HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/21/1990, 7 - BIKEWAY IMPROVEMENTS 9�y"',11111I'n�lj, "J P MEETING DATE:
Iell� Illulll INp C� of S� �t,(�S OBISPO August 21, 1990
COUNCIL AGEITEM
NDA REPORT NUMBER:
IWN: Dave Romero, Public Works Director
BUWECT: Bikeway Improvements
CAO RECOM)EBNDATION:
By motion, direct staff to obtain an environmental
determination and schedule a hearing after Cal Poly
starts this fall (possibly October 2, 1990) , to receive
comments on proposed projects for Phase I bike lane
improvements (as shown on Exhibit E)
BACKGROUND:
For approximately 25 years, the City had various bicycle plans..
Most recently the City adopted the Bicycle Facility Plan in May
1985. Progress in implementing this plan has been inhibited for
several reasons including the following:
1. In some limited (but important) locations, creating bike
lanes may require the widening of streets. (An example is
the segment of Higuera Street between Marsh and High
Streets) . Street widening projects can be expensive if
-- undertaken by the City, independent of private redevelopment
activity.
2. In numerous locations, creating a bike lane will require
the removal of curb side parking spaces. In these cases,
there is not enough room within the existing roadway to
safely accommodate travel lanes, parked cars and a lane for
bicyclists.
During budget review, the Council received a strong presentation
from the public that much greater emphasis be placed on bicycle
planning and improvement so as to encourage increased use of
bicycles. Accordingly, the City Council adopted a work program
objective as follows:
"Create a continuous network of bikeways throughout the city
that encourages bicycle use as an alternative to the
automobile".
This objective contained two separate phases, the first being
implementation of bicycle projects outlined in the current plan,
the second being an update of the Bicycle Facilities Plan to
reflect a more urgent emphasis. In response to the first phase,
$200,000/year was included in the 1989-1991 Financial Plan.
Q%g111W1§ city of san tui s oBi spo
ffft COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Bikeway
Page Two
City staff consisting of Dave Pierce, Terry Sanville, and Nancy
Rnofler, met with a committee composed of the following citizens:
Dave Morrow, Air Pollution Control District
James Merkel, ATTF/Sierra Club
Peter Phillips, Cal Poly
Stephen Puccini, ATTF/Sierra Club
Wayne Williams, SIA Bicycle Club
The committee reviewed a number of documents including Existing
Bike Lanes, Routes & Paths (Exhibit A) , Existing Class II B Bike
Lanes (Exhibit A-2) , Proposed Lane/Route System (Exhibit B) ,
Design Standards (Exhibit C) , and Existing Policies and
Objectives Related to Bikeway Projects (Exhibit D) . They spent
considerable time and effort in determining what kind of program
would provide best service to the community as quickly as
possible. Their consensus recommendation, after considering
numerous alternatives, was that the highest priority should be
given to a program which would target Cal Poly students and which
would encourage use of bicycles for commuting.
DISCUSSION:
In making its recommendation the committee determined that safety
was of prime importance, therefore, it recommended that most of
the routes shown be developed as Class II-B bike lanes, that is
with the bike lane against the curb with no parking. In making
this recommendation, the committee realized that removing curb
parking would be controversial and of concern to adjoining
residents and businesses. However this recommendation. is
consistent with "Existing Policies and Objectives Related to
Bikeway Projects", which contain the following provisions
(summarized) :
A. The City should promote alternatives to cars, such as
bicycles.
B. Streets should not be widened unless absolutely necessary.
C. The City should promote the safe operation of all modes of
transportation.
D. The City should use Caltrans standards to design bike paths.
E. Bike paths along existing streets may be created by removing
parking or by striping a lane on the street side of the
parking lane, when sufficient space is available.
F. Circulation projects must provide for mitigation of adverse
impacts on residential neighborhoods.
ai01111l01111 city of san Luis osispo
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Bikeway
Page Three
G. The City should develop a network of trails and bikeways to
connect neighborhoods with major activity centers.
H. Bike lanes are shown exclusively on arterial and collector
streets.
I. Arterial streets should not have parking (long standing City
policy) .
J. The City cannot guarantee a permanent right to curbside
parking (M.C. 17.76.020G)
The committee discussed whether a more effective use of City
funds would be to widen streets at critical bottlenecks (Higuera,
High-Marsh, lower Higuera, Tank Farm Road) or whether the first
priority should be the acquisition and development of alternative
rights of way, such as surplus SPRR property. The consensus was
that these projects will be costly, will require a significant
amount of design work, and will take a significant amount of time
and effort to implement. Therefore while these projects have
merit and should be pursued, they should not be considered as top
priority projects for immediate implementation.
The program recommended by the committee will provide the safest
bike lanes (type B) by eliminating parking and will thus
encourage increased use of bicycles. The feeling of some members
of the committee (and of the staff) is that eventually all
arterial streets will have parking removed and the longer we wait
the more difficult it will be.
C0JWTTEE RECOI=NDATION
The committee recommended that 6 arterial streets be fully
developed in the near future as Class II B bike lanes.. City
staff has broken these into two priorities, those nearest the
campus being in Phase I.
Phase I (Exhibit E-1, E-2) Parking Spaces Lost
*California Blvd. - campus to San Luis Drive 79
Foothill Blvd. - west city limits to Crandal Way 212
Grand Ave. - campus to Monterey 125
* The most heavily parked area on Callfomis Boulevard is between Foothill
Boulevard and Hathway Sbeet where curb spaces are occupied by people attending
Cal Poly during the day and residents and visitors to adjoining apartments during the
evening. As an a/temadve, It Is poss/ble to build a separated bike path west of the
palm trees on the west side of California Boulevard and retain the curb parking on
that side of the street: This off-sheet path could form a component of eventual path
development southerly on railroad ►Ight-0f-way.
city of san tuts owpo
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Bikeway
Page Four
Phase I implies the removal of the 416 on-street parking spaces
with day and night occupancy varying from 0-100%, but with an
average occupancy of 46%.
Phase II (Exhibit F-1, F-Z) Parking Spaces Lost
Osos St. - Narsh to Santa Barbara 50
Santa Barbara - Osos to Broad 111
Johnson - Mill to Buchon 69
Johnson - Ella to Orcutt 480
Phase II implies the removal of 710 on-street parking spaces with
day and night occupancy varying from 5-95$, but with an average
occupancy of 48%.
If these two phases are successfully implemented, there are a
number of other routes of lesser priority which should be
considered as Class II B bike lanes. These include North Chorro,
Mill, South, Laurel, Orcutt, and county roads Los Osos Valley
Road and Tank Farm Road (Exhibit G) . These projects imply
removal of 800 parking spaces, however, staff has not as yet made 1
an inventory of % occupancy. l
The City currently has 18.0' bike lane miles along public streets.
If the committee's Phase I and II recommendations are
implemented, 8.9 bike lane miles will be_added to the inventory.
OTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Survey
A City transportation survey conducted in January 1990, showed
that while bicycle ridership in the city accounts for about 10%
of all in-city trips, bicycle ridership for college students
accounts for over 18% of all student trips. Comparing Cal Poly
student ridership to other communities is also illustrative:
* The most heavily parked area of these three street segments is along Santa
Barbara Street near Railroad Square. Spaces In this area are occupied by patrons
and employees of adjoining businesses. Parking along segments of Osos Street
leading Into downtown is from adjoining residents and closer to downtown (e.g.
Mitchell Park north) parking for downtown patrons and employees.
7'�
city of san tins oBispo
NNIMs COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Bikeway
Page Five
Bicycle Ridership of. University Students
SLO, CA 17,000 Students 18% ride bikes
Eugene, OR 18,000 Students 30% ride bikes
Davis, CA 21,000 Students 65% ride bikes
Goleta, CA 18,000 Students 67% ride bikes
The potential for increasing college student ridership may be
significant, if safe bike lanes and routes leading to and on Cal
Poly campus can be provided. For the general population, the
results of the City's transportation survey show that providing
bike lanes a) along streets, b) separated from streets, and c)
reducing traffic levels were the top three actions that would
encourage people to ride a bike more often.
Recent Projects
1. Bike lanes were installed along South Street in connection
with the installation of curb and gutter on the north side
and street widening on the south side. Both type A and type
B lanes were installed after Council received testimony at a
public hearing.
2. Bike lanes were provided in connection with the widening of
Higuera, between Madonna Road and High Street.
3. Parking was removed and type B bike-lanes were installed on
Higuera, between Madonna Road and Elks Lane (Caltrans) .
4. Type B bike lanes and separate bike paths have been provided
in connection with several new subdivisions along. Tank Farm
� Road in the Edna-Islay area, as required by the Edna-Islay
specific plan.
Protects in Process
1. All City planning for arterial streets now incorporates bike
lanes in the basic design. These lanes are installed as
streets are widened.
2. Plans are virtually complete to construct a bike path on the
south side of Madonna Road from Los Osos Valley Road to
Periera, leading to a new bike route along the frontage road
to Oceanaire. Madonna Road will be chip sealed and
restriped to provide a bike lane for westbound riders
between Oceanaire and Los Osos Valley Road.
IQJIIWJl city of San tins OBISpo
WMIZA COUNCIL ADENOA REPORT
Bikeway
Page Six
3. Staff is currently actively engaged in obtaining appraisals
and studying the possible acquisition of surplus Southern
Pacific railroad property, with one of the objectives being
to develop a bike lane along the entire SPRR right-of-way
within the city limits. This will be a long range and very
expensive project requiring many years to complete. It
should not be considered as a substitute for the recommended
project.
Future Proiect
1. An update of the Bicycle Facilities Plan to reflect a more
urgent emphasis is awaiting Council decision on the projects
presented in this agenda report so as to provide staff
guidance.
ALTBRNATMS
1. Remove parking and develop class II-B bike lanes on streets
as shown on the exhibits. (committee recommendation)
Advantages: will best meet the objectives of the City, in
the most cost effective manner. Safest choice for both bike
riders and motorists. In many cases will allow restriping
for left turn lane, thus improving safety.
Disadvantages: will result in the loss of 1,126 parking
spaces, resulting in inconvenience to many residents and
businesses. Parking will relocate to nearby streets and may
impact those neighborhoods.
2. Remove parking on one side of streets, restripe the streets
to provide a bike lane along the curb (type B) on one side.
of the street and a bike lane outside of the parking lane
(type A) on the other side of the street.
Advantages: will represent a compromise between the parking
needs of the property owners and the safety desires of the
bicyclists. Both sides may be partially satisfied. Some
motorists will be able to continue to park in front of their
homes, some across the street as opposed to all having to
park on neighboring streets.
%1� 01911'il city of san Luis oBispo
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Bikeway
Page Seven
Disadvantages: both factions will be partially
dissatisfied. Approximately 550 parking spaces will be
eliminated. Type A bike lanes are not as safe as type B.
Major restriping required on virtually all streets, which
will increase City cost. Many residents will have to cross
an arterial street to use their car. Not as safe as
Alternative #1. There will be some weaving of traffic lanes
(a la South Street) .
3. Expend bicycle improvement efforts on elimination of tight
spots or development of new routes such as the SPRR right-
of-way.
Advantages: major parking removal will not be necessary at
this time.
Disadvantages: these projects are very expensive and time
consuming, and may require years to complete. Approach
would not satisfy the high priority needs of the bicycle
riders for a continuous network. Parking removal at a
future date will be more difficult, and eventually will
still be needed.
4. Follow past practice of providing bike lanes in connection
with street widenings and at specific locations on a case by
case basis.
Advantages: ,major parking removal will not be necessary at
this time.
Disadvantages: progress is very slow on this basis. Would
not meet high priority of objective to provide a continuous
network. Parking removal at a future date will be more
difficult, but will still be required. Bicycle riders will
not be satisfied, nor will those who are willing to ride
bicycles but are concerned that riding on city streets
without bike lanes is not safe enough.
FISCAL IMPACT:
If project is approved as submitted with all parts intact, cost
is estimated at $43,000 for Phase I and $70,000 for Phase II.
$200,000 is included in the 1989-91 Financial Plan for each
budget year (page B-30 . Funds budgeted, but not spent for Phase
I or Phase II improvements, would be carried over for other
bicycles path improvement projects.
7•
40 i11U city of san tins osispo
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Bikeway
Page Eight
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
Removal of large numbers of on-street parking will require an
environmental determination, which will require approximately two
months after the Council has made a preliminary determination on
the project.
RECOMMENDATION:
The committee recommends that the Council proceed on the basis
outlined, obtain an environmental determination, and set a
hearing after Cal Poly starts this fall (possibly October 2,
1990) to receive input from both residents and bicycle riders.
Staff believes that the best interests of the city are served by
removing parking from arterial streets and providing Class II B
bike lanes. This will provide increased safety for both the
bicyclist and the motorist. Since removal of this much parking
may generate major opposition, staff believes it would be prudent
to hold hearings on the higher priority projects on Foothill,
California and Grand as a first phase. If the higher priority
can be successfully implemented, Phase II would follow.
Attachments: Exhibits A-1 existing bikelane map
A-2 Class II B bikelanes
B (1985) proposed lane/route system
C-1 (class I) design standards
C-2 (class II) design standards
C-3 (class II & III) design standards
D-1 policies & objectives bikeway projects
D-2 vehicular circulation
E-1 Phase I
E-2 Bikeway improvement projects/Phase I
F-1 Project 1990 —Phase II
F-2 Bikeway improvements projects/Phase II
G Future Class II B bikelanes
bikeimp/dfr#23
7
i
CAL POLY
•
R HIGHLAND_ i'
Jy.
RAM ONA N
LEGEND
--
CLASS 1 ���
CLASS II-A a,� �ti
CLASS II-8 Q NO SCALE
CLASSINC •������
CLASS III »•»•«•• y�Ce
-— Qty 0�
l' LAGUNA HIGH c
' LAKE �-
� SOUTH
a
$0WrHW00r'7
Q '•
m
m
� b
U%
J ,
o
� e
♦ l
TANK FARM
city of MAP #1
San WIS OBISpo EXISTING SLffm LANES,
Department of Community Development &p_ PATHS H TLJS
990 Palm Strwu Post Office Box 8100 • San Luis Obispo. CA 93403.8100 ROUTES/S
yT•MIMT NI}jBl - I
7-
5
� I '
■��� 111 ■■■
rt
son
om
IVA
w
I
i
CAL POLY
II/\ •
••
Q HIGHLAND
a 9 O\
a Jy.
9• -
y,♦ RAMONA N
i cn
•
i •
LEGEND �p
CLASS I •••••-•-•
CLASS 11-A •�••••�•••••• ti
CLASS II-B QpV V\� M0 sem
CLASS II-C •��•�•®
CLASS III «•••••••. r• O �0?
LAGUNA
LAKE -
1 p
L \.
SOUTHWOOD
JPO
o�
JC
7GNdG Fa'R�t '�'
1/ t�
- city or MAP #6 ( 1985)
san tins oaIspo BIKEWAY
Zr Department of Community Development
990 Palm Stree,/Post Office Box 8100 • San Luis Obispo. CA 93403.8100 LPI NE/RQUTE SYSTEM
D.T°M,MT NI...61
EXHIBIT "B" 7-11
I
I`
LL—L
PATH ee9rA1X AIWA Moron roes[LAWS
CLASS 1 511E PATH
SEPARATED
n city or -
i San Luis OBISPO FIGURE 9
Department of communloSTi�e�I Palm Street/Post Office Box 8100 • DAWS
San Luis Obispo, A 934
NNUII4
.L
a• as e
PARKU4 LAKMW LANK NOTOR VEHICLE Laws am LME Para" LANE
CLASS 117A BIKE LANE
1
S
SNIE LK #MWW VENICE! LAMES BIKE LAME
CLASS II®B BIKE LANE
Clty Of
x+ill ` FIGURE #1
R.., San Luis OBISPO
( Department of Community Development DESIGN STANDARDS
_4
90 Palm Street/Post Office,Box 8100 • San Luis Obispo, CA 43403.8100
DATA"91� NIMBI
7 71.5
C. - 2
I
NIOA"M M EWA"
SHCU M CIN! LANE. 810708 tMQ.E LAMB 6W LANG UWAVW
SII ckm
CLASS 11-C BIKE LANE
140. CURB
i
W.ANWN6 LAN! mom VWCLB LOAM f'gg10N6 LYi! .
CLASS III BIKE ROUTE
SIGNAGE ONLY
.:.. . city of
..:.; iy san lugs OBISPFIGURE *9
O
Department of Community Development DESIGN STANDARDS
190 Palm Street/Post Office Box 8100 • San Luis Obispo. CA 93403-8100
iTAMiMT NISSBI �./�
8
OEXISTING POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES RELATED TO BIKEWAY PROJECTS
Circulation Element Adopted March 2, 1982
Under Transportation Goals on page 3 the plan states that the City should keep
its rural, small-city character, that transportation planning should be guided
by these broader goals, and that "to achieve those broader aims, the city will
pursue the following goals in transportation planning:
1 . To reduce people's . use of their cars by supporting and promoting
alternatives such as walking, riding buses and bicycles, and using car
pools.
4. To widen and extend streets only when there is a demonstrated need and
when the projects will cause no significant, long-term environmental
problems.
6. Promote the safe operation of all modes of transportation.
In Part 2 - Traffic Reduction Programs under Bicycle Transportation on page 10
the Basic Objective is to:
"Use of bicycle as a means of daily transportat-ion or recreation.
People who live near their job or school (within a 20-30 minute bike
O ride) should be encouraged to use a bicycle).
Under Policies and Examples of possible Programs on page 10 the following are
stated
The city will use the classification system and construction standards developed
by Cal Trans as guides to design bike paths.
Bake Paths along existing streets may be created by (1) restricting curbside
parking during daylight hours, (2) .removing curbside parking when it is not
needed, or (3) striping the street to the left of the Curbside parking lane when
sufficient space is available.
Objectives under Part 3 - The Street MasterPlan on page 17 include that the
City Government will:
Ensure that existing streets are fully used before it considers widening them
or building new ones.
Manage Traffic so that it is concentrated on arterial streets and thorough fares
and is not disbursed throughout residential areas.
Ensure thatany circulation project solution, major or minor, must provide for
the mitigation of adverse impacts on. all residential neighborhoods.
Circulation Study Phase I Report dated December 1988
OSection VI Preliminary Transportation Goals, Policies and Programs included the.
following goals, Policies and Programs under the issues as indicated
Attachment 2
Ex0-1 7-/45'
a �
VEHICULAR CIRCULATION Page VI-1
Policies
1. The city supports the effective use of existing major streets, thereby
limiting the need for street widening projects or new major streets.
3. The city will ensure that circulation projects incorporate the mitigation
of adverse impacts on residential neighborhoods
BICYCLES AND PEDESTRIANS Page VI-4
Policies
1. The city supports the use of bikes and walking as alternatives to the
automobile and encourages the use of existing bike and pedestrian paths
2. The city should continue to develop a network of trails and bikeways that
connect neighborhoods with major activity centers and link up with bike
routes in the county, as well as supporting bicycle facilities
San Luis Obispo Municipal Code
The Subdivision Regulations section 16.36.140 Street Types and Requirements
requires that the pavement of an arterial be 70 feet wide and prohibits Curbside
parking. There are five vehicle travel lanes, two each direction and a left
turn lane, plus a bike lane in each direction. The vehicle lanes are 12 feet
wide and the bike lanes are 5 feet wide.
�� a ♦�� ���
♦ l♦����o�� w
♦PGS♦
v kip,
it
city of
BIKEWAY IMPROVEMENT
• : • •
PROJECT 1990s
C C Y N u M C OI Y
.o -3 o � v NIL or n m
d � a s c d N u rN a m a
CL N A d. '�. d • ♦L
y �` 0 - O '0 .mss M -M d 0 d T
d a a N C c. c
Orth � H r O O
c-0 du
s m
q C ` C Y C r
pp O
d Z . S u 3 6 A C
N r L N d A III M s N dat
«
T q -6 d
v on
n i M I1rOO o s d m i
d N N3 C N T. d G i 21, .�.
N� i. 0 � O m 1p i ai Z
CLC' C i t O N.
CL
n `
O`d d
IT
C Q A Ol
2 d __ C on
U) 10L� W m •G C d -c Oj r r
RRMW
M.
O a[ O .0d W y '0 r i N .r m t' i
d d d L N� d r W y op
0 i
`o
y n 1J m o Y V
L in
N dm r i
c ry , , A $ o m s In
m `
In
LLA s 1 ;,i a o o « .�
r r L e u O O
O i d e an d
r 'w a N � — 0
O� OI 01 _P QI YI d 'N W 7 � O r i
J S Z S S S 2 s O i 01 Y.y « � ���••
i
K ~ —
o0 m a •' C
Q �W 1=q D G C C d U n_ A O
�.Z ? Ci H y Y A M Y A •G Od1
0 . m u
b4 Z + c CL100
m sw > K LLI .1 K 4 C d Ie d U
CL O w N N C m W O
m i N t r
c ai a1 -� d •—` c mn i c ¢ d m r a`
�
m m '^ n m 1 & u u
am d =c n N N 6 IO 6 ;i 0 p d N L d
OC 6. ~ — i d 7 A OC 775
d L 117 w C C p r d u m 1LLI 9D �"/
7 C n d d C « ►W� Lj
Lj
a � v a m o «
W
7 'mO 'O 7 6 1.0! O O i — Y (�I7
IN ._ Z_ N pQp�� — — ZZIo
H .9 9 i n IdO Q iJJ O
CG)G W
Cp7 N o A � o yn,�, m
W
3 Y7 1� N O .e0 .e0 1.O d. N do « N o r a r
t_
dim
Q
V w
.¢. .► O .�
QI d
7. N d .Q.. p
OI — s •a d i. N O W M0 Ll 00
i
a 0-
��cpp o
W M O r w tl1 'C
o r — _
WEis
« � '• a ea
is-
•� N O r 1 0O L W U N O
W -C {L.U {L n i 6F. M N W N _
OC N
Jq d
N 2 U U
Y cp—
to
gO C — d N Y
m � d M N i
� c 'o � c !
d d .i o N
6 � .� i
R 2 d a
O N 2 d M
_ « C
N C 31d
d
c p
y p ddo
d p
n d
-40
b d • s Y N m s
c c d0 cc
c
C d
�O' d C «
_00m
do
MCL b N d d N •� N
CL -C d d .�
(f1 Md
L o « d e Y O N It -j
C.
= 0 0 W A O 7 i T d
S' V OC 10 cc I d H d pC .N d
Co
r C N G
H U M
W +T
n
OAC
d 1
r
• Z C� � � _T pf
Y! J S S S S S
90
=
LLJ
K F K ��Kjj tKfl 1e
Z ? M Q p
� 10
W3.9
Z
mK t O K K
N
N C C Y N N
12- C2
d d
d La M Y Y
L N
Y IL 100L
N d n C7 N N
4 N O O cr.
•! �! ! �! !
7 eN+f d .d0 d .gyp �
d .
N H
10 �
1 ... .�.
C OCc
0 7 «_
N + CC cc O 0
N d m J CL
'03,
W « d 10 U M
OC r a
d
J d
W V V N m1
='
0I.- 1
. III■ � �, � ..
�.�■ 1 ■on
r1son
...r�✓
MAV
Ity of
s
C d Co d
O L go c 2 1. V m YId
T T m i ~-0 c a C u
CE
W M N W 1A C 0 C * m
C o m In -In d
M .N m Ic•c.�• — 2 !.
in
01
c c e L ,� $n .� Z" col s
ox
so
d d Q •a C.A C m m IL C
R'
C « Q it
L d as n n A s 'W m m c
• d .� .� y � T � d d 0
M L Y L L M •C DL' 4 Into in
�+ I ♦ •I j L m - C
L 41 i C i ~ 0 Go
m as i m 1
C 'a 2-0L ~ d L
u c c c T. a o = c L Q
m m m m
0 -0 p
C C C C 1• ■ d a L a md
.� Y ■ 40I L C y C �.
.�[ T d• rc �[ m d x'
L L L L m Cj
111 L �y L .
H 6 6 6 6 7 .0 C 6 p 0 6 y
•• t d m
a Y a o
d L O
M � i i i i s Y
0 01 ■ a1 a1 d m o■1 •po d + s m a.
N u pc pc pe of •+ Q L m oe m -LCJ OG m
D O O
D O Dp p
� D O O O O O O`
N .r r nl N O.
W
O L
CK
WXX e ■
_ Z _P _T OI OI 01_ a% 'p
CD
•e •_ -� ,a
o o' o v o
Lr) uKi �f1� 1
c' a � .. In .o r.
Y t 1J') +p i tY1
m d G ? ? P m •� V
Y1 N N N C Ilk
c 111 m
d d d d d Y
LD u a n n n ` `. A d
1n 1n N N n d m
cm
H C C D O Q ti
lu a, MIL
d
u
� a s a a s s a •a
a m n L
6 Q
Q ... d
1dp d 01 f C J O O N
ymC 0 Y
` S 3 {f7 L m QL
o a+ o
YZ O da « IL
•p'' « «
Vl Q -• _O 7 N 1: J M
O 40
W _. = S L m m ~ m
YI I 1 1 1
OC
N
1 �
C CL C
i n ` m u
d NL r c go
- .�
A L co
d d L L w
1L v R c
Go S.- o
d 2
O r mc N M i
O:. O 7 .•. d
N d O t
N L
cu ■ M N
m u = •.0
m N G
♦ 6 N M L
L
uc i a
�+ L a 6
L
m L ap
,O ® L O i
C ■ -0 m0
■ w m 6.fir 9
c_ c m ,_ O m
_ "'
co
U3 n ■ O > G p y
d i oe N
�j o .+i o 1 o u 0 r wo
S u oc a cr = ►`. m
0.
t�77 0 0 ciz
En u ~ N 1•i
LAJ
W N
0
PC
W i¢L 1 S 1
in m
o
we
"5at be we
'� C:3
0
2
W {7
Z be
po 7
m % GCL
r P O
N
N M m
d d Y
_ m my
6 6 6N
Y N N
AX �p
m r H
d d d
C3
O_
O O O
N
a J Qm
W 2 O
fn N ■
O N
pgo
W ?
O:
Ln O
CAL POLY
g N/GHLAND
�� RAAIONA a
0�
FO
Q
Q
a
LAGUNA N/GH 9G
LAKE Z
v
\ THW000
O�aP
0
Q
m
�o
0
�Q
# IN COUNTY
city or. FUTURE
San lU1S OBISPO
BIKEWAY IMPROVEMENTS
CLASS II B BIKE LANES
EXHIBIT "G" / 'i