HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/16/2002, 2 - STUDY SESSION ON CONSERVATION GUIDELINES FOR OPEN SPACE LANDS OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO M.ft DN
council7-16.02
j acEnaa REpoRt '`2"
CITY O F SAN LUIS 0 B I S P 0
FROM: Wendy George,Assistant City Administrative Officer v�
Prepared By: Neil Havlik,Natural Resources Manager
SUBJECT: STUDY SESSION ON "CONSERVATION GUIDELINES FOR OPEN
SPACE LANDS OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO"
CAO RECOMMENDATION
Consider the draft "Conservation Guidelines for Open Space Lands of the City of San Luis
Obispo" and provide staff direction toward its content, as appropriate.
DISCUSSION
Background
Since establishment of the Natural Resources Protection Program in 1996, much of the focus of
the program has been on land acquisition. By 1999, however, the City's open space properties
had grown and there was a perceived need for a systematic approach to the proper stewardship of
those lands. As a result, the City Natural Resources staff began to review approaches to this
matter by other agencies. Some type of land classification for park or open space lands,
regardless of size, was the basic method by which land management decisions were guided at a
systemwide level, and then those classifications were applied to individual areas within a
particular parkland or open space. The cities of Boulder and Fort Collins, CO and agencies such
as East Bay Regional Park District, National Park Service, and the Trust for Public Land utilize
this basic classification approach. Working originally with the Land Conservancy, and later
utilizing the City Biologist staff position when it was created, a similar approach was crafted for
the City of San Luis Obispo's open space lands. Originally called "Best Management Practices
for City of San Luis Obispo Open Space Lands", the document was modeled upon those similar
documents, and is expected to be followed by specific conservation plans for individual open
space lands using what we are now calling the "Conservation Guidelines for Open Space Lands
of the City of San Luis Obispo".
Following a period of internal review by appropriate City departments, the document was made
available for public review (ECOSLO assisted with the notification efforts). This included a
workshop on January 30, 2002, which was attended by about twenty persons. A number of
comments were received at that workshop, and several letters were also received during an
extended review period. Following the review period, Natural Resources staff evaluated the
comments, and made a number of changes to the draft document. This included changing the
name, since several commenters did not care for the previous one. A number of other additions
2-1
I
Council Agenda Report—Study Session on Conservation Guidelines
g P
Page 2
and changes relating to limits of acceptable change, location of access, and more carefully
delineating boundaries between classifications, were also incorporated into the document.
Highlights
The fundamental purpose of the Guidelines is to provide policy level guidance for resource
management practices within City-owned open space lands, and to ensure that those practices are
applied in a consistent manner throughout the City's open space system. Five main
classifications of lands are recognized: Habitat Areas, Management Areas/Trail Corridors,
Restoration Areas, Cultural/Historical Areas, and Agricultural Areas. Each of these areas will
have a different "mix" of resource management policy directives appropriate to that
classification. The policies will govern management of the following: land and vegetation,
human activities and impacts; aquatic systems; agriculture; and wildlife protection. Certain
policies may not be applicable to certain areas: for example, policies designed to protect native
plant communities are not applicable to the agricultural areas, which are expected to remain as
cropland.
It should be noted that the policies are intended to proscribe the nature and extent of resource
management activities, and the real thrust of the Guidelines (through the classification process)
will be to leave large blocks of land alone through the Habitat Area designation. The main
difference between the Habitat Area designation and the Management Area/Trail Corridor
designation is that the latter will experience generally minor but more or less routine vegetation
management, such as pruning for clearance along trails, under power lines, and at the urban
interface for fire protection purposes. Also, to strengthen the integrity of the Habitat Area
designation, and for purposes of consistency, areas where livestock grazing will be permitted will
be given the Management Area/Trail Corridor designation. Existing City policies encourage
retention of agricultural uses where appropriate on City lands, and properly managed livestock
grazing in our more productive grasslands is completely consistent with other resource
management objectives and City policies supporting the preservation of agriculture in areas
surrounding the community. Historically the most significant open space activity has been trail
construction and maintenance.
With regard to access, the Guidelines require that location of public access to open space lands
be considered during that individual property's Conservation Plan preparation, or at another
appropriate time, where public input into the location and design of such access points can be
made. This has been raised as an issue by neighbors of the proposed Bowden Ranch project,
where public access to the open space above the project area has existed informally for many
years. It is expected that the approval process for the Bowden Ranch project will be the
appropriate time to address this matter at that location.
Next Steps
Staff is seeking Council direction toward completion of the Guidelines. Any necessary further
changes to the document will be made following the Study Session, and it is staff's intent to
2-2
1
Council Agenda Report—Study Session on Conservation Guidelines
Page 3
present the Guidelines to the Planning Commission in August or Early September, then return to
the Council for adoption of the Guidelines. This will allow us to proceed with preparation of
conservation plans for individual open space lands based on the approved Guidelines
immediately thereafter. The staff goal is to complete four such plans by the end of fiscal 2002-
2003. The lands expected to be evaluated first are: (1) Irish Hills Natural Reserve; (2) Bishop
Peak Natural Reserve; (3) Cerro San Luis Natural Reserve; and (4) Johnson Ranch Open Space.
Inventory work, which is a necessary precursor to the land classification effort, is currently
underway on all of these areas.
Each Conservation Plan will include public participation in the development of the land
classifications, and each will be subject to environmental review and presentation to the Planning
Commission. In addition, there will be a discussion of fiscal implications of each Conservation
Plan. The Conservation Plan will be reviewed and adopted by both the Planning Commission
and the City Council.
CONCURRENCES
The draft Conservation Guidelines have been reviewed and commented upon by the following
departments: Community Development; Fire;Parks and Recreation;Public Works; and Utilities.
FISCAL IMPACT
Adoption of the Guidelines by themselves will not have any fiscal implications. Indeed, staff
believes that management of the open space lands will entail relatively little in the way of capital
expenditures, except where structures may be involved or where significant cleanup or safety
improvements may be needed. Many grant programs are available to use for habitat
enhancements and it is expected that these will be pursued vigorously. Therefore, staff feels that
fiscal impact of the various Conservation Plans will be minor. The projected fiscal impact will
be addressed during the adoption of the individual Conservation Plans and will be subject to the
normal budgeting process. Conservation Plans will include a section addressing the potential
fiscal effects of adoption of those plans.
It should be noted that the growth of the City's open space system has been accompanied by
growth of the Ranger Service; this has been supported by the Council in the past and is a likely
fiscal impact of continued growth of the system.
ATTACHMENT:
1. Conservation Guidelines for Open Space Lands of the City of San Luis Obispo
G/havliklconncilagendalguidelines study session
2-3
ATTACHMENT 9
Conservation Guidelines for Open Space
Lands of the City of San Luis Obispo
c
— _• +=.ori
Prepared by:
The Natural Resources Program
Administration Department
City of San Luis Obispo
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo
CA 93401
July 2002
2-4
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands ATTACHMENT 1
Contents
1. Executive Summary.........................................................................................3
2. Introduction ......................................................................................................5
3. Land Use Designations....................................................................................7
3.1 Habitat Area........................................................................................................................7
3.2 Management Area/Trail Corridor........................................................................................8
3.3 Restoration Area..................................v.............................................................................9
3.4 Cultural/Historic Area........................................................................s.............................. 10
3.5 Agricultural Area.............................................................................................................:. 10
4. General Policies.............................................................................................11
4.1 Land and Vegetation Management................................................................................... 11
4.2 Human Activities and Impacts........................................................................................... 14
4.3 Aquatic Systems............................................................................................................... 16
4.4 Agriculture......................................................................................................................... 17
4.5 Wildlife Protection............................................................................................................. 18
5. Conservation Plan Elements..........................................................................20
5.1 Executive Summary..........................................................................................................20
5.2 Inventory...........................................................................................................................20
5.3 Goals and Policies............................................................................................................20
5.4 Map...................................................................................................................................20
5.5 Needs Analysis.................................................................................................................21
5.6 Implementation Strategy....................................................................................................21
5.7 Fiscal Impact of Council Adoption of Conservation Plans................................................22
6. References.....................................................................................................23
7. Appendix 1 .....................................................................................................24
2 2-5
ATTACHMENT 1
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
1. Executive Summary
The policies contained in this report provide guidance on the preparation of
Conservation Plans for property acquired by the City of San Luis Obispo for open
space purposes. They are not applicable to land owned by the City for parks,
utilities, or other non-open space purposes.
Each City-owned open space has unique qualities; this requires each property to
have its own plan to define the uses that will be allowed on the land, and to guide
how the land will be enhanced, maintained and preserved.
The policies contained in this report describe a "tiered" approach to plan
development that begins with the general and then leads to the specific. Each open
space property will be divided into land use categories that define how the property
will be managed. This report describes policies and guidelines applicable to each
land use category.
The final decision on which adopted policies and guidelines apply to individual open
space properties will be made as the Conservation Plan for that property is prepared
and approved. The Conservation Plan will translate policies into specific
improvements, if any, necessary for each property, and give direction on how the
property will be maintained. This report also describes the process by which
Conservation Plans will be prepared and their content.
The concept of categorizing land use, between or within, open space properties has
been adopted to provide a practical means of achieving management objectives. By
dividing an open space property into discrete areas, each with a unique complement
of resources and requirements, the overall management objectives will be achieved
by addressing the needs of smaller units. The proposed land use categories are:
• Habitat Area — Land on which the primary objective will be to protect natural
resources essential to the continued existence of resident native plants and
wildlife.
• Management Area/Trail Corridor — Land that has the potential to support
low levels of recreational pressure, or may be adjacent to other land uses.
Active management of land in these areas will be required to facilitate
approved activities while protecting valuable resources.
• Restoration Area — Land on which restoration and enhancement of plant and
animal habitats will be pursued in an effort to restore damaged or impacted
open space resources.
• Cultural/Historic Area — Land that will be managed to preserve and/or
enhance cultural or historic resources on the site and provide for their
interpretation. Restorative measures may be implemented if necessary.
3 2-6
ATTACHMENT 9
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
• Agricultural Area— Land that will be managed for agricultural production in a
manner consistent with the protection and preservation of natural resources
represented on the site.
For each land use category, policies have been developed to direct the
management of the following:
• Land and Vegetation — Includes policies relating to the management of
vegetation, pests, fire, mitigation projects, visual resources and scientific
study.
• Human Activities and Impacts — Includes policies relating to the
management of recreational activities and access.
• Aquatic Systems — Includes policies relating to the management of creeks,
seeps and springs, storm water, riparian vegetation, wetlands and aquatic
habitat restoration efforts.
• Agriculture — Includes policies relating to agricultural practices on city-
owned land.
• Wildlife Protection — Includes policies relating to the protection of native
plants, wildlife habitat, threatened species and species of special concern.
The final Conservation Plan for a City open space property will include: a.
description of the resources represented on the property; an explanation of the land
use categories identified; the management/resource protection goals for each
category; an analysis of the actions required to achieve stated goals; and a
description of the anticipated fiscal impact of adoption of the plan to the City.
4 2-7
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands ATTAcWMENT `
2. Introduction
In January 1994, the City Council adopted an updated Open Space Element to the
General Plan for the City of San Luis Obispo, as required by California state law
(Government Code, Title 7, Section 65302). The element's stated goals are to:
• Provide open space, agricultural, and rural lands that meet the needs of
present and future City populations (OS 1.1.1).
• Protect resources (such as creeks, sensitive habitat, and agriculture), and be
sensitive to the factors which allow these resources to remain viable (OS
1.1.2).
• Provide a greenbelt around the City's perimeter to: a) define the urban limit of
San Luis Obispo; b) provide a physical separation between urban
communities; c) protect important agricultural areas from urban uses and
maintain agriculture as an economically viable activity(OS 1.1.3).
• Provide for
passive recreation I' `� Bishop Peak
where such low
intensity uses will
• Reservoir Canyon
not damage the ,r { : Cerro San Luis
resources that are _
being protected, u :_ g
and preserve Laguna Lake ?
r
lands as open :. ;.. i
space or parkland `` r
which serve as �• ` .'. RIt;� 'i` South Hillsr `
important linkages r h Irish Hills Reserve
between other, � .
open space lands, Filipponi Properly ' }`
parks or trails (OS ( Johnson Ranch r - :' Islay Hill'
1.1.4). •1.4. • 'i'�;
• Provide continuing
community Location of City Open Spaces
education that
underscores the value of the area's cultural, scenic and natural resources
(OS 1.1.5).
The Open Space Element contains numerous policies and programs to achieve the
stated goals. Included among these are policies that govern the operation and
management of City-owned open space (OS 14.2). Section OS 14.2.5E requires
the preparation of plans that specify how City open space will be managed to
provide recreation, resource protection, access, security, and long-term
maintenance and operation.
5 2-8
ATTACHMENT I
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands J
In recent years the City's open space system has grown rapidly. The amount and
variety of property now in ownership require that the City systematically plan for the
long-term stewardship of these areas. This will be done through the adoption of
guidelines consistent with, and designed to implement the directives of the Open
Space Element of the General Plan adopted in 1994.
City Natural Resources and Parks and Recreation staff, with support from staff from
the Land Conservancy of San Luis Obispo County, have developed these
guidelines to provide direction on the management and preservation of land,
vegetation, aquatic, agricultural, cultural, recreational, and wildlife resources on
City-owned open space.
The goal of these guidelines is to provide a set of standards from which functional
Conservation Plans can be tailored to address the specific requirements of
individual open space properties. Each document will be tiered providing a menu of
activities appropriate to each particular land category (or `area' as defined in Section
3). The conservation/management recommendations contained within a
Conservation Plan will be based on the unique complement of resources
represented on a property, and the activities and practices approved for it..
The final product will provide information and recommendations on:
• The Prevailing Conditions on the Property - A description of the physical,
natural, and biological resources represented on a property (including
species lists and distribution maps), resulting from initial surveys. This will
evolve over time as knowledge of the property increases, resulting from field
studies and observations made during the implementation of management
and resource protection practices.
• Future Goals for the Property - A detailed account of how a property has
been classified (in accordance with the land use designations described in
Section 3), the rationale behind the designations, and the future goals for
each designation.
• Prescribed Means of Achieving Stewardship Goals — A description of the
resource management/protection practices to be implemented, and the
rationale behind the implementation. A detailed account of the duration of
the practice and the ultimate objectives of the practice.
6 2-9
ATTACHMENT 9
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
3. Land Use Designations
The concept of categorization of
land among or within individual
open space properties is
proposed. Categorization,
based on resources present and
land use patterns has been
successfully used by a number
of public and governmental
agencies to provide a basis for
similar plans (1, 2).
These designations will provide
a means of achieving the
management objectives of
providing a diverse range of
experiences and opportunities, Cuftural/Historic Area
while protecting natural
resources on the property.
For example, it may be
0
desirable to manage a portion
of a large area for the Management Area/
protection of a sensitive Trail Corridor
species of plant or animal. Rmtoration Area
Such areas would remain as Habitat Area
natural areas and would not
contain trails or other types of
physical improvements. In Overhead view of the Irish Hills Reserve
other locations, managers may showing how areas may be designated
want to designate different types of open space experience involving high
concentrations of public use.
The policies implemented by City staff in the development of Conservation Plans
will depend upon the unique combination of resources and use patterns for the
open space. Properties will be managed in accordance with the following land use
classifications:
3.1 Habitat Area
Areas receiving this designation will primarily be those which will not be significantly
impacted by human activity. The primary purpose of this designation is to protect
natural resources essential to the continued well-being of resident native plants and
wildlife. This designation is synonymous to an "ecological area° as defined in the
City of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code (chapter 12.22.30) which states that:
"(areas) shall be primarily utilized for their wildlife habitat or other ecological values
and may be subject to restrictions upon, or prohibition of, public access".
2-10
ATTACHMENT 9
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
The preservation of resources and habitat shall be the dominant consideration in all
management decisions where a choice must be made between preservation of the
natural environment and recreational use. The long term goal shall be to establish
or preserve, a fully functional self-sustaining ecosystem.
3.2 Management Area/Trail Corridor
The purpose of this designation is to recognize that some areas have the potential
to support passive recreation, or may be adjacent to other land uses, and that active
management of land in these situations will be required.
Examples of land receiving this designation may include existing areas that contain
trails, and land adjacent to urban areas or beneath power lines where management
of the land to reduce fire hazard is necessary.
When considering permitted uses and undertaking maintenance activities, efforts
will be made to accommodate passive recreational activities as defined in the Open
Space Element (OS 1.1.4). The amount of land within the City's open space
system receiving this designation will kept to a minimum, and efforts will be made to
reduce the impacts of human interaction on the habitat and natural resource value
of the open space.
For example, the width of trail corridors will be kept to a minimum to reduce
negative impacts associated with them, and recreational areas will be periodically
closed if necessary, for resource restoration or protection (e.g. protection of raptor
nesting areas etc).
Under certain circumstances (e.g. If the City deems that a specific area is capable
of sustaining increased levels of user pressure), active recreational activities that do
impact the natural environment (such as mountain biking, or equestrian activities),
may be permissible in designated areas. Input will be sought from interested
parties on the most suitable areas to allow these activities, and on the construction
and design of suitable trails.
The growing requirement for recreational resources challenges resource managers
to develop systematic management and monitoring frameworks. This is particularly
challenging because the provision of open space seeks to achieve two overlapping,
yet conflicting goals: (1) protection of the resource (OS 1.1.2); and (2) providing
opportunities for passive recreation (OS 1.1.4). Inevitably, providing recreational
access to open space results in some level of impact the management challenge is
to identify how much impact is acceptable.
To evaluate the effects of visitor use on the resources, indicators will be identified
that reflect the types of impacts recreational use creates (e.g. erosion problems; trail
corridor width; visitor use); and these indicators monitored over time. The
effectiveness of management actions designed to reduce impacts will be linked to
quantifiable Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC's). Since the amount of acceptable
impact is a value judgment, the determination of LAC's for an open space should
8 2-11
ATTACHMENT 9
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
incorporate the interests and values of various interested parties. Comment on the
identification of LAC's, and how they should be monitored, will be sought at public
workshop sessions during which the Conservation Plan for a particular open space
property is discussed.
If an area fails to meet the accepted standards then management actions will be
taken to correct the situation (e.g. closure and/or re-classification to a restoration
area).
Management for approved, low impact, recreational activities may be active, such
as trail building and maintenance, or may involve leaving an area in a natural state
of succession (e.g. as grassland), requiring minimal maintenance.
Visual resources are also an important component of the City's open space. All
management activities that may affect the viewshed (e.g. trail construction, utility
corridors, fences, signs etc) will take into account and minimize adverse visual
impacts.
3.3 Restoration Area
The purpose of this designation
is to recognize that portions of
some land acquired by the City
have been degraded by prior
activities and requires
restoration. This is seen as a
temporary designation, and after
restoration is complete the land
would be re-designated as a
Habitat or Management Area.
Land receiving this designation
may include riparian corridors
where there has been collapse of
the creek bank, eroded areas
along old roads, or agricultural Tree plantings In a Restoration Area
lands damaged by historic land
uses.
The kind of activities that would be performed are planting degraded areas with
native species, and re-grading to prevent erosion or facilitate plantings.
Each Restoration Area will have a restoration blueprint associated with it which will
make up an element of the Conservation Plan. This will include an explanation of
the restorative activities that will be performed, possible sources of funding, and
projected date for the re-classification of the area.
9 2-12
ATTACHMENT I
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
3.4 Cultural/Historic Area
The purpose of this designation is to provide special recognition and treatment of
cultural and historic resources. Land receiving this designation would include
archaeological sites as well as historical buildings and even mining or old railroad
rights-of-way that provide a linkage to our local history. Guidance from the City's
Cultural Heritage Committee, recognized archeologists, and historical preservation
experts will be sought in identifying these resources.
The kinds of activities that would receive priority are appropriate preservation and/or
restorative measures implemented in accordance with policies adopted in the Open
Space Element (OS 8.1.1). When appropriate, the City will apply for grant funds to
preserve and restore such historically significant sites and buildings. Whenever
possible, such areas will be open to the public and include features to educate
visitors on the heritage value of the resource.
The City will require appropriate mitigation for impacts to recognized cultural or
historic resources resulting from unforeseen City actions or projects.
`C-
Rodriguez Adobe-Orcutt Rd, SLO
3.5 Agricultural Area
The purpose of this category is to recognize that fertile agricultural land is a special
resource and that every effort should be made to continue agricultural production on
these lands. However, all agricultural practices should be consistent with the
overall goals of the City's Open Space program, and the protection of natural
resources will be a high priority while still providing for the economically viable
operation of agriculture.
The kinds of uses that would be permitted include environmentally sensitive forms
of farming and the use of associated facilities such as barns, residences and other
buildings; equipment may also be stored and used on the land. Conflicting
activities, such as recreation, may be restricted.
10 2-13
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands ATTACHMENT
City-owned agricultural lands leased to farmers will have a program of approved
'Best Management Practices' developed for them that foster sound stewardship of
the land.
4. General Policies
Policy relating to potential management decisions is required for each land use
category described in Section 3 of this document. This will ensure that a
standardized management practices are implemented throughout the City's open
space system. The policies, and how they apply in each land use category are
summarized in tabular form in Appendix 1. Throughout the following discussion the
relevant section of Appendix 1 is referenced (e.g. HA1; LV8 etc).
4.1 Land and Vegetation Management
Objectives:
To conserve, enhance, and restore natural plant communities; to protect
sensitive and endangered plant species and their habitats; and to maintain
biodiversity of native plants and animals.
Policy.
Vegetation Management
The City will monitor and manage vegetation to meet prescribed goals for the
land (LV10). Management strategies such as the use of selective livestock
grazing (LV1); physical pruning/removal of unwanted or problematic
vegetation (LV6); erosion and sediment control (LV7); application of
Integrated Pest Management practices (LV12; LV13); and prescribed burning
of native vegetative communities (LV8), will be implemented where
necessary.
Restoration and/or re-vegetation techniques will be utilized when necessary
to restore a degraded vegetative community to a fully functioning ecosystem.
All restoration activities will utilize site- or region-specific native grasses,
herbs, shrubs, and trees. Planting of invasive, non-native species will be
prohibited (LV2). Adjacent landowners will be encouraged to undertake
efforts to control target non-native vegetation on their land (LV3).
All existing native trees will be preserved wherever possible, and new native
trees planted to enhance wildlife habitat (LV4; LV5). Where possible,
vegetation will be left to follow its natural course of succession and will not
receive any form of active management. The ultimate goal will be to re-
establish, or preserve, a self-sustaining ecosystem.
11 2-14
ATTACHMENT I
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
,Fie Management
The status of vegetative communities will be monitored, particularly in
grassland areas, to determine if brush, weeds or other heavy fuel materials
are encroaching (LV10). If the fire.hazard is increased because of fuel
loading, an evaluation will be carried out to determine the most desirable and
effective means to correct the problem. Corrective measures may include,
but are not limited to: thinning or removal of eucalyptus, pine and cypress
plantations, and shrubs or woodland occurring along the open space/urban
interface to produce a less fire prone condition (LV6).
The decision to utilize prescribed burning of vegetation to reduce fuel load or
manage vegetation composition will lie with the City's with input from the
California Department of Forestry and County. All affected residents will be
notified of any prescribed bum at least three weeks before the event (LV8).
At the urban/open space interface the City will, and adjacent land owners will
be encouraged to, maintain defensible spaces (10m recommendation);
providing sufficient space between structures and flammable vegetation to
allow the fire service to mount a defense against a wildfire. This will help
protect urban developments from fires originating on City-owned open space
and vice versa (LV9).
In open space lands the City will employ firefighting methods which have the
least impact on the natural resources represented on the site, providing the
use of such methods does not put property or human life in danger (LV9).
During periods of extreme fire hazard the City reserves the right to close
certain open space areas to the public (per San Luis Obispo Municipal Code,
Chapter 12.22.050C). In the interest of public safety, open fires (including
barbecues) are prohibited year-round (per San Luis Obispo Municipal Code,
Chapter 12.22.050M) (LV11).
Pest.Managemen# ,.__.__:___-._
All City open spaces will be managed in accordance with established
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) methods to control pest infestations
(LV12; LV13; AS7).
Appropriate herbicides will only be used to control noxious weeds and
invasive, non-native shrubs in areas where other methods of non-chemical
control (e.g. hand removal, grazing, planting of cover crops) do not succeed.
Under such circumstances the use of low toxicity, highly specific insecticides
(e.g. Bacillus thuringiensis), will be permitted on a localized scale to protect
natural resources on City open spaces. Highly toxic, broad-spectrum
insecticides (e.g. organophosphates) will only be used in the case of a
devastating pest outbreak when a wide variety of the City's natural resources
are at significant risk. It is anticipated that the use of chemical pesticides on
City-owned open space will be minimal. 2-1512 2-i
ATTACHMENT I
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) will be obtained from the manufacturer
for toxicological information and personal safety protection requirements. All
on-site pesticide handling will be done away from streams, ponds, and
drainage areas. Records will be maintained for all pesticide uses as directed
by state and federal regulations. Handling, disposal, and clean up of
pesticides shall comply with the product label, and state and federal
regulations (LV14).
,,moils ----—---- —-------The City is committed to the creation of an integrated trail system that
connects City open space to other public or private lands (OS 12.1.2).
In the interest of public safety and resource protection, travel in open space
lands is restricted to designated trails, and off-trail travel is discouraged.
Construction of new trails is prohibited, except where authorized by the City
as part of an adopted Conservation Plan for the open space (HAl2).
Trails will be constructed and marked as such to facilitate recreational uses;
they will be located to minimize impacts to sensitive natural features and
visual resources. All trails will conform to an adopted City standard (e.g., a
1ft cleared tread ['single-track']; with not more than 5ft of vegetative
clearance on either side). Use of trails may be subject to restrictions in some
areas (HAl2).
Signage on open spaces will be limited due to aesthetic considerations. In
accordance with Open Space Element sections relating to public education,
interpretive booths and signage will be constructed where appropriate. Size
and style of signage will be standardized to maintain consistency throughout
the City's open space system (HA13).
Mitigation_Projects � _ i
Mitigation for the impacts of private projects shall generally be conducted on
private lands. However, special circumstances may arise that justify use of
City-owned lands as a mitigation site:
A. Where there is a clear City benefit from a transaction that involves
the use of City land as a.mitigation site; or
B. Where General Plan goals will be furthered by the appropriate use
of City lands for mitigation purposes.
Private mitigation actions on City-owned land shall have a clear resource-
protection or amenity value to the site, and shall be subject to approval by
the City Council. Under all circumstances a mitigation and monitoring plan
13 2-16
ATTACHMENT I
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
will be prepared that meets the requirements of the relevant state or federal
regulating agency (LV15).
ScientificStudy — ---- ----- — _--- ---
Non-destructive scientific study and research will be permitted with written
approval from the City. A condition of approval will be that the applicant
provides the City's Natural Resources staffwith a written report of the
findings of the study.. This will assist the City in compiling a detailed
inventory of natural and biological resources located on City open space
lands (LV16).
4.2 Human Activities and Impacts
Objectives.
Provide the public with a safe and =
pleasing environment in which to t
pursue passive recreational
activities, while maintaining the
integrity of the resource and s. y
9 ty
minimizing the impact on the
wildlife and habitats represented.
Policy-
'General
The system of open space lands Hikers at Reservoir Canyon
that has been developed within and
around the City is considered an important part of the community's setting
and character, providing opportunities for enjoyment of the natural
environment by our citizens. The Open Space Element states that uses of
open space lands owned or managed by the City should:
"preserve the natural amenities of the open space land"and "may not include
uses which would degrade or significantly impact resource preservation on-
site or on an adjacent parcel"(per San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, Chapter
12.22.020).
Consistent with this direction, City open spaces will be managed to provide
limited opportunities for passive recreation as defined in the Open Space
element (OS 1.1.4), i.e.:
"low-intensity recreational activities such as hiking, bird-watching, nature
photography, trails, individual picnic areas, nature study, viewing stations,
interpretive areas, and similar uses"(OS Def-5)
14 2-17
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands ATTACHMENT I
Such activities will only be permitted where there are no significant
environmental or land use compatibility conflicts. All other forms of
recreation, such as mountain biking and equestrian activities, are considered
active recreation and will be subject to restrictions (HA2; HA4).
The City has adopted regulations that restrict or prohibit activities deemed
inconsistent with the goals for City open space as described in the Open
Space Element. Activities which may be so restricted or prohibited include:
camping; horseback riding; bicycling; fishing; animal trapping; boating;
walking of pets; consumption of alcohol; sound amplification; solicitation;
possession of weapons; rock climbing; parasailing; operation of motor
vehicles; and plant collection (San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, Chapter
12.22.050). The reader is referred to the Municipal Code for specifics. All
management decisions relating to permitted activities on City owned or
managed open space will be consistent with these regulations (HA5; HA6;
HA7; HA8; HA9; HAI 0; HAI 1).
Special events (e.g. competitive races, weddings or memorials) should not
be permitted on City-owned open space (HAI 4).
In general, active recreation will be prohibited within creek corridors (except
Mission Plaza and Mission Plaza expansion areas), wetlands (except
portions of Laguna Lake and the wetland area within Meadow Park),
sensitive wildlife habitats, and areas where recreation would significantly mar
the scenic quality of the site. Similarly, no overnight camping is allowed in
any City-owned creek corridor or open space. Presence in such areas after
dusk is prohibited (OS 12.22.0508), as facilities to accommodate overnight
use are not provided in City open spaces such use can pose a significant
threat to public health and safety.
Access
City open space lands, where
public access is permitted, shall
be open to the public from
dawn to dusk. It shall be
; +':.
unlawful to enter or remain �. � ;• r
within such lands between one r
hour after sunset and one hour
before sunrise of the following
day without approval from the �S
City (HAI).
Temporary closure of a City
open space may be necessary Pool habitat on SLO creek is critical for the
if the prevalent conditions pose development of juvenile Southern
a threat to the public safety. Steelhead Trout
Such threats may include fires,
landslides, or flooding (LV11). 15 2-18
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space lands -' ATTAC ENT 9
Any section of the City's Open Space Lands may be closed to the public at
any time, and for any interval of time. Closures may be either temporary or
at regular and stated intervals (daily or otherwise), and either entirely or
merely to certain uses, as deemed necessary (per San Luis Obispo
Municipal Code, Chapter 12.22.050B/C).
Public access may also be restricted in an area if the City determines that
adopted Limits of Acceptable Change have been exceeded, as described in
the Conservation Plan for the open space (HA1).
Access points to City-owned open space shall be established as
inconspicuous trailheads, which may or may not provide off-street parking.
Trailheads originating in residential areas will be located to minimize any
potentially disruptive effects to the local neighborhood (HA3). During the
public review of the Conservation Plan for an open space, or at another
appropriate time (such as review of a development proposal), public input will
be sought on the design and location of trailheads originating in residential
areas. Trailheads will consist of a gate preventing vehicular access, and a
sign designating the trail. Specific facilities such as restrooms and garbage
cans will generally not be provided.
Access issues will be reviewed on a 5-7 year cycle as the Conservation Plan
is periodically updated and amended. Should public use of a trailhead be
causing disturbance to local residents, then measures to reduce these
disturbances will be explored. This may include, but is not limited to
relocation or closure of the trailhead.
4.3 Aquatic Systems
Objectives:
To preserve and restore creeks, wetlands and ephemeral seeps or springs in
a natural state, and provide suitable habitat to all native aquatic and riparian
species. To minimize the impacts of harmful activities, such as the release of
pollutants, while maintaining the creek system as a means of conveying
storm water within urban areas.
Policy.
Gene al
Riparian vegetation will be managed to preserve and enhance the wildlife
habitat value of these important resources while minimizing the danger to life
and property from flooding (AS8). New plantings within creek corridors or in
setback areas will be restricted to trees, shrubs and groundcover native to
the local area and normally found within creek corridors (AS4).
16 2-19
ATTACHMENT I
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
The City will avoid actions on open space lands that could result in a net
decrease in wetlands. When wetland loss is unavoidable, a mitigation
strategy will be adopted which has been approved by the appropriate state or
federal regulatory agency, and replacement will be at a ratio of at least 2:1
(OS 6:C:1) (AS2).
Waterways and wetlands will be managed to enhance and preserve native
fish and amphibian populations and their habitats. Public access will be
regulated in riparian and wetland areas, when necessary, to protect natural
resources (AS1; AS3). Erosion and sediment control practices sufficient to
stabilize disturbed or actively eroding creek banks will be implemented when
necessary (AS6).
Aquatic habitat improvements will be implemented as opportunities for
restoration arise. All restoration work intended to improve in-stream habitat
for southern steelhead will be in a manner consistent with guidelines
published in the California Department of Fish and Game Salmonid Stream
Habitat Restoration Manual(3) (AS4).
Where appropriate, efforts will be made to increase the public's knowledge
and appreciation of the City's aquatic resources by provision of interpretative
services on City-owned or managed property (AS5).
4.4 Agriculture
Objectives:
The City is committed to the permanent preservation of farmlands to protect
the agricultural economy of the County and the State (OS 10.1.1); and it is
committed to conserve and maintain adequate natural resources (such as
ground water) for productive agriculture (OS 10.1.5).
Policy.
In general, agricultural lands on City Open Space will be maintained for
agricultural uses. Publicly owned agricultural lands will be leased back to
farmers, or utilized as demonstration projects of good stewardship practices.
All agricultural operations on City-owned lands must adhere to the policies
and regulations outlined in a "Best. Management Practices" document
prepared for the site. These will include the provision of protective measures
for wildlife habitat and endangered species identified on the site (AG1; AG2).
Agricultural practices on City-owned Open Space may be restricted if
continuation of those practices conflicts with higher priority objectives. For
17 2-20
ATTACHMENT �
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
example, farmland may be reverted to wildlife habitat if the area historically
had high habitat value (e.g. land adjacent to wetlands or creeks). Another
example of such a conflict is the use of limited groundwater supplies for
irrigation purposes on City-owned open space that may be required for
general consumptive use by the local populace. Under such circumstances
the City will make every effort to provide an alternative source of water to
support agricultural practices. Alternative sources may be in the form of
recycled water from the City's proposed wastewater re-use system.
4.5 Wildlife Protection
Objectives: _. a 9l
To conserve and protect native
plant and animal species and -
enhance their habitats, in order
to maintain viable wildlife o
populations within balanced
ecosystems.
Many of the City's Open Space Lands
Policy. have high wildlife habitat value
•
Habitat
-- -- -
To the extent feasible, the City will protect and conserve local native habitat
(such as grasslands) and the native wildlife that depends on it. The City will
cooperate on a regular basis with other public and private land managers,
and recognized wildlife management experts, to address wildlife
management issues on a regional scale (W P1).
Recognized restoration techniques will be used where appropriate to restore
a degraded habitat to a fully functioning ecosystem. Only native plants will
be utilized in restoration programs, and the planting of invasive, non-native
plants will be prohibited (WP2).
The creation of habitat islands (habitat surrounded by developed areas) will
be avoided and necessary wildlife corridors (including corridors under
proposed major roads, highways, or other impediments which restrict animal
movement) will be provided whenever possible (V/P1).
18 2-21
-� ATTACHMENT I
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
Habitat for native raptors (hawks, eagles, and owls) will be protected and
enhanced (WP4), and nesting and roosting trees will be preserved wherever
possible. Tree pruning will be performed only when nesting and brood
rearing is not occurring.
If a structure that is acting as a perching site for raptors is removed, it will be
replaced with a suitable alternative structure whenever feasible (WP4).
The habitat of native songbirds and migrants will be protected and enhanced
whenever feasible and appropriate (WP5).
[Exotics and
Control programs may be implemented for exotic wildlife species, such as
bull frogs or carp, that are negatively impacting native species (WP7).
Mosquitoes may be controlled in the case of serious human or domestic
animal health threat due to disease outbreak (e.g., encephalitis) (WP6).
The City will request the aid of the California Department of Fish and Game
or County Office of Animal Control to remove any animal that poses a threat
to public health or safety; or an animal that is preying on domestic animals or
critical nesting birds (HA6; WP8). Such actions will be taken only when
passive means have been exhausted (e.g. public education; signage;
fencing; closure of open space etc).
Species of Special Concern
Conservation of rare, threatened, and endangered species of plants and
animals and their supporting habitats will take precedence over all other
management objectives.
Management activities will promote, enhance, and protect habitat used by
endangered species, threatened species, and species of local concern. In
Restoration Areas, management activities will enhance habitat that has the
potential to support these species (WP9).
Native plant species of special concern (according to listings by the California
Native Plant Society and the California Department of Fish and Game) may
be reintroduced into suitable habitat on City open space only if targeted by
special projects or grants (WP3).
19 2-22
ATTACHMENT it
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
5. Conservation Plan Elements
A Conservation Plan prescribes an ongoing land management program of
activity undertaken to prevent or minimize adverse impacts of approved land
uses on resources of importance to the City of San Luis Obispo. Plans
should be completed for a property within 2 years following acquisition.
Plans for newly acquired properties adjoining existing City-owned open
space may take the form of an amendment or addition to the existing
Conservation Plan for the previously owned open space.
The overall purpose of a Conservation Plan is threefold: 1) to provide an
account of the prevailing condition of a property; 2) to set out future goals for
the property; 3) to prescribe a means of achieving those goals.
Each plan will consist of the following elements.
5.1 Executive Summary
This will include a concise summary of the plan's significant findings relative
to recreational, visual, wildlife, habitat, agricultural, culturaVhistodc and land
management needs on the property, and the actions proposed to meet those
needs. It will also include a discussion of the public participation processes
used to prepare the Conservation Plan as well as its origin and purpose.
5.2 Inventory
The inventory will be a catalog of the physical, biological, natural, cultural and
recreational resources represented on a property. Establishing a detailed
resource inventory is likely to be a long-term, ongoing process. The initial
plan will be formulated using the information gathered during base-line
studies performed during preparation of the first draft of the Conservation
Plan. Plans will be updated periodically as new resource information
becomes available.
5.3 Goals and Policies
Clearly defined goals for the long and short-term management of the property
will be set out; and the adopted policies and guidelines that will be
implemented to achieve these goals identified. When a property is
designated with multiple categories as described in Section 3, individual sets
of goals and policies will be established for each land use category.
5.4 Map
The map will show the location and configuration of all proposed
management, restoration, habitat, cultural/historic and agricultural areas
together with justification for each designation. The proposed location of new
trails or other physical improvements will also be identified.
20 2-23
Ad AACWMEbAII I
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
5.5 Needs Analysis
The Conservation Plan will include an evaluation of the adequacy of current
management practices to satisfy present and projected public demands and
desires for open space. The needs analysis will address such topics as:
• A description of current recreational activity levels, participation patterns, and
trends likely to affect activity levels in the future. Recommendations on
changes that need to occur to meet future goals (e.g., new trails or
trailheads). Description of adopted Limits of Acceptable Change for the site.
• A description of the existing wildlife habitat value of the property, together
with recommendations on how to preserve and improve this value.
• A description of any restorative work required on the property.
• A description of current agricultural practices occurring on the property; and
how these practices are likely to change in the foreseeable future.
• A description of cultural/historic resources occurring on the property; and
recommendations on how these resources can be preserved and/or restored
in the future.
5.6 Implementation Strategy
The implementation strategy provides direction for the orderly and
coordinated execution of the Conservation Plan. Actions should relate
logically to the needs identified and should be based upon the adopted
policies detailed in Appendix 1. The implementation strategy represents the
City's decisions for addressing needs and goals based on the desires of the
community and the City's fiscal constraints. It should encompass specified
time-periods and should be updated every 5-7 years to report on progress,
make adjustments, and include any proposals for new actions.
The following points will be addressed when formulating the implementation
strategy:
• Time Frame — In this section the goals set out in Section 5.3 will be
prioritized and a time-line established to define when these goals should be
met.
• Physical Improvements - This section will include a blueprint for any
restorative work and/or plans for physical structures; such as informational
booths, road improvements, footbridges etc, that are recommended for the
site. When appropriate, detailed plans and engineer's drawings describing
the structure should be included in this section.
• Cost Evaluation — This section will contain the projected costs of
recommended management activities and physical improvements
2AY4costs
ATTACHMENT '1
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
that fall outside the approved normal operational budgets for the City's open
space program will be acknowledged, and possible sources of external
funding identified.
• Staffing resources — This section will outline the staff necessary to meet
specified goals. It is anticipated that staff from the Natural Resources
Program and Parks and Recreation Department will play a major role in the
day-to-day management of the open space system. Additional assistance,
from other City departments and groups such as the California Conservation
Corps and local non-profits, will be solicited as necessary.
5.7 Fiscal Impact of Council Adoption of Conservation Plans
Adoption of this document as a policy guide for City-owned open space lands
will not of itself involve any expenditures not currently anticipated by the City
Council or by staff. However, adoption does imply a greater level of
inventory and planning for City-owned open space lands than has heretofore
been the case. Therefore, some increased level of resource management
activities (such as vegetation manipulation, prescribed burning, in-stream
habitat enhancements, restoration of degraded areas, and development of
trailheads and trail systems) is a possible result of this planning effort as it
applies to each open space area. Additional effort and costs will be
estimated as part of the development process for individual Conservation
Plans.
22 2-25
ATTACHMENT 1.1
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
6. References
1. City of Fort Collins. Natural Resources Dept. 1995. General Management
Guidelines for City-owned Open Spaces and Natural Areas. 281 N. College
Ave. P.O. Box 580, Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580.
2. Jefferson County Open Space. 1998. Open Space Master Plan. 700
Jefferson County Pkwy. Suite 100 Golden, CO 80401.
3. Flosi, G., S. Downie, J. Hupelain, M. Bird, R. Cowy, and B. Collins. 1998.
California Salmonid Stream Habitat Restoration Manual. California
Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, Sacramento, CA.
227 pages.
23 2`26
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands ATTR C H m ap '1
7. Appendix 1
The following table contains the official language that will be used when preparing
individual Conservation Plans for land acquired for open space purposes; and
shows how policies will be implemented within the various land use categorizations.
Habitat Restoration_ Management I _Cultural/Historic Agricultural
Land and Vegetation
Generally Permit the use of livestock grazing
prohibit as a management technique to
Lvi (may be help maintain a balanced and Not.Applicable.
Livestock permitted diverse ecosystem; increase the
grazing under special biodiversity of native plants;or
circumstance). reduce fire risk.
Preserve and protect native vegetative communities. Restore native
LV2 vegetative communities by employing restoration and/or re-vegetation
Native techniques. Utilize only site or region specific native trees, grasses, herbs Not Applicable..
vegetative and shrubs; prohibit the planting of invasive, non-native species within
communities native vegetative communities.
LV3 Encourage adjacent landowners to undertake efforts to control targeted non-native vegetation on
Adjacent land their lands.
LV4 Preserve all native trees when feasible.
Native trees
Plant new native trees to increase benefits to wildlife where appropriate.
LV5 Use fencing to exclude livestock and damaging wildlife(e.g. deer)from Not Applicable.
Tree planting newly planted areas.
Thin eucalyptus, pine and cypress
LV6 plantations,shrub-land or woodland areas
Vegetation Prohibit. occurring along the wildland/urban Not Applicable.
thinning interface to create a less fire—prone
condition.
Implement erosion and sediment control practices(e.g.vegetation,water bars etc)sufficient to
stabilize disturbed areas, where appropriate.
LV7
Erosion control Reclaim burnt areas that are deemed susceptible to excessive erosion.
Mana a un aved access roads to minimize erosion or decommission and re-vegetate them.
LV8 Use controlled bums for vegetation or pest management. All affected residents will be notified of
Controlled fires any prescribed burn at least three weeks before the event.
Maintain defensible spaces at the urban/open space interface, providing sufficient space
between structures and flammable vegetation within which the fire service can mount a defense
against fire.
LV9
Fire safety Employ firefighting methods which have the least impact on the natural resources represented
on the site, providing the use of such methods do not put property or human Irfe in danger.
24 2-27
A`d'TACC a[i ENT `]
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
Habitat . I Restoration -Management CuRural/Historic f A ricultural
Monitor the stability of plant communities in selected areas, particularly grassland areas,to
determine if brush, weeds or other heavy fuel materials are encroaching.
LV10
Monitoring Employ Limits of Acceptable Change standards to evaluate the impacts of human use on land
and ve etation.
Reserve the right to close certain open space areas to the public during periods of extreme fire
hazard conditions or other emergencies,and/or to protect natural resources, including
LV11 endangered species. Reserve the right to limit the use of vehicular traffic and machinery on
Public safety agricultural lands during periods of extreme fire risk. Closures will be made on a daily basis,
except in certain areas mutually agreed upon for long-term closure.
LV12 Manage City open spaces in accordance with established Integrated Pest Management(IPM)
IPM methods methods to control noxious weed and pest infestations.
Use appropriate herbicides only when other IPM measures have failed to control noxious weeds
LV13 and invasive, non-native shrubs.
Pesticide usage Use insecticides only for devastating pests e. . gypsy moth outbreak).
Obtain Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)from the manufacturer for toxicological infor-ft ion
and personal safety protection requirements.
Handle on-site pesticides away from streams, ponds and drainage areas.
LV14
Pesticide safety Maintain records of the use of restricted use pesticides as directed by state or federal
regulations.
Handle, dispose,and clean up pesticides in compliance with the product label, and state or
federal reaulations.
Permit the use of degraded areas on City open space for mitigation projects,
Where there is a clear City benefit from a transaction that involves the use of City land as a
mitigation site;or
LV15
Mitigation b. Where General Plan goals will be furthered by the appropriate use of City lands for
Projects mitigation purposes.
Private mitigation actions on City-owned land shall have a clear resource-protection or amenity
value to the site,and shall be subject to approval by the City Council. Under all circumstances a
mitigation and monitoring plan will be prepared that meets the requirements of the relevant state
or federal regulating agency.
LV16 Permit non-destructive scientific study and research on City open spaces with the prior
Scientific Study evaluation and written approval. Approval will only be granted on the condition that a written
report of findings is submitted to the City on-completion of the study.
25 2-28
-WENT 11
ATTACHI
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
Habitat Restonstion Management CulturaUHlstoric I Agricultural
Human Activities and Impacts
Permit public access to City open spaces
from dusk until dawn.
Entry to such lands shall be unlawful
between the hour after sunset and one
hour before sunrise of the following day Prohibit, unless
HA1 Discourage. Prohibit. without approval of the City.
Public access posted otherwise.
Public access may be restricted in an
area if the City determines that the Limits
of Acceptable Change have been
exceeded; as described in the
Conservation Plan for the open sace.
Permit passive recreation as defined in the City's Open Space
element(OS 1.1.4).
HA2 Discourage. Prohibit. Such activities will only be permitted where there are no
Passive significant environmental or land use compatibility conflicts, as
Recreation determined by the City.
Establish access points to City-owned
open space as an inconspicuous trailhead
which may or may not provide off street
parking.
HA3 Prohibit. Prohibit.
Trailheads Locate trailheads originating in residential
areas in such a manner as to minimize
any potentially disruptive effects to the
local neighborhood.
Permit in
designated areas
HA4 as per Open
Active Prohibit. Space regulations, Prohibit.
recreation (San Luis Obispo
Municipal Code,
12.22.040).
HA5 Permit dogs on a leash (per San Luis Obispo Municipal Code,
Dogs Prohibit. Chapter 12.22.050F.1.e). Unless otherwise posted.
Prohibit, except for special circumstances to trap nuisance wildlife (i.e. wildlife posing a threat to
HA6 people, property or pets neighboring open space areas; or users of open space when other
Animal trapping/ means of addressing the problem (e.g. temporary closure]have failed), or to conduct research in
collecting/ cooperation with the City's Natural Resources Department. Any trapping activities will require
hunting written approval from the City.
HAT Prohibit, unless posted (except for Laguna Lake).
Fishing
HAs Prohibit the use of firearms, bows, paintballs, and fireworks on City open space lands (San Luis
Weapons Obispo Municipal Code, 12.22.050M).
26 2-29
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
Habitat - Restoration Management Cultural/Hlstoric -Agricultural
Permit only in
designated
areas with prior
City
HA9 Prohibit. authorization. Prohibit.
Rock Said areas are
climbing subject to
closure during
raptor nesting
periods.
Permit only in
designated
areas and with
prior City
HA10 Prohibit. authorization. Prohibit.
Parasailing Said areas are
subject to
closure during
raptor nesting
periods.
Prohibit collection of any plants, animals or minerals from the natural environment, except where
HA11 authorized as an integral part of the land management program or for scientific study (with
Collection of written City approval). Approval will only be granted on the condition that a written report of
specimens findings is submitted to the City on completion of the study.
Construct and mark trails to facilitate
recreational uses as part of an approved
trail systems plan. Place trails to avoid
impacts to sensitive features of the site.
HAl2 Prohibit. Not Applicable.
Trails Prohibit construction of trails without city
authorization.
Restrict the use of trails on sensitive sites.
HA13 All management activities that may affect the viewshed (e.g. trail construction, utility corridors,
Visual fences,signs etc)will take into account and minimize adverse visual impacts.
Resources and
Signage Allow interpretive features for educational purposes.
HA14 Special events (e.g. competitive races, weddings or memorials)should not be permitted on City-
Special Events owned open space.
Aquatic Systems
Conserve, enhance and restore native fish and amphibian populations and their habitats;
AS1 monitor fisheries resources to determine species composition, size, and population;and
Aquatic habitat cooperate with the State Department of Fish and Game to conserve, enhance and manage its
fisheries resources for ecological benefit.
Avoid initiation of actions on City open space lands that could result in a net decrease in
wetlands. If City actions do result in a decrease in wetlands mitigation shall consist of creating
twice the area of habitat of equal quality(OS 6.C.1).
AS2
Wetland habitat Manage wetland areas to enhance and preserve populations of native species.
Restrict livestock access to riparian and wetland areas,when necessary to protect natural
resources.
-- - - - - - 27 2-30
ATTACHMENT -1
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
Habitat Restoratlon_.. _Management -Cultural/Historic Agricultural
AS3 Regulate public access in riparian and wetland areas, when necessary to Not Applicable.
Public access protect natural resources.
Restore and rehabilitate creek,wetland and seep/spring vegetation to
enhance and preserve the natural value of the habitat. New plantings within
creek corridors should be California native plants (trees, shrubs and ground
cover) normally found in creek corridors.
AS4 Not Applicable.
Restoration Follow pertinent guidelines published in the California Department of Fish
and Game Salmonid Stream Habitat Restoration Manual (CDFG, 1988),
when performing in-stream restoration work designed to improve habitat for
southern steelhead.
AS5 Increase public knowledge and appreciation of natural resources and provide public
Public interpretative services on City-owned or managed property.
awareness
AS6 Implement erosion and sediment control practices sufficient to stabilize disturbed or actively
Erosion control. eroding creek banks.
AS7 Limit the use of pesticides within creek corridors. When pesticides are used they should be
Pesticide use hand applied only to those species identified as appropriate to remove.
Manage creek
corridor vegetation
to preserve and
AS8 Generally prohibit(may be enhance habitat for
Flood control permitted under special wildlife,while Not Applicable.
circumstance). minimizing the
danger.from
flooding to local
residents..
Agriculfure
_. Maintain
agricultural lands
for agricultural
uses,except in
cases where:
past agricultural
practices have
AGi degraded the
area and
Protection of Not Applicable. restoration is
agricultural.
lands , needed; or
threatened or
endangered
species occupy
the area,and
protection of
sensitive habitat
is necessary.
28 2-31
ATTACHM, ENT
Conservation Guidelines for City Open Space Lands
Habitat Restoration. Mana gement_ _ Cultural/Historic Agricultural
Lease publicly
owned
agricultural lands
AG2 back to farmers,
Leasing of or utilize such
publicly owned Not Applicable. land as
lands demonstration
projects that will
benefit local
farmers and the
environment.
Wildlife Protection
Protect native wildlife and habitat. The City will cooperate on a regular basis with other public
and private land managers and recognized wildlife management experts to address wildlife
WP1 management issues on a regional scale.
Wildlife and
habitat Avoid the creation of habitat islands(habitat surrounded by developed areas); provide necessary
protection wildlife corridors (including corridors under proposed major roads and highways, around
agricultural land, or other impediments that restrict animal movements).
WP2 Employ restoration techniques where required to achieve a self sustaining
Habitat natural system; use only native plants in restoration areas,and prohibit the Not Applicable.
restoration planting of invasive, non-nativespecies.
WP3 Target native si ies reintroductions forspecial projects. Not
Applicable.Reintroduction
Promote, enhance, and protect habitat of raptors(hawks, eagles and owls).
Preserve nesting and roosting trees wherever possible.
WP4
Raptors Delay tree pruning until nesting and brood rearing is completed.
Preserve or replace historic raptor perching sites wherever possible.
Songbirds Promote,enhance and protect habitat of native songbirds as appropriate for site characteristics.
Son
WP6 Control mosquitoes in the case of serious human or domestic animal health threat due to
Mosquitoes disease outbreak(e.g.,encephalitis).
WP7 Control exotic wildlife species(e.g.bull frogs,carp) if they are endangering the continued
Exotics existence of native species of special concern.
Control problem individual animals(e.g., Coyotes) preying on domestic animals or nesting birds.
WP8 Action will be taken only when passive means of control been exhausted(e.g. public education;
Animal control signage;closure of open space etc).
WP9.
Rare, Conserve rare,threatened, and endangered species of plants and animals and their supporting
threatened and habitats in precedence over all other activities.
endangered
species _
29 2-32
mcET111LG AGENDA
DATE 77"_b ITEM # 2.
From: Don & Ellen Dollar<ddollar@pacbell.net>
To: Allen Settle<asettle@slocity.org>, Ken Schwartz<kschwartz@slocity.org>, Christine
Mulholland<cmulholland@slocity.org>, John Ewan <jewan@slocity.org>,Jan Howell Marx
<jmarx@slocity.org>
Date: Sat,Jul 13,2002 11:12 AM
Subject: Open Space Guidelines- Meeting 7-16-02
City Council, RrCOUN,CiL CDD DIR
C7'CAO _ FIN DIR
Concerning Open Space WACAO FIRE CHIEF
IWATTORNEY ❑ PW DIR
I have been in contact with the City Natural Resources staff on the ErCLERK ORIG d POLICE CHF
first"Draft' guidelines and the current version to be reviewed on July � PT HEADS ❑ REC DIR
16,2002. I think the Natural Resources staff is off to a very good ❑ UTIL DIR
start for an effective program to manage Open Space. The approach th O HR DIR
are suggesting is realistic and practical. I would like to offer a few
suggestions for °fine tuning"the Guidelines.
* I think it is important that the Natural Resources staff be in
charge of the Open Space Program, it should be clearly stated in
the Guidelines and Municipal Code.The educational and experience
needs are quite different than those associated with running an
urban parks program. As clearly stated in the Municipal Code
12.22.020, Open Spaces are °...not considered to be parks..."
With Open Spaces having the emphasis on the preservation of
natural resources and a visual sense of openness, while allowing
public use so long as it does not impair the resources, calls for
trained active management. On a day to day basis,there is a very
different focus than urban parks. As stated in the Municipal Code,
12.22.040 B.,the "director" means the director of parks and
recreation.With so much success in acquiring so much Open Space
in the last few years, and the potential for many more acres to be
added in the future, now is the right time to align Open Space
management correctly. I feel that the day to day authority for
permitted activities (including those various exceptions)should
be made in a natural resource context by the Natural Resources
staff.This Will help prevent the setting of unintended
precedents by not allowing resource impacting activities.
Obviously,there are many issues that necessitate close
cooperation with the Parks and Recreations staff and that is
proper and needs to continue.
• I suggest that there be.some type of informal Open Space group
(not requiring Brown Act) started that would perform functions
similar to the Parks and Recreation Committee, to act as an
advocate for the Open Space Program and focus on Open Space issues
which are not the same as Parks and Recreation. At times there
will be overlap and they would need to work together-which
should be encouraged. A couple areas of concern; easements or
acquisitions of large agricultural lands that may have unusual
restrictions, including grazing lands, and areas that are planned RECEIVED
to be Open Space but are coveted for active recreational
activities. Also, an informal group could be very useful in the JUL 2002
formation of individual areas plans, i.e. Islay Hill, Bishop Peak,
etc. SLO CITY CLERK
*The various parts of the Guidelines dealing with agriculture need
expanding. 1 understand that now there is very little agricultural
land in the Open Space Program, but I imagine that overtime that
could change considerable. I look at these Guidelines as a
framework to address current issues and many unknown future
issues. I think more attention to grazing issues need to be
addressed so that any grazing activity on Open Space lands is done
in a quantifiable way that is resource enhancing with grazing
plans that are site specific. If grazing is done for fuel load
reduction,fire prevention, quantifiable goals should be set.
suggest that these guidelines apply to easements and be clearly
stated as such throughout the Guidelines. Future easements for
Open Space should state that these Guidelines are incorporated
into the easements.
'As for Fire Plans, I think each Open Space area should have a
written plan,filed with SLOFD and CDF that aggressively and
effectively fights fire with minimal resource damage. Some issues
such as planting native fire resistant plants along urban
interface areas can easily be part of the plan, along with fuel
reduction programs. Also,the Natural Resource Manager and
Biologist should be designated as "Resource Advisors" in the plans
filed with SLOFD and CDF, so that natural resource values are
clearly identified to the fire staff during fire incidents,this
can be especially valuable when threatened and or endangered
species are concerned.
Open Spaces are an important component of our quality of life here in
San Luis. I will try to attend the meeting on Open Space on July 16.
Please feel free to contact me if you have questions or concerns about
my comments.
Don Dollar
SLO
781-0118
CC: Michael Clarke<mclarke@slocity.org>, Neil Havlik<nhavlik@slocity.org>
Lcouncil """"July 16, 2002
A acEnOA i PORt �mC2
C I T Y OF SAN L U I S O B I S P O
FROM.- Michael D. McCluskey, Director of Public WorkMDQ
Prepared By: Bridget Fraser, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES; SPECIFICATION NO. 90358
CAO RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve the Request for Qualifications for Environmental Services.
2. Authorize the City Administrator to execute an agreement with the top selected consultants.
3. Authorize the City Administrator to execute purchase orders up to $50,000 for individual
environmental service contracts where funding is available in the project account for those
services.
DISCUSSION
Staff recommends generating a list of qualified consultants to perform environmentally related
services for Council approved and budgeted CIP projects on an "as-needed" basis over the next
two years. Providing a list of prequalified environmental consultants will greatly reduce
engineering staff time in hiring consultants by eliminating the repetitive process of preparing
RFPs, advertising and soliciting firms for each and every project.
Staff uses consultants for two main purposes. The first is to complete work for which there is no
internal expertise. The second is to allow project work to continue or be expedited when staff is
unavailable due to other project work. Staff is working on a number of projects that will require
a variety of environmental services over the next two fiscal years. Currently, there is not
adequate City staff with the training and experience necessary to carry out these duties efficiently
and effectively. Hiring consultants with the proper expertise will ensure that the City CIP
projects get the thorough environmental analysis that the Council and the public expect, leading
us to project solutions that enhance the environment as well as mitigating for impacts.
In the past, staff has traditionally hired individual consultants on a project-by-project basis. This
has proven to be time consuming, expensive and redundant for both the City and the consultants.
Over the last few years the. Public Works Department has generated lists of prequalified
consultants to provide services on an "on-call" basis for various areas of specialized work such
as surveying, materials testing, construction management, right-of-way acquisition services and
hazardous materials testing/monitoring. Environmental service is simply another type of service
that can be provided by a consultant, available to the City on an on-call basis.
The Request for Qualifications (RFQ) solicits information packets from interested
Environmental consultants. After evaluating the submittal packages received, staff will select
the top one to three consultants based on their demonstrated ability to provide these services.
Once these consultant(s) have been selected, and entered into an agreement withthe City, staff
would be able to use their services for individual projects as needed.
Typical work performed by the environmental consultant will include biological Mies and
surveys, regulatory permitting services, construction surveys and monitoring and �uch
CouncilAgenda Report—Request for Qualifications—Environmental Services
Page 2
environmental services deemed necessary for the successful completion of the City's Capital
Improvement Plan projects.
The City's Financial Management Manual allows consultants to be hired without any special
requirements for services totaling less than $5,000. Each department is responsible to prepare
vouchers, or a purchase order, for payment to the consultant. Between $5,000 and $15,000, a
department solicits proposals in an informal manner, and a Purchase Order is authorized by the
CAO. For any consultant services over $15,000, a formal Council-approved Request for
Proposals (RFP) is required. When consultants are hired, departments collect insurance and
establish general conditions for the agreement. This is a time consuming endeavor in a division
such as Engineering, where project management is a significant portion of the workload.
The purpose of issuing RFQ's is to shorten the purchasing process without compromising its
purpose. If the City has an agreement with a group of consultants for a variety of specialties,
then their insurance is on file with the City and an agreement has been executed outlining the
conditions under which the consultant must work, such as indemnification, non-discrimination
and conditions for termination. When a need for services is identified, staff needs only to review
the list and specialties of the consultants, find a match to the project requirements and contact the
firms to determine if they have staff available for the work and what the cost and time frame for
completion will be. Once a written cost proposal is received from the consultant, a purchase
order can be approved, and work can begin.
The RFQ process and the execution of an advance agreement allows staff to obtain needed
services for previously approved and budgeted CIP projects in a greatly reduced time frame,
basically under the guidelines for services less than $5,000, but in compliance with the City's
purchasing policy. Additionally, the RFQ process invites new companies to be recognized by
the City as interested and available for work. This improves competition and brings us new
ideas and expertise.
FISCAL IMPACT
The RFQ process itself, does not have any fiscal impacts. Payment for the consultant services
will come from the individual project funds to which they apply. The Project Manager in
conjunction with the Finance Department monitors the availability of funds. If an account is not .
adequately funded at the time the work is needed, staff will return to the City Council to request
a supplement to the budget prior to issuing any purchase order for the work. Individual work
orders for environmental services are expected to range anywhere from $1,500 to $50,000.
C2-2
Council Agenda Report—Request for Qualifications—Environmental Services
Page 3
ALTERNATIVES
Staff can continue under the current practice of obtaining needed services for individual projects
by hiring a consultant in accordance with the purchasing policy guidelines. This alternative is
not recommended because of the additional time it takes to hire a single consultant for each
needed service, and the fact that no benefits are obtained over the RFQ process proposed.
Available in the Council Reading File for Review:
RFQ—Environmental Services
GAConsultant Service Contracts\Environmental\CAR adv RFQ EnviroServices.doc
C2-3