The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02/06/1990, 5 - CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS WHERE MORE THAN 50% OF THE BLOCK IS ALREADY IMPROVED h4EEnNs DarE: all City Of San Luis OBISPO ETBRUARY NUMBER CONL AGENDA REPORT MMUCI � FROM: David Romero, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements where more i than 50% of the block is already improved- CRO mprovedCAO RECOMMENDATION: By motion, after making desired modifications, direct staff to proceed BACKGROUND: Resolution No. 6031 (1986 Series) (attached) calls for the staff to bring to Council attention those properties where more than 50% of the frontage of a block has been improved, thereby meeting 1911 Act criteria for completion of improvements within a block. A staff survey of sidewalk improvements within the community resulted in the list shown on Exhibits A & B. Provisions of the 1911 Act call for the property owners to construct said improvements after the Superintendent of Streets has given notice to construct. Further provisions of the Act call for a public hearing, when the legislative body will hear and pass upon objections or protests raised by the property owner or other interested parties. At that public hearing, the Council may make those adjustments it feels are appropriate, then direct staff to proceed, following provisions of the 1911 Act. This evening's meeting is held in response to the City Council concern, that it be notified prior to start of an action which will affect a number of citizens. If the Council- feels that any of the blocks listed (Exhibits A & B) are inappropriate, it should inform staff prior to beginning of formal notification proceedings. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval to proceed implies only expenditure of staff time until the Protest Hearing is held in several weeks. At that time, the Council may exempt certain or all properties. Those not exempted would be obligated for certain improvements. If all of the 22 separate blocks remain on the list, cost for improvements is estimated at $138,723. Past experience is that approximately 70% of owners either have the work done or pay their costs in cash. The City could expect to finance approximately $42,000 of property owner obligatedwork and approximately $8,000 for City owned property. There is approximately $85,000 remaining in sidewalk budget accounts for this work. 0 city or sari Luis owspo COUNCIL AGENOA REPORT Improvements Page Two ALTERNATIVE: The Council may remove any of these blocks which it feels should not be included. Attachments: Resolution 6031 (1986 Series) Exhibit A (map) Exhibit B (Proposed Improvements - 1911 Act) cgsid/dfr#19 RESOLUTION NO. 6031 (1986 Series) CA RESOLUTION OF MiZ COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SA14 LUIS OBISPO ADOPTING GENERAL CRITI•TZIA AND SITE SELECTION PRIORITIES FOR THE. SIDE AT.K Itr'i.OVII�= PROGRAM WHEREAS; the City desires that its citizens have available safe, convenient and suitably located slde.alks; arra FZI RFAS, many areas of the City do.not have such sideezalks; and K-*M A.S, the City desires such. areas to be improved considering n__ds, hazards and the wishes of the neighborhoods, NOW, T'r REFORE, BE IT RESOLVE), that the City Council hereby adopts the following: C£1r-MAL PiiDC AM CRITMA a. Sidewalk program should integrate repair and const:-ucticn. b. Sidewalk prog=-n should mphasize safety, particularly safety of children. To t}?is effect, City staff should consult �: t school authorities and PTtis in preparing specific costruczicn priorities c. City-initiated sideal}s should be installed only where t::e:e is a demonstrated pedestrian need. d. City should respond favorably wtien it is petitioned for sidrall, irprovemaents by nore than 505.; of the owners of a block (theme portions already improved are c %sidered a favorable vote) . e. Sidewalk program should consider tonography and significant trees. f. Council may consider scenic nature of area, desires of the neighborhood, traffic flow and other judgement items in Its determinations. SS Resolution No. 6031 (1986 Series) g. Staff will bring to Council attention those properties where more than 50% of the frontage of a block has been improved, thereby meeting 1911 Act criteria for completion of improvaments within a block. SITE SELECTION PRIORITIES FUR CONSTRUCTION or Nra; SIDL• i: LK'S I. In areas with safety hazards or heavy pedestrian use, especially children. 2. Along arterial and collector streets near schools, parks, churches, .and neighborhood connercial centers. 3. Along local streets near schools, parks, churches, and neighborhood cammeroial centers. 4. In other residential and ccx=mrcial areas as necessarv. On moticn, of Councilman Griffinseco.'xieyd by Councilman Settle ako on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Griffin, Settle, Dovey and Mayor _Dunin TEES: None A-&=- : Councilwoman Rappa the foregoing Resolution cos passed and adopted this 15th day of July , 1986. MAYOR RON DUNIN C CMLERK PA, VOGES (tel i API I: D: City Admin:istq ,'Vlc fiver X2 CityAt/ r n e y Public works Director G • c 9• y.. tea^ a n i CAd POLY p o s _ L w ' . - � : 9, 40 4y .'�urs ,+\' '� tcFp►�C Fool■" .G.a I 1 of acsl.n _ l Su• + r•a - . `• ~ • \00tH a G ,m t 3 4 an •w •W. }� � � p, f ♦ Imo''_ .` 0�. cj�olzp-c ST. N c 0 • ` z / s O �� RAFAtt- WAY - \�°' l 'f tie r LiNrc-LN AtiF-- o ♦ , G t • �, PARK 6T ' SRECK 5T. S { l R S 5Tr= LLA ST g ,fir SwA z.E7 5T. i5ucmcN 5T. BLcNUti 5T. j-AWTON 57 ON6Rlack IT. C WcOa®/21a@E ST. Y �� ,v - '°� `• yo ` CAl;1�� LL. .S! • LMOI • ` ,O `•i S' ��.0. ,ice y ``•� ` iI I • y '* \ • fZ6.`G K l 1 L:YL' FAL. wl � �..�o. '8 �EcoJ:. �"•: c au .•may �:.:,� •', ` Y i i % 'fib}� .�4y �` `'�� P �s .- l_�1 19 ��• °{ J �y�•w'�/.f, R :` � ; c • { a Y F"...coo i. } �.�a•C. SG�� `� f i C ..a - i.1 �� `1 \ ,fay + '•• . .g0 V / ♦ t 1 c � �� PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS - 1912 ACT - 50% RULE G 1 . East side - Chorr.o (.between Boysen and Highland) 539 ..96 feet - total footage improved - 438. 5 feet = 81% unimproved- 101 . 1 feet = 19% 2 . East side - Rafael Way (between Lunetta and Ramona) 471 . 76 feet - total footage improved - 295.75 feet = 63% unimproved - 176.01 feet = 37% 3 . West side - Lincoln (between Venable. and .Mission) 291 .46 feet - total footage. improved - 157 .73 feet = 54% unimproved - 133. 73 feet = 46% 4 . East side - Almond (between Center and Mission) 726 .78 feet - total footage improved - 533 .0 feet = 73% unimproved. - 193 . 78 feet = 27% 5. West side - Almond (between Venable & Mission) 371 . 25 feet - total footage improved - 248 .72 feet = 67% unimproved - 122 . 53 feet = 33% J 6 . West side - Park (between Phillips and Hillcrest ) 251 . 0 feet - total footage improved - .187 feet = 76`K unimproved 64 feet = 24% 7 . North side - Breck (between Johnson and Fairview) 300 . 0 feet - total_ footage improved = 200 .0 feet = 67% unimproved - 100.0 feet = 33% 8 . North side - ,Iris (between Johnson and Fixlini ) 294 . 0 feet - total footage improved 244 . 0 feet = 83% unimproved - 50 . 0 - feet = 17% 9. South side Ella (between Osos and Binns Court ) 1.181 .16 feet - total footage improved - 790. 16 feet = 67%* unimproved - 391 .0 feet = 33% 10. West side - Swazey (between Osos and south end) 515 .97 feet - total footage imvroved - 387 . 47 feet = 75% unimproved - 12.7 .,5 feet = 25* Proposed improvements Page 2 11 . North side - Buchon (between Nipomo and Beach) 450.0 feet - total footage improved - 348 .0 feet = 77% unimproved - 102 .0 feet = 23% 12. South side - Buchon (between Carmel and Beach) 450 . 0 feet - total footage improved 261 . 5 feet = 58% unimproved - 188. 5 feet = 42% 13 . South side - Branch (between Beebee and King) 1664 .70 feet - total footage improved - 1194 . 53 feet = 72% unimproved - 470. 17 feet = 28% 14 . South Side - Branch (between King and Broad) 1528 . 45 feet - total footage improved - 1181 .95 feet = 77% unimproved - 346. 50 feet = 23% 15 . North side - Funston (between Lawton and Broad ) 333 .0 feet - total footage improved - 250 . 0 feet = 75% unimproved - 83 .0 feet = 25% 16. West side - Lawton (between South and Funston) 350 . 0 feet - total footage improved - 194 . 5 feet = 56% unimproved - 155 . 5 feet = 44% 17 . North side - Woodbridge (between Broad and Victoria) 400 . 25 feet - total footage improved - 315.70 feet = 79% unimproved - 84 . 55 feet = 21% 18 . South side - Woodbridge (between Broad and Victoria) 330.0 feet - total footage improved - 290.0 feet = 88% unimproved - 40.0 feet = 12% 19 . South side - Caudill (between Broad and Victoria ) 330. 09 feet - total footage improved - 290.09 feet = 88% unimproved - 40.0 feet = 12% 20 . South side - Franck (hPtwPPn Broad and Vi(-tnr;a ) 340.0 feet fetal footage improved - 300 . 0 feet = 88% unimproved - 40 . 0 feet = 12% B'2 Proposed improvements Page 3 21 . South side - Sweeney (between Broad and Rockview) 507 . 69 feet - total footage improved - 369 .69 feet = ,73% unimproved 138 .0 feet = 27% 22 . East side - Rockview (between Sweeney and Broad) 1825. 94 feet - total footage improved - 1000 . 59 feet = 55% unimproved - 825 . 35 feet = 45% O sidewalk .wp/th#1 JJ 1�) 4 8- 3