Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/05/2004, C2 - ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1457 (2004 SERIES) MODIFYING THE WALTER BROTHERS CENTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVE i council M umDW os'oLp j, agenba Report 1w.Hmb. CITY O F SAN LUIS OBISPO FROM: John Mandeville, Community Development Director Prepared By: Buzz Kalkowski, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1457 (2004 SERIES) MODIFYING THE WALTER BROTHERS CENTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PD 95-04). CAO RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance No.. 1457 (2004 Series), modifying Ordinance 1376 (2000 Series) eliminating the overall size restrictions of non-governmental offices and.allowing medical clinics and doctors offices. DISCUSSION Situation On September 21, 2004, the City Council introduced Ordinance No. 1457 to print, approving the requested Planned Development overlay zoning amendment for the Walter Brothers Center. Ordinance No. 1457 is now ready for adoption. The amended zoning designation will become effective 30 days after adoption of the ordinance. Significant Impacts The City Council determined that the project was categorically exempt, Class 1, Existing Structures, of the California Environmental Quality Act. Consequences of Not taking the Recommended Action If the Council does not adopt Ordinance No. 1457 (2004 Series), Ordinance No. 1376 (2000 Series) remains in full effect. ATTACHMENT Ordinance No. 1457 /0) � I ORDINANCE NO. 1457 (2004 Series) AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY MODIFICATION FOR THE WALTER BROTHERS CENTER LOCATED AT 3250 SOUTH HIGUERA STREET (PD 95-04) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on August 11, 2004, and recommended approval of the project; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on September 21, 2004 and has considered testimony of interested parties, the records of the Planning Commission hearing and action, and the evaluation and recommendation of staff. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council finds and determines that the project is categorically exempt under Section 15301, Existing Facilities, of the CEQA Guidelines because it does not involve physical changes to the environment. SECTION 2. Findings. That this Council, after consideration of Walter Brothers Center Planned Development Overlay Modification and the Planning Commission's recommendations, staff recommendations,public testimony, and reports thereof,makes the following findings: 1. The request for deleting Condition No. 4 is consistent with General Plan policy regarding the restrictions on office uses because the Land Use Map designation for the property is Office. 2. The approval of the request will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity of the subject property, or be injurious to the general welfare of the City because there is no demonstrated evidence to support that the change in the minimum floor area for non-governmental tenants at this location will be detrimental to the City's desire to maintain a viable downtown and concentrated government centers. 3. The proposed modifications to the Planned Development overlay conditions do not result in physical modifications to the site, and are therefore exempt from environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental.Quality Act(CEQA). SECTION 3. Approval & Revised Conditions. The requests for approval modifying Ordinance No. 1376 (2000 Series), eliminating Condition No. 4 .to allow non-govemmental office spaces containing less than 2,500 square feet; and modifying Conditions No. 5 and No.7 to remove "doctors offices and medical clinics" from the list of prohibited PD uses, are hereby approved, and are reflected in the following revised conditions: 1. Except as otherwise noted in these conditions of approval, all zoning regulations for the c� � a 1 Ordinance No. 1457 (2004 Series) Page 2 of 3 Office zone shall apply. 2. Preference shall be given to governmental social service office uses; owners shall seek tenants for available lease spaces among local, state, and federal social service agencies prior to seeking tenants among alternative office uses. 3. Tenants other than governmental social service agencies, quasi-governmental social services businesses, private non-profit social services providers, and private offices whose business relates directly and primarily to social services, shall not occupy more than 70% of the gross lease spaces on the subject parcels. 4. The following office-related uses shall be prohibited: banks and real estate offices. 5. Applicant shall dedicate a creek maintenance and pedestrian access easement over that portion of the site within the San Luis Creek Channel, and including a 20-foot buffer strip at the top of bank on both sides of the creek. (Extension of requirement from previous Use Permit U 1401.) 6. Uses allowed and prohibited within this O-PD zone shall be as provided in Exhibit A attached. 7. All future development shall comply with the Creek Setback Regulations to ensure the maintenance of a healthy creek environment. SECTION 4. A summary of this ordinance, together with the names of the Council members voting for and against, shall be published at least five (5) days prior to its final passage, in.the The Tribune, a newspaper published and circulated in this City. This ordinance shall go into effect at the expiration of thirty (30)days after its final passage. INTRODUCED on the 21St day of September 21, 2004, AND FINALLY ADOPTED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo on the 5 h day of October, 2004, on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Cc�-3 Attachment 1 Ordinance No. 1457 (2004 Series) Page 3 of 3 Mayor Dave Romero ATTEST: City Clerk Audrey Hooper APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Atto ey Jonathan P. Lowell CD-PlantRalkowski/PD 95-04(Amendment Ordinance) council S a j acEnaa Report CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FROM: Jay D. Walter, Acting Public Works Director Prepared By: Ron Holstine,Fleet Maintenance Supervisor SUBJECT: UNSCHEDULED PARK MAINTENANCE FIELD RAKE REPLACEMENT CAO RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Approve a cooperative procurement via purchase order to John Deere Company in the amount of$8,277.60 for one John Deere field rake 2. Approve transferring $8,300.00 from the Fleet Replacement Fund completed projects account to a new equipment replacement account DISCUSSION Park and Landscape Maintenance crews use two field rake machines to prepare baseball and softball infields for play. One of these machines—Fleet #8806, a Smithco Easyrider field rake— is out of commission with a blown engine. Although the engine could be replaced for about $1,000, the entire machine is pretty much worn out and ready for replacement. If it is repaired and returned to service, it will be unreliable, will diminish the productivity of the ballfield prep crews, and will increase field service repair calls. This equipment must be reliable and mechanically sound because, in addition to City maintenance crews, sports clubs are allowed to use this equipment outside of regular working hours in order to keep City overtime costs to a minimum. For these reasons, the Fleet Maintenance Supervisor recommends replacement at this time due to the overall condition of the machine, not just the engine. The Fleet Management Policy sets a 15-year expected service life for this type of equipment, and #8806 is now 16 years old. The field rake needed is available through a California Multiple Awards Schedule (CHAS) contract with John Deere Company. FISCAL IMPACT The cost of the replacement field rake is $8,277.60. Public Works is recommending that $8,300.00 be transferred from the Fleet Replacement Fund completed projects account to a new equipment replacement account. The current balance of the completed projects account is $26,972.83.. I lCouncil Agenda Reports\2004 agenda reports\Administrative Services (Elliouffleet Maintenance (Holstine)U0501 CAR Field Rake Replacement.DOC