Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/06/1998, 4 - HOUSING AUTHORITY REQUEST FOR CONDUIT FINANCINGcouncil Wn,D.s �_ 8 j acEnaa 12Epo1Zt Item Nu.kr C I T Y O F S A N L U I S O B I S P 0 FROM: Bill Statler, Director of Finance V? SUBJECT: HOUSING AUTHORITY REQUEST FOR CONDUIT FINANCING CAO RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution approving the issuance of multi - family housing revenue bonds on behalf of the Housing Authority for their Brizzolara apartments project. DISCUSSION Background As set forth in Exhibit A, the Housing Authority is requesting that the City issue multi - family housing revenue bonds through the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (CSCDA) to assist in financing their Brizzolara apartments project. The CSCDA is a joint powers authority created by the League of California Cities and the California State Association of Counties to serve as an issuing agency for conduit financings like this one. The City joined the CSCDA in July of 1994. According to the Housing Authority, this project will create 30 affordable units for seniors and persons with disabilities: 27 one - bedroom units and 3 two - bedroom units. Continuing support for this project is consistent with the City's previous commitment of $1.0 million in Community Development Block Grant funds over the next six years in repaying a Section 108 loan for this project. We expect this project will be considered by the Architectural Review Commission in February or March of 1998. This will be a joint venture partnership with the Bay Development Group. Supplemental information on this relationship is provided in Exhibit B. City's Conduit Financing Policy Under the City's debt financing and management policies (Exhibit C), consideration of a request for conduit financing is generally a two -step process: ® First asking the Council if they are interested in considering the request, and establishing the groundrules for evaluating it. 8 And then returning with the results of this evaluation, and recommending approval of appropriate financing documents if warranted. This two -step approach ensures that the issues are clear for both the City and applicant, and that key policy questions are answered. However, due to timing constraints, the Housing Authority has requested that these issues be addressed in one meeting on January 6, 1998. .2-1-1 Council Agenda Report — Housing Authority Request for Conduit Financing Page 2 Given the close and ongoing working relationship that the City has with the Housing Authority, and the clear relationship of this project in meeting the City's adopted housing affordability goals, we believe a "one- step" process will be adequate in addressing the City's criteria for assisting with conduit financings, summarized as follows: ■ The City's bond counsel will review the terms of the financing, and render an opinion that there will be no liability to the City in issuing the bonds on behalf of the applicant. ■ There is a clearly articulated public purpose in providing the conduit financing. ■ The applicant is capable of achieving this public purpose. Our bond counsel's (Jones Hall) opinion providing assurance that there will be no liability to the City in issuing these bonds is provided in Exhibit D. As discussed above, we believe there is a clearly articulated public purpose in providing the requested conduit financing to the Housing Authority, and that they are capable of achieving this public purpose. CONCURRENCES The Department of Community Development concurs with this request. FISCAL IMPACT There is no adverse fiscal impact associated with this financing. The cost of the Jones Hall opinion (time and materials, not to exceed $1,000) will be paid from the bond proceeds. ALTERNATIVES ■ Do not approve the requested financing. purpose of this financing and the City's recommended. Given the clear relationship between the adopted housing goals, this option is not ■ Defer consideration of the request. Due to the time requirements for this financing, this option is not recommended. ATTACHMENTS Resolution approving the issuance of multi - family housing revenue bonds by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority Exhibits A. Request from the Housing Authority for conduit financing B. Supplemental information on the Bay Development Group C. City's conduit financing policy D. Opinion from the City's bond counsel on our liability for this project RESOLUTION NO. (1998 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS BY THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (the "Authority") is authorized pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 65.00 et seq. and the terms of an Amended-and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, dated as of June 1, 1988 (the "Agreement'), among certain local agencies throughout the State of California, including the City of San Luis Obispo (the "City"), to issue revenue bonds in accordance with Chapter 7 of Part 5 of Division 31 of the California Health and Safety Code for the purpose of financing multifamily rental housing projects; and WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo Non -Profit Housing Corporation, in conjunction with Bay Development Group, LLC (collectively, with any related entity, the 'Borrower ") has requested that the Authority issue multifamily housing revenues bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $4,000,000 (the 'Bonds ") for the purpose of providing financing for the acquisition, construction and development of a 30 -unit multifamily residential rental project for seniors, handicapped and disabled persons at the intersection of Nipomo and Brizzolara Streets, San Luis Obispo, California; and WHEREAS, the Bonds will be "private activity bonds" for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code "); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code, prior to their issuance, private activity bonds are required to be approved by the "applicable elected representative" of the governmental units on whose behalf such bonds are expected to be issued and by a governmental unit having jurisdiction over the entire area in which any facility financed by such bonds is to be located, after a public hearing held following reasonable public notice; and WHEREAS, there has been published, at least 14 days prior to the date hereof, in a newspaper of general circulation within the City, a notice that a public hearing regarding the Bonds would be held on the date hereof; and WHEREAS, such public hearing was conducted on said date by the City Council, at which time an opportunity was provided to interested parties to present arguments both for and against the issuance of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, the members of this City Council (this "Council') are the applicable elected representatives of the City; and WHEREAS, it is intended that this resolution shall constitute the approval of the issuance of the Bonds required by Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 9 of the Agreement; WHEREAS, the proposed bonds will be payable solely from revenues received by the Authority from the Borrower and the City will have no financial liability for the financing of the project, and neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the City is pledged to the payment of the principal of; premium, if any, or interest on the proposed bonds; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2. The Council hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority. It is the purpose and intent of the Council that this resolution constitute approval of the Bonds for the purposes of (a) Section 147(f) of the Code by the applicable elected representative of the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which the project is located, in accordance with said Section 147(0, and (b) Section 9 of the Agreement. SECTION 3. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and to execute and deliver any and all documents that they deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out, give effect to and comply with the terms and intent of this resolution and the financing approved hereby. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall forward a certified copy of this Resolution to: Ana Marie del Rio, Esq. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Old Federal Reserve Bank Building 400 Sansome Street San Francisco, California 94111 SECTION 5. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. Upon motion of and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: the foregoing resolution was adopted this ATTEST: Bonnie Gawf, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: r 4 ea ( g 13ac -Li Jeffrey 0. Jorgensen, City Attorney seconded by day of Mayor Allen Settle WM Ll-7 L 0 Housing Authority of the City of San Luis Obispo December 3, 1997 Mr. William Statler Director of Finance City of San Luis Obispo 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Dear Bill: Exhibit fr [WLL1.dlLMO WM[NMT {) 487 Leff Street Post Office Box 1289 San Luis Obispo CA 93406 -1289 (805) 543 -4478 fax (805) 543 -4992 Executive Director-Secretary George J. Moylan As per our conversation of Monday I am asking that you inform the City Council of our plans to use the services of the California Statewide Communities Development Authority, which the City holds membership in, to bond the Brizzolara Street development. We are told that to do so the Council is required to hold a public hearing and adopt a resolution. You indicated'that in following City policy this is normally a two -step policy. However, given the timing constraints of the pooled bonding process, and the fact that the Council has already held it's only meeting in December, we have a need to accomplish this dual goal at the January 6th meeting. To bring you and the Council up -to -date on the development please be advised we have acquired the property, relocated eight of the sixteen tenants, and plan to be before the Architectural Review Commission within the next 30 to 45 days. We plan on constructing 30 units, 27 1- bedroom and 3 2- bedroom apartments, on the site. We expect a mix of occupants similar to our successful Marvin Gardens development on Laurel Lane and Orcutt Road. As with Marvin Gardens the actual owner of the development will be our affiliate, San Luis Obispo Non - Profit Housing Corporation with us, the Housing Authority, being the management agent. I have met with the neighboring Homeownership Association and have their support in ridding the neighborhood of a dysfunctional eyesore. Finally, also as per our Monday discussion, I have reviewed Ordinances No. 1256 (1994 Series) and No. 1200 (1991 Series) as to transportation, water and wastewater impact fees. I see nothing in those ordinances which would specifically exempt the Authority or its non - profit affiliate from those fees. My recollection is that such an exemption was granted in the case of Marvin Gardens and Ironbark Apartments, our last two tax credit developments. In addition to the high cost of land in San Luis Obispo this development is a particularly expensive one because of the additional acquisition, relocation and demolition costs. y s�_ J Add that to the practical elimination of the 9% tax credit for our county by the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee and you are left with an extremely difficult development to "pencil out ". Because of this we will need every fee waiver possible to bring this development to occupancy. Thus please advise on the method of securing exemptions from the above two ordinances. Drafts of the legal notice and the resolution to be adopted at the meeting of January 6th, copy of correspondence enclosed, have already been provided by Bond Counsel to the City Clerk and City Attorney. The only amendment I would make to those documents is to expand upon the word "seniors" to read "seniors, handicapped and disabled" which is consistent with both Federal law and what we have found to be the need at Marvin Gardens. I am making both the City Clerk and City Attorney aware of that suggested change. Sincerely, "Jc 9)?' George J. Moylan Executive Director cc: Bonnie Gawf Jeff Jorgensen /V-6P C1ec- 2.3 -97 11:16A HOUS =N^ AUTH OF SLO M E M C R A N D U M December 23, 1997 TO: Bill Statler, City of San Luis Obispo e FROM: Georg "J. Moylan, Housing Authority SUBJECT: Bay Deveicpment Group, iLC 805 - -43 4992 P. 01 Exhibit You have asked as _.ne iden�ity of -he above. Since we built Poinse =tia Street Apartments almost ten _years ago have relied on Atty. Sabelhaus of Sacramenre for -�:ax creci.. and other specialLzed housing advice. He has seen us t rcuct Poinsettia Street, Marvin Gardens and = ror_bark P.partments. He __ representing us c_: the Brizzolara Street Apartments. He has beer. associated with Michael Schulte, first as an attorney employee a-: later as an associate when Michael moved to Fresno and established Bay Developmen� Group.; LLC. in this particular case, in order to secure the best possible terms, Pat and Mic: ^ae' are combining clients to produce one bc-.d issue which will sup_;ort several developments. Ours being one of those developments. Thus the phrase in the Resolution, "San L•;_s Obispo Non - Profit Ccrporatl.on in conjunction wiLh Bay Developmenz C=roup, LLC . . " However, it shcu_ld be understood that other than the bondir_! function Say Development Group, TIC will have r_ involvement w_-t. Brizzolara Street Apartments. The apartments will be owned by Say_ Luis Obispo Ni - Profit Hcusing Corporation and managed by the Housing Author o= the City of San LL:._s Obispo. The same arrangement tha= i� _r -= _'.� ^_e at Poinsettia Street, Marvin r_�_' -= and zronbark Apart^e� DEC. 23 ' 9' :2:36 COW-MUNI CAT 7ON Nc:25 PAGE. 1 POLICIES AND OBJECT.- ZS Exhibit BUDGET AND FISCAL POLICIES 1. The City will generally conduct financings on a competitive basis. However, negotiated financings may be used due to market volatility or the use of an unusual or complex financing or security structure. J. The City will seek an investment grade rating (BaaBBB or greater) on any direct debt and will seek credit enhancements such as letters of credit or insurance when necessary for marketing purposes, availability, and cost - effectiveness. K. The City will monitor all forms of debt annually coincident with the City's Financial Plan preparation and review process and report concerns and remedies, if needed, to the Council. L. The City will diligently monitor its compliance with bond covenants and ensure its adherence to federal arbitrage regulations. M. The City will maintain good communications with bond rating agencies about its financial condition. The City will follow a policy of full disclosure on every financial report and bond prospectus (Official Rtatrmnn4) CONDUIT FINANCINGS A. The City will consider requests for conduit financing on a case -by -case basis using the following criteria: I. The City's bond counsel will review the terms of the financing, and render an opinion that there will be no liability to the City in issuing the bonds on behalf of the applicant. 2. There is a clearly articulated public purpose in providing the conduit financing. 3. The applicant is capable of achieving this public purpose. B. This means that the review of requests for conduit financing will generally be a two -step process: first asking the Council if they are interested in considering the request, and establishing the groundrules for evaluating it; and then returning with the results of this evaluation, and recommending approval of 01 appropriate financing documents if warranted. This two -step approach ensures that the issues are clear for both the City and applicant, and that key policy questions are answered. The workscope necessary to address these issues will vary from request to request, and will have to be determined on a case -by -case basis. Additionally, the City should generally be fully reimbursed for our costs in Wluating the request; _ however, this should also be determined on case -by -case basis. HUMAN A. The budget will fully appropriate the resources needed for authorized regular staffing and will limit programs to the regular staffing authorized. B. Staffing and contract service cost ceilings will limit total expenditures for regular employees, temporary employees, and independent contractors hired to provide operating and maintenance services. C. Regular employees will be the core work force and the preferred means of staffing ongoing, year -round program activities that should be performed by full -time City employees rather than independent contractors. The City will strive to provide competitive compensation and benefit schedules for its authorized regular work force. Each regular employee will: E B -17 y X ;. QVAPJ wa P. ADAMS 67EPEMN a CA4AJ.EGGIQ THOM" A. DOWNEY tiDREW 4 BAY 1 ,m -0QURTb BY L JOWW CEMISTOP1 w 3L LYNOB WnJ-ZAM a MADMOK DAVID J. M= DAVID A. WA TOn XZN'N'R= I JONES, = eovNne William C. Statler Director of Finance :ity of San Luis Obispo 990 Palm Street P.O. Box 8100 JOKE S HALL PROFESSIONAL LAW G08POAATIO__ • ATT0RA- =y9 AT LAW December 23, 1997 San Luis Obispo, California 93403 -8100 Exhibit D 6606A "0R_"aA =0L==2\ 11. FLOOR 6AN FRAN crsco. CA "106 T>w= «C \'8 "m 091-6760 VACS= - 14161 Oa1•D ?&4 HOXIMAOX http�//aww.jhhw.wm e-mail: cadamsQjhhw.com Re' ° Qsed Tax-ExeWRt FinanCiZlz For Briz7QlaYa.&mrtWents Dear Bill: At your request; we have reviewed drafts of various documents submitted to us in connection with the -o: oposed financing of a multifamily housing project known as the Brizzolara Apartments ct" ?. The Pr =u� oject will be ow-ned by one San Luis Obispo :tion- rofit Housing Development Cornora. on in conjunction with a for - profit development entity. ,Financing for the Project wi'_1 e- provided `rom the proceeds of tax - exempt bonds in the maximum principal amount of $4,000,000 (the "Bonds ") to be issued by the Californiz Statewide Communities Development Authority (the "Authority"). We have reviewed the Notice of Public Hearing wi,ic :: has been prepared by Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, as bond counsel to the Authority, and the proposed Resolution to be considered by the City Council at its meeting on I nuary b, 1998. Although we have not received drafts of the Indenture of Trust, Loan Agreement and other bond documents, we are ggenerally familiar with the forms of these documents inasmuch as we have worked on other multifamily housing bond transactions with the Aut;.Iority and with the Orrick firm, y g The scope of ou_- ngasement has been, and until the Peal issuance of the Bonds ':):, = ^e uthority will continue cc be, to act as - ounsel to the City for the sole purpose of ensuring that .ie City's interests are protecte� n the finPncing, and that the City does not assume any substantive financial liability or obligations in connection with the financing of the Project or otherwise in connection with the delivery of the Bonds. We do not undertake to review independently the validity of the underlying agreements or any matters relating to the tax - exemption of interest on the Bonds, or to analyze the credit quality of the financing. Based on our review of the Notice and the Resolution, and based on our familiarity with the Authority's standard documentation used on similar transactions, we believe that the Bond documents will contain previsions which adequately protect the City's interests and ensure that the City does not assume -any substantive financial obligations or responsibilities in respect of the financing. We will cor := thi oreliminary conclusion in writing *ollowing our review of the DEC. 23 ' 97 ,717E: '.3 i 3 CON7V.0 \: CA -:ON \_ : 27 PACE. 2 �_/ William C. Statler December 23, 1999 page 2 final executed documents, in the interim, we would recommend that the City Council procee with the hearing and ccnsideration of the Resolution on at its meeting on January 6, if that be the desire of the Coun- -". Please let me k--:: •rr ii we can be of further help to you in this *_matter. ANTI DEC. 23 '97 , -:;r; 13::3 CO'.NUKICAT?O\ N -:27 PACE.3 lel—/O SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY ramaib-me 'Tele i South Higuera • Post Office Box 112 • San Luis Obispo, California 93406-0112 • (805) 781-7800 In the Superior Court of The State of California In and for the County of San Luis Obispo AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION DV# 16886-0-5 City of SLO STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of San Luis Obispo I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen and not interested in the above entitled matter, I am now, and at all times embraced in the publication herein mentioned was, the principal Berk of the printers and publishers of the SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY TELEGRAM -TRIBUNE, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published daily, Sundays excepted, at the City of San Luis Obispo in the above named county and state; that notice at which the annexed clippings is a true printed copy, was published in the above-named newspaper and not in any supplement thereof - on the following dates, to -wit: December 22, 1997 that said newspaper was duly and regularly ascertained and established a newspaper of general circulation by Decree entered in the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County, State of California, on June 9, 1952, Case #19139 under the provisions of Chapter 1, Division 7, Title of the Government Code of the State of California. I certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foreabino is true and correct. Clerk) Date: l3gRember 22, 1997 credit nor the taxing pow Those wishing to Com. CITY CE •er of the City, the Issuer, mertt :on. the Proposed the _State of California financing and the nature `LUIS any !polltioal subdivision of the Proleh t -may either Dated Y thereof is pledged to the appear id person at' -the ,1997 payment of the principal public, hearing or submit 0�.7y 1 of, prooilumr if arty, or written comments, which intetW on the Bonds, nor must be mceived by the shah •the City or the 4e-4ble or obligat IMMCFLY4 pay ffie' 'Principe premium, 8 any, or. Sdn est on the Bonds. -CEBonds will be PU NoTf UC HEARING solely from revenue (REGARDING ISSUANCE card Wthe Issuer OF the Borrower. MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that at its regular meeting to be held at 7:001 p.m.. or as soon thereaft- er as the matter can be heard. on Tuesday. Janu ary 6, 1998. in the Council Chambers of City Ha1L 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, California, the City Council of the City of 'San. *Luis Obispo ithe "City") will conducts public hearing as required 'by Section 1471n of the .Internal Revenue Code of 1986, at which it wto hear and consider information concerning the Proposed issuance by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (the'Issuer') on behalf of the City of multifamily housing revenue bonds 'the "Bonds") to.finance the acquisition, construc- tion and development of a 30 unit multifamily rental housing project for sen- ors, handicapped and disabled person located at the intersection of Ni - porno and Brizzolara Streets in San Luis Obis- po, California, and known as the Brizzolara Apart- ments (the "Project'). The Project will be owned and operated by the San Luis Obispo Non -Profit HOtra- ing Development Corpo- ration in conjunction with Bay Development Group, 'LLC, a California limited liability company, or an affiliated entity (collective. ly. the "Borrower'). The Bonds will be issued in an aggregate amount not ex- ceed 54:000,000. Neither the faith and of, ments should be sent to ter the City of San Luis Obis - Rte po, 990 Palm Street San ble Luis Obispo, California re- 93401; Attention: Bonnie