HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/13/1999, 4 - SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY INTERIM YEAR SOLID WASTE RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION. Counat Dec. 991 9
jLacxnba REpom
CITY OF SAN LUIS O B I S P O
FROM: John Moss,Utilities Directolk
Prepared By: Ron Munds,Utilities Conservation Coordinator
SUBJECT: SAN LUIS GARBAGE COMPANY INTERIM YEAR SOLID WASTE
RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION.
CAO RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution increasing solid waste rates by 1.72% for interim year 1999 and 3.5% for
interim year 2000, for a combined increase of 5.22%to become effective on February 1,2000.
DISCUSSION
Background
On October 18, 1999 San Luis Garbage Company (SLG) submitted to the City interim year solid
waste rate adjustment applications (Attachment H) for years 1999 and 2000 along with the
required audited financial statements. According to the Rate Setting Process and Methodology
for Integrated Solid Waste Rates (adopted by Council in 1994), rate adjustment applications
should be submitted in late spring with the review process completed in the summer, and the new
rates implemented on the following January 1'. If the Council recalls, the 1998 base year rate
adjustment was not implemented until December 1, 1998 because of the modifications made to
the service levels and rate structure, the implementation of the commercial recycling fees, and
the delay in receiving SLG's audited financial statements.
Since the base year rate submittal timeline was delayed, SLG has combined its interim year rate
adjustment requests for 1999 and 2000. The recommended rate increase is for 1.72% for 1999
and 3.5% for 2000 for a combined overall increase of 5.22%. It is anticipated that SLG will now
be back on schedule for next years base year application submittal which should be submitted to
staff for review by July 2000 with proposed rate changes to be implemented January 2001.
Purpose of the Interim Year Rate Adjustment Application
The City's rate setting manual provides a process and schedule for rate application review and
binds the contractor and the City to a method of determining revenue adequacy. Under this
methodology, base year applications, like the one brought to Council in September 1998, are
prepared every third year. Base year applications require a detailed submittal and.review of past,
current and future operating expenses. Less detailed interim year applications are required in
year two and three of the cycle, and are intended to adjust only for the prior year's cost-of-living
increase and any changes to the landfill tipping costs. Though the combining of interim year rate
adjustment applications is not the normal or preferred practice, staff has determined that the
4-1
Council Agenda Report—Solid Waste Rate Adjustment
Page 2
requested rate adjustment is within the parameters of the rate setting manual and will potentially
avoid a larger increase during next year's base year review.
Key Assumptions in 1999/2000 Application
Tipping fees
SLG considerably under estimated tipping fee cost in the 1998 base year application for 1999.
The projected fees in the base year application were $824,604 compared to the current estimated
fees for 1999 of $908,596. This, coupled with an increase in commercial waste generation
attributed to the good economic climate, increased the pass through costs by $83,992 for 1999.
The year 2000 estimated tipping fee costs of$967,383 takes into account higher than expected
tipping fees and also anticipates a five dollar per ton increase already approved by the County
Board of Supervisors, effective September 2000.
• Consumer Price Index (CPI)
The figure used to factor inflation into increases in solid waste rates is the Consumer Price Index
for Los Angeles, Riverside, Orange Counties. The reason for using this CPI figure is that this
geographic area most influences SLG's costs to provide service. The previous twelve month CPI
is used to determine the weighted average change in controllable costs in the rate adjustment
application being considered. Since the current rate adjustment application is for two years, the
applications use the CPI from October 1997 to October 1998 of 0.9% to account for inflation
during 1999 and the CPI from October 1998 to September 1999 of 2.9% for the 2000
application.
• AB 939 Fee
A three percent increase in the AB 939 fee is included to reflect the inflationary and solid waste
program cost increases experienced by the City.
Staff has determined that the adoption of the 1999/2000 rates as recommended will ensure SLG
the necessary operating revenues, including profit, within the prescribed levels set by the solid
waste rate setting policies.
Survey of Solid Waste Services and Rates—Other Cities
As part of the rate setting process, SLG is required to conduct and report the results of a survey
of residential and non-residential solid waste rates in communities similar in size and location to
the City of San Luis Obispo. The purpose of the survey is to benchmark rates proposed by SLG
against other cities to determine if the rates are reasonable. Attachment III is the results of the
survey and the survey forms submitted by SLG.
4-2
• I
Council Agenda Report—Solid Waste Rate Adjustment
Page.3
= It is important to note that there are many variables that make up the solid waste rates in different
fra
communities. The variables include nchise fees,AB 939 fees,tipping,fees and levels of
service (i.e. curbside recycling, green waste collection, etc.). Because of the variability of
factors, it is difficult to compare rates from other jurisdictions on an"apples to apples"basis.
Taking this information.into account, the survey indicates that the current rates charged by SLG
are in the mid-range of cost when compared to other local jurisdictions. When compared to
comparable agencies located in other areas of the state, SLG7s,rates are significantly;less. Based
on the overall comparison,the rates charged by SLG seem to be reasonable. j:
FISCAL UWPACT
The proposed rates are as.follows:
L
Residential Solid Waste.Services/Rates i'
�I
i
LL�tI� i�
Orange Bag $2.51/month $2.64/month
(32 gallon) plus$18.85 for package of 10 bags plus 519.83 for package of 10 bags
Economy $8.27/month $8.70/m l`nth
(32 gallon wastewheeler).
Standard _ $16.54 month $17:40/II nth
(64 gallon wastewheeler) �I
Premium $24.81/month $2.6.10/month
(96 gallon wastewheeler)
Commercial Solid Waste Services
As identified in Exhibit A to Attachment I.
ATTACHMENTS
I. Resolution
Exhibit A- Rate Schedule for Integrated Solid Waste Activities
H. 1998 Rate Application
III. Survey of.Other Cities- Solid Waste Rate
1I
II
1I
• Ili
111
1l 4-3
ATTACHMENT I
RESOLUTION NO. (1999 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ESTABLISHING INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE RATES
WHEREAS, on June 21, 1994,the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approved
the Rate Setting Manual Process and Methodology Manual for Integrated Solid Waste
Management Rates; and
WHEREAS, a review of San Luis Garbage Company's 1999/2000 interim year solid
waste rate application has been completed in accordance with the adopted solid waste rate setting
policies.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
SECTION 1. Resolution No. 8854 (1998 series) is hereby rescinded on midnight,
January 31, 2000.
SECTION 2. The rates set forth in Exhibit A shall be effective February 1, 2000.
On motion of , seconded by
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
The foregoing Resolution was adopted on this day of ' 199.
ATTEST: Mayor Allen Settle
Lee Price, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
QJOih
i tte effng Jorgensen 4-4
ffiBIT A
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
5.22% AVERAGE ACROSS THE BOARD INCREASE
FOR INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE ACTIVITIES
EFFECTIVE 2-1-2000
MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DUMPSTER CONTAINERS(PER MONTH)
Size of COLLECTIONS PER WEEK
container
(cubic yards) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 $62.80 $91.44 $120.08 $148.72 $177.36 $206.00 $234.64
1.5 $72.71 $112.36 $152.02 $191.68 $231.34 $270.99 $310.65
2 $82.62 $132.19 $181.76 $231.33 $280.90 $330.46 $380.03
3 $102.44 $171.85 $241.25 $310.65 $380.05 $449.46 $518.86
4 $122.27 $212.61 $302.95 $393.29 $483.63 $573.98 $664.32
6 F $161.91 $293.02 $424.12 $555.22 $686.33 $817.43 $948.54
The rates shown above include the monthly container rental fee and are the same for bins
and garwoods, when volume is identical.
COMMERCIAL GARBAGE CANS(PER MONTH)
number COLLECTIONS PER WEEK
of
cans 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 $15.43 $2423 $33.04 $41.85 $50.65 $59.46 $68.27
2 $19.83 $30.85 $41.87 $52.88 $63.90 $74.92 $85.93
3 $24.24 $37.47 $50.69 $63.92 $77.15 $90.37 $103.60
4 $28:65 $44.08 $59.50 $74.93 $90.35 $105.78 $12120
5 $33.06 $50.68 $68.31 $85.93 $103.56 $121.18 $138.81
6 $37.47 $57.29 $77.12 $96.94 $116.76 $136.59 $156.41
7 $41.88 $63.91 $85.94 $107.98 $130.01 $152.04 $174.08
8 $4629 $70.53 $94.77 $119.01 $14326 $167.50 $191.74
9 $50.69 $77.14 $103.58 $130.02 $156.46 $182.90 $209.35
Maximum volume and weight per garbage can:35 gallons and 80 pounds
Additional charge per can per collection: $4.73
Proposed Rate Schedule for Integrated Solid Waste Services effective 2-1-2000
4-5
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
COMMERCIAL WASTE WHEELER CONTAINERS PER MONTH
number COLLECTIONS PER WEEK
of
containers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 $25.34 $41.87 $58.40 $74.93 $91.46 $107.99 $124.52
2 $40.76 $64.99 $89.23 $113.46 $137.69 $161.92 $186.16
3 $56.19 $88.13 $120.08 $152.02 $183.97 $215.91 $247.86
4 $71.61 $111.27 $150.93 $190.58 $230.24 $269.90 $309.56
5 $87.04 $134.41 $181.78 $229.15 $276.52 $323.89 $371.26
6 $102.46 $157.55 $212.63 $267.71 $322.79 $377.88 $432.96
7 $117.89 $180.68 $243.48 $306.27 $369.07 $431.86 $494.66
8 $133.31 $203.82 $274.33 $344.84 $415.35 $485.85 $556.36
9 $148.74 $226.95 $305.16 $383.37 $461.58 $539.79 $618.00
In addition to the collection rates stated above for waste wheeler containers,there shall be charged a
monthly rental fee for each container. $2.20 Rental per waste wheeler per month
COMMERCIAL DUMPSTER CONTAINERS(PER MONTH)
Size of COLLECTIONS PER WEEK
container
(cubic yards) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 $55.08 $77.12 $99.15 $121.18 $14321 $165.25 $187.28
1.5 $61.69 $90.33 $118.97 $147.61 $176.25 $204.89 $233.54
2 $68.30 $102.45 $136.61 $170.76 $204.92 $239.07 $273.22
3 $81.51 $128.88 $17625 $223.62 $270.99 $318.36 $365.73
4 $94.73 $156.42 $218.11 $279.80 $341.49 $403.18 $464.87
6 $121.16 $20820 $29524 $382.27 $469.31 $556.35 . $643.39
8 $147.59 $259.97 $372.34 $484.72 $597.09 $709.47 $821.84
The rates shown above include the monthly container rental fee and are the same for bins
and garwoods, when volume is identical.
UNSCHEDULED EXTRA COLLECTIONS FOR
COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS AND
MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DUMPSTER CUSTOMERS
$25.34 1 cubic yard(minimum charge)
$33.05 2 cubic yards
$40.76 3 cubic yards
$48.47 4 cubic yards
Proposed Rate Schedule for Integrated Solid Waste Services effective 2-1-2000
4-6
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
SINGLE FAMILY and MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL(4 units or less)
VOLUME-BASED RATES =
ORANGE BAG RATE
$2.64 per month for collection service
$19.83 per special 33-gallon bag-payable when bags are issued.
ECONOMY RATE
$8.70 per month for one 32 gallon wastewheeler container collected once each week
STANDARD RATE
$17.40 per r onth.for one 64 gallon wastewheeler container collected once each week
PREMIUM RATE
$26.10 per month for one 96 gallon wastewheeler container collected once each week
PREMIUM PLUS RATE
$7.93 per month for additional 32 gallon wastewheeler container cojlected.once each week
$15.86 per month for additional 64 gallon wastewheeler container collected once each week
$23.79 per month for additional 96 gallon wastewheeler container collected once each week
SERVICE AWAY FROM THE STREET CURB
$5.94 additional per month per can or container
LATE°MAKEUP COLLECTIONS WITH GARBAGE TRUCK(phone call required)
$8.82 per trip plus charges identified above for any extra containers or equivalent volume
$3.30 additional charge.per 33 gallon can or equivalent volume per collection
EXTRA COLLECTIONS WITH PICKUP OR FLATBED TRUCK.(phone call required)
$13.22 per trip plus:
$3.30 per garbage can or equivalent volurne(arriounts over six cans by quotation)
$3.30 per white good article(once a month)
$3:30 Per piece of furniture
$3:30 per mattress or boxspring
(Economy service customers must pay in advance)
Proposed Rate Schedule for Integrated Solid Waste.Services effective 2-1-2000
44
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
RATE SCHEDULE
FOR COMMERCIAL RECYCLING ACTIVITIES
BASE CHARGE FOR COMMERCIAL RECYCLING
All commercial customers will pay$3.00 per month for commercial recycling services.This charge includes
all recycling services except collection of cardboard in excess of one yard once a week;collection of
white office paper,and collection of polystyrene.
CARDBOARD COLLECTION
COMMERCIAL DUMPSTER CONTAINERS(PER MONTH)
Size of COLLECTIONS PER WEEK
container
(cubic yards) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Included $19.28 $24.79 $30.30 $35.80 $41.31 $46.82
1.5 $15.42 $22.58 $29.74 $36.90 $44.06 $5122 $58.39
2 $17.08 $25.61 $34.15 $42.69 $51.23 $59.77 $68.31
3 $20.38 $3222 $44.06 $55.91 $67.75 $79.59 $91.43
4 $23.68 $39.11 $54.53 $69.95 $85.37 $100.80 $116.22
6 $30.29 $52.05 $73.81 $95.57 $117.33 $139.09 $160.85
8 $36.90 $64.99 $93.09 $121.18 $149.27 $177.37 $205.46
The rates shown above include the monthly container rental fee and are the same for bins
and garwoods, when volume is identical.
WHITE OFFICE PAPER COLLECTION
The charge for collection of each bag of white office paper is $0.89
POLYSTYRENE COLLECTION
The charge for collection of each bag of polysttyrene is $0.89
Proposed Rate Schedule for Integrated Solid Waste Services effective 2-1-2000
4-S
ATTACEM ENT II
City of San Luis Obispo
Interim Year Rate Adjustment Application
Summary
h%i'p'ry'y'�'ry,j ryry,ili0l�ri7 i'i,i4y Ci,i4h+iO� i.iri ri•rri/a G.rh.i.!•h,�/i'G/.�4 ri a�i'hri i rli4rilr fi4ti ei'44i�ii 4'ei�i%�4Oii+'.:ii�h'iry
1. Rate Increase Requested(summary of 1999 interim request&2000 interim request)'
....Jr4,i4C:�ry<`i:lir,'/iry riR'�4rir ri4r:n,'ri":.1'y�rY:'Gri(l'ri4/:4':•%'ii4<:riri riG::"ri44ri45'ii4iirir,'ri4riliri4%4./i4 '
?.ri.�i.+;rilA�i,4,li�:�tU;V:�lr:i'ii4.Uli44.r:4.!...............h. ....n..�5.�i;U.rilit�l�i.4ri.4ri,i;'i:ri:r'.41i.4ri�.<i<t4ii�i:irili�:4.ir{!i�.ri.•:h•�
Current Increased Adjustment New
Rate Schedule Rate Rate (a) Rate
Single Family Residential
2a. Orange bags(Pkg of 10) $18.85 $19.83 $19.83
2b. Orange Bag Service(collection) $2.51 $2.64 $2.64
3. Economy Service $8.27 $8.70 $8.70
4. Standard Service $16.54 $17.40 $17.40
5. Premium Service $24.81 $26.11 ILCL0211 $26.10
5. Multiunit Residential and Non-residential Rate increases of
will be applied to all rates in each structure
i,�'4 .4iii`i`4ii ..iii. .litiri iiii,i;4tiri.5li. 17,i4ii. .r:�l:h,.)r�!'r`ii'{,%4r% �:U�ii•%Ori•i
riri4l�;riirU,4.r44'ri!:U!!ii!r0
,4,GlG.Uiili64{{{iiii{r{.>4.r�4.:.�{�,G,4 4Ui�'{4:err it{4;ri4.
::1:544,4G!{r{ri:{ritiriri:4rir{/ir{/{,rriri/{r{riliri!{ri;G!{r{ri:'it{r{{{4/✓;r J.r{�.r... .i r...{!r:iiri�:iri...
To the best of my knowledge,the data and information in this application is complete,accurate,and consistent with the instructions
provided by ibe City of San Luis Obispo.
Name:TOM MARTIN Title:CONTROLLER
Signature: Date:OCTOBER 18,1999
Fiscal Years: 111/99 - 12/31/2000 Pg. 1 of 3
4-9
arersmLis o°bw January 2000
Interim Year Rate Adjustment Application
Financial Information
.............:i.^; •�4!.!N"i;F'Y.�Tr.�< "i��'iri�'p'`^Gih�>4 iry.i•i::rir i:'O:irir:iq is
Base Year Controllable Costs
6. Total Allowable Costs $4,506533
7. Plus Allowable Operating Profit $339,201
8. Plus Lease Payments to Affiliated Companies $0
9. Equals Total Controllable costs S4,845,734
Base Year Pass Through Costs
10. Tipping Fees 5824 604
Franchise Fees $295789
11. Plus AB 939 and Regulatory Fees $92 800
12. Equals Total Pass Through Costs L $113 193
13. Base Year Revenue Requirements(less Franchise Fee) $6 058 927 100%
t
.v.:.r Giiii ii��ir'iii'ri'��p(�'� i .�1���yyr `4�Y�jb 'ii.Y�i�'4Uiv aiiiirigiiriri GAG�. iirii�•
:4!ir4 is iri4r{r{riri iii^n�'•�•%.n. �6.�J'.T.Y.'>.�i:i4.49b.�i;40^.,4lirixr:O;rir%rir%9.%lrihl�rir:ri�r%4;•.
Change in Controllable Cost
14. Historical Percentage Change m Consumer Price index(Oct 98-Sept 99) 2.9%
Change in Pass Through Cost
15. Projected Interim Year 1999 Tipping Fees $908 96
Projected Interim Year 1999 Franchise Fees $266 68
16. Plus Projected Interim Year 1999 AB939 Fees S92.800
17. Equals Total Base Year Pass Through Costs L $1 67 664
18 Projected Interim Year 2000 Tipping Fees $967 383
Projected Interim Year 2000 Franchise Fees 5266 68
19. Projected Interim Year 2000 AB939 Fees $95 84
20. Equals Total Projected Interim Year Pass Through costs S I 29 5
21. ProjectedPercentage Change in Pass Through Costs
p''r i:�.•:.C•�T•' V1A +T�� •
Weighted Change in Controllable Costs
22. Controllable Costa as a Percent of Base Year Revenue Requirements
23. Mulrip&d Percent chane in CPI IF 2.900/
24. Equals Weighted Percent Change is Controllable Costs 2320/.
Weighted Change in Pass Through Costs
25. Pass Through Cosa as a Percent of Base Yr Revenue Requirements
26. Multiplied Percent Change in Paas Through Cosa
27. Equals Weighted Percent Change in Pass Through.Costs
Total Change
28. . Total Percent Change in Cost 3.29%
29. Divided b Adjustment for Franchise Fee 1-6.0 percent) 94.0%
30. Equals Percent change in Existing Rates 350%
Fiscal Year. 11112000-12/3112000 Page 2 of 3
4-10
QW CCSM L=ObW October 1999
Interim Year Rate Adjustment Application
Financial Information
;C:ryi�3 ori ii ii N
Base Year Controllable Costs
6. Total Allowable Costs 54,506,533
7. Plus Allowable Operating Profit $339,2011
8. Plus Lease Payments to Affihated Companies so
9. Equals Total Controllable costs L $4 g45�734
Base Year Pass Through Costs
10. Tipping Fees $824 604
Franchise Fees $295 789
11. Plus AB 939 and Regulatory Fees F $92,8001
12. Equals Total Pass Through Costs L$1
�213�193
13. Base Year Revenue Requirements(less Franchise Fee) -�:��100%
Ory
. . . ......
. . . .
Change in Controllable Cost
14. Historical Percentage Change in Consumer Price Index(Oct 97-Oct 98)
Change in Pass Through Cost
15. Base Year Tipping Fees 5824 604
Base Year Franchise Fees $295 789
16. Plus Base Year AB939 Fees 59 00
17. Equals Total Base Year Pass Through Costs 51 13 193
18 Projected Interim Year 1999 Tipping Fees 5908 96
Projected Interim Year 1999 Franchise Fees $266 68
19. Projected Interim Year 1999 AB939 Fees 592 800
20. Equals Total Projected Interim Year Pass Through costs 51 67 664
21. Projected Percentage Change in Pass Through Costs.
Weighted Change In Controllable Costs
22. Controllable Costs as a Percent of Base Year Revenue Requirements 80.00/0
23. Mulri lied b)Percent change in CPI 0.900/0
24. Equals Weighted Percent Change in Controllable Costs 0.72%
Weighted Change in Pass Through Costs
25. Pass Through Costs as a Percent of Base Yr Revenue Requirements
26. Multi lied biPercent Change in Pass Through Costs
27. Equals Weighted Percent Change in Pass Through.Costs
Total Change
28. Total Percent Change in Cost
29. Divided bv Adjustment:for Franchise Fee(1-6.0 percent) 94.00%
30. Equals Percent change in Existing Rates JL_ 1.72%J
Fiscal Year. 11111999-IM1199 Page 3 of 3
4-11
C Do O m C O ml" b y 03 G �Y3
rt g .i a ft
'+ o o n T• p R X3 O E h C r m m
e r .4 � m � m 0 N :.m 'i w
i Y ° O v. ° P
C Q o e 1�.Y. o' 1r0 r3 0 .l !'' R R R y
th
la N I d 1 tl H W r C1 N 17 x m
o Y mAoo pF{+ �°I F• 0 0d�I Q �
Ob R OSy^ r 06C1 H \ • � Cg m
D O O 4 0 o w R 0 1 0 0 m0 p P 0 p
° n .. W .•' P r r r I r �' S
zz
1 1 .• C RO ' R 6 . a m _ �N
O J 1O 9 i ^ •o 7 O O O ° it
13v° s ° a : : av : v : : p : '
ON 0
O e em C.
im a o eay' "7 r° no
0 0. 1rra .- rNrror ArAr w 9 F^
4 R ' P B w Iri W ti A IOC IQ 010 01 01 0 10 w 1D 1pYp� �w�1 I2 O 'SI C
a m wB m° 0101001 0190 �I w io I"10 mI-- a, w I.7 y I= n n PI
°< n c o o r ^ a
Ulan r Im JJ J 0110 W 001 r p10 O �O
NJNJ r 01WOWbr WOJ 10C m �/� P .j 00I
O O W N co r . .JW .10
W ul
b ro rV) O W W µ C'•'O ° °
u W > ?< 6p r Nrm M Pr01 r !I <' .y O a
^' W :l ° O O Nr :71 r� O JQ QQ b01O W rw
1 1 1G M n w r N .i W V r PI 011Dr r G A J N J 10 � Q r r 1.1 `�" pr ,gyp 0.••
V OI 10 .a. O w W W W w b C 1° •`pmpall V' O N C
Y 0 W m N �iN W OOrobb O
P m o m O vLA A. u •i r W 01 10 • C,C O (7
on o
y y e '�O, aa •� ,e..°' PP N W N Nw Nw bm Q
ar-Ze0 ^0=` 1 b Q�e9 W O cwM p
I
Rt.
C I A fA R
5 e V r 0 N W W N N %00 y m r or v 7 }
� V
A R
0
N A 4 N O I
0 1 1 1 1 • V) V' �} A Al C
n o ° - 0 0 1 1 VO m A N O W A 10 1•] 1D �+ p O N O
•9O A ? ^.Qyr �, b r b ro r [� V Y��I �^�In �i5
7u: o ° ° n
O C a r _.•moo %0 pL r ppR
� pp 00 a
e s 10 v 1 1 ~ p V 7 0 0 0 0 0 10 F•
0 W 1�r 1 1 1 I b
C A W W 01 b O S R / 10
° ° u o f/1
rA+ M " a Y.•a Ara r Q ^
Ln v N 0 O �•� W ale 0f r r Nrror rrAr R O
O W W N b O IA a 01 01 O1 01 V W r y 1
VO m N co m O 1+ 01J0 O
•0 U o Q e V b W OT J W 10
01 10 0 w u A r N N W
r a M M O S
° S w :l
V1 �• . a ° Ar ° r r .+ rNrA �1 rr a a
J1 W 0 r G O co 1-1 01 r O W 01 01 a N W A r A C
as ° Wl` m aollwaa `N10Jw um may'
N66 W u r ;ft :loi.lrmm x 10 •
r1> 01 J r+ NrNrAaAr -^3 �n
O O0rJ rc' O01014101
WOf 01 J0 % rm
OO I
0 . J O 10 0 01 01 01 A b C w C
Om m O O 0 A
I0
W W W J01J 10
a In 40 w
R M r■ yy (((��� � p rp O I
104
p O�
rOWi m 0 N l r 10 (i! ��+ y N J 1 r 1 40 1 A 1 A 1100
M1s1.^ P N o
N R O rm110 r 01m
C
S 0 w O 10 N w W N 0 10 w
all w 1 1 'am 1 1 I 1 w41 9 IN w9
R 4 V r 11 10 01 w O b W w X1••33 6 Q�d O
W 13U. C Q N r Ir 7 0
W .. n g 7 I L'
1 e54 O rm1 7 rq 6o GG H 1. �e
a.
aO �•tl 1 1 VD m 0 1 1 1 1 ww 1>J r
0. n e r u1 O Vi 1G o ► W at tr u)ul
N•G7 11 p�.
3 . ._..- n
0 � A n w p mo ?Ir V 0 0 � SI
o D co %% r m H o ^ p _
O X � °y m m� .p R Nm � � � R � OI 7 a sr
0 03 R M O S h C ^ n l
m r " :90
9 % u mCf m
cw m a m •°�C or rmNS � c m cR m eh N �mm
c1 Z 6
e
m m �' ►�- "` S �° ucu � a ' � ' m em � N p I •'� �=`<
t10 (D Q
o
n mrm o L°
0 o D b p y = m o l 0 0 p O I m M ► + mem Q
mJ c m V4 ft - m - 7mc r • r • r 1 M _
1 mpn Fp: .loi : .loi : o .�f+ om A' o
L16 _Z
v m v n R m 1 0 : n m O e < SI
sy> 6 1
Ilan „ '0 7 '� am 0 : o : 41,
r • r : w :
m b m I. o.. 0 . .
o .l b o um ►' o O be •
CD - m e
me m ab . 40 oo ��: y a" : a : 2-ler0
% m m p g " � I
e P13Rw' m o a m °0
n C C R ly
mr r ►Oim m p \ zz
00 m mn <
yn m µ mr tr T i h °
ao m 1^ 1c \ rr rNrNrr0 as
rrr 3YYYf^
r a e RO -3 a A mmbP. r0 emmmmJmmm r s9
m a 2tem . \\bN bq N � wWNurar lel i o roe
m ° 0 00 � 1 ppau m " r �orromiDrrm � • •� � waS
n m
°o Amrk o rwrrorrrrr
om c
i. W. OJmmmmmbm ry °d. m
Co ■ 0. ZC6xZ to ro0ulmworo0w b W [i', IN
o r@] NW 11N9�
W o , \ c a e \\\\ b . . . . . . b N ..n .
Cl x o pppp m Jln bb I- o: mrm an o
tr ro m 1 110
o v m
N N 1 ro �y m 0 e E m n •.`� C.
n :nrwr rNrNrrrrr nF s Z ^'
g r mrP. r0 O J mmmm mbm r O 1 1�1� ��•`
1 1 b 9 Imy I� b 6 T b r J b [a, W M 01 J IA N w r A b ff r 1.�cT
'1
N P b J V. rJ . . .
O ¢ m b mmr r Vw6N m oN w taw
rm 7 f1 p
wr 4 7 Inm ? r'y� m Hgy CA p9 "2 � `� .
m 7 W �'• � 7 m t . v �("�Q m rtn. o to
m� �� •°�� �m
m m
n7 .7 i•a O 1 1 r 1 r m m e .� "0 I C•,'1
\ pm N n m �pIt
D Ln 0 tr m n p r m r m p r r0 N^
In
c
r
w O
m � mb 1 o1 J 1 w 1 m m'COD
•
a µ m � rr Rw
O
rk
IS
R a tL w er o o yp o 0 0 0 o b F� p ■C
1 .1 b 10 ? 1 I 1 b O p O i
0 mr
P,- ptr • _ w— r— m� m w N N a N m • R �lsJl;
4 mr
C. y ----------- 1— ------ p er
Oz
IImw {0 '1m C x 'am �n r oLAcritl% CulxsLnQul r b Imt'
bP b ? P b nD putt/ v
m {P rb W W r A W J �l
b IbC
0 7 � o rNrNrr 'IQ, I� •Af TI
elDmwmmr ulrm rvl w IL
uw o m / malsm rm �jg romomormJo b {I� ° � ^
om n � � Ybp\m m tRN7e99 wuoi, iorriaN m11D] I^+ m6
g 1 m rrrr 1- NrNrr err Ic g
r m coa40P. rQ awmwmm0Jm rQ
Nbobrwmme 10
a co c & obvlm1•'1 °
h r••' m h• M W'.O
n c a01/ 7 A o
10 m e
m h \ 1 \ b p 1 1 1 1 b
r a p p m m J m w b N m p r�
� h3 I rqq
.P.: O r{>fm1 9 � 1 1 + d H m J m r i W m 1'7 ; '
lo: -M,
COQ m � ..
O C O owl 1 1 b ••!q m w W r s N m �
r 7 b m J r m
0'
ATUCM49RT III
FOR SAN LUIS OBISPO
City of San Luis Obispo
Solid Waste Fee Survey
Section I — Introduction
1. Name of City/County Morro Bay Napa Redding
2 Contact Penson Linda Greg Kelly Larry Miralles
3. Title of Contact Person Coordinator Manager Manager
4. Telephone Number 772-8230 (707)255-5200X502 (530)224-6207 X 5
5. Date Contacted 10-14-99 10-14-99 1 10-15-99
Section II —General Information
6. Are residential curbside
collection and disposal Private Private City
services provided by the
municipality or private
contractor?
7. Is a franchise for refuse
collection granted to the Yes Yes Yes
hauler?
8. is a franchise for recyclable No Yes No .
material collection granted to
the hauler?
9. Is there a franchise fee? Yes Yes 5% No
If so,how much is it?
10. What is the franchise
hauler's disposal cost per 24.45 5% No
ton?
11. Who bills customers? Private Private City
Section III —Residential Service
12 Are residential rates
regulated? Yes Yes Yes
13. What is the monthly charge 33 1 10.00 35 . 22.38 96 al. 14.30
for residential service? $a g
I 6 cans 14.85 64 gal. 13.50
14. How many cans are picked
up at this charge? 2 2
15. What is the charge for 3.00 4.00 13.30
additional carves?
I
I
fiscal Year. Page 1 of 2
4-14
City of San Luis Obispo
Solid Waste Fee Survey
Section III — Residential Service (continued)
16. Is there a separate charge for
yard waste collection? No No No
17. Are there any City-wide
dean-up days provided at Yes Yes Yes
no additional charge by
the hauler?
18. Does your community have
a curbside recycling Yes Yes Yes
program?
19. Is there an additional
charge to residents for this No No No
program,or is it included in
the monthly charge for
solid waste collection?
20. If separate,what is the
charge per month?
Section V— Non-residential Service
i 21. Are non-residential rates
t regulated? Yes Yes Yes
22. Provide the monthly fee for
the following services,
assuming pick-up is one
time
-per week:
23. 1 cubic yard 46.00 122.00 None
24. 1 1l2 cubic yards 57.00 300.00 51.94
25. 2 cubic yards 69.00 386.00 61.57
26. 3 cubic yards 90.00 565.00 85.75
27 6 cubic yards None 1093.00 148.42
28. Effective period of
ratesquoted: 10-99 10-99 10-99
1
i
Fiscal Year. Page 2 of 2
4-15
FOR SAN LUIS OBISPO
City of San Luis Obispo
Solid Waste Fee Survey
Section I— Introduction
1. Name of City/County Sal i nq Monterey de
ro
2 Contact Person Barbara Brenda Carol
3. Title of Contact Person Office Manager Customer Serv. Customer Serv.
4. Telephone Number 831 899-9941 466-3636
5. Date Contacted
F10-14-99 10-14-99 10-15-99
f . Section II—General Information
6. Are residential curbside
I collection and disposal
services provided by the Private Private Private
municipality or private
contractor?
7. Is a franchise for refuse
collection granted to the
hauler'? Yes yes Yes
8. Is a franchise for recyclable
material collection granted to Yes Yes Yes
the hauler?
9. Is there a franchise fee?
If so, how much is it? Yes Don't know Don't ]mow
10. What is the franchise
i hauler's disposal cost per
ton? kon I t know Don't know Don't know
11. Who bills customers? Private Private Private
Section III— Residential Service
12. Are residential rates
regulated? Yes Yes Yes
13. What,is the monthly charge 32 gal. 11.90 13.90 brown/green 32 gal. 11.05
for residential service? 64 gal 21.30
96 gal 28.28
14. How many cans are picked
up at this charge? 2 w/green waste 2 w/ green waste 2 w/green waste
15. What is the charge for 2.60 2.70 4.00
additional cans?
I
7scal Year Page 1 of 2
f
4-16
City of San Luis Obispo
Solid Waste Fee Survey
Section III - Residential Service (continued)
16. Is there a separate charge for
yard waste collection? No No No
17. Are there any City-wide
clean-up days provided at Yes Large items
no additional charge by appointment only No
the hauler?
18. Does your community have
a curbside recycling Yes Yes Yes
program?
19. Is there an additional
charge to residents for this No No No
program,or is it included in
the monthly charge for
solid waste collection?
20. If separate,what is the
charge per month?
Section V - Non-residential Service
21. Are non-residential rates
regulated? Yes Yes Yes
22. Provide the monthly fee for
the following services,
assuming pick-up is one
time-per week:
23. 1 cubic yard 72.50 none 57.85
I 24. 1 1/2 cubic yards None None 68.40
25. 2 cubic yards 131.75 108.87 78.15
26. 3 cubic yards 201.85 163.46 .96.30
j 27. 6 cubic yards 285.00 272.54 149.55
28. Effective period of
ratesquoted: 10-99 10-99 10-99
Fiscal Year. Page 2 of 2
4-17
J