HomeMy WebLinkAbout8263-8274RESOLUTION NO. 8274 (1994 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DENYING A REQUEST FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND PREZONING
FOR A PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF 22.05 ACRES
AT 154 SUBURBAN ROAD (GP /R ANNX 54 -93)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this Council, after consideration of a request to change
the Land Use Element Map from Rural Industrial to Service- Commercial /Light Industrial
and Neighborhood - Commercial, and to prezone the proposed annexation site C -S, C -S -S,
and C -N; and after consideration of the Planning Commission's recommendations, staff
recommendations, public testimony, and reports thereof, makes the following findings:
A) annexation of the project site is premature and should be considered together with
the entire Airport Area Annexation;
B) the proposed in -lieu fee for purchase of open space does not adequately meet the
intent of the General Plan annexation policies; and
C) additional water resources to meet safe annual yield have not been clarified, and
the City should not annex additional land until such time as it has secured additional water
resources sufficient to serve land already within the City, as well as the annexed area.
SECTION 2. Denial. The request for approval of the general plan amendment and
prezoning described above is hereby denied.
R -8274
0
Resolution No. 8274 (1994 Series)
Page No. 2
On motion of Council Member Roalman, seconded by Council Member Settle, and
on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Roalman, Settle, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: Council Members Rappa and Romero
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 1st day of March, 1994.
ATTEST:.
APPROVED:
sit
-Ez fl"I al,"
V" OlFjejeff Argensen
j. cpi
L
J
RESOLUTION 8273 (1994 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO ADOPTING A DEFINITION OF UNMET
TRANSIT NEED AND REASONABLE TO MEET
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has attained a Federal
designation as an "Urban" community, and
WHEREAS, the City's transit operation is now eligible for
Section 9 funding from the Federal Transit Administration, and
WHEREAS, said Section 9 regulations requires the City to adopt
a definition of "Unmet Transit Need" and. "Reasonable to Meet ".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City
of San Luis Obispo does hereby adopt the definitions of "Unmet
Transit Need" and "Reasonable to meet" as appears on attached
Exhibit "A ".
Upon motion of Romero , seconded by Roalman ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Romero, Roalman, Rappa, Settle, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 1st day of March
1994
Mayor g Pinard
unmetreso
R -8273
EXHIBIT "A"
THRESHOLD CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING IF REQUEST IS AN UNMET TRANSIT
NEED
An "unmet transit need" is a mobility need that is: not being
met by the current public transit system; is essential for transit
dependents or choice riders; and has been identified by community
input through the public hearing process; and
If a request fails to satisfy any of the criteria below, stop
the analysis, the request is not an "unmet transit need ".
YES NO
1. The request fills a. gap in transit service.
2. Sufficient broad based community support
exists (15 requests for fixed route•transit
service, 10 requests for *paratransit service.
3. Request is a current, rather than a future need.
4. Request is not operational in nature (minor
route change, bus stop, etc.)
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING IF AN UNMET TRANSIT NEED IS
REASONABLE TO MEET
An unmet transit need is "reasonable to meet" if the new,
expanded, or revised service, if implemented, would not cause SLO
Transit to incur expenditures in excess of available TDA and
Section 9 operating funds, and would meet the required farebox
ratio (20 %) based on projected ridership; and
If a request fails to satisfy any of the criteria below, the
request is not "reasonable to meet ".
5. Request is projected to generate a 2.0 %.farebox
ratio.
6. Service is comparable to other services, or
is a market - driven service.(greater than 40%
projected load /capacity factor).
7.. Request is.fundable with existing TDA /Section 9
funds, without reducing.other existing services.. _
*Provided under Regional Transit agreement
unmetneed/hwI
by
R -8273
����. a� ����
� ��
.�
RESOLUTION NO. 8272 (1994 SERIES)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
SUPPORTING THE CALIFORNIANS FOR PARKS AND WILDLIFE ( CALPAW)
BOND ACT OF 1994
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo finds that providing parks and recreation
services is a vital environmental, social, and economic interest to citizens of our community;
and
WHEREAS, a coalition of community and conservation groups, business and labor,
historic preservation and other organizations have undertaken a volunteer community based
effort to place a park, recreation, and wildlife General Obligation Bond Act on the June,
1994 ballot; and
WHEREAS, the bond act will provide needed facilities for the enhancement of our
community, including urban forestry, parks and recreation facilities, historic preservation,
and a wide variety of other programs; and
WHEREAS, CALPAW '94 includes funding for at -risk youth facilities, in order to
reduce crime, drug activity, and gang violence in our community; and
WHEREAS, passage of CALPAW '94 will bring over $22 million dollars worth of
parks, recreation, and wildlife preservation projects to San Luis Obispo County; and
WHEREAS, thousands of jobs will be created with passage of this bond,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of San Luis Obispo endorses
the CALPAW '94 Initiative which will be on the June 1994 ballot.
Upon motion of Settle , seconded by
following roll call vote:
Roalman
and on the
AYES: Council Members Settle, Roalman, Rappa, Romero and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None 8_8272
Resolution No. 8272 (1994 Series)
Page 2 =
the foregoing resolution was adopted this'. isuday of jjarc4 1994.
ToLr_(
ATTEST:
wo: mw 4
.... •
\g:calpaw
vv- n��v
vyo-
C�
C
RESOLUTION NO.8271 (1994 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ENDORSING THE ELECTRONIC VILLAGE CONCEPT AND CO- SPONSORING
THE ELECTRONIC VILLAGE FORUM
WHEREAS, the City's mission is to provide quality programs that serve the
community and provide each citizen with the opportunity to participate in the life of the
City; and
WHEREAS, the local, national and global community is developing information
networks which permit electronic communication between the private sector, government,
education institutions, and citizens; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, Cal Poly State
University , Cuesta College, County Office of Education, San Luis Coastal Unified School
District, and many community businesses have individually identified the need for integrated
electronic communication within their environments; and
WHEREAS, these organizations desire to develop means of community
communication beyond their traditional boundaries;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo, in cooperation with the County of San Luis Obispo, Cal Poly State University San
Luis Obispo, Cuesta College, the County Office of Education, San Luis Coastal Unified
School District, and the San Luis Obispo Chamber of Commerce on behalf of the business
sector:
SECTION 1. The City will co- sponsor with the Chamber of Commerce, Cal Poly and
the County of San Luis Obispo an electronic village forum to be held at the Pacific Suites
Hotel on March 31, 1994 and will contribute $500 toward the forum and encourage Council,
staff and citizen participation.
SECTION 2. The City will - within the limits of its own data communication system -
include electronic data interchange as an, additional means for providing information to the
public.
SECTION 3. The City will support cooperative endeavors between business entities,
government agencies and educational institutions to conduct business activities using existing
communication networks.
SECTION 4. The City will incorporate electronic communication with other
community organizations as a part of its future organizational strategic planning efforts.
R -8271
Resolution No. 8271
Page 4
On motion of Settle ,seconded by Roalman
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Settle, Roalman, Rappa, Romero, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 1st day of March . 1994.
SAT 17EST:
D%a0e Gladvkll, Clerk
(APPROVED:
/1111 Jor nseA City Attorney
Mayor P6k Pinard
,d ��-
p/p �PE%b E
x,
rX
III
N
L�
RESOLUTION NO. 8270 (1994 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ACTION,
THEREBY APPROVING A USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A JEWISH SYNAGOGUE
AT 2211 JOHNSON AVENUE (U 135 -93)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after consideration of the staff report,
public testimony, the appellants' statements and the Planning Commission's action, denies
the appeal based on the following findings:
1. Because of the small size of the congregation and the infrequency of its use of
the site, the proposed temple use will not adversely affect the health, safety and
welfare of persons living or working at the site or in the vicinity.
2. The temple use is appropriate at the proposed location and will be compatible
with surrounding land uses because potential noise and visual impacts can be
effectively addressed through architectural review.
3. The proposed uses conform to the general plan and meet zoning ordinance
requirements.
4. The proposed off -site and joint use parking is appropriate at the proposed
location, being within the prescribed 300 feet from the uses and not separated
from the uses by any feature which would make pedestrian access inconvenient
or hazardous.
5. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared by the Community Development
Department on December 3, 1993, which describes. significant environmental
impacts associated with project development. The Negative Declaration
concludes that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the
environment subject to the following mitigation measures being incorporated into
the project:
a. In its review and consideration of the required use permit, the
Planning Commission shall consider including conditions limiting
hours of operation and the maximum occupancy of the building to
reduce potential land use conflicts. Site development plans shall be
reviewed by the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) to evaluate
1
City Council Resolution No. 8210 (1994 Series)
Page 2
building design, parking lot development, lighting proposals and
landscaping plans for buffering and screening between the project site
and adjoining lots.
b. To minimize conflicts in turning movements from the site, the
existing driveway approach shall be removed and replaced with
gutter and sidewalk to the approval of the City Engineer.
C. The applicant shall provide compensatory. tree planting for mature
trees to be removed, at the rate of two 24 -inch box specimens for
each tree removed, with species and placement to the approval of the
City Arborist and the Architectural Review Commission.
6. The City Council hereby adopts the above - referenced mitigated negative
declaration of environmental impact, with the following modifications:
a. The Council has reviewed and considered whether to require
limitations on hours of operation and maximum occupancy and finds
that there is no substantial evidence in the record that it is necessary
to require any such mitigation to reduce potential land use conflicts
(mitigation a).
b. Because the council has modified the project and conditioned it to
prohibit on -site parking (except limited handicapped spaces), and to
prohibit access via the common access easement and driveway,
mitigation b of the negative declaration is not necessary.
SECTION 2. Action. Application No. U 135 -93 is hereby approved, subject to
the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall submit an application for architectural review prior to
occupancy which includes specifics on building design, handicap parking location
and design, lighting proposals and landscaping plans for buffering and screening
between the project site and adjoining lots. The Architectural Review
Commission shall review the project for neighborhood compatibility issues,
including privacy, density, massing, scale and noise impacts.
2. The site shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner. All plant materials
shall be maintained and replaced as necessary. Required landscaping plans shall
include a plan detailing automatic irrigation systems for all formal landscaped
areas.
3. The project shall include facilities for interior and exterior recycling. The
applicant shall consult with local recyclers regarding the size and location of
areas dedicated to on -site recycling storage.
C 10
City Council Resolution No. 8270 (1994 Series)
Page 3
4. The applicant shall submit an agreement to the City for review, approval and
recordation indicating that a minimum of 28 off -site parking spaces will be
available at all times at 1551 Bishop Street for the Temple Ner Shalom for a
period of at least five years, with a minimum five year option to extend. Upon
its expiration or sooner termination of the agreement, or if off -site parking is not
available, the applicant shall notify the Community Development Director in
writing, and the temple use which the off -site parking serves shall cease, unless
other off -site parking is made, or on -site parking is provided in compliance with
City standards. There shall be no on -site parking other than for handicapped
spaces, which shall be located on the existing driveway area, with access only
from the existing curb cut directly serving that driveway area.
5. The common access easement and driveway (MS 91 -145) shall not be used for
access to the temple site, or for any temple activities.
6. The applicant shall submit a parking demand management plan for review and
approval by the Community Development Director.
7. The Planning Commission shall review the project in one year.
On motion of Council Member Settle, seconded by Council Member Roalman, and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Settle, Roalman, Romero, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: Council Member Rappa
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 15th day of February, 1994.
C�
City Council Resolution No. 8270 (1994 Series)
Page 4
Q FWsM V;wCA A---' =A.-I
ATTEST:
` Ci + Clerk Di a a R. Gla ll
I\ 2 J:Z9]1F/ 0
ff4fA�r-m—
0
�t
Y\
V �� ✓k
�� t�t
RESOLUTION NO. 8269 (1994 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
SETTING FEES FOR PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City's municipal code authorizes establishing various fees for the
delivery of municipal services; and
WHEREAS, the cost of providing various public safety services has been
comprehensively reviewed by Vertex Cost Systems and by the staff, and
WHEREAS, the public safety fees provided in Exhibit 1 (fire fees) and Exhibit 2
(police fees) are consistent with the user fee cost recovery policy set forth in the 1993 -95
Financial Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Council held a noticed public hearing concerning these proposed
fees on February 1, 1994;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo that:
SECTION 1. The fee schedule for public safety services provided in Exhibits 1 and
2 attached hereto is hereby adopted effective March 1, 1994.
SECTION 2. Consistent with adopted cost recovery policies, all public safety fees
will be reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis. Accordingly, the fees set forth in
Exhibits 1 and 2 will be adjusted annually on July 1 of each year by annual changes in the
consumer price index (all urban consumers for the Los Angeles -. Long Beach - Anaheim
area) for the most recent period that this information is available prior to July 1st; and a
comprehensive analysis of public safety fees similar to that prepared by Vertex Cost Systems
should be made at least every five years.
SECTION 3. To ensure cost recovery for services not specifically referenced in
Exhibits 1 and 2 for supplemental or additional services as may be required, charges will be
based on actual labor, material, equipment, and indirect costs. In determining labor costs,
hourly billing rates will be established by the Director of Finance which appropriately reflect
salary, benefit, and overhead costs. In determining equipment usage costs, the equipment
rental schedule developed by the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS)
or similar authoritative source for equipment costs will be used. For services provided by
the City through private contract not specifically set forth in Exhibits 1 and 2, the contract
price plus 100/c for City contract administration will be used in establishing the service
charge.
SECTION 4. If any charge set forth in this resolution or the application thereof to
any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, such invalidity will not affect any other
charge or application thereof, and to this end the charges established in this Resolution are
declared to be severable.
0 . . O
Resolution No. 8269 (1994 Series)
Page 2
SECTION 5. Refunds of any portion of fees for withdrawn or partially completed
services shall be determined by the Fire Chief or Police Chief based on her or his appraisal
of the cost of the staff work already performed.
SECTION 6. Effective March 1, 1994, Resolutions No. 5614, 6139, and 6784 are
hereby rescinded along with all other fee schedules in conflict herewith.
On motion of Rappa , seconded by Romero ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Rappa, Romero, Roalman, and Mayor Pnard
NOES: Council Member Settle
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 1st_ day of Fehrnary , 1994.
ATTEST-
i .d
APPROVED:-
G. rgrn, Vy Attorney
AGR \FEESPUB2.WP
Mayor 1'
Exnlbft.�
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FIRE DEPARTMENT
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANS FEE SCIMULE
Initial Inspection /Administration Fee $265.00
Annual Permit Renewal
Additional Tank Fee $ 85.00
Owner /Operator Transfer Fee $ 45.00
Plan-Check Fee $ 70.00
New Installation Permit - Field Review $105.00
Plan submittal required for permit;
includes a minimun of 3 site visits
per tank. Additional site visits subject
to additional fee.
Tank Removal Permit $ 70.00
Plan submittal required for permit;
includeds a minimum of 2 site visits
per tank. Addition site visits subject
to additional fee.
Phase II Vapor Recovery Modification $ 70.00
Excavation Above or Near Flammable Liquids
Pipeline $ 70.00
Monitoring Well- Drilling Permit Contact County
Plan submittal required. Health Department
State Surcharge Permit Fee $ 56.00 (per tank)
(Fee set by State)
Additional Site Inspection Fee $ 40.00 (per hour)
SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT
HAZARDOUS OCCUPANCY PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE
(Renewable Annually)
1.
Aircraft Refueling Vehicles
$ 70.00
2.
Aircraft Repair Hangar
70.00
3.
Automobile Wrecking Yard
70.00
4.
Bonfire or Rubbish Fires
70.00
5.
Bowling Pin or Alley Refinishing
70.00
6,
Burning in Public Place
70.00
7.
Candles or Open - Flames in Assembly Areas
70.00
8.
Cellulose Nitrate Storage (handle /store over 100 cubic ft.)
70.00
9.
Combustible Fiber Storage (handle /store over 100 cubic ft.)
70.00
10.
Compressed Gases:
A) Non - flammable: More than 6,000 cubic feet
70.00
B) Flammable: More than 200 cubic feet
70.00
11.
Cyrogens:
A) Inside Building
1) Flammable - over 1 gallon
70.00
2) Oxidizer (includes oxygen) over 50 gallons
70.00
3) Corrosive or Highly Toxic - over 1 gallon
70.00
4) Non - Flammable - over 60 gallons
70.00
B) Outside Building
1) Flammable - over 60 gallons
70.00
2) Oxidizer (includes oxygen)
70.00
3) Corrosive or Highly Toxic - over 1 gallon
70.00
4) Non - flammable - over 500 gallons
70.00
12.
Dry Cleaning Plant
70.00
A) Using Flammable Liquids
70.00
B) Using Non- flammable Liquids
70.00
13.
Dust Producing Operation
70.00
14.
Explosives or Blasting Agents
70.00
A) Engine Standby
185.00 hr
15.
Fireworks
70.00
16.
Flammable /Combustible Liquid Pipeline Operation /Excavation
70.00
17.
Flammable or Combustible Liquids
A) Inside - Class I (over 5 gallons)
70.00
Class II & III (over 25 gallons)
70.00
B) Outside - Class I (over 10 gallons)
70.00
Class II & III (over 60 gallons)
70.00
18.
Fruit Repening - Ethylene Gas Process
70.00
19.
Fumigation or Thermal Insecticidal Fogging
70.00
20.
Garages - Repair
70.00
PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE - continued
21. Hazardous Chemicals:
A) Cyrogenics (any amount)
$ 70.00
B) Highly Toxic Materials (any amount)
70.00
C) Hypergolic Materials (any amount)
70.00
D) Organic Peroxides (over 10 lbs.)
70.00
E) Poison Gas (any amount)
70.00
F) Pyrophoric Materials (any amount)
70.00
G) Any combination of amounts stated above
180.00
H) Hazardous Materials Business Plan (fee includes
any hazardous materials fees)
See Table I
22.
Highly Toxic Pesticides (storage of any amount)
70.00
23.
High - Piled Combustible Stock - exceeding 2,500 sq. ft.
70.00
24.
Junk Yards
70.00
25.
Liquified Petroleum Gas
A) Containers more than 119 gallons water capacity
70.00
B) Tank Vehicles for Transportation of LP Gas
70.00
26.
Lumberyard - Storage in excess of 100,000 board feet
70.00
27.
Magnesium Working - Process more than 10 lbs daily
70.00
28.
Mall (covered)
A) Place or construct temporary kiosk, display booths,
concession equipment or the like, in the mall
70.00
B) Use the mall as a place of assembly
70.00
C) Use open -flames or flame - producing device
70.00
D) Display any liquid or gas - fueled power equipment
70.00
E) Use liquified petroleum gas, liquified natural gas
and compressed flammable gas in a mall
70.00
29.
Matches - Manufacture /Store in excess of 60 matchman gross
(14,004 each gross)
70.00
30.
Nitrate Film - Store, handle, use or display
70.00
31.
Oil and Natural Gas Wells (drill, own /operate or maintain)
70.00
32.
Open Flame Devices in Marines
A) Use open -flame devices for maintenance or repair
of boats, slips or wharfs
70.00
B) Use a portable barbecue, brazier or working device
on any boat, slip or wharf
70.00
33.
Organic Coatings - manufacture over 1 gallon a day
70.00
34.
Ovens - Industrial, Baking and Drying
70.00
35.
Places of Assembly
70.00
36.
Radioactive Material (store or handle - see UFC for amounts)
70.00
37.
Refrigeration Equipment - Mechanical refrigeration (see UFC
for most common refrigerants)
70.00
38.
Spraying or Dipping
70.00
39.
Tank Vehicles for Transportation of Flammable and Combustible
Liquids
70.00
40.
Tents and Air- supported Structures - excess of 200 sq. ft.
70.00
PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE - continued
41.
Tire Re- capping
$ 70.00
42.
Underground Storage Tanks
2
3
A) Facility Inspection /administration fee - 1 tank
265.00
6
B) Additional Tank Fee
85.00
1001 -5000
C) Transfer Fee (owner)
45.00
1001 -5000
D) Plan-Check Fee (new facility)
70.00
55 -1000
E) Site Inspection /test fee (new facilities)
105.00
55 -1000
F) Tank Removal Permit (plan submittal required)
70.00
GAS - Cubic
Ft.
G) Monitoring Well Drilling (obtain from County Health
N/A
5001 & up
Department)
1001 -5000
5001 & up
H) Phase II Vapor Recovery
70.00
$250.00
I) Excavation, Flammable -liquid pipeline
70.00
$300.00
J) Additional Site Inspection Fee
40.00 hr
43.
Waste Material Plant
70.00
44.
Welding and Cutting Operations - Any Occupancy
70.00
NOTE: Any combination of the above permits shall not exceed $180 except for permits
requiring apparatus and personnel stand -by time, permits for underground hazardous
material storage and permits for Business Release Response Plans and Inventory.
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS BUSINESS PLAN FEE SCHEDULE
Table 1
QUANTITY
1- 5 CHEMICALS
6 OR MORE CHEMICALS
Category
1
2
3
4
5
6
SOLID -
Pounds
500 -1000
1001 -5000
5001 & up
500 -1000
1001 -5000
5001 & up
LIQUID -
Gallons
55 -1000
1001 - 10,000
10,001 & up
55 -1000
1001- 10,000
10,001 & up
GAS - Cubic
Ft.
200 -1000
1001 -5000
5001 & up
500 -1000
1001 -5000
5001 & up
Fees
$120.00
$250.00
$350.00
$180.00
$300.00
$350.00
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FIRE DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW FEES
A 12.5% fire protection surcharge shall be added to all construction permit and plan check fees
collected by the Building and Safety Divison that require Fire Department review.
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FIRE DEPARTMENT
FIRE EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL STAND -BY FEES
Fire Engine /Ladder Truck
Two (2) employees $ 85.00 per hour
Equipment charge $100.0 0 per hour
$185.00 per hour
Squad or Light Rescue Equipment
Two (2) employees $ 75.00 per hour*
Equipment charge 75,00 per hour
$150.00 per hour
Fire Investigation /Fire Prevention
One (1) employee $ 40.00 per hour*
Firefighter Standby
One (1) employee $40.00 per hour*
Administrative/Clerical
One (1) Personnel $ 27.00 per hour*
*All personnel costs are determined by the Director of Finance
G:\C0MM0N\ADM1N\WP\WKM1.FEE
Ci C
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FIRE DEPARTMENT
FALSE ALARM FEES
FALSE ALARMS:
False alarms from an alarm system which are excessive as described in this section shall be
grounds for suspension or revocation of the alarm users permit. In each case, the responsible
department shall conduct an investigation and keep accurate records as to the cause of the alarm.
A. Fire Alarms.
1. False fire alarms shall be considered excessive when they exceed the following
number:
a. Two false alarms in any thirty-day period;
b. Three false alarms in any three- hundred- sixty-five day period.
2. False alarms exceeding the number indicated in the
corresponding time period shall be subject to a service charge
of seventy-five dollars to be charged to the alarm user of the
alarm system. Charges are payable to the finance director
within sixty days of notification that such charges are. due.
Failure to pay the assessment within the prescribed time period
shall result in the suspension of the alarm user permit and
disconnecting of services.
SAN LUIS, OBISPO
POLICE DEPARTMENT
User Fee Schedule"
Charges for reproduction of certain documents and /or reports,
including those specified in the California Vehicle Code:
■ Minimum charge (includes first four pages)
■ Each page thereafter
2. Departmental fingerprint service charges:
(Plus any mandated State or Federal fees)
■ Per card (Currently per first two cards, additional $1.50 per)
Attachment A
CURRENT PROPOSED
$5.00 $10.00
.50 $1.00
$5.00 $5.00 /card
3. Charges for information as required by Government code section 6254(f)(i) and (2):
■ Forms completion $10.00 $14.00
■ Archival searches - per hour (1 hour minimum) $15.00 $27.00
(Includes computer searches)
4. Handling charges for return of reproduced document and materials:
■ Less than 4 ounces $1.00 $2.50
■ More than 4 ounces $3.50 $5.00
5. Processing charge for return of property taken for safekeeping:
■ Processing & maintenance fee * $10.00
6. Clearance letters: $3.00 $10.00
7. Duplication of photographs:
■ In -house duplication costs plus processing fee (first sheet) $5.00 $10.00
(proof sheet) $5.00 $10.00
■ Duplication costs (contractor) plus fee $3.00 $8.00
8. Concealed weapons permits:
■ F.P.S. processing
$5.00
$5.00 /card
■ Admin /support cost
$15.75
$13.50
■ Investigative costs
$68.00
$80.00
■ Permit fee
$3.00
$3.00
■ Renewal
$30.00
$30.00
9. Massage license processing /investigation:
■ F.P.S._ processing
$5.00
$5.00 /card
■ Admin /support cost
$15.75
$13.50
■ Investigative costs
$68.00
$80.00
■ Renewal
$25.00
$25.00
10. Miscellaneous charges:
■ Local record information (13322 P.C.)
$25.00
$27.00
■ Impound vehicle releases
$5.00
$10.00
■ Stored vehicle releases
*
$10.00
■ Record sealings (851.8 P.C.)
■ Administrative Investigations (1 hour min)
11. Solicitor permits:
■ Initial investigations
■ Follow -up required
12. Adult entertainment permit:
(per 5.40.050 SLOMC)
■ Permit fee
M Inspection fee
i Renewal
13. Cost recovery programs:
A. DUI cost recovery:
■ Officer costs - per hour
■ Vehicle costs
B. Nuisance abatement (per 9.25.150 SLOMC) (Actual Costs):
■ Officer costs - per hour
■ Unit costs
® Plus Administrative costs
C. Alarm permits (per 15.12.060 SLOMC):
■ Permit
® Renewal
■ Excessive alarms
D. Second response cost recovery
(per 9.21.030 -050 SLOMC)
■ Officer costs - per hour
■ Vehicle costs
E. Taxi permit:
(per 5.20.010/5.20.210 SLOMC)
■ FPS processing
■ Permit fee
■ Plus any state mandated fees
F. Electronic game center permit:
(per 5.52.020 SLOMC)
■ Permit
■ Inspection
® Renewal
4th -
5th -
All others -
* Note: This is a new fee.
** Does not include any mandated state /federal fees, unless otherwise noted.
$27.00
$80.00
i..l 11
$25.00
$60.00
$25.00
As determined by
Finance Director
As determined by
Finance Director
$30.00
$30.00
$25.00
$50.00
$100.00
As determined by
Finance Director
$10.00 /card
$33.00
$40.00
$40.00
$25.00
c/ 0
V
JZ
c, S \CA \
CAO REPORT TRAM-,,tAITTAL �-
This form should be completed in legible handwriting.
Date Received
PURPOSE (Check one —see reverse side for required documentation) — —9
Admin Use Only —
0 Authorize Invitation for Bids (IFB) or Request for Proposals (RFP)
After CAO approval, the City Clerk will return the original submittal package to the initiating department and publish the
notice inviting bids or requesting proposals. Printing and distributing the IFB or RFP package to prospective bidders is the
responsibility of the initiating department.
Recommended Vendor
Award Contract
After C40 approval the City Clerk will make two (?) copies of the complete transmittal (excluding the proposed
agreement and the bidder's proposal if it is a large, separately bound document) and distribute as follows: original to be
retained by the City Clerk; one (1) copy to Finance: and one (1) copy to the initiating department.
Are there any special award circumstances? Yes No
Ifyes. a CAO Report describing therm should be attached
® Other Action Requiring CAO Approval (See reverse side for description)
The initiating department should indicate in this space the appropriate distribution after CAO approval.
Police Department Building & Safety
Fire Department
Finance Department
REQUEST SUMMARY
Report Title
Specification No.*
Safety Fee Increases
-initiating
Date
Department
Department Head Approval
Transmittal Date
Finance Department
William C. Statler
5/17/94
Financial Plan Reference
Bud ct
Bid Estimate
Bid Amount
S
S
IS
' All formal IFB or RFPpackages must be assigned a specification number by the City Clerk's Office before submitting this form.
APPROVALS (Check appropriate box if review is reguired—sce reverse side for euidance)
Routing will occur in the order listed unless otherwise noted by a initiating de rtment.
REVIEWER COMMENTS Attach additional pages as necessary
City Clerk use only — IFB or RFP oackaras and contracts
Received By
-
�i�i�
Date
I PA
namij
Routing will occur in the order listed unless otherwise noted by a initiating de rtment.
REVIEWER COMMENTS Attach additional pages as necessary
City Clerk use only — IFB or RFP oackaras and contracts
Received By
Date Mile Rcf No.
I City Clerk I
Date
_t C7
INSTRUCT
See Section 735 of the
ONS `
Management Manual
for preparing and processing CAO Reports.
AUIHUKIZL 11413 UK K1Y 11KUI:J4bb KLUUIKJ41J Al IAl.l1MI4N lb
EJCAO Report authorizing invitation forbids or request for proposals process
Bidders list
Invitation for bids (IFB) or request for proposal (RFP) package
See Section 350 of the Financial Management Manual for information regarding the City's standard IFB and RFP documents.
• Check box ifrequired documentation is attached
AWAKIJ C:UN IKAC:1 — RP-QUIMPAJ All
ElSummary matrix of bids or proposals received
Original of the bidder's proposal document
Return original of all unsuccessful proposals directly to the City Clerk's Office
Original of the proposed agreement
Copy of CAO or Council Agenda Report originally authorizing IFB or RFP process
Budget Amendment Request form
This maynot be required for operating expenditures such as supplies, equipment. or operating maintenance services where
sufficient budgetary authorization for the purchase already exists.
CAO Report describing special award circumstances
This memorandum is ONLY required when there are special circumstances regarding the recommended contract award.
Generally, this would include: any recommended award that is not based on the lowest cost proposal received or is in excess of
the approved bid estimate: warren in bid requirements: rejection of bids: and RFP approaches to the purchasing process.
• Check box ifrequired documentation is attached
ULJC:KIYIIL)N Ul UTHLK ALAWNS KLUUI KIN U CAU /WrKUVAL
• Organizational changes and any related reclassifications
• Requests to fill vacant positions if "hiring freeze" is in place
• Budget requests such as the use of ventures & contingencies or operating program carry—over
• Other significant management or policy decisions
UUl1JL1UK WHhN 1)P -FAKI ML"NIALIfLV111 W lb UbUALLI
Other Operating Departments
City Engineer
Personnel
Finance
City Attorney
Assistant CAO and CAO
Two spaces are provided for the concurrence of other
departments affected by the recommended action
0- Construction projects
Actions thataffect staffing, labor relations, or deviate from
standard insurance requirements
0- Requests lhat affect the Citys financial condition, revenues,
budget appropriations, or purchasing procedures
Contracts & other actions µith significant legal implications
w All CAO Reports
• 3
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dunn, City Administrative Officer
FROM: William C. Statler, Director of Finance a
Prepared by: Linda Asprion, Revenue Manager] /jf�
SUBJECT: SAFETY FEE INCREASES �/
RECOMMENDATION
Implement safety fee increases to be effective July 1, 1994 as adopted by Council pursuant to
Resolution No. 8269.
DISCUSSION
In February 1994, Council adopted Resolution No. 8269 which provides for safety fees to be:
"...adjusted annually on July 1 of each year by annual changes in the consumer price
index (all urban consumers for the Los Angeles -Long Beach - Anaheim area) for the
most recent period that this information is available prior to July 1st..."
In accordance with the adopted Resolution, the 1994 safety fees have been increased by 1.8%
which is the CPI -U increase for the prior year ending March 31, 1994. The increased fees for
the Fire and Police Departments are attached in Exhibits A and B. All fees have been rounded
to the nearest $1.00 or $0.05 as appropriate.
CONCURRENCE
The Police and Fire Departments concur with this recommendation.
EXHIBITS
A. Fire Department Fee Schedule
B. Police Department Fee Schedule
C. CPI -U for March 31, 1994
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FIRE DEPARTMENT
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEE SCEOEDULE
Initial Inspection /Administration Fee $270.00
Annual Permit Renewal
Additional Tank Fee $ 86.55
Owner /Operator Transfer Fee $ 45.80
Plan -Check Fee $ 71.25
New Installation Permit - Field Review $107.00
Plan submittal required for permit;
includes a minimun of 3 site visits
per tank. Additional site visits subject
to additional fee.
Tank Removal Permit $ 71.25
Plan submittal required for permit;
includeds a minimum of 2 site visits
per tank. Addition site visits subject
to additional fee.
Phase II Vapor Recovery Modification $ 71.25
Excavation Above or Near Flammable Liquids
Pipeline $ 71.25
Exhibit ....
Monitoring Well - Drilling Permit Contact County
Plan submittal required. Health Department
State Surcharge Permit Fee $ 56.00 (per tank)
(Fee set by State)
Additional Site Inspection Fee $ 40.70 (per hour)
SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT
HAZARDOUS OCCUPANCY PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE
(Renewable Annually)
1.
Aircraft Refueling Vehicles
$ 71.25
2.
Aircraft Repair Hangar
71.25
3.
Automobile Wrecking Yard
71.25
4.
Bonfire or Rubbish Fires.
71.25
5.
Bowling Pin or Alley Refinishing
71.25
6.
Burning in Public Place
71.25
7.
Candles or Open - Flames in Assembly Areas
71.25
8.
Cellulose Nitrate Storage (handle /store over 100 cubic ft.)
71.25
9.
Combustible Fiber Storage (handle /store over 100 cubic ft.)
71.25
10.
Compressed Gases:
A) Non - flammable: More than 6,000 cubic feet
71.25
B) Flammable: More than 200 cubic feet
71.25
11.
Cyrogens:
A) Inside Building
1) Flammable - over 1 gallon
71.25
2) Oxidizer (includes oxygen) over 50 gallons
71.25
3) Corrosive or Highly Toxic - over 1 gallon
71.25
4) Non - Flammable - over 60 gallons
71.25
B) Outside Building
1) Flammable - over 60 gallons
71.25
2) Oxidizer (includes oxygen)
71.25
3) Corrosive or Highly Toxic - over 1 gallon
71.25
4) Non - flammable - over 500 gallons
71.25
12.
Dry Cleaning Plant
71.25
A) Using Flammable Liquids
71.25
B) Using Non - flammable Liquids
71.25
13.
Dust Producing Operation
71.25
14.
Explosives or Blasting Agents
71.25
A) Engine Standby
188.35 hr
15.
Fireworks
71.25
16.
Flammable /Combustible Liquid Pipeline Operation/Excavation
71.25
17.
Flammable or Combustible Liquids
A) Inside - Class I (over 5 gallons)
71.25
Class H & III (over 25 gallons)
71.25
B) Outside - Class I (over 10 gallons)
71.25
Class II & III (over 60 gallons)
71.25
18.
Fruit Repening - Ethylene Gas Process
71.25
19.
Fumigation or Thermal Insecticidal Fogging
71.25
20.
Garages - Repair
71.25
PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE - continued
21. Hazardous Chemicals:
A) Cyrogenics (any amount)
$ 71.25
B) Highly Toxic Materials (any amount)
71.25
C) Hypergolic Materials (any amount)
71.25
D) Organic Peroxides (over 10 lbs.)
71.25
E) Poison Gas (any amount)
71.25
F) Pyrophoric Materials (any amount)
71.25
G) Any combination of amounts stated above
183.25
H) Hazardous Materials Business Plan (fee includes
any hazardous materials fees)
See Table I
22.
Highly Toxic Pesticides (storage of any amount)
71.25
23.
High -Piled Combustible Stock - exceeding 2,500 sq. ft.
71.25
24.
Junk Yards
71.25
25.
Liquified Petroleum Gas
A) Containers more than 119 gallons water capacity
71.25
B) Tank Vehicles for Transportation of LP Gas
71.25
26.
Lumberyard - Storage in excess of 100,000 board feet
71.25
27.
Magnesium Working - Process more than 10 lbs daily
71.25
28.
Mall (covered)
A) Place or construct temporary kiosk, display booths,
concession equipment or the like, in the mall .
71.25
B) Use the mall as a place of assembly
71.25
C) Use open -flames or flame - producing device
71.25
D) Display any liquid or gas - fueled power equipment
71.25
E) Use liquified petroleum gas, liquified natural gas
and compressed flammable gas in a mall
71.25
29.
Matches - Manufacture /Store in excess of 60 matchman gross
(14,004 each gross)
71.25
30.
Nitrate Film - Store, handle, use or display
71.25
31.
Oil and Natural Gas Wells (drill, own/operate or maintain)
71.25
32.
Open Flame Devices in Marines
A) Use open -flame devices for maintenance or repair
of boats, slips or wharfs
71.25
B) Use a portable barbecue, brazier or working device
on any boat, slip or wharf
71.25
33.
Organic Coatings - manufacture over 1 gallon a day
71.25
34.
Ovens - Industrial, Baking and Drying
71.25
35.
Places of Assembly
71.25
36.
Radioactive Material (store or handle - see UFC for amounts)
71.25
37.
Refrigeration Equipment - Mechanical refrigeration (see UFC
for most common refrigerants)
71.25
38.
Spraying or Dipping
71.25
39.
Tank Vehicles for Transportation of Flammable and Combustible
Liquids
71.25
40.
Tents and Air - supported Structures - excess of 200 sq. ft.
71.25
PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE - continued
41.
Tire Re- capping
$ 71.25
42.
Underground Storage Tanks
2
3
A) Facility Inspection/administration fee - 1 tank
270.00
6
B) Additional Tank Fee
86.55
1001 -5000
C) Transfer Fee (owner)
45.80
1001 -5000
D) Plan-Check Fee (new facility)
71.25
55 -1000
E) Site Inspection/test fee (new facilities)
107.00
55 -1000
F) Tank Removal Permit (plan submittal required)
71.25
GAS - Cubic
Ft.
G) Monitoring Well Drilling (obtain from County Health
N/A
5001 & up
Department)
1001 -5000
5001 & up
H) Phase II Vapor Recovery
71.25
$254.50
1) Excavation, Flammable- liquid pipeline
71.25
$305.40
J) Additional Site Inspection Fee
40.70 hr
43.
Waste Material Plant
71.25
44.
Welding and Cutting Operations - Any Occupancy
71.25
NOTE: Any combination of the above permits shall not exceed $183.25 except for permits
requiring apparatus and personnel stand -by time, permits for underground hazardous
material storage and permits for Business Release Response Plans and Inventory.
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS BUSINESS PLAN FEE SCHEDULE
Table 1
QUANTITY
1- 5 CHEMICALS
6 OR MORE CHEMICALS
Category
1
2
3
4
5
6
SOLID -
Pounds
500 -1000
1001 -5000
5001 & up
500 -1000
1001 -5000
5001 & up
LIQUID -
Gallons
55 -1000
1001- 10,000
10,001 & up
55 -1000
1001- 10,000
10,001 & up
GAS - Cubic
Ft.
200 -1000
1001 -5000
5001 & up
500 -1000
1001 -5000
5001 & up
Fees
$122.15
$254.50
$356.30
$183.25
$305.40
$305.40
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FIRE DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW FEES
A 12.5% fire protection surcharge shall be added to all construction permit and plan check fees
collected by the Building and Safety Division that require Fire Department review.
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FIRE DEPARTMENT
FIRE EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL STAND -BY FEES
Fire Engine/Ladder Truck
Two (2) employees $ 85.00 per hour*
Equipment charge $100.00 per hour
$185.00 per hour
Squad or Light Rescue Equipment.
Two (2) employees S 75.00 per hour*
Equipment charge 75.00 per hour
$150.00 per hour
Fire Investiaation/Fire Prevention
One (1) employee $ 40.00 per hour*
Firefighter Standby
One (1) employee $ 40.00 per hour*
Administrative /Clerical
One (1) Personnel $ 27.00 per hour*
* All personnel costs are determined by the Director of Finance
It is anticipated that these hourly rates will change in August, 1994, after labor
negotiations are fmalized.
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FIRE DEPARTMENT
FALSE ALARM FEES
FALSE ALARMS:
False alarms from an alarm system which are excessive as described in this section shall be
grounds for suspension or revocation of the alarm users permit. In each case, the responsible
department shall conduct an investigation and keep accurate records as to the cause of the alarm.
A. Fire Alarms.
False fire alarms shall be considered excessive when they meet or exceed the
following number:
a. Two false alarms in any thirty -day period;
b. Three false alarms in any three- hundred - sixty -day period.
2. False alarms exceeding the number indicated in the corresponding time period
shall be subject to a service charge of seventy -six dollars and thirty-five cents
($76.35), to be charged to the alarm user of the alarm system. Charges are
payable to the finance director within sixty days of notification that such
charges are due. Failure to pay the assessment within the prescribed time
period shall result in the suspension of the alarm user permit and
disconnecting of services.
Exhobid.
SAN LUIS OBISPO
POLICE DEPARTMENT
User Fee Schedule"
1. Charges for reproduction of certain documents and /or reports,
including those specified in the California Vehicle Code:
o Minimum charge (includes first four pages) $1
o Each page thereafter $11.00
.20
2. Departmental fingerprint service charges:
(Plus any mandated State or Federal fees)
o Per card $5.10 /card
3. Charges for information as required by Government code section 6254(f)(i) and (2):
o Forms completion $14.25
o Archival searches - per hour (1 hour minimum) $27.50
(Includes computer searches)
4. Handling charges for return of reproduced document and materials:
o Less than 4 ounces $2.55
o More than 4 ounces $5.10
5. Processing charge for return of property taken for safekeeping:
o Processing & maintenance fee $10.20
6. Clearance letters: $10.20
7. Duplication of photographs:
o In -house duplication costs plus processing fee (first sheet)
$10.20
(proof sheet)
$10.20
a Duplication costs (contractor) plus fee
$8.15
8. Concealed weapons permits:
o F.P.S. processing
$5.10 /card
o Admin/support cost
$13.75
o Investigative costs
$81.45
o Permit fee
$3.05
o Renewal
$30.55
9. Massage license processing /investigation:
o F.P.S. processing
$5.10 /card
o Admin/support cost
$13.75
o Investigative costs
$81.45
o Renewal
$25.45
10. Miscellaneous charges:
o Local record information (13322 P.C.)
$27.50
v Impound vehicle releases
$10.20
o Stored vehicle releases
$10.20
i
o Record sealings (851.8 P.C.) $27.50
o Administrative Investigations (1 hour min) $81.45
11. Solicitor permits:
o Initial investigations $40.70
o Follow -up required $61.10
12. Adult entertainment permit:
(per 5.40.050 SLOMC)
o Permit fee $25.45
o Inspection fee $61.10
o Renewal $25.45
13. Cost recovery programs:
A. DUI cost recovery:
o Officer costs - per hour As determined by
G Vehicle costs Finance Director
B. Nuisance abatement (per 9.25.150 SLOMC) (Actual Costs):
c Officer costs - per hour As determined by
a Unit costs Finance Director
o Plus Administrative costs
C. Alarm permits (per 15.12.060 SLOMC):
o Permit
$30.55
o Renewal
$30.55
o Excessive alarms 4th -
$25.45
5th -
$50.90
All others-
$101.80
D. Second response cost recovery
(per 9.21.030 -050 SLOMC)
o Officer costs - per hour
As determined by
o Vehicle costs
Finance Director
E. Taxi permit:
(per 5.20.010/5.20.210 SLOMC)
a FPS processing
$5.10 /card
o Permit fee
$33.60
o Plus any state mandated fees
F. Electronic game center permit:
(per 5.52.020 SLOMC)
o Permit
$40.70
o Inspection
$40.70
o Renewal
$25.45
* Note: This is a new fee.
** Does not include any mandated state /federal fees, unless otherwise noted.
Exhibit G_
Table s Consumer Price Index for All urban Consumers (CPI -U) and Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Cle r'�aa.
Workers (CPI -W): Selected areas, all items index �e
(1982 -84 -100, unless otherwise noted)
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF THE CPI
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) is a measure of the average
change in prices over time in a fixed market basket of goods and
services. Two CPIs are published: 1) The CPI for All Urban
Consumers (CPI -U) which covers about 80 percent of the total
population and 2) the CPI for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical
Workers (CPI -W) which covers 32 percent of the total population.
The CPI is based on prices of food, clothing, shelter, transportation,
medical care, and other goods and services that people bury for
day - today living. In calculating the index, price changes for the
various items in 85 locations are averaged together with weights
which represent their importance in the spending of the appropriate
population group. 117oaxes for different months are usually
eomparedin relative terms Thus, an index of 133.5 is 1.063 times
higherthananindexof125.6( 133 .5/125.6 = 1.063), in other words,
prices increased 6.3 percent. The CPI is used as an indicator of
inflation, a deflatorof other economic series, and as an escalatorfor
income payments.
More detail. This news release from the Bureau of Labor Statistics
of the U.S. Department of Labor provides summary data from the
Consumer Price Index. The full release is available electronically at
release time. For information, call 202-606-5902. CPI data also are
available on diskette and tape. For information, call 202 -606 -7000.
If you have any questions about the CPI, please write to the Bureau
of Labor Statistics, Division of Consumer Prices and Price Indexes,
Room 3615PS, Washington, DC 20212, or Call202- 606- 7000.Full
detail is available in the monthly periodical CPI Detailed Report,
available for $26 per year from New Orders, Government Printing
Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250 -7954. This
information will be made available to sensory impaired individuals
upon request. Voice phone: 202 - 606 -STAT, TOO phone:
202 - 606 -5897, TOO Message Referral Phone: 1-800- 326 -2577.
Fora recorded message of summary CPI data, call 202 - 606 -STAT.
-
CPI -U
CPI -W
Area
Indexes
Percent
Indexes
Percent
change to
change to
Jan.
1994
Feb.
Mar
Mar. 1994
from
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Mar. 1994
from
1994
1994
Mar. 1993
1994
1994
1994
Mar. 1993
U.S. city average ......................
146.2
146.7
147,2
2.5
143.6
144,0
144.4
2.3
Region and area size I/
Northeast urban....... .........
Size A - More than 1 200 000
153.2
154.0
154,7
2.3
150.8
151.4
151.7
2.0
........
Size B - 500 000 to 1 206 000 .......
153.7
152.5
154.6
153.0
155.1
152.7
2.3
2.3
150,2
150.3
150.9
150.7
151.4
150.6
2.0
Size C - 50,000 to 500,000 ..........
151.3
151.9
152.2
2.1
2.2
152.7
153.2
153.4
1.8
North Central urban ..
Size A - More than 1 200000........
141.5
142.5
142.1
142.6
2.6
138.5
139.0
179.4
2.3
Size e - 360 000 to 1 200 111 .......
141.1
143.2
141.3
143,9
141.8
2.7
3.3
1)8.8
137.4
139.4
137,6
140.0
137.9
2.6
Size C - 50,000 to 36 10 ..........
Size D - N o nmetrapolitan
142.4
143.0
143.1
1.9
140.0
140.6
140.6
2.8
1.7
(less than 50,000) .........
136.7
137.2
137.8
2.3
135.3
135.8
136.3
1.9
South urban ............................
Size A - More than 1 2006:11O_:::::::
142.5
142.9
142.9
14)•4
143.6
144.4
2.8
141.0
141.2
141.9
2.6
Size B - 450 000 to 1 2000
Size C
144.4
144.6
145.4
2.8
2.7
I4I.0
141.1
141.]
141.2
142,7
141.8
2.7
2.6
- 110 met to 450.00 ..........
Size D - Nonmet ropolitan
141.0
141.6
142.0
2.5
140.8
141.3
141.6
2.2
(less than 50,000) .........
140.8
140.7
141.7
3,1
141.1
141.0
141.4
3.2
West urban ......
Size A - Mare than 1j250*000�........
148.1
148.3
149.0
2.6
145.7
145.4
145.9
2.2
Size C - 50,000 to 3j0,000
149.7
147.8
149.9
150.5
2,2
145.3
145.4
145.9
2.0
..........
148.3
148.7
7.4
145.4
146.0
146.7
3.2
Size classes
A 2/ .. ...............................
B
172.7
133.7
133.9
2.5
131.7
132.1
132.7
2.3
...... ............••••...............
C ....................................
145.8
144.3
146.1
144.9
146.5
145.2
2.8
2.4
143.2
143.4
143.8
2.6
D ....................................
141.2
141.5
142.0
2.7
143.6
140.6
144.1
140.8
144.3
141.2
2.1
2.5
Selected local areas
Chicago- Gary -Lake County, IL- IN- WI......
Los
146.5
146.8
147.6
2.4
142.0
142.3
143.0
2.5
An gel es - Anaheim - Riverside• CA
N.Y.- Northern N.J. -Long Island NY -NJ -CT
152.2
156.0
152.2
157.4
152.5
�j
146.8
146.9
147.0
1.5
Phil. - Wilmington- Trenton• PA- NS -DE -MD ..
152.5
152.9
157.9
153.5
1.3
2.8
152.4
152.1
153.5
152.2
154.0
152.8
2.2
2.6
San Francisco- Oakland -San Jose, CA .....
147.5
147.4
148.2
1.7
145.3
145.0
145.6
1.3
Baltimore• MD ..
Boston - Lawrence - Salem. MA- NN'...........
143,8
153.6
-
-
145.0
155.0
1.7
142.7
-
144.2
1.7
Cleveland- Akron - Lorain, DH
142.4
-
147.7
.6
3.2
152.5
1]5.1
-
ISJ.S
175.7
-,J
Miami -Fort Lauderdale, FL ............
St.
141.0
-
14)•5
3,1
138.7
3.0
Louis -East St. Louis, MO- ILA........
Washington, DC -MD -VA
138.6
-
139.7
2.6
137.7
-
jjg;j
Z;�
...................
150.9
-
151.5
2,0
148.)
-
148.9
1.8
Dallas -Fort Worth, TX ..................
-
139.2
-
_
; -
138 1
Detroit -Ann Arbor. MI ..................
Houston- Galveston - Brazoria. TX
-
141.7
-
-
-
177.0
-
-
-
-
Pittsburgh- Beaver Valley, PA ...........
-
-
137.0
142.6
-
-
-
176.3
-
-
136.3
-
-
1/ Regions defined as the four Census
Z/ Indexes
regions.
See map
in technical notes.
on a December 1986 =100
Data not available.
base.
NOTE: Local area CPI indexes are byproducts
than the national index and is•
of the national
therefore. subject
CPT program. Each
to
local index
has a smaller
samVle
size
As a result, local area indexes
shoo
volatility
substantially
more
sampling and
other measurement
error.
[rends are similar. Therefore•
greater
tae Bureau
oC Labor
than the national
Statistics
index, although
their
lane -term
national average CPI for use in
their escalator
clauses.
strongly
urges users to
consider
adopting
the
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF THE CPI
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) is a measure of the average
change in prices over time in a fixed market basket of goods and
services. Two CPIs are published: 1) The CPI for All Urban
Consumers (CPI -U) which covers about 80 percent of the total
population and 2) the CPI for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical
Workers (CPI -W) which covers 32 percent of the total population.
The CPI is based on prices of food, clothing, shelter, transportation,
medical care, and other goods and services that people bury for
day - today living. In calculating the index, price changes for the
various items in 85 locations are averaged together with weights
which represent their importance in the spending of the appropriate
population group. 117oaxes for different months are usually
eomparedin relative terms Thus, an index of 133.5 is 1.063 times
higherthananindexof125.6( 133 .5/125.6 = 1.063), in other words,
prices increased 6.3 percent. The CPI is used as an indicator of
inflation, a deflatorof other economic series, and as an escalatorfor
income payments.
More detail. This news release from the Bureau of Labor Statistics
of the U.S. Department of Labor provides summary data from the
Consumer Price Index. The full release is available electronically at
release time. For information, call 202-606-5902. CPI data also are
available on diskette and tape. For information, call 202 -606 -7000.
If you have any questions about the CPI, please write to the Bureau
of Labor Statistics, Division of Consumer Prices and Price Indexes,
Room 3615PS, Washington, DC 20212, or Call202- 606- 7000.Full
detail is available in the monthly periodical CPI Detailed Report,
available for $26 per year from New Orders, Government Printing
Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250 -7954. This
information will be made available to sensory impaired individuals
upon request. Voice phone: 202 - 606 -STAT, TOO phone:
202 - 606 -5897, TOO Message Referral Phone: 1-800- 326 -2577.
Fora recorded message of summary CPI data, call 202 - 606 -STAT.
RESOLUTION NO. 8268 .(1994 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
GRANTING APPROVAL OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 170 -93,
ADJUSTING THE LOT LINES BETWEEN TWO LOTS
AT 411 GRAND AVENUE
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, After
consideration of the preliminary map of LLA 170 -93 and staff
recommendations and reports thereof, makes the following
findings:
1. The lot line adjustment is consistent with the City's Zoning
Regulations and Building.Code.
2. The lot line adjustment complies with the Subdivision Map
Act and with the City's Subdivision Regulations.
3. The design of the lot line adjustment preliminary map and
the proposed improvements will not conflict with easements
for access through or use of property within the proposed
lot line adjustment.
4. The Community Development Director has determined that the
proposed lot line adjustment is exempt from environmental
review. The City Council hereby concurs with this
determination and finds that it reflects the independent
judgement of the City Council.
5. All design and improvement standards and environmental
protection measures established by the City will be complied
with.
6. The lot line adjustment will not result in a greater number
of parcels than originally existed.
R -8268
Resolution No. 8268 (1994 Series)
Lot line adjustment 170 -93
Page 2
7. The property to be divided.is of such shape, that it is
impractical, in the particular case, to conform to the
strict application of the subdivision and zoning regulations
because to do so would require a combination of the two
existing lots. The creation of two smaller lots is more
consistent with the single - family nature of the immediate
neighborhood.
8. The cost to the subdivider of strict or literal compliance
with the subdivision and zoning regulations is not the sole
reason for granting exceptions to lot depth and area.
9. The lot depth and area exceptions will not be detrimental to
the public health, safety, and welfare, or be injurious to
other properties in the vicinity.
10. Granting exceptions to lot depth and area is in accord with
the intent and purposes of the subdivision regulations, and
is consistent with the general plan and all other plans of
the city.
SECTION 2. Conditions. The approval of the tentative map
for LLA 170 -93 is subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall submit a "Declaration of Lot Line
Adjustment ", along with recording fees, to the City Engineer
for review, approval, and recordation, based on samples in
the Community Development Department..
2. The applicant shall provide individual electrical, cable
television, and natural gas services and metering for each
lot to the approval of affected public utility agencies and
the City Engineer.
3. The subdivider shall provide individual water services and
sewer connections for each lot, to the approval of the City
Engineer.
4. All buildings must be located at least three feet from
property lines, unless otherwise approved by the Chief
Building Official.
5. An addressing plan shall be submitted for approval by the
Community Development Director.
•
Resolution No. 8268
Lot line adjustment
Page 3
(1994 Series)
170 -93
r�
6. Any existing utilities that will cross the new lot line must
be removed, or easements created, to the approval of the
City Engineer.
On motion of Council Member.-Romero ,
seconded by Council Member Rappa , and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Romero, Rappa, Roalman, Settle, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 1st day of
February, 1994.
Mayor Pe Pe a
Pinard
ATTEST:
C1 y Clerk Diane V Gladwell
APPROVED:
�. Y /f Jorgensen
ru
N
P
Recording requested by
and when recorded mail to:
City Clerk
City of San Luis- Obispo
P. O. Box 8100
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 -8100
RESOLUTION NO. 8267.(1994 Series)
A RESOLUTION.OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT CLAY STREET, BETWEEN HIGHWAY 101 AND
STENNER CREEK, IS UNNECESSARY FOR PRESENT OR PROSPECTIVE PUBLIC
STREET PURPOSES AND ORDERING ITS ABANDONMENT, SUBJECT TO
RESERVATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY, OPEN SPACE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. In accordance with the public hearing duly held on
February 1, 1994, pursuant to Section 8300 et seq. of the
California.Streets and Highways Code, this Council finds and
determines that Clay Street, between Highway 101 and Stenner
Creek, as described and shown on the map marked Exhibit "A",
attached hereto and incorporated herein, is not necessary for
present or future public street purposes.
SECTION 2. This Council hereby orders the abandonment of said
right -of -way subject to:
A. Reservation of an easement for public utilities., sanitary
sewer and water mains, open space, drainage and creek
maintenance (with the.right to make improvements), bicycle path
and incidental purposes, over the entire 40 ft. wide Clay
Street right of way, lying easterly of the Highway 101 right of
way; EXCEPTING the NE'ly 10 ft. of the SE'ly 55 ft. of the
NW'ly 75 ft., as measured along the northerly line thereof.
R -8267
o
Resolution No. 8267 (1994 . Series)
Page Two.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of
this Order of Abandonment, duly attested under the.seal of the
City, to be recorded in the Office of the Recorder of the
County of San Luis Obispo.
On motion of
Romero
, seconded by
and on the following roll call vote,
Settle
3
AYES: Council Members Romero, Settle, Rappa, Roalman, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 1st day of
February , 1994.
MAYOR P&qg Pinard
ATTEST:
� r
4 ftCLE Diane ){ Gladwell
G: ... \Misc\ClayAban.wp
t�
Y
1
..D
rr2
ti 0
10t
i3
�v
if
i
i
L_
All Q
Leaal Descriotion pf Abandonment
That portion of Clay Street shown on the map
fled for record In the Office of the County
Recorder in Book A at Page 45 of Maps, City of
San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo,
State of California, lying easterly of the State
Highway 101.
k)'
Easement Reservation:
Easement for public water, sewer, storm drain,
bike path, utilities, open - space, and creek
Cy aL
drainage and maintenance with the right to make
`u
Improvements, described as follows:
Z.
That portion of the above said street, EXCEPT the
,u
northeasterly 10 feet of the southeasterly 55 feet
of the northwesterly 75 feet of said street, as
measured along the northerly ine the leg
x
— 6
� r a
75'
�—
`20' C4LT N5
D-PA/NAG EASEMENT
v
�+ J .J 1 i •J y�l I� N \ 64zENENT
\ (3¢ AR 50)
5E(N �5c�T
�v SCALE: 1" = 40'
10011 1111111 city of, EXHIBIT A
san tins oBispo
CLAY STREET ABANDONMENT
Department of Public Works
955 Morro Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 MS 1-94
pp , .
Recording requested by
and when recorded mail to:
City Clerk
City of San Luis Obispo
P. O. Box 8100
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 -8100
Doc No: 1994 18953 Rec No: 00010769
Official Records ;NF 0.00
San Luis Obispo Co.
Francis M. Cooney
Recorder
Feb 10, 1994
Time: 11:15
@@ 31 ;TOTAL 0.00
RESOLUTION NO. 8267 (1994 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN .LUIS OBISPO
FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT CLAY STREET, BETWEEN HIGHWAY 101 AND
STENNER CREEK.. IS UNNECESSARY FOR PRESENT OR PROSPECTIVE PUBLIC
STREET PURPOSES AND ORDERING ITS ABANDONMENT, SUBJECT TO
RESERVATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY, OPEN SPACE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. In accordance with the public hearing duly held on
February 1, 1994, pursuant to Section 8300 et seq. of the
California Streets and Highways Code, this Council finds and
determines that Clay Street, between Highway 101 and Stenner
Creek, as described and shown on the map marked Exhibit "A ",
attached hereto and incorporated herein, is not necessary for
present or future public street purposes.
SECTION 2. This Council hereby orders the abandonment of said
right -of -way subject to:
A. Reservation of an easement for public utilities, sanitary
sewer and water mains, open space, drainage and creek
maintenance (with the right to make improvements), bicycle path
and incidental purposes, over the entire 40 ft. wide Clay
Street right of way, lying easterly of the Highway 101 right of
way; EXCEPTING the NE'ly 10 ft. of the SE'ly 55 ft. of the
NW'ly 75 ft., as measured along the northerly line thereof.
R -8267 \
C
K
Resolution No. 8267 (1994 Series)
Page Two.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of
this Order of Abandonment, duly attested under -the seal of the
City, to be recorded in the Office of the Recorder of the
County of San Luis Obispo.
On motion of Romero , seconded by Settle
and on the following roll call vote,
AYES: Council Members Romero, Settle, Rappa, Roalman, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 1st day of
February , 1994.
MAYOR P g Pinard
ATTEST:
(/L /
d iT CLERK Diane I( . Gladwell
G: ... \Misc \C1ayAban.wp
I hereby certify that the foregoing 1-6061
and correct Copy of Resoldt onQN1 o..8267�
199- 41":8eF1 e`sY
on file In the Office of the G�jr C Qk ?'�=
In witness heregf, my land=
2/7/94 A
Date i ne R. G1 at%n� t ity Cl.Erk'�`r;
City of San Luls4bispo- ; "%
t+ J J L�t��il� N \ \ 643ENENT �I�i
' L� -SEWER �►3ENE�/T
- - (34 o'Af 50) SCALE: 1" = 40'
1pQOm� ppm° ppj city or EXHIBIT A
san tins ompo
CLAY STREET ABANDONMENT
Department of Public Works
955 Morro Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Me 1-94
END OF DOCUMENT
Legal Description of Abandonment
That portion of Clay Street shown on the map
filed for record in the Office of the County
a
Recorder in Book A at Page 45 of Maps, City of
San Luis Obispo, County. of San Luis Obispo,
N
State of California, lying easterly of the State
Highway 101.
Iy
Easement Reservation:
1-41`
Easement for public water, sewer, storm drain,
bike path, utilities, open - space, and creek
oC
drainage and maintenance with the right to make
Improvements, described as follows:
1 :ti % .
Z.
That portion of the above said street, EXCEPT the
northeasterly 10 feet of the southeasterly 55.feet
N
of the northwesterly 75 feet of said street, as
measured along the nort herly ine theleg€
7f C�=�
f
-20 C4f7 N5
�t �
_ �
__ ___- _- •_-`�� � BRA /NAG EASEMENT
• �1
t+ J J L�t��il� N \ \ 643ENENT �I�i
' L� -SEWER �►3ENE�/T
- - (34 o'Af 50) SCALE: 1" = 40'
1pQOm� ppm° ppj city or EXHIBIT A
san tins ompo
CLAY STREET ABANDONMENT
Department of Public Works
955 Morro Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Me 1-94
END OF DOCUMENT
GLvk
n .
RESOLUTION NO8266(1994 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
FOR TRACT NO. 1750 (UNITS 1 & 2)
EXTENDING THE TIME TO SUBMIT SURETY
(Rob Rossi, Subdivider)
WHEREAS, the City Council conditionally approved the final map for Tract 1750
(Units 1 & 2) per Resolution No. 8086 (1992 Series), subject to submittal of adequate
surety by February 10, 1993, guaranteeing installation of the required subdivision
improvements , and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved amendments to the subdivision agreement,
the last of which extended the time to submit required surety to February 6, 1994
pursuant to Resolution No. 8241 (1993 Series), and
WHEREAS, the Subdivider has requested an additional 90 days in order to provide
said surety.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the attached amendment (Exhibit A)
to the Subdivision Agreement for Tract No. 1750 (Units 1 & 2) is hereby approved and
the Mayor is authorized to sign the amendment.
The surety shall be submitted on, or before May 7, 1994 or this approval shall
become null and void. The final map shall not be recorded until submittal and approval
of the surety, to the satisfaction of the City Attorney.
On motion of settle seconded, by Romero and on the following roll
call vote:
R -8266
• o
Resolution W266(1994 Series)'
Page Two
AYES: Council Members Settle, Romero, Rappa, Roalman, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 1st day of February, 1994.
ATTEST: MAYOR Peg Pinard
�C CLERK Diane Gladwell
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
G:\W P51\DReNeMT17505Xr.wp
C
�W:49'00:1*M:,
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, dated this J day of February ,.
1994 by and between Robin L. Rossi, herein referred to as
"SUBDIVIDER ", and the City of San Luis Obispo, herein referred to
as "City ".
WITNESSETH:
Reference is hereby made to that certain real property in the
City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of
California, as shown on the final map of Tract No. 1750 (Units 1
& 2), as approved by the City Council on November 10, 1992.
WHEREAS, a Subdivision Agreement was entered into between the
above - mentioned parties to guarantee completion of the subdivi-
sion requirements, and
WHEREAS, the subdivision agreement provided for satisfactory
surety to be submitted by February 10, 1993, and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved an amendment to the
subdivision agreement per Resolution No. 8241 (1993 Series) which
extended the time to submit the surety to February 6, 1994, and
WHEREAS, the subdivider has requested an additional 90 days to
submit said surety.
•
Subdivision Agreement Amendment
Tract No. 1750 (Units 1 & 2)
Page Two
C
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the subdivision agreement
dated November 10, 1992 for Tract No. 1750 (Units 1 & 2) is
hereby modified to extend the time to submit the required
Faithful.Performance and Labor & Materials surety by an
additional 90 days to May 7, 1994. All other provisions of
the aforementioned Subdivision Agreement shall remain in force.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreementAhas been executed by:
APPROVED: City of San Luis Obispo
MAYOR - eg Pinard
ATTEST:
CIT CLERK - DiaLi Gladwell
- n4r
P14 a �j
� '171mrs
G: \wP51\D Revlew\T7750\SXT.wp
v O
I� u
fiJIV
V��
\tkk
0
o
RESOLUTION NO. 8265 (1994 SERIES)
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DECLARING INTENTION TO REIMBURSE EXPENDITURES
RELATING TO PERFORMING ARTS CENTER PROJECT
FROM THE PROCEEDS OF TAX- EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY
WHEREAS, the City has previously advanced funds, and expects to make future
advances, to finance a project consisting of a performing arts center (the 'Project "), and in
order to provide funds to finance the Project the Council intends to issue and sell its tax -
exempt bonds, certificates of participation or other obligations in the aggregate principal
amount of not to exceed' $6,000,000 (the "Tax- Exempt Obligations "); and
WHEREAS, in order to use the proceeds of the Tax- Exempt Obligations to
reimburse advances made by the City for the Project before the date of issuance of the Tax -
Exempt Obligations, and not more than sixty (60) days before the date of adoption of this
Resolution, Section 1.150 -2 of the United States Income Tax Regulations requires that
Council declare its intention to reimburse such advances from the proceeds of the Tax -
Exempt Obligations; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest and for the public benefit that the City
declare its official intent to reimburse the expenditures referenced herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Declaration of Intent. The Council hereby declares that it reasonably
expects to issue the Tax- Exempt Obligations and to use a portion of the proceeds thereof
to reimburse expenditures made by the City for the Project before the date of issuance of
the Obligations, and not more than sixty (60) days before the date of adoption of this
Resolution. The aggregate principal amount of the Tax- Exempt Obligations shall not exceed
$6,000,000.
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the
date of its passage and adoption.
R -8265
v C
Upon motion of Council Member Settle, seconded by Council Member Romero ,
and on the following roll call vote:
APES: Council Members Settle, Romero, Rappa, Roalman, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this
ATTEST:
jaCli
e a rk Diane Gla ell
APPROVED:
i tto/p ey J fret' orgensen
1st day of February; , 1994.
Mayor ' :j '
appp� i � d
ti
RESOLUTION NO. 8264 (1994 Series)
REVISING POLICY REGARDING
THE USE OF RECLAIMED WATER
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 7024 (1991 series) establishing policy
regarding the use of reclaimed water, and
WHEREAS, City policy is to pursue a water reuse program to supplement the City's
water supply, and
WHEREAS, by offsetting the current non - potable water use with reclaimed water, the
City would be able to avoid demands on the safe annual yield from its other water sources, and
WHEREAS, using reclaimed water to replace or augment that used from private wells
for irrigation and /or other non- potable use would lower the rate of withdrawal from the basin
making more water available for potable use, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo that Resolution 7024 (1991 series) is hereby rescinded.
BE IT RESOLVED, that City policy regarding reclaimed water use places emphasis on
offsetting potable water demand for non - potable use and minimizing the amount of groundwater
pumped for non - potable use.
BE IT RESOLVED, that in keeping with State water reclamation policy, each reclaimed
water project should be cost effective when compared to developing anew potable water source.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following is the City policy guideline for
approving reclaimed water projects. If demand for category I is met; then reclaimed water
could be distributed to category
CATEGORYI
• New irrigation /non - potable water uses within development approved for construction
within the City and approved for connection to the City water system.
• Existing irrigation /non - potable water uses connected to the City water system.
• Existing irrigation /non - potable uses within the Urban Reserve Line, with or without
connections to the City water system which employ private wells to supply or augment
non - potable water requirements.
• Maintaining creek flow for existing instream uses
R -8264
l\
Resolution No. 8264 (1994 Series)
CATEGORY II
• Outside of the Urban Reserve Line irrigation /non - potable uses that. maintain or enhance
agriculture or open space.
Upon motion of Roalman , seconded by Settle _,and
on the following role call vote:
AYES: Council Members Roalman, Settle, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: Council Member Romero
ABSENT: Council Member Rappa
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 25th day of January , 1994.
MAYOR P PINARD
ATTEST:
Di Gladwe 1, City '
g:&VCVW -Pky.M.
���� o �
a
��' � 1��,,� fir'
� ��
�I 1
RESOLUTION NO. 8263 (1994 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ADOPTING BIA RULES AND REGULATIONS
FOR THURSDAY NIGHT ACTIVITIES
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
SECTION 1. Resolution 8061 (1993 Series) is hereby rescinded.
SECTION 2. That the BIA Rules and Regulations for Thursday
Night Activities, attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and
incorporated herein by reference, have been reviewed and are
accepted. Recommended changes shall be made from time to time by
the BIA Board of Directors for subsequent Council approval.
On motion of Council Member Settle seconded
by Council Member Rappa , and on the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Council Members Settle, Rappa, Roalman, Romero, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 18th day of January, 1994.
Mayor Peg Pnard
iaAe Gla it Clerk
i
R -8263
i
J �
• q
` � 3
skip
Inn
y LIAJ •
M—i o
�...j uj
•My
V
LLM
a
a
90V£6 VD `odsigp sinj uES `ZOtp i Xog '0 -d
NOIIVIDOSSd.LAi2[NaAOHcI II SSaNISflg
N
N
W
CD
00 t77
0na
0 O
L
tj
� � A
4.
0
C=D
C/J 0 r
� y cAD
0 � y
� r
0 CD
a
0 0
m
7 ��dyy
3 V
w 8
.-1 A
ao
m
t77
a
m
oo�
G m b
0 3
V
a p
z�
T
o m -9
g c
o •< �. �. a
° e
y O
A � o
°
o CD
O
y `4
q ° A F
0
^ �..0 a CO w
CD cn
r; CL
y C
O g n y.
CD c ° CD
CD
S
n c fa � y.
L, y' ¢1
A
Ln
�. S
a
�. CD
O
A H CD
CD
O t<o c
CD
c y y• °, c
m w ; �e
C) CD
C1 D s
•, CD' <<
°o Cr C1
d S n c W
COD-
co co
OQ
O S < �•
c
=r
< n o °c as
CD v, H d. c ,r• O
m
re
c Q°Q t�y d O .O•y.
fD y+
<
> rL UQ
y n o CCD D
w O ? CD
<
< CD
Cn b A
CD
o z
O
0 �
a CD
a
N
H
s
CL
CD
H
QQ
.i
c.
CD
O S
..
o �
CD ,�
o a o
c a
O
'0
c�
o B
CD
CD
2'�a cv
p I'D
O y
O o
O �7
ya
�y ... ^p
a �.
S :A b
0 .T• d
A O
w '.=r
v, CD
fl
•-
to
.,
^
y
5
O
CD
O
O
y
X O
Cn
w
CD
� m
M y
CD CD O
oCD
o
?
y
D p
CD
Or
A•t
+�
v n
CD
A C.
A7
..
cr O
<
<
CD
W
O
O
p
A
�
— ao
c�D w
CD
.�
c
p
S
�
CAD y
C7
cA
g
CD
.,
o
Q4
0
0
N
Vl
.7
b
DS'
m
p y
CD
w
°
�_
^ _•
Co
m
°
CL
5
Q =
y
O S
..
o �
CD ,�
o a o
c a
O
'0
c�
o B
CD
CD
2'�a cv
p I'D
O y
O o
O �7
ya
�y ... ^p
a �.
S :A b
0 .T• d
A O
w '.=r
v, CD
.b
O
=•
fD
s
c co
"a
O
y o
b �
<
N CD
y
.b cD
� y
o �
• S
0
0
O
ra~
r
y
a
c
rz
S
b
7
9)
c
Z
^
y
5
O
CD
O
O
y
X O
Cn
w
CD
� m
M y
CD CD O
oCD
o
?
y
D p
^
Or
A•t
+�
v n
CD
A C.
A7
cr O
CD
W
O
O
p
�
— ao
c�D w
CD
.�
c
p
S
�
CAD y
C7
cA
CD
CD
.,
o
0
0
'•r
Vl
.b
O
=•
fD
s
c co
"a
O
y o
b �
<
N CD
y
.b cD
� y
o �
• S
0
0
O
ra~
r
y
a
c
rz
S
b
7
9)
y r0 U C C
.N. Vi 'CS Z'f V1 'L7 i•.
Lv
o _ a e
b Z
Gn i. CC ^ , b+ y T . L) o c o a y s F C ca b
Ln 0 C) al a� = a% H
$ z y s C.) E E s WD 4.)
wtu c> Q
r
14 ca M y
>
a3i E s
>
c Uu c o v v
M CZ .o s o 3
a� o = y .. c a o
c T v s 3❑ b ro ti a� R 'n 3
� U
ao 3 w , its r� �° $ c c °' .O ° °' c
°
s E °—' h E c c
Z b r o E F E T o o o �e ce s."
fl C 0.c i e� ° O $ C �
WD
U ¢ O= w ° 0 EO 0.
c�
iz
y y b V CS y 3 8
° w � ° U U ° CO CC y E O
o S E ° .�,,,
_ •rI �I •rl
CZ
Cd
cc
N O. w c O' ca s .> c " s cC U C° > ..
x w C> L U c v s> w
H o m E V �; on a E cs a� R F W .S •• .+ c c
o M. o� 3 * a� — 4) � o ca — m oq
C9tJ U.0 H E n CQ a Eu
LC ca u _
T O >
ti h .� •y :C Lit y G C C •..
Q L T' H W C L+" W ?
a o ° E ° z , a�i a% i
E E 4
G t y O '� LC C 0. N C w
E• E E d U 0 E
•c ��1." y f�/1 � S � •C� � I � � � X � E VJ
a� n y L 0 +- w CL >, Q O a�i O
> a et 44. U O 'a' E w O > b �" 01
aWi �a y w y a
y >' ° s ° O E n. o U y c
e y oO .. /o [s y . c ¢ c� G /�� r� o w
rA :n �� c E Ga z °c c �� ° o o' a�Ui
p,Cd� tia U o °Cd i��'E; >
w.t •1••
.a ° c .. O. �h ' °a a, `o..„ u Vc R % YI •♦ EO �I U jT . -•te.+y .. •^' e,i V � . �te. I �o p•
ed
� .CU A
I1 O c E w c3 V .2
2 o .0 o > = Z
y
ej
00 CA
c U .: o U ti v 1 .a ,. o E o K F 2 w Z o Q. u w O
M,
N
N
A
N
S
0
Z.
07
a
°
y
'Q
O
0
Cr
0
T
cD
O
'-t
Q
A7
(D
°
0
•v
S
9
co
Q C6
s'
�
°.
0OQ
m p
yya
pSm
m�N� a8a�5
'lam =a�
goo
8
3 .i
amp
o
$s= g5; Z
Mai
s
zg
mErm 'l'
_aA m
o
B
3
•
N.
>
>
v
N
H
=m
ag8
pY
S
g
38$
=
a
C
�
O
�<
38
3 $
�n
mL
8e�
mB
CD
CD
go
pag
N
Ct1
<
P
m B
m
co
�
� O
�+
a m
m
.n.
cr
o-
CD
., y'a O
a
a oo
�, cD =
a
60.
CL 0 y ...
,i, S
0 CD
C c w
m
b
0'Q c
CD
n v OrQ
Cv' ..�_
CA
0.
y y
iy y
cD C
H O may' y
CD
a
Voof
0 C O
CD
_
CA
CD
v A ° �' °
Z
a
CD
° S
0 n
Zi
CD CIQ "'1
>
O
y
.°1. O
CD LL rII C-D C
H
v
? a
n
y
CD
ct
�n
°
CO
CL
^ N
E
C
O
C
m
v, C
O- y C.
.c
-�
c y�
CD
0 ?
s 3
CD
O C C
'S
�j
C3. 7' ... �<
y EL
w
5
C
CD
CL
yw
rr
cD
CD
�. >e CD
CA
OrQ
FA
H
0
y
Ji V) C
rn
•Lr1 � Q� ° '�i •° � r�T 1
�I. Vi W ° •r. U °
T .+
tab
o y C9 era L Z °
y ° y
.0 :� c $ >t�, •= w `" s Y Cq � E= on
z y d �:: H +bAe6OQ y� a�V caZ
CU N ti y z tC •� •C M
t�^O�+ n c N ... �" U 3 O�r w V cz
o .2 8 A cz X
0
c ce
y e . CGs ec eZ °
CZ r-
0-0 cc
LIZ v
cz
ca M
o .S
N s H y Z W¢ ra-I m O O dy ca y Z C R
afu `C O ,o U a O O Z y
y N
8 I E > I.
cu
au
cm
T a> G T c3 t ,,; N w cc O U 'C d
M-0
T y 'D L N
l7 chi A b ^� �` , >` 3 a: O .C` x 0 y
.r i.t =1 W �. °1 � O W 5� y •C
c0
coo
0.
v1 W u to cC y T . 4.1 cC a • � y
g v l .tee s k ai 3 ecd' i s .c 3 " E cc
^d G > �� [0 3 ce s «s v c c W
tL
Gn
cn
c`a a y w d C o v$= O
cz
YJ .. a
°o E °' p 3 3 p c y s y 0 W
Cd
cc
Z n E
o W 8� Gz.� GV cS =4;w y �t,1o� ..;Fs E- O8 Rv
fA
H
T
d
a
c
s
rn
e
W
a�
r
c
rn
LV
CL
A
kn
0
R
P
a y.ct �'ya 0 CD 2.1
cob-
CD
y n' oo C.
3. iD co 0 y y a°a
o y c
C CO
RE CD
O CD rA p
'° = M _ co
C� s aa. I.. �c a
�< �• C CS ..� .A... C y "�f Co
r•
CD w O aQ y CCD o' •, �' F G
163 -1 ; r. ;. w n I o o A A v,
a s� co aQ _ -+
d co w w c o CL s m c CD y
0 CD O
.. .. CD
CD
9 CD
' am• `.'! O CD ::r .
CD
C
O C co O
CD
C�9 M w Q CO O CD -CAD
CD K y
c o. C `< CD A . CO CD o CD > w p ? c co o T p�
.?. H C CD < ^i A A A f9b S CD A �" 0 +• .A-. N y �:.'D2 > y
'.� < CD :.t' m ^� (A y R� w' G: G is CD uJ .-r 'p A S CD C+ 9
7 O C. Co cn. Q. .-.. .. ur rL i G' uJ O �' •-' M CD
CD O' CL O --9 P_ m O cr ti O pH � fJ� �• O v A A A Q ��y O A+
= G p <n O ti �, S p fD CD fY rn C A7 A A7 w y• < "" !-S CAD �y+
�• 4. O. C. _.�.. d '• �. n C C (� CAD .. .s
CD ^ ..h .. .D �! O = y O' G• ^ 3 G w M aQ ^ CD 0 vV co '•1
ci c O 'O
cr cD r+ cD aQ O C. v
a p= H a �, m 3 y c 0 3 CD. AD co o, b CS
o A O co
CL ao o
" CD �i ^ 3 .•. °n b �vi ° cD () < CD B 7 �n
'
CD aQ m CD O
�
w CDp p CD
A � A G z UCD CD
�. d " W. . w
m
bvN 7
'
m ' S O 0 ee ry 7C' co O° C. a O CD
w a DA B o Y ..
CD
coo O y b aQ -f Di m `� y e n �e bC w CD
w A-0 O. s c X co O a CD ° w Fr co CD
CD = 4 O 0 eD CD A = '� .b �' c7D CD
G Cr vw N p, (D .y O CL CS G W
:. s .r O S ' O � 7 S y. 8 - y S O
CD G O< 0 O i p y K7 H< y
CD ^
CD 7• O C=D m N CD ,0. CD w �•
d . aQ u�i fSD O y .Gy. G tD CL 7
CD pe
v 0 CD
6 b
rA
b e ° -� 3 .� c as e
cn n
o ° c
In cc (n
t.
E o o s
i
Z 1 ai/ I- \Q, En cca cz /[T]s 7 � G "p u '" o vi u
v, y ../y:. � '�
• M4 Y •y
Gn CA
D_ t, "'C a p 1. .0 N v Y �/ I n O C W v
Ca ttQ v, \ Y .�.. t: y a .C.. SC 'C �' y •dj U N a
o> c q ca ea - a o a a� s s ca
O..� .t.. a � .y. Q > ca y C Y L N w w
R5 E v
tz
C3 y •y y. C� ca .� O.� a CO
3 a_ c aEi s y? a
lu c ag n G b O O y=
b H
O v ° Z y w E -w ' 'y a Ln .o � p O E Y
w C o C a� y o
' o aci
cz ¢ n 4 O
a
U YU G -0 h m. w E o. fs: as Vcn Q E E W 07 as a-5 3
{1 4d
>1 r w T
H
C4 Y 'Y
OU
O s a a y'�'crC
ca
ca
R c
Cd
i y
O c w p¢ i
Y w
O •~ .14 T c
C
~ H ca U
n O
'2 >, "
= O 0
ea N 0.
a�
a�
O O V
a>i CO $ •3
a>
y CA
> °" a >
ma
7
CC
.0-6
C c
S=
4
w
CX i
a
D
>1IVM3UIS
>1 ltl A 3 G I S
r-
00
75
m
�y
m•
A C
crQ
O
cD
O �
°
O co
i Gn
O �
o
V ^
O
b �
CD
� n
O O.
7
Q
A
r.
<
O
0
r:
:II
b
CD
H
0
0
H
0
B
ci
a
c c �
cr
CD
.,
o c
.+ N
'.7 cr
00 O w
.r
Q.
O •* O
co
Q4
CL N
c. o
ct n y
corr LA
roc
O�
� b
nO
C
CD
O CD.
CD
_
N ,may
fD
O
9P
w
O �
ON
p'
.b O
y CCO
nG
_S
= V
0
A
c
.o
a
a
C
QQ
S
a
C
�o n
b
'v
OA
1 H
1 H
cg S
y
m
G'
°
H
r•
•R
S
CD
b
b
O
9 <
< v M Z
ty O
CCC.w
o �
^ o
Q�
y � a
m ^
� ° H
= O
O y
.CD C CyD
m<'S�
O O O
y .a
A ^
o s a
Al
CD �
"O O
c fD
4
° � r~•I•j i^h
Gn
0
2
CAD CD
O O
y
e �
I
Cn .0
=
?
b W
co
x N
S
< Cr
O
p.Z
A
Z �_
n
fD
abd
o. v,
(D y CD
^° ° a
s=
ct
"t ii.
��-•
tv
N °
.0
G CD
f�
b °.-,
CD N
a
=
3�
CD rA
CD
OQ
CD�
3
A
p
n
G �. ►n
< w
�
9
�.
3 tv N
'0
CD.
-�
^n
=o
ay
y
a
W
1.4
m
°
T
c...< o
y
=
y° aro w
"o
''
s
CD r
CD
O
CD
0
y
co
O CD
°
.-. y
.�
CD CD A
a..-0 o
c°D
�.
x
tA CD
rA CD
...
...
s
w o o°�-
^
w
A
cm• CD CD
°
y
°
0 d
v< S
a
gysr
cD cD
CD
vy
Cep
$
PTJ
a
CD
S 3
N O
C,An
0
N
in
CD
&.' g
°
_
Y
A
N
0
a
CD
gr
y
CCDD
CD
n
p y ai m V
W .. > cz a s cUC > II .Cc. w
cz
U y
ca ca N 'V U 4. _ 'bA y
CZ >, ti w O
cz :a ° a n o o a L a
C3 E
CZ
Ea ocu cU Q e`a a¢s aci c o•°-°y
° .�.. .y •H O i eC .r y cC
Q �• O �_� bA Z r1 5 C O G CC v� _U c �r
C w Rf N a ._.+ `n .^� s O Z •D N Q •� C 'L7
CL 0 cc M
tz L4
cm
c o
vi
ca
U
as Q;: a.0 eq V e G. _° «.i �e Q s w c° W Ci n 8 C
Olo
a�
y r
•Q CC O C to
h
a
r 61
cz •r � w > U .0 H= M
z e°n m °'o y-o Qay Ln N
w .8 cz
2 U .� •rl l ° r Q U JJ W �• y `.1
•oa .2 0
cz
43 u
cr
N
L 3 'yamy �v U v ob n h
y y F V1 Er E, O
CZ
cz
Cd
y C y 7 Q CO
kn
ti y Ly ° c Q a�i w W z o� vii s G00 a .i
y o w .� °' •3 obi a� p ° a�
O y
� m p v p 3 N .� m
_0. y a� �� oeo.. ° °
E 4 y � �F > �s a�
•� 8 ^� ac�i � � n� °� � � s � o $ o � a1 3
E boo =-
F a
y � ey O .. ca .•. U y a ci
w 0.0. v�S� = o
C\
0
CD CD
in cr
1..� V may[ �. lr, Q L. T
R n.1. iU ` y. CI cl ° ^ Y a ^ Lii y v
aq CD
C"D R
'O CD O y 0 '+ 0
CD O (n n
�• Q °" 0 Co y O 0 R m C-5 CD
CD 0 CD
W O o 0 °n w a c�^D 5
o O 0 CD CD 0 � =
CD
O = av
�'
i
0. O L. y e `� D Mb
0
U C 'O L y 3121
L° C O. ca
O
b tit„ W C y E y H .� y
C Vi p t1r 1 h '0 C ao C
O 0 1 1 ca CL b E
N 'O C �, C w O N 'C A
^a 3 c
to ° 1 cz E o 0
0 3 � .. w 1 C c°.. U- �o r
1 r Vi 1 CC 1 �1 O '�C cC •C_ O CU •1
T ; ; •� y CL v CL cc N bA L N -S ea
v� C
cc
E ea 1 °' _ a� E
O ce
i � e]
r rz
o ff y 3 -O v o E° ¢ cgs G E s
s no -'4 w v cz O$ T N ¢ G C E iF
y D '� C .�. ea C C 1 yCj
ca T O
y 1 EZ UQ 1�-� E E 1 n> o0 o RU
•� v, N C C
E E •. C D O c� U 1 1 V 1 :: ti" L L 7
cc
O 1. C > Ca D y Q1 r1
F >, W 0.s xo W .>. W U F. ao U c. ¢ ¢ n
o� y E U a d 3 n. s W Luz C
P
tn
r ^a CL O 03 O v M ti 4
ar D .0 C y 1 GT. y U 0. O 1n Q '� w Q y 0.
to U pa m 1 C n O C
cya = ai ai `a ° E 0.) 3 s g !.^ 1 `a c v c E s
C y y o 'b n ��
pO cs D 7 eDra
-0 0 L C p G' 'J CL �_ 1 Oo C "' C Q •C 7 `n y
a 0 1 3 1 y o 1
y> C O La . E p y 1 y
C4 i ++
rA
a CL ca s° 1 1 D p 1 Do L CC
1D ED ,. N- �' ...
��' •0. 7 0. t
o 0 T 1 ca 1
M.
cs a, y
to ca iti O E ea 1 U C y Q1 G7 y
.1 O U R O w T 4) OZ
p > awi C7 L j `a on
0 > 4) cbali
•.. x. C +.�+ ¢ G •.,' iti X11 C o 1 ° y _C •C ° •° 1 -•.
C V (� Qy C •(+ 1 r ..+ .r w 1 �' 11.e .n r
•b •ti ri r A C Q CS'
Gea 'O ea •.. F 1 >' D .O >> "" E E C t., 1 •^. w ca D C
cz
¢tea 3c°��zc `" EL -�Eo?U a1a�°4°
Itt
N
w
CD cD W co G w Ci7 C1 y w c CD .ti
a CD CD CD
co
CD co
sco a y Co IQ ''°° �.E cnw c.Co
O 8 O w .<. b a �. w. C ti O Cr7 M.
CD
w Oa o 0 o w �, v �, CD
rj o
ct
cD o w a co cD < `< S: y ? O O to CD ^ _
co 0
y w
CD ^. CAD w n w y b o �. co �.
CD
^ (D ° .�.� a �3 w n a J y = O• Q •o n cD O C. Q� �
CD y
Cp C, °a : m 0 c<o 0 ciao .a
° DA Vn 4 a '•Z Q b ^• w W r..0 I=-r CD
0 �' 0 t7 C fD w'
CD
CD
r• _
o a �J a cD
a co• Co
S
0 n
$ -3w
=na c
..
a
c C
CD
`<
= w -,
OO
CD co
f'1' '�
O r CD
..
N w
_
N �'•
-
N
Cp
y
.�
�t•�y
o
_•
CD
CD
Q
Qq H n
Q
,a `G
p cap
CD c
O
oa
�.
O
O 51
O CD
CD a
cD O
CD
°
v�
a°
y
S
o
o
° A
CD w
;:
�'
a0 °<
CD
n ==
w
cD
ct
n
CD
cn
w
w
c
w O
o
CD
c
3 C
S
°
w.w°.
7•
° a
'W
CD.
�
CD
O^
CD
Q
? .J• y:
LA
CD
.x•.
CD
p
O
=
`s
r
O
�
r'
�•
CD
On
0
b
cp
w
CD
<
CD
0
Ln
0
0
co
co
c
_
y"
o•
h
N
.x.
ih
*•
9F
dF
N
Cp
1
.�
�!
'!'7
y
fD
r
o
sob
4
.'xX. i
o
D
•wy
cr
CD
o
o
°
x
y
c
cD
y M
w
co C.
cn
w
c
o
CD
° CD
^
S
�.
co
7•
O
CD
Q
N
_
CD
.x•.
CD
vwi
r'
�•
On
O
iD
a Q
^
CD
°
'�
W
w
Q.
y
O• „�
'O'1
V
y
b
y
f c
CD
w
�
CA
s
^
a
ccy o0
r.
M O
CD
O
00
00 00
00.
H fD CD
CD