Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10156-10183RESOLUTION NO. 10183 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING A MODIFIED USE PERMIT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR THE GARDEN STREET TERRACES PROJECT (U/TR 124 -06) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on February 24, 2010, for the purpose of considering Application U/TR 124 -06, a use permit to allow a maximum building height of 74 feet and vesting tentative tract map for the Garden Street Terraces Project; and WHEREAS, said public hearing was for the purpose of formulating and forwarding recommendations to the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo regarding the requested entitlements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on June 1, 2010, for the purpose of considering Application U/TR 124 -06; and WHEREAS, notices of said public hearing were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the Final EIR prepared for the project; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony of the applicant, interested parties, and _th_ the evaluation and recommendations by staff, presented at said hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Use Permit Findings. Based upon all the evidence, the City Council makes the following findings in support of the use permit to allow a maximum building height of 74 feet: 1. With implementation of conditions of approval and mitigation measures contained in the EIR, the public benefits associated with the project significantly outweigh any detrimental impacts from the additional height because the project meets or exceeds all established performance standards for buildings taller than 50 feet and at least two required policy objectives, including the following: a. Affordable and workforce housing (three low- income housing units at 9% of total units built). R 10183 .�. Resolution No. 10183 (2010 genes) Page 2 b. Economic vitality (retail and hospitality uses at 216% of building footprint). c. Other policy objectives (implementation of the City's Garden Street Improvement Plan and Conceptual Plan for the City's Center). d. View access and preservation (fifth floor Sky Terrace with views of the Santa Lucia foothills). e. Historic preservation (rehabilitation of all on -site historic buildings consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Resources). 2. The mixed -use project is consistent with the General Plan and community goals for the following reasons: a. Maintains and enhances the downtown area as the commercial and social center of the City by converting surface parking lots to more economically productive uses. b. Expands space for existing businesses and opportunities for new businesses to locate in the downtown area by creating new hotel, retail and restaurant space. c. Provides housing downtown interspersed with commercial uses to help balance jobs and housing in the community. d. Provides for improved pedestrian amenities via the project's pedestrian streets and paseos. e. Rehabilitates all on -site historic buildings consistent with the Secretary Standards for Treatment of Historic Resources. SECTION 2. Subdivision Findings. Based upon all the evidence, the City Council makes the following findings in support of the airspace subdivision: l.*`'The design of the vesting tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan because the project will incrementally add to the City's housing inventory, conforms to the site's allowable density, provides for three low- income housing units, and does not change allowable land uses or modify the intent or design of the project. 2. The site is physically suited for the type and density of development allowed in the C -D- H zone because the site is located adjacent to existing street right -of -ways with complete City services and the airspace subdivision will simply allow for separate ownerships of the various project components. 3. The design of the subdivision, or the type of improvements, is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because the site does not have any creeks or other potentially significant habitat Resolution No. 10183 (2010 series) Page 3 areas for fish and wildlife, is surrounded by urban development and has already been developed with commercial buildings and surface parking. 4. The design of the subdivision, or the type of improvements, will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision because no such easements exist. 5. The design of the subdivision, or type of improvements, is not likely to cause serious public health problems because the development will be designed to meet all existing building and safety codes. SECTION 3. Action. The City Council does hereby approve application U/TR 124 -06 with incorporation of the following conditions and code requirements: Conditions: 1. The project shall be revised consistent with the Reduced Development and Project without Public Parking Spaces alternatives. Revised plans shall incorporate all applicable EIR mitigation measures and use permit and subdivision conditions, subject to review by the Architectural Review Commission and final design approval by the City Council. 2. Minor variations to the Reduced Development alternative setback requirement of 15 feet above the 2nd floor level along Marsh and Broad Streets should be considered to achieve architectural benefits, subject to review by the Architectural Review Commission and final design approval by City Council. 3. If the revised project continues to exceed 50 feet in height, it shall be designed to comply with all applicable performance standards and policy objectives required in Chapter 17.42 (C) of the Zoning Regulations for buildings taller than 50 feet, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 4. The use permit shall be effective for a period of five years from the date of approval. 5. All applicable mitigation measures contained in the Final EIR shall be included as conditions of approval, and are incorporated herein by reference. 6. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66474.9(b), the subdivider shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and /or its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City and/or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul, the approval by the City of this subdivision, and all actions relating thereto, including but not limited to environmental review. 7. The project shall provide a minimum 8 -foot clear sidewalk width on all project street frontages where existing buildings are not retained. To accommodate this requirement, building entries may need to be recessed or street furniture relocated. Project plans indicate Resolution No. 10183 (2010(ries) Page 4 that this required clearance is not provided at the comer of Broad and Marsh and along the Broad Street frontage. 8. Garden Street Improvement Plan: The final design of Garden Street shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director and Fire Chief. Revisions to the plans shall include parallel parking, in- ground pavement lights across Higuera Street at Garden Street, dimensioned plans that identify a minimum 20 -foot wide curb -to -curb clear area between Marsh and Higuera Streets for emergency vehicle access, a minimum clearance of 4 feet behind a parked bicycle in Peak Racks for users to access the bike rack, dimensions from street furniture to building face with the goal of providing an 8 -foot clear width, the location of utility boxes or other sidewalk features that would limit the placement of street furniture, and retention of the existing truck turning radius onto Garden Alley to allow continued use by service vehicles. 9. Any City street furniture (i.e. bike racks, parking meters, trash cans, etc.) not utilized in the project shall be offered to the City for reuse at another location. 10. Building plans shall include City standard tree grates and pedestrian lighting for the downtown. 11. The parking structure shall be developed as a private parking structure. If the parking structure is approved for public parking, the circulation flow shall be reversed so the in- bound lane is on the right and adequate line of sight provided. This revision will provide adequate sight visibility and reduce confusion to those using a public parking garage. 12. Building plans submitted for public improvements shall include truck turning template diagrams illustrating truck turning movements at all street corners. A 35 -foot long ladder truck (12 feet wide) with a 44 foot turning radius shall maneuver the left hand turn from Garden Street onto Higuera Street. Plans shall be revised as needed to comply. 13. Bollards proposed for Garden Alley shall be relocated as close to the alley entry toward Garden Street as feasible so unauthorized vehicles will not have to back out of the alley. 14. Building plans shall include long and short-term bicycle parking dimensions per the manufacturer to illustrate adequate space and clearances are provided with a bicycle parked in each space. 15. A minimum of 3 short-term bicycle parking spaces shall be provided near the Broad Street entry to the neighborhood market for use by customers, subject to the approval of the Public Works Director. 16. Building plans shall identify bicycle parking required for commercial uses, the path of travel to these spaces and how these spaces will be easily accessed for use by employees and customers (i.e. directional signage and lighting). Resolution No. 10183 (2010 ocries) � Page 5 17. A minimum 6 -foot wide lighted pedestrian walkway shall be maintained (via an easement) through the building at street.level to allow public access from the interior of the building to Garden Alley, Garden Street, and Marsh Street. 18. To reduce vehicle conflicts in the parking structure street level driveway and allow for 6- foot clear pedestrian circulation, the proposed handicapped parking behind the hotel shall be relocated to the lower level. 19. The section of the City owned parcel located within "Garden Alley" and labeled as "Remainder" on the tentative map shall be incorporated into the public alley to remain. The process to achieve this alley continuity shall be resolved prior to map recordation. The final map shall be revised if necessary to reflect any offer of dedication, prior deed, or revised tract boundary reflecting any final project development conditions or provisions of the MOU. 20. The final map shall correctly define and describe all lots including but not limited to the lot(s) used for parking purposes. The final map shall comply with final project actions regarding the use(s) of the parking garage as public, private, or common areas. 21. The final lot configurations including upper and lower limits shall be based on the final construction requirements. 22. A separate exhibit documenting zoning and building code compliance shall be approved to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department prior to recordation of the map. 23. The final map shall show any existing or proposed offers of dedication and pedestrian easements as conditioned with all applicable agreements, discretionary approvals and/or building permit and public improvement plan approvals. 24. Public pedestrian easements may be necessary to accommodate improvements required for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance or for circulation clearances around obstructions to satisfy conditioned access width requirements. If required, these easements shall be shown on the map to the approval of the Public Works Director. 25. The subdivider shall dedicate any private or public utility easements determined necessary to serve or accommodate the development of this project. The necessity of said easements will be determined in conjunction with the review of the public improvement plans, utility company plans, and building plans for the development. 26. The final map shall reserve and delineate certain applicable horizontal and vertical private easements including but not limited to drainage, utilities, vehicular and pedestrian ingress & egress for the benefit of the lots affected by such easements. 27. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall receive Utilities Department approval of an interim garbage storage and pick up plan for businesses currently utilizing Garden Alley for trash pick up and storage. Resolution No. 10183 (2010'3eries) � Page 6 28. The proposed project includes replacement of the existing six -inch sewer line in Garden Street with a new eight -inch sewer line due to its age, grade defects, and poor condition in order to accommodate the additional wastewater flows from the proposed project_. Should the City replace the sewer line prior to the project, the applicant shall reimburse the City for the cost of upsizing the sewer line from six to eight inches to accommodate the wastewater flows associated with the project. Upon motion of Council Member Settle, seconded by Council Member Marx, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, and Vice Mayor Carter NOES: None ABSENT: Mayor Romero The foregoing resolution was adopted this 151 day of June 2010. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: J. Stine Dietrick rty Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 10182 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO CERTIFYING THE FINAL EIR FOR THE GARDEN STREET TERRACES PROJECT AND APPROVING THE REDUCED DEVELOPMENT AND PROJECT WITHOUT PUBLIC PARKING SPACES ALTERNATIVES AS THE REQUIRED PROJECT (ER 124 -06) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on February 24, 2010, for the purpose of considering the Final EIR for the Garden Street Terraces Project (ER 124 -06); and WHEREAS, said public hearing was for the purpose of formulating and forwarding recommendations to the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo regarding the Final EIR; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on June 1, 2010, for the purpose of considering Application ER 124 -06; and WHEREAS, notices of said public hearing were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and WHEREAS, the Final EIR was reviewed and considered by the City Council after extensive review by City staff and other agencies, and with the comments of the concerned public; and WHEREAS, the potential environmental impacts of the project have been evaluated in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the City's Environmental Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony of the applicant, interested parties, and the evaluation and recommendations by staff, presented at said hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. Based upon all the evidence, the Council has concluded that the Final EIR (ER 124 -06) for the Garden Street Terraces Project adequately identifies the project's potentially significant impacts, alternatives to the proposed action, and recommended mitigation measures, based on the following findings: 1. The Final EIR was prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and was considered by the City prior to any approvals of the project. R 10182 Resolution No. 10182 (201 0'seri es) Page 2 2. The Final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City. 3. For each significant effect identified in the Final EIR under the categories of Aesthetics and Visual Resources, Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Geologic Resources, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning Policies, Noise, Energy, Transportation and Traffic, Utilities and Public Services, and Cumulative Impacts the approved mitigation measures contained in the Final EIR will avoid or substantially lessen the identified adverse environmental impacts of the project to a level of insignificance and have been incorporated into the project. 4. The significant effects identified in the Aesthetics and Visual Resources, Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Short-term Construction Noise, and Cumulative Impacts sections of the EIR will not be fully mitigated to a degree of insignificance with the incorporation of all of the identified mitigation measures included in the EIR. 5. The City Council finds that the unavoidable and significant adverse environmental effects of the project as proposed are unacceptable, but may be addressed and reduced to acceptable levels through project redesign that more closely adheres to the design features outlined in the Reduced Development Alternative and the Project without Public Parking Spaces Alternative. Although redesign to reflect these alternatives would not mitigate all significant Aesthetics and Visual Resources, Air Quality, Cultural Resource, Short-term Construction Noise, and Cumulative Impacts to a level of insignificance, the Council finds that these impacts would be reduced to acceptable levels and makes a statement of overriding considerations for those significant and unavoidable environmental impacts because: a. Mitigation measures are identified in the Final EIR Reduced Development Alternative that would apply to help reduce project impacts to the historic and visual resources of Garden Street and their contribution to the character of the Downtown Core and Downtown Historic District, particularly through the rehabilitation of all on -site historic buildings consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Resources and greater upper story building setbacks. b. Mitigation strategies are identified in the Final EIR to help reduce project emissions and ultimately put the air basin in closer compliance with established State and federal standards. c. Mitigation strategies are in place in the event that Mission -era burials are encountered as a result of subsurface grading and excavation that are consistent with State law and have been reviewed and endorsed by the Cultural Heritage Committee. d. The unavoidable adverse impacts associated with the loss of historical structures have been reviewed by the Cultural Heritage Committee and their specific recommendations regarding proposed demolitions and incorporation of appropriate and feasible mitigations has been reviewed and considered. Resolution No. 10182 (2010 series) Page 3 e. The unavoidable adverse impact of construction noise is temporary in nature and can be substantially mitigated by implementation of a construction management plan that regulates the hours of construction, noise reduction measures, and a complaint resolution process, consistent with recommended mitigation measures. f. The unacceptable mixing of public and private parking and the long -tens management problems that could arise would be addressed through a redesign that would make proposed parking exclusively private and the replacement of lost public spaces through the payment of parking fees. g. The cumulative impacts addressed in the EIR may result in significant impacts to Air Quality and Noise. A series of mitigation measures to reduce these impacts have been included in the EIR, and future projects that may add to the cumulative impacts will provide additional mitigation. 6. The City Council has identified the following overriding economic, social, and other public benefits of the project, which are additional reasons that the significant and unavoidable impacts identified in the Final EIR for approval of a combination of the Reduced Development and Project without Public Parking Spaces Alternatives can be found acceptable; these are: a. In conformance with the City's General Plan policies and community goals, maintain and enhance the Downtown area as the commercial and social center of the City by converting surface parking lots to more economically productive uses which would not be achievable without private capital and investment; b. Provide expansion space for existing businesses and opportunities for new businesses to locate in the Downtown area by creating new retail, restaurant and hotel space which produce further tax dollars to keep the Downtown vital and the center of the community; c. Include an on -site, private parking structure and/or payment of in -lieu parking fees to provide adequate off - street parking to meet the demand of on -site uses; d. Provide housing Downtown interspersed with commercial uses to help balance jobs and housing in the community; e. Provide for improved pedestrian amenities via the project's pedestrian streets and paseos; f. Improve business synergy by creating incentives for other property owners to seek improvements to their own sites and increased revenues and foot traffic; and g. Rehabilitate all on -site historic buildings consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Resources. Resolution No. 10182 (2010aen'es) Page 4 The data to support these overriding factors are found in the following sections of the record including: 1. The Final Environmental Impact Report; 2. Letters submitted by the public contained in the project files; 3. Public testimony provided at this and previous project hearings; and 4. The applicant's presentation. 7. The Mitigation Monitoring Program has been reviewed by the City Council in conjunction with their review of the Final EIR. SECTION 2. Certification. The City Council does hereby certify the Final EIR for the project with all mitigation measures as amended in attached Exhibit A. Upon motion of Council Member Settle, seconded by Council Member Marx, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, and Vice Mayor Carter NOES: None ABSENT: Mayor Romero The foregoing resolution was adopted this I` day of June 2010. poAr VA 0W1*16 Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ,/-1 )6` � J Stine Dietrick City Attorney EXECUTIVE SUMMARY C R y y a y bR�p O Lr, u Gi O T R y u R Q R O R C ii R u 1— R a � u y C IA U v� rl 11 VI W a, R F L ES -14 Garden Street Terraces Project Final E!R F U C t N 0 O r^ = r. > R d N . p _ C R 'N E V N 'O 0 0 E_ 'ca C a''J 0 U N C' E > w $ C O p R 4 O t0 b N T -� > cE ca —p 2 E ru- -r- ca p r— 3 g� °cb.5 •° 0 v E 0 v ° �'g :o r V C m d J u c E N c>C v Q r. �' ow U E dU G U'y a Ga O O O V r ' 0 . U F LZ ^c Io U cc - JG 'E C4 ° RC — � e oD t OD 0 0 V O w ' F JJ o�O N 7 7 V 7 N S r CO O L ; — a� > A V C O y ,0 O A E•O a..W- O'N V s m V p•� m> O Nw. c a J a o C to E DO > 7 E s C m w ca E _D r. r- �,,, 7 .'. E d, '9 O 3 '" c C •-, (] y U d E 'O rs E 5 c Cr y Y E M .-+ .V�. 4 .r p Qr,O N ` > .'Z > y O E N c0 p OD :: C y v V A N 1? .v. w u N o '� ' 7 E td U N � d x 0 5 v 3 > 03 J :? c o Ad 'Cl cc > O 00 •... . c C. y t0 r = N LL 00 bA N - 10 ❑ r N > a > U = C E 3 7 c 3 3 o c �— Ca ca a E p 'D >,.V .p d o M, w a° a� Cu 0. 0. w ° c= 'O s A— w c0 0 p O W E O C R 0 R OD 7. v s O 'O •~ U y ° 7 a.'� 7 O C N y0. .d .5 .0 3 `.° p O O m O y 3 J H E ° J E ��.[ �p cry o E ; t .0 aci p $ E 3 0 o o w 'o a E > 2 �.o N y N N .r c Do ' � O p A O .vQ p V r. o .0 � e � c Z�s y.N . 'O r- t4� K N O Tv pa w 04 V 'p N O J C O O N w o E> o ys C .� N y O N U'° o O O J L x �m0.o ° y= Eb'�0A ..y r T •. "„ a O F A V U � V J A O w x . W o G ai s 0 4. V v r- ' m p V (� T N U } = U E'G rz a 10„ N � a C N N N N C U r E w y N .O V> s G J r�..� V �I ^ b J O U. 4.� U U u3 °��t a E3R�,7 -� d V s 0. d v > •"J' m ` .E— Rs r E o O N O'o c Gar' o E. Q e+i > a J E 3 N A A r a o w o J J ES -14 Garden Street Terraces Project Final E!R [ cc F vn v .a 0 v d ao i [ wo 0 y u ee e� O i [ [ u •r [ � u w � [ H .r y [ U v� W 3 cc i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY u FBI 'a _ O O > E o C y b, o ° C y .E >1.0 > a by N ? N d .E y 3 N y v O W. o3yoo 0a, ,o.- 1= 'off 00 tm . C4 C L O N � yO A° �C �C L � N roo tt� � C ? a° •J ° G g ..O E 3� '9 v "T y �❑ = ,o c O N 7v 0 . Q a cc ° a w v " -0 Cc v o N 0. CO w Z � O U 00 o' C N O 000 0.W O M C 1:6 0) e Q 1I ao O - " = p 2 h y O O C w O . _ a6,. C e. '-gyp n > d o'C a •oaC C � C o o Nt�Q � . . U � `E� R a� aL O , = g s wc y °o' • y 3 N C AC . '0O U U m a N oO3 a N Q 4 N a1 N E x —+m = ' N rN LL .0 Ca U ' ` E � O g kn 4 ^o O 0 � � F° z �EocU— w c w on .d > � W t y c v A (7x 0 cv yma- �on cE �Qyw °o a o o CE2 0 h wb. _ a A C O O . E> Q O F ,> a U u .O o s 3 °- Q o u c0' U O y N y 'b y ❑: ti 1J �a y m is C C V C 0 �y cN c b O .�^ ) ' O y m. w 3 'R C . Wis W oC L N Ll 0 0 oo a C y O Caoo —u C w ai 0 ? C N aA a > ca E v N O O C 'D N d V C U .N p > O O O QN m b D CO O b . p0 g O O y — N b ,> 17 j O O "0 R N — y O U 8 Q zU� n o 0 N -0 O w Q C. • e • • • • e o e • • a+ V ,8 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ES -15 O R F y h a 0 ��i 111 5V F a I�1 Q GC a� 0 R y u �R G R �C O R C C � 7 ., o �o v H 1 � h c .r R R Ge ..y � U v� r; 1 W R Z EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.. IV G MM W e '0 N x X h U ° 3$ m 0 R.N w O f�/I U .� O ° Eoo Q > ° °d E °' ro 0 0 T A L d E V .0 a 0. •G row p w G p ) v o 0 N r� "y •'� 4 ° d� 0V E N a o � N o o u .- � oa N E o p EL y �°' �a m k nc .a. i d roC]�Eo y �> i a � + CL ° ° G w c � ,c w U > U o -0 o , d WO U E -0 re c m c y 'O3 u z o e O O V N O> 44 g q. co u .0 ca 5 O N N O U p C _`'�ao�i c i s ' .�3 S ro °3 ' F a K oG n Q L � Cal , _3 U aE F T E 'oc - n 3L U :y ° .' F a N O.� c y a C ,o ° .° c3 o o c y y fE -ro - .:° . ° ro ai S cU L .."� aa i w w cE L °� . � �N ° � ,o a ^ •.� c °c y ? o p ° rov c v E s �:,= o ° d O , iC ••3> ° ° . N L a. E o a "0 r w Q o X> p U W 4 d «y o "o O > N Ly o O ° L. U O CV o > ° ao : o o ro w R w ro J ro 14 Sb� J. � o U O u o u R o � c U .ro o o i >c U o y u o o ° S ° � " v ° N t ` a ° C d . aO •= w ;E o Z o� ro m ro E ca NV o a ° h c F L 0 U U o CO E U "w � y oo o m b ° L — C N ° y ro y o N V a ❑ cq " y d o a " o c ° E a V° ° °s N u=o 00 d = Q Q ^o -5 UO. a c Q > ro N i t c° o u 6 w u E ES -16 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR C R F y H dl �1 0 b R 00 i, W6 0 R Y V R C6 d R O O n: O 4r G CJ d y > R C6 y C i.r R y C U vz 1: va w 3 R u E m 0 9 ao V a L .,,`a., y 0 'O CO .O C y 0 °n.. 'fl y V .E 'j a) U L �= 7 a R td s b 3 .Q O C 4 i0 .0 a� C L p �. s Q a `. x y C O y O U E Oq y v R x o U =° T d s y o F. U= y = a v y o =° g' y 3 °a `°- ;,'"72 O a cay i y G . A 3 Ed a o U ayEi a° . aciu V�tC .aC o c ° cato o : oc uo =-, > E s oto° oa o � oOy Ay AO Z c 01) 00 G O F ° U y to = E U ° a E c Ca A ze ° v �aU°y O i v° e O y II E wL ° v y E ? a� R u ` yc c •a y �y ° e sc ° o � Q ° 7 u y ° a a� 4J C c db ° ��ao N 0. 40 o ° =Q cy O a ' 0 10 i>, a"0 c cA 0 b ° s xaU <U ca s `oo E - � 0 E ? ba Z Y If- =o . E m o s o A 7 ° m U V ° v E s h °U E = o °o ueR 3 Eo' = v_� 0 Cu ° E° y °w "L U o EC R 0 s c� QC m 0 o c g �o c o E aa � C 0 C • om C c`C O > � .'U �O C :'y iC .Q -O. A d v C y .G w L E dO 4 o° C o O . U . 2�° C. L s o m o a O E °U .p a d C C O U b Cr QQ M -0 x 0. 7 L L td C c7 C 7 Q q N E ^ Vo o E m cc v -C A h 0 O U m . h ° • • • • V O i V W E Garden Street Terraces Project ES -17 Final EIR C H y a i oC°n y w u O C� R iy+ u a E 0 C 's y �a GL y C � O R � U v� CC a n EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - ES -18 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR y Wo O °' '� .S 'b rx ° ° .. m ° o ro CO "0 o c.01z N o�^n ° ro U'N E° o tee"- R�E ° G oU E c tiQx OU y,m Nuy-r .0 a av a cQ m �-O y xu _ .0., - _ V — cu yR..Q W o° ti o d d° z �-Ic o' ya ro.� oa E o o O a d O Q R% y¢ 'O u% O O C Z az .C1Z E 01 d ° s 00 N p C ° ro W 00 00 .^ a aci ° 0 u y u C cQ o c 'g 0 0 bo ' O 4> c �. .7 O C 00 00 Cis . U .U.. U y 3 c U O . ~ 0 O 0. pp C ° O O . y . y � vC y •C y c0 ro E 4 U •y 0 s . .0 R b .D d b ro > C C b[ 3 �' to M C 0y7 C E 00'r- ro Q ti U .. C i cc U ro O o0 0 2 —° s � y °' C m — •° - ° O 1 UC > � °''a 2 ° A cam? U p E y❑ �:. ro ro 3 ro 7C C 'O d v. ° ro _v .0 ro ro° S v O ro C 0. O C. d o.> aci o0yv 0 ro E aE °;5 °: > _ E o c o ` c c o w ro oC o > °y °. aa h 0a c ro Q c ° �� �„ s . E c :p •�o °7 0.0 N ` C r ° - C. C > N U Uc C C O U O p S .0 ro w s ,4 0 � Q O U + p � . O �3 ' ° Uy .12 N •[ � 'fl "'i U O y P. r. 3 .� E�°> . �a = a u °0 `b E U �Q. . ° .° ° a ° p ro ao ro aC'b •i� c o =9 H Q = ^ s b c U C p ° ro M U C i �° d O N O O U M G ro V N1 ,O cd .� M _ M U U P. G. y ;a °o M U :: b A A ro N O a.y��'������ 0 'J .o • y y U Q' '.. C. U D\ ¢ .� sG Q U Q «. .., Q' y •., :tg O U O O q ••• O A n. c. v C o °y' b E U v o R° a o ff aEi .�'3- �° aEi aEi U O_ 4 q N C a O ? a� U U .. w G .'' O ti O C .00 U W O c e ayi OJ yro K -4 O y ° yZ. 3 U O C O O -0 y W V1 ro '� 3roc0.2C c O R y= U U b r. a v U o ES -18 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR 0 on as w" O III. C EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 0 0 0 t > -1Z (U 0 0 E. E CN w E u Cn Cc 0 M r- 0 0 > C� .;J 00 Li. E Q—T —C 2 0 0 U W CIO Ia. 0 a 0 0 > E cc QJ E. u 6 Z5 0 "a 0 is g 0 m z a fu .0 .4 so M L;. 0 CO = = r- — = — CQ Cw to >1 0 ca U 0 U r. 0 > MW — >, 0 c CO Cw 0 0 0 m a) o— 0 M�= -6-0 0. 0 0 Q,.,. 0 > V CO 0 > 9:6 -14 QJ L;-. 0 C:6 Q) to — 0 0 to r. -8 v -0 2 — 0. U 0 u �r -* =' r. 0 00 0. 0 E A m r. - 0 0 , u tz U .- 0 r. -0 Ou U r- u r. 0 0 45 > E 0 .- 1, > 0 L= E -a Y) wu r- 0— 00 Q) -o = 70- E > o 0 0 u CQ 0 u Q, m a. :3 W. 0 'M •=,a gR too —0 0 U r t;. — 4) >, r. Q. m 0 m U Q m -0 0 04 0. = .— - = 0 r 0 0. 0 0 E u ro- E 0 0 u 72 U 72 79 0 79 r? 2 2 °L°' V, u E -0 0 E 2 > 0. > > > >1 2 2 2 Q) 0 Z 0 = — = = E m V 'i, -0 > u u L�. n w 0 E Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ES-19 n R s F rn Q d a 0 R y D iTr �r O R R s rA u R a 6� R O R n n� O •� n � o 1 � N Ra a r R r rA .� y R pq U •v� ,: d� W d B R EXECUTIVE SUMMARY _ y d C y L 700 00 0 7 O y y •� N 7 ° ° ° Q d °4OU hc0 E�� m w o° o° U y C O 7 ` v u. 'C is .b C . z cc x •> E V O O U O O C E —CO 0 IG o 0..•m C 0 G ° x 0 c ° C 7 a) N �• O O 'n O V .N O 00 m c.. H Nl C h p rz • • � c 3 � . � aEi ES -20 _ Ir o> o y O O aCi 'O N •O 4) p O y •E o° a, r ;; E.? u o �� c O U_ 0 m a .0 .yi \� O v r- , G 7° • y . •p O � O C E G O 4 y O w y .E b 0 CA x a> ? ° � >c C o. T o00 Jz, rOi, O .E v, O 0n. O m Y w •� 0 7 b f," N q M C, O N O m O O O C y..V. vVi •00 b m N O y U u N .a C° 'CJ 0.0 15 cw S:6 AAA�++ bra o °a�Q+ N o ai �i aF-ap E a�..�.= ❑ a i to O. C 7 R o cc G 000 � O e v � A v C y oar N \ CN V N aven y V O 0 o o a� � U > C p •O � v u ° o E CO Q b � d 3 C � T w y_ '5 ti C'� N o a > O y 7 O a.0 a e a 0 NCO m E M o .= > v N > C N 7Li > s m E a v > O G .0 v c b 0 O E d 61 O, rj 'in 4 D �' .0V• E aai V 0 0 L ^E yFH E Q° T o u u t O U U C4 O Cww n °E:3a�i O O W OAw 0M a�i Ea 0 �o A OJ n. o w o � v3iU.Ea°N Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR C R y y a IQ CIO rf W d 0.1 O no is �R R h a+ C.4 R 0) 3 R :O R C aS � O O R u C O v � rn I � H R a CI y G rr S GO R � U 'v� rl W Ci Z R n EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ES -21 .• C 0 y A V. CO L u 0.,o 0 ° ° c p . 3 > cvx C V w T y y C cx ^° o.E 0 c 0 0 ° E U C c =° 3 y E> 3 —0 aUi E ° A q °o C. o 3 0. d = N J> C «> .� 7 C p> p y O 04 y 'fl `F3 y •G 'C 'C •° w w Ca 0.O 0 ,J y .� ,y oCq oq.= a A 0.0 0 V o00 +- O ca o hl 00 m ° > > V m C p o a m 0$ L E o o ? A > �o � ° U .o �.4 Q �� TC U U .0 CO � > Y :r Vi V V ' A QO 0.0 'y V C 9 C . O U O lz L17 •0-� O E iC m L U r co N U L • y Dm - C V, cC y O =0 t O � E G O � � iO � � 2 L O_ 0> U>V C :C moo C > W L 'fl '� C 0 "� A O U C y —a ' 'a o ° 0. ° ti : a Lc 0 a a o on ..� >a E6 . s a ¢v o cc ° a. ° 00 QJ ° " �Q ' 0 o o oa ° d G n y 0 t .0 c D o 0 w °n.o U _ y U ° a o 0.2 ' y o j e d O v A 0 u _ q 4. m s o g s o °�� Q- a°' A ' m ,1 10 m m o cc 00 0 VEa�w& y . ^0 E w'•S °3 : o > o v ' c 'O ° V U v 0. N Ci > aUi 0 0 y O �m u i a^ aG V> J O n w o o n O 'U o s E w 0E U y - 0 � > C O E 0 E Y A i A A ° :a t ° d M O V C C . '- C J m . p 0 0 0 a T O . y 0 O 0 O C 3 = s.� cC W o y v t v N 0 0 0 S 0 U Y � 3 o o U" ri 0 E a p •U o D 0 ' y y ° 0 z C v � ' pv U � o U $ a H 0 = o ° o s ° ° vdH w c n a o ,, 0. a 0 0 v . o v V °' wC 72 o w 'f ° °> °yE`�� ��UL � �C Ac 0U c_o p yh0 ° " 06 r>v ~ uU0. V Co ? • to cu 2 U ° • cs o ° '�3 ao 0. G. O 7 r. 0 0 O C 0 0 ` 'D u 'y 0. m O V ca C V CJ 0 0 y_ 7 O [ h •^ V V o a Ia ?? ou 3 y ^ E m R ^y y U V C m V lC 0 -0 .0..o n 'E 0 N C >. V ,W C cc V ca h �i C 2 fl O C 0. 7 F v E w V en , E a o0 0 0 �i U Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ES -21 R a y a 0 Gr, i.Q 0 >a R R s by+ u R O, u R 0 R C C v O oD � y y �a a.. u rl V1 y U 'v� W u 3 R EXECUTIVE SUMMARY w X O O r, _ L y X L Oq O cC0 — N D Oq 7— 0 7 o o G p Ln v E z — c . •5 - $ � 4) Ea� 0 c 0 E m 5.0 'o Ors° c ,E, _5 oLo-0 --MOC 7 ] =coU ° m e 0. d d r= t7 0.- c` .5 ^� m .` o h b o f c o° 0 y C °? o LQ 5 c 0 0� 0 r.� �+ ^� E� °�f� o� � EL9U o y v° Q c E 0.— 0 .giy v p a N y .y �O ° 0 = O o 05 .G p m O O c w Ln O .0 O O C3 0 .0 ^� L n E.O c - o � .0 0 c .y ° � C c m+ b •co ° I V . Q o .3 4. ? L- v > o ¢ v °° °° 0. o � c w o > ' " v 3 U ° A i. L C . 4) /� a Cc 0 � -0 00 p .9 s y O O "b C6 0 E c U O 7 0 ( > EL ti ° 0cE O o s O m r- 0 . CY O O -pG:d N L °Si R :: , p 0 V .L > (G p ^ 0 ° c >, r- m � v m° E ° 0 .0 ^ U o A o " 0 5 o o r 0e j p Cn 00 — � p e0 a 0 y 0 m U V O N 0 0- O c O E ° U u °° ° A ° U c a -°" o o° 'd tti v ° oc o o C- m 0 >, F� " y- c v cn .o v o o 'o 0 � c 0 pA pc �b x ay v [ � - 'r o a o ° c � O 0 t= 0 v o a 0 U u M E E at _ ° U'.i 0 U .m o.NO N a y 0 d 0.b nr � M. n °y tl , cV • • G U • .r � U 8 wo C c :, i0 . o a"i ' o R ' 3 E U U U V 0O O .. > os n.^ o ° o i ;o sE ° 03: d'O OA ••G O c E rr y b o E ^ H R C4' o u. o o :° n m .°o N C Vl U 'p ^� N O U 3 > a p A 0 c. ° y 3 0 t T L V i O 0 w X O O r, _ L y X L Oq O cC0 — N D Oq 7— 0 7 o o G p Ln v E z — c . •5 - $ � 4) Ea� 0 c 0 E m 5.0 'o Ors° c ,E, _5 oLo-0 --MOC 7 ] =coU ° m e 0. d d r= t7 0.- c` .5 ^� m .` o h b o f c o° 0 y C °? o LQ 5 c 0 0� 0 r.� �+ ^� E� °�f� o� � EL9U o y v° Q c E 0.— 0 .giy v p a N y .y �O ° 0 = O o 05 .G p m O O c w Ln O .0 O O C3 0 .0 ^� L n E.O c - o � .0 0 c .y ° � C c m+ b •co ° I V . Q o .3 4. ? L- v > o ¢ v °° °° 0. o � c w o > ' " v 3 U ° A i. L C . 4) /� a Cc 0 � -0 00 p .9 s y O O "b C6 0 E c U O 7 0 ( > EL ti ° 0cE O o s O m r- 0 . CY O O -pG:d N L °Si R :: , p 0 V .L > (G p ^ 0 ° c >, r- m � v m° E ° 0 .0 ^ U o A o " 0 5 o o r 0e j p Cn 00 — � p e0 a 0 y 0 m U V O N 0 0- O c O E ° U u °° ° A ° U c a -°" o o° 'd tti v ° oc o o C- m 0 >, F� " y- c v cn .o v o o 'o 0 � c 0 pA pc �b x ay v [ � - 'r o a o ° c � O 0 t= 0 v o a 0 U u M E E at _ ° U'.i 0 U .m o.NO N a y 0 d 0.b nr � M. n °y tl , cV • • ES -22 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR G N G. ' O M N SNr V L — b U y R ' 3 E U U U V 0O O .. G 0 N w C d'O OA ••G O c E rr b o E ^ H R 0. 7 +47 OL -0 V) cN0 d� cam+ L E ° ti c or`U o rx ocn ° .N -5 a� ES -22 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR .0 y y 'C rp E .w a GT, v �O 0 C Q � 7 u C L: a+ b�0 Y � R a u y vro .4 i W R a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY = ^ 0 40 ,C O _ C O w -- • y d5 0 A 'cQ m C 3 . y a = n k W a cS'° ' � a v �j ° p N .0 o t 0 s ti o k > 0 w .w ^ *6 2 ?o ; .c O d '� C O E Y ° •J .5 o C U - U r. ° .0 w 7. a = - L E� 04 L Q Q 0 C O U 5 ° G o f Q N 5 c Ca ° O G C ° E d 0 M 3s a o d O ° s v O U U 0 ny Oy b 0 '« A ." a, °'C r'- o d M ao3 c " c V ib y ��ppx or 0'0 q :5 0 3 y A .�•. •c .� V 7 •5 y ,c -d :: y v v wJ .+ A U A ° .a t s+ O O d�5.?br0 y �`°V°��ra:$�U� �. 0�_ay0a�c_.ygUa a�7 .S °' C •� a`°' i C 0-0 ,W 0 5 0. 0 Oi 00 w '0 0 -°O > G O .. >, 3 �, •N 0 r. 0 o Jr ? °° v a d > m C 0 ° 3 > d o V 7 o ti 0 •r �'U aQ o o Cp °°'C •° c .o c Z 5 a.'- c � o A� v o E � o m a o 5 �a� c o c-0 0 U° �-5 w c U v) = 0 on Uy aabD 0 0 °c U0 * O'a V 00 1.�i •3 iC .Q 7 p, ;O .p, a� U •y, c 0 N. �O� O > �4 > .� m on 0 0 3 5 ° ° ,� ou . C o .5 w p Y z U 0 x c«. ° y c c m a Ln y° 0 5 U 0 ' Q o y flo 2 > CM .0 U .•c � t3 ta V o 5 = c 0 o 3w o x Q ° o m a.° 0.5 ° w > O O v° 0 8 mO C OCa .R N Q — p h G a 0 9 110 r- 0 w C .Z , O r— 0 o o E.2 to v on 10 o .D m Z v 5 m A a Q U o ' 0 S o U d a "a U m � osU v a 0 v W °' U° a N 0. Q-0 ge. Jw:rwHx O• U cA cc CO a�Qa y 03 0 0. 02 °? i b N O O A h U = v k O O O 1] U 4? Y O r- U m CL E 0 c a aQi , ., o p V U v ❑ co 3 U r o H ^ orz 0 p U � •Oq ° ti U•5�R°:x Garden Street Terraces Project Final E!R ES -23 c U c0 U m Cd v$= y H c'� 0 Q " (u.n E�4 O v L0 = M a O 'O d4 y X c p cQa ° a0i 'r ° U a M m 0 ai N m° 5 b �d `� on t,' ,o ai > rz o w o U• c y y Q E EXECUTIVE SUMMARY = ^ 0 40 ,C O _ C O w -- • y d5 0 A 'cQ m C 3 . y a = n k W a cS'° ' � a v �j ° p N .0 o t 0 s ti o k > 0 w .w ^ *6 2 ?o ; .c O d '� C O E Y ° •J .5 o C U - U r. ° .0 w 7. a = - L E� 04 L Q Q 0 C O U 5 ° G o f Q N 5 c Ca ° O G C ° E d 0 M 3s a o d O ° s v O U U 0 ny Oy b 0 '« A ." a, °'C r'- o d M ao3 c " c V ib y ��ppx or 0'0 q :5 0 3 y A .�•. •c .� V 7 •5 y ,c -d :: y v v wJ .+ A U A ° .a t s+ O O d�5.?br0 y �`°V°��ra:$�U� �. 0�_ay0a�c_.ygUa a�7 .S °' C •� a`°' i C 0-0 ,W 0 5 0. 0 Oi 00 w '0 0 -°O > G O .. >, 3 �, •N 0 r. 0 o Jr ? °° v a d > m C 0 ° 3 > d o V 7 o ti 0 •r �'U aQ o o Cp °°'C •° c .o c Z 5 a.'- c � o A� v o E � o m a o 5 �a� c o c-0 0 U° �-5 w c U v) = 0 on Uy aabD 0 0 °c U0 * O'a V 00 1.�i •3 iC .Q 7 p, ;O .p, a� U •y, c 0 N. �O� O > �4 > .� m on 0 0 3 5 ° ° ,� ou . C o .5 w p Y z U 0 x c«. ° y c c m a Ln y° 0 5 U 0 ' Q o y flo 2 > CM .0 U .•c � t3 ta V o 5 = c 0 o 3w o x Q ° o m a.° 0.5 ° w > O O v° 0 8 mO C OCa .R N Q — p h G a 0 9 110 r- 0 w C .Z , O r— 0 o o E.2 to v on 10 o .D m Z v 5 m A a Q U o ' 0 S o U d a "a U m � osU v a 0 v W °' U° a N 0. Q-0 ge. Jw:rwHx O• U cA cc CO a�Qa y 03 0 0. 02 °? i b N O O A h U = v k O O O 1] U 4? Y O r- U m CL E 0 c a aQi , ., o p V U v ❑ co 3 U r o H ^ orz 0 p U � •Oq ° ti U•5�R°:x Garden Street Terraces Project Final E!R ES -23 a R H h u a b 0 Gr■ u 0 R R .sq y u R 4 R b O C C � 7 O h 1 � Y c. a R y �G U 'va r1 W R F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.: i w Ca C 0 .. 3 o •V, 'o W 0 O O C Q/ .Q W U ro = U `°' v° °c b s is W' 0 0 y CO O v E E " ° oo ° 0 o r— = � b ca x s���•o =ys 0 �°���0�° E'O L U N O D U a> 0 3 A o> O H x as U E Y y oA 01 0 r. y^ N U 1C C r l00 fC0 .� .UL. ,�.� ,�' v) � o O X W " 0 E op a0i W° s s p y m o L U0 i O O ° a H.5 s A w C w a0i C C ay U L r o 4+ �;: V... O U v O E O p E .- a m. a> � = o c 0 3 v y A L y U a to - L x-0 c^ ° o o L d y y c d a s ai o' A 3 °= y y °' c' C -°' °= v .0 3 . E a a� o °' v" E 00 0 0 ©• _ d�= .c°i'�a�RWV_a�' n�� o°n o 6 ��5.°° a� o'=y °E UcE °a��0 >o TCV w- d ` o_°z —� °'cE =a w °- 5 0 p° a0� ° o° �a Z' c h h °' 0 a m R 0 a ._ .° c F .1 O 5 _ A ° o a°i o is b _� C °- ' a w w v E d J s .= ° d° y W E 0 t y U ci 0 w y .° o o •` v :. - E � r ov a N f.n > to o p to oy WO ° y "-t Z- WC °E � °°U ° °�e u = = s e ° A o 3 a c U O c U H UU 0 0 w •� L 0 0 0 u r- :L E z ° O C a. ° o a o E 5 94 A m q m 5 c . r. op_ = x O ca p U "p v v U o w o U 10 o o o o . a ° a' R o .a 'b F m wo O : o U c° o. 0 .O .O O rO C 0 C O 4C C) O LL b i p u r os Ou ° : s o =s'ps ° " E— ° a = U ° 8 n U .l .7 aU a y F a a� 7 a� F U ro� F L F .5 n rn �Q cn 0 v U y E U v a.5 W Cn a. w ° ES -24 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR C_ _ U O 3 0 O V° R i VJ ° ° 'C U •• 0 O ° U 0 t G ca C LxY+ R F = 0 x C Ln 'a La . C u 2 U'w�F�C ES -24 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR n R F'I % .a O b Ir1 Ql O R R v R a d R :C R 1� C� G7 � O r V % I � R Or y u H % r % n U v� t W Z R i r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ° 5 �� ° �•_.C.S mo w_ E E o.c �p ° .� s H. C L Vi .ti 'C ° y a r. 7 O ° V j � . V r. .ti Ec L r. ° 0 CO 0 ° b w A yp R ` 0U= a an �O '0 E Do O O v° i .z O t; a t'O to L p bA .�'� O V H ° G p k 0 Q ^ L N a w b d❑ c�'° 5> E y G° o Q. � m o R-O E � fl) y o fly 'O F:yc , . ��Z G } V ,, :Y G 3 L E R O >a° , w 3y L ° `io � �O E3�c% '�E_ •mO w , .2 G N 0. oO ^ p E o y E G°o ' . .b ar CE �'° L o. •L y N a aa) , . " °;. ; ' .O L ,y E .. a h a a° c . b w .Q .i-a . Dc o l A O > O Fv G'` c c �5a 0 0 > z 0� > b� H `o a o G � $ ti ° a - o 0 U = U a (u o :OJ V O _0 -0 wC CO to O 0 N 6 d y O CO U`U Lo L ' o a) R CO , v.o a o c L o 0 > E O 7. a) V O O CU , G ° v cx ° O U o o.5 IQ . Do o R i° °a o oU r ° ° O w� a) _ 0 r- 3 v 4 L a o y 'O > .o o o o o o . o U o 4) - U _ a Tb ❑ o y ° c > ZCa O a .E Ce U 5; A ) u O oO a) d 7 0. v r G as c ax 'J ° E ° mu Ca x b v 307 o ) ) >, E w Sz c a) m roc w" a v c ) 0 °o Do d O r G OVA 'O O :�'C G !'" b E ? r z T On = .� a y d 7 .fl 00 0 •� i 0 W .0 u r. w a7 E � L 0 E E 3 o 0 3•C o_ 9 3 g•E f0 0 G R CO 'S5 0 c E o�� mx �^ o 0 am a°oi� °° ° e� o R E o o 0 - 0 0 � E > 3 � -v � •� ro � 'O o E E° v 'J m a � 4 w .� ° 5 �� ° �•_.C.S mo w_ E E o.c �p ° .� s H. C L Vi .ti 'C ° y a r. 7 O ° V j � . V r. .ti Ec L r. ° 0 CO 0 ° b w A yp R ` 0U= a an �O '0 E Do O O v° i .z O t; a t'O to L p bA .�'� O V H ° G p k 0 Q ^ L N a w b d❑ c�'° 5> E y G° o Q. � m o R-O E � fl) y o fly 'O F:yc , . ��Z G } V ,, :Y G 3 L E R O >a° , w 3y L ° `io � �O E3�c% '�E_ •mO w , .2 G N 0. oO ^ p E o y E G°o ' . .b ar CE �'° L o. •L y N a aa) , . " °;. ; ' .O L ,y E .. a h a a° c . b w .Q .i-a . Dc o l A O > O Fv G'` c c �5a 0 0 > z 0� > b� H `o a o G � $ ti ° a - o 0 U = U a (u o :OJ V O _0 -0 wC CO to O 0 N 6 d y O CO U`U Lo L ' o a) R CO , v.o a o c L o 0 > E O 7. a) V O O CU , G ° v cx ° O U o o.5 IQ . Do o R i° °a o oU r ° ° O w� a) _ 0 r- 3 v 4 L a o y 'O > .o o o o o o . o U o 4) - U _ a Tb ❑ o y ° c > ZCa O a .E Ce U 5; A ) u O oO a) d 7 0. v r G as c ax 'J ° E ° mu Ca x b v 307 o ) ) Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ES -25 to L a) G O T On V ° G 0 H R � G R CO 'S5 0 V U o. 2 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ES -25 C aA y m O b i �0 7 G� d C'C O s dl u d E ee b O C � O .r v dl 1 � y A .. as r.r Vi .r y U 'v� w Z F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY d o O 'a Z; 0 •7„C. fi .�. Z °U R A W D E �Ui G A C .'U' N ad N R t a U N U A so, Z Q. C p V N U a w 'v E oo .> C C y 0 .� >1 U O O q'� h Co.E'e r � e =� ao°' Cv y•� �cn �'E.4 a� a° 3 z E V o o• ° a 0 ,2 s c C: O i TS o U C w. m y A .a •� O 'G b .� = a F �'. v i •�? .p ° •� w wo E c °'° 0 0 �y, m es E i a $ Q o ^ i° ° y L. b 0" R e c s „ 0 a E`o r. 2. a o c a� a c y 3 s x• -Uo o� >1 c E o o' �^ �o ~ecEaze e'E cRCa��'°2�o"0 _ >' m .a = p t C a�i d > U a`�i arEi O C y O O IS � F- o w E 2 w. E vs •,O o o C 10 v a) U T ti =— a a PC o v a$ = c o ❑ c A c U :3 "> >0 'D c v2 � E a gig° E aai> y o 0 0 s c co a a E c¢ y c c y 3? •- E vb c .. u o o° c .S E b —° _ - y �iZG y a7C o Q �j -C N �a 0 - . ay O ai ) L a0 N C m c U C A 0. m 0 ? C rJ C 0 L y J • G L E —'U U . w y° u G i U y ai •° d 0 'c E E Q a> v a '? o o " � o c Eo o o 0. .n Ea a0 mm 0 cA 0 s. o U $ o o U s ,a ,a x a. r g oc U v a m o °O 0 ° ° E v 0 � E v aj eo E c U U j n C C O > O O m � ° U ?N ' • U r. ,0 -10 0 r O E° i U C L O O 2 M wo 00t>— u 3 0. cc 00 t �o a t w O 0 o C 0 0 y i7 C tl 0 N a C) y '.R • y •N � m y •tl U mU � L Q a �U >? av w ° 5 . U C t0 rC .w t ..� h y 0 t5 a.r. 0 oo $ 4) Q a � 'a 0 "a c a, Lr- o > O L L U Cn ° c C ¢ UU a 0 0 0 0 -Z y C V. 0 CO p y° r. cc c O G ] r. � U , N o ° 7 z° O COZ �d ° R z �c z U a PC 0 o ` a— o t U > v o U o .a 0 -0 4A U a m 0 0 U „ 0 o p O o O • • a) U Z W w �b Q O 0 h o°3U o Y C z y y to a —'��go 0 d C 0 E 3 6, h m�'4 o a o D o z — a 0 0o O o r v' e M Z3 := ate ES -26 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR C R s F W w � W4 O i+ iI R .r •r 7 Gil MMd Irl 0 R R t F V R hl d 3 R b O C O y 1 � h R ra a„ a h •r rA U 'va r, 1 W _ y b N y 3 0 0 'O 00 °. c a�i > 5 a• 5 ° cam., 0 C t R ,y OA 7 z svas�R d VW) 3 2 �aQi_n °cr. 0 > L L N �.' y D O abi d L C O L 7 ... v, O c...0 O € o o Go 0 0 C aUi d o p 2v C U C U —0 .R y y :° .o o R A s �' A o v 0 J y r.. r0 O N ' = O C t 3 N �' .p C OC L_ a 7) C S. tp �+ 0 J C .p g s 0 Q U" N O= S y Idd C u - m� y v c .00 cc ._ U E •a c a0 r Aga E> °: C v v �`- a c°, - g 0 0 7 v o v° ° oa o m 0 c d 0 L y F' y; O d T .o a G Q L O U C O E _ C td > d �ouEC 0 =° 2� e • • a. 0 0 0 0 0 0 a U U Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES -27 W z d r+ c R c: c R y y 61 O w d ii R U R y v R d ii 4: •rid 1 ate+ a V1 h R �1 N i L R F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES -28 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR y y E C 7 ros 7 C �s G3 ms 7 7 �y 7 7 os O 4 ° 4 °N °N E L a�� E L EL EL E c 'VR = > O .0 _ > O .D _ > O _ > _ > M G I O O N L c0 OC-D O N Uq O tE W O R{ to 0 e0 00 U ¢ T 7 E E E v E U E Ub U w C w C w C w CO w CO w 7 u o a o a E o a E o Q o Q• 0 o 3 U p; �.E a = - C ❑ e c•E C =•E.: C = a Q Ca C 7 V R 7 U 4) M 0 U V U A m> G'Ow C•Ow 7 C•O� 7 G•O 4" C G'C �`= C p(�jw E L °_° E` ._° E L •a' E L .a' E L °_° E A¢_ y •d rn aG y •d y a7 N b in as = N b N 43 N 'C y ao w V N '� rn a� 3 3 E 3 E 3 s E a r E Q °? L ° 0 ca C a> w O € E J O > O E 0) o o �° c U c ass O a 5 -v C� > b ' o .^ �N G O U y N 'G N a Q > o o o > � oo M e m 'p A O° . C b L y E0 „�.5 5r aiQ a"i d s° o.� a�w C�0 E.E� o o �= 3 o to �E o ° a° 0 = U °�wc c t -.0 o EGg° y c 'o sbg� °� o Q m to 0. C C Q d o .� V b L F C 0. w -- V O G °� d C7 L Id” b ; oo G 3 N U „ O H ° E is U �n 0 :S U O 0. e 1= 'O n'= °o E aYw .a N C7 �w fl c 0. ti n ° U w c4 ° U �7 tis w = m o¢ Q p y O to > t, t5 15 O O o „ . Q= •� c U° C s E a o c ° ° v CO O U L t •o o G 0.- cc -O - U O = 7 0 N U U O O > -a — U TO VO O V . w O 0. U U a H K U � E.� o:°-_' °> N b e ��.E 00 0 0 X3.`00 _° _� 0.0 oo°' rim° ° 0�y '� 'y G F caooEL 'r r 0 0 Qw —'� - .E Q y^ aUi QyTy .5 '0 3 0 -X r- FGn7 A u o 7= 0 - ->,y ¢NR s L y a° O 0 0 t ` 0. oq m $ cppv 7 0 c o G$ .O s a4- v v 'E v1 O yam. �"' U r OA N .0 c=tl m O N C 'C N O V to .^J L O .� N ,O "-I N N U a N r C= N �"" Z G �a 0. G O O N > m 0 3 > A o 0 ao > > ov > a� > E y H o ° c°i 0 i =" a H o E "' °' a o v o c °_ ° v a a L �r o o c F'yv -N a� o d o o v p a .d o� E O O„ M u cs 0 0o w Q. c a : ? on U c: •= d O O y O C f O 00 O 3o > Cc m c V o 0 °q G c a d ° 0. 0 0. x U o w L t.. = CL > w m � U O O 'a w O is C G 0 CO cc m MO U 4. cd 00 V+�'�' w V �"" .^ 'O O h C ,O Gt Lam° .00 O'H ,ya, 0 ° h F 3 ° m? i y ' vio s Q 0 �N b o � o h° @� 02 d r. A E > O U 7 N O ES -28 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR b O a ar Vi i u a Y Z: ao ii Q< W q O Y u Cl R R W a+ u a ♦r C OA 1 u R f/1 r A N 1 w d i c 0 U 2 c 0 V OA C w 0 LID .V+ _ E c 0 U c ro U Ci m y v >1 r„ ° 5 C E 7 A 'ti O � N V > W V=i H C H 0U c20 C C C o ° ._ U d ro ro QU _� o _ y ro ro U U � X U a0 � c v b O .o v V = U 'S °- ° > 0 0 U R U 0 2 y a =MGR 1; 0 '> 0 M C y ro i 0 s c $ e R O 5 d ro a • °- o 0 O c.U.5U O z� ° C � � 5 •° U ' 0 7 y U U a ro 0 3 '- y 0 C U c O h 0 C �. >y0 ° 0 .5 0 ".0 0 Z 0 r 0 U N .0 y �• 0 L CC O r- 0 ?) 0 ro c.n 0'c0 •O O 0 n s s U v v 0 3 0. .n C',4 3 U ow C1 bq U'S c V 0 O L 0 ti p 0 � E � 3 v by N � " 3 'b ro ro �x N = 0 ra qs 0 @s cQ ,O t ro � � vro N 5 In c U °� u 0 A L 0.0 R y L w 0 C O .r c 5 0 U 0 w R U cn r; ri O >1 U a° T A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 ro U .a U O 0 O 0 . � •p v, Q U ^O a� "0 � �c 5 V .0 [ •0 c° s 0 5 F ro G � v C W y y W r 0 o0 ._ ° ❑ y 0 0 C O QJ ro y 0 0 E y U v o�xw o 'u; o v,y ro �•g•m x°` bA U y U or 4+ O or, o •° = a=i t 20 • e F ;0 00 v 0 3 0. .n C',4 3 U ow C1 bq U'S c V 0 O L 0 ti p 0 � E � 3 v by N � " 3 'b ro ro �x N = 0 ra qs 0 @s cQ ,O t ro � � vro N 5 In c U °� u 0 A L 0.0 R y L w 0 C O .r c 5 0 U 0 w R U cn r; ri O >1 U a° T A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 ro �.5 e >0 °� OD V U ^O a� "0 ..3 'fl .°. ip O '20-2-4 x Ez ° _ 0 s 0 5 F p..� �^ ,^. 0 .5 ca x o N 0 O .� 0 C O QJ C L E 0 v v c 'on v o�xw �•S .2P .r ° 0.00 4+ 0.5x C7 C' 0 o •° = a=i O 1 U OU O w c. cc Im '7 O Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR p 0 C r 7i C •� S �.L 5 E 0 c o o R O O O '0 O y O vi 3 = v s v > m n.>,w 0w y U ° Q OD �U v a >0 2y��an.ax > = O r 0 o 0 mr w O > W w�°= 03 =U0 O 6=i O N e•' > 1 N CO C p C 0 = ca fl v y 0 n r 0 �s n0U e ES -29 OD V U m w 0 U 0 bq y U C . ,^. 0 .5 ca x o N ^wou- C, 5 ro v o^ x y 0 O .a ` U = U 2 E 0 v v c 'on .2P 4+ 0.5x C7 C' 0 a a$i o =�Ci0�ro pp _ y F 0 O o y ro U U U U d07u r0 0 M V•0 oaa040 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR p 0 C r 7i C •� S �.L 5 E 0 c o o R O O O '0 O y O vi 3 = v s v > m n.>,w 0w y U ° Q OD �U v a >0 2y��an.ax > = O r 0 o 0 mr w O > W w�°= 03 =U0 O 6=i O N e•' > 1 N CO C p C 0 = ca fl v y 0 n r 0 �s n0U e ES -29 O O C O y 6� �r c c C FA y W2 0 y GO R Z y u E 4a C i u rr ►�I W fn 0 N i W d F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY \ Cq � U U R pp p , C, o •, A> o t 'o O r. r. C R [ U U cL o e. C °.0 n N ca �A o U = = o .J y m R a° o 4 a(07 \ 00 G 00 p•v ^yoro OS� y ° oCSN.L°°1�'a�9 v y U-a 3 0 0, Cc: ram n'0 w.a o f 'a L 5 —° w 3 .a n °o '3 R V) ° o .o v rA A a m >, o L 0 L CQ °> U o v7 r o? Z O ° U- 0 V a..5 ° R R C Z 3 o .o 0 E 0 U° 3 O o ¢� a V y N 'C y y N ?; 4 R 1. 0 0 O •— o •o ° y A c v v U ti a c-S O° 4 y F U N o s o R a. cc v�o�T°K� on U° d ^ - � U w c t �°- `" O w O a 0 C °o �304a g 0 V W O C y..y ti. R h v a U 0 a r- c o .0 o y J e d r a� ° C7 aL� 7� R U0 O U ° N C U V'00 to m y y C°. a: w asa yU Cr >, y r V R'C y'� .V, •0 O C Utz v �"' O •X ro y� C N .0 N ^V w �, 'O 0= '-' E y ' ° �. E �y o °A c :3 E ° �r N.p0. OT7 4'C 1, U R' t Oq tlq b L���•• R O C O �. o�v�•�3�o�.y U m cCe w'J >'R .^U. '� y C cL a�i s °q c ° o m a�i ._ U?r°5ov at^V R U c c R R y ci v £ U o U U � t5Q fU0 fl vr- R 0 4 ^ O O .2 0 L R U o ti O Oq Cq � U U R pp p , C, o •, A> o t 'o O r. r. C R [ U U cL o e. C °.0 n N ca �A o U = = o .J y m R a° o 4 a(07 \ 00 G 00 p•v ^yoro OS� y ° oCSN.L°°1�'a�9 v y U-a 3 0 0, Cc: ram n'0 w.a o f 'a L 5 —° w 3 .a n °o '3 R V) ° o .o v rA A a m >, o L 0 L CQ °> U o v7 r o? Z O ° U- 0 V a..5 ° R R C Z 3 o .o 0 E 0 U° 3 O o ¢� a V y N 'C y y N ?; 4 R 1. 0 0 O •— o •o ° y A c v v U ti a c-S O° 4 y F U N o s o R a. cc v�o�T°K� on U° d ^ - � U w c t �°- `" O w O a 0 C °o �304a g 0 V W O C y..y ti. R h v a U 0 a r- c o .0 o y J e d r a� ° C7 aL� 7� R U0 O U ° N C U V'00 to m y y C°. a: w asa yU Cr >, y r V R'C y'� .V, •0 O C Utz v �"' O •X ro y� C N .0 N ^V w �, 'O 0= '-' E y ' ° �. E �y o °A c :3 E ° �r N.p0. OT7 4'C 1, U R' t Oq tlq b L���•• R O C O �. o�v�•�3�o�.y U m cCe w'J >'R .^U. '� y C cL a�i s °q c ° o m a�i ._ U?r°5ov at^V ES -30 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR R w y R � O •y w v U U � t5Q fU0 y ^ O O o ti O U O V R Q O W O 5 E v U U'v� L�O ES -30 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR b O .5 �r G O u H d L+ R u i; C dtl C R �i d 1� O R �D 00 O R a.+ R t y u R a a tC u R C6 E 0 W R M N W u R [r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 0 ao ° c ,,,, o ro v ° e •E E ° � C U O .0 m O R v A O w .a O as 7 a7 H y N i0 A G ° •� 'y O O a V d U Q C '.0 �e v.� A 7 d p Cu C cc .0 v y cCtl pp O W h w- y " G N C C O p O >> E O p C .d y 'O U O .=pp •- k 'b-0•JYO• N �° p i 0 cl b y o tia° C - O ' C U 0q U 0. > a i E ad = v E E E o .>a o o o co CU ?o m Z 0� O Q ° °� U°� ° o'-oa 0 � A0 m s b o � o c ` o m - O _ c e co E o F 5 v C A ': U H O to s y � o a p � EO: r 9p c 'p 0 0 �C y ' ^ti O 'ti 00 O- -y ' s O C p D 7 ^ "a U tv U.- C p U 0 0 tQ C 6 � V O U p w O A O j N . S. t0 ^ A O 0 m Cc O U •y �N o � O E .'. U C C � °- m `O ou t L L�� ° v U a°' �s y c3 U U p y o cs saa a' aE N O Q .14 c > t �E !n c a H 0t0 0 = Ocd t OU � .E c O N : C- 00 .. ° t CO O C O + v T 0.- O C U ' C W .A Aaa c0n � o o o 0 0 � .- 0 RE U Um > ^ v v A o a o ° C $ ©a E CL C� o U > N cd :c ° o °i c x u 0 y s a [- > Q : > o i a A u N C U S a°G i ao • `a Garden Street Terraces Project ES -31 Final EIR 'C u D .9 y O O a d a b R a°o Q R F h h O "0 C R U R VJ y u R C R N dU t CJ R �d G ►n v7 R LdIw N W u R F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (71 C O s w O E 3 O iC �V O A C A m H T 0 y N 0. E V C W .b t ES -32 C O .E L v L � x L 3 c p 1.. t�0 f�7 t v L o0 ro� 4°. y O V s� N S v o s 0u 0.> V A y ..O ' 7 L >+ s° o E -O c o 14 E E a o ° v 3 b 3 y w w A v y C tCO p JE 0R.�"'rJ �UVC,c G y •C V] 0.. ° s O y 'O Q T O c a v 0 E° c C$° 'O V cc 00 . 'c7 s 0. ;n p C r-I ca 0 -Z w LV W� ,. o� g.E g 0 O c 00 U d E o Q ° E o to C: C� p O p O E! N 00 N O > y u7i Oo �'O' d O T R C* E:. v.o F�wr a> m� O .d '..' •-- 1. O O 4. O i0 'fl y N V O N O N W (�' W •y td V Si m 50 T N y ° E > E ' e ,c . a s D'a JS ti c o a E ° m CU acidco- _'p�Ec Co ri$ ms's F_y^. u 0.0u<0 ou rL U s . �s .. y io y n ?� � o U y Co 4 w E o o�> Er N >1 u o c s a R >° E E o° 0 °�> e p o0 c c m C7 A R 0.0 C y O 0F'Eye°�w^ v> b y t �C7y� F 0 0A C'j 'O •� L 0 U V O 'O Y y V y N Cn oo ° �= >._3E•Eaiao [ C ° aO o u .o _ y V O N pp Cvl A l p o •y .e 3 y C O° y U E�: U__ c V ,� o •- L a 4 R n dos U 4 a>i 4 E E V ' V V .O y o p b O C y y '°j d 'OH O '•� N to 0 ,� 7 7 0 U O Q � Ca 4 A >> N L t0 C O ' V C) y . O V y 0 C _T > O 0.d U O C U V aE`c'Gy °0 c F.�aa� yEO@ 0. bA rx ao °y s 0 a U'm 2zU•O uCo v r C v -7 WO y N y y 0 U L p U � L 7 w q y V y G o c y O 0.� � •y O Q0.N. E OL CJ v°i .ao 4s w E c T v O w to ° C V U C` U V > CJ L y L 7? p N y C O E'a R ° 3 E W O C is .p E q. .O A w y cc •O :: V V U U E y V V a� y ' h C v y . 4 = F V 'O Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ^C R .r a+ C O .Vi VJ d Y R Sul C7 ti F O ENOw R a1 R U R ry+ U R �r L. y bd V R a E H H R LIS N W d R EXECUTIVE SUMMARY y u cc CL ee 7 •O -N ° S y on o> ° c 5 n > a O O L 00 ❑ G .� c0 c0 •O 0. O C. N 3 Oq 'O O N to a � LO w V y w N CO O 'r 0 O 0 u �+'� F T ... 0 5 C �y .r C O ro.. '� w O y '0 y O w R. w 0 c0 d 0 3 s ° ° : 0 .� •rn A W C' �O y L^' H. '� R ° w O N N `�" vs'o c °5 I d a E y u o c Tm u� R.o.S lV U �` lO ri U i - Q. M. L u . x � � L L L� .� � = U ld R —• =� O u 'fl .°: a0 `' C. •E w � p u p .•• u u A O y C `� C A. u c a M x• °. a e C ❑° A s R C1 y v o n C a� c0 0 °� L y. �? � :D — L `.: a. O� s .. p u L ., L .. ;? T p u p O N y L o :c a� — ° o 0 9 Lx E�.S vx G v y m G. ° d —y, u x >, w3 R ti ° U — — d ;� o M� d is E Iwo 10 0 3 o u u u T o. _ U C C y O y O p; V 'O to 7. Cn t ;y O r. 70 M > ._ o ° ' .« y x ? q R O x 0 H d °' ' 0 O v bw T �° . N U O o u y r°.o E a > U yo u E o o ° 0 0 'o p' ° C C � 0 : O ' G D i ° ° a" v 3 ° .` U on 0 p r O X y C • � Q y p V to 'E V 0 o Ou aO`J : .V y � 0.0 d E n y O> O ° a N m a a h _ w v ,E ►r Garden Street Terraces Project ES -33 Final EIR 7 C O u Vl a C R u Zu OA C h y a O PO 4t �0 u C O J7 u O CL E C G: u a E Mw h H cc A N W Z CQ F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY '.+ 3 O U � ' •y 'a C a R => C N O E E C O W O y E U O >, y Nr 0 C° i O 0 o M .52 Z f E to ° 0 0 O 0. y y 4 C Oy C E • a y v CO u A t • 0 o a—m c o o d _y ou V On L C O P4 V C 0 @ a � 67 x 0°.� ' . v .0 E y E E O O r N y .0 'O E U . QJ F U ' ° v m O 0 Cn 0 a>i . L m c a0i d v ti ° o°n t :: v$, c A o a c a ° >? °' � o c�� y o d � c a°i F r o ca p E U p C V V > C p •A on 0 0 •N 3 �L1 N o Ez o tl 0 0 psi o °•�'ow:?wy A o°_ aci O cc >> O F O v °. y- °= o _° o °' Oa E y a .00 e� =�E'�� Cod E E00a —m- A�o1 °a ° ° °'oy ° o�o`namo aUOai; was °000E°v° -'tee a� => i. p w O E C O 0 C O. 'n O '� P. � s 0 'b O .� W. iy t.; C z> o o >= .= ° o o` E A E v s 9= v �° 'o aai A e s a m ._ 0 R a o aai "? o o �. b v 7 °: o a s m .o a n qs .= ono 0 0 v v 0 O .. 0- F. a a� a v C e .0 u 0 3 0 �'E • d 0 a 0 H y o H ai v o w y p .9 m C p w E i O E O w 0 .y v 6 0. •" U Q 0 w- -Eo w -r mR >. v 0ac a�arE Conogc o w ,o K m o •� a o 0 0 0 = o d• s 0 0 r -- w. O y 4 0 U 4 v > .� > tO — cc 3 a~i 'b E_ 5 � � .o p �` 0 o .° U w O s o o v 0 a o_ p o v y 0 y° N .: V b t m 'b O 0 0 .Y �„ w 0 p , E .O E y C A 'E y O p E. 0 0 0 C a) O^ U N 0 �p 6. U Q o ° ° s _ w �m 3 0— m osU Ws °ow °' ay.QF UgE0.34) O u0 ca G3U��`ASVO�b V ?��9:6 s °U aE ° ;' tea° °��' a r� a 9 2 ° o ° 3U Rm�x ti� 0 fl C D h '0>' aE�i u s t to O 0 EG�� rEi _ e'ti _ 0 00 O ° 6 3 U-0 s V N O C w C V U E a ° X W N .+. CW M .0 >1 C r+ E O 7 = C y t 0.0 u G r3 -0 V . y'0 V '.+ 3 O U � ' •y 'a C a R => C N O E E C O W O y E U O >, y Nr 0 C° i O 0 o M .52 Z f E to ° 0 0 O 0. y y 4 C Oy C E • a y v CO u A t • 0 o a—m c o o d _y ou V On L C O P4 V C 0 @ a � 67 x 0°.� ' . v .0 E y E E O O r N y .0 'O E U . QJ F U ' ° v m O 0 Cn 0 a>i . L m c a0i d v ti ° o°n t :: v$, c A o a c a ° >? °' � o c�� y o d � c a°i F r o ca p E U p C V V > C p •A on 0 0 •N 3 �L1 N o Ez o tl 0 0 psi o °•�'ow:?wy A o°_ aci O cc >> O F O v °. y- °= o _° o °' Oa E y a .00 e� =�E'�� Cod E E00a —m- A�o1 °a ° ° °'oy ° o�o`namo aUOai; was °000E°v° -'tee a� => i. p w O E C O 0 C O. 'n O '� P. � s 0 'b O .� W. iy t.; C z> o o >= .= ° o o` E A E v s 9= v �° 'o aai A e s a m ._ 0 R a o aai "? o o �. b v 7 °: o a s m .o a n qs .= ono 0 0 v v 0 O .. 0- F. a a� a v C e .0 u 0 3 0 �'E • d 0 a 0 H y o H ai v o w y p .9 m C p w E i O E O w 0 .y v 6 0. •" U Q 0 w- -Eo w -r mR >. v 0ac a�arE Conogc o w ,o K m o •� a o 0 0 0 = o d• s 0 0 r -- w. O y 4 0 U 4 v > .� > tO — cc 3 a~i 'b E_ 5 � � .o p �` 0 o .° U w O s o o v 0 a o_ p o v y 0 y° N .: V b t m 'b O 0 0 .Y �„ w 0 p , E .O E y C A 'E y O p E. 0 0 0 C a) O^ U N 0 �p 6. U Q o ° ° s _ w �m 3 0— m osU Ws °ow °' ay.QF UgE0.34) O u0 ca G3U��`ASVO�b V ?��9:6 s °U aE ° ;' tea° °��' a r� a 9 2 ° o ° 3U Rm�x ti� ES -34 Carden Street Terraces Project Final EIR n � g =•E�a v b C o V y G 0 30-Ey`3N•o O o v A .0 CO A ,SL lT a V O 6 3 x O O x E C o 0 u o a p >,C = N ,O T H - y u m- E � V Q O y �WX0 I a V 0 y o 0 2 ES -34 Carden Street Terraces Project Final EIR b d C 0 OJ a .a ii d�D �n C R Vi y ►a O F' N W v R H EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ES -35 cC C A ca - ca ca A ca R y d V E �= _' dU E w dU y'� o o E a o y y I I y R E T u N A �O���II ro V 00 rOr�� V O 'r .... U ' V m y a. v ° 0 3 o•o ow 0.;3 � x 3 y ov 0 0 v y a> "= w� �u o� V y L Q 1 Opp,,-0 L L [0p, L." L OQQ,,-O G' L U c0 ? ' H C� °VC 0 A y U to > 0> �0> 0> do to y G U �� ° 3a. 3a� 33� E3h to > 0 C N V a OA tC c0 00 pp U Cu U U U N A^ N W CO p N V t FA d is 0 .gyp 'CCo N L CO N p A O 0 H m ° N OO L A V Y C C C y o • 92. y v0 .� .E m '$ Q y .E y C 'J' O C 0 A m d d .G 0. A 0 E a,C� C E 0 d o: Vi U y �asV vi C r y aev V N �; .b mo 33�sE '> .. y � N �O Ca0 N 7 a iC Q O° y -S cc .O C itl id °� Y O w C C p y p M ,r C1. y C ° �- �. N ° E V Cd y .... 0 �y ° >, Oo M w a 0 .= .. O r- 3 a U o v r 3 a 0"Qdv� °a°:� Voac0sE ° °'� .. o y ° a a o 'to e o Q :� tk y w adi p E 0¢ E s 0 ' pq uj .9 b 0 .r. O U y w A p •E V 0 N O m a CO a U p v O t O o° o v c v 0 a O >1 S C C Y V 0 E uJ A � v o y m A 'C R mo t d .0 4E U w _ >1 y 'O C CC >> Cd >� 0 t0 R V V a ' a. -5 0. i C p O 0 = E >,� t C 0 0.x O O N 0 0 0 0 E' C CO l cc N 0 0- O �• y y �. L y � c7 > G. O° C .$ 0 �> y E° d V E H c 0 d V b 0 0 3 0° N'00. 0 0 �. 3 0 '% Q ° E E w E .. O N o a a a. 0 S d o L) E 0 0° d L i". d G-+ N 0 ;�•-' y `;� ,> O C '> O y ro y R 0. .ctl .N p 0. 0 0 A r- a 0. cc b? � c s 0 A> F w? e Ca fl a M n c..: c c v 0 0 O 0 c v 'O U Cc 0 m v Cz N T q 4 E y V M N v •O .y N I y l`y i0 C d ro= Cn N v rn 4: N C C ,03 =°, C A 'y b C y O a 0 2 0 a Q..� r'ii tN�' R o E C7 c a. A R WO ."0 °- 0 CD o Ww ° o o C7 y E° v Q C u °° w x 3 `8 y 0 m y 0.o V 0 0 d 0. 0. 00 rn m 0 v t 2 3 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ES -35 d O y y ii W W G OD O H Q O E-H .d u d Cq rr s y u C'. o0io rA CIO R R H H R MW N W a� e� f EXECUTIVE SUMMARY- -- j N ° V W O y C � N fly w O o E Ca 0 o a x c '� U U E � o oco _ G O N N � C a O_ X V `C c s w _? c v 9 c•� m � � v a 5 y.5 a .0 .v °' `o c > E o^'^ m E G 3 0 c N -, .y _ a� - - _ G0>C,( N " °c0 0. yosoo o0 co5; °c b =8 ° °sE cc C m RS •5 w c O °• �' s '^ ,O O b.0 0 q .0 N •: 'C `:.� E w 3 >, ? .5 M Ac EcA. o 4a0 °e �'yg0u—a u NEo. ° oE� o 0w v E� °o �.^ a..� R o ,', `= E 5b R e -E ?: NU � •a ° o = a to R � � .5 °'° o. y_ ° s '0 y 9 = a3i m = � �° y `° .o V s .N c O w pp 'fl •5 %. N E y O 'O a7 N v 'O O OA v W= y N Q fC O ' 'O V v O .O y 'O O .G — is rT ,C N T t� w t� h m °a.c �F o ° ° ° E .°'pQ h.5 > QO c ¢ = c c 07, .'^.°, o :: o °' c " •� ° .9 N ° V aai oNO :: `o a°i c 7. z :o x cz. �a .5 Q c. ,cc ° 0 43 ° rJ t� O C oN 'E °� oo ° Ca. y_ c ao OD .c 0 N 0E p 3 w7 R 0 0 :9 o c ou R C A d O C O 0 P. O O C O N s [ ai 'O6 S ' O N CO 00 .0 p >, L E ° u O ^O =tio a' yw 9 aN oi R °- v �• w3 o E s .E� y xQ • �N o O ' oO W `" d .� N .0 E5 .y E m .c y ,o , ¢ x ti N b tec ao _ 0 3U .w ° a v x cR 'h '=c o >°� S 3ca " .o ov> �x o R CR' oac° i -14 u 3 N a 0. ao ° v 0 c cc o y - 0. o v 'o ° ° °' v 3 c o ° °•� ° o 00 N> = 61 c'g °o c o y= b c D a ° R s a o ° Q > s G A a a > = °a c o . '°? 0 `° ca 5 y C G N a X -,g aTd e 4 d o d °� N > °' ° u o : o R o a a v c o o 8 � a �.5U ° n o N rd' As R A n ES -36 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR Y C � d d - u wO�a Lr y w0 0 z o o 00 X 6 v � N 0 x o`oav ES -36 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR u D 0 u V1 a C 4: C M a 0 b d W C eA U CIS F u ed O.. ar C Zi y b+ u .r q 203 CO LO N W 3 ea F� EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Garden Street Terraces Project ES -37 Final EIR M C' u 0 c ` Er Es M c 5 ou U y R O M O M .�'. CO to is '-' 0000 0. y R o �" a E U E U 'fl a a o o o .° c a ❑E a.6�bo Ca E `R' E E o° s 3 y' u e bA C O to . O 1. 7 D Ca 5 0 ' R (1) ° U 5 0 N v h C o C 0= 3 aou � o0 r . R ° X O C o p o o ° U C -rw •— co w Q) 0 O O U .rR yy R a) 4 W °w' °P C E M 0 ^ G J-. y °z Rp° 3 0 •- °° m R a c E " E Ln E a c °3 a — > ° �0 o o yC a F . A o t 0 5 ° — C y C* y CU > w E ° U aJ G NQ 4.. •� U d N R y> y w vi d` '3 E y c 0 O C fG U 0. ° p M m U > y 4 .. o a7 co O' E 'UD y CO y 5. A 7 C' 'O 'fl C T 7 «17 ° U .0 i •J 0A 7 •� ° L M .0 := ?� O .� �- i 'C v U U b4 °: R o'�a 2°=osR a �. °E U = ov�v u 0. ,d �dx��� dip° -�- d °: E°ae a E - 7�aj c -u •° � r 3 a CO o o^vi u O > o o� a .0 Co 0 0 0 R •a �M v °° 0 0 O .d 'O u O C -i . ° U y ' w 'O ° U V y > 0 O � .0 y $ 0 0 a o ~ W 2 0 CO = r- . i .. • 0 rz U O 0 a U R O U o U 0 a O w M .- + ca m °m y C : n E ° u a Q o aa U a z c o y =°t�oC 'N U O N o .� E x R O b R M .� M 4 C c '0 o Q .. w .M U . > 0 N y R x E a �•. . C p U °4 O O �y ccaw M �d g�4'v — � C °0 v - ° °R.5 O " EQ F O o S M UL 5 o o O M N= C m a,—Ri U C R 01) O• z Z: s G > ? ^� o 0 U U ` a 3 E .E a4i O_ U 7 5 O O • U •U 0 R o a.a u n o` Ca X p 7 U .d O O «. 4 .1 •1 O N V eoD��.� `° a� O T R ° 0 8 ° 0 3° � ° • E o r. ° ° a M K ° con e °° •° -; c ^ y b R a c 'C o a v 4 b O O o 3 a M o M }- .E o > O Eb= a h fL a� •> yay Na ' a . o 'oyO Q s = aE^ s M x v E ro a)a ai E "ii x .E E o`u A Garden Street Terraces Project ES -37 Final EIR 1�I u O f/1 i 6� a Y u w e� H y 0 PC w OVA d Oq U R J. q u CL C R u L: 1 i u C. w y N W u 3 F I f EXECUTIVE SUMMARY T c o � U C w m O Vi 7 0 9 r C R N 7 N n E y O 0 . S a s o"0 O R y 0 as�3 0 to o o rRa 3 Cr U m w c 0 b 0 6. •� O x.R a os o °. a � A °w' o� � o � „ .=O C4 E� C y c.. O U m m" On s a N 7 y O 2� O y �+ O, CO 3 O e0 �� 7 w R N H 3 ono ys y onv c m o R° onREn s— c a oN R y o o c 0� 0 3 y o 5 e. 0 0 awr CU c c is s o? on 0: m .5 k= a> u[ c 0 °- a a u m on y c O R c= Q 3 �° ° 0 E 0 v ° �=° [ O v °� ¢ a o o c5 R ow° am`�° o �� y R Cl ¢ �? 7 0 m .5 w `w C U >� O s O On R C O w '� C 00 U R. - aci cO 0 .° �o x 0 =°w� o m c R a.D cc 00 0/ C to y T N 5 0 R y 7 O 6:.E O is C p m On O s �0, 3 0 >` € y b 0 Cr m 0 'O a s s0. ° N V m O .� N .-. R L U .0 y— fa 0 m w a c — c y o0 3 c m c 3 c o o > 3 R R cE 0 5 0 a 5 'm a o 0 � ° ci n a 0 C O C H = w O :: R O U . 0 a o 0 t; 0 0 o n C, om 'm04) °c,p8 2 roar O OU 0 O 70i >' 7 C N 3 N W> y U w — °° fl° 0 w A 0 v c 3 A 0 0 C t 0 o .�. �. •� ... j> 0 .d rj C N 0 C is F O is L 0 Q O :+ > y •� '0 p N 'b 5 C O— `" O O Q' to CO 0 '� 3 a s •C w S c o v b 0 a C C O] A H o v y - cc O' ��S*0 16 0 h0O.o'y�c U„Q4)—ed a5� €as>,5,= ¢53 R ro c- Rr m c o e 0 s.5 =° ai 0 0 °a5 3 m 5 c0.o0. atia ° o A''oa�i p a D V° c .5 `� c ys0 3° w a N; c w 0 5 a y R R A 0 R 3 0 A is p R w m ro C y D o Q o 3 u < v n 4 o x s c .� s x •° r x o 7 a a w° t+ y o9 w >W Q. h t+ m Z V1 `. R b G. Ou O 6 cc Q r w 3 m m 0 - O � E C s 3 u S 0 c R• atji .. v•�,> > aon y a O p a 0 O O. E m aci 2 N L.', v� C G•0 �„ v� w a 0 0 •„ x .5 S •� � o � ES -38 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR N W R F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 0 0 O q y , v' i N• ' y y ti G o q 7 T O Q A O 'n.° A 8� -0 MO 0 -:S A $ o 'C O y y u v g °= aci o 3 w y o m o a j c r o m y 0 7 q 0 _ y> O q n y y v w 7� y O ro C q E y `� N y -d `O w O° O c O N O ~ `' C ,� y ❑ v ❑ t0 0 �. y °��' '8 A R°: y o x G 0 "a w u > q .0 ° � C A D O o> E2 E v ayi .o °� U ocyn °q ° Ca y c 50 y o . t v V ° ° o E o y U A y d° V v v e c° a°i y. ° r u= Ou T d aci _ °q E r? d c c 2 ° o os y ° y g c r y 3 op yt 0 5- c 0 r m C v •C O' ° r- 0 v .mil C '° .. y m ❑ ,0 .G iE �+ d C iE y.a 3 y q w d .•y � 7 cp,..j S q b4 w y y y 3 ,2 �rU Oy y ^O q ' -y :° y A .is U U 0 ci ? 'C O O d .A O y r. Cr ° o ° a E 3 "A 7 z. —° 04 _ QV y a�`0 y R `>° N yA, •4. �,3 ` . a� ° ,g ci V V vV > 7 .. M . N C ° R o R -0 o 0 o .0 O . > m aO m ' 'O O a 8 e q u c, v -fl ° O� 2 0 q N w .ca a d c ' m U O a O c h p E t c° q w Q R y Q° v� o v H Q F q.S I I I I y -B o . Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ES -39 d O O a C V OD y y d a O E■ N W d O F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY T _ O C '•' U 'O C c=v ': CL o 3 "3 ^ o O O N = W C CG d d O 0 aCi aEi . 3 E ay o °.= ay N E 0.w E 0 .0 o w ,C 7 O w y E 0.O O a E o CO �c 7 E L c b m p ° L ° o0 y 0 0 o 3 o oo o a o r o 0� °' = L C �, Ty 0 00 a owe 0�A�.= °�N =>.° icEc0 0 sAs C, L o c y= o °_ a tl e h E .w 0 0.rJ U° w U o e b J. a 3= U= y v O L _ Z- � `°' m C 3 e a Q ° o `� _ .o. w m 3 U OE t 0�= wo°'°'0w EiE Co �ti >�E' yy 3w 0o y id «. y 0 C O ;O U T y 7 4.. 04 O r�. ,O w w Oq y w _ C •'�, R y .E 0" C 07 U= i', w N ?"- 0D m O .� 'n « ,,,..E U 0. Cl., U O O b 0 r- ''O W d Q a aL ` • w _ >-a- -0 y m O as O- 0 A 00 w a 0 C 0 L v tc C o > O Y R 0 , C _ , G 0 O o p N 00 a t E Ow R � oe 3� o °° E ° 0 Co 0 e ;03 w wa ^ O c d aH .t w 0 w p v y �0 cc O ui 3 r w 0. £ E C o uO C^ O U o w C w - 0 O m 0 5 0.� o o c Cm m P6 m v = N 00 o � o > C e 'v ° o 0 u 0 •— O n bJD 4 Onr= 0 0 y O 'fl ° w W v o o cc Os- _ v 0.Gm -o> ° 00�0 0 ? F v y y w ,, ; v w- 0 = 0. L v L y u CA d w fl L C w bo € w .0 ., 0 a S eq : w _ u o0 0.c a o 0 N : 0 w U r. L v = E UO yo O 3 A 0 > " a :0 C > 0 0. .0 w O ° > ° c E O L E v x�QCO ° E �t I I ��. � > o � s � o ° � � a o a0i a0.i p n u a0.i � � W > a .5 > � 3 3 H o a 0 U s o 3 0. a o 3 y E o .. w " 0 b 0 :? 0 a° a C a C 3y�A 3 >' m o,E to o,Er v 0.... ? .G 0. ... w '.o Cw o o w c y U_ 0.'0 Ca.'E 0 c'E 5 cc L U y L N t'1 U Q' U A 0 U '3 `o 0 ES-40 Garden Street Terraces Project Final E!R /1 D O y d i C u L: O ew C ca V1 0 b y GD M� �1 R U Z +y+ u a R o�D .r 1 H u R fl. r h q R LO N 1 W 6� C0 F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ES-41 N � U R T yU'° ti R F C R N R C u a C% d p� s A p 3 C p o0 O O 4 o O C W' p G. c o •�, m N ELOq E°';� G ELU y'OL Ub.V w y'O W' E 3b E 3 a° b C G U > R .L. L O O m y G d i0 W O' y 3 tJ p; y G, '' U cC0 C R U O .+ IJ' O u IR. X 3 cc a u . :> N c N C 0A 47 R cCJ d y L pL v 0.= 6. r�' T N y w E p0., �a CJ U R U L 0.O C � SU o O N pp o Q c °° p OJ ° R% r- E L C C) 04 0 O 0 N L `G� CO c 7 t O° c R N '� 0. OA V .0 G.'r 0 - .y 'DJ N N .4?• N 0 �� Dq U— O '_• .N y 0 N C ,� N R% .U.. .E cc L io ca ' w N O > U 3 baN W i G •� c U O pO 7 > .S N O N L y c 7 E y Y 04 0 0 '7N O w 5o d —0--a p o G U G 3 C � °m ° cb t°c ° Uo04 R .i O y— � O o 'O cc � 0 N Co L O �C V R ' N G : : N U T N " N O > — ' p. %R R CO , 0.0 U L N — R N O % L O O O. 0. R iyy d C c U U O V 00 • 4i 8 0. 0 0 C N m • e " 'C '° R E 0 7 E L JV' R L6 V O�� >p U �n pEL" V Z G y p 4R 3 o �.... °.iU o q w 3 oa. o R R aD aTi.N �� oon Z o u .. h o. U 3p C 3 O E y y 0q W O O y 3 O o4 0 U .� U Dq R 0D U t7 U W cc 0 E °C i 1N 0 00 N . O . c O o o 0 0 G id o v D ` Z Go Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ES-41 d �r a O h a L: a on y d a O d 0'a a U i •i u C6 a VJ 1 U R CL r ..n M N W u Z F 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY " ES-42 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR u CO y W O O �N, O N E O .fl .0 O ,C E 00 Q O c0 O O c0 O a e, E E�� E ° ° > ° b ° .y V a d 49 0- a E 4b a>i 0- ° z v 3 R° 3 A aCi L O p.•C 7 O y '2 ° 0A 3 •fA OA U pq 3 L Y 'N OD U � V 4 pp •� di .� w V 0 W G '0 A .fl ° 'n �' y C C °' C w W 0 .>'. _ E c °v n ro' W a coo v > G cCa a"i a.� `° .o o y ti E CD p 72 d >1 d N OL E 0� L co — V y CO C C C R 0. 0 .d Ste. s> O C U r. V o0 C u. 'O a' y E '�- v: y y A C C ° O O L 00 O . O E. 0.0 E CO C 0.L 'C O w ° y L 0 4 .y = w .fl . o C 0 v A A, W °U L) a O w C y O O O oU C 0 ' W C 3G°i N AJ R 0 ° �- v aUgw E t A c "a my � to .: o o > io� 0 ' ° N mrE ❑ > -0 Ca n z 0. ° > o: c ° Q o V 0 U Q 0° y i C � UO 0. y O ° O N U U C O C p D � O ¢ 7 LO .> ' J J .v 0 0 O O M.0 0 m >1 0 O 7-- c Ca 0.0 d 0 0 4 p C a to c c v A p$ c > 2 'a u v c o a > v o j � ai y o E •E t' ' F6 cE o i a 7 u L ° G ° � .0 ° w y o ° oo E° dai � V � O o o v z Z° E ° o .:° .p 7 0 z N T z b .a0 C 'C ? b N ��.�LG.•+ A d as ca 'p FCI Q) 0. i� p A a 4 + E O ° U M M CO O V • • . C Oq C C tO Cn y •V C � � C N T N W O O v z U Ol 0 C O >1— �y y O C O w O y u m C9 .E 0"0 > y v v C 06 0 0 3 19 O 'b E 'O O �• G' ti i 0 O V 4 C 0� w" 7 O p N v0 . L O ° V L O ° env_ o pp C a�°iwU m p ° Cz cc Z C z O C O z 3 axi +1 R ri w° h w E.E. -= ES-42 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR N a F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY op 0 o � .0 N O a=i O= '-' O° E C ' U 0 y E o O m E��°'oaO_c� 7 7 .� ° 0. R c,. > R O R > R y Ri .d w ❑ = U a > b O O C F. h O. y O �...` 0O C W G O F 0 a U v Ou = C h O R P. R C U b c0 = :: E v1 v U '0 G R .U. R O Ut+ y L ,U R ro �i N •E ° o H 0 cc ca CL 0 'y ° C c o=n ° u o ° ,° o = y y c b a A E _ c } ." R A ^� m C W :; `°� ' R�.° .. —•° .. '" U Ha ro °' H ° vN ° oa ` o v o o w rU L. R to U o o o c R c s fl w m C 3 = �. c 3 h .°.° ,° _w �" ' �R A A � •': o aa E c ' o 0 04 U o ;y R v ° w y O 4PA . C 0 O u 00 '. y > ° di ° U O O d = O O G C. O M U a) 00 C F fl' O ti C w O O O O U C c0 R E 0.... o 0. vi 0 w v� ° a O ,l = .9 .0 X 0. O U 2°.7 .O O R O R 7 W o N b R 0 ° E td R CO ca — 'fl '> w 0 L. y O RR . V E o ° O - U by' O > O U 0. ° CO 04 0q ' cp y N y R N> C C w ° CO ao c ri F v -0 .R` aOu 0.c°iw Garden. Street Terraces Project ES43 Final EIR 3 C u y a C u t; ao q CC .0 F y H 6� a O eC 010 G eA U u .r �r G: OA •r 1 +y+ u �Q rn nr rr w v, el Ar N 6� L e� EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 0 m > C 4i O i y vi i�ro 0 N C> Cp •O N> y N N .: 0' as N 1.. m 0 0 0 'O m R r 3 R u m °: c m c s c x d va IU.. 3 ti O Oq 7 Ip, 0 C v� N O !+ i0.. �^ O n W 7 rg cc 0 o `o 0 o •2 o w- U o° 3 ro U o° ca u o R a b 3on°afV 3,�,mQO 3x.°^°� 3 oa C p O rC!! O •� > ^pj o ,9 ^ 0. O C `3 > "_' 7 O N O 0 0 0 O 0 O N O 0 y y V O cc $ e m u o> x c° d a c° d a o E ca R O c ° N 0. A .b (U C b .O G v. .O 'O N .O 0.- O — 0 N 0. of o -- y c C? o y Q o— N n E o Ca u c c° 3 a m °^ c °' d 3° a° v E 3w n es 4,�ro°p , x m c u a�p'E a4i�a�icaE a4i„coE m H c. CO �° 3 E cc Fs» ''�° [�- 'y° [�- a .� .E .� H o 3 E C 0 C pq O ° ,� v O N N N° C N R E C U � t O y C y :D y 7 O t Nsw '3 0 0.400�c o •m a4i o s v F E❑ v o .5 v N aEi y a c ° 4 r d on c y A 3 - F" CO ° ao „ > .d �°'. O on p E -I 'y o � o a°i vo v ao° wNO s c v 4 Cd �C E co U A . ° ca a c c o c U > a on . 0 0 ° aa U > U .- o a a ° 0i . o c o F y d ° U c W � o� 0. W U JG c A 0. b m ° c o 3 a w 0' 00 ca O CL CO 0 � p > � w C w E C 0 p m O v d O O y o 0 > 0 C 0V C C - y i ` A a o c y ` O Up w c 4= > p 7•m c M 0 r4 o , v° 0 o 0 G - r A � ° w 0.e a °: v o cai aCaEi i ° E • .v ?; a Sc E c o4 d� ° o cd o a o o o co o a O o3 C > .0 >, ? oco'^ ° ti 3 v A c aci E v c°. S' °- y°c ° e z [� o a 04.c ox y 0.� y V E m y a c �.N �'�s U O > nF.o u wo .E °c to E ` .� d ' •E o°n c 'c FE - ai .c_c c CQ F x co ' U p ^3 M.2 '0. ° 9 e ° n 7 cZ � o C> C 0 -0 ¢ ' 'b O .0 a A cCa E A o m 0 3 •a d H 5 o O 0 3 F" > a3i ° c o • t 0. 0..0 .o G E vf co C m C o 'O o b 1- •� w .L w �• O c E c0`f y U Om <Ca y ❑ 0 C lief b o . o n ;`, 3 � a3i 3 �•�:s2 3'Nb,x a> ° R °'�-' 0 �,�.: v ° a t v y on c 0._ v c CO c w o 0. ro 5 ti 0 w N 0. oEo obt4 oc:O3vf v� o. �° °coq o vi E= EU0 , •^ o o ° 0: O C .>. ' O y 0 0.0 > p • y , Q. Cu c" > . cn JG cc CU . ° oo J ? > o 2 C o o > 0 0 0.v 0. 3 E ES -44 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR v 7 C Pig O .v. G R G R 0 0 iIIA d a O b y ORO a+ W q R U R y u 4r 0 IZIR u ern u R h H R A N d R F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 0 b d yTa° Es E R a.L o y 0 0 bb v, m .b N , d y0 v U M O W O c,E= ❑,E now 0 m EHb o > 0 0 ° 0 w G 3 c aai aai .� N G.0 40 W 0.0 � a � E .� •v � 3 '� � 3 O w0 V 7J N y m 0 r- V w >1 m t)o o o QJ M Cu IV as ro 0 R o c d to ° Eo� o ff 0 o ' , w O 9 ,G � a o U° a E no d . o R G c c ° H — a v e' a c,� 0 � ° 0 °�$ � v acU ao gH v 0 o �0 a '> '" an nu o y �3 0 In y 0 m s m O E 0 0 m w m 'a 0 0 0 m m s 0 3 w o w y V E w V U .�. 4 '.a 7 .M cc :: y O W. Ly a ,A .> .. O 00 'V — s O .a L O n 0 3° o'er o a o �.[ ❑ 0 v c o NF. 0 E oa a T a �oE"py � Rm�[ ��'� a'i°Dz o�v3 s"00 bo C y y 7 5C 0. yQb 0 °= � ca a V CO �a . b .� � =o � E w G v r = C 9 O 0 0 m ` o� ToE > o (5 0 0 a, Ca 0Oo � >a o o a� "^ .- ,N ' mEc° u E 06 s .. 0� a>i w 0 a o ,a c .° 0 T O id 3 p- C7 ? CLO c o o p E v` o ¢w 3 a a A a Ca P x 0 d 0. U o Cm C 1 0 CO o r. C O c > . H 0 M .d H 'o. F .° no •N'o o a' o N o a o: [- avi p F� F p ° 1:L 0 a E n a 3 as b 3 aci a` v$ o s [- ❑ 3 0 [- „ s V F °' 0 0 no o s o O C U T IZi 3 a v ` E a"i r h 0 E m 0 0 0° o ocq m 3 a R = ° ou a �.E.N> CID cc 'C a m c 00 C 4 0 to 0> > v N o ° a v o aoQ 0 0 c o to O >n " o Oo . c T V N d N V >1 > 0 F ° m C o ° a ° A b ap o sN v m s • C �c p -o 0 0 0 o 7°° o 0 > � o c w o f a H m o= F F- 0. 0. In a o a0. c. F 07w 3 E. H•E Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ES -45 L" ar C O Vi 61 a C R u C R a O R O�0 u 0'a R s y y u R a 8 Y R e w u R a FBI W) W R A N u R EXECUTIVE SUMMARY — V1 C R U 4. C O^o .y ° L 0 H 0 X I 0 b dQ 0 0 N .Q C w 0 O o y .0 U c ai U O v_ N O r Cd .E d h T u u L d c Y M ES-46 U O L1 cCp O O C h O C id U O C i9 U W'O O "O O O C ._ 'O O 7 A y N O w A N c 0 d Z AV E c� °U E1 0 .0 ca o A o 0 0 N 0 0 E fl 0 4 0. fl ar 0 0. y C C C 'O y C C 7 b vE'O•y� 0 c o? R o- = w 0 A o-� w 5 c 4 ° a 0 o 3 .3 =ocn Z y C O C N y C y C C vi C C C u r N o Ca ° c o y a, ❑ °' d C C ca 7 �" 4 C C R O. N 4 C C C d co N ° E ° 'y' E ° E .E ? E ° 0 8 .E w Ou ° o'. >1 ID 0 ° o° a E A R " o ° m° F O C C 0 .0 y d • - 0 4 C 0 s.' .v 0 7 . 0 N y C O= 0 0 N C = CO -1:1 to o d �� 0dC ai O -? c w� o 0 0Q . . ° > N y ° 0 0 yo 0 o ° ° 00 0. n - u .= y o O o ° E o 3 E p > o g 0 0E U O o'o � 0 -`.0 m0 = o m 0°r� ca0E5 0 do o e wE A o 0�x ' 0 ° ~O0. ° E 0 0 0 0 O O m C c r ow Oy .5 o Oo0 o ° o _ ^ � l dq� o y ro b 'fl y C y m b O 0 is ` .0 >, 2 "' h N— C .0 W C C .= d Uo 5�E a3 �'? °A.�," y CO °iNv�v 0eu6vNo $ 0 b a ° U E A° 0 0 a o E fl E nO s A a' 0 0 u o y E"a o .E a, o .> ° w L c A u c c c 0 >, �° E a v N .0 i0 0• C N .. t? A CO U y ca w E kn .0 I^ U C 0. w U y 0 3 cc F y 3 t t .b t O 0. c° c U r. OO 3 y y 0 0. E� e w .n cc C a3 w [� C is m a) E �= E 0. `O`, 'C C0 = 0.0 0 a 'C 0 -0 O A m C _ -0 d N>1 aai avyJ; N aCi y a) C .� C O U M R U 7 0 3 ca M 0. y u .0 . 0 3 .5 0 a c (r U E >, = E O w F .o D y a. E o O a3i m O° e w o U .E a O aEi v= E° ;o O 6 0 ^° v 3.5 �U um 5._ 2._ 2 en a E N� �OGw 0 Cw C .`n r y = y U 0•s 2 a cv d C> 00 oA�3 n U O rL ...E c y L a) 4J N E � � .O ° 3 o U y r- T O 0 > tl o c: a 0 0 O,a O Tw a' °ya 'm 0 0 q n E o °a a`i o C ai OD.- 3o.5.5c E F -R_0r. C 0 w C 5 y r y= n y m (- 3 E E °�' o. Q Q axi *18 O Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR N W F I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY w o 0 o v o 0 y 0 N O _ a O tic 7 •� tN0 N. y h 3 0 V Q ° �o u ° V ow 0 O 00 - M.0 -a .X 't0 59 •O a c O E >1> € y ° ° o fl C O.0 �� 7�7>'� O by O O 'j y7 0 O 73 N O ° ° ° 77� 3E� °' -o °^'o �g to F � U �. Cn H a ca U N U h° v d ca ca V Y3 O iv JO c a 06 3 0 Garden Street Terraces Project ES -47 Final EIR 'p T id y y O T 0 N 7 � y T N �• a O Cis v O C i0 v•� C 3� C C O V N O w C N C £ 3> b 3 O o o f •y OA � � N N f1p � � � h L f=/1 CU yI � .0 1.� 1yy 0 Ix dVECa � R °UEca"c. i Oq H 7) N a 0 N V a O O lO S V •°°' 0 ocrq•°_y°.T � E o U y o3n .E a`di E �� �� I v a w •- o `o a ro O ° p 7 a ) = O 04 N L C A y> a) m 0 F N V1 to 0 V p N y C ° o V E C c y A t0 �' R C cyCl O k CJ C E o o E 7`7 y io N tw O y C rJ" y y C 'O y at6i H E v ° h`ox o w o 0 o v o 0 y 0 N O _ a O tic 7 •� tN0 N. y h 3 0 V Q ° �o u ° V ow 0 O 00 - M.0 -a .X 't0 59 •O a c O E >1> € y ° ° o fl C O.0 �� 7�7>'� O by O O 'j y7 0 O 73 N O ° ° ° 77� 3E� °' -o °^'o �g to F � U �. Cn H a ca U N U h° v d ca ca V Y3 O iv JO c a 06 3 0 Garden Street Terraces Project ES -47 Final EIR 'p T id O T � 7 � y T N �• V 0 0 iv R G V; O C O V N O w C N C £ 3> b 3 O o o f ~ U O p 3 rz U V O N a °773N °PC00�74 'C � R a> y w ° 3 W) N O •E L V a.G P.a •°°' 0 ocrq•°_y°.T � E o U y o3n .E a`di E �� �� I v a w •- o `o a odu y v ° abi = �. E `� N L C A y> a) m 0 F N C ,d ° o h 7s E C c a7 o E. a a7 g A •y 7`7 y io O ..7 C c°i E O y C rJ" y y C 'O y at6i H E C G y 7 E C C C E C G V 77 c0 ,C Oa .� U_ O C U C> o C T S .a ip C C .yCV. ° OU K 0' Ow .� F o �.5 n° R ao a� a 0 o. tCC V a y Q 737 z d L S 77 C j t N t Gr. y i 7) T O R V E _?: > > U= v ° c a .0 Ep ca o w a 0 CL 00 ° VUm o o it Caw o aaOO °��' a •• e e w o 0 o v o 0 y 0 N O _ a O tic 7 •� tN0 N. y h 3 0 V Q ° �o u ° V ow 0 O 00 - M.0 -a .X 't0 59 •O a c O E >1> € y ° ° o fl C O.0 �� 7�7>'� O by O O 'j y7 0 O 73 N O ° ° ° 77� 3E� °' -o °^'o �g to F � U �. Cn H a ca U N U h° v d ca ca V Y3 O iv JO c a 06 3 0 Garden Street Terraces Project ES -47 Final EIR 'p T id O O 0 0 r O 0 0 iv R G C O V N O w C N C £ 3> b 3 O o o f ~ U O p 3 rz U V O N a °773N °PC00�74 'C � R E-' U r- 00 O F" V ca '.�.. Q N - R .0 C 7) W) N O •E L V a.G P.a cc w o 0 o v o 0 y 0 N O _ a O tic 7 •� tN0 N. y h 3 0 V Q ° �o u ° V ow 0 O 00 - M.0 -a .X 't0 59 •O a c O E >1> € y ° ° o fl C O.0 �� 7�7>'� O by O O 'j y7 0 O 73 N O ° ° ° 77� 3E� °' -o °^'o �g to F � U �. Cn H a ca U N U h° v d ca ca V Y3 O iv JO c a 06 3 0 Garden Street Terraces Project ES -47 Final EIR N w EF EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 0 O C 0 m 'Cpp .0 d 7 cd i0 ' y U � DA Vi C V £ C p 7 0 c0 a C r 0 V 70 :d 0 C 7 y d b c W O A U C O C 03 �' 3 "' 00 o a O.C. Ou p,y U U E .E N O U 'y N h � h O 00 O C _ � O N O � � y N O i0 0 m r- 0 0 O) 4y V Cl m Z .V V CJ U L W O q � 3 3 � > 'n o u v o E c; 00 0 i0 O E a b C A O O m t cC 7 y 2 O v A O O d N C R `� cL 0 0 ICI y � d O N t o 2 V ' � A N y F �x ES48 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR i+ eC u Ct q C3 q H ra �r Qa h L s F y ru YV a I W u r y H M W 6) CC i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY V cc 7 y Q�i N � L r R a A 3 G Ru a on'g Q Cc o ° V v ° R o a0Cy, U ° o o C .°? U .R p E co'30 iV r cc o a G ! s o a 0.— ..b := 3 c 0. p R S 0.0 03 >,.a •� O T C v U C y•� x U U G O N G O N V1 F m > .0 O C p E Cd N "0 O tOd E c CQ cGa O fl O cOtl - OA G Q O i 0 cc u N O 7 o E U C O G on o ar' > G Q o 0 t 0. y N C 3 7)X > . - O > O ^ « L L A G a � pp ��' = U C y ' ,O N �p c0 'bpttl 30 T.0 00 O CL—v L O V y A C 7 0 .�.� 'C '7 'y Co .V N y N C (u N > N N N O C:C O O ,a t�6 L U= Ni QU p0� C Op 0 o O G o o w H w �. ^'. 0 0 ova 4 F V 3 0 p p 0U p a L m w m .0 = L a y C Oa L v C u u 0� t dM Ca b— N 3 .� a d E E E"0 aEi oNcuy `d?.0 Ci 0 w 0 0 i m 0. G 6T p y+ Oq Cu u GO N 0 ^A N L O. a �_ N aCi to U o o> '� v E E EpGG�a�:?° • °tea a8•^ z z z E° n°�'> a o E� °.' ao is �U T N O J U = o.a °O e o rA ^ y O co E ti Co. Q C M 10 ti •r O v O G .a? .� y lGQ L❑ C> ea N • O a. 0. O ? cc = M U NCO ca .� ¢, . O G U •O W F. cd O DQ Ca 21 O. O O F x "` N y.^ � o 0'8� b T ao v a Ia. apvU Garden Street Terraces Project ES49 Final E!R b V _ 0 y C R V Ci 00 C R ri EF W w Y MM� �I V1 L V Q L Q E• u 4 8 i V R a rA fA R Le e �i W d a CC i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Y E fl A U C 00 C V1 V V C 3 A E U C OD C m f/I V V b 3 7 E V C Oo c cc Vi N N c! 3 t0 E V C br.0 C H V N O 3 d E O O O O N L V L V L V L C L N L L N L V V N N 7 3 7 7 3 3 3 3 � IVn 1V. 4 L y y y ca `V71 N E V E d E N E 0 0 0 0 ao m on 0 0 R z E E E E z z z z E O •E � O ,C .0 vyi ti bA U h t U y° c G 3 o ° ? E '? E c Lac ooh c:= m °cv°t °r cu 0 °E3v yN0 3 F 3 '� 3 U 3 .�o o E 3 c. mu 5 4 CLn 0 F _ U O 'J N _ O J 011 .-a av vac to atiE a cy3°�c30 oati 0 0 ❑� �.E to v'o ° to 5 = c o Z o co y o "o= -ca . .o L a c o U °n v > _ o o •_ La . CZ A ti 3 m s s d 3 0 .� x C a�i '� v o 'y F •o y tv W L C lO U L VJ r- R L rq L 00 .'_', L d ° F: >° y F >° N p: °= u v '� d cd e v e•i E (-• a r_ A .0 F- m .E i F a •E a °a a1 U H ao X ES -50 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR y u a y a E e L a W O 7 L LQ W u a ea F i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Garden Street Terraces Project Final E!R ES -51 t0 O n >> a n .o G F `c o k 5 o �' u .c y p u P 00'v 3 o v 5= Oo y :a' N L C a0 6i O. b.0 y C >. `:. <... O O •5 T'y O "0 U ° L C i.. .O.wQ y N— L i� 0 y N c ? �' ' O O w y .> R 0 v m ya C c -• C C C O O O .d "O P. ti i 'C+ U y y p .� y N 0 ie V C U 'y •. '� O U .� O .5 E C 7% T C y .y v.. U p > 0.0 . p� p c >� 0 c t5 0 ca 0 0 -0 �'�'0 u c. = o 12 O U a c M t U T m H �. c 3C w o e c a5i -e ° C V W N N •� ° aL O y >. Q3 u � ctl p 47 ° R> � . ' S 3 i7 D s 'v .a Cu d v ai u O 3: u U o v 'U >° 0v •N C W Cn p 7 F O y C 'C U y O w Q .(u Q� t0 VI v y O U �° 'J N y N� C C Q d L L C .Q C r F U y rrrr Q y a`i O C U 0 O '� O .o O oCA � a .O y .5 y .: . 0 ti-.v_ O `3 A c 9 .5 yS„ 5 =0 0 3 y o C G y �- o°- C 5 .°c �, y 3 `. o 0 ° v 4) - c°� 3 c. L v :o a. o c °i z ...7777 a c u o c 3 c.o o �� 3 °c'.� y v ax A H A 3 v v° 3 N y C. O v �, C 0.L. 7b t� N u z tow � s y � ° ro E. o° v y a�..^ ° 3'0 0.5 ° ° 3'0- a $.OLb'0 y F 0 Q `�' •... ' > .d O ?4 0 C� co 'J V G n' d � a' p u ca y 7 7 v N N '� 'J Xy. ° .$ 3 y 'N > I 00 °� .� •� i7 U U -0. y> > i(("yyi C ai y.y Uw- ¢ = 04 JJ= y- C �= y =...0 7 W 5 �/i. V 6O 3 y fd y N (A y L A = t3 .iy Q {.�. N .0 .�i °i. A W ° �.. N >,.r- . 'O Cu 'C - 5 y '+^ -0 u d 'J y N C y FO. Vj L> N C V 'O 0 C N m -o u C O l , Q C p U G � a¢°' , O N ` z G ti •cy0 a m a °N U 9 0s,j L.S ' v °0 07O Ua a.o 00v R v� c c L ° °' oap s 0 m • d w - 3 y x °? O y C V C C C> C C 'n > m> o 7 rr O �"., _ 0 .-di L N y 5° O IU, V'o x u 0 0° 4- P R .L Q �:., U a�n y 5 L °`.- O.5 v �. 7 Z '^ .0 y 0. O '.. O F C C C- a) U R ,3 = - O vi 4. .�. .d N -0 ,5 'O vyi O ° - a� y C7 CO .O0 ac0 a m w ° x o 0 c 0 ° fu N ° o .0 ai a°�i `o v aQj o ° °°? > o°= �aLivaa 630 oo �a 25A��0> c F'y d sJ•• ° y ao. °ate 3 '.. ti -' y O. ._° 6 i0 U = ` a oW O 'O U >�5R �o 0U� u'=�E�� °x'50 0 0 VF �> E 5 S n 3 O n ° Q ° . c v .E e c s U .�� > .0 u r u c 3 - 0 o > °'y i c u c u E C.y 3 3 0 aoi o� ° =Loa. iR °oa vAu °OOn.OUC Rbo=a S, °v3Ec.S y C O •� .5 H ^p 5 v O �'°' b = tLO X '� Q p .T. 5 .N y y y .= .5 .a 'y tCi .N a •° '$ s v C y c`d / u . 5 v 5 Cr y U 'O L Cs O '.. :: C U '� y 5 O L. v r,. O. 0 p ° 0 iO •`y a� 5 •o- ° ci D ' 3 `O y O c .F - FH N N ° aG n U U F w aO , Eo a te° > ? ° GU o c 3 o °c „0 = z R 0GU V p c' �A o �a o. p� o 3d mi ° E E �n s ° o u 0 0 FF s. c c� o '3a '5 e 10 Q $ d O V °3 �C [-O CC7ti oG v y o ° e F . .T5 .� Garden Street Terraces Project Final E!R ES -51 W d e� F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES -52 Carden Street Terraces Project Final EIR O O y to N m id y O •� N V Q 61 ° g E E> a 0 ` m o ° o ° a ° Ca u 0 0 0 w N L N C IcG a U 0 E 0 n it m o o? v o° N -° 0���2sQ�r > � 3 o �=cm R v y0 C. p m 0. y '14 ",a 0 O. C p R Q E •C m a° c E 0 m° s 5 h ro v 6 0 co 0 3 O 4? O V v O• C V y L _ .. N .N+ Q H -0 N V U 7 E E m 0 c0 >1 N COi O 0 o3��°C'o3� O >E��°m°� 00 a - m 0 3 `% w W G. o Na O E O a p� d O° -0 F `m 2 `a vp 3° E° C 7 .DO a v U n y m a 3 E 0 U— m v O cd 3 0 p cU0 0 ,� tw asi c.. ,.+ > m N 0 Om y .. '$ > F °•Es o o° a oss.E o 0 m o� 'p N N p s C p .� U N R cr7 b O O 4. N 7 0. �O r. °' c 3 3 a °C' 5 ` o > F cai o p A o >" o a E e o O N ? 0 y ti 4) O C p .00 E .E W ,L •V CCq E V U° .d y w O Qa. N 7 F N p v C a N .0 m =6 0 C aO i m N m -0 m N x s m ° . C S y 5 E m o o,o0. U 0 N > 0 CN o 37 0 3 y 0 s cp, U C ° v O •° ` c N � o O m N ." O V oU vuymh,;.emallo p�Eav�"? c °,5a� UppoV.CEoE >eoa° y O >L' 0 v ° a0i 3 3 C p a0i °' a� 0 m> m 0 3 �° p 3a� C 0 3 a°i a`i.E ° s 5 m y '0 m .0 N O p t C ° E 3 y> w m 0 > co y Ca° N o s y wp o 0 0 F- a u .= 0 '1Z —0 3° .m NQ U ° m U mb= J y y y C y O G y O 'C "CO. ` p N 0 'O m m a a7 C u .OD m r ° eC..° s b� 5 °° � �0 a 3 3 «a~. cc � y > ° E > w y .0 Z5 • ym p> U . u v — y an d •N 0 0 d m o 5 b `p s 'O s �. .' . �. C O U m E K 0-0 1:6 0 C > b C° O d• C R .: a`i 7 :? 0 ¢ 'C O cc cc y E v ayi p a 3 y [- .� c y C u L .0 O N rV. o a >s•DEa 6 o co �o s n�o 0 • ES -52 Carden Street Terraces Project Final EIR d C C .�i v CS C d C i C W 3 7 w 0 L E 7 W d F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY w N 0 0 3 0 t o ° o a 0 0 N ao 0 5 >O 4 0 E a F N c N Ca v E R °: 'S 0 - E 3� 0 y �.E� 0.= 0 O ro o O �v' ° a0 y�-0 r- 0 o 0 s c CQ 3 > E s E 0 0a 0Ms U c :m .0 m,g ro °L' s —_ m0 E E E Na >0 gI. 7 �.E o � °' Aa m _ _ y 0 0 c 0 c— o A° E y o° c g O _ °? x °° C4 °' U5 °3o ro .o .i' 00.Eoo V ro N' o c m; > �3 cum v 6 0. °Q! v� c ° e'� Tro o v 'G 0 3 _T =L 0° 0 ° ° D 'o 0 9. °° 6 x° ? a a E o a _ N b L:n i..i N '0 7 b N ro N cNa 7 0 y p 0 4 r .? 0 E :• N y� �' w y 3 a r_ ro 4 y 0 N ro °V 0 r ° G y 'r Y '0i 0 0 to T ro y C r y 0 0 C a Lz U yo N .fl ° d 3 ^ 0 4, 0 7 L 5 ro> '0 5" ° y N N L 0.0 N 3 0..r o a� $ fl o L on a^n ia• d w 0- chi E b 00 0 � �'A o c fl.5 7 L 0 E ¢0. �.5 U 0 u.E� ° p Ua .?;T.S . o ca�C 0. D ao > A c c o> N c-a E.0 o °'.� aS °? roUa p xw'y� E o g:6 cc U y 0 s "00 w0 N Np ro C. 0 G C" p w °C N L W N .5 0 Cp 0 7 O 0 0 N L w 0 T 4'r 3 0 ro 0 a•y 0 G> U y U G 0 0> 0 ` 'sr•—�4c°ax0 v i i .�'�°= fle G R c R a_ > s v c Bv CT°° ,4Q cti 'Dy o N 33 >.o aN - � � vc - E a� �� ° 0 °7 E Ap fl3E U ...cN U y . " 5va ' s N °>T3 >xE ro ° .0 �io° n = w �O�3 ro C 3 'O O0 a 0 ° 'o v S ° ` O 0 N Ca CO C w O i.3 5 t s o > 0 O 0 0 '0 , N 0 O O ° y> ^ 7 T O y = % m 0 ti Oq U. N O, . L E cc o R E 0 0 o � ° CO U n E o° E '° a 3 y ° o 0 &.c ro ro 0 c N 4 '> o 0 . o ro ° - -a 0 o x E ro °p33 E 0 E c° fl N CO E. a ° a = o° cc p 0. S ° 06 IC O U N p L 3 0 G° w 0 O 0 0 9:6 ^ m— a Ou 5 c�o c cc � •o :a 5 m o o > 0:5 ° v ° Q ,p 3 > o v 5 0.— o ro ^ E ' o to x 0 7 � y O 00- a C's CE � °. A y � 4 E o 0 ro a Ec c> ° o ° 0 . -IV E : c o cw 0 ,��, 0 T� c,.�0 0�•� 0.Tr e E L Z ,, 3 4° r �', E 0..0 3 c .O ro R C E .- 0. N N N O 4 Chid O b O 0> O E U tJ 0. v U C U t U °' E G. d T —'• ca L N ,a fL ppp _ w as 0 5 0 N c C 0 0 0 d >''^�. O > '0 0 0 W G. U y 0 0 C d 3.N 4GC N O M abi 0 3y N O T�' G U C. �C ?� K C ro.3 U 0 Nt,—r 3' 3 A 0 U v o 0 o'�'v fl N°? A— U E> ro ro ° o d ro° E c 0.� ° c 3 d p N p.,% 0 o p � aU� 0� bO �u�,�oou2ro E Eo0 nro„43ro �@. ^rE� �.NNNN °wroo r y O U a c 3 O 0 O p 0 o 0 ,e O - L 3 `3ro p .W a S y.. on c � a ° �c c o � o c V° :£ to o .E v fl 0> .5 -- o 0. v s? y a O ro ro E 5 a`p ° w o a—c3i ° a0i $ s 3 .� a 3= ° m °: •3 o T O 0 .0-0 0 0 ti U (� ri G 3 E p, •O N 0 ro4 C A O ro to > t= ro D\ a 0 ro c y'7 N ,fly O> G c G G E L t O c v1 4 c O. CA 3 0 0 ro y c 0 L ro 0 0 0 3 ro 0 3 L A O L E E o.^ a-.�su 3 c(-c. v G a Q � o.S ° 4os �� aai /0)�'0 3 r�'p> > 0 y x K N w b t o co_ 8 N o o y ti o c L L U a° a° 0 3 °° Y ° y> U c ro .°� N w °: aEi - 0 w CO .°' p .0 s v1 3 U y .E o> t. � v t E 0 >1 Q) u o 0, R C u R p E" fl" 0 L E° r E$ U 0 °, 0 0. u U 3 E o O o, p 0. 0 O ro rob E O 00 o x > 3 S 0 3 d . O 3 Nb ^ ro� s c a u d m° c 0 o CO Z 0> E > fl E a4 aw o o �-''oc C Ln fl o >° s a� � n2u o P. 0.ba 9:6"0 ti a v F L 0 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ES -53 a rii W U R CL E w a d O i a W i 7 w R a R W c F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY cJ ES -54 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR L - O O ^O b i .bD O $ c a 3 ° VE b o o u � E o 0 ou o c l cc 0 0 3 y°° ❑ C a 5 L3 = n> c R �O J .07 xv �y ox C T R c0 E s o y a h o ° 7 Oq c o co �� mrte 0 0 =.-.0 c °c ° a w` O O ''T' C — .p C v C A L p w p O O C O F N tJ E d L == N w G O P, C N 'V b V Q' O L >1 C •'O O .y O C N y O1 = N N V oq V N . VJ Vi N N 4r p t0 rC. 0I.0 c U r > O Q c_ bz OJ • ca is N . . C v i0 c = U 0 E O v L p C. � O .E U .� � Q N'0 .9 G _ �.N p.fl p pq JN r4 L R v O �tAa W O' 6. '= a ° ° CO =° c °° A u A y° e Y O' .2 Z O t0 0 V] • � p C ie U r. d ° y C�a. _ 0 O ^ p, y C T ° ai O �c•. w v bq L �- A > c� N V II_ . O 0. _ 40 c o U ° i ° R y a 0 0 2 r. c0p�.EcO> °�c� °°.> �Er� E2°'c:: °'�°°y e4°oda 9 3 0 b= p c > a'a y p y p o 0 Aa o 3 co � o b > ? ° o o E° c > o c p eQ 3 b � c o _ E E 0 0 E.4 4 0 �o � _ v to 0 E g -Cl -0 p ^ ° = E L •fiE p E T m = ^C =�w ° 0 H m op a moo m O ou R w a a _ c ° v c o : ° O O w W -- U U 0 Q .ti p E 0 =O O T'C' C E d 3° m �:• .O• •p. y y �0 3 0 2 'h L� o c •y o= c •0 Cr v 'C c 3 ti p c= -0 o0 ip 0 0. 0. A .N M O v .04 E p N C� G itl 0 U L c 7 0 = C y •°--' _% E u y t> y •E C "` 'U > o d E o y c"o.c o m E s o D a°i ° �.� axi Q o c ° a n ° d° =L° o b e y ° o b a o a$ 3r v � d onv .� 3 40 '-' C 3 w w O ° cad' bip � CO 0-- C 0. - V � _ = O m S_ v V tiL' c c ° •1u a a a o c c o .� .E m y ° `: .�L 0° 0 ca cc o E vy ° x is O y C C O F 0 Q ai G 0 0 ° L . O vi p N 4 O L im V 9 .5 ca c0 =E > =C: C c y m= > =6 c R ti d ° s E O 0 c ES -54 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR b u C 0 .Vi y u R rr C d C i Li W V 7 w 0 ea W Z cc s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY V_ E v> y L v — ° ❑O U r. C c a 0 ° 0 O a E o U Q U °y R 0BA^7B N O n Li. CO o OL ° � N r b C ° C O �3 N R ( 0. �0. k c y E °3 w> �� ° 0 0 �, A c o U d C R c v c . a 4 0 E V E 3 cc • —° 0C 0 o 0 CO a Lv >>,-, > 0 3 L < E A O d V a V O pa Id �" L " C V r O .r Op N R m> y E °3 ° 3bouc� 0 c t.- a 0 0 0 °• =^ v uw 3 CG 0o0cL0 o�R�S E u.5 ?;.= 2_ "7S?0G0 R a w o 5 o a:E > o ° 3 S ° 5 ° vi L O S R •E N O R U V 60 h 'y y qA y y tJ C 0 °= E.6 o,?�c 0 T E.= 0 c E A O° 0 o 5 r. y C ' y y 0 3 = 0.p N C io O fj L .y y v C y t .N T V .0 C R> .b O q C '9 �„ >. O_A R E° 00 8 0."'R ° yp W 0 y °: o �T > y c°qi ti E c 4J> c 0 0 o 0° E R $ u °' o QJ R oOt ° E on0 a. c 'o .> -° °o r 0 L a o a 0 b 72 0 0 0 0 R b b ° 0 v.5'C ° 3 cy� o°u� Cx R y- o L °.5 C o . •- u o 4 r '> 0 0 o a o m E R E -° > or. 0 3 °w 0 ° 0 . °�-� y aFCi c a 0E- v �.E v a0 a� = Z �ww C1 o U :: o E A 3 3 'o.�° cc 0R Cy MSyyo E04.L. �°a ra ao Q a'`O� °�oG R L >; R M -' L 0 .- c L '�, p, c 5 3 0. 0 0 fir' .-0, .5 c., t R C V V ?? .O a o n d >, 0 O �U 3 o Ca q r R O u . a o = 0 E E a o a- o ° . C c R _ E m_ a -- E ° d o a > o 0.0 m -0 Z M.0 H 3 s L c a°0i o 0 3 A ro o t' R. R o o = 0 ° o > E o CE E Q c 0.9 o E v V 5 ''Q � � °y E ° 5 N c '3L .y E m L y oU m U O °v V L p .O N w R o 2 C :o U : N 4 V E . O R n '^ 0 ° to U tv > 0 ° v d oa o ° 00 s ' i s iv 3 'R 0 o c 0 a° E a a L o% a0i C boo ° 0 R F a ao . e Q0, °o - C a> °p V e >'o aE °C1p y E c coi E. >r� �__o E o CO c a s 0 0> v 0 0 0 ^q o L° 0 L ° 0 a .� 0 0 p im. C4. �' U 8 m c'S Y gH E ° ari °' U C C O > v 04 G o > o c 0 F..E s -� R ° > v �' o > .0 on'v oW� r n, y °' a 0 0> 0 3 v c r y as ° 0 ' 0 nc � o > o V e 0 U rs y 0 0 yc s 0 0 tiE b o 0 0 p o e L 0° .� v a._ °' R u o 0 '� ° b 3 R �, v c9 U N U O .� y U y m 0 L 67 p a. d e r L :� U 5 = 5 0 0 Q F" d °-; =° c .5 ? d 0 o v' >' -� R R 3 0 0 U'u'E 0 �w; o >> ° R> 7 b a. E ti s C o °' ti R y w V ° p° m E Q, .a 3 CO :: N co o H> ❑ E 0 w -0 ai'.0 R R 0 out t' 0 U a L� v 0 w- R V °: 0- oti 0 E t' 0 a m 3 0 Q -S 3> 6 _� = .�.5': a U N �c c U o d- s o a> '> o c v.o 7 a`i '09 i0v a0i y 0 b m O t_ `" m R °° � t'�' a >°. a a v a0i ° C v nR-q W C y n' 0> O R a'r L°' O a 0 nq y V £ CO tw pp S Lam' L s y E CL O 0 R N .- .a�Vc.EUa wHQaa"ir.5'�FaUmm C7[- R0awon3 >5 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ES -55 EXECUTIVESUMMARY� - ' ES -56 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR RESOLUTION NO. 10181 (20.10 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADOPTING AN UPDATED HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, State law requires cities and counties to adopt a general plan. The general plan includes seven required elements, one of which is the housing element. The housing element must be updated every five (5) years or as otherwise provided by State law; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has prepared an updated Draft General Plan Housing Element to address community wide housing needs, challenges and opportunities, and to meet State law; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and the City Council have held public hearings on the updated Housing Element in accordance with the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the input of diverse community interests and housing stakeholders in the preparation of the updated Housing Element to identify community needs and to recommend housing policies and programs; and WHEREAS, the potential environmental impacts of the updated Housing Element have been evaluated in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to an initial environmental study (City File Number ER 120 -08), and the Community Development Director has granted a negative declaration of environmental impact; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the negative declaration of environmental impact and the updated Housing Element; WHEREAS, by a separate resolution the City Council found that there is no evidence from which it can be fairly argued that the project will have a significant, adverse effect on the environment, and consequently certified and approved the negative declaration of environmental impact for the Updated Housing Element; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the changes to the January 2010 adopted Housing Element requested by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and found that there are only minor changes to the supporting documentation and no changes recommended to any policies or programs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Record of Proceedings. The City Council has received and considered the Planning Commission recommendations, public testimony and correspondence, HCD recommendations, and the staff reports on the Housing Element Update. Copies of these items or testimony are on file in the office of the City Clerk and in the Community Development R 10181 Resolution No. 10181 (2010 series) Page 2 Department. The Planning Commission held seven public hearings to consider the Housing Element Update and related matters. The Human Relations Commission held two public hearings and the Airport Land Use Commission held one public hearing to consider the Housing Element Update and related matters. In addition, staff conducted three public workshops and attended numerous meetings with stakeholder groups to consider the Update and related matters. The minutes of those hearings indicate Commission member comments on the Housing Element Update and are on file in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 2. Public and Agency Review. Drafts of the proposed Housing Element Update have been made widely available for review and comment by interested agencies and individuals. Copies were posted on the City's website and were distributed to the San Luis Obispo City-County Library and to the California State Department of Housing and Community Development ( "HCD ") as required by law, and to governmental and non -profit housing agencies whose jurisdiction includes housing issues within the San Luis Obispo Area. An email list of interested parties has been kept abreast of hearings, proposed changes and updates to the Housing Element in addition to distribution required by law. SECTION 3. Findings. This Council, after considering the April 2010 Housing Element, the Planning Commission's recommendations, staff recommendations, public testimony and correspondence, and reports thereon, makes the following findings: 1. The Housing Element Update, as contained in the document titled "Council Hearing Draft General Plan Housing Element ", dated April 2010, Exhibit "A" on file in the Community Development Department (hereinafter "the Update "), is consistent with all elements of the General Plan. 2. The Update will promote public health, safety, and welfare by: preserving housing that is affordable to extremely -low, very-low, low and moderate income households; encouraging variety in housing types, sizes, cost, and tenure; establishing programs to ensure that most new development incorporates affordable housing, pays an "in- lieu" fee toward the development of affordable housing, or otherwise contributes to the production of affordable housing; establishing incentives to encourage and help defray the costs of affordable housing development; affirmatively furthering fair housing opportunities; and by setting quantified objectives for housing production, rehabilitation, preservation and conservation. 3. Consistent with provisions of California Government Code Section 65583 (b)(2), San Luis Obispo has evaluated its ability to accommodate its Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA) number of 1,589 dwellings by July 2014 and has adopted quantified objectives that are the same as the RHNA number. There is sufficient land suitable for residential development to accommodate the RHNA number within the planning period. 4. The April 2010 Draft Housing Element was submitted to HCD for its review, as required by State law. The Update includes additional information and analysis in response to HCD comments. The Council has determined that the Update conforms to the statutory requirements of State housing element law (Article 10.6 of Government Code). o Resolution No. 10181 (2010 series) Page 3 5. Council hereby finds that the Update will not operate to directly limit the total number of dwellings which may be constructed on an annual basis, since dwellings affordable to extremely -low, very-low, low -, and moderate income households, and dwellings constructed in the Downtown Core (C -D Zone), are exempt from Residential Growth Management Regulations. SECTION 4. Approval of the 2010 Housing Element. Council hereby approves the 2010 Housing Element, as set forth in Exhibit A. SECTION 5. Publication and Availability. The Community Development Director shall cause the updated Housing Element to be published and provided to City officials, concerned agencies, public libraries, and to the public. The Director shall also transmit a copy of the Update to HCD for its final review, as required by State law. SECTION 6. Effective Date. The 2010 Housing Element shall become effective immediately upon adoption of this resolution. SECTION 7. Repeal of Previous Element. The Housing Element adopted March 30, 2004 and as subsequently amended, is repealed upon the effective date of the 2010 Housing Element. Upon motion of Council Member Ashbaugh, seconded by Council Member Settle, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, and Vice Mayor Carter NOES: None ABSENT: Mayor Romero The foregoing resolution was adopted this 1 st day of June 2010. Mayor • F. Romero ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS T ORM: Christine Dietrick City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 10180 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CREEKSTON FRONTAGE PORTION AT 791 ORCUTT (M07 -009) FOR TRACT 2707 (953 ORCUTT ROAD) WHEREAS, the City Council made certain findings concerning Tract 2707, as prescribed in Resolution No. 9748 (2005 Series); and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the final map for Tract 2707 per Resolution No. 9928 (2007 Series); and WHEREAS, the subdivider has satisfactorily completed the portion of public improvements known as the Creekston frontage (M07 -009, 791 Orcutt) for Tract 2707, in accordance with City standards, specifications, and the subdivision agreement, and has requested acceptance of the public improvements for maintenance and operation by the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby accepts the public improvements known as the Creekston frontage (M07 -009, 791 Orcutt) for Tract 2707. SECTION 2. The current Faithful Performance surety may be released upon submittal of a replacement surety guaranteeing the workmanship and materials for a period of 12 months. SECTION 3. The Labor & Materials surety may be released after 90 days from this date of acceptance of the improvements in accordance with Section 66499.7(h) of the California Government Code. SECTION 4. The surety guaranteeing the workmanship and materials may be released by the Public Works Director upon the successful completion of the 12 month warranty time period from this date of acceptance. Upon motion of Council Member Ashbaugh, seconded by Council Member Settle, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, and Vice Mayor Carter NOES: None ABSENT: Mayor Romero R 10180 Resolution No. 10180 (2010 Series) Page 2 The foregoing resolution was adopted this 1 st day of June 2010. �. • g. i d F. Romero ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: (3&"4, ehristine Dietrick City Attorney T: \Council Agenda Repons\Public Works CAR\2010\DevRev \Tract 2707 Tumbling Waters — Creekston frontage \T2707 Final Acceptance Resolution.doc C RESOLUTION NO. 10179 (2010 Series) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING EXERCISE OF THE OPTION AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY, AS AMENDED, CONVEYANCE OF A CONSERVATION EASEMENT THEREON TO THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, AND PROVIDING CERTAIN OTHER ASSURANCES TO GRANT FUNDING AGENCIES, REGARDING 310 ACRES OF LAND NEAR LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD IN SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, COMMONLY KNOWN AS FROOM RANCH WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is a chartered municipal corporation of the State of California that is authorized by law to purchase real property; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2008, the City of San Luis Obispo entered into an Option Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property commonly known as the Froom Ranch, and described as portions of San Luis Obispo County Assessor's Parcel Numbers 067 -241 -023 and 067 - 241 -024, ( "the "Property"), with the property owner, Irish Hills Plaza East, LLC ( "Plaza East "), at an agreed purchase price of $700,000; and WHEREAS, Irish Hills Plaza West, LLC, ( "Plaza West ") is the successor in interest to Plaza East, of said property; and WHEREAS, on April 12, 2010, Plaza West agreed to a reduced purchase price for the property of $635,500, based upon a qualified appraisal of the property; and WHEREAS, the Property possesses high natural resource values including wildlife and botanical resources, and scenic open space values (the "Conservation Values ") of great importance to the people of the City of San Luis Obispo, and the people of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo intends that the conservation values of the Property be preserved and maintained forever by the continuation of currently existing land use patterns. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo hereby: 1. Authorizes and directs the Mayor to exercise the Option Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property, as Amended, to a 310 acre portion of the properties described as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 067 - 241 -023 and 067 - 241 -024; and 2. Further authorizes and directs the Mayor to convey a Deed of Conservation Easement to said property to the Land Conservancy of San Luis Obispo County as soon as possible upon close of escrow; and R 10179 Resolution No. 10179 Page 2 3. Authorizes and directs City staff to, include in the deed to said property certain restrictive language regarding future use and management, required as a condition of funding support by the Nature Conservancy of California; and 4. Authorizes and directs City staff to conduct the necessary archeological and historical site investigations of the property prior to any new ground disturbing activities, required as a condition of funding support by the Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund; and 5. Authorizes and directs the Finance Director to transfer funds from City reserves in the escrow account to advance the funds anticipated to be reimbursed from the LWCF; and 6. Authorizes the City Attorney to approve any non - substantive changes in language to the various documents required to effectuate this action by the City Council. Upon motion of Council Member Ashbaugh, seconded by Council Member Settle and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, and Vice Mayor Carter NOES: None ABSENT: Mayor Romero The foregoing resolution was adopted this 1 st day of June 2010. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Christine Dietrick City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 10178 (2010 SERIES) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO REQUESTING THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO CONSOLIDATE THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 20109 WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THAT DATE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo has called a General Municipal Election to be held on November 2, 2010, for the purpose of the election of certain officers; and WHEREAS, Section 302 of the City Charter establishes November of even - numbered years as the date for conducting the City's General Municipal Election; and WHEREAS, it is desirable that the General Municipal Election be consolidated with the Statewide General Election to be held on the same date and that within the City the precincts, polling places and election officers of the two elections be the same, and that the County Election Department of the County of San Luis Obispo canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election and that the election be held in all respects as if there were only one election. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo does declare, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1. Pursuant to the requirements of the Section 10403 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Luis Obispo is hereby requested to order the consolidation of the General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election to be held on Tuesday, November 2, 2010. SECTION 2. The Board of Supervisors is requested to certify the results of the canvass of the returns of the General Municipal Election to the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, which shall thereupon declare the results thereof. SECTION 3. The Board of Supervisors is hereby requested to issue instructions to the County Clerk and Registrar of Voters to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of said General Municipal Election. The City will pay its pro rata share of extra costs incurred by the County in consolidating the elections pursuant to Section 51350 of the Government Code. SECTION 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file certified copies of this resolution with the Board of Supervisors, the County Clerk and the Registrar of Voters of the County of San Luis Obispo. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adopt of this resolution. R 10178 Resolution No. 10178 (2010�eries) U Page 2 Upon motion of Council Member Ashbaugh, seconded by Council Member Settle and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, and Vice Mayor Carter NOES: None ABSENT: Mayor Romero The foregoing resolution was adopted this 1 st day of June 2010. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: O RESOLUTION NO. 10177 (2010 SERIES) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 20109 FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY CHARTER AND ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES' STATEMENTS WHEREAS, under the provisions of the San Luis Obispo City Charter Section 302, a General Municipal Election shall be held on Tuesday, November 2, 2010, for the election of Municipal Officers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo does declare, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1. Pursuant to Section 302 of the City Charter, a General Municipal Election shall be held Tuesday, November 2, 2010, for the purpose of electing a Mayor for the full term of two years and two Council Members for the full term of four years each. SECTION 2. Pursuant to Election Code Section 13307, each candidate may submit with the nomination papers a Statement of Qualifications of the candidate of no more than 200 words, which statement will be printed and mailed out with the sample ballot. SECTION 3. The candidate shall be required to _pay - for the cost of printing the candidate's statement in the voters' pamphlet. The City Clerk shall estimate the total cost of printing, handling, and mailing the candidates' statements filed pursuant to this section, and require each candidate filing a statement to pay in advance to the City his or her estimated pro rata share as a condition of his or her statement in the voters' pamphlet. Accordingly, the City Clerk is not bound by the estimate and may, on a pro rata basis, bill the candidate for any additional actual expense or refund any excess amount paid depending on the final actual cost. Said amount will include the cost for the translation and printing in the voters' pamphlet the statement in Spanish, if requested by the candidate. In the event of overpayment, the Clerk shall prorate the excess amount among the candidates and refund the excess amount paid within 30 days following notification by the Registrar of Voters office of the exact cost. SECTION 4. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in form and content as required by law. SECTION 5. That the polls shall be open at seven o'clock a.m. of the day of the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o'clock p.m. of the same day when the polls shall be closed, except as provided in Section 14401 of the Elections Code of the State of California. SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution.. R 10177 Resolution No. 10177 (2010 ties) —/ Page 2 Upon motion of Council Member Ashbaugh, seconded by Council Member Settle, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, and Vice Mayor Carter NOES: None ABSENT: Mayor Romero The foregoing resolution was adopted this 1 st day of June 2010. • is R omero ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: J 'stine Dietrick City Attorney 0 RESOLUTION NO. 10176 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AMENDING THE CITY'S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE COMMUNITY GARDEN PROGRAM WHEREAS, it is the policy of the City of San Luis Obispo to review service charges on an ongoing basis and to adjust them as required to ensure that they remain adequate to achieve adopted cost recovery goals; and WHEREAS, in accordance with this policy the Council has adopted a master fee schedule based on a comprehensive analysis of service costs and the City's cost recovery policy; and WHEREAS, the Council considered amendments to the master fee schedule at a public meeting on May 18, 2010 based on a detailed analysis of costs and funding requirements to meet adopted cost recovery goals. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo that the City's master fee schedule is hereby amended as follows, effective July 1, 2010: a. The base fee for each garden plot will be $24.00 per year plus $.03 per square foot. b. The base fee only will be increased annually by the Consumer Price Index. Upon motion of Vice Mayor Carter, seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and Mayor Romero NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was adopted this 18`h day ofMay 2010. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AST ORM: Christine Dietrick City Attorney R 10176 0 • RESOLUTION NO. 10175 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO UPDATING THE CITY'S REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL POLICY WHEREAS, the Property Management Manual was adopted in 1986 (Resolution No. 5963), and except modifications for leases with non - profit organizations in 1989 (Resolution No. 6706) and leases of City-owned buildings in 2001 (Resolution No. 9226), it has not been comprehensively reviewed since then and WHEREAS, the given the passage of time since 1986, the City has undertaken a comprehensive review of its real property acquisition and disposal policy. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: Resolution Numbers 5963, 6706 and 9226 are hereby rescinded. 2. The attached Real Property Acquisition and Disposal Policy is hereby adopted as Section 475 of the Financial Management Manual Upon motion of Council Member Settle, seconded by Council Member Marx, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and Mayor Romero NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was adopted this 18`h day of May 2010. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: *Christine Dietrick City Attorney R 10175 Section 475 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION 1 Purpose and Objectives I Management- Strategy 2 Responsibilities 2 State and City Requirements 4 B. PROPERTY ACQUISITION 6 Purchase 6 Rents, Leases and Management Agreements 6 C. PROPERTY DISPOSAL 8 Sales and Long -Term Leases 8 Leases of City-Owned Buildings 10 Right -of -Way 13 APPENDIX 14 City Charter: Article IX, Section 906: Sale or Lease of City Property 14 Resolution No. 10052: Policies for the Sale or Lease of City Property 15 777 Y:.iroryliS` Adopted by the Council on May 18, 2010 (Resolution No. 10175) O Section 475 -A PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES Purpose O The purpose of this policy is to set forth responsibilities and general strategies for the acquisition and disposal of real property, whether by sale, lease or via grants, donations, gifts, dedication or exchange. This policy does not address maintenance and operations of City real property. These are covered in other policy documents that are more focused on operations. For example, the City prepares detailed Conservation Plans for each of the City's open space areas, such as Bishop's Peak, Cerro San Luis, Irish Hills Natural Reserve and Johnson Ranch, which include detailed management plans for maintenance and operations. Likewise, the City's Water and Wastewater Management Plans also address maintenance and operations of the real property used in delivering these services such as treatment plants and reservoirs. It also does not address City "personal property," such as vehicles or computers. For example: detailed policies and procedures for the acquisition, disposal, operations and maintenance of the City's fleet are comprehensively set forth in the City's Fleet Management Policy (Section 405 of the Financial Management Manual); and detailed policies and procedures for the acquisition, disposal, operations and maintenance of the City's information technology assets, such as servers, printers, computer workstations and software, are provided in the City's Information Technology Policies and Procedures Manual. Lastly, this policy supplements provisions regarding the acquisition and disposal of real property that may exist in other City policy documents: unless there are direct conflicts, it does not replace them. Objectives The goal of this policy is to provide a framework for the acquisition and disposal of City real property that assures these actions: Advance City plans, policies and goals, such as the General Plan (which consists of eight elements: Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Parks & Recreation and Conservation & Open Space, Noise, Safety and Water & Wastewater); Physical Concept Plan for the City's Center (Downtown Plan); Bicycle Plan; Short-Range Transit Plan; Access and Parking Management Plan; and Financial Plan and Budget. 2. Provide effective stewardship of City assets. 475 -1 0 0 Introduction MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Team - Oriented Rather than Centralized or Decentralized The opportunities to acquire or dispose of property, whether initiated by the City or others, are infrequent. Accordingly, it does not make sense to establish a centralized real property management function for this purpose. On the other hand, a highly - decentralized approach is unlikely to be successful in achieving broader City goals and assuring effective stewardship of City assets. For this reason, real property acquisition and disposal will be managed on a team basis, with the project manager and team members to be determined by the City Manager based on the nature of the sale or lease on a case -by -case basis. Depending on the complexity of the sale or lease, the project manager will be responsible for preparing a formal "Project Plan." Along with staff members, the project team may include third party, independent advisors as needed based on the nature and complexity of the sale or lease, such as appraisers, engineers, accountants, legal counsel, economists, brokers and financing consultants. These will be selected in accordance with the City's purchasing policies. RESPONSIBILITIES 1. City Council a. Adopts Real Property Acquisition and Disposal Policy. b. In accordance with Resolution No. 10052, approves the sale or lease of City-owned property. c. Determines the process that is most appropriate for the sale or lease of City property on a case -by -case basis. 2. Planning Commission a. Reviews the acquisition of City real property via its review of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) as part of the City's budget process for General Plan consistency. b. Reviews the sale of all City-owned property for General Plan consistency. 3. City Manager a. Recommends real property management policies to the Council and oversees implementation. b. On a case -by -case basis, designates project manager and team members comprised of staff from various departments to manage real property acquisition and disposal projects. 475 -2 0 0 Introduction Along with the project manager, the project team will typically include representatives from: • Administration • City Attorney • Finance Division • Operating Department responsible for managing the property that will be disposed of or acquired • Other City staff as appropriate c. Makes non - substantive administrative changes to policies and procedures as required to accomplish policy objectives. 4. City Attorney a. Serves as member of project team as set forth in the Project Plan. b. Drafts required legal documents. c. Manages escrow closing and other related technical duties, including review of title reports and insurance requirements to ensure encumbrances on City real property do not cloud title, whether acquired with City funds, grants, donations, gifts, dedications or exchange. 5. Finance & Information Technology Finance Division a. Serves as member of project team asset forth in the Project Plan. b. Manages financing and budgeting activities, as well as processes payment for a property sale or lease. c. Reviews all City-owned properties as part of the two -year Financial Plan development process. Information Technology Division d. Via the City's Geographic Information System (GIS), maintains an on -line inventory of City -owned properties and provides an annual summary report to the City Manager and department heads. 6. Project Manager As designated by the City Manager on a case -by -case basis, provides overall planning, coordination and successful implementation of real property acquisitions and disposals. 475 -3 Introduction 7. Human Resources: Risk Management Ensures appropriate insurance coverage for all properties; reports property acquisition and disposals to the City's insurance carrier. 8. City Clerk Maintains central records system for all real property acquisitions and disposals, including deeds and lease documents 9. Operating Departments a. Serve as members of the project team as set forth in the Project Plan. b. Operating department responsible for managing the property that will be disposed of or acquired Ensures compliance with any covenants or restrictions set forth in the deed or lease, including any grant or donor requirements. STATE AND CITY REQUIREMENTS While the City Attorney's Office should always be consulted on real property acquisitions or disposals for compliance with State and City requirements, the following summarizes key guidelines: 1. State Guidelines a. California Government Code Section 37380: Allows City -owned property to be leased for a period not exceeding 99 years; and allows charter cities to set their own procedures for property leases. b. California Government Code Section 54220: Surplus City-owned property must first be offered to: • Housing authorities • Parks, recreations and open space areas • Enterprise zones • Schools While these agencies have the "right of first refusal," the City is not required to accept an offer from these entities if the terms are not acceptable to the City. Property exchanges are exempt from these provisions. c. California Government Code Section 65402: The Planning Commission must review all property acquisition and disposal proposals to determine compliance with the General Plan. 475 -4 Introduction d. Abandonment of Parks, Street Right -of -Ways: There are detailed requirements that must be met in each of these cases. As such, the City Attorney must be contacted for direction on a case -by -case basis. 2. City Requirements a. City Charter: Article IX, Section 906: Authorizes the Council to adopt policies and procedures applicable to the sale or lease of City property by ordinance or resolution. b. Resolution No. 10052: Sets the policy authorized by the City Charter. Key provisions are that Council approval is required for any: • Sale of real or personal property in excess of $1,000. • Lease of personal property for more than three years. The full text of these City requirements is provided in the Appendix. ass -5 o • PURCHASE The following guidelines apply to the purchase of real property, whether in the form of fee title, rights -of -way or easements; and whether purchased with City funds or acquired via grants, donations, gifts, dedications via the development review process or property exchanges. Prior to the acquisition of real property, a professional title search shall be completed. 1. Purchase with City Funds a. Property purchase recommendations should normally be presented as part of the City's Financial Plan process via the recommended Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). However, as opportunities arise, the Council may consider property acquisitions at any time. b. Acquisition proposals should be consistent with adopted plans and policies, including the prior Financial Plans and the adopted CIP. c. The Council must authorize negotiations and approve the acquisition of any real property. d. Depending on the complexity of the transaction, market conditions and other circumstances at the time, the City may choose to be represented by a broker or other third party professionals in acquiring real property. These will be selected in accordance with the City's purchasing policies. 2. Acquisition Via Grants, Donations, Gifts, Dedications and Exchanges Acquisition recommendations that will be fully or partially funded from grants, donations, gifts, dedications or exchanges should follow, at a minimum, the same guidelines as acquisitions financed from City funds. Where grant fund requirements for property acquisition are different from these guidelines, the requirement with the greater public disclosure will apply. 2. Council approval of acquisitions via grants will be required in accordance with the City's Grant Management Policy (Section 740 of the Financial Management Manual). 3. In considering property donations and gifts, the City will evaluate and short and long- term maintenance and operating costs, as well as any one -time costs that might be necessary to rehabilitate properties for public use or meet building code requirements. RENTS, LEASES AND MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS The following guidelines apply to real property rents and leases (including management agreements) where the City will be the tenant. This need may arise for short-term uses, such as rental of interim space during construction; or ongoing operational needs, such as leases for the 475 -6 o s Property Acquisition City's telecommunication and radio needs at the South Street Hills and Tassajara Peak as well as cooperative use agreements with the school district for recreation programs. 475 -7 0 0 Property Acquisition 1. These should normally be included as part of the City's Financial Plan process. However, as needed, the City may consider renting or leasing property as required to meet the City's operational needs at any time. 2. The approval authorization required for entering into lease agreements will be in accordance with the City's purchasing policies. 3. Depending on the complexity of the transaction, market conditions and other circumstances at the time, the City may choose to be represented by a broker or other third party professionals in renting or leasing real property. These will be selected in accordance with the City's purchasing policies. 475 -8 r 475-C The consideration of selling or leasing City property may arise from the City's initiative to do so or may be in response to interest by others. The guidelines below cover short-term leases of City property as well as long -term leases or fee -title sales. SALES AND LONGTERM LEASES Sales Versus Long -Term Lease In most cases, the sale or long -term lease of City real property will have a similar practical effect: the use of City property by others for a very long time. As such, as set forth below, the basic process for the sale or long -term lease of City property will be same. The decision on whether the City goals will be better met through sale or long -term lease will be made by the Council on a case -by -case basis. Key factors to be considered include: 1. Which option represents the best financial return to the City? 2. Are the City's fiscal goals at the time best met with one -time proceeds from the sale or from a long -term income stream? For example, if the disposition is directly linked to the funding of another capital project, such as the acquisition or construction of a replacement facility, then sale may make the most sense. 3. Does the City have a long -term policy, project, program or proprietary interest in how the property is used? In this case, a long -term lease may make the most sense. 4. Is the property already fully developed, undeveloped or under- developed? If developed, was it intended to be use as leased space? 5. Are there limiting factors based on how the property was originally acquired or its initial intended use, such as grants, enterprise funds or donations) that would favor long -term leasing over direct sale? 6. What is the appropriate lease term? Depending on the circumstances, the Council is hereby authorized under this policy to enter into a lease for up to 99 years. Terms up to 99 years would be appropriate for leases where the intent, from a use and developer financing perspective, is intended to mirror a sale; but for the reasons outlined above, the City desires to retain fee - title. In most cases, the decision will be a balancing of competing interests that can best be weighed by the Council based on the circumstances at the time. Process: Determined on Case -by -Case Basis The City disposes of property infrequently and the most appropriate process will vary in each case depending on the circumstances. The guidelines below are intended to provide the City with 475 -9 Property Disposal a framework for assessing the best approach on a case -by -case basis. It is not intended to limit the approaches available to the City: the overarching principle that should always apply is using an approach that will best accomplish the City's objectives given the circumstances at the time. As outlined below, there are five basic approaches that the City could take in determining the best long -term use of City property by others: request for proposals, broker services, exclusive negotiations, competitive sealed bids or auction (or a combination of these approaches), which will be determined by the Council on a case -by -case basis depending on the circumstances. Request for Proposals (RFP). This approach makes the most sense when the City is initiating the sale or long -term lease of City property. It provides an opportunity to clearly articulate the City's policy goals and the general terms and conditions under which it will select the successful proposal. However, even with an RFP process, extensive negotiations are likely to follow the finalist selection. 2. Broker Services. This approach makes the most sense for sales when the City is initiating the sale; the goal is primarily a financial one; and the conditions of the sale are straightforward. The sale of the prior Headquarters Fire Station at Pismo and Garden Streets after the construction of the replacement Fire Station No. 1 at Broad and Santa Barbara in the mid- 1990's is an example of where listing the property with a broker is likely to be the best option. 3. Exclusive Negotiations. This approach makes the most sense when considering the sale or lease in response to a development proposal by others. The following factors support this approach: a. The City receives a written request from a proposer that sets forth its conceptual project and why it believes that exclusive negotiations are in the City's best interest. b. The proposer owns or controls a majority of the privately -held property adjacent to the intended area to be developed that is integral to the proposed development and required for successful implementation of the project. In this case, the project could not occur without the developer's property and no other developer could make a similar proposal. c. The proposal involves an exchange of City-owned property with the developer /property owner. In this case, the project could not occur without the developer's property and no other developer could make a similar proposal. d. There is a clear link to the development proposal and accomplishment of significant City goals, plans or policies. e. The proposer has a demonstrated record of completing highly successful projects in the City or similar communities. f. Other circumstances where it is clearly in the City's best interest in achieving major policy objectives to enter into exclusive negotiations. 475 -10 _ 0 0 Property Disposal When this approach is used, the City will enter into a formal Exclusive Negotiating Agreement which will be considered at a public meeting and clearly sets forth the terns and conditions of the negotiating period. 4. Competitive Sealed Bids This approach makes the most sense for sales when the City is initiating the sale; the goal is primarily a financial one; the conditions of the sale are straightforward; and the City believes that it can successfully market the sale without outside professional assistance. 5. Auction. This approach is typically used for delinquent tax sales or forfeited assets. Accordingly, it is likely to be rarely used by the City. LEASES OF CITY -OWNED BUILDINGS AND REAL PROPERTY The following guidelines apply to leases of City -owned buildings to outside parties. Leases with Non - Profit Organizations 1. Requests for the long -term use of City property by non -profit organizations should generally follow the same review procedures as the sale or lease of City property by private for -profit entities. 2. The proposed use should be consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and not conflict or preclude any existing or planned City use. 3. Any development or operations directly related to the proposed use should have a clear and measurable community benefit in alignment with City goals, policies and plans. 4. Any lease agreements for the use of City property by non -profit organizations that charge a less than market rate for the City property should include a provision for community access and/or City use, or operate in close partnership in the delivery of City services. 5. Lessees will be responsible for all property related use taxes that may be assessed. Long -Term Uses 1. Buildings permanently intended for non - residential uses (such as retail or office) and located on land zoned for those uses a. The City may use the services of a real estate agent or broker in advertising, locating and managing the leases. This selection will be made in accordance with the City's purchasing policies. The net difference between the manager's fees and the rents collected shall accrue to the City. b. For -profit entities should pay comparable market rents. Below- market rates may be considered for non -profit organizations in accordance with the guidelines above. 475 -11 o 0 Property Disposal c. Unless otherwise agreed upon, lessees will be responsible for making all tenant improvements and comply with all City zoning and land use requirements, including any special conditions the City may place on the property. d. Lessees will conform with the City's non - discrimination requirements. e. Lessees will be responsible for all property related use taxes that may be assessed. Typical buildings in this category include: Office space located in the Marsh Street Parking Garage Structure. 2. Buildings or real property permanently intended for specific City- approved purposes by others, such as cultural or agricultural uses a. The lessee must be a formal, non -profit organization whose stated purpose is a public benefit aligned with the purpose and goals of the City. b. The proposed use must further the Council's intended goals or policies for the specific property, and shall not conflict or preclude any existing or planned City use. c. The proposed use should be consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan for land use. d. Any development of operations directly related to the proposed use must be in the public interest and supply measurable benefit to the public. e. The lease agreement must include a provision for community and/or City use. f. Lessees will be determined either by a specific organization requesting use of the building or by the City actively seeking out an organization to fulfill the Council approved use for the property. g. Approved lessees must conform to the City's non - discrimination requirements. h. Lessees will be responsible for all general maintenance and upkeep of the property and any expansion or improvement of the building, unless the Council otherwise chooses to help fund that expansion or improvement. i. The long -term lease will be at a rate of $1 per year, unless the Council determines otherwise. Typical properties in this category include the Children's Museum, Art Center, Railroad Historic Museum and land zoned for agricultural /open space operations. 475 -12 Property Disposal Interim Uses 3. Buildings on land eventually intended for other purposes, which are available for interim residential use and located on land zoned for that use a. Unless there are compelling reasons otherwise, the property will be managed by the San Luis Obispo Housing Authority. Each property will be evaluated on its particular merits and an appropriate agreement will be developed between the City and the Housing Authority. b. For any properties acquired that are already being successfully managed by a property management company, the City may continue this relationship. Typical buildings in this category include residential units along Bullock Lane that were acquired for eventual demolition for needed right -of -way for the Orcutt Road improvements. 4. Buildings on land eventually intended for other purposes, which are available for interim uses on land zoned for other than residential uses a. The Council will determine the best use of the property on a case -by -case basis. b. Unless there are compelling reasons otherwise, if the interim use is residential in nature even though the property is located on land zoned for non - residential uses, the property will be managed by the San Luis Obispo Housing Authority In this case, each property will be evaluated on its particular merits and an appropriate agreement will be developed between the City and the Housing Authority. For any residential properties acquired that are already being successfully managed by a property management company, the City may continue this relationship. c. For non - residential uses, the City may use the services of a real estate agent or broker to advertise the property, and locate and manage lessees. This selection will be made in accordance with the City's purchasing policies. The net difference between the manager's fees and the rents collected shall accrue to the City. The City will provide direction to the property manager as to the length of the lease term, since business /office users that install tenant improvements generally want lease terms long enough to recover those costs. d. Lessees will pay comparable market rents. Below- market rates may be considered for non -profit organizations in accordance with the guidelines above. e. Lessees must conform with the City's non - discrimination requirements. f. Unless otherwise agreed upon, lessees will be responsible for making all tenant improvements and comply with all City zoning and land use requirements, including any special conditions the City may place on the property. Typical buildings in this category include: properties acquired for the Palm/Nipomo Parking Structure 475 -13 Property Disposal RIGHT -OF -WAY Right -of -way disposals may be initiated by the City or in response to public requests. Right -of- way will only be abandoned when it has no apparent current or future use. The following guide the disposal of right -of -way: 1. The City will follow requirements of the State of California Streets and Highways Code in acquiring, disposing and abandoning public right -of -way. 2. Right -of -way that has been purchased in fee or easements purchased with City funds will be sold or leased in accordance with the policies above. 3. Easements used for utility transmission and distribution systems will normally be reserved. If the utility previously using the easement declines further use, the City will offer it to other utilities before abandonment. 4. The City may place conditions of approval on abandonments of right -of -way that must be satisfied prior to transfer of ownership of the subject easement or property. 5. The City may reserve an easement for its water and sewer system or may reserve a blanket easement for all utilities. 6. The City will not guarantee the title of right -of -way it abandons. 475 -14 906 Sale or Lease of City Property. The City Council, by ordinance or resolution, shall adopt policies and procedures that shall be applicable to the sale or lease of City property. 475 -15 -o RESOLL'TIa1 NO, 10052 (21109 series) A RESOLLTION OFTHE COUtiCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO SETI`ING FOLIC" FOR THE SALE OR LEASE OF 071f PROPER -rV WHEREAS, sn Nosembc 2004;, City voters approwd am urnrndrocist to Swim 9U6 of the City Charier that provides fev Council adoption by ordimaocc or resolution of policics and procaltrres that sholl be applicable to the sale or low of City property-, and WHEREAS, the Council desires Lo adc+pt policies gmeming authi city fm the sate or tease of City property that arc sarnilaa to those in that were place is the City C7sa:ter pc^_w to tivvcnsber 20M. CaMpt for an adjustment in U= umount to aaxwnt fur the pwsabe of tithe. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as fotloaT_ No sale or lose of and property nor amy sale of personal properly of a value in eases of ortc thousand dollars (S1,41)0,401 nor any tease of personal property for a period exceeding dtrtx (3) } shalt be avtltoib:od by the Council except by rc%Dhziw psssed by the affirmative vote of than fifths (315) of all the m=b=s of the Council. Upon elution of Viii ma�tix Satic. wwrsded by Council i'vi"ilxx btirx, and on the 0lowing vote: AYES: Council Members Carter and Marx, Vice Mayor Settle urd M eyor Rortcru NOES: None ABSENT: Council h %ember Ashbaugh Thu loranoieg resolutiue was adolmed this 2U" day of January Zfltl9. City Clerk APPROVED AS TOO FORM; Jor- ha . Lowell -- City Attorney 475 -16 David . Mayor it 10052 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 10174 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE PREPARATION AND APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES PLANNING GRANT AND INCENTIVES PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE DRINKING WATER, WATER QUALITY AND SUPPLY, FLOOD CONTROL, RIVER AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2006 (PROPOSITION 84) WHEREAS, the Legislature and Governor of the State of California have provided funds for the program shown above; and WHEREAS, the Strategic Growth Council has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of this grant program, establishing necessary procedures; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the Strategic Growth Council require a resolution certifying the approval of application(s) by the Applicants governing board before submission of said application(s) to the State; and WHEREAS, the applicant, if selected, will enter into an agreement with the State of California to carry out the development of the proposal. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo: 1. Approves the preparation and filing of an application for the Land Use and Circulation Elements Update (the proposal) in. order to become a sustainable community; and 2. Certifies that the applicant understands the assurances and certification in the application; and 3. Certifies that the applicant or title holder will have sufficient funds to develop the proposal or will secure the resources to do so; and 4. Certifies that the proposal will comply with any applicable laws and regulations; and 5. Appoints the City Manager, or designee, as agent to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to applications, agreements, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned proj ect(s). li[IIiLI Resolution No. 10174 (2010-Senes) Page 2 Upon motion of Vice Mayor Carter, seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and Mayor Romero NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was adopted this 18th day of May 2010. i Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: JC4stine Dietrick City Attorney 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 10173 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $2139450 TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR FIRST TIME HOMEBUYER PROGRAM FUNDS. WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo, a charter city and political subdivision of the State of California, wishes to apply for and receive an allocation of funds through the CalHome Program; and WHEREAS, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (hereinafter referred to as "HCD ") has issued a Notice of Funding Availability ( "NOFA ") for the CalHome Program established by Chapter 84, Statutes of 2000 (SB 1656 Alarcon), and codified in Chapter 6 (commencing with Sections 50650) of Part 2 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code (the "statute "). Pursuant to the statute, HCD is authorized to approve funding allocation utilizing monies made available by the State legislature to the CalHome program, subject to the terms and conditions of the BEGIN Program Guidelines adopted as amended by HCD in April, 2004; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo wishes to submit an application to obtain from HCD an allocation of BEGIN Program funds in the amount of $213,450; and WHEREAS, at the time of application, the City of San Luis Obispo has a Housing Element that is certified by HCD. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Application. The City of San Luis Obispo shall submit to HCD an application to participate in the BEGIN Program in response to the NOFA issued on April 19, 2010, which will request a funding allocation for the First Time Homebuyer Program in the amount of $213,450, which may be used (but is not limited to) units designated for low income households in the Moylan Terrace project, as outlined in the following table: Unit Size Low Income Purchase 20% Down Number of Total Price Payment Units Assistance Assisted 1- bedroom $135,900 $27,180 3 $81,450 2- bedroom $153,000 $30,600 2 $611200 3- bedroom $176,775 $35,355 2 1 $70,710 ----z al ti Total 7 $213,360 SECTION 2. Eligible. Activities. If the application for funding is approved, the City of San Luis Obispo hereby agrees to use the CalHome funds for eligible activities in the manner presented in the application as approved by HCD and in accordance with program regulations cited above. It also may execute any and all other instruments necessary or required by HCD for participation in the CalHome Program. R 10173 0 0 Resolution No. 10173 (2010 Series) Page 2 SECTION 3. Authorization. The City of San Luis Obispo authorizes the City Manager or the Assistant City Manager to execute in the name of the City of San Luis Obispo, the application, the Standard Agreement, and all other documents required by HCD for participation in the CalHome program, and any amendments thereto. Upon motion of Vice Mayor Carter, seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and Mayor Romero NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was adopted this 18th day of May 2010. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: i Christine Dietrick City Attorney 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 10172 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $6319000 TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR BEGIN PROGRAM FUNDS TO PROVIDE DOWN PAYMENT ASSISTANCE TO FIRST TIME HOMEBUYERS IN HASLO'S MOYLAN TERRACE PROJECT. WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo, a charter city and political subdivision of the State of California, wishes to apply for and receive an allocation of funds through the BEGIN Program; and WHEREAS, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (hereinafter referred to as "HCD ") has issued a Notice of Funding Availability ( "NOFA ") for the BEGIN Program established by Chapter 14.5, Sections 50860 through 50866 of Part 2 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code (the "statute "). Pursuant to the statute, HCD is authorized to approve funding allocation utilizing monies made available by the State legislature to the BEGIN program, subject to the terms and conditions of the BEGIN Program Guidelines adopted as amended by HCD on.May, 21, 2007; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo wishes to submit an application to obtain from HCD an allocation not BEGIN Program funds in the amount of $631,000; and WHEREAS, at the time of application, the City of San Luis Obispo has a Housing Element that is certified by HCD. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Application. The City of San Luis Obispo shall submit to HCD an application to participate in the BEGIN Program in response to the NOFA issued on April 19, 2010, which will request a funding allocation for down payment assistance to first -time homebuyers, consistent with BEGIN Program Guidelines, for ten units in the Moylan Terrace Project, including five two- bedroom units and five three- bedroom units, for a total of $631,000, as follows: Unit Size Moderate Expected Per Unit Number Total Affordable Price Market Price Subsidy of Units Assistance Required Assisted 2- bedroom $267,575 $327,000 $59,425 5 $297,125 3- bedroom $309,225 $376,000 $66,775 5 $333,875 Total ] 0 $631,000 SECTION 2. Eligible Activities. If the application for funding is approved, the City of San Luis Obispo hereby agrees to use the BEGIN Program funds for eligible activities in the R 10172 Resolution No. 10172 (201 eries) Page 2 manner presented in the application as approved by HCD and in accordance with program Guidelines as cited above. It also may execute any and all other instruments necessary or required by HCD for participation in the BEGIN Program. SECTION 3. Authorization. The City of San Luis Obispo authorizes the City Manager or the Assistant City Manager to execute in the name of the City of San Luis Obispo, the application, the Standard Agreement, and all other documents required by HCD for participation in the BEGIN program, and any amendments thereto. Upon motion of Vice Mayor Carter, seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and Mayor Romero NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was adopted this 18th day of May 2010. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1 hristine Dietric c City Attorney C C RESOLUTION NO. 10171 (2010 Series) A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AMENDING THE CITY'S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT FEES TO STRENGTHEN UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDINGS WHEREAS, it is the policy of the City of San Luis Obispo to review service charges on an ongoing basis and to adjust them as required to ensure that they remain adequate to achieve adopted cost recovery goals; and WHEREAS, in accordance with this policy the Council adopted Resolution No. 10098 on June 16, 2009, updating the City's updated master fee schedule on a comprehensive basis; and WHEREAS, the Council considered amendments to the master fee schedule for permit fees to strengthen unreinforced masonry buildings at a public hearing on February 16, 2010. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo that the City's master fee schedule is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit A, effective July 1, 2010. Upon motion of Vice Mayor Carter, seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and Mayor Romero NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was adopted on this 18`h day of May 2010. NOR. • �: • am ' • • ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ! Christine Dietrick City Attorney R 10171 Resolution No. 10171 (20100 Senes) O Page 2 Exhibit A Amend the BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE to add the language in italics to the existing fees that follow: All fees associated with Seismic Strengthening of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings shall revert to usual Plan Review, Permit and/or Planning services fees when the seismic retrofit permit is deemed to have expired by the Community Development Department following the deadline for completion of the seismic retrofit Plan Review Fees: The plan review fee for a permit application that includes seismic strengthening of a building of unreinforced masonry construction shall be $40.00. Amend the BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE to add the following paragraph under Permit Fees — General application: The all inclusive combination permit fee for a construction permit that includes seismic strengthening of a building of unreinforced masonry construction shall be $40.00. Amend the PLANNING SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE to add the following category under OTHER PLANNING SERVICES for Architectural Review: Project with Seismic Strengthening of Unreinforced Masonry Building $40.00 Establish a Fee for Use of Parking Spaces as follows: For construction projects with a valid building permit to strengthen an unreinforced masonry building, the fee for use of each Metered Parking Space, up to three for a maximum of six months, shall be $1.00. 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 10170 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO SUSPENDING ENFORCEMENT OF SEISMIC RETROFIT DEADLINES FOR SPECIFIC UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDINGS WHEREAS, on September 7, 2004, the City Council adopted changes to its existing Unreinforced Masonry Program (URM) by adopting Ordinance No. 1453 (Series 2004) establishing July 1, 2010 as the deadline for strengthening unreinforced masonry buildings identified on the Inventory; and WHEREAS, on April 3, 2007, the City Council established deadlines for specific buildings based on aggregate hazard reduction and other practical aspects, including progress by large projects within the City permitting process and ownership by not - for -profit entities, by adopting Resolution No. 9890 (2007 Series); and WHEREAS, the deadline established for the buildings identified on the Inventory as 722, 728, and 748 Marsh; 1119 and 1123 Garden all part of the Garden Street Terraces Project, and 1029 and 1035 Chorro all part of the Naman Project, and 840, 848, and 886 Monterey; and 861 Palm, all part of the Chinatown Project, and 2747 Broad is July 1, 2010; and WHEREAS, the three large projects have made diligent progress toward project permitting and are in various stages of the process but without construction documents that allow construction to begin; and WHEREAS, the building at 2747 Broad is owned by a non - profit entity with limited ability to complete the retrofit within the deadline; and WHEREAS, the Garden Street Terraces, Naman, and Chinatown Projects continue to progress toward construction but require more time to obtain required permits and construction financing prior to beginning construction; and WHEREAS, the Chamber of Commerce, following careful consideration and recommendation by the Chamber Seismic Task Force, supports the action by Council allowing the Garden Street Terraces, Naman, and Chinatown Projects more time to address the hazard due to the diligent efforts exercised by the owners of these three projects to obtain necessary permits. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Subject to the property owners' execution of agreements to secure performance, the City will suspend the enforcement of seismic deadlines as to the URM buildings identified on the Inventory as 722, 728, and 748 Marsh; 1119 and 1123 Garden all part of the Garden Street Terraces Project, and 1029 and 1035 Chorro all part of the Naman Project, and 840, 848, and 886 Monterey; and 861 Palm, all part of the Chinatown Project until July 1, R 10170 Resolution No. 10170 (201 eries) O Page 2 2015, unless the project fails to progress, in the sole discretion of the Community Development Director. SECTION 2. Subject to the property owner's execution of an agreement to secure performance, the City will suspend enforcement of the seismic deadlines as to the URM Building identified as 2747 Broad Street until July 1, 2011. Upon motion of Vice Mayor Carter, seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and Mayor Romero NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was adopted this 18th day of May 2010. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: � A16 Christine Dietrick City Attorney 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 10169 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING COLLECTION OF FEES FOR 2010 -11 FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY INSPECTIONS OF MULTI- DWELLING PROPERTIES CONTAINING THREE OR MORE DWELLING UNITS ON THE SECURED PROPERTY TAX ROLL WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is required by California Health & Safety Code Section 17921 annually to inspect multi - dwelling properties containing three or more dwelling units, including apartments, certain residential condominiums, hotels, motels, lodging houses and congregate residences; and WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 13146 authorizes cities to charge property owners in recovering the reasonable costs of providing these annual inspections; and WHEREAS, in accordance with this policy, the Council previously adopted Resolution Nos. 9799 (2006 Series) and 9889 (2007 Series) updating the master fee schedule and authorizing the collection of these fees on the secured property tax roll; and WHEREAS, the Council desires to continue collection of these fees on the secured property tax roll for 2010 -11. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 13146.2(b) and Municipal Code Section 3.50, the Council hereby authorizes and directs that Fire and Life Safety Inspection fees, as specifically set forth in "Exhibit A" hereto, shall be collected on the secured property tax roll for fiscal year 2010-11. SECTION 2. A listing of fees by assessor's parcel number shall be provided to the County Auditor - Controller for collection on the 2010 -11 secured property tax roll in accordance with its schedule and data format requirements. Upon motion of Vice Mayor Carter, seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh and Marx, Vice Mayor Carter and Mayor Romero NOES: Council Member Settle ABSENT: None R 10169 O Resolution No. 10169 (2010 Series) Page 2 The foregoing resolution was adopted this 18`h day of May 2010. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: J./diristine Dietrick ity Attorney Resolution No. 10169 (2010 Series) O Page 3 oil - - - Multi- Dwelling Fire and Life Safety Inspection Fee Schedule Apartment Houses $28.00 per unit per year Administrative fee of $65.00 per year per facility $10,000 maximum per property Fees are waived for units that are built, owned and managed by the San Luis Obispo Housing Authority, other governmental agencies or not - for -profit housing organizations. Hotels, Motels, Lodging Houses, Bed & Breakfast Facilities, Youth Hostel Facilities, Senior Living Facilities, Sororities, Fraternities and Other Congregate Residences I to 30 units $200 per year per facility 31 to 80 units $300 per year per facility More than 80 units $400 per year per facility These fees are applicable to all multi- dwelling units in the City based on the following definitions as set forth in the 2007 California Building Code. Apartment house: residential occupancy containing sleeping units or more than two dwelling units where the occupants are primarily permanent in nature. (Includes R -2 Occupancy classification condominiums). Congregate residence: residential occupancies containing sleeping units or more than two dwelling units where the occupants are primarily penmanent in nature. A congregate residence may be a convent, monastery, dormitory, fraternity or sorority house, but does not include jails, hospitals, nursing homes, hotels, or lodging houses. Dwelling unit: a single unit providing complete, independent living facilities for one or more persons including permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation. HoteYMotekEodging House, Bed & Breakfast: residential occupancies containing sleeping units where the occupants are primarily transient in nature. O O RESOLUTION NO. 10168 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ON PROTECTION OF WHALES AND OPPOSITION TO PROPOSED RESUMPTION OF COMMERCIAL WHALING AND TEN YEAR QUOTAS FOR GRAY WHALES AS PROPOSED BY THE INTERNATIONAL WHALING COMMISSION WHEREAS, whales are considered sentient beings that, at the apex of the marine food chain, are extremely important for the health and viability of our oceans; and WHEREAS, the California gray whale is our official state Marine Mammal and is enjoyed by millions of whale watchers along the coast of California every winter and spring; and WHEREAS, whale watching for gray whales and other species is a multi- million dollar industry supporting coastal communities throughout California; and WHEREAS, the California gray whale population is showing signs of stress; and WHEREAS, all whale populations, including the gray whale, are facing serious global environmental problems including effects of global warming and acidification of the oceans, harvesting of krill and other small fish species, intense underwater noise, and water pollution; and WHEREAS, the International Whaling Commission ( "IWC ") has adopted an indefinite moratorium on commercial whaling that went into effect for the 1986 -87 whaling season; and WHEREAS, the U.S. government vigorously promoted the whaling moratorium and has, in the past, led efforts to protect whales in the IWC and other global forums, including the establishment of the entire Southern Ocean as an IWC whale sanctuary; and WHEREAS, an IWC delegation has now proposed an agreement that would legitimize •and perpetuate commercial whaling, including so- called scientific whaling, on whale species, including several that are considered globally endangered; and WHEREAS, this agreement would legalize current commercial whaling, including so- called scientific whaling from which all the products are marketed, being conducted by the countries of Japan, Norway, and Iceland in defiance of the moratorium, as well as continue illegal trade in whale meat; and WHEREAS, this agreement would set ten -year quotas for whale species for both commercial and subsistence whaling, including gray whales, without regard to scientific. review of the population status of the species or potential adverse impact of the quotas; and WHEREAS, this agreement would allow a subsistence quota of 1,400 gray whales over the next ten years, a quota that could only be modified by a three- quarters vote of the full IWC; and R 10168 Resolution No. 10168 (2010 Series) 0 Page 2 WHEREAS, the IWC is scheduled to consider this new whaling agreement and to take action on it at their annual meeting on June 21 -25, 2010, in Agadir, Morocco. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of San Luis Obispo: SECTION 1. Opposes the agreement to renew commercial whaling and set ten -year quotas as proposed by the IWC; SECTION 2. Urges President Barack Obama to direct the United States Delegation to the IWC to oppose the agreement or any other agreements to allow commercial whaling or set ten -year quotas; SECTION 3. Urges the IWC to end all commercial killing of whales, including killing undertaken by nations holding objections to the IWC moratorium and nations issuing so- called "scientific" permits to kill whales for commerce; and SECTION 4. Urges the IWC to focus instead on protecting whales and whale habitat, encouraging nonlethal and non - harassing uses of whales for education and scientific study, and addressing global environmental problems that impinge on whale populations as representatives of the biodiversity of the oceans. Upon motion of Vice Mayor Carter, seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and Mayor Romero NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was adopted this 18th day of May 2010. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: 4.* '%. L Elaina Cano City Clerk AS X Christine Dietrick City Attorney O RESOLUTION NO. 10167 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO OPPOSING PROPOSITION 16 THE "NEW TWO- THIRDS VOTE REQUIREMENT FOR PUBLIC ELECTRICITY PROVIDERS" INITIATIVE WHEREAS, the "New Two - Thirds Vote Requirement for Public Electricity Providers" Initiative ( "Initiative ") appears as Proposition 16 on the June 8, 2010, Statewide Primary Election; and WHEREAS, the Initiative is a Constitutional Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Initiative would prevent a simple majority of citizens from determining whether they want Community Choice Aggregation, a program authorized by the state legislature in 2007 that allows a city, county or group of government agencies to procure and provide electricity to residents and businesses within its jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the Legislative Analysts Office concluded that the Initiative would create an unknown impact to state and local government costs and revenues, depending on future voter decisions, due to the potential impacts on electricity rates and publicly owned electric utility operations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. The Council by adopting this resolution does hereby oppose Proposition 16 on the June 2010 ballot. SECTION 2. The City Council and staff are authorized to provide impartial informational materials on the Initiative as may be lawfully provided by the City's representatives. No public funds shall be used to campaign for or against the initiative. SECTION. 3. The residents of the City of San Luis Obispo are encouraged to become well informed on the Initiative and its possible impacts. Upon motion of Vice Mayor Carter, seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and Mayor Romero NOES: None ABSENT: None R 10167 Resolution No. 10167 (201Qeries) O Page 2 The foregoing resolution was adopted this 18th day of May 2010. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: ) � - 427', Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: . CGstine Dietrick City Attorney O - O RESOLUTION NO. 10166 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING A CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION FOR TEN APARTMENTS AT 614 GRAND AVENUE (CON 12 -10) WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on May 4, 2010, to consider Application No. CON 21 -10, a request to approve a Condominium Conversion for 10 apartments known as Grand Terrace Town homes at 614 Grand Avenue; and WHEREAS, notices of said public hearing were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and WHEREAS, the conversion of existing residential apartments to ownership condominiums is exempt from environmental review (CEQA); and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony of the applicant, interested parties, and the evaluation and recommendations by staff presented at said hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. Based upon all the evidence, the Council makes the following findings: 1. The proposed condominium conversion is consistent with the General Plan because changing the apartments to condominiums will not impact available affordable housing since the conversion will provide three deed - restricted affordable units at the "low- income" category consistent with the City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and the other units are affordable by design. 2. Upon final tract map review, the conversion will comply with all regulations and property improvement standards for condominium conversions. 3. As stated in the applicant's property condition report, the property is in satisfactory condition and a report of any known defects will be made available to future property owners and kept on file at the City. 4. Based on a staff review of the application materials, a visit to the site and a review of City records, the property is in substantial compliance with the Zoning Code in terms of allowed use, density, parking, yard areas, building height, and all other applicable property development standards. 5. In accordance with the Condominium Conversion standards the applicant has delivered a notice of intent to convert to each tenant on February 10,-2010, which will be at least 6 months prior to the tract map review by the Planning Commission. R 10166 Resolution No 10166 (2010 es) O Page 2 6. The existing apartments, due to location, design, condition, and general conformance with property development standards are appropriate for conversion to individual ownership units and will result in a quality living environment for future property owners. 7. In light of the above findings, there exists adequate facts to support the findings required under sections 66473.5 and 66474 of the Government Code. 8. An equivalent number of new units comparable in affordability and amenities to those being converted are being created as part of the new project. 9. In accordance with the CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (K) the conversion of multiple family residences into condominiums is categorically exempt from environmental review. SECTION 2. Action. The Council hereby approves Application No. CON 21 -10, a request to convert ten apartment units at 614 Grand Avenue to individual ownership condominiums in accordance with Municipal Code 16.17, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall apply for a tentative parcel map as defined by the Subdivision Map Act and in accordance with the City's Subdivision Regulations and Municipal Code Chapter 17.82 (Condominium Conversions). The tentative parcel map shall be subject to (but not limited to) the following conditions of approval: a. Each unit shall be supplied with individual meters for gas, water and electrical service. Location and type of metering shall be subject to review and approval of the City. b. Any building defects noted in the property condition report submitted to the City shall be repaired prior to approval of the final condominium map. c. Any improvements necessary to comply with the property improvement standards for condominium conversions (Chapter 16.017.070 A through I) shall be completed prior to approval of the final condominium map. Such improvements include (but may not be limited to): private open space yards, bicycle storage lockers, retrofitting units with additional energy compliance requirements such as increased insulation or insulated windows, restoration and refurbishing of landscape areas, installation of common area improvements, installation of smoke detectors and fire protection systems, or repair and upgrades of parking areas. d. Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC &R's) are required, to the approval of the Community Development Director and the Public Works Director. The CC &R's shall include a description and regulations pertaining to the open space easement and all common areas. e. If pertinent, the tentative map shall reflect the location of all any overhead and underground utilities. f. The subdivider shall submit a final map to the city for review, approval, and recordation. The map shall be prepared by, or under the supervision of a registered civil Resolution No 10166 (2010 Series) O Page 3 engineer or licensed land surveyor. The final map shall be prepared in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations. g. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66474.9(b)(1), the subdivider shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the city or its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the city or it agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul an approval of the city, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body concerning this subdivision. The city shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Each non - purchasing tenant not in default under the provisions of the rental agreement or lease shall have the right to remain not less than 180 days from the written notice of intent to convert. 3. After submittal of the tentative map, prospective tenants shall be given a written notice of intent to convert prior to leasing or renting any unit. 4. Applicant shall give any present tenant a non - transferable right of first refusal to purchase the unit occupied. This right of first refusal shall extend at least 90 days from the date of issuance of the subdivision public report or commencement of sales, whichever date is later. The tenant's security deposit and last months rent shall be credited towards the purchase of the property. 5. Private open space yards, including new fencing and any other necessary landscape improvements, shall be completed prior to recordation of a final map. 6. Solar water heating shall be provided for each unit, and appropriate easements shall be provided for collector locations. The Community Development Director may waive the requirement for solar water heating in cases where the Chief Building Official has determined that equivalent energy saving will be obtained by other means. 7. A minimum of three units, of average size and quality, shall be deed restricted to "low" affordable levels for a minimum of 45 years, consistent with the City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. The units shall be deed restricted upon recordation of the final condominium map prior to sale of the property. Upon motion of Council Member Settle, seconded by Council Member Marx, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and Mayor Romero NOES: None ABSENT: None Resolution No 10166 (2010 Series) O Page 4 The foregoing resolution was adopted this 4`h day of May 2010. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Christine Dietric c City Attorney O Q RESOLUTION NO. 10165 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DESIGNATING SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES WHEREAS, City of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code section 9.22.010 authorizes the City Council, upon a finding that there is a need to take immediate action to protect the public health, safety and welfare, to designate a specific geographical area as a "safety enhancement zone;" and WHEREAS, the periods of time coinciding with Mardi Gras, Halloween, and St. Patrick's Day involve conditions and circumstances throughout the city that create the potential for a significant threat to public health and safety, including large crowds, excessive and illegal alcohol consumption, and public drunkenness; and WHEREAS, these conditions and circumstances associated with these events are not isolated to any one area of the city and impact many different neighborhoods and the downtown; and WHEREAS, the threat would be reduced by enhanced penalties for violations of provisions of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. The entire area within the city limits of San Luis Obispo is designated a safety enhancement zone during the Mardi Gras period, effective from 12:01 a.m. on the Thursday preceding "Fat Tuesday" until 7:00 a.m. on the Wednesday following "Fat Tuesday." SECTION 2. The entire area within the city limits of San Luis Obispo is designated a safety enhancement zone from 12:01 a.m. on March 17 (St. Patrick's Day) until 7:00 a.m. on March 18 of each year. SECTION 3. The entire area within the city limits of San Luis Obispo is designated a safety enhancement zone from 12:01 a.m. on October 31 (Halloween) until 7:00 a.m. on November 1 of each year. If Halloween falls on a Thursday, Friday, Saturday or Sunday, the safety enhancement zone period will be effective at 12:01 a.m. on the Thursday falling on or preceding October 31 until 7:00 a.m. on the Monday following October 31. R 10165 Resolution No. 10165 (2010 eries) Page 2 Upon motion of Council Member Ashbaugh, seconded by Vice Mayor Carter, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and Mayor Romero NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was adopted this 20th day of April 2010. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: 'e� Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: (5o", hristine Dietrick ty Attorney N RESOLUTION NO. 10164 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING REVISED STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND ENGINEERING STANDARDS FOR CONSTRUCTION WHEREAS, the Public Works Department is responsible for maintaining Standard Specifications and Engineering Standards establishing quality requirements and contract conditions for construction; and WHEREAS, the Standard Specifications and Engineering Standards must be periodically updated to allow for changes in construction practices and contract and state law; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo proposes to establish a Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance in compliance with the state requirements set forth in Assembly Bill 1881; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that for the ease of reference for City staff and project applicants that the Standard Specifications and Engineering Standards are the appropriate location for the water efficient landscape standards to be placed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. Resolution No. 10137 (2010 Series) approving previous editions of the Standard Specifications and Engineering Standards is hereby rescinded. 2. Revised Standard Specifications and Engineering Standards dated January 2010, copies of which are on file in the Office of the City Clerk, are hereby approved. Upon motion of Council Member Marx, seconded by Council Member Settle, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and Mayor Romero NOES: None ABSENT: None R 10164 Resolution No. 10164 (2010(eries) O Page 2 The foregoing resolution was adopted this 20th day of April 2010. i Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: . Christine Dietrick City Attorney N K RESOLUTION NO. 10163 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF THE 2009 -10 TRANSIT SYSTEM SAFETY, SECURITY AND DISASTER RESPONSE ACCOUNT PROGRAM APPLICATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo (referred hereinafter as the City) operates the San Luis Obispo (SLO) Transit; and WHEREAS, the California Transit Security Grant Program has allocated a portion of Proposition 1B (Prop 1B) Safety and Security Grant funding to be used for SLO Transit capital projects; and WHEREAS, the California Emergency Management Agency has been delegated authority to award financial assistance for a transportation project; and WHEREAS, a grant of State assistance will impose certain obligations upon the City of San Luis Obispo and may require the City of San Luis Obispo provide the local share of project costs; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has or will provide all annual certifications and assurances to the California Emergency Management Agency required for the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. The City Manager or her designee is authorized to execute for and on behalf of the City, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, any actions necessary in the submittal of this or future applications for the purpose of obtaining financial assistance provided by the California Emergency Management Agency. Upon motion of Vice Mayor Carter, seconded by Council Member Settle, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Carter and Marx, Vice Mayor Carter and Mayor Romero NOES: None ABSENT: None R 10163 Resolution No. 10163 (2010-series) O Page 2 The foregoing resolution was adopted this 20th day of April 2010. �.�;r4 Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: 3..�CLhristine Dietnck City Attorney N • RESOLUTION NO. 10162 (2010 Series) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN OPEN SPACE AND AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT ON REAL PROPERTY WHEREAS, Irish Hills Plaza East, LLC, a California corporation, ( "Plaza East ") is the owner in fee simple of certain real property in San Luis Obispo County, California, outside of but adjacent to the City of San Luis Obispo, described as Assessor's Parcel Number 067 - 242 -014, which is proposed for annexation into the City of San Luis Obispo and development thereon; and WHEREAS, as part of the annexation process, Plaza East has been required to permanently protect through a conservation easement approximately seven acres of land suitable for agricultural uses by the San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation Commission (SLO LAFCo), a local agency which governs changes in boundaries of municipalities and special districts within San Luis Obispo County; and WHEREAS, an area suitable for such protection has been identified nearby; and WHEREAS, said area, identified as a portion of Assessor's Parcel Number 067- 241 -024, possesses natural resource values including agricultural production, wildlife and plant resources, and scenic open space values (the "Conservation Values ") of great importance to Grantor, the people of the City of San Luis Obispo, SLO LAFCo, and the people of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the property owner, Irish Hills Plaza West, LLC ( "Plaza West "), a California corporation, is willing to make such dedication of a conservation easement in order to meet conditions of the proposed annexation, and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is a chartered municipal corporation of the State of California that is authorized by law to accept Conservation Easements; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo agrees by accepting this grant to honor the intentions of grantors stated herein and to preserve and protect in perpetuity the conservation values of the proffered area for the benefit of this generation and the generations to come. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo hereby: 1. Authorizes acceptance of the offer of donation of an Open Space and Agricultural Conservation Easement on a portion of Assessor's Parcel Number 067 -241 -024, subject to non - substantive changes approved by the City Attorney; and 2. Authorizes and directs the Mayor to accept said Conservation Easement on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo. R 10162 Resolution No. 10162 (201b'Series) Page 2 Upon motion of Vice Mayor Carter, seconded by Council Member Settle and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Member Carter and Mayor Romero NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was adopted this 20th day of April 2010. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Christine Dietrick City Attorney 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 10160 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO TO REMOVE THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1415 MORRO STREET FROM THE CONTRIBUTING PROPERTIES LIST OF HISTORIC RESOURCES WHEREAS, in 1983 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5197 establishing the "Master List of Historic Resources" and "Contributing Properties List" (collectively referred to as "Historic Resources "), along with procedures for adding and removing properties to the List; and WHEREAS, on March 23, 2010, following such procedures, the Cultural Heritage Committee held public hearings to consider recommending to the City Council an update of the Contributing Properties List due to its finding that the property located at 1415 Morro Street did not contribute to the historic and/or architectural character of the Old Town Historic District; and WHEREAS, at said meeting, the Cultural Heritage Committee considered public testimony, staff reports and background information on the property at 1415 Morro Street and recommended that the City Council remove it from the Contributing Properties List. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo that based on the Cultural Heritage Committee's recommendation, documentation as described in the Historical Resource Inventory for the property, on file in the Community Development Department, the staff report, and on the City's Historical Preservation Program Guidelines the following: SECTION 1. Findings 1. The Cultural Heritage Committee is responsible for maintaining the Contributing Properties and Master List of Historic Resources. Contributing properties are buildings at least 50 years old that have retained most or all of their original architectural character, and that contribute to the historic character of their districts. These lists are published in the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and on the City's website. 2. 1415 Morro Street is listed as a Contributing Property in the Old Town Historic District. It is a four -story apartment building with stucco exterior walls, low slope hip roof, and aluminum slider windows constructed in 1959. 3. The building was constructed outside of the District's period of significance of 1880 to 1920. 4. Based on the building's exterior architectural style and appearance, and on a review of City historic files and other information, the Council has determined that the building does not contribute to the District's historic character; it does not exhibit historical significance in terms of architectural style or craftsmanship, nor is it associated with persons or events important in the City's history. R 10160 Resolution No. 10160 (2010'�5enes) O Page 2 SECTION 2. Environmental Review. The City Council hereby determines that this action is not a "project" under Section 21065 of the CEQA Guidelines since it will not cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and consequently, does not require environmental review. SECTION 3. Publish Revised Contributing Properties List. The Community Development Director is hereby directed to amend the Contributing Properties List to delete 14.15 Morro Street and to publish revised historic resource listings for public distribution.. Upon motion of Vice Mayor Carter, seconded by Council Member Settle and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and Mayor Romero NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing Resolution was adopted this 20th day of April 2010. ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: 7 J Christine Dietrick City Attorney 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 10161 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF THE 2009 -10 FEDERAL CAPITAL AND OPERATING ASSISTANCE GRANT APPLICATION WITH THE FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration has been delegated authority to award federal financial assistance for a transportation project; and WHEREAS, a grant of federal assistance will impose certain obligations upon the City of San Luis Obispo and may require the City of San Luis Obispo provide the local share of project costs; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has or will provide all annual certifications and assurances to the Federal Transit Administration required for the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. The City of San Luis Obispo is an eligible recipient as defined by 49 U.S.C. 5307, 5336j, and 5340. SECTION 2. The Public Works Director or his designee is authorized to execute and file an application for federal assistance on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo with the Federal Transit Administration for federal assistance authorized by 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53, Title 23, United States Code and other federal statutes authorizing a project administered by the Federal Transit Administration. SECTION 3. The Public Works Director or his designee is authorized to execute and file with the application the annual certifications, assurances, and other documents the Federal Transit Administration requires before awarding a federal assistance grant. SECTION 4. The Public Works Director or his designee is authorized to execute grant agreements with the Federal Transit Administration on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo in Exhibit A. Upon motion of Vice Mayor Carter, seconded by Council Member Settle, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and Mayor Romero NOES: None ABSENT: None R 10161 Resolution No. 10161 (2010';32nes) O Page 2 The foregoing resolution was adopted this 20th day of April 2010. rZ,4)�i Mayor David F. '• • ►:vrr *1111 Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1"), Christine Dietrick City Attorney 0 0 Exhibit A FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION GRANT APPLICATION FOR SLO TRANSIT REVISED PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 -2010 The City of San Luis Obispo held a public hearing to receive comments on the Draft Program of Projects on October 06, 2009 at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo. The below Draft Program of Projects is the first revision and will become the final program unless further modified: Federal Apportionments: For 2009 -2010 Carryover from previous year Available to Program Project Operating Assistance 7/1/2009- 6/30/2010 Staff Vehicle replacement Forklift Bus Replacement (1) Downtown Transit Coordination Center study Cutaway vehicle replacements (2) Paratransit operations Total Project Cost Federal Share City of San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority Local Share City of San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority $1,843,246 $445,070 $2,288,316 Transit Federal Total Operator Amount Amount SLO City 1,232,126 2,515,656 SLO City 40,000 50,000 SLO City 24,000 30,000 SLO City 427,500 475,000 SLO City 100,000 125,000 SLORTA 150,000 166,666 SLORTA 200,000 250,000 $3,612,322 $2,173,626 1,823,626 350,000 $1,438,696 1,359,530 79,166 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 10159 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO REVOKING THE CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY AND TAXI PERMIT FOR GREEN -GO TAXI WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo desires to provide for taxi service for its citizens; and WHEREAS, Green -Go Taxi is a current operator in the City of San Luis Obispo; and pursuant to San Luis Municipal Code Section 5.20.030 was issued a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity and Taxi Permit on March 17, 2009 for a one year trial basis (Resolution #10068 -2009 Series); and WHEREAS, the City has received notification from Green -Go Taxi that they are unable to operate taxi service on a twenty-four basis in the City and the owner has waived his right to a public hearing; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Chapter 5.20, the City has evaluated the twelve month trial service of Green -Go Taxi and Green - Go has failed to meet criteria for continuation of its permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council finds that Green -Go Taxi's failure to provide continuous service and to meet criteria for its continued operation constitute good cause to revoke Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity and Taxi Permit issued to Green -Go Taxi on March 17, 2009. SECTION 2. The City Manager or her designee is hereby authorized to revoke the Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity and Taxi Permit issued to Green -Go Taxi LLC on March 17, 2009. Upon motion of Council Member Ashbaugh, seconded by Council Member Marx, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and Mayor Romero NOES: None ABSENT: None R 10159 Resolution No. 10159 (201�eries) • Page 2 The foregoing resolution was adopted this 6th day of April 2010. up M"Woogo,55'erM M� • �: • F. Romero MWOMW Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: J. Christine Dietrick City Attorney O • RESOLUTION NO. 10158 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO CREATING THE CITY'S CREEK AND FLOOD PROTECTION FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, the City is required under conditions of its adopted Stormwater Management Plan to adopt ordinances for the regulation and management of stormwater; and WHEREAS, connection to the public storm drain system as defined in Chapter 12.08 of the City's Municipal Code, must be recorded for purposes of verifying compliance with the ordinance and to assist in locating pollutant sources; and WHEREAS, there will be some cost associated with issuing a permit, reviewing reporting, completing inspections, and mapping the connection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo that a new Creek and Flood Protection fee schedule be adopted, and rates established as set forth in the Exhibit A attached hereto, with an effective date of July 1, 2010: Upon motion of Council Member Ashbaugh, seconded by Council Member Carter, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh and Marx, Vice Mayor Carter and Mayor Romero NOES: Council Member Settle ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was adopted this 6`h day of April 2010. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: iistine Dietrick ty Attorney R 10158 o • EXHIBIT A CREEK AND FLOOD PROTECTION Effective July 1, 2010 Fee Public storm drain system annual connection fee: Single property $20 Multiple property watershed $60 C 0 RESOLUTION NO. 10157 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION'S ACTION TO APPROVE THE DESIGN OF A BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PATH WITH BRIDGE OVER PREFUMO CREEK AND A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1269 VISTA LAGO (ARCIER 74 -09) WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Commission, on January 20, 2010, approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration and granted final approval to the design for a proposed bicycle and pedestrian path extending from Vista Lago to Oceanaire Drive including a bridge over Prefumo Creek; and WHEREAS, Paul Johansen, a property owner of a dwelling unit in the Windemere Condominiums, filed an appeal of the Architectural Review Commission's action on January 28, 2010; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on March 16, 2010, for the purpose of considering the appeal of the Architectural Review Commission's action; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact as prepared by staff and adopted by the Architectural Review Commission; and WHEREAS, the Council has duly considered all evidence, including the record of the Architectural Review Commission hearing and action, testimony of interested parties, and the evaluation and recommendations by staff, presented at said hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. Based upon all the evidence, the City Council makes the following findings: Project Design The proposed project consisting of a bicycle and pedestrian pathways and a connecting bridge over Prefumo Creek is consistent with Section 7.1, Creekside Development, of the City's Community Design Guidelines because it: a. Minimizes encroachment into the riparian corridor by its free -span bridge design which includes its support piers above the top of creek bank outside of the creek channel; b. Include lighting fixtures that do not produce glare, but provide for the safety of users; and c. Provides for pedestrian and bicycle circulation while protecting the quality of the creek environment. R 10157 Resolution No. 10157 (2010 Series) Page 2 Creek Setback Exceptions 2. The location and design of the free -span bridge and the connecting pathways will minimize impacts to scenic resources, water quality, and riparian habitat, including opportunities for wildlife habitation, rest and movement because the encroaching features are relatively minor in scale. 3. The exception will not limit the City's design options for providing flood control measures that are needed to achieve adopted City flood policies because the project creek banks and stream channel remain essentially unaltered. 4. The exception will not prevent the implementation of City- adopted plans, nor increase the adverse environmental effects of implementing such plans because along with the minor exceptions requested, the project will not adversely affect the health and vitality of the riparian corridor. 5. There are circumstances applying to the site, such as shape and topography, which do not apply generally to land in the vicinity with the same zoning that would deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity with the same zoning because the project site is irregularly shaped and includes an extensive amount of the creek corridor. 6. The exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege — an entitlement inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning because the proposed project provides a significant public benefit to surrounding properties. 7. The exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the area of the project or downstream because of the project's environmentally sensitive design. 8. Site development cannot be accomplished with a redesign of the project because the alternatives to having a bridge with no encroachments in the creek setback would have more significant aesthetic and environmental impacts because they would require more extreme bridge heights and support features. 9. Redesign of the project would deny the property owner reasonable use of the property given the unique circumstances of a bridge that would require some sort of creek setback exception to be feasible. SECTION 2. Environmental Review. The City Council reaffirms the Architectural Review Commission's adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration finding that it adequately identifies the project's potentially significant impacts with incorporation of the following mitigation measures and monitoring programs: Resolution No. 10157 (201`US eries) O Page 3 Mitigation Measures: Reduction of Light and Glare Bridge lighting shall be limited in intensity and scale necessary for security and safety and shall be designed not to shine offsite in conformance with the requirements of the City's Night Sky Preservation standards contained in Chapter 17.23 f the Zoning Regulations. All exterior lighting shall be shielded down - lights that do not shine skyward or spill onto adjacent properties to the review and approval of the Architectural Review Commission (ARC). Construction plans shall include details of light fixtures with illumination levels and shielding mechanism • Monitoring Program: The ARC will review development plans for the project. City staff, including Planning and other departments, will review plans to assure that all of the ARC's requirements related to lighting are compliant with the MASP provisions and have been incorporated into working drawings. City building inspectors will be responsible for assuring that all lighting is installed pursuant to the approved lighting plan. AIR QUALITY MITIGATION Short-term Construction Impacts 2. During construction/ground disturbing activities, the applicant shall implement the following particulate (dust) control measures. These measures shall be shown on grading and building plans. In addition, the contractor shall designate a person or persons to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering, as necessary, to prevent transport of dust off site. Their duties shall include holiday and weekend periods when work may not be in progress. The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the City Public Works Department prior to commencement of construction. a. Reduce the amount of disturbed area where possible. b. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency will be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non - potable) water should be used whenever possible. C. Dirt stock pile areas (if any) should be sprayed daily as needed. d. All areas disturbed by construction shall be re- vegetated with plant materials to the approval of the City Biologist and Department of Fish & Game. e. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site. f. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with California Vehicle Code Section 23114. Resolution No. 10157 (201 series) O Page 4 • Monitoring Program Community Development Department staff will insure that project plans incorporate the mitigation measures. City Engineering staff will inspect the construction operations to verify conformance with specifications and mitigations. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION Vegetation, CRF, and South - central California steelhead 3. All staging work will be in clearly designated and flagged areas from the proposed alignment and previously disturbed areas to avoid inadvertent disturbance of existing riparian vegetation or damage to associated root systems of trees. Any new proposed staging area will be first inspected by the City biologist or other qualified monitor (MR 1). 4. Prior to commencement of construction, the City biologist or qualified biological monitor will clearly mark with visible flagging the extent of the work area in sensitive sites (e.g., near the top of the creek banks or riparian vegetation, and ensure that no trees are impacted other than those shown on plans to be removed. to accommodate bridge construction) (MR 2). 5. Exclusionary fencing will be installed around the work area on either side of the top of bank when working near Prefumo Creek. This will serve to keep animals out of the worksite and keep material from leaving the site (MR 3). 6. All areas of disturbed soil will be stabilized to prevent erosion (MR 4). 7. Heavy construction equipment shall be restricted to the project area or established staging areas (MR 5). 8. If willows are removed during the project, they will be replanted at a 2:1 ratio or as specified in the CDFG permit. The willows shall be installed from cuttings of the adjacent, unaffected willows; or if feasible, cuttings will be directly installed from willows that need to be trimmed for bridge installation (i.e., trimmings will be planted near the work area immediately after they are removed). The replanting will occur in the open, exposed area of the floodplain immediately upstream of the bridge crossing. The willows will be monitored and maintained until successfully established (MR 6). 9. Pre - Activity surveys for Steelhead trout, California Red - legged Frog, nesting birds, and sensitive plants will be completed. A reference site will be examined for appropriate comparison. Nesting Birds 9. if possible, the project should be completed without removal /trimming of willows. If willow removal /trimming is necessary it should be conducted in late winter (September — January) Resolution No. 10157 (201 u-S'eries) Page 5 prior to the arrival of spring migrant birds. Doing so will minimize the potential for impacts to nesting sensitive bird species during the spring and summer. Prior to such trimming, a qualified biologist shall inspect such willows to ensure that nesting birds, or other species, will not be directly and adversely affected by the activity. In accordance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will be notified if a nest, egg, or nesting will be affected (MR 7). 10. Prior to construction, a qualified biologist shall be retained to conduct a pre - construction survey (approximately one week prior to construction) to determine presence /absence of nesting birds within the project area. If no breeding or nesting activities are detected near the proposed work areas, construction activities may proceed. (MR 8). 11. A qualified biologist, with experience in Bell's vireo surveys will conduct nesting bird, and/or presence /absence surveys along the project alignment and in the riparian corridor one week prior to construction (MR 9). 12. Construction near or adjacent to the riparian corridor will be conducted to minimize disturbance to any birds that may still be nesting in the area as an additional precautionary measure 9MR 10). Erosion Control 13. Restore all previously vegetated areas that are cleared during project activities through revegetation with appropriate seed mix. If necessary, irrigate to establish a ground cover prior to onset of the wet season. Silt fencing should be installed around any disturbed area located less than 23 feet from the main channel of Prefumo Creek. The City biologist or other qualified monitor will ensure erosion control measures are intact and functioning properly during winter (MR 11). 14. All earth disturbing construction will occur in the typical dry season (April 15 to October 15) (MR l2). Noise, Dust, and General 15. The work area will not be expanded into the adjacent riparian community. The City biologist or other biological monitor will clearly mark the boundaries of the proposed work area prior to and during construction using highly visible flagging or fencing. All construction personnel will be advised to conduct work activities within the defined work area only (MR 13). 16. Best Management Practices (BMP's) to control dust will entail use of a water truck on -site during the excavation of the abutments. Should material need to be removed from the site via trucks, covers on the trucks would further prevent fugitive dust from leaving the site or being blown out along travel routes. Since the staging area at the Windemere location can be reached by pre- existing asphalt surfaces, a stabilized entrance would not be required. However, the Vista Lago Park entrance /exit is not paved. Plywood sheets shall be laid down Resolution No. 10157 (201 U eries) O Page 6 to prevent tracking of dirt and/or mud out of the project area. A new trail connector will be installed at the Vista Lago Park location. This may allow for vehicles to be driven across the grass during excavation of the north abutment (MR 14). 17. Work hours will be limited from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. to reduce noise impacts to surrounding neighborhoods (MR 15). • Monitoring Program (Mitigation Measures 3 -17) City Engineering staff will inspect the construction operations daily to verify conformance with specifications and mitigations. The Natural Resources Manager will conduct periodic spot -check inspections to verify conformance with specifications and mitigations. A qualified Monitoring Biologist will be retained during work which could affect sensitive habitat. The Monitoring Biologist will inspect the work site each day, coordinate compliance with biological mitigation requirements, and prepare a daily log to document the presence or absence of any sensitive species and actions taken. CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION 18. If excavations encounter significant paleontological resources, archaeological resources or cultural materials, then construction activities that may affect them shall cease until the extent of the resource is determined and the Community Development Director approves appropriate protective measures. The Community Development Director shall be notified of the extent and location of discovered materials so that a qualified archaeologist may record them. 19. If pre- historic Native American artifacts are encountered, a Native American monitor should be called in to work with the archaeologist to document and remove the items. Disposition of artifacts shall comply with state and federal laws. A note concerning this requirement shall be included on the grading and construction plans for the project. • Monitoring Program Requirements for cultural resource mitigation shall be clearly noted on all plans for project grading and construction. GEOLOGY AND SOILS MITIGATION 20. Grading and construction of the bridge and other improvements shall be, designed and performed in compliance with the submitted foundation report. • Monitoring Program Community Development and Public Works staff shall review plans to assure that the recommendations of the foundation report are incorporated into plans. Resolution No. 10157 (2011U Series) Page 7 21. Hazardous materials transfers, fueling, and other use of chemicals shall be restricted to staging areas away from the project site. o Monitoring Program City Engineering staff will inspect the construction operations daily to verify conformance with specifications and mitigations. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY MITIGATION Avoidance and Minimization Measures for Impacts to CRF from the Programmatic Agreement between the Federal Highway Administration and USFWS (1- 8- 02 -F -68) (Only the measures pertinent to the project are listed below). 22. Only Service - approved biologists will participate in activities associated with the capture, handling, and monitoring of California Red - legged Frogs. 23. Ground disturbance will not begin until written approval is received from the Service that the biologist is qualified to conduct the work. 24. A Service- approved biologist will survey the project site 48 -hours before the onset of work activities. If any life stage of the California red - legged frog is found and these individuals are likely to be killed or injured by work activities, the approved biologist will be allowed sufficient time to move them from the site before work activities begin. The Service - approved biologist will re- locate the California red - legged frogs the shortest distance possible to a location that contains suitable habitat and will not be affected by the activities associated with the proposed project. The Service - approved biologist will maintain detailed records of any individuals that are moved (e.g. size, coloration, any distinguishing features, photographs, [digital preferred]) to assist him or her in determining whether trarnslocated animals are returning to the original point of capture. 25. Before any activities begin on a project, a Service- approved biologist will conduct a training session for all construction personnel. At a minimum, the training will include a description of the California red - legged frog and its habitat, the specific measures that are being implemented to conserve the California red - legged frog for the current project, and the boundaries with -in which the project may be accomplished. Brochures, books and briefings may be used in the training session, provided that a qualified person is on hand to answer any questions. 26. A Service - approved biologist will be present at the work -site until all California red- legged frogs have been removed, workers have been instructed, and disturbance of habitat has been completed. After this time, the state or local sponsoring agency will designate a person to monitor on -site compliance with all minimization measures. The Service - approved biologist will ensure that this monitor received the training outlined in measure 4 and in the identification of California red - legged frogs. If the monitor or the Service - approved biologist recommends that work be stopped because California red - legged frogs would be affected to a Resolution No. 10157 (201 U series) - Page 8 degree that exceeds the levels anticipated by the Federal Highways Administration and Service during review of the proposed action, they will notify the resident engineer (the engineer that is directly overseeing and in command of construction activities) immediately. The resident engineer will either resolve the situation by eliminating the effect immediately or require that all actions which are causing these effects be halted. If work is stopped, the Service will be notified as soon as is reasonably possible. 27. During project activities, all trash that may attract predators will be properly contained, removed from the work site, and disposed of on a daily basis. Following construction, all trash and construction debris will be removed from work areas. 28. All refueling, maintenance, and staging of equipment and vehicles will occur at least 60 -feet from riparian habitat or water bodies and not in a location from where the spill would drain directly toward aquatic habitat. The monitor will ensure contamination of habitat does not occur during such operations. Prior to the onset of work, the Federal Highway Administration will ensure that a plan is in place for prompt and effective response to any accidental spills. All workers will be informed of the importance of preventing spills and of the appropriate measures to take should a spill occur. 29. The number of access routes, size of the staging areas, and the total area of the activity will be limited to the minimum necessary to achieve the proposed project goal. Environmentally sensitive areas will be established to confine access routes and construction areas to the minimum area necessary to complete construction, and minimize the impacts to California Red - legged Frog habitat; this goal includes locating access routes and construction areas outside of wetlands and riparian areas to the maximum extent possible. 30. To control sedimentation during and after this project implementation, the Federal Highway Administration and sponsoring agencies will implement best management practices outlined in the authorizations or permits, issued under the authorities of the Clean Water Act that it receives for the specific project. If best management practices are ineffective, the Federal Highway Administration will attempt to remedy the situation immediately, in consultation with the Service. • Monitoring Program The Federal Highway Administration and sponsoring agencies will implement best management practices outlined in the authorizations or permits, issued under the authorities of the Clean Water Act that it receives for the specific project. Community Development and Public Works staff shall review plans to assure that the best management practices are incorporated into plans. 31. If the Community Development Director or hearing body determines that the above mitigation measures are ineffective or physically infeasible, he may add, delete or modify the mitigation to meet the intent of the original measures. Resolution No. 10157 (2010 Series) Page 9 SECTION 3. Action. The City Council does hereby deny the appeal of the Architectural Review Commission's action, thereby granting final approval to the design for a proposed bicycle and pedestrian path extending from Vista Lago to Oceanaire Drive including a bridge over Prefumo Creek, subject to the following conditions: Conditions: The proposed lighting fixtures for the bridge shall be a different style to better complement the aesthetics of the bridge and modified to comply with Mitigation Measure No. 1 and the City's Night Sky Preservation standards. These fixtures and details shall be shown on plans submitted for a building permit and shall be to the approval of the Public Works and Community Development Department Directors. 2. The ultimate fencing detail selected for the edge of the bike path on the northeast side of the Windemere Condominiums shall: 1) eliminate the sharp pickets at the top of the fence to address safety concerns; and 2) maintain a minimal footprint so that the pathway can be as wide as possible. 3. The design of the bridge shall be modified to include entry embellishments and a softer appearance to the approval of the Public Works and Community Development Department Directors. Roof elements were suggested as a design consideration, but not mandated. 4. Based on continuing negotiations with the Windemere Homeowners' Association Board, modifications to the path design on the northern boundary of the Windemere condominium development may be approved by the Community Development Director if the modifications result in a wider path width at this location. 5. An evaluation of site lighting shall be conducted to determine the need to provide additional lighting along the bicycle pathways to address safety and security issues to the approval of the Community Development Director. Upon motion of Council Member Marx, seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh and Marx, and Vice Mayor Carter NOES: Council Member Settle and Mayor Romero ABSENT: None 0 Resolution No. 10157 (2010-�eries) Page 10 The foregoing resolution was adopted this 16`h day of March 2010. i ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS ,V. Christine Dietrick City Attorney C RESOLUTION NO. 10156 (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO SUPPORTING THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN THE GOOGLE FIBER FOR COMMUNITIES PROJECT WHEREAS, Google has announced the intent to build and test ultra -high speed broadband networks in one or more locations across the country; and WHEREAS, this project would deliver Internet speeds more than 100 times faster than what most Americans have access to today over one gigabit per second, fiber -to -the -home connections; and WHEREAS, participation in the project would benefit local businesses, public agencies and citizens by providing high -speed Internet access; and WHEREAS, Google is interested in deploying the fiber network quickly and efficiently, and wants to work with communities where it can bring significant benefits to residents and develop useful proofs -of- concept that can have a broader impact; and WHEREAS, the Chamber of Commerce supports City participation in this project and is spearheading individual applications in support of the City's participation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo that it hereby endorses participation in the Request.for Information (RFI) process to bring the Google Fiber for Communities project to the City of San Luis Obispo and pledges to work with Google to achieve the goal of deploying the network efficiently and quickly, and to this end, grants authority to the City Manager to serve as the City's point of contact to coordinate interactions with Google. Upon motion of Council Member Ashbaugh, seconded by Council Member Marx, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and Mayor Romero NOES: None ABSENT: None R 10156 Resolution No. 10156 (201 u series) Page 2 The foregoing resolution was adopted this 16`h day of March 2010. F. Romero ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: J istine Dietrick ity Attorney