587,400 more money available
TDA for New Transit Capital 46,000 37,600 local match lower
TDA for F.rich_ng Transit Capital 0 229,000 not rebudgeted for 97-98
FTA for Transit Operations 180,000 364,900 more needed
FTA for New Transit Capital 680,000 704,000 federal portion higher
FTA for Existing Transit Capital 30,000 782,400 not rebudgeted for 97-98
Total for Fund 530 Revenues $1,489,200 $2,705,300
FTA may actually approve less than$364,900 for operations. If so,Public Works will prepare a
request to further reduce the revenue budgeted for operations.
Recap-Uses of State and Federal Grants for Transit in 1997-98
Budgeted Budgeted Reserved
Total for for for Future
Available Operations Capital Capital
TDA-LTF(from prior years) $316,000 $87,000 $229,000 $0
TDA-LTF(for 1997-98) 538,000 500,400 37,600 0
TDA-STAF (for 1997-98) 59,000 0 0 59,900
FTA(from prior years) 533,000 0 533,000 0
FTA(for 1997-98) 545,000 364,900 171,000 9,100
$1,991,000 $952,300 $970,600 $69,000
Attachments:
Resolutions for TDA Claim and for FTA Grant Application
FTA Program of Projects
Note: The TDA Claim documents are available for review in the City Clerk's office
state and Federal Transit cru 1997-98
3S
RESOLUTION NO. (1997)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING THE 1997-98 ANNUAL CLAIM
FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS TOTALING $863,509
WHEREAS,the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments("SLOCOG")has
apportioned$863,509 of Transportation Development Act subventions from the Local
Transportation Fund to the City of San Luis Obispo for approved transportation programs and
projects; and
WHEREAS,to receive this money the City of San Luis Obispo must file a claim with
SLOCOG;
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
1. to approve the 1997-98 Annual Claim for Local Transportation Funds in the amount of
$863,509 for the purposes of transit operations, transit capital improvement, bicycle and
pedestrian education, and bicycle and pedestrian planning;
2. to authorize the Public Works Director to execute the claim documents;
3. to declare that reasonable efforts have been made to implement transit productivity
improvements recommended in performance audits; and
4. to direct the City Clerk to forward the annual claim plus one certified copy of this
resolution to:
San Luis Obispo Council of Governments
1150 Osos Street, Suite 202
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Upon motion of seconded by and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing resolution was adopted this day of 1997.
Mayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED:
City Clerice"-IA,4-ZA L'(A'4-4-C4�
Cr-MeV
36
RESOLUTION NO. (1997)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF APPLICATIONS WITH THE FEDERAL TRANSIT
ADNIINISTRATION FOR FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION ASSISTANCE
WHEREAS,the Federal Transit Administration has been delegated authority to award
Federal financial assistance for a transportation project; and
WHEREAS, a grant of Federal assistance will impose certain obligations upon the City
San Luis Obispo and may require the City of San Luis Obispo to provide the local share of
project costs; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has or will provide all annual certifications and
assurances to the Federal Transit Administration required for the project;
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
1. that the City of San Luis Obispo is the designated recipient as defined by 49 U.S.C. 5307
(a)(2),
2. that the Public Works Director is authorized to execute and file an application for Federal
assistance on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo with the Federal Transit
Administration for Federal assistance authorized by 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53, Title 23,
United States Code and other Federal statutes authorizing a project administered by the
Federal Transit Administration,
3. that the Public Works Director is authorized to execute and file with the application the
annual certifications, assurances,and other documents the Federal Transit Administration
requires before awarding a Federal assistance grant, and
4. that the Public Works Director is authorized to execute grant agreements with the Federal
Transit Administration on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo.
Upon motion of seconded by and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing resolution was adopted this day of 1997.
ayor
ATTESTED: APPROVED:
City er e
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION
GRANT APPLICATION
for
SLO TRANSIT
PROGRAM OF PROJECTS
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-98
Federal Apportionments:
For 1997-98 $545,000
From Previous Years $533,000
Federal Total
Prosect Amount Amount
Intermodal Terminal $600,000 $2,725,000
Support Vehicles 32,000 40,000
Radios 32,000 40,000
Capital Cost of Contracting 40,000 50,000
Operating Assistance 7/1/97 to 6/30/98 364,900 1,283,700
Net Project Cost $4,138,700
Federal Share $1,068,900
Local Share $3,069,800
3-�
Transportation Development Claim for Funds
FY 1997/98
All the items marked with an X are included with this claim
ITEM # DESCRIPTION
X 1. Signed and completed claimant information, form.
X 2. Signed and completed certifications form.
X 3. A completed Annual Project and Financial Plan.
X 4. Resolution authorizing the claim for funds including the
amounts of LTF and STA funds being requested, the proposed
uses of those funds, and a finding that reasonable efforts have
been made to implement transit productivity improvements
recommended in performance audits (transit claimants).
X 5. A proposed budget for the fiscal year of the claim pertaining to
transit or subsidized taxi.
X 6. A statement identifying actions to comply with prior year's
fiscal audit recommendations (if applicable).
X 7. A statement identifying and substantiating the reason or need
for any increase in the transit operating budget in excess of
15% above the preceding year, and substantial increases or
decreases in the scope of operations or capital provisions for
major new facilities (if applicable).
X 8. A certificate from the CHP verifying that the operator is in
compliance with Section 1808.1 of the vehicle code as required
in PUC 99251.
3-9
Item 1
Claimant Information
CLAIM# SLO-978-1
FISCAL YEAR 1997-98
TO: San Luis Obispo Council of Governments
1150 Osos Street, Suite 202
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
FROM: City of San Luis Obispo
955 Morro Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
CONTACT: Harry Watson, 781-7209
This claimant, qualified pursuant to Section 99203 of the Public Utilities Code,hereby requests,
in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes of 1971, as amended an applicable rules and
regulations,that an allocations be made for the purposes and in the amounts described in the
attached Project and Financial Plan.
Annual LTF Apportionment $863,509
Annual STAF Apportionment $59,851
by Revenue $10,085
by Population $49,766
Total Amount Claimed $8639509
Claimant Signature: `%
u c or cs irector
Date: �o z ;P/V
This claim was conditionally approved by the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments at a
meeting on June 4, 1997 by Resolution No. 97-06.
�-l0
Item 2
Certifications
1. Proposed expenditures conform to the Regional Transportation Plan as required by CCR
6651.
2. The City of San Luis Obispo has established a separate account for bicycle and pedestrian
allocations pursuant to PUC 99233.3.
3. SLO Transit is not budgeted to receive TDA allocations for operating costs that exceed
budgeted operating costs minus the sum of budgeted fare revenues and budgeted federal
operating assistance. The ratio of fare revenue to operating cost for SLO Transit was at
least 20 percent in 1996-97 and will be at least 20 percent in 1997-98.
1996-97 1997-98
Operating Cost $1,310,670 $1,283,700
Fare Revenue $308,757 $328,800
Federal Operating Assistance $455,000 $364,900
Fare Revenue/Operating Cost .24 .26
Operating Cost-Fare Revenue- Federal Operating Assistance $546,913 $590,000
4. The City of San Luis Obispo is making full use of federal grants available through the
Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964 and the Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act as required by CCR 6754(3).
5. SLO Transit will comply with SLOCOG's adopted bus transfer pass policy.
6. SLO Transit makes available reduced transit fares for senior citizens and disabled people
as required by PUC 99155.
7. As required by PUC 99264 SLO Transit does not routinely staff transit vehicles designed
to be operated by one person with two or more persons. As required by CCR 6754(2)
SLO Transit is not precluded by contract from employing part-time drivers or from
contracting with common carriers of persons operating under a franchise or license
8. SLO Transit complies with inspection and driver certification requirements of CVC
12804.6.
9. SLO Transit will program or implement services to meet all unmet transit needs per the
adopted 1996 SLOCOG resolution, if applicable.
10. SLO Transit is not eligible to receive its STAF allocation for 1997-98.
11. SLO Transit has an adopted short range transit plan.
12. SLO Transit recorded the following operating data for 1996-97:
Vehicle Service Hours: 28,951
Vehicle Service Miles: 318,967
Passengers: 999,861
Employee Hours: 47,780
13. Before disbursement of TDA allocations, the City of San Luis Obispo will:
a. submit a claim to SLOCOG
b. submit a state controller's report of financial transactions to the State Controller's
Office and to SLOCOG
C. submit to SLOCOG by December 31, 1997 three copies of a certified fiscal audit
of all TDA funds received in 1996-97
Claimant Signature:
Public Works Director
Date:
�2
ITEM 3
Annual Project and Financial Plan
City of San Luis Obispo
Proposed Use: Authority: Amount:
City Share of Regional Transit Cost Article 4, Section 99260 286,521
Subtotal to be Paid Directly to SLORTA 286,521
Bicycle and Pedestrian Education Article 3, Section 99233.3 17,270
Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Article 8, Section 99400(a) 21,717
Local Share of SLO Transit in 1997-98 Article 4, Section 99260 536,751
TDA Audit Cost Article 3, Section 99245 1,250
Subtotal to Be Paid Directly to the City 576,988
Total LTF Allocation 863,509
Total STAF Allocation 0
Total TDA Allocation 863,509
,3/3
0
y
a 0 0 0
� - o
0
u m e
m
_ y
cn ? q
L y
m Y e o e E
L o o U
L_
m O O C
� N
N y J
C
Y —
� O O O O O O p m
� O Y
O L..
m C
� Y m
N c
O
V m
V O G
S.
O
v C c m V a o a
in i W
E fA E. tz = Li o
y y0 O` m
C m O O 6
C (7 a O O y
7 C Li v O O `u
9 h ^ w
a
c c
o m o 0
Y Y
m o c - n m H c c
IV) u u
m a u c c
y Ev o o r o n vei o o Li ir0.
r
T r n N - N' � D L '
m Z F F
fi, Y Y Y
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 ^ a N o 0
n o r o. rf of 0 0 0 0
c 0 0 - A T O 'Cl
F U N n N n N N ? h
r
y c s u of
O C
C Y O O O\
O N ?) Y O
O Ym9 LA
oar � N
CC C Liz H v � C � Y G •C C
u c G m v € _ v � m a a
0 0
m a m E 'H
C6 .Cm u c E U u m m m
o Y = G m
O f'
2 0 �
m � O• a mY F >. U y �' F v m a s
C M H t GEA IZ
Q
ITEM 6
Actions to Comply with 1995-96 Fiscal Audit Recommendations
The fiscal audit for 1995-96 noted that SLO Transit had received$436,000 more than it was
eligible to receive from the Local Transportation Fund. This ineligible portion was classified as
deferred revenue. The audit recommended 1)that the City identify specific capital project
appropriations which would be spent in the following fiscal year and would in effect reduce the
deferred revenue and 2)that"the City closely monitor the funding requested in future years and
its eligibility for TDA funds based on the guidance contained in the TDA statutes".
At June 30, 1997 there was $316,000 of deferred LTF revenue. Nearly all of this deferred
revenue was appropriated as the local share of the following capital projects, which were not
completed during 1996-97:
Local
Share
Multi-Modal Transportation Terminal $ 27,100
Bus Maintenance Building Expansion 71,000
Bus Acquisition(Three Buses) 151,000
Bus Stop Improvements 2,300
Passenger Van Acquisition 28,000
Service Truck Acquisition 33,000
$312,400
If these projects had been completed in 1996-97, there would have been only$3,600 of deferred
revenue at June 30, 1997.
ITEM 7
Substantiation for Any Increase in the Transit Operating Budget
in Excess of 15 Percent Above the Preceding Year
Transit Operating Budget for 1996-97 $1,300,800
Transit Operating Budget for 1997-98 $1,283,700
Amount Decrease -$17,100
Percentage Decrease -1.3 %
No substantiation required
CARRIER(NAMEOR TERMWAL FLE CONTROY.
U.
DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA NOWAY PATROL r N PAGE OF
VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT INSPECTION REPORT 9
MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY OPERATIONS COUNTY
CHP 343A(ROV 4-91)OP1062 N DATE
CIRCLE ONE Tractor Trailer MAKE EQUIPMENTNUMBER LICENSENUMBER VIN O -
TNdt s \ _ 000Y I l`;S TYPE FUEL
ClF10.EONE r Trabr MAKE EQUIPMENT NUTABER .V
hudtIN
Bus o00 TYPE FUEL
TANWCONTAWERMAKE SPECJIYPE SERIALNUMBERNNR
NUMBER CT NUMBER I
( VRS
CERTFICATE TYPE Test
CERTFrATE NUMBER DATE ISSUED REWSPECTION DATE El Certified ❑Witnessed
ODOMETER
SECTION i
AA
1
I
I
I
u Rt-W'f l u^t I
rT
CrRCLEONE I 11 L I
TtaCtor Trailer MAKE EQUIPMENT NUMBER LICENSE NUMBER YW
husk ONE Do ODOMETER CMZ+ TYPEFUEL
:IRCLE EQUIPMENT NUMBER
fBCfdr �et MAS LICENSE NUMBER
Bus YW r TYPE I
MUCIC ODOMETER L 7
UCONTAWERYAKE SBEGitYPE ` SERIAL NULCBERIUNITNUMBER CT NUMBER l"� 1. I
VRS I
ERTFICATE TYPE ❑ Certified Mru
Test
'
CERTFICATE NUMBER GATE ISSUED
REWSPECTION DATE ODOMETER
1
SECTION �
I
I
1
/ 1
I
I
'ECTED BY � I
LD.NUMBER
A� 45
U40 previous edlons until depleted
CARRIER 6A OR TFRYJNAL FW CONTROL&
DEPARTMENT OFCALIFORNIA mr,4wAYPATROL INSPECTION DRESS, �t PAGE OF
44
VEHICLE(EOUIPMENTINSPECTION REPORT
"OTOR CARRIER SAFETY OPERATIONS1
P 343A(Rev 491)OPI 062 CITY OR u
DATE
I pRCLEONE Tractor Traaer C E t EQUIPMENT NUMBER LICENSE NUMBER VW
i Truck . Do 1. C _ - 1 �7 ODOMETER TYPE FUEL
I CIRCLE ONE EQUIP UMBER L NUMB VIN O ( � (U7 `0
I Tractor Trailer "E
Truck Bus Do M TYPEFUEL
i TAJDtiCONTABJER MAKE SPECITYPE I SERIAL NUMBERIUNR NUMBERCT NUMBER
vRs Test
iCERTIFICATE TYPE CERTIFICATE BER DATE ISSUEDREwsPECTKNJ DATE ElCertiBed wiUlessed
ODOMETER
SECTION
FI
! _
E
i -
CIRCLE ONE Dz1 -
Truck Tractor TraOer MAKE EQUIPMENTNUMBER LICENSENUMBER YBJ ODOMETER
DO ( FUEL
CUiC1E ONE EQU�MENT NUMBER LICENSE NUMBER VLN `` TYPE
tactor Trader "1AKE
Truck DOU TYPE FUEL
TANKR.�ONTAWER MAKE SPEWrYPE SERIAL NUMBEWUNIT NUMBER OT NUMBER
I �� YRS
CERTIFCATE TYPE Test
CERTIFICATE DATEISSUED ❑CerGFied WItrIBSsed❑
_ REINSPECTKNJDATE ODOMETER
SECTION
1 ,
• v
NLSPECiED aY
LD.NUMBER
Ll
Use previous editions until depleted 1
'951:1
OEPARTUMTOFCAtJ MA HIGHWAY PATROL
ComuanON 'e 5AGONr1NUAIIONOF
CHP 343-1 Rev 11-93 OR 062
REMARKS CHP 343 CHP 343A CHP 343C
9
N`�
1=ILE: C 0 1�ita ►+'1j3t1ZI057L r
S N ►'�S C-FfV -Ti" N S F:A4LE
T 0 — S6 Ii L-L I I A F C
IDEM i 1 F I 'W ail U k1um pS-FCZ
c
7
ip
0
r _ -
tZ S D 1; - S t IJP EP n1 q +
5 5�- p15PI�p 5 N
sLu
C,A 3
Z
Use previous editions until depleted.
Pape of
ir z
a FWLLJ (csno naa)vw-w
CL o
w C
Y. FiP�lr[tiI•":'.: :[ :I::::::.it[sltil: ~ -•I m
"3 Csh :>o-o-s;;• a
LL
Z �i'4.......
LL
Z Q E ¢
1-4
L)
Q O J O z t[1
z O W :I.li17;1����,:i^i?: 'r' 'ii;.:I;:.:i..:., W
LU
z :r 1"vn:21i3:'o - O ¢
F o ci''c LL O
Z > - >
Z u 3'9':i '=;r n� O
Wi
-.. U.1t— zr; Q
G ` ' Nis: OC U
WXX
N
z
} L
_ (A H
m
V a
f
_ VI
0
IIIQ
W ZZ
IL
z
a e° 'pq o
J W i -,01P...;1'ii_•r Q Q O to
Y W W ��yp+iF in11;]i
06
IL 0
:r.
Q W Q H O
C�
a U
1
x
�0
IL
OY
ac
� a J
Ic
cc
Ch
OCL
Q
Lij
C2 0
cOi Ln J N
c d a Q - `a'i'i"I !p'.'': 3iiliij Z
O JY W 1� ^ Z::.:�i:a::!'i
CO Z _J
Ci CMX.
O -
W
WW
' Ln
r
m fir. CC
Q O
w 6 o V a m
ONE
Q W O Z 4 m 1-v,..-4_.-i :
f� G1 W
> > E Oo W , :
p I :
m C1 g o,
a' y W ` ydvl:: Z N u
W W o p
i:;VO tj
o
Z O : WN
0 yQ Q 1J6 __
o+ N Z z p F ".i:.�.u,l.i_;ry ..;;.:'::':;'':: W Z O O Q ¢ a - -
y __ - i•}::iii Z H -
a
O
e 3 W a F z m %'.; :: i:.i:i;;.ii; a W 0.� --
fA p f LL •+'Y.f't'I'iy:d; V a W Z = W
x Z Z % y x
H
r fd W :I,I, ea. V Ill (/� O
7
a O :..o-; ;:'i o J Z 0h Z H
o V
Z 'j3t'2["'"` z
> O m e . UWNl�O
d' y ul CS ��uu
Oj W
�/ U NII W "�.,+n+n.nn�"��
0 F Z ✓�¶.pty{1L�1y f.l
S M iY y O W .r,�r', �y'.'.!IIIY1:�1'�:1 :!.�i::t:l.. Z V o Z W
F W O C x N U q O O H aQ-'
2 z 3 x z p W W Z
m W �D Qo S
LL.
"M W a0 Lill
CL
o
CL
W
NGWWd'F-
°
W
V w y m g •r,.. . y J 0.'J LD U. Z
W wo ti ~ _ - - z QZO > O _
d' U - w >UUW W F„
N,,,I W _ _
8 - -
W Q o O� o m E E Z = <3 %3 ' ---:! p C Vl d'![I ¢ W
> °a Ln ► f°ca x O = '' a O W Q W ch a
W a60
_ t 5 > z
z Ro.5 o O
m
0 0 -
Z
U
LU
m z
Q W uj
(L6ftA38)VMC3
Oik
cx
Lu
LL
> m m m
LU
ui
p C9 W i LL'
W a M
O a = az
O ` W 'rJ
O o
f" J p.■ W C
LL Z
a V
° . +iQ O > W
w
U U. ui Ix
a
f
o
�. Y J V „y O
W O
Z 2:CF11
F u Swa q
H O U -
O -
O > w
ZLL a.Z W
W
y }
F-O cs VI
W >>
pa� Y Z Fn
UV)O
, Z rr� .a .ar? Z r.,Z Jrii�r:,,r:.;ffl: a}1...CA 0
a v �i::;g; >r.' N z as
..
..
m _
e �i
CL o-
- - -
W
3 qV) z --_
V
O
C
W M
= Q
- a
m
J
U
2
�O
gYdJ -
CL
Q
a a iii`sg:yi;3;j m
q
Ch ":ig; ! Ei. Q Q CK Z O
Z ..rt,"" J N V1
O ....... LL
O
pO OLU
^sm :?::CD
;:;:;
ou Ln
y ti tJy:?
U co -
a N puj
O
Im! now
W C> q F U O Q ___
o D -
Z
lj
F Z O
6� '?t�,t:;�-.;d�o�r,�rl:: Si;i;''j.!;��:pil,:. 7 m P _-
QW ?j.';:ice_. •'�i:: W cnV _ _
Om
z �• 7U _ a >O� _
Zfn, e} Q, .....:
V W m 6 W '�. .�,:�:
O
a p oxa Jz
-O mZ LL mC
-
_
H a 2
Z m 4 0
U
W on -
a J
V
z
--
W
dLU
0 H :'
u~ no-.: o QO
J Q'Wcc
�—
Q Q
Z 2 i.:r!....
p LL x 90c °
Q O 2
J a
UK;
>Cm
¢g {t1
2W
O
uV)
W a i ' -uuz 2
-
-
-
fivri,