HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/03/2001, 1 - PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT UPDATE COUnaL
j acEnaa aEpmt
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
FROM: John Mandeville,Director of Community Development
PREPARED BY: Paul LeSage,Director of Parks and Recreation
Jeff Hook, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT UPDATE
CAO RECONEWENDATION
Adopt a resolution approving the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve a
negative declaration of environmental impact and adopt a new Parks and Recreation
Element/Master Plan replacing the 1995 Element.
DISCUSSION
Background
In January 1995, Council approved the current Parks and Recreation Element after a
comprehensive review and revision process. During the last six years, many of the unmet
needs identified in the Element were realized; however, new recreation needs and trends have
emerged, prompting the need to update the Element. As required by state law, the Planning
Commission must review the update and forward a recommendation to the City Council prior
to adoption.
The Parks and Recreation Commission endorsed the draft Parks and Recreation Element and
Master Plan at its meeting on December 6, 2000 (Attachment 3), and forwarded it to the
Planning Commission for review. The Planning Commission approved the Element and the
Environmental Impact Report on February 28, 2001 (Attachment 4).
The Parks and Recreation Department prepared the draft Recreation Master Plan, of which
four chapters constitute the Parks and Recreation Element of the City's General Plan.
Community Development assisted Parks and Recreation Department staff to ensure consistency
with other General Plan documents. The updated element is similar to the current version, but
reflects new citizens' preferences and priorities expressed during recent public meetings and
surveys. The Element's emphasis continues to be on developing new facilities to meet the
community's recreation needs.
State law requires the general plan to contain seven elements: land use, circulation, housing,
conservation, open space, noise, and safety. The general plan may include "optional elements"
which the local jurisdiction deems necessary. Optional elements can be amended at any time.
San Luis Obispo has adopted several optional elements, including the Parks and Recreation
/-1
l
Council Agenda Report—k--,7cs and Recreation Element Update
Page 2
Element, Energy Conservation, and Water and Wastewater Management Elements. By law,
general plan elements must be comprehensive and "comprise an integrated, internally-consistent
and compatible statement of policies." In particular, parks and other recreation facilities need to
respond to anticipated growth and development and be compatible with land uses and open space
programs. Therefore, the relationship between the Parks and Recreation Element and the Land
Use and Open Space Elements is particularly important.
The subjects covered in a parks and recreation element and the level of detail at which they are
addressed are flexible and vary widely among cities and counties. City size, level of
urbanization, environmental context, recreation needs and funding all affect the issues to be
included. In general, however, state guidelines suggest that parks and recreation elements
address such topics as:
1. General distribution, location, and extent of existing parks, recreation facilities, and
open space;
2. Projected recreation demands by user group and type of facility;
3. General location and availability of school district properties for joint recreational use;
4. Parks .and recreation facilities policies and standards (including level of service
standards and support for Quimby Act parkland dedications);
5. Schedule or timetable for improvements, expansion, or retirement of facilities;
6. Implementation strategies and funding sources.
These topics are addressed in the updated Element.
Element Changes
In the revised Element, the major unmet facilities needs identified are: athletic fields,
community center, therapy pool, recreational trails, and neighborhood parks. Of these,
recreational trails represent the one unmet need that is not also listed in the current Element. It
was identified as a new community priority in public surveys and during meetings on a
possible new Community Center/Therapy Pool. Two lighted softball fields are being proposed
in the Implementation section to meet the need for additional athletic facilities, as the need for
turf fields for soccer and football is being met with the Damon-Garcia Sports Fields. A park in
the area bordered by US Highway 101, Broad Street, Cerro San Luis, and Foothill Boulevard
is also recommended.
The Community Center/Therapy Pool is the major un-funded project in the Element. It is
hoped that funding for the therapy pool will come from a State grant and will be constructed at
the SLO Swim Center in Sinsheimer Park. No location has been determined for the
Community Center but Johnson Park is high on the list of desired sites.
Another new item in the Element includes a section on open space. Section 2.58, Open Space
Services and Programs, covers policies relating to services and programs not addressed in the
current Element, since the Parks and Recreation Department did not manage City-owned open
space in 1995.
I-2
r �
Council Agenda Report—Forks and Recreation Element Update
Page 3
Scheduled playground equipment replacement is identified in the draft Element. Play areas are
maintained, replaced, and repaired in accordance with the State of California's Playground
Safety Regulations and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The State regulations were
finalized in 1999 and inclusion of this component in the Element supports the City's
commitment to provide safe play equipment in our parks.
The new Element recommends that the City modify the way it applies its policy on parkland
required for residential annexations. The requirement continues to be 10 acres of parkland per
1,000 residents as identified in the parkland annexation policy; however the new Element
recommends that five of the 10 acres be designated as developed neighborhood park, while the
remaining 5 acres can be located anywhere within the City's Park System as appropriate. The
10-acre developed parkland requirement can only be imposed on discretionary changes such as
annexations or General Plan amendments and not on subdivisions or use permits. This will
result in larger parks in new neighborhoods and improved accessibility, with the goal of
providing parkland within one mile of any residence.
With the construction of Damon-Garcia Sports Fields and a major City goal of building two
lighted softball fields, a process has started that will transition most athletic fields in the park
system from multi-use to single use fields. The Element contains policy language that supports
the change.
The revised Element also sets standards for private concessions being operated within City
parks and buildings. Such activities are subject to approval of the Parks and Recreation
Commission and City Council, and are to be compatible with park usage without altering the
ambience of the area.
General Plan Consistency
A General Plan consistency determination should be based on: a) whether the draft Element's
policies are supported by or promote policies in other General Plan elements, and b) whether
specific programs or projects are consistent with the standards and policies in the other General
Plan elements, such as land use designations, safety or noise standards. The proposed draft
appears consistent with the General Plan in both respects.. General Plan policies that support
the draft Element include (General Plan digest references):
A. Policy consistency
1. Land Use Element: LU 1.7 (open space protection and greenbelt uses); LU 2.3
(recreational facilities in expansion plan areas); LU 6.1 (open space policies); LU
7.4, 7.10 (greenbelt and recreation in the Airport Area).
2. Open Space Element: OS 12.2 (Outdoor Recreation policies); OS 14.2 (open space
management policies).
B. Project/Program consistency
At a program level, the Parks and Recreation projects and programs listed in Chapters 5 and 6 are
consistent with GP policies and the LUE Map. Land acquisition and capital improvement plans
I�3
Council Agenda Report—I-arks and Recreation Element Update --
Page 4
for park developments require individual evaluations of consistency with General Plan policies
prior to final approval.
CONCURRENCES
On December 6, 2000, the Parks and Recreation Commission unanimously endorsed the
updated Parks and Recreation Element (Minutes are Attachment 2).
On February 28, 2001, the Planning Commission approved the Element update by a vote of six
to none (one member absent).
ALTERNATIVES
The Council may request more information concerning the environmental determination. The
Council would need to identify the specific type of additional information desired. If the
Council believes there may be significant impacts that cannot be mitigated, an environmental
impact report would need to be prepared before the Element is adopted.
The Council may continue action. There is no State-mandated deadline to complete the update.
ATTACHMENT
1. Draft Parks and Recreation Element
2. Resolution
a. Exhibit A —Negative Declaration
3. Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes
4. Planning Commission Minutes
The Legislative Draft of the Parks and Recreation Element was distributed separately to the
City Council. A.copy is available in the City Clerk's Office.
ATTACMENT' l
crty of San US OBISPO
PARKS AND RECREATION E
MASTER PLAN
G :a ■ FIN D -
' '• ■ -
E CHIEF
n �P �(• - D .
•- ■ -.
IXE CHF
Through People, E3 DEPT HEAos DOPEC Dip
u ■ UTIL . -
■ HR . -
GOONON •
40- 7 0
•
4z j
"Flames of Knowledge" sculpture, Parks and
• 1 � I 7 •f��4. 1 ,• -
FF f
� x i
i � ','r � r-. moi: • f .yj 1 rr:
Recreation / / / Building
C
0
city of san Luis oimspo
PARKS AND RECREATION AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS
Our mission is to serve all persons in a positive and courteous manner and help ensure that San Luis
Obispo continues to be a healthy,safe, attractive and enjoyable place to live,work,or visit. We help
plan the city's form and character, support community values, preserve the environment, promote
wise use of resources and protect public health and.safety.
.. Fd .'77 r[ 3s 1t 7775 ry7� 7�k. ' � .i4 yR+
The City of San Luis Obispo Parks and Recreation and Community Development Department
staff provide high quality service when you need it. We will:
o Listen to understand your needs;
0 o Give clear, accurate and prompt answers to your questions;
o Explain how you can achieve your goals under the City's rules;
o Help resolve problems in an open, objective manner;
o Maintain high ethical standards; and
o Work to improve our service.
/ (O
•
City of San Luis Obispo
GENERAL PLAN
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT AND MASTER
PLAN
OThis element was first adopted June 15, 1982,by City Council Resolution No. 4866. The
following amendments have been adopted:
Tonic Dnte Council Resolution Number
0
The City's General Plan is made up of sections called"elements."Each element focuses on
certain topics as required or allowed by State law. According to State law, each element has
equal weight in defining City policies. In December 2000, the following elements comprised the
City's General Plan.
Title Ado tion or Last Major Revision Date
Land Use 1994
Housinjz 1994
en S ace 1994
Circulation 1994
Noise 1996
Safe 2000
Conservation* 1973
Energy Conservation* 1981
Parks &Recreation 1995
Water&Wastewater Management 2000
O *Revision in progress.
This update of the Parks and Recreation Element was adopted ,
2001,by City Council Resolution No.
O
f`�
i
SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL
O Allen Settle,Mayor
Ken Schwartz
John Ewan
Jan Howell Mane
Christine Mulholland
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
PLANNING COMMISSION
Jim Aiken
Allan Cooper
Alice Loh
Paul Ready,Chairperson
Orval Osborne
Stephen Peterson
Mary Whittlesey
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Debbie Black
Gary Clay
Peter Dunan
Teresa Larson
James Neville,Chairperson
Ron Regan
Bonnie Marzio
ADMINISTRATION
Ken Hampian,City Administrative Officer
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Paul LeSage,Parks&Recreation Director
Kathy Mills,Recreation Manager II:
Linda Fitzgerald,Recreation Manager I
Laurie Hanson,Sr. Administrative Secretary
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT-
John Mandeville,_Community Development Director
Jeff.Hook,Associate Planner
O City of San Luis Obispo
990 Palm Street -
San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-3249
SAN LUIS OBISPO GENERAL PLAN
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT AND
O MASTER PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter Page
Vision ............................................................................................................................1
ExecutiveSummary........................................................................................................2
Updating the Parks and Recreation Element
andMaster Plan ......................................................................................:.................3
I. INTRODUCTION AND GOALS
1.0 Introduction.........................................................................................................5
1.10 Public Participation.......................:....................................................................5
1.20 Acquisition and Development..............................................:.............................5
1.30 Summary of Overall Goals and Policies...................................:.............. .........6
II. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES
o2.00 Existing Facilities..................................................:..................:.........:...............10
Exhibit 2:00:1 - City Parks&Joint Use Sites Map.......:.........:.::..................:..a0a
Exhibit 2.00.2 -Open Space&Recreational Trails Map:........:........................10b
2.10 City Parks.... .............................................:.........................................................10
2.20 Open Space and Recreational Trails.:................................................................13
2.30 Joint Use Facilities.......................................:.....................................................15
2.40 Unmet Needs......................................................................................................16
2.50 Policies and Programs........................................................................................16
ThePark System....................................................................:....................16
SportsFields...............................................................................................16
NeighborhoodParks...................................................................................17
CommunityCenter........:..............:.:...........................................................17
LagunaLake Nature Park...........................................................................18
SinsheimerPark..........................................................................................18
Playgrounds&Special Recreation Areas..................................................18
Open Space Services and Programs.....................:.:..........:...............:........18
Recreation Facilities:.:................................:....:......................................:...19
III. PARK AND RECREATION ACTIVITIES
3.00 Activities......:...........:...........:..............:..............:.:..:...:......:....:..:........,:...........:..21
3.10 Unmet Needs....:......:.:....:..........:::......:.........::...:.:.:....:.:..:....:.:..:.:..:...................21
O 3.20 Policies and Programs
CurrentPrograms........................................................................................21
FutureNeeds...............................................................................................22
nChapter Page
y IV. FINANCING
4.10 Facilities..............................................................................................................25
4.20 Activities:............................................................................................................25
4.30 Concessions........................................................................................................26
V. IMPLEMENTATION
5.0 Introduction ........................................................................ ...:...:.........,....:......28
5.10 Athletic Fields ....:.......................................:..:.:....:.............................................28
5.20 Community Center and Therapy Pool ......::......................................................28
5.30 Mini-Parks .........................................................:....:...:.........:..........................29
5.40 Trails ...................................................................:................:.....................:.......29
5.50 Other Uninet Needs...............:...............................::..........................................:29
5.60 Master Plans...............................:..:......................................:.............................29
VI. APPENDIX
A. Park Acquisition and Implementation Priority(0-4 Years).........................31
B. Park Acquisition and Implementation Priority(5-10 Years).......................32
O C. Park Land Acquisition and Improvement in Annexation Areas Policy......33
D. Planning Commission and City Council Resolutions.................................36
E. Glossary of Terms.............................................................................:...........39
TECHNICAL BACKGROUND REPORT INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. CONTACT
THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT FOR ACCESS.
NOTE: Chapters I-IV, as well as the Vision Statement, of this Master Plan constitute the -.
Parks and Recreation Element of the City's General Plan.
VISION
San Luis Obispo's recreation activities, facilities, parks and open spaces are strongly influenced
lyJ by city residents. The community speaks and the Council and staff listen. San Luis Obispo is
renown for its unique features, including environment, archaeology, history, neighborhoods, and
style of citizen-driven government. Our recreation programs and facilities clearly display the
direction received as a result of ongoing public participation. The City's vision is to continue
enhancing our network of trails, located in both open space and developed areas, and to provide
pedestrian and cycling links between parks, recreation facilities, recreation activities and open
space.
While recreation needs and requests for activities continue to evolve as the population changes,
the community has clearly voiced a preference for active recreational pursuits. These pursuits
include multi-use paths, hiking trails, playgrounds, and swimming as outdoor activities and
indoor needs for fitness and exercise. There is also a collective interest in more indoor, passive
pursuits, such as lectures and fine arts, and social opportunities for our senior population. In
keeping with a widespread trend throughout the United States, San Luis Obispo is experiencing
the growth of a new entry population of"senior citizens" called the "Baby Boomer" generation.
This group will be characterized by seeking more of the active pursuits they enjoyed in their teen
and adult years. It is envisioned this population will significantly increase in number, as those
born between 1945-1964 tum the magic age of fifty. This emerging population is expected to
result in two distinct groups of "Senior Citizens" — each with very different recreational and
leisure time needs. There is a universal trend developing which reflects these needs: the
increased need for "50 and over" sports leagues, classes, and activities, and the continuing need
O to provide recreational opportunities for older seniors, ages 70 and above. Balancing the needs
of these two dynamic senior populations will be a key focus of the Parks and Recreation
Department's services and facilities.
While it is necessary to continue to fund unmet needs, it is equally important to maintain a
balance between continued renovation and improvement of existing parks, facilities, recreational
activities and open space, and the development of new facilities and programs. Traditionally,
City recreation programs have tried to balance unmet needs with on-going community
recreational needs. Moreover, it is the City's guiding philosophy that all city residents,
regardless of interest, ability, and needs, shall have the opportunity to help shape and participate
in City recreation programs.
City officials, staff and volunteers who will implement the Parks and Recreation Element/Master
Plan are responsible for ensuring city programs and facilities are current and meaningful by
regularly seeking input and evaluation from those who use these services. They must also ensure
that new or expanded recreation programs and facilities are implemented because they represent
a need expressed by a cross-section of the community and not just by a small, special-interest
group.
1
1- 12
EXECUTIVE SUM1N,..�RY
The purpose of the Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan is to evaluate current and future
® parks and recreation needs, identify city recreation goals, policies and programs, and to establish
short- and long-range implementation and funding mechanisms to ensure our facilities and
programs keep pace with our changing community.
The Vision Statement and Chapters I-IV constitute the Parks and Recreation Element of the
General Plan. The Master Plan provides technical and procedural details to implement the Parks.
and Recreation Element.
The findings identified in the Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan update are derived
from citizen comments and participation. The use of public hearings, surveys, and comments
received by City commissions all contributed to the goals,policies, and programs of this element.
Recreational policies, programs and priorities must be reviewed in a broad community context,
considering both needs and opportunities; and must be consistent with other General Plan elements.
City decision-makers will use these policy and program guides to review land use, circulation,
fiscal and other important matters that shape the City's character.
Major topics addressed in this document include:
✓ Updated goals,policies and programs
✓ Facility needs
✓ Activity needs
V ✓ Implementation strategies
y Despite increasing demands for recreation services, the ability of local government to meet those
demands is increasingly constrained by funding limitations. In 2001, the City's recreation
infrastructure is operating at peak capacity. There are also outside impacts on our parks, recreation
facilities and activities from the college and university community and growing areas adjacent to
the city. Consequently, San Luis Obispo's parks and recreation services have, in recent.years, had
to do more with increasingly limited resources. As demand for recreation facilities and activities
grows and changes,the City intends to focus its efforts in the following critical areas:
• Continued development of athletic fields and support facilities;
• Providing parks in underserved neighborhoods;
• Providing a multi-use community center and therapy pool;
• Expanding paths and trails for recreational use and to link facilities;
• Meeting the special needs of disabled persons,at-risk youth,and senior citizens.
The City intends to meet growing recreational needs through more efficient delivery of services,
user fees which more closely reflect the cost of providing the services, community support through
• 2
donations of time and mate..w§, and special grant programs. The Cit;-.dso intends to continue and
expand participation in joint use programs with the San Luis Coastal Unified School District and
other agencies,enabling shared use of public and private parks and facilities.
UPDATING THE PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT AND MASTER PLAN
This document will be updated by January 2006. Citizens may propose changes to the Parks and
Recreation Element at any time. Such changes are considered General Plan amendments and can
be adopted by the City Council after holding public hearings. For more up-to-date or more detailed
information concerning parks & recreation in San Luis Obispo, contact the Parks & Recreation
Department;1341 Nipomo Street,San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-3964,or phone(805)781-7300.
0
0 3
J Chapter I
0
INTRODUCTION AND GOALS
i
4
HE
1.00 INTRODI JMON
State law requires each city and county to adopt a general plan to guide the physical development of
the community, and to guide the conservation and use of certain resources. General plans are
required by state law to include at least seven elements: land use, circulation, housing,
conservation, open space, noise, and safety. In addition, state law allows cities and counties to
adopt optional elements to guide the community's physical development. The Parks and Recreation
Element is one of several optional elements of the City's General Plan.
The Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan sets forth a plan for a balanced park and
recreation system. It has been prepared to help plan, develop, and maintain community parks,
sports and other recreation facilities, and recreation activities. The Vision Statement, Introduction
and Chapters 1-4 contain parks and recreation goals, policies, programs, and comprise the General
Plan Parks and Recreation Element. Chapters 5 and 6 provide implementation details and identify
the most critical recreational needs. They also contain funding recommendations.
Other General Plan elements and plans that may affect the City's parks and recreation system
include the Open Space, Conservation, and Circulation Elements and the Bicycle Transportation
Plan.
1.10 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
A key component in the update of the Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan has been
citizen input. Prior to the preparation of the final phase of the Master Plan, San Luis Obispo
O citizens had a variety of opportunities to comment
including public hearings and an opinion survey.
Y As part of the needs assessment for a community
center and therapy pool, three public meetings
were held to determine unmet recreational needs.
While these meetings focused on the community
center, other unmet community needs were
considered. Over 200 people attended these
meetings, representing a variety of users,
organizations,and neighborhoods.
; �'; � •f ' In addition, over 500 community members were
L `S_Iry interviewed at random to gain a citywide
Parks and Recreation Focus Group perspective on unmet needs. The results of the
information gathering are available from the Parks
and Recreation Department in a separate document entitled "the Community Center/Therapy Pool
Needs Assessment Study."
1.20 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT
High quality parks, recreation activities, open space, and recreational trail systems that relate to
existing demand and changing community needs are essential for a well balanced and healthy
community. The Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan focus on issues, policies and
programs unique to the Parks and Recreation Department. Figures I and Il show the location of
City parks,joint use sites, other recreation facilities and open spaces. The following pages describe
5 /-i�
specific recreation facilities .,d their individual amenities and refer to_.gures I and 11.
Parks and recreation needs must be considered in the context of all recreation services available
throughout the community. The City of San Luis Obispo is served by:
- City parks, recreation centers,and special facilities
- Joint use sites of the City and San Luis Coastal Unified School District (S.L.C.U.S.D.)
and other agencies
- Non-joint-use school sites (Churches,private,and commercial recreation facilities)
- Other governmental sites(County, State, and Federal)
Acquisition and development priorities
are derived from citizens preferences
expressed at public hearings and
through surveys. This data is used to
g help set priorities for acquisition of new
-4- a parkland, renovation of existing areas,
renovation of existing facilities and
construction of new parks and facilities.
Whenever possible, land will be
acquired through donation or dedication
by a private individual, family,
development, or corporation.
Damon Garcia Property
The priority of land acquisition will be:
1) areas in developed areas of the community lacking parks,
2) areas scheduled for developments and not yet built out, and
3) land within identified City expansion areas.
Recreation development will focus on renovation of existing facilities,completion of parks in built-
out developments lacking parks, and implementation of the approved Parks and Recreation Master
Plan. Facility development will include constructing a community center, additional sports fields,
neighborhood parks, recreational trails, and improvements to ensure that all parks are safe and
accessible.
1.30 OVERALL PARKS AND RECREATION GOALS AND POLICIES
The City's parks and recreation goals, policies and programs will guide the development of parks,
sport fields, and other recreation facilities and activities into the next century. It is important to
understand how these statements define and implement the Community's recreational needs. Here
is how the three levels of statements differ, with goals at the top and being the most general
statements, working down to programs,the most specific statements of intent:
131 IDermition Of Goals,Policies,And Programs
0 Goals. Goals are desirable conditions or ends which the City will attempt to reach
over the long term. They are general expressions of community values and
6
�- �7
interit,-mid therefore, not precisely measurable _.,action-oriented. Although
it may not be possible to attain all goals during,this element's planning
period, they will guide City actions during this period
O0 Policies. Policies are clear statements of intent that guide decision-making. They
show a clear commitment by the local legislative body, and become the basis
for specific projects and programs. Most policies have a time frame that fits
within this element's planning period. Policies are directives to those
involved in the review of projects to do or not do certain things. Policies
often include the use of"shall`or"will" when providing directives for future
actions.
0 Programs. Programs are actions the City intends to carry out, or which the City is
cooperating with other agencies to carry out. Programs translate goals and
policies into specific projects and actions.
1.32 Statement Of Overall Department Goals
1.32.1 The City's Parks and Recreation facilities and programs will enable all
citizens to participate in fun, healthful, or enriching activities, which
enhance the quality of life in the community.
1.32.2 Recreation services shall enhance the quality of life in San Luis Obispo and
meet the changing needs of residents.
O133 Statement of Overall Department Policies
1.33.1 Recreation services will be operated in a manner that is environmentally
sensitive and which conserves natural resources.
1.33.2 Recreation facilities shall be developed and operated, and services delivered
in the most efficient and economical methods possible.
1.33.3 Recreation facilities and activities shall be accessible to all individuals,
regardless of race, religion,age, gender,disabilities, and income level.
1.33,4 Recreation services shall be designed and administered to avoid duplicating
commercial,private, and university recreation services.
1.33.5 Recreation policies and programs shall reinforce . the objectives and
programs in the Open Space Element, Land Use Element, Circulation
Element,Bicycle Transportation Plan,and Pedestrian Transportation Plan.
1.33.6 New development should be encouraged to contribute to the development of
park facilities in proportion to the demand resulting from increased
population.
a1.33.7 Parks and Recreation staff should provide volunteer opportunities for
residents,particularly teens and young adults.
7
I lg'
1.33.8 Parks and Recreation facilities and activities should be developed, whenever
possible, as collaborative efforts with school districts, colleges, private
entities, and"non-profit organizations.
V1.33.9 Open space shall be managed in such a manner as to allow for appropriate
public uses and to maintain and enhance its environmental quality.
1.33.10 Trails shall be designed as recreational amenities and shall link to
appropriate parks and open spaces.
1.33.11 Recreation services shall consider the use of technology to provide enhanced
service delivery and program offerings.
0
8
�-19
Chapter II
PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
9
>-ate
U. PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
• 2.00 EXISTING FACILITIES
City recreation facilities consist of mini-parks, neighborhood parks, community parks, joint use
sites (such as school playgrounds), non joint use sites, recreation centers and special facilities,
including: Jack House, Swim Center, Senior Center, Recreation Center, Golf Course, historic
adobes, and community gardens. Locations
of these facilities are shown in Figure I.
Most parks have been renovated in the last
five years with an emphasis on more visually
- appealing and safe playgrounds. A plan for
1 the ongoing upgrade of these facilities has
' been approved. Vista Lago Park, for
example, was upgraded in 2000. Renovation
of Islay and Emerson Parks has also been
completed. Purchase of land to
_ accommodate athletic fields was
accomplished in 2000 and design work
began on the Damon-Garcia Sports
Islay Hills Park Complex. In cooperation with the school
district, six youth sized gymnasiums have
been constructed Work has also begun on the implementation on the master plans for Sinsheimer
and Laguna Lake Parks, and specialty facilities, such as the Santa Rosa skate park, have been
constructed.
Management of city-acquired and publicly accessible open space has become a function of the
Parks and Recreation Department. As of December 2000, City open space included 1,669 acres
located both within and outside city limits.
2.10 CITY PARKS
2.11 Mani Parks. Residents of the immediate area or those frequenting the area design these parks
for passive use. Basic elements are comprised of passive amenities.
<1> Buena Vista Park(100 Block of Buena Vista): Circular grass area measuring.44 acre.
<2> ElLsford Park (San Luis Drive near California): 2 creekside grass areas, totaling 1 acre,
separated by a stand of trees.
<3> Stoneridge Park(535 Bluerock Drive): Small,grass-covered neighborhood lot of.5 acre.
<4> Osos/Triangle Park (Santa Barbara Street at Osos): Flat grass area of .32 acre with 1
picnic site.
O <5> Las Praderas Park (Las Praderas and Mariposa Drives): .44 acre partially developed
creek side lot
10
ai
i
a �
' e
15
7/M
14
28
oI�I
M 425
✓18 ,x 19 fir rt
•A
16
N
• i '
\lam imp WO
/
o -
,. .000o
{
i• ' aa4m
•• •••• 6 ••••i
•• • i
-'S ....
0.1 ,
• � i
i
WO 0 Om ® !m � � .�1Y�•
Trail
v Desk qM Spam Open Space and Recreadonal Trails60008b IWILM
® open Space owsao
�-a3
<6> Priolo-Martin Park Vista del Collados and Vista del A- .oyo): .5 acre grass area
developed with benches and small pathway adjacent to Laguna lake
OMINI PARK TOTAL ACREAGE 3.20 ACRES
2.12 Neighborhood Parks. Defined as an area which is convenient and accessible for active and
passive recreation to residents within a prescribed service area. Basic elements should include turf
playfield,playground equipment, landscaped picnic/seating area. Other elements may include hard-
surfaced courts, restrooms, group barbecue,incorporation of natural or cultural features, and on-site
parking. May also be developed with other public entities.
G7> Vista Lago Park (Laguna Lane/Vista Lago): 3 picnic tables, benches and children's play
equipment located on this .5 acre neighborhood lot.
<8> Anhohn Park (870 Mission St.): Small neighborhood lot measuring .13 acre featuring play
equipment,benches and picnic area.
<9> C.L. Smith Joint Use Site (1375 Balboa): Adjacent to C.L. Smith Elementary School,
offering 4.8 acres including baseball and softball diamonds, soccer and athletic fields, children's
play area and outdoor basketball courts.
<10> Emerson Park (Pacific SUNipomo St.): 3 acres with softball, soccer and athletic fields,
outdoor basketball courts,community garden, and a children's play area.
<11> French Park (Morning
Glory/Fuller): Park features include
s " hard surface basketball court, sand
volleyball court, 2 horseshoe courts,
softball field, tennis court, individual and
group barbecue areas,benches,restrooms,
lighted walkways and children's play
equipment located on 10 acres.
<12> Johnson Park (1020 Southwood
` x Dr.): Bordered on 1 side by a creek;park
amenities in this 4.5 acre grass area
consist of restrooms, basketball court,
Emerson Park Community Garden children's play equipment and group
barbecue area.
<13> Laguna Hills Park (Diablo DrJMirada Dr.): Features included on 3.5 acres of grass
include 2 sets of children's play equipment,picnic area with 3 tables and paths.
<14> Mitchell Park (Santa Rosa/Buchon St.): 3 acres of grassy area diagonally crossed with
concrete paths, including an area with children's play equipment, picnic tables, restrooms and one
horseshoe pit,and barbecue area.
O <15> Throop Park (Cuesta DrJCerro Romauldo Ave): Adjacent to Teach Elementary school,
this 3 acre joint use site includes picnic tables, children's play equipment, youth baseball field with
bleachers,concession stand and restrooms.
11
l-a �
<16> Islay Hill Park (Tank Farm RdJOrcutt Rd): 5 acre park with softball field, basketball
court,picnic area,children's play area, and restrooms. .
® NEIGHBORHOOD PARK TOTAL ACREAGE 32.93 ACRES
2.13 Community Parks. Usually identified by unique features, community parks may be
constructed for very specialized usages and include a wide range of facilities which would attract
users from throughout the City not included in smaller types of parks.
<17>Jack.House Gardens(536 Marsh St.): Garden setting contained on .75 acre which includes
gazebo,bandstand,patio,restrooms,group barbecue and picnic areas.
<19> Meadow Park (Meadow & South Sts.): The park and linear park total 14 acres, with
individual picnic/barbecue sites, 2 horseshoe pits, outdoor volleyball and basketball courts,
restrooms, soccer/athletic fields, children's play equipment, trails, an 18-station fitness course, and
softball field.
Y° <20>. Mission Plaza (Chorro/Monterey St.): 4
downtown, creekside acres with restrooms,
�. amphitheater, Murray Adobe, cultural amenities
and creek walk.
<21> Santa Rosa Park (Santa Rosa/Oak St): 11
acre park offering 10 lighted horseshoe pits, 1
O ff lighted softball field with bleachers and score shed,
r - 1 youth baseball field, lighted . multi-use hard
17 _ surface area for activities including basketball, a
�o
multi-use athletic grass area, 2 group barbecue
y � � areas,. picnic areas, 3 children's playground areas
and restrooms.
Mission Plaza
<22> Sinsheimer Sports ,Complex (900 Laurel
Lane): Regulation baseball stadium and lighted softball field begin the list on this 23.5 acre
facility. Additional amenities include 1 horseshoe pit, group barbecue, picnic areas, children's
playground area,tennis courts,trails,restrooms and sand volleyball court.
.<23>Laguna Lake Park(500 Madonna Road) 40,park acres and a 180 acre lake that serves as
migratory stop and home to a variety of waterfowl. The park features 3 picnic areas with tables and
individual barbecues, covered pavilion.area, group picnic/barbecue area, children's play equipment,
restrooms, sand volleyball court,par course fitness trails and a commemorative grove of trees. The
lake provides for fishing, sail boarding, row boating; power boating under 1 horsepower, and
birdwatching.
Facilities Under Development:
® <30>Damon-Garcia Sports.Fields(Broad Street near Industrial Way): 20 acre site under
development that will contain 4 multi use sports fields and support facilities.
12
�-as
TOTAL PARK AL...EAGE 121.95 ACRES
2.14 Recreation Centers And Special Features
O <24> Laguna Lake Golf Course (11175 Los Osos Valley Rd.): 9-hole, 27 acre executive length
golf course with additional features including small practice putting green and driving range,
barbecue pit and picnic area and restrooms.
<25>SLO Swim Center (900 Laurel Lane): Square feet totaling 43,720 include a 50 meter X 25
yard pool, separate tot pool,restmoms,locker rooms,and 1 multi-purpose room.
<26>Jack House (536 Marsh St.): Contained on a downtown lot is the multi-use building, main
house, washhouse shop and carriage house totaling 4,300 square feet.
<27> City Recreation Center (864 Santa Rosa St.):
mow- 14,000 square foot building, including a game room,
weight room, pottery and lapidary studio, 3 meeting
.;; rooms, gymnasium, preschool facility, shower
facilities, and restrooms.
<28> Senior Citizen Center (1445 Santa Rosa St.):
eq
1 multi-use room, 1 meeting room and small
specialty meeting rooms plus restrooms and a kitchen
are included in the 5,800 square foot building.
o <29> Meadow Park Center (2333 Meadow St.):
Senior Citizens' Center 3,400 square feet of multi use facility and restrooms.
Other Special.Recreation.Areas not indicated on Figure 1:
• Laurel Lane Community Gardens(Laurel Lane,next to Fire Station#3)
• Broad Street Community Gardens (North Broad Street near Highway 101
southbound exit)
• Rodriguez Adobe(1341 Purple Sage Drive)
• Rosa Butron de Canet de Simmler Adobe(466 Dana Street)
• Loma de la Nopalera Adobe(1590 Lizzie Street)
TOTAL RECREATION FACILITIES SQUARE FOOTAGE 71420 SQ.FT.
TOTAL SPECIAL FEATURE ACREAGE 27 ACRES
2.20 OPEN SPACE AND RECREATIONAL.TRAIL'S
The City's open spaces are undeveloped lands, which allow for nature study opportunities; passive
recreation activities and habitat conservation. Recreational trails are typically class 1 bicycle paths,
that provide opportunities for runners and walkers as well as non-motorized transportation modes.
<30> Laguna Lake Natural Reserve (500 Madonna Road): 360 acres of open space and lake
Oadjacent to Laguna Lake Park.
13
1-a�
e �-. to �
`' <31> Bishop Peak Natural Reserve
N-
`" (access from Highland Drive and
O Patricia Street): Developed trails and
climbing areas with access to Bishop
r Peak totaling 360 acres.
<32> Cerro San Luis Natural
- Reserve(Fernandez Road): 121 acres
includes Maino Open Space,Lemon
Grove trail follows the northeast side of
Cerro San Luis
<33> South Hills Open Space (access
Laguna Lake at Woodbridge Drive and Bluerock
Drive): Nearly 60 acres includes ridge
line hiking trail linking Stoneridge Park to Woodbridge Drive
<34> Let it Be Nature Preserve (Los Osos Valley Road): 8 acres adjacent to Laguna Lake
Natural Reserve,no public access.
<35> San Luis Creek Open Space (Mission Plaza to Bianchi Lane): 16 acres traversing San
Luis Creek with viewpoints at Mission Plaza,Matthews Creek restoration and Bianchi Lane
<36> Islay Hill/Islay Creek Open Space (Spanish Oaks Drive): 19 acres with trail access to
OIslay Hill and meeting at Islay Hill Park.
<37> Terrace Hill Open Space (Bishop Street): Access to 22 acres atop Terrace Hill with 360
degree views of San Luis Obispo
<38> Matthews Open Space (near Higuera and Marsh Streets): 1 acre parcel along San Luis
Creek
<39> Stenner Springs Open Space (end of Stenner Canyon Road): 49 acres with limited
hiking trails
<40> Reservoir Canyon Open Space (end of Reservoir Canyon Road): Creek side open space
encompassing 242 acres through Reservoir Canyon with developed trail
<41> Filipponi Open Space (South Higuera Street near Highway 101 exit): 75 acres,
maintained as a working farm,no public access I '
<42> Railroad Recreation Trail: 1.2 miles established'as a Class I bicycle path with .7 miles
completed from Orcutt Road to Bushnell Street and a 1/s mile portion completed in the Edna-Islay
tract. Phase II will extend from Bushnell Street to the Jennifer Street Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge,
scheduled for Fall 2000 completion.
O Not shown: .
]Lopez Canyon/Little Falls Open Space(Lopez Canyon Road 'north of Lopez Lake): 320 acres
with paths to Little Falls and serves as a link to US Forest Service wilderness area.
14
Miscellaneous Open Space parcels: several parcels totaling 17 acres including creek dedications
and easements.
TOTAL OPEN SPACE ACREAGE: 1,669 ACRES
TOTAL CLASS I RECREATIONAL TRAIL MILEAGE: 1.2 MILES
TOTAL PARK ACREAGE 162.58 ACRES
TOTAL RECREATION FACILITIES SQUARE FOOTAGE 71,220 SQXT.
2.30 JOINT USE FACILITIES
Joint use facilities are typically sports fields and gymnasiums on San Luis Coastal Unified School
District property that are available for City parks and recreation programs.
<18> Laguna Middle School (11650 Los Osos Valley Rd.): 8.7 acres adjacent to Laguna Middle
School. This joint use site has a regulation baseball field, youth baseball and softball fields,
soccer/athletic field, tennis courts and outdoor volleyball and basketball courts.
<A> Teach Elementary School(375 Ferrini St.): Gymnasium
<B> C.L.Smith Elementary School(1375 Balboa St.): Gymnasium
O <C> Sinsheimer Elementary School (2755 Augusta St.): Gymnasium, youth baseball/softball
field,turf area.
<D> Hawthorne Elementary School (2125'.Story St:): Gymnasium, youth baseball/softball
field, large turf area
<E> Bishop Peak Elementary School(451 Jaycee Dr.): Gymnasium,large turf area
<FS Pacheco Elementary School(165 Grand Ave.): Regulation baseball field(Silveria Field)
<G> Los Ranchos Elementary School (5785 Los Ranchos Rd.): Gymnasium
2.40 UNMET NEEDS
The major unmet needs for parks and recreation-facilities are;
1. Athletic fields
2. Multi-use community center and therapy pool
3. Mini-parks-Purple Sage Lane,Eto Street
4. Multi-use trails for recreational use and connect to facilities
5. Lighted tennis courts
0 6. Neighborhood parks: In Broad Street area near.Highway 101 and Foothill Blvd.
7. Upgrading and replacement of playground equipment .
1
8. Specialty facilities such as disc golf,dog,parks,BMX parks
9. Mini-parks in underserved areas where neighborhood parks do not adequately meet needs—
O Marsh&Santa Rosa Streets,ten-ace Hill,Royal Way
10. Bocce ball facility
2.50 POLICIES AND PROGRAM
251 The Park System
Pnhny2-51-1 -The City shall develop and maintain a park system at the rate of 10 acres of
parkland per 1,000 residents. Five acres shall be dedicated as a neighborhood park. The
remaining five acres required under the 10 acres per 1000 residents in the residential
annexation policy may be located anywhere within the City's park system as deemed.
appropriate.
Poliny 2 51 - Parks shall be maintained in such a manner that priority will be given to the
preservation of the natural beauty and safe use of the land within the system.
Pnlicy 251 1 - Parks shall.be designed to meet a variety of needs depending on park size,
location,natural features and user demands.
Policy 751 4 - The Park and Recreation Element and Master Plan shall support the
downtown plan concept by encouraging the development of the identified recreation areas
found in the Conceptual Physical Plan for the City's Center.
® Policy 2-51-5 - Park amenities (such as athletic fields, play equipment, skateboarding area,
amphitheaters)will be developed, based on funding availability and community demand.
Polio+ 2.51.6 - Lease or sale of City-owned parkland'is discouraged unless such an action
meets a demonstrated need which can not otherwise be met.
Pnlicy 2 51 7 - Provisions must be made to replace any parkland sold with an equal amount
Of land at another location.
Poliry 2-5_1_9 - Park site acquisition should enhance the City's recreational trails, pedestrian
transportation, and open spaces in keeping with adopted policies.
Policy 2.51.9 - Parkways shall serve as visual linkages between park and recreation
facilities, to be developed, landscaped_and maintained in a manner that enhances the.
aesthetic quality of the City. ._ ..
Policy 2 51 10 - The historic Jack House shall be maintained, operated, and preserved in
accordance with the Grant Deed, accepted by the City in 1975.
252 Sports Fields
OPolicy 7.57.1 - There will be sufficient athletic fields within the city to accommodate
practice and competition demands for organized and informal activity.
�-a9
Pmgmm 2.522 - In partnership with the San Luis Coastal Unified School District
(S.LC.U.S.D.) and other joint use partners, the City will help provide funding for
Orenovation of existing athletic fields to ensure they are in playable condition.
Miry 157 4 - The demand for additional
athletic fields will be met first by developing
facilities on land owned by, or dedicated to the
City; and second, by developing facilities on
land to be acquired by the City, or on privately-
owned land.
Policy 7-574 - New significant residential
developments and annexations, shall provide
sufficient athletic fields to meet the demands of
Sinsheimer Park Ball Field the youth who will reside in the development.
Progmrn 2 525 -As space becomes available, additional fields will be added in the vicinity
of the Damon-Garcia Sports Complex.
2.53 Neighborhood Parks
Pnlicy '2_51 I - San Luis Obispo residents shall have access to a neighborhood park within
.5 to 1.0 mile walking distance of their residence.
OPolicy 2 512 - The designs of neighborhood parks shall be consistent with the needs and
preferences determined from a consensus of neighborhood residents.
Policy 1533 -All residential annexation areas shall provide developed neighborhood parks
at the rate of 5 acres per 1000 residents.
Policy 2.54 4 - In neighborhoods where existing parks do not adequately serve residents,
mini-parks may be considered
2.54 Community Center
Miry 2.54.1 - A multi-use community center shall be provided to meet the indoor
recreational needs of all segments of the community. A therapy pool may be considered as
a part of a community center but may be constructed separately at a more appropriate
location.
Pmgmm 2.54.2 - The City shall acquire property and construct a community center when
funding becomes available.
Program 2.543 -Existing indoor recreation facilities shall be updated and improved to meet
current and future recreational needs.
OPolicy 2 54 4 - While major facilities shall be designed to meet multi-generational needs,
there shall also be space available to address the unique needs of the senior population.
17 l-3�
2.55 Laguna Lake Nature Park
O Policy 2 55 1 - Laguna Lake shall be maintained in an environmentally sound and self-
sustaining condition.
Pmgram 2 55 2.-The revised Laguna Lake Park Master Plan shall be implemented.
2.56 Sinsheimer Park
Policy - If the San Luis Coastal School District relocates its bus maintenance
operations adjacent to Sinsheimer Park, the Master Plan shall be revised to reflect the
additional available space. An effort will be made to buffer the surrounding neighborhoods '
by relocating active facilities, such as the tennis courts,to the new portion of the park.
Prn.gram 2 56 2_The Sinsheimer Park Master Plan shall be implemented.
Program 2. 56 3-A therapy pool should be constructed at the SLO Swim Center.
2.57 Playgrounds and Special Recreation Areas
Policy 7-57-1 - As space and funding are available and as public need is indicated, special
recreation areas shall be constructed.
Programs - The Playground Equipment Replacement Program shall continue to be
Oimplemented.
Policy - Needed special facilities are identified as off-leash dog area, disc golf,
lighted tennis courts, bicycle motocross, bocce ball, community garden, and sand volleyball
courts.
Program 2.57.4 - In addition to SLO Swim Center and a therapy pool, aquatic program
needs shall be met through joint use of the San Luis Obispo Senior High School swimming
pool.
Policy _57-5 - The City will maintain the historic Rodriguez, Butron, and La Loma
Adobes once restored and any adjoining park lands in a manner consistent with their
restoration. The adobes shall be open and available to the public, depending on the level
of restoration.
Policy 2.57.6 - The, City will make available community gardens in appropriate park
locations.
2.58 Open Space Services and Programs
Policy 2 58 1 - Open space shall be managed in. a manner that provides for appropriate
public access and enhances the natural-environment.
O
1R
I-3l
Policy 2.58.2-Public trails shall t ;rovided where appropriate
to provide public access to City-owned open space. Use of
trails for hiking, mountain biking or equestrian activity shall be
determined as posted.
Policy 2 58 3 - Use of certain areas of open space may be
t
restricted or prohibited.
,b
Policy - Ranger Services shall be provided in all public
ff` creek easements considered as City open space and shall be
c
managed accordingly.
Policy 2 58 5 - Upon Parks and Recreation Commission
recommendation and City Council approval, open space areas
may be designated as receiver sites for public and private
Ferrini Open Space Trail mitigation projects.
Policy2 58.6-Open space and parks shall be connected
wherever possible by trails or bike paths.
2.59 Recreation Facilities
Policy - The City will encourage interaction and coordinated participation of other
public and non-profit recreation service providers in meeting public facilities demands.
Miry -The City will encourage private agencies to support or provide facilities to
satisfy unmet demands.
Policy 2 591 - Where possible, the joint use of facilities between the City and the
S.L.C.U.S.D. should be expanded. Joint use may include gymnasiums, stadiums,
classrooms,pools,athletic fields, and play equipment.
Policy 2 59 4 - The City will avoid providing facilities which unnecessarily duplicate
similar amenities available in the private sector.
19
/-,3,2
o Chapter III
PARKS AND RECREATION ACTIVITIES
0
20
III. PARKS AND RECREATION ACTIVITIES
3.00 ACTIVITIES
City recreation activities are designed to meet the needs of the entire population regardless of race,
religion, age, gender, abilities or income. Activities can be identified in several general categories
represented by aquatics, sports, special
events, youth and teen intervention, senior
citizens, facility operation, ranger services
and the golf enterprise.
The scope of recreation activities change
both seasonally and with public demand as
f well as with new up-and-coming trends.
Evaluations from participants and the
community assist staff in identifying
successful activities and determining new
offerings. Changing demographics of the
community is reflected in increased
participation in all types of youth activities.
3.10 UNMET NEEDS
O Based on community surveys, user input, public hearings, and Commission evaluation of
on-going activities, the City has determined that recreation services must respond to several
unmet needs. At this time,the unmet activity needs include:
• Prevention and intervention programs.
■ Teens,particularly high school age.
■ Special needs individuals
■ Senior citizens
3.20 POLICIES AND PROGRAMS
3.21 Current Programs
Policy 1-21-1 -The City will assign the highest recreation priority to providing services and
activities for the residents of San Luis Obispo on a priority basis.
Policy 321-7-Non-City residents may participate in activities for an additional fee.
Pmgmrn 3_21_1 - Activities will be evaluated regularly to determine demand and need If
participation drops or need change,programs may be dropped or modified.
Pmgram I ?1-4 - The City will periodically conduct public evaluations of recreation
O services to determine their quality and effectiveness. Program outcomes will be identified
and measured whenever possible.
21
l �
13ragcam 321.5 - Recreation opportunities will be publicized on a regular basis. Advances
in information technology shall be utilized for this purpose whenever practical and possible.
Program 321.6 - The City will consider the needs of underserved groups in offering
recreational programs.
Policy 321-7 - Recreation activities will encourage "mainstreaming" individuals with
special needs.
Pnlicy 3.21_R - The Parks and
Recreation Department will actively
coordinate with private/non-profit,
commercial, educational institutions
and service clubs, to ensure that
recreation services are not
duplicated
• Prngram 39,L9 -The City will avoid
offering recreation classes or
`- 1 activities which unnecessarily
< — duplicate commercial programs.
-- Pnlicy 32110 - City-sponsored
Senior Programs activities will promote self-directed,
lifelong recreation pursuits.
Policy 121 11 - Recreation activities will be operated safely, in keeping with the
characteristics and demands of the activities.
Pay 321-12 - The City will recruit and train recreation volunteers where appropriate to
type of the activity.
Policy 321 13 - Recreation activities will be offered that identify and interpret historical
resources,and that highlight multi-cultural entities in the community.
Prng m 3.21.14 - The City will collaborate with groups or organizations providing high
risk or active recreation programs in open space areas, upon the recommendation of the
Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council approval.
Policy 3 21.15 -The City's Information Technology Master Plan shall support the Parks and
Recreation Element/Master Plan by making program registration and activities more
accessible.
3.22 Future Needs
O Pnlicy 3 22 1 - The Parks and Recreation Department and Police Department shall
collaborate in planning and share resources in providing activities that focus on crime
prevention and intervention in the community.
22
��3s
Pnlicy3 2 2 - Youth recreation activities
will include prevention and intervention
Ocomponents.
Program 322' - Youth at-risk will be
recruited to participate in recreation
activities.
Prngram 322 4-'The City will collaborate
with other agencies to develop activities
that will serve as outlets for youth at-risk.
Teen Programs Policy3_92 5 - The Parks and Recreation
Department will be responsive to the
changing community needs for services.
Pmgram 3.22.6 - City staff will regularly evaluate services to determine outcomes and
benefits.
Prngram 322 7 - Recreation activities T —
shall take place at facilities and during
times to accommodate the schedules of
working people- .—
�s
L
O Program 322.9 - New activities will be f
prioritized from the results of public
hearings, community input, on-going
activity evaluations, and participant
surveys.
Policy - City-sponsored recreation ^ -
activities will provide community and
individual opportunities to contribute to
emotional,physical and social wellness. Sinsheimer Child Care Program
Policy 322 10 - Programs will be designed to meet the needs of seniors pursuing active
lifestyles.
Policy 322.11 - Programs shall meet the needs of the demographically changing
community.
Prngram 3.22.12 - Publicly accessible open space shall continue to be maintained through
the ranger service and linked to other open space areas through recreational trails.
23
l 36
O
Chapter IV
FINANCING
0
a
24
IV. FINANCING
l J4.10 FACILITIES
vv Policy.4 10 1 - The City shall continue to acquire and develop parkland through the
development review and annexation process.
Miry.4�102 - For annexation areas, at least 10 acres of developed parkland for each
1000 residents shall be required provided by the developer.
Policy 4.101 - Staff shall pursue all appropriate State and Federal grant programs for
project and acquisition funding.
Policy 10 4-The City Council shall review park-in-lieu fees periodically to ensure that
they stay consistent with land acquisition and development costs.
Policy 4 10.5 - park-in-lieu fees shall be committed to a project within two years from
collection and shall have a direct benefit to the area for which they were intended.
Policy 4.10.6; -Requests for easements or the placement of privately owned equipment or
structures in City parks, such as utility structures and antennas, is subject to the review of
the Parks and Recreation Commission and approval by the City Council. Revenues
derived from these activities shall be credited to the Parks and Recreation Department.
04.20 ACTIVPTIES
Policy 4.20.1 - 'The Parks and Recreation Department shall maintain financial practices
that are consistent with the City policy and the Financial Plan.
Program 420 2 - The Parks and Recreation Department will develop a collaborative fee
exchange agreement for services with other agencies (for example: in-kind exchange of
services).
Miry 4 Parks and recreation fees will be adjusted as needed to meet the approved
level of cost recovery identified in the current Financial Plan..
Pnlicy 4.2(14 - The Parks and Recreation Department shall strive to develop corporate
sponsorship, adopt-a-park,or activity support,as alternatives to general fund monies.
Policy. 4 20 5 - The City will offer subsidies to assist low-income individuals and
families with recreational activity fees.
Pnlic>?y 4-70-6 - Participants residing outside of the city may be assessed a non-resident
fee for participation in City recreation activities.
0 25
J 38�
Policy 4.20.7 - When ' -sible without reducing services, activiL__. shall be operated as
an enterprise activity, with the objective that it be financially self-supporting, or
essentially so.
O430 CONCESSIONS
Policy 430-1 -Upon recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Commission and with
approval of the City Council,private concessions shall be authorized in City parks.
Policy , Park concessions shall comply with existing park master plans and
provide a public service.
Policy 4.40.3 - Park concessions shall not significantly alter-the ambience or use of the
parks where permitted
Policy 4 30 4 - Concession are limited to those activities that are compatible with the
traditional use of the park.
O
® 26
/-39
O
Chapter V
MPLEMENTATION
' 27
V. iMPLEMIQUAMv-
5.00 INTRODUCTION
OThe Parks and Recreation Element/Master Plan identify the areas of greatest need for new
recreation facilities in section 2.40. Upcoming capital projects funding requests for
recreational facilities will concentrate on these needs. In addition there are many proactive
steps that can be taken to address the identified needs.
5.10 ATHLETIC FIELDS
Program 5.10.1 - Continue to improve existing fields through renovation and providing
additional resources for maintenance.
DAMON-GARCIA SPORTS PARK
Pra=m 5.1(1.2 -
SAN LU'.S OBISPO.CALIFORNIA Transitions from multi
— - � •y! � � t use to single use fields,
centering different
Wiz- _ _ -r- sports at single
locations.
G '• 4
11� Prn sm 5-10.3 -
\�. �n
In' Develop joint use
agreements with other
public agencies, in
addition to the current
``. agreement with the San
` 517EGONSTP.AINTS
Luis Coastal School
District, to maximize the use of existing facilities.
Program 5 10 4-Develop new programs, such as senior athletics, at times other than
when current fields are heavily used.
Pm=m 5-10 5 -Insure that athletic fields are provided within new residential
developments within the community
PrnMm 5-10.6 -Consider additional fields for needs not addressed by the Damon
Garcia Sports Fields.
5.20 COMMUNITY CENTER AND THERAPY POOL
Program 120-1 -Complete the upgrades and renovation of the Recreation Center to
provide an interim community center.
PrnUam 5 20 2 - Secure funding for a therapy pool to be located at the SLO Aquatics
Center.
0 28
Prngram.5 70 3 -Consid._.,.avenue enhancement measures on a ci. _..ide basis that will
fund the construction of a new community center.
O5.30 MINI PARKS
iv the Rodriguez Adobe
Program 5 �n 1 - Construct rrum parks on Purple Sage Drive [ gu
and at the corner of Marsh and Santa Rosa Streets through the City's normal Capital
Improvement process.
Programme- Support efforts of neighborhoods lacking adequate park space to
develop mini parks.
5.40 TRAILS
Program 5401 _Acquire property to be preserved as open space on which trails can be
constructed and maintained.
Program 5.40.2 -Use a variety of techniques to acquire open space, including-
purchase, grants,donations, and developer agreements.
Prngram 9403 -Design new parks so that they can be connected by recreational trials.
Prngram 5.40.4 Connect existing parks and open space areas with trails.
5.500 THER UNMET NEEDS including: lighted tennis courts,neighborhood parks,
upgraded playground equipment, dog parks,BMX park,other mini-parks, and-specialty
facilities such as bocce ball court.
Program 5.50.1 -Schedule these"unmet needs" projects for construction through the
normal capital improvement proceeds, as funding exists.
Prng mra 550-2 -Look for alternate methods to construct some of these projects, such
as community and volunteer participation.
5.60 MASTER PLANS
Prno am 5.60.1 -Complete the implementation of existing master plans, such as those
for Sinsheimer and Laguna Lake Parks.
• 29
Chapter VI
APPENDIX
0
• 30
APPENDIX A
PARK ACQUISITION AND U"LEMENTATION PRIORITIES, 0-4 YEARS
apital Improvement priorities and cost estimates for recreation projects are based on the availability of
funds and current funding levels.
Park Acquisition and Implementation Plan
0-4 Years
Athletic Field renovations[includes Santa $ 820,000
Rosa]
Community Center $4,500,000
Therapy Pool $ 500,000
Neighborhood Gymnasiums $ 300,000
Laguna Lake Park Improvements $ 350,000
Sinsheimer Park Improvements $ 820,000
Rodriguez Adobe Park(Purple Sage Dr.) $150,000
Marsh Street Park $100,000
OPlaygroutid Equipment Upgrades $800,000
Eto Memorial Garden Donation
DeVaul Neighborhood Park Park-in-lieu project
Sinsheimer Park Batting Cages Donation
Las Praderas Park $30,000
Damon-Garcia Sports Fields Construction $4,000,000
Open Space Trail Construction
2 Lighted Softball Fields $1,000,000
• 31
APPENDIX B
PARK ACQUISITION AND IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITY, 5-10 YEARS
Park Acquisition and Implementation Plan
5-10 Years
Lighted Tennis Courts $600,000
Laguna Lake Park.Improvements $400,000
Sinsheimer Park Improvements $800,000
Special Use Facilities $400,000
Playground Equipment Upgrades $1,000,000
Orcutt Area Neighborhood Park Park-in-lieu project
Neighborhood and Mini Parks $400,000
Margarita Area Neighborhood Park Park-in-lieu project
Community Garden Improvements $20,000
OOpen Space Trail Construction
Athletic Field Improvements $90,000
Broad Street Neighborhood Park $500,000
• 32
1 �5
iiiii���illllllllllll a°i II city of
san lugs owspo 777-7,17
Park Land Acquisition and Improvement in Annexation Areas
A. OVERVIEW
The purpose of these guidelines is to provide a framework for achieving General.Plan
park system goals in annexation areas. While these guidelines are not intended to be
"hard and fast rules,"they are intended to provide sufficient direction to help ensure that.
1. We clearly communicate our goals — and method for achieving them — to those
proposing residential annexations in order to avoid any misunderstandings about
development requirements and related costs.
2. We achieve these goals in the most effective manner possible.
B. GENERAL PLAN POLICIES
The General Plan sets forth two key policies regarding the City's park system standards,
and new development's responsibility to pay for the cost of the park land necessary to
O serve it:
1. The City shall develop and maintain a park system at the rate of.10 acres of park
land per 1,000 residents (PR 6.1.1).
2. The costs of public facilities and services needed for new development shall be
bome by the new development, unless the community chooses to help pay the
costs for a certain development to obtain community-wide benefits (LU 1.14).
C. IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
In accordance with General Plan policies, the City will use the following guidelines in
acquiring and improving park land whenever State law allows us to do so. This is most
likely to occuf in the case of annexations. However, these guidelines are also applicable.
whenever discretionary approvals of the City are requested, such as zone changes; general
plan amendments or development agreements.
1. Park land acquisition and improvement.goal. The City will achieve a ratio of
10 acres of park per 1,000 residents_projected to.reside in.,the annexation area.
This includes land and improvements.
a. Privately owned and maintained landscaped areas such as. interior
O parkways and community greens may be considered,as contributing to this
goal. This will be determined on a case-by-case basis depending on the
purpose and nature of such areas, and the level of public access to them.
Park Land Acquisition and Improvement in Annexation Areas Page 2
b. School sites may also be considered as contributing towards this goal.
Y g
This will be determined on a case-by-case basis depending on the location
of the proposed school site to planned park sites; and the likelihood that
the school site will be used as a"joint use"facility.
C. Open space will not typically be counted as park land in meeting the 10
acres per 1,000 residents standard. The City's General Plan is clear in its
distinctions between open space and parks; and the purpose of these
guidelines is to help implement the General Plan's park system goals, not
open space goals.
2. Property owner dedication and developer improvement requirement.
Through an annexation agreement, the City will generally require the dedication
and full improvement of required park land by the property owner and/or
developer (applicant) as a condition of the annexation. This means that the City
will typically not take the lead role in acquiring and improving parks in
annexation areas; this is the applicant's responsibility similar to the construction
of other on=site, project-related infrastructure improvements such as streets,
sidewalks, storm drainage collection, water distribution lines and sewer collection
lines.
O 3. Acquisition and improvement phasing. The phasing of when dedication and
improvements are required by the applicant will be set forth in the annexation
agreement, specific plan or development plan. While this will be determined on a
case-by-case basis, land dedication and improvements should generally.be phased
as follows:
a. Land should be dedicated upon annexation.
b. Phase 1 improvements (as defined in the annexation agreement, specific
plan or development plan) should be completed before the first certificate
of occupancy is issued; other improvement phases and standards may be
established in the annexation agreement, specific plan or development
plan.
C. All improvements should be completed by the time that about two-thirds
of the units are available for occupancy. ... .
4. Fees in-lieu of f dedication and improvement. Depending on the circumstances,
the City may prefer to develop some portion of the required park acquisition and
improvements on property that isnot being annexed. This would generally occur
when the City plans to meet part of the"10 acres.per 1,000 residents"requirement
through a community-wide facility that is not located in the annexation area, or
O
when the annexation area is not large enough' to dedicate and improve a
meaningful amount of park land. Whenever fees are paid in lieu of dedicating and
improving park land, they will be:
Park Land Acquisition and Improvement in Annexation Areas Page 3
a. Restricted solely for park land acquisition and improvement.
b. Determined, assessed, collected and accounted for in a manner consistent
with state requirements for development impact fees as set forth in AB
1600.
C. Used for park land and improvements that directly serve the annexation
area, unless a.finding is made that the area is already adequately served by
existing neighborhood facilities. In this case, fees will be used to acquire
or improve community-wide facilities.
5. Case-by-case review. The following issues will be addressed on a case-by-case
basis as part of the specific plan or development review process:
a. Amount of park land to be dedicated and improved within the annexation
areas versus the amount that will be met through the payment of in-lieu
fees in meeting the overall goal of 10 acres of parks per 1,000 residents.
b. Location and type of park land to be developed in the annexation area.
C. Value of the park land and improvements that will not be developed in the
Oannexation, and the resulting amount of fees to be paid.
d. Timing as to when these fees will be paid.
e. Timing as to when park improvements will be made by the applicant.
f Distribution of any in-lieu fees between neighborhood versus community
parks and facilities, and the need to redress any deficit in the availability of
neighborhood'parks in the vicinity of the annexation area.
7777t .ni�-.e{', v'�f'` ..,40,,�A; .y�o3:M ,o'h'@;.
,...
H:Margarita Area Specific Plan/Park Land Acquisition in Annexation Areas
r •
APPENDIX D �
PLANNING COMIVIISSION AND CITY COUNCIL DRAFT RESOLUTIONS
OSAN LUIS OBISPO PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. -01
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF THE UPDATE TO THE
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT OF THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN AND
MASTER PLAN
WHEREAS, on December 6, 2000, the Parks and Recreation Commission voted to revise
the draft Parks and Recreation Element update as recommended by the Planning Commission, and
referred two revised policies to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, Section 65353 of the California Government Code requires the Planning
Commission to hold at least one public hearing before approving a recommendation to update or
amend the City's General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo did conduct a public
hearing in the City Council Chamber of the San Luis Obispo City Hall, San Luis Obispo,
California, on January 2001, to consider the Parks and Recreation Commission's
recommendation for a comprehensive amendment to and update of the City's General Plan Parks
0and Recreation Element and Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, after considering the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, the staff
report, and public testimony, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve the
Negative Declaration and the amended Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of
San Luis Obispo hereby recommends that the City Council 1) approve the Negative Declaration of
Environmental Impact, and 2) adopt the update to the Parks and Recreation Element of the City's
General Plan as revised by Parks and Recreation Commission and the Planning Commission.
The foregoing resolution to recommend adoption of the Parks and. Recreation Element
update was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES: None _
ABSENT: None
Secretary
Planning Commission
DATED: ..2001
36
RL.,JLUTION NO. (2001 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT AND
AND THE REVISED PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
WHEREAS,the Parks and Recreation Commission and Planning Commission and
the City Council have held public hearings on amendments to the Parks and Recreation Element and
Master Plan, and
WHEREAS,the Parks and Recreation Commission and Planning Commission
have both recommended Council adoption of the December 2000 Parks and Recreation Element and
Master Plan update; and
WHEREAS, the potential environmental impacts of the revised Element have been evaluated
in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City of San Luis
Obispo CEQA Guidelines and received,a negative declaration; and
WHEREAS,the proposed Parks and Recreation Element goals,policies and programs as
Ocontained in the document entitled Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan are consistent with
all elements of the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the goals,policies and programs will support and provide direction for the City to
provide a park and facility network that includes neighborhood parks,community parks, special
recreation and sports facilities as well as recreation activities designed to meet current demands and
strive to keep up with future demands;and
WHEREAS, the identified unmet needs for parks and recreation facilities have been developed
through the collection of public input,and are addressed by the policies and programs set forth in the
areas for Athletic Fields,Neighborhood Parks,Gymnasiums;:_Community Center,Laguna Lake Park,
the entire Park system and indoor recreation facilities; and
WHEREAS,the unmet recreational needs have been developed through public input, and
found to be activities for prevention and intervention in children and teens, special needs individuals
37
including disabled persons,seri___.-itizens, and the needs are addressed bj a policies and programs
set forth in the Master Plan.
ONOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
1. Environmental Determination. The City Council affirms and adopts the Community
Development Director's Negative Declaration of environmental impact for the Parks and Recreation
Master Plan and Parks and Recreation Element update.
2. Adoption of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The City Council adopts the December
2000 Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan in which chapters one through four and the vision
statement are adopted as the update to the General Plan Parks and Recreation Element.
3. Repeal of the Previous Element. The Parks and Recreation Element adopted in April 1995 is
repealed on the effective date of the amended Parks and Recreation Element:
4. . Effective Date. The newly adopted Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan shall be
effective on the thirtieth day after passage of this Resolution.
5. Publication and Availability. The Parks and Recreation Director shall cause the newly adopted
Master Plan and Element Update to be provided to City officials, concerned agencies, public libraries,
and to the public at a cost not to exceed the cost of reproduction..
On motion of seconded by _ and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor Allen Settle .
ATTEST:
Lee Price,City Clerk y
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jeff Jorgensen,City Attorney
38
f
APPENDIX E
GLOSSARY OF TERMS:
Concessions- Any contracted activity involving the for-profit sale of goods and services on public
property,including temporary and on-going activities.
Enterprise Activity - Programs where fees and rates fully cover direct operating costs. Programs
with a focus on youth and seniors may be subsidized by the General Fund to cover indirect costs with
Council approval.
Joint Use Site- Facilities or properties where long-term development and uses between the City and
another agency has been established through a formal agreement.
Life long recreation pursuits — Activities that can be enjoyed by persons over a wide span of years,
physical abilities and interest, such as from youth through one's senior years..
Mainstreaming Incorporating those with special needs into regular leisure programs or everyday
activities
Multi-generational — Programs and facilities designed to cover a broad range of age levels — pre-
schoolers, school-age children, teens,adults,seniors.
Open space—Land or water area which remains in a predominantly natural or undeveloped state, and
intended to protect and preserve the community's natural and historical resources, define the urban
boundary and provide visual and physical relief from urban development. Open spaces include farming
Oand grazing land, creeks, marshes, watershed and floodplains, scenic resources, plant and animal
habitat,historic and archeological resources and passive parks and recreation areas.
Park-in-lieu fees -Fees charged to new development to defray public costs of providing parks and
recreation facilities to serve new residents, as allowed under state law (the Quimby Act).
Parkways—Park areas that provide a transition from one area to another, such as linear parks.
Passive recreation area—A park or an area designed for lower levels of recreational activity, such as
hiking, picnicking, nature study and similar activities that generally do not involve more active uses
such as team sports,playground equipment,or intensive landscape modification.
Prevention and intervention program—Activities designed to facilitate those children identified as at
risk as a means to improve quality of life and encourage responsible behavior
Public creek access easements—Areas within or along creeks where the public is allowed
Special needs — Program participants who require reasonable accommodations as defined under the
Americans with Disabilities Act
Specialty facilities — Buildings or areas constructed for a specific program, such as golf courses,
community gardens,skateparks
�./ 39
Youth-at-risk — Children undt.-ode age of 18 that face challenges invo._ tig self-esteem, responsible
behavior,independent thinking, and other social issues
0Youth-sized gymnasiums — Indoor facilities designed to accommodate youth activities on a smaller
scale than adults. A typical facility will have smaller court dimensions and lowered equipment, such as
nets and baskets.
0
0 40
-s3
,�
����'� �,
__ �
a�
.�
...
O � w �
.�
� �U
� c.
� �
� �
ti
o °�
z
a � �
i .�.. �O
.r � C�
U �:
on °'
� �
y � � _.
W ti U _ - -
Q GA U
t � -
/-S �
� � §
\ \ \ $ } \ $ \� . \/ \ ] §
qLUL
\ \ \
. .
§ � f . ® \ . � f .
\[ { \ f \ \ / • m . CN
) ! ! \ \ `,
%
-
2
-
2 ) ( ) k \ ) 7 ) \ d }) / d / \ ! ) ƒ
\ d / \ / CQ
cn
2
cn
/ 321 $ . _ � . _ \ , /ƒI
/ \ ; m ; _ %M rr- -
-
k � \
-
+
-
�
! \ \ k \ t / \ } ƒ / ) \ W \ \ \
Z / -5b
8
a
YyQ
opC
C
x _ a
w
a
U
z E
m 8
N V
o Y $ $ •
MEETiN = AGENDA ATTACHMENT 2
DATE '3"Of ITEM #.1...
RESOLUTION NO.. enes
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT,
ADOPTING A NEW PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT/MASTER PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on April 3, 2001, and has
considered testimony of interested parties, the records of the Planning Commission hearing, the
records of the Parks and Recreation Commission hearing, and the evaluations and
recommendations of staff, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the draft Negative Declaration of
Environmental Impact as prepared by the staff and reviewed by the Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
SECTION 1. Environmental Determination. The City Council finds and determines that
the project's Negative Determination adequately addresses the potential environmental impacts
of the proposed Element update, and reflects the independent judgment of the City Council. The
Council determines that the Element update will have no significant impacts on the environment.
The Council hereby adopts said Negative Declaration.,
SECTION 2. Repeal of Previous Element. The Parks and Recreation Element adopted
in 1995 is hereby repealed on the effective date of the adoption of this resolution.
SECTION 3. Adoption of New Element. The revised Parks and Recreation Element /
Master Plan consisting of the text dated April, 3, 2001, on file in the City Clerk's Office is
hereby adopted.
SECTION 4. Publication and Availability. The Community Development Director
caused the newly adopted Element to be published and provided to City officials, concerned
citizens, and public libraries, and made available to the public at a cost not to exceed the cost of
reproduction.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. The newly adopted Element shall be effective on the
thirtieth day after passage of this resolution.
Upon motion of , seconded by
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Resolution No. (2001 Series)
the foregoing resolution was adopted this day of 12001.
Mayor Allen Settle
ATTEST:
Lee Price, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Je . J rge , C1 Attorney
I - S�
EXHIBIT A
11�IIDlllll!I�� 1111 C11ILN Of
SAn x,115 OBISPO
OEM990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FOR
THE PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT
AND MASTER PLAN UPDATE
ER 149-00
1 . Project Title: Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan Update
2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of San Luis Obispo
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Jeff Hook, Associate Planner
4. Project Location: Citywide
5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Parks and Recreation Department
City of San Luis Obispo
1341 Nipomo Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
Attn: Paul Le Sage, Director
6. General Plan Designation: Public
7. Zoning: PF
8. Description of the Project: The Parks and Recreation Element (PRE) is an
optional policy section of the City's General Plan and part of the City's
overall Parks Master Plan, a comprehensive plan for the acquisition,
development and funding for parks, recreational. programs and facilities
throughout the City. Generally, the PRE does not include .specific timetables,
designs, or implementation strategies for facility development, but instead
establishes overall goals, policies and a program framework. The, Parks
Master Plan addresses the type, location, and timing of development of city
parks and recreation facilities. The PRE was last updated in 1995. Due to
changing community recreation needs and opportunities, the PRE and Parks
Master Plan need to be updated.
The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to include the disabled in all at its services. programs and activities
V Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (8057 78i-7410 /4
ID
The Draft Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan shows few
significant changes from the 1995 version. This is a citizen-driven document
and the unmet needs section reflects community preferences. Policy and
program emphasis continues to be on developing new facilities to meet the
community's needs. The five major unmet needs are: 1) developing youth
athletic fields and support facilities, 2) meeting the special needs of senior
citizens, teens, disabled persons, and at-risk youth, 3) providing indoor
recreation facilities, including a multi-use community center and therapy pool,
and 4) expanding paths and trails for recreational use and to link
neighborhoods and facilities, and 5) providing parks in underserved
neighborhoods. The City intends to meet growing recreational needs through
more efficient delivery of services, user fees which more closely reflect the
cost of providing the services, community support through donations of time
and materials, and special grant programs. The City also intends to continue
and expand participation in joint use programs with the San Luis Coastal
Unified School District and other agencies, enabling shared use of public and
private parks and facilities. No General Plan land use changes are proposed.
The main changes reflected in this updated PRE and Master Plan are:
• A new is being considered in the area bordered by state Highway 101,
Broad Street, Cerro San Luis and Foothill Boulevard.
• A new Community Center and Therapy Pool is included in planned
facilities.
• An additional athletic facility containing two lighted softball fields is
proposed.
• Revised parkland requirement for new residential subdivisions,
increasing the requirement from 5 acres of parkland per 1 ,000 future
residents to 10 acres per 1 ,000 future residents.
• For the first time, policies and programs related to Open Space
administration and recreation are included.
• The Element includes standards for the operation of concessions
within public parks and buildings.
This initial study addresses the updated program goals, policies and programs
being considered by the City for adoption. It evaluates program-/eve/ actions
that describe planned recreation facilities and programs. As such, the
evaluation focus primarily on the Element's consistency with adopted City
plans, goals, objectives and standards. Specific recreation projects, including
10111&0 CITY OF SAN Luis OBISPO 2 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2000
land acquisition, park and sports field development, and special activity
centers envisioned in the Plan will require subsequent study, design and
environmental review.
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Settings: PRE policies and programs apply to the
entire city; consequently the "project area" or setting includes the entire City
of San Luis Obispo and parks and open space areas located outside city
limits within the City's planning area.
10. Project Entitlements Requested: Review by the city Parks and Recreation
and Planning Commissions, and approval by the City Council.
11 . Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g. permits, financing
approval, or participation agreement): None
CITY OF SAN Luis OsISPO 3 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKusT 2000
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the
checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics Geology/Soils Public Services
Agricultural Resources Hazards & Hazardous Recreation
Materials
Air Quality Hydrology/Water Quality Transportation & Traffic
Biological Resources Land Use and Planning Utilities and Service
Systems
Cultural Resources Noise Mandatory Findings of
Significance
Energy and Mineral Population and Housing
Resources
IflThere is no evidence before the Department that the project will have any potential adverse effects
on fish and wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. As such, the project
qualifies for a de minimis waiver with regards to the filing of Fish and Game Fees.
ElThe project has potential to impact fish and wildlife resources and shall be subject to the payment
of Fish and Game fees pursuant to Section 711.4 of the California Fish and Game Code. This initial
study has been circulated to the California Department of Fish and Game for review and comment.
DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a X
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there
will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made, or the
mitigation measures described on an attached sheet(s) have been added and agreed to by the
pro ect proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant" impact(s) or "potentially
significant unless mitigated" impact(s) on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been
adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has
been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached
sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects
that remain to be addressed
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
because all potentially significant effects (1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or
ia+ Cm OF SAN Luis Oeispo 4 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2000
1- 63
M
GATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (2) have been avoided or
igated pursuant to that earlier EIR of NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are im osed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
December 11, 2000
Sig a Date
John Mandeville Long,Range Planning Manager
Printed Name For
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except 'No Impact" answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the analysis in each section. A "No
Impact' answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact
simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture
zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as
well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on
a project-specific screening analysis).
2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site,
cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational
impacts. The explanation of each issue should identify the significance criteria or threshold, if any,
used to evaluate each question.
3. "Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is
significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination
is made, an EIR is required.
4. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation
measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant
Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they
reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures. from Section 17, "Earlier
Analysis," may be cross-referenced).
5. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an
effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c) (3)
(D) of the.California Administrators Code. Earlier.analyses are discussed in Section 17 at the end of
the checklist.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for
potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or
outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the
statement is.substantiated.
Cm of SAN Lues Oeispo 5 INmAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2000
\ 1 r
i -
r
7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or
individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. In this case, a brief discussion should
identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
b) Irripa6ts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on earlier
analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the
earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sources Potentially Less Than Las Than No
Significant Significant Significant impact
Issues with Impact
ER #149-00
Mitigation
Incorporated
1. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X
b► Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but 1 X
not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, open space,
and historic buildings within a local or state scenic
highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or X
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which X
would adversely effect day of nighttime views in the
area?
Parks and Recreation policies and programs will generally not result in significant, adverse aesthetic impacts to
natural or manmade landscapes, degrade the community's visual character,.block views or create light or glare
that would affect views. Development of the Damon Garcia Sports Fields (Exhibit 1, #30) will convert 20 acres of
open, former grazing land to sports fields. In the near term, the conversion of 20 acres of grazing land will change
the site's visual character through landscaping, paving, and support facilities, such as maintenance building and
concessions stand, however scenic views of the South Street Hills and Santa Lucia Foothills would be unaffected.
Individually, this conversion will be a less than significant impact, since the site accounts for a small portion of the
total open space in the Margarita area and will be bordered on the northwest, west and south by open space
consisting of former grazing lands, the former oil Tank Farm, the South Street Hills and creek areas. Policy 2.57.8
says that parkland acquisition should enhance the City's recreational trails, pedestrian transportation and open
spaces, and Policy 2.57.2 calls for the City to maintain parks in such a manner that "priority will be given to the
preservation of natural beauty and safe use of land within the system." These policies will help ensure that the
sports field will be designed and located to preserve views and protect visually sensitive areas, resulting in a less
than significant impact at that site. installation of sports field lighting will have to meet City performance standards
that prohibit exterior lighting from creating glare which causes a nuisance or hazard on adjacent property.
Moreover, future sports field plans will be reviewed by the City's Architectural Review Commission to ensure the
development meets City standards for view corridor protection, shielding sports field lighting to prevent glare and
other aesthetic issues.
The sports fields are located in the Margarita specific plan area, an area designated as a major residential
expansion area in the City's General Plan, to be built out over several years. In the long term, the cumulative
result of the land conversion for sports fields and the eventual build out of adjacent residential will be to change the
area's predominantly rural character to urban. This change was identified as a significant, unavoidable adverse
aesthetic change in the City's 1994 Final Environmental Impact Report on the Land Use and Circulation Element
Updates. The draft Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan is consistent with the adopted Land Use
Element and with impacts analyzed in the Council-certified EIR, and is therefore referenced in this initial study.
CITY OF SAN LUIS Osispo 6 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2000
/_/�
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sources Potentially Lcss Than Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Issues With Impact
ER 11149-00 Mitigation
Incorporated
In December 2000, the Damon Garcia Sports Fields are being designed and a project-specific initial
environmental study is being prepared. The project's potential environmental projects effects, including
lighting glare, traffic, noise and other factors are being evaluated separately and will be addressed in detail in
that document and considered prior to any specific project approval.
2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. Would theproject:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland X
of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use?
b) .Conflict with zoning:for agncdultural::use,..ora . X
Williamson Act contract?
C) Involve other:changes in the existing environment-. X
which, due to their.location or nature, could result in
conversion of.Farmland, to non-a ricultural.use?
Of the planned recreation facilities included in the PRE update, the only program or facility involving•a
change in land use is the proposed Damon Garcia Sports Field Complex in the Margarita Expansion Area.
Consequently, only the Damon Garcia site is discussed in this initial study. According to data from the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), the Damon Garcia
sports fields site includes three distinct soil types: Cropley, Concepcion and Lodo, with a fourth portion
consisting of rock outcrop. About 80 percent of the site consists of Cropley clay on slopes ranging from
zero to 9 percent and is designated as Class 11e-5 soil. According to the USDA Soil Survey of San Luis
Obispo County, this is soil with "moderate limitations that reduce the choice of plants or require moderate
conservation practices." Lodo and Conception soils comprise about 14 percent of the site and are designated as
Class IV soils. According to NRCS criteria, irrigated and non-irrigated Class I and!l soils in San Luis Obispo
County are generally considered `prime soil.' Prime Farmland consists of those areas with the best
combination of physical and chemical features to sustain long-term crop production, and that has a history
of crops and availability of a developed irrigation water supply. The Damon Garcia property has historically
been used.as grazing land and does not have a history of growing crops, hence, it would generally not
qualify as prime farmland'under NRCS criteria.
Construction of the Damon Garcia Sports Field will convert about 18.5 acres of prime soil to recreational
use. The conversion of rangeland to urban uses was analyzed in the City's 1994 Land Use and Circulation
Final EIR. The Damon Garcia property was included in the cumulative Citywide loss of about 700 acres of
prime agricultural soils resulting from build out as shown in the General Plan. The FEIR concluded that the
loss was a significant, unavoidable adverse impact and the City adopted findings of overriding considerations
pursuant to state law. The Draft Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan is consistent with the
General Plan Land Use Element and with the findings of the previous FEIR, which is herein referenced.
3. AIR QUALITY. Would theproject:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute X
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
b) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the X
applicable air quality plan?
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X
concentrations?
d) Create objectionable odorsaffecting a substantial X
number of people?
e) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of X
�/ Cm OF SAN LUIS OaisPo 7 INmAL STuoY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2000
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sources Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Issues With Impact
ER #149-00 Mitigation
Inco orated
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
non-attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed qualitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
Parks and Recreation Element programs and projects are not likely to significantly affect air quality or vehicle
emissions since they are targeted primarily at meeting the needs of current, local residents. The Element's
policies and programs also accommodate future residential growth as anticipated in the General Plan. The
potential effect of community growth on air quality was evaluated in the 1994 Land Use and Circulation
Final EIR, and determined to be a significant but mitigatable adverse impact. The FEIR included several
mitigation measures which will reduce impacts to less than significant levels. The programs and facilities
are not likely to expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, create objectionable odors or result in cumulative
increases of any pollutant for which San Luis Obispo is a non-attainment area. No or negligent effect at
program level. individual parks development projects subject to further review for conformance with county
air quality management plans and impacts.
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would theproject:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or X
indirectly or through habitat modifications, on any
species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special
status species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and
Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect, on any riparian X
habitat or other sensitive natural community identified
,in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by
the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting X
biological resources, such as a tree.preservation policy
or ordinance (e.g. Heritage Trees)?
d► Interfere substantially with the movement of any native X
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat X
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
f) Have a substantial adverse effect on Federally X
protected wetlands as defined in Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marshes,
vernal pools, etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interni tion, or other means?
General Plan policies require that parks, recreation centers, playgrounds, sports fields and other recreation
facilities and programs be designed to preserve unique natural resources, including hillsides, creeks,
watersheds, wildlife and native plant habitat 9 (Land Use Element Policies 6.2. 1 and 6.4.4). The City has
adopted creek setbacks for new development and establishes development limits on hillsides. No part of the
Damon Garcia project will encroach into creek habitat or extend onto hillside areas. The project will be
consistent with General Plan standards and designed and located to avoid sensitive resources or habitat.
Precise development plans for the sports fields will be subject to environmental review to verify compliance
11111111111hQ8 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO a INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2000 / (/')
/—/ r
( 1 �
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sources Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
ER !1149-00 Issues With Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
with City standards.
S. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would theproject:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance X
of a historic resource? (See CEQA Guidelines 15064.5)
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance X
of an archeological resource? (See CEQA Guidelines
15064.5)
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X
resource or site or unique geologic feature?'
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred X
outside of formal cemeteries?
Parks and Recreation Element policies and programs are not likely to adversely affect cultural resources.
Community heritage preservation policies in the Land Use Element (Policy 6.6.4) call for the City to protect
both known and potential archaeological and historical resources, and the Archaeological Resource
Preservation Guidelines establish specific procedures to be followed in public and private development. All
planned recreation facilities are subject to these requirements and will normally require at least a "Phase 1"
archaeological study to evaluate potential resources and identify appropriate preservation measures.
6. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? X
b) Use non-renewable resourcesin a wasteful+and X
inefficient manner?
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral X
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the State?
The Energy Element and Conservation Element include policies and programs to encourage the conservation
and careful management of city resources, including land, water, minerals and energy. These policies are
reflected in the operation and maintenance of Parks and Recreation facilities, and reinforced in Policy 1.33. 1
which states "Recreation services will be operated in a manner that is environmentally sensitive and which
conserves natural resources.'
7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Would theproject:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial X
adverse effects, including risk of loss, injury or death
involving:
1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated X
in the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the
area, or based on other substantial evidence of a
known fault?
II. Strong seismic ground shaking? X
IIL 'Seismic related ground-failure, including X
liquefaction?
IV. Landslides or mudflows? X
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or X
that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on or off site landslides, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B X
of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
`�
CrTY OF SAN Luis Osispo g INmAL STUOy ENVIRONMENTAL CNECKUST 2000
r
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sources Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
ER (1149-00 Issues With Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
The proposed facilities and programs are not likely to cause significant adverse impacts to soils or natural
landforms, or expose people or structures to seismic hazards. Limited grading will be necessary to develop
or expand recreation facilities, however this grading will generally be minor in scope and designed to
accommodate outdoor use areas and small structures on gently sloping sites. Such grading will be subject
to environmental review and mitigation on a case-by-case basis, once specific designs are prepared. City
architectural review guidelines and grading regulations set standards to minimize aesthetic, physical and
biological effects of grading, and include requirements for landscaping and erosion control.
Passive recreation activities (hiking, nature study) will be accommodated on designated trails and in public
open space areas. Limited trail improvements, staging areas and signs may be provided in dedicated open
space areas for public use. These facilities will not require significant landform modifications, nor subject
people or property to seismic hazards.
8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the roject:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the X
environment though the routine use, transport or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the X .
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or X
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
d) f-xpose people or structures to existing sources of X
hazardous emissions or hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste?
e) Be located on a site which is included on a list of X
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, it
would create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
f) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or X
within two miles of a public airport, would the project
result in a safety hazard for the people residing or
working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of, or physically interfere with, X
the adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of lose, X
injury, or death, involving wildland fires, including
where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or
where residents are intermixed with wildlands?
Parks and Recreation programs and facilities generally do not involve use of hazardous materials, with the
possible exception of fertilizers and landscape maintenance chemicals. These materials are stored and used
in compliance with State standards and applied by State licensed City personnel. The Damon Garcia Sports
Fields is located within one mile of the San Luis Obispo County Airport. The sports field site is shown in the
San Luis Obispo County Airport Land Use Plan as being within an Area 5 , which conditionally allows
sports fields. The Damon Garcia annexation and concept plan was referred to the Airport Land Use
Commission and conditionally approved, with site lighting design to return for approval.
`� CITY OF SAN Luis OBISPO 10 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2000 — v /'�
1
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Source Fotentia,.,- Less Than Le55 Than Nn
Significant Significam Significant Impact
tssucs With impact
ER #149-00 Mitigation
Incorporated
9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would theproject:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X
requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere X
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering
of the local groundwater table level (e.g. The
productionrate of preexisting nearby wells would drop
to a level which-would not support existing land uses
for which permits have beengranted)?:
c); Create or contribute runoff water which.would exceed.. X
'the.capacity of existing or planned storm-water
drainage systems orprovide substantial additional '
sources of polluted runoff.
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage patter of the X
site orarea in a manner which.would result in
substantial erosion or siltation onsite,or.offsite?
e) Substantially alter the existing drainage patter of the. X
site or,area in:a manner which would result,in
substantial flooding Onsite,OT.-offsite?
f) Place housing.within a 100=year flood hazard.area as X
mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
g) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures X
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
h) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X
Parks and Recreation Element programs and projects would not affect water quality and/or flows. New
parks and park improvements would be landscaped to encourage water retention and soil percolation, and
creeks are preserved, consistent with City standards for creek setbacks, environmental protection and flood
protection.
10. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would theproject:
a) Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy, or X
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the
project adopted for the purpope of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
b) Physically divide an established community? X
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan X
or natural community conservationplans?
Most of the City's parks are located in or adjacent to residential neighborhoods to conveniently serve
residents. The draft Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan is consistent with Land Use Element and
Open Space Element regarding location and design of parklands, open space and trails, and other recreation
facilities. For example, the Damon Garcia Sports Field is proposed in an area designated for 'Parks"in the
City's General Plan Land Use Element Map. Parks are allowed uses in residential zones under the Zoning
Regulations and are generally considered compatible with residential and some commercial uses, provided
that land use and development standards are met in the park's design. Parks are also allowed in the
Conservation/Open Space zone upon approval of a conditional use permit. Use permit review assures
compatibility of new park design, and uses with the overall purposes of open- space, including resource
conservation, public safety, aesthetics; and passive recreation opportunities.
�i Crrr OF SAN Luis Oetspo 1 t INmAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2000
/ 7)
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sources Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
ER 51149-00 Issues with Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
11. NOISE. Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of people to or generation of "unacceptable' X
noise levels as defined by the San Luis Obispo General
Plan Noise Element, or general noise levels in excess of
standards established in the Noise Ordinance?
b) A substantial temporary, periodic, or permanent X
increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels existing without theproject?
c) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive X
groundbome vibration or groundbome.noise levels?
d) For a.project located within an airport land use plan,.or X
within two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive'noise.levels?
City parks and recreational facilities do not typically generate sustained or frequent noise levels which
exceed City standards. Park facilities are typically located in residential areas and away from major noise
sources such as manufacturing uses, highways, and airport hazard zones. At the time the City annexed the
Damon Garcia property with the intent of developing sports fields, the County Airport Land Use Commission
reviewed the request. The Commission determined the proposed sports fields were a compatible use within
the Airport Land Use zone and found the use to be consistent with County airport policies. Intermittent uses
can have short-term noise effects on adjacent uses, e.g. nighttime games. City recreation programs must
comply with performance standards in the Zoning Regulations, which establish acceptable levels for noise,
vibration, glare and other potential land use compatibility factors.
12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would theproject:
a) Jnduce substantial population growth in.an area, either X
directly ' (for example by proposing new homes or
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing or X
people necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
Historically, the development of city parks and other recreation facilities has not kept pace with population
growth. Consequently, several neighborhoods do not meet the standard parkland ratio of JO acres of
parkland per 1,000 residents. The City intends to use its resources primarily to meet existing park and
recreation needs. Park development will not "lead" or induce population growth, but rather, will meet a
current, demonstrated need. New parks and other recreation facilities will be developed to serve new
residents in expansion areas, concurrent with the build out of these areas. This anticipated level of growth
has been evaluated in the 1994 Land Use and Circulation Final EIR and can be accommodated, subject to
appropriate mitigation, within its projected build out capacity of 57,700 residents and 25 year timeframe of
the adopted General Plan.
The Draft Parks and Recreation Element is consistent with the City's General Plan. Because it focuses on
infill park development, joint recreational facility use, upgrading existing facilities, and open space
preservation and trails, the draft Element does not encourage growth nor raise issues regarding growth
management, land use or open space preservation. With the exception of the Damon Garcia Sports Field,
targeted recreational needs are to be met primarily through redevelopment or improvement of existing
facilities and development of small facilities within existing neighborhoods. Development of new parks and
related active recreation facilities will occur.in new subdivisions, within expansion areas already designated
in the General Plan for residential development and evaluated as part of the 1994 Land Use and Circulation
Element Final EIR.
`� CRY OF SAN LUIS OetsPo 12 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2000
/-7/
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sources Potentia q' Less Than less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
ER #149-00 Issues With Impact
Mitigation
Inco rated
13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision, or need, of new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times,
or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection? X
b) Police protection? X
c) Schools? X
d) Parks? X
e) Roads and other transportation infrastructure? X
f) Other public facilities? X
Parks and Recreation Element programs and projects are intended to meet existing or anticipated needs, and
would not cause significant adverse impacts to existing government facilities, services or response times.
14. RECREATION. Would the project:
a) :Increase the use of existing-neighborhood or regional X
parks.orotherrecreational.facilities such that. .
substantial physical deterioration of the facility would
occur or be accelerated?
b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction X
or expansion.of-recreational>facililties;,whichmight have
an adverse physical effecf omthe environment?'.
See discussions under "Land Use and Planning" and "Population and Housingw
15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would theproject:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in X
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system?
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of . X
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads and
highways?
c) Substantially increase hazards due to design features X
(e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)?
d) Result in inadequate emergency access? X
e) Result in inadequate parking capacity onsite or offsite? X.
f) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative X
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
g) Conflict with the with San Luis Obispo County Airport X
Land Use Plan resulting in substantial safety risks from
hazards, noise, or a change in air trafficpatterns?
See discussions under "Land Use and Planning", "Population and Housing" and "Hazards and Hazardous
Materials"
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would theproject:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction or expansion of X
new water treatment, wastewater treatment, or storm
drainage facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
��� CITY OF SAN Luis Oalspo 13 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2000
Sources Potentially less Than Less Than No '
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Significant Significant impact
Issues With Impact
ER #149-00 Mitigation
incorporated
c) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the X
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new and expanded water resources needed?
d) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment X
provider which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand and addition to the provider's existing
commitment?
e) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted X
capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste
disposal needs?
f) Comply with federal, state,and.local statutes and X
regulations related to solid waste?
17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a)'Does the project have the potential to degrade the X
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
—Explain Here—
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually X
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of the past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of probable
futureprojects)
--Explain Here--
c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will X
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
-Ex Iain Here--
18.EARLIER ANALYSES.
Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or
more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration. Section 15063 (c) (3)
(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following items:
a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review.
Final Environmental Impact Report, Land Use and Circulation Element Update, City of San Luis Obispo,
August 1994; available for review at Community Development Department, San Luis Obispo City Hall, 990
Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, Ca.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of
and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether
such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
CITY OF SAN.Luis OBISPO 14 INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2000
P �3
Significant adverse effects of urbanization/population growth on conversion of open space to urban uses and
loss of prime agricultural soils and farmland due to urban development.
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe
the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to
which they address site-specific conditions of the project.
19. SOURCE REFERENCES
1. San Luis Obispo General Plan Land Use, Circulation, Open Space, Noise, Safety, Energy
Conservation and Conservation Elements, City of San Luis Obispo.
2. Draft Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan, December 2000, City of San Luis Obispo.
3. Final EIR, Land Use and Circulation Element Updates, August 1994, City of San Luis Obispo.
4. Air ort Land Use Plan, SLO County Airport, December 1973, County of San Luis Obispo
5.
Soil.Survey of San Luis Obispo, Coastal Part, 1983; U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service.
20. MITIGATION MEASURESIMONITORING PROGRAM
Not applicable.
Attachment: Draft Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan
JM/L/PARKS AND RECREATION/ER 149-00
`� CRY OF SAN Luis 08lSCo is - INmAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CNECKUST 2000
ATTACHMENT 3
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
MINUTES
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2000
CITY-COUNTY LIBRARY CONFERENCE ROOM
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Neville called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Chair Jim Neville, Commissioners Debbie Black, Gary
Clay, Pete Duncan, Teresa Larson, and Ron Regan
ABSENT: None
STAFF: Paul LeSage, Larry Tolson, Linda Fitzgerald, James
Bremer, and Carolyn Goossens
PUBLIC COMMENT
Bill Wilson, San Luis Obispo resident, spoke in support of the realignment of Prado
Road.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
The Minutes of November 1, 2000,were unanimously approved as presented.
ITEM#1: VOLUNTEER OF THE MONTH
This item was continued to next meeting.
ITEM#2: APPROVE UPDATED PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT /
MASTER PLAN
Paul LeSage recognized Linda Fitzgerald for an excellent job of formatting the revisions
to the Element/Master Plan. The Commission reviewed and discussed various sections of
the Element including:
A. Established that the Eto Memorial Park meets an unmet need by being a mini-
park of the Parks &Recreation facilities.
B. Create a new section for"Adopted Master Plans"
C. Page 36, add Community Center verbiage to last paragraph.
D. Page 10, 2 paragraph, replace "special needs" with "specialty facilities" and
add terminology of key words, i.e. passive recreation, special needs, youth at
risk, parkways, etc.
E. Page 19—2.58.2 identify what"case-by-case"means
F. Page 22—3.21.2 end sentence at"additional fee."
G. Page 22, questioned meeting the needs of"entire population."
H. Page 36, last paragraph, change"Youth Athletic Fields"to "Athletic Fields"
Chair Neville opened the discussion for public comments.
Richard Kreit, San Luis Obispo, encouraged maintaining athletic fields as an unmet need
of SLO. He would like to see more lighted fields for Babe Ruth and Girls Softball who
are willing to participate in the maintenance of those fields.
Ron Regier, representing the Youth Sports Association, spoke in support of establishing a
master plan among all sports organizations and the City. He also supported athletic fields
are a#1 unmet need.
Bill Wilson, San Luis Obispo, questioned proposed fields suggested for diamond fields.
He spoke in support of needed facilities for soccer players.
Mitch Wolf, representing Babe Ruth Baseball, commented on the lack of usable facilities
and the need for full-size fields for baseball.
Jeff Wagner, representing AYSO, spoke in support of more facilities and the strong need
to meet the needs of many participants..
Paul LeSage recommended moving "lighted softball fields" to the 2004-year goal. He
reviewed the Council Goal Setting Session and indicated that all requests must be
submitted to Council by January 5, 2001. The recommendations from the Commission
should also support the current Element.
After much discussion, moved by Neville/Black to approve the updated Parks &
Recreation Element; motion passed unanimously.
ITEM#3: STATUS OF DAMON-GARCIA SPORTS FIELDS PROJECT
Paul LeSage gave a brief report on the proposed realignment of Prado Road as it relates
to the Damon-Garcia Sports Fields. The City Council has continued this item to January
9, 2001. Paul recommended the Commission discuss this item at the next meeting
allowing time to receive additional information before making a recommendation to the
City Council. He indicated the proposed alternatives 1)will not change obtaining 4 fields
or prolong the project; 2) has not been reviewed by the Transportation Managers — will
be in Phase 2; 3) will require Tank Farm to have a General Plan -amendment (6-9
months); and 4) will need some additional environmental studies but not a large project.
Paul recommended the Commission urge the Council to take action and not delay the
proj ect.
Bill Wilson, SLO resident, spoke in support of the realigning of Tank Farm and strongly
urged the Commission toward their obligation to protect the safety of the children.
Richard Kreit, SLO resident, encouraged the Commission to support Paul's
recommendation not to delay this project.
The item was continued to the January meeting.
/- 76
ATTACHMENT 4
MEETING UPDATE
SAN LUIS OBISPO PLANNING COMMISSION
Agenda
Council Chamber of City Hall
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo
February 28, 2001 Wednesday 7:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Commissioners Jim Aiken, Mary Whittlesey, Allan Cooper, Alice Loh,
Orval Osborne and Vice-Chairman Stephen Peterson (one vacancy)
Commissioner Peterson was absent.
Staff. Leaha Magee, Recording Secretary
Paul LeSage, Parks and Recreation Director
Gil Trujillo, Assistant City Attorney
Jeff Hook, Associate Planner
ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: Accepted as submitted.
MINUTES: Minutes of December 6, 2000, January 10 and January 24, 2001.
Amend or approve.
Minutes were approved with corrections.
PUBLIC COMMENT: None.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Citywide. GPA and ER 149-00; Update to the Parks and Recreation Element and
environmental review; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant.
Jeff Hook, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. After a brief discussion, and
on a motion by Commissioner Loh, seconded by Commissioner Cooper, the
Commission voted 5-0 to: 1) approve the project's negative declaration of
environmental impact, 2) find the draft Parks and Recreation Element consistent with
the General Plan, and 3) endorse the draft Parks and Recreation Element and forward
it to the City Council for action. There was no public comment.
2. Citywide. GPI and ER 197-00: Housing Element Implementation: Downtown
Housing Conservation program, and environmental review of an amendment to the
Downtown Housing Conversion Permit Ordinance to implement downtown housing
conservation policies; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. Jeff Hook (1 hour)
MCGIIIY�7 nu6.11un
D'": Al-3-01 ITEM #
council m E m o Ra n o u m
April 3, 2001 COUNCIL CDD D I R
W ❑ FIN DIP
TO: City Council 0 ❑ FIRE CHIEF
PRNEY ❑ PW DIP
-PLERK/ORIG ❑ PZICE CHF
VIA: Ken Hampian, City Administrative Officer 0 DEPT H DS VREC DIP
I GY ❑ UTIL DIP
FROM: Paul LeSage, Director of Parks and Recreation _HR DIR
SUBJECT: UPDATE TO PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT/MASTER FLAN
There is one change and several additions to the City's open space inventory as found in
Section 2.20 of the Element — Open Space and Recreational Trails. All of these items are
found on Page 1-27 of the Agenda Report. The correct acreage for Item 36, Islay Hills/Islay
Creek Open Space, is 65 acres, not 19 as is shown in the Element.
Since this update of the Element was initiated, additional open space parcels have been
acquired:
• The purchase of the Hastings property raises the total acreage in the Reservoir Canyon
Open Space (Natural Reserve), Item 40, from 242 to 487 acres.
• Two parcels, Prefumo Canyon (360 acres) and DeVaul (182 acres), now form the Irish
Hills Natural Reserve totaling 542 acres.
These open space additions bring the City's open space acreage to 2,502.
The properties will be included in the text and open space map (Page 1-23) of the final
document approved by Council.
PL:lh
f
March 30,2001
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Mary Kopecky,Assistant City Clerk 1"
SUBJECT: Attachment for April 3, 2001 Staff Report
When the agenda packet went to the printer last week the attached resolution was
inadvertently left off. Please insert in as Attachment#2 for Item#1 (Parks and Recreation
Element Update).
Thanks!
MEETIN AGENDA ATTACHMENT 2
DAT "3-oi ITEM #..1.
RESOLUTION NO. =1 Senes)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT,
ADOPTING A NEW PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT/MASTER PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on April 3, 2001, and has
considered testimony of interested parties, the records of the Planning Commission hearing, the
records of the Parks and Recreation Commission hearing, and the evaluations and
recommendations of staff; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the draft Negative Declaration of
Environmental Impact as prepared by the staff and reviewed by the Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
SECTION 1. Environmental Determination. The City Council finds and determines that
the project's Negative Determination adequately addresses the potential environmental impacts
of the proposed Element update, and reflects the independent judgment of the City Council. The
Council determines that the Element update will have no significant impacts on the environment.
The Council hereby adopts said Negative Declaration..
• SECTION 2. Repeal of Previous Element. The Parks and Recreation Element adopted
in 1995 is hereby repealed on the effective date of the adoption of this resolution.
SECTION 3. Adoption of New Element. The revised Parks and Recreation Element /
Master Plan consisting of the text dated April, 3, 2001, on file in the City Clerk's Office is
hereby adopted.
SECTION 4. Publication and Availability. The Community Development Director
caused the newly adopted Element to be published and provided to City officials, concerned
citizens, and public libraries, and made available to the public at a cost not to exceed the cost of
reproduction.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. The newly adopted Element shall be effective on the
thirtieth day after passage of this resolution.
Upon motion of , seconded by ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Resolution No. (2001 Series)
the foregoing resolution was adopted this day of 12001. O
Mayor Allen Settle
ATTEST:
Lee Price, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Je . J rge C' Attorney
O
O