The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06/15/1993, 3 - REVIEW OF THE DRAFT LAGUNA LAKE PARK MASTER PLAN. ��Iill��llllulllllllll U II ty r _ MEETING GATE: uilf�� c� o san hues o��spo (/-/S,-9,3(/-/S,-9,3A � COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM NUMBER: FROM: Arnold Jonas, Community Development Director; By: Jeff Hofilss ciate Planner SUBJECT: Review of the draft Laguna Lake Park Master Plan. CAO RECOMMENDATION: 1) Affirm the Community Development Director's mitigated negative declaration of environmental impact; and 2) adopt a resolution approving the Laguna Lake Park Master Plan as recommended by the advisory bodies. SITUATION The draft Laguna Lake Park Master Plan (LLPMP) is returning to Council for review and possible adoption after refinement of the plan and advisory body review. In the last six weeks, the Architectural Review, Planning and Parks and Recreation Commissions reviewed the plan, and their comments are summarized below. With relatively few recommended changes, the advisory bodies recommended certifying the Director's environmental determination and adopting the Master Plan to guide use and development of Laguna Lake Park. The consensus-building process leading to preparation of the Laguna Lake Park Master Plan has been a lengthy one, and has involved extensive citizen and advisory body review. Work began in late 1990 with preparation of draft planning principles (Phase I), developed by staff and the consultants through surveys (phone and onsite surveys) and two public workshops. Workshop and survey information was used to assess community park needs. The planning principles were reviewed and approved by the Park and Recreation Commission (PRC) and the City Council in January and February, 1991. Utilizing these planning principles, the consultants developed three alternative park designs (Phase II). The alternative park designs provided varying levels of development at Laguna Lake Park. Alternative 1 depicted minimal new facilities and maintained a low level of park use (primarily new picnic areas, trails, and play areas). Alternative 2 added more structures and facilities (an indoor neighborhood recreation center, additional play area, and a day camp). Alternative 3 proposed slightly more development,including an indoor community center (versus a neighborhood center), and moving the children's museum to Laguna Lake Park. The alternative park designs were reviewed by the PRC on May 15th, June 3rd, and July 10th, 1991. The ARC reviewed the park alternatives June 3, 1991, and the Planning Commission on June 27, 1991. The City Council, based on the recommendations of the City's advisory bodies and public input, recommended Alternative 1 (with some changes) on August 27, 1991 (see attached City Council minutes). In October 1991 the City Council directed staff to complete the Open Space Element as a first priority. Consequently, work on the Laguna Lake Master Plan was put on hold until recently. Community Development Department staff completed the plan's environmental review in early - March, 1993 (see ER 141-92 attached). 3-� I��n��fli�ulllll�lllnA city or san tu,s oBispo - 4094 COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Staff Report Page 2 As part of Phase III, the final phase of the project, the consultants took the City Council's recommendation and created the draft master plan. Once the Council has reviewed the Plan and is satisfied that it is consistent with previous direction and with the planning principles, the Council should adopt the Plan; with or without changes. Then, as provided in the original workscope, a final adopted version will be prepared for distribution incorporating any final changes. Data summary Address: 504 Madonna Road Applicants/property owners: City of San Luis Obispo Representatives: Mike Multari, Crawford, Multari & Starr; David Foote, SEDES Zoning: Active park area is zoned PF; the nature preserve area is zoned C/OS - 40 General plan: Active park area is designated Park; the nature preserve area is designated Conservation/Open Space Environmental status: Mitigated. negative declaration granted by the Director on March 29, 1993 Site description Project components are explained below. Exhibits are attached to ER 141-92. It may be helpful ,to refer to these exhibits when reviewing this staff report. Exhibit B depicts the park as it exists today and environmental constraints. Planned park facilities for the active and passive areas are shown on Exhibit C. Exhibit D indicates the boundaries of the Active Park and Nature Preserve. Exhibit D1 provides a larger scale depiction of active park facilities. Those lands that are proposed for acquisition and project phasing are shown on Exhibits E and F respectively. Exhibit G (3 pages) shows project components in more detail, and Tables I and II provide park acreages and facility data. Project description The draft Plan depicts an active park area near Madonna Road, and a nature preserve in the western and northern areas of the site. The active or developed park area encompasses roughly 65 acres, the nature preserve roughly 248 acres. The draft plan proposes obtaining additional land for habitat and scenic purposes. Four phases are proposed for project construction; however, timing for the phases has not been proposed at this time. Access to the park would remain off of Madonna Road, at the Madonna Road/Dalidio Road intersection. It has been proposed that the park be closed at night for security reasons. I J. 1 ��i�i�H�lullllll�l�lu�ui►@�� MY Of San LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL AGENDA REPOPM Staff Report Page 3 ADVISORY BODY RECOMMENDATION The Draft Master Plan is coming back to the City Council with a recommendation for adoption from the three advisory bodies most involved in the Plan's development and review: Parks and Recreation Commission, Planning Commission, and Architectural Review Commission. Consistent with previous Council direction, the draft plan emphasizes long-term preservation of the Park as multi-use facility with emphasis on those uses compatible with the Park's primary role as a nature preserve. Man-made improvements and topographic changes are minimized in this plan. Parks and Recreation Commission The Plan was reviewed by the PRC on June 2, 1993, and was forwarded to the City Council for adoption. Commissioners unanimously recommended that the City Council affirm the project's mitigated negative declaration and approve the Master Plan including the following changes and/or additions: 1. Implementation of phase 1 improvements should be expedited by: preparing design guidelines for park elements (eg. benches, signs, fences, trailheads) which could be done on an incremental by community groups or other patrons; by preparing a detailed phasing plan which addresses implementation-priorities and timing of improvements; and by preparing more detailed design plans for those features to be implemented in phase 1. 2. Park entry and nature preserve portals should be redesigned to be more natural-appearing and less architectural, emphasizing landscaping and natural features such as stone and plantings. 3. The south parking lot should be relocated away from the lakeshore. 4. Design details of the Adventure Playground and pond features should create a natural appearance which complements the Park's character and function as a nature preserve. 5. The public bus stop and turnaround should be relocated to the parking area near the interpretive center. 6. An analysis of deceleration and/or turn out lanes on Madonna Road at the Park entry should be conducted for safety and to emphasize the natural character of the park, leading toward a possible redesign of the entry. C 7. Mitigation measure 1, limiting construction hours to Monday through Friday, 8 am to 5 pm, should be maintained as is (differs from Planning Commission recommendation, ��H�►�►i��IIIIIIUIpaIIBIII city Of San lois OBISPO - COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Staff Report Page 4 below). Planning Commission At its May 12, 1993 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the draft master plan and on a 4;0 vote recommended that the City Council certify the mitigated negative declaration and adopt the master plan with minor changes to mitigation measures and to planning principles. Specifically, commissioners recommended that: 1) construction hours in the park be limited to 7 am to 7 pm (instead of from 8 pm to 5 pm); 2) that limits on topographic modification not apply to the placement of berms in connection with lake dredging; and that planning principle number 7 be amended to read ";...boating and windsurfing in this portion of the lake should be prohibited'adzscQzage ." Architectural Review Commission (ARC) On May 3, 1993, the ARC reviewed the draft plan, and expressed support for the overall master plan, with direction to bring architectural details of the park entry and interpretive center back to the ARC later. Commissioner's liked most of the plan's key features, and particularly the childrens' "Adventure Playground" with a recirculating stream. They discussed the possibility i with the consultants of shifting the south parking lot farther from the Lakeshore; and opinions were split on the appropriateness of the gated main entry and the Nature Preserve entry feature: Commissioners suggested that handicapped access to the nature area be restudied for wheelchair accessibility to some areas (decomposed granite pathways are shown and may not be a suitable surface material for wheelchair access); and asked staff to investigate the possible timing and soil quantities involved in dredging the Lake. DLSCUSSION I Environmental Review The project's negative declaration (ER 141-92) identified potential environmental impacts (see ER 141-92 attached). Potential adverse impacts are summarized in Table A below: The Active Park Area New recreation facilities in this area include a gated entryway and stone wall along Madonna Road, picnic and barbecue areas (group, family, and individual), children's play equipment, parking, road alterations, volleyball and horseshoe equipment, docks (fishing, launching,* sailboard), a pavilion, two public telephones, one new restroom, and facilities for park maintenance (a small maintenance yard and equipment shed). The maintenance yard would be fenced and screened. Other alterations include berms and windbreaks, landscaping, additional 3- ��H�i�NuV111111UIp IIUIII City Of San LUIS OBISPO ONGe COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Staff Report Page 5 trails, shoreline changes, expanded turf area (playfield area), and an adventure playground (pond and stream). TABLE A - Impact Summary POTENTIAL, D4PACT PROPOSED EMPACT DESCRIPTION MITIGATION Noise Park construction noises may Limit park construction hours to 8:00 am to adversely impact adjacent 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday. residences. Geology Berms, shoreline alterations, and Project grading shall be consistent with Soil park grading may increase erosion Conservation Service guidelines. and sedimentation in the lake. Surface Water Quality See Plant & Animal Life Category. See Plant & Animal Life Category. Plant& Animal Life Park alterations may impact lake Marsh and riparian vegetation removed or and shore habitat. altered shall be replaced on a 2:1 ratio. Park construction will be limited during nesting or mating season. Aesthetics Existing views from Madonna Road Significant view corridors from Madonna and lakeside residences could be Road and the lakeside residences shall be altered by proposed berms and maintained. windbreaks. Other- High Voltage New park facilities may be New recreation facilities shall be located to Power Lines adversely impacted by minimize impacts. The final plan shall comply electromagnetic fields. with PG&E's easement requirements. The adventure playground would consist of a recirculating stream with a shallow wading pond, j large boulders, natural reeds and Tule, and interpretive displays for children. The stream and pond would be similar to the area that children play in at Mission Plaza. Proposed shoreline alterations include creating a sheltered cove, providing additional docks/launch areas, stabilizing the shore (with a geotextile fabric and cobbles), and providing vegetation (windbreaks) along some portions of the shore and sandy beach areas along other portions of the shore. As part of this project the existing shoreline road would be narrowed to a pedestrian path (ten feet wide). Vehicle traffic would be rerouted along the park's interior. The shoreline path would be paved for bicycle, pedestrians, and joggers. Other trails in the active park would be surfaced with decomposed granite or gravel, and would have a maximum width of eight feet. Berms and windbreaks would be scattered throughout the park's developed area. Windbreak trees would consist of a mix of California native conifers and oaks. The berms would be four to six feet high with gentle slopes not exceeding 5:1, and contoured to appear natural. �,��i�ii►�IIIIIIpIp ��IU city Of San WIS OBISPO COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Staff Report Page 6 The Nature Preserve The passive portion of the park has been proposed as a nature preserve. This area would emphasize the park's natural resources and visual quality. Changes would include a nature center, interpretive signage and displays at key points within the park, formal entranceways (three designated entranceways into the nature preserve), boardwalks (in sensitive areas), trails, and low fencing to separate the developed park area from the nature preserve (such as a 3 foot high wood rail fence or a low log barrier). Trails would be located on the northern foothill, and through the center of the preserve. Trails would be surfaced with decomposed granite or gravel, and would have a maximum width of eight feet. The Nature Center would be located at the main entrance to the nature preserve. This center would consist of an outdoor interpretive display and plaza. The plaza would provide a surfaced area with seating and some open turf area for children to play. The Nature Center would be the primary starting point for group lead nature walks. In the plaza, interpretive panels would be mounted on a stone wall. The panels would be aluminum with micro-imaged, durable graphics covered with plexiglass. The interpretive displays would contain information about local resources. To increase the wildlife value of this area, wetland areas would be expanded, serpentine seeps (which contain rare or endangered plants) would be fenced, and grazing would be discontinued. A marsh buffer area would be provided adjacent to the lake. The marsh and marsh buffer area would have two pedestrian access points. These access points would be along an elevated boardwalk to minimize human intrusion into a sensitive area. The peninsula (located near the middle section of the lake) would be altered to create an island, providing a protected habitat for birds and other wildlife. Access to the island would only be available via a boardwalk and retractable footbridge. The footbridge would be withdrawn periodically (for example during nesting season). Stream corridors (excluding Prefumo Outlet) would be enhanced and vegetated with native riparian species. In addition, native trees, shrubs and herbs would be provided to buffer the marsh area and to enhance the natural habitat of the area. Prefumo Outlet would be a part of the passive park; no recreational facilities (including trails) are proposed in this area. Landscaping along the Outlet is not planned as a part of the Park Master Plan. Proposed Acquisitions Potential acquisitions are proposed to augment the parks natural resources and trail capabilities (see Exhibit E). The plan identifies four properties that could be used for Nature Preserve expansion. Acquisition 1 is recommended to protect sensitive habitat areas (important marsh resources). Acquisition 2 would protect wildlife values and important viewsheds. Acquisition j r II��i�uVVllllllui�i°AMY Of San LUIS OBI SPO Walmol COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Staff Report Page 7 3 is proposed to protect habitat value (the heron rookery on the Dalidio property), and Acquisition 4 is to provide a western buffer to the lake. FISCAL IMPACT Estimated cost for the proposed park improvements is about $1 million. No cost estimates have been developed for property acquisition. The Master Plan's development guidelines discuss various financing strategies, including use of general fund monies, development exactions, assessment and special tax districts, grants, and debt financing. Adoption of the Master Plan is intended to provide a long-range plan for property acquisition; however specific funding is beyond the scope of Council review at this time. The Councilmembers may wish to direct staff to return at a later date with a discussion of park acquisition/funding strategies for incorporation into the City's Financial Plan. ALTERNATIVES 1. Adopt resolution approving the LLPMP, including changes in addition to or other than those recommended by the advisory bodies. 2. Do not adopt resolution approving the LLPMP, and direct staff to return with a revised draft plan including changes and/or additional information as desired by the Council. Attachments: I ■ Draft Resolution 0 Negative Declaration (ER 141-92) ■ City Council Minutes (dated August 27, 1991) ■ Park and Recreation Commission Comments (dated July 22, 1991) ■ Revised Planning Principles (dated May 3, 1993) Enclosed: Exhibits "A" and "B": Full scale plans and Program Elements/Development Guidelines (Council and CAO only) CRESOLUTION NO. (1993 Series) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING A MASTER PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES FOR LAGUNA LAKE PARK WHEREAS, the City has solicited public comments and held public hearings on a Master Plan to guide possible uses, operation and development of Laguna Lake Park; and WHEREAS, as a result of public comments, advisory body recommendations, and City Council direction, a draft Master Plan and Development Guidelines were prepared to guide the long-term land uses and physical development of Laguna Lake Park; and WHEREAS, this Council, after consideration of the advisory body recommendations, public comments,Laguna.Lake Park planning principles, and staff recommendations and reports - thereon, finds the proposed Master Plan and Advisory Body recommended changes thereto to be consistent with the Park's previously approved planning principles, and to be an appropriate planning tool to guide Laguna Lake Park's use and development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION I. Environmental Determination. The City Council has considered the Community Development Director's Mitigated Negative Declaration (ER 141-92) granted on March 29, 1993; and pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and the City's Environmental Guidelines, hereby affirms the Director's Negative Declaration and required mitigation measures listed in the initial environmental study. SECTION IL Master Plan and Development Guidelines, The Laguna Lake Park Master Plan and Development Guidelines are hereby approved, as generally described in -0 Resolution No. (1993 Series) Page 2 Exhibits "A" (Master Plan) and "B" (Program Elements and Development Guidelines booklet dated March 1992), with the specific changes and additions as recommended by the Parks and Recreation Commission at its June 2, 1993 hearing and by the Planning Commission as noted in the Commission's May 12, 1993 minutes, with the clarification that mitigation measure number 1 from ER 141-92 dealing with permitted construction hours remains from 8 am to 5am as specified in the initial environmental determination by the Community Development Director. SECTION M. Plan Implementation and.Amendment. The City Council hereby directs staff to implement the Plan and Development Guidelines in the on-going use, operation, and development of Laguna Lake Park. Further, amendments to the Master Plan and Development Guidelines shall require City Council approval. On motion of , seconded by , and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of 15th day of June, 1993. Mayor Peg Pinard ATTEST: Diane Gladwell, City Clerk 3- Resolution No. (1993 Series) Page 3 APPROVED: p/LuLPi�.:. ity tto Y Attachments: -Exhibit "A": Laguna Lake Park Master Plan -Exhibit "B": Laguna Lake Park Program Elements and Development Guidelines CTCy Of San lU1S OBISPO INITIAL STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT SITE LOCATION Laguna Lake Park & Adjacent Lands APPLICATION N0141-92 PROJECTDESCRIPTIONhe Laguna Lake Park Master Plan proposes (a) active parkland '(65 acres) , (b) nature preserve area (248 acres) , and (c) acquisitions for habitat and scenic area preservation. APPLICANT 'City of- San--Luis- Obispo STAFF RECOMMENDATION: XNEGATIVE DECLARATION X MITIGATION INCLUDED EXPANDED INITIAL STUDY REQUIRED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REQUIRED PREPARED BY eanette Di Leo, Senior Planner DATE 3-4-9(3 COMMUNITYDEVELOPME DIRECTOR'SACTION: DATE 3�29(�� fir-OurI)E t aOFL.. SUMMARY OF INITIAL STUDY FINDINGS I.DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 11.POTENTIAL IMPACT REVIEW POSSIBLE ADVERSE EFFECTS NONE* A. COMMUNITY PLANS AND GOALS..................................................I... NONE B. POPULATION DISTRIBUTION AND GROWTH........................................... NONE C. LAND USE ................................................................,.......... D. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION ................................................ NONE* ' E. PUBLIC SERVICES ................................................................_. NONE F. UTILITIESNONE* ......_.........................._........... . . .................... .. .. .. G. NOISE LEVELS ..................._....._........._........................_....... MAYBE* H. GEOLOGIC SSEISMIC HAZARDS&TOPOGRAPHIC MODIFICATIONS ........................ MAYBE* NONE* I. AIR QUALITY AND WIND CONDITIONS................................................ _ J. SURFACE WATER FLOW AND QUALITY .................................................. MAYBE* K PLANT LIFE ..................... MAYBE* LANIMAL LIFE....................................................................... MAYBE* M. ARCHAEOLOGICALIHISTORICAL ............ NONE ................................. N. AESTHETIC ........................ MAYBE* O. ENERGriRESOURCEUSE .......................................................... NONE .......... P. OTHER ....................... MAYBE* 111.STAFF RECOMMENDATION NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH MITIGATION 'SEE ATTACHED REPORT seas 3l/ LAGUNA LAKE PARK DRAFT MASTER PLAN - ER 141 - 92 504 Madonna Road I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Project Description A group of consultants (Crawford, Multari, & Starr; SEDES; and Leisure Visions) have developed a draft master plan for Laguna Lake:Park (see Exhibit Q. This plan has been prepared for the Cin of San Luis Obispo. The plan depicts an active park area near Madonna Road, and a nature preserve-inthe-western and northern areas of the site (see Exhibit D). The active or developed park area encompasses roughly 65 acres, the nature preserve roughly 248 acres. The draft plan proposes obtaining additional land for habitat and scenic purposes (see Exhibit E). Four phases are proposed for project construction (see Exhibit F). Timing for the phases has not been proposed at this time. Access to the park would remain off of Madonna Road, at the Madonna Road/Dalidio Road intersection. As proposed, the park would be closed at dusk. The MasterPlan (Exhibit C) depicts proposed facilities and changes. For specific statistics regarding existing and proposed facilities and uses see Tables I and II (attached). These tables indicate the number of persons these facilities would serve, as well as the acreage for various uses. The following is a description of proposed facilities and changes: The Active Park Area New recreation facilities in this area include a gated entryway and stone wall along Madonna Road, additional picnic and barbecue areas (group, family, and individuaI), additional children's play equipment,additional parking,road alterations,volleyball and horseshoe equipment,additional docks (fishing,launching, sailboard), a pavilion, two public telephones, one new restroom, and facilities for park maintenance (a small maintenance yard and equipment shed). The maintenance yard would be fenced and screened. Other alterations includeberms and windbreaks, landscaping, additional trails, shoreline changes, expanded turf area (playfield area), and an adventure playground (pond and stream). The adventure playground would consist of a recirculating stream with a shallow wading pond, large boulders, natural reeds and tules, and interpretive displays for children. The stream and pond would be similar to the area that children play in at Mission Plaza. Proposed shoreline alterations include creating a sheltered cove, providing additional docks/launch areas, stabilizing the shore (with a geotextile fabric and cobbles), and providing vegetation (windbreaks) along some portions of the shore and sandy beach areas along other portions of the shore. As part of this project the existing shoreline road would be narrowed to a pedestrian path (ten feet wide). Vehicle traffic would be rerouted along the park's interior. The shoreline path would be paved for bicycle, pedestrians, and joggers. Other trails in the active park would be surfaced with decomposed granite or gravel, and would have a maximum width of eight feet. Berms and windbreaks would be scattered throughout the park's developed area. Windbreak trees would consist of a mix of California native conifers and oaks. The berms would be four to six feet i� - 1 - Laguna Lake Park Draft Mas. Plan — ER 141- 92 high with gentle slopes not exceeding 5:1;and contoured to appear natural. The Nature Preserve The passive portion of the park has been proposed as a nature preserve. This area would emphasize the park's natural resources and visual quality. Changes would include a nature center, interpretive signage and displays at key points within the park, formal entraceways (three designated entranceways into the nature preserve), boardwalks (in sensitive areas), trails, and low fencing to separate the developed park area from the nature preserve (such as a 3 foot high wood rail fenc., or'a low log barrier). Trails would be located on the foothill (the northern area of the park), and through the center-of the preserve.-Trails would be surfaced with decomposed granite or gravel, and would have a maximum width of eight feet. The Nature Center would be located at the main entrance to the nature preserve. This center would consist of an outdoor interpretive display and plaza. The plaza would provide a surfaced area with seating and some open turf area for children to play. The Nature Center would be the primary starting point for group lead nature walks. In the plaza, interpretive panels would be mounted on a stone wall. The panels would be aluminum with micro-imaged, durable graphics covered with plexiglass. The interpretive displays would contain information about local resources. To increase the wildlife value of this area, wetland areas would be expanded, serpentine seeps (which contain rare or endangered plants) would be fenced, and grazing would be discontinued. A marsh buffer area would be provided adjacent to the lake. The marsh and marsh buffer area would have two pedestrian access points. These access points would be along an elevated boardwalk tr-- minimize human intrusion into a sensitive area. The peninsula (located near the middle section the lake) would be altered to create an island, providing a protected habitat for birds and other wildlife. Access to the island would only be available via a boardwalk and retractable footbridge. The footbridge would be withdrawn periodically (for example during nesting season). Stream corridors (excluding Prefumo Outlet) would be enhanced and vegetated with native riparian species. In addition, native trees, shrubs and herbs would be provided to buffer the marsh area and to enhance the natural habitat of the area. Prefumo Outlet would be a part of the passive park; no recreational facilities (including trails) are proposed in this area. Landscaping along the Outlet is not planned as a part of the Park Master Plan. Potential acquisitions are proposed to augment the parks natural resources and trail capabilities (see Exhibit E). The plan identifies four properties that could be used for Nature Preserve expansion. Acquisition 1. is recommended to protect sensitive habitat areas (important marsh resources), acquisition 2 to protect wildlife values and protect important viewsheds. Acquisition 3 is to protect habitat value (the heron rookery on the Dalidio property), and Acquisition 4 is to provide a western buffer to the lake. Environmental Setting Laguna Lake Park is located west of Madonna Road and south of Cerro San Luis (see Exhibit A). The majority of the park site is outside the City's Urban Reserve Line. The park is surrounded by_, Laguna Lake Park Draft N. sr Plan — ER 141 - 92 hillsides to the north; Madonna Road to the east, open land and grazing land to the west, and residential development to the south. Presently the site serves as a community and district park. The park currently provides recreational opportunities (such as windsurfing, picnic facilities,.and trails) and open space (see Exhibit B and Table I and II). The lake and park site contain habitat area in the northwestern region of the lake and adjacent to Cerro San Luis. Riparian vegetation (primarily willows) is located along the Prefumo Creek arm. Vegetation within the park site varies,with non-native grasses and a mixture of native and non-native trees located within the developed park site. Non-native grasses are the primary vegetation on the hillsides, with some species of special concern located within hillside seep areas. Marsh vegetation, including-grasses, -forbs, bushes (e.g., smartweeds, bulrushes,-etc.) are located along the northern portion of the lake. Various wildlife inhabits the park and lake site including the American white pelican, double-crested cormorant, northern harrier, Cooper's hawk, California gull, western pond turtle,burrowing owls,short-eared owls,black shouldered kites (limited), and more common animals such as domestic ducks and geese, sparrows, finches, deer, and hawks. The topography north of the.lake slopes slowly upward toward Cerro San Luis. The elevation in the park varies from 125 feet adjacent to the lake to 560 feet at the eastern.park edge. Along the park's eastern edge, which is adjacent to Cerro San Luis, the topography becomes fairly steep, with Cerro San Luis having a maximum elevation of roughly 1,292 feet. West of the lake (extending out toward Foothill Boulevard) and west of the existing subdivision (located along Los Osos Valley Road) the topography is relatively flat. During the rainy season stream corridors and associated marsh areas may extends beyond the park to Foothill Boulevard and Los Osos Valley Road. The Prefumo Creek arm brings water into Laguna Lake. Other Environmental Review A 1981 EIR (Final EIR, Laguna Lake Management Program) reviewed potential impacts associated with (1) clearing weeds from portions of the lake, (2) periodically removing sedimentation from the Prefumo inlet and delta, (3) the construction of a temporary log dam at the downstream end of the Madonna Road culvert, and (4) establishing a monitoring program to document the impacts associated with items 1 through 3 listed above. Currently (1992-1993) a team of Cal Poly biologists and a soil-engineering firm are reviewing lake dredging impacts and options. Impacts associated with dredging Laguna Lake will be discussed as a separate environmental document. II. POTENTIAL IMPACT REVIEW A. General.Plan.Consistencv: The Laguna Lake Park site is currently designated by the Land Use Element as parkland and open space. The Master Plan would provide for (1) additional neighborhood and community recreation facilities, and (2) protection of sensitive and scenic resources (through creation of the Nature Preserve). The uses designated in the Master Plan would be consistent with the �' - 3 - Laguna Lake Park Draft Mast Plan — ER 141 - 92 _. ...._... City's Land Use designations and adoption of such a plan would be consistent with the General Plan i Conclusion: The Master Plan would be consistent with the City's General Plan. D. Transportation & Circulation: ettin . Access to Laguna Lake park is from Madonna Road, at the Madonna Road/Dalidio intersection. This intersection has a traffic signal, and an existing level of service (LOS) Al. Other intersections in this area also have an adequate LOS. Both the Madonna Road/Los Osos Valley Road and the Madonna Road/Highway 101 intersections currently operate at a LOS C. It is anticipated (according to the City's traffic model MINUTP) that with future land uses (as specified by the Draft Land Use Element), the Madonna Road/Dalidio intersection would function at a LOS B, and the Madonna Road/Highway 101 and Madonna Road/Los Osos Valley Road intersections would remain at LOS C. Peak hour trip generation 2 at these intersection occur around 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday. In this area of town there is also a morning peak; however, the 5:00 pm peak is greater. Potential Impacts. With park completion (all phases of the Master Plan), it is anticipated that an additional 369 persons will utilize the park. Maximum park use would largely occur durin; prime park season (Saturdays and Sundays, June through September). During prime season vehicle trips would be generated throughout the day, with the highest peak use bccurrin; lat- morning through the late afternoon. Some trip generation would also occur.weekday primarily during early morning (7:00 am to 10:00 am) for people jo4a ng or walking their dog and late afternoon (4:00 pm to 6:00 pm) for similar park use. The Land Use Element Update anticipated urban park uses at Laguna Lake Park similar to those proposed in the Master Park Plan. As noted by the expected intersection LOS, uses proposed at Laguna Lake Park are not expected to generate a significant increases in traffic. -If in the future more intense recreation is proposed at Laguna Lake Park, traffic studies should be preformed prior to project approval. Conclusion: Not significant. No mitigation required. 1 The..level .of-service (LOS) at a traffic intersection is measured from A to F. LOS A represents the best service level (i.e., the least amount of waiting time at an intersection), and LOS F represents the worst level of service (e.g. , a long wait, a congested intersection) . A LOS C is an acceptable 'level of service, with LOS E and F considered unacceptable. 2 Peak hour trip generation is that time of day. when. traffic volumes are the highest. Typically peak hour trip generation occurs during the morning rush hours (7:30 am - 8:30 am) and evening rush hours (4:30 pm - 6,:00 pm) . /1 - 4 Laguna Lake Park Draft M x Plan -- ER 141 - 92 G. Noise Levels: Setting. Excessive noise can not only be undesirable but may also cause physical and/or psychological damage. The amount of annoyance or damage caused by noise is dependent primarily upon three factors: (1) the amount and nature of the noise, (2) the amount of ambient noise present before the intruding noise, and (3) the activity of the person working or living in the noise source area. Generally, noise levels diminish as the distance from the noise source increases. The duration of noise and the time period at which it occurs are important factors in determining noise impacts. For example, noise is more disturbing at night than during the day. The land uses around Laguna Lake Park include residential uses south of the lake, Madonna Road to the east, commercial uses to the northeast, and grazing and open land to the north and northwest. Madonna Road is designated by the City as an arterial roadway. Noise levels in the park (from Madonna Road) range from approximately 65 dBA 150 feet from Madonna Road to 60 dBA 300 feet from Madonna Road. Potential Impacts. Playgrounds, parks, and residential uses are considered noise sensitive uses. According to the. City's Noise Element (1991), a noise impact occurs if: (a) an adjacent noise sensitive use (such as a residence) is adversely affected by new park facilities or park construction, or (b) park facilities are proposed in areas exceeding 65 dBA Ldn. In terms of adjacent noise sensitive uses, a significant impact occurs if noise generated by new park use or park construction result in the adjacent use having outdoor noise levels exceeding 60 dBA Ldn or interior noise levels greater than 45 dBA Ldn. Thus, potential noise impacts would be associated with: (1) additional noise generated from the park as a result of new facilities and additional use (impacting adjacent residential uses), (2) noise from park construction equipment (impacting adjacent residential uses), and (3)new park facilities proposed within the 65 dBA noise contour of Madonna Road. Noise Generated From New Park Facilities. At the completion of Phase IV, park use would potentially increase by 369 persons during peak park use. As proposed, playfields and picnic areas, at their closest, would be located roughly 400 feet from existing residential units. Such a distance would generally diminish park noises. As planned, berms and windbreaks would be constructed in Phase 1, new play and picnic areas in Phases 2 and 3. As a result of project phasing, noise generated by additional park use would be attenuated by berms,windbreaks,and additional vegetation proposed near new and existing park facilities. Proposed berms, windbreaks, and the distance between residences and new facilities would be adequate to mitigate any increase in noise occurring as a result of additional park use. Noise impacts associatedwith additional park use are not considered significant. In addition, a beneficial project component is that the park would close at dusk if the Master Plan is adopted. Presently park hours are not regulated. Closing the park at dusk would terminate any existing noise impacts associated with night use of park facilities.. Noise Generated From Park Construction. Noise from construction equipment could occur - 5 - Laguna Lake Park Draft Mast Ilan — ER 141 - 92 1 -_ as close as 200 feet from adjacent residences (due to proposed shoreline alterations). Because only the lake would be available to attenuate noise levels, a short-term 3, adverse noise impar may occur to some residences (those located near the southeastern boundary of the park._. This impact would only occur when heavy equipment is used near the shoreline. Madonna Road Noise Impacting New Park Facilities. Traffic from Madonna Road would - generate noise levels of 65 dBA along the park's frontage. Since no new park facilities are located within the 65 dBA noise corridor or in an area exceeding 65 dBA, planned park facilities would be consistent with the City's Noise Element and noise from Madonna Road would not significantly impact proposed recreation uses at Laguna Lake Park. Conclusion: a. Increased use of the park would not result in a significant noise impact to adjacent residential uses. b. Construction equipment may result in an adverse, short-term noise impact to those residences located close to where shoreline alterations would occur (primarily near the southeastern edge of the park site). C. Traffic noise associated with Madonna Road would not be significant since new park facilities are not proposed within the 65 dBA contour. Mitigation: 1. Construction shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 pm to 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday': 2. Recreation facilities, excluding trails, shall not be located within the 65 dBA or greater corridor of Madonna Road. This mitigation measure shall be added as a planning principle. 3. All construction and maintenance equipment, fixed or mobile, should be in proper operating condition and fitted with standard silencing features. H. Geologic & Seismic Hazards & Topographic Modifications: ettin . Topography onsite varies. A large section of the eastern park perimeter is hill or foothill to Cerro San Luis. This area of the park has slopes of 42% to 48%. Natural serpentine seeps are located in. this foothill area. Seeps and other natural drainage have created some stream corridor along the foothill ridges. These corridors end largely at the 3 Noise impacts are assessed . in terms of long and short-term impacts. Long-term impacts result from a noise source which is constant or re-occurring (such as traffic or train noise, respectively) . Short-term noise impacts occur for a limited duration of time. Construction and maintenance equipment noise are examples of short-term impacts, once construction or maintenance is completed the noise impact is removed. I - 6 - 217 Laguna Lake Park Draft Ma I Plan — ER 141 - 92 park access road (which runs parallel to the foothill area). CThe area near the lake and the center of the project site are fairly flat, tending to gently slope upward from the lake to the eastern foothills. Slopes in this area vary from 9 to 16 percent. Within the developed park area drainage tends to sheet flow into the lake, whereas within the undevelopedarea shallow stream corridors still exist. Soils on site consist of Cropley Clay and Diablo Clay on the flat areas of the site, and Los Osos-Diablo Complex and Obispo-Rock outcrop complex in the hilly areas of the site. The soils on the flat area of the site have moderate drainage capacity while the hillside soils have good drainage (Soil Survey of San Luis Obispo County, California, 1934). Potential Impacts. The proposed project would result in various topographical alterations including: berms, shoreline changes (recontouring and the addition of shoreline stabilization), grade changes in certain areas of the park,new plantings, and restored stream corridors (within the Nature Preserve area). Site grading and shoreline alterations may result in increased erosion, increased sediment in the lake, and drainage concerns. Changes along the shoreline may result in bank erosion and stability concerns. Conclusion: May be significant Mitigation: 1. Project grading shall be consistent with Soil Conservation Service guidelines. The final plan shall depict the siltation measures that will be in place during construction and grading, and,the planting utilized to stabilize graded areas. I. Air Quality and Wind Conditions: Settins. Ozone and particulate matter less .than 10 microns are the primary pollutants of concern in the SLO area. Although the City has not exceeded Federal ozone and particulate standards, occasionally State standards for both ozone and particulates have been exceeded. The City of SLO, during the period of 1939 through 1991, did not exceed State or Federal standards for carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide or sulfur dioxide. Persistent and relatively strong winds are a feature of the Laguna Lake area. These winds may influence the amount of airborne particles in the Laguna.Lake area. Strong winds tend to blow nearly every day from March to August, with wind direction generally blowing from the west to the northwest. Wind speed is low in the morning, but increases ten or more miles per hour in the afternoons. The calmest seasons tend to be fall and early winter. Potential Impacts. Air quality impacts may occur as a result of (1) vehicle emissions, (2) construction equipment emissions, or (3) grading activities generating dust or other airborne particles. Proposed park facilities could increase Laguna Lake.Park's use by 369 persons, and C ' - 7 - Laguna Lake Park Draft Mases Plan - ER 141 92 could increase park traffic levels by approximately 185 new vehicle trips.' Traffic generated by new and existing park uses would occur throughout peak park use (summer weekend° primarily between the hours of 10:30 am through 3:30 pm. Since traffic generated by ne.. facilities would be relatively minor and because this traffic would be spread throughout a portion of the day, vehicle emissions impacts are not expected to be significant. In terms of construction equipment emissions and grading activity impacts, planned park improvements would be phased over a number of years. These improvements include shoreline alterations, constructing berms and windbreaks, and providing new recreation facilities (i.e., picnic areas, trails, and volleyball and horseshoe courts). Since improvements --would-be (1) phased -over a- two to -three year period, (2) consistent with sound Soil Conservation Guidelines, and (3) relatively minor, equipment emission and dust impacts would not be considered significant. Conclusion: Not significant. J. Surface Water Flow and Quality:. This impact would only be potentially significant in terms of plant and animal life. See sections Kand L. K. & L Plant Life/Animal Life: Settine. The project site contains a fresh water lake, marshes, serpentine rock outcrops.- parkland, trees, grasslands, and extensive open space. In general, the lake serves as a dire wildlife area where animals congregate for a season as well as a connecting habitat to nearby areas. Thus various animals migrate to or from the site from other locations. Wildlife sensitivities tend to vary by location within the park. Within the developed area of the park (as defined by Exhibit D), domestic species (such as ducks, geese, sparrows, and similar species) are predominant. Wildlife in this area of the park has been limited due to frequent human use and limited habitat (minimal vegetation)5 The park's passive area is predominated by sensitive habitats. This section of the park contains hill, marsh, and wetland areas that constitute major habitat areas for various birds; plants, and .animals. Along the hills, north of the park, several serpentine seeps and springs exude from the hillside. These seeps and their habitat are only found in the San Luis Obispo area. Plants 4 This vehicle trip level assumes some park users will (a) drive to the park individually, (b) walk or ride their bike to the park, (c) drive with another person, and (d) be families (thus contain a minimum of 3 people in one car) . In addition, this figure is based on the fact that existing and proposed park uses would not generate large traffic volumes, e.g. , a community center would typically generate traffic during a.m. and p.m. peaks; whereas, picnic and volleyball facilities generate traffic more sporadically throughout the day. 5 Hanson, Michael, "Preliminary Report: Wildlife Values of Habitats in Laguna Lake Park, " Department of Biological Sciences, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 1990. iJ - 8 - Laguna Lake Park Draft M. : Plan - ER 141 - 92 along the hillsides include Calochonus obispoensis, Cirsium fontinale var. obispoensis, Dudl*-a abramsii murina, and Perideridia pringlei. Calochonw obispoensis and Cirsium fontinale var. - obispoensis are listed by the California Native Plant Society (CLAPS) as rare and endangered; Cirsium fontirWe var.obispoensis is also listed.by State Department of Fish and Game (SDFG) as endangered.Dudleya abramsii munna, and Perideridia pringlei are listed by CNPS as rare.s Animals located in the hillsides include the burrowing owl. Burrowing owls are listed by SDFG as a species of special concern. 'Ile western pond turtle inhabits portions of Laguna Lake. This species is a class 2 Candidate species for threatened and endangered status by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and listed as a species of special concern by the SDFG. Bird species -of-special concern which frequent the lake and, tend to congregate in the passive area of the park include the American white pelican, the double-crested cormorant, the northern harrier, Cooper's hawk, and the California gulls Potential Impacts. The proposed project could result in potentially significant biological impacts to flora and fauna as a result of: !Me of Development Impacts Shoreline Changes Shoreline changes in this area would include (1) stabilizing Within the Developed certain areas with a geotextile fabric and cobbles, (2) cutting Park Area the shore to allow for protected cove areas, (3) providing windbreaks along portions of the shore, and (4) providing sandy beaches along other shore sections. Shoreline changes may result in short-term impacts to habitat areas due to: (a) increased lake siltation during construction, (b) human encroachment during construction, and (c) changes to habitat areas. Shoreline Changes Within the passive park (Nature Preserve) shoreline Passive Area alterations include (1) forming an island out of the existing (Nature Preserve) peninsula, (2) grade alterations to impede human encroachment along some shore areas, and (3) planting additional marsh vegetation along the shoreline to stabilize shore areas and increase the wildlife component. Alterations may result in short-term impacts to habitat areas due to: (a) increased lake siltation during construction, (b) human encroachment during construction,and (c) changes to habitat areas. Increased Park Use The project would provide new trails within the Nature Preserve. New trails would include a trail around the Cerro San Luis foothill, and a boardwalk trail in a portion of the lake's marsh area. Such trails may result in habitat impacts due to increased human encroachment changes to habitat areas. Shoreline Changes Within the Developed Park Area. The shoreline along the developed portion of the park is degraded as a wildlife area (e.g., it is eroded and contains minimal J - 9 - 3;0 Laguna Lake Park Draft Mas. Plan — ER 141 - 92. vegetation). Presently the developed shoreline is accessible to humans and domestic animals, and to some extent by vehicles (the existing roadway is located near a portion of lake shore' As a result, wildlife in this area primarily consists of domestic species (such as ducks an.. geese). Proposed windbreaks (composed of native California trees and shrubs) along the shoreline could be beneficial by providing additional roosting vegetation and protected wildlife areas. Such plantings would serve to limit human access along portions of the shoreline and thus potentially bring back some native wildlife to this area. Since (1) the developed park area is degraded, (2) proposed plantings would potentially augment native wildlife in this area, and (3) the project would incorporate Soil Conservation Service siltation and grading methods, wildlife impacts in this area of the park are not considered significant. Shoreline Chanoes Within the Passive Park Area. The shoreline along the park's passive area is a nesting area for numerous birds and various wildlife. Presently there is limited habitat protection within Laguna Lake Park. Except for the fenced seeps, all areas of the park are open for public and domestic animal access. As proposed, the Master Plan would provide (1) a marsh buffer area and the creation of additional marsh area (2 acres), (2) the creation of a habitat island with limited human access, (3) fencing or other protection for sensitive habitats .(such as the burrowing owls and seep areas), and (4) new plantings along creek swales. Such _measures would serve to augment wildlife in the long-term. Other measures, such as interpretive displays, would also potentially protect wildlife by educating park patrons. Such displays would identify important resources and protection mechanisms. Proposed alterations in the passive park may result in short-term wildlife impacts. To create shoreline alterations heavy equipment will be utilized. Such equipment may generate noise levels of 90 dBA 50 feet from the source, thus causing wildlife to move out of that area uni noise levels return to normal. In addition, grading and shoreline modifications in the short term would disrupt wildlife by flooding some areas presently dry and by filling some areas presently submerged. Some marsh vegetation would be removed to accommodate alterations, and in addition, human encroachment would occur in sensitive areas for staking purposes and to operate equipment. Potentially, short-term significant impacts could occur as a result of construction and proposed changes to the park's passive area. _Conclusion: May be significant. .Mitigation: 1. The final park plan shall provide the following: a. A mitigation and monitoring plan. This plan shall depict habitat impact areas (i.e., areas where marsh and riparian vegetation will be removed and where habitat will -be-impacted due to planned facilities or construction). The plan shall also indicate mitigation areas (i.e., replacement of native marsh and riparian vegetation to mitigate project related biological impacts). Habitat impact areas shall be replaced onsite by a 2:1 ratio (i.e., for every acre impacted, two acres shall be provided as replacement). Replacement vegetation and habitat shall be provided in designated mitigation areas. Replacement areas shall provide the same or better quality i - 10 - Laguna Lake Park Draft M; Plan -- ER 141 - 92 habitat area as.where the impact occurred. 2. The Final Master Plan shall: a. Designate mitigation area boundaries. Mitigation areas shall be maintained and protected as natural habitat areas. Allowed uses in mitigation areas shall be limited to habitat enhancement, restoration, nature study and education. The planning principles shall specify protection mechanisms for mitigation areas. b. Designate sensitive areas (such as serpentine seeps) boundaries. Sensitive areas ---shall be maintained -and protected as natural habitat areas. Allowed uses in sensitive areas shall be limited to habitat enhancement, restoration, nature study and education. The planning principles shall specify protection mechanisms for sensitive areas. C. Specify construction limitations in the Nature Preserve (passive park area). For example, the plan shall specify that shoreline alterations, grading, and the use of heavy equipment should not occur near or within mitigation or sensitive areas during nesting or mating season (roughly the months of February through July). N. Aesthetic ettin . Panoramic views across Laguna Lake Park exist from sections of Madonna Road J (near-the park's entrance) and from the residences located south and southwest of the lake. The scenic backdrop in this area includes the lake, marsh area, hills, and portions of the Morros. These panoramic views largely exist because park facilities are modest and tall, clustered vegetation within the park is located near the park's northern edge (near Cerro San Luis) or the park's center. Potential Impacts. The proposed park plan could alter existing views as a result of (1) new park facilities, or (2) planned windbreaks. Since the Master Plan proposes small scale and primarily non-structural recreation facilities (i.e., picnic areas, trails, and play areas), new park facilities would not significantly impact existing park aesthetic or views. In terms of windbreak impacts, as proposed windbreaks would consist of vegetated berms. Berms would be designed to imitate the existing topography. Berm vegetation would consist of California native trees and shrubs arranged in informal clusters. Windbreaks would tend to impact views if they are (1) extensive throughout the park, (2) located perpendicular to the view corridor, and/or (3) located close to where the view occurs (i.e., directly adjacent to Madonna Road or directly in front of residential units). If windbreaks are located a sufficient distance from Madonna Road and lake residences then prevailing views would tend to be over proposed windbreaks. For example,-presently. the- park contains numerous mature eucalyptus; however, since the eucalyptus is located toward the center of the park views tend not to be impacted. Thus, significant aesthetic impacts may occur if windbreaks are not located properly. Conclusions: May be significant.. - 11 - Laguna Lake Park Draft Masi Ilan -- ER 141 - 92 7 Mitigation: a. The final master-plan shall designate significant view corridors from Madonna Road ani lakeside residences. When locating windbreaks, large clusters of vegetation, and park facilities these significant view corridors shall be maintained and where possible enhanced.. Windbreaks, large clusters of vegetation, and park facilities may be located in these view corridors provided they do not significantly degrade the aesthetic qualities of these corridors. P. Other Impacts•. This section examines the potential hazards associated with electromagnetic fields.' High voltage transmission lines, low-voltage distribution lines, substations, electrical service vaults, and household appliances all generate electromagnet fields (EMFs). These fields are generated laterally from power lines, tending to diminish with distance from the source. The rate of decay depends on the source. EMFs from appliances fall off quickly, while those from power lines do so more slowly.' More than forty studies have found a positive association between long-term exposure to EMFs and disease (usually cancer). One study showed that adult subjects whose house had magnetic fields of about 2 milligauss (mG) exhibited a 28 percent increased risk for cancer, compared with subjects who lived in a field of 0.5 mG. Another study showed that children who lived in a 2 mG field exhibited a 133 percent increased risk for cancer.when compared with children exposed to a OS mG field.' Despite the indications from the epidemiological studies, there is as yet no precise threshold for EMF effects. Itis still not clear what particular aspects(s) of the EMF is (are) responsible for the observed higher rates of cancer and other health effects. Progress will be slow until more is known about the mechanisms of EMF interaction.e Various jurisdictions have established their own guidelines. The California Department of Health Services has recommended the application of"prudent avoidance,"described as follows: :. 'The best response is a prudent one, to avoid unnecessary new exposure to electromagnetic fields if such avoidance can be achieved at a cost which is reasonable in light of the risk identified." The California Board of Education's School Facilities Planning Division has adopted setbacks for locating schools near high voltage power lines. These setbacks range from 100 feet to 250 feet from the edge of the-utility easement, depending upon the line voltage (magnetic fields of 2 mG may extend 100 feet from a 115,000 volt power line). The City of Irvine has used 6 Slesin, Louis, et al. , "Electromagnetic Fields and Land-Use Controls," American Planning Association, PAS Report # 435, American Planning Association, 1992. . 3�3 Laguna Lake Park Draft M, Plan - ER 141 - 92 measurements of EMFs emitted from existing power lines to regulate new land uses. In the consideration of a proposed subdivision and rezoning, Irvine used a Southern California Edison report to define 4 mG as the acceptable level and prohibited residential or school development in areas where the measured magnetic field was greater. The City of Wilmette, in approving a new transit facility that included an electric substation, required that there be no increase in EMF exposure at the project property line and set an absolute level of 2 mG for the project's field strengths. Impacts. PG&E has a utility easement (60 feet wide) which runs from Madonna Road west to the rear park boundary.line. This easement, and associated towers and high-voltage power -lines, cross the project site,-running through the center of Laguna Lake Park. The power lines are 115,000-volts. The Laguna Lake Master Plan proposes maintaining an existing park trail which crosses under the line at three points and runs adjacent to the power line for roughly 1,700 feet. All other recreation facilities (such as the proposed playground, game area, and picnic areas) would maintain greater than a 100 foot distance from the lines, except for one picnic table located roughly 80 feet from the power line. Other facilities that may be affected by the power lines would be the existing and proposed parking near the Nature Center. To mitigate potentially significant impacts additional planning principles should be added and changes should be made to the final park plan too guarantee that new park facilities are located an appropriate distance from transmission lines. Conclusions: May be significant. Mitigation: 1. The following should be incorporated in the Laguna Lake Park Master Plan Planning Principles: "If a project will result in long-term exposure to EMF fields, the City should avoid unnecessary new exposure to electromagnetic fields if such avoidance can be achieved at a cost which is reasonable in light of the risk identified." 2. The Final Master Plan shall depict a buffer along both sides of the PG&E easement. This buffer shall be 100 feet wide from the edge of the power lines on both sides of the easement and shall extend the length of the PG&E easement (on City property). The Final Plans shall clearly preclude new recreation facilities (such as playgrounds, picnic areas, game areas, benches, trails, or similar facilities [excluding trail crossings]) within the PG&E easement or the buffer area. The City of San Luis Obispo shall enforce this buffer area restriction and shall not locate prohibited facilities within this area. This mitigation measure shall be added as a planning principle. 3. The Final Park Plan shall be consistent with PG&E easement requirements, and the planning principles shall stipulate easement requirements. These requirements include the following stipulations (a) trees which exceed 15 feet at maturity shall not be planted in the PG&E easement, (b) towers located within a parking area shall have an island or traffic barrier around the towers (providing a ten foot buffer around an individual tower), and (c) a ten foot clearance shall be provided around an individual tower for cut and fill. - I3 - Laguna Lake Park Draft Mast.._ :lan — ER 141 - 92 _ -. : .. ... . ._..._.. ...... . III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Negative declaration with mitigation. Mitigation is summarized below: 1. Construction shall be Iimited to the hours of 8:00 pm to.5:00 pm, Monday through Friday. 2. Recreation facilities, excluding trails, shall not be located within the 65 dBA or greater noise corridor of Madonna Road, This mitigation measure shall be added as a planning principle. 3. All construction and maintenance equipment, fixed or mobile,should be in proper operating condition and fitted with standard silencing features. 4. Project grading shall be consistent with Soil Conservation Service guidelines. The final plan shall depict the siltation measures that will be in place during construction and grading, and the plantings that will be utilized to stabilize graded areas. 5.. The final park plan shall provide the following: a. A mitigation and monitoring plan. This plan shalldepict habitat impact areas (Le., areas where marsh and riparian vegetation will be removed and where habitat will be impacted due to planned facilities or construction). The plan shall also indicate mitigation areas (i.e., replacement of native marsh and riparian vegetation to mitigate project related biological impacts). Habitat impact areas._, shall be replaced onsite by a.2:1 ratio (i.e., for every acre impacted, two acres shall be provided a replacement). Replacement vegetation and habitat shall be provided in designated mitigation-- areas. itigation -areas. Replacement areas shall provide thesame or better quality habitat area as where the impact occurred. 6. The Final MasterPlan shall: a. Designate mitigation area boundaries. Mitigation areas shall be maintained and protected as natural habitat areas. Allowed uses in mitigation areas shall be limited to habitat enhancement, restoration, nature study and education. The planning principles shall specify protection mechanisms for mitigation areas. b. Designate sensitive areas (such as serpentine seeps) boundaries. Sensitive areas shall be maintained and protected as natural habitat areas. Allowed uses in sensitive areas shall be limited to habitat enhancement, restoration, nature study and education. The planning principles shall specify protection mechanisms for sensitive areas. c. Specify construction limitations in the Nature Preserve (the passive park area). For example, the plan shall specify that shoreline alterations, grading, and the use of heavy equipment should n.ot occur near or within mitigation or sensitive areas during nesting or mating season (roughly '.-he months of February through July). - 14 - . 3�S Laguna Lake Park Draft M,, Plan — ER 141 - 92 7. The final master plan shall designate significant view corridors from Madonna Road and lakeside residences. When locating windbreaks, large clusters of vegetation, and park facilities these significant view corridors shall be maintained and where possible enhanced. Windbreaks, large clusters of vegetation, and park facilities may be located in these view corridors provided they do not significantly degrade the aesthetic qualities of these corridors. 8. The following should be incorporated in the Laguna Lake Park Master Plan Planning Principles: "If a project will result in longm terexposure to EMF fields, the City should avoid unnecessary new exposure to electromagnetic fields if such avoidance can be achieved at.a cost which is reasonable in light of the risk identified." 9. The Final Master Plan shall depict a.buffer along both sides of the PG&E easement. This buffer shall be 100 feet wide from the edge of the power lines on both sides of the easement and shall extend the length of the PG&E easement (on City property). The Final Plans shall clearly preclude new recreation facilities (such as playgrounds,picnic areas, game areas, benches, trails, or similar facilities [excluding trail crossings]) within the PG&E easement or the buffer area. The City of San Luis Obispo shall enforce this buffer area restriction and shall not locate prohibited facilities within this area. This mitigation measure shall be added as a planning principle. 10: The Final Park Plan shall be consistent with PG&E easement requirements, and the planning principles shall stipulate easement requirements. These requirements include the following stipulations (a) trees which exceed 15 feet at maturity shall not be planted in the PG&E easement, (b) towers located within a parking area shall have an island or traffic barrier around the towers (providing a ten foot buffer around an-individual tower), and (c) a ten foot clearance shall be provided around an individual tower for cut and fill. C IV. MONITORING In order to assess compliance with mitigation measures outlined above that are intended to avoid potentially significant environmental effects, such measures shall be monitored by the staff: of the Community Development Department and the Parks and Recreation Department's project manager. Monitoring will take place at the time the work is begun, at mid-construction and upon completion. Trees and vegetation proposed for removal shall be identified in the field by the monitoring parties prior to the start of construction. Attachments: Exhibit A - Project Location Exhibit B - Constraints Analysis & Existing Facilities Exhibit C - Laguna Lake Park Draft Master Plan Exhibit D - Active & Passive Areas of Park Exhibit D1 - Active Park Area Exhibit E - Proposed Parkland Acquisition & Trail Easements Exhibit F - Phasing Plan & Cost Per Phase Exhibit G - Project Components (3 pages) Table I - Laguna Lake Master Plan Acreages Table II - Facilities and Persons Served - 15 _ 1 /I , J 1 - 1 1 ' Pow 1 , Laguna Lake Park 1 , ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - � 1 r '1 9y 'AI �� `----- - - . i I , l --- --' ' •,�roet.. N SCALE i*.3sw 7 Q CrrY LIMfr LIME------ city o� VICINITY MAP San luws OBISp0 - 990 Palm Street/Post Office Bos$100•San Luis Obispo,CA 93107-etOO 7: Extibit A Project Location -J-o2� _ .F / % /: `_ /Y[ .t •'Tie-�v= .:[!• uj 000 LL /1\` v '• i sir O �i_�^ ;:.J/'/a+ �,, 43 .+ 'f%12, LL ZZ Cc z '$ -: :..:�:. / '-•fes' `\ �•O i// N QO cn _ '• � t /� S V N U � I • 6 3-�2� !; a ss:: is ! �� / �, .�1 �..q� . .\� yy��•f! � �J :f •=Sr�=� �/� �• lilyof fopt CL vi ae '/ •% ( S —� ft ,. F Till • �a CIL LU 77v- CL • { 3:- �� .- _ ,off?,/ � _ '•.� � =i . tG/- I �1 ••\ _ r } `' \'\ LLI I 1. ej CL Cz Lu Z vJ i 3-�9 t J � I Pc .� :\ ,L; ,.;MATURE PRESERVE. LAKE (61 -•��~` -:=�' =...~�•Ji� '+TLS e e ol A6I: /y 4/ 101* 10, Exhibit D - Active & Passive Park Areas . 330 -- ••� ��moo\ � -4'. _�r Z 4 - `' Q 7 l�//)/V-�� T r VI `li `••J Cj 1 � x CO co Lij h co 1 331 �! 1 �W\\ ACQUISfT'tQ%aZZ i! IM Q�\ _ � .=.�_:.::=;.� ::: .._�.._:::_..--:..-� •\oma CQUIS1770 AM 'EM jw _ PARK \ � � �l'-'-• � � LAR PO ji _ •?; �, � CQUlSJTJOJY 3�!�= a i •, Exhibit E - Proposed Parkland Acquisition & Traff Easements LAGUNA LAKE PARK MASTER PLAN PHASING PLAN PHASE ONE Approximate Cost: $195,000 -terminate grazing lease and remove fence •excavate new wetland and pond •construct and plant berms •provide irrigation to new plantings -construct interpretive area -construct wetland buffer fence -plant wildlife buffer map-and.fence.seeps PHASE TWO Approximate Cost: $395,000 -construct new park entry and road extensions and realignments -construct path along marsh -develop shoreline stabilization and revegetation -develop shoreline bike/walking path *construct restroom near boat launch PHASE THREE Approximate Cost: $290,000 -develop turf and family picnic areas near existing play area and near interpretive area -construct games areas -construct fishing dock -construct all remaining jogging walking paths -develop maintenance yard -� -construct boardwalk PHASE FOUR Approximate Cost: $235,000 -develop group area and related turf and games area . -construct play area, adventure play and pond Exhibit F - Phasing Plan & Cost Per Phase . 3�3 ,r I• tT l - 6 rr � _ r I\� r i = s� C 1 E IL 16 ell 0 Ar EN I m < W I 3. ! F=- W Z z f CL AkN& Cc _S`' kr �c r• L4 AN -, LL 3-3� 6 s s p = w • �-_ -- sir-�, `r-'= a r i W W ! n t > CL 3 I 3 •• W W b C 7z a n ' Y tu + W a -- , a § CL W O 'moi' _ W ^• _ v i a i �� a `• V � u � R Z cn 3-4 Yk 2 1u,`' V tr U Z "_ w z Y a a m Q J ��U(n C i ' i y _ t�� c � . J• n 3! � N • W a F e" u is J ( c• i J i � a i !l • � W ( •• 1 t•i aJ j � j'l t ° a - W (� C • I^I n N •I � i � Iai- CL C cr- to a u C) 'j1 •fY • < n� Z �• V � T Y W V Lu CL CL• alb fyn��' i2 C � � In =� O �_ .j,• Y' A W LU 1 . • /� W � °y f i L a . tt ui J46 TABLE I _ LAGUNA LAKE PARK MASTER PLAN ACREAGES Existing % Proposed Total TOTAL PARK AREA Acres' Acres' Acres' Total Area (part:, lake, open area) 40x.100% - 405..,100516 Developed Park Area 65...16% 0 65....16% Nature Preserve 0 248 248....61% Lake Area 92...23% 0 92....23% Grazing Area 152..37% To Nature Preserve 0 Marsh Area 52...13% To Nature Preserve 0 Open Space 44...11% To Nature Preserve 0 Existing Proposed Total Acres' Acres' Acres' Total Park Acreage 405 405 Developed Park Area 65 0 65 Playfields 13 4.4 5.7 Commemorative Grove 4.0 4.0 8.0 Open Space 55.47 -17.02 38.47 Building 0.02 0.01 0.03 Group Areas 0.11 0.11 022 Playgrounds 0.08 0.92 1.0 Pond 0 0.90 0.90 Revegetated Shoreline 0 0S0 0.50 . Stabilized Shore 0 0.72 0.72 Nature Center 0 0.46 0.46 Trails & Paths 1 3.0 4.0 Roads & Parking 3 2 5.0 Nature Preserve 0 248 248 Marsh 52 2 54 Open Space 44 130 174 Trails 1 3 4 Buffer 0 16 16 Lake 92 0 92 Grazing Area 152 To Nature Preserve 0 Acreages represent dose approximations. Bold numbers represent a total for that category. i i - i - TABLE II FACILITIES AND PERSONS SERVED Number of Facilities/Number of People Served' Existina Prol2osed Total Facilities Family Picnic Areas 1./50 3/150 4/200 Group Picnic Areas 1/94 1/93 2/187 Play Areas (children equipment) 1 1 2 Games Volleyball 1 3 4 Horseshoes 0 2 2 Restrooms 2 14/20 Boat/Canoe/Dock Launch 2/10 / 10 Sailboard Launch 0 2/15 2/15 Fishing Dock 0 1 1 Nature Center 0 1/50 1/50 Interpretive Displays (along walking & jogging paths) 0 8/45 8/45 Shore Users 0 1/20 1/20 PERSONS SERVED Existinci Proposed Total Persons Served 168 369 537 PARKING SPACES Existing Proposed Total Parking Spaces 80 170 250 ' Calculations for the number of people served is based on facilities people will make a trip to the park for. Thus ancillary facilities do not have projections. An example, persons having a picnicwould tend to use the volleyball facilities; hc-�-mever, it is unlikely people will travel to the park for just volleyball. z The two existing docks would be relocated; however, they are counted as existing docks. 3 90 City Council Minutes Page 3 Tuesday,August 27, 1991 -7:00 p.m. 830 p.m. City Council reconvened. All Council members present. 2. LAGUNA LAKE PARK DESIGN (File No.883) Council considered three alternative designs for Laguna Lake Park. Jan DiLeo. Long Range Planner, reviewed the staff report stating the three alternative designs had been reviewed by the Park and Recreation Commission and requested the Council after review give general direction or comment on all three proposed designs. She stated the projects work scope included three phases which were: Phase I of the project included research, data collection, and the development of guidelines for future park development This phase included determining constraints and accessing community preferences by cogducting surveys and workshops. As a result of the complete research, data collection,and community input, Draft Planning Principles were developed. These principles were developed not only to direct future development in expansion of the park but to respond to community concerns and site constraints. Phase II of the project required the three alternative park designs be developed by the consultants. The alternative designs were based on policies contained within the adopted planning principles. It was planned. that the designs would be reviewed by the project steering committee, the Park and Recreation Commission, the Architectural Review Commission,the Planning Commission,and the Council. It is currently in its second phase. Phase III involves developing one Coral draft plan,cost estimates,and a report The final draft park plan would combine those components of the three alternative plans that the Council recommended be incorporated _ Mike Multari.of Crawford,Multari,and Starr, reviewed the three alternatives along with David Foote. Mayor Dunin expressed concern that if grazing is removed how it would effect Pre hazard. He suggested any wind breaks be made up of berm or trees. Mayor Dunin asked for public comment Mike Hessler.Vista Del Lago,asked for clarification of Item 34 on page 24. Lionel Johnston. asked the Council to preserve the Laguna Lake area by planting trees and shruberies that would provide food for wildlife in the area Ann Philips.Vega Way,submitted a letter into the record urging support of its preservation. Brett Cross. 1217 Mariners Cove,also submitted a letter urging the park be retained as passive. Candace Havens, 617 Oakridge Street, urged that the Council keep as a priority an area for the children's museum if not at this location then somewhere in the downtown area. Susan Lee 1552 Oceanaire,spoke in support of Alternative I, urged dredging of the lake,and retaining water quality. .Tim Dummitresident near the lake,urged that if the park.Is kept passive it also be retained as a windsurting and boater area Walt Ross. 1132 Vista Del Lago, also spoke in support of providing sufficient parking and space for boaters.. cc minutes 91 City Council Minutes Page 4 OTuesday,August 27,1991 -7:00 p.m. Lee Burkett.1304 Oceanafre,spoke in support of preserving boating use. Pierre Mattheson, Prefumo Canyon Road, offered to volunteer to put in some kind of picnic building from where people could enjoy the lake. Councilwoman RaDua supported Alternative I;urged that staff look at providing for guided tours and suggested extending the commemorative grove further into the park Councilman Roalman supported Alternative 1. He was not convinced that the interruptive center as proposed for the kitty pond might present additional liability and maintenance and would like the staff to look at it. Councilwoman Pinard felt the acquisition.proposals were too minimal and would like to have the City be more active and search for open space to provide for some of the other amenities that have been requested by citizens. Councilman Reiss supported Alternative I. He also supported a protective area for children. Mayor Dunin supported the previous comments and urged that dredging be looked.at as well. He would support Alternative I. After discussion and upon general consensus, Council supported the Park and Recreation Commission's recommendation to support Alternative I with the changes and additions as outlined in Attachment E and as made this evening. 10:00 pm. Mayor Dunin declared a recess. 10:10 p.m. CIty Council reconvened;and all Councilmembers were present. 3. ORCUTT ROAD WIDENING (File No.537) Council considered design alternatives for the Orcutt Road Widening (continued from 7/16/91). Councilman Reiss stepped down due to a possible conflict of interest because he owned property in the area. Wavne Peterson. City Engineer, reviewed the agenda report with the recommendation that Council support Option IV to allow staff to follow through with appropriate acquisition and design. This would include a right- of-way width of ten feet with 11-foot and 13-foot travel lanes in each direction, a 22-foot median with left turn pockets,8-foot Class IIS bike lanes on each side,4-foot sidewalks on the south side and 10-foot planting strip between curb and sidewalk,and 6-foot integral sidewalk on the north side. This would also include a median with an estimated cost of$526,000 more than the basic project. After discussion, moved by Raipna/Roalman to give conceptual approval of the combination of Alternatives 3 & 4 to evaluate opportunities for sidewalk alternatives; look at appropriate egress and ingress at the south side of Orcutt; support conceptual approval of the Laurel/Bullock intersection; and inclusion of a transit shelter. Motion.carried (3-1-1, Mayor Dunin voting no, Councilman Reiss absent). COMMUNICATIONS C.1.Councilman Roalman requested the request by Planning Commission Chairperson Gil Hoffman regarding Planning Commissioner attendance be agendized. Upon general consensus, Council Liaison Subcommittee directed to review this issue and bring back to Council as necessary. 0 cc minutes 340 �II1a88�II�IIfflNlf 181 ��pilliliillj �„ � - �illlllll �IIIII Cityo san vuis� � 990 Palm Street/Post Office Box 8100 • San Luis Obispo, CA 93403.8100 TO: The City Council ;,FROM: Paul Orton, Chairperson of The Park and Recreation Commission DATE: July 22, 1991 RE: Laguna Lake Park Three Alternative Designs At the July 10, 1991 Park and Recreation Commission meeting the three alternative designs for Laguna. Lake Park were discussed. The purpose of this discussion was to identify for the City Council .those design features that the Park and Recreation Commission _._considers important. This memo outlines the recommendations and `concerns of the Park and Recreation Commission. _.In_ general, the Park and Recreation Commission supports the design =:features and level of development of Laguna Lake Park as depicted in Alternative 1. The reason elements of Alternative 1 were supported are explained below. In addition, the Park and ;_Recreation Commission proposes some changes to Alternative 1, also noted below. __The Park and Recreation Commission supports Alternative 1 for the _;_following reasons: 1. Recreation Facilities Planned for the Park: The Commission stated that facilities such as the Children' s Museum and a community or neighborhood center are inappropriate for Laguna Lake Park. The park is a unique visual and biological resource within the City, and as such should remain open and largely undeveloped in perpetuity. Alternative 1 represents a level of development that is most consistent with the park ' s unique features. 2 . Trails and Bikeways. The Commission recommends the trails as depicted in Alternative 1. It is anticipated that at the time the City acquires additional lands (outside the park) bikepaths and trails can more appropriately be planned. 3 . Shoreline Design. The Commission supports shoreline. improvements which minimize shoreline impacts, i.e. , improvements which provide planned and easier access in certain locations while creating wildlife buffers and limiting human encroachment in other sections. - PRC Comments / Park and Recreation Commission Memo page 2 4 . Windbreaks and other Features. The Commission generally supports the concept of improvements to the park aimed at providing a more enjoyable outdoor experience. These include: dredging the lake, berms and windbreaks, a small scale nature/interpretive center, bank stabilization and improvements to the boat ramp area, paths and blinds to view wildlife, a "kiddie pond" , ... some picnic/playground areas, and restrooms/changing rooms. The interpretive center should provide information and exhibits about the unique biological features of this park. 5. Habitat and Marsh Protection. The Commission supports the peninsula design as depicted in Alternative 1 as it -- - provides protected marsh and habitat areas. The ==- _ Commission supports revegetation and the creation of additional wildlife habitat where appropriate. only endemic plants should be used in this effort. To reclaim terrestrial habitat areas, grazing should be discontinued within the park and degraded grazing lands should be reclaimed. "Design ' aspects or features that should be incorporated into 'Alternative 1 are noted below: - 1. Property Acquisitions/Easements. The purchase of easements or outright purchase of additional surrounding parkland is highly desirable. The City should pursue at -least the acquisitions for .additional open space and parkland as proposed under Alternative 3 . Lake and marshland areas should be considered a high priority for acquisition. 2 . Handicap and Elderly Access. Handicap and elderly access should be an important design feature of the plan. 3 . Park Entrance. The area directly adjacent to Madonna Road should have a friendlier, park-like edge. 4 . Dredging. Any future dredging operation should not degrade or diminish the integrity of the master plan. 5. Berms and Landscaping. Berms and landscaping features should be compatible with the overall intrinsic character of the park. Berms should be contoured to appear natural and endemic to the site. Landscaping - should appear natural and not impair scenic view Ocorridors. PRC Comments - -- - 3- � 4 Park and Recreation Commission Memo Page 3 6. Park Roads. Park roads should not incorporate overly long straight lines and sharp angles. In addition, park roads should not focus' attention on the power lines. 7. Boat and Sail Ramps. The boat and sail ramps should be moved away from the wildlife area to provide adequate separation from human activities associated with such ramps. S. Perfumo Creek Inlet. .. The Perfumo'.Creek Inlet should be designed consistent with Planning Principles 22 and 34 . If any member of the City Council has questions regarding this memo or other items please -feel free to contact members of the Park and Recreation Commission or myself. cc: Planning Commission ARC PRC CommenIs �} mp.cc LAGUNA LAKE PARK MASTER PLAN PLANNING PRINCIPLES' '- C General 1. The long-term viability of the lake as a lake is very important; planning for the park should be coordinated with the long-term protection and maintenance of the lake; the on-going implementation measures prescribed by the adopted lake management plan (namely, weed control, siltation control and raising the level by log dams) should continue to be followed. 2. The_lake and-associated wetlands constitute a rare and extremely limited habitat; this resource should be protected and managed to ensure its habitat values for the long-term. 3. Continued community access to portions of the lake for water-related recreation is important. 4. Besides the lake itself, the most important feature of the park area is its open space; any new uses must not overwhelm feelings of openness. 5. The City should,ifwestigate expanding. the park in the following priority:. • Protection of the privately held portions of the lake and wetlands along the northern most region of Laguna Lake(the intent is not,to include the yards of single family dwellings located along the southern shoreline of Laguna Lake). Access easements for trails (walking and bike) to Foothill Boulevard, the downtown and Los Csos Valley Road. Access easements or acquisition of prominent knolls. • Easements restricting development on open areas outside the park,including the eucalyptus grove south of Madonna Road. Easements or acquisition of the eucalyptus grove could occur as a resul of adoption of the Dalidio specific plan. Acquisition of hillsides and other open areas west of the park. If a high priority site cannot be acquired with reasonable effort,louver priority sites should be pursued. 6. Planning should always take the long-term view of the park, recognizing it as a major resource of the community in terms of aesthetics, land, open space, recreation and wildlife habitat. 1 A note on directions: in these principles "east" is considered the direction toward Madonna Road; "west" is the direction toward Foothill Boulevard; "south" is the. direction of the developed side of the lake, toward. Los Osos Valley Road; "north" means the direction away from the lake toward the hillsides. 2 Some changes are proposed to these PlanningTrinciples as clarifications. '^ Clarification are presented by cross-hatching text proposed to be deleted and shadowing text inserts. Mitigation measures have not been included at this time. limp-pri 1 - 05/03/93 Laguna Lake Park Planning Principles Land and Water Use 7. Human encroachment in and around the western part of the lake should be minimized; this area (the western portion of the lake and wetlands) should be set aside as the City's first officially recognized wildlife preserve; boating and windsurfing in this portion of the lake should be prohibited. 8. Highest priority in terms of expanding the park should be given to placing the privately held portions of the lake and wetlands into the wildlife nature preserve. 9. Uses in the nature preserve should be limited to: (a) those activities required to maintain the habitat values for the long-term; (b) wildlife observation from designated paths and blinds only;and (c) small interpretive exhibits which encourage the protection of the resource. 10. The eastern part of the lake should be used for aquatic recreation; gas powered boats should continue to be prohibited; adequate public docks and ramps should be provided on the park side of the lake (consistent with the final park plan). 11. Grazing should be discontinued in the park; existing fences, pipes and tanks should be removed. 12. The steep hillsides should be kept open and uses there should be limited to hiking and ancillary facilities; hiking there shall be limited to designated paths only, to minimize erosion and to protect. springs and endangered species (see below). Seating and viewing stations, for enjoying the views of the lake, morros and the Los Osos Valley, should be provided. 13. Sensitive habitat areas on the hillsides, including sites of rare or endangered species and the springs, will be protected; approaches should include signs to encourage people to stay on paths, opportunities to see the springs from designated areas, interpretive exhibits to educate people about the sensitive nature of these locations, and, if necessary, barriers to discourage human intrusion. 14. The great majority of the park should be kept in open space. 15. Buildings and active recreation facilities should be limited to a small proportion of the total parkland, and (except for rest rooms, small interpretative exhibits and picnic shelters) may be located only in the eastern part of the park. In general, the more developed or active the use, the more easterly it should be located. Habitat Protection 16. The marsh areas should be preserved as an environmentally sensitive habitat area. Uses should be limited to paths or raised walks which do not significantly threaten the habitat value, viewing blinds and small interpretive exhibits. Where deemed necessary to restrict human encroachment, barriers should be installed around especially sensitive areas. 17. A buffer zone should be created landward of the marsh. This buffer should be re-vegetated with: " variety of native plant species. Uses in the buffer zone should be restricted to paths and recreatioi. Ump-pri - 2 - 05/03/93 /�� Laguna Lake Park Planning Fr:nciples uses which would not significantly impact the wetlands, such as an exercise trail. 18. AAd+4e*"nterpretive exhibits of the cultural history and natural history of the area should be located elsewhere in the park. Buildings should generally be located near parking and in the eastern portion of the park. 19. Dogs should be prohibited in the nature preserve. 20. Suitable tree species, emphasizing natives and endemics, should be planted in the vicinity of the lake and within the preserve which may provide future nesting (rookery) opportunities for herons and egrets. 21. Additional plantings should occur in the nature preserve using native species, to enhance the natural habitat values there. Additional plantings, with suitable species, should occur throughout the park for habitat enhancement, human comfort (windbreaks and shade), spatial organization of uses, aesthetics and view control (i.e., framing exceptional views, hiding unattractive views, or screening activity areas or facilities). 22. Wildlife corridors should be maintained and,where feasible,enhanced including along Prefumo Creek, both upstream and downstream of the lake. 23. An active fish management program should be implemented for the lake which would include stocking the lake with suitable species. Recreation 24. Because of habitat values and potential impacts on nearby neighborhoods, lighted recreation field,. or sports facilities should not be part of this park. In addition,neighborhood or community recreation centers or other uses which may generate a large amount of traffic should not be located at Laguna Lake Park. 25. Unlighted play fields may be located in the eastern portion of the park and away from the lake shore. 26. Individual picnic areas may be located anywhere in the park, outside the nature preserve and sensitive habitat areas. Small-scale sports courts (e.g., volleyball, horseshoes) may be permitted on the flatter areas of the park, outside the nature preserve, and usually in conjunction with group picnic areas. 27. Wind breaks should be planted or built around all picnic areas and play areas. 28. Fishing should continue to be an activity allowed in the park. 29. Consistent with the master plan, playgrounds should ire provided, especially for younger children. — 30. The southern lake shore should be evaluated in detail for:opportunities to provide passive recreation, \� access and view points for the public on publicly owned land. limp-pri - 3 - 05/03/93 ''//l- Laguna Lake Park Planning Principles Access and Circulation 31. The park should be oriented to pedestrian and bike traffic. Vehicular access should be limited; in general, new roads should not be planned for the park. However, if after more detailed analysis a new park road is deemed necessary, it must be carefully sited and designed to ensure it will not significantly impact habitat, aesthetic or recreational values. 32. Additional parking should generally be located in the eastern part of the park, away from the lake shore. 33. Walk ways and bike paths should be separated, wherever possible, from automobile roadways. 34. A The trail system within the park should a : (1) access to the ridge and saddle; and (2) integr-afieft ef park paths with a eempf:ehensi-ve fr-SA System whieh ii connect the park with Los Osos Valley Road, Foothill Boulevard, and the downtown. Another potential linkage,provided habitat values can be adequately protected,would be along Prefumo Creek corridor (upstream and downstream). In addition, a trail link to existing-Laguna Lake neighborhoods ,should be explored. 35. A The park bike path(s) should be insta4led ift the park with,provide links to Foothill Boulevard, the downtown and Los Osos Valley Road. 36. The City should attempt to acquire access easements over adjacent properties to create the off site linkages described above (i.e., Foothill, Los Osos Valley Road and downtown). 37. No Highway One "by-pass" or other major roadway should be permitted within the park. 38. Public transit links to the town and to the region should be raved developed and maintained. 39. Handicap access should be provided within the park and adjacent to Laguna Lake. Aesthetics 40. Consistent with the park master plan, the existing memorial grove should be expanded; more trees should be planted especially near Madonna Road. 41. The park entrance and Madonna Road frontage should provide a "park like" and inviting character. Major view opportunities from Madonna Road, over the lake, and down Los Osos Valley should be preserved. 42. T'he City should re-evaluate using reclaimed water to facilitate increased planting, and possibly for maintaining the water level in the lake. 43. Where buildings are proposed, they should reflect a continuity of design elements and materials Furthermore, the design of buildings and other facilities such as play areas should reflect the ove, limp-pri 4 - . 05/03/93 J47 Laguna Lake Park Planning I t raciples -arching character of the park as a natural place: the choice of materials, color, plantings, and the scale, architecture and orientation of these facilities should emphasize elements of the surrounding natural environment. 44. All built elements should be designed as low-scale and relatively unobtrusive nodes placed amid plants and other natural materials; any active recreation areas or buildings should be buffered and screened from open areas elsewhere in the park. afe 45. The park should be closed at night; a gate should be used to keep out cars. 46. Mer-e Telephones should be installed (as needed), especially near boating and windsurfing facilities. 47. a Rest rooms should be provided (as needed), especially near activity areas; the design of rest rooms and other features should provide security for the users, especially children. 48. Safe crossing for bikes and pedestrians should be provided across roads. 49. Areas of the lake shore subject to erosion, and storm drainage, outside the nature preserve, should be protected; shore line protection should emphasize techniques which most closely relate to the natural environment, such as plantings and use of native materials. (—'50. Traffic in the park should be kept as slow as possible, to reduce noise and enhance safety. 51. To protect any developed areas and structures within the park from wildland fires, the park's design. should include planned irrigated green vegetation serving as fire breaks, mowed areas, and/or other similar preventive measures. 52. The pe k s, etild be better-.. a r Park maintenance should pay special attention to litter control, upkeep of bathrooms and other facilities, and management and enhancement of landscaping. 53. 1 The master plan's implementation should be phased to match funding ability. 54. Long-term funding sources and management approaches must be should be identified and pursued. 55. Facilities, acquisitions, and/or easements proposed outside the city's boundary should be reviewed -and coordinated with the County of San Luis Obispo Parks Department and the County Planrtng Department.. i limp-pri - 5 - 05/03/93 3�dr8 MEET[ AGENDA DATE ITEM # WoOLPERT MAM WOOIFERT J.CRRISTOPHER MEWS ToEws & VIA PETER TERHUNE OF COUNSEL nRHUNE JAMES C.BROWN ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1026 PALM STREET SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401 (805)541-CSS FAX(805)5414028 VCAMBRIA OFFICE 2 Cj,0 779 ARLINGTON A CA 0 CANIBRIA,CA 93428 �1/1.7707,NTY D TR. (805)927-0410 1 IT...... (——�- 4C47 F* June 11, 1993 D,F:, r T 7- 1 City Council City of San Luis Obispo City Hall San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Re: Hearing on Laguna Lake Park Master Plan and Moving California Style Bungalow House at 1042 Palm Street Dear City Council: You will recall that Palm Street Enterprise plans to build on the property across from the County Courthouse. Because many people were concerned about the loss of the California style bungalow located on that site, we offered the building to bidders who would be willing to move it to another location. The winning bid was Barry Stone, who wished to use the building in Cayucos, but found Caltrans' regulations made a move beyond Morro Bay virtually impossible. He has been unable to find another suitable site. Another interested party wanted to move the building about four blocks, but City regulations related to converting old or moved buildings to business/commercial use made that use prohibitively expensive. As a consequence, the future of this building is in doubt. We have been told that there is a possibility that the City could use the building in Laguna Lake Park. Apparently this has not been discussed by your council, but you have a meeting on the Laguna Lake Park Master Plan on June 15th. If the City wants to use the bungalow for some purpose, such as a visitors' center, or caretaker's house, Barry Stone and the partners of Palm Street Enterprise are willing to give the building to the City. (If you wanted to establish a private-public cooperative venture, Barry Stone, a licensed general building contractor, has indicated a willingness to participate. ) Unfortunately, because it has taken so,.long to try to find a way to save the building, we are now JUN i 1993 Cert' CLEF C. i City Council June 11, 1993 Page 2 virtually out of time. It will be necessary for the City Council, if it wants the building, to decide that issue on June 15th, as part of its Master Planning for the park. We all want to save this building, but realistically, the City is the last chance. We are very willing to work with your -staff, if you so direct. Sincerely, :RT TOEWS &�ERHUNE MARK WOOLPERT f:\wpnet\caro1e\mark\Laquna.Np MW:clh ►� a