HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/07/1999, 7 - CITY DONATION ACCEPTANCE POLICY council M.6,D=
AcjenoA Repom ;N-�
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
FROM: Paul LeSage,Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: CITY DONATION ACCEPTANCE POLICY
CAO RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution establishing a City Donation Acceptance Policy.
DISCUSSION
Background
From time to time, individuals, community groups, and businesses have approached the City
with the intent of making significant donations. On August 17, 1999, the City Council received
a correspondence from Pat Cusack, of Saturn of San Luis Obispo, offering to build a basketball
court at Emerson Park. The matter was referred to staff. In reviewing the potential of a donation
of this magnitude ($30,000 to $40,000 estimate), and with the potential for donations at the
Sports Field Complex, staff determined that there was a need for a formal City policy to cover
the acceptance of such gifts. If this policy is adopted, it will be used in reviewing the Saturn
donation offer. That item will then be brought to the Council in a timely manner.
Cities and other government agencies find it appropriate to develop a formal approach to
accepting donations. The purpose of such a policy is to protect the City's interests while not
discouraging potential donors.
San Luis Obispo park and recreation facilities have benefited from significant donations in the
past. Much of Sinsheimer Park, including the baseball stadium, was donated by private
businesses and community organizations. Many of the barbeque pits.in City parks were built by
service clubs. The Rotary Pavilion in Laguna Lake Park was constructed entirely by the Monday
Rotary Club. The City has also previously recognized donations with namings, such as Rotary
Pavillion, and with signage such as the baseball scoreboard at the Sinsheimer Baseball Stadium.
Certain ongoing maintenance efforts have also been acknowledged. The trail signs on Bishop
Peak note that the trails are maintained by the Sierra Club.
Primarily, these donations have been accepted on an informal or "hand shake" basis. While
major problems have not happened, this informal process does put the City at risk. What if, for
example, a project was constructed without inspection and later found to be substandard. Would
the City be required to demolish and rebuild it? The attached policy addresses this issue and
others that protect the City's interest.
7-1
Council Agenda Report—City Donation Acceptance Policy
Page 2
Proposed Policy
The policy stipulates that donations must have a purpose consistent with City goals and
highlights the City's ability to decline donations. It also seeks to encourage donations that do not
add to the City's workload or bring hidden costs.
The policy provides for all donations with a value in excess of$5,000 to be approved by the City
Council. Donations of less than that amount may be approved by the Department Head.
Significant donations bring with them an expectation of recognition. This policy allows for
appropriate recognition without imposing commercial advertising in City facilities.
This policy also stipulates that capital donations will be subject to normal City review,
permitting, inspection, and insurance requirements. While the item in this policy on recognition
has raised the most questions, this stipulation on review, permitting, etc., is what protects the
City from well-intended, but ill-advised, donations.
Regarding recognition, while it is staff's position that what is spelled out in Item 9 of the policy
is appropriate, not everyone agrees with that position. Staff asked the Joint Use Committee to
review the policy because of the potential for donations on sites under their purview. While
endorsing the policy, the committee members expressed concern that the naming policy was
restrictive and could discourage donations. Staff understands and appreciates this concern, as it
represents the enthusiasm of the public for more high-quality facilities and provides a balance to
staff's caution in protecting the City's interest. However, Staff believes that a successful track
record of facilitating donations has been established and is reflected in the proposed policy. Staff
is comfortable that the proposed basketball court in Emerson Park can be accomplished under
this policy.
CONCURRENCES
The Joint Use Committee unanimously endorsed this policy on August 24, 1999, with the
concern previously noted.
The policy will be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission on September 1, 1999.
The action of the Commission will be reported to the City Council prior to the September 7,
1999, Council meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact in adopting this policy. The fiscal impact of individual donations with
be reviewed either by the City Council or the Department Head, depending on the value of the
donation.
ATTACHMENT
Resolution
7-2
RESOLUTION NO. (1999 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ADOPTING A CITY DONATION ACCEPTANCE POLICY
WHEREAS, individuals, community groups, and businesses may wish to make donations
to the City in either cash or in-kind contributions that enhance projects, facilities, and programs;
and
WHEREAS, the need for projects, facilities, and programs exceeds the City's ability to
fund all such needed projects; and
WHEREAS, it is an acceptable and appropriate practice to accept donations, in order to
enhance City programs and/or facilities to provide a higher level of service to the public.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
hereby adopts the following policy concerning the acceptance of donations:
1. The donation must have a purpose consistent with City goals and objectives.
2. The City may decline any donation without comment or cause.
3. The donation will not be in conflict with any provision of the law.
4. The donation will be aesthetically acceptable to the City.
5. The donation will not add to the City's workload unless it provides a net benefit to the
City.
6. The donation will not bring hidden costs such as starting a program the City would be
unwilling to fund when the donation was exhausted.
7. The donation places no restriction on the City, unless agreed to by the City Council.
8. The donation shall become property of the City.
9. All donations will receive recognition appropriate to the level and nature of the
donation as determined by the City. For those of a capital nature, that may be in the form
of signage, marking, or naming. Any naming of Parks and Recreation facilities shall be
consistent with City policy on the naming of such facilities as set forth in Resolution
8621 (1997 Series). Regardless of the recognition strategy selected, the intent shall be to
appropriately honor the donor for their contribution to the community. The appearance of
traditional commercial advertising shall be avoided.
.7-3
,v
Resolution No, (1999 Series)
Page 2
10. Donations exceeding $5,000 shall be accepted through a written agreement
consistent with these guidelines and approved :by the City Council.. In=kind Capital
donations will be subject to normal City review, permitting, inspection, and insurance
requirements.
Upon motion of - ____—__, seconded by
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing resolution was adopted this day of , ..1999.
Mayor Allen Settle
ATTEST:
Lee.Price, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
G. rge n, ty Attorney
7-4
MEQ" _7_q� AGENDA .�
DA)` ITEM #
council mcmoizanoum
F3O110d
-'�❑
September 2, 1999 wv3 1 w❑
AHO EJIH01N831yL1 A3NHOilWMTO: City Council ❑ ovo�❑
VIA: John Dunn, City Administrative Officer� �
FROM: Paul LeSage, Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: '••II CITY DONATION ACCEPTANCE POLICY
At their September 1, 1999, meeting, the Parks and Recreation Commission unanimously
endorsed the City Donation Acceptance policy.
PL:lh
RECEIVED
SEP - 3 1999
SLO CITY CLERK