HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/20/2004, - COMM i
San Luis Obispo Chamber of Commerce
1039 Chorro Street • San Luis Obispo, California 93401-3278
(805) 781-2777 • FAX (805) 543-1255 9 TDD (805) 541-8416
David E. Garth, President/CEO
20 April,2004
Mayor Dave Romero and Members of the City Council
City of San Luis Obispo
990 Palm St.
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Dear Mayor Romero and Council Members:
As part of its mandate to attract more visitors to San Luis Obispo,the Promotional Coordinating
Committee has embraced the Chamber's concept of "Dressing the City"for tourists.Travelers with a
choice are more likely to visit a physically attractive city than one that lacks visual appeal,and to spend
more time there once they arrive.Thanks to the foresight of government and community leaders over the
years San Luis Obispo has become a city of great charm,but there is room for improvement.
The Chamber's Tourism Council, in formulating strategies for Dressing the City,has determined that one
simple way to beautify San Luis Obispo is to upgrade the landscaping of median strips on major streets.
It is along these streets that many visitors get their first glimpse of the city,and this first impression can
have a powerful effect on how long they decide to stay—and how much money they ultimately
spend—here.
In recent years the city has followed a policy of planting street medians with drought-resistant native
plants.Admirable in purpose,the policy is unintentionally detrimental to San Luis Obispo's appearance.
Most of the species planted in the medians seem perhaps too natural,giving the landscaping a parched
and ungroomed look.The result is not only unattractive but contrary to the city's leafy, immaculate
character.
The Board of Directors of the Chamber of Commerce asks that the Council consider amending the policy
on median landscaping to allow for the use of greenery and flowering plants. This modest improvement
could have a great impact on the ambiance of major streets,and would make the city more inviting to
those passing through.The benefits would be twofold: visitors would be more likely to linger and
patronize local businesses and residents would enjoy a better quality of life.
The Board hopes that the Council will see the value of beautifying San Luis Obispo's street medians and
will act to revise the city's landscaping policy.
Reseuramurphy
ectfully �iot y�
f the Bo d
e-mail: slochamber@slochamber.org • websites: www.slochamber.org www.visitsio.com
r �
I �
I
E
�1
Page 1 of 1
C',_
Allen Settle - Mardi Gras A
From: "Betty Schetzer" <schetzer@kcbx.net>
To: "alien settle" <asettle@slocity.org>
Date: 4/21/2004 1:28 PM
Subject: Mardi Gras
Allen,
Quite a session. Maybe some real progress finally?
I was prepared to wave my booklets from the Mission Plaza 10th anniversary
as an example of how to have a constructive city party without.all the
negatives, but decided that would be a distraction and not help move things
along.
It was interesting that several people used the "just because it CAN be done
doesn't.mean it SHOULD be" argument. Maybe some of that reached those who
need to understand responsibility.
The council and staff are both impressive!
file://C:\Documents%20and%2OSettings\slouser\Local%2OSettings\Temp\GW IOOOO1.HTM 4/22/2004
Lee Price-Letter for 4/20 Council Meeti-
From: 'Jennifer" <jennifer070@earthlink.net>
To: <Iprice@slocity.org>
Date: 4/19/04 10:16PM
Subject: Letter for 4/20 Council Meeting
Please distribute to the Mayor and all City Council members as soon as possible (Tuesday), so that they
can read it before the Council meeting.
Thank you very much!
Sincerely,
Jennifer Robinson
SLO Resident ,
ptAl
1
Dear Mayor and City Council,
I am a resident of San Luis Obispo and I would like to strongly express my support for
the canceling of Mardi Gras. Until a month ago I lived right downtown at Chor o and
Pacific Sts. (I have since moved to about seven blocks from there.) During Mardi Gras,
noise, alcohol-related behaviors, and general partying downtown were so out of control
that I would have left town immediately and permanently right then if I could have
afforded it. It was a nightmare. It was unbearably noisy - with "boom cars", cars revving
their engines, helicopters, and noisy students, etc. disturbing the peace until all hours. I
also felt trapped in my house, as I didn't feel it would be safe to even go as far as the post
office with so many obviously drunk people cruising about the downtown area.
As for the overall alcohol and partying problems in SLO, I think a very important statistic
to look at in the report from the Chief of Police, is that there were 3,406 noise/partying
complaints in 2003, yet there were only 238 citations. This is a great disparity. It may be
valuable to review why it is that more parties or noise offenses weren't cited.
Also relevant to consider is that when a resident calls the police to make a noise
complaint about a specific location,that that is the only complaint counted. Even if
twenty more people call to complain about the same party, or the same person calls back
three more times, these complaints are not included in the statistic. So the statistic as it
currently is would certainly seem to not show the whole picture.
One more point to look at is that in studies done about noise issues, apparently only
approximately 10% of people who are bothered by noise actually call the police and
make a formal complaint. And from what I understand, when dealing with noise and
partying issues, most people eventually either give up making formal complaints or
move, as the problems continue to happen. This is even when they HAVE regularly been
making the appropriate complaints. This is what happened in my circumstance.
In any case,both of the above points would indicate that the situation here is significantly
worse than one might think when looking at the number of"3,406" noise/partying
complaints for 2003.
I believe the solutions to this problem are several:
1)Enforce the noise ordinance and alcohol laws MUCH more strictly. Give citations and
fines consistently. If thereareno serious consequences to out of control partying and
disturbing the peace, students will just continue to do so. Noise and crime are very
strongly related, so take noise issues much more seriously—especially concerning
parties, nightclubs, and"boom cars", which are just hostile and aggressive "mini-parties"
on wheels. The drivers of these "boom cars"consistently have been shown to be criminal
in other ways, in addition to breaking the law by intentionally disturbing the peace. Note:
If you'd like more information about this, I'd be happy to provide it for you.
2)Change the existing laws so that the penalties for alcohol and noise related offenses are
MUCH more severe. Then make these potential penalties VERY well known to students,
AND follow through on them. A climate in SLO needs to be created where students think
twice and VERY seriously about getting drunk,partying and making a lot of noise.
Students need to fear that there will be VERY serious consequences if and/or when they
do break the law in these ways. Currently that is not the situation.
3)Do not allow any more bars to be opened up in town at all. We already have WAY too
many on the whole, which just adds fuel to the partying "fire". There is a 600%
concentration of bars in the downtown area. (Last fall I was informed by ABC that there
should be only eight bars per the census tract, and at that time there were forty-nine.)All
of these bars were granted alcohol licenses over the past number of years, and the
granting of all of them was unopposed by the city or police department, except one. Per
SLO PD Captain Dan Blanke, "the over-concentration of alcohol licenses in the
Downtown (600%) contributes greatly to the over-concentration of calls for service."
Why add to the problem by allowing any more bars? San Luis should have stopped
allowing more bars many years ago, but the very least that could be done is to stop
allowing more NOW.
Now that I live further away from the core of downtown SLO, the noise and partying
situation is much better for me personally. However, it is clear to me from having lived
right in the thick of it for two years, that the situation overall has been consistently
escalating, and is likely to continue to do so if not stopped. For what it's worth, I
personally was not surprised when the Mardi Gras riot happened. It actually seemed quite
able to be predicted, all things considered.
So with or without Mardi Gras, the noise, alcohol and partying problems will continue to
grow in quantity and severity- and spread to other neighborhoods not currently affected-
if not VERY strongly cracked down on immediately. I hate to see the quality of life
continue to deteriorate for all the good, respectful, and law-abiding residents of San Luis
Obispo. So I sincerely hope that the City and SLO PD do whatever is necessary to
reverse the dangerous trend of out-of-control behavior that has been escalating here for
quite some time.
Thank you very much for your consideration,
Respectfully,
Jennifer Robinson
P.O. Box 15046
SLO, CA
93406
698-3824