Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/18/1997, C-5 - AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO THE CONTRACT WITH WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS FOR THE SALINAS RESERVOIR EXPANSION PROJECT council Nov. 18 1997 acEnba Repoin °®H CITY O F SAN LUIS O B I S P O FROM: John Moss, Utilities Director Prepared By: Gary W. Henderson,Water Division Manager�✓N SUBJECT: Amendment No. 6 to the Contract with Woodward-Clyde Consultants for the Salinas Reservoir Expansion Project CAO RECOMMENDATION By motion: 1. Approve Amendment No. 6 to the contract with Woodward-Clyde Consultants for the Salinas Reservoir Expansion Project increasing the maximum compensation by $39,950; and 2. Appropriate $8,000 from the CIP budget for legal services to be provided by Hatch and Parent. DISCUSSION The Salinas Reservoir Expansion Project has been tediously proceeding forward for many years and is currently being pursued on a parallel track with the Nacimiento Project. While the City Council has acknowledged that the Nacimiento Project is a preferable alternative from a regional water supply standpoint, the Nacimiento Project also has many obstacles and issues which must be addressed prior to project approval. There is a chance that the Nacimiento Project may not proceed forward in the.near future and if this occurs the City needs to be positioned to move . forward with the Salinas Reservoir Expansion Project. With the recent Board of Supervisors action to extend the close of the comment period for the Nacimiento draft environmental impact report(DEIR)to February 1, 1998, it is likely that certification of the Nacimiento DEIR will not be completed until late 1998. The revised draft EIR for the Salinas Reservoir Expansion Project was released for public comment in May of 1997 and the comment period closed on July 25, 1997. Numerous comments were received that warrant additional review which were not originally anticipated in the scope of work covered in the contract with Woodward-Clyde. The specific additional work areas are outlined in Attachment A to this document. One of the driving factors for the additional work is the recent elevation of steelhead trout to a "threatened" status by the National Marine Fisheries Service. With this recent change, additional downstream biological assessment is needed to confirm that that projects findings relative to steelhead trout habitat and related impacts are accurate. C -S-/ Amendment No. 6 Page 2 While the Salinas and Nacimiento Projects are being pursued on a parallel track, this does not mean that the project EIR's need to be certified at the same time. With the recent delays associated with the Nacimiento Project and the potential cost impacts associated with further delays in the certification of the Salinas DEIR, staff would recommend that the Council pursue completion of the EIR and direct staff to return in early 1998 for certification of the document. The actual approval of which project to proceed with would be made after both EIR's have been certified and staff returns to Council with an evaluation and recommendation relative to each project. This approach would be consistent with Council's goal of proceeding with both projects on a parallel track and will allow Council to make an informed decision on both projects, while minimising potential cost impacts. Background The City of San Luis Obispo has been pursuing the Salinas Reservoir Expansion Project for many years. The City entered into the initial contract with Woodward-Clyde Consultants for preparation of the environmental impact report in March of 1992. The initial draft EIR was released for public review in November of 1993 and the comment period closed on January 3, 1994. Numerous comments and concerns were raised by agencies and individuals at that time and Council directed additional studies and analyses be prepared to address the concerns. On February 21, 1995, the City Council endorsed a phased strategy for proceeding with the Salinas Reservoir Expansion Project. In April of 1995, Council approved Amendment No. 4 to the contract with Woodward-Clyde Consultants for Phase III work associated with the project. The main goal of Phase III was to determine what type of mitigation strategies would be acceptable to the regulatory agencies (Fish and Game, Fish and Wildlife, Corps of Engineers, etc.)and identify the additional studies or information necessary to accomplish future preparation of the detailed mitigation/mitigationmonitoring plans for the project. The Council also directed staff to proceed with certification of the EIR with the goal of completion within the same time frame as the Nacimiento Project EIR. This would allow the Council to make an informed decision based on all the information relative to which project or projects should continue to be pursued by the City. Phase IV On January 16, 1996, Council approved.Amendment No. 5 to the contract with Woodward- Clyde Consultants for the scope of work identified as Phase rV. The scope of work for Phase IV was developed with the goal of certification of the EIR by mid-year in 1997. The schedule was meant to coincide with the expected completion date for the Nacimiento water supply project EIR. Delays in the release of the Nacimiento draft EIR, as well as issues related to the Salinas Reservoir revised draft EIR preparation, resulted in this schedule not being met. Phase IV involves the following four major work scope areas, the majority of which have been completed. Amendment No. 6 Page 3 ■ Conduct Additional Biological Studies to Support EIR, Environmental Permitting, and Mitigation Planning ■ Organize and Direct Project Mitigation Advisory Committee and Complete Mitigation Planning Effort for EIR ■ Update and Reissue Draft EIR for Expansion Project and Prepare Final EIR for Certification by the City as CEQA Lead Agency ■ Prepare Work Plan for Phase V (Post-EIR Compliance Support) Additional Work Regrdred Amendment No. 5 to Woodward-Clyde's contract assumed approximately 120 staff hours for preparation of responses to the revised DEIR. Based on the number of comments received and additional analyses recommended prior to issuance of the Final EIR, current funding levels are not adequate to accomplish all the identified work. The general areas which require additional work on the part of Woodward-Clyde staff are identified below. Refer to Attachment A of this document for specific work scopes related to each item below. • Responses to Additional Downstream Hydrology Related Comments • Responses to Additional Downstream Biology Related Comments • Incorporation of Additional Analyses into Final EIR (including 2 new technical reports for Hydrology and Biology/Steelhead) and Preparation of Additional Comment Responses The total estimated additional cost for the work to be prepared by Woodward-Clyde is $39,950. This additional funding will provide for completion of all work identified in Phase IV and the scope of work outlined in Attachment A. Legal Review In addition to the work identified above, staff would recommend that a qualified CEQA attorney provide a detailed legal review of the administrative Final EIR prior to Council consideration. A number of concerns have been raised in the comments on the draft EIR that warrant thorough legal review and consideration. The potential for litigation on any water supply project is relatively high and staff wishes to ensure that all issues have been properly addressed. The firm of Hatch and Parent has worked extensively with the City on this project and other water supply issues for many years. Staff would recommend that the review be performed by Hatch and Parent personnel who have extensive experience in the area of CEQA documentation and (= - Amendment No. 6 Page 4 requirements. The total estimated cost to provide this legal review is $8,000. Summary The preparation of the environmental impact report for the Salinas Reservoir Expansion Project has been underway for many years and substantial analysis and studies have been performed to resolve concerns raised by individuals and agencies. While, in the end, the project is likely to be opposed on several fronts, the additional work outlined in this report will provide adequate response to the concerns raised during the public review period and strongly position the City should the Council decide to proceed with this project. In addition, the review by experienced legal counsel relative to CEQA compliance is recommended to ensure that the document adequately addresses all CEQA requirements. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of the additional study and legal services will cost-$47,950. This total reflects a $39,950 increase in the Woodward-Clyde contract for environmental and planning services, and an $8,000 encumbrance to Hatch and Parent for related legal services. It is recommended that the $47,950 be drawn from the $135,000 approved in the 1997-98 CIP budget (1997-99 Financial Plan, Appendix B, pp. 33-35) for additional studies necessary to move forward the Salinas Reservoir Expansion Project. None of the budget has been used to date, so the full amount is available to support this request. The table below summarizes the Woodward-Clyde contract to date, including the recommended increase. Project Phase _T Amendme�No. Contract Amount Total Approved Approved to Date Phase 1 - 4 No. 1 - 5 F _T $685,700 Recommended Phase 4 No. 6 $399950 $725,650 (continued) Attachment: A. Amendment No. 6 Consultant Service Contract between the City of San Luis Obispo and Woodward-Clyde Consultants C'r- AMENDMENTNO.6 CONSULTANT SERVICE CONTRACT BETWEEN CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS THIS AMENDMENT NO. 6, made in duplicate and entered into this day of November, 1997, by and between the City of San Luis Obispo (herein referred to as City) and Woodward-Clyde Consultants (herein referred to as Consultant), provides for changes to the Consultant Service Contract dated March 4, 1992,as follows: WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, City and Consultant completed and issued the revised Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Salinas Reservoir Expansion Project,and conducted Public Hearings in San Luis Obispo and Paso Robles;and WHEREAS,additional studies and analyses are necessary to complete the EIR;and WHEREAS,Consultant has offered to provide the required services as detailed in the scope of work as shown in Exhibit I to this Amendment for the Salinas Reservoir Expansion Project on the terms and conditions set forth in the AGREEMENT and as modified by this AMENDMENT; NOW,THEREFORE,in consideration of their mutual covenants the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Description of Proiect. The basic description of the Project,as provided in Exhibit A to the Agreement remains unchanged. 2. Scope of Services. The Scope of Services,asset forth in Exhibit A to the Agreement is modified to add the following (refer to Exhibit I of this Amendment No. 6 for more information): A. Responses to Additional Downstream Hydrology Related Comments B. Responses to Additional Downstream Biology Related Comments C. Incorporation of Additional Analyses into Final EIR and Preparation of Additional Comment Responses 1 3. Compensation. The cost estimate in Exhibit A of the AGREEMENT shall be changed to increase the maximum compensation by $39,950 for a total compensation of$725,650. All other terms for compensation remain unchanged. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AMENDMENT on the year and date first written above. CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO WOODWARD-CLYDECONSULTANTS By: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: WAtteG)Jr6 en o 2 C —If-6 Exhibit I - i Woodwardyde W Engineering a sciences applied to the earth a its environment October 28, 1997 Proj ect No. 916B 131 D Mr. Gary Henderson Water Division Manager City of San Luis Obispo 955 Morro Street San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Subject: Scope Amendment No. 6 to Agreement No. A-19-92-CC for Salinas Reservoir Expansion Project Dear Mr. Henderson: INTRODUCTION This letter describes Woodward-Clyde International-Americas' (WCIA) (formerly Woodward-Clyde Consultants) scope of services and cost estimate for performance of additional studies and analyses related to responding to comments on the Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report(RDEIR) and completion of the Final EIR for the subject project. This Introduction section provides background on why additional effort and the associated costs are necessary to complete the Final EIR. The section titled Additional Scope of Services outlines the key additional tasks necessary to complete the work. Finally, we have provided an estimated cost and schedule for the services covered by this Amendment No. 6. The scope of services described herein is intended to allow WCIA to respond to all of the written and oral comments received on the RDEIR at an appropriate level of detail as discussed with City of San Luis Obispo representatives (Gary Henderson and John Moss) at the project meeting held on October 10, 1997. WCIA's proposed scope of work for Phase IV - Salinas Reservoir Expansion Project (dated December 15, 1995) (Exhibit 1 to January 16, 1996 Amendment No. 5 to Agreement No. A- 19-92-CC) assumed that the level of effort to respond to comments on the RDEIR would not exceed 120 hours of our labor to prepare draft responses. To date, this level of effort has already been invested.in the preparation of draft comment responses for a portion of the total comments received, due to the number and complexity of the comments. Based on our -discussions with you and John Moss at our meeting on October 10, 1997, additional effort SAPROJ19168131D1AMEND6.DOC October 28,1997 Woodward-Clyde Consultants•A Subsidiary of Woodward-Clyde Group,Inc. 130 Robin Hill Road,Suite 100•Santa Barbara,California 93117 805-9646010•Fax 805-964-0259 7 C-50- Woodwarddr.jfde Mr. Gary Henderson City of San Luis Obispo October 28, 1997 Page 2 must be invested to perform additional studies and analyses in order to fully and completely respond to the numerous comments received on the RDEIR. The majority of the comments that require additional analysis and response are related to the project's potential downstream flow effects on biological resources (riparian habitat and steelhead) and water users/rights (Atascadero Mutual Water Company, Templeton Community Services District, Paso Robles, etc.). The RDEIR analyses conclude that the proposed project would not significantly impact downstream resources or water rights; however, additional analyses are warranted in order to more fully respond to the various purported impacts described in the comment letters. North County entities concerned about water supply and rights issues related to decreased downstream flow have jointly opposed the Salinas Reservoir Expansion Project, and it appears that the project may be subject to additional protest and possibly litigation. Additionally, it is expected that the upcoming State Water Resources Control Board - Division of Water Rights Hearing will include consideration of Ca1Spa's protest(related to potential steelhead trout issues) to the City's request for a Water Rights Permit time extension. The steelhead trout(Oncvrhynchu.s myki.ss) was recently officially elevated to "threatened"status (in the project area) by the National Marine Fisheries Service. The steelhead's elevated status was announced on August 17, 1997 and became effective on October 17, 1997. Under the Endangered Species Act(ESA), all public agencies and private landowners must now ensure that all ongoing activities and future projects along rivers where the steelhead occurs will not result in harm to the fish or its habitat. There are recent undocumented reports of steelhead in tributaries of the Salinas River downstream of Salinas Dam. It is now considered prudent to conduct more in-depth analysis of the occurrence of steelhead habitat along the mainstem of the river below the dam to support the impact conclusions regarding steelhead in the Final EIR. This additional information will help ensure that the EIR is complete, as well as assist the City in complying with the ESA. Finally, it was expected that our Phase IV scope of services would be completed by June of 1997. While the Mitigation Monitoring Committee/Mitigation Planning (Task IV-2)portion of Phase IV was very successful, it took longer than expected to complete due to subsequent agency coordination. The completion of the Salinas Final EIR has also been-postponed by the City so that the EIRs for the Salinas Reservoir Expansion and Nacimiento Water Supply projects could be available for City Council review at approximately the same time to facilitate informed decision making. As you know, the Nacimiento EIR schedule has been SAPROM168131D1AMEND6.DOC Oetober28.1997 Woodward-Clyde Consultants Q C 15� Woodwar%,de Engineering a sciences applied to the earth a its environment Mr. Gary Henderson City of San Luis Obispo October 28, 1997 Page 3 delayed several times, thereby delaying finalization of the Salinas EIR and causing WCIA to invest additional project management and maintenance costs beyond what was originally anticipated by both WCIA and the City when the Phase IV scope was developed at the end of 1995. ADDITIONAL SCOPE OF SERVICES Based on the comments received on the RDEIR and our meeting on October 10, 1997, WCIA plans to perform the following additional analyses prior to issuance of the Final EIR for the project. Key items addressed under this Scope Amendment No. G are: Resnonsc to Down trcam Hvdrolo Rcl,ted Comment • Clarify use of 10,000 acre feet per year demand scenario in computer model for downstream flow impact analysis • Clarify use of downstream flow impact percentages • Re-run selected downstream flow effects model and incorporate pre-1972 data into EIR analyses regarding downstream flow effects • Assess adequacy of 1991 Morro Group report flow data for Atascadero related to adequacy of the data; AMWC' s attorneys/consultants stated in their comments on the initial DEIR that the DEIR analyses failed to consider the Morro Group report data; the RDEIR considers the Morro Group report data but now AMWC's attomeys/consultants are stating that the Morro Group data is not reliable and needs to be redone by performing an extensive watershed analysis to reestimate historical flows at Atascadero • Perform additional analyses for flow effects at Atascadero Mutual Water Company (AMWC) wellfield area focusing on monthly data(versus annual); as practical with available data Further assess project impacts on AMWC well levels and production including consideration of seasonality (versus historical annual variations) S:I12ROJW613131DWMEND6.00C October 28,1997 Woodward-Clyde Consultants•A subsidiary of Woodward-Clyde Group,Inc. 130 Robin Hill Road,Suite 100•Santa Barbara,California 93117 805-964-6010•Fax 805-964-0259 Woodward-G,yde Mr. Gary Henderson City of San Luis Obispo October 28, 1997 Page 4 • Present data and impact assessments for additional AMWC wells in response to comments from AMWC attorneys and consultants • Further assess potential for project to result in scour reduction and associated effects on groundwater and wellfield recharge, as practical • Expand downstream analysis and rationale for insignificant findings for locales downstream ofAtascadero (i.e.,Templeton Community Service District) • Re-run computer model and revise all applicable text, tables, and graphs related to use of revised County data set for water year 1985-1986 (as provided to WCIA by City on October 10, 1997) • Prepare a new Hydrologic Technical Report for inclusion in the Final EIR to present and document key EIR related analyses; this report is expected to be useful for the forthcoming State Water Resources Control Board Hearings, as well. Responses to Down tream Biological Effects Related Comments • Perform downstream biological reconnaissance of the Salinas River from the Dam to the Highway 58 bridge with a recognized fisheries (steelhead) biologist focusing on assessment of habitat suitability for steelhead trout access (i.e., presence of obstructions, artificial dams, etc.), spawning (e.g., substrate), and rearing (including pre-winter water conditions) • Perform downstream biological reconnaissance of the canyon below the dam to evaluate riparian habitat conditions • Perform downstream reconnaissance to assess stream channel conditions (i.e., approximate width and depth to generate cross-sections) at selected locations for use in estimating streamflow rates and scour capacity under various downstream flow scenarios • Further assess potential project effects on downstream scour and related effects on riparian habitat considering project effects on flow magnitude and frequency with respect to channel morphology SAPROM168131DIAMEND6.DOC October 28,1997 Woodward-Clyde Consultants Woodward-ClAM Mr. Gary Henderson City of San Luis Obispo October 28, 1997 Page 5 • Add historical pre-1972 flow data into computer analysis of downstream flow effects and correlate to biologic conditions and effects • Prepare a new Biology Technical Report (focusing on downstream steelhead issues and riparian habitat impact assessment) for inclusion in the Final EIR; this report is expected to be useful for the forthcoming State Water Resources Control Board Hearings on Ca1Spa's protest to the City's request for a time extension to its Water Rights Permit. Numerous other comments which are more minor will be responded to as part of this additional scope of services, as well. The results of the additional hydrological and biological related analyses will be used, as appropriate, to respond to comments on the RDEIR in the following ways: 1) prepare direct responses to individual responses received; 2) provide input for hydrology and biology technical reports (Final EIR appendices); and 3) provide input for Final EIR text revisions in response to comments received on the RDEIR. ESTIMATED COST AND SCHEDULE The estimated costs and schedules to perform the additional scope of services estimated are as follows: • Responses to Additional Downstream Hydrology $15,340 (11/97 - 1/98) Related Comments • Responses to Additional Downstream Biology Related $17,710 (11/97 - 1/98) Comments • Incorporation of Additional Analyses into $6,900 (11/97-2/98) Administrative Final EIR(including 2 new technical reports for Hydrology and Biology/Steelhead) and Preparation of Additional Comment Responses • Total $39,950. (11/97-2/98) Assuming the services covered by this Contract Amendment No. 6 are approved and authorized by early November of 1997, all of the additional studies, analyses, and EIR related services are expected to be completed by February, 1998 (i.e., anticipated Final EIR completion date). We understand the City of San Luis Obispo does not want to further delay completion of the Salinas Reservoir Expansion Final EIR in order to have its release coincide s:1PR0J19166131 D"END6.DOC October 28.1997 Woodward-Clyde Consultants Woodward-A%de ACA Mr. Gary Henderson City of San Luis Obispo October 28, 1997 Page 6 with the Final EIR for the Nacimiento Water project, and that WCIA should complete the Final EIR as soon as possible following authorization of Amendment No. 6. TERMS AND CONDITIONS WCIA's proposed scope of services for Amendment No. 6 will be performed on a time and materials basis at a cost not to exceed $39,950 in accordance with the terms of our existing contractual agreement(dated March 4, 1992) with the City. Our cost estimate assumes that only one review iteration by the City will be required following WCIA's completion of the Administrative Final EIR and that any review meetings will be held in our offices in Santa Barbara. Other cost assumptions are as specified in Amendment No. 5 (dated January 16, 1996). WCIA appreciates the opportunity to continue to be of service to the City of San Luis Obispo on this important project. Please call the undersigned if you have any questions or if you need further information. Sincerely, A�>� Robert L. Ray Timothy J. Cohen Project Manager Vice President, Project Director c: John Moss S:TROR916B131DWMEN06.DOC October 28.1997 Woodward-Clyde Consultants