HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/03/2002, C9 - WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL, CITY SPECIFICATION NO. 90341 council "'°�°�
Se t. 3 2002.
acEnaa Repoot (!9
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
FROM: John Moss,Utilities Direq�o .
Prepared By: David Hix, Wastewater Divi ton Manager
SUBJECT: WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL, CITY SPECIFICATION NO. 90341
CAO RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Request for Proposals for the Water Reclamation Facility Improvement Project study
and design, authorize staff to solicit proposals, and authorize contract award for the study phase.
(Phase 1)by the CAO if the negotiated amount with the selected consultant is less than the budget of
$100,000.
DISCUSSION
In October of 2000, Brown and Caldwell Engineering completed the Wastewater Master Plan. The,
Master Plan identified the expansion of wastewater treatment processes needed to meet future
capacity needs and improvements of other processes. The recommended improvements and
capacity upgrades require additional study and analysis, followed by the preparation of plans and
specifications for construction. Other studies and analysis are required to improve facility
efficiency and address future discharge compliance requirements. The attached Request for
Proposals (RFP) has been prepared to solicit proposals from qualified firms for the study, analysis
and design of these improvements at the Water Reclamation Facility(WRF).
The RFP consists of two phases; the first phase is a study phase that will take a comprehensive look
at the recommendations in the Wastewater Master Plan and the other identified issues at the WRF.
Phase H will complete environmental review and preparation of final plans and specifications for
construction. This request is for funding of Phase I or the study phase. After completion of the
study phase, staff will return to Council with a preliminary design report on the recommendations
from Phase I and request authorization to proceed with Phase H.
An increase in treatment capacity is required to meet the growth anticipated by the General Plan.
Processes that will require study and analysis for capacity include: an additional cooling tower,
filter, Dissolved Air Flotation Thickener (DAFT), chlorine contact chamber and filter influent
pumping station. The WRF will reach its current capacity in 2010. Several other important projects
are listed in the Master Plan and require additional detailed study.
Also included in the scope of work are studies to analyze several processes associated with the
WRF's efficiency. Analysis and study of the WRF's hydraulic flow, evaluation of the trickling
filters and solids treatment and handling processes may recommend changes that could significantly
enhance operational efficiency, reduce maintenance, and improve biosolids quality. Evaluation of
process efficiency and alternatives is being recommended, in lieu of simply replacing with similar
C 9—/
Council Agenda Report WRF Improvements Project RFP,Spec.90341
Page 2
or like equipment..
Two of the items in the scope of work address requirements of the WRF's current National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. One item requires the City study ways
of decreasing the formation of Trihalomethanes (THMs) in the City's effluent. THMs are a by
product of disinfection with chlorine and currently are at levels that exceed the proposed limit based
upon the Domestic and Municipal Supply (MUN) beneficial use designation of San Luis Obispo
Creek. The RFP also includes a study of current WRF processes that may be modified for de-
nitrifying the WRF's effluent. Currently the WRF converts ammonia,which is toxic,to nitrates that
are discharged to San Luis Obispo Creek. De-nitrification (elimination of nitrates) will likely be
required after the adoption of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's (RWQCB) Total
Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for San Luis Obispo Creek. Although there is no requirement for
de-nitrification at this time, staff feels that the City will be required to address this issue and it is
better to study it now as a part of the WRF Master Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT
The Water Reclamation Facility Master Plan Implementation project is identified in the 2001-03
Financial Plan, Appendix B, page 142-143. There is currently$100,000 in the project to support the
study and preliminary design aspects of the project. One million dollars has been projected for
project design and environmental review in 2004-05. Following completion of this study phase and
presentation of the preliminary design report to.Council, staff will be seeking authorization to
proceed with the design phase of the project.
ALTERNATIVES
Defer this project. This alternative is not recommended. The WRF will require capacity expansion
in the near future and study must begin soon for design and construction to be completed when the
capacity is needed. The Regional Water Quality Control Board has required the City to study
alternatives to reduce THMs and improve process efficiency. This work is included in the RFP and
cannot be deferred.
ATTACHMENT
Request for Proposals, Specification No.90341
Electronic File Path: WRF Master Plan CAR
C9-Z
Attachment 1
IIIIIIIIIII��� �IIIIIII�
city o f
iEMAWA San Luis Obispo
990 Pabn Street ■ San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
Notice Requesting Proposals for
Analysis and Design Services for
Water Reclamation Facility Improvements
The City of San Luis Obispo is requesting sealed proposals for development of recommendations of
improvements at the City's Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) and subsequent preliminary design of
necessary improvements pursuant to Specification No. 9034L All proposals must be received by the
Department of Public Works by 3:00 pin on Thursday, October 17`h, 2002, when they will be opened
publicly in the Public Works Conference Room,955 Morro, San Luis Obispo,CA 93401.
Proposals received after said time will not be considered. To guard against premature opening, each
proposal shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works in a sealed envelope plainly marked with
the proposal title, specification number, proposer name, and time and date of the proposal opening.
Proposals shall be submitted using the forms provided in the specification package.
A pre-proposal conference will be held at the Water Reclamation Facility, 35 Prado Road, San Luis
Obispo on Thursday, September 19"at 2:00 pm to answer any questions that the prospective proposers
may have regarding the City's request for proposals. A tour of the Water Reclamation Facility and related
facilities will follow the pre-proposal conference for any interested party.
Proposal packages may obtained at the City's website: www.slocity.org under Bids &Proposals or by
e-mailing your request to pkin @g slocity.ore, or by faxing your request to the Public Works Department
at (805)781-7198. Please include your company name, street address, phone, fax and e-mail address,.
along with your name and specification number of the RFP you are requesting.
Questions may be directed to David Hix, Wastewater Division Manager at (805) 781-7039 or
dhix@slocit rLorg.
® The City of San Luis Obispo iscommitted to including disabled persons in all of our services,programs and activities.
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf(805)781-7410.
C'9-3
Specification No. 90341
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. Description of Work 1
B. General Terms and Conditions 4
Proposal Requirements
Contract Award and Execution
Contract Performance
C. Special Terms and Conditions 9
Contract Term
Estimated Quantities
Proposal Content
Proposal Evaluation and Selection
Proposal Review and Award Schedule
Start and Completion of Work
Accuracy of Specifications
D. Agreement 13
E. Insurance Requirements 15
F. Proposal Submittal Forms 17
Proposal Submittal Summary
References
e��
f
Section A
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
The City of San Luis Obispo is requesting proposals for a Analysis and Design Services for the Water
Reclamation Facility (WRF). The City is seeking a qualified team provide engineering services for:
Phase I. Preparation of a preliminary design report for recommended improvements to provide
capacity and to enhance operations at the Water Reclamation Facility(WRF);and
Phase H. The design of the recommended improvements including plans, specifications, and other
necessary documents for bidding purposed and the initial environmental assessment
relative to construction of the improvements.
The selected consultant will be asked to meet with staff after being chosen and before the contract is
negotiated to clarify_the_work to be done and the final contract costs. The consultant will also include in
the work schedule ample time for staff and consultant to review the.activities and.process to assure the
project is executed expeditiously and that the final product meets the City's needs.
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The City of San Luis Obispo operates and maintains a Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) that provides
tertiary wastewater treatment for the entire City, Cal Poly and the County airport: Effluent is discharged
to San Luis Obispo Creek, a coldwater freshwater habitat. The WRF's last upgrade was completed in
1994 to meet discharge requirements. The WRF is a tertiary nitrification facility that includes
clarification,biofiltration,activated sludge/nitrification,final clarification,filtration,cooling,chlorination
and dechlorination. Currently the WRF's average dry weather flow is 4.5 MGD with a design capacity of
5.2 MGD.
Brown and Caldwell Engineering recently prepared a Wastewater Master Plan for the City of San Luis
Obispo. The master plan identifies a number processes that need expansion to meet the City's planned
population growth per the City's General Plan. These improvements along with several other
improvements and items that require study for compliance and operational efficiency are discussed in
more detail in the following sections. This RFP also includes items not included in the Master Plan that
focus on regulatory compliance requirements and overall treatment plant operations and effiecncy.
SCOPE OF WORK
The City is looking for a qualified team of consultants that can work with City staff relative to the
capacity and facility improvements identified in the Wastewater Master Plan, overall analysis of the
WRF's current processes, flow and operations, and several compliance related areas of study. The City
anticipated the scope of work would be carried out in two phases:
Phase -Study and Preliminary Design
Phasel Tasks
Review and analyze the recommendations from the City's Wastewater Master Plan for the
expansion and addition of processes required for future capacity at the WRF. Recommendations
from the Master Plan include the construction of additional filters, cooling towers, a chlorine
contact tank, a pumping station and Dissolved Air Flotation Thickener (DAFT). Provide
technical justifications for any modification of the Master Plan's recommendations.
■ Review,analyze and provide recommendations for the WRF priority l and 2 projects listed in the
Wastewater Master Plan.
■ Prepare analysis and recommendations of the WRF's current hydraulic flow scheme. Analysis
shall include evaluation current hydraulic flow and control systems, current flow equalization
operations, possible enhancement of operational efficiency using flow equalization, impacts on
all flow dependant processes such as, but not limited to primary and secondary clarifiers,
pumping,trickling filters, aeration basins, solids and final clarifiers.
■ Prepare analysis and recommendations for the future use(s) of the WRF's trickling filters.
■ Prepare analysis and recommendations for enhancement of the WRF's solids treatment,
dewatering and handling operations. Analysis shall include evaluation of alternatives to the
construction of another Dissolved Air Flotation Tank(DAFT), digester efficiency including flow
scheme, heating and mixing, boiler replacement and cogeneration of electricity using digester
gas, current dewatering/drying operations and supernatant handling. Provide analysis and
recommendations for processes that will produce Exceptional Quality(EQ)biosolids.
■ Analyze the WRF's current disinfection system and use of chlorine in other processes and
provide recommendations for the reduction of Trihalomethanes in the WRF's effluent. Analysis
shall include but not be limited to: ammonia addition, air stripping, alternative disinfection
methods and processes, and seasonal mixing zones discharge concentrations.
■ Analyze modification or construction of treatment process(s) for the reduction of nitrates in the
WRF's effluent.
■ Provide recommendations for WRF improvements based upon current and/or proposed
requirements and regulations..
■ Discussions and interaction between the Consultant and City staff is considered critical to the
success of the overall project. The Consultant shall assume that several meetings with City staff
will be required during the project study phase,as well as subsequent design phase.
■ Present recommendations in a Phase I study session to the City Council (one meeting).
Phase I Deliverables
■ Five (5) bound copies of the Draft Study and Preliminary Design report for City review and
comment.
-2- C9-G
• Five (5) bound copies and one camera ready copy of the Final Study and Preliminary Design
Report incorporating City comments and requested revisions. One electronic copy of all files
required to print the Final Report using the software programs identified in the Special Terms and
Conditions section. In addition, one electronic copy on Adobe acrobat PDF format at high
resolution suitable for printing purposes,with all figures and text.
Phase II Environmental Review and Contract Documents for Construction
Phase II Tasks
■ Following review and approval of the recommendations in the Phase I report, prepare an initial
environmental assessment for the project for City review and approval.
■ Prepare plans and specifications for the construction of the recommended improvements
identified in the Phase I report. The plans and specifications shall utilize City standards details
and specifications to the maximum extent possible. City shall provide electronic copies of
standard specifications and standard plan sheets.
■ Present plans to the Architectural Review Committee and the City Council for review and
approval(a minimum of two meetings should be anticipated)
Phase II Deliverables
■ Five(5)copies of the draft initial environmental review for City review and comment.
• Five (5) copies of the final initial environmental review which incorporates City comments and
requested revisions.
■ At 50%completion, five(5)review copies of the draft plans and specifications for improvements
and preliminary engineering cots estimates and construction schedule:
• At 90%completion,five(5)review copies of the draft plans and specifications for improvements
and final engineering costs estimates and construction schedule.
■ At 100% completion, Three (3) final sets of bound plans and specifications and one unbound
reproducible set of final plans and specifications,ready for reproduction.
■ One electronic copy of all files needed to print the plans and specifications using software
programs identified in the Special Terms and Conditions section.
-3-
/—/
Section B
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Requirement to Meet All Provisions. Each individual or firm submitting a proposal (proposer)
shall meet all of the terms, and conditions of the Invitation for Request for Proposals (RFP)
specifications package. By virtue of its proposal submittal,the proposer acknowledges agreement
with and acceptance of all provisions of the RFP specifications.
2. Proposal Submittal. Each proposal must be submitted on the form(s) provided in the
specifications and accompanied by any other required submittals or supplemental materials.
Proposal documents shall be enclosed in an envelope that shall be sealed and addressed to the
Department of Public Works, City of San Luis Obispo, 955 Morro Street, San Luis Obispo, CA,
93401. In order to guard against premature opening, the proposal should be clearly labeled with
the proposal title, specification number,name of proposer,and date and time of proposal opening.
No FAX submittals will be accepted.
3. Insurance Certificate. Each proposal must include a certificate of insurance showing:
a. The insurance carrier and its A.M. Best rating.
b. Scope of coverage and limits.
C. Deductibles and self-insured retention.
The purpose of this submittal is to generally assess the adequacy of the proposer's insurance
coverage during proposal evaluation; as discussed under paragraph 12 below, endorsements are
not required until contract award. The City's insurance requirements are detailed in Section E.
4. Proposal Quotes and Unit Price Extensions. The extensions of unit prices for the quantities
indicated and the lump sum prices quoted by the proposer must be entered in figures in the spaces
provided on the Proposal Submittal Form(s). Any lump sum bid shall be stated in figures. The
Proposal Submittal Form(s) must be totally completed. If the unit price and the total amount
stated by any proposer for any item are not in agreement, the unit price alone will be considered
as representing the proposer's intention and the proposal total will be corrected to conform to the
specified unit price.
5. Proposal Withdrawal and Opening. A proposer may withdraw its proposal, without prejudice
prior to the time specified for the proposal opening, by submitting a written request to the
Director of Finance for its withdrawal, in which event the proposal will be returned to the
proposer unopened. No proposal received after the time specified or at any place other than that
stated in the "Notice Requesting Proposals" will be considered. All proposals will be opened and
declared publicly. Proposers or their representatives are invited to be present at the opening of
the proposals.
6. Submittal of One Proposal Only. No individual or business entity of any kind shall be allowed
to make or file, or to be interested in more than one proposal, except an alternative proposal when
specifically requested; however, an individual or business entity that has submitted a sub-
proposal to a proposer submitting a proposal, or who has quoted prices on materials to such
proposer, is not thereby disqualified from submitting a sub-proposal or from quoting prices to
other proposers submitting proposals.
-4- eq—
i
7. Communications.. All timely requests for information submitted in writing will receive a written
response from the City. Telephone communications with City staff are not encouraged, but will
be permitted. However, any such oral communication shall not be binding on the City.
CONTRACT AWARD AND EXECUTION
8. Proposal Retention and Award. The City reserves the right to retain all proposals for a period
of 60 days for examination and comparison. The City also reserves the right to waive
non-substantial irregularities in any proposal,to reject any or all proposals, to reject or delete one
part of a proposal and accept the other, except to the extent that proposals are qualified by
specific limitations. See the "special terns and conditions" in Section C of these specifications
for proposal evaluation and contract award criteria.
9. Competency and Responsibility of Proposer. The City reserves full discretion to determine the
competence and responsibility, professionally and/or financially, of proposers. Proposers will
provide, in a timely manner, all information that the City deems necessary to make such a
decision.
10. Contract Requirement. The proposer to whom award is made (Contractor) shall execute a
written contract with the City within ten (10) calendar days after notice of the award has been
sent by mail to it at the address given in its proposal. The contract shall be made in the form
adopted by the City and incorporated in these specifications.
11. Insurance Requirements. The Contractor shall provide proof of insurance in the form,
coverages and amounts specified in Section E of these specifications within 10 (ten) calendar
days after notice of contract award as a precondition to contract execution.
12. Business Tag. The Contractor must have a valid City of San Luis Obispo business tax certificate
before execution of the contract. Additional information regarding the City's business tax
program may be obtained by calling(805) 781-7134.
CONTRACT PERFORMANCE
13. Ability to Perform. The Contractor wan-ants that it possesses, or has arranged through
subcontracts,all capital and other equipment, labor,materials,and licenses necessary to carry out
and complete the work hereunder in compliance with any and all federal, state, county, city, and
special district laws, ordinances,and regulations.
14. Laws to be Observed. The Contractor shall keep itself fully informed of and shall observe and
comply with all applicable state and federal laws and county and City of San Luis Obispo
ordinances,regulations and adopted codes during its performance of the work.
15. Payment of Taxes. The contract prices shall include full compensation for all taxes that the
Contractor is required to pay.
16. Permits and Licenses. The Contractor shall procure all permits and licenses,pay all charges and
fees, and give all notices necessary.
17. Safety Provisions. The Contractor shall conform to the rules and regulations pertaining to safety
established by OSHA and the California Division of Industrial Safety.
-5-
V
18. Public and Employee Safety. Whenever the Contractor's operations create a condition
hazardous to the public or City employees, it shall, at its expense and without cost to the City,
furnish, erect and maintain such fences, temporary railings, barricades, lights, signs and other
devices and take such other protective measures as are necessary to prevent accidents or damage
or injury to the public and employees.
19. Preservation of City Property. The Contractor shall provide and install suitable safeguards,
approved by the City,to protect City property from injury or damage. If City property is injured
or damaged resulting from the Contractor's operations, it shall be replaced or restored at the
Contractor's expense. The facilities shall be replaced or restored to a condition as good as when
the Contractor began work.
20. Immigration Act of 1986. The Contractor warrants on behalf of itself and all subcontractors
engaged for the performance of this work that only persons authorized to work in the United
States pursuant to the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 and other applicable laws
shall be employed in the performance of the work hereunder.
21. Contractor Non-Discrimination. In the performance of this work, the Contractor agrees that it
will not engage in, nor permit such subcontractors as it may employ, to engage in discrimination
in employment of persons because of age, race, color, sex, national origin or ancestry, sexual
orientation, or religion of such persons.
22. Work Delays. Should the Contractor be obstructed or delayed in the work required to be done
hereunder by changes in the work or by any default, act, or omission of the City, or by strikes,
fire, earthquake, or any other Act of God, or by the inability to obtain materials, equipment, or
labor due to federal government restrictions arising out of defense or war programs,then the time
of completion may, at the City's sole option,be extended for such periods as may be agreed upon
by the City and the Contractor. In the event that there is insufficient time to grant such extensions
prior to the completion date of the contract,the City may, at the time of acceptance of the work,
waive liquidated damages that may have accrued for failure to complete on time, due to any of
the above, after hearing evidence as to the reasons for such delay, and making a finding as to the
causes of same.
23. Payment Terms. The City's payment terms are 30 days from the receipt of an original invoice
and acceptance by the City of the materials, supplies, equipment, or services provided by the
Contractor(Net 30).
24. Inspection. The Contractor shall furnish City with every reasonable opportunity for City to
ascertain that the services of the Contractor are being performed in accordance with the
requirements and intentions of this contract. All work done and all materials furnished, if any,
shall be subject to the City's inspection and approval. The inspection of such work shall not
relieve Contractor of any of its obligations to fulfill its contract requirements.
25. Audit. The City shall have the option of inspecting and/or auditing all records and other written
materials used by Contractor in preparing its invoices to City as a condition precedent to any
payment to Contractor.
-6-
26. Interests of Contractor. The Contractor covenants that it presently has no interest, and shall not
acquire any interest—direct, indirect or otherwise—that would conflict in any manner or degree
with the performance of the work hereunder. The Contractor further covenants that; in the
performance of this work, no subcontractor or person having such an interest shall be employed.
The Contractor certifies that no one who has or will have any financial interest in performing this
work is an officer or employee of the City. It is hereby expressly agreed that, in the performance
of the work hereunder, the Contractor shall at all times be deemed an independent contractor and
not an agent or employee of the City.
27. Hold Harmless and Indemnification. The Contractor agrees to defend,indemnify,protect and
hold the City and its agents, officers and employees harmless from and against any and all
claims asserted or liability established for damages or injuries to any person or property,
including injury to the Contractor's employees, agents or officers that arise from or are
connected with or are caused or claimed to be caused by the acts or omissions of the
Contractor, and its agents; officers or employees, in performing the work or services herein,
and all expenses of investigating and defending against same; provided, however, that the
Contractor's duty to indemnify and hold harmless shall not include any claims or liability
arising from the established sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its agents,
officers or employees.
28. Contract Assignment. The Contractor shall not assign,transfer, convey or otherwise dispose of
the contract, or its right,title or interest, or its power to execute such a contract to any individual
or business entity of any kind without the previous written consent of the City.
29. Year 2000 Compliance. The Contractor warrants that the goods or services provided to the City,
including those provided through subcontractors, are "Year 2000 compliant." For the purpose of
this contract, "Year 2000 compliant" means that goods or services provided to the City will
continue to fully function, fault-free, before, at and after the Year 2000, without interruption or
human intervention; and if applicable, any data outside of the date range 1900-1999, including
leap years, will be correctly processed in any level of computer hardware or software, including,
but not limited to, micro-code, firmware, application programs; files and data bases. This
warranty supersedes all warranty disclaimers or limitations, and all limitations on liability,
otherwise provided by the Contractor.
30. Termination. If, during the term of the contract, the City determines that the Contractor is not
faithfully abiding by any term or condition contained herein, the City may notify the Contractor
in writing of such defect or failure to perform. This notice must give the Contractor a 10 (ten)
calendar day notice of time thereafter in which to perform said work or cure the deficiency.
If the Contractor has not performed the work or cured the deficiency within the ten days specified
in the notice, such shall constitute a breach of the contract and the City may terminate the contract
immediately by written notice to the Contractor to said effect. Thereafter,neither party shall have
any further duties, obligations, responsibilities, or rights under the contract except, however, any
and all obligations of the Contractor's surety shall remain in full force and effect, and shall not be
extinguished,reduced,or in any manner waived by the termination thereof.
-7- C9/�
\1 _
l l
In said event, the Contractor shall be entitled to the reasonable value of its services performed
from the beginning date in which the breach occurs up to the day it received the City's Notice of
Termination, minus any offset from such payment representing the City's damages from such
breach. "Reasonable value"includes fees or charges for goods or services as of the last milestone
or task satisfactorily delivered or completed by the Contractor as may be set forth in the
Agreement payment schedule; compensation for any other work, services or goods performed or
provided by the Contractor shall be based solely on the City's assessment of the value of the
work-in-progress in completing the overall workscope.
The City reserves the right to delay any such payment until completion or confirmed
abandonment of the project, as may be determined in the City's sole discretion, so as to permit a
full and complete accounting of costs. In no event, however, shall the Contractor be entitled to
receive in excess of the compensation quoted in its proposal.
-8- C9-/z
Section C
SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Proposal Content. Your proposal must include the following information:
Submittal Forms
a. Certificate of insurance.
b. References from at least three firms for whom you have provided similar services.
Qualifications
C. Experience of your firm in performing similar services.
d. Resumes of the individuals who would be assigned to this project, including any sub-
consultants.
e. Standard hourly billing rates for the assigned staff, including any sub-consultants.
f. Statement and explanation of any instances where your firm has been removed from a
project or disqualified from proposing on a project.
Work Program
g. Description of your approach to completing the work.
h. Tentative schedule by phase and task for completing the work.
i. Estimated hours for your staff in performing each major phase of the work, including
sub-consultants.
j. Services or data to be provided by the City.
k. Any other information that would assist us in making this contract award decision.
Proposal Length and Copies
1. Proposals should be kept to a minimum necessary to address the requirements in the RFP.
in. Five(5)copies of the proposal must be submitted.
2. Proposal Evaluation and Consultant Selection. Proposals will be evaluated by a review
committee using a two-phase selection.and contract award process as follows:
Phase 1— Written Proposal Review/Finalist Candidate Selection
A group of finalist candidates (generally the top 2 to 3 proposers) may be selected for follow-up
interviews and presentations based on the following criteria as evidenced in their written
proposals:
a. Understanding of the work required by the City.
b. Quality,clarity and responsiveness of the proposal.
C. Demonstrated competence and professional qualifications necessary for successfully
performing the work required by the City.
d. Recent experience in successfully performing similar services.
e. Proposed approach in completing the work.
f References..
g. Background and experience of the specific individuals to be assigned to this project.
-9- C9-/3
Phase 2—Oral Presentations/Interviews and Consultant Selection
Finalist candidates may be requested to make an oral presentation to the review committee and
answer questions about their proposal. The purpose of this second phase is two-fold: to clarify
and resolve any outstanding questions or issues about the proposal; and to evaluate the proposer's
ability to clearly and concisely present information orally. As part of this second phase of the
selection process, finalist candidates will submit proposed compensation costs for the phase I&II
work, including a proposed payment schedule tied to accomplishing key project milestones or
tasks. After evaluating the proposals and discussing them further with the finalists or the
tentatively selected contractor, the City reserves the right to further negotiate the proposed
workscope and/or method and amount of compensation.
Contract award will be based on a combination of factors that represent the best overall value for
completing the workscope as determined by the City, including; the written proposal criteria
described above; results of background and reference checks; results from the interviews and
presentations phase; and proposed compensation.
3. Proposal Review and Award Schedule. The following is an outline of the anticipated schedule
for proposal review and contract award:
a. Issue RFP 9/7
b. Conduct pre-proposal conference 9/19
C. Receive proposals 10/17
d. Complete proposal evaluation 10/25
e. Conduct finalist interviews 10/30
f. Finalize staff recommendation 11/4
g. Award contract 11/12
h. Execute contract 11/19
i. Start work 11/25
4. Pre-Proposal Conference. A pre-proposal conference will be held at the following location,
date,and time to answer any questions that prospective proposers may have regarding this RFP:
Thursday, September 19`s, 2002, 2:00 pm
Water Reclamation Facility Conference Room
35 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, CA
5. Ownership of Materials. All original drawings,plan documents and other materials prepared by
or in possession of the Contractor as part of the work or services under these specifications shall
become the permanent property of the City,and shall be delivered to the City upon demand.
6. Release of Reports and Information. Any reports, information, data, or other material given to,
prepared by or assembled by the Contractor as part of the work or services under these
specifications shall be the property of City and shall not be made available to any individual or
organization by the Contractor without the prior written approval of the City.
7. Copies of Reports and Information. If the City requests additional copies of reports, drawings,
specifications, or any other material in addition to what the Contractor is required to famish in
limited quantities as part of the work or services under these specifications, the Contractor shall
provide such additional copies as are requested, and City shall compensate the Contractor for the
costs of duplicating of such copies at the Contractor's direct expense.
-10-
8. Format for Computer Files. When computers have been used to produce materials submitted to
the City as a part of the workscope,the Contractor must provide the corresponding computer files
to the City, compatible with the following programs whenever possible unless otherwise directed
by the project manager:
• Word Processing Word
• Spreadsheets Excel
• Desktop Publishing Coreldraw, Pagemaker
• Computer Aided Drafting(CAD) AutoCad
Computer files must be on Compact Disc (CD) 3%z", high-density, write-protected
diskettes, formatted for use on IBM-compatible systems. Each CD must be clearly
labeled and have a printed copy of the directory. Alternatively, files may be emailed to
the City.
9. Attendance at Meetings and Hearings. As part of the workscope and included in the contract
price is attendance by the Contractor at up to three (3) public meetings to present and discuss its
findings and recommendations. Contractor shall attend as many"working" meetings with staff as
necessary in performing workscope tasks.
10. Alternative Proposals. The proposer may submit an alternative proposal (or proposals) that it
believes will also meet the City's project objectives but in a different way. In this case, the
proposer must provide an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each of the
alternatives, and discuss under what circumstances the City would prefer one alternative to the
other(s). If an alternative proposal is submitted, the maximum length of the proposal may be
expanded proportionately by the number of alternatives submitted.
11. Accuracy of Specifications. The specifications for this project are believed by the City to be
accurate and to contain no affirmative misrepresentation or any concealment of fact. Proposers
are cautioned to undertake an independent analysis of any test results in the specifications,as City
does not guaranty the accuracy of its interpretation of test results contained in the specifications
package. In preparing its proposal, the proposer and all subcontractors named in its proposal
shall bear sole responsibility for proposal preparation errors resulting from any misstatements or
omissions in the plans and specifications that could easily have been ascertained by examining
either the project site or accurate test data in the City's possession. Although the effect of
ambiguities or defects in the plans and specifications will be as determined by law, any patent
ambiguity or defect shall give rise to a duty of proposer to inquire prior to proposal submittal.
Failure to so inquire shall cause any such ambiguity or defect to be construed against the
proposer. An ambiguity or defect shall be considered patent if it is of such a nature that the
proposer, assuming reasonable skill,ability and diligence on its part,knew or should have known
of the existence of the ambiguity or defect. Furthermore,failure of the proposer or subcontractors
to notify City in writing of specification or plan defects or ambiguities prior to proposal submittal
shall waive any right to assert said defects or ambiguities subsequent to submittal of the proposal.
To the extent that these specifications constitute performance specifications, the City shall not be
liable for costs incurred by the successful proposer to achieve the project's objective or standard
beyond the amounts provided therefor in the proposal.
i
In the event that,after awarding the contract,any dispute arises as a result of any actual or alleged
ambiguity or defect in the plans and/or specifications,or any other matter whatsoever, Contractor
shall immediately notify the City in writing, and the Contractor and all subcontractors shall
continue to perform, irrespective of whether or not the ambiguity or defect is major, material,
minor or trivial, and irrespective of whether or not a change order, time extension, or additional
compensation has been granted by City. Failure to provide the hereinbefore described written
notice within one (1) worldng day of contractor's becoming aware of the facts giving rise to the
dispute shall constitute a waiver of the right to assert the causative role of the defect or ambiguity
in the plans or specifications concerning the dispute.
-12- 9-/G
Section D
FORM OF AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into in the City of San Luis Obispo on this day
of , by and between the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, a municipal
corporation, hereinafter referred to as City, andCTOWS NAME IN CAP AL ], hereinafter
referred to as Contractor.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, on [�, City requested proposals for analysis and design services for water reclamation
facility improvements per Specification No. 90341.
WHEREAS, pursuant to said request, Contractor submitted a proposal that was accepted by City for said
services.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises, obligations and covenants hereinafter
contained,the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date this Agreement is made and entered,
as first written above,until acceptance or completion of said services.
2. INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE. City Specification No: 90341 and Contractor's
proposal dated[gg,are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this Agreement.
3. CITY'S OBLIGATIONS. For providing services as specified in this Agreement, City will pay
and Contractor shall receive therefor compensation in a total not to exceed[$ .00]
4. CONTRACTOR'S OBLIGATIONS. For and in consideration of the payments and agreements
hereinbefore mentioned to be made and performed by City,Contractor agrees with City to do everything required by
this agreement and the said specifications.
5. AMENDMENTS. Any amendment, modification or variation from the terms of this Agreement
shall be in writing and shall be effective only upon approval by the.Council of the.City.
6. COMPLETE AGREEMENT. This written Agreement, including all writings specifically
incorporated herein by reference, shall constitute the complete agreement between the parties hereto. No oral
agreement, understanding, or representation not reduced to writing and specifically incorporated herein shall be.of
-13-
any force or effect, nor shall any such oral agreement, understanding, or representation be binding upon the parties
hereto.
7. NOTICE. All written notices to the parties hereto shall be sent by United States mail, postage
prepaid by registered or certified mail addressed as follows:
I
City Pam King
Public Works Department
City of San Luis Obispo
955 Morro Street
San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
Contractor ( ]
( ]
( ]
8. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT. Both City and Contractor do covenant that each
individual executing this agreement on behalf of each party is a person duly authorized and empowered to execute
Agreements for such party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be executed the day and year
first above written.
ATTEST: CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
By:
City Clerk City Administrative Officer
APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONTRACTOR
By:
City Attorney
-14- C7��d
t
Section E
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS: Consultant Services
The Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for
injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of
the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents,representatives, employees, or subcontractors.
Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
I. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage(occurrence form CG 0001).
2. Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering.Automobile Liability, code
1 (any auto).
3. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability
Insurance.
4. Errors and Omissions Liability insurance as appropriate to the consultant's profession:
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than:
I. General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property
damage. If Commercial General Liability or other form with a general aggregate limit is used,
either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general
aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
3. Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
4. Errors and Omissions Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared
to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such
deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City,its officers,officials,employees and volunteers;
or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim
administration and defense expenses.
Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be
endorsed to contain,the following provisions:
I. The City,its officers, officials,employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as
respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products
and completed operations of the Contractor;premises owned,occupied or used by the Contractor,
or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain
no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, official,
employees;agents or volunteers.
2. For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary
insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any
insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or
volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall.not contribute with it.
3. The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or
suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
4. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be
suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty
(30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt.requested, has been given to the
City.
-15-
e9-�9
Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.Best's rating of no
less than ANIL
Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall fumish the City with a certificate of insurance showing
maintenance of the required insurance coverage. Original endorsements effecting general liability and
automobile liability coverage required by this clause must also be provided. The endorsements are to be
signed be a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be
received and approved by the City before work commences
-16- C9'�
PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL FORM
The undersigned declares that she or he:
■ has carefully examined Specification No. 90341 ,which is hereby made a part of this proposal.
11 is thoroughly familiar with its contents.
■ is authorized to represent the proposing firm.
■ agrees to perform the work as set forth in this proposal.
❑ Certificate of insurance attached; insurance company's A.M.Best rating
Firm Name and Address
Contact Phone
Signature ofAuthorized Representative
Dale
-17-
J
REFERENCES
Number of years engaged in providing the services included within the scope of the specifications under
the present business name:
Describe fully the last three contracts performed by your firm that demonstrate your ability to provide the
services included with the scope of the specifications. Attach additional pages if required. The City
reserves the right to contact each of the references listed for additional information regarding your firm's
qualifications.
Reference No. i
Customer Name
Contact Individual
Telephone&FAX number
Street Address
City,State,Zip Code
Description of services provided
including contract amount,when
provided and project outcome
Reference No.2
Customer Name
Contact Individual
Telephone&FAX number
Street Address
City,State,Zip Code
Description of services provided
including contract amount,when
provided and project outcome
Reference No.3
Customer Name
Contact Individual
Telephone&FAX number
Street Address
City,State,Zip Code
Description of services provided
including contract amount,when
provided and project outcome
18" CIA?Z2
STATEMENT OF PAST CONTRACT DISQUALIFICATIONS
The proposer shall state whether it or any of its officers or employees who have a proprietary interest in it,
has ever been disqualified, removed, or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing a federal,
state, or local government project because of the violation of law, a safety regulation, or for any other
reason, including but not limited to financial difficulties, project delays, or disputes regarding work or
product quality,and if so to explain the circumstances.
■ Do you have any disqualification as described in the above paragraph to declare?
Yes ❑ No U
■ If yes, explain the circumstances.
Executed on at under penalty
of perjury of the laws of the State of California,that the foregoing is true and correct.
Signature of Authorized Proposer Representative
-19- t"9.23