HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/05/2004, C2 - ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1457 (2004 SERIES) MODIFYING THE WALTER BROTHERS CENTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVE i
council M umDW os'oLp
j, agenba Report 1w.Hmb.
CITY O F SAN LUIS OBISPO
FROM: John Mandeville, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Buzz Kalkowski, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1457 (2004 SERIES) MODIFYING THE
WALTER BROTHERS CENTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
OVERLAY
(PD 95-04).
CAO RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Ordinance No.. 1457 (2004 Series), modifying Ordinance 1376 (2000 Series) eliminating
the overall size restrictions of non-governmental offices and.allowing medical clinics and doctors
offices.
DISCUSSION
Situation
On September 21, 2004, the City Council introduced Ordinance No. 1457 to print, approving the
requested Planned Development overlay zoning amendment for the Walter Brothers Center.
Ordinance No. 1457 is now ready for adoption. The amended zoning designation will become
effective 30 days after adoption of the ordinance.
Significant Impacts
The City Council determined that the project was categorically exempt, Class 1, Existing
Structures, of the California Environmental Quality Act.
Consequences of Not taking the Recommended Action
If the Council does not adopt Ordinance No. 1457 (2004 Series), Ordinance No. 1376 (2000
Series) remains in full effect.
ATTACHMENT
Ordinance No. 1457
/0) � I
ORDINANCE NO. 1457 (2004 Series)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY MODIFICATION
FOR THE WALTER BROTHERS CENTER
LOCATED AT 3250 SOUTH HIGUERA STREET (PD 95-04)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on August 11, 2004,
and recommended approval of the project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on September 21, 2004 and
has considered testimony of interested parties, the records of the Planning Commission hearing
and action, and the evaluation and recommendation of staff.
NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council finds and determines that the project is categorically
exempt under Section 15301, Existing Facilities, of the CEQA Guidelines because it does not
involve physical changes to the environment.
SECTION 2. Findings. That this Council, after consideration of Walter Brothers Center
Planned Development Overlay Modification and the Planning Commission's recommendations,
staff recommendations,public testimony, and reports thereof,makes the following findings:
1. The request for deleting Condition No. 4 is consistent with General Plan policy regarding the
restrictions on office uses because the Land Use Map designation for the property is Office.
2. The approval of the request will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of
persons residing or working in the vicinity of the subject property, or be injurious to the
general welfare of the City because there is no demonstrated evidence to support that the
change in the minimum floor area for non-governmental tenants at this location will be
detrimental to the City's desire to maintain a viable downtown and concentrated government
centers.
3. The proposed modifications to the Planned Development overlay conditions do not result in
physical modifications to the site, and are therefore exempt from environmental review in
accordance with the California Environmental.Quality Act(CEQA).
SECTION 3. Approval & Revised Conditions. The requests for approval modifying
Ordinance No. 1376 (2000 Series), eliminating Condition No. 4 .to allow non-govemmental
office spaces containing less than 2,500 square feet; and modifying Conditions No. 5 and No.7 to
remove "doctors offices and medical clinics" from the list of prohibited PD uses, are hereby
approved, and are reflected in the following revised conditions:
1. Except as otherwise noted in these conditions of approval, all zoning regulations for the
c� � a
1
Ordinance No. 1457 (2004 Series)
Page 2 of 3
Office zone shall apply.
2. Preference shall be given to governmental social service office uses; owners shall seek
tenants for available lease spaces among local, state, and federal social service agencies
prior to seeking tenants among alternative office uses.
3. Tenants other than governmental social service agencies, quasi-governmental social
services businesses, private non-profit social services providers, and private offices
whose business relates directly and primarily to social services, shall not occupy more
than 70% of the gross lease spaces on the subject parcels.
4. The following office-related uses shall be prohibited: banks and real estate offices.
5. Applicant shall dedicate a creek maintenance and pedestrian access easement over that
portion of the site within the San Luis Creek Channel, and including a 20-foot buffer strip
at the top of bank on both sides of the creek. (Extension of requirement from previous
Use Permit U 1401.)
6. Uses allowed and prohibited within this O-PD zone shall be as provided in Exhibit A
attached.
7. All future development shall comply with the Creek Setback Regulations to ensure the
maintenance of a healthy creek environment.
SECTION 4. A summary of this ordinance, together with the names of the Council
members voting for and against, shall be published at least five (5) days prior to its final passage,
in.the The Tribune, a newspaper published and circulated in this City. This ordinance shall go
into effect at the expiration of thirty (30)days after its final passage.
INTRODUCED on the 21St day of September 21, 2004, AND FINALLY ADOPTED
by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo on the 5 h day of October, 2004, on the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Cc�-3
Attachment 1
Ordinance No. 1457 (2004 Series)
Page 3 of 3
Mayor Dave Romero
ATTEST:
City Clerk Audrey Hooper
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Atto ey Jonathan P. Lowell
CD-PlantRalkowski/PD 95-04(Amendment Ordinance)
council S a
j acEnaa Report
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
FROM: Jay D. Walter, Acting Public Works Director
Prepared By: Ron Holstine,Fleet Maintenance Supervisor
SUBJECT: UNSCHEDULED PARK MAINTENANCE FIELD RAKE REPLACEMENT
CAO RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Approve a cooperative procurement via purchase order to John Deere Company in the amount
of$8,277.60 for one John Deere field rake
2. Approve transferring $8,300.00 from the Fleet Replacement Fund completed projects account
to a new equipment replacement account
DISCUSSION
Park and Landscape Maintenance crews use two field rake machines to prepare baseball and
softball infields for play. One of these machines—Fleet #8806, a Smithco Easyrider field rake—
is out of commission with a blown engine. Although the engine could be replaced for about
$1,000, the entire machine is pretty much worn out and ready for replacement. If it is repaired
and returned to service, it will be unreliable, will diminish the productivity of the ballfield prep
crews, and will increase field service repair calls. This equipment must be reliable and
mechanically sound because, in addition to City maintenance crews, sports clubs are allowed to
use this equipment outside of regular working hours in order to keep City overtime costs to a
minimum. For these reasons, the Fleet Maintenance Supervisor recommends replacement at this
time due to the overall condition of the machine, not just the engine. The Fleet Management
Policy sets a 15-year expected service life for this type of equipment, and #8806 is now 16 years
old.
The field rake needed is available through a California Multiple Awards Schedule (CHAS)
contract with John Deere Company.
FISCAL IMPACT
The cost of the replacement field rake is $8,277.60. Public Works is recommending that
$8,300.00 be transferred from the Fleet Replacement Fund completed projects account to a new
equipment replacement account. The current balance of the completed projects account is
$26,972.83..
I lCouncil Agenda Reports\2004 agenda reports\Administrative Services (Elliouffleet Maintenance (Holstine)U0501 CAR
Field Rake Replacement.DOC