HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/19/1998, C-13 - AGENDA C-13, ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT Mtr fiNG 9-9 AGENDAC �3
ommiulu�I�IIIIP 91�1�� coon ci l m cm oRa�T ITEM #
May 15, 1998
TO: City Council
VIA: John Dunn, City Administrative Officer
FROM: Mike McCluskey, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Agenda C-13, Engineering Services for Pavement Management
Sometimes high tech doesn't work so well. The color diagram titled Paving Program 1998-99 is
an ARC-VIEW print program routine that GIS has had trouble with in the past in which the
colors on the map do not correspond to legend which the program automatically also prints. This
happened on this map. The following corrections to the legend will make the map read correctly:
Area 4-6
Area 3 7
Area 3 4
Area 41
Area 6 8
Area 6 CBD COUNCIL ❑CDD DIR
Area 3 2 0 ❑FIN DIR
9 po ❑PRE CHIEF
Area 8 5 9,4TTORNEY ®'PW DIR
GBP 3 CLERKIORIG ❑POLICE CHF
Area rMV
❑RTC DIR
[3UTII DIR
❑PERS DIR
l
: �s ��r •H'� �� li"7;�®[tlYiS�' . .. -� _ I' ➢"'I � Y � r��v.
M�0YIf
��1, ® F����
'x I yy-+ o-�•,y �>.T� +�ca�}d�SI� JiCI�Mk]�u1 �1��\ r�'"•. u �L*nii�� ,y� nJr >`ti 'J YtE
I � yr, A � .fji + f\ e,L.•����i:Y '•lt.:�J Sf 1•� 3.� f > 4J.... I Y��f.1j``',
�4M.A�i. 1� �y��P/f
,4. 1 1��C�U�•7C tl + �Ihl1 I �'Ti is� ��
,y
`I.tl� �3yd'. �1tR:1�� f I N{��, i1' �'+�r illi��.r��YY,r,'ILIA�.A rte-n4 tl� \ Y T' ly➢�
�� �"ii' -•^T r 4"�"�i�V���i1W j i^?*L.� 1 , t ���4
{ ; , .. ;'{t',• t15i1}�,y�'I" ,. aT'�dr��+�dP,.�td'0�'IAyai�r./moi u,l` 1 +.
1 ;a �'br ee.��,,���� .1 ;5 ��"�{ 'g1•E�r�'o.�d�,��rJm� � �` _
,, ui4 ��.•� , :.•� 5 ' ,; � dF� n ,i/ � 37`� b'4�57: f7' .. .. •.
Ir //I�` �3g��� I' ���81I � ���"�?;�, Il'�ynl'.y�lyyl`��5�- 4A ���■p�' :,
T \l�i i5 .13�b�®.r4 �yl•1! 'r R 'n J'lrt"�i " . �I 014
I'" Jti - �R�r'il�,,,n to Ij �� r kyr.H� r1 �?!': I I Ild.'f�,yy v '�f'�'�ai.' � • �
I
�=� r_.._�'._�^rAai �-.. •}✓✓,�y�"'/enni� r,�Sr .1 'y �'A;rJ��'A�Ii�'� P[G'.E'r,. L.l�ral ',"�'t�fl.
rrw�rA.xr1I11 �'\
r•'+'C141
MEETING AGENDA
DATE ST ITEM #
Steven _McMasters (805) 541-9168
750 Chonro St. 41' San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Mayor Settle and City Council
City of San Luis Obispo
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Mayor Settle and Council members:
I am writing this to urge you to deny the appeal of ARC 58-97 (Kona's Deck). I feel that
the ARC's conditions of approval for the project attempt to preserve at minimum, the
public's right of use of a City held easement area, while still allowing the property
owner to enjoy the use of his property.
I still have a concern with the ARC's approval of a wood deck in the public easement
area. The applicants deck, without clear designation of the public use area, and clear
restriction of use of that same area for Kona's business, will effectively exclude the
public from the easement area. The ARC attempted through conditions # 3 and 6 (c),
to guarantee the public's continued right to use the area in question. Without these
conditions, or even more stringent measures, the public's right will gradually be eroded.
The easement area in question has been used extensively in the past by the public. I
have worked in the downtown area for ten years, and frequently (especially during
summer) eat lunch in the Mission Plaza / San Luis Creek area. I frequently used the
bench that was removed during the summer months when most other public use areas
were filled with locals and tourists alike
If the City allows this business unrestricted expansion into a public easement area. it
will set a precedent as to future uses throughout the city. The expansion of a deck into
a public access/easement is essentially a gift of public right-of-way to a private entity.
If the deck is allowed to remain, there is no doubt that it will become part of the
applicants use area for his business and the public will be excluded. The ARC, in an
attempt to be solomonic, tried to accommodate the owner and at the same time
preserve the public right of access. If the deck is allowed to remain, there should be an
absolutely clearly defined boundary to designate the public area. In addition, a set of
air-tight conditions of approval should be included. This would be to the benefit of both
the applicant and the City. If the deck is allowed to remain, over time as owners
change, along with staff and Council changes, the specifics of this area will become
vague. At some point it is certain that a future owner will want to use this area. A very
specific set of conditions of what is allowed, how the public area is to be designated,
and how it is to be maintained will help avoid a future potentially costly battle.
�� DD DIR RECE VIED
❑FIN DIR
❑FIRE CHIEF
P ❑PW DIA rA(y; 1407
G :VOn1G ❑POLICE CHF
C] I AIA ❑UTILDIR SLO CI''`` r T'UNCIL
0 0 PERS DIR ,
As a final note, for comparison of a potentially analogous situation, attached are photos
of a beach front area in the City of Del Mar. Over a period of 50-60 years, private uses
such as decks and patios were constructed over a public access way that fronted the
beach. When the City asserted the public's right to use this area, some of the property
owners sued because they felt they had acquired the property through long term use.
After a painful court battle, the City prevailed and the structures have been removed.
Please do not set up a future San Luis Obispo City Council to fight an unecessary court
battle. Preserve this public access easement for the free use and enjoyment of all the
public, not just patrons of one business.
Sincerely,
Steven McMasters
vv:uy)I IEec:V^�lampn
;
Ilr'
YYv LLLLr
,I- t y r
'Y `,u Sna �� ri iG3 f u r� ��>•� 3� ti�r3'SC. =s It tf
16
h
s 1 (
I
•r}ii a -- ,3 ti � s :
C�'r t + :�s�'� y3 y. s + ' LiS I+.� =t+ ,t+. _: ,• "'�(1! � 'a QI �k _- e �.
v - � fW �#� t .t � .. C {�t� ��li � !'�if�[' r=�� h� I t Y��4T'�7✓� ,t
S Y .
MEETING AGENDA
DATE S-/-9 PS-ITEm #
Cl OUW CJDM
CAO 0 FI
/ICAO 0 FIT���' ❑P
Brad Schwan LEOKIORIG 0 P
�a 0 R
Kona Deli Cafe - SLO Inc. 0 0 U
726 Higuera 0 PE
San Luis Obispo, CA. 93405
805 783-7174
805 546-0395
May 19, 1998
Dear Council Members,
I have tried to negotiate an agreement with the City Staff but have so far
have been unable to reach an agreement. I would like to ask for a
continuance until June 2 for the following reasons:
1. To further negotiate with city staff. I have tried to expedite the process
but staff has been very slow to respond to my offers and we could not
come to an agreement as of yet.
2. To wait until Dave Romero returns from vacation so that there can be a
full council.
Thank you for your consideration,
Brad Schwan
RECEIVED
MAY 1 9 1997
SLO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING AGENDA
DATE.. -/9- ITEM #
KAREN 5OREN5ON
1268 Woodside
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
544-8151 (home) / 541-1000 (work)
rVATTORNEY
CIL DD DIR
❑ FIN DIR
❑ FIRE CHIEFMay 12, 1998 ❑ PW DIRKIORIG ❑ POLICE CHF M ❑ REC DIR❑ UTIL DIRMayor Allen settle ❑ PERS DIR
City Council
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 95401
RE: May 19, 1995 City Council Meeting
Rezoning of 1234 Laurel Lane
Dear Mayor Settle:
I have lived in San Luis Obispo for approximately 30 years and, having grown up here, I
write this letter to you today with somewhat of a heavy heart as I watch the closing of
Laurel Bowl. A place that many 'old timers" consider a landmark!
As you will see from the enclosed letter to Smith and Company, dated November 11,
1997, 1 have a personal attachment to Laurel 5owf, as my 13 year old daughter, Chelsey, has
been an avid bowler for approximately seven years. Over the past months, I have come to
terms with the fact that Laurel Bowl will be closing its doors on May 15, therefore this letter
is written to you as a concerned parent and neighbor of 1234 Laurel Lane.
As a parent, I am concerned about the fact that there is very little for families and
young people to do for recreation in the city of San Luis Obispo. I find that much of our
recreation dollars are spent in surrounding communities. There is Flippos for roller skating
and Paradise Park, for miniature golf, in Morro Bay; and there is also miniature golf, etc. at
Camelot Park in Santa Maria. Now, with the closing of Laurel Bowl, we will be taking our
bowling dollars to Pismo beach, Atascadero, Paso Robles or Santa Maria.
Laurel Bowl provided a safe place of entertainment and recreation for families,
children, teens and college students. Quite frankly, from personal knowledge, it has been an
outlet for many young people, and is responsible for keeping many of them off the streets.
As a neighbor, I find myself surrounded with elder care facilities. To the south, three-
tenths of a mile, there is Judson Terrace and Cabrillo Care Center. Up the street one block
is Woodside Nursing and Rehabilitation, and two blocks down the street is Las Brisas
Retirement Residence. It is my opinion 5Hgi i re facility for alzheimers and
Tr9tt VIM
MAY 1 5 1997
SLO CITY COUNCIL
May 12, 199b
Page Two
dementia patients be located at 1234 Laurel Lane there would be too many elder care
facilities located within the Laurel/5outhwood area.
It is my understanding that the facility proposed by 5mith & Company is to be one in
which the patients are allowed to roam freely, rather than be restricted to beds and
wheelchairs. With this facility located in a residential area, the security aspect is one of
great concern. What precautions are being taken to assure that these patients will not be
allowed access to the streets and surrounding neighborhoods?
While I support the need for elder care facilities, I also believe that the
Laurel/Southwood area is a family area and our families and children need a place to go for
recreation. A bowling alley, such as Laurel Bowl, is one of those places.
I strongly believe that it is important that we be able to financially support
businesses and that we provide a safe, balanced, community, in 5an Luis Obispo. I, therefore,
strongly urge you to vote against the rezoning of 1234 Laurel Lane from Neighborhood
Commercial to High Density Residential to allow for a residential care facility.
Your consideration in this matter is greatly appreciated. Should you wish to discuss
this matter further, I can be reached at the above telephone numbers.
Sincerely,
-L)
Karen 5orenson
Enclosure
cc: Hamish Marshall (w/ enclosure)
Karen 5oren5on
November 11, 1997
Mr. Patrick Smith
Smith and Company
555 Ramona Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93405
KE: Laurel Bowl
Dear Mr. Smith:
As I looked around the bowling alley on E�aturday morning, November 1, 1997, after
sitting in on a meeting where the junior bowlers were told that Laurel Bowl had been sold and
would be torn down, I could not help but wonder if you really know what it is you have
purchased.
If the walls of Laurel Bowl could talk they would tell you unbelievable stories. They
a ii „ r ;.,,,„� „ ;H :4 7/Y� �n.4 Aga %A/” t.akv nriiJ_v. irk the fart
irVuiln Vv'u yvu vi Viv I I..vr C.Vla v� .., i..u,.j .�.. . —, r
that they are able to participate in a "sport." They would tell you of the handicapped adults
who bowl in a league on Saturday afternoon, and of the pride and joy that is felt by them
because they too are able to participate In a "sport."
Through these walls you would hear the laughter of children at birthday parties. You
would hear screams of delight as children watch the ball knock down even one pin. You would
see parents who were able to sit back, relax and enjoy their child's special day because, quite
Simply, Zippy the Clown was a perfect hostess.
The walls would tell you of the junior bowlers, who down through the years have set
goals and standards for themselves and taken pride in their achievements. They would tell
you of the dreams that have been born, particularly of becoming a professional bowler.
5even years ago, at the age of 5, my daughter, Chelsey, picked up a bowling ball for
the first time. She fell in love with the sport, and began to take bowling very seriously. The
walls would tell you of the time she, at the age of nine, bowled well enough to be named one
of the "Nations Top Ten Junior Bowlers." Chelsey, along with several of the junior bowlers
have set some high standards and goals for themselves and it was at Laurel Bowl that they
began to dream of becoming a professional bowler. The walls would tell you of the countless
hours spent in practice in an effort to make their dreams come true.
1268 Woodside
5an Luis Obispo, CA 95401
November 11, 1997
Page Two
Most importarrtly, however, you would hear about friendships that have developed
down through the years, many of them beginning back in 19591 You would hear of the ways
these friends have touched each others' lives. How they have laughed together, celebrated
each others'joys, felt each others pain and even at times cried together. These are
friendships that will last a lifetime.
Many of us were saddened by the news that Laurel Bowl had been sold. But most
upsetting was the fact that it was going to be dsstroyed. You see, Laurel yowl is not just a
building, it is a "house" where dreams have beer: born and where life long friendships have been
made. For many it is quite simply a "house" filled with family and love. How thankful I am
that, although we may lose the building, the memories that we hold in our hearts and the
friendships that have been made throughout the years cannot be touched and will never be
destroyed.
Before the doors of Laurel Bowl close on December 23, 1997, 1 would encourage you to
stop by our "house' and 'listen to the walls." I particularly Invite you to visit on a Saturday
morning between 10:00 and 12:00 to meet our junior bowlers. They are a wonderful group of
young people and I think you will be amazed at their dedication and love for the sport of
vowung.
Sincerely,
Kare n J. Sorenson
cc: Pete & Kay Colombo, (who made Laurel Bowl a "house' of family and love)
BIICLIIn AVCPIIJR
►'"'E �=ITEM� o�►rvt, l
MCMORAnbum
May 19, 1998 an EfMGMT
�DD DIR
O FIN DIR
TO: Council Colleagues ❑ Ft CHIEF
MUIORNEYDPW DIR
RIG ❑ POLICE CHF
FROM: Council Member Dodie William,�01 AM ❑ REC DIR
❑ UTIL DIR
❑ PERS DIR
SUBJECT: City Monument Sign
The City spent approximately $30,000 each for monument signs last year to improve the City's
most important gateways. I have driven past the sign at the southern entrance several times
recently, and have noted the area is decidedly unattractive and the sign almost invisible. It is not
doing the job for which it was created. Conversely,the sign on the City's northern boundary has
a lovely palm tree (which was already there), is and very attractive.
On the south, the fence obscures the view from the freeway and the unsightly weeds growing up
the fence further distract from the sign's beauty and utility. Landscaping is minimal and
immature and I believe we should at the very least plant a tree or trees around it to highlight the
monument.
We must deal with Caltrans regarding the fence,but palm trees, pepper trees or other year-round
species could be planted on the sight to achieve instant improvement.
I mentioned this to Todd Martin and John Moss but wanted the Council to be aware of my
concerns.
c: John Dunn
Wendy George
John Moss
Todd Martin
'11111 i aJ?;T '
$� }}:OT a
Fla t]aD fl J;0�9WO fl
F{O W1 0 CAO 0.
i-7i ,31 ERR D OAOA'C
�!� V" rU Y311SOTTA17