The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10312-10320C i C RESOLUTION NO. 10320 (2011 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF WATER REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS IN THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF NOT TO EXCEED $6,700,000 TO REFINANCE OUTSTANDING 2002 WATER REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, AND APPROVING RELATED DOCUMENTS AND ACTIONS WHEREAS, the City owns and operates a public enterprise for the supply, treatment and distribution of water within the service area of the City (the "Water System "), and in order to refinance bonds issued to finance improvements to the Water System, the City has previously issued its City of San Luis Obispo 2002 Water Revenue Refunding Bonds in the aggregate original principal amount of $9,485,000 (the "2002 Bonds "); and WHEREAS, the City has the right to redeem the 2002 Bonds in full on any business day at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, without premium, and in order to provide funds for that purpose and thereby realize debt service savings, the City Council wishes at this time to authorize the issuance and sale of City of San Luis Obispo 2012 Water Revenue Refunding Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $6,700,000 (the "Refunding Bonds ") under the provisions of Articles 10 and '11 of Chapter 3 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code, commencing with Section 53570 of said Code (the "Refunding Bond Law "); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City has duly considered such transactions and wishes at this time to approve said transactions in the public interests of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Authorization of Refunding Bonds. The City Council hereby authorizes the issuance of the Refunding Bonds in the maximum principal amount of $6,700,000, for the purpose of providing funds to redeem and discharge the 2002 Bonds in full. The Refunding Bonds shall be revenue bonds which are payable from and secured by a pledge of and lien on the net revenues of the Water System. The Refunding Bonds shall be issued under and in accordance with the provisions of the Refunding Bond Law. SECTION 2. ,Approval of Indenture of Trust. The Refunding Bonds shall be issued upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Indenture of Trust between the City and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, which is hereby approved in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk together with any changes therein or additions thereto deemed advisable by the Director of Finance and Information Technology. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to attest to, the final form of the Indenture of Trust on behalf of the City. R 10320 n n Resolution No. 10320 (2011 Series) Page 2 SECTION 3. Approval of Escrow Deposit and Trust Agreement. The 2002 Bonds shall be refunded under and in accordance with the provisions of the Escrow Deposit and Trust Agreement between the City and U.S. Bank National Association, as escrow bank, which is hereby approved in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk together with any changes therein or additions thereto deemed advisable by the Director of Finance and Information Technology. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to attest to, the final form of the Escrow Deposit and Trust Agreement on behalf of the City. SECTION 4. Competitive. Sale of Bonds. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the competitive sale of the Refunding Bonds in accordance with the Notice of Sale in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk together with any changes therein or additions thereto deemed advisable by the Director of Finance and Information Technology. The Director of Finance and Information Technology is hereby authorized and directed to accept the best bid for the sale of the Refunding Bonds, as determined in accordance with the Notice of Sale. SECTION 5. Publication of Notice. Pursuant to Section 53692 of the Government Code, Jones Hall, as bond counsel to the City, is hereby authorized and directed to cause a Notice of Intention to Sell Bonds, in form and substance acceptable to said firm, to be published once in The Bond Buyer not later than 15 days prior to the date set for receipt of bids on the Refunding Bonds. SECTION 6. Official Statement. The City Council hereby approves and deems nearly final within the meaning of Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the preliminary Official Statement describing the Refunding Bonds in the form on file with the City Clerk. The City Manager or the Director of Finance and Information Technology (each, an "Authorized Officer ") is individually authorized, at the request of the purchaser of the Refunding Bonds, to execute an appropriate certificate affirming the City Council's determination that the preliminary Official Statement has been deemed nearly final within the meaning of such Rule. Distribution of the preliminary Official Statement by the purchaser of the Refunding Bonds is hereby approved. An Authorized Officer is hereby authorized and directed to approve any changes in or additions to a final form of said Official Statement, and the execution thereof by an Authorized Officer shall be conclusive evidence of approval of any such changes and additions. The City Council hereby authorizes the distribution of the final Official Statement by the purchaser of the Refunding Bonds. The final Official Statement shall be executed in the name and on behalf of the City by an Authorized Officer. SECTION 7. Engagement of Professional Services. The City Council hereby confirms the designation of Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation, as bond counsel and disclosure counsel, and the firm of Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates, as financial advisor, in connection with the issuance and sale of the Refunding Bonds, in accordance with the existing agreements between the City and each of such firms. The term of each of such agreements shall remain in effect until terminated by the City in its sole discretion, but not prior to the issuance of the Refunding Bonds. Resolution No. 10320 (2011 Series) Page 3 SECTION 8. Official Actions. The City Manager, the Director of Finance and Information Technology, the City Clerk and all other officers of the City are each authorized and directed in the name and on behalf of the City to make any and all assignments, certificates, requisitions, agreements, notices, consents, instruments of conveyance, warrants and other documents, which they or any of them deem necessary or appropriate in order to consummate any of the transactions contemplated by the agreements and documents approved under this Resolution. Whenever in this Resolution any officer of the City is authorized to execute or countersign any document or take any action, such execution, countersigning or action may be taken on behalf of such officer by any person designated by such officer to act on his or her behalf in the case such officer shall be absent or unavailable. SECTION 9. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of approval and adoption thereof. Upon motion of Council Member Carter, seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Carter and Smith, Vice Mayor Carpenter and Mayor Marx NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was adopted this 13th day of December, 2011. 061MIS �� Elaina Cano City Clerk O RESOLUTION NO. 10319 (2011 SERIES) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF A CONSERVATION EASEMENT AFFECTING REAL PROPERTY AT 2877 SOUTH HIGUERA STREET WHEREAS, Katherine Foster and Michael Spangler ( "Grantors ") are the joint owners of certain real property in San Luis Obispo County, California, within the City of San Luis Obispo, at 2877 South Higuera Street and described as Assessor's Parcel Number 053- 021 -031 (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, portions of said Property possess significant natural resource values including wildlife and plant resources, scenic open space values, and passive recreational uses (the "Conservation Values ") of great importance to Grantors, the people of the City of San Luis Obispo, and the people of the State of California; and WHEREAS, Grantors desire, as owners of the Property, to convey to the City of San Luis Obispo the right to preserve and protect the conservation values of the Property in perpetuity; and have so proposed in a letter offer dated October 25, 2011; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is a chartered municipal corporation of the State of California that is authorized by law to accept Conservation Easements; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo agrees by accepting this grant to honor the intentions of Grantors stated herein and to preserve and protect in perpetuity the conservation values of the Property for the benefit of this generation and the generations to come. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo hereby: 1. Authorizes acceptance of the offer of donation of a Conservation Easement for Assessor's Parcel Number 053- 021 -031 as outlined in the letter offer of January 19, 2006, subject to a finding by the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo that the acquisition of a conservation easement covering the property is consistent with the City's General Plan; and 2. Authorizes and directs the Mayor to accept said Conservation Easement on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo upon the finding described above. R 10319 Resolution No. 10319 (2011 Series) Page 2 Upon motion of Council Member Smith, seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Carter and Smith, Vice Mayor Carpenter and Mayor Marx NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was adopted this 13th day of December, 2011. ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED TO J. C stme Dietrick C' Attomey RESOLUTION NO. 10318 (2011 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATION AGREEMENT FOR THE CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, The United States Congress under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, amended (16 U.S.C. 470), has authorized the establishment of a Certified Local Government program; and WHEREAS, the State of California, represented by the State Historic Preservation Officer, is responsible for the administration of the program within the state and the establishment of necessary rules and procedures governing the application by local agencies under the program; and WHEREAS, said adopted procedures established by the State of California require the applicant to certify by resolution of the local government's elected officials the approval of an application prior to submission of said application to the state; and WHEREAS, notices of said public hearing was made at the time and in the manner required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony of the applicant, interested parties, and the evaluation and recommendations by staff, presented at said hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. Approve the filing of an application for certification under the Certified Local Government Program; and 2. Appoint the Community Development Director or authorized deputy as agent of the City to coordinate, process, and execute all contracts, agreements, amendments, and ancillary documents within the scope of the attached application for certification. Upon motion of Council Member Smith , seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Carter and Smith, Vice Mayor Carpenter and Mayor Marx NOES: None ABSENT: None R 10318 Resolution No. 10318 (2011 Series) Page 2 The foregoing resolution was adopted this 13'h day of December, 2011. L o an Marx ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Christine Dietrick City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 10317 (2011 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AMENDING THE ACCESS AND PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, the City adopted its first Parking Management Plan in 1987 and revised the Plan in 1990 and 1995 and revised and retitled the Plan in 2002; and WHEREAS, the City's General Plan contains policies and programs to encourage housing development in the downtown core, including allowing more flexible parking regulations for housing developments through amendments to the Zoning Regulations and Access and Parking Management Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted public hearings on May 25, 2011, July 27, 2011, and August 24, 2011, and recommended approval of amendments to Access and Parking Management Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on November 15, 2011 to consider amendments to the Access and Parking Management Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Negative Declaration of environmental impact as prepared by staff and reviewed by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony of interested parties, and the evaluation and recommendations by staff, presented at said hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. The Council makes the following findings: 1. The proposed amendments will not significantly alter the character of the City or cause significant health, safety or welfare concerns. 2. The proposed amendments further the goals and policies of the General Plan in support of downtown residential development. SECTION 2. Environmental Determination. The City Council finds and determines that the project's Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact (GPI/ER 83 -07) prepared for the Access and Parking Management Plan and Zoning Regulations amendments adequately addresses the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the City's Environmental Guidelines, and reflects the independent judgment of the Council. The Council hereby adopts the Negative Declaration. R 10317 Resolution No. 10317 Page 2 SECTION 3. Access and Parking Management Plan Amendment Approval. The City Council finds and approves the Access and Parking Management Plan Amendment attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. Upon motion of Council Member Carter, seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Carter and Smith, Vice Mayor Carpenter and Mayor Marx NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was adopted this 6th day of December, 2011. May r an Marx ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED TO LCPAEhie Dietrick Attorney o City of San lugs OBISPO ACCESS AND PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN Amended November, 2011 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, PARKING SECTION 1260 Chorro Street, Suite B, San Luis Obispo, California 93401 C ity o� san luis o-Bi Vo ACCESS & PARKINGMANAGEMENT PLAN SAN LUIS.OBISPO CITY COUNCIL Jan Marx, Mayor r. John Ashbaugh, Vice Mayor Dan Carpenter Andrew Carter Kathy Smith PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. Jay Walter, Director Tim Bochum, Deputy Director Peggy Mandeville, Principal Transportation Planner Robert Horch, Parking Manager CITY ADMINISTRATION Katie Lichtig, City Manager Michael Codron, Assistant City Manager 0 0 0 CITY TRANSPORTATION PLANS The City of San Luis Obispo adopts and maintains plans that help direct the implementation of the General Plan Circulation Element. These plans include: Title of Document Status Access & Parking Management Plan (this document) Amended November, 2011 Updated July, 2002 Bicycle Transportation Plan Updated May, 2007 Short Range Transit Plan Updated May, 2009 Pavement Management Plan Updated October, 2009 For more information about City transportation plans, projects and programs, contact the San Luis Obispo Public Works Department, Transportation Division at (805) 781 -7210. 2 C�� O TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic Page Introduction.................................................................................................... ..............................4 Relationship to Other Plans and Policies ........................................................ ..............................5 Scopeof Plan .................................................................................................. ..............................5 ParkingManagement Goals .......................:................................................... ..............................6 Definitions....................................................................................................... ..............................6 GeneralUse of Parking ................................................................................... ..............................7 EmployeeUse of Parking ................................................................................ ..............................8 JurorUse of Parking ........................................................................................ ..............................9 Use of Parkins for Downtown Residents .............................. : ...................................................... 10 Expansionof Parking ...................................................................................... .............................11 Enforcement....................................... ......:..................................................... ............................... l l Financing of Commercial Core Parking ........................................................ ............................... l l ResidentialParking .......................................................................................... .............................12 Program Administration and Promotion ......................................................... .............................13 APPENDIX A.1 Map of Downtown Parking and Business Improvement Area Showing Existing Parking .... 15 A.2 Approved Parking Management and Demand Reduction Programs ......... .............................16 A.3 Map of Existing Residential Parking Districts .......................................... .............................17 A.4 City Council Resolution # 9350 (2002 Series) revising this plan ............. .............................18 3 "fii5i INTRODUCT101 Between 1977 and 1987, a number of studies were conducted to assess the vehicle parking situation in downtown San Luis Obispo. As a result of this work, the City built two parking structures that house 669 vehicles. The first parking structure located at the corner of Palm and Morro Streets was completed in 1988. The second garage at the corner of Chorro and Marsh Streets was completed in 1990. An expansion of the Marsh Street garage that added 342 spaces (net increase of 245 spaces) will be completed in September 2002. These three projects resulted in a total of 1,007 garage spaces. In addition, the City manages over 1,600 spaces located in surface lots and along downtown streets. Another result of these early parking studies was the City's adoption of its first Parking Management Plan in 1987. The management plan was updated in 1990 and again in 1995 to reflect the completion of some of the major parking projects and to better define management policies. In February 1993, a group of local architects and designers completed a Conceptual Physical Plan for the City's Center (commonly known as the Downtown Concept Plan). The City Council has adopted, in concept, the Plan and feels that it should be considered when making planning decisions that affect the City's center. The Plan was revised in 1997 to reflect changes to the Court Street Parking Lot area. The Concept Plan suggests that a number of new parking structures be built and that the pedestrian character of the commercial core be improved. In November 1994, the City adopted a new General Plan Circulation Element. The adopted Circulation Element directs the City to conduct studies of downtown parking needs and to consider ways of reducing traffic congestion by promoting the use of other types of transportation. The Circulation Element also directs the reevaluation of the use of curb space in the commercial core with the aim of creating more short-term parking spaces. This plan has been revised to address a number of events and decisions that have occurred since 1995, including the follgwing: In 1997, a Downtown Parking and Access Plan was completed by Meyer - Mohaddes and Associates. While never adopted by the City Council, this draft plan estimated future parking demand identified candidate parking garage locations, as well as a variety of actions that the City could take to better manage its current parking supply and reduce employee demand for downtown parking. As a way of incrementally implementing the draft Downtown Parking and Access Plan, the City Council authorized the implementation of a variety of measures to encourage employees to use means other than their private vehicles to access the downtown. In July 2001 a "Gold Pass" program was initiated that provides subsidized monthly transit passes to downtown employees. Parking stalls for car pools have also been reserved in existing parking structures. Other parking management activities have also been pursued. Appendix A.2 identifies these approved activities. On 05/01/2001 the City Council amended Section 6.1 of the Parking Management Plan to provide clarity on the use of Parking Fund revenues. 4 ° The City Council approved a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with private property owners that among other things, calls for the construction of a new office/parking structure on the southeast corner of Palm and Morro Streets that will house 243 vehicles. This project is designed to satisfy parking demand created by the retirement of the Court Street parking lot and the development of a retail commercial project on that site (the "Copelands Project"). The City Council authorized its staff to solicit proposals from consultants to prepare schematic plans for a transit - parking -mixed use facility east of Santa Rosa Street. Entitied the "North Area Regional Facility (NARF)," this design work will investigate opportunities for constructing new parking garages to serve the downtown core and the expanded County Administrative Complex. The San Luis Obispo Downtown Association participated in the review of the 1995 Parking Management Plan. This updated plan will be used as a management tool to help direct how vehicle parking should be provided and used throughout San Luis Obispo and how the demand for downtown parking will be managed. o RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANS AND POLICIES The City's General Plan Land Use Element establishes the pattern of land uses throughout San Luis Obispo. The General Plan Circulation Element identifies how transportation services will be provided to land uses envisioned by the Land Use Element. One of these transportation services is vehicle parking. This plan provides specific direction for the management of vehicle parking in a way that supports the Circulation Element's overall transportation strategy. This plan focuses on the management of vehicle parking in the community's commercial core. Parking of bicycles is ad&essed by the Bicycle Transportation Plan (2002) but is an issue that is relevant to the use of City..parking structures and surface lots. SCOPE OF THIS PLAN This plan establishes vehicle parking policies and programs that apply throughout San Luis Obispo. However, its primary focus is the management of parking in the commercial core. This plan also identifies, in Appendix A.2, approved management techniques for putting to better use existing parking spaces, and for reducing the employee demand for parking spaces in the commercial core. This plan may be revised from time to time to address parking needs in areas beyond and within the commercial core. For more information about City parking programs, contact the Parking Section of the Public Works Department at (805) 781 -7230. 5 O O PARIING MANAGEMENT GOALS �a Support the commercial core as a viable economic and cultural center and preserve its historic character. Support the goals of the Conceptual Physical Plan for the City's Center. [ZF1 Provide enough parking in the commercial core for visitors an d employees. cop, Reduce the demand for employee parking through various programs, such as carpooling, vanpools, transit subsidies, and bicycle and pedestrian systems development. Support the transportation strategy presented in the General Plan Circulation Element.. 01 Support the residential component of mixed use development downtown as presented in the Land Use Element. Carry out actions described in this plan within budget constraints and consistent with Financial Plan goals and policies that are updated every two years. RPMON DEFINITIONS The following words and phrases used throughout this plan have the following meanings: Commercial Core is the central business district in San Luis Obispo. Its boundaries are the same as the Downtown Association Area (see Appendix A.1). Commercial Deliveries are made to businesses in the commercial core using trucks that are commercially licensed. Downtown Association (DA) Advisory Board is an I1- member group established pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 12.36 by the City Council to promote the economic health of the commercial core. The DA (and its advisory committees) participates in the development of City programs that affect the downtown and provide advice to City staff and the City Council. Long -Term Parking spaces may be free or metered, are located along streets, in monthly permit lots or parking structures, and typically allow parking for 10 hours or more. Parking Structures are multi -level buildings that are managed by the City and provide parking for the general public, residential component of mixed -use development, commercial core employees, and jurors at the Palm Street parking structure. Short -Term Parking spaces may be free or metered and typically have a two -hour or less time limit. — — rl o GENERAL USE OF PARKING POLICIES 1.1 The City should maximize the use of all parking structures and surface lots. 1.2 The City should encourage any development of surface parking lots in the commercial core . to conform, to the degree possible, to the "Conceptual Physical Plan for the City's Center." 1.3 Curb parking spaces are intended for short-term parking. People parking for longer periods should use monthly permit lots and long -term metered spaces and parking structures. 1.4 The City may install parking meters or post parking time limits where at least 75% of a block's frontage is developed with commercial uses. The City will consider requests by a majority of residential and commercial property owners along a block to install parking controls. 1.5 Thirty- minute parking spaces shall be placed at the ends of blocks in the commercial core where short-term parking is needed. The City will consider requests by property owners to locate 30- minute spaces at other locations. 1.6 Parking for commercial deliveries in the commercial core should be managed so that: lzr Illegal double parking or excessive circulation by delivery vehicles is discouraged. Deliveries are discouraged during peak traffic periods and during retail business hours. Merchants may consider lockbox systems that allow for unassisted nighttime access for deliveries. Oversized vehicles do not attempt deliveries. ACTIONS 1.7 The City will: � Publicize the availability of parking spaces in underused lots and will offer incentives to increase their use. Take actions that better direct people to parking structures and underused parking lots and long -term metered curb parking areas. (27 Continue to offer permits for 10 -hour metered parking spaces. Maintain long -term metered spaces on Pacific Street and along side streets near the Marsh Street parking structure for overflow parking, but periodically evaluate their use. 7 0 0 1.8 The City will consider: rr Allowing the mixture of daily and monthly parking in underused permit lots. (2r, Managing employee use of the Marsh Street parking structure so that (A) more spaces can be'reserved for shoppers, and (B) more employees are encouraged to use the Palm Street structure, which has more vacant spaces. Allowing the use of lone term parking for downtown residential uses in City owned parking facilities. 1.9 City staff will periodically evaluate and revise as appropriate: CZF' The placement of 15- and 30- minute parking meters. ° The layout of existing parking lots or structures when they are resurfaced or re- striped with the aim of. (a) maximizing their use, (b) improving circulation and complying with requirements to provide parking for the disabled. °° The use of curb space in the downtown (including no parking and loading zones) to identify opportunities for creating more short-term spaces. The optimum mixture of long- and short-term metered spaces and the expansion of metered curb areas. 1.10 If congestion levels in the commercial core exceed standards set by the Circulation Element, the City will adopt an ordinance that limits times for commercial deliveries. OUMNUW EMPLOYEE USE OF PARKING POLICIES 2.1 Employee parking programs will be consistent with the goals and objectives of the Circulation Element. 2.2 The City and County should develop programs that reduce the number of their employees that are driving alone to work. 2.3 Commercial core employers should establish programs that encourage employees to: Use Palm Street Parking Structure, monthly permit lots, and long -term metered spaces. o Use other types of transportation to get to work or to carpool. A listing of approved programs is included as Appendix A.2. 8 C ACTIONS 2.4 The City will establish a program in the commercial core that fosters carpooling by employees and visitors. 2.5 The Downtown Association (DA) and Chamber of Commerce should sponsor on -going education programs that discourage employees from using curb parking and promote alternate transportation. 2.6 The City should discourage long -:term employee use of curb parking in the commercial core by: Expanding areas with two -hour parking limits when needed to maintain convenient customer parking opportunities. Monitoring the use of 15- and 30= minutes curb spaces; Consider increasing the fines for overtime violations; As requested, consider establishing resident parking districts in 'areas adjoining the commercial core and office districts. 2.7 The City will institute a trip reduction program for its employees in compliance with goals established by the Circulation Element. 2.8 The City should develop a bulk discount rate for its transit passes without negatively affecting transit funding. Employers should purchase passes and make them available to employees who substitute riding the bus for driving to work. 2.9 The City will install bicycle lockers at convenient locations in the commercial core and will promote their use by commercial core employees on a space- available basis. 2.10 The City will work to consider park -and -ride lots that serve the commute needs of commercial core employees. The City will evaluate outlying parking lots for their use by commercial core employees with a shuttle connecting these lots with the core. JUROR RMWN USE OF PARKING POLICIES 3.1 The City will provide free parking for jurors in the Palm Street parking structure or in metered spaces when the Palm Street parking structure is full or when a juror drives an oversized. vehicle as per the agreement with the County for limited use. ACTIONS 3.2 City staff will work with the Jury Commissioner to inform prospective jurors of the City's parking policies. Staff will monitor the amount of jury parking and inform the Jury . Commissioner if overflow parking becomes a problem. VJ is st USE OF PARKING FOR DOWNTOWN RESIDENTS POLICIES 4.1 As a pilot program, the City will provide a limited number of parking spaces to accommodate residential tenants within the Downtown - Commercial (C -D) zone consistent with General Plan Land Use Element policy 4.22 and Housing Element Policy 3.12.4. These spaces may be provided in structures or other locations that are suitable for overnight parking programs. 4.2 Monthly fees for such parking spaces shall be as adopted by City Council Resolution to financially contribute to the cost of the new program. 4.3 Parking spaces shall be in locations suitable for overnight use and shall. be in locations that do not significantly interfere with necessary parking for downtown customers and employees or encroach into adjacent residential neighborhoods. ACTIONS 4.4 The City shall establish a pilot program to allow residents within the downtown core to utilize public parking and to monitor the amount of residential parking required. 4.5 The City Council shall adopt a resolution that establishes a fee program, use limitations and enforcement options for regulating use of parking for downtown residents. 4.6 The Municipal Code shall be amended to include parking options for downtown residences. 4.7 The City will assist owners of downtown residences to inform prospective tenants of the City's parking policies and transportation choices. The Parking Services web page is one element that could be used as a component of this information source. EXPANSION OF PARKING POLICIES 5.1 Parking should be provided in the commercial core for shoppers, tourists, employees and patrons of government and private offices. 5.2 Building parking structures is the best way of providing more parking facilities while minimizing the use of valuable commercial land. City-owned land earmarked for parking structures may be used as temporary surface parking lots.. 10 5.3 Existing City-owned surface parking lots purchased by the Parking Fund which are not earmarked for parking structure locations may.be sold to finance expansion of parking in permanent structures when and after new parking structures have been built to take their place. 5.4 Parking structures and surface lots should be located along the periphery of the commercial core as a means of eliminating traffic congestion and enhancing pedestrian activities. ACTIONS 5.5 Develop a program to encourage use of underutilized parking lots, which would benefit the commercial core. ENFORCEMENT POLICIES 6.1 Parking laws will be strictly enforced to: Discourage overtime parking; lv' Discourage habitual parking violations -- people with six or more violations; Encourage meter payments; and lv Direct people parking for long periods to use long -term parking spaces. ACTIONS 6.2 City enforcement officers will strictly enforce all parking laws, especially overtime violations and the misuse of loading zones. 6.3 The City in cooperation with the BIA will develop a plan to discourage habitual violators. RMEW FINANCING OF COMMERCIAL CORE PARKING POLICIES 7.1 The City's Parking Program will be self - supporting. The principal purpose of Parking Fund revenues will be used to: a) Maintain and expand parking operations and supply, including effective parking demand reduction programs, and b) Repay bonds that financed the construction of the parking structures. Pilot or "test case" parking demand reduction activities may also be funded, provided that they are well defined and monitored for a defined period of time and a measurement of effectiveness is predetermined. 7.2 Commercial core merchants, business owners, and property owners should help finance the parking program. ACTIONS 7.3 The City will deposit all revenues from parking fines into the Parking Fund. 7.4 The City will: Review parking meter and citation rates every two years and make adjustments as needed Continue to charge variable rates for different types of parking. Continue to collect in -lieu fees from development projects in the commercial core. 0- Consider new fee programs applicable to commercial core merchants, business owners, and property owners. 7.5 - The City, upon Council direction, will evaluate the elimination of parking meters in the commercial core and the creation of a comprehensive financing plan to finance the Parking Program. RESIDENTIAL PARKING POLICIES 8.1 Parking along streets in residential areas should be used by residents and their guests. However, no individual household has the exclusive right to use a particular section of curb parking and curb parking is not guaranteed in front of each household. 8.2 The City may prohibit or limit curb parking in residential areas to ensure safe traffic flow, pedestrian crossing conditions or to install motor vehicle or bicycle lanes consistent with the Circulation Element or the Bicycle Transportation Plan. . 8.3 The City will create residential parking districts when needed to manage parking and maintain the quality of life in residential areas. 8.4 All residential parking districts must comply with provisions of Section 10.36.170 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. 12 ACTIONS 8.5 Upon receiving a petition from a 60% majority of affected residents living within a proposed parking district, the City Council may create a district consistent with provisions of the municipal code. (For the location of existing Residential Parking Districts, see Appendix A.3.) RPERW PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION AND PROMOTION POLICIES 9.1 The City's Parking Manager is responsible for interpreting and implementing the provisions of this plan. 9.2 As the need arises, the City will evaluate the potential for hiring a private company to manage its parking structures. 9.3 The Parking Manager will continue to work with the Downtown Association (DA), Chamber of Commerce, and County government to cooperatively implement this plan. 9.4 The Parking Manager will undertake a wide range of actions to make the public aware of the provisions -of this plan. 9.5 Applications for amending the Access and Parking Management Plan shall be filed with the City's Parking Manager. Applications will receive and extensive review process and will be acted on no more frequently than annually by the City Council. 13 0 0 APPENDIX A.1 Map of Downtown Parking and Business Improvement Area Showing Existing Parking A.2 Approved Parking Management and Demand Reduction Programs A.3 Map of Existing Residential Parking Districts A.4 City Council Resolution # 10317 (2011 Series) amending this plan 14 = - j uuLMIZ- - APPENDIX A -1 �A M,^ w V/ W 0u rL � I� I� Bull], w.n u W D_ Opp O N 2 C N 0 OOra ( Z y m � 5 710. g � Q ss 0 � 0. 9 9 1 �d�� a i� sa a w„ 0 e nww S ^n O R j uuLMIZ- - APPENDIX A -1 �A M,^ w V/ W 0u rL � I� I� Bull], w.n u W D_ Opp O N 2 C N 0 OOra ( Z y m � 5 710. g � Q ss 0 � 0. 9 9 1 �d�� a i� sa a w„ 0 e nww S ^n O j uuLMIZ- - APPENDIX A -1 �A M,^ w V/ W 0u rL � I� I� Bull], w.n u W D_ Opp O N 2 C N 0 OOra ( Z y m � 5 710. g � Q ss 0 � 0. 9 9 1 �d�� a i� C C APPENDIX A.2 Approved Parking Management and Demand Reduction Programs 16 SM i a" .K' ✓w.4.. i t +.� M - -R4'�' °' t EY ,Status �,w #..� �> ParktnWI)emand Reduction Programs 1 Increase the maximum charge for garage parking Approved/Completed 2 Transit pass subsidies for downtown employees Approved/Completed 3 Reduce monthly parking pass costs for high- occupancy vehicles Approved/Completed 4 Improve bicycle access to the downtown Approved/Ongoing 5 Establish an advertising program for downtown parking demand reduction (PDR) programs Approved/Ongoing 6 Encourage the county to establish a trip reduction program similar to the City's program Approved/Ongoing Parl"g Management Programs 1 Reduce free parking in garages from 90 minutes to 60 minutes Approved/Completed 2 Increase the in -lieu parking fee charged to new development to better reflect the cost of downtown parking Approved/Completed 3 Increase 2 -hour parking in the commercial core and limit long -term parking Approved/Completed Respond to. citizen proposals to establish residential parking districts in neighborhoods adjoining the downtown. Approved/Ongoing 4 Increase long -term parking at the periphery of the downtown Approved/Ongoing 5 Work with the Downtown Association to establish a program for discouraging habitual violators Approved/Ongoing 16 t I I I I i I L._._.— .— . —. —.J T 0 > E v o A N 9. ,v g v I-v C4 N —4 y� W Vd A Est W. Pam 0 ism a& IN riV t`i� APPENDIX A ca +� o �c LL LL a I V)iz0 f pE I nE C cc° (O Q uai r Q N N I I I I i I L._._.— .— . —. —.J T 0 > E v o A N 9. ,v g v I-v C4 N —4 y� W Vd A Est W. Pam 0 ism a& IN riV t`i� O RESOLUTION NO. 10316 (2011 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO CEASING TO PAY AND REPORT THE VALUE OF EMPLOYER PAID MEMBER CONTRIBUTIONS FOR APPOINTED OFFICIALS AND MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES AND SUPERSEDING PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo has the authority to implement Government Code Section 20636(c) (4) pursuant to Section 20691; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo has a resolution which no longer provides for the normal member contributions to be paid by the employer and reported as additional compensation for appointed officials and management employees; and WHEREAS, one of the steps in the procedures to implement Section 20691 is the adoption by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo of a Resolution to no longer pay and report the value of said Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC); and WHEREAS, the governing body of the City of San Luis Obispo has identified the following conditions for the purpose of its election to no longer pay EPMC: • This benefit shall no longer apply to all employees of the Appointed Officials, Department Heads, and Management classifications. • Zero percent of the normal contributions will be paid as EPMC, and the same zero percent (value) of compensation eamable {excluding Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) will be reported as additional compensation. • The effective date of this Resolution shall be January 26, 2012. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo hereby: SECTION 1. Elects to no longer pay the EPMC, as set forth above, and therefore has nothing to report as EPMC additional compensation. SECTION 2. Directs that prior resolutions relating to management and appointed official compensation and benefits are hereby superseded to the extent inconsistent with this resolution. Upon motion of Council Member Carter, seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh and Carter and Mayor Marx NOES: Council Member Smith and Vice Mayor Carpenter ABSENT: None R 10316 Resolution No. 10316 (2011 Series) Page 2 The foregoing resolution was adopted this 6th day of December, 2011. G - 61 Mayor Marx ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPR7_AS TO FORM: Richard C. Bolanos Partner, Liebert Cassidy Whitmore N RESOLUTION NO. 10315 (2011 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO REGARDING MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION FOR APPOINTED OFFICIALS, DEPARTMENT HEADS, AND MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES AND SUPERSEDING PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT WHEREAS, the unrepresented management employees (Appointed Officials, Department Heads, and Management employees) of the City of San Luis Obispo met multiple times during the months of September and October to identify sustainable reductions in total compensation costs to achieve Council's labor relations objectives to reduce total compensation costs and implement sustainable pension cost containment and reductions; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo strives to provide excellent service to the community at all times, and supports this standard by promoting organizational values including customer service, productivity, accountability, innovation, initiative, stewardship, and ethics; and WHEREAS, to achieve its service standards the City must attract and retain well qualified employees who exemplify its organizational values, and WHEREAS, the unrepresented management employees acknowledge the fiscal challenges facing the City of San Luis Obispo and are committed to working with the City to help achieve long -term sustainable solutions; and WHEREAS, the unrepresented management employees have demonstrated sensitivity to the fiscal challenges facing the City for several years by agreeing to no across the board salary increases (e.g. "cost of living" increases) since January 2009; and WHEREAS, the unrepresented management employees have also agreed to no increases in the City's contribution to health care for the past two calendar years, while medical premiums have increased in that same timeframe and will increase again in 2012; and WHEREAS, the unrepresented management employees remain committed to providing high quality service to the citizens of San Luis Obispo in an efficient and effective manner. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo hereby revises management compensation as follows: SECTION 1. Unrepresented management employees will begin paying the full Member Contribution to Ca1PERS (e.g. eight percent of salary for Miscellaneous employees and nine percent of salary for Safety employees) and the City will no longer report to Ca1PERS the Member Contribution as additional compensation, effective the first full payroll period in January 2012. SECTION 2. There will be no across the board salary increases (e.g. "cost of living" increases). R 10315 Resolution No. 10315 (2011 Series) Page 2 SECTION 3. There will be no increase to the City's health contribution. SECTION 4. Cash out of administrative leave is eliminated. SECTION 5. City Manager's car allowance as set forth in Resolution 9440 (2003 Series) is eliminated. SECTION 6. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute amended contracts with the City Manager and the City Attorney reducing their compensation as specified in this resolution. SECTION 7. The City shall continue to provide employees certain fringe benefits as set forth in Exhibit "A ", fully incorporated by reference. SECTION 8. Unrepresented management employees acknowledge the City's need to achieve long term financial sustainability and pension cost reductions through the establishment of a second tier retirement formula for new employees. If the City amends the CalPERS Miscellaneous contract to provide a second tier retirement formula, management employees will participate as required by Ca1PERS. SECTION 9. All prior resolutions relating to management and appointed official compensation and benefits are hereby superseded to the extent inconsistent with this resolution. SECTION 10. This resolution shall be in effect from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013. SECTION 11. The Director of Finance and Information Technology shall reduce the appropriate accounts to reflect the compensation changes. Upon motion of Council Member Carter, seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh and Carter and Mayor Marx NOES: Council Member Smith and Vice Mayor Carpenter ABSENT: None Resolution No. 10315 (2 011 Series) Page 3 The foregoing resolution was adopted this 6th day of December, 2011. Mayor � 711, ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPR D AS TO FORM: 6,Azt--t -X-- Richard C. Bolanos Partner, Liebert Cassidy Whitmore MANAGEMENT FRINGE BENEFITS 2012 Section A Medical, Dental, Vision C EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 6 The City shall establish and maintain medical, dental and vision insurance plans for department head and management employees and their dependents. The City reserves the right to choose the method of insuring and plans to be offered. The City has elected to participate in the PERS Health Benefit Program pursuant to the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) with the "unequal contribution option" at the PERS minimum contribution rates, $112.00 per month for active employees and $106.40 for retirees as of January 1, 2012. The City's contribution toward retirees shall be increased by 5% per year of the City's contribution for the active employees until such time as contributions for employees and retirees are equal. Employees with proof of medical insurance elsewhere are not required to participate in the medical insurance plan and may receive the unused portion of the City's contribution (after dental and vision insurance is deducted) in cash in accordance with the City's cafeteria plan. Those employees will be assessed $16.00 per month to be placed in the Retiree Health Insurance Account. This account will be used to fund the City's contribution toward retiree premiums and the City's costs for the Public Employees' Contingency Reserve Fund and Administrative Costs. However, there is no requirement that these funds be used exclusively for this purpose, nor any guarantee that they will be sufficient to fund retiree health costs, although they will be used for employee benefits. Employees will be required to participate in the City's dental and vision plans at the employee - only rate. Should they elect to cover dependents in the City's dental and vision plans, they may do so, even if they do not have dependent coverage for medical insurance. Employees shall participate in term life insurance of $4,000 through payroll deduction as a part of the cafeteria plan. Section B Cafeteria Plan Contribution The City's contribution to the Cafeteria Plan for regular, full -time employees will remain the same as the 2010 amounts. Employee Only $469 monthly Employee + 1 $938 monthly Employee + Family $1254 monthly Employees with proof of medical insurance elsewhere may elect to opt out of the City's medical plan and receive a $200 cafeteria contribution. Employees who opted out of the City's medical insurance coverage and were hired prior to August 31, 2008 were "grandfathered" in at the $790 per month contribution level, until that time when they elected to be covered under the tiered contribution structure. An employee elects to be covered under the tiered contribution structure Resolution No. 10315 (2011 Series) EXHIBIT "A" Management Fringe Benefits 2012 Page 2 of 6 when he or she enrolls as an employee only or with dependents (employee plus one or family). At that time the employee would no longer be grandfathered in at the $790 per month contribution, but would receive the tiered contribution amount. Employees hired prior to August 31, 2008 that had employee only medical insurance coverage were "grandfathered" in at the $790 per month contribution level, until such time when they added dependents or opted out. At that time the employee would no longer be grandfathered in at the $790 per month contribution, but would receive the tiered contribution amount. Less than full -time employees shall receive a prorated share of the City's contribution. The City agrees to continue its contribution to the cafeteria plan for two (2) pay periods in the event that an employee has exhausted all paid time off due to an employee's catastrophic illness. Section C Life and Disability Insurance The City shall provide the following special insurance benefits in recognition of management responsibilities: Long -term disability insurance providing 66 2/3% of gross salary (maximum benefit $5,500 per month) to age 65 for any sickness or accident, subject to the exclusions in the long -term disability policy, after a 30 -day waiting period. 2. In addition to $4,000 term life insurance purchased by the employee through the cafeteria plan a $100,000 term life insurance for department heads and $50,000 term life insurance for management employees, including accidental death and dismemberment. Section D Retirement The City shall provide the California Public Employees' Retirement System's (Ca1PERS) 2.7% at 55 plan to all eligible employees including the amendments permitting conversion of unused sick leave to additional retirement credit, the 1959 survivor's benefit (Level Four), one year final compensation, and pre- retirement Option 2 death benefit. The Police and Fire Chiefs shall receive the same retirement formula as sworn personnel in their departments. The employee is responsible for paying the employee's contribution to Ca1PERS (8% for miscellaneous, 9% for safety) effective the first full pay period in January 2012. The City shall no longer report as salary all Employer -Paid Member Contributions (EPMC) to Ca1PERS for the purposes of retirement credit in accordance with Government Code Section 20636 (c) (4) effective the first full pay period in January 2012. Resolution No. 10315 (2011 Series) EXHIBIT "A" Management Fringe Benefits 2012 Page 3 of 6 Section E Sunnlemental Retirement The City shall contribute 1% of salary for management employees and 2% of salary for department heads to a defined contribution supplemental retirement plan established in accordance with sections 401 (a) and 501 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and California Government Code sections 53215 - 53224. Section G Retiree Medical Benefit Trust Management employees participate in the San Luis Obispo Employees Retiree Medical Trust. This trust aims to provide for health insurance and other medical expense reimbursements to San Luis Obispo City Employees Association ( SLOCEA) and management employees after retirement. The Trust is administered separately by SLOCEA and a Board of Trustees. The City is not involved with the establishment or administration of the Trust. Included in the funding for the Trust will be amounts designated by SLOCEA to be deducted from each employees' paycheck. The City's sole responsibility is to forward the designated amounts to the Trust. The employee contribution is currently $100 per month and $6.50 per month to SLOCEA for administration of the Trust. Appointed officials and public safety chiefs have opted not to participate in the Retiree Medical Trust. Section H Pay for Performance In 1996 the City Council established the Management Pay for Performance System for management employees. The system is designed to recognize and reward excellent performance by managers and to provide an incentive for continuous improvement and sustained high performance. Instead of step increases, the management employee moves through his/her salary range solely according to accomplishment of objectives and job - related behavior. Further information about the Management Pay for Performance System can be found in the Management Pay for Performance System Guide. Section I Vacation Vacation leave is governed by section 2.36.440 of the Municipal Code, except that it may be taken after the completion of the sixth calendar month of service since the benefit date. Vacation leave shall be accrued as earned each payroll period provided that not more than twice the annual rate may be carried over to a new calendar year. However, if the City Manager determines that a department head has been unable to take vacation due to the press of City business, the City Manager may approve up to a six -month extension of maximum vacation accrual. The City Manager may, within two years of appointing a department head, increase the rate of vacation accrual to a maximum of 120 hours per year. Resolution No. 10315 (2011 Series) EXHIBIT "A" Management Fri rige Benefits 2012 Page 4 of 6 Vacation schedules for management employees shall be based upon the needs of the City and then, insofar as possible, upon the wishes of the employee. A department head may not deny a management employee's vacation request if such denial will result in the loss of vacation accrual by the employee, except that, a department head may approve up to a six -month extension of maximum vacation accrual. However, in no event shall more than one such extension be granted in any calendar year. Department Head and management employees are eligible, once annually in December, to request payment for up to 40 hours of unused vacation leave provided that an employee's overall performance and attendance practices are satisfactory. Section J Administrative Leave Department heads and appointed officials shall be granted 80 hours of administrative leave per calendar year. Management employees shall be granted 48 hours of administrative leave per calendar year. Administrative leave hours shall be pro -rated when a department head or management employee is appointed or leaves employment during the calendar year. The employee's final check will be adjusted to reflect the pro -rated hours, however there is no provision to receive cash payment for unused administrative hours. Department Heads and Managers are considered exempt from the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and not eligible for overtime payment. In general, management employees are expected to work the hours necessary to successfully carry out their duties and frequently must return to work or attend meetings and events outside their normal working hours. However, when specifically authorized by the department head due to extraordinary circumstances, a management employee may receive overtime payment of time and one -half for hours worked above and beyond what would be considered normal work requirements during an emergency event lasting at least eight (8) hours. Section K HDlidays Department heads and management employees shall receive I 1 fixed plus 2 floating holidays per year. The floating holidays shall be accrued on a semi - monthly basis and added to the vacation accrual. Section L Sick Leave Sick leave is governed by section 2.36.420 of the Municipal Code. An employee may take up to 16 hours per year of sick leave if required to be away from the job to personally care for a member of his/her immediate family as defined in Section 2.36.420. This may be extended to 40 hours per year if the family member is part of the employee's household and to 56 hours if a household family member is hospitalized and the employee submits written verification of such hospitalization. If the family member is a child, parent, domestic partner or spouse, an employee Resolution No. 10315 (2011 Series) EXHIBIT "A" Management Fringe Benefits 2012 Page 5 of 6 may use up to 48 hours annually to attend to the illness of the child, parent or spouse, instead of the lesser maximums above, in accordance with Labor Code Section 233. In conjunction with existing leave benefits, department head and management employees with one year of City service who have worked at least 1,280 hours in the previous year may be eligible for up to 12 weeks of Family/Medical Leave in accordance with the federal Family and Medical Leave Act and the California Family Rights Act. Sick leave may be used to be absent from duty due to the death of a member of the employee's immediate family as defined in Section 2.36.420, provided such leave shall not exceed forty working hours for each incident. The employee may be required to submit proof of relative's death before being granted sick leave pay. False information concerning the death or relationship shall be cause for discharge. Upon termination of employment by death or retirement, a percentage of the dollar value of the employee's accumulated sick leave will be paid to the employee, or the designated beneficiary or beneficiaries according to the following schedule: (A) Death — 25% (B) Retirement and actual commencement of Ca1PERS benefits: (1) After ten years of continuous employment —10% (2) After twenty years of continuous employment — 15% Section M Workers' Compensation Leave An employee who is absent from duty because of on-the-job injury in accordance with State workers' compensation law and is not eligible for disability payments under Labor Code Section 4850 shall be paid the difference between his/her base salary and the amount provided by workers' compensation law during the first ninety (90) business days of such temporary disability absence. Eligibility for workers' compensation leave requires an open workers' compensation claim. Section N Vehicle Assignment For those department heads requiring the use of an automobile on a regular 24 -hour basis to perform their normal duties, the City will, at City option, provide a City vehicle or an appropriate allowance for the employee's use of a personal automobile. Department heads who are not provided a City vehicle shall receive a car allowance of $236 per month. The use of a personal automobile for City business will be eligible for mileage reimbursement in accordance with standard City policy. / I Resolution No. 1031.5 (2011 Series) EXHIBIT "A" Management Fringe Benefits 2012 Page 6 of 6 Section O Uniform Allowance For employees required to wear a uniform, including the Fire Chief, Fire Marshall and Police Chief, shall receive the same uniform allowance as those they directly supervise. Section P Appointed Officials The fringe benefits outlined in this exhibit for department heads apply to appointed officials, except where they have been modified by council resolution. 0 C RESOLUTION NO. 10314 (2011 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ENDORSING THE COUNCIL COMPENSATION WAIVER REQUESTS FOR MAYOR AND ALL COUNCIL MEMBERS FOR THEIR CURRENT TERMS OF OFFICE WHEREAS, Charter Section 410 provides for compensation and reimbursement of expenses for the Mayor and Council Members; and WHEREAS, Compensation for the office of Mayor was set at $1,200 per month and the compensation for the office of City Council Member was set at $1,000 per month by Resolution Number 9794 (2006 Series) and compensation remains at those levels, as reflected in Section 2.1 of the Council Policies and Procedures; and WHEREAS, the City currently pays the 8% employer paid member contribution (EPMC) to the California Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) toward the retirement of participating Council Members; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and each of the current participating Council Members desires to waive his or her EPMC portion of the Council compensation and pay the member contribution; and WHEREAS, Council Members Ashbaugh, Carter and Smith wish to waive $51 per month of the compensation currently provided to them, thereby reducing their monthly compensation to $949. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:. SECTION 1. The City Council hereby acknowledges and endorses that the Mayor and all currently participating City Council members wish to and hereby do waive the 8% EPMC paid on their behalf by the City to PERS and, beginning the first full pay period in January 2012, the Mayor and each participating Council Member shall pay his or her own member contribution to PERS. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby acknowledges and endorses the waivers of salary by Council Members Ashbaugh, Carter and Smith, which shall reduce the monthly compensation of each of the Council Members from $1,000 to $949, effective the first full payroll period in January 2012. R 10314 Resolution No. 10314 (2011 Series) Page 2 SECTION 3. Upon the conclusion of the terms of office of the current Mayor and Council Members, compensation for any new member holding the office of Mayor and Council Members shall automatically be adjusted consistent with the City Charter, the then applicable Council Compensation Resolution, and the Council Policies and Procedures Manual. Upon motion of Vice Mayor Ashbaugh, seconded by Council Member Carter, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Carpenter, Carter and Smith, Vice Mayor Ashbaugh and Mayor Marx NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was adopted this 15'h day of November 2011. M&Yo J Marx ATTEST: Elama Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO J. C store Dietrick Ci Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 10313 (2011 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO UPDATING THE CITY'S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, it is the policy of the City of San Luis Obispo to review service charges on an ongoing basis and to adjust them as required to ensure that they remain adequate to achieve adopted cost recovery goals; and WHEREAS, fees are adjusted as required to ensure they remain equitable and adequate to cover the cost of providing services; and WHEREAS, an analysis of the Building and Safety fees was performed for 2011 -12 and presented to the Council for its consideration on August 16, 2011. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo that City service charges and rates for Building and Safety services are hereby updated as set forth in the Exhibit attached hereto, with an effective date for of January 1, 2012. Upon motion of Council Member Carter, seconded by Vice Mayor Ashbaugh, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Carter and Smith, Vice Mayor Ashbaugh and Mayor Marx NOES: Council Member Carpenter ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was adopted this 1 S` day of November 2011. ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk J Attorney AS TO FORM: (" , L MaV Marx R 10313 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MINOR & MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS !The -fees -iiste�fbec�w-are itin8-aFre es. Additional D �eve op nki;Tie or StoFWwiier fee s may -pply Misc Page 1 of 4 Fee Description Fee Unit Fee 50% REDUCED FEES FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ENERGY SAVING UPGRADES Electrical service upgrade each $ 104.50 Electric car charging system each $ 104.50 Firepalce Insert/upgrade each $ 278.50 Fumacelheater replacement each $ 104.50 Graywater/Rainwater Harvesting System each $ 64.50 Insulation/energy upgrade per project $ 100.50 Re-roof with added ventilation per project $ 100.50 Solar photovoltaic system per project $ 145.00 Water heater replacement each $ 104.50 Window retrofits non-structural only) per project $ 169.00 MINOR COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Balcony/Porch/Deck first 300 s.f. per project $ 951 ea add'I 100 s.f per project $ 97 Canopy / Awning per project $ 330 Cellular Tower / Antenna First Antenna /Tower each $ 782 each add'I antenna/ tower each $ 85 Antenna/Tower w/ Equipment Shelter each $ 570 Commercial Access Upgrade (ADA Compliance) Site-work such as Ramps or Exterior each $ 1,021 Upgrades such as reception counter, registers, Mgnage, etc. each $ 817 Commercial Coach Installation each $ 1,356 Demolition Interior or garage - utlity building per project $ 387 Entire Building, residence or commercial per project $ 677 Dry rot/Termite Repair per project $ 201 Fence or Non-Engineered Wall per project $ 582 Fireplace Retrofit / Chimney Repair per project $ 557 Flag, Light, or Sign Pole - Install / Replace per project $ 692 Foundation Replace I New (includes piles, piers, or foundation-only systems under existing or partial construction) per project $ 1,160 Foundation Repair (includes piles, piers, or foundation-only systems under existing or partial construction) per project $ 580 Garage Conversion First 500 s.f. per project $ 773 Ea add'I 100 s.f. per project $ 97 Grading 1,000 CY or less per project $ 677 1,001 - 10,000 CY per project $ 870 >10,001 CY per project $ 1,063 Paint Booth per project $ 870 Partition per project $ 647 Patio Cover Open per project $ 582 Enclosed per project $ 1,015 Pool / Spa - Commercial per project $ 966 Pool / Spa - Residential per project $ 773 Re-Roof - Residential per project $ 201 Re-Roof - Commercial First 300 s.f. per project $ 387 Ea add'I 100 s.f, per project $ 97 —iRoof Structure Replacement Misc Page 1 of 4 o CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MINOR & MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS The fees listed -below --are --stand -alone fees. Additibnal DeveloperrInt Review or Stormwater fees may gppjy. Misc Page 2 of 4 Fee Description Fee Unit Fee First 300 s.f. per project $ 870 Ea add'l 100 s.f. per project $ 116 Retaining Wall Engineered per project First 100I.f. per project $ 1,063 Ea add'I 100 I.f. per project $ 97 Non-Engineered per project $ 678 Stair Repair / Replace per project $ 870 Shear Wall I Steel Support Column - stand alone (not part of a building permit) per project $ 773 Siding / Stucco per project $ 367 Sign Wall per project $ 290 Monument per project $ 516 Solar/ PV System - Commercial / Mufti-family per project $ 677 Store Front[Fagade Alterations: Minor per project $ 870 T-Bbar Ceiling/Furred Ceiling - stand alone (not part of a building permit) per project $ 580 Trash Enclosure per project $ 966 Vapor Recovery Systems / Service Station Upgrades (up to 3) per project $ 483 Window / Door- Non-Structural First 10 windows/ doors per project $ 338 each add'I 10 windows/doors per project $ 16 Window / Door - Structural First 10 windows/ doors per project $ 499 each adcrilOwindows /doors per project $ 65 Minor Repairs (for items otherwise not listed, for the purpose of reconstruction, renewal, or maintenance of any part of an existing structure - requiring not more than two inspections) per project $ 265 Minor Code Corrections per project $ 201 Minor Lease Space Improvements Prior to Tenant Improvement per project $ 1,160 MECHANICAL, PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL PERMITS (Not associated with anexisting building. permit) ADMINISTRATIVE AND MISC. FEES Minimum Permit Issuance (includes travel and documentation) $ 209 Appeal of Building Official Decision per project $ 966 Handicap Board of Appeals per project $ 966 Fire Permit Handling Fee per project $ 387 Supplemental Plan Check per project $ 193 Supplemental Inspection per project $ 193 After Hours Inspection (Scheduled, 2 hour minimum) per project $ 387 Preliminary Project Consultation / Code Analysis (per hour) per project $ 193 MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES Stand Alone Mechanical Plan Check (per 1/2 hour) $ 97 UNIT FEES: A/C (Residential) - each $ 64 Furnaces (F.A.U., Floor) $ 64 Heater (Wall) $ 64 Refrigeration Compressor/Condenser $ 81 Boiler $ 81 Chiller $ 81 Heat Pump (Package unit) $ 48 Heater (Unit, Radiant, etc.) $ 48 Misc Page 2 of 4 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MINOR & MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS The s listed iie-16m are stand -alone ee . Addlii&al De_veloP_em_ntRev'iew or Stor*mwat_er f ees may 9 p _ pjy. j ....... :. Fee Acthrity_ Fee Description Fee Unit Fee Air Handier $ 48 Duct Work only $ 48 Evaporative Cooler $ 48 Make-up Air System $ 48 Vent Fan (Single Duct) - each $ 48 Exhaust Hood and Duct (Residential) $ 48 Exhaust Hood - Type I (Commercial Grease Hood) $ 97 Exhaust Hood - Type 11 (Commercial Steam Hood) 64 Walk-in Box/Refrigerator Coil $ 64 Miscellaneous Mechanical Items NOS (not otherwise specified) $ 64 Other Mechanical Inspections (per hour) $ 193 Mechanical Volume and Current Fee Analysis 59 PLUMBINGIGAS PERMIT FEES Stand Alone Plumbing Plan Check (hourly rate) $ 193 UNIT FEES: Fixtures (each) $ 48 Gas System Replace/Repair/Extend (First Outlet) $ 48 Gas Outlets (Each Additional) $ 6 Building Sewer $ 64 Grease Trap $ 48 Water Heater (First Heater) $ 64 Water Heater (Each Additional Heater) $ 16 Water Pipe Repair/Replacement $ 48 Drain-Vent Repair/Alterations $ 48 Solar Water System Fixtures (solar panels, tanks, water treatment equipment) $ 64 Graywater Systems (each) $ 129 Miscellaneous Plumbing Items NOS $ 64 Other Plumbing and Gas Inspections (per hour) 93 Plumbing Volume and Current Fee Analysis $ 58 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES Stand Alone Electrical Plan Check (per 1/2 hour) $ 97 Service (not over 200 amps) $ 64 Add/Replace Service (over 200 amps) $ 97 Now/Altered Circuits 15 or 20 amp --Each 10 circuits (or fraction thereof) 25 or 40 amp circuits (each) $ 32 50 to 175 amp circuits (each) $ 39 200 amp and larger circuits (each) $ 48 ---Temporary Service (each) $ 48 Generator Installation (each) $ 74 Miscellaneous Electrical Items NOS $ 64 Other Electrical Inspections (per hour) $ 193 Misc Page 3 of 4 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MINOR & MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS The —fees -listed -below —are --stand -alone fees.--Add-ifi6-6i - DevelopemnfReview orf6ii�-\Wife- ........... . r fees ma __ppp 77: Fee Description Fee Unit Fee Electrical Volume and Current Fee Analysis $ 60 STORMWATER PLAN REVIEW &.11SISPECTION Minor Projects: Non-structural commercial TI's, residential remodels and residential additions less than 500 SF and U occupancies (Garages and storage sheds) all with minimal grading activity $ 254 Moderate Projects: Structural Commercial TI's and additions up to 5,000 sf, Residential additions over 500 SF, Change of Occupancy all with site grading work less than 1 acre $ 1,595 Major Projects: New SFR's, New Commercial Buildings (addition over 5,000 SF), projects with ,parcels of 1 acre or more $ 3,383 Misc Page 4 of 4 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO -� BUILDING DIVISION USER & REGULATORY FEES New Construction Fee Schedule - Plan Check Fees O u- aonlbuRbn F.Plw[h loft Fire Retina Tvm 1. 11 Fire Phri Type IIA, III Fire Raping g T IIS IV VB Cost Per S.F. Con Per S.F C= Per S.F. Occupancy Type and Class Fee Unit Base Coat Between Base Con Between Base Cost Between Thresholds Thresholds Thresholds LEVEL OF EFFORT 1.5 1.25 1 Commercial Uses - Structural (All newly cOnnrected, added. Or structurally remodeled space for non- nsldemlal occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E. F. H, I, M, or Omer commecilal occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere In this Fee Schedule) Square Footage: 500 per proll:a S 2,441 $ 1.63 3 2.035 3 1.36 S 1,628 E 1.09 5,000 per pmjw S 9,766 S 0.49 S 8,138 S 0,41 E 6,510 S 0.33 10,000 per project S 12.207 3 0.1B S 10,173 It 0.15 $ 8,138 S 0.12 50,000 Per Project 3 19,531 S 0.10 f 16,276 S 0.06 3 13,021 S 0.07 100.000 per project E 24,414 3 024 f 20,345 E 0.20 S 16,276 It 0.16 Commercial Residential and Multifamily Resldentlai Usee - (AII newly ccnelNClad, added, or structurally remodeled space for residential Occupancies chiselled as CBC Group R ( except R -3), or deer residential 000upeneles not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule Square Footage: 500 per roed S 2.686 E 1.79 f 2238 3 7.49 E 7,790 S 7.78 5.000 per Projeci $ 10,742 f 0.54 $ 8,952 3 0.45 S 7,161 '3 0.36 10,000 per project S 13,428 S 0.20 E 11,190 $ 0.17 $ 8,952 S 0.13 50,000 per project $ 21,484 $ 0.11 E 17,904 S 0.09 '.S 14,323 $ 0.07 100,000 per project 3 28,856 $ 0.27 E 22,380 3 0.22 $ 17,904 S 0.18 Duplicate Floor Plan Review - Commercial Residential one Multifamily Reslmrpal U603 Square Footage: Soo fir mad $ 1,772 $ 0.39 $ 1.477 S 0.33 E 0.26 5.000 per project S 3.645 $ 0.14 3 2,954 S 0.12 S 0.09 10,000 per road $ 4254 E 0.03 S 3,545 $ 0.02 $ 3 0,02 50.000 fir road S 5,317 S 0.04 $ 4,431 s 0.03 S 0.02 100,000 per road 3 7,090 $ 0.07 E 5,908 f 0.06 E 0.05. g$2 Low and Moderate Harard Storage - (All newly constructed, added or structurally remodeled space for storage occupancies classified as CBC Group S. or other storage occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in mla Fee Schedule) Square Footage: 500 y�roecl S 2,447 S It 2,035 S 1.36 f i.OB 5000 per project S 9,768 S 8,138 S 0.41 3 0.33 10,000 er roed f 12.207 3 10,173 3 0.15 3 0.12 50.000 rProect f 19,531 E 16,276 3 0.08 3 13,01 S 0.07 100000 per project S 24,414 3 20,345 3 0.20 S 16,276 3 0.78 Attached Accessory and UUlily Uses - (All newly conelredeO, added, or structurally remodeled space for utility and accessory occupancies classified as CBC Group U. m other Wilily and accessary occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere In this Fee Schedule) Square FOOIi C 200 per meat S 022 S 519 3 1.18 $ 415 S 0.94 400 per pmjem E 905 S 1.32 $ 754 E 1:10 $ 603 E 0.68 800 per project S 1,7118 S 029 S 973 It 0.24 $ 779 S 0.19 1.000 per project E 1,285 S 0.23 3 7,071 $ 0.19 S 857 S 0.16 3,000 per Project E 1,752 S 0.58 3 1.460 3 0.49 S 1,168 $ 0.39 Detached Accessory and Utility Uses - (All newly ccnmucted, added Or structurally remodeled space for dilly and accessory occupancies classified as CBC Group U. or other utility and accessory occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere In this Fee Schedule) Square Footage: 200 per It ro eat S 822 S 1.41 S 519 $ 1.18 S 415 S 0.94 400 per Project 3 905 3 1.32 $ 754 3 1.10 $ 603 S 0.88 800 or meat 3 1,168 E 0.29 3 973 $ 0.24 $ 779 S 0.19 1,000 or pro am S 1,285 3 0.23 3 1,071 f 0.19 $ 857 S 0.16 3.000 per project S 1,752 $ 0.58 S 1,460 $ 0,49 $ 1,168 $ 0.39 Shell Buildings for all Commercial Uses - (The enctosum for all newly constructed, added, Or structurally remodeled space for non- fesidedfal occupancies Uassined v CBC Group & B. E. F. H. 1, M, or Other commercial occuparrcles not specmcalty addressed elsewhere In this Fee Schedule where the Interior is not completed or Oocu lable Squars Footage: 500 per project S 1,485 S 0.98 $ 1,221 It 0.61 S 977 $ 665 5.000 per pmject $ 5,859 S 0.29 $ 4,883 $ 0.24 d 3,908 S 0,20 10,000 per pm eat S 7,324 S 0.11 $ 6,104 E 0.09 S 4 883 $ 0.07 50,000 per pmled S 11,779 f 0.06 3 9,766 3 0.05 S 7,817 'S 0.04 100,000 per eat S 14.648 $ 0.15 S 12,207 $ 0.12 S 8.768 $ 0.10 Commercial Tenant Improvement - Non Structural - (Non- dmdunlly remodeled space for nommsldentlal ocaupancies Uesslfed as CBC Group A, B. E. F, H, I, M. or other commercial Occupancies not specifically addressed eleewbem in this Fee Schedule where the structure is not altered) Square Footage: 500 per prolect $ 1.221 S 0.81 $ 1,017 S 0.68 E 814 E 0.54 5.000 er mad $ 4.887 S 0.24 f 4.069 E 020 E 3255 f 0.16 10,000 per project S 8,104 '.E 0.09 S 5,080 S 0.08 E 4,069 111 0.06 50,000 per Project 3 '9,766 $ 0.05 E 8,138 E 0.04 S 6.510 S 0.03. 100,000 perpmfacl $ 12,207 3 0.12 S 10.173 S 0.10 E 8,138 S 0.06 Commercial Residential and Muni mily Residential Remodels - Non Structural - (ROn- Structlually emodeled space for residential occupancies Classified as CBC Group R (except R -3), or other residential occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule) Square Footage: 500 parproject 3 1,271 f 0.85 -S1.059 3 0.71 S 847 S 0.58 6,000 or Mao S 5,083 $ 0.25 $ 4,236 3 021 S 3,389 S 0.77 10,000 parprolect $ 6,354 f 0.10 E 5.295 S 0.08 $ 4,236 3 0.06 50.000 Per Prolact $ 10,166 f 0.05 $ 8,471 S 0.04 f 6,777 S 0.03 100,000 per protect f 12,70'1 S 0.73 S 10,689 S 0.11 3 6471 3 '0.08 Single Family Dwellings and Duplexes - (A9 newly constructed space for residential occupancies ctasal0ed as CBC Group R -3, Including custom builds and model homes for tract made plane, m Other similar residential Occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule) u- aonlbuRbn F.Plw[h loft 0 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO I TYPO I II BUBDINo OMSION USER & REGULATORY FEES Fire Rating T US IV VB New Construction Fee Schedule - Plan Clieck Fees Cost Per S.F. 0 ww Qn.e .v...-nl.nu.n 2of2 Fire Rath I TYPO I II Fin Ratio - 1 111 Fire Rating T US IV VB Cost Per S.F. at Por S.F. Cost Per S.F. Occupancy Type and Clap Fea Unit Base Coat Between Base Cost I Schuman Be" Cost Whalen Thresholds Thresholds Thresholds LEVEL OF EFFORT 1.5 1.25 1 Square Foote : 1,000 perpro d f 2,911 S 1.94 S 2.425 3 1.62 f 1,940 S 729 2,500 par project E 5,821 $ 0.39 3 4,851 $ 0.32 S 3.881 S 026 4,000. S 6,403 S OA4 s 5,336 f 0.36 $ 4,269 $ 0.29 6,000 or S 7,276 S 0.73 S 6.064 3 0.61 S 4,851 S 0.49 8,000 per 5 8,732 9 1.09 3 7,275 3 0.91 E 5,821 $ 0.73 Duplicate Floor Plan Revlev- Single Family Dwellltt;' Duplexes S"are Footage: 1,000 f 941 3 0.83 S 784 f 0.52 f 827 S 0.42 2.500 or s 1,881 3 0.13 f 1,568 $ 0.10 S 1254 3 0.08 4,000 ct S 2.089 S 0.14 $ 1,724 3 0.12 E 1,379 S 0109 6.000 d 3 2,351.3 0.24 $ 1,960 E 0.20 $ 1,668 3 0.18 8,000 d 3 2,822 S 0.35 E 2,351 E 0.29 E 1.881 f 0.24 Duplicate Floor Plan Review- Attached or Datached ACCOSSWY and Utility Ups Square Footage: 200 r A) S 187 S 0.42 S 156 $ 0.35 f 124 S 0.28 400 or Jed s 271 3 0.39 3 228 5 0.33 'S 107 $ 0.28 600 or mom s 350 S 0.09 E 292 $ 0.07 S 234 5 0.08 1.000 or ro ad S 385 S 0.07. E 321 'S 0.08 $ 257 $ 0.05 3,000 r m act 3 526 f 0.18 3 438 1 S 0.15 S 350 '.3 0.12 SVUClursl Residential Remodels and Addaions - (AS newly constructed MOWOes to, or structurally remodeled areas ot, residential occupandas WuslBed es CBC Group R -3, or other similar residential occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere In this Fee Schedule) Square Foote e: 100 r med S 801 f 1.93 S 667 S 1.61 E 511 f 1.28 500 per Project $ 1,571 $ 3.14 It 1,310 E 2.62 $ 1,048 f 2.10 1,000 per project $ 3,143 E 0.63 S 2,619 S 0.52 S 2,095 S 0.42 1,500 per project E .3,457 E 0.63 S 2,881 $ 0.52 $ 2,305 $ 0.42 2.000 per project S 3,771 3 1.89 $ 3,143 $ 1.57 E 2,514 E 1.28 NonSpudurel ReSidemlal Rem ides and AddNOna - (M newly constructed additions to, a non- mvctumlly remodeled MU of, reSidemlal occupancies classified as CBC Group R -3, or other similar residential occupancies not ilrecilicalky addressed elsewhere In this Fes Schedule) Square Footage: 100 2,r road f 574 S 0.41 E 479 383' S 0.27 500 per reed S 737 $ 1.28 S 614. 491 S 0.86 1.000 per reed E 1,379 S 0.28 S 1,149 919 S 0.18 1.500 par 'eat 3 1,517 'S 0.28 E 1,284 1,011 f 0.18. 2,000 or med 'f 1,654 3 0.83 f 1,379 .1,103 S 0.55 She Improvement; - This Includes substantial development of Plwate parking lots Which are processed separate of the structure and Include any combination of the 112.745 fo0mwing: Underground ulBWes, parking lot Il9minp, accessipte path or navel analysis, grading, dmlmge and compliance wM the Cats Parking and driveway standards. Square FOOtepe• 500 er. road 3 823 5 0.55 $ 686 549 3 0.37 5.000 per med E 3,294 f 0.16 S 2,745 2,198 i 0.11 10,000 per Project S 4.117 f 0.06 S 3431 3 2.745 S 0.04' 50.000 per reed S 6,587 S 0.03 3 SA89 S 0.03 1 3 4,391 Is 0.02 100,000 per projact S 8,234 3 0.08 S 8,861 3 .0.07 1 S 5,489 13 0.0.5 ww Qn.e .v...-nl.nu.n 2of2 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO BUILDING DIVISION USER & REGULATORY FEES Now Constructlen Fee Schedule • Inspection Fees O raw comwawn rmmsa.a. s m 2 Fla Rating Type 1 II Fin Rath T ILA, 111 Fire Fortune T IIB IV VS Coat Per S.F. Coat Per 9.F. Cost Par S.F. Occupancy Type and Cleat Fee Unit Base Coat Between Base Cost I eotwaen Baas Cast Between Thresholds Thresholds Thresholds LEVEL OFEFFORT 1.5 1.25 1 Commercial Uses - Structural (AIL newly cOnstrucled, added. or Structurally remodeled apace for non-nsldemlal occupancies classified u CBC Group A, B, E. F. H. I, M, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere In this Fee Schedule) Square Footage: 500 per project $ 1,985 S 1.31 3 1,638 $ 1.09 S 1,310 S 0.87 5,000 Per pJect S 7,882 S 1.18 3 6.551 S 0.98 3 5241 S 0.79 10.000 project It 13,758 3 0.15 If 11,465 $ 0.12 3 9,172 S 0.10 50,000 -per per project S 19,654 3 0.16 f 16,378 S 0.13 S 13,103 S 0.10 100,000 per project S 27,515 S 0.28 f 22.930 3 0.23 S 18,344 E 0.18 Commercial Residential and Multifamily Residential Uses - (AIL newly constructed, added, or etrUMMIIY remodeled spew for residential occupancies classified as CBC Group R (except R -3), or other residential occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule) Square Footage: 500 bar project S 2,948 3 1.97 S 2.457 S 1.64 3 1,965 f 1.31 5,000 r ad S 11,792 S 1.77 $ 9,827 S 1.47 S 7,862 S 1.18 10.000 r roam $ 20,637 S 0.22 S 17,197 S 0.18 S 13,758 $ 0.15 50,000 r M act S 29481 $ 0.24 It 24,567 3 0.20 $ 19,654 S 0.16 100,000 r erect 3 41,273 3 0.41 $ 34.394 $ 0.34 $ 27.515 3 0.28 Duplicate Floor Plan Review, • Commercial ResidenMIM901family Uses Square Footage: 500 mar nett S 2.948 b 1.97 S 2,457 5 1.64 S 1,965 5 1.31 5,000 er roed 3 11,792 3 1.77 $ 9,827 3 1.47 'S 7,862 'S 1.18 10,000 1 nor protect f 20,637 3 0.22 S 17.197 '3 0.18 S 13,758 f 0.15 50.000 per project 3 29.481 5 0.24 S 24,567 5 0.20 It 18,654 '.S 0.16 100,000 per project $ 41,273 It 0.41 $ 34,394 S 0.34 E 27,515 S 0.28 Low and Moderate Hazard Storage • (All newly constructed, added. or structurally remodeled space for storage occupancies classified as CBC Group S, or other atone occupancies not Specifically addressed elsewhere In this Fee Schedule Square Footage: 500 per project S 1,965 S 1.31 S 1.638 f 1.09 S 1,310 S 0.87 5.000 er reject S 7,862 S 1.18 S 8,551 3 0.98 S 5,241 S 0.79 10.000 oar protect 3 13.755 S 0.15 E 11,465 5 0.12 3 9.172 S 0.10 50,000 per project S 19.651 S 0.16 $ 16,378 S 0.13 f 13.103 $ 0.10 100,000 _per road $ 27.515 5 0.28 $ 22.930 S 0.23 S 18,344 S 0.18 Attached Accessory and Udiby Uses • (AIL manly constructed, added, or structurally remodeled space for utility and accessory occupancies classified as CBC Group U. or other utility and accessory occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule) Square Feota 200 er road 3 1,535 E 1,279. $ 0.62. S 1,023 S 0.50 400 per perfect S 1,684 =S;4.l E 1,403 S 343 S 1,123 S 2.74 600 er road 3 2,507 S 2,089 S 1.03 S 1,672 S 0.82 1,000 r act S 3,001 S 2.501 S 0.83 S 2,001 S 0.66. 8,000 _per mad S 4,985 S 1.87 S 4,163 S 1.39 3 3.330 S 1.11 Detached Accessory and Utility Uses - (All nearly cunstmtded, added, or structurally remodeled space for Ally and accessory occupancies classified as CBC Group U. or other utility and accessory occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere In this Fee Schedule Square Footage: 200 or road S 1,407 $ 0.58 $ 1,172 3 0.49 3 938 S 0.39 400 per project S 1,523 S 3.87 S 1,269 3 3.22 3 1,016 3 2.58 600 per roed S 2,297 It 1.15 $ 1,914 3 0.96 S 1,531 3 0.77 1,000 par maject $ 2,756 3 0.92 S 2.297 3 0.77 S 1,837 3 0.61 3,000 _p± mad S 4,593 S 1.53 S 3,826 3 1.26 3 3,062 3 1.02 Shell Buildings for all Commercial Uses - (rho enclosure for all newly constructed, added, or struchurdy remodeled space for nonresidential occupancies classified as CBC Group A. B. E. F. H. 1, M, or over commercial occupancies not spec catty addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule where the interior 13 not completed or accu lable) Square Footage: 500 per project S 1.260 S 0.77 3 1,050 3 0.64 3 640 S 0.51 5,000 per proect S 4,717 3 0.71 3 3,931 3 0.59 S J,145 3 0.47 10.000 bar orolect S 8,255 S 0.09 3 6,879 3 0.07 $ 5.503 3 0.06 50,000 per p med S 11,782 S 0.09 3 9,827 3 0.08 E 7,862 3 0.06 100.000 per project S 16,509 S 0.17 S 13.758 7 0.14 f 11.006 S 0.11 Commercial Tenant Improvement - Non Structural - (Non•sWchmily remodeled space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A. B. E, F. H, I, M, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule where the sWCture is hot tittered) Square Footage: 500 per project S 934 f 0,67 3 779 5 0.55 S 623 S 0.44 6.000 per pmaoct 3 3,931 $ 0.59 S 3.278 S 0.49 S 2,621 It 0.39 10.000 per project S 6,879 3 0.07 3 5,732 S 0.06 E 4,596 S 0.05 50,000 er reed S 8,827 3 0.08 S 8,189 S 0.07 5 6,551 f 0.05 100,000 per Project S 13.758 S 0.14 $ 11,465 S 0.11 S 8.172 S 0.09 Commercial Residential and Multifamily Residential Remodels - Non Structural - (Non- Structurally remodeled apace far residential occupancies classified 83 CBC Group R (except R -3), or other residential occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule Suaturne Footage: 580 r med S 943 $ 0.63 S 786 S 042 $ 629 It 0.42 5,000 perprolect 3 3.773 $ 0.57 S '3.144 S 0.47 3 2,515 S 0.38 10,000 porproject S 6,603 3 0.07 S 5,502 f 0.06 S 4,402 S 0.05 50,000 pled S 9,432 S 0.08 f 7,860 S 0.06 $ 6,288 S 0.05 100,000 _per par set S 13205 3 0.13 S 11,004 f 0.11 $ 8,803 Y 0.09 Single Family Dwellings and Duplexes - (All newly constructed space for residential occupancies contained as CSC Group R -3, Including custom builds and model homes for Inch mirster plans, or other similar resldemlal occupancies not spedfically addressed elsewhere In this Fee Schedule) raw comwawn rmmsa.a. s m 2 n CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO BUILDING DMSION USER i REGULATORY FEES _. ..__. _ New Construction Fee Schedule • inspection Fees N. cmnrumon r..s.maV.a, 2 ar 2 Fin nation Type I II Fin Won IIA III Fire Rating ti8 N VB Cost Per S.F. Cost Per S.F. Cost Per S.F. Occupancy Type and Class Foe Unit Son Cost Between Be," Cost eetwaen Baw Cost Between Thresholds Thresholds Thresholds LEVEL OFEFFORT 1.5 1.25 1 5 uaro Footage: 1.000 at matt S 2,947 $ 1.96 3 2,456 3 1.64 S 1,965 f 1.31 2,500 per Project S 5,895 $ 0.98 S 4,912 S 0.92 S 3,930 S 0.65 4,000 per project S 7,368 f 2.27 3 8,140 f 1.84 Y 1,912 S 1.47 6,000 per project $ 11,789 E 2.95 $ 9,824 E 2.46 $ 7,860 $ 1.96 8,000 or matt E 17,684 S 2.21 $ 14,737 § 1.84 E 11,788 S 1.47 Du kale Floor PlR-Single EDftllingS RDUpi�S Square Fools e: .7.000 per protect S 2,947 S 1.96 $ 2,466 S 1.64 f 1,965 $ 1.31 2.500 per project S 5,995 S 0.98 S 4,912 $ 0.82 S 3.930 S 0.65 4,000 r mad S 7,368 3 2.21 3 6,140 $ 1.84 S 4,912 f 1.47 6,000 r coact S 11,789 3 2.95 $ 9,824 8 2.46 $ 7.880 S 1.96 8.000 _ per Project 3 77,884 $ 2.21 $ 14,737 E 1.541 S 11,769 S 1.47 Duplicate Floor Plan Review- Attached Or Detached Accessory and Utility Uses Square Foreign: 200 er mect S 1,407 S 0.58 S 1.172 f 0.49 'S 938 $ 0.39 400 per project 3 1,523 3 .3.87 $ 1,269 $ 3.22 If 1,016 S 2.58 600 per project 3 2,287 5 1.15 f 1,914 § 0.98 S 1,551 3 0.77 1,000 per project E 2,756 3 0.92 f 2.297 f 077 'S 1,837 $ 0.61 3,000 _per matt S 4,593 3 1:53 3 3,828 S 1.28 3 '.3,062 'S 1.02 Structural Residential Remodels and Additions - (All newly constructed additions to, or smuctumily remodeled some of, residential occupancies c1e33111ed as CSC Group R -3, or other similar residential occupancies not sPedeuily addressed elsewhere In this Fee Schedule Square Footage: 100 per project S 1,166 S 2.66 S 972 $ 2.22 f 778 f 1.77 500 per Project 3 2,231 S 2.23 $ 1,859 $ 1.86 f 1,488 f 1.49 1,000 per Project E 3,347 3 2.23 3 2.789 $ 1.86 S 2.231 S 1.49 1.500 rued E 4,483 f 2.23 f 3,719 S 1.88 S 2.975 f 1.49 2,000 _per OW DMiOCI If 5,578 $ 2.79 $ 4,649 S 2.32 S 3.719 S 1.86 NonSlructurel Residential Remodels no Add'NOna - WI newly constructed adds ions to, or nonimuctumily remodeled areas of. resideMal occupancies classified as CBC Group R -3, or atom similar residential Occupancies not spedfiCally addressed elsewhere In Ws Fee Schedule Square Footage: 100 per pored 3 7,061 'S 2.65 S Bel 3 2S1 S 707 S 1.77 500 par project 'S 2.122 S 2.12 $ 1,768 S 1.77 S 1,415 3 1.41 1,000 per project f 3,183 $ 2.12 f 2,653 $ 177: S 2.122 S 1.41 1,500 r rued 3 6,344 E 2.12 S 3.537 3 1.77 3 2.829 3 1.41 2.000 per project S 5,]05 S 2.65 S 4.421 3 2.21 3 3,537 3 1.77 Site Improvements - This includes Substantial development of private perking lots which am processed separate of the structure and include any combination of the following: Underground utilities, parking tat lighting. accessible Path of trowel analysis, grading• drainage and compliance with the Ctlys Parking and driveway standards. Square Fame e: 500 per Pmjed S 651 S 0.43 S 543 S 0.36 3 434 S 029 5.000 per . rued S 2,604 S 0.39 S 2,170 3 0.33 3 1,736 $ 0.26 10,000 per react S 4.557 S 0.05 S 1,796 f 0.04 S 3.038 S 0.03 50,000 per project S 6,510 3 0.05 3 5,425 f 0.04 S 4.340 S A.OS 100000 perpmjed S 9,115 S 0.09 1 E 7,596 3 0.08 S 6.076 S 0.06 N. cmnrumon r..s.maV.a, 2 ar 2 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO BUILDING DIVISION USER S REGULATORY FEES Now Construction In Schedule - Toni Fees (Plan Check and Inspection) Nor Centavebn FG 7T t Zeta Fin Rath Type 1 II Fire Ratino Type IIA, III Fin Ratin T [IS. IV VB Cost Per B.F. Cost Per S.F. rest Per S.F. Occupancy Type and Clan Fee Unit Ban Coal Between Base Cost Baronet Ban Coil Between Thresholds Thresholds Threshold& LEVEL OF EFFORT - PLAN CHECK 1.5 1.25 1 LEVEL OF EFFORT - INSPECTION 1.5 1.25 1 Cammemlal Uses - Structural (All newly constructed, added, or structurally remodeled space for non - residential occupancies classified not CBC Group A. B. E. F. H. I, M. or other commercial oaupantiea not specifically addressed elsewhere In M Fee Schedule) Square Fooni S00 er to act S 4,407 S 2.94 E 3.672 S 2.45 $ 2,938 S 1.96 5.000 r to ct S 17.627 f 1.67 f 14,689 S 1.38 S 11,751 S 1.11 10,000 at mad S 25,965 S 0.33 S 21,637 S 028 S 17,310 S 0.22 50.000 or mod $ 39,185 S 025 S 32.654 S 0.21 S 26,123 S 0.17 100,000 per project S 51,930 S 0.52 S 43,275 S 0.43 S 34,620 S 0.35 Commercial Residenial and Multifamily Residemnl Uses - (All newt' constructed. added. or stracturely remodeled space for msnemnl occupancies Classified es CSC Group R (atmept R -3), or other residential occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere In this Fee Schedule Square Footage: 500 nor Pralect $ 5,634 S 3.76 S 4,695 $ 3.13 $ 3,756 S 2.50 5,000 per pmjed S 22.535 3 2.31 S 18,779 S 112 S 15.023 S 1.54 10.000 per project E 34,064 f 0.42 S 28.387 IF 0.35 f 22.710 S 0.20 50,000 par project E 60,965 S 0.34 f 42,471 $ 0.29 $ 33,977 $ 0.23 100.000 per preW S 68,129 S 0.68 S 56,774 3 0.57 S 45.419 S 0.45 Duplicate Flom Plan Review- Commercial Residential and Multifamily Residential Uses Square Footage: 500 per project S 4,721 S 2.36 S 1.934 f 1.97 f 3,147 S 1.57 5.000 par project S 15,337 S 1.91 E 12,781 S 1.59 'S 10225 IF 1.27 10.000 per project S 24.890 S 0.25 $ 20,742 '$ 0.21 f 16,594 S 0.17 50,000 aeromiect $ 34.798 S 0.27 5 28,999 3 0.23 $ 23,189 S 0.18 100,000 per projed S 48,363 E 0.48 $ 40,302 S 0.40 S 32.242 S 0.32 Low and Moderate Hanrd Storage - (All newly constructed. added. or structurally remodeled space for storepe occupancies classified as CBC Group S, or other storage occupan'do. not sptici0aly ndrooiled elsevalare in this Fee Schedule) Square Footage: 500 per project $ 4.407 $ 2.94 '.S 3,672 $ 2.45 S 2.938 5 1.96 5,000 per project $ 17,627 S 1.67 S 14,689 S 1.39 $ 11,751 S 1,11 10.000 per reed $ 25,965 $ 0.33 '.S 21,637 S 0.28 S 17,310 S 0.22 60.000 per arsiect S 39.185 S 0.25 S 32.654 It 0.21 $ 26.123 S 017 100,000 _ ear pJeo S 51,930 S 0.52 $ 41.275 $ 0.43 S 34,620 3 0.35 Allsohso Accessory and Utlloy Uses - W newly constructed. added, or structurally m nwelre space for utility and accessory occupancies classified as CBC Group U, or other utility and accessory occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule) were FOOi9 e: 200 par Project S 2,157 S 2.16 $ 1,798 $ 1.80 S 1,438 S 1.44 600 per palled S 2,589 S 5.43 1 S 2,157 S 4.53 f 1,726 S 3.62 600 pm project s 3.675 S 1.53 S 3,063 S 127 3 2450 S 1.02 1,000 par mjoct 'S 4,286 E 1.23 S 3,672 S 1.03 S 2.857 S 0.62 3,000 per roam E 6,747 S 2.25 E 5,623 S 1.67 S 4,498 S 1.50 Detached Accessory and Uffiry Uses -, (All newly constructed. added. or structurally remodeled space for Wilily and accessory occupancies Classified n CBC Group U. or other utility and accessory occupancies not specifically addressed elsevdrere in this Fee Schedule) S uaro FOan e: IF 2,029 S 2.00 S 1,691 S 1.68 3 1,353 S 1.33 200 400 parproject per pLoject It 2.628 S 5.18 E 2.023 S 4.32 f 1,619 f. 3.48 600 per preed S 3,485 $ 1.44 S 2,887 S 120 S 2,310 S 0.96 1,000 par Project S 4,041 S 1.15 S 3.367 3 0.96 S 2.694 S .0.77 3,000 _per project S 6,345 S 2.12 S 5,288 S 1.76 $ 4.230 S 1.41 Shell Bulldmgs for all Commercial Uses - (The enclosure for 0 newly dindructed, added, or stmpu eRy remodeled space for non -maidential occupancies elantfied as CBC Group A, B, E. F, H, I, M. or Omer commercial occupancies net specifically redressed slowness in this Fee Schedule whom me Interior is rem completed or occu labs Square Footage: 500 per project $ 2,725 S 1.74 S 2,270 S 1.45 S 1,016 5,000 per pmjad S 10,576 S 1.00 3 8,014 S 0.83 S .7,051 10.000 per Project S 15,579 5 0.20 $ 12,982 S. 0.17 E 10,386 50,000 per project S 23.511 S 0.15 S 19.593 $ 0.13 S 15,674 100.000 per prowd S 31.158 E 0.31 S 25,965 $ 0.28 $ 20,772 F$0,21 Commercial Tenant Improvement - Non Structural - (Non- structurally remodeled some for non - residential occupancies desalted as CBC Group A. B. E, F. M. I, M. or other commercial occ Fanolee not epOtlflally addressed elsewhere In this Fee Schedule where the etrudare is not aftemd) S uaro Footage: 500 r ect S 2,155 3 1.48 S 1,796 $ 1.23 E 1,437 E 0.88 5,000 r rued $ 8,816 S 0.83 S 7.345 S 0.69 S 5,876 S 0.58 10,000 er project S 12.982 S 0.17 S 10,818 S 0.14 S 8,655 S 0.11 50.000 er reed $ 19,593 S 0.13 E 16.327 S 0.11 S 13.082 f O.OB 1pp 000 per pined S 25,985 S 026 S 21.637 $ 0.22 E 17,310 3 0.17 Commercial Residential and Multifamily Residential Remo(1ela - Non Structural - (NO0- Slmduresy remodeled space for residential occupancies classified as CBC Group R (except R-3), or other residential occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere In this Fee Schedule) Square Foote0e: 500 per project S 2216 E 148 $ 1,845 1 S 1.23 'S 1,478 $ 0.98 5,000 per pmjaV $ 8.056 S 0.82 S 7,380 '.5 0.68 is 5,904 S 0.55 10.000 perpro)ect E 12,968 $ 0.17 8 10,797 S 0.14 E 1,637 S 0.11 50,000 m m acl S 19,598 E 0.13 E 18,332 S 0.11 E 13,065 E 0.08 100.000 per project s 25,912 S 0.28 S 21,593 S 0.22 I S 17,273 S 0.17 Nor Centavebn FG 7T t Zeta CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 0 BUILDING DIVISION USER S REGULATORY FEES New Construction Fee Schedule - Total Fees (Plan Check and Inspection) Nw [onomalon F- Tolal, 2 0 1 Fire Ratin Type I II Flre Rating Type M. III Fin Raw T US FV VS Coat Per B.F. Con Per S.F. Coat Pv S.F. Occupancy Type and Clans Fee Unit Base Coat Between Base Cost Between Baas Con Batwaan Thresholds Thresholds Thresholds LEVEL OF EFFORT -PLAN CHECK 1.5 1.25 1 LEVEL OF EFFORT- fNSPEC7fON 1.5 1.25 1 Single Family Dwellings and Duplexes - (All newt' constructed spaea for residential occupancies classified as CBC Group R -3, Including custom builds and model homes for from master plans, or other similar residential occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere In this Fee Schedule) _ Sq FOetege: 1.600 r project S 5,858 a 3.91 S 4.882 S 3.25 $ 3.905 S 2.60 .0 2.500 of them S 11,718 b 1.37 E 9.763 f 1.74 a 7.810 E 0.91 4,000 per Project $ 13,771 S 2.65 f 11,476 S 2.21 S 9,181 $ 176 6.000 par project S 19,086 $ 3.67 $ 15,888 E 3.08 E 12,710 'f 2.45 g.ggp per project S 28.416 S 3.30 E 22,013 E 2.75 S 17,810 f 2.20 Duplicate Floor Pion Review- Single Family Dwellings and Duplexes Squano Footage: IS 3.888 S 2.59 $ 3.240 S 2.16 a 2,592 $ 1.73 1,000 2,500 par project oar orvied 13 7,775 S 1.11 S 6,480 3 0.92 S 5,184 f 0.74 4.000 per PTIOCI S 9.438 S 2.35 f 7,865 $ 7.98 $ 61292 E 1.57 6,000 r roam 3 14,141 f 3.18 $ 11,784 S 2.85 S 9,427 E 2.12 8.000 par project $ 20,508 f 2.56 f 17,080 $ 2.14 f 13.670 S 1.71 Duplicate Floor Plan Review- Attached or Detached Accessory and Utility Uses SCUM Footage: 200 per roan E 1.593 S 1.01 S 1,328 f 0.84. f 1.062' E O.BT 400 per project E 1,795 f 4.26 S 1,498 S 3.55 S 1,196 S 2.84 600 per project E 2.647 3 1.24 $ 2.208 S 1.03 S 1,765 f 0.82 1,000 parproject $ 5141 S 0.99 $ 2,618 S 0.82 E 2,094 S 0.56. 3.000 Per Project S 51119 3 1.71 f 4,2156 f 1.42 3 3,413. S 1.14 Structural Rasidemial Remwels and Additions - WI newly constructed additions to. or sfruaumly remodeled drew of. nsidemiel oaupanmes classified as CSC Group R -3. or other similar residential occupancies not sPeciBCatly addressed elsewhere In this Fee Schedule Square FOetd e: r S 1,967 $ 4.59 3 1.639 E 3.82 $ 1,312 $ 3.06 100 700 500 project per imaject S 3,803 S 5.37 E 3,168 f 4.48 $ 2,535 S 3.58 1,000 per project f 6,490 S 2.86 E 5,408 $ 2.38 S 4,327 S- 1.91 1.500 per . ro em E 7,920 f 2.88 a 6,600 S 238 3 5280 $ 1.91 '3.12 2.000 per mjem S 9,350 S 4.87 S 7,791 3 3.90 3 6,233 Il Non - Structural Residential Remodels and Additions - (Ail newly constructed addWOns to. or non - structurally romodeied areas of residential occupancies classified as CBC Group RJ, or mher similar realdenllal occupancies net specifically addressed elsewhere In this Fee Schedule) Square Footage: per project $ 1,635 S 3.06 $ 1,363 $ 2.55 E '1,090 $ 2.04 100 per p roso $ 2,859 S 3.41 S 2,383 3 2184 $ 1,906 S .227 500 S 4562 S 2.40 S 3,801 $ 2.00 S 3,047 S 1.80 1008 1,500 per project r hem 3 5,781 S 2.40 S 4,801 S 2.00 $ 3,840 $ 1.60 2000 per prol am 3 6,960 3 348 S 5.800 E 2.90 $ 4,640 $ 2.32 Site Improvements - This Includes substantial development of private parking lots which an processed separate of the structure and Include any combination of me following: Underground Wiles. es. parking let lighting, aeressible path of travel analysis, gnding, drainage and compliance wit ma Citys parking and driveway standards. Square FOOFootage: roes $ 1,474 S 0.98 f 1,229 $ 0.82 S 983 'S 0.68 500 500 5.000 par perproecl S 5,898 S 0.58 f 4,975 3 0.46 'E 3932 3 0.37 10.000 per project f 8,674 f 0.11 S 7229 'f 0.09 E 5.783 $ 0.07 50,000 r roam $ 13,097 $ 0.09 S 10,915 f 0.07 S 8.732 f 0.06 700.000 per project $ 17,348 f 0.17 S 14,457 $ 0.14 $ 11,568 f 0.12 Nw [onomalon F- Tolal, 2 0 1 RESOLUTION NO. 10312 (2011 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE FINAL DESIGN OF THE GARDEN STREET TERRACES MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE C -D & C -D -H ZONES (ARC 124 -06; 1119,1123-1127,1129-1137 GARDEN STREET AND 7127 7209 722, 728, 736, 748 MARSH STREET) WHEREAS, the applicant, Garden Street SLO Partners, LP, on August 8, 2006, submitted a request for architectural approval of a proposal to develop a mixed -use development project in the downtown core known as Garden Street Terraces; and WHEREAS, the Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC) conducted a public hearing on July 25, 2011, and determined that the revised project design is appropriate in the Downtown Commercial Zone and Downtown Historical District, and recommended final approval of the project design to the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) and City Council; and WHEREAS, the ARC conducted. public hearings of the final design on August 15, 2011, and September 19, 2011, and recommended approval of the project design to the City Council on September 19''; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on November 1, 2011, pursuant to an application filed by Garden Street SLO Partners, LP, applicant for the purpose of considering ARC 124 -06, final design review for the Garden Sleet Terraces Project; and WHEREAS, notices of said public hearing were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was previously certified by the Council on June 1, 2010, along with the Addendum dated September 2011 prepared to update the EIR to be consistent with revised project plans reviewed by the CHC and ARC; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony of the applicant, interested parties, and the evaluation and recommendations by staff, presented at said hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Environmental Determination. The City Council finds and determines that the project's Final EIR as updated by the Addendum dated September, 2011 adequately addresses the potential significant environmental impacts of the proposed project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the City's Environmental Guidelines, and reflects the independent judgment of the Council. The Council has reviewed and considered the R 10312 � o Resolution No. 10312 (2011 Series) Page 2 information contained in this Addendum in its consideration of the final project design and finds that the preparation of a subsequent EIR is not necessary, based on the following findings: Findings None of the circumstances included in Section 15162, which require a subsequent EIR have occurred, specifically: a. The project changes do not result in new environmental impacts. b. The circumstances under which the project is undertaken will not require major changes to the EIR. c. The modified project does not require any substantive changes to previously approved mitigation measures. 2. The proposed modifications to the project description are consistent with prior Council direction to update plans to be consistent with the Reduced Development and Project without Public Parking Spaces alternatives included in the certified Final EIR approved by the City Council on June 1, 2011. 3. All of the updated mitigation measures are reasonably necessary to reduce potentially significant impacts to less than significant levels and become project conditions. 4. The changes are consistent with City goals to promote the intensification of infill sites, respect the context of the site's setting in the Downtown Commercial Zone and Downtown Historical District, provide a project scale compatible with its surroundings, accommodate pedestrian flow through the site and onto adjacent streets, and bring economic vitality to the downtown core. 5. The proposed scale and design of buildings will be compatible with surrounding uses as found by the City's Architectural Review Commission with their review of project plans and are consistent with the City's General Plan, Zoning Regulations, and Community Design Guidelines. SECTION 2. Action. The final design of the Garden Street Terraces Project (ARC 124 -06) is hereby approved, based on the following findings, and subject to the mitigation measures listed in the attached Exhibit A and the following conditions: Findings 1. As designed and conditioned, the building materials, style, character, and form of the new structures within the project will promote the architectural character, style, form, and materials of the Downtown Commercial Zone and Downtown Historical District and complement the architectural character of the surrounding buildings and area consistent with the City's Historic Preservation Program Guidelines. Resolution No. 10312 (2011 Series) Page 3 2. The project is consistent with standards contained in the City's Community Design Guidelines for the downtown, which encourage projects to be pedestrian- oriented, and to have proportions and design details that complement surrounding structures 3. The project's design is consistent with the design principles contained in Section 4.16 of the Land Use Element including providing pedestrian- oriented spaces on the ground floor of buildings, continuous storefronts, and upper floor dwellings and offices. 4. The project is consistent with the mitigation measures adopted by the City Council on June 1, 2010 with the certification of the Final Garden Street Terraces Project EIR. Conditions Final project design and construction drawings shall be in substantial compliance with the project plans approved by the City Council. A separate full -size sheet shall be included in working drawings submitted for a building permit that list all conditions, and code requirements of project approval as Sheet No. 2. Reference should be made in the margin of listed items as to where in plans requirements are addressed. Any change to approved design, colors, materials, landscaping or other conditions of approval must be approved by the Director or Architectural Review Commission, as deemed appropriate. 2. The final design approval shall be valid for five years from the date of City Council approval. 3. The project is subject to all of the conditions approved through City Council Resolution No. 10183 (2010 Series) for a modified use permit and tentative tract map. If a previous condition is modified with this latest approval, the latter condition shall prevail and supersede the former wording of the condition. Any phasing of the overall project, shall receive Community Development and Public Works Department review and approval. 4. All applicable mitigation measures contained in the Final EIR shall be included as conditions of approval and are included in the attached Exhibit A. Building Design 5. The new project building through its lowered height and design which includes wall offsets, tiered massing, and visual gaps at upper building levels meets the intent of the parameters included in the Reduced Development Alternative of the EIR for upper floor setbacks eliminating the need for Condition No. 2 of City Council Resolution No. 10183 (2010 Series). 6. Historically accurate window specifications for the buildings at 1119 and 1123 & 1137 Garden Street shall be reviewed by the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) with their review of project plans and details shall be included in working drawings. 7. Changes to the rear elevation of the building at 1123 -1127 Garden for new windows and Resolution No. 10312 (2611 Series) Page 4 doors shall be a quality and historically accurate treatment. Specific details shall be reviewed by the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) with their review of project plans and details and specifications included in working drawings. 8. The existing variety of color with the tenant spaces within the buildings at 1129 -1137 Garden, or a similar new proposal, shall be maintained to reinforce the character and interest of the block. 9. All of the significant and contributing character - defining historic features identified in the Garden Street Terraces Project Analysis prepared by Chattel Architecture, Planning & Preservation dated April 2011 shall be retained and incorporated into the project consistent with the Secretary of the Interior Standards and Historic Preservation Program Guidelines. 10. The building at 748 Marsh shall be painted in a color consistent with its Spanish architectural style that differentiates it from the new construction beyond. 11. The central portion of the Marsh Street elevation of the new structure shall be finished in a compatible color to differentiate it from adjacent storefronts. 12. Plans submitted for a building permit for all project components shall include window details indicating the style and type of materials for the windows, mullions, their dimensions, and colors. Plans shall also include the materials and dimensions of all lintels, sills, surrounds, recesses, and other related window features. 13. Plans submitted for a building permit for all project components shall clearly show details for all railings, balconies, decorative architectural features, and storefronts. 14. The plaster finish for buildings shall be smooth - troweled as noted on plans. Planning 15. The project's required archaeological monitoring report shall be reviewed by the Cultural Heritage Committee. 16. The specific art proposals for the project shall return to the ARC for review at a later date once developed by artists and approved by an art jury as overseen by the SLO Arts Council. Consider an additional location for public art at the corner of Marsh and Broad Streets. 17. Details of lighting fixtures shall return to staff for review and approval, either prior to, or along with, the plans submitted for a building permit. The locations of all lighting fixtures shall be clearly called out on building elevations included as part of working drawings. The lighting schedule for buildings shall include a graphic representation of the proposed lighting fixtures and cut - sheets shall be separately submitted for the project file of the proposed lighting fixtures. The selected fixture(s) shall be shielded to insure that light is directed downward consistent with Section 17.23.050 of the Zoning Regulations. Details of all exterior light fixtures, including site lighting and service area lights, need to be included C, Resolution No. 10312 (2011 Series) Page 5 as part of plans. A note shall be included on plans that "Lenses of exterior wall- mounted lights may be modified or shielding devices added after installation if the Community Development Director determines that they emit excessive glare." 18. A specific sign program for the project shall be to the review and approval of the Architectural Review Commission (ARC). The sign program shall include information on the sizes, locations, colors, materials, and types of signage proposed for various buildings and project directional signs, including garage and hotel entry signage. Project signs shall be designed to be compatible with the architecture of proposed buildings and to complement the site's setting within both the Downtown Commercial Zone and Downtown Historical District. Once adopted, the sign program shall contain provision for the Community Development Director to approve minor deviations to the approved sign program if findings can be made in support of the exception being consistent with the intent of the program, and in keeping with the design characteristics and historical context of the building(s) and/or site. The Director may refer signage proposals to the ARC if there are concerns that a particular design is out of character with the sign program. 19. Mechanical equipment shall be located internally to buildings. With submittal of working drawings, the applicant shall include sectional views of buildings, which clearly show the sizes of proposed condensers and other mechanical equipment to be placed on the roof to confirm that parapets and other roof features will adequately screen them. A line of site diagram may be needed to confirm that proposed screening will be adequate. 20. The required fire risers for buildings shall be located internal to buildings. Other fire department equipment shall be located internal to buildings where feasible. The externally mounted Fire Department Connection (FDC) for buildings shall have a chrome or brass finish to the approval of the Community Development Director. Trees 21. Tree protection measures shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Arborist. The City Arborist shall review and approve the proposed tree protection measures prior to commencing with any demolition, grading, or construction. The City Arborist shall approve any safety pruning, the cutting of substantial roots, or grading within the dripline of trees. A city - approved arborist shall complete safety pruning. Any required tree protection measures shall be shown or noted on the building plans. Contact the City Arborist at 781- 7023 to review and to establish any required preservation measures to be included with the building permit submittal. 22. A tree protection bond or surety shall be provided to the city prior to demolition, construction, and/or tree relocations to the satisfaction of the City Arborist, Public Works Director, and Community Development Director. The surety amount shall be established in accordance with current standards for evaluating tree value. n Resolution No. 10312 (2011 Series) Page 6 23. All new or relocated trees shall be installed per City Engineering Standards. Existing trees to remain shall be upgraded to include a tree well and grate per City Engineering Standard #8130 where determined feasible by the City Arborist. 24. Any required off -site compensatory tree planting as required by Mitigation Measure VIS -5b shall be 24" box stock. Said plantings shall be completed prior to acceptance of the public improvements or prior to occupancy whichever occurs first unless otherwise approved for deferral by the Public Works Director. Public Works 25. Plans submitted for a building permit shall address the following items of the Garden Street Improvement Plan: a. In- ground pavement lights across Higuera Street at Garden Street. b. Final loading zone design/placement. c. Public art proposal, if applicable. d. An increase in height of the parking bollard to improve its visibility. e. Inclusion of one on -street ADA parking space. f. Use of the four existing Peak bicycle racks. g. Final parkway designs. 26. The Garden Street Alley plan shall include a decorative pavement treatment for its entire extent between Garden and Broad Streets and show all existing and proposed public and private utilities. Improvements to the public alley, including final bollard design, shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director. The proposed grease interceptor may be located within the public alley. A separate encroachment agreement shall be recorded against the property. 27. Final street furniture details shall comply with the City Engineering Standards in effect at the time of submittal or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 28. Disruption to pedestrian or vehicle traffic and/or property access shall be minimized subject to the approval of the Public Works Director. The contractor or sub - contractor(s) may be required to provide written notice to any affected properties prior to commencing with work. A list of properties to be noticed shall be approved by the city and documentation of delivery of said notice(s) shall be provided to the city. Upon motion of Council Member Carter, seconded by Vice Mayor Ashbaugh, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Carpenter and Carter, Vice Mayor Ashbaugh and Mayor Marx NOES: Council Member Smith ABSENT: None Resolution No. 10312 (1011 Series) Page 7 The foregoing resolution was adopted this I" day of November 2011. ATTEST: Elaina Cano City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: I M� I� x W EXECUTIVE SUMMAl, C R F Vl VJ 0 r bR�D wo oa O R VJ u R c H R "O O R C C R L' w1 ri I � �a r. py R ICI y V7 ii U r� ..i W R F "' t N CS • O N C y CJ .0 y 0 N L r. a 0 o - A as�Qoo E.oC "ii V y 4-- >. E d > r 7 .O E•E3_v- w o °LJ o a E o a p E > Q p p V O Q V J vWu to u _ i C - Q c a 3s 0v c •= to coy W:?0'oo.�E o p U 7 on > E C V N a C o. E s L 3 3 'C — n. cc C o o c o 3 N to •� N v- �p W N O> l0 C C In V 00-0 E to " p .. p R •E y .= o p C C •� V x E t V O •G. «. to C7 E 'O C :E 9 d.= R=y s R a o.E ao Chi € v� a o c v R a •p t y V Q ?� i O ti H 0 A C6 TQ �' C6 C — V N O R L 'O a�i C a% C p CJ Y •p V 1„' C) L W L R E m •da .� R L V. V :a .p U N> N Cu O C �% .A td _ R U u V y C Cr O tl0'O O O C. a e .L V N a L U tn c Y`oV�tia a•cy •eJ �-E >s� U N •O p o� y U Q, •� �r R CU'O C C N h N U O _ L a O r .. _ W _ vl U e.. V 3 ftl �+ 1�l..�� p ^p • C S LVi N C Q OJ RS Ci '•' OO yO M N ,C„ L :C R > , C A aL.+ L3 C9 N .� m A A N= Q p C C, C L N y N N.� N 'O. m G.00 N w> •� c 0> v�, E °' c L o >1 L U ^�= °o � Q L O'd � 4) o E c° i o � G .a w ST �� o L " Y ct ' W d d •C N — R a A r H U 7 a C 0 n' 0 CL o y •9 •_ .E C C OCA C H C N 3 d •� W L L %, W N' N '� •a l7 C U V N C y 0 0' .fl .N .p ._. L .E O p m 'v to N L 0 0 0= Y vi E V O 'O U d bA R .0 'O 7 t V 0 C ca V a 'O U, y C C V y 0 y c 2 v 3 o s d 3 i= o m o o. " '- U E .o o> N C ,; ^ E 2> aLJ .:� y- u N.N E— O c o ac.°L" " V °' - =: �' t �� RcaEoayoy�m °��_�A�?0.R1.�S�d'00.6AcoOEvc�o Q �_ O O U> E o 3 L c`� N o' O w V O L O v V 'O O Q - U L I �/ n. W dq W d ,�. Q W H L L .0 .5.. v% R rN, N H X O > o R z=�� N O O y p c N U o O C •� .�.. N C) CJ .i . y 6:. •£ CJ y � W V V 0 0 mo X c d U > Q O = V a c N ti E E : o a i 0 V O U o a p 0 3� wNao �Wo'E r- M Q a c iv O U V ES-14 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR C R s F m m u .a 0 y u y 0 O GTr u CC1 O R s w u d R :O O i C O = u O � O v v7 � R ri C r R EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .Q CO O O y G O O 'p t Cj y 0 c 5 u u y s o 4 Y aNi aci c 3 p = u> 3 u v o -0 E o u w z E R u u L N d% 7 N •D N '� aL.+ d N E > o N s R ¢° V c° ° c y E n 'o u p" Q .= 04 o u c 0 M-0 o N a u :° u u o u U c c c u o ° c_ a o u M m v u c° o u.=e« v E o O aE..5 °-c• :3 y 0. d 04 C A N V L 7 �. 4. C N R Cz •_ •a > L N N m+C C A O C i C C 2 vc �. L 7 0 W C w Y U N r �_ >i Q.- 4.w ,O 3 ca L L 0.4 O U° 4., N` d V. )° A y C r 10 ° c c u c N o o u u° G o o c °w o c c.c y u cv d E cG '= 'o N o o c `° -° a°Ji �n o: °= y c a a o y v 6655 E u-. E o t a x p . ti • L ° ° •o s3 °' ai 4� II c a `^ m c a u _ > L. o cQ M c U c u m c "a '0 y c 3 i— CO O o o n •0 >s m , `o ° 6 E .0 u > u mU a o u o O t u c E R N 0 3 CJ d 7 .G LL N C id 0 7 G— o c? > o H g E uc E 3 H> n° u o' E m N u O c a E c s « N C C N O o a a 0.'N c w — o p :? CO . N H Q ,h c Cp._ E" c p M o b cc° 3 R c C E o o u N Ecn y o aF..S.= °=Q 5 U Or c°° _ u N G. N u, Q F io > c ° to U c d y = v c ': © N�� aci�m0Q- a a3i.o ° o °.0 v °o c cz v 3 >- °t: > Nr Uv° crQ `Z 0 C c'> V E 7 0�A `" vi y C 3 =tl•,.m c� L .� 0. V .-�'O Q c CO C R U �. .t... N U ,O U 0. d 'fl N CL >+ N O L° 3 m > :: N E N 6500 'O 00 Y L 'C ,_.., y F m �' ' a+ N CO N N V y <r C V w. d v U E .« Q DA ° a c= d c v 3 �, �G : c u> 3 °_ '� °- O 3 •_' N ` U O y A C •; a. G 'O N 'O Vi •� 'O ¢ .y Q u U ` A G tb u.'-•N E m -_ u c°�- �m N E•- ,'...oC E a._ >_ c vw .c N o o aEi au'Cu aR uaQ °vim �Q� �Q a°i owO aZUv �� oCaQ ca a�UO H••, • • • • • e • r u H y ' t4 OCL u c E W ca F Garden Street Terraces Project Final E/R ES -B 0 C R Ls r y CA a 0 .r u R an C G=r u y 0 R R .0 u R C. u .0 R 0 C a � 0 �w � O Z R a C ~ U M R dD U rig W u R F EXECUTIVE SUMMAh1 E r 7 7 7 a � O H L G 0 CO �. 0. d •C � m •C O C• tC O N C. 4' R3 rn C y`, �. A �..i a'w L .L.+ N 7 E H ° ° o �O on o d ^ a. 30 ��° V «. " E� o p an y Qi Ci N LC r' aV+ •i7 fC S'r c� R •O V a=.+ C m CO ° W r- ii 7 y •�,' u .Qp n o o.: Q c v V cQ =.= i s R c c cy.a� .cc •E `o °aE € y t cQ 1 w c c 0 E ° c 0 > ° = - s m o iV . nn E M c p W a t « o ° E o 0U 'w N A -Z. 0"" 0 ° w V U U V O N E c O O O d E ttl C O ° c -.3 o" p S V° a > E t O cc E N d N O O q C V 'C L w F "0 O " t C c o d a ti E ° 'E R° .?� v� ° E c A c 'x c c a v ti= v co •c a•° 2 o.0 �'� o m s m c o O rn L ca C N U O co • 'fl O d m y 7 c.. rn ^ R y Q> 0. N oq U 'O y O 'V R. t. .3 O to .` 7 C N C O O 4V•, rn 'O > U •.. a) — E O 3 "0 d N ca U 'E a v v c c °_ �.Y v c•� o o c� aL o to `mss o a? ° E x° < u d au N ° y y o._ ° —aV € °� `oa aaa o—° o 3 c A N C y 5 E v v? `c' C V �+ o•c �•+ o° c ° L o x c p O. L U Q 0. -. w 0. L u Q c0 y w ca O V CL .j stir- .y V .R ,E OV ES -16 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR C 0 s Vi vi 0 +r "O 7a O GT. CC O ea s v R G H R .U. 0 R C 7 U � fw y C � � o 1 C r GRd r y � U v� V� W F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - y u � apC) Any MO m oyaaiQ° -°E E c cEi w A LQ E M u v = .Q .O. U E v m c 6 J y c o O ° m y z R a O � Eyt6 "o0'Dd O p X> y w OO �.Eec Q a .z 7 .•� Z cC c ° m o° — ��o°o eq = c o y o L) E ?n v ca R o_ o y u O+ N c. °_ ° i w C R o-� 6 c a p Wiz:• N d o E° c E eno y 3 y H Q s d N a 3 v u a d ou L o 00 c env 3 '� 0 Q. pap ti O y V L U '� H -� E '� " -°" €> C p o c co d c0 a N'S •o °c a� o o r > o c Cy o Cr U o Li•° c c a a c a o� L y c E E y .E •Q 'C to 00 ,C C` t •"' ° N '.:+ C L �' O •p c R O O 04 exJ C E A c0 A � .E N :u d• c oo o a> 3': > '� c o L n.c Ev cn'C iao- °'mow° ` .y ° E C° L L 3 y d N 7 w y y 'C E G '7 d G y E '=O r L 'E_ as 6i. R •OD U >�'A °Q o 0 o c E a c c o �Q `o °'o[v N p x s 0 0 O t-, O :: A c a L is { y y :: O '- E •E '9 d 7 y C (] L v 3 ^tea u3 'cam° _`Y' w�'E°'= a'�h �aci° =oV4° CL 2 .� ° 3 '3 R a o °' A= m w a � o ,3y oU ° E > c a¢ o A CL ° E E a d > y o u' u E u' ` L N .5• °' ° 0 c d v c v v _ E `d v Q ° W c 3= R ° L p CO y _ a w ou ` y en on — a 3 c on o s. E �- a N O CO .� y y0„ .E C R i vi _ E N N L O N E N 'p ° O u yo u o s E` 1O u s R s fl w y c c° s o to .� y u E CL O N r- c N T eQ 77 � y U y OL = 7 c d L d N O >i R% O N ••� E_ d d d w E c c o a c L 1 Cu o c E ro o s L 3 E L> o o .. t 00 a y n w 0 c" E v c o t �_ o •� E D .v c v o u o E- (. 3 R E F- C O N 00 j 'C O E E. OD c-'C .0 N 7A V... 4.. M c7 t ep M 61 y O :: d O OC-p N R bq .0 a€ h I Q v O O T C .� C7 N C 1 E u u c01i c c E • N s A °' u a°i d p •• y H d d •° n• E y O O R� ° H e e • • • � U o� e• e a a L oo � �oAar`a� 0 N vp cc dUt.:U w as Q_�v 4.. C •L _ O y i 'u .N O .O c u .0 1? N .. o O . E _ _ •� is .N aci o p 'y E ° d p J n..N = o c Z c c E u 0 CO w O �'o.o d C E O s a Garden Street Terraces Project ES -17 Final E/R C R s F m n, a a+ ^O y R �a 0 R R s i wJ u R d Z R 0 R G C v 0 e Ge a rr R r H .� V7 R OC U 'v� 14 w N R F EXECUTIVE SU O c , o oEi � m -, QO o 012, LQ 0 m 3 °—UC7 E G N fl N O o cE°L'aw Qm � c o E x O O Z N y p O C Q E G in O1 C. G O y •C m ` _, N m ap > m N N •° y n. a o ai v cEa o :° c 3 0 °•'c 0 E E N m N N L cc= "05 N 'O •O C L L ..+ p C p, y N .3 .E m N .N+ t+ N a 7 •O X m G .NC :-', ai c .� ° •:° ` S1 O. c ° y '° 4 L p, u ° _ :°. °—E' ti C ;? c Q„= o R n a N b E .. y. o o c '� N v N n- ._ E o c N •R r c c N> o c o N y c n c E c c a m m:, N y N "€ OM .0 c °' c E •= E c •. D 3 •o = c> CN o U m 6.., m •� d F- '` m 7 m N O O N y N N O c= a m L a.— �- 6 c o u c U om`n t� a E cu c .0 •� ci m vd o a'3 0 c- L. N o 6 N .. c o 0 C O L L > m O O O .D c �- y Op. t v1 m' O U m u O > 'O .9 m a¢ ... O y Y y w m R Y F 7 N C d C N V L w C °_' m `- m c O❑ t t u ;n N N y cvC cc 0 m N H C .= vOi C .c = a �, F y o `-� A- Oq '0 •� 3 y G �O Y E y O cCOi e'1 cc o ?° aci ao R a9i c 'E c w E a o o `- s .N 3° s e o o fl o ecs ° m E r °- o° FE- .� ° m �, C7 A o 'op'. _ .. a s o N '> c O > c o y on c N E o c .m •°'• _ `-° C A iy.. �• y CO G '� a O 'y •°°' ` ti oEp °' E E 'U a y O C C `on.c0 �A _°'m�N� .mcrwocuo icar-c -CC °g "E� °EaoE r. C m bND Y N Non'.. .9 ..� E U p N m o E 00 ,�, 3 a E o> ~i. N C N W R E c 3 .Q -� c 0 u 's 'o Ga N 0 L . c N N y L n U- c o O N 'H n d ° U Z N N F Ey E c , `m . ` D a L m °' ° ° E c 'o _ = ` H a E .•y E N a .a s F s s e N E aN 0 i z F " £ 'o N ? .d c > • `o a F A o w a o ° c ' € > h O 0 ° 0=p °• ° oNyd " n =e' '•N > o • R o c o ¢ a g a o c � o E O d Cn c c to E o -o M 0 E o c ro c M v N E < a •o < E N U o° a U a CL c a a•_ N c m s o L o E o EU o N c°C m > m ;N ,oz E a N N 3 O L C b4 .o " c m ES -18 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ri F H H 6� R ar 3 �Tr Q O s y u a ea 0 R O .: 0 C O tu u C L7 C bA v � v y Ra G r U 'v� W u m F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY V vR eE R 0 7 P dL t C H 7 ° O L oC r- . >' U "c Q OD , ° N CQy d 7 C y y.00C v ya y R o, •v °O 4� C . •o ai '0 0c —� �a3 ° z t .. ao � o N > q _y' a� ° ao � `E coo -o b O CO E E U iE o s E O Jo L O x s 0 n. N o a. °- a m a" aU c v .0 . u. °_ E v v E „ h •� m .9 c..= Cn ° a y c t 'y t0 7s ." vi j�' C y C4 N U d y y L .0 y U O d =a '� E C >•.°_� �s •E"E�uv3a�y� oDfl -Z° c. =� e' ^° On r- O 'C V O r L C '� c0 'O a .0 V U A N 'C vi �• i N V V d vi C y 9 y L vta = ':: y R +- O a t •O 'O U to .� 6 N t cC y H E O O °o ° c c°, y .—°° o D° ti a 'o v a_ R c aU.— CDC e0 O �- +r y 3 v • °_ . oD o O: o c ° ° v n'Q r C '7 3 ° O - N ' 'O X 0 0° EEv �° cd aa cVo = os. = E 'd a>o > •c E y _Fc°n ' 9 o 0 E r =•vV N° _ .O M A - 4_ s T c 0 T E L 3 o a to o oD = c O 12 ` O to V5 ° v a o E ° > en >,Q y ° y d > . N 0� E w E 0 ° �m U a a •- • • • m 0 • • • • • • • • • c 3 E E Q • • u m E Carden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ES-19 c s F y v, V +r 7 R �0 a f:. O y .c U 0 d L R 0 i CQ C •C C y V d �a C r CQ r � •C Rt pp U*(7 rl W R F ES-20 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR E Co ' R S C? •° L E.- E U -0 U 0 u L R E y V U C E 0 •0 v = O R R L OA > • L� � � .+ C p• y L M O C� O O R O oA •C U� _ U .� R OL C� R •L.. 3 R to V U 4G R c Cr .0 c 'y ° y •U C > •0 � R N L N y L N C - C .0 U 7 '0 p C U O p C U U W •E N O. E O ?y .0 L 3 "a 04 a o ° c y o c OA LU O O O a > 3 C N C to N O • A a C L y U ' N U UH OC ° >°' _ N OA L > a y > ' C p O 1:C �° r , (-La 0 3 C 6a 7 .lC V N O 0 > j C V t A O— C 'O N n • U 2 E O O- 0 C/i > L . T - C y U s E y ao. C C d• R N ao o N > > N C o o -y y o 0 U a a E 0 ° N 'G —° i•" N ow' E L Q O aN N U C ys R y :: E N ''� '- R .. a 'J' x >.'fl a p d U a L y .E c c U a c o Y L U M F~ o v� L F- oq._ •U o U. L c •€ o .N y y T p°' c 3 o ° O o y F= U C 0 _ C Q' p _ L d a a y 0 m u c 0. T �., ..� . I �.. T N CCD O •-. •- y Cp > F" U .O` U C W R ._ C U °' y U aOCR U N•o ° c O; O O Es a� Ta�L p CO a > d � E 0 a .v a;., M a N > o. —" —u V N o c L oe:. c v» o •� 2 o R R.o z O C .�, u �: ° U O OD C R h '•' 4: .0 O .E w i O N N y h N y 0 v U° .3 u U Ou x R V L c ° =° 'N E 'T C° > s •E = ° p �U n— - v' N U '0 N c .cc L N O N C T ° E G. 0 > y 'y L IR. F- L L '0 F 3 L 3 I.R. U .N..^ 3 R C u N .U+. > =' C R Q: •V n ti aai U •0 OL 'p 0 fl r- 'o U U °R' c — N E 4+ N O O tzcl Ob ° i a°'i a I4.� N 'O R = C 7 > °c c ° o L .. R y U. y ui .0 L C v y C iy C C E •C W I%j •O C t'. E y E O 0 s a .2 Ca '� V E ai - a p m c c cfQi E c E °" N 'C 0•'y C: L O .U.. y IR.. V .� E a U U c E •� U U U •0 > O �•. U •E O �. .cG U •� R U U U >> R N cL0 O C Gg • ; � o E V R L U C O M =� 02 u T W t� u 0 c u "I O ayi R E 0 o 0 yYy Yi II. R y � N a.a R 3 U CO oo v R mu M K E ri x U a .cc ES-20 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR O 0 Z F 4A y O rr Y w O i/ R Z 0 u ca ca C 0 R .a O R I� ^ C � u = 4. C �o v X VJ �r y C R U 'v� .Q R F I I I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR C 4- ? m 'v 0 Q 'a A C c d c a) O L E E ° o x y -0 t • -Z: V p V N> 00 O .O N 'O .. y .II O S U Q y d E A° w >. .� cLV L N X v vUi.X u 4 �, y' 'U i -� Q. Q o fi'� " .� °L' p °'0 , U L , v E °q= e c L to.- E >" 0> c v = y o° r d s Q p on s O N c a .c a 7 F _ e 7 m o 'O �. �• Z ?. d d aUi L C 0 7 7 y C —t, a z .°° c u E •o aL� °_' '? y. `� °• vac >aa� 000Qaz,m�� -�° E.��EN ,uN, = E y= = o r v h o s ° d E n c E V w °' `p' ° E c E C 01 O d Q p .fi ti y Z O d O t O o c :. O C O 'O ctl , m N N y, .. vi o� a) ca 7 a) Op 00 2: t3 _L, N� t. . y _ ^C O O ?. p�j "� y fi° u0 s c d > O N 0 O C '� E v o V s g e o Zs o F- o L o L w E A ❑ E A v v g v o .= E•�_ aL' �.� E u c b y 4) = c o o c c� 7 E N> a E$ N o O o N C •3 .3 V R Q. �a s c =; E �""' v •p c L O O c o O t d N ^ U L O y 'C L X. E LO 'rn .� N 7 y L 10. y y E_ O U V y Nzs O C 7 W cs v p ° c0 C c l0 .,,, c 0 7 'D 7 ns N U •p V D ° ❑ _ °' W L w °' y -, a) N E a) O• G U vbs v U y" . T N — CO 7 p >, ¢ E O .N. Cu ° y c a) id ` C6 G. OL '> O '> 7 c 7 y N (j, cC R N Q 7 E c v °' 0¢ V> E N C, p c_ N .5 p L cvs.N in a7 = d W E d Y C' s..io Eso V CO s o. L y cs c° E m �: o aDi� °° °'o u E E R ° E apOO c °$ -° m ,� d O V N d N ... c R p C L tC '-Oi ° 7 .� F 0.0 Cr c 4" E' V V O 7 E y z O 0 v C O '%� L t •r- O r W R L L c�• y m 9 >. ,,, 7 t� '0 .O a) 2' O— Rs" 'R C.0 i E' r� o E ° "O � °„ c +•� C �.;: v R O W W p V R 'O 'C V 'O p 'D «+ A E ca — •O y OA'v p V ..0 >.._ 'C y �°, — — R vi U �., U °Sov•o N N C.0 1 L .,, w O R C a) — 7 ='o� 3 U ::— = vs vacs a� ic c�A p° E_o`o dt�d .t.. •D •`�Li E•fl .E v �.� E O OL� N atiW C O '_ ❑ G G y y ', 'D O •O 'O C x.00_' W c .� E c•- a, > L .- o„ o Q a a u a p a n v o c L b y -c�•�+ a, c a= s ro N L. v a, • n d m E 'v •y y O H Y i — — -� OL = c A O r E E �� v 7 `-- •OO_ s s� ,c V .. c0 IO y E crd Q p U V N V a) C c n O O N E N E E N N V 'o C V V N V V S ty 2 E C O. c a) c p 4r d s W .^ y> c c .E ° U .E O a E '_ a Q E m R O L E °_ g O y Qv �s d.? E° E v R> h p o zs c= .E� z.E N a=i = z V Z aEi a 3 `v aci v= c r o>> c-ii r a v s c A aci pa Q V z E a A aa' 'C c L0 D •v a o o y d, V L L •v d z X Q c O y d O C O h r 7 cO cc N E 0 Q Q C) 00 d a) R•p :aUZt i L c y !� a�Ei •a o z b o O 0o 0 O 70 > L CO �i za��Z3 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR C R s F y H R 00 W, Gr. u s F y POOu R a Q Z R 0 ea C , C C u C C � �A u z M M 1 � y � R a C r CQ q C R pA U 'v� .: 1 rn W Z F EXECUTIVE SUMMAR p D O L N d 0 N v N L 3 0 O a=i ca C N ° .o o C c d '3 0 n y goo 0 °_ N o .E_ a 3' N R. V C = O s N c O L = •y oa. Y o9 «. ° Q E ° o o E E n THV d•C ,_ = 0 �.t :0•-'3 O•V 3 ,AC" rypn yL y p ri L N V y= 3 3 D O 0 _ C N y 3 2 L ° L �•fl p 00900y ON 3 0> �L V1 "� y d r a= VJ 0 —u d N c o o N c :° �° °° c ° i° n c o.:? .a y c d E 0. o is v ,:: r T'9 .0 U 0 y U rw .00 " 0 Z; E Q t o o a0i O w C L = = A ° s ° c° c= 3 N L d m °' C c p N In. CO u a>i O s s y u a w c a=i 5 ai a�i i E y •y 7 y y •°' O.•� O cNa O M. E > ° :: •� .E °' O :N 7 h = Q °' •� v a N CC _Q• •7N9 0 'H 0 0 y c 0 E° aci E o a0i 1� o c N o FL- o E> R (U o y —> c° c E o° a= y C �„ _ _ b L •O y 10 O . O c0 > O > (••� p Ia N+y' 0 0 o p E a= c. a 2 Q N c t's 4 ° rw E c U .: R 3 Q ca Fes- axi H Q o `°' F v z N rw a E @ o 0 z o n.0 0 0° O U G. U U ES -22 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR q V a C s~ •C CO C R s H y N MM� ICI C R U to s u R C ea u 1 u ca �1 r m y R A N W Y 3 R EXECUTIVE SUDIMC�. ES -23 Carden Street Terraces Project Final EIR N N E o N v N d O y 1 R L R L R V O E y R y y E W C ° = o p N a 0 = o 0 3 7 L. = tr,. C � W � •y d N C N d N R¢ O .= C R •C� E .Y E O = cC 'D L R V N c0 iO y L C= 4. U 15 C y U = y R .� E ¢ •O .O N DD N p y C. V R N L C > �- U y�j C .D '_' .�' E y L �+ R > V= O E •_' > N c= C p E _o o 3 'O N a7 .R = •^ 0 ,E E E .g = .E o 0 y R N C C .0 A N y O N 4. �'= E V U •x = V N p E C a ° LU O . C ,D OA II y = am N= ' O i0J) ' N C O$ . N° m °m � �L Ud ° R a°U' dO — u ' ° D n vE E o E .•N C L ° o R Q v 3 ° °� wa U N C V° > `L 00 N '•�E s c •o K msN ¢ - o °° C' c �a„ .O '� y" � ur � � � sR ? d>°�' •oO -R ` '.�� m C E_ ai c o O 0.0 • L E> 'O .fl = U C ry. N O L C 7 � E. w o' 0 v O v a> L R N= N a O m O R E u m s v L E o R c° r fl 'O y ,C E r co > '. o>° E 70 b Bc `R " x� —0 L R 0 == c N . C°�> = .> n cp +¢ — v -, g •O L n C 4r O •c c ° m d z aN = o m ,^U ., tN 0 E O R V . O d U C U d' = O OD C = •C N •a°N �' c > CN• E O � � n E 0 Ru o > 0' mO L aE � d ° ° N oo O = U U G.L L u N a 0 v C y y C y L N I.n p fl..fl E O d R E•0 •C .N G .Y R cd R 4 U .R- CC in a� V U L O iv = U U Q' E O cc ..+ U C .U.•. Y ° d cN =tu 4+ - E ` C O M= p C O O E v II O u U= T v v1 > C= O O `p y t U U O ¢ U L Oq N y r- 4 M > 2 ES -23 Carden Street Terraces Project Final EIR b O C a� C 0 u H O R Zi b0 0 R VJ y Q "O C> bD R U R s y v R C an rA 1 Y u R d m VJ R LA N w Z R E'F EXECUTIVE SUNIMARY O ES-24 Carden Street Terraces Project Final EIR s U c c co n y E o � cU G U 0 A p a = E C _ o > •O U N N � R U G M O O > N ••R '� °" •. �= O C ld = ' p p fl 4 c=`v € H h pd , N M ._ s N y U N 1Q0 'O ._ .4 ' N •O p .y = > ' C N > ° O N= o• 0 N 9° maL E N E "m •v ° c r= c E d c E C •y 'C� C .` y T L U :fl O O �7 C m ` V C t0 C 'C N v p A v °- ° a� d N -°' U °° d a U > o A" E '� L CO y E U > `o ° 0 a H s °= d 9 d v c a=i ° E_ - N a d• C U c cc e - 03 E £ ° y 4 a s �U c. E d ci cc ° v gE ` oo •"' U 74 U t ap bUq'O L C t N .D 'C r 7 O �"" •� •S a E O v O C• M U cO «+ R 00.E y 'n O .` •U N N p= a�Ui ca N L U p .0 V O v O = E = N d to fL) E N N E C U s •9 'O H .� _ N .?� - m 0= N= 0. U= .Q N °' v c CO a A m M s o on '° °�> "a ° o s V 3 d ° E M L'° `L° c y E ro ao c N u' c c.E ° o -_ 3 T° U o > c m R> °' 3 .o M Ca = v Eva ° '> > E° v o ej c y m cc L 1 C= .> N= _ t c = V [A /�� y0� OL O y N Q E r> c 'N V U R L N I.N. = d L M .= to 4i •> -0 U N �"� ° 4: h V v= y R OD = O U U 'fl O C U .E NC�^ O,O C.ZU UO `�. U U Ut.:=C=pq��'w�C�C O •9 •p •D C.0 LN_O�OtO YO TyV N Y d •O V U °" R A 2 = h U �U., O •C R •D y -° s0. E .O+ cQ •> v N .y U W a V N O V V= i= U O == U cc V= U R •= 00 F-v 7= 7 7 y i o• R s s E U c c a '> •o X= t= O 7 p [- °° 3 a a F" > '> u N «. «. v¢ N = R - N y R E U V , U to � U L _ O L •O CJ N C ._... Q..= 7 U CL E r0 V ° v as c N p y d M M V aE L � 7 _ = c=a O S U C O tr O r:. z f�i f� =M = n E o vi 'H s ° L 'v U ° ES-24 Carden Street Terraces Project Final EIR 'C v C w C 0 u VJ v y C u bA C M H V 0 'C r OU C U R s Vi u C6 C ao y V c Vl y R wQ N W d R F 0 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A c RNv =- os' du.c u cc'o °�°' r .+ t ° on p o 0A — .D O +d 'O O U c N= y l0 OA O E •E O A O C O i O V -.0 V p to 4r •C-' O V t O V V V «� y L. t N "' > N L N .= E c° o L° cb n a c w sou p °L' = L p Em c L c =r ° o` °• -� a c o o E v o R c v m u o c :: •c = E a:D o N •° o L �vZ. t =-N oEaco L �'occZ_mvoN ctE_��ouflc °OL. °_ d a.E >� m.v E Z '-' ds c y 3 H as w uc CU) c ° °L'•� E E A c =.a� y�EEE�3 �c�'v > >oFg a=i°aucozc'Ln'� °,op�t�bc. °_ouc aci Us c� y n o c £ i� o��cZ_ O O� o e E N E�a,�°''.° ro > E A u u o' w a o a °' = c __ - N o w o a cO 4) ca b .L.. .p O V V V 7 do V O i0 •+ m 0= C u 0 C y C W N. _� U __� N X y. Wit.. .� N .� N L O N u N N N N i L >� A w ,q'c '`' E o C c0 y Y 00 y A C C u A O E L .L. OV i d N �: C_ N RS R OA O..0 •p .L' N O 'b V R O R ;:O E cC c c •- c E u u a co d a u to Q' u E u w a H L .c u c E u v °o $ m u° °— O aNi °= c° A v ° o o b a� ° R A o �= E 4 •io `' of .a o L a •v u T u m .= w u L co N E .u. z a co u u L s- r c w 'E. E v c u o° .5 u o L h° •� o o E u? m N L u c« m 3 �' . u m u A c c C u —° E `o aai c E Lo u s .E c 0 L w u `o 'm u p 3 N ° N c� 'y u D aai �co t aNi ^ �o s R o H > °' ° aci o R On N Cr o = U fu c t� ° °' > y a l/1 cv O N 0 +' ti O G o 7 Oq'� d> T .0 A N V M a•t O w co cc Cc U •O V E °V ' .a _ u —AV aO o c ~N C L 6O ,O� . N •.N 3 F C 7 ° L o = cc t O c N v 0 t O u OD .- UQ N 3 V c •� $ aE MOO ,0 Vy Y ip O O •2 = V O E •C u t ° a c a3cEc � a °u E•9 Y OF•� � E a° E Ogt u o t O Q E 0 E a V + .°O " R O c i a ,c u R w L L O L ° 'v d 0 •° " ° N N _ V O ac E 0 o N N G O t Tj A CL cc y c m m o a 0 u o U X 0. E a C y ti •. u• � u o ct•o E ° F u u Q NO u O ca a t E o a E e m > � N A t o f U'N .uzU•o oboe Carden Street Terraces Project ES -25 Final EIR d 0 N .c 0 N w 0 w L U t 00 ❑ c A d u ca — � o E U y R a E u V V O 4 3 Ec c RNv =- os' du.c u cc'o °�°' r .+ t ° on p o 0A — .D O +d 'O O U c N= y l0 OA O E •E O A O C O i O V -.0 V p to 4r •C-' O V t O V V V «� y L. t N "' > N L N .= E c° o L° cb n a c w sou p °L' = L p Em c L c =r ° o` °• -� a c o o E v o R c v m u o c :: •c = E a:D o N •° o L �vZ. t =-N oEaco L �'occZ_mvoN ctE_��ouflc °OL. °_ d a.E >� m.v E Z '-' ds c y 3 H as w uc CU) c ° °L'•� E E A c =.a� y�EEE�3 �c�'v > >oFg a=i°aucozc'Ln'� °,op�t�bc. °_ouc aci Us c� y n o c £ i� o��cZ_ O O� o e E N E�a,�°''.° ro > E A u u o' w a o a °' = c __ - N o w o a cO 4) ca b .L.. .p O V V V 7 do V O i0 •+ m 0= C u 0 C y C W N. _� U __� N X y. Wit.. .� N .� N L O N u N N N N i L >� A w ,q'c '`' E o C c0 y Y 00 y A C C u A O E L .L. OV i d N �: C_ N RS R OA O..0 •p .L' N O 'b V R O R ;:O E cC c c •- c E u u a co d a u to Q' u E u w a H L .c u c E u v °o $ m u° °— O aNi °= c° A v ° o o b a� ° R A o �= E 4 •io `' of .a o L a •v u T u m .= w u L co N E .u. z a co u u L s- r c w 'E. E v c u o° .5 u o L h° •� o o E u? m N L u c« m 3 �' . u m u A c c C u —° E `o aai c E Lo u s .E c 0 L w u `o 'm u p 3 N ° N c� 'y u D aai �co t aNi ^ �o s R o H > °' ° aci o R On N Cr o = U fu c t� ° °' > y a l/1 cv O N 0 +' ti O G o 7 Oq'� d> T .0 A N V M a•t O w co cc Cc U •O V E °V ' .a _ u —AV aO o c ~N C L 6O ,O� . N •.N 3 F C 7 ° L o = cc t O c N v 0 t O u OD .- UQ N 3 V c •� $ aE MOO ,0 Vy Y ip O O •2 = V O E •C u t ° a c a3cEc � a °u E•9 Y OF•� � E a° E Ogt u o t O Q E 0 E a V + .°O " R O c i a ,c u R w L L O L ° 'v d 0 •° " ° N N _ V O ac E 0 o N N G O t Tj A CL cc y c m m o a 0 u o U X 0. E a C y ti •. u• � u o ct•o E ° F u u Q NO u O ca a t E o a E e m > � N A t o f U'N .uzU•o oboe Carden Street Terraces Project ES -25 Final EIR d 0 N .c 0 N w 0 w L 7 v _ _ O V y Ci a _ u L: •C OD C GQ W, u O b CQ M� W _ R m s F aV'+ u _ OD m v R c E y M N Gzl O M R F EXECUTIVE SUMNk Y ES -26 Carden Street Terraces Project Final EIR u R CL E CD 9 y C 00 C 3 R m u o n w crci v H aVi E p> 3 rz J o Lo R c s A• °- `c o$ a °' y c c v O cOi U V y R R O a 0 a N 7 Co c R VOV r N E: o c= •C R. =3'L d-0 L rz w c C Q ° c °- UD a N y_ y U m> V 00 C N O V .Q «L L 7 :d y R w V p Ln fl O y y p w n• U O •fl �'�' R L F" 3 .V0 .� c=S 0 0 .0 V n' •y w 0 v� ' C a a Cr __ L 7 .` L N= A 0. C c 'N O c G" L R O R a V .b y R G vi L' y' R O V C O h 'C O' t r 0 C y N V .0 p .0 i^ C 7 N a A R y V R y tCV O R O d 'D A R a a O 0 N U U d L L R U V G M N R 4. R •a R U 7 y y R C Vp •Q L' C C IE: O L a �.D .VO b w G 'D L Cc 'O N "C L L �+ CV1 C Oy0 R R L .� o 0 >+ a. 0 V L N L a L O y' R V L >> ,.0. R R ED O ° 0 �' Cu U_ c�°pLFS _E •� •� s O 'C L V 'V .D .� Oq 7 C c' O. O "' = R ° N L OJ N m c w 3= '3 y p °' L y D a yY C p r w U O a "� OL OL A' C C O V '�' • '? E v, a a s .RC °" =_ Q `' O O �'C 'eO O v c 0 L d" c A «' G E R °' d. °' T >' TiO. L y •U L" :o A .� N 'Q Q._ a 0 L R.t V E C H =u s s n p E y c axi aOi H y c c c t� c Y a• a 'y N «. C O G E C Cr �p V .p y p b O O y C Z L >= C u o L U R C p A' L O E N p 7 U W L R R w d E R y °_ a s � r L y 44 w VO N d O >' o= o o c c .E Q: V 7 no X V E 7 a ..+ L m aJ CG c .�. N O O R N L y O C 'y •- R v l£O N c L c> R = .R U L w o axi = d '� c" E N R L V .= 7 L c c a, o 0 3 L p •R y G A C A> r-'ce p d y y cU 0 .'O 'VD A b N V R E ES -26 Carden Street Terraces Project Final EIR Y O V Y R V C L' R y y a O CC C R CYQ s GM v 1�..1 L� C bD 1 v C r.i y H R L N w C-' 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Garden Street Terraces Project Final E!R ES-27 0 O ' y O7 UO C N L V at E c o E � � ° y E v c 7 v � ooA o t y L U LQ o U V 'Q: � U N L i C O X N Cn ++ L N c ..+ C C 00 t O d O u s to t 3 Q a O N JD R L N V O -O �' 0 oq C O .� C 40 .— O N .. E `o °° d o A Y a Z c E '3 _ R on 0 n m e '= 0. .O 3 U 4..E y •� a�i .r '7 O 'O .0 f% •° CL.. E OL E .LO+ y y •O �sOU N E 0.p c0 c V O N a o 4) _n oonU —° y R c� ?w E CO > c iy C N OJ t d N p— V 7 d V N Cn N= Y O w+ C L U r a N .i 4. y U f0 cc E L a L C N O .r n. O ._.. C C c N .p u 0 p .D .E 0 °• E �•—, O E a� y O N 'p N 'p — V O 'D _ c V y V7 y t c fn O •OA •_—• s c=O R vOi O Q N m O O r- 4: C u Lt O U RC C E CUJ vOi p y Y 0 n' .O. On 00 p a .E p 'D <„O„ r y vi O •N N 'D .. R La• Oq Q A t E C .c � V O c t0 O [y - E 1 7 ] `T °ai ' 0 T a N .D O cC V A C V N � 0: 1 a3 i ? C o o E o 3 .° o E c a Eb E w '= .F.A ai a . vay O s E E U ai ai — —•y R o m a0 V a c E ro ? m :o `0° . R c :L N d L c a .0 A "V c O oV ? o L C ° °v , V ai O V ° •; N tV N :— ]m ?c d U C L O .L i3 `s� O o e a- � 0 C E o C v L L s O o O ❑ y o d FN a � o C °' V y F ° Cr ° > 4 V y a o Eon° c° N 4? � E� o U O a a. ,y U v M o= a D v v A t aci `o 4 E w o x o •� c c u ` p v t? °- s c R y E 0 Q c6 E N o• d N lO V V O 'o+ .> V l7 .'^_' C L N .r .may., .O y y U Oa pj V O L O C _a . c C D y CZ 'D V c V c O 0 O E U y °0 0 ' d u D N •O o a ° UU y V �E c m L o m c a c o o H . g ; e c E � o E O .i .d C E E ° d ° > .i 0. 0. L 0 u a L m U O L u m Q i 3 U R m m t T = to - V c °•�E�°�' cc U O 0'D E E v tO Y E R �p d O .D A N c+ G � La ayi V 1 N W .- et. tM C7 axi v0i O a0i Garden Street Terraces Project Final E!R ES-27 V C O V X CODa a O C h H V a O 'O M� W C O a Z Vi u ea a 8 C u C y u GC G E I.r q H R LdwJ N G=7 Y m"Ask ES -28 Garden Street Terraces Project Final E1R O A � U C V C V C C ' w cC0 O O.V O.0 O.0 ys E 4'. E rE E E H ' > C N N oO„ y 0 d 'E U .O t0 N C C '> y E -� E R N N> u E W A W m W R y Q —° y �- O N �.• — tLj on t t t = U CI E " u 9 O• °- N ° a N h H o . m °'a•E a a� a� to mn aci U y U y '0 O- t 4.. R op 4-. R op 4.. R op E.3 ,E,ca =. o R .9 04 a v E y Y 3 h c 0.0 0 0 0� g •o �r - u= c F- u 0 O "V Q O u 0 u o u c c c tu 0 ° E 47 c c i a V fl o b m y O Y Y E °' •a-N° u t s e t o d s o n p e N R V pQ 'N V •VD CO N p> 3 3= O> 3 °' O> 3 3 °_' O Op E 3 'y �` ou _ o on •o 1.. •C ri L ri .y R >\ N R V> a% V] Ol) w R d 'n V d s V7 0. t v G W 'ci U N t C ' L L c^ ..VVi y •O a d o CO Dl) O V> � .N u c 0. C y y y 0.0 N R y U C Cts _ R ie°. •O L y R U. E V 4J R '"" L 3 R °' N C Rv=>'- of .O > = ^a =c O .O V E p .3 . 4 c v> M y -0 u= 0> c o v U v d y 0 •G 'O '0 C V W L Qv U R C E U V �` L A C V— 'v i0 c R O p C U> Q V U E C tCO � G �•' d L y ` y,L y DQ .0 .fl t. an y O V .� t •C _C o • c c o .° c N co— CJ uc w y U a E =Q 0 y Q C U V-0 - N O O R bn M y On E .R� U u p •C O C p ° N R . y� .— W n•'- N y W d Q a ea ,o v R y o� c n> C �._ 0 0 ou M oC d u 'H t Ct v on 0. aCi fu W 'O O i . U _ O O R to U cd Q O v v U p 9 —= V R 0 ' O C O o R V 0 r- C 'O y .VC .E O n° , E O v H O .L R C •U C :y + H O C m 0 6� 1•L o y °° ° o A 0 0 R R u N cO — ° a ' R : C y 7 R CtN E E .E /(- // �� Cu E N O O y N p y R .a �_ ,R N •-U � ° .N , m C R O 'O O C •fl R s Wi N N Ci �y V O.R. Ti ° V y �+ t 3 L y. U >:"' D O Z 2 v c a`ii c C o y a c s , °- X> a 3 y d o ?° a°i 2 o= °�' u 3 o.E 0' m d m c o a° v? v 0 u o > 0On O . -0 u > 0 n o 3 0 > o y- H C o a c p O = u t` > y y-° L o " u c a CU a R r° ° " i y a$i •R°�R — a -' C. X..� O W aRi 7 R A W L X' n.� 0 0 0,0 a N O U .mss 2 C7 c N a N u L O V m N a o d u V d a ca a on 9 t>i C O S R u o 3 u ES -28 Garden Street Terraces Project Final E1R V .i G Y O u C R u L: O b0 VJ I.� O "C u d0 u C RS U ea s u R c •Ir O R Zi o�n y u CQ 0. y h U N LW u R F' OO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY _ N L L A � E V � R y N C 7 y O N A U (u V U b" N — .� 00 O E 3 o •_ o_ @ u c E •;, a � .R U d = aCi L w aEi ? E 3 •o=n N L A N N co C li 'fl Y 3 O C L >i U •� F 'fly' m cQ E m y Li- to .= O >. a'Oi O N N V R O a=i m °. ON O 'fl O p 0 ro= O U O Cl 0 E N Oq L x ca 7 �•c � E = E O N C p N C c 7 p o� c m 'E ` U 3 A .Y A p R a 0A c0 N ._ U F. 0.y ` A L b 6) •p U t0.� � %0 y O .� •O C L p�•O p e0 4. eA •5 C i0 p'C N" L •O U aW 0. W L w ' Q A L aLi n y u u? R c N° c y m 0. c m F o a c° ro m v E E a. y .5 > Q� y t o d •R c° c °' _ i c = 0.2 12 0 emu m Lo a=i Lo ° Z a L° = T. z A d 'o •� U 0 - U = = ° °L° ` = ° op ou eoi c o c d._ W, c 3= °—° ° a 3 5 c.5 u E 0. 'O C O W C G .N ca OL C 0..O t.+ C 7 d' C V N c¢ E r n s c —_° = eu •- o`U •- a o c 'au • p ou L O E n. Eros N ? E = U t .E •p 'C; A F} ° c 'O O y 7 r? oL0 N O '� O p 3 r ` ouAyEAV��REc�4_N= mo" — U O 'O V •m ,O y> O U N =. 5` O v: '0 •p O> U t `mU.'fl L y 'U H O ... cc 7 L •p O c0 ° O 4 •— U C N c�C — r y :; y y d .0 a r- CLO � ` m U m s C• �' C b y s U> s N �« •E L A ._ :°_ E O m O M s t .o ca u :d td .E H .� M H 'fl N cL�C L eo c .D m _H m R A 'o .: ,� m •n �' 3= s .mr c '- R �c •= 4 L p O m E 9) `° c > N •o n. `'• " ° � m c .E N ou o N H ai ,R y � •c ea •`-° � is - •o N y A v; � y � N 5 � 3 Lv, ou E E .� R 0 0° c x E ° m o 4 L n E• 4 v = 0 x o '� 3 E °' 3- S n y= v a� o ey�n N g N ._°.. E y oR0 �o> s =c ago• -,N 4, o =a� oa�n� o V L c= L o o°• o `O A y° 4 .L. i o= 4 c ° R o 0.10 ai `obs a as u 3 u E� N v 4. m N cc u. U L. m m N ou— 0. w A m Garden Street Terraces Project ES-29 Final EIR N L A R � O R y N C 7 y A U (u V U b" N — .� o •_ o_ :D—. c � o x •o � 'o � O = N eq 72 p C V Garden Street Terraces Project ES-29 Final EIR u 7 C .r C 0 u y 6i v a R C t0 C R M w O u u m L' R U R s w u R c 8 C R u Iu b0 y R c E MCI y y R LA N Gil u Z F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY u ES-30 Carden Street Terraces Project Final E/R N d L L V V y E r E r c U C y C y cQ _ E _ E R y o =• E c as a o° .E o° R E E V E U O v CG m N N c o c. r-? c w ou.E d p b c R E A R C U .p E- m U y O .0 T ro 0r > cC rid L= cQ 7 0 0 y is L y 3 ti a o a cn .� o c � �° 'E 3� c a CO — w °L' d— oq a O O U O ,J 0 U m V O N cC p U N 'O U y cm U V y y V 0 0 U �. as y N N M N O N V _ 7. = E p y V N 7. E R— y 7 t`j R y y O. `o C L m V O V •„V�, 0 O c0 V V a. m � C C .. m o Em c m' or ° E Q a —'� c °�'� n a `� •� ;.E R n m= o `o p 'C u U d .D v •c ro c = o y `° c c is d Z` . EU w= C1 0 ° L 0 3 • c d ' •O V° •° — E O Q ¢r 9nO c' R > Ee y •m c ° E _ ��° ' ° o ad G l M U O U > ca c� L r - 03 •O E 'O E R > ° to = H c0 — O d L 7 O fy O L O. a >' = w ¢ C U_ y .0 z bA N E Y E OA c L oq .D L_ •n O 7 N U C L O y, v .U. o c 35.p9 v a =' 3coE,",44••, N E' c y� `_` d 3 —L a'v a°i c c=a _ ea tDJ o N >o o�au 'u .0A .5 E O. ,E O A A O N U E •o a°i L° u 0 0 0 E c^ X w 'v fl t° m ° 3 "'�'9 .N•^ y on € aYi +°- > U o 2 c d o v o �C7 �_� ,�,�„ o �, @ naO: cn ; c > c•E o CL c aoa. c �a E u R °� ,o -0w °•� ° ° E•�`°' H.= CL s c oDMo o "•"' Y G. ¢ •--� R ._ p, N U O 'O d.9 C c0 ,� .E y L G N E °�' cV •.N E C c • ` 7 Gy 'n O R d E s L L % c y N a E Q a 0. L 'Q C m r .° F ° ti ° A ai y O U E z F = E °�' c °- a c - V T E � cc`ca o N ; N .c i N — C Oy w i = c0� CO p m c N n o c 4 c L o •3R N o 0 N v �.. 'L '�i Y G Q Y .V N Y 'p E m .yj + ._ . vyi , cd 4. y o P Q C L c ¢ A¢ Y y G X �_ •,.p •_ flc •N . } O O U 0L p L U C 'O — L 'R G Oo . , ¢ CU E L " U ° E O L C E L s •v V .E cc O .N 3 V = V " E C > O T y L 7 •� 4U" ° O - °a'�0� a cv x m O ? O O L � o ' O 0 p o> E V - a a 5 c y p p= b0� C • ^ r • = o R xm N L C m o c a°o 0 3 L N o v o a o cma os E— �a d L c s F .: L D c o N c u. c• L n N E ¢ ¢ •U CS �" �( y U L cC t0 xC O L L E X p r-C R U c0 y L E M ES-30 Carden Street Terraces Project Final E/R .3 C is C 0 u V a C R c b0 C y a O w bD 00 CQ U R .0 h u mac• C w O x e ea I y V W, an ea L N W R F V - 0 3 oA c 3 v C'L 2 0 " ° V N i0 h I« C •" C H O pCq G E :? a oy 0. C7 V y •Q 5 a, a L o L N C � •Y V y C N OA Cu E _ c E s Q V U 0 w> V c cu'- Y .� d 'v s o a m A Cc N 3 MOO c o4N c o, 3 R `� a y .0 T L .0 c m i= v E'. U U s c€ E ° E Cu V A N CO d C E. h R > cc Q LV °° m dsn�o— °cmEc —m taxi �3 o ° " o �a 3 ��°�,y °a�a°'a og ° ;di a❑ 4 v c s° m `w c 3 E= s° U A aU' E o ° N °` •3 ocq 0 d a 9 m E ° E 3 ° `u G A.o y ° n O3 °' ° >. o c t 0 r' a, '0 c° ou — • !� .D G I- C. y y Q c0 O_ .Oi > > V a) '0 «s. C N N �> y LL7 Ip L H y° O .0 a) O > c °n E V T O c OD V) U v o "' 04 R p= s v 'C — o o °E = —'0 s. = R LE __ «0. cC E id O C_ V C °' y 'Q y t L fO s — *R L O on ° o o s L y O y y C C7 Cc u o OvL 3Q cEoO v o`er 0 Z o c.�s on a, s o a A o N°N L S h d d� • • e • �"' � OLq G 'C o C L L „ $ 3' a C U T V V E�°sv°' LZ 7 D O A C cc y: CO a7 N, V C O aj 0.0 — R o N ° •0 ° � L U d ro V O m U y o= 3 c '- 5,��E��E c o ° = > EXECUTIVE SUMMARY �o 2 O' R! E r- u a v y c O O,on yN C C U � � °.E�d E v d� V a E 0' 3 0 m O T d .0 C4 aE;, °5 a>3 =o v eW � L C rn C c Uj aci O y o r ,c a c o R . °'v ° � � c c a•o c y c •� z is m € is coa�EV3•ao� T 3_ O O a a ... C ° c y o y. c s E a 0. o —°m. CO y C t U O d t m U o cC) y O N V C nL 4 3 3 0.° 0 c R c .N S `o 2 €tea c :° •c Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ES -31 N ; O y p O 0 0 E ° 0 •E •c c 3 V C ry C C r=i, O V O p L y C O U a tlq m c" 0 V E t0 CQ cC a7 O y CU1 O C ocns'E o O ° O O,•' O .� N C .(u V N y N t a,0•, r' y 0. d 3 n y c> O O M Cc y a a1 y. C CO cV7 .0 O E Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ES -31 b 7 C a+ O u y V a C R u t~ �C OD C R y y V O b�+ R s� C R U R S y v R C. E C Q� 1 W u R c E z Vl R LdFJ N 1 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E L N a C N O — r0 O N U N A i ,_ r = i6 o O a •c a O E i.. C v U h L N W ✓ N N - r y L G n" z M. r N E>1 � £ c4- ,0 O R E — O U O O N o N W c v E '3 °�' E c c U,> o• c0 C w. E• a� O c >= U =Aa `0uE - m cad ¢ E3 — m a v r4 V V c as c N 3 L N C`1 E �, U = €aRzc A co 2 CL €� c V ti '0 ° CO �O o 2a) 2 Co �sn3 T N C •. _ L N a C R — r0 O N U N A i ,_ r i6 r E i.. C h L N W ✓ N N r —_ r r N tO A N W c v E '3 °�' c U,> E >= �— - m cad N c V ti '0 R O C y T N C •. _ 7 A p y .� d 0 V > •N t+ t N. 4.. V c V 2 N N y E C V 00 c 0 V V V y N 00 M p c6 s-. 0. c 0 O v C _T i O V w7 . V� c R. C O 0 y q l6 7 O vT , y 0 .�O '0 N E t � E ;E ° CL1 >1 o ' e .fl O Y v' � aO y 7 vi .p .N V c �7 c1 a� �L= •O .0 q.'Q e6 q� ��0.-> A N 0. Nw .Q 3 A �s O ,-, 0 V O C 'C L c L- 6i u N• 3 E c 4N Acs 3 0 c o c CL ;'O„ o c H Y v� c R. o° 'c6 n• •R a a � N 'A - L �, O E Y .a o4.ti ._. p M-0 CO 0 > E v E p 0 '� �•• = t6 c6 C 'O E T O L E T °a.? - Eo 0 v� �e 9 � oEo —w = „ o p q. '� o „ 61 U E� R 7 a0'a O N L E E to N v O c V O c ME N 2 y c6 c h .p c _ t p V V N E E _ E O L V 7 O �•. V O 2 F- 0 N c c Q M- i E g q I I � E c� N �a a u. c¢ N¢ � v� � u .. m A s •_ ES -32 Garden Street Terraces Project Final E/R ^O V .3 C C O m d w R u L: C en C Vl y r.7 O 'O w h0 R U R s CA U R C C L: C nD y : Qm R a i.r q el R N W u B R E� C) OEXECUTIVE SUMMARY Garden Street Terraces Project Final E!R ES-33 L CO L T 3 V_ O w c N 0 2 C C0.2 1 a ot�_n3a 0 . Y e.8 m ;• 9 c A Ewo �yE ° c ° �•o 7 tQ N C .aa y c.v p Op y a E E N 3 E of a� E c H ow n'r y 0 u = o°u 0. A 0 0 �. �o'� E u CL r. CD O O c0 0 N C 9 T -- 0 L. is •O•' 9 �..� 3 N O R bA 3 c0 a d :: 'C CJ p3 - , �` r- . R t0 T °C C _ U c ^ t o Q..= C O = cc � . V W x ° 3 L cC cC �. G7 ° E — C) c"" 4.. 0 0 0 O cC E. ''E E ca c,., C p ° y OA F N V c 3 N m E s O 7. O a .O V _T 0 y �, p p y R RS E C 0.p, �.+ O 'O Cu � .A 'C b O E �' V R O O •u D O L T v y 0 ,C C N L 4 'A E > R G C) m y RI G '� L v1 0 0 R C 3 O' C V c ro 77 61 ,N N 0 N 0 O j R L O C 0 00 cc0 ,s„ oA T ;? L T O C >_ 7? L 0 c0 �- s C E a E. ^ L 0.v G E 0 V N A c' °- V ° 7 •C H N p V ° > ° A 0 o°n ro o 5 A c 3 0 °L' R o c c on a m n N e cc ' D Y a c E ° c= co o v 0-- °' ° V N a.5 a -°-;._ U N. � .0 N C U O C^ L (O ° R O N OO V U C E N '•' R N •C y •E N t0' L i.. L O fL0 a O a , a �..� E E L V c N N R C Y CO = V L E C E N H 0 .E !tl a C) c c C> 0 O a 0 C) OD C L .0 _ U E o E .E ° E c 3 0 CO .E Y y °o c Y c m o ° 0.R Cr N c .� fl R c O u 0- ° N ° p C° O O 0 2 00 r- '0D 4 p'.0 a° R C 0.C4 y -0 C wp Q• eq two •O aei v O. G A b y ."3' T� etY .V •p" E 0 Q 4 0 N O t U Y V 7 C 0 ti A N N" L N '00 ,.0+ L L N N R .G p N d T L LE N L° .7 C I i Cr d R _ c° V A ° V c E V R O o °L"° 00 u E 3 a a N a �+ d as y E N E O U 7 c4 t G. L �..' '�.' R,.cc M .� C .�•a, c.. N M U CO a 0 •£ N d C �mT ^y i a s >o c A^ .0 ' " n 0= w Lo `os £ E z c a` '?€ 7 E 0 2 cs = E o_ L Z° c _ c E Z Q I I I I - c °' a o at7M a �oo� M 0-0 d ° cci w T 3 o 0 o U ° 10 0 ZZ o C to O O C v 3 R p O T 3 N i • N CL a '00 •-Oi 0 a£ � c a e c "R •p R CL 0 .. 0 0 0 C) T N L en a A 3 2 .5 3 0 S .5 N s Garden Street Terraces Project Final E!R ES-33 O V q C d0 C R VJ Vi Ci O V d0 V O e� s V ea a 8 C w ern y V c NI N W R F EXECUTIVE SUMM N ES -34 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR N N N fig°° Es EL = N C C rn C t~n O � E Oq 0 y DA O Op 0 m �! E E U .'C G U w R ° U W a E a ,E ,E V 011 y V E R V y V L 'o •o s '0 4: aEi E ° E °•=0 E ° •-i'. c R C V '� �.0 c O O . .. O 3 to V > L r0 V] a) V W L m .V O V •v r O 7; Cr V U A w. O •x. 'D y p 2 ,. •' l� C i c) L '30 b C > � a. •'-' >• � R ._+ N v .O O O O .NO O v"'i '� ° N P4 N N r t > E� > a ' � ° E v = `c O a ° p o p ° > a V ° O •D •N c '«cC N i V k4 u A n c 0 a) O O ai ai c Lz .:.. _. 0 CO CS °0 R i •A W C w C R > Q- E 0 E p N Hv° •:L a `' on N w -5 0 0 N C U Oq = w vi O N o a E ' o G 0 'V C L bU 7 S R ai a) a) ❑ a... N � c a> O R t ti N y G a) O C W N z 0 •@ O N 'C u E T 4y > C = ° a' y E " E° o.> .'O p c ° _ =—t o o o . En , ' w o E p o > > ° E R o y 0 ° E ° R � ° C N •E iC. > U 3 y c O a '= Ca) -:o >R , caE O v ti c C £ y Cr 'ao i E ° o c = N � p Ca L =¢ O CO to 0 c- asT s V _ . W c s b1J D C O i EE R O > C R a°E ) • O R ' t ° y o °E. w. m ° c ° c__ o a3i v° c �° n OL z: w e ti ° n' rL i c° E$ 00 ai p V O a V .9 O v O > y .E a) O 3, G p� y ° 0. a) N A Oq y N 0>1 N V 7 a.E C U y� 4 c� R 'O Q O N E• 'O L E. ;E ❑ E G .` p C 'O L O R 0 0 c R .. `o d> .E o y= °° wp is L y° R °° 7 m N L T'ro v a N v E > R g. a E p ti z $ x � c° 5� J U o O a w 3 `o a o` R z❑° o z o Cr .E c •RO "a —° aX, . • • • to M • .°o E > i 3 n • • x a; W.E E E o � � R •U 3 O L r y N„ U a.+ C _ U R 0 •-Vi 0 _C y �" U .> C .> • a .+ E p U a N E N V N o x � � o.E3 L€ $ O N N a) V �� -. •e0 O p CL W 0 •O .0 w F N y V t ? o 'N A_ �L" N Z pis z•3 M za >N ES -34 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR d C C O u C R O en 0 H Q ^O e CYi G U Y CQ u CC cGc �G CE u O nn u R a 8 y m to Mr N w Z F n EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Garden Street Terraces Project Final E!R ES -35 9 w cOj E O V E O E c c c a9i c c c a�i O m O U O O m O •� V O p` a a>i n. a>i rz L m E U C�0 E U 4 o4 oD V pq .E •N U 3 � � Oq .E •N V 0`O C C O T «O l N C C U p y E N> C �•' y W X O V m V C E p m D o OD Q U q!' °' S E U= `o " .o L cc: OD O' _ O O v V v E C '•' R y o d R 3 V 9 >1 D L .� o c .�, °: E '�� A . y a0.i i c o o � f o E L V .� Vy > u•' N .D 7 C o? C E a y 0 p y F" m L V O Cp > •m V a c C U c �V„ V tVi, O ccn 3 0 3 >^ E c _ N O O L o E E ^D0 C.? D 13 — E ? U .� - > O 00 E .= =. N z .0 ° ffm ' E U m C. o> s > 0 M c O v 0.r V a O V ¢ CO C C .O ° D TO . V + y m o o �c o m . -19 .D Qc ' ov c av 0.0 10 a ° d v a c N ❑U 7 c ou c c 0 . °" Ocm . 3 £ nm •X . a c N c G > C V L N m V C O D V O O 4o - p m m a C O cu = c Q 1.0 R a u w 0-0 E o to U �. C >.. m m O c '..+ V O ¢� N m r O C N .o >, G O .D 'O r. 'a ,o y c p en E v V r °- 0 3 m N .a c E A c 3 E N u c a"i • y R 3 p c ,� s V �.+ '� w W '_ p 'O 0. .". m O L V �. z u •� z C a O E •� O c i VI V 'O ❑ 7 m H 4'.0 N c .� C E C E m c O fi Ou C 0 [p N •^ y L p �LQ T N p p Cc1 � .D C ,, _ > L o V N G L _- G > U C N ='' m c 0 3 ti o •v °' a m Co c Eyoa w Udm co� V L y °jE ... - C •.. y 7J E.. N 0. U � L V d OCD axi J m e-i W o ti w a E .E. Garden Street Terraces Project Final E!R ES -35 O C O 0 a C C 00 C R v� �J a 0 7 C R U R s Vi U R G C Vf 1 U R G y. w R U N W R i EXECUTIVE SUMMAItV L01 ES -36 Garden Street Terraces Project Final E!R w _ ° c ❑ c c ° 3• °- 'n � � o C O. �"' y°> c N 'fl C ° N •O R lC .v +• -L. L o E • 0 00 'r-L L E o> o „y ° v im or �' y o vU OD d o y o ? �a r uor R id d 0 Z E o o o c ° •_ ° c. ° T R a>i ° o aEi oc Q E ' cC ° c vi C 0'- E o s a d � •d y 'O ^ C A` W " L O cC0 V ti° E 'y .� F a F a m 3 E s c o - L O O c R =� m ca ° a c v c °' o °� a� R E c N y C L 0.0 Q. U N - y w _ N C. Qi as ..O m b E 3 N U w o. Tom' L C N N M G' S.-- M. A C7 t2 M y •� 0 � y E d V V 0 N� 0 t0 «O s r a cc y vi E c 3 o O y 2 Y t CO a A H x F > o E o y• c °- >a �, 9 CO 3 R C'� N> _ U coi es° c o c E a _ ° E O j O O U N O' U O ^ ' R O = y � B c0 O t 3 R ° O C .0 m V C y V ° C ° E G d ti .h C" 03 a- Eo o .. . o d m s co 0 a c ° C C C X R C yv°i C •a y E o Cm C N y 'O C y �!r .Q 0 ", N O. 0 c � : c i t ° c y c R° y y N a � a ' D E c °O � m o c y_ end c u o a 3 L.c C •O V m U C aa Q .+ (C N o a C EV n U O U > m L OD , c° >1 p E c c °- cL .o m E° a"i a _° ,E •O R E V U C 'y U A C cj c N L C C 'C E V T .� y •p �N —< 2 g �° o` V _ F - U d `" 0 .N o f > o� o E�£ � ca a� X 0 ° 40 ° ° c °c o ? $ ° w c y •r- o`. y °' c E° c o FL°- ." € m N ou o ` C cv V $° ro as n ° o " > >= ? o E o .2 c LE E E dE = E cE°- E y � yf'-oQ� U° y f0 O•oE G L Q E C c a2 N v R N •O �L+ 0 Lm C� U N E C O° O O 7 cN0 C 'C p Y c a• O V V •O C � U N L U F C .O Y " v R O 7 4., °� �= •° '° = 0 3 F a3i o°'u y m o c 0 N c 3 y d'N N O p,'C C�-' F O C R C. . 0.0 O .E 0 > • U n O p on Q.-6 d O =L t N V C ..+ u OD O L U O V �` G' L Q O R y 7 C. V y 0 U R U L V) F R •y A F E ,U O = Mme' >'y�2c r- V IT u 'C OD € C C M 0 l0 O O O y «+ O N N ES -36 Garden Street Terraces Project Final E!R b O C y C V y a r.+ O L C m C ee d1 a O ^O V C e� R s `u R C **e� �I O Vl 1 y V QS m v, ee Mr N W E• EXECUTIVE SUMMARY «. o VI 4. °'• V1 V c> E= c �v o 7 m i� •O 7 0 ca 'C V 7 U v 3 o E-Ow = vc RL°'9 00000 ; 0 0 0 0y Eu0a� a>a 0"a > ° 3 0 0> Onws� 3 = N 7 ?� p 7 y O=A F•" 7 n =a y 3 M s aci 3 a c ,0 3 A ° )i E u ° E " U m V aN y ° cl, ag u m w �s o°n�� U i 0.MC °'�, n 0.= o ti 0.O=u N d i N C T V ON = V •� m V L m !_' N O L N °' .D y 'fl O Q _ ti R O_ d N 7 0 3 L O °' p °= c •— .a R" ai 'L' m p v L '" i v d V N L r .+ '„—L„ y m = O� y, V E a `o ` i c c n m "� _ 0° c c 9 0 7°,7 a R c s y O a' V ca N 'O m L >' 7= E y. p V to .0 .d E m V ° ac o m o ° 0`n " A E,A o R ;, E c N es 8 y U V m 7 .� 1;' °= td •G .D v.:+ �' C N V U N ._ '.—+ V O= U R N V p p a% . 0. L L V C:, sr m •c m = N = V v R N? r y o• 3' m c3 3 a L_ a = ° ,G C � •'•�� O D m a Vo '`cN y + i Y W = 3 . a 0r •:E� ; .�E m a _ `°Eo` .y uY u L.� E°O° d- wt y ° E E e y L E ai 5. Co 0 U O 5> 0.t (u 0 O O N O p O 10— V L = R = e •o U � V p 0.� UN� 0 >- 1r ` s y T L c � a U o 'A n t OD E WC� ° "m " CO -v0 c Z: L > c m a > O n a n a cc Ou o? .5 " —d o n CO E a 0 L3 E ° �.�ir 0 ' N� V y �. � .� _ 'N m� C �. _ •[� N C t= N N� y m m V � .O N= V ` oon c= E m p c r = UrL.2 n p°o cO a= M > c c Ec 0 is y 0. 10 =t m O 7 u j5 O 0 p V a E N L RJ V V S c = Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ES-37 V O E v=i C m U y 1u v m 'O V= U Y v E > 'O U : R 3 .°_° m _ N y E° Q am L 0"° n, to .',aaa m V ouc o y o c Sin A o.N °L' d a.E 2 ��-e N� a to d O O oa c m U lu, c= E o° 0 "0 > E g °v 3OOb > — °> Ro a c?.L ,� A o4 C L .� y N �' c? c n o a c. 0.. E°' ° > .E m O y 0. 0 m °a a Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR ES-37 'M C 0 V ^l R v ao a R fA Vi u u 0.1 C R U R W u R c �r C Qt! 1 u R a N.I ICI rr rn R Ar N I W R F EXECUTIVE SUNIMA-kV ES-38 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR � � ° V td a Ica o 7 7 C H on •D O� y O C id U R 'O O 7 '.� O cad cd C y = 7 = 'O L c U E >.2 o V E c 7 ° .N. y= C V N y= o EH U a •� .V E �� N •0 y R7 r+ E L N `o O o:o o:fl K O o= V o v ?= V o= °> Y�°_' ° E3E E y G. 7 C a C C d d C C y 6. N E 3' E $ to E °'y 0 E.E= E c°� .+ ..+ c E A R y rd L V V rO d E R C r- i• �. O >` N '9 s OD O F O 0. aEi O — E T �...- V >, 7E • E L R 4O n O E C. C 0 V a N V O , On E E N > C L 0 0 � y .O •C O N >� N O v 4y�. o`4 i0 A O N O 00- V —° c v a y E C7 ° ro a ° m o c o E c O 0 CU Lw a� >'E °o Lat sU O C 0 'n y� r L Cc R d Q E o c V � t y ° d ° C o .•° � E . E E U tc a" o . y N o _ a Iy° , y o o w o 3 E y Q f _ U L o L E y e Z' > y y y i° d ' ° > E > u on N U c n> y y c Q. O U r M Wi t V d _ t0 ° 0 y V y O ^ ca c L O cc O ° E= N V .. am . .°N CO O ° E L s E E v a = >L °L' R o s c s 3 Y n C7 .. c d L •.: d E a=i b - '•� oo n E y a° cm = y 1O = ° E '•o > W an v a) "cE E ' atF o oE y - A a E A aE 4 > °n ' = ` ° U � ''O o ,�'a`o Gi . °L ° =R N p ..E •— O'� : GE E `N H L C U O H .y ° =u _y oO LL.� E F � •L V u E � ' F > 7 E N d E L d RE ✓ O E "y N .- A O G Ls. 'C U •E d cd V Q in y C h •H � �+ 3 c L U Cdd C G i as d • • • • a G •C .7 .E .� V T ' H O L GJ y L3 0 j .� H C G N O N aS E V V N OLJ cyd �• R E y 5 m (/i V td `° _T y U U 1 •pia y y _ •y ayi 3 .tea E t y 4y ..L y ayi o a. E ° c d E O u E •p v t y t, cc N T C c., J OL. > c=d fl° " o n.•� cyi o a o 4 oa. 'E y :: m cLd� c .N a: c 3> ca LL o L •� O L y O on t aci = E rn 7 0 m d _ 7 C L N A M F a E y EE Ih �da.5 � Etu 0.) ES-38 Garden Street Terraces Project Final EIR C 0 u M }C W C C m y N ^1 0 F y M� W C ea R i' u R G C ea C 00 u G 8 r_ N CC M N W u C F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - N N s O YO YO p O _ E a C A U O p m U O p M U C 9 N c° c m U c U E .E c oU E B ? c:S E c=o E v _° c E A e w E 2° L N L N 'L N h�E�• =v p°oEv• v °vEo= vE-ULffi m o a'cy3•-E c�o•-'E c.�p... •��EEVi N N = C vi � N = _ = vi y0 • H � � C. N r V N R — r V N 1 L l0 •� c C O a N a= = y a y a= c y a y y u d ° v E.E= u v E.E� �°, v E.E= E H o 0 L •0 cq d o d o c L p> O U awo V 0 .0 O v y O t- L N= O d4 M fa. E u U r. 0 •� . �u ° •H E c c yc . 'v on E 0 ° v E t c m V a -0 v a °o ? to •a ° a c n R m V U o e . C E a A 0.-0 L u 03 ° E_ O O E G0 • • c` , o E ob.0 c c C c N L y u tda > E 0 0 aoi -' °u °o ° c E E o N o° a Lr.E c_ u o o_ E u g U °> a o d p o E° E ca °° U E u U v 0 c E c = = �0 E U C y N w O y O V V V U = r- = V C C u A n p ME Cp •ia t C C O cO A O A O m C U >' u 'fl cc y @ OL U A 4. C X v c F u ca o. y u m > o u ^> c > •- cn a o E Q o m o° a A aci o °- a H A z v o cc 0-0 c o 0 o E._ a U a, 3 c n a H= N o =° u N> o '� R a a O b = >, ° a L g s E s CU c ti E Y ` o= E U E r c a°i r q v o c a v s o a N u cn F-• fl u N u a E. p L ( o aC U E� °° E A v u t o f N —° = v °' F' ° F° °' 0° °° E E° E fl =« s ° a d A 0 A c A o on A == m a 3 �r . CL - -. �.E..uc €E N� G�L�•UOt�(7UQ � o o � Ac`d°. � o.ocOU � � � °L�� • e • • e • • c A C a� cc T O T v V [J. U o p E_ a a=i a o w `' K O A o 0 m m to a o a a Ln c a-O= �w E cw c '+cE'b 30030E E o u m d o N a O N E. _ .� n A o•� T ° 0 3 3 °v o 0- Cr EEJ -t '? •� m cu ie c F- H 0 � ° F °' c � u aNi V c N a ro. c u o•-s u -4 �.E c 0 =S c �r > °. u ¢ to 'a Carden Street Terraces Project Final E/R ES-39 V ii Y C O V v d W L' R C ii R s VJ rn V a O "d v b0 q R s V R C R C hD i V R c NI rr rr y y R MW N i W V Z R F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES -40 Garden Street Terraces Project Final E!R 0 N Cr �7 b C G 7 C = CO N N GA 0 y N m O C u 7 N L o U E c:S ^C a ti's a o •p o y y O. u c° � o as N O V A E °= N V C 0 o E 9 V 'N 'i 69 O V U �L' E N •� E ` • L 3 5 on U�9. =� m = C C N d cc gm . _0 O N G V O O C >1 cC O. N z E•£- ES -40 Garden Street Terraces Project Final E!R Cr O = � = o W- V O N Cr w O c7 �•• U C 'C �.� U O C u 7 N L .> a ti's a o 3 V o> u c° � o V 'N 'i 69 O V U �L' E N L R 0 E W U�9. =� ��2Eamm -0E 0 d fQ 0 N •fl . _0 Y V N G V O O C >1 cC _ o E eo.E s o N 3 ��•� A ,�, o N nv =�'3 =�� G0. �"' N • O V= N A � V 0 ... � t R .� 7 E c U t � � C_ � C F d >. � d y A y O� > L r d G c � u I•^ d _ Vl �+ V•1 Ci A V OD L c3 = O V •� O •O C y 0 .C. W Cu N 15 d0 a s c°.0 3 ecs O k a E o. ES -40 Garden Street Terraces Project Final E!R O O � U N 7 N L O L R 3 � o V d N O b 'L •fl E NNs aE � V N ES -40 Garden Street Terraces Project Final E!R c u w c a c c s F rA OR Qn �ll 1�1 MM� 1� Qn L .c Q d L Q ca r W. F R C E i u R C EXECUTIVE SUMMARY m „E — 7 N, m � •c � on N � L i L U ro a ro N cc 3 c Q a 4) :a c _ o R o .� ¢' 4. ro C u u EuO U ° > O ro ° ..� ... a3 n• o y ro a o ,E a d N ¢ a•� y u O aDU u o p y ._ A y N `• tC p a E v a c p �+'C L aE °"N 0-0 N" N C C u j�.� y U� h •y «t+ �— ro •- 'c ro N N s c r;5 c c � E u- C u o— C on E .0 H y n .D o 3 cud a E C C u u 4u'. C C oq cu m E ..C-• r ti H = d 0 .9 .v > > 3 3 R cud a a E E C u C oq R s H d .D > 3 cud 0. E v v L L Lam. Lam. L _ d d d d d 3 3 3 3 3 •Vl N L N V N N L V N V N N N N N 7 cc u u cc ro E E E E o 0 0 0 0 E E E E E z z z z z r id •N � o � c � � � O 3 c .� a •a .00 °�' ro o cCd � ro a ao � N oroa 'o fl ME �-__ v_Ev N o_ U CJ GJ O U a' .=L. R Oi Cq U a U 7 o O N c a N U c c a ti E fl o _. CJ c4 0 O JD N s O Q a C •?? em C yV 4? CL m c >_ L a N N a N d ° C CO o ay L um o C6 o o7E v ° o E .c °a"i3o r�o s s. F•ao" f2 RQ Ica O �U00 NON °'9a p °d E N O w c y o `o K o °° aO, F aci x ri ¢.5O Ni C7 ao ° ri ros ro.E F ro.5 F oUu Garden Street Terraces Project ES41 Final EIR