HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-26-12 BAC Agenda PacketAGENDA
Regular Meeting of the
SAN LUIS OBISPO BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Council Hearing Room, City Hall
990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo
January 26, 2012 Thursday 7 p.m.
MISSION:
The purpose of the Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) is to provide oversight and policy
direction on matters related to bicycle transportation in San Luis Obispo and its relationship to
bicycling outside the City.
ROLL CALL: Bill Bradlee (Chair), Peter Deragon (Vice Chair), Chris Black, Catherine
Machado, Kristina Seley, Howard Weisenthal, and Jim Woolf.
PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, the public is invited to address the Committee concerning
items not on the agenda but are of interest to the public and within the subject matter jurisdiction
of the Bicycle Advisory Committee. The Committee may not discuss or take action on issues
that are not on the agenda other than to briefly respond to statements made or questions raised,
or to ask staff to follow up on such issues.
MINUTES: November 17, 2011 (Attachment 1)
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Election of Officers
2. 2012 Bicycle Transportation Plan (BTP) Update - Consent Items (Attachment 2)
3. 2012 Bicycle Transportation Plan Update - Outstanding Items (Attachment 3)
PRESENTATION ITEMS:
4. 2012 BTP Update - New Presentation Items
• Presentation of Railroad Safety Trail and Bob Jones City -to -Sea Trail Projects
• Presentation /discussion of deferred Pavement Area 9, New Projects
• Review existing plan: Appendices
DISCUSSION ITEMS:
5. Committee Items: •
6. Staff Items: • Unmet Transit needs and Bicycle & Pedestrian Inventory Public
Hearing
• Bicycle Friendly Community (BFC) status and feedback
• Special meeting
The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs, and
activities. Please contact the Clerk or staff liaison prior to the meeting if you require assistance.
ACTION ITEMS:
Item #1: Election of Officers
Article 3 (Officers), of the Bicycle Advisory Committee Bylaws updated July 2007, states that,
"The officers will consist of a Chairperson and Vice - Chairperson who will be elected at the first
regular Committee meeting in each calendar year. The Chairperson will preside over all
meetings of the Committee and perform such duties as directed by the Committee. The Vice -
Chairperson will serve in the absence or incapacity of the Chairperson." Additional officer duties
include; writing quarterly progress reports, representing the Committee at the Mayor's quarterly
luncheon, and representing the Committee at relevant Advisory Body and City Council
meetings. The term of election is for one year, commencing upon election. No person shall
serve in the office of chairperson or vice chairperson for more than two consecutive terms. Chair
Bradlee has completed one term and Vice Chair Deragon has completed one term.
The Chair should open the floor for nominations for the office of Chairperson, close the floor for
nominations, then ask members to vote for one of the nominees. If only one nominee is offered,
then a voice vote can be taken. However, if more than one person is nominated, the BAC may
want to cast a secret ballot. The same process should be followed for the office of Vice
Chairperson.
Staff Recommendation: The Committee shall elect a Chair and Vice Chair.
Agenda Item #2: 2012 Bicycle Transportation Plan Update - Consent Items
This material has been presented and reviewed at previous meetings and BAC input has been
incorporated, along with individual BAC member rankings. These are consent items
(Attachment 2). No further discussion is planned unless a committee member requests a
specific modification at the meeting.
BTP projects — Outstanding existing projects from Pavement Areas 6:
• Laguna Lake Bikeways A
• Laguna Lake Bikeways B
• Laguna Lake Bikeways C
BTP projects — Existing projects in Pavement Areas 8:
• Casa to Toro Bicycle Boulevard, Crossing Hwy. 101
• Highland Class II
• Highland / Santa Rosa Bypass
• Highland / Chorro Class I Connection
BTP text
• 'A. Education and Promotion" thru "6. Administration" (pgs 20 -22)
Staff Recommendation: Approve consent items.
Agenda Item #3: 2012 Bicycle Transportation Plan Update - Outstanding Items
This material has been presented and /or reviewed at previous meetings. Items listed below
address outstanding questions or changes not yet reviewed by the BAC. (Attachment 3)
BTP projects — Outstanding, new, and existing projects in Pavement Areas 6:
Vista Lago connection
BTP text
• New text amending sections previously reviewed (Attachment _ ?):
• Class III Bikeway Policy: Policy changes made based on discussion during the
November 17, 2011 BAC meeting, related to cost of signage required in the current
draft policy.
• "Special Design Provisions"
• Revision of Policy 1.43 - Expanded Policy on Sharrows: During discussion of proposed
projects for Nipomo St. between Higuera and Marsh, and "North Chorro Sharrows"
during the November 17, 2011 meeting, direction was given to clarify the need /use of
Sharrows. Note: The Sharrow definition has been expanded to support this policy.
• Revision of Policy 1.44 (Continued revision resulting from discussions during both the
Sept. and Nov. 2011 BAC meetings)
• Traffic Calming (Presented under Agenda Item #2, Nov. 2011 BAC meeting)
• Expanded Definition on Sharrows: To support new sharrow policy.
Staff Recommendation: Approve projects for ranking. Approve draft text.
PRESENTATION ITEMS:
Agenda Item #4: 2012 Bike Plan Update — New Presentation Items
BTP projects — New Presentations Items (Attachment 4)
• Railroad Safety Trail (RRST), all project sections:
• Currently the RRST project segments are named and listed in a numerical sequence
based on project prioritization from the 2002 plan. For this update, staff recommends
that project segments be named by logical location names, and listed in a north to south
manner.
• To better identify the primary route of the Railroad Safety Trail that can be built meeting
current Union Pacific Railroad requirements, staff recommends that project segments be
designated as "Primary' or "Support ". "Primary' segments are those whose completion
will create a single continuous north to south trail, and which are currently seen as the
most attainable routes due to known right -of -way (ROW) or funding issues. "Support"
segments are those that add further connections to the Primary route and should be
pursued if current issues (such as right of way) are resolved.
• Over time the RRST project segments have been called various different names in City
plans and documents. A matrix will be created and presented in an appendix to clarify
past naming in relation to naming proposed in the 2012 plan.
• As with the current BTP, only the overall RRST project will be ranked, not the individual
project segments.
• Bob Jones, City -to -Sea Trail, all project sections:
o Currently the trail project segments are named and listed in a numerical sequence based
on project prioritization from the 2002 plan. For this update, project segments will be
named by logical location names, and listed in a North to South manner.
Presentations of proposed projects, Pavement Area 9
• Higuera Street: At the November 17, 2011 meeting, the following two project proposals
were listed under "New Presentation Items ". The Committee requested that these be
deferred to this meeting, and that data be made available for further discussion.
(Attachment 5)
• Downtown Higuera Street Bicycle Facility
• Downtown Higuera Street vehicle restriction
• Sharrow Projects: At the November 17, 2011 meeting the following two project proposals
were listed under "New Presentation Items" and both involved the discussion on the use
of Sharrows. Based on presentation /discussion in above Agenda Item #3, "Expanded
definition and Policy for Sharrows ", provide direction for possible project creation on the
following:
• Nipomo St. Bicycle Facility between Higuera and Marsh
• North Chorro Sharrows
Data for streets previously proposed for Sharrow facilities, along with Monterey St.
(existing Sharrows) has been compiled for review (Attachment 6).
BTP text
• Appendices: Appendices A— K of the 2007 BTP directly relate to requirements of CA
Streets and Highways Code section 891.2, which make the plan eligible for Bicycle
Transportation Account (BTA) grant funding. For the 2012 BTP update, the information will be
organized by subject throughout the plan. The updating process for these appendices has been
ongoing by both staff and through input from the BAC, as part of policy text and the BTP project
review process.
For this meeting, please review the maps associated with appendices "D: Existing and
Proposed End -of -trip Bicycle Facilities', and "F: Existing and Proposed Changing and Storage
Facilities', and provide staff with input on any public facilities not currently shown on the maps.
Staff Recommendation: Review in advance of the meeting the listed BTP text section for
understanding. Use the meeting to seek further understanding and /or to provide staff with input
on desired changes /additions. Review listed existing plan projects in advance for understanding.
Use the meeting to seek further understanding of specific projects and /or to provide staff with
direction. Members will rank these projects prior to the next meeting.
DISCUSSION ITEMS:
Item # 5: Committee Items
• Committee discussion items
Item # 6: Staff Items
Updates on:
• Unmet Transit needs and Bicycle & Pedestrian Inventory Public Hearing (Attachment 7)
• Bicycle Friendly Community (BFC) status and feedback
Other:
• Special meeting
• Items for next meeting
o Draft Outline "Actions" Update
0
0
The next meeting will be held: March 15, 2012
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Minutes, November 17, 2011
2. Bicycle Transportation Plan Update, Projects and Text (Consent Items)
3. Bicycle Transportation Plan Update, Projects and Text (Outstanding Items)
4. Railroad Safety Trail and Bob Jones City -to -Sea Trail project keys
5. Downtown: Higuera and Marsh Street data comparison
6. Sharrow Comparison Data
7. News Release: Annual Unmet Transit Needs and Bicycle & Ped. Inventory
GATransportation- Data \_Unsorted Stuff\Transportation \Transportation Committees \Bike Committee \BACAgendas \2012
I
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
n
I Tea �
Minutes
Attachment 1
io�L�
Regular Meeting of the
SAN LUIS OBISPO BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Council Hearing Room, City Hall
990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo
November 17, 2011
Thursday
MISSION:
The purpose of the Bicycle Advisory Committee i
direction on matters related to bicycle transportation
bicycling outside the City.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Bill Bradlee (Chair), Chris Black,
Absent: Peter Deragon
Staff: Kevin Christian and
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Jessica Berry, San
the following:
• A recent survev
to place the item on thevlallo
• Ove[„�Q50 people parfcclE
• Rideshare. is currently off
contact Morg' Marshall at 7
MINUTES: Septeriber 1
CM Woolf moved to approve
The motion passed unanimo
of
1
of
7 p.m.
provide oversight and policy
Obispo and its relationship to
and Kristina
representative, discussed
respondents were in favor of a sales tax
ansportation, but 67% was recommended
Month, and over 18% were bicyclists.
to School "Mini Grants ". For more information
minutes as submitted. CM Weisenthal seconded the motion.
ACTION ITEMS:
Attachment 1
zoo Lt
Agenda Item #1: 2012 Bicycle Transportation Plan (BTP) Update - Consent Items
BTP projects - New and existing projects in Pavement Areas 6 and 7:
• Cerro Romauldo Bicycle Blvd.
• Cerro Romauldo Class I
8 • Foothill / Ferrini Crossing
9 • Patricia / Foothill / La Entrada Intersection
10 • Tassajara Sharrows
11 • Madonna to Laguna Lake Traverse, Class I Trail
12 . Santa Rosa at Boysen, Grade Separated Crossing
13 • Boysen Ave. Connection
14 North Chorro Intersection Enhancement
15 Sacramento / Duncan to Laurel Class I, Railroad Safety Trail Connection
17 BTP text
18 Bikeways, "Bicycle Parking and Storage" thru "Other Support Facilities" (pgs 16 -20)
19
20 Staff presented a report on the project rankings and text/policies amendments. Staff
21 recommended that BAC approve the consent items as submitted.
22
23 Gary Havas, SLO Bicycle Club, discussed Club support of the BTP.
24 -
25 CM Bradlee moved to approve the consent items as presented. CM Woolf seconded the
26 motion. The motion passed unanimously.
27
28
29 Agenda Item #2: 2012 Bicycle Transportation Plan Update - Outstanding Items
30
31 Staff discussed the outstanding BTP projects:
32
33 Staff noted Laguna Lake Bikeways B and C have been modified.
34 o There was consensus to move forward with the projects as modified.
35 o CM Woolf suggested the dirt path connecting the cul -de -sacs behind Laguna Middle
36 School be added to the BTP reserving it for bikeway connectivity. The BAC concurred
37 and requested that staff should move forward accordingly.
38 Staff discussed dropping the Highland centerline striping project from the BTP. There was
39 consensus that this was appropriate. The BAC concurred that the language, "on streets where
40 vehicle volume, speed, or collisions are impacting bicycle travel, the City shall consider possible
41 remedies such as a'ignay`e, striping, or other traffic calming devices" should be added to Policy
42 statements in the "Special Design Provisions" section of the 2012 BTP draft text, to help
43 address traffic issues.
44 • Staff discussed the proposed text regarding design provisions regarding colored bike lanes.
45 o Mr. Havas stated his Club endorsed the text as revised by staff.
46 o Staff Mandeville suggested including more general language for flexibility.
47 o The BAC supported the colored bike lane trial and concurred that the glossary of terms
48 should include language "...such as, but not limited to" bike boxes, etc. The policy as
49 presented will be modified to reflect the direction given.
50
51
Attachment 1
1 Agenda Item #3: Class III Bikeways — Prioritization, Project Listing, Highland Drive
2
3 Prioritization: Staff noted that signage specifications for Class III bike routes (existing and
4 planned) in City Pavement Area 7 would require approximately 50 signs. The agenda
5 attachment estimated that 36 signs had a cost of $18K. Staff suggested a preference to
6 prioritize funding cross -town routes and /or on higher trafficked routes, rather than, "Class III
7 routes shall include Bike Route signage..." as the currently policy directs.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
CM Woolf agreed with tying signage needs to traffic volume. The BAC concurred and directed
staff to modify the Draft Plan text accordingly.
Class III Project Listing: Staff discussed the project listings. Based on the above item
discussion, traffic volumes would be considered. There was BAC consensus on this direction.
Highland Dr. (Patricia to Cuesta): The BAC concurred with staff determination that the existing
Highland and Patricia Drives Class III route be modified to Highland and Cuesta.
PRESENTATION ITEMS:
Item #4: 2012 Bike Plan Update - New Presentation Items
The BAC agreed to email staff with any comments /questions concerning the text on pages 20-
22 of the 2007 Bicycle Transportation Plan, as listed in the agenda for review.
Highlight discussion of proposed projects included:
• UPRR Foothill Underpass: BAC consensus was to leave it out
• UPRR Murray Undercrossing: BAC consensus was to leave it out
• Relocation of Murray signal detector at Santa Rosa: BAC consensus was to leave it out, but
forward the detector location issue to the City and Caltrans Traffic Engineers.
• Downtown Higuera Class II and Pedestrian /Bike only Higuera St. restriction: The BAC
requested staff to provide data, such as traffic volume and speed, and that these projects be
brought back for further discussion.
• Nipomo St. Bicycle Facility: Discussion centered on what type of facility would be
appropriate if provided. There was general consensus that Class II lanes might not be
appropriate as they do not exist in other blocks of Nipomo St. and would require removal of
parking. The concept of installing Sharrows (Shared Lane Markings) was raised, and
brought up the further issue of what criteria or warrants should be met to install Sharrows.
The BAC requested Staff to create a policy focused on Sharrows, and to bring the project
and policy back 10 the BAC for feedbac,:.
• No. Chorro Sharrows: This project was wrapped in to the discussion on Sharrows in the
above item. It will be brought back to the BAC at a future meeting.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DISCUSSION ITEMS:
No Items
Item 5: Committee Items
Item 6: Staff Items
Attachment 1
�J . � 1
• Bike Rodeo re -cap, and recent Bicycling Accomplishments
• Moving Planet: Bike path completion acceleration request
• Draft Outline "Actions" update will be brought to the BAC at a future meeting
• Advisory Body Training
• Due to known date conflicts with some BAC members, an alternate date for the January
2012 meeting is being considered. BAC members will provide staff with their availability, and
a date will be set and posted within two weeks.
ACTION: CM Woolf motioned to adjourn. CM Bradlee seconded the motion. The
motion passed unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 9:05 pm to the next meeting, date to be decided.
Respectfully submitted,
Lisa Woske
Recording Secretary
Attachment 2
1 °C- \3
Project: Laguna Lake Bikeways A
Description: Create a Class I bikeway from the north end of Laguna Lake Park to
lower Foothill area at O'Connor.
Create a link between Madonna Road and Foothill Blvd. which
Intent: doesn't require using LOVR, providing direct access to O'Conner
Way. Overall, the Laguna Lake Bikeways A, B, C should create off
roadway links between northern and western City neighborhoods,
City parks, and the City's only Middle School.
Class: I
School zone: SM
Pave
section: 6
Length (Feet) 10,000
Est. Cost $5,000,000
Priority
m
c
.o
Q
�o_
F
Z�
1 Chris
2 Bill
3 Peter
4 Catherine
5 Kristina
6 Howard
7 Jim
avg. SCORE
First
4
5
_ 31
_ 4
- 5
c
3
1
4
4
2_1
0
-
�
m
_4_
1
o
w
qj
4 �y
F
°
c
°
0)
C-7
AQ
AO
4
5
_ 31
_ 4
- 5
4
1
3
1
4
4
2_1
0
4
2
4
3
_4_
1
38
25
0
4_
- 5
5
3
0
5
1
4
5
2
34
-
0
4,
5
5
2
l
j 4
2
4
--
4
- -
3
34
4.25
4.5014.751
2.S0
1.25
4.251
1.25
3.501
4.00
2.50
32.7S
Notes: Requires approval of Madonna ranch owners; path is in flood zone,
may need elevated sections. Note relationship to Laguna Lake
Bikeways B and Laguna Lake Bikeways C, Class I paths connecting
to the Laguna Middle School neighborhood at Diablo Drive, and
upper Foothill neighborhood area. Portions of the overall project
(parts A, B and C) were formerly known as Mis 18 in the Bicycle
Transportation Plan dated May 7, 2002. Cost associated with this
project are noted as 30% from "TE /BTA" grant (Transportation
Enhancement /Bicycle Transportation Act) in the 2002 plan.
Attachment 2
20� \3
Project: Laguna Lake Bikeways B
Create a Class I bikeway connecting the proposed Laguna Lake
Description: Bikeways A, a Class I bikeway from the north end of Laguna Lake
Park to lower Foothill area at O'Connor Way, to the Laguna Middle
School neighborhood at Diablo Drive.
Create a bike path (low traffic volume /speed) connection to the
Intent: Laguna Middle School neighborhood. Overall the Laguna Lake
Bikeways A, B, C should create off roadways links between northern
and western City neighborhoods, City parks, and the City's only
Middle School.
Class: I
School zone_: SM
Pave
section: 6
Length (Feet) 3690
Est. Cost ... $1,800,000
Priority
c
0
Q
F
=m
1 Chris
2 Bill
3 Peter
4 Catherine
5 Kristina
6 Howard
7 Jim
avg. SCORE
First
co'
F w�
vF �ma,
lc�
Z
o
m s' y tiv
o
(10 Q y ° o AF
4
5
4
4
3
4
274
41
4
38
5
3
5
1
1
4
0
2
3'
1
25
-
0
4
5
5
3
0
5
1
44
2
33
0
0
4
5
5
2
1
4
2
4
5
3
35
4.25
4.5014.7512.501
1.2514.251
1.25
3.50
4.00
2.50
32.75
Notes: Requires approval of DeVaul and Madonna ranch owners; path is in
a flood zone, may need elevated sections, and may require
reconfiguration of Los Osos Valley Road between Diablo Way and the
City Limit. Has a relationship to Laguna Lake Bikeways A and
Laguna Lake Bikeways C class I paths. Portions of the overall project
(parts A, B and C) were formerly known as Mis 18 in the Bicycle
Transportation Plan dated May 7, 2002.
Project:
Laguna Lake Bikeways C
Attachment 2
3 �Q,- k3
Create a Class I bikeway connecting the proposed Laguna Lake
Description: Bikeways A, a Class I bikeway from the north end of Laguna Lake
Park to lower Foothill area at O'Connor Way, to upper Foothill Blvd.
neighborhood area.
Intent• Create a bike path (low traffic volume /speed) connection to the upper
Foothill Blvd. neighborhood. Overall the Laguna Lake Bikeways A, B, C
should create off roadways links between northern and western City
neighborhoods, City parks, and the City's only Middle School.
Class: I
School zone: SM
Pave
section: 6
Length (Feet) 9,970
Est. Cost $6,000,000
Priority First
kzN
m
0
Q
F
=m
1 Chris
2 Bill
3 Peter
4 Catherine
5 Kristina
6 Howard
7 Jim
avg. JI�V RL
c
0
c° 3 Q) ,m
j ° ��O a," mo' 41 fil
o,
45� tiF v sic Q /.O
4
5
5
4
4
3
4
2
4
4
4
38
5
3
5
1
1
4
0
2
3
1
-
25
0
IF
4
_.
5
4
3
0
-
5.
1
41
-
4
2
32
4
4.251
5
4.501
5
4.500;
2
2.500;
1
1.251
4
4.251
1
1.001
4
3.5001
4
3.751
3
42.501
303
31.nn
Notes: Requires approval of Madonna ranch owners, and may require
acquisition of property in Foothill neighborhood; path is in flood zone,
may need elevated sections. Has a relationship to Laguna Lake
Bikeways A and Laguna Lake Bikeways B, class I paths. Portions of
the overall project (parts A, B and C) were formerly known as Mis 18
in the Bicycle Transportation Plan dated May 7, 2002.
Attachment 2
' l a- \3
Project: Casa to Toro Bicycle Blvd. Crossing Hwy 101
Description: The overall project creates a Bicycle Blvd. from the north end of the
proposed Toro St. Bicycle Blvd, over Hwy101, to Murray via Lemon
St., Santa Rosa park and Casa St.
Intent: To provide a low traffic impact north /south through route for
bicyclists that serves Cal Poly for the neighborhoods East of Santa
Rosa and other downtown bike route connectors, in response to the
continuing congestion and deterioration of Santa Rosa St.
Class: BB
School zone: BP
Pave
section: 8
Length (Feet) 1,515
Est. Cost $4,000,000
Priority
m
c
o
Q
F
=m
1 Chris
2 Bill
3 Peter
4 Catherine
5 Kristina
6 Howard
7 Jim
avg. SCORE
First
51
4
3
41
3
41
2
4
4
4
.o
51
5'
4
1
1
4
0
21
41
1
27
3
c°j
c
0� tia
0
4
3
2
3
0
4
0
4
4
1
25
0
G° aim
��' •`i
�a
�c tiF �
.0
tom`'
�
�O
51
4
3
41
3
41
2
4
4
4
37
51
5'
4
1
1
4
0
21
41
1
27
0
4
3
2
3
0
4
0
4
4
1
25
0
0
5
5
4
4
1
5
3
5
5
3
40
4.75
4.25
3.25
3.00
1.25
4.25
1.25
3.75
4.25
2.25
32.25
Notes: Has a relationship with the proposed Toro St. Bicycle Blvd. Overall,
the pedestrian grade separated crossing (section "A ") is key to this
project. Path through Santa Rosa park necessary to connect Lemon
St. with Casa. This project with its related links of Lemon and Casa,
becomes more important if the proposed Broad St. BB is not able to
be completed. City of SLO Bicycle Count Data taken in 2008 show
the intersection of Santa Rosa and Mill use as thirteenth highest out
of 28 locations surveyed, with a total count of 98 (data included here
as this project may impact use at the mentioned intersection).
Pave8_9 and misc Master.xls 1/17/2012 CasaToroBB
Project
Section:
Casa to Toro Bicycle Blvd. "A"
Attachment 2
S -1 \--�
Section This section, "A ", creates a pedestrian Grade Separated Crossing
Description: from Toro St. to Lemon St. across Hwy 101
This is the pivotal section of the entire project. The intent is to
provide a low traffic impact North /South through route for bicyclists
Section that serves Cal Poly for the neighborhoods East of Santa Rosa and
Intent: other downtown bike route connectors, in response
Class: BB
School Zone: BP
Pave Section; 8
Length (Feet)
Est. Cost
405
$4,000,000
See overall Project Rank
Section Relationship with "Casa to Toro Bicycle Blvd." sections "B" and "C ".
Notes: (Section "B ": Connecting Lemon St. to Santa Rosa Park. Section
"C ": Lemon St. from Hwyl to Santa Rosa Park. ) Also has a
relationship with the proposed Toro St. Bicycle Blvd. Overall, the
grade separated crossing (section "A ") is key to this project. Path
through Santa Rosa park necessary to connect Lemon St. with
Casa. This project with its related links of Lemon and Casa,
becomes more important if the proposed Broad St. BB is not able
to be completed.
Pave8_9 and misc Master.xls 1/17/2012 CasaToroBB
c
0
See overall Project Rank
Section Relationship with "Casa to Toro Bicycle Blvd." sections "B" and "C ".
Notes: (Section "B ": Connecting Lemon St. to Santa Rosa Park. Section
"C ": Lemon St. from Hwyl to Santa Rosa Park. ) Also has a
relationship with the proposed Toro St. Bicycle Blvd. Overall, the
grade separated crossing (section "A ") is key to this project. Path
through Santa Rosa park necessary to connect Lemon St. with
Casa. This project with its related links of Lemon and Casa,
becomes more important if the proposed Broad St. BB is not able
to be completed.
Pave8_9 and misc Master.xls 1/17/2012 CasaToroBB
a;, I I ; � 6
IN a
Casa to Toro Bicycle Blvd. "B"
This section, "B" creates a Bicycle Blvd. along Lemon, from Hwy
101 to Santa Rosa Park.
To provide a low traffic impact North /South through route for
bicyclists that serves Cal Poly for the neighborhoods East of
Santa Rosa and other downtown bike route connectors, in
response to the continuing congestion and deterioration of Santa
Rosa St.
BB
BP
8
640
$3,000
C
0
c0)
See overall Project Rank
Relationship with "Casa to Toro Bicycle Blvd." sections "A" and
"C ". (Section "A ": Grade separated crossing at Hwy. 101
connecting Lemon and Toro. Section "C ": Lemon St. from Hwyl
to Santa Rosa Park. ) Also has a relationship with the proposed
Toro St. Bicycle Blvd. Overall, the grade separated crossing
(section "A ") is key to this project. Path through Santa Rosa
park necessary to connect Lemon St. with Casa. This project
with its related links of the GSX'ing between Lemon and Toro
and the Casa St. BB section, becomes more important if the
proposed Broad St. BB is not able to be completed.
Pave8_9 and misc Master.xls 1/17/2012 CasaToroBB
Attachment 2
7 a �- \3
Casa to Toro Bicycle Blvd. "C`
This section, "C" creates a Bicycle Blvd. along Casa St. from
Santa Rosa Park to Murray St. It includes a connection through
Santa Rosa Park.
To provide a low traffic impact North /South through route for
bicyclists that serves Cal Poly for the neighborhoods East of
Santa Rosa and other downtown bike route connectors, in
response to the continuing congestion and deterioration of Santa
Rosa St.
BB
BP
8
875
$ 4,500
See overall Project Rank
Relationship with "Casa to Toro Bicycle Blvd." sections "A" and
"B ". (Section "A ": Grade separated crossing at Hwy. 101
connecting Lemon and Toro. Section "B ": Connecting Lemon St.
to Santa Rosa Park.) Also has a relationship with the proposed
Toro St. Bicycle Blvd. Overall, the grade separated crossing
(section "A ") is key to this project. Path through Santa Rosa park
necessary to connect Lemon St. with Casa. This project with its
related links of Lemon and the GS crossing at Lemon to Toro,
becomes more important if the proposed Broad St. BB is not able
to be completed.
Pave8_9 and misc Master.xls 1/17/2012 CasaToroBB
c
0
co'
LC
F
L¢a
v m
Um
Ja�
O \�F y
v Q
0
03
FO
See overall Project Rank
Relationship with "Casa to Toro Bicycle Blvd." sections "A" and
"B ". (Section "A ": Grade separated crossing at Hwy. 101
connecting Lemon and Toro. Section "B ": Connecting Lemon St.
to Santa Rosa Park.) Also has a relationship with the proposed
Toro St. Bicycle Blvd. Overall, the grade separated crossing
(section "A ") is key to this project. Path through Santa Rosa park
necessary to connect Lemon St. with Casa. This project with its
related links of Lemon and the GS crossing at Lemon to Toro,
becomes more important if the proposed Broad St. BB is not able
to be completed.
Pave8_9 and misc Master.xls 1/17/2012 CasaToroBB
Attachment 2
Project: Highland Class II
Description: Install Class II bike lanes in each direction on Highland from SR1
to Cuesta St.
Intent: To provide travel lanes for bicyclists. The project will also provide
connectivity to the proposed Class III lanes on Cuesta and in turn,
to the proposed Cerro Romauldo Bike Blvd.
Class: II
School zone: BP
Pave
section: 8
Length (Feet) 1,150
Est. Cost $5,000
Priority
m
oc
Q
�°_
QJ
F
=v
1 Chris
2 Bill
3 Peter
4 Catherine
5 Kristina
6 Howard
7 )im
avg. SCORI
Second
2
4
5
3
5
4!
3
3i
3,
2
11
4
c
3
3
4
4
0_
2
4
2
4
3
3,
5
o
m
28
23
0
33
0
,gym`
c
r
o
AO
2
4
5
3
5
4!
3
3i
3,
2
11
4
2
1
0
3
3
4
4
0_
2
4
2
4
3
3,
5
2
1
2
28
23
0
33
0
_
0
5
4
3,
3
&00 5
_
2
34
4.00
4.00
3.00
2.50
1.00
3.25
2.75
3.2
1.75
29.50
Notes: This project may require removal of parking. If space limitations
only provide for one bike lane, it should be installed in the East
hni inri ri ira�tinn to aCCCmm-date SICWe� ���...�n ^y Uphlll ISl ke traffic.
This project was formerly known as Mis 10 in the Bicycle
Transportation Plan dated May 7, 2002. In that plan the project
was for only a Class II on the North side of Highland with a length
of 575 feet and a "negligible" cost. Note that the project now calls
for a class II lane on each side with the total length at 1150 feet.
Costs responsibilities were listed as Developer = 100 %. "Cal Poly
install as part of H -8 site development ". City of SLO Bicycle Count
Data taken in 2008 show the intersection of Santa Rosa and
Highland use as third highest out of 28 locations surveyed, with a
total count of 202.
Pave8_9 and misc Master.xls 1/17/2012 HighlndCLII
Attachment 2
� 6� \3
Project: Highland / Santa Rosa Bypass
Class I - From entrance at apartments (200 N. Santa Rosa),
through parking lots and across existing creek bridge and along
Description: the edge of the agriculture field, connecting to Highland
Intent: To improve an already heavily used route for all season use
Class: I
School zone: HA
Pave
section: 8
Length
(Feet) 2,700
Est. Cost
Priority
ZN
c
0
Q
F
1 Chris
2 Bill
3 Peter
4 Catherine
5 Kristina
6 Howard
7 Jim
avg. SCORI
$300,000
Second
5
5
3
oc
3
4
3
31
m
3F—
46 ti<c v
�
0o
�
/10
5
5
3
4
3
4
3
31
3
3F—
36
4
0
2
3
0
21
0
5
4
1
--
4
01
I
3j
-
0
3
4
0
24
0
-
—
-
--
I
0
5�
—
4
- --
3
-- --
3
1
4
3j
3.
5
2
33
4.25
4.00
3.00
3.00
1.25
3.75
1.50
2.751
3.751
1.2528Sbi
Notes: This route involves both private property and Cal Poly State
University property. City of SLO Bicycle Count Data taken in 2008
show the inters Qction of Santa Rosa and Highland use as third
highest out of 28 locations surveyed, with a total count of 202.
I� r
Project: Highland / Chorro Class I Connection
Construct a bike slot on Highland turning south on to Chorro St.
The primary goal is the bike slot, but a secondary alternative
would be to construct a Class I path from Highland to Chorro
Description: streets on the South side of Highland.
To facilitate better circulation for westbound Highland traffic
turning south on to Chorro. The connection is necessary to
provide an alternative north /south corridor into and out of the
Intent: downtown area for bicyclists to avoid Santa Rosa.
Class: I
School zone: BP
Pave
section:
8
15 ft. for slot
Length (Feet)
up to 200 ft. for path
Vim_. - mrrmus
l�gfl- sl�I� --
Est. Cost
$Ctly#f� pall n
Priority
First
c\
°lc�'
'
o°
co
'zo
moi
a,°
q
oy
y
Div
v
(4 Z
/10
Gm
tea°
45c
��Q
1 Chris
5
5
3
3
3
4
4 3
3
3
3E
2 Bill
4
3
51
11
3;
4
0 3
2
1
2E
3 Peter
3:
4 Catherine 4 4 3 4 0 4 1 4 4 4
5 Kristina
6 Howard
3
7 Jim 5 4 3 4 1 4 5 4 5 2
avg. SCORO
4.5014.0013.5013.001
1.7514.0012.501
3.50
3.50
2.50
32.7`
Notes:
Attachment 2
A 6�- \3
1 2012 Bicycle Transportation Plan DRAFT UPDATE:
2 The following covers the text currently appearing on pages 20 -22, beginning with "4.
3 Education and Promotion" and ending with "6. Administration ".
4 Where 2007 version text has been modified, the original text appears as "strike- through ".
5 New text additions /revisions are in bold italic type. The numbering system will be revised
6 for clarity. For ease of comparing the proposed draft to the current plan, current plan
7 numbers have been left intact. New policies are generically " assigned as "X ".
8
9
4. EDUCATION AND PROMOTION
10
11
The City
will:
12
13
4.1
Consider hiring a full time bicycle coordinator to help manage bicycle oital projects, prepare
14
grant applications, review development projects to ensure, consistency witii$icycle facility
15
standards, and coordinate City - sponsored bicycle promotion, and education act%ities. _
16
17
4.2
Prepare and distribute Request foti4posals to organizations that can establish and sustain City -
18
funded bicycle promotion and edaoati tivities that benefit San Luis Obispo's residents,
19
workforce, and visitors. -
20
21
XX
Provide annual bicycling behavior draining to. City deansit drivers, preferably just prior to the
22
start of the Fall school term. Addidiondliy, pursue otheropgortumues to train fleet or contract
23
drivers that work for companies that regmrea City contract or license for operation.
24
25
4.3
Continue-to-work with the San Luis Obispo Coastal Unified School District to create and support
26
"StiggestedRbotes to School Plans" and !prografisfor all elementary schools in San Luis Obispo.
27
_WA with the`Sau: uis Obispo' s 3nnier Middle and Senior High Schools to encourage the use of
28�liicycles.
29
30
4.4
Continue to promote andsponsor programs and events designed to teach children and adults safe
31
riding methgds and the baeits of bicycling.
32
33
4.5
Continue to or with the S) O Regional Rideshare, the SLO County Bicycle Coalition, the
34
League of Am encanBtcyetists and others to support bicycle promotion and education activities,
35
such as the anon al $ike i" Work Week, Bike Rodeo, bicyclingke education classes, after - school
36
programs, bike valet' bike helmet giveaway programs.
37
38
4.6
Continue - te- previde- Considerproviding incentives for employees to commute to work by bicycle
39
and encourage local business to do the same.
40
41
4.7
Promote and support the use of a "traffic school" option for persons involved in bicycle - related
42
traffic violations.
43
44
XX
Provide residents with information about theparposeofnew bicyclefacility treatmemt (e:g, Comment[kc11. From swine Bike PI..,
45
bicycle boulevards, sha✓ed lane markings, etc.) and safe behaviorsfor all users operating on t uo uw n� xeaalc eovflmn :Donal onitiikemaam� n�
'
46
M
thesefacilhies ............. __. _____-_
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
X.X Provide bicycling speeifrc information oh the City's "Construction Update" web page wlren
any City bikeways are included in the eonstructlon area
X.X . Postbicycleaadlor,makearailable routcnetwork mdpsin high- visibilitypublic;locations such
as City offices; transit stops, libraries, college campuses and tourist destinations:
Attachment 2
\zo� - \-5
Comment[kc2] ];4 tioa'fromth.porlland
ptaa. Propose something as simple as a bullet point
sayiag, Bike Lane Closed, Share the read"
Add "POffiaadBioycle PJao- fbr2030 "tb our credits
hat; , ,
XX Si pport effortsby Local organizations or individuals to nominate and maintain, the City's
League ofAmetican`Bicychsts,(LAB) Bicycle Friendly Community (BF'C) awardstatus[_ _ _ Coroment[kc31; sF &tko plan
X.X Support bicycling related events promotion (eg.: Tour of California) opportunities, with the
goal of leveraging them for the promotional opportunity to increase local bicycle use and/or
bicycling education.
S. FUNDING BICYCLE PROGRAMS
The City shall:
5.1 Reserve a minimum of two percent (2 %) of Its Eiihaspodaligu Development Act (TDA) funds for
bicyclinge projects and programs.. - Candidate actfiddeiWpse of these funds include, but are not
limited to:
a) Support cost of bicycling safety
b) Minor capital pirgipqts such as b
C) Planning en
ryneerlrg and envii
d) Bicycleing,&ofhotional4E.bvitii
5.2 Continue to includejmgjor bii
City's Capitol Improvenren€
X.X Continue to prioritize Ale'ag
congestion relief high : priori
5.3 Require that new developmei
and programs. New bikeways
development.' , ..
Y"
drain grate upgrades.
projects.
including the Railroad Safety Trail, in the
ipact Fee (TIF) programs.
1/2 cent sales tax) towards transportation
t cruff to its fair share to support the costs of bicyclinge facilities
shall tie created in advance of or during the first phases of
FundbigGnuit Programs
Level
State Highway Account (SHA)
Regional
Trans ortation Enhancements Activities (TE)
Regional & State
Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA)
State
Environmental Entrancement and Mitigation Program (EEM)
State
Safe Routes to School Programs (SR2S)
State
Sae Routes to School Program (SRTS)
Federal
Statewide Transportation ImprovememE°hanoeme•° Program
(STIP)
Federal
Communit Develo ment Block Grants
Federal
Hi hwa Sae Improvement Program (HSIP)
Federal
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
nz
44
45
46
Attachment 2
k`3 0�- �3
5.4 Continue to apply for regional, state and tederal grants to help pay for bicycleing projects and
programs. Candidate grant programs include, but are not limited to:
H.e Railroad Safety Trail to the Cal D.J. e
5.6 Consider employing debt - financing strategies for large bikeway projects, where their costs are -
out of scale with potential funding from regional, state or federal grant programs or from the
City's Capital Improvement Fund.
5.7 Include small -scale projects, such as signing and
appropriate. -
KX :Wark.with local organizations,to pursue; additio.
programs. By providing support to grants and o
organizaaionsthat eonduct`edueation to - increase
users'
As part of the City's two -year financiaLl�tanning process,
5.8 Provide the City Council with aFwgpi
facilities that include bicycle racks 2c
such m striping.
5.9 Submit a list of prioritized projects th .
year budget cycle. This funding shall
facilities that improve bicycle transpo
5M
for
City paving projects when
Comment [kC4):From Seattle Bike plan
hHp / /wn , saetile ..goyltranaportatlonfbikemasterht
m"
(BAC) shall:
g of miscellaneous bicyclinge
or segment improvements
for City funding during the two -
I construction of bicyclinge
SNISTRATION=' - - _1 .
'(6 � -G1ty shall update )las.Bicycle:Transportation Plan as required by the Stat.. — °- 4)
y�aintmn eligibili'€y for State Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) grants. And - shall
6.2 Any person inakfile a request for amendment to this Plan with the San Luis Obispo Public Works
Department. Requ istrwiusfidentify all proposed changes (additions, deletions, or modifications
to goals, objective�_eiliiiies, activities, standards or maps) and provide a rationale for the
proposed changes. Amendment requests are subject to the City's environmental review process.
They will be acted on no more frequently than semi - annually by the City Council, after review
and report by the Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) and the Planning Commission. The
Depa tment may charge applicants a ecc to e'valuatZ a proposed amendul at. .'re fee'; _'ll cover
the cost of evaluation and process administration by staff.
This page has been left blank on purpose.
Attachment 3
to�-3
Project: Vista Lago Connection
Paved or unpaved bike trail connection between Vista Lago and
Description: Vista Collados
,Preserve/provide a paved /unpaved bikeway between Vista Lago
and Vista Collados for a low /no traffic connection between
Intent: neighborhoods around the Laguna Middle School.
Class: n/a
School zone: SM
Pave
section: 6
Length (Feet) 515
Est. Cost n/a
Priority
#DIV /01
m,
c
°
c
s'
w
mm �m
c°
o 'Za my
m°' m�
a
F
L� cm
F
o
aim
v
=m
�oF �m
�aJ
45� �F�
��
/10
1 Chris
2 Bill
3 Peter
(
4 Catherine
5 Kristina
6 Howard
7 Jim
(
avg. SCORE
# ## # ##
###1###1 ###1
###1###1###1
Notes: Relationship to Laguna Lake Bikeways B project. At this time
preserving access as an unpaved route is preferred. Therefore,
there is no cost associated with the project.
Attachment 3
Zo� 3
1 2012 Bicycle Transportation Plan DRAFT UPDATE
2 Where the previously approved version text has been modified, the original text appears as "strike -
3 through ". New text additions /revisions are in bold italic type. The numbering system will be revised
4 for clarity. For ease of comparing the draft revise to the current plan, current plan numbers have been
5 left intact. New policies are generically assigned as "X ".
6 Policy
7 Class III BlkewaV (previously approved test version 7/2011 PAC
8
9 1.21 'Bike Route "signage along Class III Bikeways
10 when the route provides a connection between other!
11 Bikeway facilities (Class 1, Class 11, etc.), when traffic cc
12 need to raise awareness of the route, or when the rou
13 route. (e.g. Bill Roalman Bike Blvd., Pacific Coast Bityc
14
15 Special Design Provisions =_ -
16 - Sharrow (previously approved text version 9/2011 BACtineyflnl
17 1.43 On streets where bike lanes are notprovided a:.
18 and cyclists to safely travel side: by side wlthln'fhe lane,
19 Committee, may install shared lane !markings (ai5osknoj
20 positioning of bicyclists on roadwa s with re ulai`br
P g Y Y g 7cyJ
21 arterial roadways that serve as connettions betweeds
22 legends and associated signage should coincide witlYt,
23 for consideration in charidna Shormw lrirntinnc no,,. i
ions (speed volume, etc.) have indicated a
an identified City',=5tate, or Federal bicycle
curb lanes are too narrow for motorists
with input from the Bicycle Advisory
arrows ") to improve the lateral
arrows will most commonly be used on
rcling facilities. Installation of the
Pavement Management cycle. Criteria
24 . 'qn- Street parking
25 . T`ra>,el Jane width
26 . Posted speed limit
27 . MeasuredYtciffic speeds
28 . Traffic volume -_
29 . Traffic composIt(on fprese&e of buses and large trucks)
30 . Bicycle traffic volume
31 . Number of incidentsafwrong- way bicycling, or sidewalk bicycling
32 . Corridors where there is a high potential to increase bicycle trips
33
G:\ Transportation - Data \_Tmnsponation Planning \Bicycle \Bike Plan \Bike Plan Update 2012 \Draft Bike Plan does \2012 BTP daft changes
Shan-ow Classlll Alternative.docx 1/17/20123:53 PM
Attachment 3
3 -� 3
1 - Contrasting Color or Other Design treatment (The following covers the tent currently appearing on page 16. This
2 text was originally reviewed in the 9/2033 BACmeeting, and followed with modifications during the 11/2011 meeting.)
3
4 1.44
5 t146 IQL�AfE' #90' '9PWIRFed,pavem6"t�pthe�,d !0!
6 hl complex traffic corridors where competingtlemands fo"r - -the use'of the right -of -way present unigye
7 chagenges thattra,Qitianalfacilii ies may aof-lu %ymeet (e.y.; areas wi[h�right -of -way constraints or
8 potential conflicts between multiple user groups), the City may consider testing alternative design
9 facilities such as, but not limited to:
10 • Colored Bicycle Lanes: To enhance Che:canspicuity of a tricycle lane orabicycle lane extension in
it locations with hiohKbickete and motor v_ehioL use, such as through intersections and other trof i
12 con Ict areas)
13 Bik Box: To facilitate- bicycbist left tuna pasitioning, help- prevent'rigt}t -hook' collision conflicts,.
14 increase bicyclist corispieuity ar to group bicyclists together to clearintersections quickly.
15 • Buffered Bicycle Lanes: Using striping to create a G'ujfer between a bike lane and the adjacent
16 travel lane, and /or the "door zone" of the parlat,I one.
17 The design treatment that is approved for use by Clie City's Traffic Operations Manager will depend on
18 a variety of factors, such as the specific desired outcamme, impact to all transportation modes within
19 the corridor, future development plans, success rates ofilarfpcilities in other locals, local
20 supporting data, cost etc.
21
22 X.XX Traffic Calming: On streets where vehicle volume, speed ar collisions are impacting bicycle
23 travel, the City shall consider possible remedies such as signage striping, or other traffic calming
24 devices. "
25
26
m
27
28 ;Detlnitio0 (Previou3ly,approved test version 5/2011 SAC meeting)
29 Shared -Lane Markings — Otherwise known as Sharrows, ShaFealane -mark ags are pavement legends
30 intended to improve the lateral positic nlY gof bicyclists on roadways with Fee .� '.ye°4se and -n curb
31 lane widths too narrow for motorists and cytiT "sts to safely travel side by side within the lane. All narrow
32 travel lanes should be considered a shared space, these lane markings are a reminder. 'harrows are
33 carefully placed within the travel lane to guide bicyclists to ride in a predictable location that avoids
34 cardaors and /or roadwaygutters, and to remind drivers to share the road with cyclists; Unlike bicycle
35 lanes, sharrows do not designate a particular part of the street for the exclusive use of bicyclists. They
36 are simply a marking to guide bicyclists and remind motorists to expect to and share the lane with
37 bicyclists', _. __..
38
G: \Tansp.a.t Ion- Data`Transponatlon Planning\ Bicycle \Bike Plan \Bike Plan Update 2012 \Daft Bike Plan dots \2012 BTP draft changes
Sharrow0asslll Alternativ,Am 1/1]/20123:53 PM
This page has been left blank on purpose.
M IT, I =-, XA
R
M-
ZE
3
mo
to
V)
r-
m
0
t
0
9NE4
CL
E
`E.
03
:3
CC
S w
CL
o
to
V)
---- --
CG
to
r-
tn
ME (00
m
Q3
cc
CC
LL
V)
E
-_- `�
E
CL
2
gig
99E-
299 OWN
F- F-
Ln
a V)
V)
V)
V)
IN
ro
12
u
0.
UJ
CL
E
0
0
0
0
u
T
9L
0
_t�
4 6
r
0
0
C
0
c
0
w
E
0
C�
0
C
—
0
0
0
T
o
w
Cm
X
V)
x
V)
,
U
,
r
m
0
m
V)
(D
0
7n
I
C.0
Ji
0
0
LE
o
(CA,
m
to
ko
f�
00
1
0)
1-4
C11
m
dT
V)
ko
I,,
w
m
Iq
N
I-i
Iq
14
H
H
H
H
1-4
CL
CL
n
n
n
n
n
n
a-
0-
0,
m
CL
CL
n
a
n
n
CL
co
co
m
'm
co
m
m
0�
m
co
co
M
W
m
=
m
m
m
m
ac
L=—
Iiii,
R
li
w
cc I
Cc I
cc
I cc:
I =
cc
cc
oc
i
H
1
M0
W
Attachment 4
OO
C
N
CL
CL
Cu
0
C
C
C
O
i
O
R
CM
L
C
C
Co
vN
O
U
to
m
Z
O
y
N
Y
M
C
o
u
d
0
0
c
Cr
>
N
N
v
L
tw
O
C
O
0
'6
C
O
0
cOa
O
'A
y
m
C
s=
YO
C
3
C
3
Y
Co
M
M
S
7
V-
0
s
a
0
t
c
m
(A
O
c
0
ro
m
o
N
*'
N
C=
t=
C
0
Y
N
i
d
M
O
X
y
O
O0
C
N
N
0-0
y>
O
L
Co
C
C
a
O
L
V)
N
0
Co
(0
N
o
f0
(6
N
O
N
Cr
>
Cu
CO
O
m
H
Co
[1
(7
-O
(6
C
o
L
V
w
Y
N
C
U
CO
O
Y
N
0
c
C
0
N
V
O_
Y
O=
M
'a
c
w
N
O
o>
Of
6
,i
Op
O
Y
C
N
Co
m
O
O
M
fO
cO
m
i
i
M
`~
M
M
O
U
Y
N
O
C
C
(YO
d
CL
`�
M
0
V
O
O
N
-O
O
+'
X
O
N
w-
o>
Y0
N
d
f0
(0
m
(p
m
V
O
Co
Cu
�"
f0
•C
m
w
N
U
0-
OJ
U
.O
F-
F-
F-
F-
F-
F-
F-
F-
F-
F-
F-
12
12
12
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
OO
C
Cr
0
C
C
C
O
i
O
R
>
Co
vN
O
U
to
m
Z
O
y
N
Y
M
C
o
u
d
0
0
c
Cr
>
Co
v
L
tw
O
0
'6
0
'O
0
cOa
O
'A
y
m
C
s=
YO
.
Y
Co
M
M
S
7
V-
V)
a
d
c
m
(A
O
c
0
ro
m
o
�-
*'
O
C=
t=
C
0
Y
N
M
O
X
N
i
N
N
0-0
y>
O0
L
V)
N
y
(0
(0
f0
(6
N
O
N
>
U
N
[1
(7
W
U
Co
U
CO
U
CO
F-
F-
F-
Co
m
M
M
M
M
m
m
m
M
M
M
M
M
V
d
.O
a`
N
O
N
N
p
ci
N
M
d'
Ln
lD
Il
00
Ol
a-i
N
c-i
N
F-
F-
F-
F-
F-
m
m
m
m
m
m
Co
Co
Co
Co
M
Co
C
O
i
Ca
C
O
V
m
m
D
0
N
G1
L
t
C
(6
L
d
3
x
C
3
0
0
N O
O O1
N N
m
c
s o
oc
c �
0 0
c �
o '^
v v
3 3
0 0
c c c
v v v v
E E E E
m m m m
v v v v
v a v v
n n n n
E E E E E E
`o `o `o `o
m m m m
b
z o 0 0 0
m
�eguaprsay
v
'a]igp'
c
J
letlJdWWO]
w
c
m o
T y
O
O
O
M y
Y
N
b E2
C
b
c
\
m
\
m
\
m
o °
m
m
v
m
m
O w
U
N
m
m
m
m
m
U
o
C
C
C
C
LL'
om
0
m
0
a
r
O
O
T
°v
0
,a
0
00
1010101
L
L
L
L
0
E
E
E
E
W
o
N
O
N
m
N
aM
w
O
W
W
E
E
E
E
y
E
E
E
E
=
m
ry
m
n
a
w
0
12
o
m
o
v
o
v
o
o
m
c
o
m
c
LL
O
O
W
w
w
h
N
�
3
m
N
_m
t
�
x
o ° - °a -j
7
0
a
2
L M
a w
3
v f
m
41 N
i W
N m
M �
0
L m
N 2
V 'y
o w
n
o �
0
N
S m
v LL
c Z
a
0
m`
N
°
O
W
m
w Z
K O a
w O o o �u o
C L m
� U
v
0 °c
N �y
III
m N Vl Ifl VI
arid-
s m
w r
N
L a N N N
VI L O) OI Ol
N ~
CM
C �
.n in in
of of of
m m m
Z
� N
r
� r
o m
m �
0 ° a o ° a
a
w O o `0 0
vYCi � U U' m
Attachment 5
n
T
02'
N
� U
m
'6
C
O -
CQ
G
O
V F
3 `
0
m
r
F
c
c
v
v
F
u
s
0
E m o E 2 Z
ATTACHMENT
E
i
-_
-
E
E
E=
E z_
E
E
e E
E
E
E
V
V
V
C U�
1
C m
C
V
V
Q Q
Q Q
Q
V
Q
c
c
N y
0 0
0 o
m
lom
oo
°oo
E
E
E E
E E
E
E E
N
o.n
oou+
E
E
E E
E E
E
v
E
m
=
s
o
o -
3
ATTACHMENT
01/04/2012 18:22 FAX 18057815703 SLOCOG 10001 /001
ATTACHMENT 7
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
(SLOCOG)
** *NEWS RELEASE * **
For Immediate Release
Re: ANNUAL UNMET TRANSIT NEEDS AND BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN INVENTORY
PUBLIC HEARING
Date: February 1, 2012
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Location: County Board of Supervisors' Chambers, County Government Center
1055 Monterey Street, San Luis Obispo
The San Luis Obispo Council of Governments ( SLOCOG) annually allocates approximately
$10 million dollars in Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds to member cities and the
county. The funds are designated for public transit, but can be used to improve local streets
and roads after all transit needs are first satisfied.
A Public Hearing will be held to receive public testimony identifying or Commenting on transit
needs that may exist within the county. SLOCOG has scheduled a Regional Unmet Transit
Needs and Bicycle & Pedestrian Inventory Public Hearing on Wednesday, February 1,
2012, at 8:30 a.m., in the County Board of Supervisors' Chambers, County Government
Center, 1055 Monterey Street, San Luis Obispo. Concerned residents will have an
opportunity to testify on any transit deficiencies they experience. The testimony is evaluated
to determine which requests meet the requirements to be considered as an unmet need and
which are 'reasonable to meet." SLOCOG directs each jurisdiction to set aside funds to
meet those needs, and then allows the remaining money to be programmed for streets and
road improvements
SLOCOG invites the general public to attend the hearing. Testimony may be presented at
the meeting, by phone or in writing (Write to: SLOCOG, 1114 Marsh Street, San Luis Obispo, CA
93401 or email to: unmet needs�3a slodog oFg or tgtllha Qslocog.orq) Deadline for written,
telephone, and electronic testimony is no later than Febn iy. &''2b, Ii at 500 p.m If you
have any questions, please contact Tim Giliham at (805) 781 -1520.