HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/07/2004, A1 - APPOINTMENT RECOMMENDATION TO THE TREE COMMITTEE councilMwinsDm
[A] acEnaa uEpoRt '�N..b� i
C I T Y OF SAN LU I S O B I S P O
FROM: Council Member John Ewan and Council Member Christine Mulholland
Council Subcommittee for the Tree Committee
Prepared By: Julie O'Connor, Deputy City Clerk
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT RECOMMENDATION TO THE TREE COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATION
Appoint George Sistek to an unexpired term beginning September 27, 2004 and ending March
31, 2005.
DISCUSSION
A vacancy exists on the Tree Committee due to the resignation of Steve Caminiti. The Council
Subcommittee interviewed four applicants on August 10, 2004 and is pleased to recommend the
appointment of George Sistek to fill the unexpired term..
ATTACHMENTS
1. George Sistek's application .
COUNCIL READING FILE
All applications
G:\Clerk\304 City Advisory Bodies\Tree Committee\Tree Committee Agenda Report 2004
J! ,111 F1.11 RECEIVED
AOVISoay BOOy AppUcateon
city of san Luis osispo
II J SLO CITY CLERK
� LarCL iSt2tG spas sys 9y2g
NAME HOME PHONE
`451 /i�GulrQ,/tLL �r � .,L✓,'S��'sPa 13*1 'M 5- Z3S- y/ZZ call
RESIDENCE STREET ADDRESS CITY ZIP WORK PHONE
Registered to vote? c g Live in the City Limits?A±L How long? Ever attended an advisory body meeting?
PLEASE LIST THE ADVISORY BODIES YOU ARE APPLYING FOR:
(2)
(Supplemental Questionnaires and interviews are required for each).
EMPLOYMENT(Present or last employer for school, if applicable])' 1 f 1 1
�! �e r n 'c � e-e 74 "f t�-4 a ��4 n C�jc'�e n L,.c,*A5e-0 04 4TG/.� Ts e-
%
EDUCATIION: /nr /
�L.(,Ta r'N r/.c UeLvTiG fir.h•L. �/a TG L/i9 '✓LrSrT`7— l l Dat!'c./ �!`n.L Ytl ✓� J//A✓T cd/TrXC
r
RELEVANT TRAINING, EXPERIENCE, CERTIFICATES OF TRAINING, LICENSE OR PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION:
INVOLVEMENT IN COMMUNITY,VOLUNTEER, PROFESSIONAL AND/OR ACADEMIC ORGANIZATIONS:
1V .1 L
CURRENT OR PREVIOUS SERVICE ON CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADVISORY BODIES(Please list names/dates)`
4 Jmdf4n_
How did you hear about this vacancy? Newspaper Ad Community Group_ Word of Mouth_ City Hall_ Website
Other. please specify
SPECIAL NOTES: (1) This application and supplement are "public documents" and are available for review upon request. (2)
Applicants are advised that they may be requested to file a Statement of Economic Interest disclosing all reportable interests held
by you at the time of appointment. If applicable, a copy of this form will be provided by the City Clerk. (3) Unless otherwise
indicated, please fill out the attached Supplemental Questionnaire. Thank you.
Applications are accepted year-round; however, if you are applying for a current vacancy,your application must be returned to the
City Clerk by to be considered for the current round of interviews.
G:304 CinAA,u,n hr, uh.'Appik t..nA S,,ppl...... 'dJrimn'Po plicariq,�I10/.Jw
OFFICE USE ONLY-
APPLICANT'S NAME ADVISORY BODY APPLIED FOR
SCREENING RECOMMEND FOR
INTERVIEW DATE COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT_YES_NO
SCREENING RECOMMEND FOR
INTERVIEW DATE' COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT:_YES_NO
TERM BEGINS: TERM ENDS: UNEXPIRED TERM: FULLTERM:
COMMENTS:
LTR SENT(Date)
G:304 C'ilr Ad,w,)'thdio Applitmum,V Supplemcmal,Ad'lwq'&d)'d/'('lll. nl.Juv
Advisory Body Application Supplemental Questionnaire - TknE COMMITTEE
Citv of San Luis Obispo
1. Why do you want to serve on a City advisory body?
As a resident of San Luis Obispo for 17 years, I regard the city's trees with a
sense of ownership. I am completely committed to donating my knowledge, experience,
and time in exchange for the opportunity to be an advocate for better public tree
practices. Serving as a member of the City of San Luis Obispo Tree Committee
Advisory Board is an avenue for me to use my expertise to return benefits back to our
community. I also view the committee as an opportunity to raise public awareness
about the importance of trees and urban forestry.
2. Why do you want to be a member of the Tree Committee and what do you hope to
accomplish?
The urban forest within the City of San Luis Obispo is a valuable asset to the city
and its citizens. Unfortunately, the general public can undervalue urban trees. The
city's trees are a precious resource that merit advocates to protect and advise on their
health. As a member of the Tree Committee, I can work effectively with team members
to create a forum for reviewing complaints, addressing safety issues, and assisting
decisions regarding tree health. My goals are to assist the advisory board to make
informed decisions regarding tree management though my extensive knowledge of
Arboriculture, environmental planning, landscape architecture, maintenance, and
construction.
3. Have you ever attended a meeting of the Tree Committee, or another City advisory
body?
What observations did you make?
I attended a Tree Committee meeting three years ago. My overall impression of
the meeting was that the applicants, understandably, had an adversarial attitude
focused on the advisory board. This attitude most likely originates from the applicants
lack of understanding concerning Arboriculture in an urban landscape. I have extensive
experience working effectively through adversarial relationships using logical,
horticultural based education and well-structured reasoning to resolve arboricultural
conflicts.
4.What qualities,experience, and expertise make you a good candidate for the Tree
Committee?
My expertise as a certified Arborist, with over ten-years of experience in local
landscaping, will bring substantial knowledge to the Tree Committee. The foundation
Advisory Body Application Supplemental Questionnaire - TREE COMMITTEE
Citv of San Luis Obispo
for my career in landscaping is a California Polytechnic State University, San Luis
Obispo B. S. degree in Ornamental Horticulture with a concentration in Landscape
Management. As a sole proprietor and as a foreman of local landscaping businesses, I
have gained extensive experience with California native and ornamental plant materials
and their required culture. For over three years, I managed large commercial landscapes
located throughout the Bay Area, which required an extensive knowledge of landscape
principles, as well as the ability to build successful working client relationships while
also constructively resolving conflicts with clients and subcontractors. In addition to
landscaping and Arborist qualifications, I have two years of environmental planning
experience, which has provided me with knowledge of environmental compliance
regulations along the Central California coast. In my current capacity, I am employed
by the California Department of Transportation, District 5, as a Landscape Technician
and Arborist. In this position I have extensive experience with visual assessments of
construction projects in rural and urban settings. Significantly, I regularly conduct
Arborist evaluations of trees in the state right of way managed by Caltrans. I have
provided examples of typical submitted reports for your review.
5. In your view,what are some key tree-related issues in SLO?
The City of San Luis Obispo's extensive urban forest forms the basis of the city's
high aesthetic qualities. Similar to other areas of population growth in California, one of
the challenges facing the city is integrating new infrastructure with existing,mature
trees. The greatest challenge to the forest manager is balancing sound arboricultural
practices while continuing to respect the landscape choices by private landowners and
the safety concerns of the community. It is during these interactions that the arborist
has the opportunity to foster greater public awareness of the benefits of trees and the
importance of preserving the urban forest while continuing to build city infrastructure.
6. Is there any additional information about yourself you'd like to share? (Please feel
free to attach a resume, if you have one).
My diverse educational background and experiences are representative of the
San Luis Obispo community and their commitment to maintaining and improving the
health of the urban tree landscape. If appointed, I have the expertise and skills to
provide a valuable addition to the City of San Luis Obispo Tree Committee. Through
my years of effectively working with private landowners; federal, state, and local
agencies; private consultant; and citizen groups, I have the developed the personal
skills to communicate effectively while resolving potential landscape conflicts.
P4 -4�;-
Advisory Body Application Supplemental Questionnaire - TRL-,-! COMMITTEE
City of San Luis Obispo
Signature: Date: VZOY
Attachment:
Resume
3
GEORGE W. SISTER,Arborist
491 Lawrence Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
(805) 545-9428
EDUCATION 1993 B.S. Environmental Horticulture, Landscape Management concentration
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
LICENSES International Society of Arboriculture Certified Arborist Lic.#WC-3553
California Landscape Contractor C-27 Lic.# 773165(inactive)
REPRESENTATIVE California Department of Transportation,San Luis Obispo 3/22/01 to present
EXPERIENCE Landscape Architect Technician
Arborist: Prepare Arborist reports for maintenance and capital programs; Survey, evaluate,
and map trees for removal due to poor health, safety,or construction conflicts;
Communicate with maintenanceand tree crews regarding tree policies.
Landscape Architecture: Assist landscape architects in the preparation and design of
complex landscape projects; Review construction plans for consistency; Field studies and
computer simulations of potential project impacts; Prepare presentation, graphic,and
perspective drawings for landscaping and transportation structures and for visual and scenic
resource studies;Advise and collaborate on use of cultivated and native plants, shrubs, and
trees in varied landscaping settings.
California Department of Transportation,San Luis Obispo 3/22/00 to 3/22/01
Environmental Planner
Technical reporting according to State and Federal Laws and Regulations; Prepare
Arborist reports for maintenance and capital programs; GIS mapping and analysis;
Environmental analysis of proposed construction projects and modal and design
alternatives Identify environmental impacts of transportation systems,corridors and
projects and formulate measures to mitigate impacts;Prepare,review and process
environmental clearance documents for transportation systems plans and projects in
compliance with all applicable local, State and Federal laws,regulations and policies.
Cultural Resource Management Service 11/20/99 to 3/22/00
Environmental Graphics Technician
Digitize and illustrate archaeological site excavation features,site records,and soil profiles;
Create project location maps using ArcV iew.
Fort Hunter Liggett Military Installation 7/3/99 to10/30/99
Integrated Training Area Management Program Field Technician
Botanical Analysis: Perform field-sampling studies on flora at Fort Hunter Liggett:
Locate remote sites using topographic maps and Trimble GPS receivers; Establish plots
as per sampling specifications; Identify,measure, record and analyze data taken from
numerous species of California flora;Measure adjacent slopes;tree heights,and aspects
using clinometer and compass.
Valley Oak Analysis: Perform field sampling and data analysis on Valley Oak Trees:
Locate randomly selected Valley oak specimens using Trimble GPS receivers; Perform 1Ql t
City of San Luis Obispo Tree Advisory Committee July 2004
George Sistek Page 2
trunk coring using an increment borer; Measure and record: GPS location, DBH,
juvenile oak population, ground disturbance,epiphyte density, aspect and degree of
slopes,and associated floral species composition, propagation activities for valley oak
plantations.
Medallion Landscape Management,Inc. 4/96 to 3/99
Arborist and Operations and Account Manager
Arborist: Arborist inspections, disease diagnosis,technical reporting and mapping;
Estimate pruning,removal, and replacement of trees($150 to$38,000); Quality control
and supervision of tree workers;Oversight on tree selection in urban settings.
Management: Extensive client interaction and on site quality management; Assist
clients with yearly landscape budget forecasting($36,000-140,000 yearly); Design,
market, schedule, and supervise landscape upgrades; Schedule and assign daily and
weekly crew agendas; Implement employee job training and education program;
Review and implement safety training programs;Review job status reports,work
orders and payroll invoices; Extensive communication with subcontractors,property
managers, suppliers and crews.
Maintenance and Installation: Design, proposal and oversight of installation and
renovation projects;Inspect and verify landscape installations with blueprint
specifications;Update and maintain blueprints; Proposal and oversight of large
irrigation repair projects; Conduct soil analysis and prepare recommendations;
Coordinate and estimate new account proposals; Conduct equipment maintenance,
repairs,and purchases.
Pest Management: Diagnose plant pests,diseases,and nutrient deficiencies in varied
site conditions; Supervise and perform integrated pest management in compliance with
Federal, State and County pesticide laws and regulations; Calibrate,mix,and apply
landscape pesticides; Submit pesticide use reports to various county agriculture
departments.
Landscapes West 9/94 to 4/96
Landscape Construction and Maintenance Foreman
Perform landscape design,maintenance,and construction activities forestate quality
landscapes; Select, install,and maintain landscape trees;Train, supervise,and evaluate
employees; Schedule daily landscape maintenance crew agenda;Assist with payroll and
billing invoices; Supervise and perform irrigation installation, scheduling,and repairs;
Implement turf/shrub fertilization and pesticide programs;Operate and maintain landscape
power equipment; Extensive client interaction.
San Luis Obispo County Agriculture Department 4/94 to 9/94
Agriculture Pest Detection Specialist
Responsible for detecting exotic and agricultural invasive insects; Extensive knowledge of
beneficial and harmful central coast insects; Data collection and analysis; Knowledge of
Federal, State and County agricultural laws and regulation; Documentation of unsupervised
daily activities; Extensive public interaction.
Great Western Gardens 2/91 to 4/94
Principal and Landscaper
Management and design of residential and commercial landscapes;Responsible for
scheduled weekly maintenance, plant selection and installation; Propagation and sale of
perennial plants; Pesticide and fertilizer analysis and application;Knowledge and
compliance with Federal, State, and County pesticide laws and regulations.
�-g
City of San Luis Obispo Tree AaYisory Committee July 2004
George Sistek Page 3
USDA Forest Service,Stanislaus National Forest 6/85 to 8/90
Forestry Technician, Seasonal
Supervise and train up to 5 crewmembers; Vegetation analysis and classification;
Document daily logbook of crew activities; Radio monitoring and Communication;
Perform over 300 hours of tree felling; Chainsaw and hand tool vegetation removal.
AFFILIATIONS International Society of Arboriculture
California Native Plant Society
California Landscape Contractors Association
City of San Luis Obispo Tree Advisory Committee July 2004
State of California Business, , ;prtation and Housing Agenev
Memorandum
To: Cathy Stettler Date: May I, 2003
Environmental Planning
File No.: Mon-I PM 70.3
Culvert Replacement
05-OH0501
From: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION/District 5
Office of Landscape Architecture
Landscape Technician /Certified Arborist
George Sistek
Subject: Arborist Report
On May 1,2003,a field review was conducted of the two Monterey Pines, Pinus radiata, located
adjacent to the culvert on Highway 1 at Post Mile 70.3.The two 30"diameter at breast height(DBH)pines
are located on opposite sides, northbound and southbound of the highway and are located within ten
feet from the culvert's inlet and outlet respectively.
Tree Health
Northbound Pine
Canopy
The tree is approximately 35 feet tall. Overall visual observation of the limited canopy, although
not vigorously growing, does not reveal signs of compromised health and suppressed growth
patterns. The central leader has been removed for power line clearance and mature side lateral
branching has occurred.
Root zone
One 12 " structural surface root was observed extending from the trunk to the culvert headwall. A
vehicle turnout with exposed compacted soil is located 10' south of the tree. The edge of asphalt is
approximately 7 feet from the trunk base. It appears that fill has been placed onto the root zone and
around the trunk base several years prior to this inspection. Seasonal water should be readily
available from the nearby unlined drainage ditch.
Southbound Pine
Canopy
The 100+ foot tall tree is vigorously growing and is in excellent health. No major structural defects
were observed.
Root zone
One 6"surface root was observed from the trunk extending over the culvert. A compacted dirt
pedestrian path is approximately 10 feet from the trunk base. The edge of asphalt is approximately
4 feet from the trunk base. Seasonal water should be readily available from the nearby unlined
drainage ditch.
Projected impacts
The proposed culvert replacement will necessitate trenching and soil excavation for removal and
replacement of the existing culvert. The roadway will be trenched to remove the existing culvert,
the new culvert installed, and a slurry cement backfill used to fill around the newly installed pipe to
approximate highway level, which will then be paved over with approximately 6 inches of asphalt
-1D
concrete.
The project will require a trench approximately 3 feet wide by 3 feet deep by 56 feet long. Typical
methods of excavation are saw-cutting asphalt, then subgrade excavation by means of heavy
equipment such as a backhoe shovel..
If typical excavation methods are applied, extensive root damage will be delivered to both
Monterey Pines located adjacent to the culvert. Root system impacts to the pine located on the
southbound side of the culvert will destabilize the tree creating a hazardous condition warranting
complete tree removal. Root system impacts to the northbound pine are potentially less due to the
angle of excavation but could still warrant tree removal depending on the severity and number of
roots impacted.
Mitigation Measures
In order to minimize root system impacts, trenching activities will be completed by hand. Roots
larger than 4 inches will not be cut. Roots smaller than 4 inches may be cut only if necessary. Any
roots damaged or cut will be cut cleanly with a handsaw. Heavy equipment will not be allowed
within either tree canopy drip zone. A CalTrans Certified Arborist will monitor all excavation
activities.
Both trees will be monitored quarterly for compromised health for a period of 2 years after
construction activities have been completed. Should either tree's health decline to necessitate
removal, no less than one#1 - size container sapling per inch of DBH (30) per tree removed, shall
be planted and monitored for one year. Replacement species will be determined by a CalTrans
biologist.
State of California. Business, portation and Housing Agency
Memorandum
To: Steve Price Date: December 10, 2003
Deputy District Director
Division of Maintenance and Operations File No.: SCR236 PM 0.8
Douglas Fir and adjacent property owner
conflict
From: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION/District 5
Office of Landscape Architecture
Landscape Technician/ Certified Arborist
George Sistek
Subject: Arborist Report
On December 10, 2003,a field review was conducted of the Douglas Fir tree located within CalTrans
Right of Way, adjacent to southbound lane of Highway 236, at Post Mile .83. The adjacent property
owner, Ken xxxxx of 14100 Big Basin Way, is requesting CalTrans to remove the tree due to potential
limb breakage and tree sap dripping from the tree onto his vehicles and residence.
The Douglas fir, Pseudotsuga memiesii, is approximately 80 to 90 feet tall and approximately 45 inches
diameter at breast height. Overall,the tree appeared to be healthy and pest free.
Visible and photographed areas of concern include:
One 3"diameter by 10 foot long dead branch located 40 feet above ground level (Figure 4)
• One 30 foot long secondary leader with 10-15 feet of embedded bark (Figure 1,.2,.3, & 5)
Recent soil trenching and excavating for a carport foundation located 8 feet from the base of the tree
(Figures 6&7)
Recommendations
• The dead branch should be removed due to the limb falling potential.
• The secondary leader poses an unknown potential for breakage and subsequent damage. This type of
twin leader growth with embedded bark will break at some time but it is impossible to forecast when
the failure will occur.The two leaders are independently growing against each other. As each growth
cycle occurs each leader increases its girth which increases pressure at the point of leader separation
(Figure 1,2 &3). It is impossible to forecast when the pressure is sufficient to cause the secondary
leader to sever from the central leader. Although the secondary leader will fall away from the primary
leader, it could fall against an adjacent 60-foot redwood tree,which could potentially increase the
damage to public and private property (Figure 5). Removal of the secondary leader would not
adversely affect the overall health of the tree. However, preservation of the existing leader and limbs
should be the highest priority during the secondary leader removal process.
• The recent soil excavation(3 to 6 feet deep by 20 feet long) for the private residence's carport
foundation most likely severed tree roots..I was unable to determine if any roots were damaged during
the construction. No above ground buttress root flare was visible on the private residence side which
would have indicated large roots in the area of excavation.The tree should be monitored in the
following years for a decline in health due to possible root removal.
Please feel free to contact me at 805-549-3014 with questions or comments regarding this memo.
I 7q I - 13-
I 4
.o�j`•.. 1 4 wa♦rel.'. to f !i
+ A
'ems'. ti `•'� • Y 1 r r :t• "i' ....'� ..Jt=t•+
..... 1 t1,5�Feet:
r�: Vie'
:•,. A�� '�.' .+5'�"� �• • .;Y�� �, CYC.{ � t , 15 .3
.�,�eF?-.;,._.- � s -"k�'+'ywF'.ui•^�1rt;. r � `- -! ':,. .�Y�d�I. ,!`'�• � • '•.• - __ �:; w,:
•r. •7. �a .'Sa.._a
Tmoi'., -1�r.•:i#• -�jr� ., •j, ,1,_``� �; . ,.,.: ;.� - •.. ��«
Dead Branch @ 50 feet
\
n Y`ad'� ','' 1 ' F f .Y ; Sasnuary ICJbL
�w�• gg
�• ter` `=4.5ter. 7,.
• \
r' 4 {GYM • - 1' •�• ��( •• 1 !'
IN
•� s, ���•. .: .•, .F. read � ' _ '� ° . . � .
'357 � . • :i
1!• t t S • ,,w � r � ve �'•
>t 7A
r F. Approa 3 Fl w.
-: F a
� r
V �