HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/19/1999, 4 - CONSIDERATION OF INSTALLATION OF NEW SIDEWALKS Nsevy D.r
council
j acencm RePout 4�m��--
CITY O F SAN LUIS O B I S P O
FROM: Michael D. McCluskey, Director of Public Works w'
Prepared By: Gregory A. Walker, Streets SupervisorAtJ
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF INSTALLATION OF NEW SIDEWALKS
CAO RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the CAO to approve plans and specifications to install new sidewalks and or curb and
gutter in various locations; advertise for bids; and award the contract if the cost is less than the
engineer's estimate of $67,320.
DISCUSSION
In June 1997, the City Council adopted, as a part of a Major City Goal - Street and Sidewalk
Maintenance, a budget of$75,000 per year to install new sidewalks, and/or curb and gutter as
needed. Although the original program envisioned use of the 1911 Act in which affected
property owners would repay those funds to the City, the passage of Proposition 218 negated the
ability to use the 1911 Act and the Council decided to continue the program without the
possibility of repayment. In June of 1999, this City Council continued the program as a part of
its Major City Goal—Street and Sidewalks—by funding $75,000 in each of the two fiscal years.
In the past, staff reviewed locations needing new sidewalks throughout the city, and made
recommendations for construction to the Council based upon the four criteria included in City
Council Resolution No. 6031 (1986 Series), attached as Exhibit A. The City Council
specifically wanted to review the list; add or subtract locations and then authorize the notification
of property owners that the. City intended to construct new sidewalks in that location. A list of
previous recommendations in the previous program is attached as Exhibit B.
In April 1998, the City Council adopted a new Pavement Management Plan that broke the City
into eight maintenance districts. The underlying philosophy of the eight districts was to .
minimize disruption to every area of the City by fixing, to the maximum extent possible, all
infrastructure in that area once every eight years. Thus, trees get trimmed, broken curb and
gutter fixed, faded signs replaced, sidewalks repaired and pavement rehabilitated or replaced.
With this report, Staff is proposing that new sidewalk installations be incorporated into the same
eight-year program.
Pavement management area number 3 (Exhibit C) is scheduled for extensive work in the
summer of 2000. Staff has reviewed the entire area and, using Resolution 6031 as a guide, has
prepared list of proposed locations to install new sidewalk. The listing is significantly longer
than funding available and shows relative importance by priority. See Exhibit D.
4-1
Council Agenda Report—New Sidewalk Installation
Page 2
Staff is recommending that the top 24 projects listed in Exhibit D be authorized for construction.
This will allow funding for unforeseen contingencies and if, after completion funds remain, one
or two more projects may be possible.
CONCURRENCES
Community Development Department has given this project a categorical exemption.
FISCAL IMPACT
The New Sidewalk Program is budgeted in the 1999-2001 financial plan, Appendix B, page 252,
for $75,000 for 1999-2000 and $75,000 for 2000-2001. Using staff's recommended list of
priorities, on Exhibit D, starting with priorities numbered 1 - 24, the total construction cost is
estimated to be$67,679.50 with a$6,767.00 contingency.
Area# 3 Total Budgeted 99-00 $75,000.00
Engineer's Estimate $67,679.50
Contingency $ 6.767.00
Total $74,446.50
ALTERNATIVES
The City Council may:
• Add to or delete from those projects listed in Exhibit D with other projects listed on
Exhibit D.
• Add to or delete from those projects listed in Exhibit D with other projects listed on
Exhibit B.
• Choose to continue implementing projects on a citywide basis and direct that the first
$68,000+/- of projects from Exhibit B be implemented.
ATTACE3MNTS
Exhibit A: Resolution 6032 (1986 Series)
Exhibit B: Recommended Sidewalk Projects, Costs and Priorities—Citywide basis— 1998
Exhibit C: Map of Pavement Management Areas
Exhibit D: Recommended Sidewalk Projects, Costs and Priorities — Pavement Management
Plan—Maintenance Area 3
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO. 6031 (1986 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF TELE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO ADOPTING GUIERAI• CRITERIA AND
SITE SELECTION PRIORITIES FOR THE SIDS�ALK
IMPR0VE N04 T PROGRAM
TRIUMEA.S, the City desires that its citizens have available safe,
convenient and suitably located sideralls; and
WHE REAS, many areas of the City do not have such side•,.alks; and
WEREAS, the City desires such areas to be improved considering needs,
hazards and the wishes of the neighborhoods,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby adopts
the following:
G�Tt�2AL PROG:WM CRIT rte. to
a. Sideealk program„ shaald integrate repair and construction.
b. Sidecealk progra.� should emphasize safety, particvlarly safety
of children. To this effect, City staff should consult with
school authorities and PTAs in preparing specific =nstruction
priorities.
City-initiated sideea ks should be installed only s rare there- is a
demonstrated pedestrian need.
d. City should respond favorably when it is petiticsed for sidecalk
irprovei-.e.-its r rare than 50% of the cyxners of a block (those
portions already irmroved are considered a favorable vote) .
e. Sidecalk program should consider t000grapkry and significant trees.
f. Council may consider scenic nature of area, desires of the
neighborhood, traffic flow and other judgement iters in its
determinations.
.4-3
Resolution No. 6031 (1906 Series)
g. Staff will bring to Council attention those properties where
more than 5O% of the frontage of a block has been improved,
thereby meeting 1911 Act criteria for completion of improvements
within a block.
• SITE SaE'.CTION PRIORITIES FOR 0ONSTRUCTION OF NEW SIDEWALKS
1. In areas with safety hazards or heave pedestrian use, especially
children.
2. Along arterial and collector streets near schools,. parks, churches,
and neighborhood co:rnercial centers.
3. Along local streets near schools, parks, churches, and neighborhood
cc arniercial centers.
4. In other residential and comarercial areas as necessary.
On motion of Councilman Griffin seconded by Councilman Settle and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Griffin, Settle, Dovey and Mayor Dunin .
MES: None
AJ SENT: Councilwoman Rappa
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this ' 15th day of
July 1986.
Ar;.L- MAYOR RON DUNIN
ATi
CI C'i,ERK P.A. VOGES
4-4
API' OVirO:
City Administra V e facer
City At rney
Public Works Director
4-5
EXHIBIT B
1998 RECOMMENDED SIDEWALK PROJECTS-COSTS AND PRIORITIES
SERVICE CRITERIA LEGEND
A=ARTERIAL CC=COLLECTOR COMMERCIAL SF--SAFETY CONCERN
S--sCHOOL RC=COLLECTOR RESIDENTIAL HP=HIGH PEDESTRIAN
INDEX LOCATIN CRITERION MET ESTIMATED COSTS
PRIORITY 3
28 2958-68-78 HIGUERA IN PROCESS BY OTHERS
29 1205 ELLA SF $8,103.00
30 1215 ELLA SF $5,603.00
31 1013 ELLA SF $15,326.50
TOTAL OF ABOVE SECTION: $29,032.50
CUMULATIVE TOTAL: $29,032.50
PRIORITY 4
32 CHORRO Sr.(EAST SIDE)
BETWEEN MURRY&ROUGEOT RC $40,000.00
33 2890 S.HIGUERA ASF $64,472.72
TOTAL OF ABOVE SECTION: $104,472.72
CUMULATIVE TOTAL: $133,505.22
PRIORITY 5
34 601 SWEENEY SF SEE 1999 LIST
35 615 GROVE SF $3,618.00
36 619 GROVE SF $3,370.50
37 645 GROVE SF $2,851.50
38 655 GROVE SF $2,871.00
39 2391 LAWTON(Woodbridge St) SF SEE 1999 LIST
40 280 ALMOND SF $1,683.00
41 262 ALMOND SF $1,683.00
42 234 ALMOND SF $1,683.00
43 216 ALMOND SF $1,683.00
44 208 ALMOND SF $3,975.00
45 1691 JOHNSON(Breck St) SF $3,176.50
46 1690 JOHNSON(Breck St) SF $6,850.00
47 1071 ORCUTT(city owned) A $9,553.00
48 1049 ORCUTT A $4,758.00
49 1015 ORCUTT(city owned) A $13,448.50
TOTAL OF ABOVE SECTION: $61,204.00
CUMULATIVE TOTAL: $194,70922
PRIORTIY 6
50 1670 MONTEREY(Palm St) SF $14,104.50
51 1656 MONTEREY(Palm St) SF $7,903.00
52 1625 PALM SF $7,443.00
53 3490 EIvIPRESSA&BONETTI SF $13,711.50
54 3469 EMPRESSA SF $3,960.00
55 213 GRANADA SF $4,059.00
56 3520 E 4PLEO SF $3,494.50
TOTAL OF ABOVE SECTION: $54,675.50
CUMULATIVE TOTAL: $249,384.72
EXHIBIT B
1998-1999 NEW SIDEWALK COMPLETION LIST
INDEX LOCATION CRITERION MET DATE COMP
1 2121 HARRIS S,HP 12/22/98
2 2129 HARRIS S,HP 12/22/98
3 220 BRANCH S,HP 1/8/99
4 236 BRANCH S,HP 1/20/99
5 268 BRANCH S,HP 1/12/99
6 2145 PRICE (Branch St side) S,HP 12/30/98
7 2145 CYPRESS (Branch side) S,HP 1/12/99
8 2031 CYPRESS S,HP 1/13/99
9 682 PALM S,HP 2/26/99
10 464 BUCHON RC 1/12/99
11 472 BUCHON RC 1/12/99
12 476 BUCHON RC 1/12/99
13 496 BUCHON RC 1/20/99
14 1367 HIGUERA(Pepperside) S,SF 1/20/99
15 1368 HIGUERA(Pepper side) S,SF 1/26/99
16 601 LAWRENCE SF 1/26/99
17 232 RAMONA SF,RC 2/3/99
18 240 RAMONA SF,RC 2/3/99
19 252 RAMONA SF,RC 2/9/99
20 274 RAMONA SF,RC 2/9/99
21 280 RAMONA SF,RC 2/9/99
22 298 RAMONA SF,RC 2/12/99
23 316 RAMONA SF,RC 2/12/99
24 CHORRO bet WEST/MURRAY RC,SF 2/25/99
4-7
Appendix I EXHIBIT C
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE AREAS PLAN
Total Square Meters per Area
�* 1. 256340. 6. 243708.
2. 267523. 7. 256613.
254971. 8. 242216.
Ni 4. 266063. 9. 87083.
232131. total 2106648.
I APRIL 1998
1
17
1 ,
r
I
•' 3
\�1
1 ,
J -
4-8
�a, •i
CH a Uirizi-I z o N ROUNDHOUSE'�,�`•,
SOUTH
SAN RLO
- - c
Cl 0-
b o 3 o FU ON SAN�P 9
CLA '
Ln
5. w m o
LJ ¢ � � �•
z z
CORRIDA m..
'-- WOODBRIDGE ���'�`•
z CAUDILLCD
BR/DGE ocr cm-i D S MITCHELLUJ
LAWRENCE p MOR ON\,,
.`,.
�p o
STONFRIDGE �v m
Q Q
Afq
ol ORCUTT '
DR.
4
9 r V�1
SVA PAZ
/ � O
Co EXHIBIT C
o
J
W
N
4-9
- OVER
�r
.s9C
,1 O��,gINE ��r\ o \••,
1A CD �
\GG\G ICIA —
ARALIA B XW00
0� :�.ti•. ROM
P { o cooAAW
�
- SLAP
4-10
EXHIBIT D
RECOMMENDED SIDEWALK PROJECTS:PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT AREA# 3
SERVICE CRITERIA LEGEND
A=ARTERIAL CC=COLLECTOR COMMERCIAL SF--SAFETY CONCERN
S--SCHOOL RC=COLLECTOR RESIDENTIAL HP=HIGH PEDESTRIAN
INDEX LOCATION CRITERION MEI'ESTIMATED COSTS
PRIORITY 1
1 2600 MEADOW SF $3,228.00
2 2590 MEADOW SF $2,706.50
3 2580 MEADOW SF $2,921.50
4 2548 MEADOW SF $3,273.00
5 406 MITCHELL(Meadow St) SF $11,109.50
6 405 MITCHELL(Meadow St) SF $7,246.50
7 2510 LAWTON(Caudill St) SF $2,998.00
8 615 CAUDILL SF $1,328.50
9 623 CAUDILL SF $1,065.50
10 631 CAUDILL SF $1,998.50
11 640 CAUDILL SF $1,098.00
12 1992 JOHNSON SF $1,296.00
13 645 CAUDILL SF $1,317.50
14 646 CAUDILL SF $2,909.00
15 652 CAUDILL SF $1,104.50
16 653 CAUDILL SF $1,204.50
17 660 CAUDILL SF $1,204.50
18 661 CAUDILL SF $3,771.50
19 664 CAUDILL SF $1,071.00
20 668 CAUDILL SF $1,204.50
21 670 CAUDILL SF $2,398.50
22 2443 BROAD(Caudill St.) SF $3,012.50
23 2391 LAWTON(Woodbridge St) SF $4,429.00 .
24 633 WOODBRIDGE SF $3,783.00
TOTAL OF ABOVE SECTION: $67,679.50
CUMULATIVE TOTAL: $67,679.50
PRIORITY 2
25 2701 MEADOW(cul-d-sac) SF $4,892.00
26 647 WOODBRIDGE SF $2,854.50
27 653 WOODBRIDGE SF $2,728.50
28 663 WOODBRIDGE SF $2,600.50
29 673 WOODBRIDGE SF $4,997.50
30 687 WOODBRIDGE SF $2,855.00
31 2401 BROAD (Woodbridge St.) SF $2,126.50
.32 423 MITCHELL SF $850.50
33 404 LAWRENCE SF $223.50
34 2470 LAWTON SF $2,716.00
35 2420 LAWTON SF $4,875.50
36 607 WOODBRIDGE(Lawton St) SF $2,268.75
TOTAL OF ABOVE SECTION: $33,988.75
CUMULATIVE TOTAL: $101,668.25
PRIORITY 3
37 750 HUMBERT SF $12,905.00
38 2691 VICTORIA(Humbert St) SF $14,081.00
39 781-783 HUMBERT SF $11,495.50
40 2663 VICTORIA SF $6,423.00
41 2690 VICTORIA SF $10,001.50
42 2650 VICTORIA SF $10,001.50
43 831 FRANCIS SF $2,617.00
44 835 FRANCIS SF $2,617.00
45 855 FRANCIS SF $2,617.00
46 881 FRANCIS SF $5,673.00
TOTAL OF ABOVE SECTION: $78,431.50
CUMULATIVE TOTAL: $180,099.75
PRIORITY 4
47 601 SWEENEY(IN PRIORITY 5 INDEX 34
48 3049-69-79 BROAD(Rockview St) SF $5,874.00
49 3204 ROCKVIEW SF $4,961.00
50 3212 ROCKVIEW SF $5,139.00
51 3280 ROCKVIEW SF $3,068.50
52 3355-61-69-75 ROCKVIEW SF (ON BROAD) $22,621.80
53 3650 SACRAMENTO CC SF REQ"D BY PARCEL MAP
54 3580 SACRAMENTO CC SF $7,120.50
55 3438 MIGELITO SF $2,965.00
56 3550 BROAD(Sacramento side) SF $46,086.00
57 3592 BROAD(Sacramento side) SF $47,984.50
r
58 3460 BROAD(Sacramento side) SF $14,053.00
TOTAL OF ABOVE SECTION: $159,873.30
CUMULATIVE TOTAL: $339,973.05